Slashdot Mirror


New Electrode Lets Batteries Charge In 10 Seconds

Al writes "A new lithium-ion electrode allows batteries to be charged and discharged in 10 seconds flat. Developed by Gerbrand Ceder, a professor of materials science at MIT, it could be particularly useful where rapid power bursts are needed, such as for hybrid cars, but also for portable electronic devices. In testing, batteries incorporating the electrodes discharged in just 10 seconds. In comparison, the best high-power lithium-ion batteries today discharge in a minute and a half, and conventional lithium-ion batteries, such as those found in laptops, can take hours to discharge. The new high rate electrode, the researchers calculate, would allow a one-liter battery based on the material to deliver 25,000 watts, or enough power for about 20 vacuum cleaners."

348 comments

  1. 20 vacuum cleaners... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...how many libraries of congress per square inch is that, again?

    1. Re:20 vacuum cleaners... by Abreu · · Score: 2, Informative

      yeah, wtf with the strange units?

      --
      No sig for the moment.
    2. Re:20 vacuum cleaners... by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 1

      Regardless of the strange units, what the heck is the point of a battery can run 20 vacuum cleaners, for only 10 seconds?

      What high drain device are you ever going to want to run for that short a time? If you can drain a high power LiIon in 90 seconds, what's the point of making it drain faster?

      Unless you're wanting to us a battery to ignite a thermite charge, I don't see an application for this at all....

      --
      "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
    3. Re:20 vacuum cleaners... by Paua+Fritter · · Score: 1

      25kW is about 33.5 horsepower; a bit over a million foot-pounds per minute. About a quarter of a furlong-cwt per hr, more or less.

    4. Re:20 vacuum cleaners... by NeverVotedBush · · Score: 5, Informative

      I don't think the ability to drain the battery in such a short time is the point. It's in delivering high current easily.

      Lots of loads pull a lot of current initially or periodically. One example would be an electric motor since they talk about applications such as hybrids. The stall current is limited by the resistance of the windings but once it spins up, reverse voltage in the motor limits the current to much lower values. If it was a motor under a heavy load, the current could be much higher.

      Another point is that in any high current circuit, the power wasted in the circuit as heat can be very high. It's current squared times resistance. With batteries that have a high internal resistance, that power heats the battery and is also power that's wasted. With a high current delivery capability, these would have very low internal resistance and under heavy loads, the batteries would run cooler and would be able to deliver more power to the actual load instead of throwing it away as heat.

      This really is an accomplishment and a valuable one.

      Just to illustrate battery self heating - if you ever get stranded in extreme cold because your battery doesn't have the power available to turn the engine over, just turn on the headlights for a while. It's a medium load but will heat the battery from the inside due to internal resistance and make the battery better able to start the car. This really works.

    5. Re:20 vacuum cleaners... by Snowblindeye · · Score: 5, Informative

      what the heck is the point of a battery can run 20 vacuum cleaners, for only 10 seconds?

      But it also means that you can *charge* it in 10 seconds. How nice it that. One problem for plug-in electric cars is that they take long to charge. If charging it doesn't take longer than filling up a tank of gas, that would be a step forward.

    6. Re:20 vacuum cleaners... by Arcane_Rhino · · Score: 1
      I thought the same thing...

      From the summary: "In comparison, the best high-power lithium-ion batteries today discharge in a minute and a half, and conventional lithium-ion batteries, such as those found in laptops, can take hours to discharge..."

      Um, isn't that the point? In fact, isn't it a goal to have a "longer lasting" battery?

      If a knowledgeable person can clarify why this is a BOO-YAA moment, I would really appreciate it. I read the article (I know, please don't hold it against me), and will concede that maybe the inclusion of lap-tops was poor writing because they are actually examples where this would not be useful technology but the article also mentions that it would be useful for quickly recharging cell phones. But, again, while it may be useful to have a quickly charging cellphone, a quickly discharging cell phone... not so much.

    7. Re:20 vacuum cleaners... by johnny+cashed · · Score: 1

      Can I get that in Hoover dams? I just can't comprehend the magnitude of this development.

    8. Re:20 vacuum cleaners... by Blublu · · Score: 1

      Laser beams, dude. Frickin' laser beams!

      --
      meh
    9. Re:20 vacuum cleaners... by NeverVotedBush · · Score: 1

      Another good point!

      Wired ran a story recently on the Tesla roadster and mentioned the time to fully charge the battery - it was some 37 hours.

      They figure it wouldn't that big of an issue, though, since most will drive short distances and the charges will be partial charges that don't take nearly as long.

      I think in practice, anyone who wants to do much driving in their Tesla is going to find that long charge time a bit frustrating.

    10. Re:20 vacuum cleaners... by willy_me · · Score: 1

      Could these issues be solved with capacitors? They would be more efficient then batteries - regardless of any foreseeable improvements to battery tech. And with the development of super-capacitors, it would not take much of a capacitor to get the job done.

      So I thing that charge time does have a big role to play in this announcement. Delivering high current easily is a problem that was solved a long time ago. But the problem of quickly and safely charging a battery is still very relevant.

    11. Re:20 vacuum cleaners... by hardburn · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Fast recharge and discharge go hand-in-hand. This will particularly improve the range of electric/hybrid cars, since regenerative breaking is limited right now by how fast the battery can take in all that power.

      I don't see it improving the overall charge time of a car from a household plug, though. The limit there is that 120VAC just isn't enough. You can double up a circuit to get 240VAC, and in fact high draw appliances (like electric dryers) often already do in the US.

      If dealerships are smart, they'll contract the services of local electricians to put a 240VAC plug in customers' garages and roll the cost into the overall financing.

      --
      Not a typewriter
    12. Re:20 vacuum cleaners... by 644bd346996 · · Score: 1

      Camera flash, with no recharge time?

    13. Re:20 vacuum cleaners... by bhsx · · Score: 1
      Blatantly stolen from: http://www.lowtechmagazine.com/2009/03/fast-charging-electric-cars-off-peak-grid.html#more

      "If you charge an electric car with a battery capacity of 25 kWh during 8 hours, it needs a power output of 3,125 watts (3.1 kilowatts x 8 hours = 25 kWh). If you charge the same car in just 20 minutes, you need a power output of 75,000 watts (75 kilowatts x 0.33 hours = 25 kWh). This corresponds to the energy output of 220 plasma televisions of 340 watts each. This amount of energy is required over a shorter period, but it has to be available. If you lower the recharging time to 10 minutes, the energy output will be 155,000 watts (155 kilowatts x 0.16 hours = 25 kWh). This equates to 450 plasma televisions. "

      Now if you extrapolate that further to 10 seconds it becomes something more like 930,000 watts, just for ONE car! Imagine what kind of peak power output we'll need our THOUSANDS and THOUSANDS of power plants to produce when we plug 200,000 cars into the grid at the same time!

      --
      put the what in the where?
    14. Re:20 vacuum cleaners... by ChrisA90278 · · Score: 1

      OK so the battery car battery could be charged in 10 seconds but who has "kilo-amp" sized outlets. What are you going to plug your charger into?

    15. Re:20 vacuum cleaners... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Meanwhile all of the lights in the street go dim for that 10 second period.. recharging a battery bank as large as one required to power an EV for any appreciable mileage is an enormous power draw if you do it over 10 seconds rather than 10 hours.

      "The new high rate electrode, the researchers calculate, would allow a one-liter battery based on the material to deliver 25,000 watts, or enough power for about 20 vacuum cleaners."

      So a standard EV Battery bank size would be on the order of say 50 litres or more? thats 1,250,000 gigga-watts!!! You wouldn't want to crush one of these cells without first designing some kind of failsafe :-P

      So lets say a EV has a power plug that draws 500 watts, that 500 watts in 10 seconds instead of spanned across 10 hours is 5000 watts, but lets say its a SUV, and it requires a 1000 watt outlet, that means its going to require 10,000 watts over that 10 second period.

      One solution to this problem is we build massive batteries out the back of an EV-refilling station which recharge during the time that vehicles aren't coming in to re-fuel, then dump their contents into the vehicle relativley quickly.

      If thats the case then the investment costs for surrounding electrical grid infrastructure must be enormous for each individual refilling station, building a backbone for EV-Refuelling stations that suck down enough power to light an entire suburb in just one building would be quite expensive, Especially considering the refuelling stations must be widespread /and/ available almost everywhere.

      It would be easier to design a communal refuelling outlet in every street corner which dumps the entire streets power into just a dozen high amperage outlets to recharge each car.

      Interesting times, I can see it now, two little Hondas collide and all thats left is a puff of blue smoke and a flash of light.

    16. Re:20 vacuum cleaners... by camperdave · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What are you going to plug your charger into?

      How about the slow charge, high drain battery bank in the basement. You know, the one that's being charged by the solar panels on the roof and the wind generator in the back yard. Oh, and occasionally off the grid, during off peak hours.

      I'm kidding. When I go off the grid, I'll be finding a nice piece of land with good sized waterfall, and setting up a micro-hydro system.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    17. Re:20 vacuum cleaners... by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Could these issues be solved with capacitors?

      Probably if you live somewhere flat. But let's say you regularly take trips up a mountain and you would like to maintain highway speeds. If you have a hybrid with today's Li-Ion batteries, you'd have to oversize the batteries to handle this use case. This then makes the car heavier, etc. With a capacitor, you could help for some portion of the journey - but inevitably you would drain the capacitor and not be able to maintain highway speeds. Sure, you can size the capacitor to the same capacity as the battery... but then you don't need the battery anymore. And as you know, you'd probably need to tow that big capacitor bank :)

      With one of these new high-current Li-ion batteries, you could maintain highway speed until the battery was exhausted.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    18. Re:20 vacuum cleaners... by chrysrobyn · · Score: 4, Funny

      Perhaps there could develop a market of special charger stations at the intersection of roads whose purpose was to provide you with energy in exchange for money. These special stations might have access to energy storage banks whch they can charge as needed and charge your batteries using a higher current plug than consumers might ordinarily pay for. As time progressed, maybe they'd sell drinks, snacks and half rotten hot dogs.

    19. Re:20 vacuum cleaners... by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      I expect that is exactly how they will describe it when they file a patent for it. That way it's INNOVATION!

    20. Re:20 vacuum cleaners... by camperdave · · Score: 1

      Can I get that in Hoover dams? I just can't comprehend the magnitude of this development.

      The damn vacuum cleaners are Hoovers, you insensitive clod!

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    21. Re:20 vacuum cleaners... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would expect that they have the fast-charge batteries for the regenerative braking which then charge the slower batteries (and are forced to discharge slowly?).

    22. Re:20 vacuum cleaners... by master5o1 · · Score: 1

      Camera flash == capacitors.

      --
      signature is pants
    23. Re:20 vacuum cleaners... by master5o1 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I was actually hoping for the units in terms of Pokemon levels and experience.

      --
      signature is pants
    24. Re:20 vacuum cleaners... by flibbajobber · · Score: 2, Informative

      Chemical batteries still have much higher energy density (Wh per kg) than capacitors - about ten times higher. That's not to say that supercaps combined with traditional batteries wouldn't solve such problems - they probably could in cases where you have a low average discharge, but high burst discharge. These new cells would be capable of sustaining high average discharge.

    25. Re:20 vacuum cleaners... by Daravon · · Score: 1

      Strobe light?

      Smile and say RAAVE!

      --
      I traded all my mod points for these magic beans.
    26. Re:20 vacuum cleaners... by UltraAyla · · Score: 1

      25000 Watts = 20 vacuums = 1 solar beam? I mean, that's a lot of watts for a solar beam, but it's pretty powerful - it takes two whole moves!

    27. Re:20 vacuum cleaners... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, if you have that many vacuum cleaners, hopefully you can finish vacuuming in 10 seconds, making the battery sufficient for the purpose.

    28. Re:20 vacuum cleaners... by Firehed · · Score: 2, Informative

      I see the electrical equivalent of load balancing coming into play to address that issue. Just because a battery is physically capable of accepting a full charge in a few seconds doesn't mean that it must.

      I'm sure that's also awful for battery life - a lot of NiMH batteries at least (I can't speak for other types as I have no idea) can accept fast and slow charges, but the 15-minute rapid chargers take a lot of lifetime off the battery as compared to a four-hour trickle charge.

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    29. Re:20 vacuum cleaners... by master5o1 · · Score: 1

      Finally I can comprehend this article. I am forever in your debt, thankfully I have my payday tomorrow trading my Bayleef.

      --
      signature is pants
    30. Re:20 vacuum cleaners... by fractoid · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Um, for starters, you're not going to be plugging all those cars in at the same time if each one's only plugged in for 10 seconds.

      Secondly, generally EV-sized batteries are fast-charged by using a 'dump pack', an identical fully charged pack of batteries that can supply as much current as the flat one can eat up. The important number is the continuous current draw, not peak.

      That's what makes small, high-current batteries so good. Imagine a car window motor which pulls, say, 5 amps at 12 volts. You need to run 5amp wiring to it. But assume that the motor only needs to run for a few seconds at a time, very infrequently - instead of running 5 amp wiring, you can simply put a battery next to the motor that's sufficient to run it for a minute or so, and trickle charge the battery over the car's CAN bus.

      Another use (actually this is one I read about where ultracaps are useful) is making a hard drive that doesn't lose data when the power drops during a write operation. Basically the cap would store enough energy for the drive to detect loss of external power, finish writing its buffer, and park itself before it ran flat.

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    31. Re:20 vacuum cleaners... by 644bd346996 · · Score: 1

      Right. They discharge very quickly. But then they have to recharge for what's typically several seconds in consumer models before they're ready to fire again. These batteries could eliminate the capacitor and the associated delay. If these electrodes become cheap to manufacture, it's quite reasonable to expect them to become common in cameras precisely because they eliminate an extra component and improve performance.

    32. Re:20 vacuum cleaners... by fractoid · · Score: 1

      Elegant, but waterfalls are too hard to find (unless you live in New Zealand). Me, I'm going to cook up a solar fired steam turbine. :)

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    33. Re:20 vacuum cleaners... by russotto · · Score: 1

      yeah, wtf with the strange units?

      Apparently, despite the upbeat tone, we're supposed to think this battery really sucks.

    34. Re:20 vacuum cleaners... by fractoid · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The crazy thing is what you could do with these batteries in a drag car. Top fuel drag cars weigh ~1000kg (if my quick googlation is correct) and output up to 1500kW. A 60-liter battery back could output the same amount of power while cutting the weight of the car by at least a couple of hundred kilos.

      Just wait for electrics to be banned from drag racing because they don't make enough noise and smoke... well actually smoke I can see happening.

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    35. Re:20 vacuum cleaners... by master5o1 · · Score: 1

      10 seconds to discharge is quite a long time.

      --
      signature is pants
    36. Re:20 vacuum cleaners... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and I'm going to move upstream from you and make a micro-hoover dam. Then I might let you have some water every now and then.

    37. Re:20 vacuum cleaners... by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      Maybe somebody already has a use for it, one for which it's perfectly designed.

      Looks at the facts: very high power, portable, limited discharge time, unlimited capacity.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    38. Re:20 vacuum cleaners... by 644bd346996 · · Score: 1

      Assuming the discharge rate scales linearly with the volume of the battery, a 5 mL cell (roughly the size of a AA alkaline cell) could dump power at a rate of 125 Watts continuously. That's more than enough to illuminate a room with a halogen bulb. It's also enough to melt the glass around a typical flash bulb. The time taken to completely drain the cell is irrelevant, because it's instantaneous power discharge rate is sufficient for photography purposes.

    39. Re:20 vacuum cleaners... by SBrach · · Score: 1

      That'f if you plug it into a 110V 15A wall outlet. If you have a 220/240V 80A service installed in your garage you can completely charge the car in 3-4 hours.

    40. Re:20 vacuum cleaners... by TClevenger · · Score: 2, Informative

      That's for the included on-board charger, which is limited by the 110 volt, 15 amp circuit it would plug into. The "high power" 220 volt charger sitting in the garage can charge the same battery in as little as 3 hours.

    41. Re:20 vacuum cleaners... by themacks · · Score: 1

      The fast discharge times and battery life aren't the same thing. These batteries are able to discharge quickly because they are able to supply more amps than previous batteries. They are capable of outputting all of their energy in 10 seconds. That doesn't mean they will only last 10 seconds. Usually you wouldn't need the maximum power from the battery so it would last much longer, but there is a lot of overhead for when you do need the power.

      --
      i read about it in a blog once
    42. Re:20 vacuum cleaners... by mfnickster · · Score: 3, Funny

      "My God, it'll be beautiful!"

      --
      "Slow down, Cowboy! It has been 3 years, 7 months and 26 days since you last successfully posted a comment."
    43. Re:20 vacuum cleaners... by shermo · · Score: 1

      Yes, as someone who lives in New Zealand, I can't go two steps without tripping over a waterfall.

      (They're not exactly common here either)

      --
      Insanity: voting in the same two parties over and over again and expecting different results
    44. Re:20 vacuum cleaners... by fractoid · · Score: 1

      Last time I was there (about 5 years ago) we were driving through the south island and I counted over a hundred of the buggers during a 2-hour journey. Compare that to Australia were you can drive in a straight line for 3 days without seeing a drop of water and you'll see where I'm coming from.

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    45. Re:20 vacuum cleaners... by shermo · · Score: 1

      Australia is in the middle of a 10 year drought or something similar though!

      Solar panels and wind turbines are still the best choice for 'backyard' power here.

      --
      Insanity: voting in the same two parties over and over again and expecting different results
    46. Re:20 vacuum cleaners... by fractoid · · Score: 1

      Australia is always in the middle of a 10 year drought, even when there's 2m of flood water on the ground. :P True, wind turbines are probably more practical unless you have your own personal waterfall (which my cousins on the Coromandel Peninsula actually do, lucky buggers). I still like solar fired steam though, more practical for large power stations (although I believe a wind tower is even better for very large values of 'large').

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    47. Re:20 vacuum cleaners... by Zymergy · · Score: 1

      I'll need that in Steve Ballmer chairthrow-roomlenghts per second please...

    48. Re:20 vacuum cleaners... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, cannot wait to see a Dell laptop going in flames (or exploding?) with the new batteries.
      Because, actually, the smaller the internal resistance, the more intense heat you'll generate.

      Applying a common sense rationing (can do it using some formulae as well): the smaller the resistance, the higher the current, the quicker the discharge. No matter how small the percentage of this energy will be lost in heat, the heat will be more intense (not talking about the amount of energy you are loosing into heat, but the rate the energy is converted into heat).

      Keep it up guys, probably at a dischage time of 1 second, you'll be selling bombs.

    49. Re:20 vacuum cleaners... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yea yea and my dad can beat up ur dad, whatever man

    50. Re:20 vacuum cleaners... by EotB · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but as a counter-point, it is next to impossible to do anything with the waterfalls even when they are on your land due to the Resource Management Act, we have a pretty reasonable sized river running through our land and couldn't do squat with it.

    51. Re:20 vacuum cleaners... by sunspot42 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't see it improving the overall charge time of a car from a household plug, though.

      Why not? Just install another battery pack at home, and keep it charged up at all times. It could then be used to quick-charge your car(s).

      It could also be used as backup power during a blackout, or maybe even to supply home power during those times of day when electric rates are especially high. You could charge it from the grid (especially during those times of day when rates are low), from solar cells on your roof or from a wind turbine.

    52. Re:20 vacuum cleaners... by digitalchinky · · Score: 1

      ...and for those situations where you wished your tazer could have 'stun' and 'kill' modes, just like the ray guns on TV. :-)

    53. Re:20 vacuum cleaners... by Ihlosi · · Score: 1
      OK so the battery car battery could be charged in 10 seconds but who has "kilo-amp" sized outlets. What are you going to plug your charger into?

      Err ... better make that mega-amps, just to be on the safe side. If you want to charge a 50 kWh battery in 10 seconds, you're looking at 180 Mega-fscking-Watts of power. That's about 1/10 of the output of a decent-sized nuclear reactor block.

    54. Re:20 vacuum cleaners... by Chrisq · · Score: 1

      What high drain device are you ever going to want to run for that short a time?

      A starter motor. Perhaps the heavy lead/acid battery van be replaced by a smaller lighter lithium/ion.

    55. Re:20 vacuum cleaners... by Born2bwire · · Score: 1

      Don't forget the Pecan Flavored Candies!

    56. Re:20 vacuum cleaners... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So lets say a EV has a power plug that draws 500 watts, that 500 watts in 10 seconds instead of spanned across 10 hours is 5000 watts

      Wow. A whole 5kW. However will the grid cope.

      You can buy power showers and ovens with a higher draw than that.

    57. Re:20 vacuum cleaners... by Ihlosi · · Score: 1

      So lets say a EV has a power plug that draws 500 watts, that 500 watts in 10 seconds instead of spanned across 10 hours is 5000 watts, but lets say its a SUV, and it requires a 1000 watt outlet, that means its going to require 10,000 watts over that 10 second period.

      I think your math is way off. 10 hours are 36000 seconds. 500 Watts times 10 hours is 5 kWh. If you want to draw that amount of energy in 10 seconds, you're looking at 1800 kW (yep, 1.8 MW) of power, not 5 kW.

    58. Re:20 vacuum cleaners... by squoozer · · Score: 1

      Even at 240V the charge time will be measured in hours though unless people plan on using cable so thick they need a fork lift truck to move it. If we want fast charging we need to step up the voltage to a few thousand volts (I like the sound of 7200V as, I believe, that is the local distribution voltage in the EU). Trouble with high voltages though is the complexity to switching then regularly.

      Personally, I don't understand why we aren't making a push to use methanol fuel cells. Methanol is much easier to transport and store than hydrogen, has a decent power density, the fuel cells pretty much work already and refueling is about as fast as with petrol. Of course there is the downside that it releases CO2 but that is only a problem if we use methane from fossil sources: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Methanol#Production

      --
      I used to have a better sig but it broke.
    59. Re:20 vacuum cleaners... by cheater512 · · Score: 1

      Or hey you could live in a modern country and get 240v as standard. ;)

    60. Re:20 vacuum cleaners... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, they rather output upwards of 6000 kW. But otherwise I agree with you.

    61. Re:20 vacuum cleaners... by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

      Top fuel drag racing is all about the noise and noxious nitromethane fumes that make you cry. If you've never heard a top fuel dragster (or funny car) launch, you've not heard loud (shuttle/Saturn V launches and Krakatoa excepted, of course). So loud it makes you lungs vibrate. Startlingly loud. Barely-holding-my-fudge loud.

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    62. Re:20 vacuum cleaners... by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

      240V is standard in the US - just ask your electric clothes dryer, oven, air conditioner, heat pump, water heater, etc.

      Using 240V to power low demand items, especially things with cheap linear power supplies, leads to much more energy being wasted as heat in the regulating elements. Switching supplies fare better, however. For high demand items, the higher voltage means less loss in the wires supplying the equipment, and allows for smaller wires to boot, saving money on copper or aluminum.

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    63. Re:20 vacuum cleaners... by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Just wait for electrics to be banned from drag racing because they don't make enough noise and smoke... well actually smoke I can see happening.

      Especially if they're Sony batteries!

    64. Re:20 vacuum cleaners... by fractoid · · Score: 1

      Curse you, Google, you have failed me again!! *ships them a load of Sony batteries* :P

      Make it 240-liter battery pack then, but that's still 250kg or so, much lighter than a bigass supercharged V8.

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    65. Re:20 vacuum cleaners... by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      What was the submitter (editor?) smoking? The correct term for electricity isn't vacuum cleaners, it's light bulbs! "WQNA, voted Springfield's best music station, with roughly the power of four light bulbs!"

      25,000 watts would be 250 light bulbs. But for batteries I never could understand why they used watts rather than watt-hours (in this case yes, it makes sense, but not for a gasoline car's battery).

      From a different FA:

      Ceder and colleagues discovered that lithium ions travel through tunnels accessed from the surface of the material. If a lithium ion at the surface is directly in front of a tunnel entrance, it can quickly deliver a charge. But if the ion is not at the entrance, it cannot easily move there, making it less efficient at delivering a charge.

      Ceder and colleagues remedied this by revamping the battery recipe. "We changed the composition of the base material and we changed the way it is made -- the heat treatment," Ceder said.

      This created many smooth tunnels in the material that allow the ions to slip in and out easily. "The trick was knowing what to change," he said.

      Using their new processing technique, the team made a small battery that could be fully charged in 10 to 20 seconds.

      Ceder thinks the material could lead to smaller, lighter batteries because less material is needed for the same result.

      And because they simply tinkered with a material already commonly used for batteries, it could be easily adapted for commercial use.

      "If manufacturers decide they want to go down this road, they could do this in a few years," Ceder said.

      One glitch, Ceder said, would be handling the extra surge of power. "All of the wiring has to get beefed up," he said.

    66. Re:20 vacuum cleaners... by Beezlebub33 · · Score: 1

      Yes, but 10 sec would be better, eh? I don't expect to see this at anybody's home, but a commercial charging system that could refuel an electric vehicle faster than you could refuel an ICE vehicle would be a huge boon to electric vehicles. It would answer a lot (but not all) of the 'what happens if I go too far?' questions. Right now, if you go too far, you end up begging someone to plug in your vehicle in their wall socket or get towed. If a charging system were available at traditional gas stations, then you could pull in and be ready to go in under a minute.

      --
      The more people I meet, the better I like my dog.
    67. Re:20 vacuum cleaners... by csnydermvpsoft · · Score: 1

      This corresponds to the energy output of 220 plasma televisions of 340 watts each.

      Where can I buy these energy-producing televisions?

    68. Re:20 vacuum cleaners... by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      Of course there is the downside that it releases CO2

      Yeah, that and the vapors will make you blind, and it has a ridiculously low boiling point (64.7 ÂC, easily reached in a tank in a car parked in the sun on a hot day).

    69. Re:20 vacuum cleaners... by Stratocastr · · Score: 1

      But it also means that you can *charge* it in 10 seconds. How nice it that. One problem for plug-in electric cars is that they take long to charge. If charging it doesn't take longer than filling up a tank of gas, that would be a step forward.

      on the other hand, your car would discharge in 10 seconds and you would have to recharge after every 10 seconds

      fun huh?

      --
      Slashdot - I went there to fix their grammar that they're so bad at.
    70. Re:20 vacuum cleaners... by Rei · · Score: 1

      Quite true. And chargers that deliver very high currents already exists. Aerovironment makes commercial chargers up to 60kW and testing chargers up to 250kW, for example (their commercial line may be bigger by now; I haven't checked). That's up to the limits of the Level 3 charging standard. A number of their 60kW chargers are already installed around Oahu.

      That may sound like a lot of power until you realize that most industrial facilities use notably more current than that *nonstop*. It's not primarily a challenge of dealing with the current -- it's a challenge of reliable connects and disconnects.

      Anyways, this tech is yet another major advancement to LiP tech; they keep coming down the pipe. Looks like it's prepped to completely blow away titanate tech in every regard (it already leads significantly in price and by a fair margin in energy density). And since this is a surface treatment, it should be able to be paired with other techs, such as Actacell's for using microwaves to make LiP cathodes of superior energy density at a far lower price (LiPs are currently primarily limited by capital costs, which are limited by production rates and infrastructure scale -- not raw materials).

      --
      Freeze Ray. Tell your friends.
    71. Re:20 vacuum cleaners... by Rei · · Score: 1

      Rarely are packs charged as fast as cells. Titanate cells have been charged in under 1 minute, but the packs are usually limited to 5-10 minutes. Mostly it's a heat issue -- harder to manage with a whole pack than with an individual cell.

      Anyway, 250kW chargers already exist, present day. For a 200Wh/mi EV (Prius or Volt-level aerodynamics/weight), that's 1,250mi/hour of charging, or 21 miles per minute of charging. Not gasoline refill speeds, but nothing to scoff at. When you factor in the overhead that exists no matter what type of recharge/refill you do -- time spent slowing down, taking an offramp, driving up to the station, up to a pump, taking the gas cap off, etc, and all of that stuff in reverse, plus payment -- the percentage difference in your time isn't much. And this is present tech.

      --
      Freeze Ray. Tell your friends.
    72. Re:20 vacuum cleaners... by Rei · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and powerful electric motors are pretty light, too, and their scaling factors well less than linear. The Tesla Roadster's motor, which takes that (not uber-light by any respect) car from 0-60 in 3.9 seconds (3.7 seconds) is the size of a watermelon and weighs ~30kg.

      --
      Freeze Ray. Tell your friends.
    73. Re:20 vacuum cleaners... by SBrach · · Score: 1

      Oh, I completely agree, I was just pointing out that the 37 hour number is misleading. 10 seconds would be great but I don't know if it is practical. The battery pack in the Tesla stores about 50kWh of power. The battery operates at 375V nominal. So, what's the highest voltage we can throw at it to charge? 400V? 500V? Regardless, it is going to be a crazy amount of current at any sane voltage to charge a 50kWh battery in 10 seconds. At the current 3.5 hours at 240V we're around 60A. If we bump it up to 400V and drop the time down to 1 hour the amperage jumps to 125A. For this to be possible we wouldn't be able to do much else in our home while charging. A dedicated charging station could probably make this work though. To get down to 10 seconds at 400V we need to increase the current to a staggering 45,000A. Increase the voltage to a kilovolt and we are still at 18,000A. I just don't see this happening.

    74. Re:20 vacuum cleaners... by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      Ah well... guess it would have taken a Real Genius to get the reference.

      Or I'm getting too old for you young pups!

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    75. Re:20 vacuum cleaners... by kevmatic · · Score: 1

      The limitation on a drag car's speed certainly isn't engine output - Its traction. Top Fuel dragsters ride the clutch (makes it slip) for the first few hundred feet to keep the wheels from breaking loose. The clutches are replaced every run. The 8,000 Hp isn't even needed till the car reaches 100Mph or so, when the wheel RPMs get up and wind downforce increases traction. And it is at this point when an electric motor starts to fall off - they make all their power early on, when it can't get to the ground on a top fuel engine.

      In fact, dragsters have a knob on the top the engine to dial out a couple hundred horsepower if the crew thinks traction will be a problem.

      These batteries may very well make electric racing cheaper and more viable, but I doubt they'll help speed much. Less weight = less traction, too.

    76. Re:20 vacuum cleaners... by Rei · · Score: 1

      Even at 240V the charge time will be measured in hours though unless people plan on using cable so thick they need a fork lift truck to move it.

      What are you talking about? Oahu already has a network of 60kW chargers, and the company that produced them (AeroVironment) makes chargers as powerful as 250kW. Here's what they look like. Here's what an older, inductive 50kW Magnecharge charger looks like.

      Does that look like you need a forklift to you? 50kW = charge a 200Wh/mi (Volt-or-Prius-like) EV at a rate of 4.2 miles per minute of charging. 60kW = 5.0 miles/minute. 250kW = 20.8 miles/minute. For an Aptera-like vehicle, double those numbers. For an SUV or pickup without extra streamlining, halve them.

      Here's a handy spreadsheet to determine how fast you'll go compared to an ICE car with different battery packs and charging powers after you take into account things like overhead for charging stops and starting each trip with a full pack. We see that, to pick an example, for six hour driving/charging in an Aptera-type vehicle at 55mph (versus a gasoline vehicle that goes 430 miles at that speed, with a minimum of 8% of your trip for restrooms/meals/getting out to stretch/etc, 1.2 minutes to gas up an ICE car, and an overhead of 6 minutes per time you have to stop to refill or recharge the vehicle), you go 56% as far if you charge from normal wall outlets, 60% from kitchen or garage outlets, 66% as far from low-power RV outlets, 76% as far from washer/dryer outlets, 84% as far from high-power RV outlets, 86% as far from old-school 60A chargers, 89% as far from a Tesla-type or new Yazaki charger, 97% as far from a 60kW charger, and 100% as far from a 250kW charger.

      In short, charging from commodity outlets that already exist will increase your travel time by a relevant amount (although not as apocalyptically as a lot of people portray it, at least in an Aptera-type vehicle), but once you get up to the high-power chargers, the penalty is pretty insignificant.

      Personally, I don't understand why we aren't making a push to use methanol fuel cells.

      The fact that it's toxic, low density, and causes several times the energy waste might have something to do with it.

      --
      Freeze Ray. Tell your friends.
    77. Re:20 vacuum cleaners... by Rei · · Score: 1

      Why would 240V waste power? Higher voltages plus lower currents = the same power but less resistance over a given conductor.

      Our 120V system is an artifact of an early desire for primarily using electricity to power incandescent lightbulbs. It's easier to make a 120V incandescent than a 240V.

      --
      Freeze Ray. Tell your friends.
    78. Re:20 vacuum cleaners... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm kidding. When I go off the grid, I'll be finding a nice piece of land with good sized waterfall, and setting up a micro-hydro system.

      You'll need to go way out in the boonies for that. Nowadays, almost all municipalities have laws that prohibit altering the flow of any body of water within their boundaries, which usually extend well into the countryside...

    79. Re:20 vacuum cleaners... by torkus · · Score: 1

      Agreed, however who says we're actually charging a EV's battery from flat dead to 100% in 10s? You get the ultra-high instant discharge rate if needed and an as-fast-as-you-can charge rate.

      How about a 50% charge in ~5 minutes? That's about 250kW. A lot, yes, but certainly within reason. In fact "gas stations" would probably like it. It would motivate you to go buy a stale, overpriced corn-dog or soda which is how they make a fair amount of their profits.

      For EV 'gas stations' to be practical you don't need to be as fast as pumping gas (3 minutes to fill my tank from empty FYI) but it needs to be reasonable. Without big underground storage tanks and hazmat permits and ugly smelly pumps you lessen the requirement for a classic gas station. Think outside the box here. If all you need is a power feed/transformer/utility meter/power plug it's really easy for anyone to sell you a charge. 5 free kWh with purchase of 2 dozen donuts. Offices that give employees a free charge once a week as a job perk. Mall or train station parking lots with EV stalls along side their already paid parking.

      The list goes on. Requiring several hours to charge presents a problem for long trips. 15 minutes every 200+ miles is good motivation to stretch your legs if you've been driving for 3+ hours straight.1

      --
      You can get rich if you own a politician, but you have to be rich to buy one in the first place.
    80. Re:20 vacuum cleaners... by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

      I am intrigued and would like to subscribe to your newsletter.

      Also I'd like a diet mt dew and a loaded hotdog please. And 3KW on plug 4.

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    81. Re:20 vacuum cleaners... by canuck08 · · Score: 1

      Ok, so all I need is 20 DC vacuum cleaners, 19 friends, lots of extension cords and I'll be able to clean my house in 10 seconds right?

    82. Re:20 vacuum cleaners... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Regen braking is limited by locking up the wheels. The highest regen current I have ever seen is about 400 amps and about 280 volts. That is not a big deal for dumb lead acid batteries, and trivial for ni-mh batteries. BTW, you can't do high levels of regen braking on RWD vehicles, as the rear wheels lock up faster under braking than the front wheels.

    83. Re:20 vacuum cleaners... by squoozer · · Score: 1

      Have you checked out the boiling point of hydrogen recently? I think you'll find that it's much lower than methanol but they seem to think they can store that. Of course we could always maybe make the refueling process not spill vast amounts of vapour into the air, just because it's a liquid fuel doesn't mean we have to pump it like we currently do petrol. I agree though there is a risk from the vapour should a fuel tank burst, perhaps we should therefore look into ethanol buring fuel cells. A much harder problem due to the greater size of ethanol but still possible.

      --
      I used to have a better sig but it broke.
    84. Re:20 vacuum cleaners... by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

      I was thinking about the DC side, not the AC side. My bad. The efficiency would be the same except that you'd have twice as many primary windings.

      On the DC side, in a linear power supply any input voltage that exceeds the desired output voltage must be regulated in some sort of power sink such as a bipolar transistor or MOSFET (generally called a pass transistor). For example, if you look at the power dissipation curves for this integrated 5V regulator, you'll see that as the voltage across the regulator increases, the available output current decreases due to maxing out the thermal limits of the die.

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    85. Re:20 vacuum cleaners... by hacksoncode · · Score: 1
      The reason you can't just install another battery pack at home and charge from it is that you'd never get a UL listing for a 10 megawatt (conservatively) transfer system.

      The reason you can't get a UL listing for it is that there's no conceivable engineering solution to the gargantuan task of making it safe for a home user. Or even a gas station attendant. The 2 1-inch thick copper charging cables might be a bit pricey and unwieldy too.

      You'd be a lot better off buying a forklift and switching the batteries.

      Really... there's no use for a car battery that charges in anything less than an hour. Unless it's really small and can only go a few dozen miles.

    86. Re:20 vacuum cleaners... by Khyber · · Score: 1

      There are plenty of No-mem NiM batteries that take rapid charging without killing the battery or reducing the power capacity. Granted this results in a lower overall storage capacity (only 2000 mAh compared to an Energizer's 2650 mAh) but a far more reliable battery. I have a few made by Lenmar, and they've been rock solid in my 10-minute charger for well over 5 years, now.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    87. Re:20 vacuum cleaners... by karnal · · Score: 1

      I think this is where if you needed current fast in a home situation, you'd install a second set of floater batteries/super caps. They'd take a slow charge over time given the utility power available to the home; then when you come home for a half hour (say over lunch) it could dump the whole capacity to the car quickly.

      Warning: Do not unplug vehicle while transferring power to car. Could cause sparks.....

      --
      Karnal
    88. Re:20 vacuum cleaners... by holmstar · · Score: 1

      You are missing a VERY important point... how big of a cable are you going to need to attach to your car in order to charge it that quickly without the cable melting away?

      The Tesla roadster has a 50kwh 375volt battery. Lets say we want to charge it in 10 seconds...

      To transfer 50kwh over 10 seconds at 375 volts the cable would need to handle 48000 amps! You are talking about a cable the size of your torso. Actually two of them, since you have a positive and a negative. NOT GOING TO HAPPEN.

    89. Re:20 vacuum cleaners... by camperdave · · Score: 1

      You'll need to go way out in the boonies for that. Nowadays, almost all municipalities have laws that prohibit altering the flow of any body of water within their boundaries, which usually extend well into the countryside...

      Water_in==water_out. Flow is not altered at all. Oh, and yes, I'll be out in the boonies.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    90. Re:20 vacuum cleaners... by cheater512 · · Score: 1

      That doesnt matter too much since a transformer steps the voltage down.
      Exactly the same as 120v.

      Linear regulators dont run on 240v.
      If they did then they would all require large heatsinks with fans.

    91. Re:20 vacuum cleaners... by Jyms · · Score: 1

      Not going to happen any time soon. Do you have a "slow charge, high drain battery bank in the basement"? We have been reliant on such a system for domestic power for the last 20 years. We have about 330 days of sunshine per year, so we have a PV array with a generator as a backup. Yes, this system is much better than the days when we only had the generator, but it still sucks. Battery banks are expensive, high maintenance and inconvenient and anything that relies on their large scale adoption is stillborn. Ask anyone with a golf cart how expensive they are to maintain.

    92. Re:20 vacuum cleaners... by sabt-pestnu · · Score: 1

      Good luck with that.

      Most land with good sized waterfalls is either public land (park/national forest), or exceptionally expensive.

      Then there's the cost of building your 'micro-hydro' system. A brief search brought up some micro hydro generators for in the range of $1K. On the other hand, it made it clear that what the generator needed was simply a swift moving stream. A waterfall isn't necessary.

      But being near a stream, you'll want to be sure you're not going to get flooded out in the next 100-year flood. (Having seen a couple of those come by in the last decade, I'm in the "twice shy" camp.)

      So... if you can afford land with a good sized waterfall, you probably aren't going to be worried about the cost of the generator...

    93. Re:20 vacuum cleaners... by adolf · · Score: 1

      Sure. That way, you can have deep discharges (and associated wear) on TWO giant battery arrays instead of just one. As if buying and disposing of this stuff wasn't already an issue, now your battery waste per mile is multiplied by 2! Horray!

    94. Re:20 vacuum cleaners... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hard to say, but probably at least two hundred Ballmer units, but possibly as much as a few kiloBallmer.

  2. 20 vacuum cleaners for 10 seconds? by DigitalReverend · · Score: 5, Funny

    That sucks.

    --
    I read Slashdot for the headlines, because the headlines, unlike the articles, are usually original and never duplicated
    1. Re:20 vacuum cleaners for 10 seconds? by CannonballHead · · Score: 1

      Most vacuums do.

    2. Re:20 vacuum cleaners for 10 seconds? by GaryOlson · · Score: 1

      Especially trying to find the right algorithm to use to suck the maximum the area during 10 seconds for 20 instances. Would that be a blow-by-blow algorithm?

      --
      Every mans' island needs an ocean; choose your ocean carefully.
    3. Re:20 vacuum cleaners for 10 seconds? by GrahamCox · · Score: 1

      That sucks

      But not for long.

    4. Re:20 vacuum cleaners for 10 seconds? by wooferhound · · Score: 1

      But remember . . .
      you can recharge it back up to full again in 10 more seconds.

      --
      We are Dead Stars looking back Up at the Sky
    5. Re:20 vacuum cleaners for 10 seconds? by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 2, Insightful

      20 vacuum cleaners for 10 seconds?

      That sucks.

      How many yomamas is that?

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    6. Re:20 vacuum cleaners for 10 seconds? by fractoid · · Score: 1

      Whoosh.

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
  3. Portable Nuclear Device... by icebike · · Score: 3, Funny

    > deliver 25,000 watts, or enough power for about 20 vacuum cleaners."

    What could possibly go wrong with that!!??

    --
    Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    1. Re:Portable Nuclear Device... by FooAtWFU · · Score: 1
      The image of terrorists attacking a civic building with 20 vacuum cleaners is a funny one.

      Especially if it's 20 vacuum cleaners each.

      --
      The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
    2. Re:Portable Nuclear Device... by tecnico.hitos · · Score: 2, Funny

      > deliver 25,000 watts, or enough power for about 20 vacuum cleaners."

      What could possibly go wrong with that!!??

      We could be attacked by an army of rebel housewives.

      --
      The good, the evil and the vacuum tubes.
    3. Re:Portable Nuclear Device... by Rinisari · · Score: 1

      That's quite an EMP.

    4. Re:Portable Nuclear Device... by NeverVotedBush · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A lot for people who don't treat them with the proper respect.

      That kind of short circuit current would probably amputate fingers if someone shorted one with a ring, melt metal in seconds (or less), and depending on the circuit, could possibly create enough of a magnetic field to launch that molten metal across a room (think rail guns).

      High fault currents can lead to a whole range of bizarre effects. People will need to take off jewelry and should wear gloves and safety glasses when handling them. Also, that kind of fault current and molten or very very hot metal and arcs would probably be a fair fire hazard. Some sort of overcurrent protection will pretty much be mandatory.

      But comparing it to a portable nuclear device is a pretty good, if extreme, analogy. One thing about such a high current capability is that less energy will be wasted as heat in the battery itself since its internal resistance must be so low.

    5. Re:Portable Nuclear Device... by Vellmont · · Score: 1

      You might want to consider that 25,000 watts is about 34 horsepower. Not exactly a large amount of power.

      --
      AccountKiller
    6. Re:Portable Nuclear Device... by icebike · · Score: 1

      More than I care to pull thru 12-2 with ground.

      The largest single circuit in most US homes seldom exceeds 9600
      watts for an electric range.

      25,000 watts is typical for the entrance rating of many modern US homes.

      Go stick you hand across the legs of your main breaker and come
      back and tell me if you still think its not a "large amount of power".

      (Note: don't do this. Really.)

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    7. Re:Portable Nuclear Device... by master5o1 · · Score: 1

      Speaking of terrorists using an EMP to attack *somewhere* in 2009 reminds me of Dark Angel.


      I think secretly I want it to be true....no wait, not secretly, I just want that EMP to happen -- and the kids to escape.

      --
      signature is pants
    8. Re:Portable Nuclear Device... by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I think something is wrong with the math here... that's 25kW * 10s / 1L = 250kW-s/L = 4.17 kW-h/L. That seems wrong, since most numbers I see on Li-Ion seem to indicate volumetric energy density of Li-Ion is lower than 0.5 kW-h/L.

      Even more confusing, the article seems to claim that the total energy capacity of the battery is actually lower due to the new material. The only thing that I can figure is that the researchers are talking about the capacity of the electrode and not the capacity of the battery - which is weird.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    9. Re:Portable Nuclear Device... by modecx · · Score: 3, Funny

      I think secretly I want it to be true....no wait, not secretly, I just want that EMP to happen

      After spending way too many hours in a datacenter today (which, incidentally sounds about like 10000 vacuum cleaners), I could care less about escaping kids, but if an EMP could put an end to the buzzing in my head, I'd strongly consider it.

      --
      Constitutional rights may be respected, repealed, or modified; but they must never be ignored.
    10. Re:Portable Nuclear Device... by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

      Roger that on the dangers of high short circuit current and moderately high voltages. Look for videos of Arc Flash to see how deadly it can be.

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    11. Re:Portable Nuclear Device... by danomac · · Score: 1

      What could possibly go wrong with that!!??

      I know! All the plugged filters from people using their vacuums outside to clean up soil!

  4. Good for cars? by NaCh0 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Great, by the time I have backed out of the driveway I'll need to recharge it.

    1. Re:Good for cars? by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 1

      It would be good for a 1/4 mile drag racer, but you'd have to push it back to the starting line....

      --
      "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
    2. Re:Good for cars? by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1

      I suggest you read some basic physics. You can burn your entire fuel tank in 10 seconds too, if you wanted to.

    3. Re:Good for cars? by bh_doc · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but think how fast you'll be going when you get there!

    4. Re:Good for cars? by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

      And affix a new set of tires.

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
  5. That would suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    for about 10 sec.

  6. charging by yincrash · · Score: 1

    being able to charge in 10 seconds would mean you could fuel an electric car as fast as a gasoline one. i hope this is for real

    1. Re:charging by yincrash · · Score: 5, Informative

      after reading the article, fast charging has not been developed. the article writer only says that it may be possible, w/o citing any source regarding that claim.

    2. Re:charging by icebike · · Score: 1

      Sure, as long as you can find a 25000 watt outlet.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    3. Re:charging by yincrash · · Score: 1

      just have a very bank of batteries at the gas station underground that can discharge that fast into the car, and the bank can be charged at reasonable amperages from the power line. sort of like gas stations are made today, but with batteries instead of tanks.

    4. Re:charging by AnotherBlackHat · · Score: 4, Informative

      >Sure, as long as you can find a 25000 watt outlet.

      I don't think so...

      Typical Miles per kilowatt hour is 4.
      A 100 mile fill-up = 25 kilowatt hours = 90,000,000 watt seconds.
      If you want that in 10 seconds, you'd need a 9 Megawatt outlet.

    5. Re:charging by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I accidentally a very bank of batteries.

    6. Re:charging by Wizard+Drongo · · Score: 1

      Maybe we could fuel it with lightning or something till someone makes a Mr. Fusion......

      --
      The truth shall always be free: Boris Floricic is Tron.
    7. Re:charging by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 1

      Political slogan from the next election:

      A car in every driveway.... A chicken in every pot.... A Mr. Fusion for every gas station...

      --
      "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
    8. Re:charging by Repton · · Score: 5, Funny

      All you need is a wall socket that can deliver 25,000W!

      Note to self: pick up some 100A fuses on the way home.

      --
      Repton.
      They say that only an experienced wizard can do the tengu shuffle.
    9. Re:charging by hedwards · · Score: 1

      It sounds to me like a variant on capacitors, but the question as you put it is, has this really been achieved, or is this still vaporware. People have been working on this for quite a while, and nobody's been able to do it. I'm sure they will some day, but right now there needs to be a proper citation.

      And for a car, it would likely take a huge number of cells and a huge amount of juice to work.

    10. Re:charging by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      All you need is a wall socket that can deliver 25,000W!

      Note to self: pick up some 100A fuses on the way home.

      Have a big battery in the house as a cache. Good for backups as well.

    11. Re:charging by hedwards · · Score: 1

      You are right, well mostly. This cell supposedly charges in 10 seconds, but I doubt that they'd hook it up in such a way that you needed a 9 megawatt outlet. More likely they'd design for a 4 hour charge, which would be a much more reasonable figure.

      For most people, they'd probably set it up so that you only had to charge it for an hour and were limited to only 25 miles, which would be fine for most people, especially since they'd have the ability to leave it charge all night and get the full range.

      Or even still more likely the author threw that in to make it look more useful than it really is. Useful for handhelds and things with lesser power needs, probably, but not for high drain devices like cars.

    12. Re:charging by Jimmy_B · · Score: 2, Informative
      From the BBC article on the same topic:

      A prototype battery made using the new technique could be charged in less than 20 seconds - in comparison to six minutes with an untreated sample of the material.

      So it sounds like fast charging has been developed, and it's just a matter of taking orders and tooling the factories at this point.

    13. Re:charging by hardburn · · Score: 1

      The Tesla can already charge in less than 4 if you have a 240V plug. But if you want much faster than that, the battery technology needs to improve.

      Assuming this tech works out, you'll see current gas stations get a flywheel for energy storage and charge the battery in a few minutes.

      --
      Not a typewriter
    14. Re:charging by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      after reading the article, fast charging has not been developed. the article writer only says that it may be possible, w/o citing any source regarding that claim.

      You must be new here...

    15. Re:charging by flibbajobber · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's only like capacitors in that the discharge is fast. This is still a chemical cell, unlike capacitors which store energy in electric fields. Chemical batteries still have faaaar higher energy density (Wh per kg) than capacitors.

    16. Re:charging by Rufty · · Score: 5, Funny

      In the fuse draw of a local college electronics lab I found a length of 6inch nail lovingly cut to length with cleaned ends, painted round the middle with the designation "10000A, slow-blow" (Apparently one of the techs had a dead scope that couldn't be powered up - it just blew the fuse. Hence the nail. Bung it in and now you know where the hard short *was*. It's the melted patch with the smoke coming out...)

      --
      Red to red, black to black. Switch it on, but stand well back.
    17. Re:charging by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      That's actually pretty interesting... If you had a big, high-discharge rate battery at home it would be silly to use it just for the car. You may as well hook up solar cells or a windmill to it. If everyone had one the electric company could even rely on them to buffer the grid a bit.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    18. Re:charging by alleycat0 · · Score: 1

      E = P/I
      Volts = 25,000 / 100
        = 250 Volts!

      Remind me not to plug any of my devices into your outlets!

      --
      I am not a number - I am a free man!
    19. Re:charging by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      If you want that in 10 seconds, you'd need a 9 Megawatt outlet.

      What, you don't have 30000 Amp wiring in your house? :) Bonus points for anyone who can tell me what gauge copper that would require

      I guess to be fair, it would only require a 14000 Amp 220V circuit. And if a recharging station were located such that it could take a 10kV feed like factories can get, you'd be down to a manageable 300A... still a big hunk of copper!

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    20. Re:charging by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depends on the circuit length. 2000kcmil wiring though.... at 240v would drop about 15 volts in a 200 foot round trip circuit.... Better have your own transformer for your house.

    21. Re:charging by russotto · · Score: 1

      just have a very bank of batteries at the gas station underground that can discharge that fast into the car,

      If you're doing it at a dedicated "fueling" station, you don't need the extra batteries. The power companies can deliver the power, just not on residential circuits.

      Making a safe and idiot-proof connection to run all that power through is left as an exercise.

    22. Re:charging by Repton · · Score: 1

      Mains voltage here is 230V. But

      Note to self: pick up some 108.7A fuses on the way home.

      doesn't have the same flow, y'know?

      --
      Repton.
      They say that only an experienced wizard can do the tengu shuffle.
    23. Re:charging by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quick! Someone invent the Mr. Fusion!

    24. Re:charging by pz · · Score: 1

      >Sure, as long as you can find a 25000 watt outlet.

      I don't think so...

      Typical Miles per kilowatt hour is 4.
      A 100 mile fill-up = 25 kilowatt hours = 90,000,000 watt seconds.
      If you want that in 10 seconds, you'd need a 9 Megawatt outlet.

      Not only that, even with a power transfer efficiency of 99.9%, you'd have almost ten kilowatts of dissipation at the transfer. You could not hold that in your hand.

      That's the thing about gasoline refueling: it's an astonishingly fast and efficient way of transferring gobs and gobs of energy.

      --

      Put my fist through my alarm clock with its ding-dong death inside my ear. - The Blackjacks.
    25. Re:charging by Bloater · · Score: 1

      Hell, it could /require/ them to buffer the grid.

      People could book energy for particular slots of time. The cost of managing grid electricity would plummet.

      The electric company would have to manage it to ensure that it really does draw the power it books, and draws it at the right time. But that's okay - it takes the risk out of it for the home-owner and pools it. For the grid operator, the risk is a tiny fraction (you need an awful lot of simultaneous failures to cause them a problem). The grid operator will also be well equipped to estimate the remaining risk, budget it, and limit the customer's liquidity at optimal times to minimise it - things the customer general isn't able to do.

    26. Re:charging by fractoid · · Score: 1

      That's one of the big things that AC Propulsion have been going on about for years; Vehicle-to-Grid as a part of widespread EV ownership. The idea is that when you get home from work, you'll plug your car in and it will partially power your house while you're doing all your cooking, watching your bigass TV with the aircon on, etc. Then once the power demand peak has passed later in the evening, it will charge using offpeak power (which is cheaper at night anyway because cooler ambient temperature = more efficient power generation).

      Of course, there are two major, major problems with this plan. The first being that batteries are expensive and have a limited cycle life that usually degrades fast with increasing average cycle depth. IIRC, sealed lead acid batteries can take 40,000 charge cycles when only discharged by 10-20%, but when taken down to 80% discharge that drops to more like 500-600 cycles. The second problem is that we rely on our cars to be available at any stage. If your kid finds her way into the medicine cabinet at 2am you want to get in the car and drive her to hospital NOW, not find out is that your car's flat and it'll take an hour for the ambulance to arrive.

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    27. Re:charging by fractoid · · Score: 1

      ...which takes years and years. Remember when A123 Systems announced their Altair Nano-based LiPoly batteries with uber high discharge rates? (A123 have licensed this tech too, FTFA). They've had working batteries for 3 years or more, and are now powering the top electric drag car and bike, but still don't sell anything bigger than a raw testing kit with 6 x 3.2v cells.

      Apparently they have approval to build a factory now, though, so if they start mass production it might help prices a little.

      <tinfoil>I read somewhere that the reason we're still using NiMH batteries instead of lithium is that they were developed based on technology lifecycles of 10-15 years, so manufacturers don't want to retool for lithium until they've recouped the research and tooling costs for NiMH</tinfoil>

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    28. Re:charging by EotB · · Score: 1

      The assumption from when I was working on EVs at university was that you can use another bank of these batteries to charge the bank in the car however. Use solar/cheap off-peak power/wind/whatever to charge the home/office storage battery bank over the day then dump the charge from one to the other in a short space of time. Same could apply for the electrical gas station equivalents.

    29. Re:charging by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      If your kid finds her way into the medicine cabinet at 2am you want to get in the car and drive her to hospital NOW, not find out is that your car's flat and it'll take an hour for the ambulance to arrive.

      That's easy enough to accommodate in a system like this, just don't let it draw the battery down so far that you don't have range to the hospital. Heck, part of the calibration procedure could even involve a 'spirited drive' to the hospital :) Of course, if you can afford a Tesla, you can afford a life-flight, so I don't actually see this as a big deal for this vehicle. If/when the next vehicle actually makes it to market, then it will be a bigger deal. However, I don't see the roadster owners actually wanting to do anything like that anyway.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    30. Re:charging by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yup. but the same with laptops, mine is chanring > hour, phone too. the only problem would be amount of power it takes and we could see lights going down in some places just because someone plugged in a laptop... If it's going to be implemented, it should have special plugs for high power hungry adapters so it wouldn't shut down current (less-effective) infrastructure.

    31. Re:charging by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

      If you want that in 10 seconds, you'd need a 9 Megawatt outlet.

      Ah, now I have a reason to build and market personal thorium fast breeder reactors.

       

      --
      Deleted
    32. Re:charging by sjames · · Score: 1

      Even at a more reasonable 100 seconds to charge, it's a huge amount of current, far more than the average person has ever encountered. To get to a practical amperage, the charger would need to run at 3-7Kv and 200 to 300 Amps. Electrical faults at that level don't spark, they explode.

      It's not impossible, but a lot of safety engineering will be needed before anything like that can be placed in a self service station.

    33. Re:charging by SBrach · · Score: 1

      Note to self: pick up some 100kA fuses on the way home

      Fixed that for ya.

    34. Re:charging by holmstar · · Score: 1

      But you still need the giant copper to transfer the energy from your garage battery bank to your car... why does everyone seem to ignore this???

    35. Re:charging by EotB · · Score: 1

      The reason it is ignored is that it is a relatively easy engineering problem. Either use more copper or higher voltages (which with correct latching/shuttered connectors are completely safe). 25kW = 500VDC at 50A which is a similar cable size to 3 phase cables here, which we have a 30m extension cord of out the back that is easy enough to throw over your shoulder and carry around. There are also other approaches such as IPT (inductive power transfer).

    36. Re:charging by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A123 systems sells to OEMs, and their cells can be salvaged from certain power-tool packs. They require special chargers, but boy howdy can these cells put out some thick, chewy amps. Hobbyists generally buy them from Ebay or something, or tear down their own drill packs (very carefully).

  7. Ka-ching. by senorpoco · · Score: 1

    fantastic, now they can start putting Ipod charging stations in airports.

    1. Re:Ka-ching. by oodaloop · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Because quickly charging our iPods is the biggest problem we face in this growing energy crisis.

      --
      Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
    2. Re:Ka-ching. by evolx10 · · Score: 1

      Because quickly charging our iPods is the biggest problem we face in this growing energy crisis.

      No charging my shitty replacement for a gas powered mower is.

    3. Re:Ka-ching. by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      Well, yeah... Now that oil is below 43 dollars a barrel. I don't know why all the doom 'n gloom these days.

      --
      What?
    4. Re:Ka-ching. by oodaloop · · Score: 1

      Might have something to do with the growing world population and decreasing stocks of fossil fuels. But as long as you can cheaply fill up your SUV, I guess there's no cause for alarm.

      --
      Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
    5. Re:Ka-ching. by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 1

      Really? What kind of mower did you get? My buddy got a black and decker electric mower, and he says it's fucking rockstar.

  8. Power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    deliver 25,000 watts, or enough power for about 20 vacuum cleaners.

    So 1 vacuum cleaner consumes 1.25kW? I didn't realise they were so power hungry. Anyway, a more important number is the capacity, how many Wh (or mAh) do these things hold? Is it 25kW for 10s? or for 1 hour? or what?

    1. Re:Power by jcr · · Score: 1

      It's a bit disappointing that an MIT publication wouldn't bother to get meaningful figures, isn't it? I presume they mean that the battery can deliver 25KW for ten seconds, since they're touting the fast discharge cycle.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    2. Re:Power by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      This doesn't affect the energy capacity of the battery at all, only the rate it can charge or discharge. It's a new electrode, not a new electrolyte.

      So obviously the battery wouldn't be able to power the vacuum cleaners for terribly long. I don't know how much energy is in a 1L LiIon battery, and am too lazy to look it up. But it would drain your laptop battery in a couple seconds or less.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    3. Re:Power by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 1

      120 Volt * 10 Amp = 1.2 kW.

      A 10 amp motor is quite reasonable for a vacuum. Consider those hot-air hand dryers have 2 amp motors at 240V, which is equivalent to 4 amp @ 120 V. And the fan in those is a lot lower power than a vacuum cleaner....

      --
      "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
    4. Re:Power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm... the power calculations are more COMPLEX than just P=V*I. You can use it for DC but it's not quite the same for AC.

    5. Re:Power by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 1

      These are batteries we're talking about. It is DC.

      But assuming the vacuums are using AC, and it's a miserable hack of journalistic inaccuracy, it's only 60 Hz. A frequency that low doesn't make that much difference to power calculations.
      If it was a few kHz, I'd agree with you.

      --
      "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
    6. Re:Power by NeverVotedBush · · Score: 1

      I don't think the capacity is really an issue. Capacity is just the amount of reactants in the battery. More reactants means more capacity.

      The current delivery capability is going to be related to the electrode area, reactant and ion mobilities, and the distance the electrodes are separated.

      All they need to do to increase capacity is upsize the battery which will probably also increase current delivery capability.

    7. Re:Power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhh, ever heard of power factor??

    8. Re:Power by julesh · · Score: 1

      Anyway, a more important number is the capacity, how many Wh (or mAh) do these things hold? Is it 25kW for 10s? or for 1 hour? or what?

      I assume, since they didn't mention a capacity, that it is unchanged from other batteries of similar chemistry, i.e. approx 120Wh/kg.

  9. usage asymmetry by rlseaman · · Score: 1

    There can't be a huge lot of commercial use cases for rapid discharge. Tasers?

    Rapid charge, on the other hand, makes a lot of applications much easier to market. Gasoline has one big advantage over electric powered cars - you can drive into and out of a gas station in 3 minutes as opposed to having to plug the car in overnight.

  10. Cyclon spiral lead-acid cells are almost this good by localroger · · Score: 1

    The cyclon X cells I used to power a robot I built a few years back can deliver 500 amps -- enough to melt a 10 gauge wire I accidentally dropped across the terminals. Not bad for something about four times the heft of a D cell. The claim sounds like hype, since it's energy density, not discharge rate that everyone is trying to ramp up lately.

    --
    Brackets contain world's first nanosig, highly magnified:[.]
  11. Liion DIES when heated too much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    discharging or charging that battery in 10 seconds creates a CRAPLOAD of heat. This will shorten it's lifespan drastically.

    They fixed that yet?

    1. Re:Liion DIES when heated too much by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 1

      Yeah. They use the rapid discharge capability to run a refrigeration system to keep the battery cool.

      --
      "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
  12. Re:fast enough for a by sgbett · · Score: 5, Interesting

    first thought?

    Railgun

    --
    Invaders must die
  13. Boom!!! by owlnation · · Score: 4, Funny

    Where does the heat go on rapid discharge?

    Or is this the Sony method of rapid discharge?

    1. Re:Boom!!! by EkriirkE · · Score: 1

      I came here to post this. Isn't a big problem with LiIon heat=explosion? With power dissipation like that, I'd imagine massive heat...

      --
      from 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
      to 45 2F 6E 40 3C DF 10 71 4E 41 DF AA 25 7D 31 3F
    2. Re:Boom!!! by LehiNephi · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The 25kW is power delivered by the battery to a load, not power dissipated by the battery. Granted, given the amount of current involved and the inherent internal resistance of the battery, there'll be a fair amount of power dissipated in the battery itself, but it would be a fairly small percentage of the 25kW

      --
      Help find a cure for cancer. Join the [H]orde
    3. Re:Boom!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The 25kW is power delivered by the battery to a load, not power dissipated by the battery. Granted, given the amount of current involved and the inherent internal resistance of the battery, there'll be a fair amount of power dissipated in the battery itself, but it would be a fairly small percentage of the 25kW

      Yeah, what is that power transferred to when the battery is shorted out?

    4. Re:Boom!!! by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1

      I would imagine the very reason it can be discharged so fast is exactly because it has less heat problems (due to less internal resistance).

    5. Re:Boom!!! by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      These batteries would be ~99% efficient, thus limiting the heat from rapid discharge.

      Though you might have to do what the Tesla Roadster does have have forced air cooling or some such.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    6. Re:Boom!!! by goodmanj · · Score: 1

      And if I accidentally short the battery with a big hunk of metal whose resistance is much less than the internal resistance of the battery? Where's the energy go then?

      Not into the "load". Mostly into the battery itself. And the elctrolyte. Which boils in a couple seconds. Boom!

    7. Re:Boom!!! by owlstead · · Score: 1

      Can somebody confirm that the explosions of Li-Ion batteries *is* the release of all of the energy at once? In that case, it does not matter if you have this fast discharging battery or one of the older ones; what matters is the amount of energy stored within the battery.

  14. Re:Cyclon spiral lead-acid cells are almost this g by sgbett · · Score: 1

    accidentally?

    riiiiight.

    --
    Invaders must die
  15. Power != Energy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The new high rate electrode, the researchers calculate, would allow a one-liter battery based on the material to deliver 25,000 watts, or enough power for about 20 vacuum cleaners."

    For how many microseconds, I wonder. I don't doubt the new electrodes might have some use. But what is holding up wide spread adoption of battery cars is not just the charging time. It is also the total energy that can be stored in a battery relative to its weight. That is the tough nut to crack.

  16. c'mon, boys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    a page of comments and no one has yet said:

    "10 seconds? the average /. geek discharges faster than that"

    sigh.

    1. Re:c'mon, boys by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 4, Funny

      That's because in order to prove the conclusion, they'd have to have done the experiment......

      --
      "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
    2. Re:c'mon, boys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there's plenty of porn for that part, the tough part is finding the one scientist who has a free hand...

  17. 1.6 Horsepower vacuum cleaners? by billstewart · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm fairly surprised to hear that vacuum cleaners use that much power - 1.25kw each is about 1.6 horsepower each. That should be enough for your vacuum cleaners to do 0-60 in the 10 seconds worth of battery you've got...

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  18. Units. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Twenty vacuum cleaners? How much is that in burning Libraries of Congress?

    1. Re:Units. by evolx10 · · Score: 1

      Twenty vacuum cleaners? How much is that in burning Libraries of Congress?

      Im not sure, but my car is a bathroom and a half long and its 1200 living rooms to work.

  19. but how many "libraries of congress" is that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously, what is with "vacuum cleaners" as a unit of comparative measurement? Running for how long? Cleaning a carpet how dirty? Upright or canister? With motorized attachments or no?

    1. Re:but how many "libraries of congress" is that? by evolx10 · · Score: 1

      Well we all know "elephant" has been in use for weighing huge objects , especially dinosaurs and airplanes. It was only a small step to measure wattage with vacuum cleaners. It goes Elephant, Vacuum cleaner, cobra, inch, sesame seed.

  20. This article is mis-quoted by junglebeast · · Score: 2, Informative

    The article describes a new technology for speedy discharge of batteries which is not the same as charging

    1. Re:This article is mis-quoted by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      Both are limited by internal resistance. If it can discharge fast it can charge fast.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  21. Picture of one by noidentity · · Score: 1

    Wikipedia has a picture of one. These can even charge and discharge in less than a second.

  22. Armageddon by GottliebPins · · Score: 5, Funny

    Wow, now we can expect to see spectacular laptop fires hot enough to burn through an engine block. Where can I get some of those batteries? Sony?

  23. Re:1.6 Horsepower vacuum cleaners? by pushing-robot · · Score: 1

    I'm fairly surprised to hear that vacuum cleaners use that much power

    Have you ever noticed the lights dim when you turn one on? Vacuum pumps, especially ones that have to suck air through a bag filled with dust and lint, are pretty power hungry.

    --
    How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
  24. Think about it by jeffmeden · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Actually, the big thing about electric driving isn't getting started in the first place, it's reclaiming the energy when you have to stop (at least for inner city driving.) If you have a battery that is bordering on a supercapacitor to dump energy into, you can reclaim nearly all of the stopping energy into the battery to use to start again. Given that there are 745 watts/hp, a battery capable of a charge rate of 25KW gives you 33 horsepower of braking capacity with one cell. Get 3 of them in a car and you can reclaim 100hp during a stop, which would be good for all but the most grueling emergency stops (depending on the weight of the car).

    1. Re:Think about it by radl33t · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Forget the battery. A 100hp generator weighs 1500 pounds. Even ~10 hp generators are excessively heavy for mobile application. I assume that's what keeps the regenerative braking (for 'normal' braking) efficiency 60% in toyotas... unless they use some other method?

    2. Re:Think about it by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      A hybrid will have a decent sized motor in it (which can run as a generator), although most cars can brake with a LOT more force than they accellerate with. For starters your brakes are on all four wheels and I suspect most hybrids have only two wheels on the drive system. That means that any braking done by the non-drive wheels is going to be lost completely. Toss in resistance/etc you're only going to get so much regeneration on braking.

      However, the problem clearly can be solved. I believe most electric trains use regenerative braking, and if there isn't sufficient demand on the local circuit to take up the power it gets shunted into a huge resistor bank. Dissipating thousands of watts as heat in this way causes less wear and tear than dissipating similar power mechanically into brake pads. A stopping train has a huge amount of kinetic energy to dispose of.

      The economics of getting rid of brake pad wear and tear on a car clearly aren't the same so we won't see 200 HP motors for braking anytime soon. However, I'm sure hybrids have room to improve.

    3. Re:Think about it by iksbob · · Score: 4, Insightful

      A 100hp generator weighs 1500 pounds.

      Really? I assume you're including the substantial weight of a diesel engine to drive said generator, as a quick google search turns up the Winco EC75PSB4G-17 - a 75 kilowatt emergency backup generator head (just the part that turns shaft movement into AC power) that weighs in at 605 lbs. That's a unit intended for stationary use, not to be mounted to a vehicle. I'm sure a similar device intended for mobile use could be constructed from less massive materials.
      In fact, may I direct you to look over the specifications page for the Honda FCX Clarity: link. There you will find that power from the vehicle's fuel cell stack and lithium ion battery is converted to motive force by a 100kW (134 hp) AC electric motor with integrated transaxle. While the page lacks a weight listing for said motive unit, I doubt it exceeds 400 lbs.

    4. Re:Think about it by fractoid · · Score: 1

      Actually, from what I've read on the EV mailing list, regenerative braking doesn't make that much of a difference to EV range, somewhere around 10%. Most of the range savings to me made are in aerodynamics and low rolling resistance tyres.

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    5. Re:Think about it by fractoid · · Score: 1

      That's a generator to produce 100hp continuously, probably including the internal combustion engine to run it. Unlike fuel engines (which are rated at peak power), heavy electric machinery tends to be rated at continuous (and sometimes unventilated) power. Many home-done EV conversions use 12 - 20hp motors and run them at higher voltage with blower fans.

      As Rich0 said, below, the electric motor in a hybrid car doubles as a generator during braking. However, I disagree that we won't see 200hp motors being used for braking - since the motor has the same power capacity when used as a generator, we'll see 200hp regen braking when we see 200hp electric sports cars, which won't be long after batteries with the advertised capabilities here hit the market.

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    6. Re:Think about it by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Actually, from what I've read on the EV mailing list, regenerative braking doesn't make that much of a difference to EV range, somewhere around 10%. Most of the range savings to me made are in aerodynamics and low rolling resistance tyres.

      Holy circular logic batman, that's because you can only store a small fraction of the energy that is produced when using the motors as generators. In other words, your comment was 100% a big fucking waste of time which could have been solved by actually reading the comment you're replying to.

      When it comes to freeway driving, you'd be right again. But the only place that hybrids actually get good mileage is in the city, where regenerative braking is actually useful, and where the electric motor(s) can be used to efficiently accelerate the car in stop-and-go traffic. However, the total energy consumption over the lifetime of a hybrid is still ridiculously higher than a turbo-diesel powered car which has only the one battery, and anywhere but in stop-and-go traffic they get worse mileage, so anyone who buys a Hybrid citing ecological impact is either an idiot or a hypocrite and should have bought a TDI instead. Thus, most hybrid owners clearly aren't actually worried about mileage (since in the vast majority of driving situations a TDI Golf gets better mileage) and are only looking to make themselves look ecologically sensitive, or they just like the way the car drives - a common reason for buying one, actually.

      Hybrids as we know them today are a gigantic boondoggle. The only way to actually get efficiency from them is to take advantage of the primary benefit of the strength of a hybrid platform, the potential to build a plug-in series hybrid, one with no drivetrain. Parallel hybrids essentially have two drivetrains (even if you merge them, there is still added complexity) which adds needless weight.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    7. Re:Think about it by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      In fact, may I direct you to look over the specifications page for the Honda FCX Clarity

      What the OP was talking about was a motor-generator. The FCX doesn't have an internal combustion engine or other liquid fuel engine, so your comparison is meaningless.

      On the other hand, you could integrate a generator into a small turbine engine; Chrysler had the technology worked out to make the engine in the 1960s, but they stupidly tried to couple it to a mechanical transmission instead of using an electric series-hybrid (which practice was already in common use at the time in diesel locomotives.) If we revised Chrysler's 1960s turbine design for use in plug-in series hybrids, it could nicely solve the problem with mass.

      Anyway, this is not the comparison you need to make in any case. Here it actually is: You need to compare the mass of the full powertrain of vehicles which actually exist - no fuel-cell vehicles please, they can lie to you all they want but the tech lead of Honda's fuel-cell division does not think they're going to be here any time soon. (Or did they replace him with someone who would lie to us? Haven't checked.) To wit: the engine, generator, batteries, and motor must be compared to the engine, transmission, and full fuel tank. Then you can examine efficiency, and come up with a sort of efficiency index based on the two. Once you have this you can move on to comparing the energy which went into producing the vehicle - which is the basis on which the Prius does not come up over the Hummer. This might not be true any more - is that battery plant in Fremont, CA operating yet?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    8. Re:Think about it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PML Flightlink produces motors that deliver something like 100 kW and weigh like 25 lb each. Reverse polarity and you have the equal generator.

    9. Re:Think about it by radl33t · · Score: 1

      Nope I was giving a weight on stationary ~100kw generators that I've worked with. 605lb is heavy enough to reiterate my point. Not to mention the FCX clarity is a million(s) dollar car.

      How do you shed significant weight from a generator/motor? Do they use the same drive motor for regen braking? A 400 lb motor + batteries ? That is going to be heavier than an IC system ? Backward progress. No point in sizing the system to capture excessive amounts of braking power for the rare instances where that happens.

    10. Re:Think about it by fractoid · · Score: 1

      Holy circular logic batman, that's because you can only store a small fraction of the energy that is produced when using the motors as generators.

      Um, hi. I'm not sure exactly why you think that "you can only store a small fraction of the energy that is produced when using the motors as generators", because that's completely incorrect. In an emergency stop the motor may not be able to provide sufficient regen torque to stop you completely, but most EVs on the roads these days are home conversions using sealed lead acid batteries, which can charge just as fast as they can discharge. You can drive these vehicles using regen braking almost to the exclusion of friction brakes. I think what you meant is that going from mechanical -> electric -> chemical -> electric -> mechanical energy results in horrible overall wheels-to-battery-to-wheels efficiency even IF you're losing very little energy to friction (ie. low speed stop/go traffic)... but I'm really not sure because you were somewhat incoherent.

      In other words, your comment was 100% a big fucking waste of time which could have been solved by actually reading the comment you're replying to.

      Not so much, but thanks for playing.

      I must concur, however, about hybrids being a boondoggle (most of their efficiency improvements come, as I said before, from improved air and rolling resistances, coupled with smaller, more efficient engines). At least they're not as bad as fuel cells. The real solution is (and has always been) battery electric with a removable internal combustion range-extender module for long tricks.

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    11. Re:Think about it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For a high performance ac motor designed for a car, a 100kw motor weighs roughly 100lbs. At least for one made by AC Propulsion.

      That doesn't include transaxle.

  25. 25,000 Watts by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 1

    Was that 25,000 Watt-seconds?

    --
    Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
    1. Re:25,000 Watts by puetzk · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, watts are correct. The thing that's special about this battery isn't the capacity, it's the rapid charge/discharge.

      --
      The Matrix is going down for reboot now! Stopping reality: OK. The system is halted.
    2. Re:25,000 Watts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Watts=Joules/second which means that Watt-Seconds =
      Joules

    3. Re:25,000 Watts by Bearhouse · · Score: 1

      Amp/Hour at a given voltage is perhaps what you are looking for. You could work it out for your device using W=V*A or I**R. 25kW for 10 seconds is a lot of power, and given the typically low voltages of battery cells, you're either talking about a lot of cells in series, or 'interesting' high current.

    4. Re:25,000 Watts by ElizabethGreene · · Score: 1

      After the recent high-profile battery failures and recalls, part of me wonders if a Li-Ion battery discharging in 10s is such a great idea. How many years ago was it that we had credible airlines considering banning in-flight battery use?

      -ellie

    5. Re:25,000 Watts by julesh · · Score: 1

      How many years ago was it that we had credible airlines considering banning in-flight battery use?

      Actually, merely carrying more than a certain (rather small) capacity lithium battery on a flight is banned by international convention. Most laptops squeak under, but officially you're probably not allowed to carry a replacement battery on as well...

    6. Re:25,000 Watts by bhiestand · · Score: 1

      I was summoned to the ticket counter by United when they discovered a spare laptop battery in my checked luggage. I was forced to bring it with my carry-on instead.

      --
      SWM seeks new sig for a brief fling
  26. Improved Lithium-Ion Battery Charges in Seconds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Because of the electronic punch that they pack, gram for gram, lithium-ion batteries are the most common rechargeable batteries found in consumer electronics, such as laptops. However, they take a long time to charge and researchers have assumed until now that there was a speed limit on the lithium ions and electrons that pass through the batteries to form an electrochemical circuit. The problem with existing lithium-ion batteries is the way ions passed through minuscule tunnels, whose entrances are present at the surface of the material. The team discovered that to get into these channels, the ions had to be positioned directly in front of the tunnel entrances - if they were not, they could not get through. The solution found by Gerbrand Ceder at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology was to engineer the material such that it has a so-called "beltway" that guides the ions towards the tunnel entrances. A small cellphone battery can be recharged in just 10 seconds thanks to the improved ion flow and a large battery that would be used to power a plug-in hybrid electric car could be recharged in just five minutes, compared to up to six or eight hours at present. Because there are relatively few changes to the standard manufacturing process, Ceder believes the new battery material could make it to market within two to three years.

  27. Where's my belt onion? by rossz · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Back in my day we called those "capacitors".

    Now get off my lawn!

    --
    -- Will program for bandwidth
  28. Re:1.6 Horsepower vacuum cleaners? by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 1

    But keep in mind, the first second is going to be startup, which, for an electric motor, can sometimes draw twice as much current as when it's running. That's going to skew your average significantly when you're only talking about a 10 second runtime.

    --
    "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
  29. My laptop was better by Alain+Williams · · Score: 4, Funny

    My last laptop battery was faster than this after a few years, it would completely discharge in 5 seconds, not a slow 10 seconds!

    1. Re:My laptop was better by spartacus_prime · · Score: 1

      Heh, that sounds like the loaner laptops my university gave us when our computers bricked out.

      --
      If you can read this, it means that I bothered to log in.
    2. Re:My laptop was better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess your laptop has my digital camera beat (and even when its using the flash). Although it seems like its faster to the "battery depleted" screen whenever there's a particular shot I'd like to be able to get. At least now I'll be able to recharge the batteries about as fast as they discharge instead of waiting overnight.

  30. Re:1.6 Horsepower vacuum cleaners? by wooferhound · · Score: 2, Informative

    Vacuum cleaners are rated in "Amps" of power. you don't have a good vacuum unless it's rated at 10 amps or more. Of course this leads vacuum companies to design really inefficient motors that pull huge amounts of energy just to get the Amp Rating up high.

    --
    We are Dead Stars looking back Up at the Sky
  31. Re:fast enough for a by momerath2003 · · Score: 5, Informative

    You probably would want capacitors for those, with other pulse-shaping devices. In fact, this is what they actually do. Ten seconds of discharge is way too slow for a rail gun.

    --
    I had but a simple dream, to destroy all humans.
  32. Couldn't be any more shocking than GM's by mkcmkc · · Score: 2, Interesting

    new electric bass boat, the Chevy Fibrillator ...

    --
    "Not an actor, but he plays one on TV."
  33. Re:Cyclon spiral lead-acid cells are almost this g by Icarus1919 · · Score: 1

    And Cylon cells? Hoo boy.

  34. Units by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whats that in Libraries of Congress (LoC)?

  35. Excessive Discharge by altek · · Score: 1

    "In testing, batteries incorporating the electrodes discharged in just 10 seconds."

    Sweet, now my laptop will get up to a full 10 seconds of use until I have to recharge!

    --
    THE MAGIC WORDS ARE SQUEAMISH OSSIFRAGE
  36. Re:fast enough for a by frieko · · Score: 1

    Pentium 4 -based laptop?

  37. Just what I need by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A battery that lasts on 10 seconds ;-)

  38. Re:fast enough for a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You just gave me an amazing hadron!
     
    Now back to my calculations.

  39. As usual, bad summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From many of the comments, most as usual didn't rtfa. It explains most of what people commented on anyways so I'll just make a summary.

    This breakthrough, as implied, is for high discharges which is useful as a replacement for ultracapacitors or possibly power tools (and weapons?) which requires high short term power. It isn't a major breakthrough but it is still nice. It has a lower capacity than normal and there is a possibility of fast charging but more research is needed. The reference to cars was more of a future possibly than a target.

  40. Energy recovery by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

    Say you have a train or tram which draws power from the grid to accelerate then turns kinetic energy into heat to stop. If it can dump power into batteries fast it can save power overall.

    1. Re:Energy recovery by mattib · · Score: 1

      Newer electric trains already use electromagnetic brakes and dump the braking energy back to the grid.
      What would you gain by dumping it into a battery?

    2. Re:Energy recovery by Chrisq · · Score: 1

      Agree, trains are a special case where the load of one train accelerating can be supplied by another breaking. Electric cars are a much more useful application, at the moment only light breaking can recharge the batteries.

    3. Re:Energy recovery by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      It might be possible to spend less on electricity infrastructure (overhead cables, transformers, etc) if batteries take the peak load.

    4. Re:Energy recovery by mattib · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't you still need the infrastructure in place to get the train moving in the first place?
      The required modifications are propably quite cheap compared to several hunred kilograms of these newfangled batteries.

      Unless you mean to power the train entirely with the batteries and ditch the wires?
      30 MWh worth of batteries.. mmmmmm.. (drooling a bit at the thought :)

    5. Re:Energy recovery by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

      Nearly all so called diesel locomotives are actually diesel-electric - the diesel engine turns a generator that supplies the power to drive the electric motors that make it move. The idea of having a battery bank on-board is not such an outrageous idea. In fact, there are hybrid locomotives that do just that.

      On the main rail line on the East coast of the US, all train traffic south of Washington, DC is diesel-electric. Traffic in and north of DC is powered by overhead catenaries. They either run full-electric or electro-diesel combo engines.

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    6. Re:Energy recovery by mattib · · Score: 1

      You are correct, diesel-electric locomotives could benefit from this.
      The electromagnetic brakes exist already in some models to provide smoother braking and lessen the wear on the physical brakes.
      (If I remember correctly.)

      However, the parent post contained "..which draws power from the grid to accelerate.." and thus I considered only electric locomotives in my response.

    7. Re:Energy recovery by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      Where I live urban trains and trams run on overhead electric power. Country trains run on diesel power. The infrastructure for electricity delivery is expensive so it is not economic to use where load factors are lower.

      If vehicles could store power it might be possible to save money on electricity delivery. You could save money on cable by not having to supply such a high peak current. Additionally you might be able to get away with not supplying power to some parts of the track.

      Its just another area where local storage of energy can help save on infrastructure.

    8. Re:Energy recovery by mattib · · Score: 1

      Like I said, it would be useful on diesel-electric locomotives.

      Here the situation is a bit different though.
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VR_Class_Sm3 (electric, top speed 220 km/h, power 4.0 MW, amount 18)
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VR_Class_Sr2 (electric, top speed 210 km/h, power 6.1 MW, amount 46)
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VR_Class_Dr16 (diesel-electric, top speed 140 km/h, power 1.6 MW, amount 23)

  41. Re:fast enough for a by sgbett · · Score: 4, Funny

    I thought of writing I disclaimer saying as much, but my submit button discharged too fast.

    --
    Invaders must die
  42. Re:fast enough for a by rsborg · · Score: 5, Funny

    I thought of writing I disclaimer saying as much, but my submit button discharged too fast.

    You know they have drugs for that. The blue pill and all.

    --
    Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
  43. Star Trek inches closer by Mr+Z · · Score: 4, Funny

    Anyone else notice this from the article?

    To improve the batteries, the researchers modified an electrode material called lithium iron phosphate . . . The models suggested a way to improve conductivity by directing lithium ions toward particular faces of crystals within the material.

    To exploit this, Ceder included extra lithium and phosphorus. This helps form a layer of lithium diphosphate, a material known for its high lithium-ion conductivity.

    Wouldn't it be something if someone trademarks this use of lithium diphosphate on targeted crystal faces as, oh, I dunno, dilithium crystals?

    First, transparent aluminum, and now this!

    1. Re:Star Trek inches closer by pgn674 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Wow, boy do I love the internet.

      So, Slashdot just recently had the Could Fuller Take Trek Back To TV? and What Has Fox Got Against Its Own Sci-Fi Shows? articles, then this one, which I can imagine influenced Mr Z to notice the dilithium crystal Star Trek connection. So he linked to the related Wikipedia transparent aluminum article, and I followed that link. In that article's In Fiction section, it is mentioned that the Enterprise D's windows are made of transparent aluminum, as noted in an episode that involved subspace anomalies and hull breaches.

      This reminded me of a TNG episode I saw when I was a small child watching TV with my dad. All I could remember from the episode was a lady looking frozen and half way through the floor, and I was scared silly that I would fall through the floor right there in the living room. Just last week I had actually thought of that episode and tried searching for it, unsuccessfully. That one part and E.T.: The Extra Terrestrial are the few childhood memories I have of TV scaring me. I wanted to see what the episode looked like to me now.

      So I followed the Wikipedia link to the TNG episode, and the description of the episode matched what I remembered. So I quickly found a torrent for the episode (I would never ever actually buy the DVD online just to watch one episode once to satisfy my curiosity. If it was streamed online by the copyright holder with ads I would probably go that route), downloaded it, and watched the episode. I finally saw that childhood fear with grown up eyes.

      And that's why I love the internet. I was reading a news site, read a comment that referenced some interesting sounding technology, and stumbled upon a childhood fear that I had tried searching for only a week before. Then I reexperienced the fear initiator as I am now to see how I would perceive it. Now I am writing about my experience and attaching it to the original comment that started it. And I did all this within a short and entertaining time span. I love the internet. I think this shows that, at least in some way, we are living in an age of awesomeness.

    2. Re:Star Trek inches closer by hansamurai · · Score: 1

      This post makes me want to watch Dumbo again.

  44. Re:fast enough for a by sgbett · · Score: 1

    An interesting hypothesis! I wonder if they have done any preliminary testing as to the viabilty of getting past the POST\1

    --
    Invaders must die
  45. Can you feel it? by Abuzar · · Score: 0

    Yes. More Power! Yes, Yes, Yes!
    Can You Feel It? Can You Feel The Power Yet?
    My Plan Is Working Perfectly.
    Soon, Very Soon, I Will Have All The Power I Need To Take Over Slashdot... and then... THE WORLD!!

    Ha ha!
    Ha ha haha ha!

  46. Re:1.6 Horsepower vacuum cleaners? by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 1

    My shop vac is rated in gallons. And so is my girlfriend.

    --
    Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
  47. Are those African vacuums, or European vacuums? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "no no, it can grip it by the husk"

  48. Re:fast enough for a by sgbett · · Score: 2, Funny

    I prefer to see how deep the rabbit hole goes!

    --
    Invaders must die
  49. ELECTRODE used EXPLOSION! by atomicthumbs · · Score: 3, Informative

    Critical hit! It's super effective! END USER fainted!

    --
    http://pinopsida.com
    1. Re:ELECTRODE used EXPLOSION! by s1lverl0rd · · Score: 0

      How is this Informative?

    2. Re:ELECTRODE used EXPLOSION! by atomicthumbs · · Score: 1

      I have no idea, but two successive mods rated it Informative, so it must be right!

      --
      http://pinopsida.com
  50. Re:fast enough for a by rubycodez · · Score: 5, Insightful

    but for a man-portable railgun, the batteries are used to charge the capacitors, all in the back pack.

  51. Re:1.6 Horsepower vacuum cleaners? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1250 W is not actually that much for a hoover. Most mid- to high-end models will use 2000 W or more, at least on the highest setting.

  52. Pew pew by moniker127 · · Score: 1

    Laser guns anyone?

  53. Wrong analogy... by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 5, Funny

    You should think more along the lines of a Beowulf Cluster of Roombas.

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
    1. Re:Wrong analogy... by ruiner13 · · Score: 1

      How about a Beowulf Cluster of Woombas?

      --

      today is spelling optional day.

    2. Re:Wrong analogy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For some reason the thought of a neural net of Roombas is terrifying to me, and I'm not one for irrational fears normally.

      Why would I possibly be terrified of Roombas working together?

      I'm not afraid of a robot apocalypse though, it's not some tech fear..I dunno.

  54. JigaWatts?? by sanman2 · · Score: 1

    But I thought the only thing that could put out that many watts so quickly, is a lightning bolt!

    Wait'll the Libyans hear about this!

  55. Re:Star Trek inches only a little closer by localroger · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I suspect dilithium came from a hint dropped in somebody's ear that regular old lithium was a critical component of hydrogen bombs. But just as regular old triticale, a grain that actually exists, wasn't good enough for Star Trek and so had to be supervened by quadrotriticale in The Trouble with Tribbles, the critical element lithium without which hydrogen bombs couldn't be made probably had to be expanded to dilithium to meet the demands of starship engines. (It's never occurred to me before now but I guess if they ever had to do it again it would have been octo-something.)

    --
    Brackets contain world's first nanosig, highly magnified:[.]
  56. Re:fast enough for a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sure glad you take a power outlet everywhere you take your rail gun. Me I use batteries to charge my caps, portable death with a reasonable recharge rate.

  57. now your ibook can really burn your house down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yay

  58. Re:1.6 Horsepower vacuum cleaners? by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

    Mine has 1400 watts written on it in big letters. Amps X Volts = Watts

    --
    And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
  59. Re:1.6 Horsepower vacuum cleaners? by master5o1 · · Score: 1

    1200 Watt vacuum cleaners are standard.

    --
    signature is pants
  60. Riding vacuums by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Great. They suckered me into getting a riding lawnmower, now I gotta get a riding vacuum. What's next? Paying for downloading music?

  61. Explode? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How fast can they explode?

    1. Re:Explode? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      10 seconds, or your money back.

  62. Re:fast enough for a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what recharges the capacitors though? the faster you can recharge the caps the faster you could fire another shot.

  63. Star Trek inches closer - or not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Doesn't dilithium mean there are 2 lithium atoms present? Whereas lithium diphosphate means there is one lithium atom and 2 phosphorous atoms.

    1. Re:Star Trek inches closer - or not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It means there are twice as many phosphate ions (each of which is one phosphorous atom bound to 4 oxygen atoms) as lithium ions.

  64. Re:1.6 Horsepower vacuum cleaners? by MishgoDog · · Score: 1
    When I was selling vacs (no, not door to door, my uni job was @ an upmarket department store), there were basically three ways of measuring power, in ascending order of relevance, and also the number of people (including sales people) who new about them:
    • Motor power (watts). Doesn't tell you much at all.
    • Suction power at motor (watts). Better, but doesn't factor in inefficiencies like bag & hose length
    • Suction power at nozzle (watts)- best! But then things like nozzle size can obviously affect the actual suction power.

    Most people didn't really know the difference, and many companies didn't publicise the last one because (a) people are dumb and might think 200 watt nozzle suction is worse than 1500watt engine power, and (b) because it'd show their machines are crap.

    Example - dysons when I was selling them had lower engine power than, say, hoover(1200 vs 2000 watts iirc), but had comparable or higher suction power because the suction didn't need to get through the walls of a bag & a bunch of filters.

    End my 2 cents.

  65. Before anyone gets overly excited... by qkslvr846 · · Score: 2, Informative

    FTA:
    "Ultimately, the energy capacity of lithium iron phosphate is lower than that of other lithium-ion battery materials, making Ceder's advance of limited value, says Jeff Dahn, a professor of physics at Dalhousie University, in Halifax, Nova Scotia. This battery is good for acceleration, but not as much for long range."

    Emphasis mine. As has been pointed out above, the practical use for rapid-discharge is in conjunction with other types of high-density storage. I envision it as analogous to the RAM and HDD paradigm.

    1. Re:Before anyone gets overly excited... by polar+red · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This battery is good for acceleration, but not as much for long range.

      so it is ideal to store braking power in , in cars?

      --
      Yes, I'm left. You have a problem with that?
    2. Re:Before anyone gets overly excited... by julesh · · Score: 1

      He's overstating the point. The best Li-ion batteries get about 150Wh/kg; the best LiFePO4 batteries get about 120Wh/kg. But, there's a crucial difference between the two that he doesn't mention: LiFePO4 batteries typically survive between 3 and 5 thousand cycles before they noticeably lose capacity; Li-ion, only slightly over 1 thousand. If you're building an EV you get a choice: spend $10,000 on Li-ion batteries and have a slightly larger range, but you'll have to replace them after 4 years, or spend $12,000 on LiFePO4 batteries, get slightly lower range, but have the batteries last about as long as the car does. Frankly, it's a no-brainer.

    3. Re:Before anyone gets overly excited... by polar+red · · Score: 1

      that depends ... how much are the batteries worth after use ? Can they be refreshed or repolarized or whatever ?

      --
      Yes, I'm left. You have a problem with that?
  66. Re:1.6 Horsepower vacuum cleaners? by fractoid · · Score: 1

    You Americans and your crazy low voltage power lines! Here in Australia, most wall outlets are rated (I believe) at 10 amps maximum, which equates to roughly 2kW. By a strange coincidence most kettles, vacuum cleaners etc. are roughly 2kW in power (and are sold by power output, not just amperage).

    --
    Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
  67. Re:Star Trek inches only a little closer by earlymon · · Score: 1

    But for money, they dropped the p from platinum.

    --
    Pathological kinda promises Path + Logical - but instead, you get stuck with pathetic.
  68. Re:1.6 Horsepower vacuum cleaners? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So is your mom.

  69. It could create a black hole and kill us all! by smhsmh · · Score: 1

    It is curious that no one has noticed, or at least commented, that such a battery could be dangerous if not used properly. The standard EE model for a battery is a voltage source in series with a resistor. This is called the internal resistance of the battery, and its effect is to limit the current that can be delivered by the voltage source. All batteries have nonzero internal resistance, and for most batteries, that resistance is significant. There are many kinds of batteries that you can safely short, and nothing hazardous will happen as the battery discharges as rapidly as it can. In order for the battery described in this article to be able to deliver such significant power in such a short time, if it obeys the simple first-order model, it must have an extremely low internal resistance. That means that if such a battery is shorted with a conductor sufficiently robust not to vaporize, the current flow through the shorting conductor could generate sufficient heat so as to be a serious fire hazard. There are videos on youtube showing what happens to a laptop when its battery is artificially induced to discharge catastrophically. It isn't pretty, especially if the laptop were in your car trunk, your backpack, or under the seat in a commercial airplane. I remember back a zillion years ago when a roommate's car was frontally crunched. He decided to loop a chain around the front grill and mounts and try to pull the bodywork into shape using another car. The chain cut into the insulation of a battery cable (probably the started cable, which mysteriously was routed along the radiator mounts) which shorted the lead-acid 12V battery to the frame. A wreath of smoke emerged as the insulation on this rather substantial cable melted, burned, and vaporized. Fortunately the now-completely-junk vehicle didn't catch fire. I believe the internal resistance of an automobile lead-acid battery is somewhere less than 0.1 Ohm. Consider what the internal resistance must be for the battery in the article...

  70. This is all fine and dandy. by stonedcat · · Score: 0

    Until one of these batteries explodes in some guy's pocket and everyone raises a fuss about it.

    --
    You can't take the sky from me.
  71. So much energy, so little time... by gustep12 · · Score: 1
    So much energy in so little time... whose idea was this?

    Was it Sony?

    BOOM!

  72. Re:fast enough for a by ubergeek2009 · · Score: 1

    you use the batteries to charge up your capacitors duh

  73. 25KW = 33 horsepower by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's decent power for a "1 gallon" battery, but for how long can it provide that much power? 10 seconds? pfft.

  74. He invented the Battacitor? by Savior_on_a_Stick · · Score: 1

    Philippe Jose Farmer would be proud.

  75. Re:1.6 Horsepower vacuum cleaners? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow, that's a lot of power. Here in America our outlets are rated at about 20 Amps. That translates to roughly 2kW. what a coincidence!

  76. Re:fast enough for a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    so thats what the kids call it these days

  77. Cell longevity? by kheldan · · Score: 1

    Assuming this is practical for production batteries, what I'd like to know is how using electrodes of this type would affect the overall lifespan of a battery in charge/discharge cycles. If it's dramatically shorter than current technology then it's not really very useful.

    --
    Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
  78. Half Assed by daveime · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Can you PLEASE stop with these half-assed, incomplete analogies ?

    to deliver 25,000 watts, or enough power for about 20 vacuum cleaners

    OH, REALLY ? FOR HOW BLOODY LONG ??? A day, a month, the rest of your life ???

    Without a time quantifier, the analogy is totally meaningless.

    20 vacuum cleaners for 30 minutes each, assuming each vacuum cleaner consumes 2.5 Kwh. Now that MEANS something !

    And just out of interest, why vacuum cleaners ? This is Slashdot, not Womans Weekly Online ... how many basement nerds actually know what a vacuum cleaner looks like ? That's something their mum's do when they are still asleep isn't it ?

    Enough power for a Beowulf Cluster damnit ... something we can relate to !

  79. Re:1.6 Horsepower vacuum cleaners? by perryizgr8 · · Score: 1

    well, here in india, wall outlets are rated at 15 amp maximum at 240 volts, equal to 3.6 kw. but only things like water/room heaters and air conditioners have ratings of 2kw and above.

    --
    Wealth is the gift that keeps on giving.
  80. If the battery charges in ten seconds.... by Akir · · Score: 1

    Then it probably needs to be replaced. :P

  81. I understand rapid charging... by theillien · · Score: 1

    ...but, in the case of consumer electronics, would I be concerned about rapid discharge? If anything, I'd *not* want that.

    1. Re:I understand rapid charging... by theillien · · Score: 1

      ...meant "why would I be..."

  82. Re:can't hold 10kw of dissipation by zmollusc · · Score: 1

    It would depend upon the thermal mass and conduction of the connector. I have a 3kw kettle and have no problem holding it while it heats the water.

    --
    They whose government reduces their essential liberties for temporary security, receive neither liberty nor security.
  83. Re:1.6 Horsepower vacuum cleaners? by julesh · · Score: 1

    Example - dysons when I was selling them had lower engine power than, say, hoover(1200 vs 2000 watts iirc),

    Having coincidentally tested my Dyson DC10 with a power meter just yesterday, I can tell you that the draw from mains is 1kw. Not sure what the official rating is, though.

  84. what is the point of feeding 20 vacuum cleaners? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    power 20 vacuum cleaners. Ok, but for how many seconds ? ;)

  85. Re:1.6 Horsepower vacuum cleaners? by julesh · · Score: 1

    Wow, that's a lot of power. Here in America our outlets are rated at about 20 Amps. That translates to roughly 2kW. what a coincidence!

    The problem is, though, that drawing 20A/110V will heat up your wiring twice as much as drawing 10A/220V (assuming the same resistance), thus wasting twice as much to transmission losses. Also, the voltage fluctuations you'll see due to changing power demands are twice as large. So higher voltage == better.

    Besides, here in the UK we get 240v x 13A = 3.1kW, so we beat you both. :)

  86. Re:Cyclon spiral lead-acid cells are almost this g by julesh · · Score: 1

    The claim sounds like hype, since it's energy density, not discharge rate that everyone is trying to ramp up lately.

    No, energy density and discharge rate are both problems. Lithium batteries are clear leaders in energy density (at least some of the more unusual varieties like lithium-iron phosphate), but they have very slow discharge. This means that to get the 500A you can easily get out of a single lead acid battery, you need something like 20 batteries working in parallel. And making more small cells is more expensive than fewer large ones. A typical EV power system based on LiFePO4 will want something to be able to provide something like 100v x 200A peak, which means 8 parallel banks each containing about 50 cells. With this new design, that can be cut to just 50 big cells, which will probably halve the cost of production.

  87. Re:1.6 Horsepower vacuum cleaners? by Eivind · · Score: 1

    Or put differently, if your wiring is good enough that they can safely take 20A in a 120V country (2400W), then in a 240V country, you get the choice between either installing the same wiring, and getting 4800W, or installing cheaper, thinner wiring and still get 2400W.

  88. Quite a lot.- as past experience shows by Kupfernigk · · Score: 1
    How many other people who were involved in the first deployment of lithium batteries in portable electronics remember how dangerous they could be? I remember two instances; once when an engineer was talking to a technician and, without thinking, the technician picked up a lithium AA cell and a set of metal calipers and was about to measure the length. The engineer warned him not to do that - from under the desk. The second was a discussion, post-Falklands, about the possibility of keeping stocks of lithium cells for use with tactical radio telephones in case the battery charger was damaged. A technical sergeant remarked "All we need is a little gadget that shorts them after a few seconds and they can double as (censored) hand grenades." The problem was that fusing them meant a minor overcurrent draw by the electronics (e.g. from being on the fringes of an EMP burst) would blow the fuse making the cell useless, whereas thermal trips might take too long to operate.

    These cells will need remarkably good protection against internal and external shorts. They have the stored energy density of dynamite, but they don't have the long development of reduced sensitivity characteristics that make dynamite safe.

    --
    From scarped cliff or quarried stone she cries "A thousand types are gone, I care for nothing, no not one."
  89. discharge in 10 seconds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    discharge in 10 seconds:
    You should see a doctor. No, bad idea, don't see a doctor, call him on the phone.

  90. Re:1.6 Horsepower vacuum cleaners? by Chrisq · · Score: 1

    In the UK, where we have 240v mains 2kw vacuum cleaners are common. They clean really well too - though the scenario in the return of the pink panther involving Inspector Closseu, a parrot and a vacuum cleaner is certainly a possibility.

  91. Re:1.6 Horsepower vacuum cleaners? by Chrisq · · Score: 1

    In the UK 3kw appliances are common, especially kettles and electric heaters.

  92. Re:1.6 Horsepower vacuum cleaners? by dspart · · Score: 0

    The GP is correct: Power is measured in watts, and "one horsepower" is 740-ish of them.

    Current, on the other hand, is measured in amps.

    You could have said "[] cleaners' motors draw a number of amps, and here in the US with our 120v mains, you'd need at least a 10amp motor..."

    But, you cannot say "[] cleaners are rated in Amps of power". Makes no sense.

    Why the parent is rated Informative is anyone's guess.

  93. What about an "Opinion with technical error" tag? by dspart · · Score: 0

    Bad form to reply to self, but anyhow...

    /Informative/, to me, means "provides useful information". It should not mean /Opinion/, he said, passing an opinion.

    Interesting to see what this post gets tagged then.
    --
    cash-=2*p;

  94. There are more than 60 seconds in an hour. by dspart · · Score: 0

    250kW/s/litre is 250x10^3/3600 which is 69.4W/hour.

    Which seems about right.

    1. Re:There are more than 60 seconds in an hour. by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      I'll gaze at my shoes and blush as I admit that I converted hours to seconds using 60 :)

      69.4 kW-h/L is indeed the right number, and falls well within what a Li-Ion battery can do. Of course, apparently NiMH can do about 100 kW-h/L (though I couldn't find the number under high load) and doesn't have the same packaging issues, so this isn't going to exactly set the world on fire.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    2. Re:There are more than 60 seconds in an hour. by dspart · · Score: 0

      Per your contrition, 1,$s/kW/W/g surely.

      Bhutt it's easily done; I did almost the same myself in an important exam at 18:

      "What is the velocity of the hour hand of the clock?"

      "Easy" I thought: 2PiRadians/hour. Wrote it.

      Then I exited said exam and immediately thought:
      "F*ck!"

      [it's 2PiRadians/12hours BTW]
      --
      WGAF today: it's Comic Relief Day here

  95. Re:1.6 Horsepower vacuum cleaners? by donaldm · · Score: 1

    You Americans and your crazy low voltage power lines! Here in Australia, most wall outlets are rated (I believe) at 10 amps maximum, which equates to roughly 2kW. By a strange coincidence most kettles, vacuum cleaners etc. are roughly 2kW in power (and are sold by power output, not just amperage).

    It depends on the house. My house has a 20 A 240 V rating with a 10 A 240 V rating for the lights. Newer houses (well those from the 1970's on) can have two or more wall outlet isolation at the fuse box so if one set of wall outlets trip their fuse the wall outlets on the other fuse continue to work. Too bad if your TV and stereo are on the set of outlets that have tripped their fuse.

    Actually many houses have separate power lines for heavier current drawing devices such as ovens, air conditioners and even bathroom heating lamps it really depends on what the electrician who wired the house was asked to do.

    The highest rating power for most single phase devices or standard mains household appliances in Australia is 2400 Watts. This is so earlier built houses aren't exceeding the basic standard of 240 V 10 A.

    Actually if you live in an older house that has rubber sheathed electrical cable get the cable replaced because over time this type of cable can go brittle or in some cases turns to liquid rubber. Note this is not just Australia this is world wide so people should be aware of this.

    --
    There ain't no such thing as proprietary standards only proprietary formats. Standards are by definition open.
  96. Re:1.6 Horsepower vacuum cleaners? by Vanders · · Score: 1

    In the UK we install the cheaper, thiner wiring but still get 4800W because we're strange and wire the outlets as a ring circuit, which effectively doubles the available cross sectional surface area of the conductor.

  97. Re:1.6 Horsepower vacuum cleaners? by donaldm · · Score: 1

    The problem is, though, that drawing 20A/110V will heat up your wiring twice as much as drawing 10A/220V (assuming the same resistance), thus wasting twice as much to transmission losses. Also, the voltage fluctuations you'll see due to changing power demands are twice as large. So higher voltage == better.

    Err No! Power dissipation in transmission cable is basically dependent on the impedance of the cable which is a function of mains frequency, capacitance to ground, resistance and inductance of the cable. Over long distances power lines at 60 Hz will be more lossy compared to 50 Hz however sometimes you want to have the cable warmer than the surrounding air especially if you want to prevent ice build up which in the colder part of the USA and Canada can actually save considerable amounts of money in overall maintenance. The problem you have is once you have decided on a mains frequency your whole county is stuck with it.

    There are advantages and disadvantages when comparing 50 Hz to 60 Hz it just depends on what you are doing with it. As for power line voltages most transmission voltages are fairly standard world wide due to practicality. A course in power transmission lines can answer many questions but don't expect it to be easy.

    --
    There ain't no such thing as proprietary standards only proprietary formats. Standards are by definition open.
  98. Re:1.6 Horsepower vacuum cleaners? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    By a strange coincidence most kettles, vacuum cleaners etc. are roughly 2kW in power (and are sold by power output, not just amperage).

    I just got a new Krups coffeemaker with a thermal carafe. It maxes out at 1200W, brews the coffee, then shuts off and stops wasting power. The vacuum-filled (heh) stainless carafe keeps the coffee warm. It brews faster than any other coffeemaker I've ever used. 2kW is simply not necessary.

    The thermal carafe saves less power than you might imagine if you don't know what the fuck you're talking about, for the same reason your kettle doesn't really draw 2kW. Oh, it might do that for a fraction of a second, but then it heats up and the resistance rises, which reduces the draw. Meanwhile, P=VI, so it doesn't actually matter if your kettle is sold by amps or watts, it still comes out to a number of watts in the end. E=IR and all that.

    Incidentally, in the USA most of our outlets are doubled. I don't know what it's like in the UK, but in the US having appliances that draw the entire capacity of the outlet is usually contraindicated. So in a 20A outlet, I don't really want more than a 15A coffeemaker. In fact, most household outlets are only 10A, so a 1200W coffeemaker is about the peak anyway - but for the same reasons your kettle doesn't actually pull 2kW, this thing doesn't actually pull 1.2kW.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  99. Re:Star Trek inches only a little closer by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    But for money, they dropped the p from platinum.

    It's just pure! Welcome to our latinum. Notice it has no P in it...

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  100. The grid could use it to buffer demand by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

    ACP or someone were looking at using car batteries to buffer high demand with base load. It would mean the electricity producers wouldn't need to have excess plant idling during low loads simply to deal with peak periods.

    --
    Deleted
    1. Re:The grid could use it to buffer demand by moosesocks · · Score: 1

      There are other, decidedly low-tech methods of solving this problem that are already in use.

      Pumped Storage is a popular one that works by pumping water up to a reservoir at a high altitude during off-peak hours, and releasing it through a turbine during peak hours.

      There are other options including flywheels, compressed gases, heat reservoirs, and of course, batteries. However, batteries tend to be prohibitively expensive.

      --
      -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
  101. Re:1.6 Horsepower vacuum cleaners? by psergiu · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Have you ever noticed the lights dim when you turn one on? Vacuum pumps, especially ones that have to suck air through a bag filled with dust and lint, are pretty power hungry.

    If your lights dim when you turn on the vacuum cleaner your electrical wiring is undersized.

    --
    1% APY, No fees, Online Bank https://captl1.co/2uIErYq Don't let your $$$ sit in a no-interest acct.
  102. Re:fast enough for a by Ihmhi · · Score: 1

    That's just because so many of them read the book "Freud on the Materials and Subject of Peter Cottontail."

    Apparently, the "Bunny Trail" is a symbolic representation of one's latent homosexual desires. It's quite an interesting read!

  103. Re:fast enough for a by dontmakemethink · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Actually what about the reverse?

    Lightning rod -> capacitors -> fast-charge Li-ion == 1.21 Jigawatts!!

    The Empire State Building no doubt gets hit with enough Lightning to go off the grid...

    --

    War as we knew it was obsolete
    Nothing could beat complete denial
    - Emily Haines
  104. Old news - Sony did this years ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Surely this has already been achieved by Sony with their so-fast-discharging-it-explodes line of laptop batteries?

  105. Charge in 10s? All you need now.... by Hasai · · Score: 1

    ....Is a charging cable as big around as a manhole cover.

    --

    Regards;

    Hasai

  106. Very very dangerous. by goodmanj · · Score: 1

    I'm surprised nobody has pointed out how dangerous this is. Lithium batteries are a serious fire hazard already, and this just makes it much worse.

    If you work out the energies involved, you'll find that if the terminals on the the "1-liter battery" mentioned in the summary are shorted out accidentally, it will heat itself up to the melting point of lithium in a few seconds.

    Best-case scenario, the battery destroys itself and melts into a puddle of molten metal on the tabletop. Worst-case scenario, the aqueous electrolyte vaporizes and the battery explodes like a grenade.

    This level of power output makes the battery Not A Consumer Item.

    1. Re:Very very dangerous. by Pontiac · · Score: 1

      A little light reading on Lithium Iron Phosphate Batteries..


      The safety characteristics inherent to LiFePo4 technology result from the incorporation of phosphates as the cathode material. Phosphates are extremely stable in overcharge or short circuit conditions and have the ability to withstand high temperatures without decomposing. When abuse does occur, phosphates are not prone to thermal runaway and will not burn. As a result, LiFePo4 technology possesses safety characteristics that are fundamentally superior to those of Lithium-ion batteries made with other cathode materials.

      --
      If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur. --Red Adair
  107. Re:fast enough for a by Doggabone · · Score: 2, Funny

    Apparently, the "Bunny Trail" is a symbolic representation of one's latent homosexual desires. It's quite an interesting read!

    Is there a moderation for +1 Too Much Informative?

  108. Re:1.6 Horsepower vacuum cleaners? by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

    Do you have independent circuit breakers on each end of the ring? If not, a break in the ring could lead to 4800W through one leg of the ring, leading to a fire.

    Here in the states we have to worry about which phase a particular circuit is on, so the ring configuration would be difficult to do safely. The odds of hooking opposite phases in the ring would be unacceptably high, although the only result would be a pair of breakers that would refuse to stay on (perhaps sparking rather magnificently when closed).

    --
    Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
  109. Re:1.6 Horsepower vacuum cleaners? by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

    I think he meant I^R losses in the premise wiring, not in the transmission lines. His point, though, is valid - for the same frequency (hence the same impedance), doubling the voltage will halve the current but quarter the power lost in distribution.

    To your point re: 50 vs 60 Hz - I wonder how the additional transmission losses at 60Hz compare to the efficiency gain you get in the transformers at either end? Typically higher frequencies allow for smaller and more efficient transformers. It would be interesting to see where the sweet spot is for a given configuration. I'd guess it'd be closer to 400Hz, but that's just my guess.

    --
    Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
  110. Re:1.6 Horsepower vacuum cleaners? by Muad'Dave · · Score: 4, Informative

    I've never heard of a 10A circuit or receptacle. Many outlets in the US are supplied via a 20A branch circuit using #12 copper, but are wired with 15A receptacles. This is legal according to the NEC code. The remainder are supplied via a 15A branch circuit using #14 copper. The 15A receptacles have the typical 'I I' look to them. 20A receptacles look more like 'I- I' where the neutral blade has a Tee shape. A 20A plug has the neutral lead rotated 90 degrees, so it'll fit in a 20A receptacle but not a 15A one. Similarly, a 15A plug will mate with a 20A receptacle. This chart shows various NEMA plug and receptacle configurations.

    --
    Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
  111. Re:fast enough for a by ResidentSourcerer · · Score: 1

    Hmm. Let's see. Consider a 1 meter long rail gun.

    v is final velocity
    a is acceleration
    m is mass of the projectile.
    W is power.

    v = at

    E = mv2/2

    But

    E = Wt

    Equating these two Wt = mv2/2

    v2 = 2Wt/m

    But t=L/2v (from average velocity v(ave) = v/2)

    v2 = 2WL/2vm

    v3 = WL/m

    v = cube root (WL/m)

    So a 8 ram bullet ...

    v = cube root (25000/.008)

    = 146 m/s or about 500 ft/sec

    Bit slow yet.

    To get up to 2000 feet per second will take
    64 times the power.

    Won't worry about it this week.

    The batteries may make recharging the capacitors
    faster.

    Let's see: to get a 700 m/s bullet (2200 fps)

    E = mv2/2
    E = .008 * 700^2 / 2

    = 2000 joules.

    Your 1 liter battery could provide power for 12 bullets
    per second. Not too shabby.

    --
    Third Career: Tree Farmer Second Career: Computer Geek First Career: Teacher, Outdoor Instructor, Photographer.
  112. Re:1.6 Horsepower vacuum cleaners? by mcgrew · · Score: 1

    Amps are the amount of current, volts are the amount of "force". Watts = amps * volts. Sp a ten amp vaccuum in the US (120 volts) would be 1200 watts.

    Most vaccuum companies rate their cleaner motors in horsepower these days. They want that "energy star" tag.

  113. Re:1.6 Horsepower vacuum cleaners? by pushing-robot · · Score: 1

    Turning on a 12 amp electric motor, in an average US home wired for ~100 amps, will cause voltages to dip momentarily.

    Granted, most US homes' wiring systems *are* undersized considering the low voltage, but that's neither here nor there.

    --
    How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
  114. Re:1.6 Horsepower vacuum cleaners? by acohen1 · · Score: 0

    Most electrical wiring is undersized in old construction. My lamp dims when I turn on my CRT monitor, and I have my Plasma TV and PS3 on separate outlets otherwise sometimes both shut off intermittently. I live in an apartment, so not much I can do about it.

  115. Think, SLOW CAPACITOR by DRAGONWEEZEL · · Score: 1

    Not really a super capacitor as they can charge / discharge instantly, but a fast charging battery. Many good uses! and The first one I can think of is R/C planes. If I could charge my Stryker's battery in 10 seconds, but fly for 15-20 min. I'm sold. Right now I have to charge @ 1C (1x the capacity of the battery) for about 45 min for a 15 minute flight (if I'm gentle on the throttle).

    The second is Recharging a car battery. Right now, if you use the electric brake gear for going down hill in a prius you'll slowly charge up your battery. If you apply brakes, you charge up your battery. But if you apply brakes hard, the battery can't take all that charge at once, and you have to use the disc brakes. Think of saving around 30lbs per wheel in brakes! No extra parts, and practically 0 maintenance for the brake for the life of the car. This alone will save hundreds of lives as people don't check their brakes enough.

    Third is drag racing e- vehicles. We allready know that from the likes of a T-0 or a Tesla that e- cars can be fast. What if you could make those cars basically have an electric "NOS" button? OH WHAT FUN!

    I'm going to go clean my pants now, ty

    --
    How much is your data worth? Back it up now.
  116. Forget vaccums- think well pumps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Supposedly electric well pumps have such a high initial draw that rigging them off batteries and/or small generators isn't presently feasible. If the grid goes down, most rural houses have no water beyond what's in the hot water tank and the pressure tank. Hopefully this type of research continues, as many rural home owners already have the space and motivation to generate their own power. Solving the well pump issue would be a major boost.

  117. Electric Jet engines, anyone? by CaPn+Corelian · · Score: 1

    This could mean the tech basis for future electric jet engines, right?

  118. Don't lase me dude! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is just what we need to bring all those hand held energy projection weapon designs off the drawing board!

  119. Re:1.6 Horsepower vacuum cleaners? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    15 amps is the peak ratings. Or a continuos load, you are not allowed to draw more than 80% (or 12 amps).

    The extra 2 amps are used to drive the beater head.

    Power factor may affect things as well, but High-drain appliances seem to be designed to have a "good" power factor.

  120. What about CHARGING? by wealthychef · · Score: 1

    The title says "charge," but there is no discussion of quick charging, just lots of discharging talk. I for one would welcome a phone that charges in 10 seconds. But nobody is discussing that. Instead we have talk of railguns etc. Right.

    --
    Currently hooked on AMP
  121. That's a HUGE instantaneous charge. by antispam_ben · · Score: 1

    Okay, so it's ten seconds, not instantaneous, but the power is huge. Another aspect of such high charge rates is the "gas station" needs to be an electrical substation. The standard US house service is 240V, 200A (48KW), which will take about an hour to put a 50KWH charge into the battery, and that's if there's nothing else taking power in the house.

    I'll leave the calculation of the power required to put 50KWH into a battery in ten seconds as an exercise for the reader, but it's big. I wouldn't want to be closer than maybe a kilometer if something "goes wrong."

    --
    Tag lost or not installed.
  122. Re:1.6 Horsepower vacuum cleaners? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    My bad, I guess I meant 15. I knew damned well it wasn't 20, because I've installed them (as well as the 220V outlets with the two flat spades, - -

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  123. Re:1.6 Horsepower vacuum cleaners? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

    Vacuum cleaners are rated in "Amps" of power.

    That depends on where you live. I was quite surprised when I set out to buy a vacuum cleaner in Canada, and found all those strange "10 amp" and "12 amp" stickers on them. Where I'm from, it's always watts.

  124. Prior art by BillX · · Score: 1

    In testing, batteries incorporating the electrodes discharged in just 10 seconds.

    Bah, my laptop battery does that already.

    --
    Caveat Emptor is not a business model.
  125. Underwhelmed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am underwhelmed by this discovery. How is the idea different than Altairnano's Nanosafe battery? They developed theirs close to ten years ago. IT uses a nano eneneered electrode to eliminate the center barrier in a Li-On battery. Allowing a 150KWH battery to absorb complete charge in as little as 10 minutes. They have licensed theirs to A123 systems and are already producing them so this is kind of a day late and a dollar short. The only thing that makes this even notable is it will be able to compete with them thus lowering cost...

    http://www.altairnano.com/profiles/investor/fullpage.asp?f=1&BzID=546&to=cp&Nav=0&LangID=1&s=236&ID=9294