Slashdot Mirror


User: mweather

mweather's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
1,360
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 1,360

  1. Re:I'm on the Mall right now on The Web Braces For Inauguration Traffic · · Score: 1

    If you like that, might I suggest going to Twitter? You'll get much better coverage from many more people in a medium made for that kind of communication.

  2. Re:Not good enough. on 6 Pennsylvania Teens Face Child Porn Charges For Pics of Selves · · Score: 4, Funny

    They're already blind.

  3. Re:it doesn't work afterall... on Watch the Obama Inauguration With Moonlight · · Score: 1

    Yep, all this fanfare for nothing.

  4. Re:Think about the Librarians! on The Web Braces For Inauguration Traffic · · Score: 1

    I have one word for you: microfiche.

  5. Re:What a country we live in... on The Web Braces For Inauguration Traffic · · Score: 1

    And where else can partisan zealots harp on and on for 40 years about a single traffic fatality? Seriously, it's been 40 years. Let it go already.

  6. Re:I'm on the Mall right now on The Web Braces For Inauguration Traffic · · Score: 2, Informative

    Slashdot is not Twitter. We don't care.

  7. Re:Duh. on PC Sales Slump Over Economic Crisis · · Score: 1

    It's been a staple food of humanity for 10,000 years. It's the reason civilization exists. Liquid bread that keeps for a long, long time. Of course humanity only recently started living past 35.

  8. Re:What about Python? on Building Linux Applications With JavaScript · · Score: 1

    Case about what? Reinventing the wheel? Gnome abandoning it's original reason for existence? The tables turning?

  9. Re:Change but not all change is good... on Watch the Obama Inauguration With Moonlight · · Score: 2, Informative

    Ummm... I just took the ten seconds to install the Moonlight plugin for Firefox 3 (running under Ubuntu 8.04 i386). After I'm done watching the presidential inauguration, what precisely is stopping me from continuing to use the plugin to interact with other Silverlight-based content?

    Perhaps other content requires features not yet implemented. Are they using DRM for the inauguration? I doubt it. Do most silverlight videos use DRM? Yes. That's kind of it's selling point right now due to Adobe's buggy easily circumvented DRM.

  10. Re:Or not on Watch the Obama Inauguration With Moonlight · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I love Linux and run it on many computers at home, and have never been particularly fond of Microsoft, but you really have to give this to them. It's more open than what Adobe have to offer and they're being far more cooperative than Adobe generally were. Remember, mono/moonlight are *open source*.. not even just a binary blob provided by Microsoft.

    More open that what Adobe has to offer? Microsoft isn't offering Moonlight, so that's not really a fair comparison. There have been open source Flash implementations for years. The only reason they aren't at feature parity with proprietary Flash is that Adobe actually releases it's software on Linux. Had they not, then Gnash would probably be much further along, if not at total feature parity. In essence you're giving credit to Microsoft for not releasing Silverlight for Linux.

  11. Re:What about Python? on Building Linux Applications With JavaScript · · Score: 1, Troll

    Well Gnome's entire existence owes itself to reinventing the wheel. It's kind of ironic now that QT is going LGPL and Gnome has come down with a bad case of Mono.

  12. Pentaho on Visualizing Complex Data Sets? · · Score: 1

    You could use Pentaho with one of the SAP plugins.

  13. Re:Slow Justice is No Justice on EC Considering Removing Internet Explorer From Windows · · Score: 0, Redundant

    So remove IE and replace it with wget.

  14. It'd been out for over a month... on Gaming Netflix Ratings? · · Score: 1

    Inkheart premiered in Berlin on December 6th.

  15. Re:My wipe is better :-) on Single Drive Wipe Protects Data · · Score: 1

    The technique is outlawed TODAY. It's never been legal.

  16. Re:Tell me why I MUST have Windows 7 on Windows 7's Media Hype Having the Opposite Effect As Vista's · · Score: 1

    There's no reason that version of DirectX can't run on XP. If you want to let microsoft extory money out of you by holding your games hostage, be my guest. I'm buying OpenGL games.

  17. Re:Duh. on PC Sales Slump Over Economic Crisis · · Score: 3, Funny

    Alcohol IS food.

  18. Re:Hello Moto on Qt Becomes LGPL · · Score: 1

    Troll...

  19. Re:Hello Moto on Qt Becomes LGPL · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Use != distribution. That's not hair splitting.

  20. Re:Strategy fail on Qt Becomes LGPL · · Score: 1

    That's why I originally installed an Ampache server. It's Cross-platform, uses mysql, and has most of the features I want. Now that Amarok itself is cross-platform, I just hooked my Ampache to it (only works on the newest version), and now I have the best of both worlds. I could just move my data off the Ampache server, but I have become accustomed to being able to play music on my friends' Ampache servers as well. Now my music is portable AND I can use Amarok. Best of both worlds.

  21. Re:time to port gnome! on Qt Becomes LGPL · · Score: 1

    There's no reason to wait until summer, unless you think you'll finish and release your app by then. Write it with QT, then fix whatever breaks (likely nothing at all).

  22. Re:Hello Moto on Qt Becomes LGPL · · Score: 1

    (the GPL isn't "give back your changes to my code", which would be fine, but rather "give me your code")

    The GPL doesn't affect the ownership of code at all, you still own the copyright and thus still own the code.

  23. Re:Hello Moto on Qt Becomes LGPL · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    The GPL doesn't tell you what you can do with your code. It doesn't cover use of the code at all, only distribution.

  24. Re:Hello Moto on Qt Becomes LGPL · · Score: 1

    Motorola is focusing on Android and Windows Mobile.

  25. Re:smithers! on In-Depth With the Windows 7 Public Beta · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Your solution to the need to bundle codecs with apps is to use an app that comes with a bundle of codecs? Won't pretty much all of them need to do that now? VLC might just lose one of it's strongest distinctions.