Personally, I find the idea of being 100% dependent on the finance industry to carry out a 'legitimate' transaction to be at the very least distasteful.
Do we really want to give banks the power of taxation?
If the clone isn't on the same VLAN, accessing the same data-gathering hardware, there is no way the infrastructure
Sounds like you should make sure the clone is on the same vlan and accessing the same data gathering hardware, doesn't it?
I'm not saying that we don't try (use data from an old run, etc.), but there is no way to truly duplicate everything, and sometimes you just have to live with that.
So, use the clone with that setup to verify as much as you can. Then use the snapshot to allow you to roll back if things don't work out in production.
If you still can't afford the risk, then you don't need a Maintenance window at all. You need to airgap the network and never update anything on the expensive side.
In cases with potentially dire consequences, I suspect people will be careful even if they don't believe they will be held accountable. In other cases, it may be too easy to rationalize that nothing bad will actually happen (often true of things like workplace safety).
They have to PROVE that the defendant did NOT forget. Even if they decide the defendant has no credibility, they still have no conviction since nobody else in the world is able to directly witness the defendant's state of mind and there isn't enough behavioral evidence to conclude that he remembers.
The defendant is innocent until PROVEN guilty. That means that until proven otherwise, the defendant must be assumed to have forgotten the password.
You would rather punish someone than make sure this doesn't happen again? Why?
If you want people to be open and honest about how things are actually being done so you can find out where the problem lies, you cannot also be playing the blame game.
Beyond that, where is the criminal intent? Do you allege that some psychopath is deliberately endangering lives for a laugh?
It's 500 feet AND they have to be able to glide to a safe landing location if their engine cuts out. 500 feet doesn't make that a good bet in a neighborhood for a manned vehicle.
In a neighborhood where a realtor might use a drone to photograph the property, a manned plane would certainly violate the safe landing requirement anywhere near an altitude suitable to photograph the home.
If there's any manned plane flying at an altitude where a realtor's drone would be, there are already larger problems, like manned planes crashing into people's homes.
So then you agree with the NRA/2nd amendment supporters that it is not now time to use their firearms in a revolution. So what's your complaint about them again? We have no idea what they might have said through channels other than the NRA (which i specifically for gun related issues).
Did you read my responses carefully? Where I expressed doubt that the prosecution would even try absent physical evidence or witnesses to a discussion of guilty knowledge to back up the theory? For example, an accountant will certainly know if they keep 2 books. A written communication indicating state of mind in the case of the adviser or at least a repeated pattern of behavior.
Slashdot Mirror
And people will switch to Tide as a currency (it's already happening!)
Personally, I find the idea of being 100% dependent on the finance industry to carry out a 'legitimate' transaction to be at the very least distasteful.
Do we really want to give banks the power of taxation?
You should also be better able to manage sharing airspace with a properly operated drone.
He is sentenced to jail based on that decision. It seems a lot like a conviction to me.
You seem to be firmly convinced that it's fine to build a house on quick sand as long as the floor is sturdy.
Awwww, did I make someone feel like a braying ass?
Who's a braying ass? YOU're a braying ass, yes you ARE!
Learn to speak like a grownup and I'll stop with the baby talk.
With fake news, fake blogs, and attempting to find an excuse (ANY excuse) to have an article taken down or de-listed?
You have lowered your expectations WAYYYYYYYyy too much.
If the clone isn't on the same VLAN, accessing the same data-gathering hardware, there is no way the infrastructure
Sounds like you should make sure the clone is on the same vlan and accessing the same data gathering hardware, doesn't it?
I'm not saying that we don't try (use data from an old run, etc.), but there is no way to truly duplicate everything, and sometimes you just have to live with that.
So, use the clone with that setup to verify as much as you can. Then use the snapshot to allow you to roll back if things don't work out in production.
If you still can't afford the risk, then you don't need a Maintenance window at all. You need to airgap the network and never update anything on the expensive side.
The Mythbusters showed us you CAN polish a turd. This suggests you still can't polish a CEO.
The natural conclusion is left as an exercise for the reader.
Fedex depends on USPS for last mile delivery in a lot of places. USPS handles orders of magnitude more deliveries than Fedex.
Based on that, they are much MORE efficient than Fedex.
In cases with potentially dire consequences, I suspect people will be careful even if they don't believe they will be held accountable. In other cases, it may be too easy to rationalize that nothing bad will actually happen (often true of things like workplace safety).
Is that a serious question?
They have to PROVE that the defendant did NOT forget. Even if they decide the defendant has no credibility, they still have no conviction since nobody else in the world is able to directly witness the defendant's state of mind and there isn't enough behavioral evidence to conclude that he remembers.
The defendant is innocent until PROVEN guilty. That means that until proven otherwise, the defendant must be assumed to have forgotten the password.
Agriculture includes animals that can transmit some strains of the flu. The most dangerous strains are those that have just jumped species.
Meanwhile, USDA knows more about pigs and chickens than the CDC.
Alas, it exists in the wild and so the only way we can destroy it there is to study it in a lab.
You would rather punish someone than make sure this doesn't happen again? Why?
If you want people to be open and honest about how things are actually being done so you can find out where the problem lies, you cannot also be playing the blame game.
Beyond that, where is the criminal intent? Do you allege that some psychopath is deliberately endangering lives for a laugh?
But the solution will be just a more complex variant on this theme. Consider also that you might have allowed complex to become Rube Goldberg.
Yes, but it's filtered by natural processes rather than by the lowest bidder.
So you're saying Republicans drink poop water?
Thank you for that!
It's 500 feet AND they have to be able to glide to a safe landing location if their engine cuts out. 500 feet doesn't make that a good bet in a neighborhood for a manned vehicle.
Given the way the DEA is going, the question might be can you make Sudafed from meth?
In a neighborhood where a realtor might use a drone to photograph the property, a manned plane would certainly violate the safe landing requirement anywhere near an altitude suitable to photograph the home.
If there's any manned plane flying at an altitude where a realtor's drone would be, there are already larger problems, like manned planes crashing into people's homes.
So then you agree with the NRA/2nd amendment supporters that it is not now time to use their firearms in a revolution. So what's your complaint about them again? We have no idea what they might have said through channels other than the NRA (which i specifically for gun related issues).
Did you read my responses carefully? Where I expressed doubt that the prosecution would even try absent physical evidence or witnesses to a discussion of guilty knowledge to back up the theory? For example, an accountant will certainly know if they keep 2 books. A written communication indicating state of mind in the case of the adviser or at least a repeated pattern of behavior.
Because who knows what 'extras' might have been included when they were made in China.