The problem is if Apple execs were unaware the effect the perception of Jobs' heath had on the stock price, then they are not fit to run the company.
If they're cleared of wrong doing, I'd sell my Apple shares. If they are not cleared, I'd sell my Apple shares.
While Jobs's efforts have saved the company from a downward spiral, that doesn't mean that it's all on him.
The parent never claimed it did. He said Apple's stock price is tied to Jobs' health. And it is. Go to Google Finance, look at the news links on Apple's stock charts. You'll see a price drop after any negative story about Jobs' health.
Whether Apple would be fine without him or not is completely irrelevant.
Considering Microsoft makes a fortune licensing their DRM, I wouldn't hold my breath. If anything, they'd just remove support for externally developed DRM, giving them a de facto monopoly on PC DRM.
Nixon had nothing on Bush. Nixon kept COINTELPRO hidden, and denied it's existence. Bush not only admitted to it, he defended it.
We have secret agents infiltrating Code Pink for Christ's sake. Even Hoover wasn't that paranoid.
Or, just get the ODF plugin for Office. If you're keeping it around, that's probably the easiest solution, and I think it's maintained by Microsoft due to governments that require open formats (MS's OOXML isn't compliant), so it probably works pretty well.
I've only used if a few times, but it did the trick for basic docs.
And where else does the cause of said fatality get to become Senator and have the investigation swept under the rug?
So your definition of being swept under the rug is being talked about openly and incessantly for four decades?
God help poor Teddy if this were out in the open, then.
I'd prefer that as well, but it's not like Microsoft has released anything for Linux, so again, the comparison is unfair. Not to mention Adobe already has an open spec.
No, the main reason the free flash implementations are lagging, is that they have been reverse engineering the format, unlike the Moonlight people, who have specs to work from.
The specs for Silverlight haven't been out all that much longer than the specs for Flash, and it did have about a decade to reverse engineer before that.
The only possible reason they aren't further along is lack of developer interest. What else can that be attributed to but the availability of Flash on Linux?
Slashdot Mirror
Once you start using an email address it is with you forever unless you're willing to dump all of your contacts.
Gmail has supported forwarding mail and exporting contacts for as long as I can remember.
It doesn't matter if you are accused of something if the accusation is not credible.
So you don't think there are any missing emails, despite the millions found after Bush and Co. said there were no missing emails?
Now, for a little puzzle, ask yourself how long it would normally take to create hundreds of email accounts in a secured system?
If the system wasn't designed by chimps, about as long as it takes to create and upload a csv.
$80 isn't much until you compare the price to OpenOffice, then it's freaking ridiculous.
Get Komodo 4.0 with the keygen. I haven't tried it (I wanted 5.0), but I doubt that keygen is safe.
Using different kio slaves....
The problem is if Apple execs were unaware the effect the perception of Jobs' heath had on the stock price, then they are not fit to run the company. If they're cleared of wrong doing, I'd sell my Apple shares. If they are not cleared, I'd sell my Apple shares.
Apple paid Xerox for right to use their ideas.
So? I paod Amazon for a copy of an mp3. It's still a copy.
Ding, ding ding. We have a winner. Thread over.
While Jobs's efforts have saved the company from a downward spiral, that doesn't mean that it's all on him.
The parent never claimed it did. He said Apple's stock price is tied to Jobs' health. And it is. Go to Google Finance, look at the news links on Apple's stock charts. You'll see a price drop after any negative story about Jobs' health. Whether Apple would be fine without him or not is completely irrelevant.
How can his health issues be any more important than those of head of tupperware or American Toyota, who's name you don't know.
Because when THEY get sick, their company's' stock price doesn't plummet.
like when they pioneered a UI based OS by copying Apple.
You misspelled Xerox.
Considering Microsoft makes a fortune licensing their DRM, I wouldn't hold my breath. If anything, they'd just remove support for externally developed DRM, giving them a de facto monopoly on PC DRM.
Although, compared to several years ago, I do find at more and more websites people fanboying for Microsoft. Which I find perplexing
Microsoft has been caught astroturfing on many, many occasions, across many product lines. It's not that perplexing.
All the Linux distributions are "bloated" compared with what we had several years ago.
But we can uninstall the bloat.
Nixon had nothing on Bush. Nixon kept COINTELPRO hidden, and denied it's existence. Bush not only admitted to it, he defended it. We have secret agents infiltrating Code Pink for Christ's sake. Even Hoover wasn't that paranoid.
Sun's business didn't tank because of software, it tanked because of hardware.
Everyone will get it right but the US will screw it up?
Or, just get the ODF plugin for Office. If you're keeping it around, that's probably the easiest solution, and I think it's maintained by Microsoft due to governments that require open formats (MS's OOXML isn't compliant), so it probably works pretty well. I've only used if a few times, but it did the trick for basic docs.
That describes Office docs pretty well.
Yes, drunk driving accidents are traffic accidents. Thus drunk driving fatalities are traffic fatalities.
And where else does the cause of said fatality get to become Senator and have the investigation swept under the rug?
So your definition of being swept under the rug is being talked about openly and incessantly for four decades? God help poor Teddy if this were out in the open, then.
That's easy to do in OO. http://openoffice.blogs.com/openoffice/2006/07/mail_merge_labe.html
I'd prefer that as well, but it's not like Microsoft has released anything for Linux, so again, the comparison is unfair. Not to mention Adobe already has an open spec.
No, the main reason the free flash implementations are lagging, is that they have been reverse engineering the format, unlike the Moonlight people, who have specs to work from.
The specs for Silverlight haven't been out all that much longer than the specs for Flash, and it did have about a decade to reverse engineer before that. The only possible reason they aren't further along is lack of developer interest. What else can that be attributed to but the availability of Flash on Linux?