Slashdot Mirror


Texas Town Turns To Treated Sewage For Drinking Water

Scientific American reports that Wichita Falls, Texas has taken an unusual step, precipitated by the years-long drought that Texas has faced: it's using treated sewage for drinking water. From the article: To launch what it calls its "Direct Potable Reuse Project," the city pipes water 12 miles from its wastewater treatment plant to this treatment facility where it goes through microfiltration. A pump pulls water through a module filled with fibers that removes most of the impurities. Then it is forced through a semi-permeable membrane that can remove dissolved salts and other contaminants. The process, called reverse osmosis, is used by the U.S. military, in ships and in the manufacture of silicon chips. The water then gets blended with lake water before going through the regular water treatment system. ... At 60 cents per 1,000 gallons, it's far cheaper than any other source of water, [Wichita Falls' public works director Russell] Schreiber said. ... He said there have been few complaints so far. A glass of the finished product, sampled at a downtown restaurant, tasted about average for West Texas.

242 comments

  1. Ewww... by countach74 · · Score: 0

    Instead of eat shit, drink shit?

    1. Re:Ewww... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Tex-Ass Water

    2. Re:Ewww... by itzly · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, they filter the shit out. The water doesn't remember shit.

    3. Re:Ewww... by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      It's a well-known survival trick actually, see?

    4. Re:Ewww... by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Funny

      I just know there's a homeopathy joke in there somewhere...

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    5. Re:Ewww... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      believers in homeopathy must love living there...

    6. Re:Ewww... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Don't know about memory but reverse osmosis water certainly does contain some of the pharmaceuticals you crapped out. To completely remove them is prohibitively expensive per gallon, and I'd be willing to wager they aren't doing that in Texas.

      On the bright side, it should save on the cost of your prescription meds if you just can drink them in your water....

      The US, and particularly Texas, is an amazingly dumb place. If Texas hadn't squandered all of it's water over the last hundred years to tycoon zillionaires it wouldn't be in as extreme of a pinch. And if federal policies didn't let corporations glut on, and then crap out, our natural resources without any regard for public good... Then maybe the fumes whouldn't have killed off so many brain-cells and people would be better armed to think straight.

      Privatize profit, socialize loss. Start investing in bottled water dummies, access to clean, healthy and good tasting water has been privatized. Destroying municipal suplies was step one, just ask Nestle.

    7. Re:Ewww... by itsenrique · · Score: 1

      That guy is such a sensationalist I can't even Bear (oops) to watch his show.

    8. Re:Ewww... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I just know there's a homeopathy joke in there somewhere...

      Yeah, a crappy one.

    9. Re:Ewww... by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 5, Funny

      A homeopath might tell you so, but there isn't really.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    10. Re:Ewww... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Don't know about memory but reverse osmosis water certainly does contain some of the pharmaceuticals you crapped out.

      You mean the stuff that is also found in rivers, lakes, and other sources of drinking water... but at leaves of parts per trillion or parts per quadrillion? It seems like every improvement to mass spec and chromatography work by chemists is shortly followed by "Look how much stuff is in our water!" news when they can measure even more insignificant traces of stuff.

    11. Re:Ewww... by Khyber · · Score: 5, Informative

      "Don't know about memory but reverse osmosis water certainly does contain some of the pharmaceuticals you crapped out."

      Uh, considering the membrane has pores small enough to remove a sodium ion, and pretty much every pharmaceutical made is much larger than a single sodium ion, good luck getting through the filter.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    12. Re:Ewww... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Instead of eat shit, drink shit?

      Well, it's Texas, after all.

      And it seems their prayers for rain aren't being rewarded.

    13. Re:Ewww... by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Ever taste a Loanstar? They're used to it.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    14. Re:Ewww... by mrbester · · Score: 2

      Except they mix it with lake water *after* filtering it, so you've got different shit in it now.

      --
      "Wait. Something's happening. It's opening up! My God, it's full of apricots!"
    15. Re:Ewww... by Psykechan · · Score: 2

      This process is called "toilet to tap" and is perfectly safe. I would guess that any first world location that doesn't have easy access to ground water will be completely doing this in the next twenty years; it's that damn useful.

      Probably the worst part about reverse osmosis is that it eliminates the water "taste" that people are used to because it gets rid of minerals as well. That's why they usually mix it with some other source like lake or ground water before it gets piped out to homes. Unfortunately the secondary source also adds in the usual pollutants as well as minerals.

      For people who get the "ew yuck" factor, there's always bottled water, but just don't tell them that it comes from the same source.

    16. Re:Ewww... by Smokeybehr · · Score: 1

      Even bottled water has "minerals added for flavor", something that's on every brand of "drinking water". The only bottled water you won't find with added minerals is "distilled water" or "deionized water" that is used for clothing steamers and car batteries (the old-school lead-acid type), or anywhere else you don't want the minerals.

    17. Re:Ewww... by Stoutlimb · · Score: 5, Insightful

      False. Water memory, a form of homeopathy, has been around since 1796, long pre-dating understanding of molecules. The idea of water memory comes from people who start with a conclusion, and grab random scientific jargon to supply "evidence". It's like science, but backwards and nonsensical. The specific "facts" people use to sell their fake cureall potions change over the years depending on what scientific buzzwords are popular at the time.

    18. Re:Ewww... by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      The idea of water memory comes from the fact that water molecules form long chains.

      Im pretty sure the water molecule is 3 atoms "long", and it doesnt form anything unless its chilled to 0C @ 1atm.

    19. Re:Ewww... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The idea of water memory comes from the fact that water molecules form long chains.

      Im pretty sure the water molecule is 3 atoms "long", and it doesnt form anything unless its chilled to 0C @ 1atm.

      Water is a very polar molecule, the electrons are not shared equally by the hydrogen atoms and the oxygen. This leads to tighter packing of water in the liquid form than in the solid. There are a lot of interesting traits of water due to the hydrogen bonding.

    20. Re:Ewww... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Simulation models suggest recycling is one of the most effective ways to increase available ground water in long term. Pharmaceuticals can be filtered with the help of bacteria mesh at a bottom of a reservoir used to do sand based filtering. Implementing that to everywhere might be problem, however.

    21. Re:Ewww... by aquabat · · Score: 1

      The first thing I thought of when he said "water memory" was this.

      --
      A republic cannot succeed till it contains a certain body of men imbued with the principles of justice and honour.
    22. Re: Ewww... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So... even if you are correct, how *strong* are the bonds in these chains, and what evidence is there that the body doesn't just break these like so much tissue during digestion? I was taught that water can form hydrogen bonds, which are *not* molecular bonds in the compound- sense, but rather weak ephemeral links.

      Honest question, not being snarky. Please elucidate.

    23. Re:Ewww... by DeSigna · · Score: 2

      My Australian education would recall that water structure is constantly changing, and that no "memory" lasts more than a few nanoseconds. No structure has been observed in any form for a longer period than this, or any kind of cyclical/regenerative states based on non-reacting impurities or solutes in the water.

      Of course, this is all in relation to room- or body-temperature water, which is quite energetic and liquid. Environmental effects are a bit different. Closer to freezing everything slows down and the molecules start to line up in preparation of forming ice crystals. Usually, I'd hope this doesn't happen in a purification plant in-pipe or a human body. Either scenario is unpleasant.

    24. Re:Ewww... by Electricity+Likes+Me · · Score: 2

      I like that you are omitting any comment on what the life span of water-water interactions in liquid form is. Because it's on the order femtoseconds or shorter.

      And it is transient to the existence of an actual solute or surface to create any statistically significant effects - i.e. anti-fouling coatings achieve part of there action by changing the water-packing order near the surface. But that doesn't persist once the surface is removed.

      Also frankly, your entire comment sounds like a bait and switch on homeopathy in the making. Surface scientists and molecular biologists care about the structure of water over nanometer scale distances but generally no larger. That you feel it's important in a discussion of bulk filtration is...odd.

    25. Re:Ewww... by ChinggisK · · Score: 2

      Uh maybe you should re-read his post; he's not disputing that water forms long chains, he's just saying the idea of water memory (which he clearly doesn't buy) was around before we knew about said long chains.

    26. Re:Ewww... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > No, they filter the shit out.
      What about the piss? they won't dare touch it, right? -- Edward B. Grylls

    27. Re:Ewww... by AutodidactLabrat · · Score: 0

      "Dummies" seems a little strong
      After all, isn't Texas a model for how America should be run?
      I mean, no regulations of any kind (that can't be bought or bought off)
      No worker safety laws (enforced)
      No discrimination laws (enforced)
      And no pesky College Grads not imported or created to fill a particular corporate servant slot.(or at least far fewer than the upper 45 states with higher K-12 to College grad rates).
      Money being made everywhere, so what if people choked to death on Fracking fumes or starve on "contractor" pay rates?

    28. Re:Ewww... by rtb61 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The only brain membrane that is of concern is the one that let's out greed driven bad ideas. The biggest risk with attempting to recycle storm water and sewerage as drinking water are right wing thinkers and cost saving or profit gaining short cuts. By far the majority of places when they attempt this do not do it as drinking water only as irrigation water, reason why, risk. The risk is enormous, you just have to keep in mind some extremely dangerous water borne diseases and just one system failure and now that whole town ends up with that disease, town goes bankrupt as a result of civil suit. I will be interested to see if they can get insurance coverage for this idea and how much it will cost. Personally based upon Texan ideal for taking money saving or profit gaining ring wing short cuts I'd be moving out rather than taking that chance.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    29. Re:Ewww... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RO membrane rejection is not 100%, a good one is over 98% Deionizing resin takes care of almost all of the rest but some things still get by

    30. Re:Ewww... by LordLimecat · · Score: 2

      Liquid water does not form permanent chains of that sort. If its doing that, its called ice, and has transitioned to a solid form.

      If you're convinced that I require education, you could perhaps link to an educational source mentioning something about this. When I google "water dipolar chain", however, I get nothing but articles on other substances forming chains, and nothing whatsoever on these chains.

      You're telling me to google; I did that before posting, and I've done it again, and found absolutely nothing of the sort. What terms should I be searching for?

    31. Re:Ewww... by dbIII · · Score: 1

      The idea of water memory comes from the fact that water molecules form long chains.

      I thought I'd have a go at your ignorance but then decided that it would just be stirring.
      Hey kid - want to buy some bitcoins? Got a bridge going really cheap too.

    32. Re:Ewww... by sjames · · Score: 1

      So you're saying Republicans drink poop water?

    33. Re:Ewww... by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

      What you need, son, is a homeopathic cure for your gullibility.

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    34. Re:Ewww... by Kevin+Fishburne · · Score: 1

      Until a few years ago I thought this is how things had been done forever. It was a story on ./ that clued me in to the fact that water from plumbing and storm drains was not being purified and pumped back into the water supply. I was shocked at how wasteful our current techniques are and surprised that some people have a problem with purifying waste water for drinking. As cynical as I am now at age 38, I suppose I should have known better. Water reclamation needs to be as closed a system as possible. With the quickly rising population and sea levels along with increasingly erratic weather, we need as much control over the water supply as we can get.

      --
      Buy your next Linux PC at eightvirtues.com
    35. Re: Ewww... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Insignificant, only to an ignoramus

    36. Re:Ewww... by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 2

      Here's the joke: Homeopathy.

      --
      -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
    37. Re: Ewww... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can't tell if serious or joking

    38. Re:Ewww... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you've ever actually looked at the numbers, and the research, it's not "eww."

      But (up 'til now), "eww" has always won.

      Most civil engineers have known for decades that filtration processes are good enough to make waste water cleaner than the cleanest natural spring.

      But... "eww."

      So, I think we may have finally found something that beats "eww"... $$$.

    39. Re:Ewww... by Khyber · · Score: 2

      I don't think you fully comprehend my point. I'm only saying RO will easily remove the pharmaceuticals. You might still get other elements present besides oxygen and hydrogen, but you're not getting any molecular structure much larger than a water molecule through those pores, which would incidentally include pretty much every pharmaceutical ever made.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    40. Re: Ewww... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There aren't any numbers even mentioned here, so I assume you think any level is significant? Talk about ignoramus....

    41. Re:Ewww... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure I'll buy your bitcoins, let's say at $1 per 1 BTC? I'm actually doing you a favor here, since you seem to imply that they're worthless.

    42. Re:Ewww... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no such thing as water memory. No controlled/verified experiment has ever been able to show the effect. If someone could, they'd probably win a Nobel Prize.
      The chains you talk about are extremely weak bonds and constantly break due to thermal agitation. If they didn't, you'd get ice.
      See also here.

    43. Re:Ewww... by evilviper · · Score: 1

      Probably the worst part about reverse osmosis is that it eliminates the water "taste" that people are used to because it gets rid of minerals as well.

      The loss of minerals is a heath issue. The "taste" is hardly the "worst part" of doing this. And let's not forget that demineraled (RO) water will dissolve metal pipes, coffee machines, pots and pans, etc.

      That's why they usually mix it with some other source like lake or ground water before it gets piped out to homes.

      So, again, you're getting only a fraction of the minerals you used-to get out of drinking water.

      RO should always involve carefully re-adding natural mineral content. Failing to do so is worse than not RO filtering the water in the first place.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    44. Re:Ewww... by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      I did not say it makes 'permanent' chains. I said it forms chains. In fact I don't know how long the chains last ... perhaps google for water molecule chain, no idea :)

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    45. Re:Ewww... by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      I googled for 'water memory' and I found nothing supporting his post/claim. But it had nothing to do with the discussion anyway :) I only made a half funny comment and now everyone is upset, rofl.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    46. Re:Ewww... by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      First of all: a femto second os so short, nothing chemical is happening in that time.
      Second, my comment was half a joke, I forgot the violent anti homeopathy spirit of the /. readers ... I will remember that next time.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    47. Re:Ewww... by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Haha, thats funny!

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    48. Re:Ewww... by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      No, I don't want to buy bitcoins, I have enough of them.
      Also you likely quoted me wrong, or? I mean, which part of my sentence is wrong? And did you not see the italics and the bold part? Obviously I was making a half joke. About the 'idea' not about the 'fact'.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    49. Re:Ewww... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if you aren't pumping well water, you are drinking someone else's sewage water. Rivers, lakes, oceans all have pee pees and poopies in them. Even well water is now contaminated with water that was sewage, just filtered by a hundred feet of soil and rock.

      RO water is pretty darn clean compared to any natural source. Places like India that pump sewage directly into irrigation ditches are taking a risk. RO is good enough and there shouldn't be too much trouble monitoring the water to detect broken RO membranes. The Texans say the water is then dirtied up by mixing it with lake water and then put the through usual chlorination treatment before going out.

      Vegas has been recycling sewage for years. Waste water makes it to lake mead(after being treated to near purity), and 100 ft away is the straw to bring the lake water back to the clean water treatment plant.

    50. Re:Ewww... by bkcallahan · · Score: 1

      Homeopathy *is* the joke in there...

    51. Re: Ewww... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great... Yet another "corporate America has stole from the people" post... So now it's water.

      Cry us a river, but do it in Texas .... If the water problem remains, it's on your small head

    52. Re: Ewww... by AutodidactLabrat · · Score: 1

      There is an easy way to tell if I'm serious or not
      Check to see which state has the highest on-the-job per capita reported injury rate.

    53. Re:Ewww... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only brain membrane that is of concern is the one that let's out greed driven bad ideas. The biggest risk with attempting to recycle storm water and sewerage as drinking water are right wing thinkers and cost saving or profit gaining short cuts. By far the majority of places when they attempt this do not do it as drinking water only as irrigation water, reason why, risk. The risk is enormous, you just have to keep in mind some extremely dangerous water borne diseases and just one system failure and now that whole town ends up with that disease, town goes bankrupt as a result of civil suit. I will be interested to see if they can get insurance coverage for this idea and how much it will cost. Personally based upon Texan ideal for taking money saving or profit gaining ring wing short cuts I'd be moving out rather than taking that chance.

      Which is why it ends up going through the water treatment plant *AFTER* reverse osmosis filtration, and ends up getting tested for a number of things, just like any other drinking water.... Not sure why you're having a difficult time keeping your mind trained on the facts to the conclusion....

    54. Re:Ewww... by Electricity+Likes+Me · · Score: 1

      Yeah I have no real conception of the different timespan units intuitively. Micrometers to nanometers I can grok, but I don't work with timescales often enough to have internalized it properly.

  2. because drinking water is so pristine by alen · · Score: 1, Insightful

    not like the wild animals and fish don't piss and shit into our water

    who drinks straight from a lake or river?

    1. Re:because drinking water is so pristine by mysidia · · Score: 4, Informative

      not like the wild animals and fish don't piss and shit into our water

      The concern is not piss and shit --- it's synthetic chemicals, such as rubbing alcohol, medications, petrol/motor oil, ethylene glycol; pesticides, fertilizer, and materials containing heavy metals or other toxins, that folks sometimes flush down the drain.

      Some of these chemicals may be non-particulant, solvate in water, and have similar physical properties that water has.

    2. Re:because drinking water is so pristine by maeka · · Score: 4, Insightful

      not like the wild animals and fish don't piss and shit into our water

      The wild animals don't tend to piss and shit birth control hormones and other still quite bioactive medications.

    3. Re:because drinking water is so pristine by fireduck · · Score: 4, Informative

      Assuming the process is something akin to the Groundwater Replenishment System in Orange County, CA, those shouldn't be a major problem. I'm too lazy to look up the treatment plant in this story, but I'd guess that the article leaves out a few steps in the treatment process, including some sort of advanced oxidation process. At the GWRS in CA, that would be a hydrogen peroxide / UV step that oxidizes the crap out of anything that might make its way through the RO process -- which isn't much, except for possibly neutrally charged, small molecules. Further, it if it's a well run wastewater collection system, there should be source control measures in place to minimize a lot of nasty stuff, like heavy metals and toxins, as that throws off advanced wastewater treatment processes as well.

    4. Re:because drinking water is so pristine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I drink from a lake, but not straight. This is Clear Lake in California. The bigger concern is chemicals used by pot growers getting into the water, and whatever some stupid bubba might decide to dump off his boat.

    5. Re:because drinking water is so pristine by gbjbaanb · · Score: 1

      pretty much everyone. Water that is treated is stored in reservoirs that are sent directly (with a little extra filtering and bleaching) to your tap.

      Mineral water out a bottle is even worse.

      but that said, this is the way its supposed to be. You don't want to live in a sterile bubble, you'd never be able to leave it if you did. A little bit of what you don't fancy does you good :-)

      but though a reservoir is a lake, its not the same as the ones filled with untreated water - they're full of bad stuff, mostly produced by farming and other over-populated human practices.

    6. Re:because drinking water is so pristine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hormones? That must be why they have to drain the reservoir every time a teenage boy pisses in it. Or maybe cooties.

    7. Re:because drinking water is so pristine by ColdWetDog · · Score: 3

      Or just plain ol activated charcoal. My sailboat has an RO system with a charcoal canister that I replace twice a year. Bigger systems have more complex pre filters. I'm sure that the system in TFA is at least cleaner than any river water or shallow well system. Possibly not as pure as a deep artesian system but if it passes EPA criteria, it's going to be pretty clean.

      Really Slashdot, RO systems are old hat. You can buy them on Ebay. Soon they'll be in breakfast cereal.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    8. Re:because drinking water is so pristine by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 2

      Soon they'll be in breakfast cereal.

      A cereal RO system to remove antibiotics and steroids from cow milk? Oh, my.

    9. Re:because drinking water is so pristine by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Your water comes from Clear Lake? Ewwwww.

      American river water here.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    10. Re:because drinking water is so pristine by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2

      The drugs are often exotic molecules we've cooked up for the purpose; but hormonal birth control exploits the same hormones that would naturally show up, since those are the ones that there are receptors for and that cause the desired changes. The quantity that a dense human population will put out is something quite different; but the chemistry won't be markedly different between humans and other placental mammals.

    11. Re:because drinking water is so pristine by RabidReindeer · · Score: 3, Informative

      not like the wild animals and fish don't piss and shit into our water

      The concern is not piss and shit --- it's synthetic chemicals, such as rubbing alcohol, medications, petrol/motor oil, ethylene glycol; pesticides, fertilizer, and materials containing heavy metals or other toxins, that folks sometimes flush down the drain.

      Some of these chemicals may be non-particulant, solvate in water, and have similar physical properties that water has.

      My local water company sends out an annual quality report and I'm pretty sure that the stats they report include information on levels of most of these. And we're getting ours mostly from a deep aquifer.

    12. Re:because drinking water is so pristine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Really?

      Allow me to introduce you to Premarin: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P...

      Originally isolated from the urine of pregnant mares. What's that about wild animals not pissing and shitting hormones and other bioactives?!

    13. Re:because drinking water is so pristine by eliphalet · · Score: 1

      The other thing they do in Orange County is that instead of using the water directly, they pump the water upstream and inject it into the ground so it replenishes the aquifer.

    14. Re:because drinking water is so pristine by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      The concern is not piss and shit --- it's synthetic chemicals, such as rubbing alcohol, medications, petrol/motor oil, ethylene glycol; pesticides, fertilizer, and materials containing heavy metals or other toxins, that folks sometimes flush down the drain.

      Medicines are a big part of that mix also. Especially estrogen and it's mimics. lot's of goodies in the water, some times from discarded pills, some teims from pissing. There is even some thought that this has been part of the issue of men "growing boobs" that's been going on for some years now. Between the Phytoestrogens we've been eating in larger and larger amounts, (soybeans, peas) and the Mimics in Bisphenol A plastics, and the estrogenated water we're drinking, men are growing their own set of hooters, and we might have trouble finding our willies soon.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    15. Re:because drinking water is so pristine by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      My local water company sends out an annual quality report and I'm pretty sure that the stats they report include information on levels of most of these. And we're getting ours mostly from a deep aquifer.

      What is the level of estrogen in your water?

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    16. Re:because drinking water is so pristine by Smokeybehr · · Score: 1

      Bear Grylls?

    17. Re:because drinking water is so pristine by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Giardia comes from animals, and is more dangerous than the things you "fear" that come in drinking water.

    18. Re:because drinking water is so pristine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Less than in a block of tofu.

    19. Re: because drinking water is so pristine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod up. Eating it in more than small quantities can approximate being on the pill.

    20. Re:because drinking water is so pristine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, that's mostly from drinking milk. Most people stop once they hit ten, but Republicans keep drinking it and keep getting gynecomastia then blame everyone but themselves for the problems they create. That's why they like to wear suits. It hides the side-effects of their milk drinking.

    21. Re:because drinking water is so pristine by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 2

      Popular Science just ran an article about Pharma in the drinking water, with a nice chart about how much water you would need to drink to get *one* pill worth of X drug. As it turns out, it takes years of drinking nothing but tap water to get a single dose of any of the detectable pharmaceuticals that make it through into tap water.

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
    22. Re:because drinking water is so pristine by mysidia · · Score: 1

      Giardia comes from animals, and is more dangerous than the things you "fear"

      Giardia is a microscopic particulant and 99% will be removed with a 1 micron filter. Combine with disinfection using Chloride dioxide, and you have a very effective treatment.

      It is much easier to safely eliminate the Giardia threat than medicines/chemical liquids such as alcohols which pass right through a filter.

    23. Re:because drinking water is so pristine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Expect for most hormones don't last long in the wild or even in the producers body. Which is good because it allows the body to manage hormone levels and make adjustments. Also, we don't have to worry much about hormones contaminating water, etc. But synthetic hormones tend to have longer life which causes problems for species that bio-accumulate them. Methoprene which is a hormone analog that tells insects to become adults, it is more useful then spraying the hormone the insect produce themselves because it probably would last more then a few hours.

    24. Re:because drinking water is so pristine by FireFury03 · · Score: 1

      not like the wild animals and fish don't piss and shit into our water

      who drinks straight from a lake or river?

      Lots of people out in the country. Go walking in the highlands of Scotland and you'll frequently see pipes taking drinking water directly from the rivers and directly feeding cottages a few metres down stream - either no filtering, or extremely minimal filtering. If I go out walking in a mountainous area I have no problems collecting drinking water from streams - and after a week of drinking nothing but stream water, a glass of mains water tastes like drinking from a chlorinated swimming pool!

    25. Re:because drinking water is so pristine by Neil+Boekend · · Score: 1

      How do you get that foul chloride dioxide back out of your water?

      --
      Well, I might have a way, but it only works on a semi spherical planet in a vacuum.
    26. Re:because drinking water is so pristine by Neil+Boekend · · Score: 1

      The one bottled water that I checked because it tasted like bleach (Bar Le Duc) turned out to have about 1000 times as much chlorine in it as reported in our local tap water. Added on purpose to increase shelf life.
      Bottled water always tastes chemical to me, but that stuff is probably usable as a light bleach.
      I can't imagine why any Dutch would drink bottled water, as our water supply is far cleaner than the bottled stuff. I only buy Spa because their bottles are so damn convenient. And I get some free water with that bottle!

      --
      Well, I might have a way, but it only works on a semi spherical planet in a vacuum.
    27. Re:because drinking water is so pristine by Neil+Boekend · · Score: 1

      who drinks straight from a lake or river?

      In some countries running water in a stream is clean enough to drink. For example: Sweden, Norway and Austria (if you drink up stream. The small mountain streams are clean).
      It all depends on whether the natives care about the environment. In these countries rules and regulations prevent a lot of problems.

      --
      Well, I might have a way, but it only works on a semi spherical planet in a vacuum.
    28. Re:because drinking water is so pristine by mysidia · · Score: 1

      How do you get that foul chloride dioxide back out of your water?

      You leave it in there all the way to the end user, so that the treated water can help disinfect the entire system.

      If the user so desires, they can remove it through simple aeration. What the end user won't be able to easily remove (without filtering) is the actual chlorine you need to treat the water with or the fluoride that you add.

    29. Re:because drinking water is so pristine by gbjbaanb · · Score: 1

      same in the UK, the regulations on what comes out of the tap are much stricter than what gets sold in bottles.

      But.. maybe we should go back to basics and drink water the way our ancestors did to keep healthy - by brewing it with hops :-)

    30. Re:because drinking water is so pristine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you may not be concerned, but virus (human) are also a large concern to me with a setup like this

    31. Re:because drinking water is so pristine by maeka · · Score: 1

      Show me a city where the (wild and domestic) animal biomass approaches double-digit percentages of the human biomass.

  3. There's an "ick factor" but... by Bugler412 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This really isn't much different than what nature would have ultimately done with the water right? Just accelerated mechanically. Not much different than what we would have to do for long duration space travel or colonization either.

    1. Re:There's an "ick factor" but... by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      There is some towns in california already doing this since the 90s.

      Maybe not exactly this way but they are treating their sewage for potable water

    2. Re:There's an "ick factor" but... by rmdingler · · Score: 1
      There are cities all along the mighty Mississippi who get the wastewater from cities upstream and turn it into potable water.

      As long as the coliform bacteria levels are beneath measurement, you're good to go.

      People sometimes forget how much chlorination has done to positively affect our longevity.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    3. Re:There's an "ick factor" but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are plenty of organic things in rivers that break down anything that is harmful to humans that came naturally from a human. When you shorten that cycle, you are asking for problems. There are also plenty of places claiming to be drinking sewer water but most of them aren't doing anything like that or are using a river, lake or aquifer for natural filtering in addition to the reverse osmosis membranes. Keep in mind that less than one liter of many store bought chemicals dumped upstream can poke trillions of larger holes in a RO membrane cartridge which might be the major problem with ocean liners systems.

    4. Re:There's an "ick factor" but... by Aqualung812 · · Score: 1

      Exactly. My town pulls drinking water from a river, then sends the sewage out a mile downstream.
      The next town 10 miles to the south gets all of our sewage (somewhat treated), and does some treatment itself, then repeats the process.

      My guess is that the "closed loop" system from TFA is actually cleaner than what I'm drinking, simply because they know they are dealing with something completely polluted to begin with and have to win the public on it.

      --
      Grammer Nazis - I mod you "troll" unless you actually add something on-topic. Yes, I know I have mispellings in my sig.
    5. Re:There's an "ick factor" but... by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 1

      And to anyone who is all pissy about the chlorine taste of their tap water, follow these simple instructions:
      Obtain 2 Glass or stainess steel water pitcher. One with a Lid, and one without. (I use a glass pitcher and a gallon glass Jug in place of a pitcher with lid)
      Obtain 1 cheesecloth.
      Optional: obtain 1 Brita water filtration pitcher and filter.
      Sort your 2 pitchers into Pitcher A, the open top pitcher, and Pitcher B, the one with a lid.
      Fill Pitcher A from the tap, place the cheesecloth over the top to block any invading insects or floating dust, and place on your counter, out of direct sunlight.
      Wait. Overnight is long enough.
      Pour the contents of Pitcher A into Pitcher B, and place Pitcher B in the refrigerator, refill Pitcher A from the tap, replace the cheesecloth, and set on the counter again.
      Once the water in Pitcher B is cold, you are free to drink it, or use the optional Brita pitcher to add one level of filtration to it. The Brita is up to you, depending on how the final flavor of the water is after Pitcher B.
      (it can take out a few more off flavors, but does make the water taste a little like potting soil if you let it warm up after filtering it with the Brita)

      So what happens here is, Chlorine will evaporate out of water at room temperature pretty quickly, and because it has already done its job of killing whatever was in your water, it is free to go. The chlorine taste leaves faster with wider mouthed containers (more surface area exposed to air I suppose.) Couple that with the fact that the colder the substance, the less you can taste it, (which is why things like ice cream and popsicles require so much sugar) and this system works really well for making chlorinated water more palatable. If you drink a particularly large quantity of water, You may need a couple pitchers to let air, and stagger their filling so you always have one that has sat about 8 hours, but for 1 or 2 people, a gallon pitcher works well.

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
  4. How is this new? by Arancaytar · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Since you need to treat sewage before putting it in the ground, and ground water before putting it in the water supply, what is new about connecting those two points? Do people think the sewage magically stops being sewage once it leaves the system?

    1. Re:How is this new? by Irate+Engineer · · Score: 4, Funny

      Do people think the sewage magically stops being sewage once it leaves the system?

      Yes. Don't disturb the illusion!

      --

      Left MS Windows for Linux Mint and never looked back!

      Vote for Bernie in 2016!

    2. Re:How is this new? by itzly · · Score: 2

      If you connect those two points, you're leaving out the part where the ground water gets filtered by the soil.

    3. Re:How is this new? by zAPPzAPP · · Score: 1

      Usually towns located at a river will pipe their (hopefully treated) sewage into that river.
      Towns downstream will often get at least part of their drinking water from groundwater taken near the river (the river guarantees a steady groundwater level), treat it again, then use it.

      This adds some cubics of soil as additional filter, but is basicly the same thing.

      Really, unless the town is lucky to get first access to some mountain's stream, the drinking water will always be at least part 'treated sewage'.

    4. Re:How is this new? by Arancaytar · · Score: 2

      This reminds me of Asimov's short story "Strikebreaker", where a person becomes untouchable by pressing the button for a remote-controlled waste treatment plant.

    5. Re:How is this new? by gbjbaanb · · Score: 1

      the mountain's stream is technically said sewage evaporated and rained on top of the mountain (or "sewage treated by nature"). Water molecules don't magic out of thin air.

    6. Re:How is this new? by zAPPzAPP · · Score: 1

      I was assuming that we would at least stop at destilled water.
      Applying the "sewage' attribute to pure water molecules would be superstitio, unless you assumed the sewage was somehow radioactive.

    7. Re:How is this new? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Wildlife also pees and craps. Surface water is always 'contaminated'. UV helps sterilize it but the world is filthy.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    8. Re:How is this new? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you connect those two points, you're leaving out the part where the ground water gets filtered by the soil.

      If you think soil is better than reverse osmosis, I have a water filter to sell you.

    9. Re:How is this new? by mpe · · Score: 1

      Applying the "sewage' attribute to pure water molecules would be superstitio

      Or "homeopathy".

      unless you assumed the sewage was somehow radioactive.

      Unless it's been kept isolated for a few hundred years it probably will be slightly radioactive :)

    10. Re:How is this new? by Electricity+Likes+Me · · Score: 1

      Technically RO filtration would remove radioactive contamination from water. If you can filter sodium out, you can filter all the bigger atoms which can be radioactive in it.

    11. Re:How is this new? by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      False dichotomy.

    12. Re:How is this new? by GNious · · Score: 1

      If you connect those two points, you're leaving out the part where the ground water gets filtered by the soil.

      Every water-treatment plant I've ever seen (only a few, admittedly, and only in Scandinavia) employs Biological Cleaning/Filtration, which mimics the processes done in the soil.

    13. Re:How is this new? by Arancaytar · · Score: 1

      unless you assumed the sewage was somehow radioactive

      I was going to say that even that should be removed by distillation, and the water molecules shouldn't become radioactive, but now I'm not sure. Deuterium can capture neutrons to form radioactive tritium, but Wikipedia doesn't say if regular hydrogen can do the same to form deuterium.

    14. Re:How is this new? by Arancaytar · · Score: 1

      (Addendum: Even if this is possible, if there is a source of radiation strong enough for that anywhere near inhabited areas, you probably have bigger issues than a little tritium in the water.)

    15. Re:How is this new? by dywolf · · Score: 1

      sewage isnt put into the ground.
      it's discharged into creeks, streams, and rivers. but its not raw sewage.

      you know how the water is usually treated* before going to your tap?
      well, sewage is treated again before being released back into the river.
      it's filtered, flocced, settled, skimmed, and chlorinated, such that it's nearly identical to the body of water it came from and is going back into.

      *usually, especially if you're downstream from another town/city; though some mountain cities and the like that get it straight fromt eh mountain don't treat theirs

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
    16. Re:How is this new? by dywolf · · Score: 1

      i think you're confusing ground water with surface water. and even then you're not understanding the mechanics at play.

      ground water comes from wells. its not filtered by soil, it's filtered by rock, because that's what it's "flowing" through, and is essentially several millenia old because that's how long it takes to "flow".

      surface water is where most people water comes from. it's also not filtered by soil, because it's not going through the soil. its creeks and streams and rivers.

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
  5. I can see it now ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tastes great, less filling!

    1. Re:I can see it now ... by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 1

      Water! the bud lite of the soda world!

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
  6. Bad news for you by sphealey · · Score: 1

    Some bad news: unless you live in Bemidji MN (or one of the towns on the watershed divides of the Rockies or Appalachians), you are already drinking treated sewage.

    sPh

    1. Re:Bad news for you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Come off it people, every piece of dirt you walk in, plant it, get dirty/dusty It all came out of somethings butthole at some point in time.

      Thats it, Time turns it from poop to fertilizer to soil.

    2. Re:Bad news for you by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Dust is the nasty one. It's 50%+ UV sterilized/powdered and blown away animal crap.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    3. Re:Bad news for you by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 1

      Nah, Where I live, the city's water is supplied entirely by a well field, (no running surface water) which is well above, and many miles from, the outlet for the cities waste treatment plant, so there is little chance of it being treated sewage.

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
  7. Re:"Tastes about average for West Texas" by Nidi62 · · Score: 0

    Probably still tastes better than Florida's water.

    --
    The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
  8. Not new, and not shocking. by astro · · Score: 2

    If anything it's shocking the process isn't used more. I know in my hometown of Fairbanks, Alaska, reverse-osmosis waste water filtering was used at least as early as the 1980s, perhaps even the 70s. I'm trying to find a reference for proof, but haven't come up with one in a couple of minutes of Googling.

    The Wikipedia article on RO, by the way, is in pretty shabby shape if anyone gets a rise out of improving such things.

    1. Re:Not new, and not shocking. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not really a shame, since reverse osmosis is rather energy intensive. It's possible that the alternatives are even more so, but it shouldn't be used if enough clean water is available and less stringently treated wastewater can seafely be disposed of otherwise.

    2. Re:Not new, and not shocking. by rasmusbr · · Score: 1

      Singapore experimented with it in the 1970's, but the news is that it is now possible to do it at competitive price point. This means that cities like Phoenix and Los Angeles will not have to be abandoned when their natural water supplies run out.

      I imagine that if the technology can be miniaturized and made to work in lower than Earth gravity it could also be hugely important for human space flight and colonization of other bodies in the solar system.

    3. Re:Not new, and not shocking. by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2

      The newer membranes need quite a lot less pressure than early versions (which is where the energy requirement was). That and membrane longevity has improved considerably. As is typical with high tech stuff, the costs come down and the quality improves over time.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    4. Re:Not new, and not shocking. by gbjbaanb · · Score: 1

      as the summary says, 60c per 1000 gallons its more cost-effective to treat it this way than traditional ways. I guess that either means energy is very cheap there (solar perhaps?) or their traditional systems are very energy intensive too.

    5. Re:Not new, and not shocking. by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      There might be an RO system somewhere that uses gravity and an input reservoir at higher altitude than the output to supply some or all of the pressure; but I don't think that that is anything like the typical configuration. Cleaning up after a leak in zero gravity isn't going to be lots of fun; but everything else should work largely as planned.

    6. Re:Not new, and not shocking. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I tried to imagine an RO well in the ocean, i.e. a big vertical pipe you could draw fresh water out of and have it refill from the bottom via deep sea pressure against an RO membrane. The depth of the fresh water below the ocean surface would be due to the required pressure difference. Something an advanced civilization could build and leave behind, that anybody could go out to on an outrigger canoe and fetch water, i.e. turn a crank and raise/lower a pail of water like the old days, or even make it a big inverted conical staircase like old wells in India, so people can walk down to platforms and perform maintenance on pumps etc.

      But, when you actually read about all the stages of active pre-processing and post-processing needed for a real RO plant, it seems more than implausible... you need good circulation to flush away the brine collecting on the input side of the membrane. You need to reionize and remineralize the water on the output side of the membrane or it is highly corrosive. You need to monitor the quality and adjust these things constantly. You need to backflush the membrane periodically. And this isn't even considering how to control mold or algae growth in this deep freshwater grotto.

    7. Re:Not new, and not shocking. by thogard · · Score: 1

      You need about 700 meters of depth with the current off the shelf parts to make a RO well in the ocean. I think there is some technology that might let it work at 250 or so meters. You still have to pump the water up from that depth unless you can play games with building a saline density pump. Then there is the problem of changing a filter at depth.

    8. Re:Not new, and not shocking. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ha, 700 meters of climb sounds like a pretty good hike... backpackers can do that in a day while carrying a pretty large weight and consuming perhaps 2-4 liters depending on the person. I'm amazed if it is even that close to feasible, ignoring all the technical problems like filter maintenance, pre-filtering, and avoiding clogs from marine life. A human power could lift water out of the well in larger quantity than what they would have to consume to perform the work!

    9. Re:Not new, and not shocking. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Singapore is using treated sewage as part of the drinking water for the past few years now.

      It's called "New Water" here.

  9. Nothing new by thexile · · Score: 0

    An extremely small country in Asia has been doing it for quite some already. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/N....

  10. Re:"Tastes about average for West Texas" by itsenrique · · Score: 2

    You may be surprised sir. Florida native here, Tampa / St. Pete born and raised. I had the good fortune to be able to do the beginning section of the PCT (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pacific_crest_trail). I tasted the water in San Diego, Escondido, Ramona, and many MUCH MUCH more rural spots. The water is awful and sometimes tastes like odd chemicals or minerals when it's from wells fairly consistently. Municipal water is better but not better than FL water. It's generally well known by the locals that the water out west in rural areas in terrible. Florida well water is not the best, but its great by comparison to some of the nasty water I was drinking on the trail in the desert. "Hey, its keeping me alive", I'd think as a strange tingle and off taste lingered on my palate after drinking from a concrete bowl designed for horse consumption only. Water is quite scarce in the border region I was in. I've had NYC tap through clean pipes and it was the best I've had so far. Florida's aquifers will still be kicking when it starts to *really* dry up out west too.

  11. Re:Let it dry up. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The Falls" is still running.... they still water all the fucking little shrubs along the side of the road the motorcycle cops hide between....I hate it here....

  12. It's not like ... by BlindRobin · · Score: 0

    We didn't see this coming. The future is here and it's not 'The Jetsons'.

  13. Moby Dick ain't got no Porta Potty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Because all the fish, crustaceans, sea mammals and every damn thing else in the oceans, rivers, lakes, and reservoirs of the world climb out to take a leak or a dump.

    Start thinking. You've been drinking recycled shit and piss since the day you were born.

    1. Re:Moby Dick ain't got no Porta Potty by rtb61 · · Score: 3, Informative

      There is a difference between human pathogens and other pathogens, we don't get dolphin flu and they don't get hepatitis. Taking one quick look at Wichita Falls and it seems those idiots should take the simple step of banning lawns but I suppose freedom to waste water on something your will burn fuel cutting comes first. Also make the installation of rainwater tanks http://tankworld.com.au/produc... compulsory at all locations. Make dirty vehicles a matter of civic pride.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    2. Re:Moby Dick ain't got no Porta Potty by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      As Falls Wichita, So Falls Wichita Falls

    3. Re:Moby Dick ain't got no Porta Potty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suspect, that much like in my part of Texas, many people would love to do without the watering and mowing. Unfortunately, the city requires all new construction fall under an HOA, and the HOA nazis require lawns be "watered, mowed, trimmed, edged, weeded". If, due to for example, pesky water restrictions and an unwillingness to break the law, your lawn dies, they will be happy to force to you resod your entire lot with grass that will once again die a few weeks or months later. Consequently, most people break the law and pay the fine, rather than piss off the HOA and end up with asshats trying to foreclose on their house for poor landscaping.

    4. Re:Moby Dick ain't got no Porta Potty by sjames · · Score: 1

      Yes, but it's filtered by natural processes rather than by the lowest bidder.

    5. Re:Moby Dick ain't got no Porta Potty by sillybilly · · Score: 2

      I feel your pain dawg. I got an empty lot that's too small to be buildable by today's standards, but it used to have a house on it that had grandfathered right to be as far as lot size was concerned, but not by other code violations, such as the neighborhood peeling off the boarded up stuff from the windows, and filling the house with used rubber tires and constantly breaking in the front door and leaving it swung wide open, so inspectors entered and found even more stuff, such as chimney needs tuck pointing. So it was demolished over code violations, and I was charged for the demolition cost, and even when I mowed the lawn when it was still standing, they still came out the very next day and re-mowed it, plus they removed some flowering bushes from the edge of the property, and charged me for all this. So now all I got is an empty lot, with like $100/year property tax and about $1500/year lawn mowing. And the land bank will not accept lot donations unless the lot has a house standing on it, and all back taxes are paid. I wasn't paying lawn mowing taxes for a while, and they put my property into foreclosure, about to mess up my credit with it, and just in time I started making payments to avoid getting my credit fucked up over this lawn mowing blackmailing..If it does enter into foreclosure, the land bank gets it, but they first mess your credit up with it, they won't let you just donate it.

      My first priority in life is to find a place to live where lawn mowing is not mandatory by city ordinances, preferably where there is no city to even have fucking ordinances. Also no sewer system, because the blackmailing that the water and sewer department does is also bullshit. Also no local income tax, work city, residence city. There are such places in the USA.

      I am halfass vegetarian and I have ideological problems with mowing lawns, such as increased US dependence on foreign oil, and hurting bugs by not allowing flowering plants to live. Everybody is deep in debt, yet they find the fucking money to mow lawns. Lawn mowing is a big fucking waste of time, waste of gasoline, and waste of bugs. Every flower in the world means a bug with a sucker on her face, be it a butterfly or a bumblebee, etc.. And the rule is not uniformly enforced, because there are patches around the city as I drive around, such as along the highways inside the city, where the grass stands knee high, and there are flowers, so unless they beat every square inch of land in this state down to the required lawnmowing height of what is it, 2 inches? So unless they enforce it uniformly everywhere, they are discriminating against me, they are picking on me. And good luck with beating it down everywhere, as some of the grass that's knee high or bushes are on steep ground with an over 60 degree incline, and it'd be kinda hard to get a lawnmower up there. But not impossible. So unless they enforce the rules uniformly on every square inch of land within state borders, or county borders, or city borders, they don't have any business not letting my lot have knee high grass with flowers and bees and butterflies on it.

      In my mind tall grass, with a variety of natural flora and fauna is fucking gorgeously beautiful. Every time I see a completely green mowed lawn, all I see is desert, a flower desert that certain bugs that have been around from before the time or dinosaurs, cannot live without. What you call weed, or jungle growth, it is magical beauty to me, and what you call a pretty mowed lawn, that is absolute ugliness of horror in my mind. And horror especially when it comes to my wallet. But we live in a democracy, with majority vote, and if there are 999 idiots voting against 1 of you and you think you're right, it's still the 999 idiots that win, and you gotta pay up to fit in with the community. But I'm not gonna cut grass on that lot, especially since it's tainted, they demolished my house on it against my will. Eminent domain and all that. In my own and everyone's best interest, it's best to have the lot empty, and force me to keep paying

    6. Re:Moby Dick ain't got no Porta Potty by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Buy one of those finished mini-houses they sell (for about the cost of a new car, check the internet), anchor it down on your mini-lot, and live in the sucker, and mow the grass yourself, with a reel mower, which uses manpower, not gasoline. That gets you out of 2 out of 4 of your problems, leaving you with the sewer blackmail and the hatred of mown grass, but at least you won't be paying a grass tax, and expensive rent, which will help your state of mind.

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
    7. Re:Moby Dick ain't got no Porta Potty by sillybilly · · Score: 1

      For the cost of a new car you can get a few acres of woodland not too far from here, and that solves the grass mowing problem, plus the "public nuisance" code violation thing, because whatever contraption you got, if the public can't see it because it's covered by trees, they shouldn't be vexed by it. A tent is pretty cheap, but they won't let you build a house from self made sun-dried mud bricks with straws (btw I've seen a house ice cold (free air conditioned like a basement) in summer heat made of 5 foot thick earth walls, walls that have been standing for 400 years), because of building codes probably requiring some stupid compression testing of bricks, plus some professional engineer sign-off. So you cannot use the woodland lot as an official residence, and you have to be officially homeless, but you can camp on your lot. The law should allow that, but if you keep camping on it year round, you may get a visit by an ambulance from the local mental health institution bringing you a straitjacket, and take you away for a few month of therapy, in hopes of rehabilitating you, and reforming your distorted way of seeing reality. Camping out in a nonresidence tent on your lot in the middle of winter to save a few bucks? There is a pill for that too!

    8. Re:Moby Dick ain't got no Porta Potty by evilviper · · Score: 1

      Camping out in a nonresidence tent on your lot in the middle of winter to save a few bucks? There is a pill for that too!

      There are 4-season tents that are well-insulated and stay nice and warm through mild winters just from body-heat. Active heating can make the colder winters comfortable, too. Heck, a -30F degree sleeping bag isn't that expensive, so you can stay pretty damn warm without any heater.

      And is there some regulation forcing only tents on your lot? Most people also consider living in a travel-trailer to be "camping". They are cheap, can be quite comfortable, even in winter, even without direct utility hook-ups. Rain collection, grey water, small septic system, and solar power, can make your trailer camping semi-permanent with only minimal hassle.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    9. Re:Moby Dick ain't got no Porta Potty by sillybilly · · Score: 1

      Or you can get a 14x70 used mobile home (which was the minimum size my land contract specified, before I was forcibly made sick, by getting xrayed, gassed and infected, so I couldn't make payments) that's not completely rotten for like 2000 bux, from someone who has moved out of a mobile home park and doesn't like to keep getting ass raped on the lot rent, so he has to get rid of it somehow, before he can stop paying for lot rent, and nobody wants it, so the price is ultra cheap. Heck, buy 3 of them, at 980 sq ft each, that's 2700 sq ft of living space. At $2000 replacement cost, and $50 property tax each per annum, as the termites and carpenter ants keep chewing them up for you, and the wood eating fungi digest it, it's cheaper to keep buying a new one out of the three you got every 3 years, so in 9 years you'd replace all 3, than invest any effort into any kind of upkeep, other than throw a tarp over it if the roof leaks (and you can only do tarps if the neighbors are not nauseated by it because the trees cover the view). And why is all tarp blue? Can't they make them camouflage color for St. Pete's sake? Also I've seen some shiny travel trailers made out of stainless or nickel plate that's not peeled, but those are small, expensive, and they are meant for more like a desert area to reflect the heat of the Sun.

    10. Re:Moby Dick ain't got no Porta Potty by sillybilly · · Score: 1

      Who wants to live in a mini-house? Every time you want to turn around to put on your pajama coat, you have to back out the front door, extend your arm, put on pj, then move back inside. That'd be kinda like them NY apartments made for singles, and not for roomates, as roommating is pretty much mandatory in NY, that "only" cost 900/mo, at like 117.35 square feet, where your mini couch doubles as your bed, and the biggest area is taken up by the shower stall and toilet. It's like your own prison cell in the outside world, and you get all the stress out of it, so you'd be better off doing something stupid, like smashing shopwindows in with bricks, and beg the judge to send you to jail - free food (even if crappy), free housing, and a lot less stress than trying to come up with the $900 rent each month for your mouse hole, in this unemployment competition economy.

    11. Re:Moby Dick ain't got no Porta Potty by evilviper · · Score: 1

      And why is all tarp blue? Can't they make them camouflage color for St. Pete's sake?

      Silver is also popular, and there are camo tarps:

      http://www.harborfreight.com/2...

      http://www.harborfreight.com/1...

      Also I've seen some shiny travel trailers made out of stainless or nickel plate that's not peeled, but those are small, expensive, and they are meant for more like a desert area to reflect the heat of the Sun.

      Reflective coatings work both ways... They also keep heat inside from being radiated out.

      I'm currently looking to sell just such a trailer, in good shape. 1950s, 8x36' in Southern California.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    12. Re:Moby Dick ain't got no Porta Potty by sillybilly · · Score: 1

      By the way no -40 F rated sleeping bag from Walmart is gonna keep you comfortable even at +30 F, that rating is all just bullshit. However, if you can get XXL size ones, and you can fit two -40F rated ones inside each other, that will keep you very comfortable and sleeping like a baby even at +20F. Just remember to cover your head, and have like a foot of narrow air passage, that functions like a Stirling engine copper gauze heat recuperator, just by the walls of the narrow air passage, and the CO2 you exhale goes out more by diffusion than flow, and oxygen the opposite direction, exchanging heat and temperature on their pass by each other and the walls. This way you don't inhale chilling air that, regardless how well insulated and even sweating you are, will still make you sick and frost bite your nostrils and air passages. That's how eskimos chill, naked with their soft women under fur blankets, with their heads covered, and breathing through a small opening. Also, use 3 of these -40F rated sleeping bags stacked inside each other, and you'll be sweating your balls off even in -40F weather.

    13. Re:Moby Dick ain't got no Porta Potty by Megol · · Score: 1

      Who wants to live in a mini-house? Every time you want to turn around to put on your pajama coat, you have to back out the front door, extend your arm, put on pj, then move back inside. That'd be kinda like them NY apartments made for singles, and not for roomates, as roommating is pretty much mandatory in NY, that "only" cost 900/mo, at like 117.35 square feet, where your mini couch doubles as your bed, and the biggest area is taken up by the shower stall and toilet. It's like your own prison cell in the outside world, and you get all the stress out of it, so you'd be better off doing something stupid, like smashing shopwindows in with bricks, and beg the judge to send you to jail - free food (even if crappy), free housing, and a lot less stress than trying to come up with the $900 rent each month for your mouse hole, in this unemployment competition economy.

      Don't know if you are delirious or trying to joke but even in the civilized world being in jail is considerably worse in stress levels.
      NB I don't consider US civilized at any level of the prison system.

    14. Re:Moby Dick ain't got no Porta Potty by ToddInSF · · Score: 1

      W.C. Fields once said he never drinks water.

      When someone inquired as to why, he replied "Because fish fuck in it"...

    15. Re:Moby Dick ain't got no Porta Potty by evilviper · · Score: 1

      no -40 F rated sleeping bag from Walmart is gonna keep you comfortable even at +30 F, that rating is all just bullshit.

      No problem there, I avoid Walmart for a great many reasons.

      heads covered, and breathing through a small opening

      Instead of a "narrow passage" I've found that throwing a light and thin breathable sheet over your face does a superb job of holding a small amount of heat and warming incoming air, without restricting breathing like anything any heavier. (a T-shirt works, in a pinch)

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  14. Attila the Hun's piss by mtrachtenberg · · Score: 0

    Every glass of water anyone drinks contains at least one molecule once pee'd out by Attila the Hun.

    It's a scientific fact,unless it's not. But it sure helps to think this is true if you're drinking treated waste.

    1. Re:Attila the Hun's piss by PeterM+from+Berkeley · · Score: 1

      Not necessarily any complete molecules. Water gets broken up and reassembled, by photosynthesis and other chemical processes (water breaks up spontaneously and rejoins, too.) But probably some of the atoms, yes.

      --PM

    2. Re:Attila the Hun's piss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's the essence of Attlia's piss.

  15. As falls Wichita ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So falls Wichita Falls !

  16. Things you did not really want to know about by sdack · · Score: 1

    It's the kind of water all nerds been waiting to drink: it's scientific, it's high-tech, it's innovative, and it will cure 90% of all nerds of their curiosity and openness to all modern things in life.

  17. Seems fitting, being Texas is NASA's home by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If treated waste water is good enough for astronauts, then why not eveyone?

    1. Re:Seems fitting, being Texas is NASA's home by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

      Let me just say that, if you offer a trip to space as the companion event to drinking this water, I will drink and I will go. :)

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
  18. Re:"Tastes about average for West Texas" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You may be surprised sir. Florida native here, Tampa / St. Pete born and raised. I had the good fortune to be able to do the beginning section of the PCT (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pacific_crest_trail). I tasted the water in San Diego, Escondido, Ramona, and many MUCH MUCH more rural spots. The water is awful and sometimes tastes like odd chemicals or minerals when it's from wells fairly consistently. Municipal water is better but not better than FL water. It's generally well known by the locals that the water out west in rural areas in terrible. Florida well water is not the best, but its great by comparison to some of the nasty water I was drinking on the trail in the desert. "Hey, its keeping me alive", I'd think as a strange tingle and off taste lingered on my palate after drinking from a concrete bowl designed for horse consumption only. Water is quite scarce in the border region I was in. I've had NYC tap through clean pipes and it was the best I've had so far. Florida's aquifers will still be kicking when it starts to *really* dry up out west too.

    Yep, a lot of Florida well water is full of sulfur, iron, and golf course/orange grove fertilizer.

    But Tampa gets water from the Hillsborough River, where upstream at Zephyrhills there's a Perrier plant bottling it.

  19. About average for West Texas? by MAXOMENOS · · Score: 4, Funny

    A glass of the finished product, sampled at a downtown restaurant, tasted about average for West Texas.

    So the water tastes like shit. Good to know.

    1. Re:About average for West Texas? by McLae · · Score: 1

      I and my family lived in West Texas. My Chemistry prof brought a sample of water from his home to have the class analyze the contents. Shit is an improvement. The bottled water distributor may loose customers though. McLae

    2. Re:About average for West Texas? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So the water tastes like shit.

      still an improvement over typical north texas (which is where wichita falls is, tfa geography fail) tap water

  20. Used on Ships? by nukenerd · · Score: 0

    FTFA :- "The process, called reverse osmosis, is used by the U.S. military, in ships and in the manufacture of silicon chips.

    I was an engineer on a [war]ship and we made fresh water from sea water, seeing that there was plenty of it around. Darned sight easier than making it from shit and piss I should imagine, but admit we never tried it. Of course, recycling being in fashion, maybe someone is doing some posturing here.

    1. Re:Used on Ships? by fnj · · Score: 1

      In that particular case, it helps that desalinating the required amount of water doesn't do any more than slightly jiggle the noise in the graph of your propulsion energy. That is not, in general, true.

  21. Re:Let it dry up. by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    Jesus titie fucking christ, move. Life is short. Don't spend anymore of it, then you have to, living in a shithole. I'm sure there are people who like the place, let them have it.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  22. Re:Let it dry up. by Irate+Engineer · · Score: 1

    Moving can be difficult if you are in the service and have the misfortune to get stationed at Sheppard AFB (Wichita Fall's biggest employer, IIRC). Trust me, there are a lot of airmen there just dying to GTFO of Wichita Falls.

    --

    Left MS Windows for Linux Mint and never looked back!

    Vote for Bernie in 2016!

  23. mental note by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When traveling in the vicinity of wichita falls, tx -- probably never -- remember to bring copious amounts of bottled water.

  24. Lots of places don't have potable water by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    I think the worry with these systems is that as the economy gets worse there's a temptation to stop running them correctly to save money. In the1800s kids drank booze because it was a good way to get safe water...

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:Lots of places don't have potable water by GNious · · Score: 1

      I think the worry with these systems is that as the economy gets worse there's a temptation to stop running them correctly to save money. In the1800s kids drank booze because it was a good way to get safe water...

      Up until "recently" (think 1940-1950), beer was the best option for a safe supply of water, and most people would drink a few pints daily.
      Naturally, this was with a lot less alcohol than most beer today.

    2. Re:Lots of places don't have potable water by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it was called small beer.
      it had at best trace amounts of alcohol. just enough to sterilize the water.

      same with a drink called grog, which was water with lime or lemon juice to break the stale taste, with rum to sterilize it. If you wanted to be fancy, mix spices and sugar into the drink. It was pretty much lemonade.

  25. Not normally done, but no big deal by Gibgezr · · Score: 2

    My wife has multiple certifications in water and wastewater treatment, and she claims that it is only impractical from a P.R. standpoint; in most places, people would raise bloody hell if you told them that they were drinking water straight from the wastewater treatment facility, but it really is no different than drinking water from a municipal watershed. As she puts it, we are all drinking dinosaur pee anyway :)

    1. Re:Not normally done, but no big deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I seem to remember in the early '80s the Thames Water Board claiming that the water in the Thames "had been drunk seven times before it got to the North Sea".

      This recycling of water goes on pretty steadily in other places. Americans seem to have the biggest "ewww" reaction to it. Take pill, chill, you ain't gonna die from this.

    2. Re:Not normally done, but no big deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My wife has multiple certifications in water and wastewater treatment, and she claims that it is only impractical from a P.R. standpoint; in most places, people would raise bloody hell if you told them that they were drinking water straight from the wastewater treatment facility, but it really is no different than drinking water from a municipal watershed. As she puts it, we are all drinking dinosaur pee anyway :)

      Aw I was just about to post, but you beat me to it, that is we are drinking the stuff that has passed through dinosaurs. Great thought.

    3. Re:Not normally done, but no big deal by BoogieChile · · Score: 1

      Nu-uh! I drink only pure, unadulterated planetary nebula whizz, and I love it!

  26. Re:"Tastes about average for West Texas" by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

    I've had NYC tap through clean pipes and it was the best I've had so far. Florida's aquifers will still be kicking when it starts to *really* dry up out west too.

    Side note - NYC's water system is amazing. Piped in from upstate New York through huge underground tunnels, ending up deep under the city and piped back up. It is very clean, and is very tasty. I was going to post a link from youtube, but it turns out there are a lot of them on the NYC water system at the site.

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  27. I'm a WFTX resident by thehomeland-org · · Score: 5, Informative

    I'm a resident of WF (and had to dig up a years-old account to login although I do read frequently but never comment much, so apologies for the cheap-shot url username).. The new water is supposedly on, but I can't tell a difference.

    It's strange to me that there is all that much of a fuss with the locals, considering the fact that the process prior to this required treatment of said wastewater and greywater that was eventually let back out into the ordinary water table, became grimy with exposed air and otherwise ground contaminants, and was just filtered back to the city again through the lakes all over again anyway.

    When suggested that there was no telling how many people had drowned in the lakes, how many cars had been run off the road into them and rusted over and still leaking gasoline and oil, and not to mention how many dead animals and super-toxic algae were present in the lake in the first place that we were "drinking" before this new filtered idea came about, they tend to clam up (perhaps from being grossed out by my description).

    The city put out a lovely and sciencey YouTube video (which is now a year old), interviewing local chemists and otherwise credible local water experts who examined the setup and offered their input on it, here, for those interested in some of the more technical aspects. I've tried to link to it in most discussions I find online, but even still there are only 2790 views currently, out of a city of 100k+ pop, which is perhaps indicative of how terrible of a PR team our city does genuinely have. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_MKrU1yi5Yc

    Possibly the biggest local water controversy aside from the "poo-water" issue is how our city operates a water park, of all things. Supposedly it creates more profit that investment and is using outside, trucked-in water that is filtered and recirculated within its own closed system, but that doesn't stop torrents of naysayers leaping at every opportunity to inject it as shitstorm material, instantly derailing any city-admin discussion.

    1. Re:I'm a WFTX resident by thehomeland-org · · Score: 1

      Incidentally, a few weeks ago I placed an order for this Amazon listing for Eleventy-billion tons of snow, deliverable directly to one of our lakes.
      There was a 4.49 shipping charge, so I figure I could do my part to help out with that much investment, at least.
      http://www.amazon.com/dp/B00IISFL64/ref=pe_385040_30332190_TE_3p_dp_1

    2. Re:I'm a WFTX resident by OklahomaRed · · Score: 1

      I remeber Lake Kemp water in the 50's. Potty water is lot better than that.

    3. Re:I'm a WFTX resident by WarlockD · · Score: 1

      My grandpa lives on the other side of Dallas, around Tulsa. The whole reason he spent more than 30k on getting a few wells down was because he couldn't trust the water from the lake.

      "I don't know about you, but I spent 40 years dumping my trash (before it illegal dumping was enforced) , no way in hell I am drinking out of it!"

      I know we are constantly out of water, but I still think we need to dredge the lakes more than once every 20 years.

    4. Re:I'm a WFTX resident by WarlockD · · Score: 1

      My grandpa lives on the other side of Dallas, around Tulsa. The whole reason he spent more than 30k on getting a few wells down was because he couldn't trust the water from the lake. "I don't know about you, but I spent 40 years dumping my trash (before it illegal dumping was enforced) , no way in hell I am drinking out of it!" I know we are constantly out of water, but I still think we need to dredge the lakes more than once every 20 years.

      Ugh I meant Tyler. Don't know why I said Tulsa:P

  28. Re:Let it dry up. by fnj · · Score: 1

    Joining the service is you giving up your say about where you live. It's their own choice.

  29. Re:Let it dry up. by Irate+Engineer · · Score: 1

    I don't believe many recruiters tout the "joys" of Wichita Falls and drinking somebody else's piss on recruiting posters.

    People serve *in spite of* Wichita Falls, not because of it.

    --

    Left MS Windows for Linux Mint and never looked back!

    Vote for Bernie in 2016!

  30. Not major news by sirwired · · Score: 1

    In most of the country, treated sewage is simply piped into the nearest creek/river/lake, and then at least some of it gets pulled in by the intake for the next municipality down the line... the only real interesting bit here is the fact that it's getting piped directly into the freshwater plant instead of floating downstream first.

  31. It's gotta be an improvement by sabinelr · · Score: 1

    After tasting the water in Biloxi, New Orleans, Opelousas, Houston, etc, I am sure that the described process is an improvement. They should just leave out the lake water.

  32. west TX water by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't remember the taste of Wichita Falls water, but west TX water in general is horrible. It probably is better than the water they are mixing it with.

  33. Happiness is... by messymerry · · Score: 1

    ...seeing Wichita Falls in your rearview mirror with an ice cold bottle of tap water from somewhere else...

    --
    Dear Microlimp: I give you 2 valid product keys for win7 and you reject both of them. Piss off you wankers!!!
  34. Its called "recycled water" by voss · · Score: 1

    If its purified to normal drinking water standards its fine.

  35. It is just like Tang, NASA Astronauts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    drink purified waste water on the ISS.

  36. Re:Let it dry up. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was in the army and every major base I was stationed had their own power generation and water treatment plants. Sheppard doesn't?

  37. Loco by TeknoHog · · Score: 2

    Whoever came up with this osmosis thing must have been...

    *puts on sunglasses*

    ...insane in the membrane.

    --
    Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    1. Re:Loco by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      You left out the "Yeahhhhhhhhhh!"

  38. Finger lakes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Syracuse NY gets drinking water from Skaneateles Lake. Only basic filtering. We've been drinking that since the 1800s.

  39. Texas by nospam007 · · Score: 1

    Where you can drink the same water over and over again, like in a spaceship.

  40. Re:"Tastes about average for West Texas" by geezer+nerd · · Score: 1

    I am just trying to figure out how Wichita Falls got to West Texas. I don't think any real Texan would use that label for Wichita Falls. It's North Central.

  41. Oh yeah? by ArcadeMan · · Score: 0

    I've been swimming in raw sewage. I love it.

    1. Re:Oh yeah? by Nemyst · · Score: 0

      Oh, so you've been browsing the internet.

  42. Where's the problem? by Stonent1 · · Score: 1

    There's an old survivalist trick where you can use a pit with water, waste, urine, etc and you put a collection can/bucket in the middle, stretch plastic over the top and put a rock in the middle. The water evaporates and condenses on the plastic and gravity pulls it down to where the rock is in the center and it drips into the collection can. It is essentially distilled and clean to drink as long as nothing else is evaporating and condensing.

    1. Re:Where's the problem? by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Done it. It's very slow with disappointingly low output but it does work. If you every have to depend on it use a vast quality of green leaves etc and be prepared to wait all day.

  43. RO / microfilter system in place in Wichita Falls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wichita Falls resident here who knows what's going on...... The effluent is being treated thru a multi-million dollar Reverse Osmosis and Microfiltration plant. It comes out of that plant basically the same as the bottled water you buy from the supermarket in gallon jugs. The synthetic chemicals that end up in the sewer, as well as all the drugs and drug metabolites that pass thru everyone's bodies and ultimately end up into the sewer are indeed being effectively removed from this treated water. The RO'ed/microfiltered water is in fact so pure that they're having to blend it with conventionally treated lakewater because otherwise it will leach too much metals and minerals out of the pipes and cause problems. The normally-treated lakewater is much, much nastier than the RO'ed effluent water.

    We all used to complain quite a bit about the conventionally treated lakewater here. It was safe to consume, but smelled and tasted like pondscum. I would not drink it or cook food with it. I didn't even like to bathe in it, but didn't really have any other choice. The first day that I took a shower with the new blended water, I could tell a huge difference. It no longer smelled like pondscum. The new blended water is also much softer, it made the shampoo and soap make lots more suds and felt almost like the water I bathed in recently at a hotel up in the Rocky Mountains... well it wasn't quite that pure, but was orders of magnitudes better than what we've had for the past few years as our lakes are drying up.

    Now having said that.... I still won't drink it or prepare food with it (now where's that smiley face with the black eye and half-toothless grin to use as the emoticon to punctuate this sentence ;-) )

  44. Re:Let it dry up. by Irate+Engineer · · Score: 1

    Nope, Sheppard AFB pulls water from the Wichita Falls system, though it is trying to cut usage. They truck in water for non-potable uses such as pools. http://www.sheppard.af.mil/news/story.asp?id=123412872

    --

    Left MS Windows for Linux Mint and never looked back!

    Vote for Bernie in 2016!

  45. And done elsewhere by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

    In Tucson 10%ish of the drinking water comes from reclaimed water (aka filtered sewage). Makes sense in an area with not a lot of fresh water resources. Also in those areas you can have different kinds. You can purchase a non-potable (not for consumption) water source for irrigation. Again, reclaimed water, but it undergoes less filtering and thus is cheaper. Plenty of larger places get a hookup to keep their watering costs down.

    It is a very sensible way of doing things and you actually have more control of purity than water that comes out of the ground.

  46. There is plenty of room for water in Lake Lavon by sgt+scrub · · Score: 1

    Lakes in the Dallas Fort Worth area have more trees growing in them than all the parks combined. Do like they do with White Rock or Bachman lakes.

    --
    Having to work for a living is the root of all evil.
  47. This is not new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The little town where I grew up in East Tennessee pumped raw sewage into the river. A larger town about 30 miles down stream used the same river water for drinking. In fact, I remember the restroom the the county courthouse had a sign over the urinal ..please flush Gxxxx needs the water.

  48. Let it flow by dbIII · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So, according to you you, water does not form long chains of connected molecules

    For all practical purposes and time scales it doesn't.
    Just let it flow.

    1. Re:Let it flow by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 0

      Well, then you are mistaken :) As there is always something dissolved in water the molecules always form chains fitting to that influence. While such a chain might be short lived, similar structures are recreated all the time. That is btw. easy to see in microscope, the water clusters are so big you can sometimes see them with a strong visual light microscope and don't even need an electron microscope for it.
      In case you don't know it: the way water or body fluids influence the cell membrane, making it passable for medicals or any molecule is a long time research topic.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    2. Re:Let it flow by dbIII · · Score: 1
      Actually I am not as your "short lived" comment indicates.

      making it passable for medicals

      WTF? Homeofuckingpathy on a stick?

    3. Re:Let it flow by dbIII · · Score: 1

      and don't even need an electron microscope for it

      Electron microscopes and liquid water don't mix. Try bluffing somebody else.

    4. Re:Let it flow by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      *sigh*

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E...

      I guess your google fu allows you to find more 'evidence' with modern REMs you even can watch a single water molecule ... well trapped somehow so you stay focused, no idea what the rational behind that is ... but researchers do that kind of stuff.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    5. Re:Let it flow by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Fair enough - but what exactly is your point? The word "memory" implies a time scale far beyond what you are going on about which is why it's been difficult to distinguish you from "homeopathic" gibberish ("making it passable for medicals" - WTF?).
      It's difficult enough to get water to flow the correct way down a plughole without considering your vastly weaker interactions once gravity and thermal gradients get things flowing, so why is anything you've mentioned back up this silly water memory idea? Beyond a very short time scale it's as unlikely as unscrambling an egg.

  49. Tasted about average for West Texas??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OK, first question is - how horrible is the the tast of water in West Texas before we start using it as the standard of comparison?

  50. Re:"Tastes about average for West Texas" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Secret - upstate New York residents have parties where they pee direcly into your water intakes. Sometimes they eat asparagus first, just to mess with you folks.

  51. Why is this a big deal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have never in my life lived someplace that DIDN'T do this. In fact, I thought it was standard pretty much everywhere. I'm actually more surprised to hear that they've been drinking straight out of a damn lake this whole time instead.

  52. All the big cities does it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why is this news? Just because Podunk in Nowhere now also does it?

  53. This 'news' and the twitter storm to follow.. by Rick+in+China · · Score: 1

    Even though it's not a big deal or deserving of 'news' (as many others point out, it's very normal) it does sound bad, and I'm expecting lots of these, mostly from Republican Texans: Now I'm drinking piss and shit water, THANKS OBAMA!

  54. Re:"Tastes about average for West Texas" by mapinguari · · Score: 1

    Agreed. It's sort of like saying "The water in NYC tatested about average for West Virginia"

  55. From what I've heard.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...Wichita Falls drinking water is the shit!

  56. Tim Minchi, "Storm": by Doghouse13 · · Score: 1

    "If you show me
    That, say, homeopathy works,
    Then I will change my mind
    I'll spin on a fucking dime
    I'll be embarrassed as hell,
    But I will run through the streets yelling
    It's a miracle! Take physics and bin it!
    Water has memory!
    And while it's memory of a long lost drop of onion juice is Infinite
    It somehow forgets all the poo it's had in it!"

    A brilliant number, start to finish. See (e.g.) https://www.youtube.com/watch?..., at about 6'45"

  57. Water memory does not exists by aepervius · · Score: 2

    Whereas it is true that for a very very short time water can retain the form of a cage of a molecule it had in this is not in any way what water memory as pushed by homeoscammer is
    1) life time of those is negligible on our level, on the order of magnitude of microsecond or lower, needless to say 1 second after dilution it is long gone.
    2) most homeopathetic (pun intended) stuff is sold on [u]lactose or alcohol[/u] for which such a things is not even demonstrated to exists
    3) even if it stayed longer than 1 second, one would have to demonstrate that the negative cage form has any effect near the normal molecule (remember the molecule was removed so all you have is an empty hole the very ROUGH form of the molecule) which elad me to
    4) the effect of molecule is not the frigging form but their component. H2S and H2O will have the rough same form (angle ~105 degree instead of ~95 degreee , bond length 130 pm and 110 pm) but i hope everybody will accept they have far different effect on your body.
    5) well any way homepathy as a whole when properly tested has practically no difference to the placebo comparison. Well done double blind at least. Because there is a lot of crapola passing of as "research" with bad protocoles in homeopathetic journals.

    Hoemopathy is worthless. But it looks like magic to people and people like magic.

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
  58. Moby and Superfriends didn't go in same place by Uberbah · · Score: 1

    Because all the fish, crustaceans, sea mammals and every damn thing else in the oceans, rivers, lakes, and reservoirs of the world climb out to take a leak or a dump.

    Because all fish, sea mammals etc all shit into the same small part of the ocean, instead of having it spread out over a vast area. Where would you rather fall flat on your face: out in the forest where wild hogs roam, or at hog factory where you have the shit from 10,000 of the little piggies in one place?

  59. Re:"Tastes about average for West Texas" by RabidReindeer · · Score: 1

    I've had NYC tap through clean pipes and it was the best I've had so far. Florida's aquifers will still be kicking when it starts to *really* dry up out west too.

    Florida has has water restrictions for years. Orlando and Cocoa have been playing tug-of-war over water, and Orlando has also been trying to plunder the St. Johns River. Tampa Bay has a lot of water piped in, and the Sarasota is about the driest in the state.

  60. Londoners' water has been through 7 others first by gb7djk · · Score: 1
    All UK sewage works purify their sewage enough so that it can be safely discharged into the nearest river. In truth, where else could they dump it?

    It (apparently) is not a myth that by the time the Thames has got to London, the water extracted from, to turn into drinking water, it has already been through an average of seven other people. And, whilst there is a reverse osmosis plant on the Thames Estuary, it is only used during times of drought and then to turn brackish (salty) estuary water into drinking water. Normal water treatment plants use traditional methods such as sand and/or trickle beds + UV purification. Reverse Osmosis is otherwise waaaaaaay too expensive.

  61. Re:"Tastes about average for West Texas" by evilviper · · Score: 1

    I tasted the water in San Diego, Escondido, Ramona, and many MUCH MUCH more rural spots.

    "Much more rural" than San Diego... You don't say?! Yeah, San Diego's water has tasted awful for many decades. That's hardly a good test. But they're the worst, not an example of the good stuff.

    California water always wins top-honors in water-tasting competitions:

    http://www.nationaldriller.com...

    If you can't find good water out west, I suppose you've just become acclimated to the taste of Florida water, and always favor the familiar...

    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  62. News flash: All drinking water is ... by Ihlosi · · Score: 1

    ... to some extent, "treated sewage". It's called "water cycle".

  63. Soylent Water is PEOPLE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    drink up me hardies

  64. Re:Water memory does not exists by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

    I did not start this homeopathic thread, it was my parent :)

    Unfortunately half of your claims or elaborations are either wrong or show quite some ignorance.

    Alcohols (2), especially the longer ones, do form chains of molecules. The scientific term is: "hydrogen bridge binding", loosely translated from german. I guess you can figure the 'correct english term'. Likely you find it in the wikipedia article about alcohol, at the discussion about the boiling point e.g.

    You ever heard about 'protein folding at home'? Your (4). Sorry, simply wrong. A huge amount of chemical effects in your body happen due to the form of the molecules involved. Yes, an amino acid is nothing but a relatively huge molecule. So picking H2S and H2O as a 'counter example' is a bit missleading, imho. Hm, btw, are there circumstances where CH2 can exist? Another thing to google ...

    Regarding to (5) there are plenty experiments with plants and animals that show that certain classes of homeopathic treatments work quite fine. E.g. in Germany most medicals for animals are homeopathic based. On the other hand I'm not Steve Jobs ... if I get cancer I don't take some homeopathic 'remedy' :)

    Oh, and btw, related to an answer to someone else, but fitting to your (1) and (4) claim: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H...

    --
    Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  65. Search Results by ZombieBraintrust · · Score: 1

    Google results are biased based on your old search history and based on the data Google has collected about you. What Google displays for to you is different than what it displays to the parent. You can type in the same terms but Google will order the results based on your history. Parent gets a bunch homeopathy pages. You get a more mainstream result. Google is not a safe way to research an idea. Sometimes your bias is just going to be reinforced.

    1. Re:Search Results by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      My top results tend to be from the NIH, which I trust a lot more than random folks on slashdot.

  66. I've had beers like that. by Cloud+K · · Score: 1

    Or at least, English lagers..

  67. Full Of IT by JimSadler · · Score: 0

    After observing Texas politics and legal system it occurs to me that their waste water has rushed to their heads and lodged there permanently. Rick Perry might be explainable in this light. Dat boy been sniffing his own poop for so long his brain has cracked. It might also explain baby Bush's mental status.

  68. Cerveza, por favor. by vandamme · · Score: 1

    I wonder if they filter out the synthetic estrogens from contraceptives. It's affecting fish and amphibians in some places.

  69. All water is 'recycled'... by servant · · Score: 1
    Normally towns put water back into a river, and the next town uses it as 'fresh water' input.

    These folks are just closing the loop before it goes on down stream.

    Anyone that only wants 'fresh' water, better stop using anything but rain water. Rain water has also been 'recycled' but it has gone to steam separating 'impurities' from the water, just like a distilled water still does by leaving it's impurities in the bottom of the boiler.

    --
    ... "When you pry the source from my cold dead hands."
  70. Price Comparison by packrat0x · · Score: 1

    "At 60 cents per 1,000 gallons, it's far cheaper than any other source of water..."
    I believe Israel is desalinating ocean water for 0.50 USD per cubic meter, which would be 60 cents per 316 gallons.

    --
    227-3517
  71. drought and water price by astar · · Score: 2

    My state of Oregon is fully in drought. California is in extreme drought. Pretty much all the west has been in drought in a more general way for over a century.

    Now in California if you have 100 year water rights then you might own water you can sell privately. Since the public sources are no longer there for many uses then buying on the spot market might make sense. The spot hit $2200 acre foot recently. You can play with this and see that this might be 250 1000 gallon units untreated. So i guess this Texas town is maybe paying $200 for an acre foot and this treated. These numbers are pretty much just in my head approximations and you can recalculate as needed.

    California if this this goes on will be in a humanitarian crisis in 18 months. If so, you may be affected. You might want to support what this Texas city did after making the scat jokes. Or maybe shut down high water use export industries. When we ship a pound of beef out of country, how much water is effectively being shipped with it?

  72. Louisiana and Mississippi by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

    All along the Mississippi River towns filter and purify water from the river for drinking, then treat their sewage and put it back into the river. If you drink the water near the delta then part of what you're drinking has been through dozens or hundreds of people.

    Connecting the output to the input eliminates some of the waste of wastewater. It's good enough for NASA, so it's good enough for you.

  73. Still have to have water to begin with by Archfeld · · Score: 1

    Recycling, and re-using are great but that assumes the water is there to be used and re-used in the first place. The Colorado river doesn't even reach the gulf anymore without artificial aid.
     

    --
    errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
  74. Sorry I was Not wrong by aepervius · · Score: 1

    1) This is not about hydrogen bonding but whether the cage have been demonstrated to exists and form a cage of similar form than the replcaed molecule. There is no such demonstration for ethanol. The point was never about hydrogen bond , which as a chemist I am aware of, but about cage formation. Due to the nature of alcohol I would expect such cage to even be quickly gone, and the cage to even even a much rougher form than H2O.

    2) protein folding is not the same phenomenon at all. The key zone where protein interract are identical, which is why some protein might be slightly different but still interrract. Protein which are utterly different do not itnerract the same way. There is no parallel at all with a *negative* form of a H2O cage having the same effect than the positive molecule. In fact protein shows quite clearly by their often key-key hole reaction that such cage CANNOT have the same effect as the molecules

    3) look if you want to debate homeopathy and animal let's us gop to JREF.ORG and register on their forum and let us debate there. There is a wealth of information that most if (baring all) those study were bunk. And frankly if homeopathy WAS working, it would be pretty damn easy to demonstrate with a tight protocol. And yet it never is.

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org