I wrote my own electronic filing system software, that OCRs, and analyzes documents using text classification and date extraction, does full text search, etc. Here is the link: http://freshmeat.net/projects/paperless-office
Good job maintaining your privacy. Keep up the fight. Find people who are equally concerned. Use free software instead of cloud services, like yacy instead of Google. Let's get in touch. http://frdcsa.org/~andrewdo
Maybe if the English would stop committing atrocities like helping with the invasion of Iraq your point would weight more. BTW, I'm sorry about your mother's close call. I personally am a pacificist:)
Of course, I don't care about that anymore. But this Satanic surveillance bullshit needs to be stopped! It would do you well to see how countries like Ireland, Afghanistan and Palestine have dealt with similar oppressive regimes dedicated to taking away their civil rights and liberties.
Maybe if the British had not invaded Ireland and killed my family off, you wouldn't have reprisals. Just a thought?
Let's not bicker and argue about who killed who...
F*** Gates. There's not a word of truth to his philanthropy. Everyone is given a choice, at every moment, whether to do good or evil. People who say they must take before they give are filthy lying bastards. That's like the snake who borrows the oxygen of the mouse, when he's ready to return it, the mouse is dead. He could have been generous and helpful but he chose not. Gate's money can't buy the truth.
This query is related to deidentification software. This is software that identifies all personal data in files. I am using this for example to make certain projects that have sensitive information in them available as open source projects. Unfortunately, I have not been able to find one that meets my needs and so I have written my own, called "classify". Google "frdcsa classify" to read more. Anyways, that will only turn up old pages on classify - to find out more subscribe to the mailinglist or email me: andrewdo@frdcsa.org
Do not worry, we have much to teach these leaders.
First of all, ethical use of lethal force? - no such thing.
Secondly, robotics and AI will be used to free people, not subject them to the whims of the ruling classes.
Hey, huge fact databases? Expressed in what logic? Unification over all theorem provers of all ? Programs as proofs via Curry Howard Isomorphism -> collect not just ATP systems but all software -> comprehensive software ontology -> FRDCSA.
I've been working on a meal planner that has been described as "frickin overkill". It's called gourmet, but not the grecipe (gourmet recipe) planner on sourceforge. I am currently working on the food ontology. I'll post an email describing it to my website. In the mean time checkout:
http://frdcsa.onshore.net/frdcsa/internal/gourmethttp://frdcsa.onshore.net/frdcsa/internal/pgourmet
I've been writing krecipes but haven't heard from them. Interested. Email me andrewdo@frdcsa.org.
Peace!
Hey, this is on topic. I am suggesting a rather BOLD strategy of ignoring the rat race and just working on free software. One does not need a lot of money to do this, in fact, by grouping together with others of a similar nature like myself, we can sustain ourselves with very little resources, hence allowing us to work on free software at all times. In fact, I do this already. I am completely supported and work 24x7 on free software. I have discussed this idea with Stallman and have found others who are interested. Who are you kidding saying that it is off-topic?
There are plenty of ways to earn money with FLOSS. But why would you want to? Worshipping money and sex isn't all its cracked up to be. Besides hell sucks.
How about this, start a commune of FLOSS software people, and play, not work. Start a no work club - despite what the slave drivers say in Hell, its perfectly legit to not work. Besides, by writing free software and releasing it to the public (best if for no charge), you will contribute to the human condition more than just about anyway else, provided the software is not evil (and considering financial software, unless its personal stuff like GNUCash it probably is evil). You're still going to die, and only then will you make your escape. BTW, you are assuredly going to heaven, because you cant be sent to hell, bcause ur already there.
Oh yeah, and regarding the formalization of arguments on Wikipedia, after talking with James Wales at a meeting, I walked away with the impression that wikipedia does not have as a goal the rederivability of their content, they would rather state it without proof. Specifically he made fun of me for asking whether any assertion that does not follow from its premises could be considered "idiotic", a word he was using. He said, let me remember, he said that was "what a programmer would think" or something to that effect. Made me quite upset.
I would not trust to wikipedia to assemble a collection of "mathematical" knowledge. I have been working on one myself due to the overt lack of such a system. Mine is called FRDCSA (frdcsa.org), its really a misnomer. "Database" is not apropos, but neither is KBS for that matter. I guess it's a working name. First of all, one should not simply store proofs in human readable format, but in machine readable format. There are many efforts, the names of which now escape my memory, but some come to mind, the best of which is FDL (Formal Digital Library), tho I can't be sure it's still in Operation. Then there is Mizar. Oh god I cannot remember.
Of course the semantic web in theory does this. I would imagine if one would look they would find collections.
The problem I ran into in assembling the collection is this, in theory, I'm not sure its possible to differentiate between proof systems and programs. Intuitively it would seem they are very different. But as Emil Post remarked, proof systems are equivalent to programs? Is that what he said, I don't remember. And then there is the Curry Howard isomorphism, which I've never really studied.
Anyways, I took to collecting all kinds of software instead of just proof systems. The one thing I'm sure about is that the larger the system is, the better the chance it can behave intelligently. That is stated (without proof) in mathematical form on my site.
Alright, I've done my best to drop hints to the wise.
Hey, I am from Aurora, IL just south of Batavia. I am looking for tech people but they are hard to find. The only LUG is in Chicago. Who is there from Batavia? Please let me know if the author of the article is from Batavia and how I might reach them. In general, how do you find people interested in Linux outside of LUGs? Thanks!
Slashdot Mirror
Here is free software to help with purchase decisions using AI technology. http://frdcsa.org/~andrewdo/WebWiki/UtilityMaximizationSystem.html
I wrote my own electronic filing system software, that OCRs, and analyzes documents using text classification and date extraction, does full text search, etc. Here is the link: http://freshmeat.net/projects/paperless-office
Was the election rigged? Or is the story that the election was rigged, rigged?
Good job maintaining your privacy. Keep up the fight. Find people who are equally concerned. Use free software instead of cloud services, like yacy instead of Google. Let's get in touch. http://frdcsa.org/~andrewdo
http://frdcsa.org/
frdcsa.org frd stands for Formalized Research Database. been doing this since 2001. there is also FDL (formal digital library)
Maybe if the English would stop committing atrocities like helping with the invasion of Iraq your point would weight more. BTW, I'm sorry about your mother's close call. I personally am a pacificist :)
Of course, I don't care about that anymore. But this Satanic surveillance bullshit needs to be stopped! It would do you well to see how countries like Ireland, Afghanistan and Palestine have dealt with similar oppressive regimes dedicated to taking away their civil rights and liberties.
Maybe if the British had not invaded Ireland and killed my family off, you wouldn't have reprisals. Just a thought? Let's not bicker and argue about who killed who...
F*** Gates. There's not a word of truth to his philanthropy. Everyone is given a choice, at every moment, whether to do good or evil. People who say they must take before they give are filthy lying bastards. That's like the snake who borrows the oxygen of the mouse, when he's ready to return it, the mouse is dead. He could have been generous and helpful but he chose not. Gate's money can't buy the truth.
This query is related to deidentification software. This is software that identifies all personal data in files. I am using this for example to make certain projects that have sensitive information in them available as open source projects. Unfortunately, I have not been able to find one that meets my needs and so I have written my own, called "classify". Google "frdcsa classify" to read more. Anyways, that will only turn up old pages on classify - to find out more subscribe to the mailinglist or email me: andrewdo@frdcsa.org
What about using a FLOSS meal planner, like both of the Gourmet meal planners: http://grecipe-manager.sourceforge.net/ http://frdcsa.onshore.net/frdcsa/internal/gourmet
Do not worry, we have much to teach these leaders. First of all, ethical use of lethal force? - no such thing. Secondly, robotics and AI will be used to free people, not subject them to the whims of the ruling classes.
should have read of all "less-than logic,axioms,theorems greater-than", instead of "of all ?"
Hey, huge fact databases? Expressed in what logic? Unification over all theorem provers of all ? Programs as proofs via Curry Howard Isomorphism -> collect not just ATP systems but all software -> comprehensive software ontology -> FRDCSA.
Oh so no one could be him at chess, where one has to prove their ideas, so people just resort to *saying* he is crazy (note the lack of PROOF).
I've been working on a meal planner that has been described as "frickin overkill". It's called gourmet, but not the grecipe (gourmet recipe) planner on sourceforge. I am currently working on the food ontology. I'll post an email describing it to my website. In the mean time checkout: http://frdcsa.onshore.net/frdcsa/internal/gourmet http://frdcsa.onshore.net/frdcsa/internal/pgourmet I've been writing krecipes but haven't heard from them. Interested. Email me andrewdo@frdcsa.org. Peace!
Hey, this is on topic. I am suggesting a rather BOLD strategy of ignoring the rat race and just working on free software. One does not need a lot of money to do this, in fact, by grouping together with others of a similar nature like myself, we can sustain ourselves with very little resources, hence allowing us to work on free software at all times. In fact, I do this already. I am completely supported and work 24x7 on free software. I have discussed this idea with Stallman and have found others who are interested. Who are you kidding saying that it is off-topic?
There are plenty of ways to earn money with FLOSS. But why would you want to? Worshipping money and sex isn't all its cracked up to be. Besides hell sucks. How about this, start a commune of FLOSS software people, and play, not work. Start a no work club - despite what the slave drivers say in Hell, its perfectly legit to not work. Besides, by writing free software and releasing it to the public (best if for no charge), you will contribute to the human condition more than just about anyway else, provided the software is not evil (and considering financial software, unless its personal stuff like GNUCash it probably is evil). You're still going to die, and only then will you make your escape. BTW, you are assuredly going to heaven, because you cant be sent to hell, bcause ur already there.
Oh yeah, and regarding the formalization of arguments on Wikipedia, after talking with James Wales at a meeting, I walked away with the impression that wikipedia does not have as a goal the rederivability of their content, they would rather state it without proof. Specifically he made fun of me for asking whether any assertion that does not follow from its premises could be considered "idiotic", a word he was using. He said, let me remember, he said that was "what a programmer would think" or something to that effect. Made me quite upset.
I would not trust to wikipedia to assemble a collection of "mathematical" knowledge. I have been working on one myself due to the overt lack of such a system. Mine is called FRDCSA (frdcsa.org), its really a misnomer. "Database" is not apropos, but neither is KBS for that matter. I guess it's a working name. First of all, one should not simply store proofs in human readable format, but in machine readable format. There are many efforts, the names of which now escape my memory, but some come to mind, the best of which is FDL (Formal Digital Library), tho I can't be sure it's still in Operation. Then there is Mizar. Oh god I cannot remember. Of course the semantic web in theory does this. I would imagine if one would look they would find collections. The problem I ran into in assembling the collection is this, in theory, I'm not sure its possible to differentiate between proof systems and programs. Intuitively it would seem they are very different. But as Emil Post remarked, proof systems are equivalent to programs? Is that what he said, I don't remember. And then there is the Curry Howard isomorphism, which I've never really studied. Anyways, I took to collecting all kinds of software instead of just proof systems. The one thing I'm sure about is that the larger the system is, the better the chance it can behave intelligently. That is stated (without proof) in mathematical form on my site. Alright, I've done my best to drop hints to the wise.
Hey, I am from Aurora, IL just south of Batavia. I am looking for tech people but they are hard to find. The only LUG is in Chicago. Who is there from Batavia? Please let me know if the author of the article is from Batavia and how I might reach them. In general, how do you find people interested in Linux outside of LUGs? Thanks!