so what about movie tickets? Books? Music? Are they going to add additional taxes on homeowners who's homes have decks/patios where they can go outside and just sit and relax all day? All of these things are sedentary entertainment. What makes them different from games and dvds?
The problem is not that they need permission. The problem is that they need permission from *marketing*. This should be the legal team's job. When you let marketing make these decisions, management (not the engineers, obviously) have effectively said "There are no flaws in our product and if you say there are then we're wrong and we all know we're never wrong."
Radio spectrum is a limited resource. There is only so much of it, and everybody has to share. It needs to be managed, just as you manage other things that are limited (time, money, space, etc.).
Your argument that it must be managed undermines your attempt to make a point, as follows:
Usable land is a limited resource. There is only so much of it, and everybody has to share. It needs to be managed, just as you manage other things that are limited (time, money, space, etc.).
You can't say one's limited and needs to be managed when that very argument applies to a VAST number of things INCLUDING land as you used in your first sentence to illustrate your (non)point.
They lost any benefit of the doubt after 6, imo. They could have done all this with 7 like they promised but they didn't. They've had years to correct the issues with security but would rather add useless superficial 'security' measures than any real fixes.
Slashdot Mirror
Oh snap!
So its not like its completely up to Nvidia to start improving their standing with AMD because of pressure from Intel.
which, if it can be proven, would result in yet another anti-trust claim against intel.
more like Fail Mary, amirite?
Actually no. The *only* difference between a religion and a cult is prominence/influence and/or state recognition as a 'religion'.
so what about movie tickets? Books? Music? Are they going to add additional taxes on homeowners who's homes have decks/patios where they can go outside and just sit and relax all day? All of these things are sedentary entertainment. What makes them different from games and dvds?
You do realize you're not limited to just the apps on the android market right?
dynamical
Dynamical? Really? It's bad enough the last president made up shit like this, now we have supposedly intelligent people doing it too?
...and calls it essentially a paper tiger
It's really simple to fight then. They need a scissor lizard!
or more specifically accept that magic is responsible for things outside our current ability to understand them.
A wizard did it.
also, technically, DOS 7 which sat under Win95
nah, old people only drive slow when they're in a hurry.
Self Fail. "day after" ..... ok. I suck. mod me down.
You fail... Election Day is the 4th this year.
I'm gonna go with 'funsturbing'
Missouri is 'at will' as well. Might wanna do your homework for yourself next time.
That puzzle piece had cankles....
They asked for free entertainment. That sounds pretty entertaining to me and he's not even charging them to see it.
The problem is not that they need permission. The problem is that they need permission from *marketing*. This should be the legal team's job. When you let marketing make these decisions, management (not the engineers, obviously) have effectively said "There are no flaws in our product and if you say there are then we're wrong and we all know we're never wrong."
Your argument that it must be managed undermines your attempt to make a point, as follows:
You can't say one's limited and needs to be managed when that very argument applies to a VAST number of things INCLUDING land as you used in your first sentence to illustrate your (non)point.
My mom is going to kill me...
Fixed.
Does it go any other way?
Of course it does. How do you think JT got here to begin with?
Your use of the word 'almost' has me both disturbed and curious at the same time...
They lost any benefit of the doubt after 6, imo. They could have done all this with 7 like they promised but they didn't. They've had years to correct the issues with security but would rather add useless superficial 'security' measures than any real fixes.
As bad as they've been about IE security in the past, they're actually trying this time.
Because they say they are, right? They've said that it'll be more secure than before everytime they've done this and nothing really changes.