That's funny since Google uses loopholes to skirt around paying billions in taxes. But these guys exploiting a loophole to skirt around paying magnitudes less in taxes are clearly the dirty crooks.
Except Backpage was editing the ads before posting them not simply posting them as is. It does change the facts of the case and their liability. Strange that the summary omitted such an important deal.
And yet did any of the executives cut their salaries, stock options and bonuses to help out? How dare those greedy people in labor want living wages, that were probably 1/50th of what the CEO made, instead of being content living in poverty!
Probably to have a vote where the electorate wasn't lied to about the benefits of leaving. Or did you miss how the Brexit leave people basically backpedalled on their promises?
What I do not like is if spy technology gets used in peaceful times or against befriended nations you form alliances with. Maybe some intelligence is appropriate, and in fact important for a better diplomatic climate, but that can happen with simply doing open source collection.
That's what you get by giving the power to begin with. Did you forget the old saying about how power corrupts?
No one said anything about legal liability, but, yes, it is the site's responsibility to vet the ads that are shown on their site. If they don't want to live up to that responsibility then they need to fuck off and die when they whine and complain about ad blockers.
Slashdot Mirror
That's funny since Google uses loopholes to skirt around paying billions in taxes. But these guys exploiting a loophole to skirt around paying magnitudes less in taxes are clearly the dirty crooks.
Because Linux invented text boot screens? lolwut?
BSP is a board support package.
Looks like he was on his way to becoming Deadpool. Seems he never quite got that healing factor.
Because he was in the hospital and trying to work with Samsung until he got that message sent to him?
He threatened to sue most likely. And?
If that were true why were they editing ads before posting them?
Except Backpage was editing the ads before posting them not simply posting them as is. It does change the facts of the case and their liability. Strange that the summary omitted such an important deal.
Spam.
Cool story, gramps. Need someone to come over and reattach the onions to your belt?
But this can't be!! They clearly state that they are a visionary according to the Gartner Magic Quadrant!
Because the "anonymous" reader is driving page hits and ads impressions for their blog.
Hey look! More features no one asked for!! Is Mozilla now in "throw a ton of shit at the wall and see what sticks" mode?
Ignoring that Firefox and Chrome were doing it first?
Unless "wrapping it in TLS" isn't secure, in which case HTTPS is not secure. I bet that's a claim that you don't want to make
Don't follow security news much do you?
It wouldn't do the job unless increased motion-sickness is the intended goal.
And yet did any of the executives cut their salaries, stock options and bonuses to help out? How dare those greedy people in labor want living wages, that were probably 1/50th of what the CEO made, instead of being content living in poverty!
Many of those 52% voted leave based on Farage telling lies.
So in your world, minority rights have no place in democracy?
Probably to have a vote where the electorate wasn't lied to about the benefits of leaving. Or did you miss how the Brexit leave people basically backpedalled on their promises?
What I do not like is if spy technology gets used in peaceful times or against befriended nations you form alliances with. Maybe some intelligence is appropriate, and in fact important for a better diplomatic climate, but that can happen with simply doing open source collection.
That's what you get by giving the power to begin with. Did you forget the old saying about how power corrupts?
I think this is even more sad:
Snapchat debuted sponsored lenses in fall last year, and charges a pretty penny to advertisers wanting to get their brand on people's faces.
It's for shit like this that we need a Dot Bomb 2.0. Flush these turds down the drain.
The last trailer I saw even assumed you knew the Facebook logo
Oh no! The plight of the first world is so terrible!
No one said anything about legal liability, but, yes, it is the site's responsibility to vet the ads that are shown on their site. If they don't want to live up to that responsibility then they need to fuck off and die when they whine and complain about ad blockers.
Some was probably pimping their shitty blog for ad impressions. Here is a link from Ars Technica.