I knew when I saw this story posted earlier that the whole story wasn't there. We can but hope that nobody jumped to conclusions and dealt her harsh words on the internet.
you could just adjust the chromosones to make then become the gender that would be suit them. I'm sure most gay men would rather be women. (I'd don't know that name of the short, but someone does)
The oldest program could be the fundamental theorum of calculus. One of the intended purposes of Calculus was to have a language that a machine could use to generate proofs. The machine was never made, but the code lives on.
Maybe there is some wisdom in crowds here. There has yet to be an proof that (2) can create complex life
Furthermore, if evolution could create complex systems, then the speed of mutation a specieces could maintain
would determine its fittness. In effect mamals would never have existed, and all life would still be bacterial
because bacteria mutates thousands of times faster than mamals.
You seem to be confusing the two concepts of invention and hard work. Hard work allows you to test and build an invention. However, without the invention, hard work is in vain. Go dig a whole and fill it up again == hard work != success.
I don't care if newton shaved his face every day with a dull rock, it doesn't make him a genius to do something hard. What made him a genius was that he discovered the easy way.
I don't think the point here is "moot" at all.
Sure, there is no native version of photoshop for linux. But I would think that one of the most popular programs for windows would be a top priority for the wine developers and community.
my 10 cents.
I guess one of the issues here is that Sony BMG is assuming that if we are willing to convert our media for free, and then they make converting media imossible, then we will pay for them to convert the media for us. What they should do is accept that consumers don't want to buy a song more than once, no matter how much they want us to. That is, of course, unless there are clear upgrades in the experience. Surrond sound, HD audio, ect.
So the basic formula here is,
New songs = more money
Old songs + improvments = more money
New songs + improvments = more money
but never
Old songs = more money
You're basically saying that a motor evolved because each part of it was usefull on it's own. I doubt very much that each part was the most efficient/shortest-pathway to achieve each goal. Evolution only allows that the best design survives, so a handy upgadable gizmo is generally always less efficient than a gizmo that only does one thing, and will fail to be adopted as an acepted mutation.
While I can see your protesting about the relative efficience of each step, from my perspective you're saying the equivalent that guns are evolved from clubs. First thew were uncarved wood, then a stock was carved, to make it more easy to swing, then a barrel was added which served as a nice handle, then the bolt and return were added, for weight, and finally, a bullet happend to fall into the chamber, and guns came to exist.
1. How many chromosomes do we share with creatures we are obviously not evolved from?
2. How significant is it to have the same chromosome as another organism
3. If another organism is found to have the same chromosomes as a species it obviously did not evolve from, could it be said that matching chromosomes do not imply relation?
Mathematics led to computers. Mathematics came from logic. The Scientific method also came from logic. But Darwinism method isn't formed on the Scientific method because it is not formed on logic.
Consider the flagellum. It's a complex form of locomotion with interdependant parts. It clearly can not have evolved, and therefore is in explicable acording to Darwinism.
Let's just take a peek into why a complex apendage never could evolve. In Evolution, the most efficient form of life wins. A cell that formes a horny knob on it's side that doesn't do anything is going to waste resources compared to a nomal cell. But if you can sort of flap the knob around and move a bit, then good for you, maybe your kids will be good swimmers and you'll have evolved. Cells don't just swim with horny knobs though. Some of them have motors. Real, spinning, multipart, interdependant part, motors. How does this evolve? If a cell can muster up the mutational ability to make one or two flagellum parts, it will have wasted resourses compared to a normal cell. It's partial motor never will spin, and the growths will be totally useless. It's children, if any, will also waste resourse. The cell's family will disapear to make room for the cells with the most streamlined horny knobs. Let me be clear. A cell will never mutate a complete flagellum in a single mutation. And nothing but a comlpete flagellum is required in order for cells to have them, Therefore according to Darwinism, the flagellum does not exist.
I think logic is great, But Darwinism is not based on it.
I know that Halo is as old as the hills, and I would not have mentioned it except as an example. It has one hellova trainer. Their's nothing quite like freezing time, loading sarge's crotch with 20 stickys, and watching him fly/swim of into the sunset. (sniff)
I like corporations, you know what they're after. Money. If they're stupid, we the customer punish them by not giving them money. A group like greenpeace however can be very, very stupid, and we can't punish them.
case in point:
.
>> in a recent Greenpeace scorecard, Apple ranked lower than HP, Dell, Nokia, and Sony.
.
Whoa, they didn't pass your score card? Stay right there, let me get my fish.
We hate apple. Whats with that name anyway? Huh? Duh, apple, duh. Change it to something more dynamic. And whats with the white every where? We like green over here at GREENpeace. Fix it. Also, they dont taste good, and its our suspicion that they arent really edible. Dell and HP have promised us to make tasty computers soon, but duh, Apple, duh, has not. Whats with that? We tried to return these not-tasty computers, but the guy wouldnt accept them, said we werent supposed to eat them. Fix it, make it so we can return our stale computers for fresh, juicy ones.
Here at Greenpeace we lead the world in hating duh, Apple, duh.
Slashdot Mirror
I knew when I saw this story posted earlier that the whole story wasn't there. We can but hope that nobody jumped to conclusions and dealt her harsh words on the internet.
You should learn software design first. Learn how to make a software requirement specification, test plans, and and architecture.
Install a really aggressive bot. It will keep other bots/viruses off your PC.
you could just adjust the chromosones to make then become the gender that would be suit them. I'm sure most gay men would rather be women. (I'd don't know that name of the short, but someone does)
huffman encoding can easily handle whole words.
The oldest program could be the fundamental theorum of calculus. One of the intended purposes of Calculus was to have a language that a machine could use to generate proofs. The machine was never made, but the code lives on.
If it's changed at all, I can't tell.
he could retire in mexico with 25K
Darwinism has three parts.
1. Origin of the species
2. Random mutation Evolution
3. Survival of the fitest
Maybe there is some wisdom in crowds here. There has yet to be an proof that (2) can create complex life Furthermore, if evolution could create complex systems, then the speed of mutation a specieces could maintain would determine its fittness. In effect mamals would never have existed, and all life would still be bacterial because bacteria mutates thousands of times faster than mamals.You seem to be confusing the two concepts of invention and hard work. Hard work allows you to test and build an invention. However, without the invention, hard work is in vain. Go dig a whole and fill it up again == hard work != success. I don't care if newton shaved his face every day with a dull rock, it doesn't make him a genius to do something hard. What made him a genius was that he discovered the easy way.
I don't think the point here is "moot" at all. Sure, there is no native version of photoshop for linux. But I would think that one of the most popular programs for windows would be a top priority for the wine developers and community. my 10 cents.
I guess one of the issues here is that Sony BMG is assuming that if we are willing to convert our media for free, and then they make converting media imossible, then we will pay for them to convert the media for us. What they should do is accept that consumers don't want to buy a song more than once, no matter how much they want us to. That is, of course, unless there are clear upgrades in the experience. Surrond sound, HD audio, ect. So the basic formula here is, New songs = more money Old songs + improvments = more money New songs + improvments = more money but never Old songs = more money
You're basically saying that a motor evolved because each part of it was usefull on it's own. I doubt very much that each part was the most efficient/shortest-pathway to achieve each goal. Evolution only allows that the best design survives, so a handy upgadable gizmo is generally always less efficient than a gizmo that only does one thing, and will fail to be adopted as an acepted mutation.
While I can see your protesting about the relative efficience of each step, from my perspective you're saying the equivalent that guns are evolved from clubs. First thew were uncarved wood, then a stock was carved, to make it more easy to swing, then a barrel was added which served as a nice handle, then the bolt and return were added, for weight, and finally, a bullet happend to fall into the chamber, and guns came to exist.
1. How many chromosomes do we share with creatures we are obviously not evolved from?
2. How significant is it to have the same chromosome as another organism
3. If another organism is found to have the same chromosomes as a species it obviously did not evolve from, could it be said that matching chromosomes do not imply relation?
Mathematics led to computers. Mathematics came from logic. The Scientific method also came from logic. But Darwinism method isn't formed on the Scientific method because it is not formed on logic.
Consider the flagellum. It's a complex form of locomotion with interdependant parts. It clearly can not have evolved, and therefore is in explicable acording to Darwinism. Let's just take a peek into why a complex apendage never could evolve. In Evolution, the most efficient form of life wins. A cell that formes a horny knob on it's side that doesn't do anything is going to waste resources compared to a nomal cell. But if you can sort of flap the knob around and move a bit, then good for you, maybe your kids will be good swimmers and you'll have evolved. Cells don't just swim with horny knobs though. Some of them have motors. Real, spinning, multipart, interdependant part, motors. How does this evolve? If a cell can muster up the mutational ability to make one or two flagellum parts, it will have wasted resourses compared to a normal cell. It's partial motor never will spin, and the growths will be totally useless. It's children, if any, will also waste resourse. The cell's family will disapear to make room for the cells with the most streamlined horny knobs. Let me be clear. A cell will never mutate a complete flagellum in a single mutation. And nothing but a comlpete flagellum is required in order for cells to have them, Therefore according to Darwinism, the flagellum does not exist.
I think logic is great, But Darwinism is not based on it.
I know that Halo is as old as the hills, and I would not have mentioned it except as an example. It has one hellova trainer.
Their's nothing quite like freezing time, loading sarge's crotch with 20 stickys, and watching him fly/swim of into the sunset. (sniff)
I like corporations, you know what they're after. Money. If they're stupid, we the customer punish them by not giving them money. A group like greenpeace however can be very, very stupid, and we can't punish them. case in point: . >> in a recent Greenpeace scorecard, Apple ranked lower than HP, Dell, Nokia, and Sony. . Whoa, they didn't pass your score card? Stay right there, let me get my fish.
We hate apple. Whats with that name anyway? Huh? Duh, apple, duh. Change it to something more dynamic. And whats with the white every where? We like green over here at GREENpeace. Fix it. Also, they dont taste good, and its our suspicion that they arent really edible. Dell and HP have promised us to make tasty computers soon, but duh, Apple, duh, has not. Whats with that? We tried to return these not-tasty computers, but the guy wouldnt accept them, said we werent supposed to eat them. Fix it, make it so we can return our stale computers for fresh, juicy ones. Here at Greenpeace we lead the world in hating duh, Apple, duh.