Slashdot Mirror


Ocarina of Time — Best Game Ever?

The Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time is the best game yet made, according to a list compiled by readers and writers of the lauded British gaming magazine Edge. Their list of the hundred best games ever is top-heavy with Nintendo titles, a full five out of the top ten being released to a Nintendo platform. Obviously, this sort of thing can get contentious, and CNet's Crave blog spoke up quickly with a contrary opinion. "The Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time is truly a masterpiece that should be thought of as one of the greatest games ever created. But to call it the greatest game of all time is a serious misstatement. Unlike Super Mario Bros., Ocarina of Time was released in an era where video games were booming and sales were on the rise. Simply put, everyone was playing video games, and the game was the best of its time. But no other game in history--Ocarina of Time included--was able to save an entire industry from almost guaranteed destruction the way Super Mario Bros. did, and it is for this reason that we should all give ol' Mario and Luigi credit where it's due." Let's hear it, then. What game deserves to top a list of the 100 best games ever made?

615 comments

  1. Counter-Strike by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Is clearly the best game ever made. With billions of player mins per month and timeless gameplay, it seems that CS will never die. How many millions of people still play Mario bros?

    1. Re:Counter-Strike by nebaz · · Score: 3, Informative

      How many millions of people still play Mario bros?
      I do.

      --
      Rhymes that keep their secrets will unfold behind the clouds.There upon the rainbow is the answer to a neverending story
    2. Re:Counter-Strike by LandoCalrizzian · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It still doesn't compare to the number of hours spent playing Super Mario Bros. Counterstrike can't even come close to the number of children(boys AND girls), teens(men AND women) and parents(men AND women) who were drawn to SMB like a moth to a flame. In 15 years, I doubt you'll find many people who keep a computer around just to play Counterstrike or it's sequels.

      Nintendo is arguably the only developer(hardware and software) to stay true to the original idea of Video Games as a source of fun instead of pimping it out to gain control of the home theater market. Sony is starting to lose it's way and Microsoft is Microsoft.

      I am not a nintendo fanboy but I do respect the Old School.

    3. Re:Counter-Strike by weirdguy · · Score: 1

      Counter-Strike has more internet traffic then the entire county of Italy. That might only be source actually...

    4. Re:Counter-Strike by strider2k · · Score: 1

      SMB has a larger fan base than CS. That could be the deciding factor whether or not which one is better.

      --
      Every geek has some sort of website, programming or computer project. Here's mine: www.youtasteit.com . What's yours?
    5. Re:Counter-Strike by plunge · · Score: 1

      Ok, so that's one then. 999,999 people to go just to get to even a million. :)

    6. Re:Counter-Strike by mastershake_phd · · Score: 1

      How many millions of people still play Mario bros?
       
      Given a SNES9x for xbox disk and current xbox games I have found a lot of people prefer Mario Bros.

    7. Re:Counter-Strike by aichpvee · · Score: 1

      I still play Super Mario World. That, by the way, is the real greatest game ever made. Ocarina of Time was and still is very good, but I don't even think it's the best of the 3D Zelda games. Not to even speak of the 2D ones, that with the exception of those on NES and Minish Cap on GBA, are all better than the best of 3D Zelda.

      --
      The Farewell Tour II
    8. Re:Counter-Strike by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't say the best game ever, but I have been playing it near enough since it first came out and I'm playing it as I make this post right now (I'm dead atm so have time :P). But these guys have loads of classic games right at the bottom of the list I don't get it.

    9. Re:Counter-Strike by gerbalblaste · · Score: 4, Funny

      A game populated (seemingly) exclusively by teenage boys with unbearably high pitched voices who use more profanity and racial epithets than a clan rally? best game ever? Clearly.

    10. Re:Counter-Strike by packeteer · · Score: 1

      That is in part because counter strike needs continuous transfer. Much of the internet traffic in Italy is your standard web pages, email, and file transfer.

      --
      unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
    11. Re:Counter-Strike by Trogre · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Which is well and good for people who like those kinds of games, but some of us like games to be sophisticated simulations that give a sense of immersion as if we are actually in a new environment. Back in the 90s this used to be called Virtual Reality, or Quake :) Currently such games are often still labelled FPSs or flight sims and for that no console even now comes close to a PC.

      And please don't bring out the old strawman that every FPS player is a pimply case-modding adrenaline junkie. You may as well say that everyone who drives a decent car is a boy racer.

      Sure I like the odd 1992-era candyland bubblegum game from time to time and that's when I break out my console, but for my style of serious gaming let's just say I'm apparently not Nintendo's target market.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    12. Re:Counter-Strike by IdolizingStewie · · Score: 4, Funny

      Two!

    13. Re:Counter-Strike by Frogbert · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I'm sorry but I'm going to have to call bullshit. Check out the statistics: http://www.steampowered.com/v/index.php?area=stats Currently Counterstrike and Counterstrike source make up around 8 billion minutes of play time per month. Steam has 3,046,980 unique players per month on average, and I'd hazard a guess and say the 95% of them play CS at least some of the time. Counterstrike is an 8 year old game, and it is still getting that level of play. Sorry but there is no way that SMB has had more play time.

    14. Re:Counter-Strike by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If you are to judge a game on how many hours are played, you shouldn't forget Starcraft. That game is even older.

    15. Re:Counter-Strike by JebusIsLord · · Score: 1

      Ocarina was freaking awsome, for sure, but I'm playing Twilight Princess now and I'm really amazed at how much more epic it is. I mean, gameplay-wise they're pretty identical (Wiimote aside), but MAN this game kicks ass in the story department. This list is (if you read the article) apparently not giving extra points for being "classic" (first), so i'd say Twilight should be ahead of Ocarina.

      --
      Jeremy
    16. Re:Counter-Strike by Goaway · · Score: 5, Funny

      We know you're fat, but you still don't count as an entire million of people.

    17. Re:Counter-Strike by CastrTroy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      With the Wii, Nintendo may be getting closer to VR than any other game system ever has. Remember VR Headsets, Force feedback controls, and all those other things that you never see around anymore? Well I for one think the Wiimote is the best progression we have towards actual VR. The fact that you can swing it like a golf club, or a tennis racket, or a baseball bat, and have it do the same thing on the screen is kind of exactly what people looking for VR have been dreaming of for a long time. It's not much of VR if you're just pushing a bunch of buttons but you happen to have a set of VR goggles.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    18. Re:Counter-Strike by CastrTroy · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Walk up to 100 random people on the street, and ask them if they've heard of a video game, called Counterstrike. And if they have heard of it, have they played it. Now ask the same about Mario. Seriously, I know that Counterstrike is a good game, but apart from the people who do play it, most people have never even heard of it.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    19. Re:Counter-Strike by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      I totally agree. Although I'm playing through TP on the GC so no Wiimote for me (actually GC on Wii, I picked up TP about 2 weeks before I managed to find a Wii). The story line in TP is miles beyond any Zelda game I've ever played. Most Zelda games once you complete a dungeon you feel like you can stop playing, but in TP, the story just keeps on going, and you don't ever want to put it down.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    20. Re:Counter-Strike by Kam+Solusar · · Score: 3, Funny

      Walk up to 100 random people on the street, and ask them if they've heard of a video game, called Counterstrike.
      I really advise slashdot users not to do this. I wouldn't take long until the cops arrive to investigate the calls about this pale, strange person talking about killer games...
      --
      The Angels have the Phone Box
    21. Re:Counter-Strike by FLAGGR · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Twilight Princess is just Ocarina done up for the next generation. It's like the special edition star wars. Sure, it is obviously a sequel, has a different story and different temples etc, but it is a spirtual remake. If you played Ocarina as a kid, you will be smiling ear to ear when you revisit places like Zoras Domain. It really is OOT with awesome graphics (no, it's not GoW - it's not the texture sizes polygon counts and shaders that matter - it's the art of it, the scale. It looks like a real world and is big. Oblivion got the big part, but it doesn't look as good as TP by a long shot - it is bland and boring.) The original bits in TP are awesome as well. I want to warn you that the story development... stops for a bit... part way through the game. Nintendo doesn't have enough balls to one-up OOT, so they crippled it a bit. Basically, TP exists because of OOT, it is basically a tribute to it.

    22. Re:Counter-Strike by Brian+Gordon · · Score: 1

      "Terrorists win." probably wouldn't go over too well either..

    23. Re:Counter-Strike by Brian+Gordon · · Score: 0, Troll

      Apart from the millions of people who have played it constantly for nearly a decade? It's a social phenomenon for crying out loud, like pokemon except long-lived. It doesn't even compare to mario 1, which only takes like an hour to beat if you're good, has no multiplay, and sucks anyway.

    24. Re:Counter-Strike by maxume · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's a lot of voices in your head.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    25. Re:Counter-Strike by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      FPS? Sophisticated? In the same freakin sentence?

      If you said turn-based strategy (e.g. Panzer General, Civilization), sure I'd say sophisticated & serious

      If you said real-time strategy (Starcraft, Command & Conquer), I may begrudgingly agree to the sophisticated & serious tags.

      But an FPS? Sorry, fraid not buddy. There's minimal "sophistication" in running around & trying to blow the head off the opposing teammembers so you can own some imaginary capture point.

      Compare to real life. The following are sentences people would accept (i.e., not laugh at)
      Chess is sophisticated.
      Soccer is sophisticated.
      Football strategy is sophisticated.

      Nobody says:
      Paintball is sophisticated.

    26. Re:Counter-Strike by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 1

      People still play CS? I gave up years ago after the cheating got shameless. Well, if CS is a good honeypot for 12 year olds who think they're hackers for downloading cheats, then mod parent up! Keep them away from my current favorites.

      --
      I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
    27. Re:Counter-Strike by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 1, Insightful

      some of us like games to be sophisticated simulations that give a sense of immersion as if we are actually in a new environment.

      Translation--you want to play tech demos. You're the usual graphics whore.

      Sure I like the odd 1992-era candyland bubblegum game from time to time and that's when I break out my console, but for my style of serious gaming let's just say I'm apparently not Nintendo's target market.

      In fact, you're a tiny niche market.
      --
      "Sufferin' succotash."
    28. Re:Counter-Strike by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 0, Redundant

      You may admire Counterstrike, but it's a fact that Super Mario Bros. is the best-selling videogame in history. The sales numbers prove that more people have played it than any other game. Everyone knows who Mario is, even your grandma.

      --
      "Sufferin' succotash."
    29. Re:Counter-Strike by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 0

      It's hardly that much of a phenomenon. Certainly not on the level of, say, World of Warcraft. As for the game sucking, it's still more solid fun than any other game out today--with the exception of Super Mario Bros. 3. If you want to compare phenomena, Mario wins on all counts. He has name recognition on the level of Ronald McDonald and Mickey Mouse. Most Counterstrike players are college kids who outgrow it in a few years, but people have been playing Super Mario Bros. since 1985. My little sister willingly plays it today on her Wii, along with the original Legend of Zelda.

      --
      "Sufferin' succotash."
    30. Re:Counter-Strike by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Well, Windows Solitiare should be pretty high up on the list too, as I'm sure it's one of the few computer games that more people have played than Super Mario Brothers. Heck, it's one of the few games from the 486-era that I still play on a somewhat regular basis myself.

    31. Re:Counter-Strike by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I call bullshit on you. Super Mario Bros sold over 40 million copies. Thats not counting how many millions of copies of the re-releases they have sold. Nuff said.

    32. Re:Counter-Strike by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apart from the millions of people who play CS, or any pc gamer alive, or half the population of the internet forum browsers, or anyone who has had someone explain something in their english class using the metaphor of AWPs versus glock's.

      Yes, more people who are not part of any of the above groups are familiar with Mario, why? Because its been around a hell of a lot longer and is a colossus of gaming history. Even still, I think you seriously underestimate the impact CS (and CSS) have on the modern world as a representation of gaming.

      All that being said, who says the greatest game ever made is the most popular? It's not, the greatest game ever made was massively popular, but the vast majority of gamers havent even played it, let alone people who dont game hearing about it.

      For those who don't know what game I'm talking about yet (probably because you didn't play it or it would have been the obvious answer you came up with as well): Final Fantasy 7. Anyone who disagrees is a terrorist and/or a witch (take your pick whether you want to end up in Gitmo or be burned alive).

    33. Re:Counter-Strike by Trogre · · Score: 1
      Just to make sure I understand you correctly, does a graphics whore describe someone who wants their gaming experience to be realistic and immersing, as well as all the usual good storyline, gameplay, etc?

      If that's your definition then yes, I suppose I must be a graphics whore.

      In fact, you're a tiny niche market.

      Given how well games such as Crysis, FEAR, Deus Ex and HalfLife 2 have sold and the anticipation for the likes of StarCraft 2 I would say I have to disagree with you.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    34. Re:Counter-Strike by Cadallin · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Precisely what I was thinking. FPS enthusiasts usually come in two types: the graphics whore, and now the Drunk Frat Guy who discovered deathmatch with Halo and thinks Microsoft invented the FPS. The Trouble is, both of these are tiny niche markets, yet they dominate the direction of the industry, that is, if you listen to the hype machine and ignore who's raking in the sales and profits. I wish the gaming industry would discover the long tail theory. There's plenty of ready made markets that could support titles in the range of $1million to $5million in development costs, and they go completely ignored. If some companies would start producing really slick, well polished, 2D Adventure, RPG, and Strategy games, they would probably meet with a lot of success without much outlay.

    35. Re:Counter-Strike by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      > Everyone knows who Mario is, even your grandma.

      Which one? they are the Mario Brothers, you know... Mario Mario and Luigi Mario!

    36. Re:Counter-Strike by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Nonsense. VR is in the mind, it has nothing to do with swinging your arms around like some kind of idiot. When a game is immersive enough to suspend your disbelief, the controls become irrelevant.

    37. Re:Counter-Strike by paganizer · · Score: 1

      How many man-hours played criteria. hmm. lets see.
      Civilization I
      Railroad Tycoon
      Super Mario Brothers
      X-COM / UFO: Enemy Unknown

      below this I don't think the order is completely accurate. By the way, if you've never played one of these games you might want to think about giving them a try, except for Civ I, Railroad Tycoon I & Masters of Magic; you really need to be able to ignore extremely outdated graphics for at least 30 minutes before the phenominal gameplay will have you not caring; that Especially applies to Masters of Magic; it's the only game on the list where they could just provide updated graphics, slightly better music & leave the underlying code ALONE and have something that would totally dominate the sales charts for the next year.

      Sim City 2000
      Masters of Magic
      Civilization II
      The Movies
      Transport Tycoon Deluxe
      Railroad Tycoon II
      Doom
      Civilization IV
      Tropico
      Sim City IV
      Age of Wonders: Shadow Magic
      GTAIII: Vice City
      Master of Orion II
      Europa Universalis II
      Morrowind
      Steel Panthers III
      Panzer General
      Dungeon Keeper II
      Steel Panthers: World at War
      Janes Fleet Command
      The Sims
      Harpoon
      Galactic Civilizations
      The Sims 2
      Starcraft
      Star Control III

      --
      Why, yes, I AM a Pagan Libertarian.
    38. Re:Counter-Strike by eonlabs · · Score: 1

      I do as well.

      1, 2, 3, World, and 64.

      Although I don't know which order I would put them in, my top five would definitly have

      Mario Bros 3
      Zelda: Ocarina of Time
      Metroid Prime (The Original, Not Echoes)

      My top 10 would have the above and

      Super Metroid
      Chu Chu Rocket
      Sonic Adventure
      Tetris Sphere
      Cave Story (Doukutsu Monogatari)
      Half Life
      Earth Bound
      Super Mario World

      I'm not sure which two in the lower list would also go into the top 5...

      --
      I wouldn't consider the mad hatter mad. Just reality impaired. He sure can make a mean cup of tea.
    39. Re:Counter-Strike by LarsWestergren · · Score: 1, Troll

      If some companies would start producing really slick, well polished, 2D Adventure, RPG, and Strategy games, they would probably meet with a lot of success without much outlay.

      Sorry....no. I used to believe that too, but after seeing the pathetic sales numbers of some really great games I have come the following conclusions:

      First of all, you underestimate the viciousness of the average bitter hardcore fan of those genres. Nothing will be good enough for them, and if you try, they will first raise you to the skies and pin all their hopes of a revival of their favourite genre on you, and then when you don't do things EXACTLY the way they want (and each fan wants things differently) they will be on an online vendetta to destroy your game and possibly you personally. First you pour your heart out making your games, then you lose money, and then you get to see people dancing on your grave (take Troika for instance).

      Secondly - doing these kinds of games is a LOT more work than creating a shooter, and it takes a lot of time and money to create the characters, the intricate branching storylines, the AI, the gameplay balance, the artwork, the depth and breadth of contents people expect these days. And then lots of reviewers will just quickly play through it, miss 90% of the content, and write a snide review slamming you for having outdated graphics and lots of bugs.

      --

      Being bitter is drinking poison and hoping someone else will die

    40. Re:Counter-Strike by hobo+sapiens · · Score: 1

      "Star Control III"
      Is that a typo? Did you mean Star Control II? I hope?

      Now, *that* is the best game ever. The open-sourced version Ur Quan Masters is even better.

      --
      blah blah blah
    41. Re:Counter-Strike by Brian+Gordon · · Score: 1

      Counter-strike is more solid fun than mario. I can play counter-strike for 6 or 7 hours at a stretch when I have time, while mario is at most an amusing distration for a few minutes. And people have been playing mario since 1985 only because it's been out since 1985.. People are still playing spacewar on the PDP-1 emulator and it's been out since '61.. but that says nothing of the quality of the game.

    42. Re:Counter-Strike by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Realistic and immersive? You kidding me? Picking up your arm and aiming at something manually is far more immersive than using a frickin mouse. True immersion would get your lazy ass off the couch and literally run in place to get somewhere, let alone aiming with your arm and shoulder.

      It's not possible to have "the usual" gameplay when you are talking high tech graphics. There is lag and choppiness, loading screens, and just plain budget constraints to high tech demos. Case in point: In doom3 you could only have like 3 monsters on the screen at the same time. Sure it looked good but the gameplay as you put it just wasn't Doom gameplay. Somewhere you have to make a choice and devote your budget to art or programming. Sometimes you get a rare game like HL2 that has almost everything, and we definately cherish those moments. It didn't have RPG style immersion however.

      It's hard for me to understand your love of FPS but you don't recognize the appeal of a controller scheme that you actually have to aim with your arm instead of your fingers. That is without a doubt the first step toward real immersion, unless of course you are simply talking about graphics, which was what the gp was refering to. Immesion in a shooter especially does not involve a mouse or keyboard. Who had the first light gun for a console? I forget.

      Deus Ex was by no means a technological marvel, it was a great game though. FEAR was in my opinion one of the worst FPS I've played. But in the end you are comparing apples to oranges, as a modern computer will always have the tech advantage, but good luck playing with your friends in the same room. It may be a bit much to call you a graphics whore, but I don't believe that immersion is your top priority, or I do not think it means what you think it means.

      As a matter of fact, it sounds an awful lot like a buzzword you regurgitated off the box of Oblivion or something.

    43. Re:Counter-Strike by Cadallin · · Score: 1
      Except Troika's titles were buggy. I would also argue that Arcanum's art wasn't so much dated, as bad. And there's really no excuse for it. I would argue that the Adventure Genre was killed in much the same way: by companies churning out cheap garbage, which consumers refused to buy, which companies saw as meaning the genre was dead, and therefore didn't make anymore. Release now - Patch later is disastrous, and unnecessary.

      For support of my point of view, I point to Telltale Games, they're doing quite well with their new episodic Sam and Max series. (The only reason I haven't bought them is they aren't available for Macs, and unless I upgrade to an Intel Mac before, I'm hoping to get the series on the Wii.) Sure, the fanboys bitched about some things. Max's voice for one. They really could have done a better job finding at least a similar sounding VA to the original games, but it doesn't really matter. The games are stable and bug free, the art is consistent and well designed, and people are buying.

    44. Re:Counter-Strike by drsquare · · Score: 1

      Except those few million people who play it are the only people who've really heard of it. It's unheard of outside the hardcore FPS demographic. On the other hand, pretty much everyone in the developed world has heard of Mario, even those who've never played it, because it's a cultural phenomenom.

    45. Re:Counter-Strike by cthellis · · Score: 1

      Star Control III and not II...? o_O

    46. Re:Counter-Strike by operagost · · Score: 1

      Which is well and good for people who like those kinds of games, but some of us like games to be sophisticated simulations that give a sense of immersion as if we are actually in a new environment.
      Good for you. Now please go back to playing Wolfenstein 3-D. Oh yeah, it wasn't immersive enough and no one plays it anymore. Such happens to games that depend on technology more than game play.
      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    47. Re:Counter-Strike by Taxis · · Score: 1

      I thought RPG's were raking in more than pretty much anything else these days? WOW?

    48. Re:Counter-Strike by MadMidnightBomber · · Score: 4, Funny

      Er, three sire.

      --
      "It doesn't cost enough, and it makes too much sense."
    49. Re:Counter-Strike by masterzora · · Score: 1

      Paintball is sophisticated.

      --
      Remember, open source is free as in speech, not free as in bear.
    50. Re:Counter-Strike by LKM · · Score: 1

      What percent of all gamers even play online games? Every gamer played Super Mario Bros. Probably hours of it. I'm not going to claim one of them got more playtime, but I'm pretty sure it's not as clear as you make it out to be.

    51. Re:Counter-Strike by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

      If playtime is the standard by which games are to be judged, then surely WoW is the best game ever. If longevity is the standard, then Starcraft probably wins. Actually, none of those win in either category; statistically speaking I have little doubt that Tetris (in all it's incarnations) outperforms any other videogame by a wide margin.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    52. Re:Counter-Strike by somersault · · Score: 1

      Considering you can complete SMB in a few days, and there is little incentive (IMO) to replay it, then it seems quite likely that there have been a lot more hours spend on CS than SMB. I know for sure that I won't have played more than a week or two (when you stick all the hours together) of SMB in my lifetime (and I even played a version to completion last year when we found a SNES lying around in our holiday villa thingy), but when you add the hours I've played Counter-Strike over the past 8 or so years it could come to quite a scary number of hours (admittedly I've hardly played it in the last couple of years, but that's because I've been trying to develop a 'life' ;) ).

      --
      which is totally what she said
    53. Re:Counter-Strike by paganizer · · Score: 1

      Sorry, sorry, sorry.
      I meant II not III. didn't proofread.

      --
      Why, yes, I AM a Pagan Libertarian.
    54. Re:Counter-Strike by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most MMORPGs can hardly be classified as real RPGs. While they borrow many design elements, they mostly fail in the most important category for an RPG, and that's telling a good story. I am not saying that WoW is a bad game, I actually enjoy it a lot, but there's a hell of a difference to for example Deus Ex, Fallout or the Baldur's Gate series.

      While the market for both are probably overlapping to a large degree, I would still count those as distinct genres.

    55. Re:Counter-Strike by Goaway · · Score: 1

      Apart from the millions of people who play CS, or any pc gamer alive, or half the population of the internet forum browsers, or anyone who has had someone explain something in their english class using the metaphor of AWPs versus glock's.

      That's a lot of people. However, it's still just a drop in the bucket compared to Mario.

    56. Re:Counter-Strike by mo^ · · Score: 1

      Everyone has heard of Bill Gates, but only geeks have heard of Linus Torsvald(SP?)

      Yay, I always knew windows was the better OS.

      Glad thats solved

      (i actually do believe this as well, but it works well as a troll)

      --
      bah!*@%!
    57. Re:Counter-Strike by clickety6 · · Score: 1

      me too!

      Ooops - sorry - I thought I was on my AOL account...

      --
      ----------------------------------- My Other Sig Is Hilarious -----------------------------------
    58. Re:Counter-Strike by HouseArrest420 · · Score: 1

      apparently you've never played with the Wiimote's grandfather the Power Glove?

      --
      This is Slashdot! Give me the latest gadget, bug, or OS project! This ain't english class so don't confuse the two!
    59. Re:Counter-Strike by Piata · · Score: 1

      fourth. I'm sure we could find our first million right here on slashdot. Mario Bros. was the first game I downloaded on my Wii and is enjoyed by pretty much everyone. CS is rather boring imo.

    60. Re:Counter-Strike by plunge · · Score: 1

      Sure, but that's not the same thing as millions of people still keepig their NES systems around to play it. The fact that Wii offers it as a nostalgia thing is not exactly the same deal.

    61. Re:Counter-Strike by PIBM · · Score: 1

      Here's a better value ...

      Players Servers Player Minutes / Month

      Counter-Strike 195,087 92,081 6.977 billion
      Counter-Strike: Source 67,707 45,510 2.116 billion
      Counter-Strike Condition Zero 27,763 19,659 902.376 million

      From the latest estimate done on world of warcraft players from a few of my friends, they concluded that about 60B of minutes were played on this game per month. It's been out for 2 years and I'm pretty sure that the total time played is already over CS total.

    62. Re:Counter-Strike by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

      You've obviously never played paintball.

      Seriously, football strategy can be sophisticated? Soccer? You're trying to get this round thing into that big square thing. Football? This oddly-shaped thing goes to that end of the field.

      But you're right, actually. Football strategy is sophisticated. And so is paintball strategy, and Counter-Strike strategy, and even Halo strategy.

      What makes their capture points more "imaginary" than football, as far as strategy goes?

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    63. Re:Counter-Strike by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

      Wolfenstein 3-D also lacks gameplay, which is why people who like old-school games still play Doom.

      Also, technology does, in fact, allow new styles of gameplay. Quake 3 would not have been possible on the Doom engine. Headshots still aren't done on Quake 3.

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    64. Re:Counter-Strike by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

      If you are to judge a game on how many hours are played, you shouldn't forget Starcraft. That game is even older.
      By that metric, Pong and its variants are the surefire winner!
    65. Re:Counter-Strike by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

      Er, actually, Freecell probably has them all beat.

    66. Re:Counter-Strike by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      .... from almost guaranteed destruction ...

      Bullshit!

    67. Re:Counter-Strike by Trogre · · Score: 1

      Just to be sure I understand you correctly:

      You believe that any game that involves shooting and places the player in a first-person perspective with a degree of visual realism is for graphics whores and johnny-come-latelys?

      Give. Me. A. Break. I'm guessing you stopped following FPSs after the UT/Quake3 multiplayer adrenaline junkie fad of a few years ago. Go play some actual single-player FPSs for a while, (not ones like Doom3 that really are tech demos) and get back to me. You know, the ones with storylines and sub-plots.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    68. Re:Counter-Strike by Trogre · · Score: 1

      Uh, so what's the problem? A more realistic game comes along with a better storyline and gameplay to boot and you're saying that's a bad thing?

      Hell I still break out oldies like Alex Kidd and Wolf3D every couple of years for a bit of nostalgic play, as I suspect you do with other games, going by your sig.

      Look it's nice to go back to 1986 every now and again but I sure don't want to live there, thanks.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    69. Re:Counter-Strike by Civil_Disobedient · · Score: 1

      If some companies would start producing really slick, well polished, 2D Adventure, RPG, and Strategy games, they would probably meet with a lot of success without much outlay.

      While I agree with you in spirit, the evidence points to the contrary. I mean, 2D game engines are available for the taking. Text adventures? Quake? Sierra? It's all either available or easily coded, yet I see no dearth of great games coming out. Is that simply because there's no golden carrot being waved in front of their faces? If that were the case, you'd expect open-source to come to the rescue. Yet it's three years until we make contact, there's no personal rocket-packs, and open-source developers have seemingly failed to take advantage of the old skool market. Personally, I think they're all too busy playing their Nintendos and MAME systems.

    70. Re:Counter-Strike by edwdig · · Score: 1

      Nintendo has re-released Super Mario Bros a lot of times, with it selling well each time. There was the original NES release, Super Mario All Stars on the SNES, Super Mario Bros + Lost Levels on GB or GBC (not sure which), NES Collector's Series on GBA, and now it's one of the top selling games on Virtual Console. You don't have to keep your NES around to play this game. You're almost guarenteed to be able to buy it for a current system at any point in time.

    71. Re:Counter-Strike by Dreamlandlocal · · Score: 1

      Try Gal Civ II over over the original. The enhancements (graphics, gameplay and AI) are DEFINITELY worth the upgrade!

    72. Re:Counter-Strike by edwdig · · Score: 1

      MMO-RPG's rake in the cash. Traditional RPGs do as well in Japan, but in the rest of the world, very few make much money.

    73. Re:Counter-Strike by incith · · Score: 1

      Well in 15 years you can ask 'how many millions of people still play CS'.. I'm sure the number will be about the same as the Mario version now. Mario > CS.

  2. Best of All Time is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Final Fantasy VII is the best game of all time :)

    1. Re:Best of All Time is... by casualsax3 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Here's what's going to happen to your post: You're going to get modded flaimbait or troll, and some people will respond and tell you that you're too young and you've never played Final Fantasy VI, then they'll mention the subpar translation and the rushed third disc... Then someone will mod you funny just because, and then someone overrated just because you've got points... But then a few people will come along and remember how they felt playing VII for the first time, when they first visited the Golden Saucer and found minigames as deep and fun as other *complete* PS1 games, the chill they got when they were under the sea in the submarine - stopping dead in your tracks as you saw Emerald Weapon lurking in the distance for the first time, and the epic theme you were treated to just sitting on the world map marveling at the most fantastic soundtrack Uematsu has ever written - and you'll be modded up.

    2. Re:Best of All Time is... by Stormwatch · · Score: 1

      And I'll just say: Panzer Dragoon Saga.

    3. Re:Best of All Time is... by smookumy · · Score: 1

      Sadly, Final Fantasy 7 started the excessively whiney protagonist trend.

    4. Re:Best of All Time is... by khephera · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Nethack. I'm still playing the DOS version.
      And I'm a female :)

    5. Re:Best of All Time is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      You mean you play a female character, right sir?

    6. Re:Best of All Time is... by Nairanvac · · Score: 1

      I... think I love you.

      --
      All your reading ability are belong to me.
    7. Re:Best of All Time is... by CrazyJim1 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sorry. I'm completely incompatible with you. I play Angband. We come from different worlds.

    8. Re:Best of All Time is... by Repossessed · · Score: 1

      I remember the graphics too, not the regular in game stuff, but the FMVs. Stuff that still beats out anything I've seen today, even if you do match the quality, the cinematography of FFVII was incredible.

      I will never, ever, forget Ruby weapon attacking, even if I've long since forgotten the name fo the city it attacked.

      --
      Liberte, Egalite, Fraternite (TM)
    9. Re:Best of All Time is... by Rakarra · · Score: 1
      the most fantastic soundtrack Uematsu has ever written

      Seriously? Hey, the overland theme is great, Cid's theme is awesome, and 1-winged angel is a legend, but compared to Uematsu's work in the super-nintendo days, FF7's soundtrack was a definite disappointment. He certainly bounced back with FF8's amazing soundtrack (best part of the game, sadly). Part of the problem was the PSX's sound synthesis when FF started developing for it actually sounded worse than the SNES's at its high point, but many of the themes from FF7, on their own, were somewhat lackluster. When I want to listen to excellent Uematsu music, I break out FF4, FF6, a few tracks from FF7, FF8, and FF10 (which was only partially written by him).

    10. Re:Best of All Time is... by bhaak1 · · Score: 1

      Nethack. I'm still playing the DOS version.
      And I'm a female :)
      On the Internet, Nobody Believes You're a Female
    11. Re:Best of All Time is... by khephera · · Score: 1

      It's okay, I'm used to that response. No one believed I was female when I ran a stand-alone BBS in the early 90's (until they started coming over to my house to play Barren Realms Elite when the Canadians were kicking our butts), and they didn't believe it when i first got onto the 'net on a VMS college server at about the same time. (looking down) Yup, definitely female :):)

      Now that I've thought of it again, Barren Realms Elite was a pretty hot game too, maybe not in the top 10, but gave several us a good excuse to get together once a week and play. Legend of the Red Dragon was great too. Kheph

    12. Re:Best of All Time is... by Qzukk · · Score: 1

      How do you tell a female @ from a male @?

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    13. Re:Best of All Time is... by Phu5ion · · Score: 1

      FFVII was a great game, but FFVI is, hands down, the best in the series.

      --
      Slashdot is kind of like Playboy; we aren't here to read the articles.
    14. Re:Best of All Time is... by blitziod · · Score: 1

      any chance i could score with you:)?

      --
      The only way to bust a doper--is when you yourself become a smoker!
    15. Re:Best of All Time is... by xappax · · Score: 1

      ;

      Pick an object.

      ...

      @ a human or elf (human geek called xappax)


      Hm...still ambiguous...

      ^x

      Base Attributes

      Starting
      name : xappax
      race : human
      role : Geek
      gender : male
      alignment : neutral

      Current
      race : human
      role : Geek
      gender : male
      alignment : neutral


      Ah HAH!

    16. Re:Best of All Time is... by blazer1024 · · Score: 1

      BRE was a sweet door game!

      As was Solar Realms Elite... did they both have inter-BBS battles over Fidonet?

      I remember the first time I hooked my BBS into Fidonet.. that was the coolest thing ever, being able to send emails anywhere. So what if they could take several days to get delivered!

      Those were the days.

    17. Re:Best of All Time is... by LordVader717 · · Score: 1

      It was Ultima Weapon that attacked Mideel. Ruby Weapon was the red one in the Gold Saucer desert.

    18. Re:Best of All Time is... by LordVader717 · · Score: 1

      Part of the problem was the PSX's sound synthesis when FF started developing for it actually sounded worse than the SNES's at its high point


      I'll have to listen to some of the Soundtracks to verify that. Final Fantasy VII was one of the first RPGs that gave us a large and diverse Soundtrack of near-CD quality music blended into the gaming experience.
      There are so many tracks from that game, but just to pick a few:

      Aerith's theme
      Weapon's Theme
      Cid's Theme
      Cosmo Canyon
      Boss Music
      Highwind theme
      Shinra theme
      Jenova theme
      Crater theme
      Mako reactor
      Opening theme
      Tifa's theme

      And of course the ending music, and the credits.

      I could go on and on, but It would probably be better for me to say which ones I didn't think were absolutely awesome. Really, that's how good I consider the Soundtrack to be.
      In fact, after just listening to one of the tracks, there's no way an SNES can get such a perfect sounding bass guitar, no way in hell.
    19. Re:Best of All Time is... by Repossessed · · Score: 1

      I think we're both wrong actually, Ultima weapon was near the crater, and an optional fight. Can't remember the name of the one that attacked the city though...

      --
      Liberte, Egalite, Fraternite (TM)
    20. Re:Best of All Time is... by LordVader717 · · Score: 1

      as far as I remember, the optional ones were Ruby (in the desert) and Emerald (under the sea), whereas Ultima was the only one that had any significance in the story. It was optional to beat him (he was flying around on the third disc) but he was such a pushover that he was a joke compared to other Weapons (except in FF X2, where Omega weapon was a standard enemy at the end of the game) Man, I still know all of this, although it's at least three years since I touched the game.

  3. Psychonauts by cyberon22 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Psychonauts got in at 99? I would have pushed it into the top ten, but it's good to see that the game hasn't been completely ignored. I wonder how many people have actually played it.

    1. Re:Psychonauts by bakura121 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I wonder how many people have actually played it.

      I played it and absolutely LOVED it! I'm happy it made the top 100, but it surely deserved to have had a higher ranking.
    2. Re:Psychonauts by BlastOff · · Score: 1

      Well, hopefully more people will play it now that Gametap has added it.

    3. Re:Psychonauts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Psychonauts had beautiful style, excellent overall construction(aside from the drama level) and a lot of Schafer's trademark creativity and dialogue.

      What it lacked was solid gameplay. It's an extremely standard grade platformer all the way through, with absolutely nothing special about the way it plays that separates it from the rest. Only its presentation really made a big difference.

      It deserves to be on the list, but I don't think it should go much higher.

    4. Re:Psychonauts by darkwhite · · Score: 0

      I've played it. It sucks.

      --

      [an error occurred while processing this directive]
    5. Re:Psychonauts by NMerriam · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's an extremely standard grade platformer all the way through, with absolutely nothing special about the way it plays that separates it from the rest. Only its presentation really made a big difference.


      I tend to agree. Psychonauts is certainly one of my favorite games ever, but it isn't one of the best games of all time. It's simply unusual for a game to be so perfectly executed and pretty much flawless in every way, and then on top of that have so much great character, personality and entertainment. But it didn't really offer any new, exciting game concepts, it simply delivered to an astonishingly high level of polish.
      --
      Recursive: Adj. See Recursive.
    6. Re:Psychonauts by ameoba · · Score: 1

      How do they call anything that's only 2 years old a "cult classic"? I could understand "underappreciated critical success" or "underground hit" but labeling something so fresh as a classic merely serves to highlight the chronological myopia of this 'all time' best-of list.

      --
      my sig's at the bottom of the page.
    7. Re:Psychonauts by donaldm · · Score: 1

      Sorry I have not played Psychonauts yet since I have too many games I am trying to catch up on but from what I have read it appears to be a unusual game that really made for excellent game play. This is the sort of game I like so at sometime in the future I will get it and play it on my PS3. I have checked it does play on my Australian PS3 so while there are few games at the moment for the PS3 there are hundreds of good games (far to many IMHO to play) for the PS2 with more games coming so I can wait.

      Unfortunately picking which game is the best is difficult since this does depend on the individual's tastes so what to one is a fantastic game to another the same game is boring or worse. Personally I have always liked action/adventurer and RPG's with Zelda and Metroid games close to the top of my favorates but I would not say that the "Ocarina of time" was the best of the Zelda series although IMHO is was good.

      I supposed the best way of picking a game's popularity is by sales but from what I have gathered Psychonauts was not all that popular (approx 400,000 sold) even though it got good reviews but it made up for this by its quirkiness in that it gathered a cult following. This to me is a form of success although this does not make for profits for the developer.

      --
      There ain't no such thing as proprietary standards only proprietary formats. Standards are by definition open.
  4. Half-life by Riverman5 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Half-life goes at the top of my list.

    1. Re:Half-life by weirdguy · · Score: 1

      Mine too, Right under Half-Life 2.

    2. Re:Half-life by Pc_Madness · · Score: 1

      While I agree, the Half Life series is great.. but I think it would have to go Ocarina -> GoldenEye -> Half Life 1 and then 2. Ocarina was just such and awesome game, everything was perfect. Great storyline and gameplay, great graphics and sound. :)

    3. Re:Half-life by arth1 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Half-Life is too short. Like the games it build on (Doom and Quake), it's a relatively short adventure. Impressive, yes, but short. I doubt many people spent months of actual playing time with it -- they either completed it, and spent a few hours more fooling around, or they gave up.

      For finite games, I would think the original Tomb Raider has racked up way more man hours of play time, not to say anything about Super Mario, and, yes, Zelda.

      For open-ended games, I can't think of many that were more addictive than Elite. And yes, that is old school. If you missed it the first time around, too bad - it won't appeal to those who think anisotropic filtering makes a difference. It's wireframes, and your imagination does all the shading much better than any graphics card can.

      Anyhow, it's hard to say what the best game of all times is. Di gustibus non disputandum est, and all that. What's clearer is the Biggest Flop of all time. It has to be Daitakana.

      *Art, going back to play "A Mind Forever Voyaging"...

    4. Re:Half-life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Elite.. well said.

    5. Re:Half-life by vishbar · · Score: 0

      One of the things that made half-life so amazing was the modability. Sure, the game was wonderful, but the real icing on the cake was the plethora of multi-player and single-player modifications that were created, some of which even became separate games (i.e. Counterstrike, Day of Defeat).

      --
      Ride the skies
    6. Re:Half-life by BlueMikey · · Score: 1

      Tired of this "too short" argument.

      Oh, well, The Godfather can't be a great movie. See, it's only 175 minutes! Titanic is 194 minutes!

      Yes, that's right. People who play Counter-Strike are a bunch of Titanic-lovers. The rest of us would rather appreciate The Godfather (but not the third one).

    7. Re:Half-life by TheoMurpse · · Score: 1

      Di gustibus non disputandum est, and all that.
      You know, for someone who is trying so hard to sound pretentious, you might want to use the right word: de, not di, gustibus non disputandum est. ;) I just, of course.
    8. Re:Half-Life by optimus2861 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      without question half-life. It was the first game to have mod tools for the fans that were freely available as well as an actual effort behind them to ENCOURAGE mod-making, it was the first to make such a business model succeed on a massive scale, and encouraged the proliferation of community involvement in games, eventually resulting in what some would call "Web 2.0".

      Say what? Where were you when Doom was released, and in the years that followed? Doom had thousands of user-created custom levels, graphics, total conversions, out on the net by the time Half-Life got released. No computer game before Doom got that kind of community; I'm not sure the concept even existed prior to Doom. While it's true that id themselves didn't provide much for tools beyond the first .. darn, I forget what it was called. Node-builder? It was what "compiled" a WAD file into a usable form that Doom could play, IIRC. Anyway, id did specifically design Doom to be user-expandable and wrote right into the license that users could do it, spelling out the terms.

      Half-Life mods, particularly Counter-Strike, may have proved to have more staying power, but they built on the groundwork laid for them by Doom.

    9. Re:Half-Life by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      Ditto Bungie's Marathon series. It came out after Doom (96, IIRC), but it was also designed for modding from the start with easily swappable and editable level, art, and sound files. (And the Physics file, that was a hoot.)

    10. Re:Half-life by arth1 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Mea Culpa. You're absolutely more pretentious than me! :-)

    11. Re:Half-life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have credibility because I'm old. LISTEN TO ME GUYS! I liked Elite, I can name drop old games! I KNOW WHAT'S WHAT!!!!

    12. Re:Half-life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well there's a fair analogy. Let's take a really crappy loooonnnng movie and compare it against a much superior slightly shorter movie, then draw the conclusion that play length doesn't matter in video games.

      How about finding me a SHORT movie (say 80 minutes) that compares with The Godfather?

      Sorry, but sometimes length of play does matter. Can you conceive of a great video game that was over in 3 hours? How about 1 hour? 30 minutes? 1 minute? Where do we draw the line? Obviously at some point short play length impacts enjoyability.

      If someone's opinion is that Half-Life has crossed that boundary, then you can't really claim his argument is invalid. You can only claim that you disagree.

    13. Re:Half-Life by Guido+von+Guido · · Score: 1

      Not only that, but the Half-Life engine itself was based on a highly-modified version of the original Quake engine. You know, Quake--the game ID did after Doom. I'm sure that had a lot to do with the fact that they encourage modding and user maps for Half-Life.

    14. Re:Half-Life by Michael+Wardle · · Score: 1

      Half Life was responsible for Web 2.0? Ha ha ha!

    15. Re:Half-life by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 1

      Quake may have been short, but Quake 2 was one of the longest games I ever played... aside from Monkey Island 2

      --

      "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
    16. Re:Half-life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, your imagination is better than any computer graphics. Great point. Why stop there? Your imagination is also better than any game mechanic as well.

    17. Re:Half-life by arth1 · · Score: 1
      An AC troll wrote:

      Yeah, your imagination is better than any computer graphics. Great point. Why stop there? Your imagination is also better than any game mechanic as well.

      Because my imagination is a lousy opponent, incapable of surprising me, that's why.

      That's why I read books too. While my imagination fills in the missing graphics and details of a book better than most movie directors can, the book provides the parts which my imagination isn't good at.
      I take it you don't read much?

    18. Re:Half-Life by Kingrames · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Like I said, there were games before it that were moddable, but Half-Life really caused the biggest explosion in fan-driven community efforts.

      When the #1 most-played online multiplayer game in America is a MOD for half-life, you know something is up.

      And that doesn't even begin to tap into the vast collection of mods and user-created content for the game.
      Like I said, Quake and Duke Nukem had lots of user-created content, but when you compare the communities for the games, you'll see a huge difference. Why? I don't know and I don't care. But it's there.

      I was here when DOOM was released, and made my own episode for Duke Nukem, since the editor was fun and easy to make stuff with. But Half-Life was HUGE. Much much bigger than DOOM or Quake or DN3D. As much respect as I have for the classics that came before it, I'm not about to say that they, and not half-life, are responsible for half-life's huge commercial success.

      To do so would be illogical. As illogical, as, say, spelling DOOM without proper capitalization.

      --
      If you can read this, I forgot to post anonymously.
    19. Re:Half-life by Joshwaa · · Score: 1

      ;) I just, of course.

      You know, for someone who is trying so hard to sound pretentious, you might want to spell the word right: I jest, of course. ;) I kid, of course.
    20. Re:Half-life by MemoryDragon · · Score: 1

      Actually Daikatana could not beat ET, nothing can beat that. There was no game before and after which a) was utter garbage b) unplayable c) was filling an entire landfill d) took an entire industry down

    21. Re:Half-life by Joshwaa · · Score: 1

      in before, you might want to get your quote tags right... XD

    22. Re:Half-Life by ghyd · · Score: 1

      I think that no game is the best ever like no movie and no album is the best ever. The great thing in art is that it is not rational enough to stand such a definitive organization.

      I may have to state that I instinctively consider that video games are artworks as they share the core features of other art forms, and I see no rational objection either (to the first objection I can imagine, I can answer that modern art creators already used people/public to participate to the live creation of artworks), so 1+1=2. Apparently this guy agrees: http://www.contempaesthetics.org/newvolume/pages/a rticle.php?articleID=299

      Also, while HL was an outstanding game, amongst a few dozen others, you seem to put on its shoulders a much wider thing, Internet gaming. And a lot of great games have few to see with Internet. At the moment I'm having a blast with Railroad Tycoon (needed more after Theme Hospital) and it doesn't need no "Internet", telegraph is far enough. And on the other hand MMORPGS ....may.... have existed without HL. And, well, even Half Life 2 doesn't really need the Internet, if not to make me cringe because of Steam.

      More importantly, vanilla Half Life was a great game, no need to put on its shoulders the invention of "the web 2.0" to explain its importance in the heart of gamers. Let's not overlook the excellent storyline (from a gaming perspective) and gameplay (AI, interface, etc).

    23. Re:Half-Life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Grow up kiddie, Half-Life wouldn't exist if it wasn't for Id Software.

    24. Re:Half-Life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Half-Life was a revolutionary game, but your history is a little off.

      First off there were plenty of games with mods prior to Half-Life. My multiplayer gaming started with LANs running Quake so I can't chime in on any DOOM mods. So back in those days we had Deathmatch, Capture the Flag and Team Fortress. Those were pretty much the big ones to play during the Quake era.

      So one of the Valve released mods was based on, and made by the same team as, a Quake mod. Hell, Valve even released Deathmatch Classic which did a damn good job of recreating the original Quake's DM.

      Then there's Quake 2, which IMHO did not have as fun of a DM mode as Quake and honestly the GLIDE version of Quake looked and played alot better. So while we didn't touch Quake 2 DM we did find plenty of mods for it. One of the best mods out there was Action Quake 2. A guy named Gooseman was on the team for that mod.

      Now if you play Action Quake 2 you can set it up for team mode. So you have your team and you run around trying to kill the other team, and if you die you fly around in ghost mode till all the members of one of the teams are taken out. Sounding familiar? Counterstrike is the logical extension of the team mode of Action Quake 2. Its essentially giving a goal other than killing all the members of the opposing team.

      You can also manage to find links to plenty of mods by going to PlanetQuake, PlanetHalfLife and all those other planet sites. Those were the places to get all those mods at the time, and they should still have listings of all the old mods.

      Your point would be better articulated as Valve was the first company to swoop in and nab mod teams which allowed some lucky mod teams to actually get paid for making their mod. Good incentive to develop for Half-Life.

      Now if only more people played the source version of Half-Life DM, with the most satisfying Rocket Launcher kills since Quake DM.

    25. Re:Half-life by Stefanwulf · · Score: 1

      Menilmontant is 38 minutes
      Un Chien Andalou is 16
      Two Men and a Wardrobe is 20 minutes
      and The Heart of the World is only 6, yet I think all of them qualify as great cinema, on the level of the godfather if not above it.

      We can find some more if you'd like, or if you'd like to fall back on a literary analogy, there's an absolute ton of wonderful short stories, and I've seen those go as short as Ernest Hemingway's 6-word masterpiece "For sale: baby shoes, never worn."

      In music, we could talk about Brian Wilson's Our Prayer, or a number of songs by the Pixies. Duke Ellington's Hank Cinq or the first movement of Beethoven's 101 in A major. Pretty much name an established genre and we can find respected short works.

      I suppose we could even fall back on visual arts, and talk about the size of a canvas or sculpture...or we could bring in the impressionists and talk about how long it should take to view a painting...but my point's going to remain the same. In any artistic medium, there are works of great merit at very small scales. They may not be commercial successes, and indeed I would imagine a 10 second game wouldn't sell very well at all, but that doesn't mean it couldn't be an amazing game.

    26. Re:Half-life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe you mean "more pretentious than I".

    27. Re:Half-life by xappax · · Score: 1

      It strikes me as very "zen" somehow, how media that offers no visual or literal representation of its subject (like books or non-graphical games) can give a more realistic feel than media which shows the environment in painstaking, realistic detail. It's sort of a paradox: the absence of realistic audio/visual immersion can make a game all the more immersive.

      This is mostly due to the way people relate to games, and what their expectations are. When I see a beautifully rendered environment in a game, I'm initially blown away, and feel very immersed. However, after a very short time, I start to notice the hallmarks of gaming engines. Many objects look exactly the same. Patterns on surfaces repeat. Sounds recur, sounding pretty much the same each time. Because of the way a 3D game is made, these unrealistic elements aren't "gaps", they're actively dispelling the illusion that I'm looking at something real. They're like little red signs all over the place that read "You're just staring at a computer screen, remember?" The better a game's graphics are, the more let-down I am when I see the embarrassing signs of a fake, computer-rendered scene.

      With a non-graphical game, it's plainly obvious that what I'm looking at isn't supposed to trick me into thinking it's real. Because of this, I'm not limited to interpreting what's displayed on the screen - I can imagine my own environment, and every detail they add to the game /adds/ to my imaginative world, instead of threatening to dispel its illusion. You don't play Nethack and go "wait a minute, every single wall tile is a # sign - that's totally unrealistic!" Because the game makes no effort to show you literally what the wall looks like, you imagine your own vision of it, which is far more detailed and realistic than a graphics programmer could hope for.

      I do like pretty games and play them, but I think the role of suspension of disbelief and visual imagination that were so key to enjoy older forms of entertainment are rapidly atrophying with the influx of cheap hyper-realistic computer graphics in movies and games. Kids these days (hah!) consume media that is so realistic-seeming that it demands nothing from their imaginations, and so tasks which do require imagination may someday be rejected as not engaging or entertaining enough. After all, what kid wants to dream up new inventions when you can just pop in a disc and see them already working in all their hi-def anti-aliased glory?

    28. Re:Half-life by Riverman5 · · Score: 1

      I don't think the length of a game has the ultimate say. I played half-life twice through, it was so much fun... #2 was good too, but some parts of it seemed as though they were just "filler", like when you got on that sled boat and cruised down a river or something, that part seemed to go on and on... I don't go to a movie expecting to be entertained for 3+ hours, why should the games that take forever to beat be rated higher?

    29. Re:Half-Life by darkwhite · · Score: 1

      As illogical, as, say, spelling DOOM without proper capitalization. Doom is not an acronym. There are countless product names with extravagant capitalization and punctuation, which most sane people (read: not you) choose to ignore when mentioning them.
      --

      [an error occurred while processing this directive]
  5. BLAZEMONGER!!! by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 3, Funny

    By far the best game ever was Blazemonger. THousands of levels, nerve shattering graphics, nothing has even come close to matching its intensity.

    --
    If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
    1. Re:BLAZEMONGER!!! by Fortunato_NC · · Score: 1

      The name of the game is BLAZEMONGER, in all capital letters. If you don't YELL when you say it, you SUCK when you play it! Get on the ball, or you'll be hearing from BLAZEMONGER, Inc. "Customer Service".

      --
      Blogging Weight Loss, Distance Education, and more at verlin.com
    2. Re:BLAZEMONGER!!! by hob42 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I tried BLAZEMONGER once, but I never could get above -15460243 points. I think the people who got positive scores must have been using a trainer.

      Of course, my whole system melted, letting the blue smoke escape, after only a couple hours. Poor old thing.

    3. Re:BLAZEMONGER!!! by maxume · · Score: 1

      You've obviously never played Rescue Raiders.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    4. Re:BLAZEMONGER!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention, BLAZEMONGER is so damn fast, you could play 20 full BADASS games of BLAZEMONGER in the time it takes counterstrike to Load...

  6. Starcraft by Magneon · · Score: 2, Funny

    Obviously...

    1. Re:Starcraft by Rebelgecko · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I definitely have to agree with Starcraft. Despite being 10 years old, it still has a huge fanbase, especially in South Korea where it is played professionally and where some of the players make hundreds of thousands of dollars a year. This very second over 24,000 people are playing Starcraft online.

      --
      CATS/Diebold '08- All your vote are belong to us!
    2. Re:Starcraft by JaWiB · · Score: 1

      My personal favorite. I'm not surprised it's not in the top ten, but seriously, how can a game like Advance Wars beat it?

      Every time I see a list like this I can't help but feel how subjective it is. How was this list compiled? It's obvious this list is biased toward Edge writers' and editors' opinions, and "thousands of readers" isn't a very good indicator anyways.

      Have there been any polls of this sort that encompass a broader audience, worldwide?

    3. Re:Starcraft by owlman17 · · Score: 1

      That fanbase is hopefully about to get bigger, and stronger now that StarCraft 2 will be out next year. Time will tell if StarCraft 2 will be one of the best games ever made.

  7. DDR! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    *waits to get hit on head with keyboard*

  8. Are you sure it's not Diablo 2? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Surly Diablo 2 is the best gamer ever.

    Zelda games in general have a fairly short life span, the game is the same every time you play though it. In comparison (aside from the story) Diablo 2 was different every time (Different character, different choice of skills, different map layouts etc.).

    1. Re:Are you sure it's not Diablo 2? by Beekeeper'sson · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't call the "Lord Of The Pit" surly. Not to his face anyway.
      Anyway, Diablo 1 was miles better

      Farnham Anybody?

    2. Re:Are you sure it's not Diablo 2? by Kagura · · Score: 1

      Surely Diablo 2 is the best gamer ever.

      Yes, but don't call me Shirley!

    3. Re:Are you sure it's not Diablo 2? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Diablo 1 was one of the best multiplayer RPGs until it was raped by people exloiting the item duplication glitch and using trainers to create their own items. It's just pathetic.

    4. Re:Are you sure it's not Diablo 2? by Goaway · · Score: 1

      Zelda games in general have a fairly short life span, the game is the same every time you play though it. In comparison (aside from the story) Diablo 2 was different every time (Different character, different choice of skills, different map layouts etc.).

      Or maybe Zelda games are the result of a sharp artistic vision, while Diablo 2 is a randomized soulless trudge?

  9. FF6 is clearly the best game ever made. by PooseCat · · Score: 1

    WTF? The Legend of Zelda: A Link to the past, was even better than OOT.

    --
    ^..^
    1. Re:FF6 is clearly the best game ever made. by plunge · · Score: 1

      I agree. Obviously the tech was not as good, but the concept and execution of that Zelda was, I thought, cleaner and more fun: it holds up on replay in ways that Ocarina doesn't: far too much of Ocarina is just plain frustrating and shallow.

    2. Re:FF6 is clearly the best game ever made. by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      I'm playing through twilight princess right now, and I have to say, it's a lot better than Ocarina of time, or any other Zelda game I've played. I know a lot of people complained it's slowed paced and something about fishing. I don't know, I only fished for about 5 minutes in the entire game. Not counting the skeleton fish in the Zora dungeon for extra hearts. The story in this one is just really fluid, and it really draws you into the game. Granted, I haven't made it all the way through yet, but I'm at the Desert dungeon now, and even without knowing the rest of the game, feel that twilight princess is the best game I've ever played.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
  10. Why spend money on the story when it looks so good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Final Fantasy XII at number 8 = critical failure. Seriously, has anyone that voted on this list not played any of the other ones that were far superior? A vote for XII is a vote against nature.

  11. BGOAT by Reason58 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You can't say something is the "best" without defining what you think those qualities are that make something best.

    Storyline? Gameplay? Graphics? Sounds? Replayability? Uniqueness?

    1. Re:BGOAT by Icarus1919 · · Score: 1

      Hear hear!

    2. Re:BGOAT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All of the above. It's the entire package.

      My vote goes for Wasteland. If these rinky-dink games like final fantasy pass for RPGs, it's a sad state of affairs.

    3. Re:BGOAT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I concur. This list is shit. The listing of Elder Scrolls IV and not listing of Fallout II, Baldur's Gate II, or Planescape: Torment makes the CRPG element of this list lose any sense of credibility. There is obviously no methodology. Could any gamer with a sense of history omit Adventure or Zork? How about Space Invaders? The Bard's Tale? Without some methodology this list is nothing more than one of Zonk's fanboy countdowns.

    4. Re:BGOAT by FiniteElementalist · · Score: 1

      The list is pretty wonky. They have a lot of good games on there, but there are some startling omissions including a lot of the original NES games and some older computer games like the diablos and X-COM. A lot of these hold up very well by gameplay standards.

      It seems like the methodology for putting something like this together is going to be almost necessarily full of holes. The articles don't tell how the list was formed other than contributions from those involved with Edge and some group of people in the industry.

    5. Re:BGOAT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most certainly cannot be sales if Okami gets in at number 21 and the comments are artsy, stylish, critical darling, and largely ignored by the public. How good can it really be if it is largely ignored by the public? Like the tree that falls in the forest with no one to hear it, if a game is good but no one plays it, is it still a good game?

      And where is DDR on this list? It HAS to be a better game than Crackdown.

      Any list, without stating the criterion, is sort of arbitrary.

    6. Re:BGOAT by Plekto · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Wasteland was great, but the game that broke the RPG wide open was the Ultima series. Before that it was nethack-ish games that lacked a persistent environment, real character development, or a decent plot. Now, Ultima III was good, but the best of the series and the one that made everyone at the time(and I mean *everyone*) was IV. It essentially was Final Fantasy VII in scope and play. A decade earlier.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ultima_IV
      1985. Nothing for almost a decade surpassed it in quality and scale.

      *quote from that link*
      "In 1996 Computer Gaming World named Ultima IV as #2 on its Best Games of All Time list on the PC."

      It didn't even make the top ten - which is how you know this "list" is a joke. And Final Fantasy VII was what - way near the very bottom? The thing still commands $60 a copy on Ebay.

    7. Re:BGOAT by aj50 · · Score: 1

      Crackdown is a great game and probably appeals to a wider audience than DDR (at least within readers of EDGE)

      --
      I wish to remain anomalous
    8. Re:BGOAT by Torvaun · · Score: 1

      Story: Baldur's Gate. The original PC one, not the PS2 version.
      Gameplay: Half-Life 2
      Graphics: Valkyrie Profile 2
      Sounds: Valkyrie Profile 2
      Replayability: Galactic Civilization 2
      Uniqueness: Shadow of the Colossus

      Only two of my games hit the list. And Tomb Raider made it on. There's no justice.

      --
      I see your informative link, and raise you a pithy comment.
    9. Re:BGOAT by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

      Daggerfall was MUCH better than Elder Scrolls IV.

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    10. Re:BGOAT by __aanonl8035 · · Score: 1

      I believe they had a criteria of "How does it hold up to today's games"

      One thing I notice about best lists is how there are many younger people now that have not played older games, so ever generation has their memories of what was best. Probably there are older folks who still place Zork as one of the greatest games of all time. Ultima was ground breaking in its day, and so on...

    11. Re:BGOAT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      God, I hated trying to play Shadow of the Colossus. Can someone enlighten me as to what makes this game worthy of a top 100 spot at all? (Why yes, I AM mad that it ranked one above Katamari Damacy, why do you ask?)

    12. Re:BGOAT by fm6 · · Score: 1

      The the best post on the concept of "bestness" ever!

    13. Re:BGOAT by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      Are you joking? Daggerfall was a giant bug disguised as a videogame. It was impossible to navigate any of their fancy-schmancy auto-generated dungeons without falling through the floor. Stores were a complete joke, since you could just go into one, rest until the shopkeeper goes home, then take all you want with no consequences. After all the patches, it MIGHT be considered a passable game, but the dungeon bugs remained. (They just patched in cheat codes to get past the places where you fall through the ground.) Also: the graphics kind of sucked, but they were average for the time I suppose.

    14. Re:BGOAT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's all about awesomeness. That's all this list is about.
      I don't agree with it all that much, but I know that if I made a list of the best games ever, I sure wouldn't bother trying to categorize them. I'd just say "that's the best. I can't explain why, but it is."
      Categories would destroy the principle of "best game ever" anyways, because you'd have many instead of one.

    15. Re:BGOAT by NeilTheStupidHead · · Score: 1

      Here's a hint: IT'S TOTALLY ARBITRARY AND SUBJECTIVE!
      The first time I saw someone playing SoTC, I said: "Wow, that looks pretty boring and repetitive, I don't think I'd like a game like that." About an hour later, someone handed me a controller and 16 hours later, I beat the game the first time. Some people like it, some don't. I can't stand most FPSs so I wouldn't have put any on such a list, but it would be my perogative.

      --
      Lose: misplace or fail || Loose: not bound together
    16. Re:BGOAT by grumbel · · Score: 1

      Mass appeal

      There are certainly games with better storylines, better gameplay, better graphics, better sounds, more repeatability and more uniqueness around then OOT, even all factors combined. Thing however is, if you have a great story, it might get to complicated for kids to understand it and thus enjoy it, "kill Ganon" on the other side is simple enough for everybody and still provides a little bit of depth to not look completly stupid. Same with gameplay, more options, more freedom and such, might make a more interesting game, but will also stop some people from playing the game, since it gets to complicated. And so it goes on and on.

      Zelda:OoT manages to successfully balance out most of these factors to create a game with mass appeal.

    17. Re:BGOAT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Best game? Let's go with gameplay.

      Correct answer: Super Mario 64

    18. Re:BGOAT by estarriol · · Score: 1

      "It didn't even make the top ten - which is how you know this "list" is a joke." Agreed. If either Ultima IV or VII were right up there, the list would have credibility. As it is, it's a Nintendo and console-biased joke. No list of best games is going to be uncontentious though.

    19. Re:BGOAT by CarpetShark · · Score: 1

      You can't say something is the "best" without defining what you think those qualities are that make something best.

      Storyline? Gameplay? Graphics? Sounds? Replayability? Uniqueness?


      In Zelda: OoT's case, I'd answer something like "most amazing experience". It's not about graphics or replayability or even addictiveness. It's just something you'll never forget.
    20. Re:BGOAT by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

      And this is why "Best X of Y" lists are bullshit. ;)

      I had tons of fun playing Daggerfall, and you seem to have hated it. In my Best 100 Games list, Daggerfall is close to the top 50.

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    21. Re:BGOAT by Headcase88 · · Score: 1

      Any list, without stating the criterion, is sort of arbitrary.
      This list ranks #12 for most arbitrary video-game ranking list.

      And while DDR is a brilliant series, the In The Groove series was more fun before it was sued to oblivion.
      --
      "When the atomic bomb goes off there's devastation...but when the atomic bong goes off there's celebraaaaation!"
  12. DNF!! by binarybum · · Score: 5, Funny

    Duke Nukem Forever will most certainly be the best game of all time

      This is so friggin' obvious that even though the game is not yet complete, it should still easily have made #1. I demand a recount!

    --
    ôó
    1. Re:DNF!! by fm6 · · Score: 1

      Certainly a game that takes an infinite amount of time to implement will be infinitely good!

    2. Re:DNF!! by llamaxing · · Score: 2, Funny

      can we please skip Florida's votes on this one?

    3. Re:DNF!! by bakura121 · · Score: 1

      Any game over a decade in the making is a sure winner!

      That's a real no-win situation for 3D Realms. At this point, IF they release it, and even if it is a great game, it is going to be so scrutinized for how long it took to make. I don't feel bad for them either. There's no excuse for a game to take over 10 years to make. And if it's a flop, there's no recovering from that.

    4. Re:DNF!! by another_fanboy · · Score: 1

      And if it's a flop, there's no recovering from that.

      They already have that covered:

      "On March 21, 2006, 3D Realms CEO Scott Miller stated that when Forever was finished, 3D Realms would begin work on a sequel."[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duke_nukem_f orever]

    5. Re:DNF!! by pcgabe · · Score: 1

      Nonsense! BLAZEMONGER always has been* and always will be the greatest game ever.

      (* Yes, even before it was written. It's that good.)

      --
      Don't put advice in your sig.
    6. Re:DNF!! by vorlich · · Score: 1

      Yes! Encore! I have been playing it in my mind for the past ten years. It's going to be so awesome when it finally appears. We will be playing it on the Holo-Deck. I can't wait!

      Hey, hang on moment... I've been saying that for ten years now...

      Oh my God! Look at me! I'm like Richard Dean Anderson in that episode where his hair turned grey and he become really old!

      Damn you George Broussard and 3D Realms! Damn you all to Hell!

      --
      Posts, MyBio or Sig, may contain satire, sarcasm, bolded nouns be sardonic or even witty & be Church of SD
    7. Re:DNF!! by aliquis · · Score: 1

      Omg, that was the funniest thing I've ever read.

      Amiga 3

    8. Re:DNF!! by Loligo · · Score: 1

      >Any game over a decade in the making is a sure winner!

      Battlecruiser 3000AD ring any bells?

    9. Re:DNF!! by lababidi · · Score: 1

      Spore will edge out DNF!!!

  13. Print View by GroovinWithMrBloe · · Score: 5, Informative

    For people who don't like clicking next 100 times. Print View

  14. Yes by sycomonkey · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The answer is yes. Ocarina of Time has every element that makes video gaming such a rewarding and engaging pasttime. It was revolutionary, and it is still fun to this day.

    --
    --The universe will not be altered by forum threads, even those which are very wry. --Tycho Brahe (Penny Arcade)
    1. Re:Yes by mobby_6kl · · Score: 1

      The real answer is no. It's a fucking* RPG after all.

      Oh, and Halo doesn't belong on the list. Anyway, enjoy your scheduled pointless top-XX list flamewar.

      *- since there's no actual intercourse involved, it's not a good one at that

    2. Re:Yes by sycomonkey · · Score: 1

      If Zelda is an RPG then Solitaire is a FPS. It has RPG elements, but it's an action-adventure game.

      --
      --The universe will not be altered by forum threads, even those which are very wry. --Tycho Brahe (Penny Arcade)
    3. Re:Yes by Stormwatch · · Score: 1

      If Zelda is an RPG then Solitaire is a FPS. It has RPG elements, but it's an action-adventure game.
      Zelda is an action-RPG. Flashback and Another World are action-adventures.
    4. Re:Yes by plunge · · Score: 2, Informative

      I have to disagree on the last part. I've actually by coincidence been playing through it recently, and I don't think it holds up all that well: the controls and concept were neat for its day, but compared to modern versions the controls are clunky and the world sort of shallow: way way too much of the game feels I'm playing through busywork to get to the good stuff. It also doesn't help that the game is so dark: I have the brightness turned up all the way on my tv, and I still can barely see anything at night or in some of the more annoying temples.

    5. Re:Yes by matt328 · · Score: 1

      If you'd ever played the game you'd know its definitely not and RPG. There's no more role-playing involved in Zelda than the games where you're a plumber with an appetite for mushrooms trying to save a princess, that scientist dude that pushed that rock into the thing and aliens came out, or a World War II soldier trying to kill some communists.

      --
      Check out the cave on the east side of lake Hylia. Strange and wonderful things live in it.
    6. Re:Yes by sycomonkey · · Score: 1
      --
      --The universe will not be altered by forum threads, even those which are very wry. --Tycho Brahe (Penny Arcade)
    7. Re:Yes by LKM · · Score: 1

      Flashback and Another World are side-scrolling Zeldas.

    8. Re:Yes by Stormwatch · · Score: 1

      Flashback and Another World are side-scrolling Zeldas.
      No, they're too different. Monster World IV is more like a side-scrolling Zelda.
    9. Re:Yes by LKM · · Score: 1

      Isn't that more like a jump-n-run Metroidvania? :-)

    10. Re:Yes by demi · · Score: 1

      I think what's meant by RPG in the "video game genre" sense is that it's a game where you have the equivalent of a character sheet--that is, the characters get better by defeating foes over time. It's not meant in the literal sense of playing a role.

      --
      demi
  15. Ocarina of Time by maestro371 · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Zelda: Ocarina of Time is the _only_ game that I had trouble leaving for hours at a time. In my humble opinion, it is by far the best that has been. I would include Psychonauts and Warcraft 3 to round out my top 3.

    1. Re:Ocarina of Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Warcraft 3

      What sort of strange and warped universe do you live in in which Warcraft 3 was a better game than Starcraft? Hell, I'd rank Warcraft 2 above its RPG-contaminated sequels.

      (Also: Alpha Centauri, or a Civilization game if you don't swing that way.)
    2. Re:Ocarina of Time by maestro371 · · Score: 1

      Warcraft 2 rocked, but 3 was everything 2 was, and prettier. Note that I did not list World of Warcraft. I never played Starcraft much. I did a little, but it just seemed like a Warcraft rip-off.

    3. Re:Ocarina of Time by gerbalblaste · · Score: 1

      Alpha Centauri! Clealy one of the best games ever and the best reviewed game in the history of PC Gamer magazine. Alpha Centauri Half Life Starcraft Startopia (anyone else remember this one?) Edler scrolls 3 My top 5 in no particular order.

    4. Re:Ocarina of Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      You know what though? I thought the exact opposite. The graphics were really good. I think back to the N64, and PS1.. and Saturn, and I think about how 3d was handled on all of those systems. OOT was great. Shading, Character Design, Atmosphere.. it was all breathtaking. Storyline was epic, and people really took to the main character's mannerisms. Mainly because the sound and character animations were so top notch.

      I think people are either actively or slightly actively looking for bad graphics when they play this game. It's extremely easy to overlook the limitations when playing.

    5. Re:Ocarina of Time by Solra+Bizna · · Score: 1

      The graphics are really bad. SMB and the original Zelda have clean crisp graphics. Ocarina of Time have untold amounts of problems with aliasing and stuff like that. It's almost unplayable now that the standard has been raised so far by modern games and consoles.

      You think hand-drawn 16-color sprites at 256x224 resolution more advanced than 32-bit 3D with console-straining textures, animations, and effects at 320x240?

      If the resolution bugs you so much, get an emulator and turn the res up.

      -:sigma.SB

      (btw, I'm playing it right now. if you think the N64 was bad, try playing the original Metal Gear Solid.)

      --
      WARN
      THERE IS ANOTHER SYSTEM
    6. Re:Ocarina of Time by Stefanwulf · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I just took a break from getting my ass kicked by the boss of the Shadow Temple...and I have to say OoT really holds its own today, at least as far as I'm concerned. I played Twilight Princess first, and it is a more polished game, with more attention paid to detail, but there are a lot of things about OoT that I'm loving. The atmosphere is excellent and the dungeons are really challenging, but in a way that keeps me coming back. Yeah, the textures look like a late 90's game, but hey, the color pallet in SMB looks like a mid 80's game, and mario's head has some serious stairstepping going on. I still love them both, however, because they both get the job done, convey what they need to, and display exemplary design.

      At what point did we loose the ability to distinguish between graphics being dated and graphics being poorly done?

    7. Re:Ocarina of Time by TheSciBoy · · Score: 1

      My problem isn't that resolution has increased or that bitmaps had less colors then. My complaint is that I can't hardly distinguish between what is what in OoT. The game is very blurry. Perhaps this is an effect of poor emulation on the Wii, I don't know, but it looks really crap and it takes me out of the game completely.

      Perhaps a contributing factor is that I never played OoT when the game was new, so I have no nostagic feeling toward the game whatsoever.

      Nevertheless, I do believe that SMB's playability factor is so high that even someone born in the 90ies might enjoy it.

      --
      Badgers, we don't need no stinking badgers! - UHF
    8. Re:Ocarina of Time by iamblades · · Score: 1

      No, the blurring is characteristic of the early texture filtering on the N64.

      When you filter low res textures, you get blurriness. It is preferable to the giant pixels of PS1 games IMO though.

      --
      Shit adds up at the bottom...
  16. What's with the sequels? by Jazzer_Techie · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There are a lot of sequels on the list, often coupled with the omission of the original(s). They omit both Doom and Half-Life, while charting Doom II at 78 and Half-Life 2 at 4. Honestly, that just doesn't make much sense.

    1. Re:What's with the sequels? by G-funk · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Coz doom 2 was better than doom, and ditto for hl2? The list isn't "revoltionary" or "groundbreaking" games, it's "best".

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
    2. Re:What's with the sequels? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe... I don't know... they were... better?

    3. Re:What's with the sequels? by morari · · Score: 1

      No, it doesn't make much sense. Especially considering that I personally I felt Half-Life 2 was boring. It looked nice, sure, but nothing really happened. Hell, you barely even see any aliens and are instead forced to fight hordes of the same damn clone squads! There were hardly any puzzles and the story went nowhere (like the original), but unlike the original it didn't seem to have the sense of curiosity of what will come. I just can't understand the almost universal appeal of the sequel when faced with the fact that it did almost nothing even comparable to the first. I'd hate to say it, but I really felt that I wasted my money on the game after finishing it. Not to mention the extreme frustration one has to put up with just to play the game with Steam looming in the background of a store-bought disc!

      --
      "He who can destroy a thing, controls a thing." --Paul Atreides, Dune
    4. Re:What's with the sequels? by KylePflug · · Score: 1

      I just got HL2 to play under Wine, and playing it through now for the fifth or sixth time (the rest under windows) I have to say I disagree with everything you say. Most of the time I've played it through on maximum settings, and now since it's in Wine i'm under DX8.1 and the gameplay's worth putting up with the cruder graphics. My experience is that people who knock HL2's plot or accuse it of being repetitive are often the people who lack the willingness to actually investigate the world. HL2 is riddled with easter eggs and artistic touches that do more for immersion and creating a sensible alternate world than just about any other FPS I've ever played.

    5. Re:What's with the sequels? by morari · · Score: 1

      I would not disagree that it is an immersing and sensible alternate world. It does a very good job at creating a realistically acceptable area to play within. And yes, more so than almost all other first person shooters. However, I still feel that the plot offers little in the way of motivation to continue. It offers even less closure than the first game did (for the obligatory episodic installments, no less) and is riddled with battles against the exact same single enemy over and over again, very occasionally split up with something like a Strider. It is by no means a bad game, but I find many elements seriously lacking for all of the praise it receives. And I still hate Steam, and probably always will. I had to wait to even purchase the game, because when it was initially released I was on a 26.4kbps modem connection. I must say however, in all fairness, Half-Life 2 definitely was a much more enjoyable and varied experience than Doom III. ;)

      --
      "He who can destroy a thing, controls a thing." --Paul Atreides, Dune
  17. Huh? Is This Only Console Cames? by Plekto · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There seems to be an utter lack of PC titles from the 70s, 80, or most of the 90s.

    Elite? Command and Conquer? Doom? Temple of Aphsai? Ultima IV? Zork?(anything by Infocom?)...

    Or any other systems of note. Marathon? Tempest?(the original), Defender? Mortal Kombat? The list of things that they didn't even include is amazing. Almost as amazing as the just that made most of the top twenty.

  18. Nintendo games by gustgr · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Titles released by Nintendo usually do not have that super-duper-ultra virtual reality and graphics effects, like those for Playstation or X-Box, however, they are FUN. You don't need fancy and world-like effects with physics simulation to enjoy a title, you just need to be entertained by the plot and by the universe it immerses you. Nintendo is an odd company on that issue. I love their titles above all else.

    I would not consider only Ocarina of Time as the masterpiece of Nintendo, but it is a hell of a game. Very fair list.

    1. Re:Nintendo games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, I'm kinda tired of people using the "Nintendo is about gameplay, not graphics" line. Of course Ninty cares about the visuals in their games! They put out some of the most polished and generally appealing visuals in the industry, because they focus on good art design rather than relying on the resolution of their customers' HDTVs to pick up all the subtle niceties of their realistic models. They just aren't resolution hounds when it comes to their systems because really, nobody needs DHCP to recognize Mario.

    2. Re:Nintendo games by FLAGGR · · Score: 1

      What the hell? OOT looked way better than any other game on any other system, especially when you counted the scale of that game (it was huge.)

    3. Re:Nintendo games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why? does he have a static IP?

    4. Re:Nintendo games by rtisbute · · Score: 1

      Mega Man 2. Best Ever!

  19. It's obvious! by Carnildo · · Score: 5, Funny

    Best games of all time? E.T. and Custer's Revenge, of course!

    --
    "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
    1. Re:It's obvious! by nebaz · · Score: 1

      No, no, no. It's Legend of Zelda: Majora's Mask, of course.

      --
      Rhymes that keep their secrets will unfold behind the clouds.There upon the rainbow is the answer to a neverending story
  20. Reordering the list by Kuku_monroe · · Score: 0, Interesting

    3. Super Mario 64

    1. Legend of Zelda: Ocarina

    9. Tetris

    5. Super Mario World

    2. Resident Evil 4

    4. Half Life 2

    6. Zelda: A Link to the Past

    8. Final Fantasy XII

    7. Halo: Combat Evolved

    10. Super Metroid

    Honorable mention to:

    Pikmin

    Katamari Damacy

    --
    //WR
  21. Best Nintendo game, maybe... by amuro98 · · Score: 1

    Is it just me, or is the list HEAVILY slanted towards Nintendo games?

    If this was really the case, then there wouldn't be a fight between Sony and Microsoft because Nintendo would have been crushing them since they first tried shoe-horning into the industry.

    Not to mention the fact that hardly any of the games on the list are more than a few years old - Ocarina being about the oldest one there.

    That's the problem with these lists - they're highly subjective to the participant's memory. If that person has only played 10 games, they're all "top 10 titles" in his mind.

    1. Re:Best Nintendo game, maybe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "If this was really the case, then there wouldn't be a fight between Sony and Microsoft because Nintendo would have been crushing them since they first tried shoe-horning into the industry."

      What makes you say that? There are a lot of very good independent movies, but I doubt any of them made more money than Spiderman 3. "Good" is not dependent on sales figures. The issues is further obscured by the fact that consoles have different numbers of games; would you rather buy a console with 5 spectacular games and nothing else, or a console with 2 spectacular games and 100 good games?

    2. Re:Best Nintendo game, maybe... by riceboy50 · · Score: 1

      Apparently it was voted number one by readers also. I think Nintendo has a certain cachet for all-around fun games. They may not necessarily be the most popular among the /. niche, but someone out there must like them.

      --
      ~ I am logged on, therefore I am.
    3. Re:Best Nintendo game, maybe... by IdolizingStewie · · Score: 1

      Not to mention the fact that hardly any of the games on the list are more than a few years old - Ocarina being about the oldest one there.


      I would have guessed Ocarina at about halfway down the list, age wise, so I decided to look it up. From oldest to youngest using initial release date in the first country to get it, we have:

      1984 9. Tetris
      1990 5. Super Mario World
      1991 6. Legend of Zelda: A Link to the Past
      1994 10. Super Metroid
      1996 3. Super Mario 64
      1997 8. Final Fantasy VII
      1998 1. Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time
      2001 7. Halo: Combat Evolved
      2004 4. Half Life 2
      2005 2. Resident Evil 4

      I would say that they did a pretty good job spreading the games' release years out, actually. They skip from the SNES all the way back to Tetris, but other than that. Only half the list came out in the past decade. There is a lot of Nintendo, yes, but I would say eight of them are more than a few years old, not hardly any.
    4. Re:Best Nintendo game, maybe... by steveo777 · · Score: 1
      Nintendo makes amazing games. Plain and simple. These lists do come out quite often and I tend to throw in some of my 'classic' games and really do get a lot of enjoyment out of them. Nintendo has a lot of staying power. I can play any of the Metroids over and over (exception being Metroid 2). But other games that I'm sure to always enjoy are most any Castlevanias (SotN!), Gran Turismo's, Gradius's. I'm also a huge fan of Resident Evil 4, Silent Hill, Einhander, and most other good shooters (Ikaruga, R-type, and others). I like Halo for multiplayer but, for me, it's just another FPS compared to Perfect Dark or Goldeneye. I was very engrossed with Dead Rising and Crackdown, but both games have no replay value for me.

      Like this top 100 list, I'm very Nintendo heavy in my choice because they make the most fun games. They've got killer replay. And I favor them over most other games. My personal favorites (I could never pick one) would be Super Metroid, Metroid Prime, Castlevania IV, and FF VI.

      --
      This sig isn't original enough, it's time to come up with something witty...
  22. Ocarina of Time? Please.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ET for the Atari, hands down the best game ever made.

  23. go? chess? by kpharmer · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Go & Chess have each lasted for a thousand years or more. Still widey played, and there's no reason to believe they won't be widey played in another hundred years.

    Besides these two there are countless other elegant and timeless board games games - backgammon, checkers, othello, etc. And quite a few great card games - poker, hearts, cribbge, etc. And some great dice games - such as farkle for instance. All of these games are in the public domain, can be had for pennies at a thrift store - or created yourself easily.

    Compared to computer games that almost certainly won't exist in twenty years it seems difficult to see how these games wouldn't have made the top 10.

    Wait, maybe someone meant Top *Computer* Games of the last 10 years?

    1. Re:go? chess? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah I don't get it, NGC 1232 has the best games.

      Wait, maybe they meant the 100 Best Videogames *on Earth*?

    2. Re:go? chess? by bern1959 · · Score: 1

      What about Rogue and the original Empire?

      Wait, maybe someone meant Top Games of the last *10* years?

    3. Re:go? chess? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Compared to computer games that almost certainly won't exist in twenty years

      Classic games are great, but that's no reason to flaunt your ignorance while attempting to belittle electronic gaming media.

    4. Re:go? chess? by rabiddeity · · Score: 1

      Those games you listed are all great, but they all have a major drawback: you have to have other people to compete with. Sure, there are some games you can play alone with a deck of cards, but they don't have the same draw or depth as chess or shogi or go. And a lot of times I either don't want to be social or I don't have people over who want to play. One of the great things about computer games is the rich selection of games you can enjoy on your own. Some of them have addictive gameplay, some of them are atmosphere games where you can play out your fantasies of space conquest or swords and magic, some of them tell a story really really well, and the occasional rare game will really make you think.

      There was an industry myth for awhile saying that a computer game wouldn't sell unless you could play with other players, and for a long time publishers didn't want to release a game without multiplayer support. I think that's patently false. Yes, WoW and multiplayer FPS games are popular; multiplayer Halo series games and the Tekken series are popular. But Super Mario Brothers and Legend of Zelda are also popular. Deus Ex and the Thief series and the Popcap puzzle games are popular and well-respected. A lot of us enjoy playing games alone, just as a lot of people enjoy reading books alone or watching movies alone. Chess and go, as fantastic and timeless as they are, don't allow me to do that.

    5. Re:go? chess? by Digital+Vomit · · Score: 1

      I'm fairly certain Chess will become a distan memory once Electronic Arts releases Super 3D Chess Extreme 64. It will become the game played by kings for centuries to come. At least, that's what the guy from Electronic Arts keeps telling me.

      --
      Modern copyright is theft of culture from everyone and it retards the progress of the useful arts and sciences.
    6. Re:go? chess? by ChronosWS · · Score: 1

      Well except that those games have been 'ported' to the computer, and will provide various levels of ass-whoopery on demand. They are equally single- and multi-player. I imagine if you ranked games by man-hours played, even on a computer, you'd end up with something like Solitaire on top. Honestly, this list assumes a very specific set of game players from a very specific era. It's meaningless without publishing the constraints (implied or otherwise) on the set of games being canvassed.

    7. Re:go? chess? by drsquare · · Score: 1

      But chess and go are boring as hell. I bet more people play computer games than board games. Chess has survived so long because for most of history there were no other games!

  24. What's with the obsession of "BEST"? by JFMulder · · Score: 1

    Why couldn't they name the list "Most popular games of all time"?

    Then nobody would be nitpicking about the choices of words. When asked, what was your favorite game of all time, the game that comes on top is pretty much the most popular game of all time.

    Tough some might argue that it's not the most popular, only the "favoritest".

    1. Re:What's with the obsession of "BEST"? by arodland · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Because that one isn't very interesting, or fun. "Best" is good for an interesting argument, discussion, flamefest on slashdot, whatever. "Most popular according to polls" is just a bunch of numbers. The best argument you can scare up is to insult the polling techniques. :)

  25. I learned the other day... by TerranFury · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...that the South Korean Air Force has an official Starcraft team.

    I'd say that getting your videogame elevated to the status of stadium-worthy spectator sport is a pretty huge achievement. Blizzard's Starcraft is surely up there.

    (This is complicated only by the fact that it has so many worthy competitors from the same era: Age of Empires is the first that comes to mind.)

    1. Re:I learned the other day... by DirePickle · · Score: 1

      But it's such a terrible spectator sport. It was a good game, but I'm 100% convinced that it is only as insanely popular as it is for the same reason that Counter-Strike is. It just happened to appear roughly at the time when internet access really started to take off, when more and more people were getting new computers, etc. There's nothing inherent about either of the games that makes them particularly special, other than the fact that they were reasonably solid and appeared at the right time.

    2. Re:I learned the other day... by xmod2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It seems to me that having a 'stadium-worthy' game would really limit your ability to innovate on the sequel without pissing off the entirety of South Korea.

      I recall reading that what Koreans wanted most out of Starcraft II was more Starcraft with better graphics.

    3. Re:I learned the other day... by quanticle · · Score: 1

      I recall reading that what Koreans wanted most out of Starcraft II was more Starcraft with better graphics.

      And if you look at the previews of Starcraft 2, that's exactly what they seem to be getting. Its fine by me, though. Starcraft was one of the best balanced strategy games out there.

      --
      We all know what to do, but we don't know how to get re-elected once we have done it
    4. Re:I learned the other day... by iOsiris · · Score: 1

      Yeah but Blizzard has never been known to lead the way for innovative games anyways. They've always refined tried and true formulas and they do a hell of a job of it.

    5. Re:I learned the other day... by fractoid · · Score: 1

      I recall reading that what Koreans wanted most out of Starcraft II was more Starcraft with better graphics. Hell, that's what I want out of Starcraft II, as does everyone I've talked to. And I'm sure as hell pleased that that's what we're getting! ^^
      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    6. Re:I learned the other day... by Nazmun · · Score: 1

      Speak for yourself, i'm not anywhere near a "pro" starcraft player but watching some of these games played by top paid players is definately extremely interesting. The amount of strategy and speed involved is massive. Also it wasn't just dumb luck as you suggest. Other great and free to play online rts' came out at the same time. Age of empires (had a good online presence as I played that as well), Command and Conquer, civ (to a degree), and their sequels.

      To this day i still turn on starcraft with its' 2d graphics and it's fun. It's not dumb luck which causes it to win in a sea of competition. It was excellent refinement in the gameplay, cool settings/units, fun factor, and finally strategy. Tactics and strategy that is remeniscent of older board games like chess. Based on what i've seen I have a gut feeling that starcraft will outlast even starcraft two which just may too many differentiating units (yes, i believe a game can always become too complicated--the oldest and most interesting games are usually somewhat simple with the flexibility for numerous strategies like Go and to a lesser degree chess). But this is early conjecture of a game that has yet to come out.

      As far as dumb luck and universality of games is concerned, on the flip side, SMB came free with Nintendo which had no competition until the genesis came out. Most people haven't even heard of the other systems including the genesis' predecessor, The Sega Master System. It to contrary can be argued had the luck of timing and lack of good competition (during the time of starcrafts release there were numerous RTS' that could be considered great).

      --
      Hmmm... Pie...
  26. this deserves a poll by wizardforce · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The sims series wins hands down as a series if you look at how many people play it. starcraft wins because you cant beat the sound of zerg being slaughtered in a poorly planned attack mario bros because of the fact that people still play it halo because of the fan following warcraft doesn't need an explanation spore is going to win if what they say about it is true

    --
    Sigs are too short to say anything truly profound so read the above post instead.
    1. Re:this deserves a poll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Nethack, because it used punctuation.

    2. Re:this deserves a poll by ChaoticLimbs · · Score: 1

      yes but is punctuation really necessary in a game I mean you can get along just fine without any of those symbols and anyway I was thinking since nethack had so many addons maybe you should be more specific tell us which if any additions you used falcons eye was cool

  27. missing more than a few by guysmilee · · Score: 2
    • diablo
    • diablo 2
    • starcraft
    • war craft 1 & 2
    • ultima
    • space harrier
  28. Crave Misunderstanding by Dunx · · Score: 5, Informative

    What criteria are you using to measure greatness?

    The Edge piece is quite clear that it is looking for games which are still worth playing now.

    The Crave posting misunderstands this point and brings in an entirely different criterion.

    I don't actually agree with either article (I don't remember Mario mattering that much in Britain, and I didn't like Ocarina of Time much), but the Crave piece just seems like pointless disagreement with the basis of the Edge article.

    --
    Dunx
    Converting caffeine into code since 1982
    1. Re:Crave Misunderstanding by Lewisham · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Mod parent up!

      Every single article I've read about this poll gets confused and doesn't mention that it is a poll on games that must stand up today, which is why Pong or Doom aren't in the Top 10. Which of course, has lead to everyone to go off on a tangent and say silly things like "Mario Bros 1 should be number 1" and things.

      This wasn't helped by the BBC deciding to choose a misleading headline and then burying this information at the bottom. I guess "journalists" don't read past the first two paragraphs anymore.

    2. Re:Crave Misunderstanding by Macgrrl · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      I have routinely hacked my copies of Zork and other Infocom games (HHGttG etc...) over the years to keep them playable as I've migrated systems.

      In my book that would mean at least *I* deem them worth playing still.

      A number of those games now exist as web hosted java apps (for example http://thcnet.net/error/index.php).

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
    3. Re:Crave Misunderstanding by acidrain · · Score: 1

      What criteria are you using to measure greatness?

      Asking for a "best" without specifying a genre is pointless. Comedy just cannot compete with tragedy in terms of critical review. But that doesn't mean gut wrenching tragedy makes for a better choice of movie.

      --
      -- http://thegirlorthecar.com funny dating game for guys
    4. Re:Crave Misunderstanding by PhxBlue · · Score: 1

      Journalists who know what the hell they're doing put the important information at the top of the story.

      --
      !#@%*)anks for hanging up the phone, dear.
    5. Re:Crave Misunderstanding by m50d · · Score: 1

      On that basis, what is super mario 64 doing on the list when donkey kong 64 is superior in every respect?

      --
      I am trolling
  29. Way overhyped by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Was Zelda OOT a great game for its time? yes. Is it a good game now? yes. Best game ever? NO!

    OOT has far too many flaws in it that have not stood the test of time to be called the best game of all time. For example the lack of a target curser with ranged weapons making them painfull esp when you had to hit things with arrows on horseback. An inconsistant art style ware most of the main charicters looked normal and the extras looked like they were made by a 3 year old. A terible combat system ware the hardest enimay in the game was bats that were on fire followed by bats that could freeze then just normal bats.

  30. Super Mario 64 by mushadv · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Perhaps even more innovative and just as fun, but with wider appeal.

    Metroid Prime and Mega Man 2 hit #2 and #3 on my personal list, respectively.

    1. Re:Super Mario 64 by KIFulgore · · Score: 1

      Super Mario 64, Metroid Prime, and Mega Man 2 are all in my top 10. You win my approval! *golf clap*

      --
      - For every action, there is an equal and opposite criticism.
    2. Re:Super Mario 64 by Frogbert · · Score: 1

      Yeah but it is much too easy to finish.

    3. Re:Super Mario 64 by mushadv · · Score: 1

      As is every game when you're making a tool-assissted speedrun of it. The Mips and backwards long jump glitches are disgustingly difficult to pull off in real-time (but possible).

    4. Re:Super Mario 64 by Frogbert · · Score: 1

      You mean the guy who did this didn't just spend 16 flawless minutes doing incredibly difficult moves with pixel perfect accuracy every time?

      I'm shocked!

    5. Re:Super Mario 64 by oddfox · · Score: 1

      So you acknowledge you're speaking bullshit because it's nigh on impossible for anyone to finish it in that amount of time without the use of tools?

      I'm shocked!

      --
      "We invented personal computing." - Bill Gates
    6. Re:Super Mario 64 by m50d · · Score: 1

      It's less fun because one never gets any emotional involvement; there is too little story.

      --
      I am trolling
  31. One of the best by Jerry+Rivers · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Deus Ex gets my vote.

    --
    The pursuit of absolute tolerance leads to the most rigorous and ludicrous intolerance. - REX MURPHY
    1. Re:One of the best by xXenXx · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I agree.

      Ocarina of Time my ass.

    2. Re:One of the best by AlgorithMan · · Score: 1

      yeah, letz go and kick their asses... ;-)

      --
      The MAFIAA is a bunch of mindless jerks who will be the first up against the wall when the revolution comes
    3. Re:One of the best by Landshark17 · · Score: 1

      I agree with you there, but I'd also like to have seen No One Lives Forever on that list.

      --
      This sig is false.
    4. Re:One of the best by StillAnonymous · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes! I was just playing NOLF the other day. The game is just all-round superb.

      It's got a decent graphics engine with nice lighting.

      Nice positional sound which helps if you like a stealth approach.

      Stealth gameplay is great, enemies hear you when they should and don't have cyborg vision so you have a fighting chance.

      There's a variety of ways to complete missions depending on whether you like stealth or full out combat.

      Creative level design.

      The storyline, dialog, and characters are hilarious.

      One of my favourite FPS games of all time.

    5. Re:One of the best by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seconded. Deus Ex has the best plot of any game I've ever played, and it has the strongest replay value of any game I've ever played. The flexibility of play styles is second to none.

    6. Re:One of the best by Doctor_Jest · · Score: 1

      I think it's got better stealth than Manhunt. Manhunt was just a juvenile attempt at a gory "edge" whatnot. It's what 12 year olds consider "kewl."

      --
      It's the Stay-Puft Marshmallow Man.
    7. Re:One of the best by Zeio · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I second that. I would say Ocarina of Time is one of my top 5 games, its awesome, I play it once a year or so in an emulator, and I hated all the Zelda games after it. It should be extended with more content. They ruined it with the follow on games, in my opinion. It was an impossible act to follow, really.

      Deus Ex is the best game ever. [Deus Ex 2 was one of the worst]

      I miss Deus Ex. I wish there were like 10 sequels using the exact format and an updated graphics engine.

      The awesome voice acting and huge amounts of immersion content made that game just awesome. The inventory system ruled. The skill system ruled. The game could be played many ways and the whole things was just good.

      I would say for console, Ocarina of Time and Super Metroid are the best console games that come to mind. But I have a long list of console game I really like.

      I really also like Herzog Zwei a lot and wish they would come out with a sequel to the awesome and fun Kid Icarus.

      --
      Legalize the constitution. Think for yourself question authority.
    8. Re:One of the best by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      -1 Troll

    9. Re:One of the best by CryptoKiller · · Score: 1

      I agree, I still haven't seen anything with such a great combination of action and depth since.

    10. Re:One of the best by MemoryDragon · · Score: 1

      actually twilight princess is very good and i love the artwork of Windwaker (sailing is a pain, but I am not too far into the game yet) I dont think the subsequent zeldas ruined anything, they just incrementally improved occarinas already very good game mechanics. Zelda has the problem that the concept and story has been rehashed too many times, they should have stopped with it after occarina of time and then should have tried something else within the universe instead of retelling the story again and again.

    11. Re:One of the best by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      i second that

      --
      Conservatism: The fear that somewhere, somehow, someone you think is your inferior is being treated as your equal.
    12. Re:One of the best by turing_m · · Score: 1

      What emulator would you recommend for OOT?

      --
      If I have seen further it is by stealing the Intellectual Property of giants.
    13. Re:One of the best by Zeio · · Score: 1

      Project64 is my emulator of choice. I save state often, I have had an occasional blip here and there. Good luck catching the Hylian Loach.

      --
      Legalize the constitution. Think for yourself question authority.
    14. Re:One of the best by ChaoticLimbs · · Score: 1

      If you liked Deus Ex, give S.T.A.L.K.E.R. a try.

  32. Best Game - Boogerman: A Pick N' Flick Adventure by PocketPick · · Score: 1

    I can think we can all agree that Snotty Ragsdale was the man.

  33. R-Type by Figbash · · Score: 1

    It's 20 years old and still my favorite game... incredible level design, awesome music, gigeresque artwork and of course it's a blast to play.

    1. Re:R-Type by zakeria · · Score: 0

      you share my memories.. I'll add Dizzy, Chucky Egg, Manic Miner and Saboteur..

  34. Classic RPG by aafiske · · Score: 1

    Baldur's Gate II. One of the few games I _still_ replay.

    1. Re:Classic RPG by Lorkki · · Score: 1

      I'd top that one with Planescape: Torment. That game has some of the best storytelling I've come across in any game, RPG or not.

      Also, bonus points in my book for the setting not being Forgotten Realms, with a slight setback due to the existence of a sewer quest.

  35. NETHACK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    See subject. That's right.

    1. Re:Nethack by dbitch · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Amen! If you look at the breadth of play and the immersion and the replay value, Nethack has to rank up there in the list. I think Salon did a decent article on why Nethack has survived so long and has such a fanatical userbase; I chalk it up to the fact that I've had a version of Nethack installed since the first day I touched the game, so 15 years of basically constant Nethacking. I've played other games (Diablo, etc) but only Nethack can still make me forget to sleep. I always compare games like WoW and such to Nethack: sure, it's got fancy graphics and is immersive, but would I be able to play this game for 15 years and not get bored? The answer so far is no.

  36. Billy Madison says: by TheDarkener · · Score: 5, Funny

    Kid: Mortal Kombat, on Sega Genesis, is the best video game ever.

    Billy Madison: I disagree, it's a very good game, but i think Donkey Kong is the best game ever.

    Kid: Donkey Kong sucks.

    Billy Madison: You know something? YOU SUCK!

    --
    It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
  37. Re:Best Game - Boogerman: A Pick N' Flick Adventur by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    World Of Warcraft, best for now.. best for ever.. the warcraft runs in ur blood stream.

  38. It's now officially Summer! by Torgo's+Pizza · · Score: 1

    Whew! With all the rain that's been dumping where I live I thought Summer would never get here. But finally, the game media has finally brought Summer to the masses with the yearly list of "Best Games List Evah!!!111" Now I can relax, read the entertaining flamewars of what should be number one, what game was left off and the messages of hatred that this game was ranked so low. Ahhh... I'm grabbing my beach blanket, suntan lotion and start tanning by the light generated from the flames.

  39. Re:Huh? Is This Only Console Cames? by spoco2 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Look at who it's compiled by.

    ALWAYS look at the source of any 'list', 'survey', or stats.

    This is Edge, it's by far a console heavy magazine, they only really have PC there to try and make 'everyone' buy it.

    No, they're not an unbiased source for this sort of list.

    I far more trust the opinions of sites like http://gamespot.com/ or the like, as they have true PC sections.

  40. ADVENT by KC1P · · Score: 1

    You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.

  41. Good list by benow · · Score: 1
    I'd add
    • forza motorsports (xbox) - excellent realism, customization and prediction (drivatar)
    • neverwinter nights - awesome concept and graphics, networking code could have been better. With more resources, could have been a WoW contender. User created worlds are great.
    • an old school dnd such as Pool of Radiance - The graphics weren't great, but the stories were.
    Jade Empire was quite good too...
  42. Panzer Dragoon Saga is the best game ever made by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    PDS is an absolute masterpiece. Just watch the 20 minute game intro, and you'll know right off that it's an unforgettable gem.

    http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-468936435 7155334830&q=panzer+dragoon+saga&total=103&start=0 &num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=5

  43. final fantasy 7 by blanks · · Score: 0

    Not only was this one of the first (console) game to have more then 1 or 2 disks (7!). It was one of the longest non repedative games made in its time, as well as having some of the best graphics, cut scenes, audio and story line.

    It was also one of the first games to have the ability to have characters off in various stages of the game with the ability to switch back and forth between them.

    The fact that this game wasn't even in the top 10, let alone on the list at all and the fact that only 5 games in the top 30 were not nintendo games shows these people are bias or fanboys.

    1. Re:final fantasy 7 by maspatra · · Score: 1

      It was also one of the first games to have the ability to have characters off in various stages of the game with the ability to switch back and forth between them.

      Stuart Smith's Ali Baba and the Forty Thieves had this ability and it was made in 1981, 6 years before the first Final Fantasy, let alone VII. I can think of at least a half-dozen others that also had this feature that predated Final Fantasy VII, including the masterful Wasteland (which really deserves to be on the top 100 games of all time IMHO)

    2. Re:final fantasy 7 by Slithe · · Score: 1

      Not only was this one of the first (console) game to have more then 1 or 2 disks So? What does disk count have to do with anything? From what I have read, most of the disk space was taken up by the FMV sequences. Suikoden II was a game I enjoyed even more, and it had only one disk (although it was longer than FF VII).

      It was one of the longest non repedative games made in its time I don't know about that. The other FF's would take a long time to beat, and there were some computer games (such as Ultima) that could probably match FF VII lengthwise. Plus, a lot of time in FF VII was spent leveling-up. That always felt pretty repetitive to me.

      as well as having some of the best graphics, cut scenes, audio and story line. It certainly did have that.

      The fact that this game wasn't even in the top 10, let alone on the list at all and the fact that only 5 games in the top 30 were not nintendo games shows these people are bias or fanboys. Since it comes from Edge magazine, this is probably a given.
      --
      ---- "XML is like violence. If it doesn't fix the problem, you aren't using enough."
    3. Re:final fantasy 7 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm just going to be blunt about thist: FFVII's storyline was shit. It's got all the cliches you ever see in a JRPG. The characters are irritating little twerps. Not once did I give a damn about any of them. The dialog was inane too. All of this made worse by long, drawn-out, and UNSKIPPABLE cut scenes.

      FFVII had graphics going for it, and a good soundtrack. The combat was interesting for a while too, until you really wished it had some depth. Why couldn't I move a character behind the enemy and gain an advantage? Nope, all you could really do was physical attack, magical attack, and heal. First and last JRPG I will play. I have a buddy who plays all of these games and every one I see just looks like more of the same, except they change the gimmick (materia in FFVII) in the fighting method.

    4. Re:final fantasy 7 by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      Why couldn't I move a character behind the enemy and gain an advantage?


      Because Final Fantasy mainline games are not tactical RPG's, combat maneuver is simply not a part of the design philosophy of them.

      But you could get the drop on enemies, (encountering them with their backs turned) every now and then and there was materia that would increase the chance of that happening. You could also use materia slap enemies with statuses with things like the Enemy Skill: Bad Breath.

    5. Re:final fantasy 7 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then what's the point of combat if there's no tactics? Other than watching the nicely done graphical effects of the spells and summons, were they just filler in between the storyline which I hated? The encounters play out like an old civil war rifle battle. We'll shoot, then you'll shoot, and we'll see who dies first.

      I grew up with D&D and Ultima. These were intricate, detailed games that had great storyline AND excellent combat. These JPRG games just come off as inferior, juvenile attempts to integrate anime into the RPG scene. Are these even RPGs? You have no control over any aspect of the game, short of not dying in a fight. You don't play a role, it's all preordained, you just watch everything happen. Perhaps it's all just ruined by horrible Japanese-to-English translation, but once there's commentary from characters that's above a grade 3 reading comprehension and doesn't have that silly "..." response all over the place, I'll take them more seriously.

      Everything in these games just has to be so over-the-top as to be completely unbelievable. It seems as if the fan base isn't satisfied unless every character or enemy has an attack or spell that appears to harness the power of a thousand suns. Witness garbage like Dragonball Z as the result of this attitude. In these games, the power someone wields is always as subtle as a sledgehammer. I don't think it was ever more apparent though than in FFVII when you whipped out that third level dragon summon. Teraflare or something like that? This dragon the size of the planet comes flying in from space and vomits a beam of energy the width of a small country that you would logically assume destroys the entire quest area you are in. But no no, your party is perfectly unharmed of course. And the enemy is only slightly scratched.

      If you want to witness a terrifying, yet believable (within the confines of the game world) enemy that couldn't be defeated by level grinding and damage whoring, check out the Shadowlords in Ultima 5.

  44. Idiotic. by Intellectual+Elitist · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Most "Top Anything" lists are silly and miss a number of obvious choices, but this list is downright idiotic. I give them points for including games like Gitaroo-Man and Tempest 2000, but some of the omissions and especially the ordering they chose are just obscene.

    Virtua Tennis 3 better than Robotron? Nights Into Dreams better than Tomb Raider? Darwinia, Super Monkey Ball and R-Type Final making the list while classics like X-Com and Fallout are nowhere to be found? Don't even get me started on the timeframe and system bias evidenced here. What a joke...

    1. Re:Idiotic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Final Fantasy XII is not only on the list, but in the top 10. That right there says enough for me that the rest of the list is bogus. Final Fantasy XII is so bad that I literally quit playing after the first play session, assuming you're willing to call moving the main character around a map to be playing.

      Other things on the list but shouldn't be are Final Fantasy VII, which started the whole "movie not game" trend and Metal Gear Solid, which brought it to non-RPG genres.

      Then there's Smash Bros. Melee, which should be in the top 20 but lingers down at 91, with Devil May Cry (another game that doesn't deserve to be on the list) one slot above it.

      But given that Final Fantasy XII is currently in the #1 slot for "worst game I can remember playing", I find it impossible to take the list seriously.

    2. Re:Idiotic. by DigiShaman · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm suprised Herzog Zwei or Star Control didn't make the list.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    3. Re:Idiotic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're implying that Nights Into Dreams isn't as good as Tomb Raider and get modded insightful?
      Now that's even more absurd than the top 100 list!

      Seriously, though. I do agree about for example X-COM certainly being worthy of any top 100 games list, but it's not my list and I don't feel insulted by it not being included. I mean no matter what games would be on this list, some people would get their panties in a bunch. Why does it matter so much?

    4. Re:Idiotic. by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      I don't get this "Final Fantasy games are too full of movies" meme. If you're seeing cut scenes that often you're rushing through the game too fast. Slow down, build up your money, items, and skills/attributes.

    5. Re:Idiotic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well I enjoyed it you poncy elitist bastard so you can fuck off.

    6. Re:Idiotic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cunts like you always think you know best about everything, you'll corner acquaintences and family members so that you can burble on endlessly about your pet opinions, not realising you are alienating everyone you meet with your nasal, whiny, dull tirades. Lots of people liked FF7, including me, and I played it for longer than 10 fucking minutes so maybe just maybe my opinion is as valid as yours fucko.
      But no you fucking know best don't you, well keep telling yourself that you boring cunt.

    7. Re:Idiotic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I played all the way through FFVII when it came out. The "pretty movie" factor wowed me at the time.

      Since then, I've grown up a bit (it's only been, what, 10 years since it was released?) and have realized that, without the "OMG pretty" factor, it sucked. Its graphics look old and dated, and that's enough to make it boring.

      On the other hand, I've recently played through the original Legend of Zelda via the Wii's Virtual Console. That's a game that, despite having severely dated graphics, is still fun. FFVII wasn't fun, but it did have the best graphics for the day. And while the best graphics can win some fans, the best gameplay keeps them for years to come. (For an even more extreme example, try Tetris. First time I played that was on a PC in the mid-80s using text mode graphics. But I still play Tetris today.)

      As for FFXII, I only played it for a single session before giving up on it. I played for something like three to four hours into it. I kept telling myself "it must get better, it got good reviews, people can't be this dumb" but it never did. Apparently people really can be that dumb. What's really the kiss of death for it is that I've never even been slightly interested in playing it since that first attempt. I'd rather play something more fun, like the Legend of Zelda on the Wii. That says something.

    8. Re:Idiotic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hear, hear! F Tomb Raider. F it and every sequel sharing its name. These stupid kids who grew up with Playstations don't know a damn thing about quality video games. Nights Into Dreams flies circles around Lara Croft and her stupid f'n crooked polygonal over-the-top rack. F'n kids these days...

    9. Re:Idiotic. by pthisis · · Score: 1

      Cetainly GP's X-Com is a glaring omission. I was going to add Starflight, which Star Control is a remake of, but neither is really a great game to replay now unlike X-Com--starflight has a bit more charm but it's one that I'd play more for nostalgia than as a great standalone game. X-Com has never been replicated, really.

      Nethack really should be on the list, and pretty high (the tournament last month had the biggest turnout ever, so it's certainly still playable).

      The Incredible Machine is replayable now and great fun, but I'm not familiar enough with everything on the list to say it should be in for sure.

      --
      rage, rage against the dying of the light
    10. Re:Idiotic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now I'm not going to comment on any of the other games you mentioned, but... have you even -played- Super Monkey Ball?

      If anything, I'd put that game in the top 10. It is simply the purest gameplay experience of the last generation. And despite its appearance, one of the most hardcore games as well. If anyone doesn't think so, they should try to unlock and beat the Master levels before speaking. Or at least watch some of those insane gameplay videos of it.

    11. Re:Idiotic. by Intellectual+Elitist · · Score: 1

      > have you even -played- Super Monkey Ball?

      Yep. Played all the way through the "Deluxe" edition on the PS2. Fun game, extremely hard in places, but nowhere near the top 100 IMO.

      I've also played Darwinia and R-Type Final, by the way. Both games have their strong points, but again, they're nowhere near the top 100 IMO.

    12. Re:Idiotic. by Intellectual+Elitist · · Score: 1

      > You're implying that Nights Into Dreams isn't as good as Tomb Raider and get modded insightful? Now that's even more absurd than the top 100 list!

      Nights was a hokey, buggy, mostly 2.5D non-platformer with a neat gimmick. I know, because I own it. The original Tomb Raider, on the other hand, was the first successful attempt to bring the gameplay of Prince Of Persia into 3D, and it's been the template for nearly every 3D environmental puzzle mechanic since then.

      Tomb Raider was clearly the more historically important game, and I personally think it was a lot more fun to play than Nights.

    13. Re:Idiotic. by Intellectual+Elitist · · Score: 1

      Yes, most of these lists miss Herzog Zwei as the father of all modern RTS games (and the Intellivision's Utopia as the father of the Civilization branch). And Star Control 2, even though it's just a more polished ripoff of the Starflight series (with Space War battle mechanics), was the game that really wound up defining that genre.

      All the more reason why this list stunk.

    14. Re:Idiotic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, no wonder. That is the worst possible version you can play.

      To be honest, if one doesn't rate the original Gamecube SMB in the top 100 at the least, then I feel one might not really be a gamer at all.

  45. Um. No. by Zekasu · · Score: 1

    FFXII at #8? Before FFVII?

    Obviously, this list was built on popularity, rather than any actual figures, or account of depth of story.

    That being said, I would still have to put Phantasy Star Online up there, even with a horrid storyline. But come on.. Counterstrike isn't even on there.

    1. Re:Um. No. by iamblades · · Score: 1

      Actually your example disproves your point, FF VII is by far the most popular FF, so if the list is based on popularity, that should be highest.

      IMO FF VI is the best FF, but even it wouldn't be in my top 5, might just edge into the bottom of the top 10, but even that is iffy.

      --
      Shit adds up at the bottom...
  46. Zelda: A Link to the Past by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Zelda: A Link to the Past

  47. Zelda, yes. OOT, maybe not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ocarina of Time was simply amazing. But I honestly had more fun playing The Legend of Zelda: A Link to the Past on the SNES. And I still play through it every now and then today.

  48. OoT wins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't buy that argument for Mario Bros. that because it was revolutionary it was a good game. Sure it was fun at the time, but to me its like saying that the first book ever written is better than, say, Les Miserables. The fact is that the first "novel" written was probably in the style of epic poetry and is not that applicable to us today. Most of us would not enjoy reading it. However, Les Miserables spells out a story of the French Revolution and its ideals: things that impact us to this day- and it is relatively recent history. Most would find it a lot more engaging. Mario Bros. was cool at the time, but its lack of a deep story line and repetitive gameplay wears on the modern gamer.

  49. I'm not sure about the best, but... by Captain+Vittles · · Score: 1

    ...Ocarina of Time is one of only three games I have ever played in which a few hours of gaming turned into an all-nighter. The others are Megaman X and Final Fantasy X. Of those three, I can easily say that OoT is the best.

  50. RE 4 at #2?? by KIFulgore · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Pffft, what a crock. The Resident Evil series did more to destroy clean 3D movement in games than any other series. I can't forgive the series for that. Mario 64 and Metroid Prime both blow away RE4.

    And SMB belongs in the top 10.

    Ocarina of Time is right where it belongs, at #1. It's funny the reviewer says "to call it the greatest game of all time is a serious misstatement," because as we all know, video game ratings lists are Serious Business (R).

    --
    - For every action, there is an equal and opposite criticism.
    1. Re:RE 4 at #2?? by iamblades · · Score: 1

      RE 4 was the game that fixed the glaring control problems with the RE series though. About 8-9 years late, I'll give you, but RE 4 on its own merits deserves to be on a list of the best games ever. Or at least it deserves to be in the discussion. Can't penalize a game just because it comes from a crappy series. Not that RE is exactly a crappy series, but the earlier games did border on unplayable control wise at times. I definitely wouldn't put those on my top games list, but RE 4 is a great game.

      --
      Shit adds up at the bottom...
  51. I CAN'T BELIEVE IT'S NOT HORSECOCK! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    nt

    1. Re:I CAN'T BELIEVE IT'S NOT HORSECOCK! by MrHanky · · Score: 4, Funny

      Mod parent up. Very insightful propagation of horsecock meme.

    2. Re:I CAN'T BELIEVE IT'S NOT HORSECOCK! by falsified · · Score: 3, Funny

      Great, so I spend two consecutive days at work actually doing work and I miss some sort of horsecock Slashdot inside joke? My timing blows horsecock.

      --
      HI, MY NAME IS ISAAC.
    3. Re:I CAN'T BELIEVE IT'S NOT HORSECOCK! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      um... FF7!!!!!! l00zerz

  52. My picks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unreal Tournament 2004 (ONS) best FPS multiplayer
    Keef the Thief for best adventure
    Gemstone III for best MUD vote

  53. Fallout by Popadopolis · · Score: 1

    Fallout and Fallout 2 defiantly deserve a place near the top of the list....

  54. Nethack by Asidonhopo · · Score: 1

    'Nuf said

  55. Re:Best Game - Boogerman: A Pick N' Flick Adventur by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A game so fun that people resort to using bots to play it for them. Grindfest FTW!

  56. Re:Huh? Is This Only Console Cames? by ImTheDarkcyde · · Score: 1

    maybe its because elite has been updated to elite iii, command and conquer to C&C3, Doom, to Doom3,

    I'm awfully sick of the nostalgia that seems to be running rampant nowadays.

  57. UK gaming rag ignores Bullfrog??? by *weasel · · Score: 4, Interesting

    No Magic Carpet.
    No Dungeon Keeper.
    No Theme Hospital.
    No Syndicate.
    No Populous.

    Furthermore: No X-Com, No Ultima IV and No Fallout.

    Almost all lists like this are complete pap, but you simply cannot omit 5 top-50 titles and 3 more that are easily top-10 contenders. Not when you're presenting a list like this with a straight face. I know we bag on gaming 'journalism' for being a joke, but this isn't even funny.
    It's just kinda sad.

    --
    // "Can't clowns and pirates just -try- to get along?"
    1. Re:UK gaming rag ignores Bullfrog??? by moderatorrater · · Score: 1

      personally, the biggest omission was Star Control 2. The first huge universe, compelling story and great arcade fights. Given that it's hugely popular with the Ur-Quan masters, and I don't know how it got left off.

    2. Re:UK gaming rag ignores Bullfrog??? by destor · · Score: 1

      The list shatters my heart. Lots of uber great games have been ignored. The person(s) who are responsible of that list must have been throwing dice, when choosing the classics or have had few too many shots of sponsored sake. Fall Out Master of Magic Arkanoid Ultima underworld ... the list goes on ... Nethack!

      --
      In the game of chess you must never allow your opponent to see your pieces.
    3. Re:UK gaming rag ignores Bullfrog??? by estarriol · · Score: 1
      This list is complete pro-console, pro-Nintendo bollocks. It almost completely ignores PC gaming.

      No Panzer Dragoon Saga!!!
      No Dungeon Master!!!
      No Ultima Underworld II!!!
      Where the hell are Ultima IV and Ultima VII?
      Where the hell is System Shock II?

      ^^^^ These are all games that I play every few years because they're just that great, keeping old systems around and tirelessly tweaking emulators as necessary. This list is just shameful.

    4. Re:UK gaming rag ignores Bullfrog??? by estarriol · · Score: 1

      Oh shit! I forgot Thief 1 and 2 (I think it would be easy to make a strong argument for Thief 2 being the most perfectly-implemented game ever) and Fallout!

      Give me another half-hour, I'm sure I'd come up with a few more absolutely sublime, life-changing games, that were somehow left off this list.

      But seriously, nothing from the Thief series? Fuhgeddaboudit. Crap list.

    5. Re:UK gaming rag ignores Bullfrog??? by zwei2stein · · Score: 1

      Talk about it ... for me this is 1st time I ever heard about this 'Ocarina' (25 years in here) how come its supposed to be best game ever?

      --
      -- Technology for the sake of technology is as pathetic as eschewing technology because it's technology.
  58. Missing by Etrias · · Score: 1

    A game that should've been on the list should be No One Lives Forever. Clever, fun game and extremely funny.

  59. the best game ever... by loki_ninboy · · Score: 1

    Daikatana!!!

    Metal Frogs FTW!!!!

    Seriously, I haven't liked a Zelda game since A Link To The Past. The 3d look isn't what made Zelda, Zelda.

    I honestly don't know what I would put as the greatest game of all time, but it wouldn't be that one.

    1. Re:the best game ever... by Oracle+of+Bandwidth · · Score: 1

      My thoughts exatly. We should start a club.

  60. Best Game Designer... by Franklin+Brauner · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Best game seems too subjective to choose any single title, but I'm of the opinion that Shigeru Miyamoto is without compare in the industry, both for his artistic achievements, and how well he has advanced the grammar and cinematic language of interactive storytelling. For sure one of his titles deserves to be on the top of any list.
    --
    Franklin Brauner

    1. Re:Best Game Designer... by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      A great game designer does not put secrets in games that average gamer would not find on their own without reading about. In a simple game where it's possible to check every "tile"
      screen, it's tedius but acceptable, but in larger more complex games, no.

  61. I can prove it's not the best by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I don't know what is the best game. But there was another game for the same platform as Ocarina that was better - GoldenEye.

    --
    Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
    1. Re:I can prove it's not the best by m50d · · Score: 1

      You sir are wrong. If only because the infinitely respawning enemies that goldeneye has but tries to pretend it doesn't have ruin any possible sense of fairness.

      --
      I am trolling
    2. Re:I can prove it's not the best by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 1

      Fairness? James Bond isn't about fairness. James Bond is about doing duty for Queen and Country, whatever the odds.

      --
      Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
    3. Re:I can prove it's not the best by m50d · · Score: 1

      No, but games are about fairness.

      --
      I am trolling
    4. Re:I can prove it's not the best by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 1

      I'm confused. I don't really know what fairness means for a single player video game. In a game like chess, or tennis, the goal is to find out who is the better player. Fairness is important because any kind of bias in the game can lead to you not getting the correct assessment of who is better. But in a single player video game, such as Goldeneye, you aren't trying to find out whether or not the computer is better than you at Goldeneye. The notion doesn't even make sense. Having baddies respawn isn't a lack of fairness, it's a lack of realism. That's a fair enough criticism, but I consider Goldeneye to be just a game and don't care if it sacrifices realism to keep the game exciting.

      --
      Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
    5. Re:I can prove it's not the best by m50d · · Score: 1

      Fairness matters in a single player game too, but then it becomes being fair within the parameters it sets itself, which ultimately means "honesty" about what it's doing. Zelda has respawning enemies, but it lets you see them doing it - it's just a part of the game. Goldeneye pretends its enemies are there already or coming from somewhere, and there are several levels you can completely clear out - and then you get infinite streams of enemies in the worst possible place.

      --
      I am trolling
    6. Re:I can prove it's not the best by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 1

      I can think of an old classic game where the lack of fairness mattered. Civilization. The computer used to build wonders of the world in times that were simply impossible for you. But here fairness made sense: there was an N-player game defined and in effect the computer was just another player. You wanted to know if you were better than the computer but there was no chance of fnding out because the computer cheated. But again I contend that this is different from Goldeneye. It's just a rule of the game that enemies can just appear from round the corner and that was that. Sometimes it was annoying, but it always added to the challenge.

      --
      Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
  62. ...Meh by Oracle+of+Bandwidth · · Score: 1

    As someone who was a hardcore zelda fanboy (Yes I have one of the gold zelda carts) this game did my obsession in for me. I was almost screaming when I got the game, but I think I played it for like three or four hours, and never touched it again. It wasn't just bad, it was painfully bad. Other than the franchise it had little in common with the pervious zelda games, and a whole ton in common with the gobs of mediocre "collect them all" third person platformers the N64 was so fond of. I should go back and play a link to the past for the 5th time.

    Rant done.

  63. Let the flame wars began!!! by Slithe · · Score: 1

    Seriously Zonk, are you TRYING to start a flame war?

    --
    ---- "XML is like violence. If it doesn't fix the problem, you aren't using enough."
  64. Re: by angryfirelord · · Score: 1

    Photoshop

  65. Best videogame? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Soul Calibur.

    Best *game*? Chess and/or Go (the latter is more "hip" these days since it's all organic and such, but the former still has its appeal)

  66. Questionable choices by cpt.hugenstein · · Score: 1

    Although Halflife 2 was great Halflife spawned the mega mod generation with cs, tfc, dod, etc. Plus it was a terrific game. FF12 is by no means fantastic other than in a graphical sence and should be replaced with snes ff3 or 6 which brought the traditional rpg to the americas and proved that we were caplable of being entertained by non platformer titles. Civilization 4 being good did not have that attention seizing grasp that Civilization 3 had and still has on me to this day. Being the peak of quality at the time and a balanced gameplay not to heavy on conflict or research it is a timeless game that should have mention.

  67. B&W Mac memories by leamanc · · Score: 1
    --
    :q!
  68. Top 10 by Bibz · · Score: 2, Informative

    is top-heavy with Nintendo titles

    Here it is, for those who don't want to click all 10 pages :

    01. The Legend Of Zelda: Ocarina Of Time
    02. Resident Evil 4
    03. Super Mario 64
    04. Half-Life 2
    05. Super Mario World
    06. The Legend Of Zelda: A Link to the Past
    07. Halo
    08. Final Fantasy XII
    09. Tetris
    10. Super Metroid
    --
    I didn't found something funny to put here.
  69. What? by StarReaver · · Score: 0

    Why is this even news, anyway? Putting it up on /. is just a way to get trolls coming in saying "x is better" or "y is better". Just because more people like OoT more than they like, say, Half-Life 2 doesn't make it the best game ever. I honestly disliked Ocarina of Time. I enjoyed Link to the Past more. But my opinion shouldn't matter towards the "best game ever". Other people may agree that OoT is the best game ever, however, that's their opinion. There will never be unanimous agreement on what the best game ever is.

  70. No. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    *clicks next article*

  71. Something is seriously wrong with this list... by Murrdox · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This list is one of the worst "Top 100" I've ever seen.

    The flaws are many and frequent.

    How could you have a top 100 list of games that completely excludes ANY Bioware or Black Isle Studios games? On top of that, there's no homage to some clear classics and pioneers of gaming, such as Zork, or Hero Quest. Only a brief mention is made for Monkey Island.

    The fact that the vast majority of the games on the list were made after 2000 says a bit.

    1. Re:Something is seriously wrong with this list... by Zeebs · · Score: 1

      Was going to waste everyones time with a brand new post, but I'll just reply here because it's semi related.

      What?! No Fallout/Fallout 2. Lord thunderin' I'm playing through Fallout 2 again for because I'm some form of addict appearntly, any media mention of a fallout game and I dig out my copies. I loves me those games.

      --

      Happy Noodle Boy says "F###ing doughnut! Mock me? You fried cyclops!!"
    2. Re:Something is seriously wrong with this list... by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      The Edge is primarily a console magazine. This would be like me complaining if CGW or PC Gamer did a list and didn't include Final Fantasy.

    3. Re:Something is seriously wrong with this list... by AndyboyH · · Score: 2, Informative

      You obviously missed the part about Edge saying they're rating games that are still playable now. Not that they're technologically playable - I'm sure there's like 3 billion java SpaceWar applets (and after all, that was the first video game (AFAIK) which should almost certainly give it a position in the Top 100) but that they're still enjoyable by today's standards.

      As in little Joe Bloggs who never lived through the 80s, and didn't know the pleasure of blowing on cartridges to get them playing on the NES or listening to ZX spectrums screech as they load - this is the set of games he should play to get a feel for gaming heritage.

      Personally I'd have loved it if Terra Nova: Strike Force Centauri was in there - however I know that playing it now would be fun, but it has essentially been bettered in most if not all respects by Halo.

      Having revisited Mario 1 last weekend (emulated via Mario All-Stars) I can kind of feel that they're right. Games now are far more expansive - they're a different prospect. (I still have foremost respect for Mario - and I'm of the opinion that Mario World should be higher than Mario 64 - but that doesn't blinker myself to the fact that people demand more from games now than they did when I was a kid playing an hour at a time after school)

      --
      Baka Drew
    4. Re:Something is seriously wrong with this list... by sixteenbitsamurai · · Score: 1

      Yeah, there is something seriously wrong with this list...

      40. WarioWare, Inc.
      54. Chrono Trigger

      There aren't words for how dumb this is. Sure, not everyone likes RPGs, but to claim that there are more readers of Edge that prefer the equivalency of first-party shovelware over a game oft spoke of in legends is tantamount to saying, "All Edge readers are either ten years old, are masochists, or have the mental capacity of a pet rock."

      Chrono Trigger had state of the art, anime-style graphics, an engaging storyline involving time travel with a variety of colorful characters, a battle system that blended seamlessly with exploration and allowed party members to combine their techniques for more powerful attacks, over a dozen multiple endings, and a bunch of minigames to boot.

      WarioWare has... a bunch of minigames.

      I'll admit WarioWare has a certain appeal, which for me was about 20 to 30 minutes. As for Chrono Trigger, I don't think I can count the number of hours I've spent playing it, though I think I've completed the game at least thirty times.

      I figure my gameplay is directly proportional to how much effort and resources went into the developement of each title. Not that this is always the case; some of us may remember a well-resourced effort by John Romero to make himself a prominent figure in the gaming scene again, only to release Daikatana, the biggest steampile of FPS ever to grace a computer monitor. But I digress.

      The reality check here is that this list of "best video games ever" was created by soliciting an opinion from people who read a magazine to figure out what the "best video games ever" are. A far better source for said list would be a carefully selected group of experienced gamers who've played a majority of the titles in existance so that they can leverage an opinion that's not total crap.

      You would think the staff at Edge would be a sufficient panel of experts on this matter, however, this is not the case because no gaming magazine in their right mind would allow a list derived from their readers to represent the publications' opinion in this fashion. If I were them, I would've emphasised that these are the opinions of Edge readers' and that this is not necessarily the opinion of Edge or it's staff. As it stands, Edge has let themselves look like they've got their heads tucked in their backsides.

      An honest opinion.

      --
      Yeah, that just happened.
    5. Re:Something is seriously wrong with this list... by nuclearpenguins · · Score: 0

      This list lacks Origin's Wing Commander.

      --
      Anonymous Coward: "This is slashdot. Accuracy is second class citizen here, unlike King Bias."
    6. Re:Something is seriously wrong with this list... by Kraeloc · · Score: 1

      Final Fantasy 7, 8 and 9 were all released for PC. Possibly others, but I'm too lazy to look it up.

  72. THPS by Joebert · · Score: 1

    Tony Hawk should be in the top 10.

    --
    Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
  73. I much prefer the Macarena of Time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I much prefer the Macarena of Time.

  74. Hear hear? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm deaf you insensitive clod!

  75. Re:Ocarina of Time? Please.. by plunge · · Score: 1

    Hey, it was programmed by ONE GUY in FIVE WEEKS, which was a huge rush job by the standards of those days. Compare that to most of the other Atari games, and it's really not any worse than most.

  76. Final Fantasy VI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It summed up everything to that point in the final fantasy world. FFXII is probably a great game, but I have never played it. I doubt it had half the sountrack and storyline as FFVI. Everything after FFVI was different. Even FFVII did not compare to FFVI to me. A truely great game that I still play once a year.

    1. Re:Final Fantasy VI by A.K.A_Magnet · · Score: 1

      FFVI is my favorite "scripted" game along with Chrono Trigger, and I can tell you that FFXII really sucks. Lame (and very short) plot, elevator music. The game system is great but you have to spend hours leveling and half the game is about killing über-monsters you don't care about.

  77. Maybe I missed it... by TheBishop613 · · Score: 1

    Was there nothing from Richard Garriott's Ulitma series in there?

  78. PONG bar none... by grapeape · · Score: 1

    Which other game has cranked out clones, sequels and spinoff's like Pong has. Heck this year Rockstar got into the game with Table Tennis and pong is an essential part of Wii Play. Sure its simple but its basically what started it all and its simplicity is still being borrowed from today.

    1. Re:PONG bar none... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pong is just a bad version of real (table) tennis. That's the actual great games there... and I say this as someone who'd rather play a video game than almost any sport.

  79. terrible list!! by scatteredsun · · Score: 1

    Quake 3 and Starcraft should be in the top 10 at least. Quake for it's multiplayer and the sheer number of games spawned from its engine. It didn't include Katamari or Pirates Gold!! Those two games are top 10 for sure! I found FF7 to be a better game than Ocarina of Time Too many new titles that beat out time tested older games. (seriously, what about Legend of the Red Dragon or Nethack or Zork?)

    1. Re:terrible list!! by hibiki_r · · Score: 1

      Quake 3 wasn't even the most popular of the series, or the most innovative. On its own, it's really hard to defend it.
      Play FFVII again. It's aged poorly, and right now nothing but nostalgia makes it palatable. As far as Square RPGs go, it's way, way worse than, at least, V, VI, Chrono Trigger, and Xenogears.

  80. Yes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes. It really deserves that title. Super-Mario Bros. was the best of it's time, and deserves an honourable mention. For me, Sid Meier's Alpha Centauri makes #2, Majora's Mask #3.

    I notice someone here mentioned MS & Sony not being that high-up. Why? IMHO, they don't deserve to be selling games. They don't follow the spirit of the industry. Nintendo is a games company. Microsoft is a software company. Sony is a home electronics company. Only Nintendo makes money on their consoles. IMHO, MS & Sony should let their games divisions go bankrupt and focus on their real cash.

    Sony is planning to lose a few billion dollars this quarter because of their game division. What the fuck has happened to the industry?

  81. Did the UK never see Deus Ex? by Ortega-Starfire · · Score: 1

    It curiously goes unmentioned. It was an awesome game. Fallout also seems to not be there. /cry.

    --
    ---- Liquid was a patriot ----
    1. Re:Did the UK never see Deus Ex? by Clazzy · · Score: 2, Informative

      Of course they did, PC Gamer loved it to bits and still call it a classic of the FPS genre. Deus Ex came in at 29, a shocking crime unfortunately. And System Shock at 64 too...

      The whole thing seems to look like they picked 100 games they liked then gave reasons why they liked them and only really orded the top 10 into an actual list with an obvious bias towards Nintendo games. How they managed to miss off Command and Conquer, Knights of the Old Republic, Worms and various others is beyond me.

      --
      If we can hit that bull's-eye, the rest of the dominoes will fall like a house of cards... Checkmate.
    2. Re:Did the UK never see Deus Ex? by Max+Romantschuk · · Score: 1

      > Worms

      Indeed. Worms may be simple, but there's nothing quite like a hotseat Worms game with the right group... And of course you need to name your Worms teams with witty names, like ex- bosses or girlfriends. ;)

      --
      .: Max Romantschuk :: http://max.romantschuk.fi/
  82. x-com by jorghis · · Score: 1

    Awesome game! Does anyone else remember this one?

    1. Re:x-com by Rebycman · · Score: 1

      This is /. of course we remember x-com!

  83. Solitaire! by Wordsmith · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Um, dude. Solitaire. Win 3.11 edition. Before they ruined it with fancy graphics. Back when it was pure.

    1. Re:Solitaire! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      have you even tried minesweeper?

    2. Re:Solitaire! by rtisbute · · Score: 1

      Jezzball for Windows 3.1 was better!

  84. Close to the top... by Ixthus2001 · · Score: 1

    ...of my list, if not at the top, are Looking Glass Technology's System Shock and Mythos' X-COM Apocalypse.

  85. Super Mario Forever by MikeTheMan · · Score: 1

    Best game ever. With commentary!.

    What the fuck? There's no floor?!

  86. fuck you nigger by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    no text

  87. Elite by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I don't know how popular this was outside the US but Elite will definitely get my vote for most game play ever per Kb of memory. The old BBC cassette version packed it all into less than 32Kb of memory via creative use of the built in random number generator. I've never yet seen a game that was so far ahead of the competition.

    1. Re:Elite by GreggBz · · Score: 1

      Starflight was way ahead of everything, well, except maybe Elite.

    2. Re:Elite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We all know Elite is the best game there ever was.

      That's why it's usually left out of 'Top 100' competitions. It's silly to use up the No. 1 slot all the time.

      It's like saying: "Who are the top 100 groups - not counting the Beatles, obviously?"

      or: "What are the top 10 films - apart from Citizen Kane?"

      Sometimes I feel sad for modern youth - they'll never know what it was to play fantastic games on an 8-bit computer. The best art is always done under impossible pressure and restriction. That's why the best painters starve to death in attic rooms, and villanelles are the best verse form.

    3. Re:Elite by Poromenos1 · · Score: 1

      Nah, there's a whole scene devoted to this thing. That's why people have written a 3d FPS (with great graphics) in something like 96k (I forget the name).

      --
      Send email from the afterlife! Write your e-will at Dead Man's Switch.
    4. Re:Elite by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 1

      Nah, there's a whole scene devoted to this thing. That's why people have written a 3d FPS (with great graphics) in something like 96k (I forget the name).

      Yes, but it is not the same since there is not a fixed memory imprint. If you need to take 10k to add a new feature that is really cool you can. Sure you will optimize it but if you only physically have 96k and you want to add the new feature then you HAVE to reduce its size (and the other code's) somehow. This being up against the wall with zero alternatives is what really motivates people to create fantastically innovative programs.

    5. Re:Elite by Poromenos1 · · Score: 1

      I don't think it works that way, the code is already as small as it can be and if you didn't have the extra 10k you just wouldn't add the feature. Sometimes the only fact that motivates people to create fantastically innovative programs is that they just can (and it's cool).

      --
      Send email from the afterlife! Write your e-will at Dead Man's Switch.
  88. Quake 1 by skrew · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The game that spawned the online 3d FPS genre. The game that first popularized modding, CTF mode, teamfortress, and the other modes still in use in various quake descended games today. The grandfather of halo, counter-strike, and everything in the future. The game that defined a generation. Up untill today there is still Quake 1 servers online.

    --
    Learn to know, the dark side of the force, and you will achieve a power greater than any Jedi...the power to save your w
  89. preemptive grammar nazi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Lest anyone be confused by the AC here, "Hear hear!" is in fact the correct form of this expression. "Here here!", despite being used all over the Internet, is incorrect. Wikipedia has the facts.

    1. Re:preemptive grammar nazi by Puff+of+Logic · · Score: 1

      Lest anyone be confused by the AC here, "Hear hear!" is in fact the correct form of this expression. "Here here!", despite being used all over the Internet, is incorrect. Wikipedia has the facts. ^^ This.
      --
      P.P.S. I'm doing Science and I'm still alive.
    2. Re:preemptive grammar nazi by Icarus1919 · · Score: 1

      Ah, thank you. Frankly, I've always wondered which was right.

  90. poor list. by timmarhy · · Score: 1

    doom2 at 55, WoW at 22... one of the worst lists ever. nothing like wow has been seen before, people have DIED from lack of sleep and food playing it. doom2 was similar wasting a good chunk of my childhood playing it multiplayer.

    --
    If you mod me down, I will become more powerful than you can imagine....
    1. Re:poor list. by antiseptic_poetry · · Score: 1

      nothing like wow has been seen before, people have DIED from lack of sleep and food playing it

      Well except Everquest. and Ultima Online. And Starcraft. All of which have had people stay up and die from playing them.

      WoW is the most popular and accessable MMOG ever, but it's simply an evolved and refined version of what came before. There's nothing revolutionary about it.

  91. Newsflash! by VorpalEdge · · Score: 1

    Ocarina of Time is not that good. You can stop rating it highly because it was A Link to the Past in 3D. (and this is from someone who has beaten it multiple times and watched speedruns of it - it's fun, but it's not timeless and it shouldn't be in the top 50, much less 10)

    Also, RE4 controlled like molasses and the laser sight was invisible. I couldn't be bothered to finish it.

    Honestly, this whole thing was a popularity contest, but... this list... it makes me cry. I mean, come on. FFXII would drop 50 places if you gave it another year. :/

  92. Dizzy by zakeria · · Score: 0

    That egg hero from the UK still kicks ass almost 20 years later!

  93. Top` by suv4x4 · · Score: 1

    What game deserves to top a list of the 100 best games ever made?

    My opinion is you can take all Top Whatever lists ever devised and shove 'em. It's pointless.

  94. HABEEB IT by skulgnome · · Score: 0
    It's not possible to disbelieve a horsecock.

    They get inside you.

  95. Top 100's are subjective; but this one has holes. by Cordath · · Score: 4, Informative

    Top 100 lists are something that are pretty open to criticism. Nobody's top 100 is the same, nor should they be. However, this particular list fails to mention an unsettlingly large number of the "obligatories" that all top 100 lists should have at least a few of. While this is evidence that the author didn't just troll other top 100 lists and cherry pick the titles he had played, it's also evidence that his gaming experience has some rather gaping holes.

    Obligatories from the RPG category:
    - *Anything* from the Baldur's Gate series?
    - Planescape: Torment?
    - Knights of the Old Republic?
    - Dragon Warrior?

    From Strategy:
    - Some of the Civ sequels show up, but where's the original?
    - Master of Orion?

    Other must-haves in any top 100:
    - Tie Fighter
    - Privateer, or at least *something* from the Wing Commander world?
    - Grim Fandango? (The list is in dire need of more classic lucasarts adventure games)

    There are plenty more, but this is the point at which I get lazy. :p I'll leave it to others to list off other "obligatories".

    Isn't nitpicking top 100's fun on a slow news day?

  96. uh.. X E N O G E A R S by nealrs · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Seriously, how could they forget Xenogears? Sure, it had a lot of cut scenes - but it was amazing. The 2nd disc was obviously abbreviated, but it was the highlight of my entire PSX collection. I am somewhat horrified it is not on the list.

    I simply have not been able to play videogames since Xenogears, nothing has come close. RPGs, RTS, shooters, etc, nothing.

    1. Re:uh.. X E N O G E A R S by Gwala · · Score: 1

      Absolutely. Xenogears was a great game that really justifies the use of the word 'epic'.

      If you liked Xenogears, you may be worth picking up the Xenosaga series (I think you can get 1 & 2 in a discount bin, although parts of #2 were fairly 'wtf?' they did a lot of character background) - the third xenosaga is a fantastic conclusion. The two Chrono games are also worth playing (and share a lot of the developers).

      --
      #!/bin/csh cat $0
  97. Glaring Omissions by jpatters · · Score: 2, Informative

    They correctly honored several classic arcade derivatives including Tempest, Robotron 2084 (twice) and Pac Man, but if they are going to include Dig Dug in that list (Mr Driller) than they should also include Defender, Galaga and Joust. There is no excuse. I would also argue for I Robot as a pioneer in 3D, even though they only sold like 500 of those.

    As far games that are not classic arcade derivatives, I would also include Master of Orion and Crazy Taxi.

    --
    "Remember, there never were pineapple-almond cookies here."
    1. Re:Glaring Omissions by timftbf · · Score: 1

      Wow, "I, Robot". I often think no-one else has ever seen that, let alone remembered it. "The law - no jumping."

  98. Pointless, but fun nonethless. by VenomPhallus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think this thread proves the ultimate futility of trying to compile an authorative top 100 - nobody will ever be happy. The purpose of these things is to generate a bit of chat (which clearly it's doing), and to maybe introduce people to games they've not played before. Any criteria is going to be flawed; there's no way of empirically measuring the quality of a game. Look how divisive something like Killer 7 can be - some people think it's definite top 10, others wouldn't see it even near the list.

    That said, it's a good list, I think. It's a mix of the obvious and the less obvious. The articles on the games (in the mag itself) are really well written, and they seem to have set out to avoid the predictable cliches that you're probably sick of reading about any of the Best Games In The World...Ever(TM). And actually, it's quite nice to read a modern take on the games I've played over the years.

    I don't think it's meant as a dictatorial "if you think this isn't the best 100 games ever, you're wrong" read, more a collectors item and a conversation starter.

  99. Missing blue hedgehog by theeddie55 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Sonic should have been in this list somewhere (near the top), being the defining character of the Sega Mega Drive(Genesis) the best selling console of the 16bit generation.

  100. Re:Huh? Is This Only Console Cames? by Clazzy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's still possible that the original was better than the sequel, maybe? C&C and Red Alert I still play to this day, Generals got boring after a few weeks and I'm slowly losing interest in C&C3 already. Worms 2 played better than Worms 3D and I even dug it out about six months ago to play against some friends on it. Deus Ex may have had an outdated engine and crap AI but it was and always will be miles better than the sequel.

    The lasting appeal of a game is what makes it deserving of a spot in a top 100. In ten years time will people still play Doom 3? Would you go and dig out your copy of Doom 3 and give it a play with fond memories of the game? Doom got something right, mindless blasting of demons and monsters. Doom 3 did well too but didn't capture the same atmosphere as Doom did back in the day. Regardless, Doom 3 is a totally different game to the original anyway.

    --
    If we can hit that bull's-eye, the rest of the dominoes will fall like a house of cards... Checkmate.
  101. Best game of all time by SIR_Taco · · Score: 1

    When it comes to best game of all time,a value needs to be place on it. For me, my favourite and I must say best game,as far as enjoyment goes and longevity, would have to be Sky Kid and old arcade game... mid to late 1980's I believe. () Only because I'm sure I spent more quarters on that then my entire University tuition bill...

    --
    I say don't drink and drive, you might spill your drink. Before you get behind the wheel just stop and think.
  102. Battletoads! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Best game evar!

  103. Mario rocks! by MikeFM · · Score: 1

    Mario is definately one of the best. I'd have to go somewhat in order of my history of playing as to my list of best games.

    Zork
    Wishbringer
    Dig Dug
    Atari tanks game (name?)
    Excite Bike
    Super Mario Brothers
    Commander Keen
    Doom
    Quake
    Civilization
    Final Fantasy 8 + 9
    Parasite Eve
    Sheep Raider
    Chrono Cross
    Grand Theft Auto
    Toy Commander
    Crazy Taxi
    Skies of Arcadia
    Unreal
    Worms
    Painkiller

    I haven't seen any really recent games I've been horribly impressed by. A couple I played were okay but nothing really worthy of honorable mention.

    --
    At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    1. Re:Mario rocks! by flibuste · · Score: 1

      Putting Zork as first in the list wins my bestest recognition.
      I am your fan.

    2. Re:Mario rocks! by bluebonics · · Score: 1

      impressive list. zork was definitely an amazing game. there's probably a handfull of muds you're missing. but you need to subtract 2 from each of those final fantasy games, and you seem to be mistaking cross (while still a great game) with trigger. ;)

    3. Re:Mario rocks! by MikeFM · · Score: 1

      MUDs are cool but I never did game-MUDs. I'm a programmer so for fun I mostly hung around popular MOOs and banged out code night and day. If I could ever find someone with the graphic talent to help me turn some of my cool MUD code into something people today would use I think we could kick the ass of stuff like EverQuest and WoW. The wide selection of MUDs back in the day at least created a lot of options and the ones that let users code their own stuff really kept things interesting as you never knew what you might find.

      I think I actually had some of the first graphical MUDs as I started creating RIP graphics (old vector based BBS format) for some of mine. To bad that level of graphics doesn't cut it today. :)

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    4. Re:Mario rocks! by NeilTheStupidHead · · Score: 1

      If it's the same Atari tank game that I own and still bust out at parties (the classic joysticks just can't be broken, no matter how drunk we get), it's just called "Combat".

      --
      Lose: misplace or fail || Loose: not bound together
    5. Re:Mario rocks! by sabre86 · · Score: 1

      Atari tanks game (name?)
      I'm going to guess you're talking about Combat or Battlezone. Both games for the Atari with tanks.
      --sabre86
    6. Re:Mario rocks! by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      If your list starts with Zork I would hazard Painkiller counts as recent. How often do you expect to be horribly impressed by games?

      Doom -> Quake wasn't too quick (civ was between maybe?) either.

      3 of the games on your list I would consider fairly recent (Skies of Arcadia, Painkiller, and Crazy Taxi, maybe even Toy Commander).

      Also missing is Snood (I like it better than the game it ripped off).

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    7. Re:Mario rocks! by spikedvodka · · Score: 1

      take a look at planeshift ahref=http://www.planeshift.it/rel=url2html-29749h ttp://www.planeshift.it/>
      it's an open-source MMORPG, always looking for developers too

      --
      I will not give in to the terrorists. I will not become fearful.
  104. Dai-friggin-Katana! by monopole · · Score: 2, Funny

    John Romero made you his beyoch!! and you just don't want to admit it!

  105. wolfenstein enemy territory - the clear winner by hxnwix · · Score: 3, Funny

    Freed from the constraint of costing money, this game obviously floats to the top.

    I'm not talking about Hindenburg-esque floating, either. I'm talking panzerfausts flying straight up until they explode at the edge of the universe. I'm talking cosmic panzerfaustage tearing space & time a new asshole. I'm talking about the best fucking shit you've ever turded out your bunghole after eating spicy food and then some. A veritable big bang of gaming ferocity and artillery raining down upon gibbing newbies.

    1. Re:wolfenstein enemy territory - the clear winner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well done sir. why you're not +5 yet i don't understand.

    2. Re:wolfenstein enemy territory - the clear winner by Puff+of+Logic · · Score: 1

      Freed from the constraint of costing money, this game obviously floats to the top. You were modded funny, but I think you're absolutely correct. I love FPS games and have been playing them since Wolfenstein 3D. Nothing, but nothing has kept me coming back like Enemy Territory. The weapons feel solid, the hits register properly (take note, Battlefield devs), and it's just damned fun. Hell, I've been playing the same six maps for years now and I still find myself laughing out loud at some of the play. To be honest, I'll probably buy the new ET coming out just to reward Splash Damage for the original, despite the in-game advertising. Enemy Territory is without doubt the best gaming money I never spent!
      --
      P.P.S. I'm doing Science and I'm still alive.
    3. Re:wolfenstein enemy territory - the clear winner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gah. It took the greatest game ever made by man or woman, in RTCW MP, removed all the good bits, and made it spammier.

  106. Original Zelda? by Bluesman · · Score: 1

    Not even on the list? WTF? I could play that over and over.

    Super Mario Bros 3 not on there? There wasn't a kid in school that wasn't dying to play this game when it came out, and it lived up to every expectation. It's still great.

    Good to see a nice showing for RTS's, but leaving out the entire Age of Empires series is a mistake.

    I might be alone here, but personally, Age of Mythology is the best RTS I've ever played, and would be near the very top of my all-time list.

    --
    If moderation could change anything, it would be illegal.
  107. UT by Mike_ya · · Score: 1

    Best game ever for me will always be UT, Unreal Tournament or UT99 for those that wish to call it that and it doesn't even make the list. UT in 'normal' mode with maybe the relics thrown is the best play. Not the BS low gravity, high firing rate sniper rifle only servers that seem to populate most of the UT servers that are still up on the net today. UT server has been running at work for the past 7 years or so and I don't see why it won't be running 7 years from now.

    Resident Evil 4 at #2? I have heard the game was pretty good, but #2 best game ever? I or anyone I know has never played it. I didn't think it was that popular.

    I don't see Halo in the top 10 either. Halo never impressed me. Single player mode on the PC to me was boring and there are other PC based games (UT) playing multiplayer that I enjoyed more. Where Halo gets all the fanboys is on the console. I have played it on the xbox and to me it was ok at best. The controls I just could not get use to. After using the keyboard and mouse for FPS, the console controller just sucked. Personally I think Halo was more of a marketing hype success then a truly great game success.

    Why isn't Tank on the list?

  108. go by BearMachine · · Score: 1

    go -- best game ever?? OMFG go is *the* *best* *game* EVAR >>>- - | | | |_________| | |_____________|

  109. Ummm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They have Katamari Damacy ranked lower than Shadow of the Colossus. No - just, no.

  110. Missing by mattholimeau · · Score: 1

    Quest For Glory 1: So You Want to be a Hero?

  111. Idiots...It's FF7 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have you all forgetten your roots??? Final Fantasy 7. Best game of all time clear cut winner. Now if you'll excuse me I have some work to do with my materia.

    *hoists self onto black chocobo and slings masamune sword onto back.*

    1. Re:Idiots...It's FF7 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe it is roots for you, if you are like 15.

    2. Re:Idiots...It's FF7 by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

      ...you'd think the "7" in the name would have given something away. Then again, FFIII(US) is a stripped down version of FF6, so for the US market, 7 was probably where Square got the balance between graphics, RPG and adventure about right. I still prefer Chrono Trigger (and Secret of Mana for that matter) however.

  112. Half-Life by Kingrames · · Score: 3, Insightful

    without question half-life. It was the first game to have mod tools for the fans that were freely available as well as an actual effort behind them to ENCOURAGE mod-making, it was the first to make such a business model succeed on a massive scale, and encouraged the proliferation of community involvement in games, eventually resulting in what some would call "Web 2.0".

    Nothing in the history of gaming has impacted the WORLD in the way that it did, and for that reason I'll say that it was the best game ever.

    You may claim that other games did it better, I might even yield to the idea that the BUILD engine with Duke 3D should have the title, or maybe even quake or quake 2, but those games didn't succeed in luring in the mod community and fostering its growth as well as Valve did with Half-Life. The mod community for Quake 2 seemed to be just a thing that popped up around the game, but Half-Life actually welcomed it in and put effort into it.

    This truly was the beginning of the real internet we know today, and marked the point in history where the community surrounding a game became just as important as the game itself.

    I cast my vote for Half-Life, not any Zelda game. While Ocarina of Time was exceptionally well made, and possibly flawless, it IS possible to do more. And many games have.

    --
    If you can read this, I forgot to post anonymously.
  113. M.U.L.E. by MMC+Monster · · Score: 1

    Best. Game. Ever.

    Played it on a C64 often with up to three human opponents all on the same system.

    It taught us supply and demand, collusion, artificial scarcity. And was damned entertaining at the same time.

    --
    Help! I'm a slashdot refugee.
    1. Re:M.U.L.E. by bakura121 · · Score: 1

      M.U.L.E. was great! I wish they'd release that on Live Arcade for the Xbox 360 with multiplayer. I would play the hell out of that!

    2. Re:M.U.L.E. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes I second that, I remember playing M.U.L.E. on the Atari 800. Great Game, because you played with other players, something that needs to be done more often in current games. Not just over the internet, but with other players in the room! More fun that way. Although single player games are good too, don't get me wrong.

      my favorite games being (no particular order) Except that halflife 2 is the best game ever . . . !!!

      halflife 2, (and halflife 1), F.E.A.R., farcry (want to swim on the beach) . . . Joust!!!! Dig-Dug, Asteroids, Ms Pac-man, Galaga, rallisport challenge 2, Ninja Gaiden, Jade Empire, Tie-fighter, Combat Flight Simulator (any version) Star Raiders, Oils Well, Indiana Jones and the Infernal Machine, Lego Star Wars, Jedi Knight, spider-man 2 (on the old xbox), Zork, quake1 and 2, Colin McRae Rally, Le Mans 24 hours, xybots, Burnout 3,4 . . ., Star Wars Knights of the Old Republic, Geometry Wars, Archon, 7 Cities of Gold, Hexen, EA hockey, Madden Football, xbox incredible hulk game, Shanghai (mahjong solitaire), battlezone, Hogans alley, super mario brothers, alex kidd in the miracle world, tempest 2000, sonic the hedgehog, Outlaws!, Halo, halo2, ghost recon, dirt, forza 2, duke nukem! (who knows if the'll ever make that sequel) but it was fun to look in the mirror and use lightswitches, and turn yourself into a midget) a very good and creative game for its time., wizard of wor, bejewelled, Marvel Nemesis (fun to play 2 players). . .Gears of war, Call of duty, call of duty 2, call of duty 3, Marvel Ultimate Alliance, Tiger Woods Golf, Donkey Kong Country, Star Wars Battlefront,

      I am looking forward to seeing Crysis (don't have a computer that it will run on though, and may not get one soon, hope it gets ported to the consoles in a decent way)

      That Star Wars game coming out next year with all of the force effects (cool preview video)
      (The Force Unleashed)

      Mass Effect

      Bioshock (Maybe)

      The new Sega Rally Revolution Game (I love rally racing games)

      Too Human

    3. Re:M.U.L.E. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      M.U.L.E. is one I keep coming back to after more than 20 years since I first played it. That, and Master of Orion (13 years going) and Dungeon Master II (12 years going).
      As evidenced here, I'm not the only one still playing M.U.L.E. 23 years after it was released. That's some serious staying power.

  114. Re:Best Game - Boogerman: A Pick N' Flick Adventur by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

    You can easily level from 1-70 without grinding. Just do every quest you come across (or use a guide like Joana/Mancow's) and you can 1-60 in 4 days 10 hours of /played with only questing (maybe 1-3 hours of grinding spread out over the 60 levels). 60-70 without much grinding.

    Now, when talking about REP.. you have a point. But that's "Working As Intended" and bot users are permabanned.

    --
    Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
  115. Bah! by jcr · · Score: 1

    Spacewar is all anyone needs. You kids today...

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    1. Re:Bah! by Teancum · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I was going to suggest the original Cruther's ADVENT, but Space War does beat ADVENT by almost (not quite) a decade.

      The classic Oregon Trail (mentioned just a bit ago here on /.) on a mainframe would be in a similar league of hard core classic games. I also remember another fun one what was global thermonuclear war, where you played the part of the USA going after Russia in a full out nuclear war lanuching MIRVs, ICBMs, and Bombers against Russian cities. You "won" if you could wipe out the Russians before you lost everybody in your own cities, and it introduced to me the ideas of overkill and megatonnage.

      This list also missed the whole 8-bit microcomputer era, so I'm not surprised they missed even earlier classics.

    2. Re:Bah! by jcr · · Score: 1

      Crowther, not Cruther.

      That was (and still is) a very fine game, too.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  116. Best game I can't get past the first stage! by Bob+of+Dole · · Score: 3, Funny

    I've played most of the other zeldas, and I've bought Link to the Past at least four times. I'm a huge Zelda fan, and I was playing Twilight Princess within 3 hours of its release...

    But I can't get past the first area in Ocarina of Time. I've tried, many times. I've seen the game played through (My brother loves it + Speedruns), so I know how good it is and how great a game it is, but I cannot get over the framerate in the first scene.

    I don't know how Nintendo dropped the ball on this one. A little slowdown is acceptable during a large boss battle where there's hundreds of explosions and enemies going every which way, but in THE FIRST ZONE? A zone with, let's count them, ZERO enemies? (One if you use the starfox cheat, but that's it)
    It just tells me it's only going to get worse from there.

    But all this "Best Game Ever!" publicity is great, really. Maybe it'll inspire Nintendo to remake the game, on the Wii...

    1. Re:Best game I can't get past the first stage! by mshurpik · · Score: 1

      Ocarina of Time blows balls. I remember our first encounter and it was like, ok, decent graphics, where's the game?

      Then I roomed with a guy who beat Ocarina and its sequel. And I was like, "Get a job," and he did.

      Then he dated some girl, went into a mathematics PhD program...anyway, Ocarina gives "underwhelming" a new meaning.

    2. Re:Best game I can't get past the first stage! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your post gives "ridiculous troll" a new meaning.

    3. Re:Best game I can't get past the first stage! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you serious, or are you merely trying to troll? I hope it's the latter, for your mother's sake.

    4. Re:Best game I can't get past the first stage! by Poromenos1 · · Score: 1

      Do you still get the slowdown in Wii's virtual console?

      --
      Send email from the afterlife! Write your e-will at Dead Man's Switch.
    5. Re:Best game I can't get past the first stage! by Bob+of+Dole · · Score: 1

      No, it's serious. I'm very sensitive to slowness in games for some reason.
      (So things like underwater levels tend to piss me off, just not to the extent EVERY MOTION in Ocarina does)

    6. Re:Best game I can't get past the first stage! by Bob+of+Dole · · Score: 1

      I would imagine so. Nintendo has already shown (with this exact game!) that they're willing to emulate slowdown to make sure the experience is accurate (and so they don't have to retest the whole game. Speed differences can change things!)

  117. Carrier Command by eaman · · Score: 1

    Carrier command http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carrier_Command on the Amiga 500 gets my vote.

    1. Re:Carrier Command by flukus · · Score: 1

      I wasted half of my preteen days on that one. Mainly because I didn't realise there was a "fast forward time" feature..... I used to read a book while traveling between islands. And my save games usually srewed up befor I could finish it.

  118. yankdot: most slimy corporate whore ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    10000 iphone stories coming up

  119. What? No Battlezone!?! by dubbayu_d_40 · · Score: 1

    And I'm not talking about 80's (although that one rocks). The Pandemic versions were out of this world and greatly under appreciated. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battlezone_II:_Combat _Commander

  120. I have a reference for your horseyness! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  121. Final Fantasy 10 by Zantetsuken · · Score: 1

    Though I've never played Ocarina of Time, only something like Zelda 2 (a gold NES cartridge?), Link's Awakening (SNES) and Seasons and Ages (GBA, and didn't really like 'em...

    Personally I much prefer Final Fantasy 10.

    If you haven't spent a lot of time getting to understand the world it is set in and the events in said world, you might be one to think it was a crappy game. However, if you actually spent time talking to Maechen (the scholar guy in-game studying the history of the game's world) just about every chance you get it'll really help you to understand just how good the story was (basically like every religion/war - win the war and rewrite history to make your side look like the good guys).

    Also, it's rather fun to level up your magic users with their ultimate weapon (removes the 9,999 damage limit, bringing it up to 99,999) - suddenly that dinky little rod the girl has isn't so dinky when it does 65k per hit and her turns come fast enough you get 5 or 6 hits before even your next fastest character gets up, let alone the enemy... (in other words, fill up Yuna's sphere grid *entirely*)

    1. Re:Final Fantasy 10 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1st. Link's Awakening is a GameBoy game.
      2nd. FF and Zelda are different genres. Can not be compared.

    2. Re:Final Fantasy 10 by Zantetsuken · · Score: 1

      Well, you're an AC who's never going to read this, but for anybody else that agrees with it before thinking about what I posted... Ok, "Link's Awakening" - it was something like 10 years ago I last played...

      Second - I wasn't talking about the gameplay difference between Zelda and the FF series. I was talking about the plot-lines, just in case you didn't read that in context with the rest of my post which centered on the *story* of FF-10. Personally, the plots from the Zelda games I'd played are pitiful crap compared to most any FF plot (with the exception of 9, which generally just sucked)...

    3. Re:Final Fantasy 10 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Genres matters for the plot. An RPG obviously has a deeper plot than an action game or a beat 'em up. FF focus on the plot an the turn-based fights, Zelda is more of puzzles and ability.

    4. Re:Final Fantasy 10 by ElleyKitten · · Score: 1

      Though I've never played Ocarina of Time, only something like Zelda 2 (a gold NES cartridge?), Link's Awakening (SNES) and Seasons and Ages (GBA, and didn't really like 'em... Personally I much prefer Final Fantasy 10. You're comparing a PS2 Final Fantasy to Zeldas that are so old the newest were made for the Game Boy [i][b]Color[/b][/i] (Seasons and Ages were GBC, not GBA. Link's Awakening was for the B&W GB, though you might mean A Link to the Past). Does that seem like a fair comparison to you? Especially since your pluses for FFX involve a giant world with a complex, intricate storyline and being able to hit for 65,000 damage. You know, the Final Fantasies on the SNES had a limit of 8 letters for names, and they didn't even TRY to put an FF on the GBC. The 2d Zeldas are completely different from the 3d ones, in terms of gameplay, puzzles, storyline complexity, everything. You can't judge the whole series unless you've played at least one of the 3d ones (and don't make the one be Wind Waker. And if the one is Majora's Mask, remember than not all of them are as depressing and weird. In other words, compare FFX to Ocarina or Twilight). If you really don't want to bother playing more Zeldas, you could play FFIV and compare that to A Link to the Past (assuming that's what you meant by Link's Awakening since you put (SNES) next to it). But really, FFX is just not comparable to the Game Boy Zeldas. Really, what would you think if someone said that Zelda was better than Final Fantasy because Twilight Princess is much more complex than FFII?
      --
      "What is Internet Explorer 7? Are you saying we can't access the normal internet?" - I love tech support. Really.
  122. @ Love by Sartak · · Score: 1

    NetHack, your day shall come!

  123. nethack by edwyr · · Score: 1

    My opinion, nethack is the greatest game ever.

  124. This List by Derosian · · Score: 1

    This list does seem to have some Epic Fail, mostly in part to a good number of missing titles, as already mentioned by other posters. I do see though that there is a bit of method to their madness as the spectrum of games they had to go through were very broad. I seriously believe this list would be more accurate say, if people were asked to submit a list of their favorite games from 1 to 100. Each game would be awarded points based on location in the list and then the list would be updated regularly to reflect online opinion. Of course this could miss out on a vast number of people who would never see the list. Also it would probably be better for everyones list to be dynamic, able to change on a whim. So when they play a new game they could go back in and go, wow that beat my game 99 I'm going to move the list down and put that in there. Then the combined list gets updated.

    Just an Idea.

  125. Hours played is meaningless by Astarica · · Score: 1

    I'm almost positive that the amount of hours played in World of Warcraft would easily blow away any console games.

    The next most played console game in terms of hours would almost certainly be some kind of Pokemon game.

    1. Re:Hours played is meaningless by Kingrames · · Score: 1

      No, probably Tetris, but you wouldn't be able to get accurate stats on that because of all the knockoffs of it.

      --
      If you can read this, I forgot to post anonymously.
    2. Re:Hours played is meaningless by btgreat · · Score: 1

      How about the original everquest? Wouldn't that be well above what even WoW has put up so far?

    3. Re:Hours played is meaningless by PresidentEnder · · Score: 1

      Hours per player, original EQ might win. Gross hours played, though, WOW has so many more players that even if they were all casual occasional gamers whose internet only worked for five minutes each day while the big dipper was properly aligned, WOW would win hands down.

      --
      I used to carry a bottle of whiskey for snake bite. And two snakes. -Nefarious Wheel
  126. One Word.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    PONG!!!

  127. The Batle for Wesnoth by mauromy2 · · Score: 1

    This is the best!!!

  128. Ancient and Ubiquitous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Chess

  129. Total Annihilation by macraig · · Score: 1

    That's it. End of game. End of story.

    1. Re:Total Annihilation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn right. TA is it. The difference between a cultured RTS player and a moron is TA.

      Most people on Earth are morons. Most have never heard of or played TA. Rest my case.

    2. Re:Total Annihilation by clarkc3 · · Score: 1

      Glad I'm not the only one wondering how Total Annihilation got left off. Amazing game thats considered one of the best RTS games of all time yet no mention of it in the article, thats bs

    3. Re:Total Annihilation by macraig · · Score: 1

      Apparently it's only a "game" and relevant to their criteria if it's mindless - as in beer and pretzels - and doesn't really require intellect, like Super Mario Brothers?

  130. Re:Top 100's are subjective; but this one has hole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't disagree with you much but... Baldur's Gate? Now that was one of the worst games I ever played. It may have been beautiful and immersive or whatever if you played it 'for fun', but if you played it to beat the game, it wasnt hard to get hold of a magic sword spell that flew out to beat up your foes; from that point until the final battle, the solution was to stand behind a wooden box (which all the monsters were too stupid to break) while your magic sword does its thing. Mostly I played the game while watching TV, only briefly flicking back to move on to the next box.

    Of course, I could just fight the monsters properly, but anytime things got remotely awkward there'd always be a box lying around, tempting you in...

    For me... Ico? maybe. GTA? right up there. Crystal Castles - fab. But lets see, a game that keeps bringing you back for more...got it.

    Money Puzzle Exchanger!

  131. Chrono Trigger by Xuranova · · Score: 1

    It's about time.

    --
    "There is no real right or wrong, just what the majority accepts at the time."
    1. Re:Chrono Trigger by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea, Chrono Trigger was #54 on that list. I highly disagree with that. That game was absolutely beautiful and, with 15 different endings, full of replayablility (yea, I made that up). The puzzles were well crafted and everything about that game was amazing. When it came out, the cartridge cost $90. People today are bitching about $60 for advertisement infested EA games, yet Chrono Trigger was sold out everywhere. It definitely deserved a higher rating.

      The same goes for Secret of Mana (which was also an extremely georgeous game). It lacked the compelling story and character developement that Chrono Trigger had, but the gameplay was addicting.

      There are a few others, but I'll keep them to myself. That one bothered me the most. :)

  132. yeah by yahurd · · Score: 0

    hell yeah it is!

  133. Dreamweb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dreamweb (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dreamweb) on my Amiga 600 in 1992 was the best game ever!

  134. I hate to be the bearer of bad news... by jgclark123 · · Score: 1

    but the story is about to... drop off for a while. After you get past the next three dungeons, it'll pick up again, so don't get too concerned.
    Also, the items in the later dungeons seem a bit uninspired. At least they're different.
    Oh, and get used to every boss dying after only three hits. Twilight Princess could really use an optional, more difficult setting, but that seems to be a pattern in all video games, not just the Zelda series.

    All in all, it is a very good game for all of the reasons you listed, and then some. I just don't think it's better than Ocarina of Time or Oracle of Ages/Seasons.

    --
    "May evil beware, and may good dress warmly and eat plenty of fresh vegetables." -The Tick
    1. Re:I hate to be the bearer of bad news... by LordVader717 · · Score: 1

      Oracle of Ages/Seasons.


      Those two are games I'm gonna have to play again. I only played them through once when they came out, but they were just so full to the rim with things to do, especially with the effectively double-sized game.
      Probably the best implementation of the "two versions" concept ever.
  135. What else is there to say but... by ADHDYoshi · · Score: 0

    KYATTOU NINDEN TEYANDEE FTW

    It's also the best cartoon on earth, if not the best TV show, if not the best thing known to mankind.

  136. Pacman by atomicstrawberry · · Score: 1

    I'm stunned that Pacman isn't in the top ten. While it's true that some classic arcade games (eg Pong) haven't dated well, the same cannot be said about Pacman. Simple, addictive and surprisingly deep gameplay, extremely accessible, and I'd argue that the yellow pie-with-a-slice-missing is at least as recognisable to the average Joe as Mario. Possibly even more so.

    1. Re:Pacman by quag7 · · Score: 1

      I agree. My personal favorite game of all time was Ultima IV - it was, in fact, so good that when I was done with it I lost interest in videogames almost altogether. Didn't buy any more consoles, anyway.

      But when I think "video game" I think Pac Man, the same way I think "Coca Cola" when I think soda pop. You could put up a good argument for Space Invaders too.

      I've never even heard of a lot of the games people mention but I just have little interest in a game that can't be played as a lark for 15 minutes and then dropped. My loss, really, since I did love Ultima IV.

  137. What, no one said M.U.L.E. yet? by vicious0000 · · Score: 1

    M.U.L.E. has got to be one of the best games ever created, and the foundation for all the RTS and Sim games to come. I've also got to give props to Archon. Another game from the same era that pretty much help found EA into the game company it is today.

    1. Re:What, no one said M.U.L.E. yet? by mshurpik · · Score: 1

      Archon Chess was pretty much the #1 reason to own a Commodore64. Years later they had "Battle Chess," but it wasn't the same. In fact, I don't think you could control the battles in Battle Chess. Archon was, and is, the best chess game.

  138. Ultima IV, Sam & Max Hit the Road, Tie Fighter by bakura121 · · Score: 1

    I can't believe that the entire Ultima series (IV in particular), Sam & Max Hit the Road, and Tie Fighter did not make the list. Oh, and what about ZORK? They were each ground breaking in their own genre. Easily my favorite games of the era.

    I think Mario games can be fun, but I don't think they all deserve the god-like praise that they get. Well, mabey Super Mario 64, but that's about the only one for me.

  139. Congratulations by hsoft · · Score: 1, Informative

    You just started a lame slashdot inside joke.

    Who knows, it might actually get popular. I'm sure it would impress chicks.

    1. Start some horsecock slashdot inside joke.
    2. ???
    3. Profit!

    --
    perception is reality
    1. Re:Congratulations by falsified · · Score: 3, Funny

      I did? I thought I was just clueless about an existing lame Slashdot inside joke. Now I'm clueless about my own lame Slashdot joke? Dammit.

      --
      HI, MY NAME IS ISAAC.
    2. Re:Congratulations by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 1

      Who knows, it might actually get popular. I'm sure it would impress chicks. I'm not so sure I want to be hanging around the type of chicks who are interested in horsecock...
      --
      This guy's the limit!
    3. Re:Congratulations by azav · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, you know what that means don't you?

      3. PROFIT!

      In Soviet Russia, horsecock profits you!

      --
      - Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...
    4. Re:Congratulations by ozmanjusri · · Score: 1
      I thought I was just clueless about an existing lame Slashdot inside joke.

      Nah, it's a kuro5hin meme that's crossing over.
      http://www.kuro5hin.org/story/2007/6/28/7149/80968

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    5. Re:Congratulations by Toonol · · Score: 1

      I'm not so sure I want to be hanging around the type of chicks who are interested in horsecock...

      Yeah, it's a pain. Sometimes I just want to tell them to stay away!

    6. Re:Congratulations by Wdomburg · · Score: 1

      I believe the missing step is

      2. Print and sell 'Horsecock inside!' stickers.

  140. Sigh by slaker · · Score: 1

    Personally, I've never seen a console game I'd consider compelling. Closed platforms, poor graphics etc.
    But hey, I'm not a console gaming person.

    Anyway, my top 10:

    1. Nethack. I ascended a wishless tourist and I am *never* going to stop bragging about it on Slashdot.
    2. Ultima V (I had III and V but not IV, which is supposed to be better...)
    3. Scorched Earth
    4. Half Life (the first one. The one that doesn't need steam)
    5. Planescape: Torment / Baldur's Gate 2
    6. Stargate (the Defender clone)
    7. System Shock 2
    8. Alpha Centauri
    9. Starflight
    10. Syndicate

    Honorable mentions:
    Robot Odyssey, which I finished after only 11 years and some college-level classes in digital logic. :)
    Mechwarrior 2
    Star Control
    Quake

    --
    -- I wanna decide who lives and who dies - Crow T. Robot, MST3K
    1. Re:Sigh by mshurpik · · Score: 1

      I never played Nethack, but I heard about it.

      I posted about Ultima V below. Ultima VI and its spin-offs were really the shit.

      Scorched Earth almost got me laid (my bad...but hey, she moved).

      System Shock was good. Alpha Centauri=Civ=awesome? Syndicate is a legend, I replayed it this year.

      All Mechwarriors from the first one on were pretty damn good. What's the max rocket load on a custom mech? 6x15 LRM iirc. Jump and shoot, after all, it's King of the Hill.

      Star Control II could bring tears.

    2. Re:Sigh by vertigoCiel · · Score: 1

      I'm with you on Alpha Centauri in the top 10. I was shocked that Civ IV was the only Civ game on the list. While it has great graphics, and the culture system is a good edition, no game can beat AC in terms of all-around experience.

      From the carefully crafted faction balances, to the relevant and often insightful quotes that accompany tech breakthroughs, to the kick-ass Secret Project videos (the Wonder vids in Civ IV pale in comparision), to the careful managing of diplomatic relationships (which gets extremely tricky in thinker and transcend difficulties), to the awesomeness of the concept of mind-worms, the game is a masterpiece. Civ IV improves in a couple of areas, but is too weak on relationship between civ ideology and societal mechanics, unique style of play for each civ, and intellectual maturity for me to fully enjoy. Ten years later, I still keep coming back to Alpha Centauri.

  141. Re:Ultima IV, Sam & Max Hit the Road, Tie Figh by mshurpik · · Score: 1

    How about, Ultima V (an Apple II port to IBM, but it took months to beat), and Ultima VI (one of the very first IBM VGA games).

    I still can't believe I beat Ultima V. Meanwhile, Ultima VI, Savage Empire, and Martian Dreams were just a rush. Savage Empire had the first weapon recipes, iirc (combining ingredients to make gunpowder).

    Mario64 is my perennial favorite. I don't think we've seen 3D like that before, or since.

  142. Best Game Ever Title is ICO on Playstation 2 by Jackie_Chan_Fan · · Score: 1

    Best Game Ever Title is ICO on Playstation 2

  143. See? This is why SHODAN hates humans so. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    System Shock 2 at #64? Apparently because it was a "commercial failure?" Everything that came out at the same time as Half-Life was a "commercial failure." And plenty of other slow-selling critic's darlings were rated in the top 20. So how does, hands down, the scariest video game of all time land that far down the list?

  144. No UT99 by Brad1138 · · Score: 1

    No Unreal Tournament 99? Still the best FPS IMHO.

    --
    If you could reason with religious people, there would be no religious people
  145. Space War by argent · · Score: 1

    Come on, not only was it the grand-daddy, great-grand-daddy, and multi-dimensional n-parent of everything from lunar lander to flight simulators, but it was the most popular videogame in the world for over a decade!

    First smartarse who points out that it was the ONLY videogame in the world will just be proving my point.

    (I've played OXO. OXO isn't even in the running)

  146. Why bother defining the criteria? by Infonaut · · Score: 1

    You can't say something is the "best" without defining what you think those qualities are that make something best.

    You also can't ask the question "what computer game is the best of all time?" and expect to get anything but arbitrary opinions, no matter what criteria you stipulate. It's like saying, "What's the best religion, on the basis of overall bliss, personal satisfaction, and possibility of eternal salvation?"

    --
    Read the EFF's Fair Use FAQ
  147. Balance of Power by rickb928 · · Score: 1

    And I'm deeply hurt by the realisation that I'm so damned old nobody else knows of this game.

    Pus.

    --
    deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    1. Re:Balance of Power by Brad1138 · · Score: 1

      I remember this game, barely, but I remember it :) (I am 40 btw)

      --
      If you could reason with religious people, there would be no religious people
  148. Re:Ultima IV, Sam & Max Hit the Road, Tie Figh by slaker · · Score: 1

    I am under the impression that Ultima V is not actually winnable.
    I played the game to the point where I knew everything I had to do, but I couldn't get characters to the point where they could actually *do* them. Or survive doing them, anyway. Dragon summons Demon summons Demon summons Demon... arg. Either I'd run out of reagents to cast spells or I'd get eaten alive if I went too deep into the dungeons.

    --
    -- I wanna decide who lives and who dies - Crow T. Robot, MST3K
  149. Earned It! by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1
    Ocarina of Time deserves it just for the amazing gameplay they managed to extract from the Nintendo 64 platform. They earned it.

    Although I must admit that playing Super Mario 64 in his 3-dimensional world was also pretty d@mn amazing up to the time before Zelda arrived.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  150. Looking Glass Studios Anyone? by Sabathius · · Score: 1

    Thief 2: The Metal Age
    or
    System Shock.

    I have more hours logged on those two games than in any other. They're both absolute masterpieces.

  151. it's list time! by namekuseijin · · Score: 1

    * Ocarina of Time
    * Half-Life
    * Trinity (Infocom)
    * Sonic the Hedgehog
    * R-Type
    * Super Metroid
    * Final Fantasy VI, VII
    * Zonk (Infocom)
    * Tetris
    * Street Fighter 2
    * Tekken 3
    * Daytona Racing
    * Super Mario Bros. 3
    * Dragon Quest IV, VII
    * Prince of Persia
    * The Lurking Horror (Infocom)
    * Battletoads
    * Galaga
    * Resident Evil 2
    * Shadow of Colossus
    * R.C. Pro A.M. 2
    * Planetfall (Infocom)
    * Doom 2
    * Star Fox
    * Yoshi's Island
    * Kenseiden
    * Deus Ex

    I could go on...

    --
    I don't feel like it...
    1. Re:it's list time! by Cederic · · Score: 1


      An excellent start. Let me add
      * Elite
      * Speedball 2
      * Llamatron
      * Baldur's Gate
      * Max Payne
      * Battle Isle
      * Duke Nukem 3D
      * Paradroid
      * Nethack/Angband (pick one; nobody ever picks both)
      * Unreal Tournament

      Unlike yours, the original list appears to have been created by people under 25. And a strange focus on sequels -
      * Outrun far more impressive for its time than Outrun 2006 (but Pitstop II was better)
      * Shogun: Total War was groundbreaking; Rome is merely a pretty derivative
      * Civ 2 remains the best in the series (subjective, I know)
      * BF1942 lacks the graphical splendour of BF2, but was far more innovative and had the only thing that matters : Gameplay.

      I'll stop now too..

    2. Re:it's list time! by namekuseijin · · Score: 1

      excellent addons, indeed. oh, elite! :)

      yeah, such lists come out every year or just in time to trumpet sequels for the new systems or rehashes. Probably Nintendo is planning a Wii remake of Ocarina or something. These lists should be called "Best 100 games ever of the year by our teen reviewers"... :)

      --
      I don't feel like it...
  152. Re:Top 100's are subjective; but this one has hole by armanox · · Score: 1

    Good ideas. I also propose we add WarCraft: Orcs vs Humans OR WarCraft II: Battle.net Edition to strategy. And Thief: The Dark Project needs to be moved higher in the list. End of story.

    --
    I'm starting to think GNU is the problem with "GNU/Linux" these days.
  153. Conker's Bad Fur Day, by Kuvter · · Score: 1

    Fight Night Round 2 (Innovative boxing), and Tetris Attack (Always seems overlooked). Everything else I could think of off the top of my head was on the list.

    --
    "To be is to do." --Socrates
    "To do is to be." -- Aristotle
    "Do-Be-Do-Be-Do..." --Sinatra
  154. Re:Ultima IV, Sam & Max Hit the Road, Tie Figh by mshurpik · · Score: 1

    Ultima V had six quests: kill 3 Shadowlords and find uh, 3 ankhs or something.

    During one weekend at my grandma's house (yes, my PC was portable...Panasonic Sr. Partner!), I killed 2 shadowlords and found one object. So, half the game beat in a few days.

    Still not sure how I did it. It happened pretty quick.

    Anyway, I never beat Martian Dreams :( There was some entrance to the final quest that I never found.

  155. The Great granddaddy of all MMOGs by Brad1138 · · Score: 1

    Heres one for the older crowd who lived in western Washington state in the early-mid 80's. A game called "Civil" run on a mainframe at T.E.S.C.. The game was entirely ASCII and played in real time. I never played it but I had a friend that was massively addicted to it. You built & acquired land and resources through politics and war etc. I can't find a thing about it on Google. 100's (or more?) of people were playing, (you had to have a TESC acct) I remember my friend connecting with a 300 baud modem (the old phone sitting on a "modem" cradle).

    --
    If you could reason with religious people, there would be no religious people
  156. No list would be complete without..... by blankoboy · · Score: 1

    Soul Calibur (Dreamcast
    Mario Kart 64 (N64)
    Sea Battle (Intellivision)
    Battlefield 1942 - Desert Combat mod (PC)
    Doom I & II(PC)
    Quake I (PC)
    Bard's Tale (C64)- Nefastmaster's will chew your ass!

  157. Best Game Ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    PONG

  158. Mordor by HAVOC0301 · · Score: 1

    Mordor was a great game the literally never ended, there was like 20 guilds and each had a 999 level cap game play for hours a hours, was bout the game play not the graphics . . . it had thumb nail pics as mobs . . . But still was a great game played the demo version for over a year the game is so long, only non-online game ive EVER played for longer than a few months. X-Com - UFO defense has got to be 1 of the best games of its time, unit based stat increase micro mange planetary defense time units in turned based system was awesome !!! Herzog Zwei - For the Genesis was WAY ahead of its time in RTS. 6 years before Command and Conquer was released had many of the same aspects that all RTS use to this day Genesis was able to keep up w/ 200+ units w/ each owns AI running around a very large map was a feet all in its own

  159. Title Wrong by kitsunewarlock · · Score: 1

    Someone should change the title from "Best Game Ever?" to "Best Video Game Ever?" As a tabletop enthusiast I continue to be peeved that "Game"="Video Game" on lists where no tabletop gaming is represented.

    And to say there is a best is like saying it is not a true art form, but a type of engineering. This is an opinion poll, which is again based purely on popularity, etc... For all we know, Kolibri could be the best game of all time...or some forum based RPG that died out years ago.

    --
    Ginga no Rekshiya Mata Each page.
  160. reviews by SP33doh · · Score: 1

    the reviews say ocarina.

    http://gamerankings.com/itemrankings/simpleratin gs.asp?rankings=y

  161. Final Fantasy III (aka VI) by gallwapa · · Score: 1

    Clearly, many other games, such as Final Fantasy III (VI) win over Ocarina. What other game had such an epic tale to tell, with twists, turns, and delights around every corner? Don't get me wrong. Ocarina was a good game, and quite enjoyable, but the gameplay hadn't changed - and still hasn't to this day. While Ocarina brought about the "Z target" and 3d realm, it was by no means revolutionary. That being said, who can resist Edgar's charming lines, Celes' striking beauty, Gau's innocence, or the wonderful musical score?

    Ocarina didn't help define games: It changed them. They began focusing on "graphical styles" and environmental textures rather than developing characters and a story. Rather than having good dungeon design, it was what looked aesthetically pleasing. No, I contend the "best" is a myriad of others. I'll name at least two which are clearly superior in every way to Ocarina:

    Secret of Mana
    Final Fantasy III

    1. Re:Final Fantasy III (aka VI) by KIFulgore · · Score: 1

      Well, you're certainly entitled to your opinion, but IMO Zelda: OOT was more revolutionary than FF3. The 3D battle system became a de-facto standard for almost every other 3D action/adventure game.

      Plus, turn-based games are boring IMO. I've never finished a FF game, try as I might, I just can't stick with them to the end. I played to the World of Ruin in FF3/6 and was mildly impressed, but lost interest.

      --
      - For every action, there is an equal and opposite criticism.
  162. I'm mostly a PC gamer, but... by etherlad · · Score: 1

    Planescape: Torment.
    Any of the Myst games (including Myst Online: Uru Live).
    Any of the Quest for Glory games.
    Any of the Space Quest games.

    --
    Soylens viridis homines es
  163. Re:Top 100's are subjective; but this one has hole by James+Lewis · · Score: 1

    Oh man... KOTOR. I can't believe they left that out. Of all the RPGs I have played, I have never enjoyed one as much as I did KOTOR. In fact... it's one of the very few single-player games I've finished. The dialogue and characters in that game blew away anything done before or since. Another ground-breaking game was Decent on the PC. That game was a blast and one of (if not the first) games of its kind. Others that I didn't see on there were Myst, Magic Carpet, 7th Guest, Natural Selection Mod for Half-Life, and EVE Online. All of them were break-throughs in gaming, and certainly deserve a mention in the top 100.

  164. Goldeneye N64 was my favorite by jaypaulw · · Score: 1

    I spent a lot of time at college playing this

  165. Where the heck is Digger? by KinkyClown · · Score: 1

    Is it just me or am I missing some real old school titles in this list? I still love the old C64 and even still own an operating Amiga 500. I also have a working XT machine. Games I used to play where: Digger (XT), Shadow Of The Beast (Amiga), Wizard of War (C65, and I still play it on an emulator now and then), Hero (C64), Nebulus (C64), Bruce Lee (C64), Speedball (Amiga), Turrican (Amiga), .... I'm stopping here, as I type more and more titles I feel older and older...

  166. God of War by franksands · · Score: 1

    is on 95th place? It is the best plataform/action game for the PS. It had simple commands, amazing graphics and more fun than a barrel of monkeys with its mini-games.

  167. Call of Duty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, but what about Call of Duty I and/or II? These games are excellent WW2 shooters, and there wasn't even a mention of them!

  168. ++elite by ink · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Elite is an incredible game.

    While we're on the subject of Commodore 64 goodness, what about Psi 5 Trading Company? I LOVED that one.

    --
    The wheel is turning, but the hamster is dead.
  169. Best Game by Y1n_X1 · · Score: 1

    We are not in a debate here about which game had the largest impact on the industry, or how many individuals play it. Each of these conditions is subjective to the time in which we study. Due to the fact that there are far more gamers in the world today as there were even when Ocarina of time was released, the number of players is irrelevant. The industry has evolved to such a degree that the impact Mario once had is also irrelevant to the current issue. What we are trying to figure out here is what game can be given the label of "Best Game Ever". This label is quite a powerful one and thus has many unique properties to it. First and foremost is pure entertainment value. Ocarina of Time was a game that kept players absolutely enthralled for as long as they played. Whether it was battling inside of the Great Deku tree as a young Link or fighting for your life, and Zelda's, against Ganon as an adult, this game kept people excited to the very end. There is also the factor of how engrossed in the game a player becomes. This is largely determined by the story. Zelda: Ocarina of Time is a twisting tale that is as appealing as a book as it is a game. The story puts gamers in the character's shoes, whether they be the De facto standard Kokiri boots or the troublesome on stairs Hover Boots, and keeps them there throughout the story. There are a great many parts that go in to making an effective game from sound and music to visual representation, but in order to garner the title "Best Game Ever" all of these segments must be handled with great care. If any game deserves this prestigious label I feel that it is Zelda: Ocarina of Time. Then again it is merely a label, and each and everyone of us tends to apply our own labels to our environment. Thus, this issue will be debated until the end of time... or until we accept that we all have our own views.

  170. Top 5 in the last 10 years by Intrinsic · · Score: 1

    Battlezone II: Combat Commander (From pandemic Studios) Minus the bugs, Best realtime first person combat strategy game ever made, hands down. Its not being distributed anymore, but there is a huge fan base that keeps updating the engine and game.

    Deus Ex: Great music and game play, graphics and ai could have used some work

    Vampire The masquerade, great gameplay

    Half-Life 2

    cant think of a 5th... dammit! :)

  171. The list is remarkable for what was left off by fzammett · · Score: 1

    * Impossible Mission
    Arguably the best C64 game ever. Anyone who ever completed it knows what I mean.

    * Pole Position
    More or less defined the driving genre... oh yes, there were driving games before, and plenty after, but this was probably the first that made any impact.

    * Karate Champ
    I don't recall a one-on-one fighter that came before this. Certainly none that had as much impact.

    * Donkey Kong
    Geez, need I say more?

    * Frogger
    Another no-brainer.

    * Tron
    There's been lots of movie tie-in games, but few that were any good. This one certainly was (and no, I don't mean the modern Tron 2.0 FPS, which ain't bad either, but it nothing special)

    * Vanguard
    Side-scrolling shooter to end all side-scrolling shooters.

    * Pac Man
    I know, they had one variation of it, but not the original?!?

    * Galaga
    I think it's safe to call this a genre-defining game.

    * Punch-Out
    You owe all modern boxing games to this one.

    * Crossbow
    We call it Silent Scope nowadays, but this started the "gunner"-type games.

    * Pepper 2
    Cult classics from the Colecovision days.

    * Q-Bert
    Again, this is one that just seems totally obvious to me.

    * Ultima IV
    You may argue about which Ultima game is truly the best ever, my vote goes to IV (with III a close second), but the point is how can you not have at least one of them on the list?

    * Archon
    Chess... err, sort of.

    * Beach Head
    Now we have a VR version of it with a 360-degree headset to get you immersed.... and you know what??? NOT AS GOOD!

    * Journey To The Planets
    This proved that you don't need anything remotely good-looking on the screen for a puzzler to be great.

    * Bard's Tale
    I'm talking the original 8-bit here.

    * Missile Command
    Pretty clearly the first of its kind.

    * Defender
    Another total original at the time. Come on, how many quarters did you burn on that thing?

    * Earth Defense Force 2017
    A modern game for ya... I put this here because it's the most fun you'll have mindlessly blowing aliens away on any current system. No, it's not especially challenging (some later stages are extremely frustrating, even on normal though), but that's part of the pleasure... big, bad alien bugs, lots of firepower at your disposal, relatively easy destruction. And they actually got the scale right, which is a trick many games screw up royally... big mother ships actually look big.

    * Postal 2
    Another relatively modern game... I don't know, there's just something about that game that's special... the dark humor absolutely, and actually, maybe that's really it... the violence is of course way over the top as compared to most other games, but it's the less violent stuff that really works (Gary Coleman, the weiner dude, the Dude's comments throughout, etc).

    Some notable mentions (without explanations... you either know them or you don't): Realm Of Impossibility, Forbidden Forest, Spelunker, Alternate Reality, Pick Axe Pete, Miner 2049'er, Pepper 2, Gorf, Test Drive.

    That list was obviously written by people who never played, or have no appreciation for, the classics. They have no understanding of what they meant, not just personally to many of us, but in defining the industry and genres we have today. Look, I'm not one of those people who think modern games suck and that only classics are any good, although I do happen to think there were more good games "back in the day" than there are today, the fact is we have some phenomenally great games today too, and many of them were on the list. I don't really have any problem with any particular game they chose to put on the list, but I do think they left of some incredibly good and important games, and that makes the list not worth a whole lot in my eyes. If you don't consider the *entire* history of gaming, then you can't say the list is the most important games ever, nor can you necessarily say they are the best games ever because you're only considering one small segment, namely modern games.

    --
    If a pion (n-) collides with a proton in the woods & noone is there to hear it, does lamdba decay into the source pa
    1. Re:The list is remarkable for what was left off by ChaoticLimbs · · Score: 1

      I played Impossible Mission on my C=64 for over 5 years.


      Another visitor....

  172. The best game in all of history... by stoicfaux · · Score: 1

    The best game in all of history would have to be the one that's been played the most, which is "killing." Started with Cain (for the creationists) or with the first bacteria that ate another bacteria (for the Darwinists) and has been going strong throughout history.

    The bloody poll was for the '100 best videogames' and not 'greatest ever' or 'of all time'. The BBC should spank the person(s) who wrote that news article.

    The actual Edge article and poll: http://www.edge-online.co.uk/archives/2007/07/the_ 100_best_vi.php

  173. Added Value by Jedi_Yo_Jo · · Score: 1

    I know that Halo is as old as the hills, and I would not have mentioned it except as an example. It has one hellova trainer.
    Their's nothing quite like freezing time, loading sarge's crotch with 20 stickys, and watching him fly/swim of into the sunset. (sniff)

  174. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  175. Ultima 7 part I and II by arcade · · Score: 1

    The two games that should top any such list is of course the two classics.

    Ultima 7 "The Black Gate"
    Ultima 7 "The Serpent Island"

    Other games are games such as X-Wing, Tie-Fighter, Red Baron (the early one, 1991ish, I guess), Speedball 2, and loads of others.

    --
    "Rune Kristian Viken" - http://www.nwo.no - arca
    1. Re:Ultima 7 part I and II by Angry+Toad · · Score: 1

      I'd love to see those done with whatever the Oblivion engine was. That would be fun.

    2. Re:Ultima 7 part I and II by MemoryDragon · · Score: 1

      Besides that Resident Evil 4 is hardly one of the best games of all time, it is a good game, but the original System Shock still surpasses all modern survival horror games, both in game mechanics and athmosphere.

  176. OT/Meta: Horsecock trolls, etc. by Kadin2048 · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm not entirely certain, but I think the "Horsecock" meme might have gotten started over on K5 ... at least, it seems to be more prevalent there, and I saw it there before I ever saw it on Slashdot. (In fact, there is a post on K5 asking people to up-mod the GP.)

    At any rate, it seems like it's been a while since I've seen a new troll on /.; while the lack of trolling is undoubtedly a good thing overall, I have to admit that I got a fair bit of amusement out of the old GNAA/Hot Grits/Stephen King/priorities posts, at least initially. But then they all seemed to disappear, whether because of the moderation system working, or a mildew epidemic in basements somewhere, I'm not sure.

    Glad to see that the universe is back in balance.

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
  177. Super Mario Bros. by saxoholic · · Score: 1

    It may not be my all time favorite game, but I think the first Super Mario Bros. game was probably the most important game in video gaming history. It is the catalyst for everything that has happened since. I grew up in that generation, born in the 80s. It seems like if there's one game EVERYONE has played, regardless of age, gender, etc, it's SMB -- I think that is a clear indicator of its deserving the top rank -- and the game ISN'T EVEN ON THE LIST! The first three aren't on the list at all. Unless I'm blind

    On another note, I'm interested to see how people rate the "goodness" of the mario games. I like World, 3, 1, 64, 2, sunshine. What are other peoples thoughts?

  178. DNF by GodGell · · Score: 5, Funny

    Am I the only one who finds it funny that Duke Nukem Forever is abbreviated to 'DNF', which in racing terms means 'Did Not Finish'?

    --
    [SHOW SOME LENIENCY TOWARDS ... I mean, FUCK BETA] Eat. Survive. Reproduce. GOTO 10
    1. Re:DNF by masterzora · · Score: 1

      Yes.

      --
      Remember, open source is free as in speech, not free as in bear.
    2. Re:DNF by ChaoticLimbs · · Score: 1

      Actually they use DNF in racing to refer recursively to Duke Nukem Forever, which was first announced at the dawn of automobile racing.

  179. Mega Man 3 by bumptehjambox · · Score: 1
    Mega Man 3 gets my vote, the music, the scenery, the battles, all of it had my imagination whirling at the young age of 6 when I first popped in that cartridge. I liked Mario, Excite-bike, and plenty of other games that were out at the time, but for some reason (divine intervention possibly) my mom picked that game out as a Christmas present and it has to be the greatest thing I've ever been given.

    As for more recent gaming, I have been playing Battlefield 2142 since it came out and that is a really great game all around, I'd say (if you're in to shooters) it's the best thing to play right now, but Mega Man 3 (and all of the others on NES) really had that full video game impact only a true classic can bring.

    This list kinda makes me wanna buy a Wii, they need to get Mega Man on virtual console.

  180. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 3, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  181. Best Game Ever - Solitaire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Re the CS argument.

    If you are rating the best game ever on number of players and how long it has been around being played then it has to be Solitaire in Windows.

  182. blah by nomadic · · Score: 1

    Their list of the hundred best games ever is top-heavy with Nintendo titles

    Of course it is, the fact that for so many people Nintendo was their first console clouds their judgment. Nintendo's made some damn good games, but I don't think any of them should make the top 5. Maybe 1 or 2 in the top 10, but even that's debatable.

  183. Come on. by LKM · · Score: 1

    There are games that could be said to be better than OOT or SMB. But Counter Strike? A purely online multiplayer title? And on the basis that millions still play it? Huh.

  184. OoT isn't just "best" - it's the "reference game". by WWWWolf · · Score: 1

    I've rambled about this for a long time, so here's my random well-weighed opinion: Ocarina of Time isn't just the Best Game Ever. It's the reference Best Game Ever.

    Before OoT, games could be just ordinarily BGEs. After OoT, you could easily compare your favourite BGE with something. Here, we finally got the BGE where just about everything was top notch and you can't really complain too much about any aspect of the game, be it aesthetic or design-related. Great graphics and music, great play mechanics, story appears to work well, there's nice original ideas, and foremost, it's fun to play, has a good atmosphere, takes a while to complete, and is worth replaying.

    There will be better games, and what exactly is a "best game" will always be an opinion that changes daily for each of us. OoT is just something that tends to stay as the Best Game Ever, with appropriate qualifications.

    That said, the list here doesn't include Ultima series at any point. Argh. Dropping Ultima VII from the list is just sad. Well, here's what you get when you try to make a list of best games ever, you always drop some that some people think obviously qualify for the list. At least they got the Reference Game in the right spot. =)

  185. Not the best list by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Starting from the top, it starts well enough. OoT deserves best game ever nods. At the time I was floored by how great it was and how perfectly it took the franchise into 3d, basically defining the 3d adventure game.

    Same goes for Mario 64.

    RE4, while I really liked, doesn't belong as the second best game ever. On the list, certainly, but not that high.

    FF12 doesn't deserve that rank - it isn't even the best FF (FF6 and FF7, at least, are superior titles).

    Vice City as the best GTA? I don't even particularly like the GTA franchise, but I felt Vice City was the weakest entry with very little to offer over GTA3.

    Some of these games don't belong either - Manhunt, Crackdown, WoW stand out (re: WoW - just because it's very popular doesn't detract from the fact that really it's just another MMORPG - it's not particularly groundbreaking in any respect).

  186. Purposefully Broad by SeanDS · · Score: 1

    Edge magazine is purposefully broad to keep sales high. It covers almost every mainstream platform, so inevitably it will attract voters whose gaming experience is limited to the popular titles on their limited platform (Nintendo DS/PSP/Dreamcast/whatever). I've read the UK edition of PC Gamer for a decade now, and they have ranked Half-Life, Half-Life 2, Medieval: Total War, Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas and if I recall correctly, Quake 3, on top of their hundred best. I'm biased, but I think these games are ten times better than the clichéd mess Nintendo throw out every year.

  187. Wikipedia article on this subject by spage · · Score: 1

    Wikipedia had a useful article "Video games that have been considered the greatest ever" that collected and contrasted numerous BEST EVAR! lists, but after a vote they deleted it. Here's a copy, http://web.archive.org/web/20060829040010/http://e n.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_and_video_games_that _have_been_considered_the_greatest_ever

    --
    =S
  188. How about Elite by PermanentMarker · · Score: 1

    Elite has been a spin off for 3d Gaming science fiction based trading pirating and hunting.
    It had a loosly timeline / story line, so partly adventure too.

    Anyway the whole list is a bit terrible, todays games are far better and they are not on the list, then how can it be a top 100 of all times ??
    If they liked to make an old list why isnt there pingpong listed ? (the first TV computer game)

    --
    I know you're out there. I can feel you now. I know that you're afraid. You're afraid of us. You're afraid of change.
  189. Just a fucking ranking of shit by Takusen · · Score: 1

    WTF !!! Halo is in top ten ?? Final Fantasy XII ??????? WHERE IS MY FUCKING SOLID SNAKE MAN !!! Metal Gear Solid is at a fucking 35th place ... Not admissible ! They never played a videogame of their life or what ??

  190. Elite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm still playing Elite, and also its latest incarnation "Oblivion". My Cobra MK III is now an elf, my Military Laser is a dwarven bow, but I'm still chasing pirates, trading legal and illegal stuff, avoiding the vipers/guards and doing missions from time to time.

  191. Not to bitch on Super Mario Bros... by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

    If the only reason Super Mario Bros should've been #1 because it saved an industry, then how do you know none of the games released after it couldn't have done the same thing?

    Tetris might have saved the console industry, so could Pokemon or perhaps Doom or maybe just any random, modern, "above average"-quality game.

    Just because Super Mario Bros was a very important game in the history of consoles, doesn't necessarily make it the "best game ever" by today's standards.

    It's good, and it's a classic, but saying it's the "best ever" because of reasons that have nothing to do with the gameplay, is false.

    --
    Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
  192. Ocarina of Time by TheSciBoy · · Score: 1

    Have you played Ocarina of Time recently? I have. I had never played it before but acquired the Anniversary Disc for Zelda games and played it on my Wii. The graphics are really bad. SMB and the original Zelda have clean crisp graphics. Ocarina of Time have untold amounts of problems with aliasing and stuff like that. It's almost unplayable now that the standard has been raised so far by modern games and consoles.

    For a game to be truly classic it must be possible to pick up again, even after all this time. SMB and Zelda qualify. Ocarina of time does not.

    Also, no FPS game sold only on a console can ever be a "best game ever" since FPS must be played with a mouse. I guess that could change now that some of the recent consoles have USB and perhaps soon there will actually be FPS games for consoles that use a mouse (or a similar device). And no, the Wiimote is not enough. You can point, it helps, but you still can't make a 180 degree turn-around like you can with a mouse.

    --
    Badgers, we don't need no stinking badgers! - UHF
  193. Tetris by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tetris is one of the oldest and mostly played games in that list. It existed even in crappy Soviet PCs with monochrome displays, loaded from a noisy tape recorder, when I had no idea what a game console is and that there are color displays. Add up the hundreds of variations of this game.

    1. Re:Tetris by rtisbute · · Score: 1

      I completely agree. Dr. Mario was a great one also.

  194. WTF? by mattr · · Score: 1

    Zork and Wumpus, obviously. Doh! Tetris, okay that is on their top 10 and that makes sense. Nobody has mentioned f'ing Breakout or Pong even. Since we're talking about GAMES people wouldn't the best game be NOT the one that requires hundreds and hundreds of dollars to be spent, but rather something that can be played on the most platforms, is available for free, had a major effect on culture, has been around the longest, has been a basis for whole genres of game design, etc. Maybe Donkey Kong ought to be there but surely Pacman and a bunch of others too. It's one thing to sell a lot of FPS games to people who have splurged on the latest console, but what about games that get people to feed quarters in them for decades? Why don't they mention space invaders or Galaxian/Galaga? I haven't seen much interesting in a lot of the recent games and none of the games on their list except tetris makes me say darn I wish I had that. Even when I had no money once I was torn and wanted to buy a Saturn just for Nights. There have been totally groundbreaking, incredible games back into the text era and for many platforms since, but despite their ability to put tetris on the list and say Mario should be it, they really do not spend any meaningful time talking about how they judge and why not others that are better known. Heck Wizardry ][ and Ultima ][ for the Apple ][ were far more interesting at the time than games on the list are these days. And all the Infocom games (especially the versions of Zork that allowed full text parsing) were incredible. No mention of Sim City or even Spore which in its conceptual stage is still also interesting.

    1. Re:WTF? by demi · · Score: 1

      ...wouldn't the best game be NOT the one that requires hundreds and hundreds of dollars to be spent, but rather something that can be played on the most platforms, is available for free, had a major effect on culture, has been around the longest, has been a basis for whole genres of game design, etc.

      Respectively, no, no, no, no and no.

      The original article is about identifying the best game. While this is still a highly subjective measure, it has nothing to do with most ported, most free, most influential to popular culture, oldest or most influential to other games.

      No one plays Pong anymore, except for the thrill of nostalgia. No one plays Breakout. Hell, even the Breakout derivative on my phone is better than the original Breakout. There are a very few older games that we know are very good because people still play them (them, not some derivative which is better). Super Mario Bros. is one. Nethack is another. There are probably a few others, but not many. Too many will have been followed by sequels and derivatives that improved on that type of game.

      If you were making a list of "most important" games some of your criteria might apply. "Most classic," "most played," etc. all might incorporate some of it. But a "best game" should be judged only on the quality of the game itself. Donkey Kong is just not that great compared to almost any of what we might consider a "real platformer" now. Was it fun back in the day? Of course! But that doesn't make it the "best" now, any more than it makes Roger Bannister the fastest runner.

      --
      demi
  195. It's subjective, but Nintendo deserves every place by LKM · · Score: 1

    I agree about the age of the titles. Older stuff is missing, as well as PC-only games. But the fact that the list is slanted towards Nintendo is no surprise. They quite simple churn out the most innovative, balanced and awesome games. No other publisher can compare with Nintendo. This sounds fanboy-ish, but frankly, in my opinion, Nintendo alone has about 30 titles that would deserve a place in a top-10 videogames list. Where's SMB3, A Link to the Past, Link's Awakening, Metroid Prime, Goldeneye?

    Nintendo deserves every spot they got in this list.

    The issue is probably that you can't really do an ordered top-10 videogames list. There's too much subjectivity involved. You may personally not like even one single Nintendo game, but then, I think that Halo has no place in any videogames top-10 list other than "top 10 games that kept a console from tanking completely."

  196. This list is very console centric by MemoryDragon · · Score: 1

    Resi 4 in the top spots, I would not agree here, the best survival horror game still is the original System Shock, this is unsurpassed. Resi4 was just an incremental update with good graphics and better story, but it still is pale to the horror Shodan gave you. The top 10 list probably would be (no order) Ultima Underworld Civilization Mule, System Shock Occarina of Time Ultima 7 A Mind Forever Voyaging Wing Commander Pac Man Donkey Kong Prince of Persia Sands of Time (or Prince of Persia 1 depending on Taste) This list is defintely less biased than the usual lets pick a number of decent console games of the last years and make them a top list

  197. CNet got it wrong by Conanymous+Award · · Score: 1

    They seem to be talking about the most important game ever. SMB might well be just that, for the reasons they gave, but that doesn't make it the best game ever (althoughit is indeed an excellent one).

  198. Best game ever? Ms PacMan, of course! by master_p · · Score: 1

    Most of the games mentioned in the so-called top 100 have 0 replayability value. I finished Ocarina of Time, but I did not ever get back to it.

    But I play Ms PacMan from time to time, 25 years after its release, on MAME. And I still haven't found all its secrets.

    Ms PacMan may not have the flashiest graphics around, but it has the most hectic gameplay, and the sound is so immersive that after a while it's you and the ghosts, and the rest of the world does not exist...

  199. The best Uematsu songs by Myria · · Score: 1

    FF3 - Overworld
    FF4 - Underworld
    FF4 - Tower of Babel
    FF4 - Giant of Babel
    FF5 - World 2 overworld / Unknown Lands
    FF6 - World of Balance / Tina's theme
    FF6 - World of Ruin after airship / Searching for friends
    FF6 - Cayenne's theme
    FF7 - Boss music
    FF7 - Cid's theme
    FF7 - Pre-Meteor overworld
    FF7 - Wutai
    FF9 - Nova Dragon (FMV at beginning of disk 4)

    I never liked FF5's music much. FF6 was by far the best for music; too many to list above. I never played FF8 or FF10 because I didn't like them; never got around to 1 or 2. His Chrono Trigger songs weren't any among the memorable ones.

    --
    "Screw Sun, cross-platform will never work. Let's move on and steal the Java language." - Visual J++ Product Manager
    1. Re:The best Uematsu songs by jeffasselin · · Score: 1

      FF1: The Prelude and the Prologue. Considering at least one of them has been reused in every FF game since (the Prelude became the "Crystal theme").

      FF8: Too many good ones to decide for a single one in my opinion, really the best music in the FF series.

      --
      If he explores all forms and substances Straight homeward to their symbol-essences; He shall not die.
    2. Re:The best Uematsu songs by Cornflake917 · · Score: 1

      I agree that FF6 has the best soundtrack out of all of them.

      Here are some more good ones.

      FF6 - Kefka's Theme
      FF6 - Mystic Forest
      FF6 - Johnny C. Bad
      FF6 - Spinach Rag

      "You're not alone" from FF9 is my all-time favorite.

  200. Elite by itsdapead · · Score: 1

    For open-ended games, I can't think of many that were more addictive than Elite. And yes, that is old school. If you missed it the first time around, too bad - it won't appeal to those who think anisotropic filtering makes a difference. It's wireframes, and your imagination does all the shading much better than any graphics card can.

    Some perspective is in order - at the time the graphics in Elite were jaw-dropping; writing the manual "in character" may not have been 100% original but was still fresh - and alluding to "generation ships" and other mysteries which might have been out there (but weren't) was a masterstroke.

    I take it that everybody knows about Oolite - which is a nice half-way-house between the classic wireframe game and glossy commercial "re-imaginings".

    I've been re-playing "Freelancer" which was one of the better 21st century Elitealikes - sumptuous graphics, but its let down by the tiny universe (Elite used pseudo-random techniques to give the impression of hundreds of systems on a 32K computer) and really, really lame and repetetive fake dialogue and "radio chatter" with traders. Its interesting that the genre persists despite nothing since Elite really hitting the big time.

    --
    In a survey of 100 programmers, 111111 thought that duck-typing was a good idea.
  201. Best Game ever? Zelda? No way.... by axia777 · · Score: 1

    Half-Life 2 > Zelda:Ocarina of Time, nuff said............

  202. She used the "F*" word ! by DrYak · · Score: 1

    And I'm a female :)


    Everyone on /. asking you out and proposing you in
    3... 2... 1...
    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
    1. Re:She used the "F*" word ! by aliquis · · Score: 1

      Hey, I thought I was the first one who got that idea!?

      Thought she seems kind of old ;/

  203. Star Control II by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Star Control II : The Ur-Quan Masters

    It's perfection.

  204. Command & Conquer nowhere to be seen... by Kiuas · · Score: 1

    Most of the flaws of the list have been mentioned, so I'm not going to repeat them. But I was amazed that not a single game from the C&C series made it to the list. They are not the best games ever, but certainly the orginal Red Alert should be in top 100. The absence of Diablo is also strange, but then again the list consist mainly of console games.

    --
    "It is the business of the future to be dangerous" -Alfred North Whitehead
  205. Never mind the PC.. by sqldr · · Score: 1

    There's only one Amiga/Atari ST generation game (sensible soccer) unless you count lemmings which came out absolutely everything, and, unless I'm not looking hard enough, not a single C64, Sinclair, or BBC Micro game in there.

    Last ninja, carrier command, UFO.. oh forget it.. it's been said a hundred times.

    Maybe I'm just getting old.

    --
    I wrote my first program at the age of six, and I still can't work out how this website works.
  206. I consider Star control 2 as the best game ever by unity100 · · Score: 1

    go see what is it about here www.star-control.com . but dont read too much so you wont spoil it when you play the game.

  207. SC2 by Kura · · Score: 1

    One game I frequently go back to is Star Control II. In an industry of sequels and copycats, SC2 keeps me coming back because there's nothing else even remotely like it.

  208. Re:Best Game ever? Zelda? No way.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Half-Life 2 > Zelda:Ocarina of Time, wrong said............

  209. Mario Kart on SNES by pcardno · · Score: 1

    I'm not aware of any game that's had the playing that Mario Kart had in student halls up and down the country and around the world.. My brother bought a SNES the summer before he went to university and his house played it for 3 years solid. I then went to university and kept playing it with my house for the next 3 years. Ghost Valley 1 timetrial was the ultimate check of you abilities - no-one ever beat my time..

    Best racing game of all time and up there in the top 5 multi-player games.

    Of course, Mario Kart 64 was rubbish..

    --
    --- Band: Joey Ultra
  210. Exactly! by camperdave · · Score: 1

    Elite? Command and Conquer? Doom? Temple of Aphsai? Ultima IV? Zork?(anything by Infocom?)...

    Forget those titles. I'll bet there are more games of Solitaire, Minesweeper, and Freecell being played at any moment than any other game on the planet.

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  211. Can't resist adding my own list by sherriw · · Score: 1

    - Half-Life, Half-Life2 (plus episode 1) (PC)
    -Resident Evil 4 (GC)
    -Duke Nukem 3D (PC)
    -Beyond Good and Evil (GC)

    (And the rest in no particular order:)

    -Super Mario Bros 3 (NES)
    -Eternal Darkness (GC)
    -Goldeneye 007 (GC)
    -Rise of the Triad (PC)
    -Dark Reign (PC)
    -Commander Keen 4 (PC)
    -Ocarina of Time (GC)

  212. Mafia? by LinuxRulz · · Score: 1

    I'm surprised not to see my fav shooter on the list: Mafia. Great storyline, fantastic soundtrack, immersive environment. It truly was a masterpiece.

  213. Tetris by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They were looking for games that still have playability, not just games great in their time, and Tetris is it. Tetris was amazing at the time and is still just plain fun. You might claim that they Tetris variants that people play now aren't really the same game, but the fact that Tetris spawned an entire genre of gaming and is still about the best of that sort puts it at #1.

  214. Neal, can we fix the &mdash thing? by AP31R0N · · Score: 1

    [offtopic] Seriously, it's been years and you must have some genius coders on hand that could fix that. Either make it render right or make a filter that can remove the &mdash altogether from the headline. [/offtopic]

    --
    Utilizing the synergization of benchmark e-solutions to pre-workaround action items!
  215. Final Fantasy VII by Ecsa0014 · · Score: 1

    IMO Final Fantasy VII should be at the top of the list. I must have wasted a thousand hours of my life playing this game. I think OoT definitely deserved to be in the top 3.

  216. The public speaks out: by BForrester · · Score: 1

    We already have a list of the top 100 games. (We pretty much have a top 100 list for top 100 games lists at this point.) Here are the top 100 games as voted by players at Gamerankings.com. Most of the titles on this list show up on the one in TFA.

    Top 100 games by user vote @ Gamerankings.com

    (Caveats: there is some duplication across platforms; the list only shows titles with at least 50 votes.)

  217. Lets define best in terms of readers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Best" is a somewhat subjective word. To a child, the best book ever written is no doubt a Dr. Seuss book.

    My point is that those participating in such a poll likely have limited gaming experience. I can think of 3 or 4 adventure games that top Zelda, but I've experienced adventure games for the past 20 years and have quite a few on different platforms to reference. If all you know is rice, then rice is the best food ever.

  218. Tetris by motank · · Score: 1

    Tetris is never at the top of these lists, but it's the only game that deserves to be. Universally liked, extremely addictive, and never gets old even after 20+ years. Still the top selling game for cell phones, still the game you want on your graphics calculator. But it never gets any love from the gaming press.

  219. This is like asking which band is best of all time by King_TJ · · Score: 1

    Don't you people hate those questions asking you for your #1 favorite band? I can never really pin it down to just one, without being completely unfair to others that maybe play in a different genre of music.

    Even if you limit it to "only rock music" ... what do you say? Led Zeppelin is probably a safe answer, but is that fair to Rush, or The Beatles, or the Rolling Stones, or The Who, or maybe The Doors or The Eagles??

    Games are the same way. If I had to name even the "best simulation" of all time, I'd have a really rough time. In a sense, maybe Microsoft Flight Simulator should get the award, since it was out back in the days of the first Mac, AND was considered the "benchmark" for years to test the "PC compatibility" of PC clones. And yet, it still comes out every year with new versions, to this day.

    On the other hand, Sim City deserves props too. It may have been the first game that really crossed the "gender gap" and got females playing computer games.

    If you're talking basic 2D arcade classics, I'd think Pac-Man might be a good bet. Again, it had really wide appeal and spawned loads of knock-offs and revisions. It probably sold more Atari 2600 systems than any other title, except maybe Pitfall. But you could obviously make a strong case for anything from Space Invaders to Donkey Kong to Asteroids, right? Who do you give the "award" to and how many do you shun?

  220. Weird Ratings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Crackdown made the list? Was that a joke? Counter-Strike at only 55? I know a lot of people don't like the game, but a -lot- of people really do. System Shock 2 and Deus Ex beaten by Halo? It all makes me a little sick to my stomach.

  221. When NTDOY beat all of SNE by tepples · · Score: 1

    If this was really the case, then there wouldn't be a fight between Sony and Microsoft because Nintendo would have been crushing them since they first tried shoe-horning into the industry. Nintendo has lost money during only one quarter, and that was a tiny loss due mostly to currency fluctuations. Wouldn't turning a consistent profit be crushing enough to Sony Computer Entertainment and Microsoft's Xbox division? What about the five minutes when Nintendo was worth more than Sony Computer Entertainment, Sony Music, Sony Pictures, Sony Electronics, and the rest of Sony Corporation combined?
    1. Re:When NTDOY beat all of SNE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't "beat" your competition by being overvalued.

  222. What about all the "Quest" games?! by jodirren · · Score: 1

    I can't believe none of the "Quest" games created by Sierra in the late 80s and early 90s were on the list, classics like King's Quest, Space Quest, and (my personal favorite) Hero's Quest. Didn't these games essentially invent a genre? Man, to think of all the hours I spent throwing rocks at trees trying to build up my statistics and trying to see how many times I could swear at the other characters before I realized they were never going to say anything interesting back, and now the game doesn't even make the top 100 ....

  223. And Zelda? by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

    I have to say, I agree with that assessment of Zelda. We don't judge whether something is a masterpiece based on whatever era it was made it. We judge whether it's a masterpiece by whether it still amazes us, and challenges us to make anything even close to that good.

    For example: Gutenberg's printing press was a marvel of technology, for its time. But no one even uses the same class of technology anymore, and no one travels from around the world to see it. Macchu Picchu, on the other hand, is impressive enough that even if we have the technology to do something similar now -- and I'm not convinced of that -- the artwork and the mathematics is still impressive, and really unmatched anywhere else.

    Ocarina of Time was such a game. Mario Bros, at least to me, was not.

    --
    Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
  224. Adventure games by RonnyJ · · Score: 1

    I'm disappointed at the lack of adventure games in there - although the original Monkey Island is at number 79, I do think that it should be significantly higher. A few other classic games should also be in there, such as Sam and Max, Day of the Tentacle, etc. They may be old, but they're still the best adventure games out there.

  225. Mafia?-shiney. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's another two things it did right considering the times. One was the models. character and set. The other was the voice sync. A lot of games do the last poorly.

  226. Tech Demos by Ayavaron · · Score: 1

    The tech-demo games eventually sell their tech and it gets used for much better games. Doom 3 sucked but it brought us the significantly less awful Prey and Quake IV. Deus Ex was made using the Unreal Engine, and both the Half-Life games were based on heavily modified versions of the Quake Engine. It is really easy to dismiss these tech demos but they come back and do cool things to the games that come after them and license their technology allowing games that come after to have equally impressive, albeit slightly more dated tech demo graphics.

    On a barely related note: I think Crysis will actually be a good game and not just graphics whoring. It just won't run on most people's computers unless they turn off every graphic whoring option. This will, in itself, be quite interesting.

  227. Myst by Insightfill · · Score: 1

    There was a game that stayed on the top 10 list for well over a year, came with no instructions, but still could suck you in for HOURS. It didn't reward "twitch", didn't depend on the latest hardware, but still made a great time.

    Of course, there are some debates as to whether it was really a "game", but I'm not sure if that really matters.

    From the wiki: "The Millers began working on Myst in 1991 and released it for the Macintosh computer on September 24, 1993. It was the bestselling video game until The Sims was released." Pretty impressive.

  228. > But no other game in history--Ocarina of Time included--was able to save an
    > entire industry from almost guaranteed destruction the way Super Mario Bros.
    > did, and it is for this reason that we should all give ol' Mario and Luigi credit where it's due."

    Holy crap! The video games industry was gonna collapse and it might be decades, if ever, before some other corporation created another video game console?

    Shit! That was a way closer call than I thought!

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  229. Top 10 for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am actually playing through Ocarina right now (Gerudo Valley) on my Wii and I think its a great game. I know a lot of people love games because of nostalgia factors but I never owned an N64 in the 90s. I do admit that the game is great but I would probably have it in at least my top 10.

  230. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  231. Super Mario Bros. 3 by thaMANSTA · · Score: 1

    It was so HUGE, looked better than anything at the time, had such diverse, tight gameplay, and I can still sit down and play it for hours, to this day. I've played all the other Mario games, and none compare to this, in the end. Who remembers seeing it in The Wizard, and their eyes lit up when he found the warp zone? Who else remembers when they saw this on TV?

  232. Where's The Sims by beatle11 · · Score: 1

    The Sims didn't make that top 100 list in spite of being one of the best selling games of all time. Nevertheless Ocarina of Time is a good pick for number 1.

  233. Zelda on N64 by pagen_hd · · Score: 1

    please read fan reviews on GameRankings.com. You'll understand why it's also GameRankings' #1 game of all-time. You literally [i]live[/i] in this game. Listen to me: the reason why your body was born is that your soul could live in this game. I hate Super Mario. IGN made a Top 100 Games of All-Time list and Super Mario Bros. was No. 1. I'm not pissed because IGN sucks anyway.

  234. Jump Ultimate Stars (DS) by sesshomaru · · Score: 1
    Jump Ultimate Stars isn't even on it?

    How is it that the ultimate video game isn't on the list? Where else can you have Light Yagami write your opponent's names in the Death Note while Monkey D. Luffy pummels them senseless? (Well, besides Jump Super Stars.)Seriously..

    --
    "MIT betrayed all of its basic principles."
  235. In Nethack... by patio11 · · Score: 1

    ... punctuation uses you.

    &'& ... Oh crud. Well, I have an unidentified wand. Time to find out what it does. Oh, genocide human.

  236. Re:This is like asking which band is best of all t by demi · · Score: 1

    Don't you people hate those questions asking you for your #1 favorite band?

    No, it's Ween.

    --
    demi
  237. Re:Ocarina of Time? Please.. by demi · · Score: 1

    If it was done in one day by a malnourished monkey, does that make the game itself any better?

    --
    demi
  238. BLAZEMONGER review by JamesGecko · · Score: 1

    Just in case anyone else wants to find out what the heck this thread is about...

    http://www.blazemonger.com/BM/Articles/60_BLAZERev iew