Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: How Do You File Paper Documents At Home?

swamp boy writes "How do you file paper documents at home? I'm mostly asking about things like monthly paper-based statements that get mailed to you (credit cards, gas cards, medical bills, health insurance explanation of benefits, electricity bill, natural gas bill, water bill, etc.). Do you push to have as many sent electronically as possible? Do you scan the paper documents to store electronically and then shred the paper document? How do you manage and organize the ones stored electronically? I've been doing this the old-fashioned way with manila file folders, but as time goes by I keep thinking that I should opt for digital storage. What works for you?"

371 comments

  1. Is digitising such a good idea? by Haedrian · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If you have a court case which requires the documents, I'm pretty sure that printing out your electronic copy won't really work, because you could have easily modified it while it was stored there.

    To answer original question - I have a big file. Sometimes I prefer having something physical that can be brought out as proof.

    1. Re:Is digitising such a good idea? by ColdWetDog · · Score: 3, Funny

      Fireplace!

      Keeps me warm and annoys the neighbors!

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    2. Re:Is digitising such a good idea? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Not true -- many large corporations have scanned and destroyed large collections of legal documents, and their lawyers are fine with it. Electronic copies scanned with an appropriate process are even considered legal by the IRS (see this IRS publication for details, page 9 http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-irbs/irb97-13.pdf )

    3. Re:Is digitising such a good idea? by sribe · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If you have a court case which requires the documents, I'm pretty sure that printing out your electronic copy won't really work, because you could have easily modified it while it was stored there.

      Yes, actually, the best copy you have will work. If the opposing party wants to claim that you have modified documents, they will have to come up with actual evidence to that fact. (You are aware, are you not, that paper documents can be forged???)

    4. Re:Is digitising such a good idea? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you have a court case which requires the documents, I'm pretty sure that printing out your electronic copy won't really work, because you could have easily modified it while it was stored there.

      IANAL and all, but a scanned (or faxed) signed contract is a valid legal document, so I don't know why scanned bills would be an issue if (slim chance) you ever needed the history for court or a dispute.

      W/r/t several other posts, the question remains "what do you store them for?" if you want to track spending, then you are better off tracking payments made through mint, quickbooks, or a simple spreadsheet. If just to keep them around, then scan into evernote or your computer, or use a shoebox. Or a shredder.

    5. Re:Is digitising such a good idea? by quacking+duck · · Score: 1

      How is this any different from getting "paper free" electronic bills and statements and other documents? If you did in fact need to present them as evidence, surely you or your lawyer would ask the original company for a copy of the original statement.

    6. Re:Is digitising such a good idea? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you have a court case which requires the documents, I'm pretty sure that printing out your electronic copy won't really work, because you could have easily modified it while it was stored there.

      What, because paper documents can't be forged?

    7. Re:Is digitising such a good idea? by hedwards · · Score: 1

      It is however advisable to keep a paper copy of anything that important anyways, just in case the electronic copy gets destroy and whatever backups you have as well. Which can happen. You can also accidentally destroy paper copies, but it's typically less likely, unless you're doing something like mass shredding or your house burns down, typically less common occurrences.

    8. Re:Is digitising such a good idea? by aliquis · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I've more or less never lost a piece of paper ;D

    9. Re:Is digitising such a good idea? by hedwards · · Score: 4, Informative

      IANAL, but I did sit on a jury for a rather long civil trial, and whether paper or electronic, somebody is going to be called to testify to the authenticity and completeness of any piece of evidence that they're wanting to submit. Just because it's paper doesn't mean that it's real and likewise just because it's electronic doesn't mean that it's suspect. I was personally frustrated by the great disparity in terms of opinions of evidence, to the extent that the attorneys couldn't seem to agree whether or not a particular photo was of the same thing they were referring to.

      Which is a part of their jobs, particularly for the defense attorney, but it is somewhat annoying to those that have to weigh the evidence.

    10. Re:Is digitising such a good idea? by hedwards · · Score: 1

      This point troubles me a great deal. The IRS under normal circumstances has 3 years in which to conduct an audit of your tax forms in the US. But, most banks limit the duration of storing said records typically to a year if you're lucky, and often times even less than that. So, while it is ultimately your responsibility to make sure that you've got the records, if those files were to get corrupted after they were destroyed by the bank and before you receive the audit notification, you haven't really any way of actually backing up your claims.

      Which is really, why one ought to keep a paper copy, and why banks ought to be required to keep such documents for longer periods of time. And preferably offer the ability to download an entire year's worth of records in a single .zip for easy organization.

    11. Re:Is digitising such a good idea? by aliquis · · Score: 1

      Also:

      On my computer all my files usually end up on the desktop nowadays, saves and what not.

      In real-life? It all ends up on the floor.

      I don't know which alternative is better. Atleast the files on my (virtual) desktop doesn't corrupt.

      Where are the self-organising file systems? Even more so, where are the self-organising homes?! Wife 1.0 + mom-patch?

    12. Re:Is digitising such a good idea? by houghi · · Score: 1

      Bills I will trow away once they are payed. Payslips I keep one year and then trow them away as I get an annual one.

      If I need proof, I ask for a copy from where it came.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    13. Re:Is digitising such a good idea? by NitroWolf · · Score: 1

      If you have a court case which requires the documents, I'm pretty sure that printing out your electronic copy won't really work, because you could have easily modified it while it was stored there.

      To answer original question - I have a big file. Sometimes I prefer having something physical that can be brought out as proof.

      I've never had a problem bringing my printed documents to court. I digitize everything now and I've had to take a few documents to court now and then for various reasons, the judge has never batted an eye. One case involved a contract and it was a digitized copy of the contract, no problems at all.

      YMMV of course, but since I see many large businesses digitizing everything, including signed documents and digitized copies of cancelled checks are valid proof I'd say you'd probably be fine.

    14. Re:Is digitising such a good idea? by NitroWolf · · Score: 1

      I thought it was 7 years, not 3 years? Has the law changed in the last decade or two? I haven't really kept up with that, since I've been keeping things for 7 years. Would be nice to throw out an additional 4 years worth of crap.

    15. Re:Is digitising such a good idea? by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      I don't know which alternative is better.

      The floor. Because there the incentive to do something about it is larger.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    16. Re:Is digitising such a good idea? by quacking+duck · · Score: 1

      Does the bank actually destroy those older records (by law?), or simply move them to archives? My own bank allows me to access certain records going back 18 months, but I'd assumed it was just a limitation they imposed on online access, i.e. if you want older records you'd have to pay a small fee to access them.

    17. Re:Is digitising such a good idea? by sribe · · Score: 1

      I thought it was 7 years, not 3 years? Has the law changed in the last decade or two? I haven't really kept up with that, since I've been keeping things for 7 years. Would be nice to throw out an additional 4 years worth of crap.

      I think it has always been 3 years normally; 7 if they find evidence of fraud in the past 3.

    18. Re:Is digitising such a good idea? by sribe · · Score: 1

      YMMV of course...

      Actually, no it won't vary. In 2000 the "Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act" established once and for all the validity of electronic records. Even before that, many states had enacted variations of the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act"...

    19. Re:Is digitising such a good idea? by hawguy · · Score: 1

      WIth thermal printed receipts, if you don't have a scanned or photocopied copy of the receipt, in 2 years, it's likely that all you'll have a blank piece of paper. The fade over time eventually becoming impossible to read.

      Well, at least that's what happens with my storage system of throwing them into a box in my non-airconditioned home office. Maybe if I stored them in more climate-controlled conditions they'd last longer.

    20. Re:Is digitising such a good idea? by jedidiah · · Score: 5, Insightful

      > WIth thermal printed receipts, if you don't have a scanned or photocopied copy of the receipt, in 2 years, it's likely that all you'll have a blank piece of paper

      Thermal receipts can actually fade much faster than that. They might not even last long enough to be used for tax purposes.

      I started scanning all of my important receipts over this very issue.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    21. Re:Is digitising such a good idea? by b4upoo · · Score: 1

      Sometimes a copy is better evidence than an original as it can be a trap to forge a copy as it is so easily proven to be a forgery.

    22. Re:Is digitising such a good idea? by clang_jangle · · Score: 1

      Important papers, like receipts, banking stuff, identity papers?! Barring thieves and fire, flood, earthquake, etc there's really no reason to lose important papers. But I'm always amazed at the people who lose important things like keys or identification. They're usually the kind of people who become indignant when you don't accept "l lost it" as a valid excuse, too. There's definitely a "type" that loses important things.

      --
      Caveat Utilitor
    23. Re:Is digitising such a good idea? by vlm · · Score: 1

      if you want older records you'd have to pay a small fee to access them.

      probably the most insightful thing I've read in the comments so far.

      You will not be the first person in the history of civilization to not have a certain piece of paper, and there are (possibly expensive) solutions in place. Figure your equivalent cost as odds times estimated cost. Take the annual probability of ever requiring a piece of paper (probably about zero), times the cost of acquiring that piece of paper via whatever special fees required (somewhere from free to the cost of a nice dinner). If your house was burning down around you, would you grab the kids or grab the file containing the 1994 local phone company bill? If the house flooded, safe stolen, tornado...

      Compare that with the cost of maintenance and storage of the data added to a reasonable hourly labor rate (probably pretty high, here on /. ) multiplied by time required per year (from some descriptions here on /., I'm thinking dozens of hours per year). Also add the cost of stolen documents (stolen cancelled checks are ALMOST as valuable to a thief as blank checks, etc). On your deathbed will you say to yourself, I wish I had a better rotating system of electric company bills?

      Examples:

      I had to get a birth cert via registered mail etc to get an expedited passport to take an overseas trip, and the whole process cost about $200. I'm keeping the BC and passport instead of shredding them because they take up practically no space and cost $200.

      For no known reason, I was collecting all my cancelled checks. So, I have my rent check from May 1995. Shredded!

      It seems quite possible to implement a plan to annually spend three to hour digit sums of money, to save single to double digit sums of money.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    24. Re:Is digitising such a good idea? by clang_jangle · · Score: 2

      The floor, seriously? I have a desk and file cabinet at home for "normal" important papers, and a safe for things like passport, birth cert, etc. That's what adults do. Grow up already!

      --
      Caveat Utilitor
    25. Re:Is digitising such a good idea? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Photocopies, with appropriate foundation for establishing their authenticity are generally admissable in court to the same extent that the original would have been.

    26. Re:Is digitising such a good idea? by clang_jangle · · Score: 1

      I used to save and scan all receipts at the beginning of each month as part of my regular accounting, but now sometimes they fade to point of being useless before the month is even up. I've gone to scanning receipts daily over morning tea, as a result.

      --
      Caveat Utilitor
    27. Re:Is digitising such a good idea? by nine-times · · Score: 2

      I'm pretty sure that printing out your electronic copy won't really work, because you could have easily modified it while it was stored there.

      Right, because paper is a magical medium that disallows document forgery.

    28. Re:Is digitising such a good idea? by the+simurgh · · Score: 0

      this is why i keep paper records for a minimum of 5 years.

    29. Re:Is digitising such a good idea? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      This point troubles me a great deal. The IRS under normal circumstances has 3 years in which to conduct an audit of your tax forms in the US. But, most banks limit the duration of storing said records typically to a year if you're lucky, and often times even less than that. So, while it is ultimately your responsibility to make sure that you've got the records, if those files were to get corrupted after they were destroyed by the bank and before you receive the audit notification, you haven't really any way of actually backing up your claims.

      Which is really, why one ought to keep a paper copy, and why banks ought to be required to keep such documents for longer periods of time. And preferably offer the ability to download an entire year's worth of records in a single .zip for easy organization.

      I don't live in your country, and have been doing all bills and all tax returns completely electronically for years, paper copies are getting a very rare thing indeed, but why would online banking systems not keep your records as long as demanded by IRS? That sounds strange.

    30. Re:Is digitising such a good idea? by user32.ExitWindowsEx · · Score: 1

      I thought it was that they had 10 years to try to claim more money from you but you only had 3 years to amend your return to try to claim more money from them.

      --
      "Evil will always triumph because good is dumb." -- Dark Helmet
    31. Re:Is digitising such a good idea? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm. You might want to check various statutes of limitations.
      For instance, if you wind up with a dispute about pay, it's a my copy vs your copy situation, with a 3 year statute of limitations. So you'd want to save that for 3 years.

      Taxes are tricky.. There are various statutes, but they typically run "from the date of filing", and if they allege you didn't file, or you commited fraud in filing, then the statute hasn't even started to run yet.

      Microfilm/Microfiche is dense, is a photographic record, and is easily duplicatable for "off site backup", and will be able to be read forever, unlike various and sundry digital media. (Yeah.. what about those scanned images on those 8" floppies, eh?)

    32. Re:Is digitising such a good idea? by nospam007 · · Score: 1

      Birth certificate and passports in a safe?

      Don't know about this in the US but I can get a new BC in 5 minutes during the workweek and a passport in a couple of days if I lost them, ditto for drivers, weapons, alcohol-distillation etc licenses.

      Invoices I paid cash is the thing I can't get a replacement for.

    33. Re:Is digitising such a good idea? by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      On your deathbed will you say to yourself, I wish I had a better rotating system of electric company bills?

      Well, I've heard so many people say things like "no one ever says they wish they spent more time at work on their deathbed." But wait, I've heard that many more times than I've heard the supposed more popular "I wish I'd spent more time with my family." On ones deathbed, one focuses on what they leave behind. And it's not how much cuddle time they've had, but how much stuff they'll pass on. Now, not everyone chooses that way, but what I've actually heard from people on their deathbed is often the opposite of what people think they should be saying.

    34. Re:Is digitising such a good idea? by fotbr · · Score: 1

      Getting a passport here takes, at minimum, a week, unless you want to pay the "get it to me faster" fee, which may or may not actually get it to you any faster. (Co-worker and I both had to take trips, sent off all the paperwork on the same day; he paid the extra fee, I didn't. I got my passport in two weeks, his took almost 3).

    35. Re:Is digitising such a good idea? by clang_jangle · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That, and I do have my original handwritten birth certificate, as well as a modern "official" copy with the state seal which is a relatively recent requirement. As I recall it took over two months to get the state seal version of it back when they suddenly decided the one I used until 1990-something was no longer "valid" So yes I do treat it as if it were irreplaceable.

      --
      Caveat Utilitor
    36. Re:Is digitising such a good idea? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you have a court case which requires the documents, I'm pretty sure that printing out your electronic copy won't really work

      Is that a nice way of saying you're guessing and speculating?

      In California electronic copies are as good as the originals except for documents conveying the transfer of real property.

    37. Re:Is digitising such a good idea? by ronocdh · · Score: 1

      Important papers like receipts? Surely you jest! I find this packrat mentality rather silly, but to each their own. If I cared enough to save something, I'm pretty sure I'd bother to digitize it, though. (Again, if your system works for you, stick to it.)

    38. Re:Is digitising such a good idea? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Um, many adults have to save receipts so they can be reimbursed for expenses, as well as so they can file a proper tax return. When you move out of Mom's basement, maybe you'll understand.

    39. Re:Is digitising such a good idea? by defaria · · Score: 1

      Actually no, in many cases the court will accept printed copies (cause they are dumb - so shhhhh don't give them any ideas).

      It always amazes me that they often accept things like emails and chat logs as proof. Any script kiddie can forge those!

    40. Re:Is digitising such a good idea? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been audited eight times (and won every time) over the past 20 years and never has there been any problem of 'original' documents. This is a non-issue.

    41. Re:Is digitising such a good idea? by skegg · · Score: 1

      FWIW, I've used home-printed documents in a court case and the judge seemed quite happy to accept them.

      I'm sure there are a lot of variables in place:
              - will this 1 document send someone to gaol for 20 years?
              - is the person tendering the document of good standing?
              - is the document corroborated / contradicted by another document?
              - etc

      On the flip side, if the document is found to be a forgery then you may well lose:
              1. your case
              2. your freedom !

    42. Re:Is digitising such a good idea? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you have a court case which requires the documents, I'm pretty sure that printing out your electronic copy won't really work, because you could have easily modified it while it was stored there.

      To answer original question - I have a big file. Sometimes I prefer having something physical that can be brought out as proof.

      Not true!! You can print out modified copies of your scanned original documents. Anything can be faked, that is why if a court is interested in finding out authenticity of documents they may want to compare your documents with that who provided them to you. For most house hold documents such as invoices, statements, receipts, etc.... Both the issuer and the receiver retain a copy and to verify a document you need to match both.

      Also, most people wouldn't want to modify documents for court, because the trouble ensuing from that is in most cases not worth the risk.
      idea
      I convert all my paper documents to digital. I use an application called paperless (for mac). Stores documents as PDFs and allows you to assign types to documents and allows you to tag them. I scan everything into it, including food receipts. The idea being that maybe 10-20 years down the road I may want to look at: how much money I spent on parking?, how much money I spent on different types of food?, What funky food I tried? etc... My bank is already providing me with more real time info about how much money a month do I spend on food in a nice little pie chart, but I wouldn't mind seeing how that changed from 5 - 10 years ago.

    43. Re:Is digitising such a good idea? by milkmage · · Score: 2

      then what is an acceptable digital alternative to a notary stamp (the thing they use to stamp the paper to make a raised impression)

      - i'm not being snarky, I would like to know.

        lawyers might be fine with digital copies of some types of documents.. like receipts or other common items, but what's the digital alternative to a document like a birth certificate or mortgage paperwork? there's a reason I had to sign multiple copes of my loan papers - the banks want wet signatures... they didn't let me check the "accept" box next to my name and email it..

      i wasn't allowed to provide a copy of my birth certificate when I got my passport either.

    44. Re:Is digitising such a good idea? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The stamp doesn't matter at all its the signature of the notary that makes it legal. If you don't believe me go talk to one. Besides many have moved to a rubber stamp.

    45. Re:Is digitising such a good idea? by Neil+Boekend · · Score: 1

      Holding (or scanning) thermal paper over tea is a bad plan: the hot vapours might damage it. I would advise to hold them at an appropriate horizontal distance.

      --
      Well, I might have a way, but it only works on a semi spherical planet in a vacuum.
    46. Re:Is digitising such a good idea? by mug+funky · · Score: 1

      There's definitely a "type" that loses important things.

      not sure what you mean by that.

      there are situations that occur that are unkind to paper.

      like being a live-in carer for someone with alzheimer's... they're very fond of getting the mail for you, then throwing/hiding anything that's "not theirs". of course, as their ability to read disappears, more and more letters aren't theirs, and one finds themselves getting angry calls out of the blue about fines and whatnot.

      there's definitely a "type" that can eat a bag of dicks. i'd call those narrow minded elitists.

    47. Re:Is digitising such a good idea? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought it was 7 years, not 3 years? Has the law changed in the last decade or two? I haven't really kept up with that, since I've been keeping things for 7 years. Would be nice to throw out an additional 4 years worth of crap.

      For the record:

      The IRS has 3 years to instigate an audit of the most recent 3 years. If they find ANYTHING in their audit then they can go back another 3 years. However, if they determine that you have intentionally defrauded the Gov't then all limits are off.

    48. Re:Is digitising such a good idea? by mrmtampa · · Score: 1

      Short form or long form?

      I'm sorry, I had to say it; I'll go back to my room now/

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy." Hamlet (I, v, 166-167)
    49. Re:Is digitising such a good idea? by xaxa · · Score: 1

      Except for consumables (food, etc), my receipts go into a C5 envelope with "2011" scrawled on the front. They're roughly in order, as I put stuff in on one side. This takes very little time.

      When something breaks, or I want to sell it with proof of purchase, it doesn't take long to find the receipt. I keep them indefinitely, as there's pretty much no benefit to going through the envelopes and deciding what needs keeping.

      Receipts for food (etc) bought on a credit/debit card go in the recycle bin in my bedroom, which is almost never emptied. If I see something unusual on the statement I'll hopefully have the receipt.

    50. Re:Is digitising such a good idea? by amplex · · Score: 1

      This person has never been a 1099 contractor. He might never understand the amount of receipts we end up with at the end of the year. Last year I ended up with 8 envelopes packed full of cryptic receipts.. Imagine the time it would take to scan and file each one of them? Not so bad if you do it every day, but I didn't do my taxes until the day before they were due like most Americans.. =]

    51. Re:Is digitising such a good idea? by jittles · · Score: 1

      It's 7 years if you don't file and 3 years if you do file. So you need to keep the records for 7 years in case they claim you didn't file in the first place! But once you can show you filed, they can't audit you for something more than 3 years old.

    52. Re:Is digitising such a good idea? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not all notary's have a stamp that embosses. Every notary I've ever used just had a simple rubber stamp and ink pad. What makes it valid is that the notary can be contacted and it confirmed that he or she actually notarized the document.

    53. Re:Is digitising such a good idea? by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 1

      This point troubles me a great deal. The IRS under normal circumstances has 3 years in which to conduct an audit of your tax forms in the US.

      Despite what the web user interface may tell you, your bank keeps statements much longer than 3 years. You can order old statements. It may cost you a few bucks, but you can do it.

      --
      They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
    54. Re:Is digitising such a good idea? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      I do both - I digitise and keep paper copies for a couple of years. I have a box for each year that I fill after scanning each paper, then once the box gets to three years old I chuck it. The digitised copies with OCR are easy to search and because the boxes are filled in order or receipt it isn't too hard to drill down by date to the one you want if you ever need to produce the original for some reason.

      I started getting bank statements electronically in PDF format to cut down on paper. If I ever needed a printed copy I could ask the bank for one.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    55. Re:Is digitising such a good idea? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how many documents of that nature do you have?
      duh you can't provide a "copy" of your birth certificate and destroy your original paper version.

      I can't think of too many documents requiring the notary stamp thing that you can't just keep in a manila file folder.

    56. Re:Is digitising such a good idea? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In my experience, (in California) anything you say in court is bullshit, but any scrap of paper handed to the bailiff was brought down from Mount Sinai. Go figure.

  2. paper? in 2011? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    You must be in the United States? In most of the world, such paper bills have been obsolete for at least a decade.

  3. In a paper shredder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It's the only way.

  4. Keep them? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I keep the absolute minimum amount of paper lying around.

    Bills get payed and then shredded. Why keep them? Same for almost every other piece of paper. My yearly insurance policy gets stuck in a binder (and the old one gets shredded). Oh, and I keep the ownership documents for my house. That's it. If everything in my paper 'archive' is 50 pages total I'm being generous.

    There is no need to keep all that junk around. In fact, I wouldn't need the paper that I do keep, because if I would ever need it I can have a replacement copy sent.

    1. Re:Keep them? by Tomahawk · · Score: 1

      Ditto. I tend to put some stuff in a drawer in case I need to refer back to it, but every once in a while I clear out the drawer of all the stuff that I never referred back to, which is all of it.

      I was lucky that I had a year of household bills, as I did need them recently. Usually you are asked for stuff like bank statements, and you can just ask your bank to send them out when you need them.

    2. Re:Keep them? by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 1

      I keep the absolute minimum amount of paper lying around.

      Bills get payed and then shredded. Why keep them? Same for almost every other piece of paper. My yearly insurance policy gets stuck in a binder (and the old one gets shredded). Oh, and I keep the ownership documents for my house. That's it. If everything in my paper 'archive' is 50 pages total I'm being generous.

      There is no need to keep all that junk around. In fact, I wouldn't need the paper that I do keep, because if I would ever need it I can have a replacement copy sent.

      I don't know where you live and what kind of tax records you would need, but the majority of my paperwork that I keep is income tax returns and the supporting documentation. I keep 5 years worth, and that's at least 60% of the volume of my paper files.

      Like you, I try to keep as little paperwork as possible, but that his bitten me. A few years ago, there was a settlement involving ATT/Cingular customers. But to receive it, you needed to have the bills from the time period. And I'd destroyed the old bills annually. Amazingly, ATT was unable (unwilling? uninterested?) to provide these historical bills online -- they only provided a year's worth, IIRC. The amount of money involved wasn't really sufficient to offset the trouble of calling them up and demanding they produce the documents for me.

      Similarly, I have missed out on some securities settlements for not having records of funds I held years ago and no longer own. To get compensation, you needed evidence of having the security during the affected time period.

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    3. Re:Keep them? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously you don't itemize deductions or have a business. Which is fine for you rat-race peon types, the rest of us need records.

      It's a lot harder than you seem to think to get old records. Most businesses don't keep anything past 6 months or so which means you will be SOL if you ever do need them. Plus it's a shit-ton of work if you ever have to go back and get all of them because of an audit or legal issue.

      But keep on being happy in your little cozy simple life. That's the way it's meant to be; we need sheep to keep us fed.

    4. Re:Keep them? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well fingers crossed the tax dept. never turns up. Bills,receipts etc... i keep them all.. mind you I am self employed.. gotta keep a separation of what is work and what isn't.

    5. Re:Keep them? by Myopic · · Score: 1

      I agree:

      1. First, keep only what is necessary. Old bills are not necessary. Keep what you need for taxes; keep you actual tax returns; keep Social Security statements. Throw away utility bills. Throw away bank statements, after reviewing them.
      2. Take what is left, which should be 100% stuff important for expected future use, and put it in a fire-safe box. Anything worth saving is worth saving from a fire. If you are worried about theft, lock the box.
      3. My tip is to keep your backup harddrive in the same firesafe box. Mine is one of those little bus-powered USB drives. I do a backup ever week or so, then put the drive back in the firesafe box.
    6. Re:Keep them? by crackspackle · · Score: 1

      Bills get payed and then shredded. Why keep them?

      You keep bills from the past so that when something changes unexpectedly in the future, you have them for reference. Granted they need not be paper, an electronic copy will suffice, but invariably you will find yourself getting cheated unless you compare your statements month to month. Every utility I ever had for more than a year has made at least one mistake, but there are some that seem to do it routinely as an extra source of income from the "trash everything that comes in crowd".

      Also, periodically there are notices bills which declare terms you need to know and may need to remind your bill collector of because they seem to have forgotten. It rarely works to tell them "I saw such and such" but having the document always works. You can order a copy but in most cases that will take more time and cost more money than it's worth. While I am at it, always check your receipt at the grocery store. I have found that greater than half the time I go, there's at least one mistake. Most stores have scan guarantees. I've had 25 bucks knocked of a $100 grocery bill due to their blunders before.

    7. Re:Keep them? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was a bankruptcy case with a supplier recently where the curator called me, according to the firms books I still owed them a large amount since 12 years. I didn't remember what it was about so and maintained my innocence. I was sued and it went to court.
      In the meanwhile, I started digging through the archives, I never throw things away. And I found the bill (which was payed) and the bank statement. Case won, bad accounting on their sides.

      Could happen to you, if you couldn't prove that you paid something 12 years ago, you would have to pay again.

    8. Re:Keep them? by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      You didn't argue an expired statute of limitations?

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    9. Re:Keep them? by honkycat · · Score: 1

      In some cases, old bills are useful. For example, when applying for permanent residence and then citizenship for a spouse, having several years of joint bills can be extremely helpful for demonstrating that your relationship is legitimate.

    10. Re:Keep them? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have large file cabinets so everything gets put away. When the Currency Conversion Fee Antitrust Settlement came around, I had a decades worth of old credit card statements that were covered. I could have just said I would take the $25 but I might get 1 to 3% back of overseas purchases and that has turned out to be quite a bit of money since I travel and have lived in multiple countries. That case was decided in November of 2009 and 10 out of 11 appeals are now done. Once that is done, they may want to audit my claim. That means I'll need to keep paper from February 1996 until this mess is over.

    11. Re:Keep them? by xaxa · · Score: 1

      Lots of people working in Europe don't need to complete a tax return, it's automatically calculated correctly.

      I just stick everything in a folder, and start a new folder every year. It's so infrequent that i need something from more than a month ago that its not worth keeping it sorted.

    12. Re:Keep them? by odoketa · · Score: 1

      I would point out that much of the recent craziness around mortgages has revolved around the fact that the banks misplaced, misaligned, or outright faked documents. Keeping a copy of the big stuff is important, because more than likely, if it's big, then someone has incentive to pretend it doesn't exist. If the only copy is the one being provided by folks who will lose money depending on what that document says, you may be in trouble.

      Marriage and insurance docs fall in this same arena. Things get lost or destroyed sometimes. For example, my original marriage records exist on a small island nation. One solid tsunami, and they're gone. When I turn up 20 years later, noone's going to know or care who I am.

    13. Re:Keep them? by wootcat · · Score: 1

      I saw an article a couple weeks ago on this subject, and it brought up something I hadn't thought of. It said to keep records of any moving violation tickets and payments of fines. Apparently it's not uncommon for the courts to come back years later claiming you have unpaid fines and it's good to have documentation of the fact that you did.

      Overall, the article said you should hold onto those and your yearly tax returns forever.

      --
      I'm really a low 5-digit Slashdotter, but this ID is where I am now.
    14. Re:Keep them? by JimFive · · Score: 1

      My tip is to keep your backup harddrive in the same firesafe box. Mine is one of those little bus-powered USB drives. I do a backup ever week or so, then put the drive back in the firesafe box.

      This is a bad idea. That firesafe box is designed to protect papers from combustion by inhibiting the available air. It is not going to keep your backup drive from being damaged by heat.
      --
      JimFive

      --
      Please stop using the word theory when you mean hypothesis.
    15. Re:Keep them? by Myopic · · Score: 1

      Good point. Can you suggest a better on-site solution?

    16. Re:Keep them? by ResidentSourcerer · · Score: 1

      Until you are audited by the tax demons. In Canada they can audit for 7 years back, further if they suspect deliberate tax evasion. If you are running a business, you keep everything.

      For us this amounts to a 3" thick folder of folders per year.

      I also keep bills of sale for anything I've bought that is more than 'disposable' E.g -- tractor, truck, auger. So if there is ever a dispute about ownership, I can show good faith.

      --
      Third Career: Tree Farmer Second Career: Computer Geek First Career: Teacher, Outdoor Instructor, Photographer.
    17. Re:Keep them? by JimFive · · Score: 1

      Can you suggest a better on-site solution?

      On your person. There are, basically, two scenarios:
      1. A fire occurs when you are at home. In this case you grab some stuff and usher your kids out of the house. The drive needs to be in the group of "some stuff" that you're going to grab without thinking too much.

      2. A fire occurs when you are away from home. The only way to save the drive is to have it also be away from home.

      So: Coat pocket, briefcase, purse, perhaps your car.

      You might also consider performing an "important papers only" backup onto a thumb drive that you keep on your keychain. Part of document management is deciding which documents don't need to be kept.
      --
      JimFive

      --
      Please stop using the word theory when you mean hypothesis.
    18. Re:Keep them? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Good point. Can you suggest a better on-site solution?

      On-site is silly for occurances of fires, theft, flooding etc.pp.. Go off-site. Store it at work in your drawer (fully encrypt the drive, of course). Take it home, once a week or once a month, whatever you need, refresh the backups, then take it back to work.
      Other options are family members, friends etc..

      Another option may be (for fairly small overall size) online backups. Store everything in an archive, then encrypt the thing using a good passphrase and upload.

    19. Re:Keep them? by Pakup · · Score: 1

      A bank account I'd ignored got turned over to the state as abandoned property. Twenty-some years later when I woke up to the fact and claimed it back, the state wanted some proof that I'd lived at the address on the account. Those old phone and electric bills came in handy.

    20. Re:Keep them? by jittles · · Score: 1

      invariably you will find yourself getting cheated unless you compare your statements month to month. Every utility I ever had for more than a year has made at least one mistake, but there are some that seem to do it routinely as an extra source of income from the "trash everything that comes in crowd".

      While I am at it, always check your receipt at the grocery store. I have found that greater than half the time I go, there's at least one mistake. Most stores have scan guarantees. I've had 25 bucks knocked of a $100 grocery bill due to their blunders before.

      Where the hell do you live? I've had comcast make a mistake on a bill once, and that was a mistake on applying a promotion. I called them once and they fixed it for good. I have never had a cashier make a mistake at the grocery store that they didn't catch themselves before I could even bring it up. Sounds like you are surrounded by incompetent people.

    21. Re:Keep them? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you clearly never had to apply for a Green Card in the US.... you better keep every piece of mail that reached your house.

    22. Re:Keep them? by Myopic · · Score: 1

      Okay. But for on-site backups, which is most of what people do, a locked firebox is about as good a solution as a consumer is going to use. That's why I use it. But hell, I don't even lock my firebox.

      If my data were worth more, then I would put proportionally more effort into my backups.

    23. Re:Keep them? by Myopic · · Score: 1

      Wow! That would be some crazy Rainbow-6 level, briefcase-handcuffed-to-my-wrist level backup! Awesome. To be worth that much, you'd also have to become a martial arts expert and have a conceal-carry permit to thwart thieves. My data isn't worth enough to go to that trouble, but I'm impressed that yours is. Good luck with that.

    24. Re:Keep them? by JimFive · · Score: 1

      Wow! That would be some crazy Rainbow-6 level, briefcase-handcuffed-to-my-wrist level backup!

      I'm not sure where you got that from what was essentially "put it in your pocket". But hey, I'm not the one who thinks I need to protect my backup drive from a fire and then fails to do so. My home backups are to avoid the inconvenience of a hardware failure. If my house burns down I have more important things to worry about.
      --
      JimFive

      --
      Please stop using the word theory when you mean hypothesis.
  5. I used to file them, by Grand+Facade · · Score: 1

    now I just put them in a shoe box....

    Then burn or shred them after a year.

    --
    Rick B.
    1. Re:I used to file them, by MoonBuggy · · Score: 1

      Yup; stack 'em up, keep them for a while in case they need to be referred to (never happened yet), destroy 'em when it's clear that they aren't needed.

      To be fair, though, maybe the only reason this works is that documents I actually will need to refer to (bank statements, particularly) already come electronically...

  6. shred by stazeii · · Score: 1

    Almost all of them I can get in digital form anyway, so MOST of them I glance at, then promptly shred. The ones I can't get digitally, I file in a file cabinet as I don't have a good way to digitize them at home (I could do it at work, but it's not that big a deal). How many do I actually file per year? maybe a dozen. Most of them are tax related. All the actual statements for credit cards, etc can all be retrieved digitally from the company.

  7. scanner + evernote by flubus · · Score: 1

    For this very purpose, I switched last year to using evernote, with a scanner for those items I can't yet get electronically. Working well. (Just between you and me, it's all just an excuse for me to use the shredder as often as possible.)

    1. Re:scanner + evernote by socsoc · · Score: 1

      Yeah I just use NeatDesk and shred everything.

    2. Re:scanner + evernote by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      the OP was about archiving data, a transient cloud service is the opposite of that, it could disappear any day without warning then you may or may not be able to untangle the cached remains of your data into something useful assuming that the process of shutting down does not cause a null sync to wipe your cached data as well.

      granted you can still export to HTML but the software should be exporting snapshots regularly, and it doesn't.

      digital archives really need to be in computer and human readable basic formats, flat text files, jpg or bmp for images, HTML, or hell even latex, it's a bit obscure but a human can open the file and read the content without a functioning viewer, which may not be around and executable under future computer systems.

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    3. Re:scanner + evernote by ArhcAngel · · Score: 2

      Perhaps a link would be helpful? Neatco has a product specifically designed for your important documents/receipts.

      --
      "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
    4. Re:scanner + evernote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "hell even latex, it's a bit obscure but a human can open the file and read the content without a functioning viewer"

      You're assuming they'll still be using ASCII ...

    5. Re:scanner + evernote by rerogo · · Score: 1

      If we're going that far, we might as well assume that he won't speak English (and it will in fact be a dead, lost language) when the archives need reading. ASCII is really just a substitution cipher on the alphabet plus some punctuation. It can be trivially cryptanalyzed. (Even if we, the entire planet, magically forget the order the alphabet goes in.)

    6. Re:scanner + evernote by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      I wonder if there's a Free Software alternative to that?

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  8. paper by symf · · Score: 4, Informative

    I've found that it's still just easier to file in manila folders by month. I rarely ever need to pull paper documents out anymore, but if I do need them they are there and I've got only one month of stuff to sort through. I tried scanning everything and backing up locally for about two months but dropped that method when crunch time at work rolled around.

  9. folders by superwiz · · Score: 4, Informative

    Hanging folders with labels by category and year. Most categories only need 1 folder per year. At the end of the year, I move them to a "history" storage box and start a new set of folders.

    --
    Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
    1. Re:folders by superwiz · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I've been able to find parking tickets from years back (because Police's system glitched and re-issued the ticket after it was resolved). It took less than half an hour to find all information on the tickets from 3 years prior.

      --
      Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
    2. Re:folders by hedwards · · Score: 1

      For items that are just FYI, I tend to just scan those and chuck the original. The files tend to just get stored on my HDD under an appropriate broad category with an informative title including date.

      For items that are tax records, you're stuck either with a paper copy, or using an IRS approved scanning product. Which reminds me that I've misplaced mine.

      But in general, I've found that it makes a lot more sense to store things chronologically, just holding out things that are definitely trash and definitely more appropriate elsewhere. That way, I can mostly shred the folder after a few years after a quick glance for anything that's still relevant.

      The biggest problem folks have is getting overly elaborate, and this system is really as elaborate as you want to get, and probably could use some simplification.

    3. Re:folders by sribe · · Score: 4, Informative

      For items that are tax records, you're stuck either with a paper copy, or using an IRS approved scanning product.

      There is no such thing as "an IRS approved scanning product". IRS simply accepts scanned receipts. Some vendors toss around terms like "IRS approved" in a vague and misleading manner in order to make you think their product meets some kind of IRS regulations, but this is just marketing bullshit.

    4. Re:folders by scruffy · · Score: 1

      Hanging folders with labels by category and year. Most categories only need 1 folder per year. At the end of the year, I move them to a "history" storage box and start a new set of folders.

      I do this, but I don't organize papers into folders until they go into the storage box, which happens after I get done filing income taxes.

      The main advantage of paper is that it lasts a long time. Many banks and financial institutions say they'll keep records for 10 years, which sounds like a long time, but sometimes you need longer. For me, I inherited some stock some 30 or so years ago. If I sell the stock, I need to know the cost basis, so I need information from 30 years ago, and I need to track mergers and splits over that time period.

      Once financial institutions promise to keep records for my lifetime, I'll probably still keep the paper for backup purposes.

    5. Re:folders by hawguy · · Score: 1

      The main advantage of paper is that it lasts a long time. Many banks and financial institutions say they'll keep records for 10 years, which sounds like a long time, but sometimes you need longer. For me, I inherited some stock some 30 or so years ago. If I sell the stock, I need to know the cost basis, so I need information from 30 years ago, and I need to track mergers and splits over that time period.

      Paper records last a long time... until your first fire or flood. My sister lost her house to a fire, including the documents stored in the consumer grade fire-safe. I'm sure there are commercial grade fire safes that can provide better protection, but then you still only have one copy of your document. Offsite backups of paper documents are possible, but there's still a lag time between when you make the backup copy and when you actually take it off site to your bank safe deposit box (or grandma's house).

      Electronic records lend themselves well to off-site storage. Keep a copy on your hard drive and have it backed up automatically to an online backup service. If you're worried about privacy, encrypt the files.

    6. Re:folders by Pascal+Sartoretti · · Score: 1

      Hanging folders with labels by category and year A good start, which works fine for major things such as "Taxes 2011".

      But then there are all the miscellaneous papers which don't fit well in one category and/or which will probably never be accessed anymore, but which one needs to keep "just in case"; for such items, I have found that the best thing is to have a set of folders named "To be thrown away in 20xx", one per year. For each document, you just need to decide how long you need to keep it (1 year ? 5 years? 10 years?) and put it in the right folder. And each December 31st, you thrown away one folder.

  10. Piles, for short term stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most invoices I get or can retrieve electronically. For stuff that has to be saved long term it gets put in a manilla right away. When I refinance I received 100+ legal pages I may never need to look at again. Scanning it would be a waste of time. Same for tax documents.

    And shred as often as possible.

  11. FIFO Queue by wormbin · · Score: 2

    Like any other data storage problem you have to ask yourself how you will access this data. For me there is a high probability that I will never look at an old phone bill or gas bill. In this case you want to optimize for insertion into the data store not selection from the data store. so I stick all of these statements into a big box. The more recent ones are on top so they are automatically sorted by date. When the box fills up I shred the bottom half of the box. This makes the most common case (insertion) really efficient; I just throw the paper in the box. In the rare case I need to find an old statement, I just hunt through the date sorted statements.

    1. Re:FIFO Queue by Compaqt · · Score: 1

      Good idea.

      I wish OS/application writers would get this message. I hate having to root around for files.

      95% of the time, I'm working with files that have been created or touched in the last few weeks.

      I've found it really handy to keep the Gnome file selector set to sort by Modify date. But you still have to drill into folders to be able to see them sorted.

      How about a system-global list of recently touched files *and* folders? The current Gnome one is hit-and-miss. And it's only in the File Open dialog, not in Nautilus.

      --
      I'm not a lawyer, but I play one on the Internet. Blog
    2. Re:FIFO Queue by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      It's pretty trivial on BeOS or vaguely recent versions of OS X to create a smart folder that contains files (optionally only of a specific type) that have been recently modified.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    3. Re:FIFO Queue by hedwards · · Score: 1

      I personally use xplorer2 when on windows as my filemanager, and it's trivial to filter out things based upon name. Typically I'll name things by institution, account and date, sometimes if it's a receipt I'll append the item purchased. It's a bit of work, but it makes it a lot quicker to sort through those files.

      Presumably theirs a better way.

    4. Re:FIFO Queue by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      It's pretty trivial on BeOS or vaguely recent versions of OS X to create a smart folder that contains files (optionally only of a specific type) that have been recently modified.

      BeOS? I know we're big on edge cases here at Slashdot but BeOS?

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    5. Re:FIFO Queue by Alrescha · · Score: 1

      The OS X Finder has pre-installed buttons labeled "Today", "Yesterday" and "Past Week".

      A.

      --
      ...bringing you cynical quips since 1998
    6. Re:FIFO Queue by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      As far as I know, BeOS was the first operating system to have the requested functionality built in (around 15 years ago). I think OS X actually has a smart folder with the files edited in the last week by default in new installs.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    7. Re:FIFO Queue by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      ...or you could just sort by date. Works for just about any desktop GUI made in the last 20 years.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    8. Re:FIFO Queue by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Did you even read the grandparent's request? He wanted to see all of the files that he'd modified in the last week or two, irrespective of where they are in the filesystem hierarchy. He even said that he sorted folders by date in the GNOME file selector in the original post...

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    9. Re:FIFO Queue by Compaqt · · Score: 1

      Oh, is that right? Thanks for that.

      That's actually a very useful part of Oss Ecks that I wish somebody in Gnome/Ubuntu would copy.

      I have a smart folder in Thunderbird that has about the past week or so of emails from folders I deem important enough. Only rarely do I find the need to venture outside of that.

      --
      I'm not a lawyer, but I play one on the Internet. Blog
    10. Re:FIFO Queue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What you have is a stack, not a queue. FIFO means first in first out, meaning that the oldest thing is the first thing you'd find. Stacks are Last In First Out, which is what you've got going here.

    11. Re:FIFO Queue by superwiz · · Score: 1

      You are probably looking for a way to tag files. So you can search,sort and filter by tags. You are about a step away from discovering that mind-mapping applications are your cup of tea. I personally like "The Brain" of http://www.thebrain.com./ No, I am not in any way affiliated with the company other than as their customer (I did purchase the full $250 version with my own money).

      --
      Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
    12. Re:FIFO Queue by spasm · · Score: 2

      find /home/[yourusername]/Documents -mtime -2

      change '2' to the number of days back you want to know about.
      change '/home/[yourusername]/Documents' to whatever path you want. I tend not to use /home/[username] because that picks up every minor change to config files.

      If you really want to get fancy, create a folder, script the above & pipe output via xargs to something which creates a symlink to every modified file within that folder, called by cron every hour or so. The folder will then always have links to every file in the directory of interest modified in the last x days.

    13. Re:FIFO Queue by synaptik · · Score: 1

      For the purpose of retrieving items for reference, it is a stack. For the purpose of excising the too-old items, it's a queue.

      --
      HSJ$$*&#^!#+++ATH0
      NO CARRIER
    14. Re:FIFO Queue by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      I was trying for a funny (although I didn't know that about BeOs).

      Oh well, it wasn't all that funny after all.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    15. Re:FIFO Queue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep. Write Often, Read Rarely. Not quite /dev/null, but close.

      My variation is a separate box for each financial year. At the end of the year, slap a label on it and store it, and start a new box. Every few years get the ones older than 7 years, shred the sensitive stuff, and dump the rest.

      Business receipts are a different category - they get filed separately with purchase orders in FY boxes.

    16. Re:FIFO Queue by godel_56 · · Score: 1

      Did you even read the grandparent's request? He wanted to see all of the files that he'd modified in the last week or two, irrespective of where they are in the filesystem hierarchy. He even said that he sorted folders by date in the GNOME file selector in the original post...

      In Windows Locate32 does this easily.

      http://www.locate32.net/

    17. Re:FIFO Queue by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      Nice! However, for those of us who do need to search in /home/user, is there any way to prevent it from searching hidden files and directories? I tried piping it through a reverse grep:
      $ find -mtime 7 | grep -v -G "^./."

      But it fails and exits if it encounters any permissions errors:
      $ find -mtime 7 | grep -v -G "^./."
      find: `./.config/menus/applications-merged': Permission denied

      At that point, it stops searching and I cannot find anything.

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    18. Re:FIFO Queue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is an excellent idea. I'm an OS designer and for the next filesystem I design I will implement the GPs suggestion.

      All files will be appended on to the end of the used space in the storage media. There will be no indexing or filenames, to find a file you will seek from the end until coming to the file you want.

      When the storage media becomes full the first half of the disk will be automatically erased and the files on the second half copied there.

    19. Re:FIFO Queue by xyourfacekillerx · · Score: 1

      I have no idea what I'm doing wrong, but I somehow manage to "modify" files in Windows XP and Vista, without modifying them. So searching for files across the file system turns up a lot of unwanted nonsense.

      Meanwhile, Windows Search (formerly Indexing Service) often inexplicably omits entires that I already know should and would belong in the list

      I've written my own tool to get around this ... didn't think to look for an existing product. What a waste of Christmas break.

    20. Re:FIFO Queue by xaxa · · Score: 1

      I use Zsh, and recommend it to anyone who uses the shell seriously.

      ls -l ~/**/*(.m-2)

      ~ is home directory (of course)
      **/ is recursive file glob
      * doesn't match dot-files unless you set the appropriate shell option ([un]setopt dotglob)
      (.m-2) is the "glob qualifier", here the . means plain files, and m-2 means modified date is 2 days ago or less.

      You might limit it to at most 15 files, ordered my most-recent:

      ls -l -U ~/**/*(.omm-2[1,15])

      -U stops ls from doing its own ordering (you could use -t, as ls supports time-ordering, but Zsh can do more kinds of sorting than ls)
      om means order by modification date, descending (rather than Om, ascending).
      [1,15] means the 1st to 15th file

      man zshexpn for the full details. There's loads, e.g.:

      ls *.*~(lex|parse).[ch](^D^l1)
                    lists all files having a link count of one whose names contain a dot (but not those starting with a dot, since GLOB_DOTS is explicitly
                    switched off) except for lex.c, lex.h, parse.c and parse.h.

      If you can't use Zsh you could modify your find commond, find ~/* -mtime -2 will probably ignore dot-files in ~ as the shell won't match them. Check with echo ~/*

    21. Re:FIFO Queue by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      Nice, thanks! I often hear about zsh and it's wonderful features. I don't use it, though, as I'm always SSHing into different (other people's) machines and need to be proficient in bash. But your find method works great. Thanks!

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    22. Re:FIFO Queue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yet another reason Linux sucks.

      Linux particularly is about 10 years behind kernel and OS research and particularly in the user interface design - actually, it's not just behind, it's actually copying everything from either Microsoft of Apple.
      Security in Linux and keeping track of changes going into the kernel until recently was unheard of!
      Unbelievable, the fact that for so long, the turds at Linux weren't using a versioning system!

      What you're mentioning is an old and solved problem in Windows, since Windows 95.

  12. Not electronic delivery! by dlsmith · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Do you push to have as many sent electronically as possible?

    I wish we lived in a world in which there was a secure electronic equivalent to document delivery. The technology exists, but nobody uses it.

    As it is, the standard is for every company I deal with to require a separate login which gives me a web interface to tracking down the documents I need. Maybe they'll send a generic email when something new arrives. The problem is that this raises the convenience barrier so high that I rarely see the documents I'm being sent when they arrive — it happens when I'm already on the site and looking around. Which means I have to remember to go to the site.

    When I get something in the mail, in contrast, I can look at it immediately, and then if necessary I can put it in a to-do box, which gives me a clear indication, in one place, of all the stuff I need to deal with.

    1. Re:Not electronic delivery! by TheClarkster · · Score: 3, Informative

      In Canada we have ePost. It is run by Canada Post and companies can send out bills, paystubs, T4's, etc electronically, all in the same place.

    2. Re:Not electronic delivery! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which is exactly why I have not switched most of my paper bills to electronic delivery. Doing so changes it from a "sender pushes" (they mail it to me) system into a receiver pulls (I have to remember to go log in, hunt down the item, retrieve it, etc.).

      If I could upload a gpg public key to each company that they would use to encrypt the .pdf of the bill or statement, and then email me that encrypted bill, I'd switch everything over immediately. Because this way, the electronic system is identical to the US Postal Mail system, they push it to me when it is ready.

    3. Re:Not electronic delivery! by xMrFishx · · Score: 1

      That's interesting, never heard of such a thing. Anywhere else employ a similar system?

    4. Re:Not electronic delivery! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Belgium has something similar thing, but I don't trust it. Or rather, I don't trust Belgian companies to send out accurate bills.

    5. Re:Not electronic delivery! by david.given · · Score: 1

      I recently changed energy suppliers because they were basically unable to communicate effectively. Whenever they sent me an email, it would be blank. (They were using multipart-alternative but only sending the HTML part. Nice.) Their online website was so badly written that an attempt to view my gas and electricity bills at the same time would confuse it --- yes, their web designers hadn't heard of tabs. Instead of using HTML widgets they'd use little embedded flash thingies containing a text field, resulting in such hilarity as the web browsing doing a Page Down while typing the space between words.

      My new supplier is much more coherent and knows how to, e.g., write basic HTML, which is a good sign.

      However, they're still not actually sending me the bill. Instead they send me a link to a web page which will let me view my bill. The only way to actually get a copy on my own machine is to print it, which kinda defeats the purpose of electronic billing. And I have been burnt by having to go to a remote website to view these documents before --- when my bank reduced the availability of online bank statements from 12 months to 6 months, I suddenly found myself unable to get at rather important tax information.

      What would be really nice is a standard interchange format for bills. PDF is not it. That way, they could send me the file, I could drop it into my accountancy package, and it would pull out the relevant information and include it in my budgeting. Don't think it'll ever happen, thoguh...

    6. Re:Not electronic delivery! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here in Sweden we've had several failed attempts to set up various electronic mail systems to replace paper. What we do have now that actually works pretty well is a kind of e-bills. I get most of my bills electronically directly to my bank. I can then view and approve them on the bank's website, which is the same place I would go to to pay paper bills anyway.

    7. Re:Not electronic delivery! by Dynetrekk · · Score: 1

      In Norway we have a system which is (or sounds) similar: digipost. It was launched this year. So far, I haven't seen or heard of a single "digital letter" sent with it. Annoyingly, it doesn't work in FF4 on the mac because no PDF-in-browser plugin is working (yet). At least, no non-adobe plugin. Because, of course, they implemented this using PDF viewing in-browser. So, you have to download PDFs just to have a peek. Stupid. Oh, and it costs money to send letters, and private persons can't - only Big Companies (whatever that means?).

    8. Re:Not electronic delivery! by hoggoth · · Score: 1

      THIS is exactly why I don't get all my bills electronically. I would rather have them digital, but the way they do it now is more work for me. I get an email notification, I have to go to their web site, look up the password to log in, then navigate their site looking for the statement, clicking through some garbage marketing about a great new service that will pay my bills for a month if I get sick, before finding the right page and using their awful form to download a PDF.

      How about just emailing me the PDF every month? Let me have it sent encrypted with my public key if I'm concerned about that.

      --
      - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
    9. Re:Not electronic delivery! by hackel · · Score: 1

      Sounds great, but can you get them to encrypt it with your public key and actually email the damn thing to you? Why is it so god damned hard for companies to adopt this?

  13. Both paper and electronic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I store it both ways: Electronic for the searching and paper for the legal. I keep my bills for two years and then toss them. Account statements and the like I keep forever. (Anyone who has ever been through a contested divorce will appreciate the value of paper and permanent files.)

  14. Paper? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's paper?

  15. I have avoided switching to electronic documents by RelentlessWeevilHowl · · Score: 1

    If I die unexpectedly, my wife will be able to (a) easily see the new documents coming in, and (b) easily see the old documents that I have on file. I use hanging folders, with each business' documents going back in time five years.

  16. fujitsu scansnap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Buy a Fujitsu Scansnap -- only $254 on Amazon, and does a great job of quickly scanning piles of documents. I use the software included with the Scansnap to manage the scanned documents -- the software is quirky and quite outdated, but it was developed for your use case, and works out better in the long run than a more polished, general purpose piece of software.

    Scan your entire backlog of documents, then shred everything. No more paper storage. The PDFs that the Scansnap generates are fine for legal purposes; big companies use the same software for their documents and their lawyers are fine with it.

    1. Re:fujitsu scansnap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I second this. I love my Fujitsu Scansnap. It really makes short work of big piles of paper.

    2. Re:fujitsu scansnap by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      Buy a Fujitsu Scansnap -- only $254 on Amazon

      Or, for a lot less, buy a cheap inkjet multi-function device and never install the ink cartridges. Let all those other people who actually print using these things subside your "scanner" purchase whenever they buy ink.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    3. Re:fujitsu scansnap by theskipper · · Score: 1

      Agree, I started scanning with a Scansnap 500 back in 2008. Definitely correct about the filing software; it's an ancient MFC app but it works nicely. So I use a dedicated VM (Win XP) for it since I wasn't able to get it to run in Wine reliably. Scans are then stored on the host ubuntu machine and accessed through a networked drive. Maybe they've updated to a more cross-platform solution, haven't checked in a long time.

      Now everything gets scanned on it, from bills to old books, then shredded. There's barely a bit of paper around the house anymore.

      Nightly cron+rsync packs the docs into a tar, then stored with regular backups daily, and a truecrypt version on Amazon S3 monthly. Since the storage+transmission costs are less than $35/year, paying for storing stuff I'll never need to see again on S3 isn't a problem. It's more effort to cull the old than to just keep it in the archive. The key is to set up the filing binders intelligently in the beginning so stuff is (realistically) accessible when needed.

      For reference, 40,000 pages is only about 8GB with average settings (no OCR, etc.). Pick+rollers runs $50 every 25k sheets iirc.

    4. Re:fujitsu scansnap by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      canon used to sell a module for the old BJC line of inkjet printers which was a replacement print head with a scanner instead of a printer on it. i never owned one but saw it in the catalog that came with the printer, pretty nifty though i imagine running it though the same spot as the ink carrier goes would eventually lead to fouling as ink residue got on the scanner.

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    5. Re:fujitsu scansnap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Or, for a lot less, buy a cheap inkjet multi-function device and never install the ink cartridges"

      Yeah, that doesn't always work. I bought a Brother All-In-One many years ago, just to use as a scanner, and only occasionally as a printer. A month later when I went to scan something it said "Add ink". I don't want to print, I want to scan. "Add ink". But I had only printed literally less than a dozen documents! It turns out the AIO cleaned its jets every day, running out all the ink in a month so you'd have to buy ink even if you didn't actually print anything. Neat trick - for them!

      In their defense, the new Brother devices don't do this anymore. Cleaning is rare, and cartridges last a long time, but they still need to be inserted. Same on HP AIOs. I'm guessing most of them want the cartridges in place to do ANYTHING.

    6. Re:fujitsu scansnap by uglyduckling · · Score: 1

      I second that. The ScanSnap is absolutely awesome, really quick, and the software is really smart (detects folds/creases as you scan and get you back on track). I've shredded hundreds of documents over the past year after scanning and OCRing. I use DevonThink on the Mac.

    7. Re:fujitsu scansnap by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      Same on HP AIOs. I'm guessing most of them want the cartridges in place to do ANYTHING.

      Not true. I have an HP AIO printer/fax/scanner. The cartridges have never been installed and it works nicely as a scanner. I have been unable to install the Windows software and drivers on my XP machine -- perhaps it needs the cartridges installed to be able to complete the software installation, but scanning using XSANE under Linux works well.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    8. Re:fujitsu scansnap by dimension6 · · Score: 1

      Wow...I thought I was the only one who did this. I follow the exact same method, with the ScanSnap, and have probably scanned in 2000-3000 pages by now. The only annoyances are having to remove staples and scanning in irregularly-shaped receipts (like the 5-page long ones from Radio Shack). I scan in everything that I don't have a digital copy of, and then trash it. As for the digitization, I just throw everything into a .pdf and OCR it using Acrobat Standard (the ClearScan OCR feature works better than anything else I've found, and works with multiple languages). Two full years of hi-res scanned documents take up around 200MB.

    9. Re:fujitsu scansnap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I third this - LOVE my (older model) Scansnap. If you have LOTS of scanning to do (a basement full of jourmals in my case) consider an upgrade to a Fujitsu model fi-6130 or fi-6140. These are used by Financial Instutions (hence the "fi" I believe), hospitals, and other heavy-use offices. Got a fi-6140 (the fi-6130 is probably more than enough for most folks) - both the "30" and "40" model scanners are really bad-ass scanners . . and INCLUDE Adobe Acrobat. Yes - kept my old Scansnap on my older XP PC, and the 6140 on my new monster Win7 PC. And use em both. The 6140 was expensive, but SOME things are just worth it.

    10. Re:fujitsu scansnap by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Or buy one of the inkjet multifunction devices that actually has cheap ink. Mine -- which I'll name only if somebody asks -- has black ink that costs $5 for ~500 pages. That's competitive, if not cheaper than, the laser printer I had been using before (and this not only does scanning, but also prints in color and has auto-duplex).

      Oh yeah, and Office Depot gives you a $3 credit for each empty cartridge you turn in, so the net cost is actually $2/cartridge!

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    11. Re:fujitsu scansnap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I always wanted one, but here in Germany the cheapest one ist at 432€... I really do hate the disparity of prices in Europe vs USA :-/

    12. Re:fujitsu scansnap by LunaticTippy · · Score: 1

      I stopped using inkjet about 10 years ago because I don't print very often. The couple times a month I would print seemed to piss off my printer. It would go through one or more cleaning cycles, then grudgingly print a bad-looking page that would run if it got the slightest bit damp. It seemed that I was buying new cartridges more often than my page count would justify, so I kept careful track. I gave up after realizing that I got less than 30 pages from a cartridge that should have given me several hundred pages.

      Has that improved in your opinion? I am curious what model has $2 ink available, btw.

      --
      Man, you really need that seminar!
    13. Re:fujitsu scansnap by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      My printer is a Lexmark Pro901 (the cheap ink also works in the Pro905, Pro805, and Pro709, according to the cartridge box). I don't know if the ink runs because I'm not in the habit of getting my printouts damp, but I do know that it can print more than 30 pages in a cartridge. In fact, the reason I got the printer is that I was printing 100+ page documents and my non-duplex laser just wasn't cutting it anymore. I only print those big documents twice a month or so, so print heads drying out hasn't seemed to be a problem.

      I had given up on inkjet 10 years or so ago too, but I've been pleasantly surprised with how well this one works (except maybe for the fancy touchscreen controls). Don't get me wrong: if I could have gotten a color, networked, auto-duplex laser printer [or multifunction device] for a similar price, I would have. But I couldn't, so I didn't.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  17. Push-down stack by Mysteray · · Score: 2

    Err on the side of not categorizing and not shredding. Only categorize into folders the stuff that you're likely to need to access by category in the future (e.g. tax documents). Everything else goes back into the envelope it came in. For bills, write "paid" on the front.

    Use an appropriately-sized box to hold old mail neatly. Stick the newly-archived mail in the front (or top) of the stack such that it naturally sorts in a coarse reverse-chronological order. It's not too hard to go back through this to find stuff if you need it later and you'd probably never need to look further back than a year anyway.

    Above all, don't spend more energy on the problem than it merits or else it will become a burdensome chore.

    1. Re:Push-down stack by hedwards · · Score: 1

      Indeed, depending upon the number of documents, it's frequently better to just have a box or envelope per year, with everything in it for that time period. If you've got a lot, then moving to a per month or possibly per week file is a good idea. It's good because you've got it in chunk size bites. And if you do decide to digitize chances are that you can handle an entire months worth of papers on the first of the next month, but either way, you generally have a fair idea of when to look.

    2. Re:Push-down stack by hubie · · Score: 1

      How far back do you like to keep your documents? From how I understand your message, it doesn't sound like you get rid of anything.

      I've got stacks of stuff going back +20 years that is around out of sheer laziness. One of my projects in the next couple months is bulk shredding, but I haven't quite decided where to draw the lines on what to keep and how far back (I'm pretty sure I can get rid of all those canceled checks and account statements from that bank account that was closed 15 years ago...).

    3. Re:Push-down stack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Above all, don't spend more energy on the problem than it merits or else it will become a burdensome chore.
       
      I think this is the real wisdom. My direct advice would be to recycle everything the first time you touch it- in almost 20 years of adult life, I've never needed a single piece of paper ever mailed to me and have had no identity theft problems. Sure, I keep DSPP/DRIP program statements for tax basis purposes, but even that data is easily available (and frankly easier to deal with) from the internet.

    4. Re:Push-down stack by Mikkeles · · Score: 1

      Well, what's the statute of limitations of the worst thing you've ever done? :)

      --
      Great minds think alike; fools seldom differ.
    5. Re:Push-down stack by xMrFishx · · Score: 1

      I think there's some sort of requirement for tax that's around 7. Beyond that most things get written off, but someone who knows better than me should give a more concise answer. I believe in England there's a limit to reclaiming tax-back that's around five years, so you need to keep employment slips (P45/P60) til at least that in-case HRMC cocks up your tax, or vice versa, and they don't tend to tell you about it for years - for instance, there was a large tax claim against teachers when their tax got messed up and everyone owed about 3 grand to HMRC, but there is a limit for both parties on settling those sorts of things.

    6. Re:Push-down stack by Mysteray · · Score: 1

      It's psychologically easier for me to keep paperwork than throw it away, something about the logical difficulty of proving a negative ("no way will you ever need this"). My old stuff is either categorized or disorganized, but I have very little that's older than 5-10 years. At that age, the whole categorical folder can usually be tossed (e.g., I moved years ago and every bill from that utility company is old).

      When I get the urge to throw stuff out, I can always go through the older stuff with a different standard and find stuff worth tossing. The older it gets, the more easily it can be tossed.

    7. Re:Push-down stack by tftp · · Score: 1

      what's the statute of limitations of the worst thing you've ever done? :)

      It doesn't matter what he did. The only thing that matters is what other people think he did.

    8. Re:Push-down stack by tftp · · Score: 1

      When I get the urge to throw stuff out, I can always go through the older stuff with a different standard and find stuff worth tossing. The older it gets, the more easily it can be tossed.

      Just make sure you don't violate a patent on that very invention.

  18. Simple by stopacop · · Score: 0

    Do like me and I assume everyone else by throwing it in a box and enjoying the thrill of adventure when you are digging through the box to find what you need.

    --
    http://www.stopacop.so -- You have rights. How about standing up for them before they go away?
    1. Re:Simple by hedwards · · Score: 1

      As long as you start a new box every year, you can just chuck the ones that are older than 3 years typically without having to worry too much about the consequences.

    2. Re:Simple by stopacop · · Score: 0

      BRB sending a DMCA takedown request to Slashdot because you posted sensitive company information about my box filing system

      --
      http://www.stopacop.so -- You have rights. How about standing up for them before they go away?
  19. Data structure by greenreaper · · Score: 1

    I like to call it a set of stacks, but it's really more of a heap. Old stuff goes in a boxed linked list.

  20. Geeky method by Compaqt · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Get a sequential numbering stamp, stamp your documents, and file them in order.

    Then keep info about them in a database, inputting both the unique number, and free-form tags about the document.

    --
    I'm not a lawyer, but I play one on the Internet. Blog
    1. Re:Geeky method by DeBaas · · Score: 1

      I do just that for my company. I use the sequential numbering stamp, scan everything, (got a full duplex scanner with document feeder). The scanner numbers the scans automatically. I then use a small program where I can enter tags and then it emails it to a Gmail account. With the filtering features (filter on the tags) and great search options of Gmail I can always find stuff and download the scans. I keep all the originals in folders on their numbers. So if I ever need the original I can easily find it based on the number.

      The big downside is that the scans are currently not yet encrypted. For that I started a small open source project at https://github.com/AlbertPluton/Tagnlock to make some software where I can easily tag the scans, encrypt and then email the scans.
      The software would have been ready, but I want users to be able to easily create their own tags and options such as compulsorily or not. So we're not there yet. But it is already on Github (GPLv2)

      --
      ---
    2. Re:Geeky method by failedlogic · · Score: 1

      Awesome idea. I've been thinking about different schemes since my stuff is an absolute mess and this is probably the best idea I've come across yet. Thanks!

    3. Re:Geeky method by Compaqt · · Score: 1

      No way! I was being somewhat sarcastic, as it's a typical Slashdot over-engineered solution. But, yeah, I could see it useful for some offices.

      --
      I'm not a lawyer, but I play one on the Internet. Blog
    4. Re:Geeky method by DeBaas · · Score: 1

      Well, I don't use this for my none work stuff. That is just a big mess in a drawer just like everyone else ;-) I usually work at clients so it is really useful to be able to access anything as long as you've got access to gmail.

      And the key is paying for a good and fast scanner with a document feeder that can number the files.

      --
      ---
    5. Re:Geeky method by Threni · · Score: 1

      If you're going to go to any effort at all (I can't be arsed - stick some in a drawer, trash the rest), you might as well scan them into a jpeg and have the whole thing on line, with a filename something like:

      yyyymmdd_company

      You could probably OCR them so you could search text for extra tedium.

    6. Re:Geeky method by synaptik · · Score: 5, Funny

      Better yet, use a binary tree. On each piece of paper, punch 1 hole at the top-center, and also a hole at both the left and right bottom corners. Tie a small length of string through the top hole, and then tie the other end of that string to the left-or-right hole of the appropriate parent paper, based on your key sorting criteria. Don't forget to rebalance the tree on occasion.

      For added fun, use different colors of string for different search keys. This way you can end up with multiple binary trees, all sharing the same nodes!

      --
      HSJ$$*&#^!#+++ATH0
      NO CARRIER
    7. Re:Geeky method by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you serious?

      I would consider this a complete waste of time for the 2 times per year you need to look something up? A single folder per year gets me close enough and puts the effort where it is really needed - FINDING the document, not filing it.

    8. Re:Geeky method by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You missed out Step 3: Happily spend all your spare time doing this, so you don't have a social life or get a date.

  21. on the interweb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just about all documents these days goes to my electronic mailbox instead of snailmail. http://www.e-boks.dk/page.aspx?pageid=f7b9da3d-2ee8-4309-ba0e-ae4cf895eb9b
    everything from the goverment, electric bills, heating, bank, loans, credit cards, water, retirement fund, taxes, phone, internet, cable TV. I can sort them in folders, download them as PDF etc and buy extra space to upload personal documents i have scanned or whatever.

    It is possible because I have a national ID(the horror). https://www.nemid.nu/om_nemid/about_nemid/

    I have always had a terrible mess in all my documents and spent hours sorting them, looking for something and so on, but this really works well.

  22. Piles by crumbz · · Score: 5, Funny

    Lots of them. All over the house. It's a mess.

    1. Re:Piles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I use the same method. It may be a mess, but things that you actually need are usually on the top of piles close to your desk, so you don't spend much time searching. You only live 80 years or so. Sorting and filing takes up a lot of time and given that you won't have time or need to read most of these papers this time will largely be wasted.
      Some people take this one step further and throw away everything older than a year, but I wont. a) Accidentally throwing something away isn't fun. b) Relevance is not a nice function of time. c) Figuring out what is old enough and throwing this away becomes a chore in itself.
      Just let it stack. I've been here for 30 years or so and I can look at my stacks and confidently say there's plenty space from 50 more years' worth of stacks. So there is no point in doing something about it - it won't pay off.

    2. Re:Piles by xyourfacekillerx · · Score: 1

      Same here. A few piles, and a mail basket (where other items like remotes, ipods and wallets often randomly get tossed in), and a drawer in my dresser where all my documents (receipts, paid bills, billing statements, etc) go in, obviously very unsorted. I am ok with that system because I know I DEFINITELY have every document in that drawer should I need it, and I don't mind spending the hour it takes to find it, since I've only ever had to bring up past documents maybe once or twice a year since I was 16. The searching process also is the purging process.

      So far it's worked out that spending the one-two hours a year finding documents saves me MORE time than implementing an organized solution! It takes 30 seconds to file something in a sorted manner, and 30 seconds to find it. I'd say I "file" an average of more than 60 documents a year, so that works out to spending more than an hour a year organizing files... and then when you have to purge old documents, you have to go through each category rather than throw them out as you encounter them, so you spend more than THAT, whenever you purge. just think about it. :)

      Ironically, what I *do* file in a very organized information is warranty information and instruction manuals for things like appliances, software licenses, electronics, even self-assembly furniture. You never know when you have to re-order a rare part or send out a repair order and so on, that kind of stuff can't afford to be misplaced or disorganized.

  23. File Cabinet and Electronic by moehoward · · Score: 5, Informative

    I follow IRS rules and keep 7 years of documents. When possible, I have bills electronically sent to me and I simply file them in folders in G-mail.

    Each January, I create a new set of file folders (physical) that mirror the previous year's folder structure. Then, I shred the files from 8 years ago. Takes an entire hour. My files for current year and past year are in the top drawer of a 4-drawer file cabinet. The other 5 years' stuff is stored 2 drawers down. The 2nd drawer holds things like insurance info and instructions/directions (indirections??) for house-hold "stuff". The bottom drawer is for home-owners stuff, personal stuff. etc.

    My work files are stored under my desk in a double-drawer horizontal filing cabinet. It holds all things work-related. But, the top drawer closest to me holds anything that is currently going on in my life, so that I have instant access when I get phone calls, e-mails, etc. On top of that, I have an organizer on my desk that holds really, really current stuff that would include stuff that I will be working with on any given day.

    I have been doing this for years, and it works, as long as you keep a maintenance routine. Easy habits to get into and I am never searching through piles like I see others doing. My desk stays neat and organized and I always have what I need for any day right in front of me.

    Being organized like this is essential to increasing personal productivity and producing quality work.

    It is stupidly easy, but I would say that maybe less than 5% of people can achieve a high-level of organization.

    Your question might come across as dumb to other slashdotters, but I find it incredibly relevant.

    --
    "If you want to improve, be content to be thought foolish and stupid." - Epictetus
    1. Re:File Cabinet and Electronic by xMrFishx · · Score: 1

      Whilst I currently don't have a system in place, that's essentially the one I'd opt for, except on the 7 year boundary I'd scan and then shred the documents. For instance my OH's business will probably follow that, once she hits the 7 year limit, scan and destroy. Neither her business nor my paperwork is old enough to hit that boundary yet (being mid 20s) but I agree that it's best to start now. I'm the sort of person who likes things easy to find, and properly filed. For instance, when sorting through huge piles of mess, I scatter it all out on the floor and then sub-pile and sub-sub-pile until I get it into some crazy neat order. I actually find it quite fun. Personally, I watch out for envelopes. I always rip in half envelopes once delt with, and file the condensed paper elsewhere, else I accidentally might look at an envelope and think it's something that needs dealing with (or more likely, the opposite and not deal with something important).

    2. Re:File Cabinet and Electronic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry to inform you the rule with the IRS is that you need to keep 3 years of documents. The exception is if you are committing a felony related crime (as in the Federal Courts) then you have to keep documents for 7 years.

    3. Re:File Cabinet and Electronic by butlerm · · Score: 1

      The IRS rarely goes back more than three years, and then only if there appears to be a serious problem. As far as the value of keeping receipts for minor expenses from even three years ago goes, one might consider the cost to you if the IRS arbitrarily decided to disallow all of them. For many people that is a such a small number it is not worth losing sleep over.

      If you run a non-trivial business, are relatively well off, or have deductions for large transactions, however, you better keep documentation for all of that.

    4. Re:File Cabinet and Electronic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clever Sheldon!

    5. Re:File Cabinet and Electronic by Gothmolly · · Score: 0

      You sound gay.

      --
      I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
    6. Re:File Cabinet and Electronic by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1

      So saving the documents for 7 years is evidence of admission that you are committing a felony? BTW do the felons also set the malicious bit on while transmitting packets to the ethernet?

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    7. Re:File Cabinet and Electronic by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1

      . Easy habits to get into and I am never searching through piles like I see others doing. My desk stays neat and organized and I always have what I need for any day right in front of me.

      ...

      Your question might come across as dumb to other slashdotters, but I find it incredibly relevant.

      One thing we learn very early is that one must keep the desk nice and clean and neat. Otherwise mom will throw you out of the basement.

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    8. Re:File Cabinet and Electronic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      felony doesn't mean "federal" it means that the potential penalty is 1yr or more in jail/prison

      the irs rules are 3-7 years for various types of documents in various situations, and there is literally "no limit" if the IRS thinks you filed a fraudulent return

    9. Re:File Cabinet and Electronic by rwa2 · · Score: 1

      Word. A decade ago we went to a used office furniture store and picked up a big black filing cabinet for $15. One drawer just for me, one just for my wife, one for our joint assets and important documents, and one to supply empty folders and some extra storage.

      When snail mail comes in, it goes into one of three bins... either a small "to do" bin, a medium-sized "to file" bin, or the large recycling bin. Maybe twice a year I'd go through the to-file bin and sort the various insurance or whatever forms into the large filing cabinet (a lot of that stuff also falls into the recycling bin then also once it's lost its expediency). Some things such as tax documents get filed into the "Current Year" tax folder right away.

      Maybe once every few years we'll rifle through the filing cabinet and purge really old stuff when school has a free shredder day or something. But just maybe, we're still not too pressed for space even after a decade.

      Should probably get a fireproof safe for all of our important documents, but meh. We have scans of all the critical stuff stored encrypted in the cloud somewhere.

  24. is i am crazy, but by NuclearCat · · Score: 1

    1)I scan them 2)store in my pc (directory with dates) 3)burn a copy to CD/DVD 4)get a hermetic plastic bag, put a CD and papers inside together 5)put bag of Silica Gel with them, seal 6)print on label printer -dates of archive, stick on bag 7)put bag in cabinet, in the basement. I hope one day i can put in this bags dry nitrogen, instead of air, and get better bags, and thermal labels maybe will discolour after while, but i don't want to look more insane, than i am now. P.S. I keen even checks from supermarket, and thermal ones tend to discolor after 3 years, but it is just for fun.

    1. Re:is i am crazy, but by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      If you notice any spare
      tags, you might want to recycle those. You seem to be down a few.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    2. Re:is i am crazy, but by Antarius · · Score: 1

      Uh-oh! It's a Dog vs Cat fight going on here!

    3. Re:is i am crazy, but by NuclearCat · · Score: 1

      Thanks for advice,
      and sorry

    4. Re:is i am crazy, but by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 1

      P.S. I keen even checks from supermarket, and thermal ones tend to discolor after 3 years, but it is just for fun.

      Better than comic books, I bet! Who am I to judge, though -- it's your hobby. I collect spores, molds and fungus.

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    5. Re:is i am crazy, but by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Not a problem, just felt like being Pedantic, this being Sunday and all.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  25. by year/by type by godrik · · Score: 1

    When I receive a document, I file it by type: electricity/phone/rent/misc/salary stub/insurance/....
    In january. I put all of them in a big envelop and write the year on it.

  26. Re:paper? in 2011? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

    moding it down doesn't make it less true.

  27. Box files by madprof · · Score: 1

    I have some shelves with box files containing all important paper documents.There is no way I am trusting my own electronic storage to hold the data as it is still way too fragile and scanning everything is a massive chore. Your time should be worth more than that. Far more efficient to keep the paper and shred years later.

    For electronic stuff it tends to be things kept on the systems of the bank or utility company so I only have to login to their systems to get hold of it.

    1. Re:Box files by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the flip side, it's much easier to backup the electronic data to a remote location. Whereas one fire could destroy all those paper documents kept at home. Of course said documents would be the last of your concerns at the time...

  28. Fujitsu Fi-6130 - Brilliant at filing a lot paper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've got Fujitsu Fi-6130 for 3 years by now - although it was expensive - it was/is worth every penny

    I get two layer PDF - scan + OCR which should be good enough as proof and searchable too.

  29. Effective download? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Very timely topic, as I am looking to go as paperless as possible myself. I just went through a couple of filing cabinet drawers and got rid of 18" of paper that didn't need to be kept past a year.

    One obstacle to getting soft copies of utilities, bank, brokers, etc. is that most of them put not effort in naming the pdf version of your statements. Thus, you have to rename each by hand (Schwab being an exception). Also, they usually pay no attention to how many clicks are required to download two successive months. Does anyone have GreaseMonkey scripts or some such for the major providers to ease the task?

    Once downloaded I back this up locally and through a SaaS provider. That has got to be safer than my filing cabinet.

    1. Re:Effective download? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One obstacle to getting soft copies of utilities, bank, brokers, etc. is that most of them put not effort in naming the pdf version of your statements. Thus, you have to rename each by hand

      Yes. Receiving random_server_side_script_name.php for each and every one of them is not at all helpful. I've complained to the "suggestion" lines of some of them, no change....

      Also, they usually pay no attention to how many clicks are required to download two successive months.

      Nor do they provide any means of "bulk download" of a set of items.

      Does anyone have GreaseMonkey scripts or some such for the major providers to ease the task?

      I've been tempted a few times to write my own crawlers for the places that only provide electronic statements, but have not yet had time to do so.

    2. Re:Effective download? by sribe · · Score: 1

      One obstacle to getting soft copies of utilities, bank, brokers, etc. is that most of them put not effort in naming the pdf version of your statements. Thus, you have to rename each by hand...

      I swear it's easier & faster for me to scan than to rename & move downloaded files...

  30. throw it in a box by ZombieBraintrust · · Score: 1

    I throw all my mail in a box. I go through it once a year to do my taxes.

  31. Fit the Method to the Need by richg74 · · Score: 1

    Having looked at this for my business, as well as for personal stuff, I think the first thing to think about, for each category of document, why you need to save it, and how you are likely to use it. For things that you are required to save, like tax documents, I am not sure that electronic storage is sufficient -- you may need the paper. On the other hand, keeping the paper doesn't mean you have to work with the paper. Scan them, by all means, and use your electronic files as an index. I have a regular-size filing cabinet with hanging folders (by year for tax info, for example), which I very rarely look into. For other things that you may keep for reference, electronic records may be fine. And some stuff, like old utility bills, is probably not worth keeping at all.

    1. Re:Fit the Method to the Need by sribe · · Score: 1

      For things that you are required to save, like tax documents, I am not sure that electronic storage is sufficient -- you may need the paper.

      Not true.

  32. Shredder by 4105 · · Score: 1

    I pretty much shred everything. I only keep paper copies of things like tax returns, and only for seven years. All that stuff fits in a hand held file box.

  33. KISS by Kjella · · Score: 1

    Paper folder with dividers, hole puncher, file and forget. I have sections for the things I might need again like work contract & related, apartment & related, insurance & related, tax reporting and related and so on then a big section of general bills/receipts. I don't bother with the date on it, I simply file them in the order I put them in - it's close enough that I don't bother. The electronic ones I hope either who I got them from or my webmail provider will keep - at least one of them. Those I generally just pay and if all else goes nuclear I'll just have the bank statement but I accept that risk.

    Most of my bills I don't really even see, they get paid automatically with a transfer limit. If they're higher than expected then they'll be stopped and I'll get mail that the payment was not completed, either because they raised prices or they did a mistake in billing. It's as simple as that.

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  34. Mounds and piles. by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

    They fall over when they get more than about 2' high, though.
    Also, the parrot chews on them.

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  35. I just throw them away by stinerman · · Score: 1

    I get two bills by mail and I can check the status of them online (they just won't stop sending me paper bills).

    They usually don't get opened and just thrown in the garbage. Is that a great idea? No. I should probably shred them, but I'm lazy and too cheap to buy a shredder.

  36. "lazy filing" by david.emery · · Score: 1

    Each year as the year goes on, I toss everything into a "inbasket". Then come tax time (usually around New Years), I dump out the box, sort through and organize the receipts. I'll put all the gas receipts together in order & staple them, electric receipts together and staple them, etc. Then I extract all the tax info into a single spreadsheet, making a note on the source (e.g. for a deductible item on a credit card, I note the card and the month of the statement with that item.) Finally, I dump everything into a bag and put that bag in a "banker's storage box;" I can usually fit 2 bags (2 years) into a single box. Then I stick that box in the closet, and hope I don't get audited. This usually takes about 10 hours over a 2-3 day period. The core principle here is "don't do today what you can put off until tomorrow, or whenever the item is really needed." :-)

    The exceptions to this are receipts associated with home improvements, which go into a separate folder (so I can deduct them from the value of the house when I sell it), car repair receipts (each car has a separate folder so I have, at least in principle, full service records for that car), any permanent legal documents which go into their own "permanent save me" folder, and finally the taxes themselves. I print out the full set of tax reports/forms (from TurboTax) and also save the full set of tax forms as a PDF. That PDF goes into a folder that is part of what I back up in multiple copies (along with digital photographs, scanned family records/genealogical documents, etc).

    There are sites that provide retention advice for various classes of receipts.

  37. all digital by sribe · · Score: 1

    Definitely scan & shred. It's only a little bit more time to stick paper in the scanner to my left and scan than it would be to file the paper in even the loosest of physical filing systems--and then I never ever have to touch that piece of paper again. (Well, OK, I toss it on the floor, then when I get up later pick up the pile and stuff it in the shredder--that that is the last time I touch the paper.) To me, definitely worth it to be done with it once and for all.

    One folder per year, within that one folder per category (where categories are broad: household, mortgage, medical expenses, health insurance...), file named with date & description.

    Of course not everybody has a half dozen or so high-speed document scanners in their office. (I write software for them...)

  38. Scan, server, off-site backup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I started scanning years ago and ultimately got a high-speed, two-sided scanner to accomplish the task. My file structure isn't that different than the way I used physically file documents.

    Company Name ->
          Year ->
                Document Name
    with document name having a format of [YYYY-MM-DD description]

    I debated lots of different filing/naming technique and settled on this one because it's easier for my wife to find a document and I can delete a company's documents based on the year.

    Since initially setting this up, most of the companies with whom I do business offer on-line documents. I still download those and file them in my structure so I can go to documents as needed. I choose the downloaded versions because they're much smaller than the ones I manually scan.

    Overall this was a convenient method for filing and wasn't much more than that until about 3 years ago when I created an expense/inventory system. I created my own just for fun and because I wanted to track categories of expenses differently than the ways provided by commercial packages and I wanted a system where I owned the data but had it accessible online. With this system, documents and receipts are linked from the expense/inventory system.

    Up until linking via this system it was of little value other than reducing the amount of paper we kept filed. I'm surprised at the number of times I look up documents, receipts, etc. online. The inventory system came about because we're getting ready to move and will have most of our possessions in storage for an extended period of time. My wife and I went room to room cataloging almost everything, taking a photo and storing the information. Because of the way the system was set up, my wife can look at a photo of a piece of furniture, link to the expense entry from when we bought it and view the documents/receipts associated with that entry.

    Thinking about how you're going to access the documents and deal with archiving/deletion will help determine your storage structure.

    The process was extremely painful until I got the two-sided, high speed scanner.

    I use one of the network-based, off-site storage service providers to back up the systems.

  39. Stacked, catagorised and scanned. by majesticmerc · · Score: 1

    My document archiving works like this:

    1. 1. Document is placed in my in tray (yes, I have an in tray at home) if it requires dealing with. Bills for example all get put in my in tray so that I remember to pay them. This step is skipped if the document is reference only (acknowledgement letters, signed contracts, etc).
    2. 2. The document is placed in the "black file", which is a catagorised file of documents. The document is also scanned to a PDF and stored on my PC (and backed up)
    3. 3. The document lives in the black file until it is no longer relevant (for bills, a year, contracts stay until they expire, etc), at which point it is shredded, but the digital copy is kept permanently.

    This works well for me, but obviously ymmv. Keeping documents digitized also keeps them in easy reach and means I only need a small file to keep important documents since older ones are all stored electronically.

  40. Pay over the Internet. No paper bills. by Securityemo · · Score: 1

    While I do get stuff mailed to me if I miss a payment, most things here in Sweden (and I believe most other parts of Europe) allows for e-mail based bills and/or just setting up a periodic wiring of money to an account through the bank's web page. My bank logins are handled using a wireless smartcard reader w/ a PIN keypad. Thus, the only things I need to file are contracts, receipts and other such signed documents; this reduces the paper load to one plastic binder, small enough that you can just flip through it to find the document you want On the other hand, I don't own or purchase many things where it would make sense to keep receipts or warranty agreements, for example.

    Occasionally I've needed to submit copies of documents to the government to prove medical expenses or such since privacy laws means that the different state departements cannot easily share such things, but it's rare (however some stuff should probably be kept down in the vault of the local bank, but that's an extra expense.) As for disposal, I just tear them to shreds and throw them in the trash. If I had to dispose of something really sensitive, I guess I'd just slowly burn it under the kitchen vent.

    --
    Emotions! In your brain!
    1. Re:Pay over the Internet. No paper bills. by Delkster · · Score: 1

      Very true, many of the everyday routines of paying bills don't require ever handling paper. A slight problem at least here in Finland is that you're technically supposed to keep bills etc. for a number of years (I think five, but am not exactly sure). They might be relevant if you need to prove something regarding your tax deductions, for example, or if you need to show that you've been wrongly billed. Banks usually offer to store electronic bills for a year and a half, so that doesn't fulfill the legal requirements of document retention. (I don't know if the online billing system would otherwise satisfy the legal requirements but that alone means it doesn't.)

      I guess you might be able to get an extended retention period by paying the bank extra for the service, but it's sort of ridiculous to design a system to make things more straightforward by moving them from paper to digital, yet leave in shortcomings that make it difficult to fulfill official requirements using that system. I think many people just ignore the problem or are oblivious to the retention requirements, but there's something wrong with the system if the number one solution is to ignore the legislation.

  41. Scan'n'shred by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use a commercial app from Neat. It comes bundled with a small sheet scanner that works pretty well. It's small enough to sit on the desk and be shoved out of the way when not in use. The software is fairly comprehensive, allowing scheduled backups to a network share, OCR of documents, business cards, receipts, etc. At the end of the month, I make sure the most recent backup was successful, then shred the paper copies.

  42. storage by egor.alexeyev · · Score: 1

    I store my documents in plastic files with zipper-like fastener. The files are in different sizes, ones for standard sized paper and smaller ones.

  43. what is this, Lifehacker? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what is this, Lifehacker?

  44. Packrat solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I tend to horde paper documents, so to solve that I moved to a mostly electronic solution. I have three kids in middle school, so sometime the paperwork is overwhelming, but this has helped me cope.

    I created a categorized hierarchical directory structure on my PC and scan in every document I receive as a PDF. I label each file with the date and brief description. A few documents I must keep the original copy, such as birth certificates, titles, etc, so those I file in a filing cabinet. I was using Paperport to manage the documents and scans. It works, but it's buggy. I switched to Scanwiz, which is cheaper and much simpler and has less bugs.

    Most bank statements and bills I download as PDF and store them in the proper directory.

    Since some of the documents I can't afford to lose, I backup them up using CrashPlan. It's the best online backup I've found.

  45. Electronically by Megahard · · Score: 1

    Required: scanner and shredder. Everyone should own a shredder, or take sensitive stuff to one of those commercial shredder services. Otherwise, as some have mentioned, you eventually get hip-deep in paper. A very small number of paper docs need to be kept (auto title, will, e.g.). Use whatever systematic organization you want for scanned documents. You will need good backups including off-site. And a way for selected others to access it if something happens to you. Yes, it's some work to set up, but then it's easy to run and maintain. And if you get everything you can delivered electronically, it saves a lot of paper.

    --
    I eat only the real part of complex carbohydrates.
  46. In a big pile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    on the kitchen table until I can't use the table and then into a paper bag in the basement. Why, do you need something?

  47. Filing Cabinet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They're these amazing specialised pieces of furniture that can hold large numbers of folders. Retaining various documents for 7 years is usually required under tax laws in Ireland (and similar in other countries). I bought a four-drawer filing cabinet. shrug. If was doing more, maybe I'd get another, then I'd have one drawer a year and an extra one for permanent stuff, eh?

  48. Scanner with document feeder makes it easy. by kieran · · Score: 1

    I picked up a printer/scanner combo with a document feeder, and I scan everything and (save for anything I think I might need for legal reasons) shred the originals.

    I file the docs in folders by company name and with a YYYYMMDD-whatever image name or subfolder (for multiple pages). And I upload a backup to my server.

    This has worked really well for me; paprework used to be a nightmare to find as I was so bad at filing it. Now I can find anything easily, and even email someone what they're asking for directly from my phone. It's awesome.

  49. Combination of GTD/ScanSnap/DevonThink Pro by Master+Of+Ninja · · Score: 1

    I heartily recommend a setup based on a ScanSnap and some sort of organisational filing software. The ScanSnap is a home-office grade document scanner - the main difference to your cheapo scanners is it's focus on documents and it's ability to scan both sides of A4 paper in one pass, achieving at least 20ppm scanning. The software that comes with it should be able to do OCR. I combine this with DevonThink on the Mac which allows me to organise the documents efficiently and search through them - it will allow you to 'tag' documents so that actually finding things is very easy. I have years of documents with me this way, and the documents come with me on the road.

    The paper documents I file in a filing cabinet at home. Get a 4 drawer filing cabinet. Get a label maker. File everything in alphabetical order. Use one drawer for 'months' - this will hold documents that you can shred at the appropriate time of year.

    GTD is a great method of planning and organisation however people never keep to the strict philosophy and work variations. I would read it. That should get you sorted.

  50. Indeed... by denzacar · · Score: 2

    Even a photocopied (as in - copied onto a dead tree format) documents will be useless in many cases if you are required to have the original receipt/bill/invoice.

    As for filing...
    Stick everything into plastic sheet protectors.
    If you need to label them in some way, either attach a post-it from the inside or simply write the label on the sheet protector with a marker.
    Put sheet protectors into a binding box or two.
    About once a year go through your binders and throw away the bills you no longer need.

    Same procedure is useful for storing warranties, manuals and instructions nobody ever reads (but you start looking for them when something needs fixing/replacing).

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    1. Re:Indeed... by hawguy · · Score: 2

      Even a photocopied (as in - copied onto a dead tree format) documents will be useless in many cases if you are required to have the original receipt/bill/invoice.

      What is one of those cases? As a private citizen, I've never had a need for a "wet-ink" original document, copies have been fine for everything, even when I had a dispute with my mortgage company.

      As for filing...
      Stick everything into plastic sheet protectors. [amazon.com]
      If you need to label them in some way, either attach a post-it from the inside or simply write the label on the sheet protector with a marker.

      Wow, are you that OCD with everything? Even in companies I've worked at where they have million dollar contracts that have a 10 year lifetime, they just put the originals in manilla envelopes in a file cabinet (and keep an electronic copy) -- what purpose does the sheet protector serve?

    2. Re:Indeed... by vlm · · Score: 1

      I used a plan similar to yours, until I realized :

      and throw away the bills you no longer need.

      That would be all of them... So, my workflow goes from in box to shredder.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    3. Re:Indeed... by vlm · · Score: 1

      what purpose does the sheet protector serve?

      Given time and pressure, xerography toner will glue pages together. If the paper gets glued to the inside of the page protector, you can still read the page.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    4. Re:Indeed... by denzacar · · Score: 1

      what purpose does the sheet protector serve?

      Easy sorting.

      They are transparent so you can immediately see what is in each of them, come pre-punched so you just attach them to a binder and... well... what the other poster said about toner.
      But I primarily use them for easy sorting.

      What is one of those cases? As a private citizen, I've never had a need for a "wet-ink" original document, copies have been fine for everything, even when I had a dispute with my mortgage company.

      The only reason anyone might need to keep a receipt/bill/contract. A case of an asshole.
      You know... an asshole behind a plate of glass demanding to see your original receipt/bill/contract/27b-6 as a proof for this or that.

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    5. Re:Indeed... by denzacar · · Score: 1

      That's all fine and dandy... Until someone requests to see your original 27b/6.

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    6. Re:Indeed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sheet protectors? You're insanely wasteful. Scan it. Name the scanned files and store them with backup as well. Put the scanned copies in a box and keep a few years of the boxes if you care but you'll never need them. I have had a virtually paperless office for over 19 years. If I had to store all the paper for my businesses we would be talking about thousands of file cabinets. Crazy talk. I've been through eight audits (and won every time) and never were original documents needed. They looked at my electronic ledgers and electronic copies of my tax returns. Catch up with the times.

  51. I store mine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the freezer. That way they don't get lost.

  52. Correction. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    YOU have 3 from the original due date file/refile and claim a refund

    the IRS has 3 years from the due date, or 3 years from the date you file a return if filed late
    UNLESS they suspect fraud... then it is longer

    some states already have longer
    http://taxes.about.com/od/statetaxes/a/tax-audit-statute-of-limitations-by-state.htm

  53. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  54. Paytrust by hawguy · · Score: 4, Informative

    I have all (well nearly all) of my bills sent to Paytrust.

    I set their address as my billing address, when they receive the paper bills, they scan them in and store them for me. Then they pay the bills for me -- I set up payment rules so, for example, if my electric bill is less than $50, they pay it automatically, if it's more than that, they email me an exception notice and wait for me to take action. It's also possible to set a maximum payment, so for example with a credit card bill, I can tell them to pay a maximum of $200 on my bill (or the total payment due if it's less than $200).

    For most merchants that have electronic bill retrieval, they retrieve the electronic copy of the bill so I don't have to have a paper bill sent to them.

    For merchants that don't send a bill (i.e. my landlord), I can schedule automatic payments (or do one-time payments) just like any online payment service.

    They have electronic payment arrangements for most major billers (credit card companies, utilities ,etc), so they don't even need to send out a check in many cases, they pay electronically so there's no chance of the bill getting lost in the mail (though I believe that with some smaller billers, instead of an EFT, they send one paper check for all of their customers along with a list of account numbers to apply the payment to)

    In about 10 years of using their service, they've never lost a payment - I've had a few checks in the mail fail to be delivered, but in all but one case, the check eventually made it, it was delayed by the post office.

    Some merchants get confused when your billing address is not the same as your physical address. Sometimes they sent notices to the paytrust address, which Paytrust either scans in for you, or if it's something like an auto insurance card, they forward it to you by mail.

    The only missing feature that I really wish they had is a way to upload my own invoices, so if I get a bill from my plumber I can upload it to my Paytrust account to store it and send him a check.

    At the end of the year, they sell me a CD with all of my bill images on it.

    I know this sounds like a paid advertisement for Paytrust, but I am just a very satisfied customer - I'm usually terrible about paying bills on time, Paytrust makes sure I make all of my bills are paid on time. Does anyone know if there any other competing services? My bank's online bill-pay service just doesn't compare - they have no way to receive paper bills and pay them for me.

    1. Re:Paytrust by hawguy · · Score: 1

      Sorry, bad link in my post - it should link to: Paytrust. I dropped the "http" in the link, and apparently that makes it link to this article.

  55. i don't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i lost my w2, but that's okay because i didn't make enough money to be taxed this year

  56. Paper filing by benjfowler · · Score: 1

    I have an alphabetical file, indexed by category. I maintain an index of category headings, to deal with the problem of losing track of something, if there's multiple ways of filing it. The index is totally ad-hoc (although I suppose a real librarian might file, based on a standardized set of headings).

    For tax records, I maintain yearly files, retained for only 7 years. Anything older gets fed into a shredder.

    Bank statements are filed, but occasionally, I scan into PDF format and then shred them. I don't, as yet, have any way of converting them into electronic format; which is too bad, because I've played with the idea of running some analytics over my spending and saving habits (and working out much money I blow on junk food every month). I'd love to have able to have bills and bank statements delivered in some kind of secure, standard format, but I don't think anybody (banks or utilities) can be arsed making life easier for their customers.

  57. Are you married? Might you ever be? Shred it! by time961 · · Score: 2

    If you are ever involved in divorce litigation, there is nothing nicer than being able to say "I have no such records" when your deranged spouse's even more deranged bottom-feeding scumbag sends you a discovery request listing 141 categories of documents and demands copies of all paper or electronic records in those categories.

    In normal litigation this isn't as much of an issue, because the attorneys are usually able to negotiate a happy medium in which they agree not to issue nuclear-tipped discovery requests and focus on what's actually relevant to the action. In divorce, though, all bets are off, because you're paying both attorneys and an evil one can happily run through all your money (a total with which he is intimately familiar, again unlike normal litigation) by harassing you--your own attorney's fees are just handy collateral damage. Mutual destruction is by far the most profitable outcome for such sharks, since they tend not to get a lot of repeat business. (It's not just divorce, of course: if you're targeted in a SLAPP suit, or, like poor George, have otherwise angered a large corporation, you'll have the same troubles.)

    Keep only what you absolutely must. The 7-year deadline is for tax returns, everything else is much more ephemeral. Search for "records retention" to find a variety of helpful guidelines.

    After 50-odd years on the planet, I've found that hardly any ordinary paperwork I've kept has ever been useful. Sure, a couple months of bills or bank statements can come in handy, but even a year is more than I have ever needed (as long as I kept track of big items, like the costs of building an addition on the house).

    This is especially true of old e-mail. When Cardinal Richelieu said "Give me six lines written by the most honest of men, and in them I will find something with which to hang him", that's what he was talking of. Prescient, he was. Anticipated the Internet and all that it entails.

    1. Re:Are you married? Might you ever be? Shred it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is all true. I work for divorce lawyers. They look at what you're worth, then figure out how many hours it will take to use it up.

  58. Glad you asked! by Saint+Stephen · · Score: 1

    I got a box with 26 folders in 5 sets of 5 colors plus 1 gray folder. My first thought obviously was a-z but how many q's would i have? So i decided to lump my stuff into 5 really broad categories and rotate the sets each quarter. The last set is long term. When i rotate the 4th quarter back to the current, i purge and move the residue to long term. The 26 th folder is for stuff waiting to be filed.

    It works great for me but no one else can figure it out :). Btw, the categories are: stuff about money, cute stuff, stuff about me and the wife, stuff about the kids, and service records. Medical bills is stuff about us not money. I always know where to look

  59. In three piles... by thejuggler · · Score: 1

    This Years

    Last Years

    Compost

    1. Re:In three piles... by turkeyfish · · Score: 1

      Keep in mind that the tax man can show up and demand up to year 7. Beyond that you are in the clear, at least as far as the courts seem to be concerned.

  60. It's not so much how, but what you keep... by Above · · Score: 1

    I use a good old pre-digital hanging lateral file. Hanging filing cabinets can be quite expensive, but a good one with ball bearing slides does the job quite well. A lateral 2-drawer is excellent because you can do letter sized in one drawer, and legal sized in the other.

    But the real question is what to keep and why. You want to make it easy to get rid of what you don't need to keep anymore.

    • Bills. Best thing, make 12 folders, one for each month. At the start of the month shred the year old bills. You want a year of bills so you can check your yearly costs, seasonal trends, or in some markets you may have to detail electrical or gas costs to sell your hose quickly. More than a year isn't necessary.
    • Bank statements, 401k statements, pay stubs etc. 7 years. Basically financial stuff should be for 7 years. The IRS generally won't expect you to have older paperwork.
    • Tax returns. This should be the 7 year rule, but each year after I'm done I put that entire year in a folder and keep it forever. It's a small amount of space, and will provide a treasure trove of documents to shock your grand kids with when you are 80.
    • Home sales paperwork. I also keep this forever. At a minimum you need it as long as you have a mortgage, IMHO.
    • Warranties. As long as they last, which may be a long time for some things.

    Lastly, things permanently installed in a house (new AC units, stoves, etc) should have all their stuff dropped in a drawer in the kitchen. Leave them for the next owner. They will love you.

    Now, that you know what to keep you need to get rid of everything else, using a good shredder. Do yourself a favor and go ahead and spring for a quality "small business" unit in the $250-$400 range. The cheap home ones will choke when you try and put your junk mail in them and break after a few years. Your small business one will swallow those credit card offers that come in the mail without even opening, and easily eat your month of bills in one feed once a month.

    1. Re:It's not so much how, but what you keep... by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 1

      I use a good old pre-digital hanging lateral file. Hanging filing cabinets can be quite expensive, but a good one with ball bearing slides does the job quite well. A lateral 2-drawer is excellent because you can do letter sized in one drawer, and legal sized in the other.

      I lucked out and got laid off from a place that went out of business so fast they didn't have time to sell or dispose of the furniture. But good used office quality cabinets are pretty widely available, especially during a recession . . .

      Lastly, things permanently installed in a house (new AC units, stoves, etc) should have all their stuff dropped in a drawer in the kitchen. Leave them for the next owner. They will love you.

      I kept all those things exactly so in my last house, carefully categorized and filed in a 3-ring binder with tabs and everything. Unfortunately for the guy that bought the house, he was a real pain in the ass in negotiations, repairs and closing. I accidentally lost the folder while moving out. Ha, let's see you try to fix that sink without the faucet manual. Ya, I showed him. Showed him good.

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
  61. Scanned Documents are Easy to Store by kenwd0elq · · Score: 1

    Scan the paper documents to your hard drive, and throw them into a cardboard box labelled with the year. Record financial transactions in a financial management program like Quicken, and throw all the receipts and statements into that same box. You generally won't ever need to access the paper documents, but you have them if you ever do.

    Any electronic documents go into the same scans folder on the hard drive, backed up to a portable USB drive or two.

    After a few years, take that cardboard box off the shelf in the garage and burn it.

  62. A $2 solution by peterofoz · · Score: 1

    I just use a big file storage box and toss them in (LIFO queue). Once a year, about tax season, I sift though (query table scan) and toss out the trash (delete query) that got in by accident, pull any missed tax related docs (move queue query). Sometimes I'll stack bills by type or account (bucket sort on doc_type/account), but don't go so far as to alphabetize them (index by date).

    You can do reduce the $2 cost to nil by recycling a copy paper box from work.

    After 7 years, I pay my kids $20 to shred a box or two for the work ethic.

  63. Not worth the trouble by EdZep · · Score: 1

    That stuff is barely worth keeping at all; not worth putting in a file cabinet; and certainly not worth the trouble of digitizing. Put it in a box or drawer chronologically, not even sub-divided by type. (Ok, keep you mortgage and insurance papers filed in a cabinet.) In the rare instance where you need to refer to a credit card bill, you'll find it easily enough. After 5 or 6 years, start purging and shredding the oldest stuff.

    No need to over-complicate your life.

    1. Re:Not worth the trouble by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Most of the documents referenced in the original question are not worthy of an special consideration.

      For most of them, a big letter sized box is sufficient. Just add to the box in the order you receive the documents (date based indexing) and get a new box at the end of the year (year based partitioning). Most monthly statements are of no value and meaningless for tax purposes.

      Stuff should get the attention it deserves and no more. Anything else is just going to over-complicate things.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  64. Flie the important stuff by m.dillon · · Score: 1

    I get paper bills for the more important things, but use my bank's bill-pay service to pay them. I file the important pages in a binder (one or two for each year) and shred the rest.

    When tax time comes around I get a second, smaller binder and I do a run-through and move tax-related items from the main binder to the smaller one. e.g. car registration, property taxes, donations, tax documents, medical bills, and so forth. The smaller binder gets shipped off to my CPA.

    For services paid via credit card I carry two cards. One I use for important recurring services and the other I use for every-day purchases and on-line commerce. That way if a fraudulent charge occurs on the second card I can just close it out without having to call people up on the phone to move the recurring charges (which is a hassle). I also lock the credit limit to a lower value to reduce the card's desirability footprint in the system. This system works really well.

    The main reason why I still like to receive paper bills is because it forces me to actually look at what services I am paying for and how much and to really think about whether I need the particular service or the level of service.

    -Matt

    1. Re:Flie the important stuff by RKBA · · Score: 1

      You are the only person I know of other than myself to call a credit card company and ask them to lower my credit limit. I have to repeat it every few years however, because they insist on raising my credit limits a little each year. Next time I will ask about locking it at the lower limit. Thanks for the tip.

  65. An accordian a day keeps the tax man away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A big accordian filing box. Makes it easier for the accountant to process receipts and keeps the tax man at bay

  66. digitize searcheable PDF, originals shoebox by egork · · Score: 1

    Fujitsu ScanSnap500 is the device that does the batch scans. This is actually the only thing I still use Windows for.

  67. Re:paper? in 2011? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Really? UK resident here, and I make my car payment any way except via post.

  68. Scanner, SharePoint, Shredder by The+Real+Dr.+Video · · Score: 1

    repeat as necessary...

    --
    Officially a geek since 1984
  69. Year box(s), scan and file by zonk+the+purposeful · · Score: 1

    I scan everything to google docs, store it with date and etc and pop the copy in a binder above my desk. Works out a binder a year - super neat, and I can always refer to the hardcopy if required - not too much of an overhead to find as every is mostly date ordered.

    --
    "I see. The fact that you...`can't explain'.. explains everything."
  70. Djvju format is made for this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First, look for a tool that will run your ADF sheetfeed scanner and produce DJVU format docs. This format was invented for specifically this purpose: storing document images. Its outputs are much smaller than PDF, JPG, TIFF, etc.

    Next, if you want to index the docs, you probably want to do an OCR on them, at least so you can snag most of the keywords in your index.

    I'm using gscan2pdf for these two steps (linux). It runs scanimage, then unpaper, then tesseract/gocr/cunieform.

    Finally, you'll need an indexer. On linux, you might look at Catfish, tracker, or beagle.

  71. Cronological by year. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've got magazine holders (9x12 boxes with the top and half the side cut off), one for the
    current year, then they go on the shelf for past years. Amost eveything goes in on the right side,
    so inside it's roughly chronological. That means I can at least go to the year and start
    looking through to find what I need. Exceptions: separate tax folders for each year, a box for
    cars, school, and investments given the high probability of trying to find those across multiple
    years. I work with computers too much to trust them.

  72. Opt for Paperless Billing and High Speed Scanner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have opted for paperless statements for all of my accounts, but there are always things you get by paper. I use a "Xerox Documate" duplex scanner. It has an automatic document feeder and scans both sides of a document in a single pass directly to .pdf files. Don't waste your time with a scanner without a document feeder. I've found that I can easily get on-line statements from my paperless accounts whenever I need them and I no longer have to keep file drawers for all the rest of it.

  73. Very simple system by mikael_j · · Score: 1

    First off, I've worked with various electronic payment systems (including building parts of them), I don't trust them, I've seen way too many screwups that end up with hundreds or thousands of users being told variations of "Oh, sorry about charging you ten times the normal amount, we'll have the money back in your account in a fortnight and according to the contract you signed with us we can't be held responsible for any family members of yours who starve to death due to this...".

    So while I've been paying all my bills online for over a decade I do still receive paper bills for everything. I keep these in binders sorted in order of the payment date. I also note the date I paid the bill on the bill.

    In addition to the paid bills I have a chronologically sorted section at the end of the binder for unpaid bills which I go through at the end of every month, paying those bills that are due.

    As for invoices, receipts and such things I keep them in a separate binder sorted by date. I don't save receipts for things like groceries and other minor purchases as I have no reason to do so.

    The third group of documents is "random important stuff", once again sorted chronologically, includes things like various official papers from schools, signed verifications of me not having thrashed previous apartments when moving out (always good to keep around just in case a previous landlord decides to be a dick years later, if you have that paper with a signature on it indicating they said the apartment was fine when you moved out then they can't make you pay for the next guy thrashing the apartment and then disappearing).

    And finally I have a stack of "sort of important, maybe, or maybe not, I'd better just keep this around for a month or two" papers. I go through this pile at the end of every month while paying bills, throwing out those papers that were either not important or that are no longer important and filing those that should be filed in a binder in the appropriate binder.

    This system has worked well for me since I moved to my first apartment and I suspect it will work fine for years to come.

    --
    Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
    1. Re:Very simple system by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      there are simple safeguards you can take to protect your money while using electronic transfers to pay bills.

      the simplest is to have 2 accounts.

      I/O checking account to take direct deposits and make electronic payments

      savings/ATM to keep your money in and get at your money as needed with your pin which you do not write down.

      bulk storage of money should be in CD's

      the reason i have the ATM tap off the savings is so i can't forget how much is going out on a check and withdraw too much, if i am logged in to the online interface i am looking at the check history so i know what may have not cleared yet (my landlord sometimes caches my checks instead of cashing them, record was around 85 days)

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
  74. throw them out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I used to keep everything. I never needed any of it. Now I throw everything out.

  75. Quarterly folders by Max+Romantschuk · · Score: 1

    I used to try and separate everything, but eventually I've settled on filing papers in quarterly folders. Personally the amount I get doesn't warrant higher granularity, and on the rare occasion that I need to find a given piece of paper a quarter (for me) doesn't add up to much more than a stack an inch high.

    --
    .: Max Romantschuk :: http://max.romantschuk.fi/
  76. Thrown against a wall. by b4upoo · · Score: 1

    I make note of the sum due and round it off to the nearest dollar and pay them all electronically, usually on the same day. The bills themselves land near the round pail or on the floor. Having all that paper makes for less dusting as when I finally pick up the bills the dust is on them and not on the carpet. No, I'm not kidding.

  77. A cardboard box by RKBA · · Score: 1

    I file important things like financial documents in a filing cabinet (oldest stuff purged after seven years or so) and toss the rest either into the trash, a crosscut shredder, or a cardboard box. I fill one cardboard box each year. At the end of the year I seal it, store it, and burn the oldest cardboard box and its contents which is typically three years old at that point.

  78. Piles of gradually more organised piles by nOw2 · · Score: 1

    Everyone else has already covered everything I can think of, but this is my current 'method':

    * Everything older than about 6 years is contained within a few box files. All held together, just ordered by when it was received. The oldest papers would be 15 years old.
    * Since then everything is sorted into a few (er, 12?) small "piles" - some in boxes, some in folders, some piled on shelves. I know where something should be and can usually guess at the depth.
    * As time goes on, I gradually makes new piles which are more organised but never go back through old documents to re-sort them. I definitely receive more paper per year as time goes on, but thankfully e-invoicing is starting to take a bite out of that.
    * Unfortunately I hoard papers so these piles will grow in number forever, though I have half a plan to burn piles once they get to 10 years old.
    * I scan stuff that is really important or that I might need at any time (I'm not always at home, but I nearly do always have Internet).
    * Generally, I very rarely need to look at a paper copy of something. If it means something, the information has already been extracted into GnuCash, Jira, Confluence (highly, *highly* recommended even just for home use) or a text file.

  79. Shoebox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a grueling sorting process. I throw them all in a stack somewhere near the spot I opened them. A few weeks later, I throw out what I don't need and leave the rest there. A few more weeks and I'll throw them in a shoebox or similar storage container.

    Then, when I move I skim the contents of the boxes. Sometimes I toss the box, sometimes I combine the boxes.

  80. The way I do it... by colinRTM · · Score: 1

    I have lever-arch files in which I keep copies of all utility bills for one year (appropriately sub-divided into water, gas, electricity, phone, internet etc). After a year, they get shredded.

    Receipts (for large/expensive things like TVs, computers) go into a file and are not shredded until the warranty period is up.

    Very important documents such as insurance and legal papers and mortgage documents are filed permanently but are also scanned to PDF and backed up offline along with the rest of my data backups, in case my house goes up in flames.

  81. gf by zmooc · · Score: 1

    I give them to my gf. Whenever I need a document, I ask her to retrieve it. What happens in between, I don't know;]

    --
    0x or or snor perron?!
  82. Fujitsu S1500M + Spotlight by AdamInParadise · · Score: 1

    I just scan everything. And I mean everything.

    The Fujitsu S1500M is a great piece of kit, but pretty expensive. But it can scan and OCR big folders in a manner of minutes. And the software does not suck, which is much more than can be said about the software that usually comes with flatbed scanners. I just hope it could remove the staples as well.

    All those scans are just dumped in one big folder. Then Spotlight makes it a breeze to find something. Anectodal evidence shows that it works on Windows too.

    I still keep the original paper version, in one big paper folder. Once a year I review the content, throw away the outdated files and move the rest to long-term storage.

    Now, if a provider offers an electronic delivery option, I usually pick that instead, if the provider is reliable.

    --
    Nobox: Only simple products.
  83. google docs... eventually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just scan really important stuff in google docs right away on a flatbed, it sucks. if it's kind of important I just put it in a folder and wait for the day where I see a fancy office copier somewhere and scan it into my email address (for the past year it's a stack of papers the size of a magazine).

    Then everything goes into google docs with a tag so I can find it. If it's not worth going to all that trouble it's probably not worth holding onto at all.

  84. Encrypt it! by oddaddresstrap · · Score: 1

    Except for stuff I need to keep for taxes (which are filed in a folder named "Income Tax"), I run everything through an easy-to-use, one-way-encryption device I got at WalMart. Once the bag containing the encrypted paper gets full, it goes to the recycling center.

    Seriously though, I used to keep filing cabinets full of this stuff and finally realized that I never, ever needed something that I couldn't get another copy from the source. Big trip to the recycling center and life is simpler.

  85. Best solution... by feepness · · Score: 1

    I married a woman with OCD. The constant cleaning can get irritating, but I never have to file.

  86. Re:I have avoided switching to electronic document by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 1

    If I die unexpectedly, my wife will be able to (a) easily see the new documents coming in, and (b) easily see the old documents that I have on file. I use hanging folders, with each business' documents going back in time five years.

    I've switched to electronic documents because my wife would have no idea what to do with them if I were to prematurely shuffle off this mortal coil. Because it wouldn't be my problem anymore, and anyway, she's free to help out with the bills and documents at any time. I'm sort of kidding, maybe.

    --
    I am not a crackpot.
  87. I wrote my own by adougher9 · · Score: 1

    I wrote my own electronic filing system software, that OCRs, and analyzes documents using text classification and date extraction, does full text search, etc. Here is the link: http://freshmeat.net/projects/paperless-office

  88. File Cabinet by Fujisawa+Sensei · · Score: 1

    I use a file cabinet, and destroy shit based on age.

    I keep around various bills longer than necessary, just in case I want documentation on where I've resided.

    --
    If someone is passing you on the right, you are an asshole for driving in the wrong lane.
  89. Find a chick with a business degree by Fujisawa+Sensei · · Score: 1

    Also find a chick with a business type degree and marry her, especially an Asian chick. Then you will never have to worry about that shit again.

    --
    If someone is passing you on the right, you are an asshole for driving in the wrong lane.
  90. my system by Time_Ngler · · Score: 1

    I just have a folder for each 2 month period and throw everything in there, regardless of what it is. If it's an important document, I'll also scan it using an application I wrote that will store the electronic copy into a filesystem folder based on category, and name it with a brief description and an encoded date. So then I just use "find" to retrieve the electronic copy, and I can get the original hardcopy by searching through the appropriate physical folder based on the timestamp.

  91. Not a plug... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use a product we wrote - built in scanning / printer driver / drag drop files/etc et al - for capture - where all materials are stored in a self contained file that can be locked (incl compression and encryption).

    www.docwheel.com

  92. Honest Question: Why? by farnsworth · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I am a marginally affluent adult with children, and I struggle to understand why I should store paper documents at all.

    I keep a stack of maintenance records for my car, because I will probably sell it some day, and the future owner may want that. But I will never actually refer to any of these, even if there is a question about the state of my car. I will just have it re-evaluated at that time.

    I don't get any financial statements in the mail, because the institutions store them as pdfs for me. I trust them to keep accurate records. Every day I throw out practically everything that arrives in my mailbox. Occasionally I will get a personal correspondence or an actually-informative message from a financial institution.

    I don't keep the records of my interactions with the government (parking tickets, licences, etc). It just doesn't seem worth the effort compared to the potential risk of some misunderstanding occurring.

    I don't keep medical bills or documents, because I trust my doctors to keep an accurate medical record. And even if they fail to do so, I don't see a strong reason to care about that.

    I don't keep correspondences with my children's school, because I can't imagine a reason that I would ever need to refer to that. I read them, respond as appropriate, then they go straight into the trash.

    I keep documents regarding real estate ownership, but in the ~10 years of doing so, I have never referred to any of these.

    So I have a couple of unsorted write-only streams of files for certain things, but everything else is either digital or thrown away. I can imagine scenarios where magically having a certain document might make things easier or simpler for me, but none of these scenarios have ever occurred to me or anyone I know. Nor do I imagine that is worth the 1-2 hours per week it would take to maintain something like that. I would rather spend that time with my kids or my friends focusing on the present.

    Is this unusual?

    --

    There aint no pancake so thin it doesn't have two sides.

    1. Re:Honest Question: Why? by rastos1 · · Score: 1

      I struggle to understand why I should store paper documents at all.

      I live in a country where the employer is responsible for deducing part of my salary and sending it to the tax/insurance system. All that the employee sees, is the number on the payslip. For taxes, social insurance, medical insurance, ... There were cases where the glitch in the system, or fraudulent employers were a reason why person's pension/medical care/... was depending on whether the person is able to produce a proof that they participated in the system and played by the rules - by presenting the payslips, yearly summary, etc. So yes, it makes sense to keep the documents.

    2. Re:Honest Question: Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      During the years-long process of immigrating to the USA, probably a hundred pages of documents are sent. Maybe 5 pages of those are actually important and need to be kept to be used in later steps in the process. The rest are informational, cover sheets, etc.

      One of those unassuming cover sheets is actually essential to continuing the process, and if the document is lost, there is literally no process for replacing it. You must go back to your home country and start your application process over from the beginning.

      I know this because when my wife was immigrating, we thought we had thrown away the document and spent several hours calling around trying to figure out what could be done (answer: nothing). Fortunately, we eventually found it in time.

      Moral? You never know what you'll need in the future. Hang on to any remotely important documents for at least a couple of years, or until whatever it is they are about is 100% complete and finished.

    3. Re:Honest Question: Why? by feepness · · Score: 2

      I don't keep medical bills or documents, because I trust my doctors to keep an accurate medical record. And even if they fail to do so, I don't see a strong reason to care about that.

      I agree with much of what you say except this. I'm a cancer survivor and the value of keeping my blood work and other records is immense. The issue is you will see other Doctors over the years and they won't have your records. With information sharing rules getting records from one doctor to another is difficult and time consuming. Most Doctors are shocked and pleased when I walk in with a short stack of records they can glance over immediately, forming an accurate baseline of my past bloodwork, medication, and medical history.

    4. Re:Honest Question: Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      because the institutions store them as pdfs for me. I trust them to keep accurate records.

      That's my problem, I have a hard time trusting others with my stuff.

    5. Re:Honest Question: Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I would argue with one thing - until there is one central database of all imaging, I would advise keeping old imaging studies - films or cd/dvd. It can be very helpful in rare circumstances to see old xrays for comparison. IAAOS (i am an orthopaedic surgeon)

    6. Re:Honest Question: Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is this unusual?

      Not at all, nor is posting your address and the day you put out your trash.

    7. Re:Honest Question: Why? by magicianeer · · Score: 1

      Beware big brother issues..
      My company had a client with some old IBM-licensed remote access software. One day IBM decided that they did not have any licenses for the software. The software disabled itself. Most of the paper and media had been discarded years ago. Much phone calling later we convinced IBM to restore some of the licenses so they could limp along.

      I had my bank mis-pay a check as 3.15 instead of 315 and docked me for the full 315.. a month before the payee noticed, another month to sort it out with the bank, and they only acknowledged the error after I faxed them a copy of the canceled check with my statement..

      I have heard tale of a checking account being closed, but an automatic payment (via ACH) was still active. And the bank payed it, debiting the closed account! Kept doing it for a year. The issue was discovered when this person applied for a loan and found his credit was bad. Considering the rules around ACH transactions, it is not clear that proof of closing the account would have helped.

      *At least* keep your own copy of the electronic records.
      And keep anything from the government. Getting fscked by Big Company Inc. is not as bad as what Big Government can do to you if you cannot (for example) prove that your kids are enrolled in school.

      --
      You can have it good, fast, or cheap. Pick any two.
    8. Re:Honest Question: Why? by pz · · Score: 1

      I don't keep medical bills or documents, because I trust my doctors to keep an accurate medical record. And even if they fail to do so, I don't see a strong reason to care about that.

      Seriously, are you trolling, or being intentionally thick? Not everything can be entirely characterized by the current state, including many diseases. Your current weight, for example, is insufficient to diagnose cancer, but a recent weight loss is a strong indicator if you can objectively quantify it. You've started jogging recently and feel chest pains; without understanding that you've made similar complaints 10 years ago, your PCP would order up a large battery of unnecessary tests. You're a woman and your second pregnancy blood tests indicate unusual thyroid hormone levels. Not knowing that the same pattern appeared in your first pregnancy without additional causation, your new endocrinologist might unnecessarily radioablate your throid requiring you to take hormone replacements for the remainder of your life. Your childhood medical records indicate a minor allergic reaction to certain antibiotics, but you forgot about the episode they document, your current PCP does not have your records from that long ago, and now you get an infection. Since your immune system was sensitized so many years ago, it now reacts to the same antibiotics in a life-threatening way. Should I continue? Your health is not based solely on your body's instantaneous state, and treatments definitely should not be.

      Your doctor may or may not keep accurate records, and may or may not keep them for as long as you would like, and may or may not communicate these records to your next PCP. Your next PCP may or may not keep them. Does your current PCP have your entire medical history? You certain about that?

      --

      Put my fist through my alarm clock with its ding-dong death inside my ear. - The Blackjacks.
    9. Re:Honest Question: Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, Same here.. I don't necessarily "trust" these places with their record keeping so much, But I agree it doesn't seem worth the effort for most things. I toss most of my mail as well.

    10. Re:Honest Question: Why? by hoggoth · · Score: 1

      > And keep anything from the government. Getting fscked by Big Company Inc. is not as bad as what Big Government can do to you if you cannot (for example) prove that your kids are enrolled in school.

      FYI my kids are not enrolled in school and the Big Government is fine with it.
      It's called homeschooling.

      --
      - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
    11. Re:Honest Question: Why? by gottabeme · · Score: 1

      In most, if not all, states, you are required to register your children with the state as home-schooled--i.e. same thing. So what's your point?

      --
      "Those who consume the bulk of goods are those who make them. We must never forget this secret of our prosperity."
    12. Re:Honest Question: Why? by hackel · · Score: 1

      Exactly what I wanted to say, and I agree completely. I just wish companies would send out encrypted communications so I could automatically archive everything electronically.

    13. Re:Honest Question: Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you are saying you don't wear a seat belt because you've never been in an accident? The IRS once didn't get word that my 401k was rolled over to a qualified 401k, 3 years after it happened. To fix it, I just mailed them copies of the appropriate statements. If I hadn't had those documents, I would have had to contact a company that I no longer have an account with to get a copy. You think that would have been easy? Oh, and the price of not getting those documents to the IRS would have been tens of thousands of dollars in extra taxes.

    14. Re:Honest Question: Why? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Big Government is NOT fine with that, they put all kinds of obstacles in your way in most states and virtually all states are continually adding more requirements and restrictions, subjecting even home-schoolers to standardized testing, et cetera. And as the sibling says you have to prove your kids are in home schooling and you are often required to teach certain things.

      If you think big government is in favor of home schooling, you are clearly not paying attention. Big government doesn't want you doing ANYTHING for yourself.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    15. Re:Honest Question: Why? by parc · · Score: 1

      I recently dealt with the declining health of my grandmother and the repeated visits to specialists and general practitioners for her care. The #1 thing I did for her that extended and enhanced the quality of her life (and probably extended it for a year of fairly good quality time) was hustle medical records from one doctor to the next. If she saw a gastroenterologist I would immediately take all the notes taken and test results received over to her other doctors. This simple act (an extra hour of my time on top of any Dr's visit) identified and resolved 3 chronic health issues that she'd had to "live with" for nearly a decade. All because I had her paperwork and noticed that the 5 doctors she had kept running the same tests independently over and over but not equating all the results.

      Without a paper trail, I'd never have figured it out. And before this experience, I just assumed all the doctors somehow used their secret handshake to share information.

    16. Re:Honest Question: Why? by ColoradoAuthor · · Score: 1

      I don't keep medical bills or documents

      Almost every contact my family has had with a emergency room has resulted in overbilling. In several cases, when I've complained "insurance already paid for that" or "the patient did NOT receive that treatment" both insurance and hospital have disclaimed any knowledge, and my paper records were my sole defense against paying hundreds or thousands of dollars. Sometimes those bills arrived years after I thought everything had been settled. I guess if you have a couple hundred grand you're willing to spend on such waste over your lifetime, then yeah, it's not worth caring about. Or maybe you live in a place (certainly not the US) where you really can trust medical billing.

    17. Re:Honest Question: Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you get my bill for 100$?
          How do you show/know that you don't owe me money?
          As a stranger is one thing, after all, you've (probably) never seen me. But how about a doctor's office sending you 3 bills for the same service?

      I've gotten double billed for things in the past

    18. Re:Honest Question: Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1

  93. KISS by nine-times · · Score: 1

    Keep it simple, and don't make your organization any more complicated than it needs to be.

    I'm a little paranoid, so my method is probably more complicated than it needs to be, but it's still pretty simple. If it's paperwork that I don't foresee actually needing ever again, I shred it. If I think there's any chance I might need it, I throw it into a manilla folder and put it into a filing cabinet. The organization is pretty free-form, just thorough enough that I know I can find a document if I need to.

    If a document is important, I also scan it and put it into an encrypted disk image that uses the same folder names as my paper file. I then back up this encrypted image online.

  94. http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/p552.pdf by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/p552.pdf

  95. Neatco? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I picked up a brochure from Neatco.com, a company who sells receipt/bill/document scanners with OCR software to pull out important info. I have read mixed reviews on the web...is anybody here using this? Or any other document control OCR software?

  96. You need to keep many records much longer by billstewart · · Score: 4, Informative
    • 1. Buy Stock s for $x.
    • 2. ....
    • 3. Sell Stock s for $z.
    • 4. PROFIT!!
    • 5. Pay capital gains tax based on z-x.
    • 6. ...
    • 7. IRS Audits you - you may need the records from step 1.

    Step 6 is 3-7 years depending on whether the IRS is lazy or suspects you of fraud, but Step 2 if however long you hold the asset before you sell it. If it's a more complicated investment, there may be other steps involved - for instance, the company merges with another, or spins off another company, or splits their stock, or does something else weird, so now you the stock you own isn't identical to what you bought.

    If you own a house, you need to keep even more records. There's the purchase of the house, and anything related to the purchasing process (real estate commissions, lawyers, everything about the mortgage), any expenses you have that increase the basis of the house (a new garage counts, painting the inside might not), and then when you sell the house, usually you're buying another one and rolling over the capital gain into it (unless it was a loss.) You probably only need to keep documentation on a single house for 7 years after you file your taxes after you sell it (maybe up to 9 if it took you the whole 2 years to buy the next house), since the tax return from rolling over the cost documents your basis.

    Usually the rule is to keep purchase records 7 years after you sell something.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
    1. Re:You need to keep many records much longer by Kittenman · · Score: 1

      • 1. Buy Stock s for $x.
      • 2. ....
      • 3. Sell Stock s for $z.
      • 4. PROFIT!!
      • 5. Pay capital gains tax based on z-x.
      • 6. ...
      • 7. IRS Audits you - you may need the records from step 1.

      If you've a fool-proof way for ensuring that z-x is positive, please advise. I have several stocks, and with the recession my z-x is mainly negative.

      --
      "The greatest lesson in life is to know that even fools are right sometimes" - Winston Churchill
  97. add one gallon zip lock bags for monthly bills by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your system is my system, writing paid on things works great. I put all bills in gallon zip lock bags for a given month, and reuse the bags after 3 years.

  98. Old school file folders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I put one of those two-drawer metal file thingies with hanging folders in the bedroom closet. It has about 30 folders in it (such as warranty papers, electricity bill, credit card invoices, health insurance) and I file documents as soon as I'm done with them. Most of those I'll never need to see again, but if and when when I do, I enjoy not having to rummage through an unsorted box. Plus, it takes just a few seconds to file a document and it's actually kind of enjoyable.

  99. Digital + physical folders by l0b0 · · Score: 1

    Anything really important (ownership documents, job contracts) is scanned + distributed to all my machines with Git, and a physical copy is kept in a small folder dedicated to that theme (one for each insurance, each bank, warranties, diplomas, etc.). Less important documents are just scanned (or retrieved electronically, when possible) and the physical copy discarded. A well organized digital library is great when you don't want to shuffle through a huge stack all the time.

  100. Don't shred your backup. by couchslug · · Score: 1

    If a physical document has value, I save it AND more than one electronic copy. A few pounds of documents are less trouble to keep than to reacquire if they are gone.

    --
    "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  101. digitize it! by pitkataistelu · · Score: 1

    Sounds like commenters have a lot of hardcopy storage space! Having moved between eight student rooms in four countries over the past decade alone, I minimize my physical burden by running everything that comes in through a scanner with automated document feeder into 600dpi b/w pdf, simply stored behind date-ordered folders and filenames. I keep many redundant copies (online backup storage, SD card, two external HDs, and once a year a computer on the other continent). Things important enough to keep in hardcopy simply go into large envelopes ordered by subject, but I rarely need to look at them because I keep those in softcopy too. When I leave a country I can usually throw most of the hardcopies out.

  102. Indirection by jvonk · · Score: 1

    One I use for important recurring services and the other I use for every-day purchases and on-line commerce. That way if a fraudulent charge occurs on the second card I can just close it out without having to call people up on the phone to move the recurring charges (which is a hassle).

    Always a good plan. However, may I suggest a layer of indirection? Controlled Payment Numbers, such as Bank of America's ShopSafe, provide a way to generate "throwaway" credit card numbers linked to your primary cc account on their backend (much like a pointer). As a bonus, they have a user-selectable fixed credit limit (or fixed monthly recurring limit), and each one can only be used for additional charges at the original merchant that charged that number.

    The biggest win was when my primary cc account was changed due to a massive data breach at an "undisclosed third party". I had setup all my recurring charges to use individual ShopSafe numbers. They updated the "pointers" on the backend and even though I got a new cc number, all the recurring charges to the ShopSafe numbers kept going through without a hitch. No hassle.

    I laugh at the specter of data breaches and attempted fraud. Have fun charging that stolen card number given that it was already exhausted because I set the spending limit == my transaction's value, and wouldn't work if you attempted to use it anywhere else but the original merchant anyway. This prevents sneaky merchant upcharges, too.

  103. a carton by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have one next to my desktop and everything important I dump there.

  104. Store as PDF's by turkeyfish · · Score: 1

    For the important ones I scan them and keep them as .pdf files, stored in directories under the vendor, activity, etc. , subdirectories sometimes by date often helps for things that go on periodically (ie taxes2010, taxes2011, etc). I forget the non-important stuff, since its not worth my time. That works for me and keeps it relatively simple, though not always foolproof. I shred the rest as it just tends to accumulate otherwise.

    However, for some things, original are important (signed contracts, certifications, etc.), so I save these. Also, a dual system sometimes helps, when you can't keep up, but generally try to avoid it unless its important to do so. Obviously, backup is important, just like not setting fire to your house. Clearly, whats important depends on to whom and for what purpose and why, which varies from document to document as well as from individual to individual.

    1. Re:Store as PDF's by cashman73 · · Score: 1

      I essentially do the same thing here. I started out scanning everything in to PDF, but it's getting better now that most bills are coming electronically, so the PDF is already there. I still set all the file names to YYYY-MM-DD.pdf and put them in separate directories by vendor/company. No need for separate directories by year since the file system does the sorting automatically based on filename. For more important documents, like birth certificates and leases and the like, I keep those in a small cash box, though I am considering upgrading this to one of those small fireproof boxes with a key, for added security.

  105. I've been struggling with this for years .... by King_TJ · · Score: 1

    Right now, the solution working the best for me is keeping one small file cabinet (2 drawers) with colored and labeled folders in it, where I keep anything I think I want the original paperwork for. (That includes a folder labeled "Advertising" where I stuff the latest coupons and sale flyers from the newspaper or mailbox. Every so often, I try to weed through that one and throw all the expired offers into the recycling can.) Other items I keep in there include random pieces of my kid's artwork or writing projects I think are worth saving, and instruction manuals that came with items I purchased. (If you've already got a paper copy they supplied, why throw it away just to potentially need to re-print a scanned copy of it later on?)

    For everything else like receipts or monthly utility bills, I scan them in with a Fujitsu ScanSnap scanner and use the Mariner Paperless software on my Mac as the document management system with it. This arrangement works pretty well, because the Paperless software lets you drag and drop in any PDF files you get in email as statements, instruction manuals, or whatever else, and they appear in the collection just like anything you scanned in from paper. The ScanSnap is capable of duplex scanning and auto selects an appropriate DPI resolution for each document you scan, based on its size. Other than the fact it's not the best at always feeding smaller receipt tape size paperwork through it on the first attempt, it's a really good arrangement.

    The IRS says digitized copies of your receipts and supporting documentation is good enough for them, in the case of a tax audit -- so there are really very few cases where you have to keep an original paper document. A few of those exceptions include my vehicle titles and birth certificate -- documents best kept in a fireproof safe or bank safe deposit box anyway.

  106. Simple - 1 folder per year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I have a single 2 inch folder without any partitions per year. All bills, warranties, receipts go into that roughly in the order they arrive (or get paid) by date. I put all financial transactions into Quicken - that provides a date stamp for any payment.

    Before you over complicate things, think a little:

    a) how often do you need that old receipt?

    b) how much trouble is a more complex filing system?

    c) when you do need an old receipt and know it was dated June 2010, finding the 2010 folder is trivial. Pulling all the items filed out and looking for a date on each will get you close in about 5 seconds. Flipping through 10 pages to find the exact receipt is easy. You probably know what your gas, water, telephone bills look like. You also know what credit card receipts look like.

    I don't do electronic anything, but if I did, it would be stored by YYYY/MM/ to make annual document cleanup trivial after 7 years.

    Don't over complicate this stuff folks. Stop wasting time "filing." KISS works.

  107. Filed For A Month to Three to Five Years by muindaur · · Score: 2

    I file copies of bills/statements for up to three years, tax returns for up to five(make so little no real point), and I keep them in a floor bolted safe. I love the fact it has money/passport/SS card drawers up to, and a file folder tray on the bottom.

    Sometimes I burn bills/statements sooner, and that's if the space runs low. My system is new things in front so it's easy to trim the last 12.

    Store receipts vary wildly. Once something is out of warranty, is not needed for insurance, or was groceries/gas that I just verified on the statement I burn them.

  108. Re:paper? in 2011? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Poppycock. I live in London and some of my bills, like EDF, are impossible to get electronically.

    Vodafone sends me paper.

    I've made my HSBC bank accounts mostly electronic, but they send me quarterly papers for my ISA investments.

  109. Three-way divided hanging folders by Miamicanes · · Score: 2

    I personally use Pendaflex 5394 legal-size hanging tri-way folders. Basically, it has a folded paperboard divider attached that divides it into three expandable sections.

    I use one folder per 'genre', with sections for "this year", "last year" and "anytime else".

    My genres can basically be divided into two categories: "dead" and "useful", with two or more sub-categories per genre. The folders are all the same color (green), but the labels are color-coded.

    "Dead" are things I'm filing because my parents told me I should, but I'm unlikely to ever look at or care about again. Bills in general fall into this category. I used to have one folder, but recently split the category into two: things specifically related to credit cards, and everything else (mainly because credit cards were accounting for 2/3 the volume, and everything else was getting lost in the clutter)

    "Useful" things are papers I might actually need to look at again over the next year or so. Things related to insurance, tax-preparation, etc. Right now, I have 4 such folders: tax-preparation, house/car/insurance, cats (one of my cats has asthma) and "everything else".

    Elsewhere, I have hanging folders with the same genre names for each past year. Sometime around January 1, I move everything from the "last year" section into its own folder in the big filing cabinet, move everything from the "this year" section to the "last year" section, and might dig through the "some other time" section if I'm feeling like it.

    Why this works for me:

    My old filing method can loosely be described as two boxes: "stuff" and "old stuff", I'd open bills, deal with them, and throw them in the "stuff to file" box... where they'd stay forever. Every couple of years, the "stuff to file" box would get full. I'd start digging through it planning to weed out everything but the latest stuff, then get bored halfway through and just throw it all in the "really old stuff" box. About 10 years after college, I had about 5 such bankers' boxes full of stuff that was technically supposed to be filed, organized roughly by year. It worked surprisingly well, but once I bought a house and started getting torrents of papers that had to be filed, I accumulated almost an entire box of papers in less than a year (previously, it took 2-3 years to get to that point). Worse, I was starting to spend lots of time digging through the boxes. So, I came up with a better idea.

    Plan B entailed having two boxes for "current" stuff -- one for things I knew I'd probably never look at again, and one for things I thought I might need again. This strategy worked surprisingly well for a year, but became unwieldy early in year 2 because I THEN had to deal with five banker's boxes of papers: this year's dead and useful papers, last year's dead and useful papers, and a box to throw everything else into (because I knew, deep down, that I would never, ever file them properly, and the alternative was a pile on my desk that would sit forever). So, I spent some time thinking of ways to distill its essence and still keep my filing minimal and manageable, but a little more portable than five boxes that were all mostly empty.

    That was how I came up with my current system. Everything still gets filed by "this year", "last year", or "anytime", but I now have a place to explicitly put things that previously fell through the cracks... things that were kind of "timeless" go in "anytime" as well. The "anytime" category actually ended up being useful in another way. Even though it means I technically have to look in two places to find something I think might be related to a specific year, it also means that the few papers I really, truly DID need to access again tend to stay in the main filing area (where I can get at them easily).

    The biggest problem I had was switching to legal-size folders. Why legal-size? Because 99% of the bills I get are legal size. I can barely even remember the last time I got a bill that was small enough to fit in a letter-sized folder without having to

  110. Been using all electronic billpay since 2003 by jmcbain · · Score: 1

    I've been using all electronic bill pay for almost a decade, so I get close to no physical bills. Some companies require me to log into their website to see the electronic bill on a webpage or PDF, whereas others send a copy to my bank (Wells Fargo in the USA), which lets me pay electronically to anyone in the world. I use these services for all my utilities, mortgage, etc. These companies usually keep about 2 years' worth of records, and of course you are always free to save the PDF or print a webpage bill to PDF. The only physical mail I get now are magazines and junk mail advertising.

  111. The same way Oroku Saki does... by earls · · Score: 1

    The Shredder.

  112. Paper or shred by Ritchie70 · · Score: 2

    I can't imagine why i would keep most of that at all, but thie method for such things that works for me is a 12-month accordion file. Just keep reusing it. When you come to a month that has papers already, throw most of it away, shredding the sensitive stuff. If there's something you feel you need to keep either start a file folder for it elsewhere or leave it in the accordion pocket ntil next year to reevaluate.

    --
    The preferred solution is to not have a problem.
  113. Why I get paper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I have noticed, on several occasions, that the wonderful PDF stored by my financial institutions, does not print properly. It it goes to the second page, some of the data falls into the gutter. I have had numbers cut in half and, on the checking statement, a transaction completely lost. So it is paper, stored and then shredded. I even shred the envelopes!

    Oh, and I ever want to start withdrawing from your IRA, you need the first page of every 1040 form for every year you made a contribution. Forget 7 years.

  114. PaperPort? Xnview? Lucion? eDoc Organizer? by TechForensics · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Most dumbfounded I've ever been after reading any thread on Slashdot in at least a decade. There are paper filing cabinets galore, and even PaperPort has its merit, so who with any technical ability would muck with files when every filing cabinet you own, hundreds if you have them, can be on your desktop and every drawer icon a different color for selection by mouse and re-creating in printed form from where you sit??? Tell me about just *one* modern hospital that doesn't store, organize and re-create medical records just like that?

    Underutilization of this technology has been one of my largest battlements. Now that I see even Slashdot isn't more into it, I think something more than technophobia is going on here. I'm really scratching my head but I can't see what it is.

    The one profession that CAN NOT do without this software is Attorney. Pretty good for CPAs too. Doctors have eClinicalWorks. *What is the excuse* for being so far behind the curve, Slashdot?

    --
    Those are my principles, and if you don't like them... well, I have others.
  115. Re:PaperPort? Xnview? Lucion? eDoc Organizer? by TechForensics · · Score: 1

    Um BAFFLEMENTS? Sorry.

    --
    Those are my principles, and if you don't like them... well, I have others.
  116. The archaeological filing system by Chuck+Chunder · · Score: 1

    A big drawer and the simple principle that the older something is the further down it is.

    --
    Boffoonery - downloadable Comedy Benefit for Bletchley Park
  117. What paper documents? by defaria · · Score: 1

    What are these paper documents you speak of?

  118. My system by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

    I scan to pdfs and then shred the originals. Most of my bank and credit card statements I get electronically so all I need to do is file those. I bought a sheet feed scanner for convenience (If I buy another it'll be a dual sided scanner so I can do front and back in one pass) and use Vuescan (www.hammrick.com) for input. Some things must be originals so I keep those in a safe deposit box. I don't bother with OCR as it is to time intensive; I do have a system way to name files so it is easy to search for them if needed. If I find I need one relatively frequently I add tags as well.

    On a day to day basis I use iXepenseit on my iphone - it allows me to categorize all my expenses and take photos of receipts. Not only is that handy for expense accounts (it exports the photos to a pdf file) as well as .xls files; I create categories such as Home Depot / Sears / Best Buy so I have a copy of my receipt for warranty purposes. I just export reports for each major category and save them. A a bonus all my receipt photos are backed up in iTunes as well.

    --
    I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
  119. Receipts for cost basis for stock purchases? by billrp · · Score: 1

    When you sell a stock you need to have some kind of receipt showing the cost of stock purchase, so this is something that needs to be kept around. I have some stocks that I purchased >10 years ago, and I have printed receipts somewhere, just in case of an audit. With Etrade they deleted online transactions after a few years, but now there's an SEC rule that they need to keep the cost basis for purchases and other transactions.

  120. Keeping paper records has saved me money by ffflala · · Score: 1

    I have made and saved *a lot* of money for the trouble of saving paper records: being organized has quite simply made me money.

    I've been able to get timely warranty replacement service. I have been able to increase my tax returns by submitting amended tax forms years later. I've taken advantage of offers that actually do save me money, and can easily comparison shop when I get sick of any given company's bullshit. I've been able to track my spending and activity, and modify it to be more efficient. I have actually bothered to mail in rebates. Most recently I was able to document the dozens of automated, after-hours phone calls (in violation of federal regulations) I received from SallieMae over the years. Having the paperwork handy meant that I was able to claim several hundred dollars from the multi-million class settlement, rather than the default $25 amount.

    I keep two manilla folders handy: one for current tax documents (not including receipts), and the other for most current statements for all other accounts. I archive everything in the current accounts folder when it gets too full -- once or twice a year, tops. Accounts statements are stacked together, with the most recent statement placed on top. When they're archived, they go into file folders for each account; these are expanded as necessary. All federal tax information is sorted by year filed. I've moved a few times, so all state tax information is sorted by state and year. All residential leases and related housing documentation (notices, bills, etc) are filed by residence.

    I also *always* get receipts. I stack these in my wallet the same way I do the mail records: the most recent receipt goes on top. Whenever I have a receipt transaction, I have my wallet out anyway. When this gets too bulky (about every two months) I place the receipts in an accordion file folder. It's easy to separate them by month, since they're already in chronological order. Hardware documentation is tricky; these things are variously-sized and simply screw up manilla folders. I keep manuals and warranties in one single plastic accordion file folder. Driver disks go into a large CD wallet. I once noted that a large video store (Le Video in San Francisco's Sunset District, a block down from the Craigslist offices) kept its entire DVD collection in a series of ~7 CD wallets, so I think this will be enough space for me.

    This system is chronological, sorted by account, and takes very little time and space. No external metadata or additional processing is required, though I have at times sent entire accounts through scanners with document feeders, ran OCR on them, and uploaded the entire file to a google docs account. I bother to open my mail once a month at most; more frequently I do so quarterly. It takes me a few minutes at the outside to move items from the current folder to the archives. I have a decade's worth of bank statements, student loan statements, phone, utility, tax, 3 degrees' worth of academic records from 4 separate institutions, membership organizations, and receipts for almost every purchase I have ever made. (I do discard warranties and manuals at the same time I discard the hardware.)

    This comprehensive chronological paper record takes up a mere two file boxes, and the accordion files with the receipts takes up another 1'x2' box. At this rate, if I keep every record and live until I'm 80, it will take up one entire four-shelf file cabinet. It has made me painfully aware of the vast extent to which my life is being tracked and documented, but it has helped me adjust to take the greatest personal advantage of the current state of affairs as possible.

  121. Re:PaperPort? Xnview? Lucion? eDoc Organizer? by bjdevil66 · · Score: 1

    A few possible reasons the Slashdot crowd isn't more "digital":

    1. Maybe people in the tech field are aware of the security risks involved with financial document storage? The chance of a hacker stealing my electronic financial documents is zero...
    2. It's easier to just throw them in a shoe box, in chronological order, and keep important tax receipts for each year in a manila envelope and then discard them after 7 years. Why go to all the trouble of digitizing a bunch of receipts and bills, time-wise and materials-wise, when there's a 99% chance that you'll never go back to the receipts/documents outside of once for taxes?
    3. I don't have to use any resources to recreate a bill in paper form if necessary. Someone else has already paid for the materials to do that for me. All I pay is a "where do I put this shoebox?" storage fee of sorts...

    The only positive for digital docs is that you don't have to shred them at some point, which takes a little time (make sure to not skimp and get a good shredder).

  122. Re:PaperPort? Xnview? Lucion? eDoc Organizer? by ian_from_brisbane · · Score: 1

    The only positive for digital docs is that you don't have to shred them at some point, which takes a little time.

    But you should probably encrypt them and/or digitally shred them when you're done. That also takes a little time.

  123. Record Storage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I assume the issuing company has a recallable record of the transaction. I record the particulars on all my transactions in a MySQl database program accessible by PHP both locally on my computers and on my domain with an Internet provider. It is not all that complicated once set up and All I have to do is fill in the form to enter a payment or purchase. That way I can create a MySQL query to analyse my transactions any way I want to. They are double backed up both on the ISP and locally on my machines. Note: I am just an hourly employee at a call center. My individual account records are back up with UbuntuONE.
    WAllen68104@yahoo.com

  124. Paper Bills? Not me! by ALeader71 · · Score: 1

    I have as much sent electronically as possible. I don't have a legal need to provide proof, so I don't keep the extra paper.

    --
    Only the dead have seen the end of War. - Plato
  125. Re:PaperPort? Xnview? Lucion? eDoc Organizer? by crazyvas · · Score: 1

    So the guy with "TechForensics" for his username is convincing you to use a technical solution for all your paperwork. Somebody feeling a little bit of job insecurity here? ;)

  126. fireplace after a few years by PatentMagus · · Score: 1

    Scanning and storing seems to be adding unneeded effort to your life. The only payoff seems to be that it is now electronic. Otherwise, BFD. Sometimes, upgrading the tech does not equate to upgrading your quality of life.

    OK, you scan and store store stuff. Storing it takes about the same effort as filing the original. A year's worth of household/personal records is about 8 inches of file storage for me - and my records are fairly complicated. Those plastic file storage bins hold a foot and a half or so of records. Easy solution. After a few years they make a nice fire.

    I like having hard copies around. I like knowing I have a piece of paper that I can hold up and say "You sent this to me ...." or something similar. I also like knowing that the only security risk comes from whoever sent me the bill/invoice/statement/whatever. Most things can be burned after a few years. Actually, most things should be burned after a few years. If the record has no use to you but could possibly be used against you, then why keep it?

    Also, as a lawyer, I do dearly love electronic discovery because I can use all sorts of cool search tools to go spelunking through someone's/some company's past. On the other hand, there's no way that I want to make it easy for someone else to do that to me.

    I do try to store medical records, legal records, and some account info forever. As in fireproof safe or safety deposit box. Those records benefit -me-. Everything else gets burned. Actually, shredded then burned. Shredded stuff burns so nicely.

    --
    I am a lawyer, but not yours. Anything I tell you might be a total lie intended to benefit my clients at your expense.
  127. Intellectual property management issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Swamp boy raises an important point that corporations would be wise to accommodate in intellectual property management - both corporate papers and personal papers, it would seem, would best be kept track of electronically. In the 1940s there was a science called " Indexology " that disappeared with the rise of computers. I researched this science to find a way to best index my papers, bills etc. - I found little useful research.
          Corporations should have methods to help employees organize papers, perhaps integrated with the indexing of electronic media.

  128. Multiple File Folders... by Ferretman · · Score: 1

    ....in a couple of different filing cabinets. Everything broken out by type (gas, home insurance, car insurance, etc.). Works pretty well.

    --
    Sic gorgiamus allos subjectatos nunc
  129. Simple system I've been using for over 10 years... by the_rajah · · Score: 1

    I used to be one of those folks that had a hanging folder for each category, electric bill, gas bill, phone bill. etc. It dawned on me that a rarely had to find one of those documents so I simplified my system. It has worked well for me, but your mileage may vary.

    I get a plastic box found at various stores called a sweater box. It's a convenient size roughly 9X12X6 Inches. On January 1 of each year, I place receipts, bills that are paid and other documents that I want to save in it, not organized other than chronologically. If I need to retrieve an original document, I know that the oldest ones are on the bottom and the most recent are on the top. On December 31, I write the year on the end of the plastic box with a sharpie and put it away in the closet for at least 3 years before shredding the contents and recycling the box for new use. It's just not that hard.

    --


    "Do the Right Thing. It will gratify some people and astound the rest." - Mark Twain
  130. It's a 2 step process.. by splorp! · · Score: 1

    I leave them in piles on my desk until either I, or my wife (usually her), becomes annoyed enough to stick them in the file drawer (neatly organized). We keep all bills on a 2 year cycle and all tax forms (and related documents) on a 7 year cycle. Everything outside of the 2/7 year range that has any identifying information (names, addresses, phone numbers, SS#'s, etc) on it is shredded.

    --
    Please don't humanize the morons around me. It makes me very uncomfortable.
  131. Scanning works great with the right scanner by stoyannn · · Score: 1

    i scan all mail to pdf files on my macbook as soon as I receive it, then whenever i have time i review the files and categorize them. works great mainly because i have an awesome scanner: epson workforce pro gt-s50 (http://www.epson.com/cgi-bin/Store/jsp/Product.do?sku=B11B194011). seriously, i absolutely love the thing: led based so no lamp warm-up time, scans both sides at once, 75 page feeder never jams, mac image capture converts and saves each batch as a separate pdf. only minus is price: got mine for $300 from b&h... but it has to be the best money i ever spent. i am now down to a single folder of documents that i can't really throw out (school diplomas, transcripts, etc) and hope to keep it this way.

  132. Why tar? by gottabeme · · Score: 1

    I mean this as a real, geeky question, not as a joke. rsync would go faster without tarring, because it could examine file mtimes and sizes rather than having to compare chunks of a tar file to see what chunks are new or changed. As your tar file grows, rsync slows.

    You may want to check out rdiff-backup for local, unencrypted backups, and duplicity for local or remote encrypted ones. Duplicity even supports S3.

    --
    "Those who consume the bulk of goods are those who make them. We must never forget this secret of our prosperity."
  133. I throw them away? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because they're the least important part of my life and not worth saving? I'm guessing SwampBoy has other, bigger issues.

  134. How to file paper docs.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Throw 'em in a paper shopping bag with the year date written on it. After 7 years shred and toss into recycle bin. Best system in the world.

  135. Re:PaperPort? Xnview? Lucion? eDoc Organizer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People don't generally have enough paperwork to take up more than one draw, therefore, storing electronic documents is too time consuming to bother with. for hospitals and attorneys, paperwork can take up rooms, and hiring someone to scan it is cheaper than buying a larger premises, but we don't have that problem. it takes up to a minute for each document to scan, and it could more easily be put into a box, and that way there is no risk of a hard drive crash destroying it. We are "behind the curve" of big businesses just as much as we are behind for using a grocery list and not MYOB to plan grocery spending, when for hospitals, keeping track of expenditure electronically is essential.

  136. Semi paperless by Thraxy · · Score: 1

    Here in Denmark we have the option to get most official papers regarding payment (income and bills) electronically. At this point I get, at most, 2-3 letters in my mailbox a month. Most of those are trivial and quickly find their new home in the rubbish bin. I also read all my news online, so I've opted out of getting the free newspapers and adds, which makes my life easier, since I don't have to take the garbage out as much as I used to :D

  137. Re:PaperPort? Xnview? Lucion? eDoc Organizer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are paper filing cabinets galore, and even PaperPort has its merit, so who with any technical ability would muck with files

    Well, my filing bin is mainly filled with manuals and warranties. I think they make them a bitch to scan on purpose. Anyway, it takes two seconds after buying a product to throw the stuff in there, but a minute to scan and tag a document. I also use the shoe-box of old bills method discussed above for the same reason. And of course certificates of ownership, birth certificates, etc all need to be stored in hard copy (though scanning a copy is nifty) so I already need to make room for soft copies of things.

    Basically, for many people's lives, it is easier to deal with papers.

  138. Paper? by martingunnarsson · · Score: 1

    I'm amazed that so many slashdotters (who are probably pretty tech savvy) receive (and keep!) so much stuff on paper. The only papers I keep are signed documents and receipts for somewhat expensive things I've bought. All bills are delivered electronically to my online bank (I live in Sweden), and with a "No junk mail please" note on my mailbox the only mail I get is interesting/important letters and directly addressed junk mail. Bills from companies I haven't registered for electronic billing with (new contracts or one-time business) I just trow in the paper recycling bin. My only problem is papers with more or less sensitive personal information on them, for now I just keep them in a box, but I'm planning on getting a small shredder so that I can throw them in the recycling bin as well.

    --
    Martin
  139. Re:PaperPort? Xnview? Lucion? eDoc Organizer? by supercrisp · · Score: 1

    I'll give a reason not to do all that scanning: Time. The OP is just asking about household bills and stuff. The first bill I get every month is my utility bill. When I open that envelope, I label it with month and year, and then all the other bills and receipts go into (big-ticket receipts go into a permanent file with the user's manuals; sometimes those get scanned). At the end of the month it goes into the back of the filing cabinet. At the end of the year, I shred the envelopes from two years before while I'm doing some other work at my desk. This process takes less time than scanning and only about six inches of space in the back of my filing cabinet. Sure I could scan them. But I don't generally need these. Maybe once a year do I have to dig around in the pile; Quicken puts me in the ball park, and then I riff through an envelope or two. I realized a long time ago that it's easy to fetishize computers and get into overkill, let the tool become an end rather than a means.

  140. scan, store, tag by nik_qc · · Score: 1

    Since recently I have adopted a following "policy" at home:

    - "incoming" documents (bills etc) get payed (by scheduling the payment online with due date minus 1-2 working days)
    - then they get into the "queue" of the documents to be filed
    - I scan each document I intend to keep (and the decision is simple: hard drive space is cheap so I scan anything except the spam ;) ). I have bought a cheap flat-bed scanner for this that does the job perfectly. Once scanned, I put a little sign on the paper document indicating that it has been scanned.
    - I store each document in an appropriate directory on my NAS at home
    - I am trying to use a tagging/searching tool for better results, trying different tools now to find the best one
    - once scanned, I file the paper documents to a small cabinet or a folder on the shelf
    - since I have adapted this "policy" only recently, I still have a bunch of documents that are not scanned. I am going to slowly process this backlog from oldest to most recent, destroying the old documents (like bills older than one year, for example) after scanning them
    - I am going to do regular backups (to DVD or BD) of the document archive. I am not very concerned about the possibility of losing the last 1-2 months of data since I am guaranteed to have these documents in their original paper form :)

    My general idea is to reduce the amount of paper documents I keep and, most importantly, to simplify searching for that last bill from the school or for that statement from the broker. And to make sure everyone in my family can find them too.

  141. Re:PaperPort? Xnview? Lucion? eDoc Organizer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Underutilization of this technology has been one of my largest battlements. Now that I see even Slashdot isn't more into it, I think something more than technophobia is going on here. I'm really scratching my head but I can't see what it is

    For me, in three words: too much effort. I tried for a while to go the scan route or find some optimized system, but in the end, what saved me enormous amounts of time and effort was just going with a filing cabinet with labeled (I go with categories myself) folders. I get a bill or document or whatever in the mail, I take the appropriate action (if any) and if it looks remotely like I might need it in the future, I dump it in a file. Takes all of 5 seconds and keeps my house free of stacks of paper. 60 seconds if I need to create a new category (but using my labeler is fun...). Once a year, maybe less if the file cabinet gets too full, I take an hour or two to go through the folders and shred documents that are either too old or have become redundant. All at the cost of a small filing cabinet and a stack of folders. Oh and the labeler.

    Scanning and electronically filing them (proper categories, file names whatever), takes a LOT more time for each document. As for getting all my documents electronically in the first place? I already cant stand the amounts of logins and passwords I must remember for all the banking, insurance, phone company etc etc etc sites out there.

    Yeah, if my house burned down I'd have lost all my documents. Well, its a small risk and quite frankly, if my family survived, losing all the documents wouldn't kill me. I'd be more worried about having lost my 5 year old's favorite stuffed animal. That'd be a real tragedy.

    Sometimes the low tech solution really is the most cost or time efficient solution, took me some time to realize that.

  142. 2 step by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a 400 square foot apartment. I have a accordion folder for the year with major headings and receipts. Then I have a file box way up in the closet that the accordion gets transfered too.

    Yes I could use digital, but it's just easier this way then manning a scanner.

  143. This is what I do by Vrtigo1 · · Score: 1

    This is what I do, and it's worked well for me. For not really important stuff (i.e. hardcopies of cable bills that I've already paid online), I just toss them. I don't see a need to retain copies of that sort of document. For other stuff such as bank and CC statements and all the other stuff the OP mentioned, I scan them and e-mail them to myself. I just use my regular g-mail account, but you could just as easily set up a new gmail account for this purpose. When I e-mail the docs, I use the subject line to tag them (i.e. april 2011 bank statement). Gmail provides fast and searchable access to the docs from just about anywhere. I also have that gmail account configured for POP access in Outlook and every couple months, I fire up Outlook to download all the mail from the account and store it in a local PST file as a backup in case Gmail ever goes away or is inaccessible. The biggest thing I've found is that it's absolutely worth spending a bit more on a quality scanner with a good ADF that allows you to quickly save documents directly to PDF. Any scanner will work, but you want something that requires the least amount of time and effort. If it takes a lot of time to scan and e-mail everything, then you won't stick with it.

  144. Paper? What paper? by glatiak · · Score: 1

    I have been scanning and shredding paper documents since the 1990's, much of it using Paperport. The older versions used a pdf-type image format called 'max', the current version uses pdf. A small fujitsu scanner that does both sides at once and writes pdfs directly has been a great help - will take a stack of pages although feeding is sometimes tricky. This all goes into a structured directory tree that gets replicated across multiple hosts. Like paper records, finding things later and keeping the clutter under control is an ongoing maintenance issue. Indexing has been less useful that I might have thought -- the directory tree is the real workhorse. I have also tried sharepoint but its just different, not really better. The built-in indexing is supposed to be a benefit but I am too lazy to want to hack the code requried to make it work. Nice part is that it can all get burned to a dvd -- and the 2tb external drive I use for replicating my folders and backups is pretty portable. All I can say is that this approach works well for personal and small business files and is a lot more portable and accessible than file cabinets or boxes.

  145. Scan and Search by jeroen94704 · · Score: 1

    I've recently implemented a digitizing scheme: All paper documents I receive are scanned. The scanner is set to store the images in a default location on my server, and a cron job periodically OCRs new images in this location. The OCR text is stored in a database, and the whole collection is made searchable through a browser interface, which provides a link back to the scanned images in its result page.

    The OCR process is not perfect, and does not handle handwriting, but with a few tweaks the process is reliable enough that printed text is OCR'd with pretty high accuracy. At least it's good enough so I am usually able to find the documents I'm looking for using a few well-chosen keyword.

    All this was done using open source software: Python, CherryPy, jQuery, Tesseract (OCR), Sphinx (Search), tied together with some bash scripts.

    Works like a charm.

    --
    He who laughs last, thinks slowest.
  146. Use a good scanner + Frequent Backups by WestonMa · · Score: 2

    The problem with scanning important documents is you need a good a backup system. RAID alone is not really a backup solution, ideally you want your documents stored securely in at least 2 geographically distinct locations. I've been using a hosted system called My Efact Paperless Office ( http://www.myefact.com/ ) -- they provide the scan software and host your documents securely, and every 3 months they send you a set of encrypted DVDs containing all of your scanned files. For me, paying their fee is well worth it because I don't have time to maintain my own organizational system, handle my own backups, or maintain a server -- and I know that just keeping scanned files in a folder on my desktop PC is not reliable enough. I've also used a number of different scanners -- in my business I work with a lot of 100 page batches that include different sizes and colors of paper; the more affordable scanners I have tried do not handle the different page sizes and colors well without a lot of manual tweaking on each batch -- then I finally got a $1000 Panasonic KV-S2026C and the difference is amazing. Now I can throw a mixed-size, mixed-color batch on top and scan it through and the brightness and contrast and page size get set automatically for each page.

  147. Asked myself that same question recently.... by Ogi_UnixNut · · Score: 1

    My solution was to write a script that would scan a document, OCR it and store the OCR'd text as a comment in the image header. This way I could do text searches on the documents and then open up the image for a high resolution scanned copy for printing if needed.

    This actually works pretty well, even if the OCR is not 100% correct, it's usually correct enough to come up on the search when I ask for it, and I have all the text anyway. As OCR technology improves I can re-OCR the scans and store new comments.

    I have scanned hundreds of documents this way, and I'm hoping I will get rid of all the paper currently sitting round in a mess. It's a semi automated process, but once I did the bulk of the text, new documents that come in are done quite quickly. It would take about a minute of my time (perhaps more if I have to flip pages) to actually do this. So I'm happy, and will hopefully refine the process in future :)

    Oh, and this all uses open source software, so another plus for me (and others who care about it).

  148. Re:PaperPort? Xnview? Lucion? eDoc Organizer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    PaperPort has helped me tremendously. Even the early free version (they came with scanners) that only allowed one level of folders was better than nothing. Now I use the latest professional verion (12) and it saves directly to PDFs, lets you edit them, rearrange pages, etc. and send them by email. Pay stubs and other items that are already in PDF can be saved directly to the folders. I haven't used the search feature, as most docs are not tagged, but with a document feeder, scanning is just another part of the bill paying process.

    I am too paranoid that I might need something so I probably keep more than I should.

  149. My system... pile and then sort by Sax+Maniac · · Score: 1

    I do a fairly low-tech approach:

    - Shred all bills that are not accounts (gas, phone, etc.)
    - Keep all records that are accounts or income (credit cards, savings, mutual funds, checking, pay stubs).
    - I keep selected receipts for big purchases, and other tax-deductible things (mostly medical expenses)
    - Put all paper in a big pile after the accounts are reconciled (I use quicken). Ignore pile as it grows.
    - At the end of the year, put the big pile of paper on a table, and sort them in to little piles by account. Sort each stack by date, but this will happen most automatically since you are sticking the most recent stuff on top during the year, and you reverse it when exploding out the big pile. I wind up with 20 or so stacks of paper.
    - Put all the stacks into ONE folder, marked with the year name.
    - Next year, you stick your taxes in that folder.

    --
    I can explanate how to administrate your network. You must configurate and segmentate it, so it can computate.
  150. trays, scansnap and spotlight by fonky · · Score: 1

    Any documents that come in are filed in 4-5 trays depending on whether its personal or professional mail. After a while the trays get filed into maps.

    Important documents are scanned.
    The scansnap i use is a breeze: very quick, doublesided, feeder scans. The pdfs end up in an action folder which triggers an OCR conversion on the pdf, and that is then automatically indexed by Mac OS X.
    If it's a really important doc, i will go through the trouble of moving the doc from the scan folder to a hierarchical folder structure, but due to spotlight I tend to do this less and less. So basically the scanning process is a one button effort.

    This setup works perfectly for me since years (and i have a *lot* of documents to manage).

  151. Re:PaperPort? Xnview? Lucion? eDoc Organizer? by TechForensics · · Score: 1

    Hm, two things occur to me.

    1. If you have the right sheetfed scanner like a Visioneer Strobe, you just take the document, slide it into a slot behind your keyboard, and it's scanned and filed in a general folder in 20 seconds. I guess it would be a P.I.T.A. to try to use some scanners with lots of software steps to get started on their (fairly slow) scan runs. Yep, I guess if I had to use one of these, I wouldn't be so keen on electronic filing, either. So having the right scanner that effectively becomes a transparent portal onto your desktop seems essential. Later anytime you can drag from the general folder to specific folders. The Fujitsu ScanSnap series of scanners look very good, although the Strobes from Visioneer with their Twain drivers are more versatile, and used to be the easiest to use.

    2. Even if scanning takes a bit longer than throwing in a drawer, isn't it WORTH the time a) not to have to take up room in your study or office for a cabinet, b) not to have to hop up 40 times while doing your filing, and c) never having to make copies (just scroll them out of your printer)? Maybe I'm atypical because I was a lawyer for 25 years before switching over to tech, and the value of having my case and client files organized, at my finger tips, and SEARCHABLE was extreme. Even now, for instance, when doing tasks like filling out financial aid forms for my son's college, it is SO EASY to click a mouse and find ALL of our tax data (without getting up), ALL of his transcripts, resumes, and award letters, etc., that I can't imagine having to go looking for paper. And how do you search a filing cabinet? PaperPort 9.0 (the last one that was good) does OCR on all scanned docs and boy is it a boon to find things by word search as in Google.

    It is a damned shame that PaperPort, which was a fine product (and still is if you buy Version 9 rather than the current Version 12, which frankly sucks) got Bowdlerized, savaged and vandalized by the current owners (Nuance? which acquired ScanSoft). The product has become a real POS but lucky you can still get Version 9. I wish Nuance would make this product good again (but they aren't capable) or take pity on Userland and spin it off to someone who knows what it can be. It could be an affordable and virtually-as-good Lucion alternative. What a crime that a truly great, superior, even classic program can be trashed by fools and turned into stinkware. Nuance, SHAME ON YOU. Personally I run Win98 in a virtual machine just to use version 9 with the Win98 Visioneer Strobe drivers that make life as easy as sliding all your stuff into the scanslot. Really.

    I absolutely know this is going to be an area of huge opportunity. Whoever can wrest PaperPort out of the clutches of Nuance has the potential to become, if not another Adobe, then at least the owner of a product as widely used and useful as Acrobat.

    --
    Those are my principles, and if you don't like them... well, I have others.
  152. In a file cabinet by Thelasko · · Score: 1

    Using the guidelines from this document.

    --
    One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
  153. Under G by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    for garbage, or I guess R for recycling if you are an ecoHippie, although recycling paper is a bigger threat to the environment. Excessive amount of carbon emissions produced to process recycled paper compared to creating new paper. Also with an increased demand for paper increases then number of trees planted which helps scrub more carbon dioxide out of the air. New paper = MORE TREES, LESS NET CARBON EMISSIONS, recycled paper = MORE ENERGY AND MORE CARBON EMISSIONS. Stupid ecoHippies.

  154. My strategy by brix · · Score: 1
    • Download anything that is available electronically and shred the dead-tree equivalent if it is mailed to me
    • Scan anything that isn't available for download
    • All files are named "yyyy-mm-dd name of document.pdf" (or jpg). This allows easy sorting and automatic folderization
    • File any account specific items to ../records/yyyy/accounts/accountname (e.g. ../records/2011/accounts/verizon)
    • Dump the rest into ../records and let Directory Opus autosort them into folders such as ../records/2011/2011-03
    • Keep any paper receipts which are still good for return until they expire and then trash them
    • Automatic backups locally and to the cloud. Cost per gigabyte for cloud storage is low enough now that it makes sense to keep essential records (and even some non-essentials) offsite.
  155. Re:I'll bite by colinnwn · · Score: 1

    Ok, what brand is this? The only cartridges I've ever seen that cheap are really old ones from before MFPs.

  156. Re:I'll bite by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

    Lexmark. I have a Pro901, but the cartridge says it works in the Pro905, Pro805, and Pro709 as well. "Lowest black ink cost" was the most prominent advertised feature of the printer, actually.

    Do keep in mind that I'm talking about black, not color... but then again, color laser cost per page, especially for relatively inexpensive home-office-class laser printers, isn't that great either.

    --

    "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  157. Re:I'll bite by colinnwn · · Score: 1

    Too bad. I refuse to buy Lexmark printers.

    They refused to honor a rebate many years ago for me because I "didn't send in the UPC" even though I sent the only bar code on the box to them and found nothing else that said proof of purchase or UPC on the box. They used to have hideously overpriced cartridges. They (at least used to) not support Linux. They put in anti-refill electronics in their cartridges to prevent end users from refilling them. And they used the DMCA to try to prevent third parties from defeating their sabotaging of the cartridges. Right now I'm only buying HP, Brother, or Epson. Though I am seriously considering buying a Panasonic laser MFP.

  158. Re:PaperPort? Xnview? Lucion? eDoc Organizer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You assume digitization is better but paper records require no "OS" or any other software, you don't need electricity to read them and they'll outlast any digital archival format.

    I believe there is some value to that

  159. Accretion by hoboroadie · · Score: 1

    If you scoop them into boxes every few months or so, you can stack those up in the garage. It's safer if there's a fire because you're less likely to get trapped. Also I remember in the Northridge Earthquake, some guy got killed by his falling boxes. Safety first!

    --
    They feared that it could be used to suppress protest or support unpopular rule.
  160. Hanging folders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hanging folders with labels . Works fine.

    Categories:
    1. tax related (mortgage interest stmt, W2, 1099-xxx, 401k annual statements, property tax, charity contribution receipts)
    2. Insurance papers (I tend to save all versions of their fine prints - call me paranoid)
    3. Auto service papers (useful when selling the vehicle)
    4. IRA contribution and distribution statements (there are strict IRS rules on the limits and I am expected to keep track)
    5. Medical reports (Lab reports, doctor reports, medical imaging - can be further sub categorized)
    6. House papers (mortgage, title, home insurance etc)
    7. Employment papers, benefits program details, fine prints, recent paystubs
    8. Immigration papers (they pile up rather fast, but need them for decades)

    Even if I were to store these in electronic format, I would prefer the same directory structure.

    I do not store statements for credit cards, bank accounts, utilities, cable, phone etc - no value gained in storing them.

  161. Re:PaperPort? Xnview? Lucion? eDoc Organizer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't have everything stored electronically because it is simply easier (and in my mind safer) for me to receive the paper bill and store it by hand. From my perspective, it is just a matter of separation of concerns (failed harddrives, misplaced/accidentally deleted files, obtaining a copy of the official bill shouldn't be a problem if i have a physical copy that I always put in the same place every month)... Also, even if I wanted to subject myself to the possibility of losing my records and being at the mercy of the regular companies who bill me to deliver accurate information in the case of a court case, I am way too lazy to scan bills and buy a shredder. It is all just too much of a hassle for something that really is so simple.. it is just a piece of paper in a shoebox, and that is what it should be. I shouldn't have to worry about having enough ink in my printer, having a printer, having paper, having it be a "legally acceptable copy", having a corrupted version of the file/losing the file due to a failed HD or OS crash, requesting a copy from the company, hoping what they sent me is accurate, waiting for the request to be completed, etc, etc ,etc... Why complicate the unbelievably simple process by putting it on your desktop? I also don't think it is a matter of underutilization, it just two things: KISS and our society of mistrust, which is the reason i do things the way I do.

    I should also mention I prefer to never pay my monthly bills electronically, I do everything with stamp and written check.. I find that writing a check for a bill helps promote a healthy skepticism about the charges I am paid for, instead of automatic payment which I feel leads to mindless consumerism (just trust the system, my brother tells me).

    I should probably also mention I don't backup any of my 3 harddrives, mostly because I feel like if I have sensitive data on any of them that I don't want to lose, I have bigger problems than not regularily backing up. I do burn files to dvd and cd on occasion (system files, various documents, local SVN repo), but full backups of drives seems like a huge waste of time when you are talking about a device that is essentially an entertainment device.

  162. Totally rocks: scansnap + favourite webservices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    - docs.google.com, for team/co-editing
    - doctape.com, for fast access + archiving (not open-beta, yet)
    - dropbox.com, for everything thats very huge or somehow relies on the filesystem