Yeah, no one ever has lifelong emotional issues stemming from being sexually abused. No, once the person stops raping you you just magically get over it and it's like nothing ever happened at all.
I should watch nothing but the pro-"make government bigger" bias of the other channels.
Yes, Republicans are truly the not "big government" type. Yeah, that's why Ronald Reagan started us down this path of financial ruin with his, for the time, record deficit spending? The same people who want to use the government to legislate their morality? The same people who were totally for spending 100s of billions on wasted wars so that Dubya could get back at mean old Saddam for making his daddy look bad? Since when has the Republican party since the 1980s ever done anything to shrink the government on the whole?
Yes, Symbian "only" has 44% of the worldwide market share of smartphones.
Did you miss the part where your 44% figure came from last year? The 2nd Quarter figure for this year is only 38%. It's lost 22% of it's market share in less than 2 years. At this rate it's going to be irrelevant in no time.
Exactly. I read it and was wondering when the funny was supposed to start. The outrage of this shouldn't be over any feminist issues the outrage should be over this person being terminally unfunny.
Yeah, and i suppose it is worse than ACTUALLY destroying someone's life, permanently? As in, you know, KILLING them?
No. Nice strawman, though. If he had murdered the guy he would be facing a mandatory life sentence rather than this 12 years.
BTW, I'm not a "think of the children person". The fact that he tried to destroy this person's life with child porn is irrelevant. He could have tried to frame him for any other number of things and I still wouldn't feel a lick of sympathy for him.
Instead of pinning child porn on the caretaker, he could have just outright shot him and suffered a more lenient fate*.
* Assuming, of course, GP is being factual in the list of crimes that have more lenient punishments.
Except none of what he states is relevant to either murder (which is a mandatory life sentence in England) or attempted murder. Both of which are far more stringently punished then what happened here.
Waaaaaah. I'm so broken up inside over people getting in trouble for possessing pictures and videos taking of people being raped. Oh how sad it is for them.
Boohoo. The guy was attempting to destroy the life of someone else and get them sent away to prison for a long time. He better start loosening his ass up now so it hurts less when he hits the cell block.
Soulskill's reviews score is mostly meaningless because probably 3/4ths of his reviews are 8/10. This was 8/10, Halo Reach was 8/10, Dragon Age: Origins was 8/10. Champions Online got an 8/10. I could go on. While he occasionally goes down to 7/10 or sometimes up to 9/10, probably 95% or more of his reviews are an above average score which makes his scale meaningless. It's like the review sites that give every game at least a 9/10 no matter how much criticism they give of it.
This sounds like a an investment, and for that money, we'll get a more powerful supercomputer and the knowledge and research and know-how that comes with it.
Yes, it's an "investment" in IBM's bottom line. Who knows what untold disaster will rock the US if we don't send them billions of dollars.
You're quite happy with all your music imposed with restrictive DRM that doesn't allow to be played on any device you want?
What DRM restrictive music? iTunes has been DRM-free for more than a year and any DRM that happens to be on the occasional CD is easily stripped and you can back it up to whatever format you want. So exactly what part of the GP's post were you responding to with this nonsense?
It would be. No one is going to invest in companies that they could be held personally liable for its actions. Why should some mutual fund investor (which make up a whole lot of investors) be held liable for the actions of some company just because the person running the mutual fund bought some stock in that company?
Just seems like a big lack of responsibility and accountability.
Most investors have little or no say in the day to day runnings of a company. It's not as if they have some direct feed into every single decision that the company makes or even have any sway at all over the day to day actions. So, no, it is not a lack of responsibility or accountability. If you want to hold someone responsible, you hold the person who authorized the wrong doing (usually some executive or board member) not the person who just happened to own stock in a mutual fund that owned stock in the company.
To make this political, then why does Glenn Beck give a shit about "where the money comes from" so much?
Because he's an blustering asshole? What Glenn Beck says or does means little to me.
Why do New Yorkers care where the money for a mosque comes from?
Because they are also assholes?
The people investing have no accountability, right?
It depends. If those people directly involved in the day-to-day running of the company and those people are directly responsible for ordering or personally carrying out a wrong-doing, yes. If it's some minority shareholder who has pretty much nil sway over how the company is run, no.
The thing with his nose was a complex that came from his father constantly deriding him as a kid over having a big nose. Such verbal abuse throughout one's childhood tends to lead people to do such things.
Slashdot Mirror
The problem is that you guys are still stuck inside the bubble. Try seeing yourselves from a different perspective.
I'm not a social retard like you. That must be the problem.
causing temporary emotion distress
Yeah, no one ever has lifelong emotional issues stemming from being sexually abused. No, once the person stops raping you you just magically get over it and it's like nothing ever happened at all.
I should watch nothing but the pro-"make government bigger" bias of the other channels.
Yes, Republicans are truly the not "big government" type. Yeah, that's why Ronald Reagan started us down this path of financial ruin with his, for the time, record deficit spending? The same people who want to use the government to legislate their morality? The same people who were totally for spending 100s of billions on wasted wars so that Dubya could get back at mean old Saddam for making his daddy look bad? Since when has the Republican party since the 1980s ever done anything to shrink the government on the whole?
Shooting into a crowd would probably fall more under grevious bodily harm than attempted murder.
Yes, Symbian "only" has 44% of the worldwide market share of smartphones.
Did you miss the part where your 44% figure came from last year? The 2nd Quarter figure for this year is only 38%. It's lost 22% of it's market share in less than 2 years. At this rate it's going to be irrelevant in no time.
Yes, but if there is also a cup involved that might help to sweeten the deal.
Exactly. I read it and was wondering when the funny was supposed to start. The outrage of this shouldn't be over any feminist issues the outrage should be over this person being terminally unfunny.
Yeah, and i suppose it is worse than ACTUALLY destroying someone's life, permanently? As in, you know, KILLING them?
No. Nice strawman, though. If he had murdered the guy he would be facing a mandatory life sentence rather than this 12 years.
BTW, I'm not a "think of the children person". The fact that he tried to destroy this person's life with child porn is irrelevant. He could have tried to frame him for any other number of things and I still wouldn't feel a lick of sympathy for him.
Instead of pinning child porn on the caretaker, he could have just outright shot him and suffered a more lenient fate*.
* Assuming, of course, GP is being factual in the list of crimes that have more lenient punishments.
Except none of what he states is relevant to either murder (which is a mandatory life sentence in England) or attempted murder. Both of which are far more stringently punished then what happened here.
Waaaaaah. I'm so broken up inside over people getting in trouble for possessing pictures and videos taking of people being raped. Oh how sad it is for them.
Which was what was going to befall his victim had the person not been cleared. It's only fitting that he now gets put into that spot himself.
Boohoo. The guy was attempting to destroy the life of someone else and get them sent away to prison for a long time. He better start loosening his ass up now so it hurts less when he hits the cell block.
Soulskill's reviews score is mostly meaningless because probably 3/4ths of his reviews are 8/10. This was 8/10, Halo Reach was 8/10, Dragon Age: Origins was 8/10. Champions Online got an 8/10. I could go on. While he occasionally goes down to 7/10 or sometimes up to 9/10, probably 95% or more of his reviews are an above average score which makes his scale meaningless. It's like the review sites that give every game at least a 9/10 no matter how much criticism they give of it.
This sounds like a an investment, and for that money, we'll get a more powerful supercomputer and the knowledge and research and know-how that comes with it.
Yes, it's an "investment" in IBM's bottom line. Who knows what untold disaster will rock the US if we don't send them billions of dollars.
You're quite happy with all your music imposed with restrictive DRM that doesn't allow to be played on any device you want?
What DRM restrictive music? iTunes has been DRM-free for more than a year and any DRM that happens to be on the occasional CD is easily stripped and you can back it up to whatever format you want. So exactly what part of the GP's post were you responding to with this nonsense?
I really wonder if it would be so bad.
It would be. No one is going to invest in companies that they could be held personally liable for its actions. Why should some mutual fund investor (which make up a whole lot of investors) be held liable for the actions of some company just because the person running the mutual fund bought some stock in that company?
Just seems like a big lack of responsibility and accountability.
Most investors have little or no say in the day to day runnings of a company. It's not as if they have some direct feed into every single decision that the company makes or even have any sway at all over the day to day actions. So, no, it is not a lack of responsibility or accountability. If you want to hold someone responsible, you hold the person who authorized the wrong doing (usually some executive or board member) not the person who just happened to own stock in a mutual fund that owned stock in the company.
To make this political, then why does Glenn Beck give a shit about "where the money comes from" so much?
Because he's an blustering asshole? What Glenn Beck says or does means little to me.
Why do New Yorkers care where the money for a mosque comes from?
Because they are also assholes?
The people investing have no accountability, right?
It depends. If those people directly involved in the day-to-day running of the company and those people are directly responsible for ordering or personally carrying out a wrong-doing, yes. If it's some minority shareholder who has pretty much nil sway over how the company is run, no.
Can we get this changed?
Sure. Just don't complain when no one ever wants to invest money into a company ever again.
Spain implemented the EU version of the DMCA back in 2006.
the DMCA is meaningless anywhere else.
Except those countries like Spain which have implemented into law the EU Copyright Directive which is the EU's version of the DMCA.
He doesn't have balls. The only reason that no one throws him out is they don't want to have his stench and fleas to get stuck on them.
Personally I believe the accusations. One does not pay an alleged victim's family to keep quiet if there is nothing to say.
Because no one ever gets wrongfully convicted of things or has a jury wrongfully to award spurious civil judgments against others, right?
The thing with his nose was a complex that came from his father constantly deriding him as a kid over having a big nose. Such verbal abuse throughout one's childhood tends to lead people to do such things.
Joe Jackson, probably.
Will this be the epic mount?
I think you have it backwards. You're character is a little boy and Michael rides YOU!!