Anytime you have a company that transcends country boundaries you are begging for trouble. Separate, cooperative companies seems far safer, cheaper, and adaptable.
Seems to me to be the best use of the moon. Hearts last longer, perhaps, in less gravity ? Old rich people squander their children's inheritance to gain another 10 years living on the moon. Retirement homes on Earth are about as lonely as living on the moon.
"... but you couldn't feasibly build a chemical rocket with enough fuel... "
In fact, you can't do it all. There is a theoretical maximum amount of chemical energy/mass you can achieve. Even when you are able to use this energy at 100% efficiency, the amount of energy required to move the fuel itself reaches a point at which its payload can go no faster.
Law is a simply a different discipline that takes skills other than brute force intellect. It takes creativity, reading comprehension, and lots of legwork.
Slashdot Mirror
sigh
That might get it's attention.
Figure out what their real needs are and meet them.
Learn who can be ignored and who can't.
In general, if they feel you are listening and understanding them,
you will get along ok.
Hah! Like Apple treats its iphone app developers ?
Anytime you have a company that transcends country boundaries you are begging for trouble.
Separate, cooperative companies seems far safer, cheaper, and adaptable.
The ease of launching, I will certainly grant you that.
But you already have unlimited, uninterrupted solar power here on earth in the form
of the Sahara.
If you wiped out all life on the earth with an asteroid, no matter what, it would be more habitable than the moon.
Seems to me to be the best use of the moon. Hearts last longer, perhaps, in less gravity ?
Old rich people squander their children's inheritance to gain another 10 years living
on the moon. Retirement homes on Earth are about as lonely as living on the moon.
Even the Earth has a whole lot of undeveloped acreage in the ocean.
A good system is one that evolves constantly from humble beginnings with smart
people making and guiding decisions at every step in its evolution.
You start with a good idea, implement it. Add more good ideas, discard the bad ones.
If your system is useful, and supersedes the older slow/bloated one, then it "becomes" the "new system".
You are not using the test for a prescription. You are using it merely to get a sense for if the test has merit other than pop psychology.
The degree of required testing is 2 order of magnitude in difference.
Give the test to 100 people.
Have the 100 people do pre-screenings with psychologists.
Correlate the answers with clinical diagnosis.
It is *not* pop psychology, but anyone using it for anything other than a basic
litmus test is a quack.
Giant carrot people drinking from bottles while playing musical instruments.
Forget what you know about programming, FPGA's are about thinking in a compleltely different mind set
Apple is one man's dream, and it will die with that man.
Open Source will outlive any particular person.
" ... but you couldn't feasibly build a chemical rocket with enough fuel ... "
In fact, you can't do it all. There is a theoretical maximum amount of chemical energy/mass
you can achieve. Even when you are able to use this energy at 100% efficiency, the amount of energy required
to move the fuel itself reaches a point at which its payload can go no faster.
She wants to get it appealed to something that wont bankrupt her? $100 ?
" .... This should help users migrating from MySQL. ... "
Because we know they are sure to be coming in droves whether they know it or not. :)
On that point I could understand why a GPS might be asked for
as opposed to a simple odometer read by the car inspector.
Is it required that you run it?
Or simply a requirement that the system come with it
pre-installed ?
If you buy an unlocked android phone, you can not run applications *you paid for*
because of DRM.
If you buy an android phone and then unlock it, all is well.
Law is a simply a different discipline that takes skills other than brute
force intellect. It takes creativity, reading comprehension, and lots
of legwork.
But how can someone sue for a copyright violation when there was no copyright?
Sure,
What specifically is disallowed by being in a U. S. territory ? I know they get no seat in the house or senate. What else?
Does a particular company suffer in any way by being located in a territory as opposed to a state?
By not having any particular roots, they can dictate the rules.