If they don't show, you will accomplish squat. Unlike a hammer, they have skills you don't. They need your financing and you need their skills (if not, you wouldn't have hired them).
Agreed. Everyone has to do their part or nothing happens. My objection is in ascribing it all to one person when clearly credit belongs to a small army of people.
Particularly when that one person starts to believe it (not saying Musk does, but there are others who clearly do).
So, by using higher order tools, I made a nuclear reactor and I operate it? The town drunk is a master distiller and a farmer and a cop?
How about instead we let some hot air out of some egos. If the welders don't show, the rockets and cars don't happen. I'm not claiming he doesn't have his part, just that he is hardly doing it by himself. HE is not a welder. His productivity is no more or less than what he personally takes care of in his day. Talking, making deals, etc. He doesn't get to claim the productivity of the people working for him any more than the guy on food stamps gets to claim the productivity of the cashier, the store manager, the trucker, and the farmer.
And before you go on about not being his money, do you think VCs and bankers are using their own money?
lawyer, Liar, same thing. Anyone who knows anything about dogs that they behave much differently for the cases of master present/master absent and in territory/not in territory.
In sane jurisdictions (rare, I know) someone who breaks and enters surrenders all expectation of safety.
Of course, I see a lot more "Never mind the dog, beware of owner" signs with the silhouette of a gun.
Yes, they realize that they need to do it, but has it been done? They acknowledged that even they are unsure who needs to do it or even has the authority to do it.
Meanwhile, the delivery companies have the opportunity to demonstrate that their good faith safety efforts are adequate to the task.
The end goal is not re-animating the dead. The goal is regenerative medicine for the still living who have severe brain damage. They're just experimenting on the dead first for ethical reasons.
Just to add a dash of hypocracy, they are in marketing. Apparently only rich people are allowed to intrusively shove their message in people's faces to make a living.
Yes, but that something shouldn't be medical errors, especially in the most expensive healthcare system in the world.
It also shouldn't be choking on unpeeled pineapples.
My, what a titanic ego!
If they don't show, you will accomplish squat. Unlike a hammer, they have skills you don't. They need your financing and you need their skills (if not, you wouldn't have hired them).
Agreed. Everyone has to do their part or nothing happens. My objection is in ascribing it all to one person when clearly credit belongs to a small army of people.
Particularly when that one person starts to believe it (not saying Musk does, but there are others who clearly do).
So, by using higher order tools, I made a nuclear reactor and I operate it? The town drunk is a master distiller and a farmer and a cop?
How about instead we let some hot air out of some egos. If the welders don't show, the rockets and cars don't happen. I'm not claiming he doesn't have his part, just that he is hardly doing it by himself. HE is not a welder. His productivity is no more or less than what he personally takes care of in his day. Talking, making deals, etc. He doesn't get to claim the productivity of the people working for him any more than the guy on food stamps gets to claim the productivity of the cashier, the store manager, the trucker, and the farmer.
And before you go on about not being his money, do you think VCs and bankers are using their own money?
So, that would mean Elon Musk doesn't make. Granted, he enables making, but he doesn't make.
So if someone who has never been in an airplane before hires you to fly a plane, does that mean *HE* flies planes?
So what you're saying is he doesn't make, he pays others to make. Others who for some reason are expected to pay a higher tax rate.
Otherwise, you would also have to say the town drunk passed out with his bottle of Jack is a master distiller.
So he's out there with a wrench? Does he weld too?
lawyer, Liar, same thing. Anyone who knows anything about dogs that they behave much differently for the cases of master present/master absent and in territory/not in territory.
In sane jurisdictions (rare, I know) someone who breaks and enters surrenders all expectation of safety.
Of course, I see a lot more "Never mind the dog, beware of owner" signs with the silhouette of a gun.
Yes, they realize that they need to do it, but has it been done? They acknowledged that even they are unsure who needs to do it or even has the authority to do it.
Meanwhile, the delivery companies have the opportunity to demonstrate that their good faith safety efforts are adequate to the task.
He is announcing that his dog is a known hazard to people who break and enter. It says nothing about the dog's behavior when someone is invited in.
Or just drop hot heating oil on the creep.
The end goal is not re-animating the dead. The goal is regenerative medicine for the still living who have severe brain damage. They're just experimenting on the dead first for ethical reasons.
Unless they get the diagnosis wrong...
As if the people who benefit from capital gains actually make anything.
It boild down to: "OOOOH, we can getz moneez"!
Even more would have to walk well more than a mile to get to the store.
That too. It would be a shame to let economic ideology turn a long held utopian dream into a nightmarish hellworld.
Even better in the mean time, cut a guy some slack and DON'T call the cops.
Why do you think "panic rooms" are now fashionable among the rich?
Your zoning may vary. A huge segment of the population must drive to the nearest store.
Just to add a dash of hypocracy, they are in marketing. Apparently only rich people are allowed to intrusively shove their message in people's faces to make a living.
So the only problem you see with his attitude is failure to outsource?
Excessive regulations and labor ...
So that's a no?
You simply tried to derail the discussion into a discussion about the recovery
Funny you should say that since I was replying to your claims about the recovery. Did you derail yourself?
There was a temporary dip during the recession, but we have mostly recovered from that.
No, I just don't spout irrelevant facts in an attempt to muddy the waters.