Slashdot Mirror


Predicting a Future Free of Dollar Bills

An anonymous reader writes with this story about how a cashless society might work and how far-off in the future it is. "...We're not there yet, but a cashless society is not as fanciful as it seems. Recent research suggests that many believe we will stop using notes and coins altogether in the not-too-distant future. New payments technologies are rapidly transforming our lives. Today in the U.S., 66 percent of all point-of-sale transactions are done with plastic, while in the U.K. it's just under half. But while a truly cashless society is some time away yet, there is raft of groundbreaking technologies that will make cash a mere supporting act in the near future."

753 comments

  1. 666 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Good luck everybody

    1. Re: 666 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the real causation of not moving undeniably is the fiat, which can crash at any moment this your digitransactions valueless

    2. Re:666 by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 1

      exactly, try dragging the crazy old bat's who still write a cheque for 11.79 at the grocery store into the 21st century with this cashless shit, and you will discover quickly why we're not even close.

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
    3. Re: 666 by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      As opposed to gold, which has never seen the price move.

    4. Re: 666 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      some point this cant deny gold never zero fiat in time history

    5. Re:666 by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The moment cash was eliminated, you could kiss your precious freedom goodbye. That is not a joke, and it is not a fantasy.

    6. Re:666 by stoborrobots · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Surely if they are writing cheques, then that is already cashless? Sounds like they've beaten the rest of us to it...

    7. Re:666 by delt0r · · Score: 1

      Yet some countries are almost entirely cashless. I wasn't using cash at all in NZ when i left in 2006. Sure you can. But almost nobody does.

      --
      If information wants to be free, why does my internet connection cost so much?
    8. Re:666 by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The moment cash was eliminated, you could kiss your precious freedom goodbye. That is not a joke, and it is not a fantasy.

      Yes, I went totally cashless about ten years ago, and still lament the loss of my freedom.

      If there is anything worse than having an itemized statement of all my purchases, and paying it off every month, then getting cash back, I don't know what is, unless it is....

      The nightmare scenario of automatically paying your bills. Jesus, that's awful.

      Some times I wonder if the doomsday preppers haven't taken over Slashdot these days. We've always had a strong streak of libertarianism, but half the comments these days read like they are posted from a bunker in Idaho. The second, fakey one, because we don't want the Guvmint finding the real one by tracking our phone. Back to the rabbit holes everyone!

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    9. Re:666 by Mike+Frett · · Score: 2

      Yeah it's going to be funny when something happens to the Satellites and Internet connected systems and you can't access any of your money. And don't say it can't happen, we all know the dangers but choose to be ignorant about radiation, space debris and war.

    10. Re:666 by Drethon · · Score: 1

      I can't see eliminating cash as also eliminating precious metals. Non government forms of trade good are hard to eliminate.

    11. Re: 666 by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      As opposed to gold, which has never seen the price move.

      This. Gold is exceptionally volatile, and basing an economy on it is not a wise move.

      The idea that fiat currency is somehow less stable than gold is not proven out by the facts. If a person were to check out the dates of depressions and recessions, at least in the US, they will quickly see that the economy is actually more stable after we left the gold standard.

      What is more, if we were to take the entire amount of gold ever mined and tried to apply it as the standard, we'll see right away that there just isn't enough gold, or else the gold would be insanely expensive per ounce. Especially as we in the US don't have all the gold ever mined. Which in the end would render any currency actually based upon it immediately worthless.

      So we were on fiat currency long before we went to fiat currency.

      I'm not in a place where I can easily look up the stats at the moment, but I did post the supporting math in here a while back.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    12. Re:666 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pick up sticks.

    13. Re: 666 by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 0

      As opposed to gold, which has never seen the price move.

      Generally, when the price of gold moves, it's as a result of a sudden influx in supply (can you say, Forty-Niners? the original ones, not the football team), or a sudden (or not so sudden) change in the money supply.

      In other words, gold costs much more now than it did back in the day because we've printed much more money....

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    14. Re: 666 by CaptnZilog · · Score: 1

      As opposed to gold, which has never seen the price move.

      This. Gold is exceptionally volatile, and basing an economy on it is not a wise move.

      The idea that fiat currency is somehow less stable than gold is not proven out by the facts. If a person were to check out the dates of depressions and recessions, at least in the US, they will quickly see that the economy is actually more stable after we left the gold standard.

      Actually, it's quite easy to argue that the gold price fluctuations are not volatility in the price of gold, but in the value of the dollar (or whatever currency you are comparing it to).

    15. Re: 666 by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 1

      As opposed to gold, which has never seen the price move.

      Which has more buying power today?

      1. Gold
      2. The French Assignat
      3. The German Papiermark
      4. The Confederate Dollar
      5. The US Continental

      Go ahead, pick one.

      --
      "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
      --- Jerry Garcia
    16. Re:666 by usuallylost · · Score: 2

      The most important words in your post are “almost entirely cashless”. I agree with the original poster about the importance of the existence of the ability to have cash transactions to the maintenance of freedom. Basically the way to think of cash is that it gives you the ability to have anonymous economic transactions and the ability to maintain a store of wealth that is not dependent upon external services.

      If you take that away then in essence you are saying that every economic transaction is going to be directly traced via some technological means. It is inevitable that information will end up in some central database. Worse if you find yourself on the wrong side of the powers that be for some reason they can simply deny you access to your wealth at their whim. Whereas if you have cash on hand the only way to deprive you of its use is to physically take it from you.

    17. Re:666 by pscottdv · · Score: 1

      Yes, I went totally cashless about ten years ago, and still lament the loss of my freedom.

      You are confusing a cashless individual with cashless society, i.e. a society where anonymous transactions are not just not common, but not possible. While I don't agree that such a society guarantees a loss of freedom, I do agree that IN such a society, loss of freedom becomes much more likely.

      --

      this signature has been removed due to a DMCA takedown notice

    18. Re: 666 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    19. Re:666 by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      That you've never had any problem paying using cashless in the past is not an indication that you will never in the future. If they decide to freeze your accounts for some reason with no cash in the system anymore, you can't even get a cab.

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    20. Re:666 by CanHasDIY · · Score: 0

      The nightmare scenario of automatically paying your bills. Jesus, that's awful.

      Blind or intentionally obtuse? I'd guess both.

      Here's your nightmare scenario:

      KNOCKKNOCKKNOCKBOOM

      "GET ON THE GROUND! GET ON THE FUCKING GROUND!" BLAM BLAM (officer shoots your dog)

      "STOP RESISTING! STOP RESISTING!" As they beat the living shit out of you, your wife, your kids, etc. on the floor of your own home

      Later, as you sit in a police interrogation room, bloody, bruised, and nearly broken:

      "So, Mr. Olsoc, we wanted to ask you about these purchases of fertilizer and pipe nipples you made at the hardware store 6 months apart... Building a hydroponic garden? We don't buy it, since you never applied for the appropriate permit."

      Of course, you'll probably accuse me of being overly paranoid, nevermind the fact that this sort of shit does happen, regularly. Because that's how sheeple think - anyone more paranoid than them is "too paranoid."

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    21. Re: 666 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting that you see the price of gold as moving, rather than the currencies you are comparing it to.

    22. Re:666 by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      We've always had a strong streak of libertarianism

      There are at least as many far left liberals. Only on slashdot (and possibly reddit) would I see comments espousing the glories of Cuban communism.

    23. Re:666 by Justpin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      15th of March 2013 Cyprus. Overnight the banks were frozen, all electronic transactions ceased, the banks were closed, ATMs suddenly did not work (they were turned back on with severely restricted withdrawal limits later). There four kinds of people The cashless Those who kept cash outside the system. Those with other things like gold/silver/food/petrol. The wolves who travelled into Cyprus to strip the cashless of their assets for fire sale prices. The cashless starved, and had to sell their assets at fire sale prices, because they couldn't get any money, they couldn't use their cards AND they couldn't escape. Those who kept cash out of the system did not starve and could escape. Those who had other things like gold/silver/food/petrol ended up cleaning out the cashless of their assets and picked them clean as they had no choice as they had to buy water and food. Trevor a wolf went out there and started buying cashless peoples' Jewellery for about 5 cents on the Euro. The cashless had no choice but to sell to a wolf or starve.

    24. Re:666 by Justpin · · Score: 2

      It did look up 15th of March 2013 Cyprus, where they froze the banks.

    25. Re: 666 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aw, go huff some more gasoline, Pepe.

    26. Re: 666 by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      Gold also fluctuates, just nowhere near as much. Particularly in the long term: you won't see gold drop to 2% of its value a century ago, as the US dollar has.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    27. Re: 666 by segedunum · · Score: 1

      This. Gold is exceptionally volatile, and basing an economy on it is not a wise move.

      Ahhhh, yet another idiot who cannot separate gold from its meaningless fiat 'price'. If gold is money, how can it have a price?

    28. Re:666 by lsatenstein · · Score: 1

      Good luck everybody

      It is coming, particularly for businesses. Cash will still be available for small purchases, but others no.

      It could happen two ways. For a fixed fee, a business will arrange for unlimited debit transactions to be processed immediately to their account, with once a day reconciliation. As for credit transactions, there will be no initial change. but later, there will be a merge with debit and credit accounts. Individuals will have a line of credit, and if that is exhausted, the credit card rates will apply after 20 days.
      Automated payments for taxes, utilities, and other fees will grow in number. And faster checkouts will be needed before this happens.
      The question to answer is "How fast is it going to occur?"

      --
      Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
    29. Re: 666 by Dare+nMc · · Score: 0

      >the economy is actually more stable after we left the gold standard.

      of course it is, and it had all signs of getting worse if kept on the gold standard. That fiat currency problem is so born out in human history, that most religions of any size has rules against being a lender or a borrower, or hoarder of money because banking with a fiat currency guarantees endless bust/boom cycles, with a regulated banking and flexible money supply the inevitable crash in money supply can be reduced or illuminated.

          It is odd that proponents of going to a fiat currency, thing that a gold standard is a fix to fractional reserve, but in reality it is what originally cause fractional reserve banking. IE it is a pain to carry gold, and to try and verify it's value over each transaction (people slugging gold coins, trimming edges...) The fix was banking, take your gold in and trade it for a paper IOU that is easier to trade/carry... Then the bank realizes it can loan out that gold in it's vault for money, and you have fractional reserve banking. Same is true of bitcoin, also since it is a pain for me to walk to the neighbor, hand him a USB chain, then force him to get online and verify it for a cost. So it will inevitably have offline paper IOU's as well (or rather already existed, and are coming back, see Casascius coins)

    30. Re:666 by rockout · · Score: 1

      How is this different from now? How many people have great amounts of wealth stored entirely in cash? The situation you describe where "the powers that be (can) deny you access to your wealth at their whim" already exists, and we seem to be okay with it.

      I'm not saying you should be entirely okay with it, or that it's the best possible system, just pointing out that going cashless isn't going to change the status of what you regard as freedom to do as you please with large amounts of wealth.

      --
      I've learned that they're worthless, so I don't read AC comments anymore.
    31. Re:666 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have great hoardes of wealth in the form of $100s, $50s, $20s, but primarily $50 American Gold Eagles. ;-)

    32. Re:666 by zidium · · Score: 0

      Oh the U.S. already banned the owning, selling, and storing of gold and silver. From 5 April 1933 until 31 December 1974. Don't tell me it couldn't happen again! They'd just say "ONLY the Top 1% own silver and gold!" and all the mindless morons would believe them and CLAMOR for the ban and seizure.

      --
      Slashdot Valentines Beta Massacre: iT WORKED! The boycotts killed Beta!!
    33. Re:666 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Freedom has nothing to do with any object this world manifests. We are all free regardless to what anything ever has been said. Those who chose to hide in fear are ones preventing their own freedom and more detrimentally sometimes a bit impedes on others, but never forever.

    34. Re:666 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good luck everybody

      We need a Fedless society.

    35. Re:666 by funwithBSD · · Score: 1

      It pretty much is, for values above $10K. as the banks report such large withdraws anyway.

      And crossing the border with large sums of cash will get you a special invitation as well, so there is no relief there.

      --
      Never answer an anonymous letter. - Yogi Berra
    36. Re: 666 by alva_edison · · Score: 1

      Yes, but gold also fluctuates with respect to the CPI.
      http://www.macrotrends.net/134...

      --
      He effected a bored affect.
    37. Re:666 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your definition of "wealth" differs greatly from most people's.

    38. Re:666 by JakeBurn · · Score: 1

      Its more likely to be a hard sell to the millions of poor people who don't have bank accounts at all. Or try convincing banks to start allowing people to have checking accounts with less $1500 in them without no fees. Where I live there are a lot of people living paycheck to paycheck that can't even begin to think about opening a bank account because all of the banks around here demand a minimum amount in the account in order to keep it open without charging you out the ass in fees. Because of that we have tons of places that charge even less to cash checks and most people stick with cash and money orders.

    39. Re: 666 by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      That fiat currency problem is so born out in human history, that most religions of any size has rules against being a lender or a borrower, or hoarder of money because banking with a fiat currency guarantees endless bust/boom cycles, with a regulated banking and flexible money supply the inevitable crash in money supply can be reduced or illuminated.

      Most religions have issues with it for the immorality of usury, not the economics of it. fiat currency wasn't common when Jesus lived and before.

      Unless you are asserting that the prophets that spoke against fiat lending were actually seeing the future?

    40. Re: 666 by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      So we should use gold because we expect our government to fail tomorrow?

    41. Re: 666 by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      A constant steady inflation is planned. If you don't like it, don't ever vote for a major party candidate again, and get all your friends to vote against them as well.

    42. Re: 666 by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      Generally, when the price of gold moves, it's as a result of a sudden influx in supply (can you say, Forty-Niners? the original ones, not the football team), or a sudden (or not so sudden) change in the money supply.

      Or speculation. The current fad of "buy gold for your future" is meant to form a bubble for current sellers to profit from before the bubble bursts.

    43. Re: 666 by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Compare it to goats. It fluctuates. Compare it to real estate. It fluctuates. Pick anything you want, and it fluctuates. It's most steady against things like silver, but even then, it fluctuates.

    44. Re: 666 by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 1

      So we should use gold because we expect our government to fail tomorrow?

      Only one of those governments "failed", AK, (the Confederacy), otherwise the failure of the currency was not related to the failure or success of the government. The Papiermark was replaced by the Rentenmark under the same government. The Continental was the first attempt at fiat money by the neophyte US government. They corrected that with the Constitution by using commodity medals as the official medium of exchanged. US Dollars were backed by commodity metals until the end of Bretton Woods in 1971. The French Assignat also failed while the government persisted. And these are just a few examples, and there are many.

      Indeed, you have it backwards with your little quip. If anything, a nations' monetary policy can cause the government to fail, not the other way around. So it should be "we should support the use of sound money, because we don't want our government to fail tomorrow."

      --
      "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
      --- Jerry Garcia
    45. Re: 666 by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's quite easy to argue that the gold price fluctuations are not volatility in the price of gold, but in the value of the dollar (or whatever currency you are comparing it to).

      Yes, that is an arguable point. I've used it as an investment medium in the past. But here's the dig.Not many make all that much on it. In typical amateur investment fashion, people tend to buy high, and sell low.

      As an example, I had invested in 1 oz silver bars back in the late 70's at around 15 dollars an ounce. Around 1980, it hit almost 50 dollars an ounce, In the 90's, it was about 5 dollars an ounce until around 2003. Around 2011, it was around 47 dollars an ounce, and has now fallen to around 20. While the investors will tell you that it was almost 400 percent appreciation from 1975 to now, When should I have cashed it in? In 1980, or 2011? During some volatile years? The same motives that get us to invest in precious metals are the same ones that cause us to keep them when they are the most expensive.

      Precious metals are simply too volatile an investment, and there are two lines the people selling them use:

      When it's rising, it's an awesome investment, better than anything else Get in on this, or you'll be a loser!

      In the long inter-valued times, it's a hedge against the inevitible downfall of Western society, and shouldn't be viewd as an actual investment. Somehow or another you'll trade your gold for bread when whatever apocolypse is the latest trend happens.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    46. Re:666 by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      That you've never had any problem paying using cashless in the past is not an indication that you will never in the future. If they decide to freeze your accounts for some reason with no cash in the system anymore, you can't even get a cab.

      well of course not. But your scenarios means that your cash can and will be stopped right at your employers paycheck to you.

      The system you fear has been in place for years, and unless you do everything through an alternative barter type economy, where your work is bartered, and all your expenses are too, you aren't going to get away from the intrusive hand of the guvmint.

      Otherwise, you'll have just a little more cash than I do, to last maybe a week before you're as broke as the rest of us? I won't get a cab in week one, you won't get it in weeks two.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    47. Re:666 by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Blind or intentionally obtuse? I'd guess both.

      Here's your nightmare scenario:

      Ermagherd!!

      Of course, you'll probably accuse me of being overly paranoid, nevermind the fact that this sort of shit does happen, regularly. Because that's how sheeple think - anyone more paranoid than them is "too paranoid."

      Holy crap, Guess anyone not as paranoid as you is a sheeple?

      You are a prepper aren't you?

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    48. Re:666 by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1
      So what you are saying is we have to start up a complete alternative society with absolutely no banks allowed? And everyone has to sew thwir money up in their beds?

      Seems like some bullies with luperas would be able to come up with cash very very quickly.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    49. Re: 666 by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      This. Gold is exceptionally volatile, and basing an economy on it is not a wise move.

      Ahhhh, yet another idiot who cannot separate gold from its meaningless fiat 'price'. If gold is money, how can it have a price?

      Ahh, the name calling. So powerful such a way to automatically win an argument. Well played. You must have won every time in debate class.

      Of course the gold has a fiat price - now. Specie, exchange, or bullion, of the Gold or bimatallic standards - there is simply not enough of it to sustain the world economy now.

      Rather than call me names, perhaps you wish to discuss my premise, that you cannot base economies on it. Especially now.

      Or is all ya got the playground 5th grader attack? Up to the Challenge?

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    50. Re:666 by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      Your money in the bank is already "directly traced via some technological means". It's numbers in a computer.

      Heck, even if you have a pile under your mattress, the value of it is due to everyone else thinking it has value too... You can't eat it.. and no, I don't think gold has more inherent value in itself either, except for conductive properties when society rebuilds itself after whatever imagined doomsday scenario you come up with.

    51. Re:666 by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      Why would they freeze ALL of your accounts all of a sudden? Use a different credit card (cabs take CCs nowadays, right?). Or go to an ATM and get some cash that way if absolutely necessary.

    52. Re:666 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This. My country invented it. We called it Corralito

    53. Re:666 by Justpin · · Score: 1

      Not at all, I am just saying don't keep all your eggs in one basket. I am not stating you should buy this and that (commonly gold/silver/guns/ammo/food) but merely to diversify so that if it does come to a bad situation then you're not the guy at the bottom. Keeping $100-$300 of cash at home it is still cash and a physical representation of electronic money, so while you retain some risks and even gain some new ones (robbery for instance). You reduce your risk in other areas should a Cyprus event occur.
      BTW I would happily note that Cyprus was an experiment by the EU to see how people would react, European states after seeing what happened started quietly writing in Cyprus style bail in agreements. Additionally a whole year before a Cypriot had concerns, a lot of people shouted at him (as much as you can online) about how it will never happen, it can never happen, except it did happen.

    54. Re:666 by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      Seriously? If they decide they're gonna ruin your life (he's a terrorist! He's exercising his freedom to think!), they're gonna go balls deep; they're not going to just get one or two of your accounts and watch while you try to figure out which ones you can still use and giggle. Overwhelming force, shock and awe, etc. Because they never send SWAT a team to bust down the doors of innocent people. Nope. Never happened.

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    55. Re:666 by Alien1024 · · Score: 1

      The "haircut" in Cyprus was a horrible deal. Having said that, people didn't "starve" like you suggest. The issue with the ATMs was that they ran out of notes. There was a bank lockdown, but it lasted 12 days. Everybody knew it wouldn't last enough for people to starve - the ECB and Germany couldn't tolerate continued damage to the currency.

      Trevor a wolf went out there and started buying cashless peoples' Jewellery for about 5 cents on the Euro

      Citation needed, really, for that.

      And the way you put it, it seems like you have to either be completely cashless or keep cash out of the bank. Misleading. There's no reason you can't keep certain amount of money in the bank, for convenience, and another amount in notes.

    56. Re:666 by usuallylost · · Score: 1

      It is different from now in a couple of ways. When you go to make a purchase using any electronic payment system that transaction is being facilitated by a third party. It could be your bank, American express, a crypto currency system (eg bitcoin) or some government agency. Whomever that third party is takes your request to buy something, pay a bill or transfer money to some third party and facilitates it. If that third party becomes unavailable for some reason your ability to conduct such transactions is seriously compromised. Now it might become unavailable because of some governmental action like an order form a court saying no transfers for person X. It might be because a hurricane has taken out the infrastructure to conduct the transaction in your area. Whatever the case as long as that third party is either unable or unwilling to facilitate a transaction your ability to conduct any sort of business is very limited.

      Cash on the other hand does not require any direct action by any third party to complete a transaction. As long as the system is sufficiently functional that money still has value you can transfer cash from one person to another and compete the transaction. Cash is resistant to being easily tracked. It’s portable and has minimal dependence upon outside infrastructure. About the only way cash totally loses its value is if the nation that issued it either ceases to exist or ends its support for physical currency. Cash can be used to anonymously support groups that the powers that be don’t want you supporting. It can be used to buy things they don’t want you to buy. It can just be held against an emergency. Going from a mostly cashless to a completely cashless system represents a significant loss of individual autonomy. Personally even if I only ever use it to keep a small cache against the power being knocked out long enough that my credit card is unusable I like to have that ability. I think it would be a significant blow to the public to lose it.

    57. Re: 666 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      might make right

    58. Re:666 by rockout · · Score: 1

      You missed my point entirely. I was responding to your argument that "if you find yourself on the wrong side of the powers that be for some reason they can simply deny you access to your wealth at their whim. " No one holds millions of dollars in 10's and 20's. Any significant movement of wealth is already electronically tracked; in fact, any significant movement of cash, usually over $10000, is tracked as well if you use a bank. Have you been completing a lot of transactions with $9,999 worth of cash? I haven't.

      --
      I've learned that they're worthless, so I don't read AC comments anymore.
    59. Re:666 by usuallylost · · Score: 1

      There are defiantly people out there that are moving that kind of wealth around in cash. Organized crime moves millions around in cash every day. They not only move it within the US but move it across borders to and from other countries. In some parts of the world people do cross border trade in US $100 bills with transaction amounts often measured in the 10s of thousands or more. So it defiantly possible to do it. If you had some reason to think you’d be a target you could pull out money in small enough transactions that no one triggered any alerts and sock it away. Actually you could pull it out in one block sum and just let it be tracked if you wanted. It isn’t illegal to pull a million dollars out in cash they just record it and ask some questions. Once you have it you can hide it, spend it, give it to somebody else or just move it without anyone else’s help. The point is that if cash goes away you won’t be able to move .01 without their cooperation and tracking.

    60. Re:666 by nobodie · · Score: 1

      Barter

      --
      Subversion of spatial scale luxury decoration ideas.
    61. Re:666 by rockout · · Score: 1

      It's interesting to me that to come up with people that move around large amounts of cash, your one example is organized crime, and that's supposed to make me against a cashless society.

      --
      I've learned that they're worthless, so I don't read AC comments anymore.
    62. Re:666 by usuallylost · · Score: 1

      Organized crime is simply the largest example here in the US. You could also point to the fact that the Chinese middle class is moving billions out of a Chinese banking system they don’t trust and into offshore accounts by carrying it in their luggage a few thousand dollars at a time. That is probably a better example anyway as it a direct example of the kind of reasons you don’t want a cashless system. A bunch of politically connected bankers are ripping them off and they are reacting by withdrawing their cash and moving some of it abroad to protect it. The Chinese government puts a lot of limits on its citizen’s abilities to do direct money transfers abroad so they are using cash to bypass that. That is an ability we should be hesitant to give up.

  2. 66 percent of all point-of-sale transactions by turkeydance · · Score: 5, Informative

    ...that they know about.....are done with plastic.

    1. Re: 66 percent of all point-of-sale transactions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      100 percent of all point-of-sale transactions are done with plastic... at least they are in Australia where we replaced paper notes with plastic ones back in 1988. Australia's $1 notes were also replaced with coins back in 1984 (go figure).

    2. Re: 66 percent of all point-of-sale transactions by sublayer · · Score: 1

      100 percent of all point-of-sale transactions are done with plastic... at least they are in Australia where we replaced paper notes with plastic ones back in 1988. Australia's $1 notes were also replaced with coins back in 1984 (go figure).

      Wrong. Some transactions use coins, which are made of metal, not plastic. Last I checked, not every transaction was in multiples of $5 (the lowest denomination Australian note/bill).

    3. Re: 66 percent of all point-of-sale transactions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, yes, but you're all upside down...

    4. Re: 66 percent of all point-of-sale transactions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your cheques are made of plastic down under?

    5. Re: 66 percent of all point-of-sale transactions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know how well they did this study in particular, but "shadow economy and undeclared work" is a well-studied topic. International organizations and national statistics institute produce yearly estimates for each country. Just for info it's estimated to 7% GPD in the US and 22% in the UK.

      Check this scholarly document : Friedrich Schneider, Size and Development of the Shadow Economy of 31 European and 5 other OECD Countries from 2003 to 2012: Some New Facts http://www.econ.jku.at/members...

  3. Cash Needs To Go Away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Cash needs to be done with because its primary uses these days include buying illegal drugs, pay for illicit services, dodge taxes, and conduct money laundering.
    No normal human being in America really needs to keep using cash for legitimate purposes these days.
    I can't wait till cash is just abolished, anonymous money transactions are really evil and hurt America.

    1. Re:Cash Needs To Go Away by MightyYar · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The other point of view is that cash is needed because the government is still all in our business. Get the government out of the morality game and the cash will more or less disappear on its own. In that way, cash usage is a proxy for government oppression.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    2. Re:Cash Needs To Go Away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't feed the troll, he doesn't know the pain of a broken modem on the one vending machine and all you have is plastic.

    3. Re:Cash Needs To Go Away by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 5, Informative

      "Cashless" is also a giant vacuum sucking service fees back to the banks and so on. Retailers pay a certain amount per transaction to a payment processor, even if you the customer don't pay directly. Think that doesn't come out of your pocket in the end through higher prices?

      Just imagine how much money you would have if you got a penny for every transaction conducted in every North American Wal-mart for just one day -- you could retire several times over and still afford fuel for your yachts!

      Are we really in that much of a hurry to keep giving more money to the banks?

      --
      If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
    4. Re:Cash Needs To Go Away by rmdingler · · Score: 1
      If you take away the cash, the folks on the dark side of society will trade in gold and silver.

      You can no more eliminate citizens living on the fringes than you can remove corruption from politics.

      Trading in the illegal and the illicit is the second oldest profession.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    5. Re:Cash Needs To Go Away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I've had it several times in my life where my debit and credit card stopped working because of a glitch. Those few times if I didn't have cash on me, I would have been screwed because I got up-front services, like going out to eat or gas or I had to pay my electric bill that day or get cut off. It doesn't happen often, but when it does, I need a way to keep living.

    6. Re:Cash Needs To Go Away by just_a_monkey · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Also needed if you happen to piss of the government and they order your accounts frozen. Then you starve unless you have cash. Or friends. Who are willing to risk "supporting a terrorist".

      --
      How inappropriate to call this planet Earth, when clearly it is Ocean.
    7. Re:Cash Needs To Go Away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The other other point of view is that a uniform means of economic exchange with no additional cost is public service that the government should be doing. Government issued cash solves the problem of trying to figure out if bank notes are valid, from a legitimate bank, or are even redeemable. Credit cards are inefficient at solving this problem when compared to cash. Unlike cash, merchants have to pay for electronic payment processing. Merchants pass that extra cost on to consumers.

    8. Re:Cash Needs To Go Away by antifoidulus · · Score: 5, Interesting

      There is a non-trivial fee associated with cash too. Cash requires labor to move/protect it, can go "missing" much more easily than credit card transactions etc. Cards are probably still more expensive, but not by as much as you may think.

    9. Re: Cash Needs To Go Away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is generally why things like bitcoin show up.

    10. Re:Cash Needs To Go Away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That "WHOOOSH!" sound is the joke flying right over your head, Percy.

    11. Re:Cash Needs To Go Away by AudioEfex · · Score: 1

      Anyone who puts a credit card, much less a debit card, in a vending machine is a fucking idiot. Those things are so incredibly easy to tamper with it's not even remotely funny. And the way they are built you would never have any idea it was tampered with, most legit ones already look like they could hold a skimmer (since many vending machines that do have them are conversion jobs to begin with). Not to mention the more and more skimmers are placed inside at this point - and some vending machine delivery guy probably being paid minimum wage has the key. Cash will never be replaced. Reduced, well, it already has, but replaced - not for a very long time.

    12. Re:Cash Needs To Go Away by Lumpio- · · Score: 1

      ...and the government passes on the costs of maintaining the cash system on to the people. Via taxes. The truth is that nothing is free and if you get something you will have to pay for it one way or another.

    13. Re:Cash Needs To Go Away by AthanasiusKircher · · Score: 2

      Think that doesn't come out of your pocket in the end through higher prices?

      Of course it does. But there's not much I as an individual can do about it. So, actually this is an INCENTIVE for consumers to use credit cards, since at least with my card I can get a percentage back in whatever form of rewards (whereas cash only customers will just lose all of it). The only place where I have an incentive to pay cash is when merchants charge different prices for cash vs. credit, and there I generally would pay cash. (Of course, this assumes you never carry a balance on your card... and why would you?)

    14. Re:Cash Needs To Go Away by Lumpio- · · Score: 1

      So get rid of mag stripes. You can't skim a smart card. At least not nearly as easily.

    15. Re:Cash Needs To Go Away by PlusFiveTroll · · Score: 4, Informative

      In theory electronic cash, such as bitcoins, could still allow anonymous transactions.

    16. Re:Cash Needs To Go Away by MightyYar · · Score: 2

      The other other point of view is that a uniform means of economic exchange with no additional cost is public service that the government should be doing.

      I agree that a common currency is a core government concern. I wasn't advocating that the government should be out of the currency business, just positing that cash usage probably has some correlation to government's interaction with your daily life. There are some pretty large cash payments taking place to avoid taxes, or because the government makes sure it is hard to use credit cards for your illegal transaction.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    17. Re:Cash Needs To Go Away by Goetterdaemmerung · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "Cashless" is also a giant vacuum sucking service fees back to the banks and so on. Retailers pay a certain amount per transaction to a payment processor, even if you the customer don't pay directly. Think that doesn't come out of your pocket in the end through higher prices?

      THIS. I can't believe everyone is so supportive of a cashless society when cash is the only transaction-free method of payment (also anonymous). Paying 3-5 percent convenience charge simply to not use cash boggles my mind. I often ask for a cash discount on large purchases and usually the merchant is quite eager.

      Cash is king.

    18. Re:Cash Needs To Go Away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, I see you've been conned by the banks. You should read up on how easily (and how long ago) PayPass/PayWave and their ilk were broken... and yet they're still being rolled out in new countries. Banks are their own worst enemies when it comes to card fraud, but as long as consumers are footing the bill in "bank fees" why should they care?

    19. Re:Cash Needs To Go Away by viperidaenz · · Score: 2

      If a tampered vending machine takes my cash, it's my word against theirs that it's my money they stole.
      If they use my credit card details, I get the money back. The insurance for that is paid by the merchant fees. There is no cash insurance.

      Writing the mag strip to a new card won't work for long anyway, since every time I put my card in an ATM machine, the mag strip is re-written.
      You can't reuse a chip or contactless authorisation, they're both one time only.

      Tell me again how cash in a vending machine is safer?

    20. Re:Cash Needs To Go Away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cash needs to be done with because its primary uses these days include buying illegal drugs, pay for illicit services...

      You say those like they're bad things. I don't know about you, but I like strippers.

    21. Re:Cash Needs To Go Away by currently_awake · · Score: 1

      Politician is the oldest profession. The guy giving the orders takes a cut of what everyone else is doing. Prostitution is the second oldest profession, as they can't get paid till there is a revenue stream.

    22. Re: Cash Needs To Go Away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank goodness no one has ever figured out a way to manipulate digital information. You is smart.

    23. Re:Cash Needs To Go Away by rebelwarlock · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You wanna know a really cool feature of cash? If the merchant from whom I buy something with cash gets robbed/hacked after I leave, I don't lose the rest of my cash. It's pretty nifty.

    24. Re:Cash Needs To Go Away by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Even if the fees are being paid for by the merchants, forcing them to charge higher prices, the people who pay in cash at places that accept both are having to pay those higher prices just as much as a person who doesn't ever carry cash would..

    25. Re:Cash Needs To Go Away by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      I don't pay a 3-5 percent convenience charge on anything. It's a violation of the rules in the US for them to charge it. And cash isn't free to the merchant either. BoA is at about 0.3% cash handling fee (some "free" each month, but a business account with large cash deposits will get charged a fee for using cash.

      Also cash is much more likely to be stolen by employees or others, or just plain get lost.

    26. Re:Cash Needs To Go Away by sjames · · Score: 2

      So why replace it with banks that launder money for terrorists and drug cartels and dodge taxes? Normal human beings do need to not pay what are effectively taxes to corporations. If they knew how much the credit cards were taking on the merchant side (that shows up in their prices), they might clamor to pay cash more often.

    27. Re:Cash Needs To Go Away by UltraZelda64 · · Score: 1

      NSA? Is that you?

    28. Re:Cash Needs To Go Away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not sure I understand? If you mean value? Such as the almighty US dollar/cash being a world dictator, as well as being the value in which government projects the countries worth, then yes.

      Government has to love cashless, with banking/credit-cards, it is easy to trace and track you. They very well may decide to keep cash in house while having citizens forced to go without it. It is a completely scary thought because of how the financial system in this country is screwed up from top to bottom, the last recession and the housing market just about imploded, and do you really want to trust these institutions with holding your invisible money? Credit Cards are the next financial bubble waiting to implode. Its the same broken record, these institutions buy off there loopholes and the regulations do little to prevent it from happening. PBS's Frontline had a report about this sometime ago, I'm not full-on buying into it since a lot of what the press reports is to get people attention and not too really look in-depth and report everything.

    29. Re:Cash Needs To Go Away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's cause American businesses are slow to adopt anti-fraud technology. The solution you're wondering about is to get rid of the mag stripe and use PayPass or the chipcard.

      Magstripe hasn't been secure for quite a while. The actual mechanical way it's required to work (swiping, as opposed to remaining in the slot during the transaction) is why it's insecure, because it can be MITM'd All it takes is skimming a card and then playing it back on a copy of your card somewhere and emptying your account before you get a chance to react.

    30. Re:Cash Needs To Go Away by Gavagai80 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You wanna know a really cool feature of credit cards? If you get mugged after you leave the store, you don't lose any of your money when you cancel the card and dispute any transactions.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
    31. Re:Cash Needs To Go Away by electrosoccertux · · Score: 1

      are you sure about that? Common Currency means Walmart can show up and sap all the wealth out of local economies, forcing everyone to get with the program and take on debt for college degrees for finance jobs to ride the highly-vertically-integrated financial american economy.

    32. Re:Cash Needs To Go Away by nukenerd · · Score: 1

      There is a non-trivial fee associated with cash too. Cards are probably still more expensive, but not by as much as you may think.

      I don't think you have much idea of the total cost of cards. It is not just the transaction fee that Visa rake in. My wife was a bookkeeper for a small company (trade supplier - guttering etc) and they thought long and hard about installing a credit card capability. It is not just the transaction fee that Visa rake in, the other fees were shocking too - set-up fee, deposit on the equipment, hire of the equipment, phone charges, admin charges. Having the facility was going to make a massive dent in the company's annual bottom line. The cost was much worse than taking cheques (which the banks are massivley discouraging too). That had to be balanced against the loss of customers who will only pay by plastic these days.

      In the end, everyone would be worse off except the credit card company, who for some transactions would be making more profit than the merchant - just for having a computer running.

    33. Re:Cash Needs To Go Away by delt0r · · Score: 1

      I pay no fees for my direct debit card. And transfers within the same country are also free. In fact the only fees i get are from Visa when i use that.

      --
      If information wants to be free, why does my internet connection cost so much?
    34. Re:Cash Needs To Go Away by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      While government certainly does enable giant chain corporations, I think you are overlooking the more obvious culprit: limited liability. Without the invention of "the corporation" - and the limited liability aspect in particular - nothing like Walmart would have ever scaled to that size. Hell, if all that was holding Walmart back was a common currency, we'd all be using "Wally Bucks" right now.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    35. Re:Cash Needs To Go Away by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 1

      ...and the government passes on the costs of maintaining the cash system on to the people. Via taxes. The truth is that nothing is free and if you get something you will have to pay for it one way or another.

      And the Fed controls the money supply, and taxes Americans even more using inflation.

      --
      "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
      --- Jerry Garcia
    36. Re:Cash Needs To Go Away by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

      Cash needs to be done with because its primary uses these days include buying illegal drugs, pay for illicit services, dodge taxes, and conduct money laundering. No normal human being in America really needs to keep using cash for legitimate purposes these days. I can't wait till cash is just abolished, anonymous money transactions are really evil and hurt America.

      Hmm, what to make of this one? Trolling? Naive? Paid shill? Pure sarcasm? It can be hard to tell these days!

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    37. Re:Cash Needs To Go Away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (Of course, this assumes you never carry a balance on your card... and why would you?)

      I'd guess it's because you don't have enough money to get what you need, so you charge it.

    38. Re:Cash Needs To Go Away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [US English] ....unless there are "biological transfers" through the cash which you might have just traded your futures and DNA. Then again, it depends on the banking functions of the bills and coins. With automatic electronic transfers, there's less dependency on this and therefore, some would say, safer. Once the transfer is made, they can make a trade of banking functions based upon your profiles, lifestyle, etc. With cash, you're stuck with whatever functions are added to the bills/coins for that time you used it.

      Example, how many people realize there is currently a banking game for adding a function to the Dollar? Some would call this new proposed function immoral or terroristic but then again, they traded heavily for it. The current state of affairs is that tt's a financial battle between galaxies and counts of higher dimensions.

    39. Re:Cash Needs To Go Away by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1, Informative

      https://bitcoin.org/en/you-nee...

      Lots of things work in theory but not practice.

      To be "anonymous" with Bitcoin, you basically have to use a different address for every single transaction, and never cash out.

      To be anonymous with Dollars, you... pay for stuff with Dollars, and you don't have to use a different wallet every time you buy something.

      Cash wins.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    40. Re:Cash Needs To Go Away by Lumpio- · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure this isn't limited to any particular country.

    41. Re:Cash Needs To Go Away by Sedated2000 · · Score: 1

      There is a trend however, of criminals kidnapping people and taking them around to various ATMs with their credit and debit cards until their accounts are empty.

    42. Re:Cash Needs To Go Away by funwithBSD · · Score: 1

      I see what you did there...

      --
      Never answer an anonymous letter. - Yogi Berra
    43. Re:Cash Needs To Go Away by electrosoccertux · · Score: 1

      sure lets get right on that so I can hold you personally accountable for the lives your medical devices failed to save and the engineering fault in the car that killed your brother.

      There's a very good reason we have limited liability, a reason many countries haven't bothered looking at, and they hurt because of it.

    44. Re:Cash Needs To Go Away by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure this isn't limited to any particular country.

      No, it's pretty much every country using fiat currency controlled by a central bank. In Europe, the central bank isn't even affiliated with any one country, it's a stand-alone financial entity that the countries have "agreed" to obey.

      --
      "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
      --- Jerry Garcia
    45. Re:Cash Needs To Go Away by Lumpio- · · Score: 1

      I love being able to order stuff from Germany without worrying about currency conversion rates.

    46. Re:Cash Needs To Go Away by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      I think we would probably survive if limited liability were rolled back just a tad. Sure, I'll admit that there probably is some benefit to having corporations with protected stockholders - in particular people who only buy or sell the stock and have little to no influence in the business. I don't see any reason to shield executives, board, or activist investors.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    47. Re:Cash Needs To Go Away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go through a bankruptcy/foreclosure and fall behind in your taxes. This is exactly what happens. I basically have no bank or electronic money at all - there is only cash and cash-based transactions. You quite literally become homeless and lose any chance of "returning to the fold". It's only by the grace of friends and their acceptance of cash that I'm not homeless already. And it's always on the edge.

      In other news I have no health insurance nor have had such for about a decade. I do not qualify for either Obamacare or welfare-related healthcare because I've been forced off the grid by the above. It's not much fun but it's far more common than most people imagine.

    48. Re:Cash Needs To Go Away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Office Space, our famed trio thought they could make a fortune by skimming that partial penny from every interest calculation, even though it was illegal. Banks now try to skim 2-4% off every transaction, and do it legally. It doesn't take a Jump-to-Conclusions mat to realize the fortunes involved here.

    49. Re:Cash Needs To Go Away by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      If a tampered vending machine takes my cash, it's my word against theirs that it's my money they stole.

      And woohoo, you're out $1. If your identity is stolen, if your card information is relayed and used, that's a hell of a lot more money available. My five-dollar bill is great because... it can't be used for anything other than five dollars. There's no way for that five dollars to be used to get at more of my money.

      Writing the mag strip to a new card won't work for long anyway, since every time I put my card in an ATM machine, the mag strip is re-written

      And yet card skimmers are currently quite profitable. The local Costco just found a bunch of them combined with pinhole cameras on their gas POS kiosks. Why would people go through all that effort if there was no financial payday?

      If they use my credit card details, I get the money back. The insurance for that is paid by the merchant fees. There is no cash insurance.

      All of that drives up fees -- that insurance is passed onto you. No one else is eating it, you're paying the cost through higher prices.

    50. Re:Cash Needs To Go Away by AthanasiusKircher · · Score: 1

      (Of course, this assumes you never carry a balance on your card... and why would you?)

      I'd guess it's because you don't have enough money to get what you need, so you charge it.

      Nope -- that's NOT why most people carry a balance on a credit card. They "don't have enough money to get what [they] WANT."

      Yes, there are lots of poor people out there in dire straits, but most of them can't even qualify for credit cards, because they don't have reliable income or whatever credit history they have is bad. The people who charge extra on credit cards are typically people who have enough money for what they NEED, but they WANT more stuff faster than they can make money to get it. If they really NEEDED something, there are often ways to take out loans that would give a better interest rate than a credit card, or they could get government assistance or something if it's a basic human need.

      The other group of people who carry a balance are the people who usually did pay off their balance in the past, but they've lost a job or had some other unforeseen expense. Most of these people could also have been saving more for a "rainy day," but I have a little more sympathy for them. And there are some for whom the "rainy day" has lasted so long that it depleted a reasonable savings... they should perhaps not be faulted either.

      But most people just use credit cards for crap they don't need that they can't afford, but they want it NOW. And I personally think that's a stupid financial decision, because at credit card interest rates, it will cost you more in the long-term than just waiting a little while to save up or just buy something more affordable that will work in the meantime, like responsible adults do.

    51. Re:Cash Needs To Go Away by Agent0013 · · Score: 1

      There is a non-trivial fee associated with cash too. Cash requires labor to move/protect it, can go "missing" much more easily than credit card transactions etc. Cards are probably still more expensive, but not by as much as you may think.

      And credit card fraud doesn't exist? At least with cash, you are usually aware of it as it happens and you are limited to what you have on you at the moment, they can't take your whole account in one go.

      --

      -- ssoorrrryy,, dduupplleexx sswwiittcchh oonn.. -Quote found on actual fortune cookie.
    52. Re:Cash Needs To Go Away by Agent0013 · · Score: 1

      Credit cards are a loan, not an electronic money transfer. That would be more like your debit card. And yes, you will loose all the money in your account while the bank sorts it out. This could take 6-8 weeks. Can you survive without any money for 6-8 weeks?

      --

      -- ssoorrrryy,, dduupplleexx sswwiittcchh oonn.. -Quote found on actual fortune cookie.
    53. Re:Cash Needs To Go Away by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      if your card information is relayed and used, that's a hell of a lot more money available

      It's still all insured.

      And yet card skimmers are currently quite profitable

      Because not all banks off the service. The technology goes by the name of "liquid encryption numbers" or "LENSecure". The country I live in has chip+pin and contactless terminals everywhere. Not a single terminal is magstrip only. Much harder to skim a magstrip when it's never swiped.

      No one else is eating it, you're paying the cost through higher prices.

      It is passed on to you. When I buy something on my credit card at a place that doesn't have a surcharge (which is pretty much every brick-and-mortar shop to go to), everyone not paying with a credit card is subsidising me. Not only that, my credit card rewards scheme pays back in cash. It pays much more than the annual fee, so I save money.

      I also save interest on my home loan by having any entire months worth of spending sitting interest free on the card.

      Again please, how is cash safer

    54. Re:Cash Needs To Go Away by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      The country I live in has chip+pin and contactless terminals everywhere

      Yeah, I'd love to get rid of the magnetic stripe, and the "CC number + security code" system in the US. Not sure what it will take to actually get that ball rolling.

    55. Re:Cash Needs To Go Away by rebelwarlock · · Score: 1

      I can, theoretically, defend myself against a mugger. I can't defend myself against what happened to Target, except by not using credit cards.

    56. Re:Cash Needs To Go Away by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      The number+expiry+security code is an online thing. You should never give your security code to a person. It's not embossed either so it won't show up on a zip-zap carbon copy.

  4. how to make it rain? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What denomination ???

    1. Re:how to make it rain? by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      What denomination ???

      Not Southern Baptist. You'll need a sprinkling denomination.

    2. Re:how to make it rain? by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      there's a water sports denomination?

  5. Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why would you ever want a cashless society? Cash is one option you have. Taking it out removes an option and therefore freedom.

    1. Re:Why? by jader3rd · · Score: 2

      Why would you ever want a cashless society? Cash is one option you have. Taking it out removes an option and therefore freedom.

      So you can audit and authorize where it goes. I can't audit a guy stealing cash from my wallet.

    2. Re:Why? by osu-neko · · Score: 0

      It's not a convenient option. I live in an essentially horseless society, but I don't mind, and it's not really limiting my freedom -- I could get a horse if I wanted, but why would I want it when it's so less convenient?

      Personally, I haven't used cash in over a decade. The cashless society arrives the same way as the horseless society, not by limiting freedom but by providing better options, and letting people choose what's most convenient for them. Unless you want to force people to keep using cash, the cashless society is probably inevitable, precisely because people are free to choose other options, and will.

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    3. Re:Why? by Kardos · · Score: 4, Insightful

      TPTB can freeze credit cards, bank accounts, etc on a whim, but can't freeze a wallet full of $20s.

    4. Re:Why? by Shoten · · Score: 4, Insightful

      TPTB can freeze credit cards, bank accounts, etc on a whim, but can't freeze a wallet full of $20s.

      Actually, yeah they can. North Korea did just this...to all the money in everyone's wallet...when they decided that the black market had gotten too powerful. They demoted the value of the won (their currency) by two orders of magnitude...and gave everyone only a week to change their currency in for the new notes, after which time the old notes would not be worth the paper they were printed on.

      Now here's the part where you say "But that's North Korea!" right on the heels of everyone claiming that the reason to go cashless is because we're not really living in a free society...

      --

      For your security, this post has been encrypted with ROT-13, twice.
    5. Re:Why? by jeffb+(2.718) · · Score: 1

      The thug prowling around in the woods can take and spend my $20s, and I've got no recourse unless he's caught. If he steals my credit cards, they're only good for him until I phone in the theft, and I'm out zero money in the end. Plus all that terrible OMG-Big-Brother-Ate-My-Privacy tracking can tell the police a good bit about where he's been and what he's been doing.

      The Powers That Be have never frozen any of my accounts, but thugs have burglarized my house more than once. I have no desire to see cash go away, but it's disingenuous to claim that it's less risky than e-money.

    6. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      The Powers That Be have never frozen any of my accounts...

      Yet. Tomorrow's another story, especially with the ever-expanding police state.

    7. Re:Why? by PlusFiveTroll · · Score: 1

      NK can do that because they have no economy. You could try the same in the U.S. (which similar thing have been done with gold and silver) but it would be equivalent to committing electronic suicide to our economy. This is how you get your armed populace to rise up against you.

    8. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm fighting the government right now. They decided three years ago I owed them 37,000$. No explanations. The only thing I was told was I'm supposed to have received everything by mail. Of course, I never received anything. I lost count how many time I called or went to talk to someone. Each time I was told I'll receive everything by mail, each time I received only a summary stating I how them those 37,000$, plus interest. I never had an explanation. Sometimes the guy I talk to says it makes no sense, so he says he puts everything on hold until he can figure it out, but after a few months I receive again an advice saying I must pay them now. Last year, the government froze all my accounts and stole my money. Plain and simple.

      I filed a complaint, and the answer I got was that I should hire a lawyer and go to a court of justice. After talking to a lawyer, I was told this kind of cases could go on for a very long time and could cost me a lot of money. The advice was that I should forget about my money.

      So fuck you.

    9. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If he steals my credit cards, they're only good for him until I phone in the theft, and I'm out zero money in the end.

      Spoken by someone who's never been a victim of that. You're out of pocket for 40-45 business days while the bank (card issuers, actually) investigate the claim. And good luck getting overdraw charges and interest refunded. Been there, done that.

    10. Re:Why? by Penguinisto · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Malo periculosam, libertatem quam quietam servitutem

      You're still perfectly able to not use cash, but why do you insist that the rest of us follow along?

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    11. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "This is how you get your armed populace to rise up against you."

      So that's why they're trying to disarm us..

    12. Re:Why? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Why would you ever want a cashless society?
      Your payment flowing into another account can be tracked for a service.
      No more upper middle class lifestyle on a wage that cannot be proved to have paid for it - that boat, RV, SUV, new car, home renovation, new home would get a bit more tricky and need semi professional help to make seem legal.
      No closing accounts and getting ready to move to another country without a lot more paperwork. A digital tax wall keeps you at home.
      It will be sold to counter all domestic aspects of an illegal economy and money laundering in suburbia.
      Wage in, food, savings, pleasure, costs of running a home out and tracked to see how it all adds up. That new pool seen from above was paid for how?
      The other aspect is microtransaction standards per use of your new card. Thats a big win for your bank for every sale over decades as a consumer.
      A huge tax base, everybody tracked in real time as to spending vs wages, savings with the correct amounts flowing to support endless wars, healthcare and needed public services.
      Add in new transaction related criminal issues with time in a nice private prison. Enjoy your new gov backed debit card id from any bank your with, you can keep your accounts.
      So your getting Australian Transaction Reports and Analysis Centre for all currency transactions.
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_Transaction_Reports_and_Analysis_Centre
      At the back end you will have the MARKINT projects.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    13. Re:Why? by Sarten-X · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If the US were to change the dollar like that, most folks wouldn't care. The vast majority of American money is held in banks, which would make the change automatically on their electronic balance.

      The only thing affected by such a change would be large stockpiles of cash. For legitimate businesses, replacing the cash in circulation would be an annoyance, but not impossible. For most individuals, who would have less than a few thousand dollars in cash on hand, the change would mean just a quick trip to the nearest bank.

      The biggest disruption would be to those who have significant stockpiles of cash, larger than what banks would normally exchange. For that, the process could be pretty similar to what happens today if you need to make a large cash withdrawal or foreign-currency exchange: the bank can accommodate it with advance notice. You call the bank, give them a name and amount, and they'll make sure they have the cash on hand to serve your needs. The key detail, then, is that the bank knows your name and the amount you're exchanging, providing a paper trail indicating the presence of large amounts of cash. That paper trail is a problem for the criminal and the paranoid, but there aren't enough of those to make for a successful uprising.

      --
      You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
    14. Re:Why? by currently_awake · · Score: 2

      No envelopes stuffed with cash makes bribing government harder to do without getting caught much harder. It means everything you do makes a paper trail somewhere. Granted the powers that be have an interest in hiding, but when you are the ONLY people hiding it makes you stand out.

    15. Re:Why? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      The fun of been a tax free charity and getting support to spread the message. One global adventure at a time.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    16. Re:Why? by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      The Powers That Be have never frozen any of my accounts, but thugs have burglarized my house more than once.

      Interestingly enough, I've had the TPTB freeze all my accounts, but have never had my house burglarized.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    17. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why would you ever want a cashless society? Cash is one option you have. Taking it out removes an option and therefore freedom.

      So you can audit and authorize where it goes. I can't audit a guy stealing cash from my wallet.

      So someone else can authorize where your money goes? Think man! The only thing you can authorize is the cash in your physical hand. As soon as it's some number in some bank/app/whatever, you are no longer the entity who authorizes the transaction. Your authorization is only an illusion.

      Your money at some bank can be easily "deauthorized" by someone else with slightly higher level of access. Maybe the police will cease it. Maybe the tax authority or some debt collector or a judge you never heard of. They don't even need to take it - they just freeze your assets and you are fucked. But don't worry, this never affects the innocent. Just just the innocent never go to jail either....

      Bitcoin is great, until some virus steals your wallet - then you have no recourse.

      Cash is the only true currency where you remain *most* in control.

      PS. Yes, I keep my money at a bank, but at least I know that cashless is not what I want.

    18. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's irrelevant since unless you work under the table or for tips, you're not getting a wallet full of $20s without first pulling them out of an ATM.

    19. Re:Why? by jeffb+(2.718) · · Score: 1

      That's not the way it worked for us. Overdraw charges? Sounds like you're talking about a debit card, not a credit card.

    20. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everyone is different. While I have never been robbed or had anything stolen, I have had the tax man take money directly from my account including fines (while I was paying all taxes, other than one I was currently fighting in court), government freeze my accounts (only for a few days but still) and my bank lock me out for a month because they were worried about the large amount of money I was making I my life, I've found cash to be much safer, although it the most important thing is to have options.

    21. Re:Why? by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      You're still perfectly able to not use cash, but why do you insist that the rest of us follow along?

      because it's impractical for some to take cash, so I am "forced" to use cash for some transactions.

    22. Re:Why? by Sarten-X · · Score: 4, Informative

      I'm fighting the government right now. They decided...

      Who? A court issuing a judgement, or the IRS seeking unpaid taxes? There is no Department of Government that simply decides anything. It's always the result of some bureaucracy, with a defined process for dispute resolution.

      I owed them 37,000$. No explanations.

      No explanations, or none that you understood? I've had the IRS come looking for money a few times, and each time it included an enumerated list of what parts of my paperwork they disagreed with. In typical government form, there was no colloquial interpretation, but to an accountant and tax preparer, though, all of the necessary information was there.

      The only thing I was told was I'm supposed to have received everything by mail. Of course, I never received anything.

      How did you get notice that you owed the money, then? Have you checked that the suitable department has your address correct?

      I lost count how many time I called or went to talk to someone.

      That's a mistake. Keep records of every time you talk to someone about the matter, and take notes on what they say.

      Sometimes the guy I talk to says...

      Which guy? Record names, ID numbers, or any other identifier. Those are important to track down exactly who has said what, and on what authority. I've had some matters resolved just by pointing different bureaucrats at each other, and letting them work out the disagreement internally.

      Last year, the government froze all my accounts and stole my money.

      "Froze" and "stole" are not the same things. Either way, get a good lawyer.

      After talking to a lawyer, I was told this kind of cases could go on for a very long time and could cost me a lot of money.

      ...as can any lawsuit.

      The advice was that I should forget about my money.

      ...I said to get a good lawyer.

      The bottom line is that either your story doesn't add up, or you're rather incompetent with governmental matters. Find a suitable advocate for this matter (either a different lawyer for a judgement, or a tax specialist for an IRS dispute, etc.) and give them absolutely every piece of information you have. Record absolutely everything that transpires. Yes, it will cost you a significant amount of money now, because you've sat on this for three years, but I'd be surprised if it totaled more than $37,000.

      The most important thing is to make sure that someone fighting on your side is an expert in the relevant process. If you work within the established process, the various governmental entities are actually very forgiving and understanding. You must realize that the actual humans involved don't really care about taking your money, finding guilt, or screwing you over in any other way. They're interested in following the process and closing disputes, so if you show that you're interested in doing things the right way, they'll often be happy to explain exactly what that is. You don't need to waste their time professing your innocence, or telling them how horribly wrong the Big Bad Government is for attacking you. Just find out what you need to do to resolve the dispute, have an expert on hand to verify the information and ask questions, then do whatever's appropriate.

      --
      You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
    23. Re:Why? by aristotle-dude · · Score: 0

      You're still perfectly able to not use cash, but why do you insist that the rest of us follow along?

      because it's impractical for some to take cash, so I am "forced" to use cash for some transactions.

      You might like to be sodomized by the man but let the rest of live free. Do you want to be the bitch of big brother or something?

      --
      Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
    24. Re:Why? by ah.clem · · Score: 1

      This is how you get your armed populace to rise up against you.

      I thought that was supposed to happen when gasoline got over $4.00 a gallon, or Obama got elected, or something...

      --
      "Life is not magic." Dr. Ron Weiss - "If we don't play God, who will?" Dr. James Watson
    25. Re:Why? by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      The bottom line is that either your story doesn't add up, or you're rather incompetent with governmental matters.

      His story doesn't add up.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    26. Re:Why? by znrt · · Score: 1

      The thug prowling around in the woods can take and spend my $20s, and I've got no recourse unless he's caught.

      and cashless means you will have no recourse against *the other* thugs either. and they are simply "too big to get caught", didn't you hear?

    27. Re:Why? by nukenerd · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why would you ever want a cashless society?

      So you can audit and authorize where it goes. I can't audit a guy stealing cash from my wallet.

      Audit all you like, you still might not get it back. Hell, they can't even stop most large-scale internet scams when you would think it easy to audit the trail.

      A mugger could take at most about $50 from me (its equivalent - I am in the UK in fact, and in a rural area where muggings are almost unheard of). However a plastic card scam might lift about three orders of magnitude more than that.

    28. Re:Why? by nukenerd · · Score: 1

      The thug prowling around in the woods can take and spend my $20s

      How many $20's do you take with you into the woods?

    29. Re:Why? by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      It's bizarre listening to intelligent adults defend the US government. What the hell? Aren't you the ones who thought that the US government was the devil from 2001-2009? Have we always been friends with Eurasia?

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    30. Re:Why? by nosfucious · · Score: 1

      What will happen is that the large denomination notes will just simply not be issued.

      Want that $1000 in cash? That will be a lot of 20s or even 10s. This is chump change and of no interest.

      Large amounts of $100s make it easy to pay for stuff "of interest" - large amounts of drugs, bribes, high end weapony, keeping wages or other taxable payments of the radar, etc. Smaller notes mean that physical transportation of large amounts of cash becomes more problematic and risky, but not impossible.

      Pennies might go, but that will be just coincidence.

      Better have a way of getting your 1000 swiss franc and 500 Euro notes ASAP, and hope.

      --
      Q:I was listening to a CD in Grip and it sounded horrible! What's up? A:Perhaps you are listening to country music
    31. Re: Why? by reanjr9417 · · Score: 1

      It would also imply the US is in control of its economy. The fed is in control of the American economy and would never do something so self destructive.

    32. Re:Why? by GNU(slash)Nickname · · Score: 2

      The OP never said it was the US government...

    33. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sarten-X is not defending the government, nor are there any partisan buzzwords in his post, so I don't see why you'd leap to the conclusion that he's some kind of Obama fanboi

      The GP is only pointing out that "The Government" never sends anyone a bill without reason, so the GGP AC's claim that "They decided I owed them $37,000. No explanation." is ludicrous. Therefore, AC has either failed to understand the explanation, or disagrees with it and considers it nothing.

      The rest of Sarten-x's post is a quite informative guideline for dealing with any bureaucracy in any country and boils down to "record everything and get professional advice outside your area of expertise."

    34. Re:Why? by brxndxn · · Score: 1

      Why would you ever want a cashless society? Cash is one option you have. Taking it out removes an option and therefore freedom.

      So you can audit and authorize where it goes. I can't audit a guy stealing cash from my wallet.

      Since you can't audit a guy stealing cash from your wallet, we will eliminate all cash! Brilliant! Then, after that, we will audit the Pentagon!

      --
      --- We need more Ron Paul!
    35. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea just look at Iraq. We freedomed the shit out of them.

    36. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the US required a dollar trade-in like that, they'd kill the dollar as an international currency.

      You think foreign investors hoard that stuff for the fun of it? No, they hoard dollars (and not euros) because a dollar bill printed in 1900 (or 1800!) is still worth a dollar at any bank or institution that trades dollars, up to and including the Federal Reserve. And everyone knows it.

      Of course, if you had a dollar bill from that far back, it's probably worth several million on the auction market to someone with more money than brains. Because "antiques"!

      As for the uprising, it would be quiet unless the US government decided to start shooting. Then it would get ugly, since many foreign powers (with guns) hold US dollar reserves as a financial hedge. The US population wouldn't even factor in to that conflict. The US is an empire of empires, and the war resulting from such a stupid move would be global and devastating to everyone.

    37. Re:Why? by jeIIomizer · · Score: 1

      The GP is only pointing out that "The Government" never sends anyone a bill without reason

      That sort of stupidity has no business existing. The government put Japanese-American citizens in internment camps, spied on civil rights and anti-war activists, is doing all sorts of unconstitutional things, and yet they can't send people a bill without a reason? Why not? Something like that would be absolutely trivial compared to their other human rights violations.

      Not saying it's true, but to claim that it can't happen is just insane.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    38. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but can't freeze a wallet full of $20s.
       
      Liquid nitrogen

    39. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If he steals my credit cards, they're only good for him until I phone in the theft

      Providing him an incentive to prevent you from calling it in. Some thieves have stolen people's phones too. Other thieves have kidnapped the card owner and kept them for days while the card was used. A few have decided that killing the owner is what they want to do.

    40. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm fighting the government right now. They decided...

      Who? A court issuing a judgement, or the IRS seeking unpaid taxes? There is no Department of Government that simply decides anything. It's always the result of some bureaucracy, with a defined process for dispute resolution.

      Only if you don't miss their 15-day deadline for Appeals and 3-month deadline for Tax Court.

      I owed them 37,000$. No explanations.

      No explanations, or none that you understood? I've had the IRS come looking for money a few times, and each time it included an enumerated list of what parts of my paperwork they disagreed with. In typical government form, there was no colloquial interpretation, but to an accountant and tax preparer, though, all of the necessary information was there.

      After the Notice of Deficiency, you receive only notifications of how much they think you owe them. A notice of deficiency is sent to "the last known address", and the IRS does not legally have to contact people in any other way. Except freezing their accounts and taking their money away, of course.

      To summarize, if you ever hear any displeasure from IRS, react quickly, and decide whether to get a lawyer or forget about the money. Meanwhile, pray that they have your current mailing address, which they may conveniently screw up. Despite spending our money to record most of our phone conversations somewhere across the street.

      The only thing I was told was I'm supposed to have received everything by mail. Of course, I never received anything.

      How did you get notice that you owed the money, then? Have you checked that the suitable department has your address correct?

      I lost count how many time I called or went to talk to someone.

      That's a mistake. Keep records of every time you talk to someone about the matter, and take notes on what they say.

      Sometimes the guy I talk to says...

      Which guy? Record names, ID numbers, or any other identifier. Those are important to track down exactly who has said what, and on what authority. I've had some matters resolved just by pointing different bureaucrats at each other, and letting them work out the disagreement internally.

      Last year, the government froze all my accounts and stole my money.

      "Froze" and "stole" are not the same things.

      De jure or de facto?

      After talking to a lawyer, I was told this kind of cases could go on for a very long time and could cost me a lot of money.

      ...as can any lawsuit.

      The advice was that I should forget about my money.

      ...I said to get a good lawyer.

      The bottom line is that either your story doesn't add up, or you're rather incompetent with governmental matters. Find a suitable advocate for this matter (either a different lawyer for a judgement, or a tax specialist for an IRS dispute, etc.) and give them absolutely every piece of information you have. Record absolutely everything that transpires. Yes, it will cost you a significant amount of money now, because you've sat on this for three years, but I'd be surprised if it totaled more than $37,000.

      The most important thing is to make sure that someone fighting on your side is an expert in the relevant process. If you work within the established process, the various governmental entities are actually very forgiving and understanding. You must realize that the actual humans involved don't really care about taking your money, finding guilt, or screwing you over in any other way. They're interested in following the process and closing disputes, so if you show that you're interested in doing things the right way, they'll often be happy to explain exactly what that is.

    41. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Talk to the people who have been audited because they donated $ to charity that seems too "conservative".

    42. Re:Why? by EzInKy · · Score: 1

      First thought, if your "business" couldn't survive for a mere 45 days without income then your business was was underfunded to start with, and I believe that underfunding is one of the biggest causes of new business failures. I would hope that you should consider your "been there, done that" as a lesson that you should never start an enterprise that you can't fund without income for at least a year.

      --
      Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
    43. Re:Why? by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      If the US were to change the dollar like that, most folks wouldn't care.

      [citation needed]

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    44. Re:Why? by TangoMargarine · · Score: 2

      I live in an essentially horseless society, but I don't mind, and it's not really limiting my freedom -- I could get a horse if I wanted

      So basically, you're saying the society isn't horseless at all. Alrighty then.

      Next!

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    45. Re:Why? by Vokkyt · · Score: 1

      Technically, they also can just walk around and shoot organ donors to steal organs, but it doesn't really mean they are. There are a lot of nasty things the government could be doing that it isn't.

      It's not unreasonable to have a very healthy distrust of government, but in this case GP is right; the current government has historically just been meticulous about their monetary demands. It is more unreasonable to assume that they'd just send out a demand for money with no explanation or reasoning than it is to assume that the GGP is just making up a story to sound cool.

    46. Re:Why? by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      So you can audit and authorize where it goes.

      That sounds like a choice for me to make, not for society to make. I appreciate the effort to make good decisions on my behalf, but I am a competent adult, and capable of making my own life decisions.

    47. Re:Why? by Justpin · · Score: 1

      Yes it can, if those $20s are debased by money printing, the British tried this in the war of independence by making funny money. The US is printing an obscene amount of money right now which is why the price of gas and food is creeping ever higher.

    48. Re:Why? by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      Why would you ever want a cashless society? Cash is one option you have. Taking it out removes an option and therefore freedom.

      So you can audit and authorize where it goes.

      Which seems like a great idea, until you realize that you're not the only one auditing your paper trail.

      Do you really want the government/advertising companies to know what brand of dildo you prefer? Or that you're buying dildos at all? Or being able to make ownership of a certain thing illegal, then use your paper trail to find out if you own any of these things, and come-a-knockin'?

      Sure, paying with a card has certain advantages sometimes. As does paying with cash. There's no logical reason to limit our options here. Well, unless you're a paranoid-schizophrenic government agency that thinks like a meth-head.

      In which case, people who pay with cash are obviously all out to getcha.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    49. Re:Why? by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      Follow up, where in the woods are they spending $20's? Bambi's Bodega?

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    50. Re:Why? by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      No envelopes stuffed with cash makes bribing government harder to do without getting caught much harder.

      You watch too many movies.

      There are no "envelopes stuffed with cash," there's "dinner with a lobbyist." And it's legalized bribery, so they don't have any concern about being caught.

      Who do you think is behind the push to eliminate cash, anyway?

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    51. Re:Why? by jeIIomizer · · Score: 1

      Technically, they also can just walk around and shoot organ donors to steal organs, but it doesn't really mean they are.

      That's why I said that I'm not saying it's actually happening. But he said that it "never" happens, which I find ridiculous. Unlikely and impossible are different things.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    52. Re:Why? by houghi · · Score: 1

      The EU did something similar when they went from local paper to the EURO paper (The EURO was already in place. People just did not see it)

      People who has black money in cash were spending it ASAP. These were not large amounts. People a few thousand EURO. People with a lot more already has and have their black money in a bank.

      Also in the past changing bills and leaving a certain amount of time to change them is not uncommon in Europe. In Belgium you can still go to the National bank and change Belgian Frank bills of 100 BEF and upwards. They will have stopped to be legal tender.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    53. Re:Why? by Shoten · · Score: 1

      If the US were to change the dollar like that, most folks wouldn't care. The vast majority of American money is held in banks, which would make the change automatically on their electronic balance.

      The only thing affected by such a change would be large stockpiles of cash. For legitimate businesses, replacing the cash in circulation would be an annoyance, but not impossible. For most individuals, who would have less than a few thousand dollars in cash on hand, the change would mean just a quick trip to the nearest bank.

      The biggest disruption would be to those who have significant stockpiles of cash, larger than what banks would normally exchange. For that, the process could be pretty similar to what happens today if you need to make a large cash withdrawal or foreign-currency exchange: the bank can accommodate it with advance notice. You call the bank, give them a name and amount, and they'll make sure they have the cash on hand to serve your needs. The key detail, then, is that the bank knows your name and the amount you're exchanging, providing a paper trail indicating the presence of large amounts of cash. That paper trail is a problem for the criminal and the paranoid, but there aren't enough of those to make for a successful uprising.

      I don't think you read what I said correctly. They didn't just devalue the notes; they devalued the currency . In other words, they increased the cost of everything/decreased the value of all money by 100-fold. And my response was to someone saying that there's no way that The Powers That Be can do anything to eradicate cash, essentially.

      I see a lot of people arguing that "it wouldn't be a good idea to do that." Yeah, no shit :) My point is that it's possible, regardless of how dumb it would be to do.

      --

      For your security, this post has been encrypted with ROT-13, twice.
    54. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you really call the IRS forgiving?

      Why does he have to be incompetent in government matters? Why can't the government be incompetent? It's not like he just sent selective service warnings to a bunch of people born in the last 1800s, right?

    55. Re:Why? by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      You might like to be sodomized by the man but let the rest of live free.

      So you want to be sodomized? Not everyone else shares your preferences.

    56. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GP is the poster child for "If you think education is expensive, try ignorance"

    57. Re:Why? by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      ...I said to get a good lawyer.

      You know, here's the thing about good lawyers -- they like to get paid. They take cases where you'll be able to afford paying them.
      Defending against this $37k lien or whatever it is may not be worth their time. It can be quite difficult to find a good lawyer willing to take on a shit case with little payout.

    58. Re:Why? by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      That sort of stupidity has no business existing.

      Fair 'nuff.

      The government put Japanese-American citizens in internment camps

      They had reason. We may think it's a totally bullshit reason, but it's an easily understandable reason.

      spied on civil rights and anti-war activists

      They had reason. We may think it's a totally bullshit reason, but it's an easily understandable reason.

      is doing all sorts of unconstitutional things

      See above. Though that's pretty vague.

      So "they refuse to give me any reason for why I owe $37,000" strains credibility. The AC is leaving something out, making it up, or is entirely and utterly incompetent in financial matters.

    59. Re:Why? by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      That's not the way it worked for us. Overdraw charges? Sounds like you're talking about a debit card, not a credit card.

      For most people now, their debit card is a credit card as well. Thief charges the credit card, then you rack up overdrawn charges when you try to online bill pay, use the ATM, etc.

    60. Re:Why? by jeIIomizer · · Score: 1

      They had reason. We may think it's a totally bullshit reason, but it's an easily understandable reason.

      Rapists have reasons. Murderers have reasons. Hitler had reasons. What does that matter? I mean, you even said that we may think it's a totally bullshit reason, which I clearly already thought, so what's the point of mentioning it?

      Though that's pretty vague.

      The TSA, for example. But they have reasons.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    61. Re:Why? by jeIIomizer · · Score: 1

      I see what you were trying to say, but "without reason" usually means "for no good reason."

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    62. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someones in need of some re-education, diddley.

    63. Re:Why? by jader3rd · · Score: 1

      not for society to make.

      I'm pretty sure that the medium for transactions is a decision made by society. If society decided not to allow physical objects to represent legal tender, I don't think that you'd be able to make many financial transactions with the physical object of your choice.

    64. Re:Why? by Agent0013 · · Score: 1
      IRS taking refunds for parents dept

      Actually, this same thing has been happening in the US. They say you owe a bunch of money from 50 years ago when your mother got some payment she didn't deserve or something, but they have no paperwork on it. And they expect you to pay it back even though your mother is long dead. And then they just take your whole tax refund even though it is more money than you supposedly owe. Plus, dept is not supposed to travel from parent to child like the IRS was claiming.

      So yeah, his story holds up. It was only after a newspaper started questioning about the theft of the tax refund that they got the remainder back. And eventually they stopped the process when enough news and lawyers started getting interested in what was going on.

      --

      -- ssoorrrryy,, dduupplleexx sswwiittcchh oonn.. -Quote found on actual fortune cookie.
  6. Drugs by slowdeath · · Score: 3, Interesting

    As long as there is a demand for illegal drugs, there will be a need for cash. Lots of cash. Dealers don't take plastic.

    1. Re:Drugs by disposable60 · · Score: 1

      And that's the number one reason cash will be eliminated.
      No undocumented, untaxed, under-the-radar transactions will be tolerated.
      No illegal drugs, no paid-for sex, no firearm/cash transactions.
      The CashMax transaction that didn't require paperwork was $10k. I believe it's lower now.
      Soon it'll wind up being $1.

      --
      You're looking for quotes? See my journal.
    2. Re:Drugs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As long as there is a demand for illegal drugs, there will be a need for cash. Lots of cash. Dealers don't take plastic.

      No as long as their is demand for illegal drugs there will always be a need for crypto currencies. I haven't bought drugs in cash in five years.

    3. Re:Drugs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No poor people...

    4. Re:Drugs by rtb61 · · Score: 5, Informative

      There are a full range of benefits of paying with cash. Limiting the number of credit card transactions to make it easier to track proper and improper ones. Discounts that are available when purchasing with cash. The trades prefer to be paid cash and discount accordingly somewhat fair as their payment can not be tax deducted unless you can hide you home behind a business. It works when the power is out. It keeps perverse privacy invasive government agencies and corporations from tracking every single thing you do.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    5. Re:Drugs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The CashMax transaction that didn't require paperwork was $10k. I believe it's lower now.

      I believe technically the limit is still $10k, but "structuring" to avoid the $10k limit is illegal, so, say, any $9,999 transaction or two $5k transactions close together would also require the paperwork. Also, the $10k limit is not adjusted for inflation, so in real terms the limit is going down.

    6. Re:Drugs by penix1 · · Score: 2

      And add to that the transaction fees charged to merchants as I said below. They are ridiculous. Many merchants where I live have a minimum charge you can make with a card. Something like $10 or $20.

      --
      This is a sig. This is only a sig. Had this been an actual sig you would have been informed where to tune for more sigs.
    7. Re:Drugs by NotInHere · · Score: 2

      No undocumented, untaxed, under-the-radar transactions will be tolerated.

      You are joking, aren't you? Cashless money only forces the small people to pay taxes. Those who can afford a monaco citizenship will still go away untaxed.
      The governments should hunt the big money instead. But they know, that if they do, big money moves off, like in france (which did a far too exagerated tax), as it lives from and lives for its money (nothing bad, I would do the same). So instead they tax those for whom money doesn't have this big priority. No average rich person will leave a country only because they raised taxes.

    8. Re:Drugs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't really think people are going to log the non-cash transaction as "Payment for illegal drugs" do you? There are already plenty of illegal things you can buy with plastic.

    9. Re:Drugs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Removing cash doesn't make these events go away, no matter how much the brainless turds in government want it to. People will simply use another medium of exchange.

    10. Re:Drugs by John.Banister · · Score: 2

      Yes, but how will stupid people buy drugs?

    11. Re:Drugs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess that means BitCoin will always be used for "illicit transactions".

    12. Re:Drugs by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Yes every suspicious transaction report would be automated with lower limits until every transaction is fully reported on.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    13. Re:Drugs by sjames · · Score: 1

      And people will switch to Tide as a currency (it's already happening!)

    14. Re:Drugs by currently_awake · · Score: 1

      Cash isn't anonymous. Every time you spend cash it eventually gets scanned and the numbers sent to the government. You take cash from the bank, scan. The gas station deposits that money, scan. You might have paid a hooker with it, and then she bought cash- but if they can trace all the other money from the gas station to tourists then it's more likely it was you buying gas.

    15. Re:Drugs by aristotle-dude · · Score: 5, Informative

      Cash isn't anonymous. Every time you spend cash it eventually gets scanned and the numbers sent to the government. You take cash from the bank, scan. The gas station deposits that money, scan. You might have paid a hooker with it, and then she bought cash- but if they can trace all the other money from the gas station to tourists then it's more likely it was you buying gas.

      Uh, you take the hundred dollar bill from the bank teller, then you buy something with it and get change with smaller bills and so on. Notice how your original withdrawal gets lost in the noise?

      --
      Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
    16. Re:Drugs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's impossible to control barter, and the economy depends on shadow industries and undocumented migrants. When there's no currency people will invent one. It has happened many times in history.

    17. Re:Drugs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Italy is already like this. Paying cash for any transaction higher than €1,000 is illegal.

    18. Re:Drugs by jbmartin6 · · Score: 1

      Who is doing this scanning and how does that eliminate anonymity? I've worked in a few cash handling businesses and never even heard of number scanning, nor have I ever seen a device to do this. I imagine the bank might scan serial numbers off of bills at some point for tracking physical currency still in circulation. Are you claiming that when a business makes a cash deposit, the bank reports all the serial numbers to the government and says "business X deposited all of these" and "we gave bills X,Y, and Z to Tom Smith when he made an ATM withdrawal"? I'd have to ask for some proof of this claim, it seems rather expensive and pointless.

      --
      This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
    19. Re:Drugs by netsavior · · Score: 1

      the 10k limit is in place, but banks can be issued a fine if they do not report obvious restructuring. Federally dictated AML (anti money laundering) training requires that "any suspicious transaction" be reported, regardless of amount, and bank policy usually dictates $5000 now.

    20. Re:Drugs by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      You might have paid a hooker with it, and then she bought cash

      Come again? How do you "buy" cash with cash?

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    21. Re:Drugs by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      As long as there is a demand for sex toys

      FTFY.

      I'd bet the societal need to be able to anonymously purchase fetish-based merchandise dwarfs the need for illicit substances.

      Because everybody fucks, but not everybody does drugs.

      Side note, this is the perfect response to the "done nothing wrong/nothing to hide" crowd.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    22. Re:Drugs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I haven't known a single person who has obtained illegal drugs via cash in years. There are LOTS of alternatives to forking over cash. Just because you don't know about them doesn't mean they don't exist.

    23. Re:Drugs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FTFY.

      I'd bet the societal need to be able to anonymously purchase fetish-based merchandise dwarfs the need for illicit substances.

      Because everybody fucks, but not everybody does drugs.

      Side note, this is the perfect response to the "done nothing wrong/nothing to hide" crowd.

      Well, not that I agree with the "done nothing wrong/nothing to hide" crowd, but my response to your point about fetishes is that I would hope one day we as a society/species would grow out of judging people on their fetishes.

      It'd be great if people can talk about sex like they talk about music. Well, if not great at least it'll be funny when the hipsters show up

      "Pffftt you call that a fetish? I get turned on by things you haven't even HEARD of!"

    24. Re:Drugs by ComputersKai · · Score: 1

      No undocumented, untaxed, under-the-radar transactions will be tolerated.

      ...unless you're a large corporation
      ...unless you're rich enough to afford legal protections
      ...unless you happen to be an important politician

      No illegal drugs, no paid-for sex, no firearm/cash transactions.

      No matter. The criminal underworld will simply just come up with another "currency", or a barter system. Banning bartering would make no sense.

      So, what did you say would be different again, other than losing the freedom of tangible cash?

  7. New World Order by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just what we need to bring about a new world order.

  8. Not me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    As someone who has had a recent issue with a certain major bank(they closed the account and sent cashiers checks to me for the balance. Waiting 2-3 days without money wasn't pleasant)...I will never go cashless. Relying on these financial institutions for every transaction is something I will not trust. I won't get into the whole NSA/FBI/etc. potential tracking of all my purchases.

    1. Re:Not me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not worried about the TLAs as much as I am about security (or lack of) with some financial institutions.

      Cash is distributed. I don't need to check blockchains. I don't have to wait for a transaction to be approved, then it reversed because the customer falsely alleged fraud. When I pay someone with cash, they stay paid, and the other way around, assuming I'm not getting counterfeit currency.

      If I completely lose all access to bank accounts, I can get back banking electronically, painful as it may be, by buying a prepaid credit card. There are a fuckton of fees, but with cash, I can pay electronically. However, oftentimes, that doesn't work in reverse, and when it does, I'm at the mercy of ATM fees, or finding a usable ATM without a skimmer in the first place.

      Plus, with the way the Internet is set up, a bank can be raided by a guy with a telephone and a basic computer anywhere in the world. Cash requires physical compromise to obtain.

      Of course, cash isn't insured... once it is stolen, it is stolen. However, there are risks with all decisions.

    2. Re:Not me... by NotInHere · · Score: 2

      Of course, cash isn't insured... once it is stolen, it is stolen. However, there are risks with all decisions.

      I'd rather like my purse taken away from me than my eye cut out because it gave biometric access to my account.

    3. Re:Not me... by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, using your eye for biometrics is a bad idea. Some people with diseases such as diabetes or have migraines would require them to update it on a weekly basis if not more. They're more likely to use finger prints which can be fooled by using gummie bears.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    4. Re:Not me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had a short term loan for $50,000 when selling one house and buying another, that was to be paid first when the first house sold (saved me over $8000 in fees doing it that way), and some person/computer decided it came due early. On a Friday evening. It emptied all of my accounts, and gobbled up anything else put into the account. The credit card was frozen.

      It was all sorted out on Monday, and overdraft fees and whatnot were canceled. But it sucked having no money for gas or anything all weekend. Had to borrow cash from family to last the weekend.

    5. Re:Not me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Incidentally, this is exactly why you should have a safe at your residence with at least $1,000 in cash reserved at all times for emergency use. I keep my emergency cash in my gun safe but if you don't own guns then a regular safe for valuables works too and should be large enough to store a handgun or two (I recommend gun ownership).

    6. Re:Not me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do you imply that cashless means bank-based?
      Think cryptocurrencies.

    7. Re:Not me... by FireFury03 · · Score: 1

      As someone who has had a recent issue with a certain major bank(they closed the account and sent cashiers checks to me for the balance. Waiting 2-3 days without money wasn't pleasant)...I will never go cashless.

      That's more of an "all eggs in one basket" problem than a problem specifically made worse by being cashless. If you split your money between multiple banks then this kind of thing wouldn't be an issue (or have multiple credit cards, etc.)

    8. Re:Not me... by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      To how many baskets should I pay a monthly fee so that I can ensure my money is safe?

    9. Re:Not me... by FireFury03 · · Score: 1

      To how many baskets should I pay a monthly fee so that I can ensure my money is safe?

      Hmm.. I forgot that the US banking system is nuts. Here in the UK I have 2 current accounts, 2 savings accounts and 2 ISAs and none of them charge a monthly fee...

    10. Re:Not me... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Paying a monthly fee for a bank account seems somewhat archaic. Let me guess: you live in the USA?

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    11. Re:Not me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As someone who has had a recent issue with a certain major bank(they closed the account and sent cashiers checks to me for the balance. Waiting 2-3 days without money wasn't pleasant)...

      Happened to me once, as a result I keep my money in multiple banks. Programs like Mint make it easy to keep track of what is all where.

    12. Re:Not me... by Peter+Simpson · · Score: 1

      As someone who has had a recent issue with a certain major bank(they closed the account and sent cashiers checks to me for the balance. Waiting 2-3 days without money wasn't pleasant)...I will never go cashless. Relying on these financial institutions for every transaction is something I will not trust. I won't get into the whole NSA/FBI/etc. potential tracking of all my purchases.

      Nor me.

      Cash is anonymous.
      No fees to use cash (yet, I guess)

    13. Re:Not me... by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      Of course, cash isn't insured... once it is stolen, it is stolen. However, there are risks with all decisions.

      I'd rather like my purse taken away from me than my eye cut out because it gave biometric access to my account.

      Right, because that is likely to happen...

      Lets keep our arguments against this to reasonable ones, as not to give people reason to actually try to implement this insanity.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    14. Re:Not me... by EzInKy · · Score: 1

      So the benefits to those who are totally 180 degrees opposite your opinion is, what!? Pretending we are still a democracy, just what would it take to cause those who want their legally protected to side with yours? Are you sure you understand the bottom line here? If I give you $x I want an authoriatory to guarantee the I get $X back if I give it to you. Maybe some laws that force you to make me at lease break even when you go under? Don't know for sure, but people are generallly okay with accepting loss as long as they don't lose.

      --
      Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
    15. Re:Not me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live in the USA, and my bank accounts only incur monthly fees if I fail to maintain a certain minimum balance, and the minimum balance is based on the account type (which is itself based on how much money you intend to keep in it).

    16. Re:Not me... by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Nope but not surprisingly it's actually quite common in the western world to pay small monthly fees on accounts.

  9. It would be handy for the governing class. by rmdingler · · Score: 1
    Bitcoin was/is an attempt at an internet cash.

    Barter is occasionally impractical, yet relatively untraceable and virtually untaxable.

    But cotton/linen fiber is legal tender for all debts, public and private. But especially for private.

    --
    Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

    Ernest Hemingway

  10. Useless coins by Gavin+Rogers · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Let's see the future free from pennies, first.

    1. Re:Useless coins by OzPeter · · Score: 2

      Let's see the future free from pennies, first.

      Years ago I was at the Denver mint (where they make pennies) and I questioned the tour guide there about getting rid of pennies (as per Oz). For some reason this tour guide couldn't comprehend a world without pennies, and started bring up all sorts of straw men arguments about how consumers would be ripped off, and other things (which I can't quite recall now). It was weird.

      But what is also weird is that the US has a $1 coin. But I think that I have only ever seen it in use in Chicago. Apparently USians don't like them. That and the $2 bill - which only seems be given out as change at Monticello in Charlottesville VA, because it was Jeffersons home and his face is on the $2 bill.

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    2. Re:Useless coins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good luck with that. The last time we dropped our smallest coin (the half cent) was 1857. Its approximate value at the time (in 2014 dollars) was fourteen cents, meaning our next smallest coin at the time was worth more than a 2014 quarter.

      I don't know how we could expect people to drop the penny when we're obviously two more coins behind on that metric. I think if most people answer honestly, they'll recognize that they barely treat even a quarter as an actual store of value.

    3. Re:Useless coins by mhkohne · · Score: 2, Informative

      Don't get me started on pennies. The reason we still have them is mostly sentimental. If it were my choice I'd drop the penny AND the nickle, AND the quarter, introduce a 20 cent piece, and be done.

      Dollar coin never took off because they kept making bills. Other countries that have dollar coins stopped making the bills, so the coin took over as the bills left circulation. The actual economics of the bill vs. coin in the US are quite interesting due to how well made our bills are and how long they last in circulation, but then you add in the fact the people tend to drop change in a jar at home and the question of which is better for the government gets really interesting (there's a GAO report on the subject somewhere).

      Two dollar bill just doesn't really serve much of a purpose - $5 is small enough for normal use, the $2 doesn't really add much functionality to the system.

      --
      A thousand pounds of wood moving at 300 feet per minute. Don't get in the way.
    4. Re:Useless coins by Macrat · · Score: 1

      But what is also weird is that the US has a $1 coin.

      The US HAD a $1 coin. It was shut down due to "cost cutting." But the old ones are still in circulation.

      http://www.usmint.gov/mint_programs/$1coin/?action=schedule

    5. Re:Useless coins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you switched to cashless payment you would no longer be annoyed by those 1/100th of a dollar amounts and wouldn't feel the need to eliminate them.

    6. Re:Useless coins by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      Why do you link to a page that shows which future dollar coins they will issue for the next several years, in order to prove that they no longer issue dollar coins?

    7. Re:Useless coins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We don't see them enough to get used to them. Until they discontinue the dollar, it's unlikely that we'll see enough of the dollar coins to actually get to use them.

      Also, Fuck you racist bastard, the term is Americans, USian is basically just a term used by snooty Europeans and South Americans that are too stupid and/or bigoted to use the correct term.

    8. Re:Useless coins by Megane · · Score: 1

      The US had a nice dollar coin (the Susan B Anthony). But it looked too much like a quarter, being only being slightly bigger, so people didn't use it.

      Then they made a new one (the Sacagawea). It was the same size (because vending machines), but made out of a brass-colored metal, and no edge milling. The metal looks nice when it's new, but with relatively low time in circulation it tarnishes to an ugly brown that has no contrast for the artwork. And people still won't use it, because the US government (probably mostly due to Congressional inertia) keeps making singles. They've even issued them with different artwork, but nobody cares. I'd be surprised if 10% of the US population even knows they exist, and probably more people know about the 2-dollar bills that nobody uses either.

      There are a few places where you might find the dollar coins used, such as some parking garages. It's more reliable to make change with coins than with worn-out GWs, and quarters are no good when you're charging $8-$15 and people are likely to want to use a $20 bill at unattended payment terminals. The coins become a sort of local currency because of repeat business, so there is some amount of recirculation.

      The post office used to have nice coin-operated stamp vending machines that took any coin from a penny to a dollar (except for those old monster JFK half-dollars), and gave dollar coins for change, but they yanked them out years ago in favor of some kind of complicated credit card-based scale/postage printing machine that basically nobody uses. So now you have to wait in line to buy a sheet of bog-standard stamps. (But I can get them at the supermarket check-out too, so meh.)

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    9. Re:Useless coins by Spazmania · · Score: 1

      What would we like about the dollar coin? Except by sight it's nearly indistinguishable from a quarter worth, well, a quarter of what a dollar is worth. And when we see it... it's ugly. I want to see George Washington on my dollars, not obscure companions of explorers however worthy they may be.

      I do think it'd be reasonable to replace the penny and nickle with a better designed $1 coin and a $5 coin. Then the new system of cash transactions in tenths of a dollar instead of hundredths of a dollar would make sense and the universe wouldn't end because of it.

      --
      Moderating "-1, Disagree" is simple censorship. Have the guts to post your opinion.
    10. Re:Useless coins by Nutria · · Score: 2

      Apparently USians don't like them.

      Merchants don't like them because there's no room in the cash drawer. Same with the $1 coin.

      Get ride of the penny and $1 bill and there would be room for the $1 coin and $2 bill.

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    11. Re:Useless coins by jeffb+(2.718) · · Score: 1

      They're no longer issued for circulation. They're only made for collectors. This seems like an odd business for a government (manufacturing collectibles), but it does produce a small profit, so I guess there's not a lot of motivation for shutting it down completely.

    12. Re:Useless coins by jeffb+(2.718) · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I think it's time for a full reset on our cash denominations. Knock out the cent and nickel (each one costs more than its face value to produce). Make dimes and half-dollars of the same general size and shape as today's cent and nickel. Make dollar coins like today's dime, and bring back the "eagles" -- quarter-eagle ($2.50), half-eagle ($5), eagle ($10), and double eagle ($20). Heck, you could even reinstate the half-union and union ($50 and $100), which never made it into circulation during the original 1850's gold rush.

      But this will never happen. There's too much inertia around our current system, and by the time inflation trivializes all current denominations, the "cashless society" folks will most likely have won. Maybe the black and grey markets will go over to true hard currency, the silver and gold that's currently the domain of collectors and doomsayers.

    13. Re:Useless coins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Merchants don't like them because there's no room in the cash drawer.

      I was one of the merchants you're referring to and we liked any kind of currency just fine. Where do these weird ideas come from?

    14. Re:Useless coins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong, they're made for circulation, they're just making sets with all the presidents, like they did with all the states and Washington DC on quarters. They are for collectors, but they're also legal tender and can be circulated, unless you're also saying the US States quarters weren't made for circulation either. I expect after they finish the presidents sets they'll go back to printing the "standard" gold dollar.

    15. Re:Useless coins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      . The actual economics of the bill vs. coin in the US are quite interesting due to how well made our bills are and how long they last in circulation

      WTF? the US have some of the worst notes in the world. The majority of the world moved to highly durable plastic notes over the last 10-20 years. By comparison the US notes have a very short life expectancy and hence are some of the most expensive to maintain currencies in the world.

    16. Re:Useless coins by Derec01 · · Score: 1

      Actually, can you explain to me the benefits of a $1 coin to the user? Fine, it's more durable; I don't really care, I rarely accidentally destroy $1 bills, so that benefit accrues solely to the mint.

      I get the odd comment from European friends about how silly the dollar bill is, which I don't understand. In practice, my experience in the Euro area and in the UK is that my pocket gets so frigging heavy and awkward. Meanwhile I can get a weightless stack of $1s as change in the US. Sure, they could make the dollar coin tiny, but now it will be confused with a dime or nickel, requiring an entire reset of the whole coin system relative sizes and weights.

    17. Re:Useless coins by jeffb+(2.718) · · Score: 2

      No, "issued for circulation" means the Mint sends them to the Fed for distribution -- so they can be spent, given out as change, and so forth. The last few years of dollar coins haven't been issued for circulation. Yes, they're still legal tender, but since you have to pay more than face value to get them, it's kind of dumb to spend them.

      Kennedy halves haven't been issued for circulation in years, either, but you'll still find recent-date ones in rolls occasionally. People inherit or steal them, don't care about collectable value, and just spend the coins or turn them in at the bank.

      State quarters (and now America The Beautiful national park quarters) are issued for circulation -- at least, the ones minted in Philadelphia and Denver.

    18. Re:Useless coins by AthanasiusKircher · · Score: 4, Informative

      Wrong, they're made for circulation, they're just making sets with all the presidents, like they did with all the states and Washington DC on quarters.

      No, sorry, but you are wrong here. The US mint is sitting on roughly a billion of these coins, minted in previous years, which may never see circulation because there is no demand. Thus, the mint is NOT minting any new coins for the purpose of circulation. Unlike quarters (which circulate and wear out and needed to be replaced, new designs or not), at current demand levels, the mint has enough dollar coins in storage to last for decades.

      Thankfully, the mint was able to stop this idiocy of minting new coins just to shove into vaults a few years ago, so now they are only producing new coins to sell as uncirculated coins for collectors (which they can actually make some money off of). Sure, the new coins CAN be put in circulation, but their primary purpose is to be sold for premium prices to collectors.

    19. Re:Useless coins by dryeo · · Score: 1

      In Canada we've always had a two dollar denomination, used to be a bill and is now a coin. It's very useful, 5 twos or 10 ones to equal $10. Never could understand the American rejection of the $2 bill.
      From the governments perspective, dollar notes are the worse due to their short lifetime (our paper money was as well made as American paper money). Dollar coin lasts for years and now that we've gone plastic the bills will last much longer as well.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    20. Re:Useless coins by dryeo · · Score: 1

      American cash registers are smaller then we have in Canada? Typically 5 coin trays and 5 bill trays I believe. When the one was changed to a coin it took the spot that the single occupied, same with the deuce, replaced by the toonie. And yes 2 dollar bills and now coins are as common as any other denomination, well thousands are getting very rare now as they aren't made any longer and every time one shows up at the bank they're removed from circulation.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    21. Re:Useless coins by AthanasiusKircher · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Actually, can you explain to me the benefits of a $1 coin to the user? Fine, it's more durable; I don't really care, I rarely accidentally destroy $1 bills, so that benefit accrues solely to the mint.

      Umm, you do realize who pays for dollar bills to be printed, right? The US government, which is funded by your taxes. Dollar bills on average last less than a year in circulation before they are removed and destroyed (due to damage, etc.). Coins last years or even decades in circulation. There's a lot of debate over exactly how much we'd save by switching to coins, but the consensus is it's at least a few hundred million dollars per year. In the giant federal budget, this is barely a drop in the bucket, but it's something...

    22. Re:Useless coins by Nutria · · Score: 1

      When the one was changed to a coin it took the spot that the single occupied

      But since the US never stopped making the $1 bill nor penny, there's no room for the $2 bill not $1 coin.

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    23. Re:Useless coins by dryeo · · Score: 1

      Yes that is a flaw but I was under the impression that the two spot isn't used. Usually for bills, now mixed, here you have ones, twos, fives, tens and twenties with larger bills going under the tray.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    24. Re:Useless coins by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      Vending machines use the dollar coins and give dollar coins as change.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    25. Re:Useless coins by Concerned+Onlooker · · Score: 1

      "By comparison the US notes have a very short life expectancy and hence are some of the most expensive to maintain currencies in the world."

      Yes, but they don't smell as bad when CEOs use $100 bills to light their cigars.

      --
      http://www.rootstrikers.org/
    26. Re:Useless coins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Canadian:
      When handing cash, pretty much everyone only gives you loonies or toonies if they give you and change at all. You will inevitably give back out most of the loonies, but at the end of the day you end up with whatever price denomination your products up to the most.
      So if your items are in 20's, you will get 20's, if your items are in 5's you'll get 5's, anything less than 5, eg 4$ means you get lots of toonies, 3$ you get lots of loonies. Anything less than 1$ means you get a lot of loonies and give out mostly quarters.

      Nobody every fishes around their change/pockets for anything less than a dollar unless they are feeding a vending machine or parking meter. Even then, our parking meters take chip cards. http://vancouver.ca/streets-transportation/pay-for-parking.aspx

    27. Re:Useless coins by stoploss · · Score: 1

      Just an FYI, all those stamps you buy from the APC kiosk at a Post Office have unique serial numbers printed on them and are linked to your credit card and photograph. Couple that with the Mail Covers program the USPS has been running for the government since the 70's, and they know exactly to whom you are mailing that stamped letter (you know, because they literally log every single one of them).

      Just look at the QR code-looking eIndicia barcodes on the stamps. Postal documentation indicates they are unique, but each APC printed stamp is obviously different upon close visual inspection.

      Oh, and try covering that black plastic window by the keypad when you're using the APC... it will give you a nonspecific error message when you try to complete the transaction if you do that. It wants your photo for the log.

      Buy your stamps from the counter or the grocery store.

    28. Re:Useless coins by UltraZelda64 · · Score: 1

      Well, I'll take a pocket full of dollar coins over dollar bills any day. I like coins--small, they have some nice weight to them, and they're easier to handle in large numbers for the most part. They won't fold, rip or get crinkled. The only major downside? Coins tend to fall out of my pocket if I lay down without taking them out.

      On the other hand... have you ever had a wallet full of bills? Dollar bills, like pennies, can really add up. Add a couple fives, tens and twenties and your wallet will be about to burst, not wanting to close properly. Then the next time you pull your wallet out, you have to deal with the nightmare of wading through tens of loose pieces of paper, all folded and bent and deformed in any way imaginable, to get to the bills you need. And often because those damn 1-dollar bills, about as annoying as the damn penny and nickel (though not *quite* as worthless), end up taking space that just isn't really available, and having fewer bills (ie. larger dollar amounts; fives, tens, etc.) would be more pleasant to work with.

      IMO they should ditch the penny and make the nickel the smallest measurement of change, and get rid of the $1 bill while they're at it making the $5 the smallest bill. Bring the 50-cent piece and the dollar coin into full circulation... and maybe even some of the old "eagle" coins ($2.50, $5, $10, maybe even $20). I would seriously almost NEVER use bills if they did that. I would be more likely to use the $10 and $20 bills than any other if I used any bills at all, but anything smaller, I'd personally use the coin. I hate the physical size of the dime though, I wish they'd give it a makeover... it's just too damn small to handle. The nickel is pretty bad too, but not quite as bad.

    29. Re:Useless coins by pjludlow · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Interesting thing about the dollar coin is that it is in wide circulation in Ecuador (due to the dollarization of 2000 based on the hyperinflation of the sucre). It was odd seeing so many transactions with the US dollar coin there (parking, transport, food, etc), when I have almost never seen it in circulation in the US. It's actually odd just using US currency in a country that currently has a president with a measure of a anti-US sentiment and strong ties with Cuba, Venezuela, etc.

    30. Re:Useless coins by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      You need one of those gay European man purses to carry around all your loose change. Then it makes sense, I suppose.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    31. Re:Useless coins by tsqr · · Score: 1

      On the other hand... have you ever had a wallet full of bills? Dollar bills, like pennies, can really add up. Add a couple fives, tens and twenties and your wallet will be about to burst, not wanting to close properly.

      Right now I have $98 in currency in my wallet (mix of 20s, 10s and 1s), and my wallet is showing no signs of distress. Personally, I'd rather have eight 1-dollar bills in my wallet than a small pile of heavy coins in my pocket, all mixed in with my thumb drives, keys, and pocket knife. I also prefer not to make jingle-jangle noises when I walk, but I suppose some people like that sound.

      Then the next time you pull your wallet out, you have to deal with the nightmare of wading through tens of loose pieces of paper, all folded and bent and deformed in any way imaginable, to get to the bills you need.

      First world problem. If your currency is "all folded and bent and deformed in any way imaginable", you're not doing it right. Are you one of those people who keep their currency all wadded up in a ball? Anyway, if you think straightening out a pile of money is a nightmare, you should count yourself lucky in life.

    32. Re:Useless coins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most of the rest of the world was paying a lot more for their bills than the US does. The US notes have the longest longevity of any paper note in the world. Which is a large part of why we haven't gone that route, there hasn't been as much of a need to as other countries.

      The one dollar bill, which is the one that we'd probably best do away with, is the one that ought to be a coin, the plastic bills are too expensive to justify replacing the slightly less durable linen notes that we've been using for larger denomination. The life expectency is between about 3.7 and 15 years depending upon the denomination.

      http://www.federalreserve.gov/faqs/how-long-is-the-life-span-of-us-paper-money.htm

      Then again, we're Americans, so clearly everything we do is wrong or ignorant.

    33. Re:Useless coins by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      Hey, pennies are not useless!

      They're great for smooshing flat under train cars, making potato batteries, and launching at your sister's friends!

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    34. Re:Useless coins by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      Also useful if you have to pay something and want to be a dick about it

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    35. Re:Useless coins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The U.S. dollar bills last 5.9 years, not "less than a year". I just love Slashdotters who make up bogus facts out of thin air to support their viewpoint. There are 2 $1 bills in my pocket right now. Both were made in 2009, which supports the 5.9 years fact.

      In many foreign countries paper currency lasts a much shorter time, you may be basing your incorrect numbers on some other country.

      A U.S. dollar bill costs 5.4 cents to produce, which makes for a slightly less than 1 cent per year cost.

      Coins last 25 years, and cost 10 cents to make. 4/10 of a cent per year cost. Not a huge difference. In some other countries the difference is much greater.

      Coins are seriously heavy; paper is much easier to carry in a pocket. I hate the idea of carrying a bunch of heavy coins instead of very lightweight paper bills.

      If coins are so much better than paper up in dear old Canada, explain this (from Wikipedia):

      "In 2005, the Canadian government polled its citizens on the idea of retiring the five-dollar note, replacing it with a five-dollar coin. The money saved in making the coin would then fund the Canadian Olympic team. Canadians resoundingly rejected and ridiculed the idea of a five-dollar coin. Many were averse to the idea of carrying yet another coin in their wallets and pockets. Due to the overwhelmingly negative response, plans for the five-dollar coin were discarded."

      On top of all this, the U.S. Treasury has to consider the needs of a huge number of foreigners, not just U.S. citizens. 2/3 of all U.S. paper currency is abroad. In a number of countries it's the official currency. Declaring a switchover to dollar coins is not as easy as in other countries where only the locals use the money.

    36. Re:Useless coins by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      Your pocket gets heavy because you're not used to getting prices with tax included, adding them up in your head as you shop and actually using your change. I have seen it in other Americans (not a slight against them, it's just a different environment and I have adapted to the American way since living here).

    37. Re:Useless coins by radarskiy · · Score: 1

      "Dollar coin never took off because they kept making bills. Other countries that have dollar coins stopped making the bills,"

      El Salvador uses the US Dollar as their currency, and dollar coins are in use all over the place.

      There must be more to it than just keeping the bills in circulation.

    38. Re:Useless coins by AthanasiusKircher · · Score: 1

      The U.S. dollar bills last 5.9 years, not "less than a year". I just love Slashdotters who make up bogus facts out of thin air to support their viewpoint. There are 2 $1 bills in my pocket right now. Both were made in 2009, which supports the 5.9 years fact.

      Well, I was a little off, but closer than you -- the average lifespan of the dollar bill is about 18 months. I do remember reading something a while back that estimated it to be a little less than a year, but this fact is from the people who make the bills (and thus have to replace them), so I'm tempted to believe them over an AC. I've seen other estimates, but none more than 2 years.

      As for your other points, at no point did my post even argue in favor of eliminating dollar bills; I simply pointed out a savings by the government. I was just correcting a previous post that made it sound like the cost of dollar bills didn't have anything to do with him. You think coins are inconvenient? Fine. I never said they weren't. Try a course in reading comprehension before attacking people randomly (and making up your own "bogus facts").

    39. Re:Useless coins by UltraZelda64 · · Score: 1

      Right now I have $98 in currency in my wallet (mix of 20s, 10s and 1s), and my wallet is showing no signs of distress. Personally, I'd rather have eight 1-dollar bills in my wallet than a small pile of heavy coins in my pocket, all mixed in with my thumb drives, keys, and pocket knife. I also prefer not to make jingle-jangle noises when I walk, but I suppose some people like that sound.

      Your pants make "jingle-jangle" noises when you walk with change in your pocket? I don't know what kind of pants you wear (too baggy?), but I can honestly say that mine keep my change secure enough (with the help of gravity) that as long as I'm not leaning over in some odd way, I never hear my change jingle. Ever. Only if I happen to put my hand in my pocket and jiggle the inner lining around on purpose, at which point it's me consciously making the noise on purpose.

      First world problem. If your currency is "all folded and bent and deformed in any way imaginable", you're not doing it right. Are you one of those people who keep their currency all wadded up in a ball? Anyway, if you think straightening out a pile of money is a nightmare, you should count yourself lucky in life.

      Nope, I have a wallet. Why would I roll my bills up in a ball? And I will admit that it seems to be relatively rare these days that I encounter a totally screwed up, wrinkled dollar bill, but they do exist. But my point really was, even if rare, every single bill that has a random creased side or corner adds up and adds to the annoyance of managing it and working with the entire stack money. Just four duds can make the whole pile a pain in the ass to work with. And I'm talking ones here; assuming you have 15 of them, of which 8 are pretty neat and the rest have random creases here and there, it adds up and can be a pain in the ass.

      Also, I wish I could say that my wallet didn't get so stuffed so badly with more bills, but it does. Then again, I refuse to pay $100 for a little piece of leather to keep my plastic cards, driver's license and bills organized in. Maybe that's my problem, I'm too cheap, but either way, it doesn't change the fact that pockets come included with the cost of all the pants and shorts that I've ever bought, they work well for holding change silently and securely the vast majority of the time, and for me it's nice to be able to grab a couple of coins instead of reaching for a wallet, opening it and fiddling with paper.

    40. Re:Useless coins by UltraZelda64 · · Score: 1

      Also... I should point out that I use the front-right pocket for the wallet, front-left pocket for change. When I have my cell phone and need a convenient place for it, and/or a thumb drive or pocket knife, they also go in the front-left, with the change. Works great for me. Keys? You seriously put them in your pocket? I just hang mine from one of my right-side belt loops. Yeah--that means my keys are noisy--but I have to admit, I don't mind hearing them when I walk. They serve as a reminder that I didn't, you know, forget them in the house (oops!) or something. And if I have my keys, 99.9% of the time I also have my wallet, so I'm not without my license and money, because I habitually pick up my wallet and keys, in that order.

  11. Drugs by Sable+Drakon · · Score: 3, Informative

    But they could always take bitcoin, paypal dead-drops, or many other forms of e-payment.

    --
    The Amarri pray for god, the Caldari pray for profit. the Gallente pray for peace, but the Minmatar pray their ships hol
  12. Some shops already have by LazyAussieStudent · · Score: 4, Interesting

    A butcher near me already has http://canningsfreerangebutche...

    1. Re:Some shops already have by Enigma2175 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why not? I was on a Delta flight the other day and the only way to purchase in-flight cocktails was via credit card. On another flight the same day, the same purchase could only be made in cash. I am not aware of any laws that require businesses to accept a certain form of payment, and why should there be? If a business doesn't accept cash (or credit cards, or chickens, or bitcoin) and their customers prefer that method of payment, it will show up in their bottom line. Why would the government need to intervene in such a transaction?

      --

      Enigma

    2. Re:Some shops already have by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Many folks confuse "legal tender for all debts" with "merchant must engage in a possible transaction with you using this currency."

  13. Biometrics by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 1

    From the article:
     
      Biometrics will also make fraud virtually impossible â" identification is yours and yours alone, and therefore very hard to copy.
     
    And impossible to change if it is somehow copied. (See: Fingerprints made from gummy bears", for example.)
     
    How is this a good idea again?

    --
    If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
  14. Class issue here. by jythie · · Score: 5, Insightful

    While cashless might make sense to a middle class with easy access to technology and banks, there is a significant percentage of the population does not have access to such things and they probably will not any time soon. As much as 10% of the US population has no bank access, no SS ID, no IDs of any type, etc.

    1. Re:Class issue here. by nesdave · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The only problem I see with your consideration is that the people who will make the decision won't have a concern for those who 'Have Not'.

    2. Re:Class issue here. by Macrat · · Score: 0

      That's actually the GOAL of cashless.

      Forcing the poor to get ripped off by all the fees for debit cards.

    3. Re:Class issue here. by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

      It's not just lack of access, it's lack of desire. Go and try to buy things at any venue that is ad hoc like an open air food market or flee market. Some will use cards, many won't because they don't want to bother with the paperwork hassle and fees. Cash in one form or another will always be desired.

    4. Re:Class issue here. by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      That's true, but the ability to process credit cards has become much easier in the last several years. You can get the hardware and an account to accept credit card payments using your iPhone, for instance.

    5. Re:Class issue here. by semilemon · · Score: 1

      I just saw a documentary on this subject. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YAxL4TB6pmQ

      --
      Why do today what you can put off until tomorrow?
    6. Re:Class issue here. by jythie · · Score: 1

      The flaw in your reasoning is these people are not illegal aliens. Rural poor are the largest group, and many of those families have been here for 100+ years.

    7. Re:Class issue here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and how much of the money that i was going to use to buy food and beer and
      pay rent to I have to give the processor for the privilege? 3%...and it goes
      striaght to the bank account that I had to close because my ex-wife kept overdrawing
      it and all my pay kept getting sucked up by fees

      thanks, that helps a lot

    8. Re:Class issue here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > The flaw in your reasoning is these people are not illegal aliens. Rural poor are the largest group,

      Hell, the suburban poor too. If you are poor it is essentially impossible to get a bank account.
      There is even a name for it -- unbanked

      Anywhere you see a bunch of check-cashing places there are lots of working poor.

    9. Re:Class issue here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And then the media criticizes the poor for owning iPhones.

      "Easier" doesn't mean a damned thing when the powers that be use it as an excuse to screw you over further.

    10. Re:Class issue here. by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

      And still pay the charges, which is what they don't want to do. And deal with the paperwork. None of that goes away just because you're doing it by phone. If I'm selling something, why in hell do I want to pay VIsa a charge for "ease" when a ten dollar bill doesn't charge me and handle paperwork that a cash transaction lacks? It's not how easy it is to do, It's paying an unnecessary middleman.

    11. Re:Class issue here. by chihowa · · Score: 2

      You're claiming that ten percent of the US citizens (~32 million people) don't have Social Security numbers assigned or ID of any kind? That's hard to believe, which is why the parent suggested that you were talking about illegal aliens. Nearly 85% of the US population lives within a largish metropolitan area [], which would mean that half-to-most rural people would have to lack a SSN for your claim to be true.

      That's very unlikely.

      --
      If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
    12. Re:Class issue here. by sjames · · Score: 1

      But it''s not getting anywhere near as cheap as dealing in cash. It's also not getting as risk free as cash. A bank can't decide that their security problem should be my problem and revoke the $20 bill someone paid me.

    13. Re:Class issue here. by sjames · · Score: 2

      It's not as unlikely as you think. You forgot the urban homeless population, for example. There's the homeless you see and then there's the squatters you may not see (or recognize).

    14. Re:Class issue here. by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 1

      While cashless might make sense to a middle class with easy access to technology and banks, there is a significant percentage of the population does not have access to such things and they probably will not any time soon. As much as 10% of the US population has no bank access, no SS ID, no IDs of any type, etc.

      two birds with one stone?

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    15. Re:Class issue here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cashless != Bank-centered
      A large portion of Kenia's poorest population use mobile-based money accounts.
      Also think cryptocurrencies.

    16. Re:Class issue here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They will when they realize their drug dealers, hookers and nannies won't accept credit cards.

  15. Going back to cash by El_Oscuro · · Score: 5, Informative

    Last week I swiped my card at a gas station pump before noticing the tamper proof seals had been broken. I have replaced the card, but while waiting for the new card I used cash. You tend to conserve more money when it is cold, hard cash instead of of just swiping a card. Less surface area for compromise as well.

    --
    "Be grateful for what you have. You may never know when you may lose it."
    1. Re:Going back to cash by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      Cash money has a huge surface area, though. Which makes it much more attractive for a low tech thief to attach to it. And let's face it, most thieves on the level regular people encounter them are dumb and fairly brutal.

    2. Re:Going back to cash by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 4, Informative

      Exactly true. Market research shows people spend more if they are using a CC. Part of the psychology is of course that cash you are carrying around is generally a more limited asset than your CC balance limit.

    3. Re:Going back to cash by Megane · · Score: 1

      Last week I swiped my card at a gas station pump before noticing the tamper proof seals had been broken.

      Most likely from some brat kid breaking them with his fingernail.

      The real reason for the seals is to stop people from getting free (or almost free) gas. If you know how to operate the pump side controls, you can press a couple of buttons to change the price to pennies per gallon. They're only downloaded when the price changes, and the back-end system then only selects which price level (cash or credit) to use for a transaction.

      And if you're using debit, the PIN pads are supposed to be potted and keys injected into battery-backed RAM (code in RAM is a good idea too) to prevent tampering. In the US at least, the key is supposed to be only known by the clearinghouse at the other end of the comm line, and only comes out of the pad already encrypted.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    4. Re:Going back to cash by AthanasiusKircher · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Exactly true. Market research shows people spend more if they are using a CC. Part of the psychology is of course that cash you are carrying around is generally a more limited asset than your CC balance limit.

      While that's true, it's beginning to change, particularly for many younger people. I've personally always found cash easier to spend, because it wouldn't be in my pocket if it weren't available. Credit cards, though? I need to think about my bank account balances and charges for the month before using those. But I agree that most people aren't that careful.

      However, the big game changer for younger folks is financial tracking software -- so now you can see instant balances changing whenever you charge or debit. With financial tracking software, the CASH becomes the "funny money," because it isn't tracked automatically.

      That means that whatever money is in my wallet has already disappeared from my "accounting software," so it's basically already spent, as far as I'm concerned. I've talked to many people who feel the same way now... cash is now the "free money to spend" while credit transactions see an immediate visceral impact as you look at your moving balance.

    5. Re:Going back to cash by antdude · · Score: 1

      It is better to have variety of money types.

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    6. Re:Going back to cash by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

      However, the big game changer for younger folks is financial tracking software -- so now you can see instant balances changing whenever you charge or debit. With financial tracking software, the CASH becomes the "funny money," because it isn't tracked automatically.

      Because using memory is such a travail. And no, the cash is accounted for n withdrawal, it has not "disappeared". That younger people cannot maintain a balance in their heads is no reason to dispose of cash in society for those who can.

    7. Re:Going back to cash by dryeo · · Score: 1

      In Canada, which is probably similar to the States, there is only a couple of keys needed to open most pumps (at least a year or so ago) and the thieves would put in their own reader (or maybe it was a tap) and skim a lot of cards.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    8. Re:Going back to cash by AthanasiusKircher · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And no, the cash is accounted for n withdrawal, it has not "disappeared".

      I think you missed my point. Suppose you take $60 out from an ATM to cover miscellaneous cash expenses for a week (or two or whatever). That number is immediately deducted from your balances, so if you look at your checking account to decide what you have to spend for future purposes, the cash is "invisible." Moreover, if you want to track individual cash transactions, you would need to enter and itemize them manually, which frankly most people can't be bothered with unless they do a lot of cash transactions or use large amounts of cash.

      So, if you use financial software, cash becomes this untraceable invisible part of your financial total (like credit cards used to be), while every other transaction will automatically update and modify your net worth. I'm NOT saying you CAN'T keep track of cash... I'm saying for people who don't use it very much, it's more difficult, and people don't bother.

      The cluster of odd bills in my wallet has become sort of like the "change jar" that people throw their coins into. You don't quite know how much is there, because you don't need it or use it very often,, but it's probably less than $100, and if you ever need some, you can probably dig out a couple quarters as necessary.

      That younger people cannot maintain a balance in their heads is no reason to dispose of cash in society for those who can.

      I know that this is what TFA is about, but I never argued in my post to get rid of cash. I don't think that would be good at all. My post was simply responding to others who said that cash was easier to track in your wallet -- for previous generations, yeah, today... not so much.

    9. Re:Going back to cash by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      I might not track where my cash goes, but it's easier to track how much I'm spending. If I yank out $100 on Saturday, and I'm broke on Friday, I know without calculating that I've spent $100 that week. If I charge that amount, I actually have to look at my records to see how much I've spent.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    10. Re:Going back to cash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly true. Market research shows people spend more if they are using a CC. Part of the psychology is of course that cash you are carrying around is generally a more limited asset than your CC balance limit.

      While that's true, it's beginning to change, particularly for many younger people. I've personally always found cash easier to spend, because it wouldn't be in my pocket if it weren't available. Credit cards, though? I need to think about my bank account balances and charges for the month before using those. But I agree that most people aren't that careful.

      However, the big game changer for younger folks is financial tracking software -- so now you can see instant balances changing whenever you charge or debit. With financial tracking software, the CASH becomes the "funny money," because it isn't tracked automatically.

      That means that whatever money is in my wallet has already disappeared from my "accounting software," so it's basically already spent, as far as I'm concerned. I've talked to many people who feel the same way now... cash is now the "free money to spend" while credit transactions see an immediate visceral impact as you look at your moving balance.

      Yep, cash has to be tracked and entered into the software manually so if I forget to enter it later that day and misplaced the receipt that money has effectively "disappeared".

    11. Re:Going back to cash by AthanasiusKircher · · Score: 1

      I might not track where my cash goes, but it's easier to track how much I'm spending. If I yank out $100 on Saturday, and I'm broke on Friday, I know without calculating that I've spent $100 that week. If I charge that amount, I actually have to look at my records to see how much I've spent.

      It depends on whether you ever use cash. I rarely do these days, except if it's cash-only, or a cheaper cash price, or a really cheap item at an independent shop (and I choose to save the owner the transaction fee).

      Thus, I probably withdraw $100-200 in cash at one time, and that will last me a few months unless I'm forced to make a large cash purchase somewhere. I visit an ATM only a few times per year.

      So tracking when my wallet gets empty tells me very little. On the other hand, I can check my net worth every few hours if I want to and instantly see the impact of my recent purchases. Plus, many of my expenses are automatically categorized, so I know precisely where in my budget I'm overspending.

      Look -- your system works for you, and I'm sure you find it useful. Others may find another system more useful. I.m not arguing that anyone should do it my way, only that something like my way is becoming more common, and it's changing the way some people view cash vs. credit.

    12. Re:Going back to cash by jwhitener · · Score: 1

      On the flip side, some people budget a week out using cash. Put X amount in an envelope for food, X amount in an envelope for fun, etc.. You can visibly see each envelope cash amount going down, and adjust your spending accordingly. And when the envelope is empty, you know you are done (despite what your bank account might say).

  16. Canada has the future :) by djKing · · Score: 4, Interesting

    In Canada we no longer have dollar bills. We have dollar coins. We also got rid of the penny.

    --
    Free as in "the Truth shall set you..."
    1. Re:Canada has the future :) by Irate+Engineer · · Score: 5, Insightful

      As someone from the U.S. who just recently traveled in Canada, I have to say that I like their current currency system a lot. Using loonies ($1) and "twoonies" ($2) coins is nice as they can actually be used easily to buy useful things, which is the primary reason why (I think) dollar coins haven't really taken off in the U.S.

      In Canada, parking meters, soda machines, etc.. take $1 and $2 coins. It beats having to feed a pile of small coins into a meter or machine, or trying to iron out and feed a frayed and mangled $1 USD bill into a soda machine and having it rejected. The coins are also fine for face-to-face transactions; they are not unusual. In contrast, Susan B. Anthony dollars in the U.S. can get you some funny looks and many vendors flat out won't accept them, legal tender or not. You can go buy a beer in Canada with the change in your pocket. The Canadian coins make small daily transactions simple.

      In the U.S., getting change is a pain in the ass because you invariably wind up accumulating pennies which are a nuisance. You can't use them for tolls or in machines in most places, and toting around a pile of pennies large enough to actually purchase anything with is ridiculous. So you either start carrying a satchel of pennies around trying to pay exact change, or you toss them in a jar, spend time rolling them, and exchange them at the bank for larger denominations (yay! A trip to the bank just to dispose of pennies!). You can also use services like Coinstar, which takes a cut (yay! A special trip to dispose of pennies AND paying some money to a company taking advantage of the dumb system!). In Canada, prices are merely rounded to the nearest 5 cents. Sometimes it is a few pennies in your favor, sometimes it is a few pennies in their favor. On the whole it is a wash, and you would have to be a really miserly SOB for it to worry you.

      Canada has cash pretty well figured out. It's not that difficult, U.S.!

      --

      Left MS Windows for Linux Mint and never looked back!

      Vote for Bernie in 2016!

    2. Re:Canada has the future :) by StillAnonymous · · Score: 1

      Why the smiley? The discontinuation of the penny is the sign of a sad state of affairs. One where government has devalued the currency so much that the base unit is considered valueless. People should be marching in the street, demanding the value stolen from them be returned, not championing the result of the thieving.

    3. Re:Canada has the future :) by SirAudioMan · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'm Canadian and I agree with you on all of these points. When I visit the US I find it annoying that a) your paper money is such crappy quality, and b) it all looks the same making it harder to tell the difference in my wallet. I always end up with a million $1 bills because out of habit I end up breaking 5's, 10's and 20's to pay for things. In Canada, up until 1996 we still had $2 bills before the toonie (the $1 bill was changed to a loonie some time in the 80's).

      The penny round just started a few years ago and nobody missed a beat! It only applied to cash transactions (not debit or credit, as those are billed in exact amounts). If I'm not mistaken, the cost to produce the penny is more than it's face value.

      I have never understood why the US treasury doesn't just stop producing $1 bills and force a coin into circulation. That's what Canada did - nobody had any choice and it was preceded with much education about the new coins making sure people understood the coins were legal tender. $1 bills are quite rare now, as are some $2 bills, both of which are still legal tender. I remember when the toonie was introduced, NOBODY would give you funny looks and everybody accepted it. I suppose it's one of those funny differenced between our cultures like opinions on guns and public healthcare.

    4. Re:Canada has the future :) by Eythian · · Score: 2

      Similar in NZ, $1 and $2, and the smallest coin is 10c. However, we have something like 80% of point of sales transactions being electronic (off the top of my head), so it doesn't matter too much. This article is a bit of history really :)

    5. Re:Canada has the future :) by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      People should be marching in the street, demanding the value stolen from them be returned, not championing the result of the thieving.

      By "people" I assume you mean 80 year old grandmothers who have spent their entire lives storing all of their money as cash under a mattress? If so, I suspect the reason they're not marching is because it would require walking. And, if not, I'm curious as to who, exactly, you think has had their money "stolen" via inflation.

    6. Re:Canada has the future :) by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      I'm personally happy to accept the benefits of an inflationary currency (incentivising investment, penalising cash-hoarding). If you're not, then I suggest that you go and live in a country with a non-inflationary currency for a while and see how you like it.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    7. Re:Canada has the future :) by kramerd · · Score: 1

      Bullshit on every level.

      I have never seen a toll booth where you can't go and hand pennies to the cashier. You may have to wait up to a few minutes in line with other cash customers, but they certainly take them. If you use coinstar like services, they charge a ridiculous fee...unless you exchange for a gift card instead of cash. Amazon, the store where the coinstar is located, a large number of chain restaurants, etc., will let you turn in all your coins and get a giftcard, to the penny, with no fee.

      I would hate to have to worry that I am losing or gaining pennies on every transaction that I participate in. If that is only 20 transactions per day, I could be losing over $200 per year; or for most americans, 2 days wages!

      You would be hard pressed to find an American who wants to live in Canada. Change isn't normally the reason, but if it was mentioned, it would certainly be a valid one.

    8. Re:Canada has the future :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > point of sales transactions being electronic (off the top of my head)

      Doesn't that hurt? How do they attach the wires?

    9. Re:Canada has the future :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would hate to have to worry that I am losing or gaining pennies on every transaction that I participate in. If that is only 20 transactions per day, I could be losing over $200 per year; or for most americans, 2 days wages!

      Maybe read up on Swedish rounding before you pull facts out of your ass? There is almost no way you would lose $200 per year even if you did 20 cash transactions per day. Also, who on Earth does *only* 20 transactions per day?

    10. Re:Canada has the future :) by jittles · · Score: 1

      As someone from the U.S. who just recently traveled in Canada, I have to say that I like their current currency system a lot. Using loonies ($1) and "twoonies" ($2) coins is nice as they can actually be used easily to buy useful things, which is the primary reason why (I think) dollar coins haven't really taken off in the U.S.

      In Canada, parking meters, soda machines, etc.. take $1 and $2 coins. It beats having to feed a pile of small coins into a meter or machine, or trying to iron out and feed a frayed and mangled $1 USD bill into a soda machine and having it rejected. The coins are also fine for face-to-face transactions; they are not unusual. In contrast, Susan B. Anthony dollars in the U.S. can get you some funny looks and many vendors flat out won't accept them, legal tender or not. You can go buy a beer in Canada with the change in your pocket. The Canadian coins make small daily transactions simple.

      In the U.S., getting change is a pain in the ass because you invariably wind up accumulating pennies which are a nuisance. You can't use them for tolls or in machines in most places, and toting around a pile of pennies large enough to actually purchase anything with is ridiculous. So you either start carrying a satchel of pennies around trying to pay exact change, or you toss them in a jar, spend time rolling them, and exchange them at the bank for larger denominations (yay! A trip to the bank just to dispose of pennies!). You can also use services like Coinstar, which takes a cut (yay! A special trip to dispose of pennies AND paying some money to a company taking advantage of the dumb system!). In Canada, prices are merely rounded to the nearest 5 cents. Sometimes it is a few pennies in your favor, sometimes it is a few pennies in their favor. On the whole it is a wash, and you would have to be a really miserly SOB for it to worry you.

      Canada has cash pretty well figured out. It's not that difficult, U.S.!

      I had surgery on my hand about a year ago and spent a couple of weeks at home recuperating. Out of boredom I rolled up hundreds of dollars in coins I had collected over the space of about 4 years. I went into the bank to deposit them and the cute little bank teller told me in the future I had two options: A) I could bring them in unrolled and the bank would use a machine to process them for me at no charge. B) She loved to roll coins and she would be happy to come over and help me.

      I had never been so sad to have run out of pennies in my life.

    11. Re:Canada has the future :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you either start carrying a satchel of pennies around trying to pay exact change, or you toss them in a jar, spend time rolling them, and exchange them at the bank for larger denominations (yay! A trip to the bank just to dispose of pennies!). You can also use services like Coinstar, which takes a cut (yay! A special trip to dispose of pennies AND paying some money to a company taking advantage of the dumb system!).

      Coinstar only takes a cut if you want to convert to cash, there is no cut taken if you convert to a giftcard for the store that you're in or other merchants (like say Amazon.) This is made very clear from the start when you use the machine.

    12. Re:Canada has the future :) by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      Coins are a PITA because they dont go nicely into a wallet, and theyre bulky.

    13. Re:Canada has the future :) by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      In the UK we sometimes call £1 coins "beer tokens". (My own golden age of inebriation revolved around a student happy hour where cheap lager was £1 a pint. Good times.)

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    14. Re:Canada has the future :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have it on good authority that the only reason this hasn't happened in the US is because we can't think of cool nicknames for our dollar coins like you Canucks did.

    15. Re:Canada has the future :) by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Well, they discontinued the half cent in 1857, and just a few years later the whole country was thrown into civil war. Do you think they're going to make that mistake again?

    16. Re:Canada has the future :) by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      The base unit is the dollar. What we colloquially call a penny is a one-cent coin, which is defined as worth 1/100 of a dollar. I can still buy some stuff for a dollar or less.

      Are you equally unhappy that we no longer make half-cent coins? Seriously, we used to have them, and then gave them up (pretty early in US history, as I recall).

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    17. Re:Canada has the future :) by Irate+Engineer · · Score: 1

      We can introduce the Sarah Palin dollar coin and call that the "Loony"! *Badum tish!*

      Try the veal folks, I'm here all night!

      --

      Left MS Windows for Linux Mint and never looked back!

      Vote for Bernie in 2016!

    18. Re:Canada has the future :) by Irate+Engineer · · Score: 1

      Umm, yeah..if you're a cantankerous old coot willing to waste time out of his life to have a dumb government take your pennies, more power to you!

      There is a better way. It's not fucking rocket science. I've got better things to do with my life than stand in a queue waiting for someone to accept my pile of pennies.

      The U.S. penny (just like the Canadian penny) is pretty much noise in the commerce system. Get rid of it, and make dollar coins that can actually used in basic daily transactions. It makes automated transactions like meters, tolls, and cojn-operated machines a piece of cake.

      Fuck, some people like to do things the hard way and be miserable. Whatever, I got a life to enjoy. Stop making it difficult, eh?

      --

      Left MS Windows for Linux Mint and never looked back!

      Vote for Bernie in 2016!

  17. Re:Last century stuff by penix1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So you are the reason that a lot of stores have a minimum charge amount for credit / debit charges. The transaction fees charged to merchants are ridiculous and so are ATM fees. Until these fees are reduced, you will never see a truly cashless society. And that doesn't include those that have less trust of banks than they do of governments.

    --
    This is a sig. This is only a sig. Had this been an actual sig you would have been informed where to tune for more sigs.
  18. It's all bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The only reason to transfer to a cash-less society is so instead of the Federal Reserve controlling our money, the credit card/debit card companies do.

    It's bullshit that not only can the credit card company charge YOU interest, they also get a small percentage/flat fee if it's very small whenever you use one of their cards.

    That's why prepaid cards want you to either direct deposit or make a retarded amount of transactions per month, they make more than the $4.95 they charge per month to keep your card active by simply you using it.

    All in all, it's an entirely bullshit situation and I really hope something like bitcoin takes off.

    1. Re:It's all bullshit by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      and who owns most the shares of the major credit card companies? big banks do, including some of the bigger ones in the Federal Reserve System.

  19. Re:Last century stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    In America, most stores won't take your card unless you plan to spend less than a pittance. Most stores will deny you if your transaction isn't 5-10$

    At that point, because of the processing fees from the credit card company they lose almost to all of their profit.

    I'm sure it'd be much different if the card user was charged instead of the merchant, but that's not how it works here. Credit card companies in the US are always double-dipping, charging processing fees to the merchants and collecting interest from cardholders.

  20. Class issue here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That 10% are also called illegal aliens by some. As long as such exist there will be no cashless society.

    Alternately, this would really be a great way to reduce such immigration.

  21. Privacy by epyT-R · · Score: 4, Insightful

    1. Privacy is more important to me than convenience. I like the idea that I can go into a store and buy something without someone making a recording of it and tying it to me.
    2. The issue isn't to make the dollar go away, or even the penny go away. The issue is to fix the inflation.

    1. Re:Privacy by Insanity+Defense · · Score: 1

      That is two of us.

    2. Re:Privacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fix the inflation?

      Unlike many, many Americans, I have net positive assets, and well-diversified assets at that. When I realize that higher inflation would barely affect me, yet clearly help out most of my house-rich-but-otherwise-struggling neighbors, I start to wonder who exactly thinks inflation is so bad. Who has actual dollar piles around but the undeservedly wealthy?

      And hey, just so you don't get confused about my politics, inflation is also an excellent way to control entitlements. You know, as in "we didn't cut your welfare benefits- they cut themselves!"

    3. Re:Privacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      2. The issue isn't to make the dollar go away, or even the penny go away. The issue is to fix the inflation.

      Unfortunately inflation isn't broken. It is quite intentional - we're just the suckers on the down side of the deal.

    4. Re:Privacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you think inflation is helping you out, then you don't quite understand it. This is by design, so don't feel too bad. The government is ripping off the majority of the people for the benefit of a few, through inflation. You don't notice the subtle effects like the rise in prices on essential items, or the lagging and insufficient "cost of living" increases on your income. Most people believe the government numbers when it comes to core inflation, and don't for a second think that what they're being fed is a load of bullshit that's calculated to keep you in the dark.

      Just because you don't notice it right now, doesn't mean it isn't a problem. Go ask someone who's on a fixed income how inflation is treating them. They feel the effects undiluted, first hand.

    5. Re:Privacy by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      Congrats, you're the top .005%, and living in a rich people bubble at that if you can't comprehend how inflation is hurting people. Federal deficit spending deflates the currency's buying power, which hurts everyone, regardless of how they've diversified. All that does is stave it off because your investments feel it too.

      For the ones filling the jobs making your lifestyle possible, this hurts them even more since they have fewer dollars in the first place. They don't have the funds to diversify like you do. Meanwhile, increased taxation prevents them from spending what they do earn in the first place. Eventually, you will feel this candle burning from both ends, too, if things continue as they have. Your entire net worth, regardless of how it's diversified, is floating on a sinking ship. If you think your wealth will insulate you, you're dreaming. It might let you hang on a little longer, but when things get real bad, you'll fall into the same pit the proles are in now.

      This is a big part of why a bag of chips that cost $0.99 in 1995 cost $4 now...or why boneless chicken is $6 a pound. It's also why the left is clamoring for crazy minimum wages so that those working bottom rent jobs can afford to live reasonably close to where they work. Of course, that's not the solution either. The problem is all the washington deficits being spent on useless bridges and corporate/social welfare.

    6. Re:Privacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is all the washington deficits being spent on useless bridges and corporate/social welfare.

      That people consider building a bridge a bad thing really bothers me. Even if the bridge didn't actually go anywhere, which it did, it would encourage people to move and build there. Good access is more likely to promote growth than zero or bad access. Also, the building of roads and bridges is one of the basic functions of government; when people bitch about the government doing what its supposed to do, its very clear they've been brainwashed by Faux News. Social welfare is also one of the functions of the government, and the money spent on corporate welfare far outstrips the money used on anything except military/defense.

    7. Re:Privacy by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      I'm not interested in fox news vs cnn vs msnbc vs nyt reader stereotype comparisons. They're all false dilemma fallacies. Whatever the government is or is not supposed to spend money on, it is NOT supposed to beggar the country in the process. That is what it is doing. What are your precious corporate/social welfare funded bridge builders going to do if/when the country collapses due to 25$ gasoline and $50/day grocery bills? Seriously, how bad does it need to get?

      in terms of recent slashdot stories, here are some useless bridges (there are plenty more):
      1. the F35 fighter jet program
      2. the FCC 5billion 'wifi-for-schools'
      3. NSA/surveillance

      While it might be nice to protect all those jobs at lockheed, the reality is that money could be better spent by the taxpayers it belongs. Kids don't need wifi for their ipuds to learn reading, writing, and arithmetic, and I think we can all agree that the NSA and friends have overstepped their boundaries. These are bridges that could be defunded immediately and money refocused on paying back debt.

    8. Re:Privacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Inflation is a *critical* part of the fiat currency. Currently, inflation is much too low. It causes stagnation. There is too much money everywhere, and not enough churn. Economic activity is the churning of the money in the system.

      1. Too high inflation and no one saves anything - bad.
      2. Too low inflation (like now!), and too much debt is accumulated. - bad

      We really must swing into higher inflation environment for a few years just to save our economy from the debt. If this does not happen, we will end up like Japan.

      Of course I do understand that high inflation causes issues, though mostly for the elderly that have some savings but not much knowhow with money. This is where government pension plans play an important role.

    9. Re:Privacy by sjames · · Score: 1

      Not really. If we devalue the dollar, the equation shifts and local manufacturing begins to make more sense than offshore. American made goods also start to look more attractive on foreign markets, again to the benefit of American workers.

      When domestic goods go up in price it is not because of a devalued dollar since all of their expenses are also in devalued dollars.

    10. Re:Privacy by dryeo · · Score: 1

      If only my federal government balancing the budget slowed down inflation, even down to US levels would be great.
      Things are a lot more complicated then deficit spending, things like low interest rates, the ever increasing price of housing, price of gas going up for the slightest reason, price of food going up due to lack of rain in places and flooding in other places, the ever increasing need for big business to make bigger profits year after year. Shit I'd be happy if my income increased at the official inflation rate instead of stagnating.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    11. Re:Privacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. Privacy is more important to me than convenience. I like the idea that I can go into a store and buy something without someone making a recording of it and tying it to me.

      Sweetie, why do you think they have those CCTV cameras?

    12. Re:Privacy by delt0r · · Score: 1

      Its soo cute that you think cash makes your transactions anonymous.

      --
      If information wants to be free, why does my internet connection cost so much?
    13. Re:Privacy by jbmartin6 · · Score: 1

      This only benefits exporters, not importers or entirely domestic businesses. And this second statement makes no sense either in light of the thousands of times prices have risen when governments devalued their currencies.

      --
      This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
    14. Re:Privacy by gnupun · · Score: 1

      Of course they are. If you pay $3 for a soda at a vending machine, can that be tied to you?

    15. Re:Privacy by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      So I guess we should just roll over and accept our anally-inserted government everything trackers. Thanks for letting me know.

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    16. Re:Privacy by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      Sure, that's what the camera in the vending room is for.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    17. Re:Privacy by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      Lies. And you fell for it.

    18. Re:Privacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cash is pretty convenient.

      It works when the power is out. Or if there's a problem with the payment network. Or in other countries (USD and Euros work in most of the countries of the world).

  22. uhhh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How am I gonna use my debit card in a strippers ass?

    1. Re:uhhh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's not what a stripper's ass is for...

  23. What? by Cryacin · · Score: 4, Funny

    This is going to be disastrous if we remove stripper money.

    Where should I swipe my card miss?

    Swipes

    ... Slap

    --
    Science advances one funeral at a time- Max Planck
    1. Re:What? by John.Banister · · Score: 2

      You buy "stripper ribbons" using the same concept as "car wash coins" The cool feature about stripper ribbons will be closer increments than 1, 5, 10, 20.

    2. Re:What? by smittyoneeach · · Score: 3, Insightful

      At the cost of anonymity for those who want to frequent such establishments without so much log file trail.
      And there are plenty of other use-cases for people wanting their name decoupled from their deeds.
      Not all of them are exactly bad, either.

      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    3. Re:What? by John.Banister · · Score: 2

      Prepaid debit cards can be as anonymous as burner cell phones.

    4. Re:What? by laughingcoyote · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Prepaid debit cards, and burner cell phones, are only anonymous if you...oh, pay for them in cash!

      --
      To fight the war on terror, stop being afraid.
    5. Re:What? by John.Banister · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Suppose there's 5 guys in different parts of town who each have 1000 un-opened pre-paid debit cards. I buy one and swap it straight across for one in a dept card anonymizer's collection, and then drive somewhere and do that again. It wouldn't be hard to make vending machines that would do this job, although some might prefer to trade with humans.

    6. Re:What? by slashmydots · · Score: 1

      Nooo, sexily plug in a bitcoin-enabled USB flash drive into their USB socketed Gstring. Of course, having to flip it around like 17 times before getting it to connect correctly because of its false symmetry might get annoying.

    7. Re: What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You just lost both your man-card AND your geek-card.

    8. Re:What? by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 4, Interesting

      And then you get picked up because the card you bought was actually traceable to kiddy porn or a terrorist bomber used it to buy fertilizer.

      Ala Tor.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    9. Re:What? by John.Banister · · Score: 2

      If the card is new from the issuer, it's traceable to the issuer, and potentially the fist purchase from the issuer. It would actually be easy enough for Walmart to anonymize them, by simply recording the transaction as "$50 Prepaid Debit Card" and not record which particular debit card number went to which customer. Also, if you anonymously acquire a prepaid debit card used for a transaction involved with some nefarious purpose, you still don't get picked up, because it may trace to that transaction, but it doesn't trace to you. The only connection is that the prepaid card used for the nefarious transaction is one of 50 prepaid debit cards used one night in a busy strip club.

    10. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Imagine being arrested for attempting to create an anonymous money exchange.

      Go ahead, I'll wait.

    11. Re:What? by gadget+junkie · · Score: 1

      At the cost of anonymity for those who want to frequent such establishments without so much log file trail. And there are plenty of other use-cases for people wanting their name decoupled from their deeds. Not all of them are exactly bad, either.

      that's the bits and pieces. the other is that this would have been any dictator's wet dream but that's a sideshow, really.
      over and above fiat money, the fact remains that money is a representation of wealth, and it's the only direct representation which you can own and have custody of irrespective of the banking system. that's the principal issue, but a secondary and even more useful to citizens is that cash is a good tripwire on faith in the political system, for the obvious but not so widespread reason that you can always own currency by another country. so the funnel of doom looks like this:

      1. use credit cards;
      2. use cash;
      3 OWN cash in the house as a precaution;
      4. own another country's cash.

      the abolition of printed cash drives a wedge between 2 and 3. at the first whiff, run.

      --
      "If a boss demands loyalty, give him integrity. But if he demands integrity, give him loyalty." (John Boyd, 1927-1997)
    12. Re:What? by nukenerd · · Score: 2

      ...... the fact remains that money is a representation of wealth, and it's the only direct representation which you can own and have custody of irrespective of the banking system.

      But modern money does rely on the banking system because it has no intrinsic value. Notes are just that - notes from the bank that they owe you X amount of dollars. Coin used to be worth their actual weight in copper, silver or gold (and was thus international) but those days have long gone. In the UK at least, the "copper" coins are copper-plated steel. Notes and coins only work because people want them to and trust them to, but that could break any time.

    13. Re:What? by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 4, Interesting

      the abolition of printed cash drives a wedge between 2 and 3. at the first whiff, run.

      Shouldn't you be complaining about not being on the gold standard?

      Seriously dude, your paranoid fantasy came true years ago, when we went off the Gold standard, and decoupled gold form the dollar.

      It's all a game, and there was always too much paper floating around to make a gold standard serious. And as soon as we went total fiat, it didn't matter whether the money was printed, or a checkbook, or auto-deduct or credit card.

      Maybe Somalia might work for you? I don't know how they handle money - mostly barter, I suspect - but it's probably more in line with your ideals. The rest of the world will just move on, and stand in line for their mark of the beast. The good news is they can pay for that online.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    14. Re:What? by jbolden · · Score: 3, Interesting

      If they don't record the information though it is called money laundering. American Express got nailed with that in the 1990s for Traveler's Cheques they were letting people buy in the USA, lose in the USA, and then getting them recovered in a South American American Express location with no record of the who.

    15. Re:What? by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      sorry, our stripper ribbons only come in $20 and $100 increments.

    16. Re:What? by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but how do you get the coins to stay in her g-string?

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    17. Re:What? by kilodelta · · Score: 2

      I was thinking along the very same lines. The whole black market economy will either disappear or be willing to be positively identified.

      And as it exists at this moment I rarely visit merchants who don't accept plastic. If I have to go out of my way to seek out an ATM to get cash you lose the sale.

      And as someone pointed out this makes the criminal economy suffer in the long run.

    18. Re:What? by Safety+Cap · · Score: 3, Funny

      It would actually be easy enough for Walmart to anonymize them, by simply recording the transaction as "$50 Prepaid Debit Card" and not record which particular debit card number went to which customer. Also, if you anonymously acquire a prepaid debit card used for a transaction involved with some nefarious purpose, you still don't get picked up, because it may trace to that transaction, but it doesn't trace to you.

      It would actually be easy enough for Walmart to switch to paper debit cards that had the amount of the card printed on the front. When you used that card, the cashier simply gave you lower-denomination of cards (say, a $5 debit card when you paid for a 5 dollar item with a $10 debit card).

      Once this practice became pervasive enough, unfortunately the government would have to step in to create rules and regulations as to how all the printing would appear, and to prevent fraud. I suggest they mandate the use of engraved printing plates; green magnetic ink; and heavy cotton rag for the card. Oh, and to certain security features like holograms, watermarks, embedded plastic strips, etc.

      My god, the level of convenience we'd enjoy would blow away any other form of paying for goods and services literally overnight.

      --
      Yeah, right.
    19. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, they're only pseudo-anonymous. You have to give ID information to activate most of them. Sure, you can provide whatever you want, but then you, and your money, are at the mercy of discretionary or mandatory real id enforcement.

      Then, too, most places you can buy them are video-surveilled. Small matter to track exactly who got which card or phone. Expect even the cash to be microchipped and rfid'd eventually, if not much sooner, in addition to being serialized.

      Cash will probably never actually go away, it will just get more centralized, much less anonymous, and already we are seeing how much less fungible it can be, when tranlated to plastic. ($3.95 to reload $10 on a card??? This, folks, is a racket. I'm sorry, $13.95 is NOT $10! ) Expect this to apply to currency in the future, as well. Currency is still at least marginally more secure than cashless money, which exists entirely at the discretion of third parties over its lifetime. Once physically stolen, though, it's gone. The less like cash cash gets, though, the more recoverable, at least in principle. Just at what cost, though?

      You'll have to go to Zerocash, zerocoin, or something else based on some kind of commodity like bitcoin, preferably exchangeable for some tangible asset or commodity, for anything like real cash, now, or in the future. Bitcoin, of course, is insufficient for this by itself, not without some kind of anonymizing layer.

      Read 'em and weep.

    20. Re:What? by segedunum · · Score: 1

      It's all a game, and there was always too much paper floating around to make a gold standard serious.

      I love to hear people talk about money, and particularly their idea of a 'gold standard' and what 'problems' it caused, obviously without the faintest idea of what they're talking about. Mind you, you're among some exalted economists in that regard,s so don't feel too bad. I suggest you go and read some Adam Smith first of all.

      Fiat money is simply a numbers game. We were given a warning in 2008 that that numbers game will not continue but that's obviously fallen on deaf ears. The irony is that the rich have got richer since then because they bought into hard assets - art, shares, property, land, gold, silver, rare artifacts (there's a reason they did that) - while those who had a regular salary and saved in dollars, euros or whatever have got continually squeezed and could afford less in real assets. It never ceases to amaze me how the ignorant get attached to their little fiat currency denominations.

      The rest of the world will just move on, and stand in line for their mark of the beast. The good news is they can pay for that online.

      Good luck with that, because they are increasingly unlikely to want your useless electronic numbers that you place so much value on. The ECB is going to create a whole lot more of them.

    21. Re:What? by gadget+junkie · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      ...... the fact remains that money is a representation of wealth, and it's the only direct representation which you can own and have custody of irrespective of the banking system.

      But modern money does rely on the banking system because it has no intrinsic value. Notes are just that - notes from the bank that they owe you X amount of dollars. Coin used to be worth their actual weight in copper, silver or gold (and was thus international) but those days have long gone. In the UK at least, the "copper" coins are copper-plated steel. Notes and coins only work because people want them to and trust them to, but that could break any time.

      not imprecise but incomplete. See, if I leave my money in my country's banking system and or in an electronic form, not only as you just said it is fiat money, BUT, the government can skim how much money they want during a weekend with nobody being the wiser. Here in Italy, it really happened like that years ago, in the process of joining the Euro . It happened in 1992, under the premier Giuliano Amato, and it was enacted retroactively . If I hold US dollars at home, I do not have European fiat money risk, and the currency cannot be "devalued" by MY political masters.

      Interestingly enough, when Greece went practically bust, one of the wild stories going around was that banks would freeze account with a view to going back to drachmas. Vigorous capital controls at the frontiers would be enacted, and Euro banknotes would only be exchangeable at the banks. To put some kind of money in circulation, there would have been an interim period in which Euro banknotes would be "stamped" by the banks to recycle them. Seriously, you cannot make up such stupidity alone. my usual question was what happened to a greek citizen who held a bond issued by an American entity denominated in Euros, in the local branch of a German bank. The company issuing the bond HAS to pay Euros, through the central depository. all the rest is a mix of stupidity, fantasy and the ability to discard all the experience accumulated since the Sumer regulated financial transactions in 3.000 BCE.

      --
      "If a boss demands loyalty, give him integrity. But if he demands integrity, give him loyalty." (John Boyd, 1927-1997)
    22. Re:What? by gadget+junkie · · Score: 1

      mind you, I am in exalted company. one of the more interesting factoids about the Euro is that the Bundesbank wanted another denomination printed: the 1.000 Eur Banknote, which belies an attachment to paper money as a store of value alternative to the bank accounts that is remarkable. Germany had the 1.000 Dmark note, issued by the same people who came out of the war on their knees, which tends to instil more paranoia that I can shake a stick at.

      --
      "If a boss demands loyalty, give him integrity. But if he demands integrity, give him loyalty." (John Boyd, 1927-1997)
    23. Re:What? by John.Banister · · Score: 1

      Are you sure those are for stripping? Last I checked, lap dances were $20.

    24. Re:What? by John.Banister · · Score: 1

      Well, if the G-string was made of that gecko foot style Van der Walls sticky stuff...

    25. Re:What? by John.Banister · · Score: 0

      Figures. When American Express doesn't keep track, it's money laundering. When the US Government prints up a new bunch of $100's, puts a big pallet of them in the back of a C-130, flies it to another country and leaves the door open at night, it's "oops."

    26. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they don't record the information though it is called money laundering

      Not it is not. You can walk into any retailer selling prepaid cards and pick them up, some right at the checkout, and pay cash for them. Nothing is recorded. It is the same for prepaid SIMs.

      http://www.itstactical.com/digicom/privacy/how-to-use-prepaid-debit-cards-for-anonymous-cash-like-digital-transactions/

      American Express got nailed...

      Amex got into trouble because their bank (AEBI), the actual entity issuing the traveler's checks, was not following federal requirements. Financial institutions are required to establish effective anti-money laundering programs under the Bank Secrecy Act, which requires institutions to report any transactions employees deem suspicious and report movements of money involving at least $10,000.

    27. Re:What? by Rinikusu · · Score: 1

      Tattooed QR code to a bitcoin wallet to transfer tips to. Making it rain will be pretty lame unless you can implant led lighting under the skin that light up with the amount of "tips" the wallet receives...

      --
      If you were me, you'd be good lookin'. - six string samurai
    28. Re:What? by Rakarra · · Score: 2

      Yes, we've been waiting for this fiat money crash, as we've been told the end is nigh, for decades now. Still waiting.

      The gold standard discussions are always interesting because they all assume that gold has some sort of intrinsic, non-volatile value.
      It really doesn't help that much of the "you should buy gold!" press in the last five years has come from people who have a vested interest in the price of gold rising (like Glenn Beck) so they can sell it off at a profit and recent buyers will be hit with a loss. Pretty much the opposite situation from the one Beck et all describe would actually happen if we went back to the gold standard.

    29. Re:What? by jbolden · · Score: 1

      Look at GP. Those are small amounts. See what happens if some retailer were doing 10k $100 cards / day per location paid for in cash.

    30. Re:What? by Archfeld · · Score: 1

      and if I visit a retailer that won't accept cash you lose the sale. I have credit and debit, but I prefer to pay cash for what I want. As for the criminal economy, I'd say corporate America is doing just fine with credit and cash. I also do a healthy side business dealing in barter for services, even more anonymous and generally tax free.

      --
      errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
    31. Re:What? by AthanasiusKircher · · Score: 2

      But modern money does rely on the banking system because it has no intrinsic value. Notes are just that - notes from the bank that they owe you X amount of dollars. Coin used to be worth their actual weight in copper, silver or gold (and was thus international) but those days have long gone.

      And precisely what is the "intrinsic value" of gold and silver? Copper mostly sells for its market value as a raw material. Gold and silver have huge premiums on their price compared to their actual utility, just like fiat currencies.

      Notes and coins only work because people want them to and trust them to, but that could break any time.

      All that would need to happen is for you to end up in a situation where "shiny rocks" are not particularly useful, and gold and silver would be worthless too. Just like fiat money, gold and silver "only work because people want them to and trust them to," but that could ALSO break. The only reason to trust them any more is because they have a longer history of made-up fake value ascribed to them.

      In real "survival" circumstances, the people who will be able to buy stuff will be those with food, clothing, tools, weapons, etc. Those things have something closer to "intrinsic value," since humans will almost always need them. Gold and silver are just more traditional "fiat" money, and their value is held up by the market, just as any other currency.

    32. Re: What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not a good idea. Taking it off could be a big problem, plus I wouldn't want some strippers to get stuck to my lap...

    33. Re:What? by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Fiat money is simply a numbers game.

      All money, every single system is 100 percent a numbers game. Probably as close as we can get to a system of real worth would be wheat, but still way too volatile.

      We were given a warning in 2008 that that numbers game will not continue but that's obviously fallen on deaf ears.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U...

      Explain how those were the result of fiat currency.

      The irony is that the rich have got richer since then because they bought into hard assets - art, shares, property, land, gold, silver, rare artifacts (there's a reason they did that) - while those who had a regular salary and saved in dollars, euros or whatever have got continually squeezed and could afford less in real assets. It never ceases to amaze me how the ignorant get attached to their little fiat currency denominations.

      Odd - I did well in both 2001 and 2008, and although I have hard investments, I simply didn't invest where the "smart" people said I should. I invested in what I knew would work. That's where most of my money went, and then returned with profit.

      Even more odd is that you think that the fiscal insanity was caused by fiat currency, when in fact, most was caused by lack of regulation, mortgage originators who had no fiscal stake in the process, leading to mortgages to people who never should have them, and the insanity ne plus ultra - the 50 year morgage. a favorite of 80 year olds.

      Just simple math that was bypassed, a crisis that would have been easily avoided, And not one thing to do with fiat currency, as if it did, people like myself who avoided the insanity would have suffered along with those who partook of it.

      If you wish to argue, refer to the depressions noted. There were some, like the panic of 1837 where people lost trust in paper currency, interestingly enough not too long after th eUs tried to establish a mint ratio of gold to silver. Many other recessions were driven by speculation, or one of the biggies, post war days of reckoning, When we go to war, we often make emergency appropriations, which is kind of like war on the layaway plan. Eventually those have to be paid for, usually by inflation and or recession.

      Good luck with that, because they are increasingly unlikely to want your useless electronic numbers that you place so much value on. The ECB is going to create a whole lot more of them.

      So do you have your precious metals in a well armed fortress? Dude, any Government that can make everyone's electronic money worthless, can take your Gold, especially if you invest in it like most people....... electronically.

      Because unless you can lay your actual hands on all your investment metal and have substantial means to defend it, you'll be in the same boat as the rest of us when your fiatpocalypse happens. Even people you think are idiots, like me.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    34. Re:What? by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Yes, we've been waiting for this fiat money crash, as we've been told the end is nigh, for decades now. Still waiting.

      The gold standard discussions are always interesting because they all assume that gold has some sort of intrinsic, non-volatile value.

      Let me tell you about a guy my wife used to work for. Back in the late 70's. The "failed" president Carter was in office, Civilization was going to collapse into a Mad Max world of shortages, and our money was goint to be worthless. The end was coming, and if you didn't prepare, you were toast.

      Now I was happy to use his connections to buy silver bullion, (still have it) but the important part of my anecdote is one time we went ot his place for a party. His entire basement had been converted to a sort of prepper paradise. He had barells of wheat seed, and canned survival food. He had rifles and bullets - in several calibers.

      His plan was that when the collapse of civilization happened imminently, he would trade people "Bullets for Bread", I told my wife that the flaw in his plan was that as na old dude, he was going ot be a prime target if his apocalypse happened. He'd be muhc better off to hope for the Rapture.

      His wife used to hate it when they had their survival food weeks, whne they ate the food that was going out of date. Yummy - no MRE's at that time (which aren't half bad)

      Since the paranoid are predicting the apocalypse all the time, eventually one of them will be right. Doesn't make for an excuse to act like that for the other millenia that we don't collapse.

      It really doesn't help that much of the "you should buy gold!" press in the last five years has come from people who have a vested interest in the price of gold rising (like Glenn Beck) so they can sell it off at a profit and recent buyers will be hit with a loss. Pretty much the opposite situation from the one Beck et all describe would actually happen if we went back to the gold standard.

      Yup, the paranoid being preyed upon by the grifters. Simply divide the world's GDP by the total amount of gold ever mined, and you'll see the futility of it all. Actually attempting to go to the gold standard now would achieve the massive collapse that these kooks all lust for, ironically.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    35. Re:What? by ComputersKai · · Score: 1

      The criminal economy will simply find a new way of paying each other. When the ordinary citizen has a legitimate reason to use cash, what can that citizen do?

    36. Re: What? by kenh · · Score: 1

      If Walmart (in your example) gives receipts without the identifier for the card, the buyer will have to trust that Walmart activates the card - the buyer will have no recourse with your anonymized receipt if they buy an inactivated card.

      --
      Ken
    37. Re: What? by kenh · · Score: 1

      It really doesn't help that much of the "you should buy gold!" press in the last five years has come from people who have a vested interest in the price of gold rising (like Glenn Beck) so they can sell it off at a profit and recent buyers will be hit with a loss.

      You do understand that gold dealers advertise on shows like Glenn Beck's, and I've heard commercials for the same gold merchants on left-leaning shows like Randi Rhodes...

      His 'vested interest' ends when the check for the paid advertisement clears.

      Pretty much the opposite situation from the one Beck et all describe would actually happen if we went back to the gold standard.

      Beck "et all" (sic) don't try and predict the future, they argue that gold is a good hedge against inflation - at the turn of the last century (1900) you could buy a nice tailored suit and a steak dinner with a $10 gold coin, some 100 years later you can still buy a tailored suit and steak dinner with that very same $10 gold coin...

      --
      Ken
    38. Re: What? by kenh · · Score: 1

      Even more odd is that you think that the fiscal insanity was caused by fiat currency, when in fact, most was caused by lack of regulation, mortgage originators who had no fiscal stake in the process, leading to mortgages to people who never should have them, and the insanity ne plus ultra - the 50 year morgage. a favorite of 80 year olds.

      And it was all federally backed to help make sure everyone had their chance at "the American Dream"!

      My personal favorite was the 110% mortgage - loaning money to people that not only didn't have a down payment, they also lacked the money to cover closing costs...

      --
      Ken
    39. Re: What? by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      And it was all federally backed to help make sure everyone had their chance at "the American Dream"!

      The thing that floored me was I knew exactly what was going to happen when I saw the first crazy ads on Yahoo. Million dollar loans with 250 a month payments.

      Yet somehow, it seems that only a couple economists foresaw the only possible conclusion to what we were doing. I knew we were in a positive feedback loop, while I was listening to people who should know better tell us that we were entering a new age of perpetual debt, and we would simply keep remortgaging our homes, forever and ever, world without end, amen. There are some simple math rules here, simple to the point that we don't need voodoo economic models. Since we base so much of our economy on real estate, I'll use it as a starting point.

      1. People have a finite lifespan

      2. Any item an economy is based on has to be bought and sold - otherwise nothing happens.

      3. When entities with a finite lifespan do their job to move the economy by buying real estate, they need to have some chance of repaying their debt before they die. Dead people's estates sucked dry to repay that 50 year mortgage just screw up the equation. Money that might have gone to buying new real estate was now going to pay off old.

      4. The old rule of 2.5 * annual salary = the price of your home is real and right. Venture from that at your own peril.

      So what we dove into was people buying houses at prices that were close to what they would earn their entire lives, obviously a fail situation. We had people that should know better believing that the price of real estate would increase to infinity - note to folks, when that lazy 8 shows up in your math, it's time to start over. They seemed to believe that people would finance their lives by refinancing their house every year.

      The bean counters will always find something to run their bubbles, but this one was pure and simple retarded. We hear about how we shouldn't have the mythical "nanny state" to protect people from themselves.

      But dammit, there is no way that voodoo finances like this should ever be allowed. People should not be allowed to take out loans that are impossible to pay back.

      But regulations are bad, and evil. The invisible hand of the free market will always correct any situation. And yes, that's actually true. The roughly two year boom and bust cycle of the completely free market is self correcting.

      But it has a marked tendency to be guided by Darwin.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    40. Re: What? by John.Banister · · Score: 1

      Sure, just like you have no recourse with any receipt if you walk out of their building having received counterfeit money when they make change. In order to get anonymity, the process has to be non-reversible. If it wasn't, the process could be reversed against you. So, you have to trust somebody in a situation where you have no recourse. The fact is, activating the cards at point of sale is, itself antithetical to the anonymity. If you and they wanted to cooperate in anonymous pre-paid debit cards, you'd want ones that were activated en masse at the start of business and kept with the cash in teller stations. The thing I can think of for verification is for the cards to have a little nfc chip that tells their value to (similarly chipped) cell phones. Then, you'd want an NFC muffling wallet so they don't talk out of turn. But, you kind of do anyways. I bought copper foil from McMaster-Carr to line the pouch in my wallet where I keep my passport and TWIC because they're already capable of talking out of turn.

    41. Re: What? by John.Banister · · Score: 1

      Ok, I slightly lied below. You can have revokable anonymity in a process where your cooperation is required for it to be reversible, using some form of encryption. For most customers of anonymous electronic currency, I expect they'd pay the trust price in order not to have to keep track of the transactions, especially if they had success with trust in the past.

    42. Re:What? by FrozenToothbrush · · Score: 1

      Gold has value to people for a number of reasons, it has for thousands of years. Gold is used in electronics if you're looking for a 'market use'. Every major civilization in history started out using gold before their eventual collapse, often coinciding with when they got off of gold and switched to fiat currency/currency dilution.

    43. Re:What? by segedunum · · Score: 1

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U...

      Explain how those were the result of fiat currency.

      Every single fiat currency since the dawn of time has failed, without exception, and with terrible results. In between, every thirty or forty years or so we get a slightly different currency, some partly 'backed' by gold, some completely fiat, but they all fail in the end.

      Odd - I did well in both 2001 and 2008, and although I have hard investments, I simply didn't invest where the "smart" people said I should. I invested in what I knew would work. That's where most of my money went, and then returned with profit.

      I believe you. Even if you have, you got lucky and you're not the 90% I'm afraid, which is my point.

      Even more odd is that you think that the fiscal insanity was caused by fiat currency, when in fact, most was caused by lack of regulation, mortgage originators who had no fiscal stake in the process, leading to mortgages to people who never should have them, and the insanity ne plus ultra - the 50 year morgage. a favorite of 80 year olds.

      The lack of regulation comes from creating fiat in large amounts with wild abandon for those well connected. It's pretty damn obvious frankly.

      Dude, any Government that can make everyone's electronic money worthless, can take your Gold

      There will be no government.....because no one will be able to afford one.

    44. Re:What? by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U...

      Explain how those were the result of fiat currency.

      Every single fiat currency since the dawn of time has failed, without exception, and with terrible results. In between, every thirty or forty years or so we get a slightly different currency, some partly 'backed' by gold, some completely fiat, but they all fail in the end.

      Every single Government since the dawn of time has failed. Probably not a good argument for Anarchy.

      And gold based systems have likewise failed. Senescence is hardly a good reason to abandon something.

      But those several failures while we were on the Gold standard - no explanation?

      We've heard all the arguments for the gold standard, and the proponents will simply have to accept that there just isn't enough Gold in the world to run the world any more. I did the math a year or so ago. It won't work. There is a reason that no country uses the gold standard any more, and it's not subjugation of the masses or whatever odd reason the gold standarders give, it's just that the world's economies have so far outpaced the amount of gold that we can put our hands on. This has been known for a long time, which was why we and some other nations tried a bimetallic standard for a while. Which didn't work because the two metals always fluctuated value when compared with each other. Maybe even that should be a clue.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    45. Re: What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're confused. So is the GP. The reason those mortgages were being offered is because they were being conglomerated into securities, rated AAA, and sold for ludicrous amounts of money. The difference between the obviously-not-worth-anything mortgage and a security rated the same as a Treasury bond is worth quite a bit. Then we have the derivatives of those derivatives, and so on and so forth. Wall Street turned something like 10 bn worth of loans into at least 100 bn worth of assets. It was a great idea, right up until it wasn't.

      The NINJA loans had nothing to do with the federal government, and if you believe otherwise, you've been listening to too many right-wing talk shows instead of attempting the admittedly-difficult task of understanding the market forces at work. No one held a gun to the bankers' heads to force them to offer those kind of loans. AIG and Bear Stearns weren't even in the market for consumer home loans. Deutche Bank wasn't offering home loans to US citizens. Why did these companies lose incredible amounts of money?

      I admit, you start talking about tranches too long, and my eyes blur. Blaming the 2008 financial crisis on individual misbehavior, or the federal goverment, is just ludicrously wrong, and contrary to all but the most biased histories.

  24. Predictions vs. reality by mhkohne · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Lots of people think it will happen" means about nothing. People are HORRIBLY bad at predicting future trends. More so en-mass.

    What people say they want and what they really want (and demonstrate by doing) are pretty much unrelated. So even if people SAY they want cashless, I doubt they'll actually vote that way when the rubber hits the road.

    --
    A thousand pounds of wood moving at 300 feet per minute. Don't get in the way.
    1. Re:Predictions vs. reality by John.Banister · · Score: 1

      People use video phones a lot. They just call them webcams.

    2. Re:Predictions vs. reality by blackraven14250 · · Score: 1

      I know two people who use Facetime daily when they work past about 6 or so to call their kids. It's not some crazy thing that isn't even on the typical person's radar in the industrialized world, it's just not 100% of all phone calls like some people envisioned it.

    3. Re:Predictions vs. reality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Skype and Facetime don't count. Skype is the closest we've come to video phones, but "videocameras" are not ubiquitous, not even close. I can't call my grandma, and my parents can't call me with Skype because they don't know my Skype ID, they only know my phone number. Facetime on the other hand covers this hole, but since it's only available on Apple products, it's not useful to non-Apple users.

      We've had video conferencing software for damn near forever (Anyone remember CUSeeMe?) the technology has just never been made practical for everyone to use, and the average person would rather send a text message that takes them 30 seconds to type out than go through the effort of waiting for a phone call to connect. Especially when Cell phones charge you for 1 minute (which can cost 1.50$/min on a prepaid phone) just to make a connection. Internet bandwidth caps aren't helping.

       

    4. Re:Predictions vs. reality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know 2 people and I don't know a single person that uses it with any regularity. It's a tiny minority of the calls being made and most people don't even think about it as an option unless they're overseas or needing to conduct business where being able to show people things is useful. Email, texting and phonecalls are much more likely to draw a response than an offer for a videocall.

      There's also the issue of convenience. You can have relatively private cell calls when you're on the bus, but when you whip out the videophone, basically everything you're doing is obvious to everybody around you. Far more so than if you're just yelling on the phone.

      The point is that the technology has probably already seen more or less peak adoption in the developed world and barring some innovation that makes it a lot more convenient, I wouldn't expect it to become any more prevalent.

  25. Cash is king! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Cash is accepted at more locations than Visa and Mastercard and always will. If government issued notes are eliminated, another form of anonymous exchange will arise. As previously mentioned, it may be gold or silver, it might be something else. People will find a way.

    1. Re:Cash is king! by Wansu · · Score: 1

      Cash is accepted at more locations than Visa and Mastercard and always will. If government issued notes are eliminated, another form of anonymous exchange will arise. As previously mentioned, it may be gold or silver, it might be something else. People will find a way.

      You beat me to it. Cash is king. Whether it's our present currency, gold or silver coins, nothing beats cold hard cash.

      --
      Wansu, th' chinese sailor
    2. Re:Cash is king! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Come to Sweden and I dare you to make that statement. It is hard to spend cash here. Plastic is always accepted and merchants are not allowed to charge fees.

    3. Re:Cash is king! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cash is accepted at more locations than Visa and Mastercard and always will.

      That is true , but nowadays Maestro/EC is accepted in more places than cash nowadays. Try paying cash in a vending machine, a parking ticket machine or an unmanned petrol station

    4. Re:Cash is king! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what happens when someone screw your credit or your CC for some reason are disabled?

      Let me answer that for you:

      You are screwed and good luck buying food.

  26. No Paper Money... by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 1

    I was talking to an economist friend, and he was saying one way to greatly reduce crime would be to eliminate all hard currency over $5 and make the currency that was left just coins.

    Yeah, yeah, I know the libertarians would go apeshit, but the world for the likes of Tony Soprano would crumble.... Most criminals would no longer be able to transact business, as they operate in a cash system.

    1. Re:No Paper Money... by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Most criminals would no longer be able to transact business, as they operate in a cash system.

      The biggest criminals run banks... or governments

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:No Paper Money... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Typical fantasy-land nonsense coming out of the pie hole of an economist. These guys live in their academic wonderlands, completely separated from what we call "the real world".

      If the paper money we use today disappears, something else will just take its place. Necessity is the mother of invention.

    3. Re:No Paper Money... by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      I'd rather have the likes of soprano running around and have my freedom intact than live in a police state world where every transaction is monitored (with inferred justification) by some bureaucrat.

    4. Re:No Paper Money... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is exactly the problem. You and your economist friend have no idea not only how much of the world is run by "criminals" but also how much of that is also necessary. Changing that implies rewriting pretty much the whole legal system.

    5. Re:No Paper Money... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In a vacuum full of spherical humans, this might be true. More evidence that economists are talking out of their assholes.

    6. Re:No Paper Money... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can we make a special case for this post and let it have 10 modpoints?

    7. Re:No Paper Money... by ComputersKai · · Score: 1

      ...and how long did it take for the criminals to figure out that Tide detergent can be used as currency, as someone earlier mentioned.
      There are better ways to reduce crime.

  27. ... Get rid of the dollar entirely... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously, those things are dirtier than my hands after not washing.

  28. Yeah, let us get rid of cash and give banksters a by Presto+Vivace · · Score: 1

    fee on every transaction. Really, the greed of banksters is enough to make a mobster blush. However, going cashless would make the church rumple sale impossible. Once that aspect of the matter is made clear to politicians that will be the end of this dicussion.

  29. Fiat can crash by tepples · · Score: 4, Funny

    the fiat, which can crash at any moment

    The currency or the car?

    (In before "yes".)

    1. Re:Fiat can crash by slashmydots · · Score: 1

      That's just dumb. Fiats don't start most of the time. How are they going to crash if they don't start?

    2. Re:Fiat can crash by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      I owned a fiat back in the 80's. It was a Ritmo and was very reliable. From what I've heard though it appears I got the only one. Kind of a reverse lemon.

    3. Re:Fiat can crash by Bearhouse · · Score: 1

      Fix It Again, Tony

    4. Re:Fiat can crash by canadian_right · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yes, you had the only one. And it took a very unusual series of events for you to get a reliable Fiat.

      It was a rare Wednesday that was also a National holiday. The regular crews were all off, and the temps were called in, but it was a Wednesday not a Friday so the temps weren't drunk. Being not drunk they remembered that they had played cards last night with the crew of a Saudi Royals yacht. This crew was all nubile Japanese girls who were taking a holiday from their work building Camries. The Fiat boys convinced them to take their shifts, and behold - the one ever reliable Fiat was built from 1969 through 1988.

      --
      Anarchists never rule
    5. Re:Fiat can crash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Derp it again, Derpmeister.

      Ya slack-jawed, drooling, mouth-breathing meatslapper.

  30. Bank accounts for the poor by wiredlogic · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Cashless only works if the poor can get bank accounts without having to pay hefty fees if they can even qualify at all.

    --
    I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
    1. Re:Bank accounts for the poor by jonwil · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The problem isn't banks, its US banks.

      Here in Australia I recently opened a bank account including an attached VISA Debit card (lets me pay with VISA using my own money). When I did it, the bank didn't care about my financial circumstances or anything and I was able to open the account with a single dollar coin.

      The only account fees I have paid since I opened this account was an overseas transaction fee when I bought something from overseas with the VISA and a fee (charged by the ATM operator) when I used an ATM not part of the RediATM network.
      I pay NO monthly fees and NO transaction fees for using RediATM ATMs, EFTPOS, VISA in Australia, bPay or internet banking.

      No reason why a bank has to make it hard for people to get a bank account or charge huge fees, they just choose to because they are greedy.

    2. Re:Bank accounts for the poor by PPH · · Score: 1

      And give the hobos at the off-ramps NFC scanners to recieve hand-outs.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    3. Re:Bank accounts for the poor by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      They make their money somehow. Do your taxes subsidize the bank?

    4. Re:Bank accounts for the poor by jonwil · · Score: 2

      I suspect the bank in question makes its money from loan products, credit cards and other things that do have fees and interest charges.

    5. Re:Bank accounts for the poor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem isn't banks, its US banks.

      Nah. The problem isn't US banks. It's people who don't shop around for their bank. I live in the US and except for having to open the account with an initial $25 (which I could instantly withdraw), basically everything you've stated above holds for me. Yet plenty of US banks do have fees, restrictions, etc.

      No reason why a bank has to make it hard for people to get a bank account or charge huge fees, they just choose to because they are greedy.

      Precisely. I don't think that's exclusive to US banks. Just a bit of stupidity that people will so gladly chose a bank with horrible practices based upon some stupid loyalty or recommendation from others. So, perhaps it's more a US mindset?

    6. Re:Bank accounts for the poor by Hunter-Killer · · Score: 1

      Fast food companies have figured this out. Paper checks cost too much, so workers receive a debit card, which the company deposits paychecks in.

    7. Re:Bank accounts for the poor by dryeo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I remember when banks made their money by lending out depositors money, and paid the depositors as well, absolutely no fees and they paid cashiers to interact with the public. Back then certain businesses such as banks had a nice steady income and profit, now they expect to make record profits every year and if their profits only increase with inflation they're a failure.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    8. Re:Bank accounts for the poor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong. Cryptocurrencies are the answer.

    9. Re:Bank accounts for the poor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While your money is sitting in an account they control they can invest it and make money off that.

    10. Re:Bank accounts for the poor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The make money from basically everything, there's just more competition atm.

      The big 4 Australian banks (CBA, ANZ, Westpac, NAB) are some of the most profitable banks in the world. (http://www.smh.com.au/business/big-four-on-top-of-the-world-for-profitability-says-bis-20140629-3b2c6.html).

      No bailouts were necessary in the GFC, see: http://press.anu.edu.au/agenda/016/03/mobile_devices/ch09.html

    11. Re:Bank accounts for the poor by delt0r · · Score: 1

      In NZ this problem was fixed by providing a "NZ peoples bank". Really just a government bank. Since welfare and everything is only via direct debit, even the bankrupt need to be able to have accounts.

      --
      If information wants to be free, why does my internet connection cost so much?
    12. Re:Bank accounts for the poor by delt0r · · Score: 1

      Not the current ones. 20mins for a transaction to "accept"?

      --
      If information wants to be free, why does my internet connection cost so much?
    13. Re:Bank accounts for the poor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only account fees I have paid since I opened this account was an overseas transaction fee when I bought something from overseas with the VISA and a fee (charged by the ATM operator) when I used an ATM not part of the RediATM network.
      I pay NO monthly fees and NO transaction fees for using RediATM ATMs, EFTPOS, VISA in Australia, bPay or internet banking.

      Actually, every time you make a purchase with your VISA debit card, you pay a 2-3% fee. This is not itemized on your bill, but is deducted from the amount the merchant receives. Of course, the merchant is fully aware that this will happen, and has inflated his prices by 2-3% to make sure that he receives the amount he actually wants.

      True, if you're just using your card like an ATM card, then doing all your transactions with cash, then you're not paying any fees. But neither are you getting the convenience of "pay[ing] with VISA using my own money."

    14. Re:Bank accounts for the poor by dmgxmichael · · Score: 1

      You suspect wrong. Australia has powerful laws to control what banks can charge for written to protect its citizens. The US has powerful laws to grant authority to banks to charge for anything written to exploit its citizens.

    15. Re:Bank accounts for the poor by jsepeta · · Score: 1

      you have a bad credit score? no bank account for you, ya lousy bum

      --
      Remember kids, if you're not paying for the service, YOU ARE THE PRODUCT THAT IS BEING SOLD.
    16. Re:Bank accounts for the poor by jonwil · · Score: 1

      I usually pay for things with EFTPOS anyway unless the merchant doesn't take EFTPOS (online is another matter obviously)

    17. Re:Bank accounts for the poor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here in the US our banks rape us in the butt and that's how we like it. If you aren't trying to maximize your profits (through butt rape of your customers and employees) then you are clearly a communist.

    18. Re:Bank accounts for the poor by will_die · · Score: 1

      My German bank account makes it money by giving almost no money in interest, and charging over $1 per automated transaction. On the good side no ATM fees.

  31. But first... by djupedal · · Score: 0

    ...we need to get rid of the stinking penny.

  32. "Always" is a strong word: I don't carry a balance by tepples · · Score: 2

    Credit card companies in the US are always double-dipping, charging processing fees to the merchants and collecting interest from cardholders.

    Often, yes. Always, no. I've had three credit cards. None of them charge any interest because I pay in full each month with an ACH transfer from my checking account.

  33. Children by tepples · · Score: 1

    So how will a child not old enough to have a bank account in his own name buy a candy bar at the convenience store?

    1. Re:Children by Spazmania · · Score: 2

      Pre-paid debit card.

      --
      Moderating "-1, Disagree" is simple censorship. Have the guts to post your opinion.
    2. Re:Children by tepples · · Score: 1

      Purchased with what?

    3. Re:Children by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who lets their children walk about alone these days anyway?
      Doesn't happen.
      The pampered little dears get escorted everywhere.

    4. Re:Children by Spazmania · · Score: 1

      Seriously?

      By the parent using the parent's bank card. By the kid splitting a larger card so he can give some amount to his buddy or combining several cards he got from his buddies.

      I'm against a cashless society but not because there's any practical obstruction to it working. There isn't.

      --
      Moderating "-1, Disagree" is simple censorship. Have the guts to post your opinion.
    5. Re:Children by Pseudonym · · Score: 0

      You let your child travel to the convenience store without adult supervision, without even a phone just in case? You child abuser, you.

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
    6. Re:Children by tepples · · Score: 1

      By the parent using the parent's bank card.

      With a substantial transaction fee.

      By the kid splitting a larger card so he can give some amount to his buddy

      With a substantial transaction fee each.

      or combining several cards he got from his buddies.

      With a substantial transaction fee each.

    7. Re:Children by tepples · · Score: 1

      The child walks to the convenience store while carrying a pay-as-you-go phone loaded with only enough minutes to arrange rides a couple times a week.

    8. Re:Children by Spazmania · · Score: 1

      Maybe. Certainly with today's approach.

      --
      Moderating "-1, Disagree" is simple censorship. Have the guts to post your opinion.
    9. Re:Children by slazzy · · Score: 1

      Perhaps using some technology or account type which doesn't quite exist yet.

      --
      Website Just Down For Me? Find out
    10. Re:Children by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Care to fix the goalposts? You complained about it being available. Now, proven wrong, you are complaining about the cost. If the cost were $0, you'd still complain about something. I've gotten a card for $0. So where are the goalposts going next? Why not just state your objection, rather than arguing with everyone over every little detail?

    11. Re:Children by aristotle-dude · · Score: 3

      You let your child travel to the convenience store without adult supervision, without even a phone just in case? You child abuser, you.

      Fucking NAZI. When I was growing up, all the kids wandered the neighbourhood without adult supervision until dusk and we turned out just fine. We also walked to the neighbourhood corner store for candy. Namby-pamby fascists like you are what is ruining society. We did not have cell phones either.

      --
      Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
    12. Re:Children by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Outside the US. And, in the northeast cities of the US.

    13. Re:Children by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A regular credit card.

    14. Re:Children by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bitcoin. If the child is old enough to be visiting a convenience store without their parents, they're old enough to have a cellphone.

    15. Re:Children by Pseudonym · · Score: 1

      I kid of course, but you know there are parents that feel like that.

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
    16. Re:Children by Pseudonym · · Score: 1

      I hope you were being sarcastic too. It's so hard to tell these days.

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
    17. Re:Children by nabsltd · · Score: 1

      By the parent using the parent's bank card.

      By "bank card", do you mean "debit card"? If so, wouldn't it be easier just to get the kid his own bank account with a debit card?

    18. Re:Children by tepples · · Score: 1

      wouldn't it be easier just to get the kid his own bank account with a debit card?

      As an 18th birthday present, yes. Until then, the kid can't make a contract with a bank.

    19. Re:Children by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      I'm interested in how you would eliminate transaction fees. Money in account form has to be maintained by somebody, and somebody has to authorize transactions. That takes effort, and incurs liability, and therefore costs money. Somebody's going to have to pay that.

      For fairly small transactions, we personally don't have that problem, but that's because we keep enough money in the bank so they profit off lending it out, and fold transaction fees into the stuff that we get "free"., Some people simply won't be at all profitable to a bank, and the financial authorities are going to want transaction fees in some form.

      Example: I can pay for groceries with my credit card. The issuing authority takes a small cut, which the grocery store doesn't get, and they also hope I won't pay off my full balance each month so they can collect interest from me. There are other problems, from the store's point of view, if I'm using a card without authorization, or I dispute a charge, but let's ignore these here. Anyway, the grocery store includes all those costs in its prices, so I'm paying more than I would if everybody paid cash, so that works out. However, say I want to give somebody money the same way. If I give $10, and the recipient gets $9.85, the missing fifteen cents is going to be obvious.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    20. Re:Children by Spazmania · · Score: 1

      Taxes pay to print cash. They could pay to run the transaction system.

      Cards could carry a monthly fee that covers up to some number of transactions.

      Transactions consisting solely of splitting or combining cards could be made free while transactions consisting of the purchase of goods or services continue to carry a fee.

      There are any number of ways to set up the system where one activity or another carries no fee. When I write a check I pay no fee. The bank makes its money off me other ways.

      --
      Moderating "-1, Disagree" is simple censorship. Have the guts to post your opinion.
    21. Re:Children by nabsltd · · Score: 1

      As an 18th birthday present, yes. Until then, the kid can't make a contract with a bank.

      You must not be in the US. Many kids under 18 have bank accounts in their own names, with their own debit cards. It's been that way long before debit cards, too.

  34. Re:Last century stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I always pay in cash and don't own a card. As do some of my friends. Perhaps its not a great idea to take your friends as the average of a bigger demographic since your friends are likely to be like you.

    Some of us just don't like having everything tracked, even if its fully legal.

  35. Not such a good idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    By removing physical currency you also remove the only anonymous way of paying for goods not to mention the ONLY way to have COMPLETE control over your own money.

    What are you going to do when a Bank freezes all your assets? Use your "plastic card"?

    1. Re:Not such a good idea... by DiSKiLLeR · · Score: 1

      Have more than one bank account?

      Preferably in more than one country? I have bank accounts in 3 countries: Australia, New Zealand, and the United States. I can use my plastic card from any bank/country anywhere I go.

      Works for me.

      Never had a problem with a bank account getting "frozen".

      --
      You can tell how powerful someone is by the magnitude of the crime they can commit and be able to get away with.
    2. Re:Not such a good idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have more than one bank account?

      Preferably in more than one country? I have bank accounts in 3 countries: Australia, New Zealand, and the United States. I can use my plastic card from any bank/country anywhere I go.

      Works for me.

      Never had a problem with a bank account getting "frozen".

      Yet.

    3. Re:Not such a good idea... by PPH · · Score: 1

      I have bank accounts in 3 countries: Australia, New Zealand, and the United States.

      Have your Australian and New Zealand banks started their FATCA compliance reporting yet? You are ether a non-US person, very wealthy so as to make the trouble worth it to them, or they'll be closing your accounts soon.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    4. Re:Not such a good idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Downmod all you like but the truth is the truth and the only way to have completely control your own money in every sense of the word is if it is physical.

    5. Re:Not such a good idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The difference is if the fed wants to devalue my cash, they have to devalue everyone's cash. Whereas, in a cashless economy they can freeze out specific individuals.

    6. Re:Not such a good idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you never have bank problem, thats good but there are many documented case of bank account getting frozen so never say never.

      No cash or other anonymous way of making transaction is a wet dream for the governments of the word.

  36. Class issue here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    screw you. I know and do business with tens of people who only accept cash, only
    pay cash, can't take or process a check. They live hand to mouth, and they do
    alot of the labor that keeps everything running. The majority of the ones I know
    are white, and were born in the united states. not that that should matter

    How convenient for you to depend on an underclass, legal or not, and piss on them
    for not having as comfortable a life as yourself.

  37. Re:Last century stuff by osu-neko · · Score: 2

    In America, most stores won't take your card unless you plan to spend less than a pittance. Most stores will deny you if your transaction isn't 5-10$

    Not sure what backwards part of America that post came from, but I can tell you for certain that it's absolutely false in every part of America that I'm aware of. I use my debit card everywhere, for everything, including buying a single item at a dollar store if that's all I want to buy. No one has ever once even blinked. $1 at the Dollar Store, $3 at the fast-food joint, whatever, everyone's happy to take my business. I stopped using cash for anything at all over a decade ago, and the only people who don't want my card are the government -- they would rather I write a check for my driver's license renewal or whatever (which is funny, no one else will accept a check anymore around here).

    --
    "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
  38. Haven't carried cash in like 10 years... by DiSKiLLeR · · Score: 1

    I haven't carried cash in like 10 years. I just never use it.

    This is living in Australia, and then in New Zealand for the past 5 years.

    In New Zealand road side fruit sellers accept cards. Literally EVERYONE accepts cards, because everyone uses cards.

    Cash is pretty much dead here.

    --
    You can tell how powerful someone is by the magnitude of the crime they can commit and be able to get away with.
    1. Re:Haven't carried cash in like 10 years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your babysitter takes credit cards? The guy you buy a used game from on Craigslist takes credit cards? Your kid accepts a credit card for allowance? Tip a guy delivering a couch? Did you pay the neighborhood kid to cut your grass with a credit card? Pay your neighbor for a gallon of gas for your lawnmower that you forgot to get before having his son try to cut your grass? My barber doesn't speak English so he can't get a merchant account so I had to pay with cash.

      I did all of those things this weekend, and in all of those cases cash was needed. The only thing I spent money on this weekend where a credit card could possibly used was when I bought a pizza. I didn't then because the place gives a $1 cash discount because they get so many chargebacks.

    2. Re:Haven't carried cash in like 10 years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Almost all of those things are normally handled with bank transfer, not a credit card or cash.

    3. Re:Haven't carried cash in like 10 years... by Justpin · · Score: 1

      See Cyprus March 2013, the cashless were hit REALLY hard.

  39. Cashless can't happen, here is why ... by TrollstonButterbeans · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Are we assuming all transactions humans do are with merchants?

    Naive as hell !

    Crappy list of examples, I'm sure there are hundreds of examples: 1) What about if I want to buy your [insert bike or computer or whatever]? 2) Baby sitter? 3) Kid's allowance? 4) Pay some kid kid to mow yard. 5) Underground transactions (illegal stuff)

    The importance of cash will continue to decline with transactions with merchants, but it will never remotely approach "cashless".

    --
    Priest: "Universe from nothing, no laws of physics, sped up time"+ huge discrepancies. Creationism? No. Big Bang Theory
    1. Re:Cashless can't happen, here is why ... by profplump · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The assumption that some sort of special merchant status will be required to accept non-physical payment strikes me as unfounded. Even today it's fairly easy for individuals to send money via ACH -- or a paper check, like individuals have used for years -- and it's not hard to imagine ways to make a similar process even easier and less dependent on banks.

    2. Re:Cashless can't happen, here is why ... by Pseudonym · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Never say "never". The kid who occasionally mows my lawn has a smartphone. I can see a day, not too far off, when this is the customary mechanism for doing that kind of payment. As soon as the transaction cost goes down to negligible.

      So yes, there may come a time when government-supplied currency tokens are obsolete for almost all transactions. That may not be in my lifetime, although the phasing out of postage stamps may happen in the next couple of decades. Illicit transactions may just move to barter.

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
    3. Re:Cashless can't happen, here is why ... by TWX · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yup. It's also common to get discounts for cash. Some places like pawn shops, used bookstores, junkyards, and other businesses will always offer discounts over published or listed prices for cash, and those discounts are often much steeper than just the cost to the merchant of a credit card transaction, and sometimes are quite a bit more than the choice by the merchant to under-report taxable transactions would account for too. I suspect that in part it's a matter of the business having the money now, as opposed to having to wait until the end of the month to get paid. Plus there's always a possibility of messing up a credit/debit transaction, which can result in having one's account (and all outstanding revenue) put on-hold until the processor chooses to release it.

      Credit/Debit works best for large companies where there's little to no haggling, and where the sheer volume of transactions allows that merchant to negotiate good terms with the processor, but they're still at the mercy of the processor as far as account and transaction fees are concerned, and then there's the other issue of security. Target, Neiman Marcus, and PF Changs are all going through that right now, and I don't doubt that it'll get worse as time goes on, and while "pin and chip" cards may help, I expect that someone will figure out how to steal through those too, and the cycle will just continue.

      And then there's the personal sale angle. I'm not going to take paypal or have the ability to process credit cards for a yard sale or some crap that I'm selling through the classifieds or craigslist. Given how I'm mainly just trying to recoup something in the process of a sale, adding more hoops or steps will just result in my not bothering to sell junk anymore.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    4. Re:Cashless can't happen, here is why ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about if I want to buy your [...] Baby sitter?

      That would be illegal unless it's a robot.

    5. Re:Cashless can't happen, here is why ... by symbolset · · Score: 1

      If he has a smartphone he can probably use Square.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    6. Re:Cashless can't happen, here is why ... by sjames · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Personally, I find the idea of being 100% dependent on the finance industry to carry out a 'legitimate' transaction to be at the very least distasteful.

      Do we really want to give banks the power of taxation?

    7. Re:Cashless can't happen, here is why ... by currently_awake · · Score: 2

      The point many people miss is that with modern technology there is no requirement for you to use local currency. You could use your phone to pay in Rubles or Pounds just as easily as in Dollars. What if you can pay bills in Bitcoins using your phone? Large parts of the economy might just vanish as far as the taxman knows. Big business has spent a lot of time/money/effort in not paying taxes. What if everyone does that? The ONLY thing required for this to happen is secure communications.

    8. Re:Cashless can't happen, here is why ... by Pseudonym · · Score: 1

      Not in Australia, he can't. (By the way, how did you know it was a "he"?)

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
    9. Re:Cashless can't happen, here is why ... by Pseudonym · · Score: 1

      I didn't say I liked the sound of it. But I can see it coming.

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
    10. Re:Cashless can't happen, here is why ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Naive is assuming that because you do it one way, or even if most people do it one way, people will always do it that way.

      Going by your examples, I suspect you live in some sort of 50s utopia peopled by Sally the Babysitter and Freddy the Lawnmowing Kid, who are both saving up for a lightbulb-powered cupcake oven and a swell new red bike, gee willikers mister. My kids, who were born this century, get their allowance paid directly into their bank accounts via electronic funds transfer from my account. They transfer funds to friends' PayPal accounts - for example, to pick up their share of a lunch tab. They buy movie tickets online, or in the queue using their smart phones. Everything is EFTPOS.

      The only thing I've purchased with cash over the last week has been drinks from the office vending machine. One day soon it'll have PayWave on the front, and that'll be the end of that. Not long after it'll be like that shortlived sci-fi series, Defying Gravity - tap a dollar value on your phone, tap your phone against mine, money moved. That's as close to cash - a person to person transfer, requiring physical contact, with a locally stored value, theoretically not visible to an external regulator - as it'll get.

    11. Re:Cashless can't happen, here is why ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Not having to deal with local currency *could* be an advantage if you're doing transactions with people overseas, but where's the benefit when the transaction is between two people who live in the same community? And Bitcoin?? Why the hell would I involve myself with something that requires that block chain and its public record of all transactions? This cashless utopia is actually quite distopian.

    12. Re:Cashless can't happen, here is why ... by arth1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The ONLY thing required for this to happen is secure communications.

      That's like saying "the ONLY thing required is world peace".
      What admins and engineers have known for a long time, and which people like Snowden provided evidence for is that secure communication is not a given, and highly unlikely to be an option for the masses.

      If the government won't let people have a shadow economy they can't monitor or control, expect physical alternatives to take their place. There's plenty of precedence for turning to valuable metals when the currency cannot be trusted. And there are examples of governments banning both gold and silver trade as a kneejerk reaction, but that just moves the market to something else.

    13. Re:Cashless can't happen, here is why ... by dltaylor · · Score: 1

      Except, at least in the USA, the $1 your friend trasfers to you will be "discounted" by a bank transaction fee. How much does PayPal make on micro-transactions?

    14. Re:Cashless can't happen, here is why ... by slashmydots · · Score: 2

      As a small business owner, I can tell you that the even more hush hush method of payment is bartering. There's no trail or taxes and honestly I don't think it should be taxed either. That's simply because of the annoyance of estimating value and the near impossibility of drawing it from owner's equity to drawn income.

      If I want to pay a 14 year old computer repair enthusiast and intern/assistant without 1000000 forms to fill out, I give them property that can be flipped for cash extremely quickly like game codes from the Nvidia promotion. That's how small stuff will be handled without cash.

    15. Re:Cashless can't happen, here is why ... by amiga3D · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Any transaction that doesn't want to pay taxes moves to barter. This shit is a government wet dream. Talk about control! If you piss off the government in any way they flick a switch and you're done. Actually they probably just click an icon on a screen. Now you can't use your money, it's gone! I can see it coming though, it's inevitable.

    16. Re:Cashless can't happen, here is why ... by Wing_Zero · · Score: 1

      the Digital currencies already have a partial solution. they allow transactions via bluetooth, nfc, and qr-code. all that has to happen after that, is sync the wallet via the p2p network they work on, and in a few minutes, it becomes a confirmed transaction.

    17. Re:Cashless can't happen, here is why ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For everything you just listed there is Square or Paypal. Basically as long as you aren't doing something illegal (prostitution "massages", under-the-table payments to illegal aliens, etc)

      Now... I've gone the last decade using as little cash as possible. I've only had to use cash when:
      a) Riding a bus, whereby boarding the bus (our buses here have NFC that could in theory accept paypass, but they're not enabled for it. They use a loadable card instead, which you can't buy anywhere except at kiosks) without a chip card.
      b) leaving tips at restaurants where the POS doesn't have it enabled.

      Those two are rapidly nearing a state of exception, not the rule.

      We use ANPR license plate readers for toll gates, which saves the toll operation money by not employing people to barricade the toll route.

      Really the only time I've had to handle a large amount of cash, was trading 20's for 5's at conventions because not everyone has Square or Paypal, and they are dealing with a lot of people coming inside on a whim, not paying admission.

    18. Re:Cashless can't happen, here is why ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are we assuming all transactions humans do are with merchants?

      I completely agree with this statement but completely disagree with the following. In the future we will transact with other humans as well as with *computers*. Why is that? Computers cannot handle cash properly but they can handle cryptocurrencies.

    19. Re:Cashless can't happen, here is why ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Probably because you said "mow lawn" rather than "babysit", it was a safer bet.

    20. Re:Cashless can't happen, here is why ... by philip.paradis · · Score: 2

      I'm 33, and I've never seen a juvenile female mowing lawns for money. I have known grown women who run landscaping businesses, however.

      --
      Write failed: Broken pipe
    21. Re: Cashless can't happen, here is why ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Buses in the UK no longer accept cash: https://www.tfl.gov.uk/modes/buses/cash-free-buses

    22. Re:Cashless can't happen, here is why ... by RedWizzard · · Score: 1

      And then there's the personal sale angle. I'm not going to take paypal or have the ability to process credit cards for a yard sale or some crap that I'm selling through the classifieds or craigslist. Given how I'm mainly just trying to recoup something in the process of a sale, adding more hoops or steps will just result in my not bothering to sell junk anymore.

      In this country direct bank transactions are used for a lot of this. It's not quite as easy as taking cash when you hand over the item but it's not much harder: give them your bank account number when they agree to the sale and then check that the money is there before handing over the item. If you're going to bank the money anyway it's actually easier. Obviously it's not practical for yard sales but it works pretty well for classifieds and online sales.

    23. Re:Cashless can't happen, here is why ... by bloodhawk · · Score: 1

      Paying kids et al with barter is one thing, bartering can be a dangerous way to commit tax fraud as my brother found out. You have to place too much faith in the person you are bartering with, my brother got burnt by the person he was bartering with being a greedy prick, he wrote himself cheques for the bartered amount so he could then claim the bartered amount as tax deductible business expense while the payment to himself still kept his income low, my brother thought there was no trail until tax man came knocking. I also know of someone that got caught because he didn't realise the person he was bartering with was honest, so that person reported the amount on his tax (as he should) yet the other person had not. Once you are involving someone else in your tax fraud you really want to be 100% certain of what they are doing on their side.

    24. Re:Cashless can't happen, here is why ... by big_e_1977 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Its already happening. See Operation Chokepoint. If the government doesn't like your line of work, you won't have a bank account.

    25. Re: Cashless can't happen, here is why ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That's just London.

      (Phone NFC does work though. Also contactless credit/debit cards, except American ones which are obviously incompatible with the world standard...)

    26. Re:Cashless can't happen, here is why ... by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      The importance of cash will continue to decline with transactions with merchants, but it will never remotely approach "cashless".

      Bitcoin. No ok seriously Bitcoin itself may not be the answer, but the essence of any trade is that you trade something for something else. Cashless is definitely achievable if you have something with which to substitute said cash.

      Right now we're living in a world where we have several options to pay for something without cash. I bought a friend's quadrocopter frame using Paypal since he didn't want cash. Australia had a system called Bartercard which is a barter trading exchange.

      The only thing keeping us from going truly cash free is the cost of exchanging non-cash things of value, but even that cost is plummeting. Paypal charges only a couple of percent. You can get a EFTPOS system for your iPhone or iPad now and swipe other people's cards. Or failing all that you really could just send another participant some bitcoins.

      Personally I helped a friend build a fence the other day and I got in exchange a case of beer. No cash required, and that case of beer was even less traceable than a piece of plastic (our paper money isn't paper money) with a serial number.

    27. Re:Cashless can't happen, here is why ... by thegarbz · · Score: 4, Funny

      Who said anything about a finance industry? It's almost like there needs to be a system of electronic money which can be transferd just by sending bits from one smartphone to another. These bits would be like coins. Ideally this system should be decentralised and not involve any financial institution.

      These coinbits would seem to solve all of these problems. They just need a catchier name.

    28. Re:Cashless can't happen, here is why ... by nukenerd · · Score: 2

      - tap a dollar value on your phone, tap your phone against mine, money moved

      And what could possibly go wrong?

    29. Re:Cashless can't happen, here is why ... by goose-incarnated · · Score: 1

      In this country direct bank transactions are used for a lot of this. It's not quite as easy as taking cash when you hand over the item but it's not much harder: give them your bank account number when they agree to the sale and then check that the money is there before handing over the item. If you're going to bank the money anyway it's actually easier. Obviously it's not practical for yard sales but it works pretty well for classifieds and online sales.

      And then you have scams arising where you pay your money and the "seller" vanishes. The only safe way to deal with a potential scam when trading through the classifieds is to hand over payment and take possession of the item at the same time. Not possible if one party has to wait to verify payment.

      --
      I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
    30. Re:Cashless can't happen, here is why ... by sjames · · Score: 2

      So you propose a currency that will only work if you own a working smartphone that is only accepted by a small percent of online vendors? How will I buy gas and food with that?

    31. Re:Cashless can't happen, here is why ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Crappy list of examples, I'm sure there are hundreds of examples: 1) What about if I want to buy your [insert bike or computer or whatever]? 2) Baby sitter? 3) Kid's allowance? 4) Pay some kid kid to mow yard. 5) Underground transactions (illegal stuff)

      As soon as you can send money from your phone to the baby sitter's phone, you'll no longer need cash for that transaction. Of course, this will make it much easier to verify that you're paying social security tax for her. And that you're paying sales tax on garage sale items. And, of course, that' you're not participating in illegal transactions. Finally, it will make sure that your bank gets its 2% fee on absolutely every transaction from feeding the parking meter to tipping the waitstaff.

      The only people who want a cashless society are banks and authoritarians.

    32. Re:Cashless can't happen, here is why ... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      In the UK, Barclays has offered a system called PingIt for a while that lets you send money to anyone with an email address. There's now a system called PayM that most of the banks have opted into that lets you send money to someone using their mobile phone number. The receiver just needs to register their mobile number and account. I'm not convinced by the security yet, but it's more convenient than cash for paying people.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    33. Re:Cashless can't happen, here is why ... by delt0r · · Score: 1

      Trade me in NZ has been doing with direct transfers since forever. And the only scams i hear about with Ebay are via Paypal.

      --
      If information wants to be free, why does my internet connection cost so much?
    34. Re:Cashless can't happen, here is why ... by goose-incarnated · · Score: 1

      Trade me in NZ has been doing with direct transfers since forever. And the only scams i hear about with Ebay are via Paypal.

      So? This is a total non sequitor to what I said above: when you need to do a transaction where both parties have no reason to trust each other the only option is payment and possession at time of sale.

      --
      I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
    35. Re:Cashless can't happen, here is why ... by TrollstonButterbeans · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I want to give the pizza guy a $2 tip. Do I really want to get his email address, register online, have him register online, get his mobile phone number and all of that.

      How is your suggestion even in the same universe as "more convenient than cash"?

      --
      Priest: "Universe from nothing, no laws of physics, sped up time"+ huge discrepancies. Creationism? No. Big Bang Theory
    36. Re:Cashless can't happen, here is why ... by delt0r · · Score: 1

      No.. We do these transactions with people I don't know all the time. And its fine. Last time i got a cell phone for my daughter, I am in Switzerland she is NZ the seller was some guy in a different city in NZ. We didn't need to see each other and use cash. We had no reason to trust each other.

      And if you don't trust someone, meeting them in person makes them no more trustworthy. How many mile on the clock on that car? Was it really looked after etc. Sooner or later you just have to trust. And mostly that works out. Cash does not fix or change that.

      --
      If information wants to be free, why does my internet connection cost so much?
    37. Re:Cashless can't happen, here is why ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Actually they probably just click an icon on a screen.

      I doubt it's quite that simple. They probably need to double-click it.

    38. Re:Cashless can't happen, here is why ... by goose-incarnated · · Score: 1

      No.. We do these transactions with people I don't know all the time. And its fine. Last time i got a cell phone for my daughter, I am in Switzerland she is NZ the seller was some guy in a different city in NZ. We didn't need to see each other and use cash. We had no reason to trust each other.

      You realise you're pointing out examples of doing transactions there are all trust based - even if you had no reason to trust that the seller would not disappear with the money, you still trusted that he would send the goods. If you trust that the seller would send the goods or that the payment would clear, then that is outside the scope of this discussion, which is "how to do EFT transactions with people you don't trust". The answer is not "trust them first, then do the transaction".

      And if you don't trust someone, meeting them in person makes them no more trustworthy. How many mile on the clock on that car? Was it really looked after etc. Sooner or later you just have to trust. And mostly that works out. Cash does not fix or change that.

      I don't trust what the seller says about a car's mileage, I check it out myself (last car I purchased went for and passed a full AA test before I parted with my money). The majority of the worlds population does untrusted transactions in person every day due to the ability of instant payment with cash and instant completion of sale. You're asking all these people that they should just trust other parties more?

      --
      I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
    39. Re:Cashless can't happen, here is why ... by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Are we assuming all transactions humans do are with merchants?

      Naive as hell!

      Hard to say. My son, who isn't in business, takes credit cards through his iPhone. Just a card swipe and there ya go. Comes free with a PayPal account.

      Pretty nice actually, will probably be a hit at yard sales. The times, they are - a - changin'.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    40. Re: Cashless can't happen, here is why ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why can't consumers want a cashless society? I'm sick of carrying cash - i barely use it and it's a pain in the ass to find an ATM that doesn't charge me a fee. In the Uk cash is more widely used, but at least all bank ATM's are feeless (so it's less of a pain in the ass)

    41. Re:Cashless can't happen, here is why ... by BVis · · Score: 1

      Any transaction that doesn't want to pay taxes moves to barter. This shit is a government wet dream.

      Are you arguing in favor of tax evasion?

      --
      Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.
    42. Re:Cashless can't happen, here is why ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Crappy list of examples, I'm sure there are hundreds of examples: 1) What about if I want to buy your [insert bike or computer or whatever]? 2) Baby sitter? 3) Kid's allowance? 4) Pay some kid kid to mow yard. 5) Underground transactions (illegal stuff)

      All but "5" are covered by NFC and a paypal or google-wallet (or similar micro-transaction service).

      I'm only surprised it hasn't hit mainstream yet. All it would take is for a few major banks to partner with ATT/VZW and you'd be walking around with a debitcard embedded in your phone - by default.

      Note, I'm not saying I'd prefer this situation. I'm just aware that this is where things are headed.

    43. Re:Cashless can't happen, here is why ... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      I want to give the pizza guy a $2 tip. Do I really want to get his email address, register online, have him register online, get his mobile phone number and all of that.

      Well, in the UK, tipping the pizza guy is pretty rare - you're paying for the service already (and delivery drivers are covered by the same minimum wage laws so they get a salary that you can live on). Credit card terminals in restaurants typically provide a tip field so that you can add a tip on at the end.

      How is your suggestion even in the same universe as "more convenient than cash"?

      Most of the people I'd want to send cash to are people I know and are already in my phone's contact list. If you live in a culture that is fundamentally opposed to paying people a reasonable wage or stating up-front how much things cost, then the solution would be to have a QR code on the box with a note saying 'Did you get good service? Send a tip here' and the details required to receive the payment. Rather than having to find the $2, you'd just wave the card in front of your phone, select the amount, and hit send. The driver wouldn't need to carry cash.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    44. Re:Cashless can't happen, here is why ... by jbmartin6 · · Score: 1

      "only a couple of percent" is the whole profit margin for a lot of businesses, especially small ones.

      --
      This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
    45. Re:Cashless can't happen, here is why ... by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      "The only thing keeping us from going truly cash free is the cost of exchanging non-cash things of value"

      That, and the implied anonymity of cash transactions. Never underestimate the desire to not have a record of a purchase, even if it's just something that seems silly or stupid to someone else. Mormons will always pay for liquor and cigars with cash, for example. No need to get a (mis-)targeted mailing for the new Johnny Walker in the mail next year.

      And there are times when cash is just faster. Not at a POS when change is needed, but elsewhere. If I'm running late and the waitress is dog slow, you can be sure I'll be leaving cash and just walking out the door. as soon as I get the check. I may not have 10 minutes for her to decide to come around to pick up my card and complete a transaction. And tipping a bellman for getting my luggage to my room - in a busy hallway it's far easier to give him a 5 or a 10 with my room number. Paypal/Square/... are slow compared to handing off a fiver. And, at least in the US, a discreet monetary thank-you is appreciated far more than a "transaction" that requires a 30-40 second interchange of electronics.

      And, as a business owner, I chafe at car processors who bill me 3% of the gross on a transaction for the simple act of transferring a money from one account to another electronically. A transaction which costs a fraction of a cent to complete.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    46. Re:Cashless can't happen, here is why ... by brxndxn · · Score: 1

      That 'small percent' of online vendors is growing about the same percentage rate as Google and Facebook when they first started. Your incredulous attitude will only prevent you from getting into Bitcoin and realizing the benefits before it becomes ubiquitous.

      Bitcoin started as an experiment.. Now you can buy anything on Overstock, Tiger Direct, Newegg, Cheapair.com, and Expedia with Bitcoin. You can also pay your Dish Network bill with Bitcoin. There is an organic infrastructure growing around Bitcoin - US government regulations, payment innovations, website integrations - and that infrastructure is increasing momentum.

      Of course it's not ubiquitous yet.. But god damn, your questions are meant to criticize Bitcoin - but they are awfully dimwitted. First, maybe 10 years ago it was seen as limiting market exposure if users needed to own a smartphone. But, there isn't a company left that worries about being out of the huge capital markets of 'users without smartphones' except maybe Walmart.

      And, 'how will you buy gas and food with that?' .. Good question there. Wow.. You found one huge flaw in Bitcoin. It's impossible to buy gas or food with Bitcoin.

      --
      --- We need more Ron Paul!
    47. Re:Cashless can't happen, here is why ... by Kelbear · · Score: 1

      Would Google Wallet or amazon payments work for personal sales? They charge you the transaction fee if you use a credit card as your method of payment, but to send money via debit payment it's free. The seller just needs to provide an e-mail address. When you get the e-mail confirmation, you let the person walk off with the goods. I'm sure slashdotters will have security concerns about providing an e-mail address to a stranger, but it's not terribly different from the risks of physical mugging

      These kinds of transactions require e-mail addresses, bank accounts, and smart phones, so obviously there will be people who won't have the prerequisites, but perhaps a few decades from now they'll be commonplace enough to suffice. More likely, I think physical cash will just continue to circulate albeit at a much slower rate to facilitate these kinds of niche transactions even after digital payment becomes the norm.

    48. Re:Cashless can't happen, here is why ... by kilfarsnar · · Score: 2

      Are we assuming all transactions humans do are with merchants? Naive as hell ! Crappy list of examples, I'm sure there are hundreds of examples: 1) What about if I want to buy your [insert bike or computer or whatever]? 2) Baby sitter? 3) Kid's allowance? 4) Pay some kid kid to mow yard. 5) Underground transactions (illegal stuff) The importance of cash will continue to decline with transactions with merchants, but it will never remotely approach "cashless".

      And, as implied here, once we go cashless they've got us by the balls. People might not appreciate the value of easy, anonymous transactions until they're gone. Who are "they" you ask? Insert your favorite power structure. There is utility in being able to conduct private business without the need for any middle-man or money transfer service.

      Remember what happened with Wikileaks donations and the credit card companies, when the latter started denying payment services for the former? Cash enables the average person to pay for or support things without permission. That's important if you want an empowered citizenry. I'll keep using cash, thanks.

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    49. Re:Cashless can't happen, here is why ... by nabsltd · · Score: 1

      How much does PayPal make on micro-transactions?

      It depends on the transaction. ISTR that PayPal had some concept of "personal" transactions that had either very small or no fees. The idea was to allow people to move money to their friends and relatives without taking a big hit. There are also places like GOG that have a lot of sub-$10 transactions who likely have a special "volume" agreement with PayPal.

      For regular one-off transactions, though, there is per-transaction fee that would kill you if you are moving just $5.

    50. Re:Cashless can't happen, here is why ... by nitehawk214 · · Score: 2

      None of those are point of sale, and none of those show up in this study. On the flip side, very large transactions are not point of sale either, such as houses, cars, etc.

      Which means that the percentage of actual transactions performed by card is much lower than they are leading us to believe. The article is using statics to mislead people, and drive clicks by working people into a frenzy.

      Cash is not going anywhere anytime soon, folks. Calm down.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    51. Re:Cashless can't happen, here is why ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn, I thought he wanted to buy my baby sister. I'd give him a good deal too.

    52. Re:Cashless can't happen, here is why ... by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      1. Purchaser pays you via credit card.
      2. Purchaser receives good.
      3. Purchaser calls credit company to revert the transaction.
      4. No profit.

      Or do CC companies actually call the seller to verify that stuff? Can't say I've ever tried it.

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    53. Re:Cashless can't happen, here is why ... by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      https://bitcoin.org/en/you-nee...

      Bitcoin is not anonymous

        All Bitcoin transactions are stored publicly and permanently on the network, which means anyone can see the balance and transactions of any Bitcoin address.

      Yea, yea, I know the paragraph goes on to state that each address should only be used once for that reason, but since we're talking about ubiquitous acceptance - Dude. C'mon. We can't even get the Normals to use GPG on their emails, you really expect them to use a different, difficult-to-remember address for every single transaction they make?

      Meh, I'll stick to cash.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    54. Re:Cashless can't happen, here is why ... by CanHasDIY · · Score: 0

      Any transaction that doesn't want to pay taxes moves to barter. This shit is a government wet dream.

      Are you arguing in favor of rent-seeking evasion?

      FTFY.

      Not every transaction is taxable, and many that are currently taxed probably shouldn't be. I'd guess the inverse is true as well.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    55. Re:Cashless can't happen, here is why ... by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      6) That haircut I got on saturday at a shop that doesnt have a card reader...

      You know you're dealing with ivory tower intellectuals when the propose getting rid of a form of payment is the only accepted form of payment in many places. What, are we going to make mandatory the credit card fees?

    56. Re:Cashless can't happen, here is why ... by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      Most of the people I'd want to send cash to are people I know and are already in my phone's contact list.

      I'd guess you're unique in that regard; most people don't get to know the various waitresses, bellhops, delivery people, etc. they might encounter in life well enough to get their contact info.

      Drug dealers, on the other hand...

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    57. Re:Cashless can't happen, here is why ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How PayM works: you already have a bank account and so does the pizza guy. Both of you told your respective banks your phone numbers and one-click enabled PayM. Now PayM is available in all banking applications under the "payments" options, and you can quickly and easily send that tip from there. We also have another system, which is also new, bug a few years old now, called Faster Payments. Pretty much every bank transfer in the UK goes through it and the money is credited to the recipient anywhere between "now" and "at most 2 hours from now". It's definitely easier than getting the pizza guy's sort code and account number, and you can even change banks without telling anybody, as you'll just re-associate your phone number with your new account. Faster Payments and PayM also cost absolutely nothing per transfer.

    58. Re:Cashless can't happen, here is why ... by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      give them your bank account number

      What could possibly go wrong?

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    59. Re:Cashless can't happen, here is why ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, I'm really keen to trust a random guy at a yard sale running my card through a mystery device....

    60. Re:Cashless can't happen, here is why ... by sjames · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Of course it's not ubiquitous yet.. But god damn, your questions are meant to criticize Bitcoin - but they are awfully dimwitted. First, maybe 10 years ago it was seen as limiting market exposure if users needed to own a smartphone. But, there isn't a company left that worries about being out of the huge capital markets of 'users without smartphones' except maybe Walmart.

      Interesting persuasion tactic there. I'm convinced now that Bitcoin advocates are oversensitive clods who fart out their mouths. You could do the whole concept a favor by stitching your fingers together and your mouth shut.

      You also sound awfully callous about actually kicking poor people completely out of society.

    61. Re:Cashless can't happen, here is why ... by lsatenstein · · Score: 1

      Are we assuming all transactions humans do are with merchants?

      Naive as hell !

      Crappy list of examples, I'm sure there are hundreds of examples:
      1) What about if I want to buy your [insert bike or computer or whatever]?
      2) Baby sitter?
      3) Kid's allowance?
      4) Pay some kid kid to mow yard.
      5) Underground transactions (illegal stuff)

        It already happens in Africa, with cellphone to cellphone transactions. You take some money from the bank which goes to your cellphone account. You spend your cellphone account and get more money. Taxi drivers receive cellphone cash, and visit the bank to convert some of it to cash, but use the cellphone money to buy gas, food, etc.

      Why cellphone. Printing money that wears out or is germ laden does not pay. And the cellphone technique limited to small transactions works.

      The importance of cash will continue to decline with transactions with merchants, but it will never remotely approach "cashless".

      --
      Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
    62. Re:Cashless can't happen, here is why ... by Yunzil · · Score: 1

      They just need a catchier name.

      "Dollars"?

    63. Re:Cashless can't happen, here is why ... by msobkow · · Score: 1

      That taxation is my biggest issue. My bank does not have free, unlimited ATM transactions on my plan. I withdraw my cash, spend it where I will, and don't pay their damned ATM fees.

      Why the hell should I pay them to spend my money?

      --
      I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
    64. Re:Cashless can't happen, here is why ... by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      These coinbits would seem to solve all of these problems. They just need a catchier name.

      Well, you have the words "coin" and "bit" there, maybe shuffle things around, experiment with changing word order and things like that. It could work.

    65. Re:Cashless can't happen, here is why ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I gave the pizza guy a tip with my card last night.

      When I ordered the pizza online, I used my card, and I added the tip.
      You could also do it if you pay over the phone.
      Also, Pizza guys could start to come around with square or some other portable card scanner.

      Problem solved.

    66. Re:Cashless can't happen, here is why ... by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      Lol. Please mod up. This works on several levels.

    67. Re:Cashless can't happen, here is why ... by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      Your incredulous attitude will only prevent you from getting into Bitcoin and realizing the benefits before it becomes ubiquitous

      Ah, so is Bitcoin yet another speculative bubble ready to crash, then?

      His incredulous attitude is also preventing him from getting taken to the cleaners by Mt. Gox and their ilk.

    68. Re: Cashless can't happen, here is why ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can take visa, mc, and paypal on my phone.

    69. Re:Cashless can't happen, here is why ... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      You didn't read any of the rest of my post, did you?

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    70. Re:Cashless can't happen, here is why ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice idea. But who controls the wires these "coinbits" travel along?...
      Unlike cash, which goes straight from my hand - most of the time - to the bartender's.
      A catchy name, you say? How about, "TraceableCashBytes"? Nah, maybe not.

    71. Re:Cashless can't happen, here is why ... by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      You didn't read any of the rest of my post, did you?

      Why would I? This is Slashdot, reading whole posts prior to responding is for noobs.

      Kidding aside, digital transactions are easily taxed (and traced and monitored and logged), which is why service personnel tend to prefer cash tips. Couple that with the fact that I indeed "live in a culture that is fundamentally opposed to paying people a reasonable wage," I'm all about helping those guys supplement their crap paycheck with tax-free donations.

      Partially because I remember being one of them.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    72. Re:Cashless can't happen, here is why ... by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      1. Purchaser pays you via credit card.
      2. Purchaser receives good.
      3. Purchaser calls credit company to revert the transaction.
      4. No profit.

      You can only get away with that a certain number of times before the CC companies catch on and figure out you're scamming them. At that point you'll be out a lot more money than you got from the reversed charges, and you could lose a lot more than cash as well.

    73. Re:Cashless can't happen, here is why ... by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      Without tax evasion millions of people wouldn't be making a living. There is no way to make any real money and pay taxes. I pay mine but I'm a wage slave. Lots of people cut grass, wash cars, paint houses, etc. These people operate on cash because If they make $200 dollars they get to keep it. If they get paid over the table they'll lose about half that money. Not just income taxes but social sec. and all kinds of other gotchas eat it up fast.

    74. Re: Cashless can't happen, here is why ... by BVis · · Score: 1

      Funny, I pay all my taxes and somehow I still have money in my account. Try living within your means (and that means not cheating on your taxes).

      --
      Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.
    75. Re:Cashless can't happen, here is why ... by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      And tipping a bellman for getting my luggage to my room - in a busy hallway it's far easier to give him a 5 or a 10 with my room number. Paypal/Square/... are slow compared to handing off a fiver. And, at least in the US, a discreet monetary thank-you is appreciated far more than a "transaction" that requires a 30-40 second interchange of electronics.

      I'd also have to say that in the US at least, the reliability of electronics and networks is greatly exaggerated. I've gone to plenty of places where the CC reader was down, but you could still pay cash. And there are huge, huge swaths of the country where you cannot get even piss-poor cell phone service, not with any sort of reliability. Would you want to limit them to network-required payment methods? >_>

    76. Re: Cashless can't happen, here is why ... by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      Don't lecture me. I've lived within my means for the last 35 years I've been on my own. I've paid a shit load of taxes but I always made good money. The facts are though that a huge number of people operate cash only because it enables them to live well even though they do menial jobs like painting and yard work. I know a lot of these people and I don't judge them, they do what they need to do to make a decent living. At least they are working and aren't a straight drain on the system like the millions on welfare and other assistance programs. The fact remains that there are lots of these people and the government looks at that lost revenue as it seeks to do something about the huge deficit and the looming day when the interest gets to the point where it's unbearable. To get rid of cash makes it easy to eliminate the ability to operate these small businesses.

    77. Re: Cashless can't happen, here is why ... by BVis · · Score: 1

      Yup, and there's the bitching about welfare. You guys are so predictable.

      --
      Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.
    78. Re:Cashless can't happen, here is why ... by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      You mean the same cash that has a serial number on each bill? Is often marked and laced for use in law enforcement activities?

      Which is all beside the point given that the primary concern with going cashless isn't a lack on anonymity but rather a lack of personal control and a requirement that your transaction be blessed and completed by a third party... For a fee of course.

    79. Re:Cashless can't happen, here is why ... by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      I wondered the same thing when credit cards came out. Also your engineering view of only the current and most expensive solution is a bit worrying. You do not need a smart phone to make bitcoin work. It just happens to be the current convenient way. Bit coin is a protocol, not a device. Why not work towards a solution to your smartphone problem.

      Mind you I can't wait for the day that my wallet is made obsolete. Let's swipe my phone at the cashier instead. Then I have one less thing to carry around.

    80. Re:Cashless can't happen, here is why ... by TWX · · Score: 1

      I see no difference between Google Wallet, Amazon Payments, and Paypal. I see unnecessary means by which to exchange money that just adds complications.

      Cash on the barrelhead works fine for all small purchases.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    81. Re:Cashless can't happen, here is why ... by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      One other thing to point out is that people by en-large don't seem to understand the difference between anonymity and trackability. Bitcoin can be tracked through the blockchain, but that doesn't make it any less anonymous. Just like right now I'm posting in a way that my activities can be tracked throughout the site, but I am still anonymous.

      If you think that's not right you can prove your point quite easily by posting my personal information.

      A bitcoin transaction is nothing more than a bunch of numbers. In addition there's no limit to the number of accounts I can have. Just like there's no limit to the number of Slashdot accounts I can create as the shills prove over and over again.

    82. Re:Cashless can't happen, here is why ... by sjames · · Score: 1

      Smartphone was YOUR suggestion, you don't get to blame me for it's shortcomings :-)

      The current solution (cash) has the advantage that you don't have to spend money just to be able to have money. If absolutely all else fails, you can carry it in your hand. True enough, credit cards weren't ubiquitous at one time, but they didn't need to be since we had cash which was legal tender for all debts.

      To actually replace cash, whatever carries the replacement will have to be available at no cost. It will need to not have transaction fees. Note that currently Bitcoin doesn't typically carry a transaction fee, but it is expected that it will once it is 'mined out' in order to maintain an incentive to compute block chains.

      The other downside to Bitcoin is that it actually is traceable. That problem may prove harder to solve than the wallet problem.

    83. Re:Cashless can't happen, here is why ... by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Yes, I'm really keen to trust a random guy at a yard sale running my card through a mystery device....

      Yard sale, online sales, a convenience store. You cannot really trust anyone at your level.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    84. Re:Cashless can't happen, here is why ... by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      No bitcoin was my suggestion, just worded smugly. Actually the answer is likely not bitcoin in its current form but bitcoin in principle. A decentralized system which is owned by no one where each "bank account" or wallet or whatever you want to call it is controlled by separate people.

      Now there's no reason this would have to be tied to a smartphone. Sure that's one of the common ways of doing bitcoin transactions, but systems such has tokens have also been proposed. As for the fees, if you think that money doesn't have fees to keep it running you're only looking at part of the picture. Your taxes, and the general principle of printing money pay for the money to be printed and maintained. New currency is made, old one is destroyed or lost, all the while the value of your bank account drops by a few percent every year partially as a result of these "maintenance" activities, and partially as a result of government policy (quantitative easing anyone?).

      Also cash is traceable. Take a look at the bill in your wallet and see the numbers? I guess you've never paid with a large bill and seen the cashier compare the number to a list, or you've never seen a bank validate the money you try to put in your account? The only difference between that and bitcoin is you can see the bitcoins change hands, whereas cash relies on people to look at the numbers, ... or just mark the bills like is often done in law enforcement.

    85. Re:Cashless can't happen, here is why ... by sjames · · Score: 1

      I do realize that there is a cost associated with printing and minting money now. But that can be taxed progressively so the poor sot with 2 dollars to his name isn't stuck with the bill. Any susc system would need a public service where the transaction is done for no more than cost, at least as a last resort. Otherwise we are back to annointing private concerns with the right of taxation.

      I also know that bills are serialized. However, unlike bitcoin, keeping track of those serial numbers is purely optional for each step in the transaction and in practice, nobody does. When they check those numbers, they're just looking for known bad money. Assuming the bill you hand over isn't on that list, it just goes in the drawer. Tomorrow, they won't be able to say where that bill came from. With bitcoin, a particular value can be back traced all the way back to the miner that first generated it,

      But I think you're starting to see the point. Smartphone may be nice for people who have one, but many do not and unless they can carry money around somehow, they never will. Meanwhile, Bitcoin likely isn't the answer, but we don't actually know what the answer is beyond a list of desirable traits some of which Bitcoin has.

    86. Re:Cashless can't happen, here is why ... by ComputersKai · · Score: 1

      ...or do we really want to give them more and more data that they can sell to advertisers???

    87. Re:Cashless can't happen, here is why ... by RedWizzard · · Score: 1

      give them your bank account number

      What could possibly go wrong?

      Actually very little. If your bank lets someone else fraudulently withdrawal from your account they are on the hook for the money. The main problem is if they get the account number wrong and the typo corresponds to a real account (which would require two digits wrong). In that case it can be difficult to get your money back from the unintended recipient (if they've already taken it out of the account). So not much risk for the seller.

    88. Re:Cashless can't happen, here is why ... by RedWizzard · · Score: 1

      And then you have scams arising where you pay your money and the "seller" vanishes. The only safe way to deal with a potential scam when trading through the classifieds is to hand over payment and take possession of the item at the same time. Not possible if one party has to wait to verify payment.

      You're arguing hypotheticals against reality. It's simply not a problem here. If it were it could be solved simply by requiring sufficient proof of identity to post the classified in the first place. A marketplace which gets a reputation for allowing sellers to get away with fraud is not going to last long.

    89. Re:Cashless can't happen, here is why ... by goose-incarnated · · Score: 1

      And then you have scams arising where you pay your money and the "seller" vanishes. The only safe way to deal with a potential scam when trading through the classifieds is to hand over payment and take possession of the item at the same time. Not possible if one party has to wait to verify payment.

      You're arguing hypotheticals against reality.

      What are you talking about? What's not a reality?

      It's simply not a problem here. If it were it could be solved simply by requiring sufficient proof of identity to post the classified in the first place. A marketplace which gets a reputation for allowing sellers to get away with fraud is not going to last long.

      Once again it comes down to trust - you trust that the marketplace has identified the scammer. What if you're the first person to respond to the ad? Regardless, you're still asking two parties who are unknown to each other to trust each other with no real evidence that the trust is warranted. My point still stands in this reality - transactions need to be completed when there is a lack of trust. Cash works for this. Waiting doesn't (hence the reason bitcoin is still less traded than actual toy money).

      --
      I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
    90. Re:Cashless can't happen, here is why ... by RedWizzard · · Score: 1

      And then you have scams arising where you pay your money and the "seller" vanishes. The only safe way to deal with a potential scam when trading through the classifieds is to hand over payment and take possession of the item at the same time. Not possible if one party has to wait to verify payment.

      You're arguing hypotheticals against reality.

      What are you talking about? What's not a reality?

      You're saying "it can't possibly work, because scams". I'm telling you it does actually work here. The concerns you have raised are simply not a significant problem in actual fact. The system I've described is not some theoretical idea, it is how actual business is actually conducted in the country I live in. Not sure how I can say this any more plainly.

      It's simply not a problem here. If it were it could be solved simply by requiring sufficient proof of identity to post the classified in the first place. A marketplace which gets a reputation for allowing sellers to get away with fraud is not going to last long.

      Once again it comes down to trust - you trust that the marketplace has identified the scammer. What if you're the first person to respond to the ad? Regardless, you're still asking two parties who are unknown to each other to trust each other with no real evidence that the trust is warranted. My point still stands in this reality - transactions need to be completed when there is a lack of trust. Cash works for this. Waiting doesn't (hence the reason bitcoin is still less traded than actual toy money).

      Someone dealing in cash can just as easily be robbed by the seller.

    91. Re:Cashless can't happen, here is why ... by goose-incarnated · · Score: 1

      And then you have scams arising where you pay your money and the "seller" vanishes. The only safe way to deal with a potential scam when trading through the classifieds is to hand over payment and take possession of the item at the same time. Not possible if one party has to wait to verify payment.

      You're arguing hypotheticals against reality.

      What are you talking about? What's not a reality?

      You're saying "it can't possibly work, because scams". I'm telling you it does actually work here.

      You're claiming "It works, because there are no scams", and I'm telling you, right now and right here, there are scams in all the classifieds. You're relying on the fact that people are honest; I'm comfortable being skeptical. You're asking me to trust "because it doesn't happen", and I'm saying that over here it's a daily occurrence. I actually don't know how to make it any clearer - if you're buying something off of craigslist, or whichever classifieds, the damn site itself warns you to be skeptical! Even the marketplace itself is telling you that there are scammers out there!

      Someone dealing in cash can just as easily be robbed by the seller.

      True, but if you're going to mug someone, why post on the classifieds first? You're just as likely to be mugged leaving a bank after all.

      --
      I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
    92. Re:Cashless can't happen, here is why ... by RedWizzard · · Score: 1

      You're saying "it can't possibly work, because scams". I'm telling you it does actually work here.

      You're claiming "It works, because there are no scams", and I'm telling you, right now and right here, there are scams in all the classifieds. You're relying on the fact that people are honest; I'm comfortable being skeptical. You're asking me to trust "because it doesn't happen", and I'm saying that over here it's a daily occurrence. I actually don't know how to make it any clearer - if you're buying something off of craigslist, or whichever classifieds, the damn site itself warns you to be skeptical! Even the marketplace itself is telling you that there are scammers out there!

      No, you're misrepresenting my position. I never claimed there were no scams. I said it was not a significant problem in practice. Perhaps that is due to a difference in the cultures of our countries. But the fact remains that the system works here. When you claim that a system that is in widespread use doesn't work, that's not skepticism. It's simply denial. Again, I am not talking theoretically - if you believe I'm wrong you can track down the crime statistics for New Zealand and prove that there is significant fraud on TradeMe. But you'd be wasting your time because there isn't. There are isolated cases, but not to the point where it's seen as riskier than any other private transaction, and certainly not to the point where the system doesn't work.

      Again, the system is widely used here. So the onus is on you to back up your claim that it can't possibly work with evidence.

      Someone dealing in cash can just as easily be robbed by the seller.

      True, but if you're going to mug someone, why post on the classifieds first? You're just as likely to be mugged leaving a bank after all.

      Your position is that direct bank transfers aren't safe essentially because the seller is not so easy catch if they decide to commit a crime. This is exactly the same as the difference between mugging someone in a public place ("leaving a bank") and luring them to some place private before mugging them.

    93. Re:Cashless can't happen, here is why ... by goose-incarnated · · Score: 1

      You're saying "it can't possibly work, because scams". I'm telling you it does actually work here.

      You're claiming "It works, because there are no scams", and I'm telling you, right now and right here, there are scams in all the classifieds. You're relying on the fact that people are honest; I'm comfortable being skeptical. You're asking me to trust "because it doesn't happen", and I'm saying that over here it's a daily occurrence. I actually don't know how to make it any clearer - if you're buying something off of craigslist, or whichever classifieds, the damn site itself warns you to be skeptical! Even the marketplace itself is telling you that there are scammers out there!

      No, you're misrepresenting my position. I never claimed there were no scams. I said it was not a significant problem in practice. Perhaps that is due to a difference in the cultures of our countries. But the fact remains that the system works here. When you claim that a system that is in widespread use doesn't work, that's not skepticism. It's simply denial.

      From the trademe site, they warn about this specifically: http://www.trademe.co.nz/trust... So, they themselves think that if you hand over money you could lose it. Let me emphasise that for you: Trademe themselves think that you should use any protection you can when paying money and you should not rely on trust!

      So the trust issue is not an insignificant problem, but it is one that is painlessly solved by using cash.

      Again, the system is widely used here. So the onus is on you to back up your claim that it can't possibly work with evidence.

      I refer you to the trademe trust and safety blog (yes, it really is called that): http://www.trademe.co.nz/trust...

      --
      I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
    94. Re:Cashless can't happen, here is why ... by RedWizzard · · Score: 1

      You're saying "it can't possibly work, because scams". I'm telling you it does actually work here.

      You're claiming "It works, because there are no scams", and I'm telling you, right now and right here, there are scams in all the classifieds. You're relying on the fact that people are honest; I'm comfortable being skeptical. You're asking me to trust "because it doesn't happen", and I'm saying that over here it's a daily occurrence. I actually don't know how to make it any clearer - if you're buying something off of craigslist, or whichever classifieds, the damn site itself warns you to be skeptical! Even the marketplace itself is telling you that there are scammers out there!

      No, you're misrepresenting my position. I never claimed there were no scams. I said it was not a significant problem in practice. Perhaps that is due to a difference in the cultures of our countries. But the fact remains that the system works here. When you claim that a system that is in widespread use doesn't work, that's not skepticism. It's simply denial.

      From the trademe site, they warn about this specifically: http://www.trademe.co.nz/trust... So, they themselves think that if you hand over money you could lose it. Let me emphasise that for you: Trademe themselves think that you should use any protection you can when paying money and you should not rely on trust!

      So the trust issue is not an insignificant problem, but it is one that is painlessly solved by using cash.

      Yet TradeMe still exists and people use direct bank transfers than any other payment method on the site. If your claim (that business this way is not practical) was true then people would not use direct bank transfers. But they do. Ipso facto your claim can't be true.

      Again, the system is widely used here. So the onus is on you to back up your claim that it can't possibly work with evidence.

      I refer you to the trademe trust and safety blog (yes, it really is called that): http://www.trademe.co.nz/trust...

      But the system still works. You haven't provided any evidence that it doesn't. You haven't even provided evidence that the incidence of fraud is higher with direct bank transfers.

    95. Re:Cashless can't happen, here is why ... by goose-incarnated · · Score: 1

      Yet TradeMe still exists and people use direct bank transfers than any other payment method on the site. If your claim (that business this way is not practical) was true then people would not use direct bank transfers. But they do. Ipso facto your claim can't be true.

      My claim was and still is that using cash eliminates many of the scams - your claim was that scamming was too infrequent to matter. I provided evidence that it was frequent enough that the marketplace warned you against handing over money via bank transfers (other than their own special bank transfer that still had no guarantees). Please read those links I posted - they actually specifically warn against bank transfers.

      Again, the system is widely used here. So the onus is on you to back up your claim that it can't possibly work with evidence.

      I refer you to the trademe trust and safety blog (yes, it really is called that): http://www.trademe.co.nz/trust...

      But the system still works. You haven't provided any evidence that it doesn't. You haven't even provided evidence that the incidence of fraud is higher with direct bank transfers.

      I don't need to provide evidence that it doesn't work because I never made the claim that it does not work. I claimed that untrusted transactions are best with payment and possession taking place at the same time, hence cash works best for this. The sites you pointed me to warn specifically about doing bank transfers.

      --
      I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
    96. Re:Cashless can't happen, here is why ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh geez.....if it is something people can make a profit from then they will. You probably said the same thing about Paypal 20 years ago, yet you can use it in all kinds of places these days. Hating on Bitcoin IS so fashionable these days.

    97. Re:Cashless can't happen, here is why ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I did have a 16yo mowing mine (until her mom "fired" her) but down here in the South, that's how them country girls roll...on a ZTR

    98. Re:Cashless can't happen, here is why ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So your brother is a dumbass. Gotcha. If you barter, you don't make a paper trail. That defeats the purpose!

    99. Re:Cashless can't happen, here is why ... by witherstaff · · Score: 1

      xapo has a credit card backed by bitcoin, exchanged to currency at point of sale, coming out. You can buy anything with bitcoin once you have one of those in hand.

    100. Re:Cashless can't happen, here is why ... by sjames · · Score: 1

      I notice that paypal has not been proposed to REPLACE cash. Nobody in their right mind has even suggested it.

    101. Re:Cashless can't happen, here is why ... by brxndxn · · Score: 1

      Throw $50 at it and see if you get 'taken to the cleaners'. Of course, I would not recommend betting your house on Bitcoin. It IS a speculative investment - but I would hardly say it is a speculative bubble.

      Also, as most Bitcoin advocates, I would not recommend storing any sizable amount of Bitcoins in anything other than encrypted wallets you control directly.

      --
      --- We need more Ron Paul!
    102. Re:Cashless can't happen, here is why ... by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Bitcoin has serious disadvantages here, if I understand it. (I would appreciate corrections.)

      With cash, I can pull a few rectangular pieces of paper out of my wallet, hand them to somebody, and the money transfer is done. I can't double-spend the money, since it has a physical representation. The recipient knows what I paid immediately, and can walk away and use the money for something else.

      With Bitcoin, we have to wait for the transaction to be added to the block chain before the money transfer is done. If I move fast enough, I can double-spend the Bitcoins, since it will typically take a fair piece of an hour for the transactions to be confirmed. This can doubtless be hastened by paying an extra fee, but that's something I simply don't have to think about in a cash transaction.

      There are a good many transactions where I value the ability to complete the money transfer fast and clean, with no overhead.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    103. Re: Cashless can't happen, here is why ... by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      Heh....I guess welfare is an off limits issue huh? It's okay to tax and spend but don't mention people living on the public dole, leeching off the people who produce. Not paying taxes is wrong and illegal, sucking up tax money on welfare is wrong but totally legal. I don't care what you think about my bitching I pay my taxes and I'm fully entitled to bitch about freeloaders. Don't worry though, the cashless society wont bother the entitled.

    104. Re:Cashless can't happen, here is why ... by RedWizzard · · Score: 1

      Yet TradeMe still exists and people use direct bank transfers than any other payment method on the site. If your claim (that business this way is not practical) was true then people would not use direct bank transfers. But they do. Ipso facto your claim can't be true.

      My claim was and still is that using cash eliminates many of the scams - your claim was that scamming was too infrequent to matter. I provided evidence that it was frequent enough that the marketplace warned you against handing over money via bank transfers (other than their own special bank transfer that still had no guarantees). Please read those links I posted - they actually specifically warn against bank transfers.

      I did read those links and they did not warn against bank transfers except overseas (and overseas transfers are quite different anyway - I can't simply entering an overseas bank account number in online banking to initiate a transfer as I can with domestic accounts). In fact both links are primarily concerned with phishing, not the sort of fraud we've been talking about. Obviously that is because the scamming you've been claiming is such an issue is not actually significant - it is phishing that catches people. My bank also warns me against phishing, yet they don't warn me against using direct transfers. What does that tell you?

      If your claim is as minor as you're now saying, my response is "so what?" You might as well say that you can't be scammed in a transaction if you don't enter into private transactions at all. It's true, but it's irrelevant. Of course I concede that cash is less vulnerable to certain types of fraud than other payment methods. But the theoretically higher incidence of scamming with direct bank transfers is still so low that it doesn't matter. The fact remains that if scamming was as widespread as you make out then people would not use TradeMe or similar markets. Those markets exist, and are massive, ergo scamming is not the problem you think it is.

      But the system still works. You haven't provided any evidence that it doesn't. You haven't even provided evidence that the incidence of fraud is higher with direct bank transfers.

      I don't need to provide evidence that it doesn't work because I never made the claim that it does not work. I claimed that untrusted transactions are best with payment and possession taking place at the same time, hence cash works best for this. The sites you pointed me to warn specifically about doing bank transfers.

      Cash doesn't work best for this because it is only practical for transactions in a limited geographic area. How far are you prepared to travel to gain this protection you rate so highly for a $20 transaction? $100? $1000?

      Again, those links you provided do not warn against direct bank transfers. Did you actually read them?

  40. Predictions vs. reality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How many decades has it been since people started predicting the inevitable future of videophone as a replacement for the telephone? People typically have easy access to videophones in the industrialized world, but for the most part videophones are mostly restricted to people wanting to see relatives from overseas and corporate meetings.

    It turns out that people don't want the hassle of having to clean up before answering the phone. And in this case, I don't think that people really want the hassle of having to deal with a bank whenever they want to buy something and to be unable to buy something if they don't pay exorbitant fees or cant' get credit.

  41. Meh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mmm.. I prefer having a cash option. Like a car that can do 120, I may not need it, but I like to know it's there.
    I can already buy pretty much anything 'cashless'.

    Print no bill smaller than a 5.
    86 the penny. Keep Nickels, dimes, quarters and half dollars.
    Mint 1 and 2 dollar coins.

    People don't like dollar coins? Stop printing the bills and they'll like them just fine.
    How'd I do Aussies?

    1. Re:Meh. by PPH · · Score: 1

      People don't like dollar coins?

      They seemed to like the Sacagawea dollar. When they first came out, people were ordering rolls of them at the bank. But then when the banks started re-rolling used dollar coins, they'd start slipping Susan B Anthony dollars into the rolls. That killed the dollar coin.

      Nobody likes confusing SB Anthony dollars with quarters, which is a good part of the reason they never caught on. But the banks (the Fed?) appears to be stuck with them and the mints won't recall them. So, no dollar coins for us.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    2. Re:Meh. by dryeo · · Score: 1

      When Canada switched to dollar coins, the mint actually gave some thought to those kinds of problems and made the coin non-round and slightly bigger then a quarter (our coinage was always the same size as American coins, no idea about the current dollar coins) . Then they lost the dies, stuck a loon on the coin and now we have loonies.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    3. Re:Meh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live near Canada - the loonie and the US dollar coin are the same size, but the US one is a lot heavier and a bit thicker.

  42. Say goodbye to the undergroud economy by chromaexcursion · · Score: 1

    The underground economy has many faces.
    drugs
    Theft
    worse crime
    far less insidious, unreported labor
    All these will have serous problems in a cashless world. There are ways around these with some problems. But, it will drive small players out of the market.
    Not a pretty picture for some.

    1. Re:Say goodbye to the undergroud economy by Errol+backfiring · · Score: 1

      You forget one: Bribery. No chance in hell that cash is going to vanish. But for the common man it will be harder and harder to use.

      --
      Nae king! Nae laird! Nae yurrupiean pressedent! We willna be fooled again!
  43. Practical question by inode_buddha · · Score: 1

    Practical question: how do you plan to tip strippers? I don't think they appreciate coins in the hooch...

    --
    C|N>K
  44. few vending / pinball / video machines took them by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    few vending / pinball / video machines took them and making them take CC's is dumb as the fees will eat much of $1-$2 per buy they take in.

  45. Not in the USA by willoughby · · Score: 1

    This is the country where those in charge are so terrified of any change they had TV commercials promoting $1 coins - and then gave up on them. They are also afraid of big changes to US notes (why not make them from plastic like Australia does?) in order to fight counterfeiting. In this, as in all other technology, the USA will be well behind the rest of the world.

    1. Re:Not in the USA by electrosoccertux · · Score: 1

      This is the country where those in charge are so terrified of any change they had TV commercials promoting $1 coins - and then gave up on them. They are also afraid of big changes to US notes (why not make them from plastic like Australia does?) in order to fight counterfeiting. In this, as in all other technology, the USA will be well behind the rest of the world.

      You must be trolling, because we have all the great tech companies. Google, Apple, Facebook, Microsoft and many other Fortune 500's.

      Compared to, Lol, Great Britain, same companies they had 50 years ago dominate the market.
      No thanks.

  46. Banks Love It - They tax you by pubwvj · · Score: 3, Informative

    Banks love you using plastic. They tax every transaction. Paying with plastic costs you at least 2.5% and as much as 5% extra because the merchants must build that into the price to pay the banks for the credit card transactions. This is a hidden inflation. A hidden tax.

    Banks also like it because they can collect data on your behavior and that is a salable product which makes them more money.

    1. Re:Banks Love It - They tax you by theycallmeB · · Score: 3, Interesting

      People point this out a lot, and it is very true, and merchants love to whine about it, but they never point out the costs of handling cash.

      You have to count it into the till, make change, balance the till, count and recount your deposit, and then haul it to the bank to deposit and pick up your change order, or pay an armored car service to do it for you. And hope nobody robs you in the meantime, or slips you a bogus $50.

      For cards, big stores don't even need to print slips for their records, it is all in the system. For small stores you can just staple the slips together by type and drop them in a box in case someone gets a stick up their butt and decides to audit you.

    2. Re:Banks Love It - They tax you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And at least where I live banks have to started to charge a fee for change money.

    3. Re:Banks Love It - They tax you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even beyond your (excellent) points is the fact that we are already on the other side of this inflation - almost every merchant accepts credit cards. So there's no reason not to reap the benefits since we've already taken the medicine.

    4. Re:Banks Love It - They tax you by jwhitener · · Score: 1

      My local cornershop convenience store owner tells me that his fee is 70 cents per transaction.

      He begs us to use cash.

    5. Re:Banks Love It - They tax you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We don't take credit cards for just this reason. It's $250 setup and then $35 per month plus 50 cents per transaction plus 3.5% of each transaction and they hold the money so we don't get use of it which costs the merchant even more. All in all, Visa MC have made it very bad for merchants.

  47. I had a Visa vendor account... by gemtech · · Score: 4, Informative

    One of my clients made me get it to get paid, their accounting department was paying net 90 days and required all kinds of crazy insurance to get me paid through them. So paying with the department credit card was just easier. So when I setup the credit card account, they told me it would cost me 4.0%. Every month new and mysterious (to my account rep.) charges would show up: a fraction of a percent here, fixed fees there. He could never give me an explanation of what they all were, and they weren't consistent from what I could tell. I told them that those charges were ok with me as I was passing that along to my client, but it was hard to do that when I didn't know what I would expect (I was running around $10K a month through it for some other part time contractors and equipment). When the project was over, I couldn't cancel that account fast enough.

    So I perfectly understand why some stores have a minimum charge or won't take credit at all, it's a big hassle and cost.

    --
    Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results. Albert Einstein
  48. Re:Last century stuff by Spazmania · · Score: 1

    Not exactly. When someone with good credit pays off his "cash back" card at the end of the month, the bank passes on a portion of the merchant fees. That's the "cash back."

    Of course, if you use your card as an unsecured loan for longer than the billing cycle then you pay interest. And if you're late paying you pay late fees. You're a fool to do that in anything but a dire emergency, and your parents, friends and colleagues have warned you about it all your life, but you're free to live your life any way you want to.

    --
    Moderating "-1, Disagree" is simple censorship. Have the guts to post your opinion.
  49. When the lights go out, we need cash by mysidia · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The electrical grid is anything but reliable.

    It's simply unacceptable to say, that if the power goes out, then we're screwed and can no longer trade.

    We need the ability to trade regardless of operating on or off the grid, and plastic or cashless methods can't do that.

  50. lot's of small hotdog / food places want cash only by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    lot's of small hotdog / food places want cash only.

  51. Oblig. Captain Picard by Hsien-Ko · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "The economics of the future are somewhat different. You see, money doesn't exist in the 24th century. "
    "The acquisition of wealth is no longer the driving force of our lives. We work to better ourselves and the rest of humanity."

    1. Re:Oblig. Captain Picard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From the first time I saw 'EBT', my mind prefixed a 'D'. It's fitting.

    2. Re:Oblig. Captain Picard by epyT-R · · Score: 2

      I remember that episode from childhood, and even then, it stuck out as communist propaganda. Even in the universe, it was obvious that the federation had currency (credits), politics, and played a lot of the same games the world governments do.

    3. Re:Oblig. Captain Picard by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2

      You're quoting a work of fiction. It didn't really happen. It doesn't support any argument, ever.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    4. Re:Oblig. Captain Picard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Life imitates art", pal.

    5. Re:Oblig. Captain Picard by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      "Life imitates art", pal.

      I'll remember that when everyone has warp drive and energy-to-matter replicators. :-P

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    6. Re:Oblig. Captain Picard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you have unlimited sources of energy and the technology to transform energy into any desirable form of matter, why would you have any need for currency.

      Nothing communist about it. Sounds more like a uneducated knee jerk reaction from an indoctrinated good citizen.

  52. It will never happen by scottbomb · · Score: 1

    Privacy concerns and the black market will keep the cash alive.

  53. The Gold Standard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's worth considering what liberty you give up for a little temporary safety: https://mises.org/document/3353/The-Gold-Standard-Perspectives-in-the-Austrian-School

  54. Re:Last century stuff by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

    I don't pay ATM fees - which makes all the easier to me to use cash as my primary payment method.
    I can get cash from any ATM too, the limitation is that at banks other than my own the minimum withdrawal is 20 euros while I can withdraw 10 euros on my bank (and have the account balance printed).

  55. Re:Last century stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure where you shop, but in NYC, here is how it works.

    All corporate/franchise/not-family stores accept credit/debit cards with no minimum charge. Most family-run stores, if they accept a credit card at all, enforce a minimum balance between 10 and 20 dollars. That's because the credit/debit card business model is not profitable to small businesses, only mega corporations that can afford to eat a credit/debit card surcharge.

    Here is an interesting mechanic I noticed in poor neighborhoods in NYC that paint this picture clearly. At the Bodega, you can get a good meal for between 2.50 and 5 dollars if you are strapped for cash and can not afford more. At the McDonalds, you can get a meal roughly the same size as the Bodega meal for between 4 and 7 dollars (we are not talking about "Dollar Menu" here, we are talking about quantity by weight). So in some of the worst places in the city where every penny counts, why does the McDonalds get more foot traffic and raucous customers than the bodega? Because the McDonalds will take your credit card for anything but the bodega will not. It's almost like a perpetual motion machine for putting debt on the poor. They can't use cash because they don't have it but they can spend more "money" because McDonalds and Visa are in on the racket together.

    Plastic money is so great for society, right? Who needs that stupid cash stuffs? Don't buy gold, buy paypal credits. If you disagree, you are old-fashioned and or crazy, and you wouldn't want that!

  56. Cost of smartphone service by tepples · · Score: 1

    You can get the hardware and an account to accept credit card payments using your iPhone, for instance.

    But then you have to pay hundreds of USD for an iPhone (or maybe one hundred for a compatible Android phone) and hundreds of USD per year to upgrade from voice-only cellular service to smartphone service. Or what am I missing?

    1. Re:Cost of smartphone service by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      But then you have to pay hundreds of USD for an iPhone (or maybe one hundred for a compatible Android phone) and hundreds of USD per year to upgrade from voice-only cellular service to smartphone service. Or what am I missing?

      That most people already have a smartphone.

      The data plan issue is a bigger one, I think.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Cost of smartphone service by tepples · · Score: 1

      That most people already have a smartphone.

      The data plan issue is a bigger one, I think.

      Some people avoid buying a smartphone precisely because many carriers force purchase of a data plan. For example, Virgin Mobile USA offers pay-per-minute voice service starting at $20 per 90 days but won't activate that plan on a smartphone. Instead, plans that can be activated on a smartphone start at $35 per month, which is five times as much.

    3. Re:Cost of smartphone service by tsqr · · Score: 1

      But then you have to pay hundreds of USD for an iPhone (or maybe one hundred for a compatible Android phone) and hundreds of USD per year to upgrade from voice-only cellular service to smartphone service. Or what am I missing?

      That most people already have a smartphone.

      The data plan issue is a bigger one, I think.

      According to this survey, 56% of all US adults have smartphones (61% of cell-phone users). So yeah, "most", but not exactly an overwhelming majority. Note also that smart phone ownership is heavily skewed toward the upper income brackets, especially among older age groups.

  57. Two words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Transaction fees.

    Vs. cash, no transaction fees.

    If you're eking out a living with a tiny to small business, which would you prefer?

  58. Canada has the future :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah it was stupid to get rid of the penny. only increases inflation.

  59. fiat crash by rossdee · · Score: 1

    "is the fiat, which can crash at any moment"

    Did they ever find that white Fiat Uno that hit the Ritz hotel Mercedes in that Paris tunnel on 31 Aug 97

  60. This happens to you a lot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Is this daily, weekly, or just bi-monthly?

  61. Never going to happen by the_Bionic_lemming · · Score: 2

    A cashless society is doomed to serfs and kings.

    Whenever the kings want more, they raise the prices by adding fees.

    Serfs will have no say in the matter.

    --
    _ _ _ Go for the eyes Boo! GO FOR THE EYES!
  62. I like Star Trek by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where Trolls are omnipotent, moi capitan!

    (at least until they get expelled for being that way and then "only" threatening young girls to come into the continuum)

  63. Cash will go away when by John.Banister · · Score: 1

    technology lets poor people receive payments from one another. I imagine pre-paid type debit cards with nfc chips. Funds can be transferred non-anonymously between people via African style cell phone transactions and moved between the cell phone and the debit card via nfc chips in both. If people can load up cards identically (or asymmetrically if a payment is involved) and swap 'em, after a few swaps the cards should seem anonymous enough for those not sufficiently motivated to barter.

    1. Re:Cash will go away when by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      poor people have cell phones, I notice. thank Reagan for starting that program

  64. Illegal transactions will still occur by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A lot of prostitutes already take plastic, so even in a "cashless" society it will still be easy to buy drugs, hookers, hit-men, and everything else. Worst case scenario, buy prepaid cards from whichever company pops up selling anonymous ones, and you can bet your sweet as somebody will because there will be a huge demand for them, if they don't already exist.

  65. Shady Transactions by IonOtter · · Score: 2

    From Alien: Resurrection:

    GEN. PEREZ: Elgyn, these were very, very hard to come by. *slides a stack of cash to Elgyn*

    ELGYN: So was our cargo. You're, uh...not about to plead poverty on me, are you, General?

    GEN. PEREZ: No. Just saying very few people deal in cash nowadays.

    ELGYN: Just the ones don't like to keep business records. Yourself, for example.

    --
    [End Of Line]
  66. If federal reserve cash ever disappeared by voss · · Score: 2

    Some private company would invent something to replace it.
    There are just too many microtransactions on too many levels to totally replace cash.

    1. Re:If federal reserve cash ever disappeared by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Federal Reserve IS a private company. Look it up.

  67. Not such a good idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > the ONLY way to have COMPLETE control over your own money.

    And what country do you live in that makes this statement true? The issuing authority can decide your currency is worth whatever they decide it's worth, up to and including completely devaluing it if they want. You never have and never will have complete control over your own money.

  68. dream on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are many financial transaction both legal and illegal that benefit perhaps even require no paper or computer record.

  69. "Recent research suggests that many believe" by exploder · · Score: 1

    I can't take anything seriously after that.

    --
    Yo dawg, I heard you like the Ackermann function, so OH GOD OH GOD OH GOD
  70. money is always going to be needed by ILongForDarkness · · Score: 2

    Ex. power blackouts like NY had last year, or ~15 years ago when New England and Ontario had a power outage for a couple days. Most things will shutdown anyways in those scenarios but still are businesses really not going to want to be able to sell things because their card reader isn't working? Or how about your wallet gets stolen, credit card gets hacked etc? With cash you might/likely have some around the house. How many people have a spare copy of their bank card and credit card and will it work once you report the other one as missing? What you are just going to not buy anything for 3-5 days while you wait for another one?

    1. Re:money is always going to be needed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The imprint method works without power, just mail the slips in at the end of the day. If you ID'd them you will know exactly who they are and can track them down if the transaction fails.

    2. Re:money is always going to be needed by ILongForDarkness · · Score: 1

      But you slow down to a crawl if you are iding every customer, they might be using false ids or they've moved since the last time they got a license etc. Plus if you've ever saw a cops episode it seems everyone walks/drives around without any id (maybe that is just criminals some how thinking that if the cops can't figure out who they are they'll just let them go :)). The US is the only rich country I know of that still takes imprints (been to France, Germany, Czech, UK, Belgium, Italy, Netherlands, and live in Canada). I've actually never had a imprint of my card because we've always had electronic readers and for the last 5 years or so chips in the card. I don't even know how many stores still have the ability I think it has been over a year since I even saw a imprint device.

      I think it will end up being like when traveling to another country with a developed banking system for a long while: you'll pay for almost everything with credit cards or a head of time but you'll still have a couple hundred (equivalent) around just in case someone won't take it for whatever reason.

  71. Flip a coin by AndyCanfield · · Score: 1

    I lived in Laos for a while and was surprised that they have no coins there, only paper money. How do you flip a coin? You have to keep a foreign coin just for flipping. Then I came back (to Thailand) and thought it was weird that we have two kinds of currency - paper and metal. Why? Don't know.

    As for all purchases being electronic, have you ever heard of Edward Snowden? Come on, be real! Currency is the last vestage of privacy! Buy a book for cash and no computer in the world knows that you own it. How will you use your credit card to give a beggar a dollar? Tip the lady at the massage parlor and your wife hits you with your bank book. "Officer, forget the speeding ticket; just take a hundred from my Visa card." A world without cash? Not in my world.

  72. How smart is it to essentially Privatize Currency? by MartinD · · Score: 1

    How smart is it to essentially Privatize Currency? Electronic money isn't handled by the people for the people, for public good. It's private global corporations using proprietary *everything*, with what's essentially a local exchange rate rate to you/me/us that's always to their own benefit. Electronic money is just trading power for convenience.

  73. Re:Yeah, let us get rid of cash and give banksters by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

    There's no reason the replacement would have a fee on every transaction. Opposing change because you are too stupid to solve problems doesn't make the change bad.

  74. BITCOIN... You dumb fucks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Oh... without cash I couldn't buy the neighbor's bike." WTF??

    Digital currency, you stupid insensitive CLOD!

    In Finland you're going to be able to use bitcoin wallet/tx devices that work off radio networks. No internet access required.

    Post after post after post after post of non-digital currency awareness bewbs! /. has really gone downhill

  75. As a person from Sweden by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

    I think that it's hard to pay with card in the US in some places like Taxi and small shops - something that's so common in Sweden that it gets annoying when you can't.

    The few shops that don't take cards these days have to put up huge signs to avoid annoyed customers that assumes cards are good there.

    --
    If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
  76. 30+ year old thinking by LongearedBat · · Score: 1

    many believe we will stop using notes and coins altogether in the not-too-distant future.

    I remember hearing exactly the same thing back in the 80's.

    Cash will be around for a long time yet, because in some ways it's still preferable. Different tools for different things.

  77. As the saying goes by DaveAtFraud · · Score: 1

    In $GOD we trust. All others must pay cash.

    (your choice as to how to define $GOD)

    Cheers,
    Dave

    --
    They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither safety nor liberty.
    Ben
  78. Cryptocurrencies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The main technology breakthrough that will enable cashless societies.

  79. Don't think so. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Short of the government forcing people not to use cash. (Democrats would love this because it means people can't hide people making money) It ain't going to happen.

    Giving some poor guy some money. (plastic dose him no good)
    Giving someone money for birthday. (cost money to buy a cash card)
    Tipping at a restaurant. (I ALWAYS tip in cash so the waitress gets more of the tip, cash don't get taxed)
    Garage sales. Kids lemonade stands .

    What is all this complaining about Banks and fees? It is so easy to avoid those fees that you only have yourself to blame.

  80. Re:Last century stuff by rubycodez · · Score: 1

    tracked? no one cares about your beer, pizza, gamer video card, lap dance and dime bag purchases

  81. Power and data coverage by tepples · · Score: 1

    I move the goalposts when failure modes become apparent to me. I apologize for not anticipating all such failure modes in advance. But the next one is that cash works without electric power, without a cellular subscription, and where coverage is unavailable.

  82. Re:RFID Ink, UPC symbols = 666 # of the Beast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey, just wanted to reply to say I appreciate your post.

    Specifically, I appreciate you posting on a topic that is literally anything besides the hosts file/DNS subject.

    Keep it up. Regardless of whether I agree with any specific post, it is a relief from the monotone you have acquired a reputation for. Hell, I don't even care if you want to deliberately troll, so long as you vary your topics.

    You could say that Satan is plotting to establish a liberal, homosexual totalitarian world regime via global warming skepticism astroturfing, and I wouldn't collapse your post "just because it's apk" like I would if it's on that other subject.

  83. Re:Last century stuff by aristotle-dude · · Score: 0, Troll

    I never carry any cash on me and even pay 10 [euro] cent (roughly equaling a dime) purchases with plastic. And I'm certainly not the only one amongst my friends. Cash is clumsy, dirty and so last century. That's Finland for you.

    You pay 10 euro cent transactions with plastic? Do you like stealing money from merchants because that is what you are doing when you consider merchant fees prick? I hope you are not a finn because you don't seem to have any sisu. Are you a recent immigrant to Finland?

    Honestly, you should be taken out back and beaten if you actually use plastic to pay for small purchases prick.

    --
    Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
  84. Predicting a future where technology does not suck by WaffleMonster · · Score: 1

    CEO of sage writes a one-sided pro-industry article about a dream standing to benefit his companies bottom line.... who cares?

    Would prefer a piece from @Dunkin_CEO detailing how 90% of the world is projected to be addicted to gooey confections by 2020.

    All those running around proclaiming demise of cash would constitute some kind of death knell to illicit industries must have been hooked up with some great shit.

  85. love cash by Tom · · Score: 1

    I love cash. You can have it when you pry it from my col... wait... not quite. But for me to stop using cash, you have to make electronic cash work first. That means three things that are absolute requirements and I will not ever negotiate:

    1. It is anonymous and untraceable, at least for any practical purposes.
    2. It is as fast and easy to use as taking a bill from my wallet. If your e-cash solution takes more than about 5-10 seconds for a simple payment, it is too slow. I'm talking start-to-finish, including everything I have to do, the recipient has to do, and your system has to do.
    3. It works between two private individuals who meet in the middle of nowhere and don't have Internet at that moment.

    As long as even one of these conditions is not met, I will have to carry cash around me anyways, and if I have cash with me, I will use it wherever I can.

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  86. pretty close to cashless over here by tantrum · · Score: 1

    The last number I saw published here in Norway said that cash only accounted for about 5% of the daily transaction volume, debit cards are used in 80% of purchases. Published statistics also say that cash is more expensive to handle than electronic transactions.

    I can't remember using cash a single time during the last few months.

  87. There may be a constitutional barrier by marbux · · Score: 1

    Unless one posits a governmental alternative to private banks, the U.S. Constitution raises some barriers to a "cashless society." In the Supreme Court's recent Obamacare ruling (PDF), the court held that neither the Commerce Clause nor the Necessary and Proper Clause provide Congress with power to require that a person participate in commerce, i.e., by requiring that they buy health insurance. The relevant legislation was upheld under the Congressional power to levy taxes, in the form of a penalty for those who do not buy health insurance.

    Requiring that people enter into a business arrangement with a private bank to handle their funds would seem to run into the same barrier, leaving the question whether Congress has power to require people to pay all debts via a private bank under its power to coin money and set the value thereof, in legal effect requiring people to loan money to private banks in the form of deposits.

    The factual basis for such a test case already exists because of a statute requiring that all payments of Social Security and Dept. of Veteran Affairs benefits (and wages of federal employees) be made by electronic funds transfer, which as currently implemented can only be made to private banks other than the Federal Reserve Banks.

    By way of disclosing my bias, I have boycotted banks since the collapse of the economy in 2008 because of massive bankster fraud that caused that collapse. I have refused to accept payment of VA and Social Security benefits by that method. I do not intend to loan my money to banks and am willing to litigate that issue if necessary.

    Paul E. "Marbux" Merrell, J.D.

  88. Re:few vending / pinball / video machines took the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why? You just accumulate the transactions at the arcade and make one single transaction. There are other places in the US that does the same (Los Angeles metro comes to mind).

  89. Things to solve by Alioth · · Score: 1

    There are still some things to solve for the cashless society.

    1. Electronic transactions are still far too expensive. Every shop I go into to get (say) my lunch have a minimum amount you have to spend before you can use your debit card (or you have to pay a surcharge). My lunch always falls below this value so I must use cash. Things like vending machines too. Until it's cheap enough to use something like a debit card to buy an item costing 60p, then you'll still need cash.
    2. Security. Debit/credit cards are too insecure, and the burden of making them secure is on the merchant in the form of PCI-DSS. It means if you're a small business taking debit/credit might not be an option. The burger van in the car park for instance, it's still impractical for him to take electronic transactions due to the equipment requirements and PCI-DSS.
    3. Very hard to settle private debts. For instance if I hire a builder for a small job, he now has to give me all his bank details if I'm to do an electronic transfer. It's about 100 times easier to give him cash.

    1. Re:Things to solve by Shados · · Score: 1

      All the tiny contractors I delt with since I bought my place have been able to take cards. Now that you can get cheap hardware hooked up to a cheap android phone and a small merchant account to start swiping cards, even the plumber and the 3 table restaurant in chinatown take cards now...

  90. Re:Last century stuff by thegarbz · · Score: 2

    So you are the reason that a lot of stores have a minimum charge amount for credit / debit charges. The transaction fees charged to merchants are ridiculous and so are ATM fees. Until these fees are reduced, you will never see a truly cashless society. And that doesn't include those that have less trust of banks than they do of governments.

    Why blame the man working within the system for charges applied by someone completely different? Either the merchant should be happy to absorb the transaction cost, the merchant should specify the minimum cost, or the bank shouldn't charge the fees. But it most definitely is NOT the fault of the person simply buying something.

    Now let's flip the thing around. For the few cents per transaction that end up going to the banks for small purchases how much could be potentially saved by not tallying up the register, not storing float offsite or managing a safe, not having to train staff to manage cash securely, not having to bank your earnings at the end of the day (that's a good expensive one there), and above all when the cash register disagrees with the paperwork not spending an hour trying to figure out where the money went.

    There is a cost of doing business in cash. You just don't see it and point to credit fees instead. I for one pay an accountant to do my taxes because he's faster and cheaper than the time I'd spend doing it, so why not pay a bank to manage the money (if we went cashless).

  91. Cashless is okay if not proprietary by Typical+Slashdotter · · Score: 1

    I'm alright with a cashless future, so long as it's done right. One thing it can't be is the current propriety charge card system implemented by and for rent-seeking middlemen. It is the government's job to develop modern, usable currency (electronic or otherwise), and they have been lax in this responsibility.

  92. I'm sure that 66% isn't evenly spread by 91degrees · · Score: 1

    I bet department stores and gas stations do much more than that portion of their business by plastic. I bet sweetshops and toyshops deal with a lot of cash, because a large chunk of their customer base doesn't have plastic. Also greeting card shops, newspaper kiosks, and other institutions that deal with a lot of small transactions, because cash is more convenient for small purchases.

  93. original idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I grew up with the sci-fi stories promoting the idea of e-notes in e-wallets. I think Shadow-run has something similar. I'm surprised that no-one is discussing this idea. Money could move from wallet to wallet without an intermediary: It wasn't in escrow at the bank where it could be tracked, taxed or seized. The obvious danger is the same as real cash: Robbery and counterfeit notes. While governments can use more precise technology to prevent couterfeiting of physical notes, unlimited processing power means digital counterfeiting is a matter of time. The best solution I can think of is the military practice: Issuing new script every year and deleting the old notes. This means such e-notes cannot be stored long-term, like physical notes can: Valid e-notes must be traded for silver and collectibles, or banked with a financial institution before they expire.

  94. Americans and their broken CC infrastructure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh, you Americans. It's funny how most of the posts I see here are specific to the USA Credit Card infrastructure.

    In Europe, we've had Chip + PIN for more than a decade. This makes CC fraud almost impossible, because chips cannot be copied without physical access to a carad and breaking it. Finished should be the days where you can just skim the magnetic strip. Unfortunately, because not all countries use this system, we still have to have 70's technology magnetic strips at the back of our cards which can be copied.

    Concerning transactions and bank accounts... well, there is obviously a fee for processing payments. It's a pretty reliable service that's provided by the banks, so why shouldn't they charge a fee? Besides, as it was said before, there IS a cost to accepting cash: you have to pay people or machines to count it, withdraw it, protect if from theft...

    To me, cash is easier to spend without thinking than with a CC. When I withdraw money from the bank, it's as if it's already been spent. With my e-banking app, I can monitor my bank account in real-time and it's much easier for me to manage my money.

    I've read some people complaining that the money doesn't arrive until the end of the month for merchants. That's not true at all in Europe anymore. If I pay at a store with a debit card, the money immediately goes out of my account to the merchants. If not, it's only a matter of days, not weeks.

    Basically, the American Credit Card system is utterly broken and stuck in the early 90's.

  95. Re:Perhaps more than that... apk by Pikoro · · Score: 1

    Wow, you really are a loony.

    --
    "Freedom in the USA is not the ability to do what you want. It is the ability to stop others from doing what THEY want"
  96. Just for YOU then... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hosts apply to a lot more than shoring up DNS redirect security issues. They add more:

    Speed (blocking adbanners, & also hardcoding your favorite sites, which provides faster resolutions than calling out to remote DNS (which also shores up that redirect Kaminsky flaw noted above also - double bonus)).

    Security (Shoring up the DNS redirect issue, & also stopping botnets, malware in general, maliciously coded adbanners, spammers & phishers, trackers, etc.)

    Reliability (vs. downed OR redirect poisoned DNS servers)

    Anonymity (vs. DNSBLs or DNS request logs)

    * Especially "courtesy of yours truly" via -> http://start64.com/index.php?o...

    APK

    P.S.=> On the UPC symbol though - is the "best you've got" a downmod? Yes - "When the DOWNMOD truncheon is used in lieu of conversation..." this site has a problem! apk

    1. Re:Just for YOU then... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and you slipped back into the dark side.

      I didn't mod your UPC post down (and wouldn't have, even if I had mod points), but if I had modpoints I would have modded this hosts file post down. Anything you post about hosts/DNS is automatically trolling from my perspective.

      Maybe it wasn't for the first few years you were doing this, but it certainly is now.

      Seriously, you should listen to people like mmell who are trying to be your friend.

    2. Re:Just for YOU then... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The posting was downmodded on the grounds laid out by Aldous Huxley. Someone dared to invoke the Transcendent (Christian texts) in a forum dominated by those who want the world not to have meaning so they can pursue their erotic and political passions. These also reject morality because it interferes with their sexual freedom.

      There is a secular pantheon, Space, Time, Matter, Energy, Chance and Politics. Abortion and Sodomy are its sacraments.

  97. Not Surprise by zisel · · Score: 1

    Since technology innovate every year, this is not surprise at all.

  98. Re:Last century stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Merchant fees for an bank card transaction are almost always lower than the cost of handling the cash, regardless of the amount.

  99. Meanwhile in Germany, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    most people pay cash most of the time. You barely see anyone using (credit/debit) cards.

    1. Re:Meanwhile in Germany, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed, I always notice when I visit Germany that people seem much more inclined to pay cash than in the Netherlands, even though it is possible to pay by bank card almost everywhere. Is there a reason for the German dislike of electronic payments?

    2. Re:Meanwhile in Germany, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've got no idea. But often, cards can only be used for amounts of 10 € or more. And we are accustomed to it.

  100. Re:Last century stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Clumsy, dirty, last century and anonymous. Even in Finland (or heck, especially in Finland) there are situations where the last property comes incredibly handy.

  101. Planet money did a podcast on this by swb · · Score: 1

    And they came to the conclusion that paper bills were cheaper than coins.

    Coins cost more to make. Canada had to mint 1.6 $1 coins for every paper bill they replaced because people hang onto them and hoarding coins is somehow a benefit to the government.

    Personally I think the explanation/justification is somewhat tortured. I haven't listened to the podcast in a while but I think it comes down to some fairly esoteric economics, including seigniorage, the difference between the cost of producing the coins and the value of the coin.

    I think they also factored in the cost of the conversion activity of business to accommodate $1 coins -- cash registers, vending machines, etc.

  102. Bit pin by ub3r+n3u7r4l1st · · Score: 1

    Best form of digital payment, with almost zero transaction fees, and no risk centralized control of regulation.

    1. Re: Bit pin by ub3r+n3u7r4l1st · · Score: 1

      I mean Bitcoin , the iPad is not typing in correctly

  103. 66% Would low for Canada by brunes69 · · Score: 1

    I am pretty sure that in Canada > 75% of transactions are made with plastic, easily. It may be more in the 85% range.

  104. Re:Last century stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perhaps no one cares about YOU, but the world isn't about YOU. Being able to track has consequences beyond YOU.

  105. "Dropping you a memo" (you're wrong) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With LITERAL proof http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    APK

  106. Just ran into this by brunes69 · · Score: 1

    When Arthur came up here (Atlantic Canada), it took out the power for a few days.. heck some were without power for a week. While without power, all the big box stores were closed. However, small mom & pop shops stayed open, using a hand ledger and accepting cash. I was actually in one store buying supplies that was operating by candlelight.

    1. Re:Just ran into this by mysidia · · Score: 1

      However, small mom & pop shops stayed open, using a hand ledger and accepting cash. I was actually in one store buying supplies that was operating by candlelight.

      Not surprising.... big box stores can afford to close, and it's likely cheaper for them to plan to do so.

      Which is also one of the reasons local governments should make sure that big box stores can't get 100% of the business for essential goods.

      There is much to be said about having $20,000 or so in emergency cash tucked away in your safety deposit vault at a bank with 24x7 access to your locker, just in case the SHTF.

  107. Re:Last century stuff by BlueStrat · · Score: 1

    tracked? no one cares about your beer, pizza, gamer video card, lap dance and dime bag purchases

    What about that AR-15 bought from a friend? Or what about those electrical/electronic parts you ordered that could either become the heart of an IED timer/detonator device or fix the controls on grandma's hobby-ceramics firing-kiln in her garage that she's been after you to fix, after some nutcase phones in a bomb threat?

    Or what about bus/train/plane tickets to a city where an anti-government protest is scheduled, coupled with your purchase of spray paint and other sign-making supplies?

    If all such data is so uninteresting and worthless, why is it authoritarian governments historically make such a priority out of obtaining as much as possible from everyone they can force to comply?

    Strat

    --
    Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
  108. Bitcoin requires cellular data by tepples · · Score: 1

    Phones without a data plan cannot run a Bitcoin wallet, and phones with a data plan are too expensive per month for a child to afford on his allowance.

    1. Re:Bitcoin requires cellular data by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      phones with a data plan are too expensive per month for a child to afford on his allowance.

      And will remain so for all eternity?

      I thought we were discussing predictions of the future.

    2. Re:Bitcoin requires cellular data by tepples · · Score: 1

      phones with a data plan are too expensive per month for a child to afford on his allowance.

      And will remain so for all eternity?

      It will remain so as long as FCC policy allows U.S. cellular carriers to keep it so. I can't say that will be eternity, but with the polarization of the electorate that has led to a do-nothing Congress for the past three and a half years, I don't see it changing in the near future. Or what other country's "dollar" is being discussed?

      I thought we were discussing predictions of the future.

      That depends on whether "future" refers to a decade or a century.

    3. Re:Bitcoin requires cellular data by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      So run a wallet with an SMS interface (I'm not aware of such a beast but there's absolutely no reason it couldn't work)

    4. Re:Bitcoin requires cellular data by tepples · · Score: 1

      So run a wallet with an SMS interface (I'm not aware of such a beast but there's absolutely no reason it couldn't work)

      In order to bring about a future free of Federal Reserve notes, U.S. cellular carriers' policies would first have to change dramatically. Under most major U.S. carriers' current policy, the carrier will force a data plan on the subscriber if the handset is capable of running third-party apps such as this hypothetical SMS wallet. CDMA2000 carriers (Verizon and Sprint) by and large won't activate a smartphone on a plan without data, and AT&T is known for cramming a data plan onto any voice-only SIM inserted into a smartphone. And even then, the subscriber has to either pay per month for the privilege to use money or pay to send and pay to receive each text message.

    5. Re:Bitcoin requires cellular data by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      I understand many feature phones can run j2me apps though in theory, even that is not required for a simple sms payment gateway. I.e. simply text "PAY .103 1FIRSTBITS" to the gateway number could be enough to make a payment.

    6. Re:Bitcoin requires cellular data by tepples · · Score: 1

      I understand many feature phones can run j2me apps

      And many can't, instead being locked down to the carrier's app store. Individuals and small businesses have historically had problems getting set up to even develop BREW apps.

      simply text "PAY .103 1FIRSTBITS" to the gateway number could be enough to make a payment.

      Still a 40 cent transaction fee: 20 cents to send a text and 20 cents to receive a confirmation. In order to bring about a future free of Federal Reserve notes, U.S. cellular carriers' policies would still have to change dramatically.

    7. Re:Bitcoin requires cellular data by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      Well, if you decide to go with a phone that can't run anything at all (Motofone f3 for example), I guess that's the choice you make. Point is that there are options that don't require a smartphone and don't need a bundled data plan (though yes, data on such plans is costly, more costly than justified but cheaper than a full data plan for occasional usage)

      And yes, texts are far too expensive. Though on Tracfone they cost 0.3 of a minute which if my quick mental calculations are correct comes out somewhere under 1c which seems low so there's something up there.

      http://tracfonereviewer.blogsp...

      But possibly something could be done along the lines of the Amazon Kindle's whispernet where the data is included in the cost of the unit when purchased.

    8. Re:Bitcoin requires cellular data by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      I missed a decimal point. So 0.3 units is around 6c

  109. FTFY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Today in the U.S., 66 percent of all REPORTED point-of-sale transactions are done with plastic

    Sales done in cash have the option of going unrecorded and untaxed, which is why you will never get total buy in on this.

    And what about transactions (not necessarily business ones) that are not at Point of Sales? Ever give money as a birthday gift? Does this need to be reported/recorded now so that it can be taxed or you sign a disclaimer that this is a gift so no tax should be applied?

  110. the quickest way to a cashless society is by jsepeta · · Score: 1

    the quickest way to a cashless society is make everybody broke.

    no more beef for the 99%. we'll all be eating bugs in the future.
    http://news.nationalpost.com/2...

    --
    Remember kids, if you're not paying for the service, YOU ARE THE PRODUCT THAT IS BEING SOLD.
  111. Economist == Gov't apparatchik by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or someone who wants to be one

  112. Screw that! by B33rNinj4 · · Score: 1

    My life's goal is to swim in my own Money Bin like Scrooge McDuck. Don't take that dream away from me.

  113. no paper money...no freedom. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the government would love not to have paper money....for it's citizens. paper money is our last bastion of anonymous transactions, just think, the federal government can now decided to start charging taxes on small private transactions. only an idiot or an ideological "true believer" in cradle to grave big government (read idiot) would love a paperless money society.

  114. New stripper costume by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    New stripper costume will have a g string with a built in card swipe!

  115. Re:Last century stuff by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

    At the cafeteria at work, they have a $3 minimum for card purchases. Not much of a problem, since most of their crap is well over $3 anyway, but they do have that min.

    --
    Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  116. See if they can phase out pennies first by Dareth · · Score: 1

    See if they can phase out pennies first. If they can't get rid of the smallest coin, they have little chance of phasing out all cash in general.

    --

    I only look human.
    My mother is a halfling and my dad is an ogre, so that makes me an Ogreling
  117. Did anyone bother to look at this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Editor’s note: Simon Black is CEO at London-based Sage Pay.

    For those of you wondering Sage Pay is an electronic payment company. That's like the CEO of McDonalds saying in 10 years all meals will be fast food takeout. Probably just wishful thinking.

  118. Re:Last century stuff by rubycodez · · Score: 1

    have your mom order pizza so the local economy doesn't collapse

  119. The real reason they want cashless money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's all about control from the politician and banker's point of view. You can "turn off" cashless money and therefore control people.

    An additional benefit from a banker's point of view is that a cashless society gives them the ability to leverage themselves up far beyond the reserve ratio. Basically to infinity. Typically a bank would have been required to hold a reserve of 5% of their loan book as cash. It limits how many loans they can create. Obviously it would be far more profitable if they could get rid of this limit, but it means that they need people to stop using cash, so they put some effort into selling the "cashless society" as a wonderful utopia where bankers rule the world and can create infinite credit on a whim.

  120. Re:Last century stuff by rubycodez · · Score: 1

    so pay in cash for certain things, I was addressing the tin foil wrapped paranoid schizo and his imagined need to use cash for everything. besides, you won't be getting or using that plane ticket without valid ID

  121. The road to dystopia... by steak · · Score: 1

    The road to dystopia is paved with good intentions.

  122. Re:Last century stuff by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

    Depends on the business.

    BigCorp, Inc. generally doesn't care, because they make enough off other purchases that the occasional loss due to merchant fees doesn't hurt their bottom line.

    Pop's Mom Stand, on the other hand, can't afford a $3 fee on a $2 transaction, so he has a minimum purchase amount.

    The local smoke shop where I purchase my tobacco recently switched to a $5 minimum for card transactions, after their bank imposed a $2.75 fee on all credit/debit transactions.

    --
    An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  123. What it would fix by nehumanuscrede · · Score: 1

    The first things that come to mind about what going cashless could potentially fix would be tax dodging and illegal immigration.

    Lots of folks love to get paid in cash so they don't have to report it to the IRS as income. In fact, many illegal immigrants are paid this way so a company can continue using them. The incentive for the illegal worker is no tax reporting to draw attention to the fact they're not supposed to be here anyway.

    I rarely use cash anymore because unless you write down every purchase, it's difficult to track what you're spending it on. I just put it on a CC, pay it off in full every month and let them send me a report of where most of it is going.

    Once you start tracking your own expenses, it definitely becomes an eye opener for you.

  124. Re:Last century stuff by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

    tracked? no one cares about your beer, pizza, gamer video card, lap dance and dime bag purchases

    They will the moment I decide to run for office, or become famous in some way, even locally.

    If you don't care, then by all means, post a list of everything you've ever bought from the sex shop, along with your age, gender, and most frequented social clubs.

    --
    An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  125. Re:Last century stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is it really so difficult to understand that this data and enforcement equals power and unchecked power will lead to corruption and oppression and that that has absolutely nothing to do with whether they care about your particular dime bag?

    You may not have a problem with it (hey, perhaps you believe in things being kept in check or figure that benefits outweight the risk..) but that's a different issue.

  126. Re:Last century stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did you read that from a tabloid or do you have data to back that up? Are we talking about marginal cost or average, ie. is the comparison to just decreasing the use of cash or to eliminating it totally?

  127. Until people realize what a "shake down" ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Until people realize what a "shake down" the collusion between VISA/MC and Governments are... yeah we are headed in the cashless direction.

    But as information security becomes more of an issue as well as spying and prying... the whole cashless system seems to be in real danger. Visa/MC are one whistle blower away from real trouble. Their practices are criminal.... except they happen with Government consent. So it's OK...

  128. Invested In Crime by JimSadler · · Score: 1

    Obviously criminals will resist electronic money. And those who knowingly invest in criminal enterprises will also resist to the bitter end. Electronic money raises the specter of eliminating almost all money based crime. Whether it is running dope or cheating on income taxes electronic money can make it impossible. So next we have the issue of powerful individuals who just happen to invest in criminal enterprises. If a US senator owns a chunk of a bank and that bank happens to make money from a drug cartel will that senator try to cripple electronic money? Are we at the point that we can confront the degree to which criminal organisations own businesses? We might also run into issues such as the government itself having financial transactions with organised crime. For the first time in history we do have the potential to eliminate almost all crime. We are about to discover that to many people freedom means the freedom to be criminals. I'm not so sure we can look into that mirror.

  129. On the way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All LEGAL tender will become cashless.

    The New World Order is already hard at work making this happen. Personally, I will always take precious metals as currency. Simply because I will always maintain full control over my money.

  130. Let me write that down... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Woops! Can't even do that b/c we now all work in paperless offices.

  131. Re:Yeah, let us get rid of cash and give banksters by GlennC · · Score: 1

    There's no reason the replacement would have a fee on every transaction.

    Actually, there are two reasons the replacement would have a fee:

    1. To recoup the cost of the infrastructure.
    2. To increase the profits for the provider.

    These are banks, after all.

    --
    Go on, citizen, stamp the vote card. R or D, your choice.
  132. Probably won't happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The people proposing a cashless society need to look harder at all of society, not just their own social class.

    There is a big segment of society that does not own credit cards, debit cards, or a check book. They live entirely based on cash and money orders. Many of them are poor. Some are illiterate. Some are zealots of the Dave Ramsey school of money management.

    Cash is still supreme for small purchases, vending machines, tips, protecting your identity, and yes protecting your illegal, immoral, or questionable activities. As such, we could only go to a cashless society if it were voted in by a majority of politicians who had never done anything illegal, immoral or questionable...... I predict such will never exist and this will never happen.

  133. When the paperless transaction machines go down? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Two weekends ago the remnants of hurricane Arthur blew through my home province of New Brunswick. We don't get many hurricanes but this knocked power out (going on 10 days now for the last of the most unfortunate) and internet/cell service for a good two or three days. When the restaurants, grocery stores and gas stations got their power back it was cash only at most places.

  134. Bank accounts for the poor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My credit union requires $5.00 to open a savings account. No fees thereafter.

    Everyone can afford $5.00.

  135. Crime is not going away! by mrnick · · Score: 1

    Criminals are not going away, ever... If there is a system they will find a way around it, through it, or profit from it. If the system is so locked down to keep that from happening a new system will be built to support vice.

    People want what they want, regardless of the legal or morality of said things. To think it can been eliminated by getting rid of cash is just naive.

    --

    Encryption: I may not agree with what you say, but I will defend your right to encrypt it...
  136. not ready yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    just got back from vacation and ran into several small shops that only accept cash. other small shops that charge a service fee for using a card.. just paid a state institution of higher learning and got a transaction fee for using a card. So, i don't think we're as ready to move all digital as some urban areas might want to believe.

  137. Re:Yeah, let us get rid of cash and give banksters by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

    You are presuming that it's a bank processing the transactions. I am not.

  138. Re:Last century stuff by EzInKy · · Score: 1

    Have to say this is pretty much false everywhere I shop, but will add I wouldn't shop anywhere where this is true. Any business whose survival depends on saving a few pennies on credit card fees is destined for failure around here because there are very few willing to walk around with cash just to keep them alive.

    --
    Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
  139. The future status of cash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "...I assume that you can arrange the delivery of the money. He asked for cash.”

    “Cash” – he rolled his eyes – “how risqué! But, yes, I can..."

    William Gibson, Count Zero

  140. Only in the US and maybe Anglo-Empire/Europe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This will not be occurring outside of the US, Anglo-Empire or Europe (parts of it only). For some people there is "no where else" than this but that is very naive as most of the post-19th century goods these regions require to continue their lifestyle are only made (or the upstream supply chains only exist in) countries outside this sphere. Those countries (Asia mostly) are strongly cash-only economies - 90% of all transactions come from bottom-up economic activities that are 100% cash-and-carry only. You can use credit cards and debit cards but only if you are near to "US/Anglo/Euro" catering hotels. Go a few blocks away from these zones (which are the majority population areas) and you are 100% SOL without cash, and your debit card is only useful in so far as it allows you to get local cash.

  141. Good luck with that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you have cashless society, few keyboard hits if targeted will makes you absolute, you basically become a slave to the system. Good luck everyone with that. For once in human history we should all be against this.

    I'm not saying cash is the king, but zeros and ones is just not good for us at all. You are not holding anything in your hand, nothing zero.

  142. I don't think this is going to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From a "Dave Ramsey" perspective (you tend to spend more when using plastic), to just simply too many places tracking my transactions - I've actually started using cash more often.

  143. Dollar Bill = George Washington, that's why by rsborg · · Score: 1

    I have never understood why the US treasury doesn't just stop producing $1 bills and force a coin into circulation.

    I'm fairly certain that a major reason for the lack of change is that US Founder and first CEO (or President, I forget the terms these days) George Washington is on the dollar and also on the US Quarter, thus making it very difficult to simply mint a dollar coin as a replacement.

    You might laugh, but these kinds of peccadilloes, added to the general incompetence and recalcitrance of today's Congress, result in a whole lot of "doing nothing".

    --
    Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
  144. NO thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I prefer to stay anonymous and not be tracked. Not to mention being an enemy of the state presents the horrible reality that they can "turn off your money"

  145. Garage sales are still cash only by tepples · · Score: 1

    In my 30+ years on this planet, I've never seen a private sale of used goods (e.g. a "garage sale" or "yard sale") that takes plastic. All are cash only. So is Coney Island, a historic hot dog restaurant in Fort Wayne, Indiana.

    1. Re:Garage sales are still cash only by EzInKy · · Score: 1

      So you've never visited a "peddler's mall" or a consignment shop?

      --
      Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
    2. Re:Garage sales are still cash only by tepples · · Score: 1

      There's a "peddler's mall" in my city where each seller collects payment individually, and when I tried to pay with plastic at some booths, I was directed to its ATM. Consignment shops and the like are more likely to have one checkout connected to one merchant account, which lets such a shop do enough business per year to qualify for a reasonable swipe fee. Besides, if taking plastic is so important to occasional private sellers of used goods, why are there still garage sales in the first place?

  146. Without a doubt by Trogre · · Score: 1

    From the summary:
    Recent research suggests that many believe we will stop using notes and coins altogether in the not-too-distant future

    I am certain that research is correct. Just as it was correct 40 years ago.

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  147. Re:RFID Ink, UPC symbols = 666 # of the Beast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This UPC issue is so "Thief in the Night (1972 film)".

    Pardon the epistemological redundancy, but sometimes clarification in no uncertain terms is necessary.

    As for the text in John's Apocaylpse, the gist is that something must be affixed to the flesh to continue transacting. I subscribe to the view that Christianity in its original form was a movement within late Second Temple Judaism. So, as one may wish to "build fences around the Torah" as prescribed by Hillel, the removal of cash from circulation as competition to this system triggers this particular fence.

    To quote a sage in this community who penned much of the Apostolic documents, namely Shaul of Tarsus, this is the MYSTERY OF INIQUITY at work.

  148. Re:Last century stuff by laa · · Score: 1

    Nice language, dude! The credit card companies, at least here, charged a fixed percentage regardless of the sum. That's why you logic is all wrong, the cost for the merchant is the same (relatively) for a 10 cent purchase as it is for a 100€ purchase. On the contrary, handling cash is way more expensive.

    I once tried to by a car with plastic, but was refused because the transaction fee would have been enormous.

    And no, I'm not a immigrant, and yes, I have loads of sisu.

    --
    Why does the kernel go through stable and then unstable forks? Can't it always be a stable build, like with Windows?
  149. Cashless Control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If all purchases are transacted via cards who must, for every purchase get approval, then the approval authorities can, quite easily, control what you can purchase and you would not have a damn thing to say about it. I hope this never comes to pass.

  150. Without a direct exchange there is no recourse. by nesdave · · Score: 1

    To accept a fully cash free society you have to acknowledge a totalitarian government as completely free of wrong doing or accept your slavery as law. There may be another way around this, short of barter, but I haven't considered it, yet. Without cash, reconstruction of credit or value in society can't be accomplished. Even Microsoft with their insistence we adapt to their new operating system has met with incredible resistance and it has taken two operating systems for them to come to terms, they realize who keeps them in business. The British discovered they weren't going to be able to keep the 'Colonies' as their cash cow when the people rebelled. If this is really something to be concerned about, I don't think we will be able to bring a viable solution to the table short of non-compliance.