Slashdot Mirror


Chinese Employee Loses iPhone Prototype, Kills Self

tlhIngan writes "Physical intimidation of a Foxconn employee, 25 year-old Sun Danyong, and a possibly-illegal search of his house may have led to suicide after an iPhone prototype in his possession was lost. Foxconn is Apple's long-time manufacturing partner for the iPhone. Entrusted with 16 iPhone prototypes, Danyong discovered that one was missing and searched the factory for it. When it didn't turn up, he reported the incident to his boss, who ordered his apartment searched. There are reports of physical intimidation by Foxconn security personnel. This ended tragically on Thursday at 3 AM, when Danyong jumped from his apartment building to his death." VentureBeat notes that "Apple exerts immense pressure on its business partners [to] help it maintain secrecy." An Apple spokesperson said this to CNet: "We are saddened by the tragic loss of this young employee, and we are awaiting results of the investigations into his death. We require our suppliers to treat all workers with dignity and respect."

514 comments

  1. Suicide? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    There's an app for that...

    1. Re:Suicide? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      -1 too soon

    2. Re:Suicide? by basementman · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Too soon man, too soon.

    3. Re:Suicide? by sorak · · Score: 1

      There's an app for that...

      So...umm....did he get to meet iGod?

    4. Re:Suicide? by crazyvas · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's called iDie.
      I hear that it's the next big killer app.

      Okay, okay. iUnderstand iStopNow else iDie.

    5. Re:Suicide? by escay · · Score: 2, Funny

      boy that's a killer app.

    6. Re:Suicide? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I read this, I thought I'd clicked on Fark for a second.

    7. Re:Suicide? by uglydog · · Score: 1

      i disagree. it's never too soon. at least this comment wasn't intended to offend.

    8. Re:Suicide? by Marcos+Eliziario · · Score: 1

      iDie actually is an reimplementation in Lisp of the popular OS package iKill. It looks like the project owner had a little conceptual misunderstanding of macros and recursion.
      As nobody yet has found the bug, because everyone who tried to debug it has died misteriously, Sourceforge decided to clone the project and call it iDie.

      --
      Your ad could be here!
    9. Re:Suicide? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Suge Knight ?

    10. Re:Suicide? by Sinbios · · Score: 1

      RTFA. It was caught on the surveillance camera.

      --
      Anyone can "stand up for what they believe", but it takes a very brave individual to change what they believe. - Loundry
    11. Re:Suicide? by Sinbios · · Score: 2, Funny

      s/surveillance/security

      Dammit, paranoia is contagious.

      --
      Anyone can "stand up for what they believe", but it takes a very brave individual to change what they believe. - Loundry
    12. Re:Suicide? by mjwx · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's called iDie.
      I hear that it's the next big killer app.

      Okay, okay. iUnderstand iStopNow else iDie.

      Ha, iKillMe. /Alf

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    13. Re:Suicide? by indiechild · · Score: 1

      /But it could've been faked with clever video editing! /sarcasm

      You, good sir, get -1 for using logic and facts on Slashdot.

    14. Re:Suicide? by craagz · · Score: 1

      While approaching the third floor of the building Mr. Sun realized he had left his iPhone in his toilet after an episode of Morning Manga.

      splat!

    15. Re:Suicide? by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      It's a big leap forward in the war against windows.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    16. Re:Suicide? by haifastudent · · Score: 1

      So...umm....did he get to meet iGod?

      His last words onthe way down? iIIIIIII!!!!!!

      --
      Thank for reading to the sig. You may stop reading now. It is safe. There is no more content. Why are you still reading?
    17. Re:Suicide? by iphonefans2009 · · Score: 1

      Mac iPhone video Converter tool - iFunia, visit http://www.ifunia.com/video-to-iphone-converter-mac.html

    18. Re:Suicide? by Bigby · · Score: 1

      It will be followed by the release of web app: Google Suicide

    19. Re:Suicide? by default+luser · · Score: 1

      It will be followed by the release of web app: Google Suicide

      Don't you mean Google Suicide BETA?

      --

      Man is the animal that laughs.
      And occasionally whores for Karma.

  2. Poor guy... by Starturtle · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ...probably the only way he could save his family from being threatened.

    1. Re:Poor guy... by FooAtWFU · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't like playing cultural imperialist, but something about current Asian cultures seems to me to be broken: this isn't exactly the first suicide of its sort, or even an uncommon phenomenon, just one of the more high-profile cases (since it's Apple, and a senior guy). Western culture isn't immune to these effects either (cf. high-profile financial advisors committing suicide in 2008-2009), but I understand that it's significantly more of an issue in Asia. I'd hazard that it's something in the common implementation of 'honor' and self-value that predisposes people towards a massive breakdown in the face of 'public disgrace'.

      Not that Americans couldn't use a bit more of the right sort of Honor in their regimen, mind you.

      --
      The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
    2. Re:Poor guy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice way to throw out random numbers. Statistics without context mean absolutely nothing.

    3. Re:Poor guy... by LunaticTippy · · Score: 5, Informative

      I had the same misconception but it is easily dispersed.

      According to this the top 7 are not Asian. China is way down there, below France, Poland, Switzerland, Uruguay.

      Country, Male Suicide per 100k, Female suicide per 100k, total pop suicide per 100k, year
      Lithuania 68.1 12.9 38.6 2005
      Belarus 63.3 10.3 35.1 2003
      Russia 58.1 9.8 32.2 2005
      Slovenia 42.1 11.1 26.3 2006
      Hungary 42.3 11.2 26.0 2005
      Kazakhstan 45.0 8.1 25.9 2005
      Latvia 42.0 9.6 24.5 2005
      Japan 34.8 13.2 23.7 2006

      I assumed the suicide rate would be much higher in Asia, but I guess it is just reported more or happens in more high-profile cases or something.

      --
      Man, you really need that seminar!
    4. Re:Poor guy... by MBGMorden · · Score: 4, Informative

      There were 5,400 suicides in the UK in 2007. There have been more in other years.

      A raw stat without comparison is meaningless though. 5,400 sounds like a lot, but is it really?

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_suicide_rate

      Looking at this list, it appears that the UK is 66th on the list for suicide rate. The US is 43rd. China is 26th and Japan is 8th. South Korea is 11th and Hong Kong (not sure why this didn't get lumped with China) 18th.

      That said, not all Asian countries are high on the list. The Philippines is 86th and Thailand is 57th. Singapore is 48th.

      If anything, the trend I see is not East Asian countries being high on the list, but rather a lot of Eastern European/North and North Western Asian countries (ie, Russia and it's western neighbors) being pretty high up.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    5. Re:Poor guy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I will steal, kill, and lie my way to the top.

      However, falling on my own sword ain't in the cards.

      Welcome to America.

    6. Re:Poor guy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Two things:

      1) Those are per-capita. China's got a shitload more people than Lithuania...
      2) Do we trust the Chinese (especially) numbers?

    7. Re:Poor guy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well in all fairness if you look at Russia and the other former soviet blocs you will easily see that: in Soviet Russia Life Takes You!

    8. Re:Poor guy... by mdarksbane · · Score: 1

      Is there a list adjusted for per capita gdp?

    9. Re:Poor guy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      high-profile financial advisors committing suicide in 2008-2009

      Not enough...

    10. Re:Poor guy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My sympathies go to his family, but I couldn't help thinking about all those Government officials loosing laptops, tapes, disks and whatnot with citizens life histories on them ...

    11. Re:Poor guy... by Macrat · · Score: 1

      I don't like playing cultural imperialist, but something about current Asian cultures seems to me to be broken:

      Or is it the American/European taboo thinking suicide is "wrong" that is broken?

    12. Re:Poor guy... by Your.Master · · Score: 1

      How would you adjust it? Should higher GDP mean more or less suicides? Should it be linear?

      I don't think GDP would tell much of a story. Rich-poor divide might be a bit better, but that's harder to give an objective number to.

    13. Re:Poor guy... by rossjp · · Score: 1

      Are the stats adjusted for soviet-style kidnapping being reported as suicide? You can't help but notice all the "leaders" are soviet bloc countries.

    14. Re:Poor guy... by jollyreaper · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I don't like playing cultural imperialist, but something about current Asian cultures seems to me to be broken: this isn't exactly the first suicide of its sort, or even an uncommon phenomenon, just one of the more high-profile cases (since it's Apple, and a senior guy). Western culture isn't immune to these effects either (cf. high-profile financial advisors committing suicide in 2008-2009), but I understand that it's significantly more of an issue in Asia. I'd hazard that it's something in the common implementation of 'honor' and self-value that predisposes people towards a massive breakdown in the face of 'public disgrace'.

      I consider that to be a feature of the culture, not a bug. I'd like to see a lot more politicians and government officials embrace suicide as a way of atoning for their dishonor. In America fucking up earns you a raise and a promotion. Getting caught with your pants down and dick out is just something to brazen out and hope the public attention fades. Senator Toe Tapper got to finish out his term instead of resigning in disgrace. Sen. Vitter the Shitter, he of the prostitutes and adult baby diaper fetish is still in his high chair in Congress. Ensign is unashamed, same with Sanford and Gingrich. And I've yet to hear of a finance company CEO eating a gun for sheer shame of public infamy.

      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    15. Re:Poor guy... by cayenne8 · · Score: 1, Insightful
      "Or is it the American/European taboo thinking suicide is "wrong" that is broken?"

      Not so much wrong, but stupid. I mean, you are only given ONE life, why the fsck would you waste it? NOTHING is worth giving your life over....

      I don't understand the Oriental thing with them killing themselves for 'losing face', I guess the only thing even close to that, is guys in the US that will get pissed off at their girlfriends leaving them, then go blow them away and turn the gun on themselves. I don't understand that either.

      I mean, there is NO pussy that is worth all that. Not your life, not all your money. I've had some pretty good stuff over the years, but, the thing is...there's always more of it out there.

      There really isn't anything out there worth giving your life for...it is short enough as it is, no need to 'rush' it.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    16. Re:Poor guy... by xednieht · · Score: 5, Funny

      Looks to me like the female segment of the population is not pulling their weight

      --

      Hope is the currency of fools
    17. Re:Poor guy... by vishbar · · Score: 5, Informative

      Oddly enough, China is #1 for highest percentage of female suicide.

      --
      Ride the skies
    18. Re:Poor guy... by cayenne8 · · Score: 0
      "I consider that to be a feature of the culture, not a bug. I'd like to see a lot more politicians and government officials embrace suicide as a way of atoning for their dishonor. In America fucking up earns you a raise and a promotion. Getting caught with your pants down and dick out is just something to brazen out and hope the public attention fades. Senator Toe Tapper got to finish out his term instead of resigning in disgrace. Sen. Vitter the Shitter, he of the prostitutes and adult baby diaper fetish is still in his high chair in Congress. Ensign is unashamed, same with Sanford and Gingrich. And I've yet to hear of a finance company CEO eating a gun for sheer shame of public infamy."

      Having trouble thinking of Democrats with the same problems and outcomes?

      Your arguments would have been MUCH stronger if you'd have balanced it out with congress-critters (hell even presidents) from both parties.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    19. Re:Poor guy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think what your referring to is widespread in Asian culture. It is predominately Japanese culture and stems from the Bushido code (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bushido_Code). Ie, a Samurai's honor can only be regained through seppuku (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seppuku), ritualistic suicide. This isn't some kind of modern phenomena, and I would guess than the suicide rates in Japan have been steadily declining since the end of WWII.

    20. Re:Poor guy... by rwa2 · · Score: 1

      Huh, interesting... makes you wonder if playing Russian roulette counts as suicide...

      /yeah, go me for perpetuating stereotypes :P

    21. Re:Poor guy... by Macrat · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There really isn't anything out there worth giving your life for...it is short enough as it is, no need to 'rush' it.

      Really? Even being "chained" to a hospital bed so you can be "brave" for 2 years as cancer eats up your body painfully?

      Everyone dies. What is so wrong with going out at your own choosing?

    22. Re:Poor guy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't like playing cultural imperialist, but something about current Asian cultures seems to me to be broken:

      Or is it the American/European taboo thinking suicide is "wrong" that is broken?

      You could be on to something, there. Try it out and let us know how that works for you.

    23. Re:Poor guy... by theheadlessrabbit · · Score: 3, Interesting

      in South Korea, the time of year when students get their report carts is known as 'jumping season'

      --
      -I only code in BASIC.-
    24. Re:Poor guy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Suicide rates are related to latitude (closer to the equator = less suicides). I think that should be the first thing to correct for.

    25. Re:Poor guy... by oldhack · · Score: 3, Interesting

      That seems to track alcohol consumption.

      --
      Fuck systemd. Fuck Redhat. Fuck Soylent, too. Wait, scratch the last one.
    26. Re:Poor guy... by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I don't like playing cultural imperialist, but something about current Asian cultures seems to me to be broken

      It's not the culture, it's the demographics.

      Take China. Population 1.3 billion. But only 500 million of those are really taking part in the new economy. The other 800 million live in rural poverty. In fact, most of the 500 million who aren't, typically don't fare much better.

      What does this mean in practical terms? It means that unless you are incredibly well educated, connected or monied, you are very, very expendable. There are literally ten people lined up behind you waiting for the same job, which means unless you are prepared to work enormous hours, under extreme pressure, in terrible conditions, you won't get it.

      I had a talk with someone recently back from a business trip to Shanghai. Their group took a short walk through the city one evening, between the rows of shining new skyscrapers that carpet the metropolitan area. As they walked, they could see into offices where employees could be seen through the windows, sleeping on the desks they had been working at all day. How are you supposed to compete with that?

      China is witnessing the kind of rapid capitalism not seen in the world since the 1890's. An economy where labour is cheap and people are treated worse and paid less because there are so many others, literally hungry enough to so the same for even less than that. The kind of capitalism that gave rise to theories like Say's Law, which held you could never have massive unemployment because there would always be people willing to work for a bowl of rice a day.

      And do you know what the most ironic thing about this whole state of affairs is? China has never actually had a communist revolution.

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    27. Re:Poor guy... by sbeckstead · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't really understand most of those reasons either and you never will understand an emotional state until your are there, but there is something worth giving your life for and many of us have put our lives on the line for that. Your diatribe seems to invalidate the sacrifice of those that gave their lives for their countries, I think that needs to be corrected. So thanks from me for all of you who served or are serving now in any military in any country.

    28. Re:Poor guy... by vertinox · · Score: 1

      I don't like playing cultural imperialist, but something about current Asian cultures seems to me to be broken: this isn't exactly the first suicide of its sort, or even an uncommon phenomenon, just one of the more high-profile cases

      No, because in America if we are going to commit suicide we're going to take a lot of people with us.

      Or you can attention whore and do it on TV.

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    29. Re:Poor guy... by Bigjeff5 · · Score: 3, Informative

      I haven't heard much about China, but in Japan (8th highest suicide rate) "losing face" can end your career. Submitting a bad report and having your boss say "Maybe you should re-write that" is akin to a death sentance. Their career at best will go nowhere, and at worst the boss will soon find another place for you. That doesn't pay as well. If at all. /enddramaticuseofperiod

      Different cultures are different. That should be apparent. In the US, a high importance is placed on the individual. Selfishness reigns, and if your boss tells you your project sucks, he can shove it. If he tries to stifle your career, you can go somewhere else. Other cultures see things differently, and a person who leaves one company for no apparent reason may be seen as tainted, and not welcome somewhere else.

      I can't apply that directly to this case, but you get the point. You can't look at another culture from your culture's point of view and expect to make sense of it. You can compare cultures, but that's a whole 'nuther exercise, and an extremely difficult one to be objective while doing it.

      --
      Security is mostly a superstition... Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. - Helen Keller
    30. Re:Poor guy... by Runaway1956 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "current Asian cultures seems to me to be broken"

      Good going, dude. Please, point us at your published works on philosophy. Seems to me that OUR WAY is as broken as Asia's way, maybe worse.

      Remember the financial meltdown on Wall Street, recently? There should have been hundreds of bodies hitting the sidewalk. Not for their own lost fortunes, but for the billions and billions of dollars lost that WEREN'T THEIR'S to lose.

      Buncha low lifes.....

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    31. Re:Poor guy... by jcr · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Not enough...

      It is rather disappointing that Hank Paulson, Ben Bernanke, Alan Greenspan, Timothy Geithner, and Bernie Madoff haven't sought to atone.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    32. Re:Poor guy... by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      So suicide is wrong because it weakens your basis for feeling superior.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    33. Re:Poor guy... by jcr · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Try it out and let us know how that works for you.

      AC wins the thread. Well done.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    34. Re:Poor guy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      something about current Asian cultures

      it's not just "current". look back into thousands of years of history. this isn't something that's going to change soon.

    35. Re:Poor guy... by Mashiki · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Just an FYI, in Asia most suicides are classified as something else in true crime rates. In order to affect a lower suicide rate in the overall data trending. European data trending can be higher because they sometimes include 'other' crimes into their suicide figures during data reporting.

      Never trust data, unless you see the raw data sets yourself.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    36. Re:Poor guy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So... females are 2-3x as likely to commit suicide?

    37. Re:Poor guy... by Stele · · Score: 1

      I expected to see Kerplakistan in that list.

    38. Re:Poor guy... by Em+Emalb · · Score: 1

      probably the only way he could save his family from being threatened.

      Or maybe he was guilty of trying to sell the prototype? We /.ers always seem to assume that people are innocent. Maybe he was guilty as sin and knew they'd eventually find out and didn't want to be around when they did?

      --
      Sent from your iPad.
    39. Re:Poor guy... by easyTree · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      5,400 sounds like a lot, but is it really?

      There's been a lot of fuss all around the world because of a 'mere' 2750; I'm thinking yah, 5400 is a lot.

    40. Re:Poor guy... by sbeckstead · · Score: 1

      What? I think you missed the point I was talking about. Suicide is wrong for many reasons.

    41. Re:Poor guy... by easyTree · · Score: 1

      surely you're not saying that millions of people having their idenity stolen is as important as apple's potential lost profits...

    42. Re:Poor guy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd have said Richard Fuld and Jeff Lane and Bernie Madoff.

    43. Re:Poor guy... by easyTree · · Score: 1

      You can't look at your own culture from your culture's point of view and expect to make sense of it.

      T,FTFY

    44. Re:Poor guy... by ppanon · · Score: 1

      Apart for Congressman Freezer Bagman, the current crop of federal Dems haven't been stupid enough to get caught recently. Dem. Governors and Lieutenant Govs. are another issue entirely, but then he didn't mention Palin's investigations either.

      --
      Laissez lire, et laissez danser; ces deux amusements ne feront jamais de mal au monde. - Voltaire
    45. Re:Poor guy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol. It's probably down to the method, generally speaking females are more likely to opt for poisoning / pill OD's, whereas men favour violent, messy methods like shotgun mouthwash and jumping from high places. (This isn't necessarily true of all cultures though, Hong Kong has plenty of female jumpers.) The latter have a higher "success" rate, often a self-poisoner won't take enough or will pass out and throw it up.

    46. Re:Poor guy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In America fucking up earns you a raise and a promotion.

      Yep. It's called "experience."

      Someone who doesn't have a history of disasters is considered "inexperienced" in the US.

      Someone who breaks everything they touch is considered "highly experienced."

      Succeed at something, and you can expected to be rewarded with being laid off as being superfluous. Really fuck up, and you'll get "retention bonuses" to keep you there to keep on fucking up until the money dries up.

    47. Re:Poor guy... by nbauman · · Score: 1

      Everyone dies. What is so wrong with going out at your own choosing?

      Sounds like you've been reading Shakespeare. http://shakespeare.mit.edu/julius_caesar/full.html

    48. Re:Poor guy... by Tanman · · Score: 1

      You should adjust your statistic for age and look at suicide rates among people ages 8-45.

    49. Re:Poor guy... by UnknowingFool · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It is rather disappointing that Hank Paulson, Ben Bernanke, Alan Greenspan, Timothy Geithner, and Bernie Madoff haven't sought to atone.

      Well to put this into perspective:

      Hank Paulson served a little under 3 years as Secretary of Treasury for George W. Bush. He helped to initiate the bailouts under Bush.
      Ben Bernanke served a little over 3 years as Chairman of the Federal Reserve. He also helped to initiate the bailouts under Bush.
      Alan Greenspan served as Chairman of the Federal Reserve for almost 20 years before Bernanke.
      Timothy Geithner served as President of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York for 6 years before his current position as Secretary of the Treasury.
      and you lump these men together with:

      Bernie Madoff who conducted a $65 billion world-wide Ponzi scheme lasting several decades.

      You might disagree with the course of action these men have chosen for the country in the current crisis. You may question their intelligence and vision for not foreseeing the problems before they became crises, but I don't know if anyone should equate their actions or lack of actions to outright fraud. What is it that you think they should atone for?

      The problems that have lead to the current situation were probably a decade in the making. The only one that might have had any real opportunity to change the course of history was Greenspan. Everyone else was relatively new to their job. And for the record, Greenspan admitted he placed too much faith in the rational behavior of financial institutions.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    50. Re:Poor guy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I remember doing a little statistics project in college where we had to correlate two variables and generate some conclusions. I chose to correlate "suicide rate" and "number of cloudy days/year" by country. There was an extremely strong correlation. My guess is that that list of countries includes ones with really lousy weather.

    51. Re:Poor guy... by jcr · · Score: 1

      Them, too.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    52. Re:Poor guy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually Japan has the highest suicide rate the world. The Japanese government simply doesn't reports most of them as "suicides" for a range of cultural (harakiri/seppuku), social (family honor) and historic (too many to list) reasons.

    53. Re:Poor guy... by Deanalator · · Score: 1

      Russia and Kazakhstan are both in Asia.

    54. Re:Poor guy... by Sinbios · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Wait, how do weird fetishes disqualify someone from government appointments?

      Hell, in the good ol' Roman days...

      --
      Anyone can "stand up for what they believe", but it takes a very brave individual to change what they believe. - Loundry
    55. Re:Poor guy... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      extremely difficult one to be objective while doing it.

      Or you could just compare suicide rates...

    56. Re:Poor guy... by MrCrassic · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's not that Asian work culture is broken; it's just very, very different from what we in Western cultures are accustomed to. Let's take Japan as a (very overused, but perfect) example. Japanese students begin training for an entrance exam from the 5th grade. The grade on that entrance exam is, for all intents and purposes, the difference between a Japanese student landing a decent job and living a very difficult life.

      On top of that, the Japanese hold very high regards to their workmanship, and many employees will sacrifice everything for their job. Death from overwork has been a major problem in Japan that's slowing down somewhat, but is still prevalent today. There is an insurmountable amount of pressure placed on Japanese individuals from family and loved ones to suceed in career and education, and this mentality just continues down the chain.

      I believe that this is, pretty much, the reason why a good number of old-school Asian families will literally cut their children off if they don't make it into a big-time Ivy league school and/or take up law, medicine or any other respectable, high-paying career path.

      Does this seem broken? Yes, considering that education and employment is significantly more lax here. Hell, I've met some people in companies I've worked for that got certifications and still landed good jobs.

    57. Re:Poor guy... by jrumney · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The profile of who is committing suicide tells the full story. In Western countries, it is overwhelmingly young (teenage to early twenties) males, followed by young females. This coincides with the most emotionally unstable period of most peoples lives. In Japan (and possibly other Asian cultures), the figures are overwhelmingly dominated by middle aged men - middle to senior management and politicians who are under a lot of pressure not to let their company or country down.

    58. Re:Poor guy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a waste. I will never ever buy an Apple product, period. Never have, never will.

    59. Re:Poor guy... by HieronymusBosch · · Score: 2, Funny

      Not enough...

      It is rather disappointing that Hank Paulson, Ben Bernanke, Alan Greenspan, Timothy Geithner, and Bernie Madoff haven't sought to atone.

      -jcr

      This sounds rather like an anti-Semitic remark to me, Sir!

    60. Re:Poor guy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey Snarky O'Snark-Snark, if you read the guy's whole post, he said the same thing you did. Lay off.

      Also, both of you are correct.

    61. Re:Poor guy... by kklein · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I haven't heard much about China, but in Japan (8th highest suicide rate) "losing face" can end your career. Submitting a bad report and having your boss say "Maybe you should re-write that" is akin to a death sentance.

      You read that in the American media, right?

      Japanese people are not so precious. I've lived in Japan off and on (mostly on) for the last 10 years. Guess what? People here are the same as anywhere else.

      The corporate culture you describe is something I have never seen or heard of, outside of stupid 80s movies about how Japan was going to take over the world, which were themselves just retreads of stupid WWII propaganda films about how Japan was going to take over the world. It is largely a fabrication based on a handful of isolated incidents. Does it happen? Of course. It happens in Western countries too. It's just far, far from common.

      Full Disclosure: In addition to living here, I took 200 credits of Asian language, culture, history, and political science in college, studying both in the US and Japan. 'm not talking out of my ass here.

    62. Re:Poor guy... by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > something about current Asian cultures seems to me to be broken

      Every human culture of which I am aware is broken in one way or another.

      Since we're talking about Chinese cultural weirdness today, the most bizarre example I'm aware of is the One China Policy. It's foolish, childish, stubborn, and clearly at odds with reality -- practically a textbook definition of "insane".

      But it's not like Western culture doesn't have some pretty off-the-wall norms as well. Maybe you're used to them because you grew up with them, but that doesn't stop them from being stupid and wrong. My personal pet peeve is the way American parents are *expected* to outright lie to their children about certain things -- not just on occasion, but we're talking about pervasively deceiving the kids on certain issues throughout their whole childhood, deliberately and systematically working to prevent them from discovering the truth. (I'm talking about Santa Claus, arguably the most evil holiday-related tradition in any society, ever.) Children are *gullible*. Their parents should be teaching them discernment, helping them learn to distinguish truth from falsehood, not deliberately sabotaging their development. Is it any wonder Americans are cynical, if they can't even trust their own parents growing up?

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    63. Re:Poor guy... by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      You have noticed an important thing but strongly mis-interpreted it. Ask yourself: what can drive a sane, grown up person to a suicide?

      Two things are common. A deadly illness and a falling down of status. If you read up some history of all the misery and changes people of former USSR and former Warsaw pact have expirienced (and many still do) it is no wonder that the suicide rate is that high. This feeling of having fallen down and the lack of hope that it ever gets better is especially strong in the Russian-speaking minorities of Baltic countries who are considered second class citizens at best (and occupation force at worst) by the natives. It gets better, though - the suicide rates were more than twice as bad in 1995.

      The thing about deadly illness is also a part of it - AIDS rates in Eastern Europe are on the continuous rise and are as bad as in some African countries (For example 1.3% of all adults in Estonia have AIDS).

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    64. Re:Poor guy... by jonadab · · Score: 1

      Russia's land is mostly in Asia, but a very disproportionate amount of the population lives west of the Urals, in the portion generally considered to be European.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    65. Re:Poor guy... by jonadab · · Score: 1

      Okay, but Eastern Europeans commit suicide because they are clinically depressed and don't want to go on living, not because they are honor-bound to commit suicide in order to save face and avoid bringing shame on their families for seven generations.

      The European scenario is certainly unfortunate, but the Asian way is weirder.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    66. Re:Poor guy... by jonadab · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, if the dude had been an American, he'd probably be filing a lawsuit against his employer even as we speak.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    67. Re:Poor guy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had the same misconception but it is easily dispersed.

      According to this the top 7 are not Asian. China is way down there, below France, Poland, Switzerland, Uruguay.

      Country, Male Suicide per 100k, Female suicide per 100k, total pop suicide per 100k, year

      Lithuania 68.1 12.9 38.6 2005

        Belarus 63.3 10.3 35.1 2003

        Russia 58.1 9.8 32.2 2005

        Slovenia 42.1 11.1 26.3 2006

        Hungary 42.3 11.2 26.0 2005

        Kazakhstan 45.0 8.1 25.9 2005

        Latvia 42.0 9.6 24.5 2005

        Japan 34.8 13.2 23.7 2006

      I assumed the suicide rate would be much higher in Asia, but I guess it is just reported more or happens in more high-profile cases or something.

      Help me with basic math...as I don't understand how the 'total pop suicide/100k' can be less than the sum of male + female. For instance if 68.1 males and 12.9 females whack themselves then wouldn't that be 81 total pop suicides per 100k per year?

      Not trolling or trying to be an ass...I seriously wish for clarity here.

      Thank you for your patience.

    68. Re:Poor guy... by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > Submitting a bad report and having your boss say "Maybe you should re-write that"

      I've not been to Japan myself, but from what I've read on the internet, I'm guessing a Japanese boss wouldn't say it that bluntly unless it was so unbelievably bad that you *deserved* to have your career ruined. If it was just bad in an ordinary way, the boss would perhaps say something more like, "This is really good. Say, have you ever seen the reports your predecessor submitted? Some of those were pretty good, too." And from this you are supposed to infer that your report was unacceptably bad, and that you need to go study your predecessor's reports and figure out how to do a decent job of it.

      But I also get the impression that losing face in Asia is seen as much worse than having your career ruined (although, career is very important in Japan, moreso than in the west). It also brings unbearable shame on your entire family, including your parents, and probably ruins your children's chances in life, and maybe your grandchildren as well, and your little dog too.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    69. Re:Poor guy... by toddestan · · Score: 1

      By simple math, 68.1 per 100k plus 12.9 per 100k would be 81.0 per 200k, which is 40.5 per 100k. This is close to the number above, but not exactly. The reason is that by adding the numbers together like that, that's assuming a population with exactly the same number of females as male. However, this is not the case, with most countries having more females than males, so that's why the number is a bit lower than you would otherwise expect. If you're clever, you can back out the male:female ratio from the data above.

    70. Re:Poor guy... by cas2000 · · Score: 1

      Suicide is wrong for many reasons.

      yes, suicide IS wrong for many reasons.

      there are, however, some reasons where it is right(*). for example, choosing a painless dignified death over an agonising death like cancer or a living hell like final stage motor neurone disease.

      (*) or, at least, a perfectly valid, legitimate, and understandable choice for an individual to make regardless of what you and your black-and-white view of the world say.

    71. Re:Poor guy... by Entropy98 · · Score: 1

      I think he was trying to say that there isn't anything worth giving your life for, like an iphone, 1000 inch TV, or even a flying car. Not that there arent any imaginable circumstances where death would be preferable to living.

    72. Re:Poor guy... by orngjce223 · · Score: 1

      It's a weighted average. 68.1 males per 100k males. 12.9 females per 100k females. You can't just add, you have to account for how 100k of a population is made of both males and females.

      --
      Note: I was 13 when I wrote most of this. Take with several grains of salt.
    73. Re:Poor guy... by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "Apart for Congressman Freezer Bagman, the current crop of federal Dems haven't been stupid enough to get caught recently. Dem. Governors and Lieutenant Govs. are another issue entirely, but then he didn't mention Palin's investigations either."

      Wasn't Palin (before she quit) recently found to be innocent of all those charges?

      As for Dems...what about Charlie Rangel (sp?) the New York fellow, who was in trouble for tax problems in the Bahamas I think? The recent rash of Dem's that had to withdraw from coming in to the Obama administration...ok, they kinda got caught, but, there are others that have been caught for things, that if not illegal, certainly aren't ethical (sweetheart loans from Freddie/Fannie)...that they survived. Possibly it was because most of the media these days seems to be looking the other way it seems?

      Hey..I've got no love for either side, personally I consider them all damned Republocrats.....but, let's not just point the finger at one side of the aisle....

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    74. Re:Poor guy... by korean.ian · · Score: 1

      mod up please. Suicides in Japan/South Korea jumped tremendously during the currency crisis that swept through Asia in the late 90s.

    75. Re:Poor guy... by mjwx · · Score: 1

      I don't like playing cultural imperialist, but something about current Asian cultures seems to me to be broken:

      From your strictly western viewpoint yes. But Asian culture is less tolerant of failure and suicide is considered an honourable death in many cultures, especially as a means of atonement for failure. Aversion to suicide in western society is almost entirely religion based with most catholic churches declaring suicide to be a sin as God is the only one who can decide who lives and who dies.

      This seems to be more prevalent in the far eastern societies, SE Asia and Near Asia (India and the Stan's) aren't as bad. Although suicide is often used as a way out by Indians, it doesn't seem to be as ritualistic as in Japan, China and Korea. In Korea, this practice is somewhat toned down, evidenced by the high rates of management resignations. If a middle or upper manager fails in the west a company will over look it, but in the east their resignation will be expected.

      We must be accepting of other peoples culture, even that bankrupt American culture (that's sarcasm for the sarcasms impaired).

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    76. Re:Poor guy... by Bronster · · Score: 1

      I have no joke, I'd just like to quote:

      "Suicides in Japan/South Korea jumped"

    77. Re:Poor guy... by mjwx · · Score: 1

      I think he was trying to say that there isn't anything worth giving your life for, like an iphone,

      It's not about the phone, its probably about his job. He would have lost it for losing the iphones, if he lost this job he has no chance of getting another job like it. The guy probably had a family and didn't want to face the shame of being unable to provide for them.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    78. Re:Poor guy... by tapanitarvainen · · Score: 1

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_suicide_rate

      Looking at this list [...]

      Note though that the list is about "deaths officially recorded as suicides", and it is well known that in some countries suicides are often officially recorded as accidents because they're considered shameful to the family. So take the statistics with a grain of salt.

    79. Re:Poor guy... by mjwx · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Everyone dies. What is so wrong with going out at your own choosing?

      God says you're wrong son.

      Western aversion to suicide is religious. In Western Christian churches only God has the power to choose who lives or dies. Eastern religions like Buddhism, Confucianism and Taoism don't have this compunction. In Bhuddism, suicide is one of those "I really rather you didn'ts", being a reincarnation religion it doesn't matter that much, you just may have to incur some bad Karma which determines weather you come back as a higher or lower creature.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    80. Re:Poor guy... by dafing · · Score: 1
      LOL

      I'd hazard that it's something in the common implementation of 'honor' and self-value that predisposes people towards a massive breakdown in the face of 'public disgrace'

      Damn that honour and self value! We should be teaching people they are worthless!

      I think its a terrible thing, suicide in any case, Im very sad for this young mans family.

      --
      --- ...or a new slashdot signature. Dear aunt, let's set so double the killer delete select all
    81. Re:Poor guy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe we could learn something from them. I wouldn't mind if CEOs committed suicide after running successful businesses into the ground.

    82. Re:Poor guy... by glenstar · · Score: 1

      I had an office in the Hanzomon area of Tokyo that had a deck that looked across the street into an engineering firm. Yes, the workers were there from 8AM-6 or 7PM every single day (including the ubiquitous half-day Saturdays). HOWEVER... 9 times out of ten when I went out on the deck to smoke a good portion of them were staring into space, slumped in their chairs, or outright napping. Sure, they worked long hours but I highly doubt they were any more productive than workers nearly anywhere else in the world. That's not to say the Japanese are not industrious... rather that the image of the busy-bee worker putting in long hours is more important than the actual output.

    83. Re:Poor guy... by ablmf · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I am Chinese and I think you really understand what is happening here. But it's really hard to find a way out. If we have more protection of employees, higher salaries, less working hours, it will definitely make massive unemployment. The point is, if we do think all people are born EQUAL, we should accept that, some one work harder and require less will get the job, the ones who works less but earn much more salary will lost his job, even if they are your fellow citizens.

    84. Re:Poor guy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      South Korea is 11th and Hong Kong (not sure why this didn't get lumped with China) 18th.

      Pretty much the same reason Puerto Rico isn't lumped in with the United States.

    85. Re:Poor guy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously he wasn't because his argument was that only one of them committed massive fraud.

    86. Re:Poor guy... by Dr.+Impossible+II · · Score: 0

      Not so much wrong, but stupid. I mean, you are only given ONE life, why the fsck would you waste it? NOTHING is worth giving your life over....

      There are many things worth dying for. Sounds like you're just a selfish pussy.

      There are also many reasons to kill yourself.

      I can't believe you were modded insightful.

    87. Re:Poor guy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As they walked, they could see into offices where employees could be seen through the windows, sleeping on the desks they had been working at all day. How are you supposed to compete with that?

      Easy. You just have to realize that the kind of creative work that really creates value (and quality) doesn't benefit from working until you fall asleep on your desk. A sustainable pace is more efficient in the long run.

    88. Re:Poor guy... by codeButcher · · Score: 2, Insightful

      On the other hand, there is a potentially slippery slope here for the acceptability of: suicide --> assisted suicide --> encouraged suicide --> eugenics.

      Oh, I think I should have included "Profit!!!" somewhere on that list....

      --
      Free, as in your money being freed from the confines of your account.
    89. Re:Poor guy... by RDW · · Score: 1

      'Western culture isn't immune to these effects either (cf. high-profile financial advisors committing suicide in 2008-2009), but I understand that it's significantly more of an issue in Asia.'

      Most Western companies in recent years have also tended not to hire thugs to deal with suspects by kidnapping, beating, and maybe worse (at least not directly, or on home turf):

      'Sun allegedly committed suicide after being detained and beaten by a man surnamed Gu, a senior official of Taiwan-based Foxconn Technology Group's security department, the newspaper [Southern Metropolis Daily] said, citing Sun's classmate. Sun chatted online with the classmate, who has not been identified, before his death. Sun said he was being investigated after one iPhone went missing at the company. "But I didn't steal it. I never steal anything," Sun said during the online chat. "How can you (the senior official) take me by force and beat me?"...Apple put pressure on the company after the phone went missing, the report said...[and] Foxconn began to investigate Sun. According to Sun's girlfriend, three company officials went to Sun's home to search it on July 15, but they didn't find the iPhone and left with Sun. She received a short message from Sun at 1:48am last Thursday, saying he had some trouble and asked her not to tell his family, the report said. Police said they will first determine whether Sun was murdered and then investigate Foxconn's treatment of Sun. Gu was suspended and under police investigation now, Foxconn said, which added it never allows employees to do anything against the law.'

      http://www.shanghaidaily.com/sp/article/2009/200907/20090721/article_408142.htm

    90. Re:Poor guy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably coz the men have small dicks?

      I'm going to hell for this one. At least I'll go anonymously :P

    91. Re:Poor guy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting theory. My reckoning is that men are generally under more pressure than women, and are expected to solve all their own problems (or even genetically predisposed to try to do so). It's much easier as a man to feel helpless and alone, and also to feel worthless because of that. Women, on the other hand, generally have a much lower bar, socially, for success, and also tend not to see seeking help as weakness.

      Of course, it could be a combination of what we've proposed. It could even be that women are more likely to use suicide as a form of communication (and thus choose methods likely to fail), whereas men are more likely to use suicide as a permanent vacation.

    92. Re:Poor guy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The jobs situation gets even worse when you consider automation and better design. From:
          http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jobless_recovery
      "In the 1960s, The Triple Revolution memorandum suggested that machines would continue to reduce the number of manual laborers needed, while increasing the skill needed to work, thereby producing greater unemployment. This trend would break the rationale for a link between income and jobs which otherwise would tend to limit industrial productivity to what the remaining workers can purchase. More recently, Marshall Brain has suggested in his Robotic Nation essay that a jobless recovery is exactly what you would expect when automation and robots eliminate jobs. To maintain full employment, an economy has to create new jobs to replace the ones that have been automated, but robots and automation can more and more easily fill many of the new jobs that get created, a trend that will only accelerate as robotics and artificial intelligence continue to improve. An economy with rising productivity also has to have rising demand per capita to balance the increased production, but for many things like housing or energy use demand may be limited per capita or may grow more slowly than exponentially rising productivity (driven in part by Moore's law and falling prices for computers and automation). Psychologists have refined ideas like Maslow's hierarchy of needs that suggest increasing material abundance only increases happiness up to a point. So, if productivity rises faster than demand, then one would expect falling prices and increasing unemployment. But without continual innovation, including increasing automation to lower production costs, profits in a market-driven economy will fall to zero through competition, and the profit-driven market place would freeze up. So this problem may be inherent to real economies (as opposed to theoretical ones with infinite demand), with a jobless recovery reflecting essentially a divide by zero error in mainstream economic thinking, with costs trending to zero as productivity greatly exceeds demand. Moving beyond this divide-by-zero error might require some sort of post-scarcity economy."

    93. Re:Poor guy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe you were being spoon fed disinformation.

    94. Re:Poor guy... by Zashi · · Score: 1

      The Philippines has a low suicide rate because Filipinos are too lazy or too stupid to kill themselves. Besides, the humidity makes it hard to do anything other than lay around. "I'm such an embarrassment. I'm going to kill myself... but maybe later when it's not as hot." Also, this isn't just racist humor, it's self-deprecating racist humor ;).

      --
      Skiffy is Spiffy, but Ort is tort.
    95. Re:Poor guy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or not dropping their weight

    96. Re:Poor guy... by cayenne8 · · Score: 0, Troll
      "There are many things worth dying for. Sounds like you're just a selfish pussy"

      What are those many reasons?

      Selfish? I dunno...I think the instinct towards self preservation is there for a reason.

      I can see with the example of someone dying of cancer in horrible pain, that self termination would be a viable option, but, short of that, I cannot think of a person, thing or movement that would be worth my willingly giving my life for...

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    97. Re:Poor guy... by LunaticTippy · · Score: 1

      Those are tragic reasons that help explain the high suicide rate in eastern europe. It is strange that Asia has such a suicide-eager image when the reality is so different.

      --
      Man, you really need that seminar!
    98. Re:Poor guy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am Asian - shame has such a huge effect on people that it is like that.

    99. Re:Poor guy... by sonicmerlin · · Score: 0

      I don't know about "cutting off children". Maybe an extremely rich, ultra-proud father will do something like that if his child utterly disappoints the family, but for the most part Asian families are extremely tight-knit, and take very good care of their members for much longer periods of time than Western families.

    100. Re:Poor guy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh shit, 200 credits?!

    101. Re:Poor guy... by socrplayr813 · · Score: 1

      I have to wonder if those are actually suicides and not just female babies having 'accidents.'

      --
      The confidence of ignorance will always overcome the indecision of knowledge.
    102. Re:Poor guy... by StreetStealth · · Score: 1

      In the 1940s, it was thought that Japan would take over the world militarily, in the 1980s, it was thought that Japan would take over the world economically, and in the 2000s, it was thought that Japan would take over the world culturally.

      --
      Your mind is clear / The things that you fear / Will fade with how much you / Believe what you hear
    103. Re:Poor guy... by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If we have more protection of employees, higher salaries, less working hours, it will definitely make massive unemployment.

      I think this a fallacy promoted by those who want to maintain profit margins. If this were true, then we should expect to see mass unemployment in most western countries where these protections apply. But we don't. And while it's true that many jobs have gone to China, one could make the case that the average Chinese worker is actually worse off in terms of quality of life compared to the western worker, who is only marginally so, if at all.

      The great paradox of the Chinese economic boom is how it has so failed to significantly raise the living standards of the population as a whole. The reason it has failed is because of lack of protection and fair compensation for employees. There is little domestic demand for goods as people have little money and less time to buy them. Western economies were similar for decades, with successive booms doing little to improve the lot of the average man until labour laws came into force, primarily after the second world war.

      Industrial relations are an extremely important part of any economy, and it is vital that a balance be achieved there. China has so far failed to achieve this balance. The consequences for failing to do so may be dire indeed.

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    104. Re:Poor guy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Specifically my ex-wife...

    105. Re:Poor guy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and the only one where the female rate is above the male rate

    106. Re:Poor guy... by n7ytd · · Score: 1

      Oh, I think I should have included "Profit!!!" somewhere on that list

      That's right after "Soylent".

    107. Re:Poor guy... by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Nah, men are just better at killing people, even themselves.

      --
    108. Re:Poor guy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's because desperate women can almost always turn into prostitutes or attach themselves to men, especially socially awkward men.

    109. Re:Poor guy... by TheLink · · Score: 1

      What do you mean?

      Is that like some cops classifying "white guy walking into a black gangsta neighborhood while wearing a t-shirt with racially inflammatory words printed on it" as suicide, and some not? :)

      --
    110. Re:Poor guy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who do you think drove these guys to it?

    111. Re:Poor guy... by Lars+T. · · Score: 0, Troll

      Huh, interesting... makes you wonder if playing Russian roulette counts as suicide...

      /yeah, go me for perpetuating stereotypes :P

      No, it counts as "Accident while cleaning the gun".

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    112. Re:Poor guy... by Dr.+Impossible · · Score: 0

      What are those many reasons?

      You should go ask police officers, firefighters and soldiers.

    113. Re:Poor guy... by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      >>What? I think you missed the point I was talking about.

      Your words:


      "there is something worth giving your life for and many of us have put our lives on the line for that. Your diatribe seems to invalidate the sacrifice of those that gave their lives for their countries, I think that needs to be corrected."

      If you were talking about something other than what you wrote, well I'm sorry I missed that somehow.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    114. Re:Poor guy... by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      What do you mean?

      Is that like some cops classifying "white guy walking into a black gangsta neighborhood while wearing a t-shirt with racially inflammatory words printed on it" as suicide, and some not? :)

      Well not quite, more like this. In Japan for example a suicide, where someone jumps off a bridge and drowns may be classified as a drowning. Where as someone who commits suicide but pillpopping is an overdose, and someone who hangs themselves is an actual suicide.

      Where in some countries in Europe, pillpopping is not suicide. Hanging is suicide, there was some classification of manslaughter that one of the former state countries had that was classified in their stats as suicide as well. The problem is, not all crimes in a true crime statistics are actually what they're reported to be. My personal favorite was in China, murder isn't classified as murder. But as intentional death by a second party(death by other), or rape. Depending on the country, it can be classified as rape, or unwilling sexual participant(but not rape).

      Criminology is one of those screwed up areas. Some countries lie, and in other cases it's simply a misinterpretation of the meaning. Which is why you always check the raw data.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    115. Re:Poor guy... by jcr · · Score: 1

      This sounds rather like an anti-Semitic remark to me, Sir!

      No, an anti-semitic remark would be to claim that all jews support the activities of the criminals I listed.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    116. Re:Poor guy... by grumpyman · · Score: 1

      Seriously, I'd think it's not about just Asia culture but the result of free market and the global village. North American wants Walmart/resource-exploit lifestyle, China feeds to it with cheap labour. To me, the China situation is comparable to illegal immigrants in the states. Everybody hates them (they'are commie/illegal), but OTOH, people benefits from them without knowing it.

    117. Re:Poor guy... by hekinami · · Score: 1

      I agree with you that we can't look at another culture from our own culture's point of view and expect to make sense of it.

  3. Yeah sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Illegal searches, intimidation, then "suicide"... Uh huh... yeah...

    1. Re:Yeah sure by escay · · Score: 1

      what good is killing him? they would never know what happened to the missing prototype that way.

    2. Re:Yeah sure by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      We should definitely ignore any questions of rule of law and labor practices and, instead, speculate on the culture of the mysterious chinaman. We'll definitely find the cause there...

    3. Re:Yeah sure by 0x537461746943 · · Score: 1

      Unless they already got that from him. It might be strictly punishment.

    4. Re:Yeah sure by twostix · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If people in the west think that this sort of thing is limited to low level Chinese citizens they'd be wrong as well.

      Witness the latest Rio Tinto troubles - they've "arrested" an Australian Rio Tinto (a major aussie-uk mining company that operates in Aus) employee on "suspicion" of "economic espionage" - holding him without charge for two weeks now. WTF is "economic espionage"? It's upsetting strategic Chinese interests in the course of doing business with said interests is what it is.

      See apparently it's just a happy coincidence that just two weeks ago Rio Tinto majorly embarrassed the government run Chinalco giving it the finger on a $19.5 billion dollar deal to allow Chinas government to own nearly half of Rio Tinto. Also the fact that Rio Tinto has been the loudest in refusing the Chinese governments increasingly aggressive demands to cut the price of Iron Ore 45% has no bearing on the arrest either, or the fact that they also just arrested four CEOS of "private" Chinese steel mills.

      No those things have no bearing on anything at all according to China's government run media, and if you can't trust state owned media of a totalitarian government who can you trust?

      China's awakening, this sort of thing is going to become more and more common as it asserts its position and we should all be worried.

    5. Re:Yeah sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank You...hello, Humpty Dumpty didn't fall either...

    6. Re:Yeah sure by Crudely_Indecent · · Score: 1

      Illegal searches...

      This is China we're talking about. I doubt any search there is illegal.

      --


      "Lame" - Galaxar
    7. Re:Yeah sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and people think Ballmer is unstable, at least he only throws chairs.

  4. jumped? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and someone saw that?
     

  5. Re:Who cares by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Your bosses were mean to you: sue them, find another job, learn to live with it.

    Yes, because that works so well in China, right?

    Get some fucking compassion, idiot.

  6. On the upside.... by Jailbrekr · · Score: 4, Funny

    There is now another liver available for transplant.

    --
    Feed the need: Digitaladdiction.net
    1. Re:On the upside.... by Sporkinum · · Score: 1

      Nope, Damaged by impact. They'll fire up the execution vans when they need some fresh ones.

      --
      "He's lost in a 'floyd hole"
    2. Re:On the upside.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but at least it is nice and tenderized

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MythBusters_(2008_season)
      Episode 103

    3. Re:On the upside.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hehe.. I have my Budweiser and beeper ready!!

    4. Re:On the upside.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pink: Yeah, Charlie, we're going to Candy Mountain. Come with us, Charlie.
      Charlie: Alright, guys, you do know that there is no actual Candy Mountain, right?
      Blue: Shun the non-believer.
      Pink: Shhhunnn.
      Blue: Shhhhhuunnnnnnn.

    5. Re:On the upside.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is now another liver available for transplant.

      How Insensitive.

      (Score:0, Very UNFunny)

    6. Re:On the upside.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good point. I'm off to the pub, don't wait up.

    7. Re:On the upside.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is now another liver available for transplant.

      This is an insult to Chinese people. One death due to professional reason, and a post mentioning "transplant" is considered to be really "Funny" by Slashdot moderators.
      Shame on you.

  7. A lot like GM in the 1930s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    They also sent goonsquads over to worker's houses to search for stolen parts and stuff.

  8. suppliers... by Bombula · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "We require our suppliers to treat all workers with dignity and respect"

    Because nothing says dignity and respect like working in a sweatshop and being paid pennies an hour...

    --
    A-Bomb
    1. Re:suppliers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Child labor: It just works

    2. Re:suppliers... by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because nothing says dignity and respect like working in a sweatshop and being paid pennies an hour...

      Welcome to your "free trade" competition. This is the world that business lobbyists want, and they aren't going away, so get used to it. Democracy, my ass.
         

    3. Re:suppliers... by clam666 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because nothing says dignity and respect like working in a sweatshop and being paid pennies an hour...

      Listen pal, I know you hippies live in fantasy world of employee unions and benefits, but how do you expect to get your brand new unlocked IPhone for only a few bucks, loaded with tons of free-to-download applications if they didn't have that kind of labor practice?

      Sheesh.

      --
      I'm a satanic clam.
    4. Re:suppliers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      exactly.
      http://storyofstuff.com/

    5. Re:suppliers... by Anonymous+Psychopath · · Score: 0

      Because nothing says dignity and respect like working in a sweatshop and being paid pennies an hour...

      Welcome to your "free trade" competition. This is the world that business lobbyists want, and they aren't going away, so get used to it. Democracy, my ass.

      Don't you mean Communism?

      And yeah, I know, China is about as communist as the US is democratic.

      --

      Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.

    6. Re:suppliers... by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "Because nothing says dignity and respect like working in a sweatshop and being paid pennies an hour..."

      Still..when it is better than any other job that person could possibly get over there...then it is just a job. A good job. Would you rather they have no jobs than the sweatshop?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    7. Re:suppliers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "We require our suppliers to treat all workers with dignity and respect" ...but fully understand if they do not.

    8. Re:suppliers... by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 4, Interesting

      A better way of putting it would be "how do you plan to pay premiums for feelgood products when the subcontractors involved lie through their teeth?" I've done plenty of business in China and seen everything spiffed up for the big customer visit, workers called in a big meeting and told to lie, etc. Doesn't surprise me one bit that a Apple vendor has hired thugs for security. At least the worker at fault had the gumption to take responsibility for his failure by committing suicide.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    9. Re:suppliers... by fishbowl · · Score: 3, Insightful

      >Would you rather they have no jobs than the sweatshop?

      I think I might. If people weren't deprived of their time and energy, they might be able to subsist *and* overthrow their government.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    10. Re:suppliers... by Kurusuki · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You know, making cross-cultural references like that doesn't always go as you expect. You can't go comparing working in a sweatshop in, say China, to working in a sweatshop in the USA. In places like China, especially the more rural towns, your options are often work in a sweat shop for next to nothing, or work in the fields doing back breaking labor for far less. While sweatshops aren't glamorous, they are jobs. I'd personally compare working in a sweatshop in China to working at a bigbox store like Walmart in the USA. They aren't desirable jobs, but for some people, they provide income that would otherwise not be there.

    11. Re:suppliers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so you say is OK to exploit other people so you can have your fucking fancy iphone, ...way to go, you got to love the new order, globalization and the American way

      I like your sincerity and while we are on this, it just came to my , I have the perfect work for your sister

      P.S Please make sure I get notified if you get shot in the head, I like reasons for a party

      Yours truly

      Your biological dad

    12. Re:suppliers... by Paracelcus · · Score: 1

      Yeah and you can buy a pair of sneakers at WalMart for $10.00, how'd you think that happened?

      --
      I killed da wabbit -Elmer Fudd
    13. Re:suppliers... by xenocide2 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I heard a piece on NPR about Chinese firms hiring Americans to present a "foreign firm" look to what is truthfully a local company. For whatever reasons, Chinese firms feel discriminated against for being Chinese by both foreign companies and other Chinese firms.

      I'm not sure that hiring actors as negotiators for an hour is helping the whole trustworthy stereotype...

      --
      I Browse at +4 Flamebait

      Open Source Sysadmin

    14. Re:suppliers... by tmosley · · Score: 1

      Because nothing else says dignity like starving to death in the countryside, or prostituting themselves for the same price.

      People work in factories, even sweatshops VOLUNTARILY, because it's the best option for them. Contrary to popular belief (propaganda), China does not consist of 990 million slaves and 10 million rich people. There is a middle class emerging, and a lower class that is working their way there, thanks to industrialization. It's exactly what happened in every other industrialized country. It's just that that process gets a bad reputation since it is a transitional period between total oppression (whether feudalism or Communism) and freedom (free markets and democracy).

      America is currently heading in the opposite direction. Just as Rome descended into serfdom to maintain their power structure and welfare state, so shall the US. God help us all.

    15. Re:suppliers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where I live in the US we only have 4% of the our original forests left

      Good job; almost there. keep it up...

    16. Re:suppliers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't. That's why I live within my means like a good 1800's boy and buy something less flashy with a cheaper unlimited plan.

    17. Re:suppliers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right. Because the free-to-download applications are all labored onto the iPhone.

    18. Re:suppliers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because nothing says dignity and respect like working in a sweatshop and being paid pennies an hour...

      Listen pal, I know you hippies live in fantasy world of employee unions and benefits, but how do you expect to get your brand new unlocked IPhone for only a few bucks, loaded with tons of free-to-download applications if they didn't have that kind of labor practice?

      Sheesh.

      That's weird - the fantasy world I live in has Intel making chips in Leixlip, Ireland, Texas Instruments still making a big chunk of technological magic in the good ole USA, has Blackberry making their techno-tools in Canada... dang, I never knew this was fantasy world. When I wake up I'm going to be massively starving - unless I've been eating my pillow. Geez, I sure hope I haven't eaten my pillow...

    19. Re:suppliers... by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah, I've done that a few times. It's not "discriminated against", whatever that means (not surprised NPR took that angle, though). Chinese people consider foreign-invested projects as desirable, while local innovation is considered shabby and not likely to increase China's standing in the world.

      For those of you having problems wrapping your brain around this idea, compare this: you're considering two vendors, one owned by Joel and one by Joe-Jack. Joel wears his sunglasses indoors, has an iPod conspicuously on his hip, and speaks English the same as people on TV. Joe-Jack takes his sunglassess off when it's not sunny, has an old cell phone in a holster on his hip, and speaks with the accent of where he's from. Which would everyone choose to develop a product?

      To make everything crystal-clear, Joel represents the company with foreigners working for it, and Joe-Jack is the face of indigenous development in China.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    20. Re:suppliers... by copponex · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Actually, quite a few products are made by well paid people in western countries, precisely because they have unions. Not all unions are good, but many are.

      Corporations don't lower their prices when they reduce their costs. They just pocket the money. That's why Apple has tens of billions of dollars in the bank - they moved their manufacturing to China and didn't lower their prices in line with the reduction in manufacturing costs. That's why the middle class in America has been making less money for nearly thirty years, and corporate profits continue to rise, and union membership has declined. America is the only modern western nation where the middle class is worse off than in 1980, and the only nation that has a broken union movement. This is not a coincidence.

      You live in a fantasy land where somehow giving all the power in a corporation to a board that's nothing more than a modern royal court is good for anyone but the royal court. Do you think for one minute that one of these guys thinks twice about pocketing extra cash for a second vacation home over offering a good paying job to someone they don't know?

      Give me a fucking break.

    21. Re:suppliers... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      How do you expect to get your brand new unlocked IPhone for only a few bucks, loaded with tons of free-to-download applications if they didn't have that kind of labor practice?

      Can't say for others, but I don't. I would gladly buy stuff manufactured in Europe or North America (or, really, any other place with sane laws protecting workers) for a premium. But in many categories, it is very hard to find anything there. Sometimes impossible. And there's one more problem: because demand for things not "made in China" (and thus not cheap) is so low, it means that economy of scale doesn't work for them, thus raising the price even higher; and it forms a positive feedback loop. The fewer people buy those more expensive products not made in sweatshops, the fewer such products get manufactured, and the more they cost per unit - causing even fewer people to buy them.

      I really think that it is a case for a form of protectionism - only allow to import goods, manufacturing process for which meets some minimum norms regarding worker conditions. I'm sure those could be worked out.

      Yes, that means more expensive iPhones. Which is why I guess this is never going to fly.

    22. Re:suppliers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Corporations don't lower their prices when they reduce their costs. They just pocket the money. ...

      You live in a fantasy land ...

      Pot, meet kettle.

    23. Re:suppliers... by syousef · · Score: 1

      Listen pal, I know you hippies live in fantasy world of employee unions and benefits, but how do you expect to get your brand new unlocked IPhone for only a few bucks, loaded with tons of free-to-download applications if they didn't have that kind of labor practice?

      Some of us would gladly give that up if employees were paid decently. It's called human compassion. I know it's a novel concept for some but geeks aren't immune to it.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    24. Re:suppliers... by nashv · · Score: 1

      Uh, seeing that, Joel seems to be doing unnecessary behaviours (sunglasses), is apparently interested in appearances more than function , and sounds like TV (make-beleive, fiction)- I'd say Joe-Jack is the obvious choice for doing ANY kind of work.

      --
      Entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem.
    25. Re:suppliers... by bkpark · · Score: 1

      Because nothing says dignity and respect like working in a sweatshop and being paid pennies an hour...

      I don't know. Maybe it's just me, but the iPhone girl seemed happy enough (at least until we Westerners uploaded her pictures to the Net). Would you be able to take a picture with a smiling face working in a sweatshop and being paid pennies an hour?

      Also, I disagree with the notion that sweatshops are bad. Sweatshops may seem bad from our point of view, but the presence of the sweatshop improves the local living standards, by presumably offering better wage than any other local employers—why would anyone work there voluntarily otherwise? Do you really think all those people will be in a better situation if all those shops just packed up and left?

    26. Re:suppliers... by mi · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Actually, quite a few products are made by well paid people in western countries, precisely because they have unions.

      Citation needed.

      Not all unions are good, but many are.

      I suppose, not all trusts were bad either, but the US has long-standing laws against them. What many fail to realize, is that trade unions are the sametrusts seeking to become monopolistic sources of their members' services. That they sometimes fight for that through highly illegal means, including violence ought to subject them to anti-racketeering laws as well...

      Now, I am all for "freedom of association" — even if Senators McCain & Feingold aren't — and have no problems with collective bargaining per se. What I see as evil, however, are the legal advantages and protections, that unions enjoy even in our mostly free country...

      Corporations don't lower their prices when they reduce their costs. They just pocket the money.

      Fortunately, that is none of our business, is it?

      The government has a defect: it's potentially democratic. Corporations have no defect: they're pure tyrannies. -Chomsky

      Fortunately, nobody is forced to associate with corporations... I hear, the North Korea's and Cuba's borders are open to people wanting to move in... Quick, rush back to Chomsky's drivel to find a decent-sounding reason you are still here...

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    27. Re:suppliers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, the economic development myth!

      Are you dumb?

      Do you really think it's possible to a "underdeveloped" country to become developed? That a linear transition from poverty to wealth exits? No, there's none.

      Central economies have been central economies since the beginning of industrial age.

    28. Re:suppliers... by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      I wasn't talking just about China. Anyhow, the term "communism" is way overloaded such that it doesn't mean much anymore. We need a multidimensional, non-boolean classification system.

    29. Re:suppliers... by superdave80 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      America is the only modern western nation where the middle class is worse off than in 1980, and the only nation that has a broken union movement. This is not a coincidence.

      Yeah, if only we had more unions to fix our economy like they fixed the auto, airline, and public education industries, we'd be much better off.

    30. Re:suppliers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Putting it another way, China is the ULTIMATE Union; They have organised themselves to protest against the US trade restrictions in order to help their over a billion members get a job in a global marketplace.

      Give the world a break. The USA can get over being conceited, just like everywhere people are being asked to do more, differently and better. This is helped by lifelong quality education and training, and a culture of innovation and reform; something unions should support. Science education isn't broken in the USA is it?

      The people of China also pocket the money. That's why they have trillions of dollars of currency reserves. Perhaps the question should be; what can Americans do to improve the lives in China in order to earn some of that potential income?

      Harder than complaining for 'a fucking break' isn't it.

    31. Re:suppliers... by sjames · · Score: 1

      "We require our suppliers to treat all workers with dignity and respect"

      PULL!

    32. Re:suppliers... by matt_martin · · Score: 1

      "Dignity and Respect" , the darker, more Apple version of "Embrace and Extend"

      --
      Lurking in the desert
    33. Re:suppliers... by Arthur+Grumbine · · Score: 1

      Actually, quite a few products are made by well paid people in western countries, precisely because they have unions.

      Citation needed.

      I scrolled down to the responses just in the hopes that someone posted exactly this. Well done, sir. An honest request that had me taxing my memory for an answer. Perhaps the GP can provide us with at least a couple examples from the dozens (hundreds?) of big unions.

      Welcome to my friends list.

      --
      Now that I think about it, I'm pretty sure everything I just said is completely wrong.
    34. Re:suppliers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      America ... the only nation that has a broken union movement.

      +50 Funny

      Is there any nation in the world without a broken union movement?

    35. Re:suppliers... by Skye16 · · Score: 1

      Simple: he's an American citizen, and he has every right to vote for whatever set of individuals he wants to mold this nation into the nation he wants it to be. If that means it turns into a socialistic paradise, that's certainly his perogative.

      Note: I don't agree with him, but I'm fucking sick of self-righteous tool sheds, like yourself, who don't think he has the right to live here and want this country to be whatever the fuck he wants it to be, as long as he's following the democratic fucking process. If he can convince enough Americans to agree with him, and enough amendments get passed, that's all within the fucking framework of our political system. Just because it's different than what we have now doesn't mean he can't shoot for it, even if, in all reality, he has a better chance of jumping on a trampoline to the moon.

      But seriously, snide requests concerning moving to another country just make you look like an entire bag of douche. They don't help your argument, they just make you look like a cunt. For your own sake, please stop. It's the adult equivalent of saying "I'M RUBBER AND YOU'RE GLUE AND WHATEVER YOU SAY BOUNCES OFF ME AND STICKS TO YOU LOLOLOL" as a child. It's a great cop-out for the rest of the argument, because you don't have the testicular fortitude or intellectual standing to continue the argument on its own merits.

    36. Re:suppliers... by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      You obviously don't buy Apple.

    37. Re:suppliers... by sonicmerlin · · Score: 0

      Unions didn't bring down the auto industry. Scapegoating unions as the cause of serious management flaws is a favorite of big business. The real problem was the lack of vision and innovation of the auto companies. GM for example made hefty profits for decades, but rather than invest that into meaningful R&D for future products, they preferred to buy a few more jets for executives. Battery technology is one example of something that has stagnated for decades because of a lack of investment by the giant car companies. Another is the EV1 of the '90s.

    38. Re:suppliers... by sonicmerlin · · Score: 0

      Unions are the only things preventing big business from employing workers at the same wages and conditions as they do in China. I don't know what you mean by the "legal advantages and protections" unions enjoy, and I could be a wikitard like yourself and say "citation needed", but I prefer to point out that individual employees have absolutely no power when dealing with their employers. Legal protections are necessary to prevent businesses from using shady, unethical, and possibly fraudulent tactics to dissolve unions. Your lamenting over unions attempting to "monopolize" resources is retarded, considering businesses have historically severely abused their own monopoly over providing compensation to their employees. Your entire assertion that it's none of our business what corporations do with their amassed profits is nonsequitor. The original poster's argument was that raising the cost of labor does not harm the final product that companies put out. The more businesses cut costs, the more they pocket. The extra money they make essentially drains wealth from the national economy. From the perspective of societal and consumer good, unions can only help the working class. Depriving the super-friggin'-rich class from being able to buy one more personal jet does not really harm them.

    39. Re:suppliers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck you. Your iShit isn't worth his life. You're probably not as smart as he was to begin with. If I knew where you lived I'd go over your house and break all your stuff.

    40. Re:suppliers... by sabt-pestnu · · Score: 1

      Interesting that you should look to the unions as a panacea, too. Did the auto and airline unions jack fuel prices up? Did the teacher's unions set the curriculum requirements and funding levels?

      I have to take issue with both of you for assuming a single factor would kill or cure an industry.

    41. Re:suppliers... by superdave80 · · Score: 1

      Did the auto and airline unions jack fuel prices up?

      No, but the unions made it more difficult for the companies to shed excess personnel/wages to make up for it.

      Did the teacher's unions set the curriculum requirements and funding levels?

      Yeah, because teacher's unions would never get involved in the politics of education!

      I'm not saying that unions caused the problems in the industries mentioned, just that they are an impediment to fixing them. And I found the OP assertion that the middle class is worse off due to lack of strong unions ridiculous.

    42. Re:suppliers... by HungWeiLo · · Score: 1

      Doesn't this description include every company that has American management and Chinese manufacturing? (Apple, Sony, etc.)

      --
      There are a huge number of yeast infections in this county. Probably because we're downriver from the bread factory.
  9. Re:Who cares by clarkkent09 · · Score: 0

    Why not? Believe it or not people are able to sue when they are harmed by somebody, even in China.

    --
    Negative moral value of force outweighs the positive value of good intentions.
  10. For a business, patronage is the highest praise... by Guppy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    When it didn't turn up, he reported the incident to his boss, who ordered his apartment searched. There are reports of physical intimidation by Foxconn security personnel.

    The question is, will this lead to companies being less, or more likely to look upon Foxconn positively when considering an OEM who will keep their new prototype under wraps?

  11. Insert Your Morbid Tag Line Here by eric02138 · · Score: 3, Funny

    "The iPhone 4 - it's to die for!"

    1. Re:Insert Your Morbid Tag Line Here by El_Muerte_TDS · · Score: 1

      "The iPhone 4 - you'll be in seventh heaven"

    2. Re:Insert Your Morbid Tag Line Here by AlexBirch · · Score: 4, Funny

      I would have gone, with the iPhone 4, the kill switch is in you.

    3. Re:Insert Your Morbid Tag Line Here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

      This was purposefully held back by the Chinese government after Apple asked them not to release it prior to the iPhone 3GS launch. And people were speculating what the 'S' stood for. Now we know.

    4. Re:Insert Your Morbid Tag Line Here by slack_justyb · · Score: 1

      "Hey Bob, what is that in your pocket?"
      "Hmm? Oh, ummm, oh! It is one of the new iPhone 4 prototypes."
      "Cool! Where did you get it?"
      "Well, funny you should ask. I could have sworn that I sent all these little buggers to China just the other day."
      "Looks like you forgot one. Maybe you should head back to the office and send it on over?"
      "Eh, we are already here at the bar. I'm sure that it isn't that important."
      "True, true. It's not like anyone died over a prototype?"

    5. Re:Insert Your Morbid Tag Line Here by crazyvas · · Score: 1

      "The iPhone 4 - it comes with killer apps!"

    6. Re:Insert Your Morbid Tag Line Here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The iPhone 4 - it's worth a life!

    7. Re:Insert Your Morbid Tag Line Here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too expensive. Who do you think I am, Bob Page?

    8. Re:Insert Your Morbid Tag Line Here by Stele · · Score: 1

      In Communist China, iPhone kills you...

      Sorry - I'm dead inside.

    9. Re:Insert Your Morbid Tag Line Here by Megane · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It makes even more sense if you know about Tetraphobia.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    10. Re:Insert Your Morbid Tag Line Here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It makes even more sense if you know about Tetraphobia.

      What? Fear of beverages in tetrapaks?

    11. Re:Insert Your Morbid Tag Line Here by Hamoohead · · Score: 2, Funny

      Or even, "In Communist China, iPhone bricks YOU!"

      --
      "If your parents never had children, chances are you wonât either." -Dick Cavett
    12. Re:Insert Your Morbid Tag Line Here by craagz · · Score: 1

      All iPhone 4 will either be covered in blood or "haunted"

  12. Did he jump? by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

    I mean, you're completely right... So it seems kind of unlikely that someone would kill themselves over a phone.
     

    --
    Deleted
    1. Re:Did he jump? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You've obviously never been to /b/.

      And an iphone is much more valuable than a ipod.

    2. Re:Did he jump? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You've obviously never been to /b/.

      And an iphone is much more valuable than a ipod.

      Rules 1 & 2 damnit.

    3. Re:Did he jump? by goombah99 · · Score: 1

      No, he had my prototype Killer app for the iphone.

      --
      Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    4. Re:Did he jump? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only newfags think the rules only apply to raids. The rules were to keep oldfags from talking about it and bringing in newfags.

      l2history

    5. Re:Did he jump? by Miseph · · Score: 1

      Can there be a rule requiring all /b/fags to quaff bleach? That would solve a lot of problems for everyone.

      --
      Try not to take me more seriously than I take myself.
    6. Re:Did he jump? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      4chan.org/b is where stupid faggots like to hang out and pretend that they are badasses because they order pizzas to the houses of people they don't know.

      nobody gives a shit about you, your stupid club, or rules 1&2. go eat a horse dick.

  13. Re:Who cares by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So tell me, what color is the sky in your world?

  14. coverups by martas · · Score: 2, Insightful

    right, "suicide".

    1. Re:coverups by Hogwash+McFly · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah, he jumped off a balcony...on to some bullets.

      --
      Mother, do you think they'll like this sig?
    2. Re:coverups by Your.Master · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So, on the one hand, skepticisim is healthy.

      On the other hand, this isn't skepticism, this is just a different sort of gullibility. And if you allow yourself to believe so many things for which you have absolutely no evidence whatsoever, you draw yourself into a world that is not entirely like the real world, and approach insanity.

    3. Re:coverups by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 1

      I wish I had mod points for you.

    4. Re:coverups by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dudes, this is China. I live there (not too far from Foxconn actually) and I can tell you it's all about getting and preserving 'face'. At all times, under any circumstance.

      You can mistreat your wife at home as long as you make her look good in front of her friends and family. You can tell your boss he's messing up as long as you do so privately and speak highly of him in public. Hell, you can get the job you suck at just be sending your future boss a box of expensive tea. His 'face' is more important than your performance.

      This means that Foxconn could be the bastards you suspect them to be and helped this guy to the next world. Just as easily however it could just be that nobody died and the whole story is a face saving scam. A supposed suicide won't make them any less popular as an employer and it saves them from having to tell Apple that the iPhone got lost because they didn't allow him to take the official security precautions they agreed on with Apple. (Or god knows what other typical reason.)

    5. Re:coverups by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aahhhh ... "believe so many things for which you have absolutely no evidence whatsoever...."

      Are you calling the Pope insane?

      All the adherents of all the world's religions, including all the "people of the book", are bordering on insanity?

      OK, fair enough, that would explain the feelings of dystopian incongruity and cognitive dissonance I feel every time I watch the evening news

      ... or it could be the weed, I guess...

    6. Re:coverups by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I still stand firm that the 16 bullets were on the ground and the force of impact caused them to fly upward and land in his back.

    7. Re:coverups by martas · · Score: 1

      and?

      like i always say, insanity is ultimate freedom.

  15. Re:For a business, patronage is the highest praise by El+Torico · · Score: 1, Insightful

    It depends on whether or not they get the prototype back, doesn't it?

    --
    In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is usually crucified.
  16. Culture of Secrecy by jpmorgan · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is the high pressure culture of secrecy taken to its logical conclusion in a country with little worker protection. I highly doubt Apple has any legal responsibility in this, but they do share a portion of the moral culpability along with the management of Foxconn. Did the senior management of Foxconn push the man out a window? No, but they created the corporate culture in which it happened. Likewise, Apple have worked with Foxconn for years now; they created the high pressure culture of secrecy and then turned a blind eye to how Foxconn enforces it.

    1. Re:Culture of Secrecy by loteck · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And just to take this to its logical, and far more important end, the consumers who support this kind of business by voting in droves with their wallets are the singularly most important party turning "a blind eye". This is applicable across all retail. The conditions under which the goods we buy are prepared, be it Nike shoes or a Big Mac or an iPhone, is ultimately the responsibility of the individuals who are purchasing those goods. They hold all the power and therefore virtually all of the responsibility.

    2. Re:Culture of Secrecy by SomeJoel · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You may be right, but if every company does it, how can a consumer "choose" not to turn a blind eye. If they don't buy Nike, they buy Adidas, but Adidas is doing the same stuff. If they don't buy a Big Mac, they're buying a Whopper, with the same baggage. So, unless they make the shoes themselves (out of home-farmed cows) and grow their own food they really have no choice. Without some sort of regulation (either governmental or self-imposed by the corporations), there's no way a consumer can realistically "opt-out" of the inhumanities of modern retail.

      --
      <Complete your profile by adding a signature!>
    3. Re:Culture of Secrecy by jpmorgan · · Score: 1

      True to a certain extent. But I would suggest that there is a lot more due diligence required when you're in a billion dollar partnership than if you're a consumer on the street spending a hundred bucks on a gadget.

    4. Re:Culture of Secrecy by edusmoreira · · Score: 1

      You remind me of my public sector economics teacher. I remember he once said "And just to take this to its logical, and far more important end, IN OUR MODEL, WHICH ANALYZES A SMALL CLOSED ECONOMY WITHOUT A GOVERNMENT, the consumers who WOULD support this kind of business by voting in droves with their wallets WOULD BE the singularly most important party turning "a blind eye". This WOULD applicable across all retail. The conditions under which the goods we buy are prepared, be it Nike shoes or a Big Mac or an iPhone, WOULD ultimately BE the responsibility of the individuals who are purchasing those goods. They WOULD hold all the power and therefore virtually all of the responsibility. ON THE OTHER HAND, IN THE REAL WORLD..."

    5. Re:Culture of Secrecy by Glyphn · · Score: 1

      The conditions under which the goods we buy are prepared ... is ultimately the responsibility of the individuals who are purchasing those goods.

      I've never been comfortable with this imputation of moral burden entirely to the buyer. Corporations are complex and no one, least of all your average buyer, has a clue as to all of the financial and commercial entanglements that ultimately deliver a buy-able product.

      Also, trying to choose amongst companies is similarly non-trivial, and as their size increases I suspect the more similar they become, if for no other reason than simple stochastics. Or do you really think that large corporations can be pidgeon-holed into "good" and "bad" categories?

    6. Re:Culture of Secrecy by loteck · · Score: 5, Insightful
      New Balance shoes are made in the US and UK, where labor laws are, at the very least, in existence. That's a good start. Your local farmer's market would be happy to sell you all the fixins' of a Big Mac, and you can get a good idea about how sustainable their operation is by actually talking to the people who farm it.

      Many people think the way you seem to, which is that "opting out" is impossible. This is an uninformed opinion, it would seem, since options abound. You just have to decide to A) look for them and then B) choose them. Moral backflipping also seems to allow people to continue to sleep at night while their conveniences are paid for in blood by their fellow man in other countries.

    7. Re:Culture of Secrecy by GigG · · Score: 2

      I think it goes a little higher than Foxconn. Remember this is the same country that put to death the former head of thier FDA. http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/10/world/asia/10iht-china.1.6587520.html

      They do tend to take more responsibility for their actions than we do in the West.

      --
      Is buying a Harley Davidson as your first motorcycle since you were 16 at age 49 a midlife crisis issue?
    8. Re:Culture of Secrecy by loteck · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The "due diligence" you speak of for the multi-billion dollar company has more to do with an investigation into the finances of a potential partner, and has very little to do with any kind of analysis of a partner's ethical fortitude.

      One might say the consumer's "due diligence" is exactly the opposite and subsequently far, far more important.

    9. Re:Culture of Secrecy by Red+Flayer · · Score: 5, Interesting

      They do tend to take more responsibility for their actions than we do in the West.

      Or, rather, they are more likely to make scapegoats pay the ultimate price.

      Do you think executing the head of their FDA-equivalent solved the underlying problems that led to so many public disgraces due to contaminants? Do you think that person was solely responsible for those problems?

      Executing that man was PR. Nothing less, nothing more. It's the other actions they have, or have not, taken that would truly demonstrate whether they have taken responsibility.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    10. Re:Culture of Secrecy by Me!+Me!+42 · · Score: 1

      Funny that people are blaming Apple.
      I highly doubt that Apple's culture of security is anywhere near as onerous as that of a defense contractor or similar "high security" situations.
      That said, people see the pretty buildings and scattered affluence of places like China and Russia and they tend to forget that they are totalitarian regimes that have no problem damaging their citizens in any number of ways and with no recourse. Contrary to what many people tend to think, capitalism is not democracy, and the occasional use of ballot boxes are not indicative of freedom.
      BTW The "news accounts" say there is video of him jumping from his apartment (is thee really "news," as we know it, in China?) Not having seen the video, I have no idea if it conclusively shows that he jumped or was tossed though.

      --
      -- My apologies if the above facts contain any opinions, or vice versa! --
    11. Re:Culture of Secrecy by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Also part of the reason it may have been a problem in this particular case is because of Apple's love for secrecy. Foxconn is a major electronics provider and works with all kinds of companies, in addition to selling under their own brand. Now of course like any contractor, they want to keep the people they work with happy. Well for many companies, this wouldn't have been such a big deal. After all frequently companies post pictures of prototype hardware on the web, or send prototype samples to reviewers. Motherboards would be a good example. You usually see a picture of and get a story on a board a month or two before you can buy it. Thus a leak might not be a big deal. They get informed of a leak and they say "Oh well, it's public info anyhow." However Apple has an irrational obsession with secrecy. Nothing can be known by anyone until it is unveiled with big fanfare at some event. They vigorously go after sites that post info on upcoming products and so on.

      Ok well Foxconn knows this, and thus wants to keep Apple happy and maybe responds in a stronger way than normal because of who their customer is. They know that a leak of a prototype, even just the pictures, could be reason for Apple to stop doing business with them since in Apple's world information must be tightly controlled.

    12. Re:Culture of Secrecy by jpmorgan · · Score: 1

      Your average American defense contractor doesn't put Chinese thugs in charge of security.

    13. Re:Culture of Secrecy by Bill+of+Death · · Score: 5, Informative

      False. The four pairs of New Balance shoes currently in my house were all made in China.

    14. Re:Culture of Secrecy by oldhack · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Perhaps PR. Or lip service, let's call it. Here in the US, we don't even bother to pay lip service. Shit hits the fan, we railroad a schmuck from the mail room, and then pretend that all's sorted out. It's like the politicos saying "I take full responsibility" with absolutely no consequence. The term "responsibility" must have changed their meaning some time while I wasn't looking.

      What the hell am I rambling on about? Gotta take my senility pills.

      --
      Fuck systemd. Fuck Redhat. Fuck Soylent, too. Wait, scratch the last one.
    15. Re:Culture of Secrecy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Your local farmer's market would be happy to sell you all the fixins' of a Big Mac, and you can get a good idea about how sustainable their operation is by actually talking to the people who farm it.

      Wow, you must live in a different universe than I do. My farmers market is just up the street from me. Actually I can go to two of them, one right down in Minneapolis and one right in my town. Both, oddly enough, carry melons and corn in June.

      In Minnesota.

      Think about it.

      Now I'm sure its possible to grow melons and corn in a greenhouse, but not economically and not cheaply. It is far more likely that this is the same stuff i get in my grocery store.

      Please pay attention the next time you go to a 'farmers' market. You might be surprised.

    16. Re:Culture of Secrecy by Me!+Me!+42 · · Score: 1

      No, they use American thugs!
      You think no part of any american defense contract gets subcontracted to China? I just read about aircraft wiring harnesses being built in China for Boeing.
      But your argument is a bit ridiculous anyway. After all, Apple contracted with FoxCon, a Taiwanese company, who has off-shored in China, the Chinese/Taiwanese company has probably outsourced the security, etc. Fact is, shit happens. Shit that Apple cannot control. Abuses happen anywhere, but especially in totalitarian countries. Do you buy Chinese?

      --
      -- My apologies if the above facts contain any opinions, or vice versa! --
    17. Re:Culture of Secrecy by Bigjeff5 · · Score: 1

      Is text shouting that annoying when I do it?

      --
      Security is mostly a superstition... Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. - Helen Keller
    18. Re:Culture of Secrecy by GigG · · Score: 1

      Well, if I was the guy that next filled that job I'd do everything in my power to make sure it didn't happen again. And that might include throwing some folks out some windows if that is what it takes.

      --
      Is buying a Harley Davidson as your first motorcycle since you were 16 at age 49 a midlife crisis issue?
    19. Re:Culture of Secrecy by jpmorgan · · Score: 1

      Yet somehow, Dell, HP and other companies that do their manafacturing in China, with Foxconn even, have managed to get by for a decade or more without any of their workers dying in suspicious circumstances. And that's the point, if it was any other company you could brush it off as a random event. But Apple is notorious for its extreme attitude towards security, and if you think that wasn't the major contributing factor in all this, I have a bridge to sell you.

    20. Re:Culture of Secrecy by Stele · · Score: 1

      I use New Balance.

      I haven't been to a "Micky D's" or a "Pedophile-looking King dude" in probably 6-7 YEARS. And I haven't had any uncontrollable diarrhea since then either... Hmmmm..

    21. Re:Culture of Secrecy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      There are a few lines of New Balance shoes made in the USA of >70% USA-origin materials (such as the 991/992/993 line), and several more lines made in USA of 70% USA materials. Basically, as New Balance has grown over the last 10 years, they have expanded by importing rather than by building new factories in the USA.

    22. Re:Culture of Secrecy by tmosley · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Free markets provide a way. If there is a market for such a brand, someone will open a farm, raise the cows (cruelty free), get the leather, pay the workers good wages (maybe even make it here in America), etc. If people want that enough to boycott other brands, then the new startup will do quite well, and will be able to lower its prices as it grows, and economies of scale kick in. Eventually, you wind up with a much better quality product at a perhaps slightly higher price.

      That is, unless they have to spend 75% of their income on paying taxes and hiring people to handle regulatory compliance, which is what drove all those companies you mentioned over to China in the first place.

      Yeah...maybe more regulations AREN'T such a great idea...

    23. Re:Culture of Secrecy by tmosley · · Score: 1

      They have to keep variety if they are staying open year round. Look for winter crops, and you'll probably find that they are locally grown there.

    24. Re:Culture of Secrecy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      last i looked not much was even made in this country

      true. these days, the usa's chief export is war.

    25. Re:Culture of Secrecy by yenne · · Score: 1

      They do tend to take more responsibility for their actions than we do in the West.

      In some ways, they have a refreshingly direct way to deal with many problems, such as requiring that all their airline executives be on flights during the Y2K changeover (cnn.com).

    26. Re:Culture of Secrecy by _xeno_ · · Score: 3, Informative

      Half-false. There are New Balance factories in the US.

      However, when I went looking for a way to find a New Balance shoe that was made in the US, I failed. All the New Balance shoes I've ever seen were stamped "Made In China."

      They seem to have greatly fixed up their website now, though. There's now a "Made In USA" section for men's and women's shoes. So if you want to buy one of the small fraction of shoes that are made in the US, you can.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little relative jumps, all alike.
    27. Re:Culture of Secrecy by MindlessAutomata · · Score: 1

      If the jobs are so bad, one may want to analyze the reasons workers in those countries actually take those jobs as opposed to other jobs in their region instead of wagging the finger at the consumer who allows them to have those jobs in the first place.

    28. Re:Culture of Secrecy by MindlessAutomata · · Score: 1

      Why shouldn't we blame the people that take those jobs in the first place, instead of taking other jobs?

      Perhaps those jobs are better than other alternatives for them? Perhaps, though shit jobs to us, they are actually opportunity compared to what other alternatives they have in their region? I am assuming, of course, that nothing like coercion or misleading the employees is going on, where it very well may be... but that is overall a different problem.

    29. Re:Culture of Secrecy by russotto · · Score: 2, Interesting

      New Balance shoes are made in the US and UK

      The "Made in China" label on my 622s says otherwise.

      Your local farmer's market would be happy to sell you all the fixins' of a Big Mac, and you can get a good idea about how sustainable their operation is by actually talking to the people who farm it.

      I've never heard anything about farm life -- either from people who used to do it or less directly -- which suggests it's any better than sweatshop labor.

    30. Re:Culture of Secrecy by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      PR? Yeah, it was great PR. It said, "the next guy in this job better take it fucking seriously."

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    31. Re:Culture of Secrecy by gnasher719 · · Score: 0, Troll

      Yet somehow, Dell, HP and other companies that do their manafacturing in China, with Foxconn even, have managed to get by for a decade or more without any of their workers dying in suspicious circumstances.

      Where do you get that from? Could it be that just nobody gives a toss if someone working for Dell or HP tops himself? Given the statistics quoted earlier, it would be very, very unlikely if nobody working for these companies in China had ever committed suicide.

      And that's the point, if it was any other company you could brush it off as a random event. But Apple is notorious for its extreme attitude towards security, and if you think that wasn't the major contributing factor in all this, I have a bridge to sell you.

      Apple isn't notorious for its "extreme attitude toward security". How many leaked news of HP or Dell products have you seen recently? I haven't seen any. Now what is the difference? Is the difference that nobody cares whether there is anything new coming from Dell or HP? Or are these two companies guarding their secrets in a much more extreme way than Apple? I suspect the latter, after all, they both build really exciting Windows-based computers that all the geeks love and not shiny toys like Apple does.

      Somehow I think you bought a bridge and now you want to get rid of it.

    32. Re:Culture of Secrecy by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      If people want that enough to boycott other brands, then the new startup will do quite well, and will be able to lower its prices as it grows, and economies of scale kick in.

      What if people want it enough, but your average guy simply cannot afford it until economies of scale kick in (which will obviously never happen if most can just keep buying cheap Chinese stuff)?

      What if people would be ready to buy those locally manufactured goods, but only if they were assured that other people will do the same (and thus the manufacturer would know to aim for a larger target audience initially, allowing him to increase production scale and lower the starting price accordingly)?

      Free markets aren't a way, they're more of an open field surrounded by cliffs without fences. They work - but rarely in a way any particular person desires to. They are "efficient" - for an abstract definition of "efficient" that doesn't truly benefit anyone. And they last only for as long as it takes for the participants who have an edge over others to understand that they can use that edge to kill the free market, and cash in the benefits of the monolopy (cartels, etc).

    33. Re:Culture of Secrecy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The box is made in US, and the little white tag with the shoe size is made in UK. Final assembly is in Mexico.

      At least the box and the tag was made with labor laws in mind.

    34. Re:Culture of Secrecy by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      New Balance shoes are made in the US and UK,

      False. The four pairs of New Balance shoes currently in my house were all made in China.

      Which, actually, says something about both you and the GP.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    35. Re:Culture of Secrecy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which of these co-ops manufactured your computer?

    36. Re:Culture of Secrecy by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      I know that by our standards sweat shops are objectionable, but to the people who work there sometimes it means the difference between feeding your family or not. We offer them some shitty jobs, and they take them, because to them it's better than their other options. So that's thanks to such shitty jobs that the economies of China or India have risen lately.

      Now, making it seem like a necessary harm is not completely fair either. I think a solution if in our countries we had some (perhaps unusually) far reaching laws enforcing some vertically spreading ethics concerning foreign suppliers and such. By that I mean make a law in the USA that prevents Nike from having, at any point in its chain of production, "unethical labour" used, even in the Chinese suppliers of their Chinese suppliers.

      The problem is, that would be a bit hard to make that work, but if it could work then that would be an elegant solution to removing the ethical issue from our products. Note that alternatively we could also apply that to any imported product, i.e. refuse the importation of anything that doesn't satisfy our legal criteria regarding ethic work. The result would be complying companies appearing in China and such, specifically meant to satisfy the requirements of such markets, and it would still provide the local population with jobs.

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    37. Re:Culture of Secrecy by tmosley · · Score: 1

      If that many people want it, then the people selling it will expand. It's not a difficult concept. It's not like there would be anything stopping expansion (minus government intervention).

      That's the thing about people who want big government, they aren't willing to even give freedom a chance, they would rather wave their hands around finding reasons to steal freedom while making their friends rich off of "cheap Chinese crap" as you put it.

      Of course free markets don't work in the way a single person wants them to, they work in the say EVERYONE wants them to, because people are free to transact as they will. If you really want what's best for people, shouldn't you give them the freedom to choose for themselves what they want? Or are you so cynical as to think that either you or some sycophantic bureaucrat knows what is best for EVERYONE? Don't you realize that there are a million unintended consequences for every government intervention in a market, consequences that the government is slow to recognize? How many people have been fired because their jobs were no longer profitable at the new minimum wage? How many careers were ended before they started, due to the elimination of entry level jobs (think about how many minorities are oppressed by this)?

      It's unfortunate that we have an entrenched "hate the rich" class warfare mentality in this country. We'd all be a lot better off without it.

    38. Re:Culture of Secrecy by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      Oh also, I'd like to say, market forces can supersede local government, so that for example in a country with no censorship you can still be effectively censored if no one's gonna publish your uncensored work.

      My point is, we can't change the laws of China, but market forces can supersede them (well, not supersede, just add restrictions). And similarly, the laws of our countries affect directly the requirements and needs of the market forces.

      So the thing about a global economy that has to be understood is, a domestic law in the USA affects work conditions in China. In a way, in a global economy, every country rules the world, with a varying degree of influence. By tightening a few screws at home your government can shape the world.

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    39. Re:Culture of Secrecy by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's the thing about people who want big government, they aren't willing to even give freedom a chance

      We gave effectively unrestricted market freedom a chance in 19th century. The outcome was such that government regulation was uniformly instituted all around the globe at the beginning of 20th century to mitigate the negative effects on both workers and consumers.

      In particular, the outcome was formation of huge monopolies that dominated the market, strangled any existing competition by engaging in price-fixing, dumping, and other anti-competitive behavior, and raised barriers of entry for any new would-be competitors; and then proceeded to maximize benefits from their monopolistic advantage by raising prices and lowering wages to the extreme, screwing society in the process.

      Then again, if you believe that regulations such as those that limited the work hours and established minimum wage should have never been enacted (and, consequently, you're fine with near-universal 14-hour 7-day work week, exploitative child labor, and other associated pleasantries), then I'm afraid that we don't have any common ground for reasonable discussion here...

    40. Re:Culture of Secrecy by ragethehotey · · Score: 1

      After reading this post, I read the wikipedia article on New Balance and it absolutely sickened me how clearly astroturfed the article had been to make the average person skimming it think that they manufacture anything close to a majority of their products in the USA.

      An example - New Balance is one of several shoe companies that makes some of their products in the United States. Co-op America states in the New Balance Responsible Shopper company information page that around one quarter of NB's shoes are made in the United States[2]. New Balance owns five factories in the United States: two in Massachusetts (Boston and Lawrence), and three in Maine (Norridgewock, Skowhegan, and Norway). [3] In 1994, New Balance manufactured 70% of its shoes in the United States.[4]

      Is that REALLY the most recent numbers they could find? Or just the most recent ones that look favorable to investors?

    41. Re:Culture of Secrecy by samcan · · Score: 1

      If you live in the Pacific Northwest, near Portland, OR, there's a burger chain called (appropriately) Burgerville. Good burgers, and they claim to be made from the Northwest.

    42. Re:Culture of Secrecy by Falconhell · · Score: 1

      YES!

    43. Re:Culture of Secrecy by indiechild · · Score: 1

      It's not irrational to want this kind of secrecy, it makes good business sense. What's the point in giving away your power by letting everyone else know ahead of time what new things you're planning to introduce?

      Yeah yeah, Apple is evil and all that.

    44. Re:Culture of Secrecy by lennier · · Score: 1

      "The conditions under which the goods we buy are prepared, be it Nike shoes or a Big Mac or an iPhone, is ultimately the responsibility of the individuals who are purchasing those goods."

      Any idea how we can seriously rebel against this, when all the main vendors do it? Not buy any shoes at all? Go naked and barefoot in protest?

      NB: I'm actually serious. I WANT this crap to stop. It's gettng so I can't buy anything without guilt. What can I, as a consumer, *do* to make it stop? Make a list of the worst corporate offenders, okay. But if it turns out that *all* the major brands outsource to the shady Asian grid and have some quantity of raw human misery embedded in their products... what's the ethical response?

      Talking and protesting got us the 1999 Seattle protests. Then the War on Terror intervened and we protested that. People are still getting killed and tortured and maimed, for religion, security, oil, diamonds, bananas, rice, chocolate, coffee and garments. What's the next step? Exhaustively confirm the ethical pedigree of everything we buy? Good, but it turns out that buying ethical is expensive, and puts you into the 'luxury purchase' bracket. Okay, I can cope with being a rich pampered luxury-buying middle-class bastard if it will help someone else. But will it?

      How do we effect serious change? Boycott everything at once? Start considering literal economic terrorism, direct action to shut down the worst offenders? Go that route and how do we stop ourselves from being perpetually angry, violent people?

      I'm open to suggestions.

      --
      You are not a brain: http://books.google.com/books?id=2oV61CeDx-YC
    45. Re:Culture of Secrecy by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

      Ummm, what point is there to not letting people know? That way you get to generate hype and all that. I'd buy in to the "You need to keep it secret," if it was something most companies did, but they don't. Hell Intel flat out releases a roadmap of what they are planning to do and roughly when. Apple is one of the very few companies that is so secretive about what they do. It isn't just a matter of not releasing information of things in the early planning stages, it is that they want NOTHING out until the day they have their big launch party. I can't think of many tech companies that do that.

    46. Re:Culture of Secrecy by lennier · · Score: 1

      "Many people think the way you seem to, which is that "opting out" is impossible. This is an uninformed opinion, it would seem, since options abound."

      Some options do, yes. A lot less than one would want, but sure, we should use what we've got or lose it.

      But what bugs me is when on the one hand, free market advocates will say "if you want ethics, shop ethical and pay more! Don't lay your moral trip on me, man! Freedom and market efficiency uber alles! PROGRESS!"

      And then people who seem in much the same free-market-ethics camp will, when someone like Richard Stallman starts making harumphing noises about how unethical Practice X is and why ethics determines that we should buy a less-functional but ethical product over one that's fuller-functional but unethical, come back with "Hey man, I'm a PRAGMATIST. I use what WORKS. Don't try to use a less-functional product! That's stupid and inferior! Your silly 'ethics' and 'morals' and 'politics' are getting in the way of my PROGRESS! Open source, not free software! Quit being so rigid and dogmatic!"

      You can't have both. If you want a society where ethics drive purchases and it's all the consumer's choice, then the consumer MUST at some point choose the less-functional but more ethical product, and doing that MUST be seen as the correct economic choice. Or we're all doomed.

      --
      You are not a brain: http://books.google.com/books?id=2oV61CeDx-YC
    47. Re:Culture of Secrecy by lennier · · Score: 1

      "If the jobs are so bad, one may want to analyze the reasons workers in those countries actually take those jobs as opposed to other jobs in their region"

      Because a commercial agri-conglomerate has bought up all their village land and/or water, leaving them unable to support themselves without migrating to the city, perhaps?

      --
      You are not a brain: http://books.google.com/books?id=2oV61CeDx-YC
    48. Re:Culture of Secrecy by Lunzo · · Score: 1

      It's not the taxes companies have to pay, or regulatory compliance. All the companies which offshore their labor still have to pay these if they have their HQ in the USA. The difference is they're paying workers $1/hour instead of somewhere in the $10 to $15/hour (assuming health care, etc included).

    49. Re:Culture of Secrecy by sjames · · Score: 1

      And that's the real difficulty. Sure they all say conditions are great in the factories and every worker gets a mint on his pillow at night!

      It's hard to buy anything without doing a year of intensive research to find out where it was REALLY made and under what conditions.

      That's no excuse for not even trying though. Even when 60 minutes does the big expose and names names, I notice those names don't tank.

    50. Re:Culture of Secrecy by MindlessAutomata · · Score: 1

      Who sold them that land?

    51. Re:Culture of Secrecy by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

      That's why, throughout history, farmers have left the fields and come to the cities in droves simply to be sweatshop laborers.

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    52. Re:Culture of Secrecy by sonicmerlin · · Score: 0

      Why should the moral culpability of a nation be dependent on the moral whims of the masses? If a people-elected government has the power to force companies to stop selling products made by abusing and taking advantage of poor 3rd world citizens, then it might as well.

    53. Re:Culture of Secrecy by tmosley · · Score: 1

      No, they don't. Local workers pay local taxes, and local factories follow local regulations. If they still had to pay those, there wouldn't be any importation of consumer goods to America, due to the shipping costs and tariffs involved.

    54. Re:Culture of Secrecy by tmosley · · Score: 1

      Long work weeks and child labor disappeared due to increases in productivity due to mechanization, not due to government say-so. If the government could simply change things by saying the word, then we'd all be billionaires, wouldn't we? Of course, we can't, because that would either simply kill off all business, or drive prices up by a factor or several million. Understand that child laborers in the free market were not slaves, but were working because their families didn't make enough to survive. Without those jobs, their families would have starved to death. Those cases that you tend to hear of where children were horribly abused were where they had no real protectors (ie parents). In those cases, it was the very government that you want to give more power and authority to that forced those children into the workhouses. http://www.fff.org/freedom/0999f.asp Those who lived with their parents were not abused so badly as socialists would have you believe.

      The fact is that it was the very government intervention you champion that created the monopolies you rail against, and continue to do so today (although now it is more like duopolies or some other multiple of oligopolies). By creating regulations that apply to all members of an industry, you find that it increases the costs associated with operations in a disproportionate amount on the smaller companies. In effect, regulations CREATE monopolies. This is why Walmart has recently been pushing for a health care mandate for all businesses, as it would drive their smaller competitors into the ground. In a free market, a company is free to "price fix" or "dump" goods on the market, but in doing so, they only create opportunities for new businesses to rise up and take over their market. Why do you think Microsoft is losing market share? Because the government said they have to?

      Also, you should understand that in 100 years, Britain went from being a backwater to being the preeminent world power due to industrialization, and her citizens standard or living was raised from that of serfs to that of a middle class. The same thing happened in the US, and the same thing is happening in China. Workers aren't weak little people that need protection from greedy, evil capitalists in top hats and monocles, they are the people who will rise through the ranks and join those at the top through hard work, and the sacrifice of small pleasures now for great riches later. Or at least, they would have, if our government hadn't created an artificial divide between labor and management, and raised dozens of barriers to such social mobility, and made it more profitable to become a union leader than a manager in a factory.

      But then, I suppose you thought prohibition was a good idea as well? They are the same concept, just taken to different extremes.

      Truly, the so called "liberal" is the greatest enemy of society. In pursuit of a "living wage", he destroys jobs, cutting off the careers of entry level workers before they can begin. In pursuit of social harmony, he clamps down on speech. In pursuit of woman's rights, he makes slaves of women. In order to fund his "projects", he steals savings away from everyone. In pursuit of safety, he abducts people in the night away to months or years of torture. Make no mistake, these people don't limit themselves to one party, but they exist everywhere that a man would sacrifice for his future and produce for his neighbors, in order to steal from him, and make themselves fat and rich. They exist throughout both major political parties, simply because they are the ones that people vote in, because the people have realized that they can vote money away from those who have it, and give it to themselves. They have existed since the first man made the first tool which was useful for production. They caused Rome to fail and they spawned that abhorrent system known as Feudalism. Whenever their policies create problems, they claim that they just didn't

    55. Re:Culture of Secrecy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      You seem to have an interesting view of society. On the one hand, everyone should be on there own in a survival of the fittest match up. Those that are more successful in garnering resources will survive and everything will work out okay. On the other hand, everyone is greedy and wants to take from everyone else.

      If you take two people that are otherwise equal and one has more money. The richer will win this survival of the fittest. This does assume they are equal in ruthlessness as well. If you can rule your wealth to the detriment of all other human beings on the planet, you should. I have to admit, this is not a world I want to live in. I think getting together as a group (i.e. society, democracy, government) and trying to control this anti-social behaviour is beneficial to society as whole with the possible exception of sociopaths. I don't believe this is simple, easy, or without massive pitfalls. Many have used Somilia as a joke example of free markets. But it is true that Somilia is unfettered by government regulations in a way that you would seem to support. And yet, I'd imagine most people don't want to live in that kind of society.

      Lack of regulation is might making right. If that might is physical (e.g. Somilia), I think most would think it wrong and harmful. If that might is power/money (e.g. RIAA, MPAA), I think most people would also see that as wrong and harmful. I believe your idea of free markets being a Utopia is every bit as unrealistic and historically innaccurate as the idea that just piling on more government will also lead to a Utopia.

      There might just be a middle ground.

    56. Re:Culture of Secrecy by tmosley · · Score: 1

      There is! Prohibit fraud, enforce contract law, and enforce laws against assault, murder, etc. Regulations exist to PREVENT crime, which is impossible, as no matter how much regulation there is, there is always a way around it, given that you know the right people. Instead, simply revoke the charter of those companies which commit such crimes, and prosecute those who had a direct hand in it, or knowingly participated in any conspiracy to commit such crimes.

      The RIAA and MPAA wouldn't exist in a free market, because there isn't a copyright in a truly free market. This is one of the few compromises allowed by the founding fathers, in the interest of promoting scientific achievement--a very limited copyright term might facilitate this, but the current regime of perpetual copyright amounts to fascism (ie the merging of government and corporate power).

    57. Re:Culture of Secrecy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't understand what you are saying.

    58. Re:Culture of Secrecy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      deal with the anger problem

    59. Re:Culture of Secrecy by Uzuri · · Score: 1

      Ha, sounds like the "Amish" markets around here (or even the Amish just selling out of their front yards).

      Yes people, that thar's an Amish Banana. In Ohio. Yup.

      --
      I'm a she-slashdotter... but I make up for it by living with my folks.
  17. I don't want an iPhone amymore... by macbeth66 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It give me the creeps knowing how Apple does business. It is obvious that this busniess partner is evil and they continue to work with them.

    1. Re:I don't want an iPhone amymore... by Enderandrew · · Score: 4, Insightful

      In all fairness I believe both HP and Dell get motherboards and laptops made from Foxconn as well. But certainly Apple's business practices are less than stellar. For every evil business practice we hate Microsoft for, usually Apple follows the same practice and somehow gets a pass.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    2. Re:I don't want an iPhone amymore... by flitty · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I try not to think of how/where most consumer electronics are built. I fear for what I'd find. I'm sure Apple isn't the only corporation with an overseas manufacturing business that involves some version of morally reprehensible behavior.

      --
      Whether or not there is some sort of god, I'm not supposed to say/god is a word and the argument ends there-Smog
    3. Re:I don't want an iPhone amymore... by je+ne+sais+quoi · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Yes. The grandparent has his or her work cut out for them because the wikipedia page shows just how hard it is to avoid Foxconn:

      Among other things, Foxconn produces the Mac mini, the iPod and the iPhone for Apple Inc.; Intel-branded motherboards for Intel Corp.; various orders for American computer manufacturers Dell and Hewlett-Packard; the PlayStation 2 and PlayStation 3 for Sony; the Wii for Nintendo;the Xbox 360 for Microsoft, cell phones for Motorola, and the Amazon Kindle.[2][3] [4]

      Bottom line.. if you like electronic devices, you have to go some way to avoid Foxconn. Apple is known for its secrecy, but we documented evidence that Apple was involved in this intimidation in anyway, you have to assume that Foxconn, and only Foxconn is responsible.

      --
      Gentlemen! You can't fight in here, this is the war room!
    4. Re:I don't want an iPhone amymore... by hattig · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Who are you going to buy instead? Everyone gets their systems built in China, under these conditions. Foxconn is probably one of the better ones.

      It's the cost of cheap, disposable goods in the West.

      Used to be you'd buy a fridge built in your country, a TV, a car, a washing machine, everything, and it would last years and years. But they were expensive, and major purchases. They kept an economy alive, with people being paid reasonable wages. The electronics industry in a rapid speed to be competitive has changed this. We could have a computer that lasted 10 years, but it would really hold things back if you gamed, or did real work. So it drove an industry of rapid upgrades for computers and personal electronics, that don't last long. Western design, eastern construction.

      But these eastern companies don't have the same standards of construction, of employee care, or values, as we do. Additionally the stresses of overwork are immense, they don't have cushy offices, free coffee and 9-5 hours like many of us. Also their upbringing is different. Coupled together, it will add up to a situation where people burn out rapidly, or worse commit suicide if something goes wrong. Many people to replace them of course. Nothing like your own company breaking into your own living space and scaring the bejesus out of you.

      Fucking killing yourself over a front-facing camera, or an OLED screen, or whatever the iPhone 4 will have. Hell, it was probably an iPod Touch 3 for all we know. That shows a massive failure of the value system. Hell, it'll turn out to be the iPhone clone rip-offs that Foxconn probably make on the side won't it? As long as the Chinese elite bosses are okay, that's all that matters. Everything else is a meatgrinder. It's 18th Century with hi-tech, and it won't improve until we stop feeding it.

    5. Re:I don't want an iPhone amymore... by sbeckstead · · Score: 1

      Oh for Christ sakes people grow up smell the coffee and join the rest of us in the real world.

    6. Re:I don't want an iPhone amymore... by acid_andy · · Score: 1

      Among other things, Foxconn produces the Mac mini, the iPod and the iPhone for Apple Inc.; Intel-branded motherboards for Intel Corp.; various orders for American computer manufacturers Dell and Hewlett-Packard; the PlayStation 2 and PlayStation 3 for Sony; the Wii for Nintendo;the Xbox 360 for Microsoft, cell phones for Motorola, and the Amazon Kindle.[2][3] [4] Bottom line.. if you like electronic devices, you have to go some way to avoid Foxconn. Apple is known for its secrecy, but we documented evidence that Apple was involved in this intimidation in anyway, you have to assume that Foxconn, and only Foxconn is responsible.

      Uhhh yeah, that's why I use Nokia for my phones, Creative for my audio and MP3 player, AMD for my CPUs, NVidia for my chipsets, my PC for gaming.... All IMHO more pleasing, in many cases better performing and in some ways more stylish to own and use than any of the above. OK so for the majority of my PC gaming I've gotta use Windoze but presumably Foxconn weren't involved in that. I wouldn't call any of the above "having to go some way" - I just used my personal preference and sense of taste.

      These practises sound like pure evil! Still, I never did like Apple....

      --
      Your ad here.
    7. Re:I don't want an iPhone amymore... by Sam+Lowry · · Score: 1

      Rumours are, Steve Jobs threats his employes the same way, except probably for the physical intimidation, but who knows...

    8. Re:I don't want an iPhone amymore... by megrims · · Score: 1

      Among other things, Foxconn produces the Mac mini, the iPod and the iPhone for Apple Inc.; Intel-branded motherboards for Intel Corp.; various orders for American computer manufacturers Dell and Hewlett-Packard; the PlayStation 2 and PlayStation 3 for Sony; the Wii for Nintendo;the Xbox 360 for Microsoft, cell phones for Motorola, and the Amazon Kindle.[2][3] [4]

      Bottom line.. if you like electronic devices, you have to go some way to avoid Foxconn.

      No, those are actually the ones I'd been thinking of as evil.

    9. Re:I don't want an iPhone amymore... by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      Actually, look on the various devices you use. There's probably a Foxconn chip or two on them. Foxconn stuff shows up just about everywhere. Besides, what would you recommend for MP3 players besides Creative? I don't want to give them any money due to some of their business activities.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    10. Re:I don't want an iPhone amymore... by cyfer2000 · · Score: 1

      And Intel brand motherboard, Wii, PS3/2, XBox360, Motorola and etc. This is not the first suicide case in Foxconn, every year, one or two poor pal/gal can not endure the torture at Foxconn anymore. I should thank Apple and iphone make the whole world know what's happening in Foxconn.

      --
      There is a spark in every single flame bait point.
    11. Re:I don't want an iPhone amymore... by meta-monkey · · Score: 1

      It's 18th Century with hi-tech, and it won't improve until we stop feeding it.

      So what you're saying is it won't improve.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    12. Re:I don't want an iPhone amymore... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For every evil business practice we hate Microsoft for, usually Apple follows the same practice and somehow gets a pass.

      Ask yourself: if this had involved MicroSloth rather than Apple, wouldn't this have generated 10x the posts?

      Why does Apple get such a bye for proprietary hardware, DRM and locked apps & hardware.

    13. Re:I don't want an iPhone amymore... by indiechild · · Score: 1

      Apple gets a free pass... as evidenced by your comment?

    14. Re:I don't want an iPhone amymore... by indiechild · · Score: 1

      If it was Microsoft, it would never have made the front page in the first place. It's cool to bash Apple these days.

    15. Re:I don't want an iPhone amymore... by lennier · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Bottom line.. if you like electronic devices, you have to go some way to avoid Foxconn. Apple is known for its secrecy, but we documented evidence that Apple was involved in this intimidation in anyway, you have to assume that Foxconn, and only Foxconn is responsible."

      But Apple must be a contributory party if they keep their Foxconn involvement secret.

      It seems to me that if we really want to eliminate economic exploitation, we have to outlaw commercial secrecy. Outsource if you must, but insist that ALL outsourcing partners and deals and trade treaties are public knowledge down to the last initimate detail.

      Yes, that gives your competitors knowledge. Sorry. Price of doing business in an open society with informed consumers. Until the consumers are fully informed, you don't have an efficient (ie, actually free) market.

      Can we make this a political platform?

      --
      You are not a brain: http://books.google.com/books?id=2oV61CeDx-YC
    16. Re:I don't want an iPhone amymore... by craagz · · Score: 1

      May I interest you in a prototype iPhone 4, which will definitely make you want the iPhone.

      I recently snicked it off a foxconn employee when he was looking the other way!

    17. Re:I don't want an iPhone amymore... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i agree sadly
      http://www.twilightcampaign.net/index.php/topic,44.0.html

    18. Re:I don't want an iPhone amymore... by Perky_Goth · · Score: 1

      I've heard a lot of good things about Cowon and Sony MP3 players.

    19. Re:I don't want an iPhone amymore... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. :-(

      Try living on goods entirely made in your own country for a year. I don't think you'd get further than some food and cooking pans.

    20. Re:I don't want an iPhone amymore... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It appears that you're mostly an apple-using fanatic homosexual and see this story as potentially damaging your designer computer brand. If the guys in the coffeebar find out that apple does this, you might need to replace your accessories!

    21. Re:I don't want an iPhone amymore... by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

      Well, that's odd - the page doesn't list Cisco, when most Cisco equipment I laid my hands on in the last couple of years were made by them. And try to avoid using Cisco equipment when surfing the Internet.

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    22. Re:I don't want an iPhone amymore... by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

      So what do you use for cabling? Not to mention Foxconn also manufactures for Nokia.

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

  18. "... with dignity and respect" by goffster · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Hah! Like Apple treats its iphone app developers ?

    1. Re:"... with dignity and respect" by BrentH · · Score: 1

      Oh My God, was the creator of iFart pushed out of the window too?

    2. Re:"... with dignity and respect" by jDeepbeep · · Score: 1

      Hah! Like Apple treats its iphone app developers ?

      This is precisely why I abandoned iPhone development, and have embraced Android instead.

      --
      Reply to That ||
    3. Re:"... with dignity and respect" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, he was pulled... by his finger.

    4. Re:"... with dignity and respect" by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      And how has your revenue changed? ;-)

      --
      You just got troll'd!
  19. Re:Who cares by OrangeMonkey11 · · Score: 1

    I as well like to live in your sugar coated world

  20. Fuck apple ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People dying for this pease of crap ? Yachhh!

  21. Re:For a business, patronage is the highest praise by edusmoreira · · Score: 1

    That depends. Is the company more concerned about securing a $2B per quarter revenues from its technology or about the $5k court settlement that it'll ultimately be required to pay somewhere in Asia?

  22. Re:Who cares by Shakrai · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why not? Believe it or not people are able to sue when they are harmed by somebody, even in China.

    You realize that families who lost their children as a direct result of incompetence and negligence haven't even been able to seek redress under the Chinese system? You really think some poor bastard working for an industrial conglomerate stands a chance? I think you've wandered away from the reservation on this one....

    Parents devastated at the loss of sons and daughters, most born under China's strict "one couple, one child" family planning policy, have sought a government accounting and a proper explanation as to why so many schools fell down.

    Police and local officials have blocked parents of the dead children from staging protests to seek information. An Amnesty International report this week chronicles instances in which parents were detained by police while seeking answers from courts.

    Lawyers who took on such cases came under pressure to drop their involvement.

    --
    I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
    We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
  23. Re:Who cares by evil_aar0n · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Are you factoring in the culture in this case? Honor means a lot to Asians. For them, failure of this magnitude may have only one acceptable response: seppuku, or the equivalent for the locale. It may seem a little drastic for Americans - is a product or company worth that much? - but we're obviously, and thankfully, not the model for every society.

    --
    Truth, Justice. Or the American Way.
  24. Self-Terminating Data... by jameskojiro · · Score: 1

    This guy in china is a perfect example of such wonderful Chinese engineering.

    --
    Tsukasa: All I really want, is to be left alone...
  25. Re:Who cares by kyliaar · · Score: 2

    I always equated that more with Japanese culture than Chinese.

  26. New Apple Slogan by zoobaby · · Score: 0, Redundant

    New Apple Slogan:

    iPhone, worth dying for...

  27. It was eninvitable by gubers33 · · Score: 1

    Either he was going to do it or Apple was going to do it, at least he saved himself from the torture...unless Apple did do it and made it look like a suicide.

    --
    Just because you are wrong and I called you out on it doesn't mean I am a Troll.
  28. Foxconn owns most employee apartments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Not sure how illegal a search of the guy's apartment would be if they own the place.

    I seem to remember an article on here about foxconn "city", everyone ate,worked and lived on the foxconn campus.

  29. Re:For a business, patronage is the highest praise by e9th · · Score: 4, Informative

    That's an interesting question. This Digitimes article published the day before he died, but after he had reported the loss, claims that Apple and Sony are cutting back on Foxconn orders, while Dell, Asustek, and HP are climbing on board.

  30. apple needs to make them to fallow china labor by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

    apple needs to make them to fallow china labor and other laws as well going beyond them and not working people to death.

    1. Re:apple needs to make them to fallow china labor by Macrat · · Score: 1

      Why? You'll still buy the products made in China anyway.

    2. Re:apple needs to make them to fallow china labor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It's not any of Apple's concern on how a foreign company operates on foreign soil.

      And if any of us cares we wouldn't shop at target, walmart, etc. where 100% of the shoes sold there are made in China and east Asia under harsh conditions. Good luck buying a consumer electronic device that isn't made in China. Foxconn is actually considered a very good place to work, according to people I have met who work for Foxconn (my company manufactures through them).

      There are much worse factories than Foxconn in China, while this situation is extremely tragic I suspect we don't have all he information to make an informed judgement on what whet down.

  31. Re:For a business, patronage is the highest praise by e9th · · Score: 1

    I should add that the timing make it almost impossible that any of those companies knew about the loss when making their decisions. But it will be interesting to see if anything changes.

  32. And that is why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I am a PC. :)

  33. iWhat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    iDied

  34. Re:Who cares by MozeeToby · · Score: 1

    The idea of ritual suicide in the face of failure confusing and slightly contradicting to me especially given Japanese culture's emphasis of 'triumph over adversity'. Japanese culture seems to love watching people try to overcome things that are almost impossible and/or unbearable.

    As an example, have you ever seen 'Ninja Warrior'? Basically, it's like 'Wipeout' on NBC only a million times more difficult. I've watched 'Ninja Warrior' dozens of times and only seen someone complete the final course once; one person out of literally hundreds of competitors. They've had Olympic gymnasts on the show not even make it to the final round. The audience cheers on the failures almost as much as the success, because the failures gave it everything even though they had to know they probably weren't going to make it.

    How is it that a culture that cheers on the underdog and loves it when people try in spite of horrible odds also finds honor in taking your own life when faced with a difficult situation?

  35. RIP by planckscale · · Score: 1, Interesting

    This is just sad. You know the security was just all over the guy saying "you're going to lose your job, never find work again, you will be sued, lose your house, and your wife/girlfriend will leave you too!" No doubt they probably shoved him around trying to intimidate him. If they were so concerned about their prototypes they'd remotely wipe them, RFID, Lojack etc. etc. Yeah the guy may have misplaced it but mistakes occasionally happen. Doc the guy the price of the phone from his pay and be done with it. If it turns up on some blog somewhere, then go after him for non disclosure. Still, I can never understand suicide, perhaps the guy had other issues and this just was the tipping point.

    --
    Namaste
    1. Re:RIP by clickclickdrone · · Score: 1

      >Still, I can never understand suicide, perhaps the guy had other issues
      Never underestimate the power of 'honour' in certain cultures.

      --
      I want a list of atrocities done in your name - Recoil
    2. Re:RIP by sonicmerlin · · Score: 0

      In Asia, especially China, wifes/girlfriends do not leave you, especially not over money. A bit of a nonsequitor, so carry on!

  36. This should piss off Jack Bauer. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After what the Chinese did to him a while back, I'm sure Jack will avenge this guy's death. Chloe, download the schematics to Foxconn to my PDA and find me a way in!

  37. RIP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    RIP, Mr Sun. Congratulations to whatever you had achieved. Wish you happiness in the other world. You just left a cold blooded world where well educated people joking about a hard working person's death.

  38. hmm i know that this will esplode all over..but by MrShaggy · · Score: 1, Funny

    Imagine after his death they discover the phone was in his jacket pocket?

    --
    I have mod points and I am not afraid to use them.
    1. Re:hmm i know that this will esplode all over..but by edusmoreira · · Score: 1

      Hmmm, but even then, how would one know that it wasn't put there afterwards? Only the accelerometer log will tell!!

    2. Re:hmm i know that this will esplode all over..but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dont be daft, it is clear that his boss liked the iphone and used him as escape goat
      in second thoughts, perhaps the butler took it, everybody knows its always the butler

    3. Re:hmm i know that this will esplode all over..but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Imagine after his death they discover the phone was in his jacket pocket?

      Then it would be a damn shame because I doubt the phone would have survived the fall either.

    4. Re:hmm i know that this will esplode all over..but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and used him as escape goat

      Damn frat house mascots. Always getting shit they don't deserve.

      W

  39. Die for an iPhone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hell, someone had to die for Steve Jobs to get a liver.

  40. this wasn't a suicide by SuperBanana · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I don't like playing cultural imperialist, but something about current Asian cultures seems to me to be broken: this isn't exactly the first suicide of its sort, or even an uncommon phenomenon, just one of the more high-profile cases (since it's Apple, and a senior guy). Western culture isn't immune to these effects either (cf. high-profile financial advisors committing suicide in 2008-2009)

    Um, this wasn't a suicide. And it's a nice bit of cultural stereotyping to picture asian people happily falling on their swords. It is deeply insulting (or you're deeply stupid) to think that someone of any culture would commit suicide just for losing / selling a production prototype.

    Funny thing is, we know exactly where it went- it popped up on ebay recently and was big news. It was also dead as a doornail- nobody could load firmware onto it. Yeah, it was a fuckup, but Apple could easily recover that phone if they wanted to, either legally or by simply saying "please", or giving the seller what he paid for it (unlikely.)

    Which do you think is more likely? That he was riddled with guilt over the loss of a prototype worth maybe a few hundred dollars in parts and little intellectual property value (since there are millions of copies in the world?) and jumped....or was pushed over the balcony ledge by a bunch of company goons who were told to make an example of him to employees, with a public story that "our employees are so dedicated to your security, they'll..."? And really, how impartial do you think the investigation is going to be? In China, these companies own and run entire cities that make Mall of America look like a strip-mall. They don't even need to pay off the police- they already employ them.

    1. Re:this wasn't a suicide by Knara · · Score: 4, Insightful

      People kill themselves for much lesser reasons than losing a top-secret prototype that makes their company a lot of money, and by losing it will end said suicide-ee's career with said company.

    2. Re:this wasn't a suicide by Stele · · Score: 2, Funny

      I bet the RIDES in those malls are freakin' AWESOME!!

    3. Re:this wasn't a suicide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I think it incredibly funny that you have, in essence, replaced one "deeply insulting" cultural stereotype with another. Namely that of corruption in china. I have no facts to say there is NOT such a culture in china, but if your post is any indication, then you do not have any facts to say there is such a culture either. Look before you leap.

    4. Re:this wasn't a suicide by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 1

      ...a bunch of company goons

      Montgomery Burns: "I prefer the personal touch you only get with hired goons."

    5. Re:this wasn't a suicide by grumpyman · · Score: 5, Insightful
      or was pushed over the balcony ledge by a bunch of company goons who were told to make an example of him to employees, with a public story that "our employees are so dedicated to your security, they'll..."? And really, how impartial do you think the investigation is going to be? In China, these companies own and run entire cities that make Mall of America look like a strip-mall. They don't even need to pay off the police- they already employ them.
      .

      Just answer me one question: where you get all those information from? Seriously, where? Slashdotter loves China bashing, and you take it to the next lower level. Shame on modders for "Interesting".

    6. Re:this wasn't a suicide by Smoeman · · Score: 1

      I can't believe how much your response is frustrating me.

      Um, this wasn't a suicide.

      And your proof is what, exactly?

      And it's a nice bit of cultural stereotyping to picture Asian people happily falling on their swords.

      I'm sorry, where exactly did you pull "happily falling on their swords" from? He was merely pointing out (imho) that there appears to be a higher suicide rate in China [asia] and it seems to stem, in part anyways, from the culture's greater weight on the importance of honor. Personally I'd argue (as does TFA) that it has more to do with the pressures that individuals find themselves under in the workplace.
      Oh, and let me fix that last paragraph for you.

      Which do you think is more likely? That he was riddled with stress over the loss of a prototype (and the subsequent black eye the company would take should it make the news) combined with the company's response which included an illegal search of his home and possibly detention and physical abuse (though not confirmed) culminating in an emotional breakdown and jump[ing]....or was pushed over the balcony ledge by a bunch of company goons who were told to make an example of him to employees, with a public story that "our employees are so dedicated to your security, they'll..."?

      Or better yet, just read the quote from a Chinese blogger at the end of TFA:

      "Students [like Sun] have been studying in schools for years, and they have been carefully protected by their parents. They can't endure such pressure - 'their house being illegally searched,' or 'house arrests' (if that's true, according some reports news). Employees at these and other factories sometimes kill themselves simply because of the pressure from their daily jobs â" you know what's going to happen when they face more serious threats. Also, most young Chinese guys don't have friends who are lawyers, so they donâ(TM)t know how to protect themselves in the legal system. They wonâ(TM)t even look for help from the legal system. They will just endure the pressure, and finally find an extreme way to end all their troubles."

    7. Re:this wasn't a suicide by twostix · · Score: 1

      China earns it's China bashing and then some. The bigger problem is desperately ignorant western fan boys who think China is some sort of Asian version of the US.

      The first half of his post is obviously speculation, the second half is is absolutely correct, in fact a little light on, as he forgot to mention that these companies are effectively arms of the government and so don't need private police forces - they have the governments full backing.

      Witness the latest Rio Tinto debacle to see what happens when you cross Chinas "private" companies.

    8. Re:this wasn't a suicide by shiftless · · Score: 1

      Here's an anecdote for you: A friend of a friend leased a factory in China to begin producing some kind of small plastic widget. (Don't recall the specifics, cause it's been years since I heard this story.) Chinese officials came in to "inspect" the place. They seemed very interested in the company and learning all the details of what he was doing, and were curious to know when he expected to begin production. A couple weeks later after production began, they showed up again, this time with armed thugs. He was given a plane ticket and a choice--accompany them to the airport and get on his flight back to the US, or disappear never to be seen again. He had to leave his factory and all of his equipment behind, which was apparently nationalized, or taken over by a Chinese company.

      I can't vouch for this truth of this story, of course, but when you see these types of stories coming out of China on a regular basis, it's fair to believe that there's a lot of shady stuff going on behind the scenes in China.

    9. Re:this wasn't a suicide by SuperBanana · · Score: 1

      http://www.pcworld.com/article/138352/reports_on_chinese_ipod_sweatshop_suppressed.html?tk=rel_news
      How's your crow pie, bitch? Newsflash: China is a COMMUNIST country.

    10. Re:this wasn't a suicide by grumpyman · · Score: 1

      Sure, just don't buy ANYTHING from this country, otherwise you're supporting a repressive regime. Calling people's name doesn't strengthen your argument.

  41. Greed is GOOD!! by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 5, Funny

    Jesus Christ Kid! Wake up and smell the Coffee! It's the Noughties! I'm not paying you to think about flower power and peace among the animals.

    1. Consider the value of a human life, starting with your own, and compare it to the value of the secrecy of some cellphone prototype

    Consider this mac: Supply and Demand!! If there's one thing that human history has taught us, it's that people are cheap, but profits are forever. You know how many guys like this guy there are? You know how many iPhone prototypes there are? You don't need to do a lot 'a math to see how this is gonna work out. Man, I could tell you stories about coffee beans and Nicaraguans in the 80's. Fucking great times!

    2. Consider your other options. Your bosses were mean to you: sue them, find another job, learn to live with it. Are any of these better than jumping out of the fucking window?

    Holy shit! The only time you need to you to jump out a window is when the stock is at 5c and your pretty sure the guy is like, your spitting image. The lesson here is that if the pressure is this fucking high, you need a safety valve, otherwise known as a fall guy. In fact, I'm betting this guy was that guy! Sweet play.

    3. Consider the safety and mental wellbeing of the people who might be minding their own business and walking their children to school as your dumb skull slams into the pavement in front of them. If you've got to kill yourself, please don't get other people involved.

    You know, you should be thinking about other people. You should be thinking about how to make money off of 'em, or else get them outta your way. You see a bus load of traumatised kids. I see a several lifetimes worth of prescription medication sales. You see tragedy, I see opportunity.

    Shit happens, deal with it. It's all part of the game. Wen just bought a new sports car. Hu just sealed the Intel deal. Yao just jumped out of ten story window. Who cares! It's all just gossip material to spend over Espresso lattes. The second you stop to moralise over rights, wrongs, lifes, deaths; is the second you stop making money. You gotta straighten those suspenders, up the sperm count on the deal, and keep kickin' ass, so people know your the hardest asshole around.

    Prime example, Steve fucking Jobs. Guy's such a ball buster that he's got subcontractors breakin' down apartment doors and throwing suckers outta windows just to keep the latest indigo and cyan iDink case covers an international fucking secret. And people still think he's Michael Jackson! You will never have those stones.

    So, Put it all on AAPL, Bernanke's got the kettle on. And get yourself a dog!

    --
    May the Maths Be with you!
    1. Re:Greed is GOOD!! by clarkkent09 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      What kind of an idiot would mod this Flamebait? +5 Hilarious!

      --
      Negative moral value of force outweighs the positive value of good intentions.
    2. Re:Greed is GOOD!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think this is the part where Hobbes pushes you into the mud puddle.

    3. Re:Greed is GOOD!! by grumpyman · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Whatever you described sounds like America to me.

    4. Re:Greed is GOOD!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Holy shit! Its Pearl Jams Do The Evolution all over again.

      A million slashdotters just jumped out of windows after reading that.

    5. Re:Greed is GOOD!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This was arguably one of the greatest things I've ever read.

    6. Re:Greed is GOOD!! by Trails · · Score: 1

      That was Les Grossman worthy...

    7. Re:Greed is GOOD!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That might be the greatest post i've ever seen.

  42. Official cause of death by xednieht · · Score: 1

    Gravity combined with sudden negative acceleration resulting from the Earth being in the way.

    --

    Hope is the currency of fools
    1. Re:Official cause of death by Falconhell · · Score: 1

      Actually, it was the sudden stop when he hit the ground.

    2. Re:Official cause of death by DigitalSorceress · · Score: 1

      Ahh, and here I thought it was an acute case of concrete poisoning.

      --

      The Digital Sorceress
  43. Suicide? by readin · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Or was he helped out the window?

    --
    I often don't like the choices people make, but I like the fact that people make choices. That's why I'm a conservative.
  44. Re:Who cares by WaXHeLL · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Now why are we talking about this when this event occurred in China? (not Japan)

    --
    The troll with karma.
  45. That's awfully Japanese of the guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess the war still haunts the Chinese. Steve Jobs is said to be heartbroken... right, of his lost prototype !!

    1. Re:That's awfully Japanese of the guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, now he's dead but maybe they will be able at least to salvage his liver....

  46. Re:Who cares by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    More to the point, being roughed up by goons, interrogated, and having your house illegally searched are pretty stressful across all cultures...

  47. The real question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jumped or pushed?

  48. Apple is just another slave master. by Jackie_Chan_Fan · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "We require our suppliers to treat all workers with dignity and respect."

    Yeah right. Thats why Apple employs chinese workers who fear for their lives. Chinese labor is employed because its virtually slave labor. Its cheap, easily controlled, and cut throat business practices allow them to dispose of workers at will.

    Either this guy was a spy, or he made an honest mistake. Whatever the case may be, its said that he took his life.

    I still find it sick that Apple can say they require their suppliers to treat workers with dignity and respect in one breathe, but in practice they really do not care because look at who they employ!

  49. Free trade? by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Why isn't the difference in workers' rights and environmental abuse priced into free trade agreements?

    I have no problem with work going to China, as long as the employers there also have to pay for health care, disability, U.S. minimum wages, and safe workplace enforcement; cannot dump their waste into rivers, etc.

    Without those restrictions, U.S. workers cannot hope to compete based on price.

    So work done in those countries, and items manufactured in those countries, should probably incur tariffs big enough to compensate for all those other disparities.

    1. Re:Free trade? by jaclu · · Score: 1

      Your comment is rather stereotypical for an US perspective, why on on all earth should a US minimum wage be part of an international trade agreement?

      With that logic, should there be extra tariffs when US companies tries to compete on markets where there is a functional union system, that makes salaries in those countries higher? You know in most EU countries there actually is such a thing as workers' rights...

      Should the US be enforced to actually _have_ a working healthcare system for everybody in order to be allowed to export to any country that has one?

    2. Re:Free trade? by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 1

      What I'm saying is that in the current system, the net result is that a low-bidding dictatorship is almost fated to ruin the labor market in countries that have more costly but more humane employment laws and/or industrial laws.

      On reason for this is that at least in the U.S., case law generally obligates publicly traded companies to maximize profit, and thus forces them to ignore all purely social considerations when deciding where to have the labor and/or manufacturing done. So if you get a company like China which is willing to let workers be abused and/or is willing to dump toxic waste where kids play, but they can produce goods cheaply, U.S. corporations are pretty much forced to ship the labor over there.

      And even if a U.S. company wanted to compete on those terms with China, it couldn't, because U.S. labor and environmental laws wouldn't let it do the things that Chinese companies can to do their people and environment.

      So yes, I think one way to break that vicious system is to use tariffs to eliminate the financial incentives for this. If China wants to let employers piss on its workers, that perhaps their business, but I don't see a reason to structure trade deals that pretty much guarantee jobs will be transferred from countries that value their workers as humans to countries that don't.

      Granted, America couldn't do this on its own, because it's not big enough to be competitive without some degree of foreign trade. But if America, the E.U., and Japan banned together to place price premiums on worker/environment abuse, I suspect they would form a big enough trade group that they could afford to get by trading only amongst themselves. And once they could get by without needing to trade with China, China would have to decide: avoid trade altogether, or start treating workers like a civilized country should.

    3. Re:Free trade? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I work for a Chinese manufacturer for an American customer. If we raise our prices (due to your suggestions), they can and will find another supplier.

      The customer's margins are razor thin as it is already, and if they could viably pass on the costs to the consumers they would. However the American company has tried that with certain products and have failed to gain any significant revenue from them.

      Let's face it, when choosing between Wal-mart product and another product that makes people feel good about themselves at a 25% premium, people choose Wal-mart. Another example of this is how much the organic foods market has shrunk since the recession.

  50. It's a fucking phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What a waste of a human life over a worthless piece of electronics. Sad

  51. dignity and respect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "We require our suppliers to treat all workers with dignity and respect."

    I would like to see the Apple policy that states that. I think its funny when these new
    policies magically appear in sound bites but not on paper.

    Also love it when I hear.
    1. Safety is our #1 priority
    2. Our customers are our #1 priority
    3. Are employees are our #1 priority
    4. Are shareholders are our #1 priority

    All four of these statements were issued by the company you work for over the past year.
    We are capitalists - Its about the money, honey - for the CEO first, then the shareholders - dont buy the b.s. for a second

  52. That would be worthless by WindBourne · · Score: 3, Informative

    China has their Yuan fixed to the dollar, rather than allowing it to float freely. If you take any value around GDP in China (or India) of a common money, then it is total nonsense. As it is, many economist think that the Yuan should be 300-400% higher (i.e. about 1.5-2 yuan/dollar instead of the 7 yuan / dollar that the run).

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:That would be worthless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Such a quick increase, would cause the Chinese economy to collapse, this is why they have a leash of 5-10% annual on deflation. It will get there, just slowly. Purchasing power must match growth in order to maintain stability. Meaning that a bottle of milk does not cost the same as it does in the US.

      Don't forget that in `06 RMB/USD traded around 7.6RMB/1USD, now it trades around 6.8RMB/1USD. Also you cannot really measure the value of the currency to the GDP. Otherwise the USD should be valued 7x higher than the British pound. Lastly do not forget that inevitably most countries 'manipulate' their currencies. Whether through direct government control, through inflation, interest rate manipulate, debt, etc.

      Remember that majority of Chinese exports end up in US. Meaning that purchases are made in US dollars here in China. Once the Chinese currency opens up and allows for global exchange (meaning that you can, like you said, freely exchange without BoC) than you will see a more dynamic currency. You cannot ask for an overnight change, much like the US didn't change overnight.

      For all you may blame China, I blame the living-in-debt trend that the US has gotten into. People do not understand that you have to save money and not to spend money they do not have. Even in terms of children, they seem to lose common sense when they get drunk but automatically become the poor-victim once the baby comes out and they work making $8, while living in a $600/month apartment. Most of us have lost self-determinism, and instead we like to always look at ourselves as the victims. The country, like the people, spend money at a rate that isn't sustainable. And don't worry eventually the RMB will trade at 5USD/1RMB, much like the Euro will eventually trade at 10USD/1EUR. Instead of cutting spending, the government solution seems to be to throw 22-trillion more paper-dollars at the problem. At that rate, soon you will be working for Gree making household fans right in your back yard. Or building Sony DVD players.

      So you honestly think that the biggest problem is that Chinese currency was pegged? China is not the only Asian manufacturing hub for the US. Don't forget Thailand, Vietnam, Malaysia, and Philippines. However if American's saved money, and didn't impulse purchase the latest 60" LCD displays than there would be no need to complain. You are not the iPhone in your pocket, and sure as hell your credit card is not same as cash.

    2. Re:That would be worthless by jonadab · · Score: 2, Informative

      > China has their Yuan fixed to the dollar, rather than allowing it to float freely.

      For China, having the Rinminbi pegged to a strong foreign currency is probably a good choice, for the time being. It's easier to maintain than a specie standard, especially in the modern world, and it effectively delegates the problem of monetary policy at a time when China has bigger issues to deal with, such as how to effectively allow the continued modernization of their economy and the urbanization of their populace in a systematic and controlled fashion, balancing the need to let market forces take the economy where it needs to go against the need to prevent excessive abruptness and, frankly, chaos. They're trying to transform themselves from a third-world agrarian dystopia into a major first-world post-industrial power in only a few decades, and that's a major undertaking. They don't really need the added complication of managing inflationary pressures at the same time. Hence, a pegged currency.

      And as strong foreign currencies go, the dollar is one of their better options. They wouldn't peg to the Yen for political reasons, and there probably aren't enough Swiss Francs available in circulation to make that currency a practical peg for a nation as large as China. That leaves the Euro, the Pound Sterling, or the US Dollar as the most obvious options. The Dollar has been around longer than the Euro, so it probably seems safer (remember, Chinese culture is conservative on the whole and tends toward a relatively long view), and as for the Pound Sterling, the Chinese may not understand all the cultural reasons why the UK won't switch to the Euro (heck, most Americans probably don't fully understand this, and our culture looks practically identical to England's when you're comparing to China), so they wouldn't be confident that the currency would still be there in a few years. (It will be, but we're talking about a Chinese perspective here.) So, the US Dollar, then, by process of elimination. It kind of just makes sense.

      Asians are pretty smart. Weird, but smart.

      When the Russians figured out that communism wasn't going to work as an economic system, not knowing what to do about it, they tried to keep going on as they were for a while, and then when it became obvious that they couldn't do that much longer, they tried to switch over to capitalism suddenly; they ended up with oligopoly and are still trying to make capitalism actually work in Russia like it does in the western world. Trying, and having what polite people call "mixed success".

      When the Chinese figured out that communism wasn't going to work as an economic system, they actively starting *changing* it. The system they have now still isn't nearly as good as western capitalism, but it's better than what Russia's still stuck with, and the Chinese system is improving visibly with each passing decade. Give it another thirty years, and it might just about *be* western-style capitalism, in everything but name. (Note that I'm only talking here about their economic system, not their government in general. They still don't have free speech, for instance. But you can have a thriving economy without that: Nazi Germany did, until they started losing the war.)

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    3. Re:That would be worthless by WindBourne · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Problem is, that when we gave them MFN in 1994, it was with the agreement that in 2002, they would drop trade barriers AND free their money. They reneged. W did not make them stick with it, which is EXACTLY why America is in the shape that we are. Had the Yuan risen slowly, then trade would have leveled off. Now, we have to get China to do the right thing by the WORLD and SLOWLY free their money. I doubt that they will.

      My guess is that next year, we will bring pressure on CHina to live up to their obligations. They speak about the dollar dropping, but that is as much, if not more, their fault.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    4. Re:That would be worthless by abionnnn · · Score: 2, Informative

      Your information is outdated, this was true up to 2005, but now the currencies are no longer pegged. Please correct me if I'm wrong, but I assume you're confusing pegging with the fact that the RMB is not convertible to the USD.

    5. Re:That would be worthless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      China does NOT have their currency fixed to the US dollar; although they have done so in the past. It is traded using a reference basket of foreign currencies. While not a total liberalisation; the distinction is important none the less.

      If you're going to repeat fear-mongering Asia bashing from the last few years, at least keep it up to date, because your comment if properly valued is totally worthless.

    6. Re:That would be worthless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      India does not fix their Rupee to the Dollar, and the rupee follows the general trends of currency all over the world - so I dont know how India came into that discussion there?

    7. Re:That would be worthless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      "when we gave them MFN in 1994" lol I love how 'normal trading relations' are a gift now.. China was opening up and the USA wanted to be first in line to make use of them.

      You also talk about China doing the right thing.. which by what you mean is something to benefit US. To put things in perspective China has to have economic growth of about 8% or so just to prevent massive rises in unemployment (8 or so million people a month) and the instability that would come from that.

      China you say did not live up to their obligations. And you predict that in the future 'we will bring pressure on CHina to live up to their obligations'.. Well guess what, back in 2005 that's exactly what happened. And guess what, back in 2005 China moved to help reconcile that by opening up their currency somewhat to trading. OMG you're right if you were commenting in 2004. But you're not. You're just doing what makes the USA hated around the world. Whinging when and as we have it as good as we really do.

      We are the greatest, we are a financial, cultural and business super hub that effectively rules the world. We sneeze and the world feels it. Our problems are our own. We had inflationary policies introducing trillions of extra cash into the money cycle, and the USD drops.. this is what happens. We also had a massive and chronically corrupt financial system that wiped out 50-60 trillion dollars worth of the WORLDS assets. Much of it offshore in the EU, but a lot of it in the US. Enough to make a recession into a world depression.

      We can fix this; but it won't start by blaming others, and it won't be helped by continuing our reputation as conceited and arrogant. Real efforts at continuous reform is needed.

    8. Re:That would be worthless by mea_culpa · · Score: 1

      You are correct.

    9. Re:That would be worthless by mea_culpa · · Score: 1

      Sorry for the self-reply. Don't know why my link didn't work:
      http://www.thesunsfinancialdiary.com/china/chinese-currency-rmb-vs-us-dollar-2/

    10. Re:That would be worthless by ibsteve2u · · Score: 1

      In short, the politicians said that "government should be run like a business", and then they ran America like a business.

      Poorly, while selling off its core assets and embezzling the proceeds...leaving only a shell company which they use to launder money - and the taxpayer's money, all too often, at that.

      --
      Orwell: "In a Time of Universal Deceit, telling the Truth is a Revolutionary Act"
    11. Re:That would be worthless by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Your arrogance and foolishness is amazing (as well as your cowardice). China has their money FIXED against the dollar. They put it in a "basket" and it adjusts upwards/downwards only in relation of the euro to the dollar. It has adjusted less than 5% even though China now has 3 trillion dollars. For China to continue to have MFN and have things be RIGHT by economics, the west will be after Chinese gov. to live up to their agreements. THey have NOT. THey were to free the money, not just control it ever so slightly. In addition, they were to drop trade barriers. China is fighting both and claiming that they want another decade or 2 before doing so.
      You can lie all you want, but it changes nothing. China has not lived up to their legal obligations, and the west IS getting fed up with it. France, Germany, and Italy have all talked to Jintao, but so far, nothing. My guess is that when this economy settles down later this year, the west will deal with this issue.
      On September 30, 2008, the renminbi traded at 6.7899 yuan per U.S. dollar, which is a 17.3% increase and the highest rate since the removal of the peg. On the other hand, on October 27, 2008 it traded at 8.52812 yuan per euro, [23] which corresponds roughly to the rate at the time of the lifting of the peg against the US-Dollar. In fact, the renminbi has remained at a value of around 6.83 per U.S. dollar since July 2008, oscillating around a narrow band, which in practice amounts to a re-pegging of the renminbi against the dollar.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    12. Re:That would be worthless by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      They speak about the dollar dropping, but that is as much, if not more, their fault.

      Meanwhile, they're buying up all the gold they can get their hands on, while the Dollar is sinking below the value where it's a reasonable world reserve currency. China and Russia are going to keep at it until the IMF creates a new one (or 'the basket'), at which point China will depeg and overnight have a 40% return as the idle dollars come home.

      We can try to shame China into not taking advantage of our ludicrous monetary policy or we can fix our monetary policy. Only one of those stands a chance of working.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  53. Re:Who cares by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Beyond what WaxHeLL said (this is China, not Japan, very different culture and values even if there is historic influence), there's also the fact that your knowledge of Japanese culture is pretty superficial. Taking your own life "when faced with a difficult situation" without further qualifiers is generally viewed about as poorly as it is in the US; it's specifically in cases of failures that are unable to be remedied and are highly troublesome for others (especially large numbers of others) where the cultural acceptance kicks in.

  54. Lithuania? by jcr · · Score: 1

    I wonder why their rate is so high.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    1. Re:Lithuania? by MrCrassic · · Score: 0, Troll

      If you're serious, maybe it has something to do with being forced to have ONE child, if any at all...

    2. Re:Lithuania? by jcr · · Score: 0, Troll

      WTF are you talking about? It's China that has that one-child policy, not Lithuania.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    3. Re:Lithuania? by MrCrassic · · Score: 1, Informative

      That's what I meant. I didn't realize you were referencing the fact that Lithuania has the highest suicide rate going now. Sorry about that.

    4. Re:Lithuania? by Falconhell · · Score: 1

      They cant get enough iphones?

    5. Re:Lithuania? by oji-sama · · Score: 1

      Or they've lost more of them...

      --
      It is what it is.
  55. Setting an example by nobodyman · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    It would certainly send a message to all other employees to not be careless.

    1. Re:Setting an example by nobodyman · · Score: 1

      FWIW, I was not trying to cast dispersions on the poor fellow who took his own life (or was even potentially murdered). What I meant was that, if he was in fact murdered, it would serve as a chilling warning to all other employees of the company.

  56. Consequences of non-existent/weak/unenforced IP? by DrMrLordX · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It is curious that nobody here has stopped to mention what influence China's notorious lack of respect for IP law might have to do with this incident. I'm not a huge fan of patents and the like, and there are plenty of ways for large, well-funded corporations to end-run patents in "the West", but if one were to lose an iPhone prototype in the United States, one would reasonably assume that it would be difficult for anyone to do anything meaningful with it without some serious reverse-engineering (unless someone from China stole it and took it overseas). Sure, it would be a problem, but there would be a lot of hoops for the tech thieves to jump through before they could make bank on their crime. If you could prove that they stole the thing and used it for their own commercial success, you could probably sue them anyway, and you might even win years down the line (bring your warchest).

    Now imagine losing a valuable prototype of an unreleased product in China. How it got lost and to whom (in the event of a theft) would have everything to do with whether or not the prototype could be recovered. In the event of a theft, the thief's backers and influence with the government would have everything to do with whether or not the stolen unit could be used for the purpose of manufacturing cheap knock-offs with release dates comparable to the real product. Foxconn has to know this and had to have been operating under the assumption that the prototype might have fallen into the hands of a well-connected rival that could have (and would have) mass-produced units based off the prototype, which is something neither Apple nor Foxconn would have liked very much. Naturally they would go to every effort to keep a prototype out of "enemy" hands since they know their production models will be copied as soon as they hit store shelves anyway; much of their profit will come from the lead time they get on their cloner competition (it would take a few months to ramp up production of a rip-off). That lead time is all you really get before the cloners flood the market (at least domestically if not internationally). Losing a prototype cuts down on your lead time. In the case of the iPhone prototype, by how much, we do not know. A hasty cloner willing to make a sloppy release might be able to roll out knock-offs before the actual iPhone product itself hits the market, giving people the option to buy a potentially-buggy pre-release version of the product before the actual product hits shelves. Apple wouldn't like that very much, especially not if the knock-offs found their way onto eBay and beyond. Foxconn wouldn't like that much either.

    Not that any of the above justifies roughing the guy up or pushing him towards suicide, but seriously, this whole issue has to be viewed in the proper light. Foxconn and Apple can't just sue whoever turns up with the prototype. In all likelihood, they will never see it again until millions of units just like it show up in Chinese warehouses.

    If Foxconn had any reasonable expectation of being able to file suit against a well-heeled competitor who magically turned up with the prototype and began furiously cranking out knock-off products, maybe they wouldn't have tormented the poor soul allegedly responsible for losing the prototype. Oh sure, being able to rip off anyone's tech is all fun and games when you're poaching the tech from foreign competitors, but when cloners start cannibalizing the creations of their domestic neighbors, things aren't so fun anymore. At least, not for the Chinese, and especially not for that one poor schmuck to whom Foxconn entrusted iPhone prototypes.

  57. Suicide Is A Bit Extreme by adeelarshad82 · · Score: 1

    I can imagine the pressure on the company after losing the prototype and the employee himself but nothing can be bad enough to commit suicide. This is tragic

  58. Re:Who cares by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that's the japs, dude.

  59. Re:Who cares by xarien · · Score: 1

    Asian isn't a culture. The remark above is quite obtuse and the mere fact of using a Japanese term to address an incident in China is ignorant at best.

  60. Companies don't give a... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...shit. They say enough to cover their asses and appear caring. Everything is a buisness, and buisness is cold.

  61. Apple security... by joocemann · · Score: 1

    ...physical intimidation..... ... he 'jumped' from a building to his death...

    sounds more like mob/thug intimidation and ending to me....

    Apple is gangsta, I just didn't think they would send goons to kill a man over a prototype.

  62. Re:Who cares by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    4. In short, get a life. Well, too late now...

    5. When you next decide to throw yourself from a building, don't superglue the hands of three polo-knecked thugs to your shoulders, abdomen and thighs.

  63. Don't confuse "Asia" with "Japan" by zooblethorpe · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "Honor" for "Asians"? Which, of the many Asian cultures, are you talking about? If Japan, then sure, to some extent this is the case. It was more so in years past, but hey, things change.

    In China, I'm not so sure. I'm not as familiar with Chinese cultural mores, not having lived there, but everything I've read suggests that "seppuku" (which, incidentally, is a Japanese word) is much less of a popular out than it is/was in Japan. I bring up the significant possibility that Sun Danyong's death might not have been suicide at all, but even if it were, I strongly suspect that it was motivated less by ideas of honor than it was by ideas of being completely and royally screwed -- i.e., desperation, not clearing one's name so much as escaping a terrible situation.

    As the South Korean character Captain Sam Pak says in a M*A*S*H episode, "Suicide? That's the Japanese. We don't do that schtick." (Ironically, the part was played by the late Japanese-American actor Pat Morita.)

    Cheers,

    --
    "What in the name of Fats Waller is that?"
    "A four-foot prune."
    1. Re:Don't confuse "Asia" with "Japan" by kelnos · · Score: 1

      My understanding of Chinese culture is that there is something similar to the "Japanese honor" concept, but in China it's more a matter of "saving face." Not quite the same as the "honor" idea, more along the lines of dignity and being allowed to cover for or make up for embarrassment. More a matter of public reputation than personal honor. Wikipedia actually has an article about it. It's very hard for a foreigner to fully understand it, I think (and as a foreigner I don't claim to really understand it myself). Don't mistake it for the similar Western idea of face-saving... it goes much deeper and is more nuanced in China.

      --
      Xfce: Lighter than some, heavier than others. Just right.
    2. Re:Don't confuse "Asia" with "Japan" by MrResistor · · Score: 1

      "Honor" for "Asians"? Which, of the many Asian cultures, are you talking about?

      All of them.

      The Japanese tend to be more serious about such things, but the Chinese aren't that far behind on that count.

      Don't make the mistake of thinking that Japanese and Chinese culture are totally distinct. China was the dominant culture (by far) in the region for millenia. Think about how much of western culture is based on Roman concepts. The Roman empire only lasted about 500 years. The Chinese empire lasted over 2000 years. Added to that, the Japanese have long been masters of integrating foreign concepts into their own culture. the result is that many of the concepts we think of as quintessentially Japanese actually originated in China. Examples include haiku and zen buddhism.

      If Japan, then sure, to some extent this is the case. It was more so in years past, but hey, things change.

      In China, I'm not so sure.

      Seppuku is more ritualized than anything I'm aware of in Chinese culture, but it could just be one of the many things that got lost in the craziness of the 20th century. Regardless, the basic idea is there, and according to my Chinese friends tons Chinese schoolchildren kill themselves every year because they are unable to hack it in the incredibly competitive Chinese school system (yet another thing the Japanese borrowed from them). The method of choice, by the way, is jumping off a tall building. The Chinese reaction to such is not particularly sympathetic, they typically write it off as the person being weak or having some sort of mental problem.

      Based on my experience, kelnos is correct. The Chinese concept of "honor" and "saving face" is a bit less personal than the Japanese version. This guys reasoning for killing himself probably had more to do with damage to the company's reputation than with his own personal honor. Personal relationships are extremely important in Chinese culture, and his failure could have reflected badly on all of his coworkers.

      I bring up the significant possibility that Sun Danyong's death might not have been suicide at all

      Unlikely, I think. The rich in China are very powerful, and can generally get away with just about anything they want. If he was killed, I doubt they would bother trying to make it look like suicide. It's much more likely he would just disappear.

      but even if it were, I strongly suspect that it was motivated less by ideas of honor than it was by ideas of being completely and royally screwed -- i.e., desperation, not clearing one's name so much as escaping a terrible situation.

      This is certainly possible. He may have felt suicide was a better option than being disappeared, and frankly I'm not sure I could argue the point.

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
  64. This kind of treatment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... only happens in China.

  65. anybody seem to link this to.. by Luuseens · · Score: 0

    an hero?

  66. How Many Foxconn Security... by Kagato · · Score: 1

    How many Foxconn security employees does it take to push an engineer out a window?

    None, he jumped.

    Just say'n.

  67. Re:Who cares by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 2

    In other words,

    If I can help Apple deliver new iPhone models by defenestration of brown or yellow people, then that's what I'm going to fucking do.

    --
    Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
  68. I am so so so so so so so sad someone died by Macd275 · · Score: 1

    Quote: An Apple spokesperson said this to CNet: "We are saddened by the tragic loss of this young employee, and we are awaiting results of the investigations into his death. We require our suppliers to treat all workers with dignity and respect." I am so so so so so so so sad someone died... I know what will cheer you up Steve... MONEY FIGHT !!!! ha ha ha ha ha... I feel better now.

  69. Exaggeration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hear it wasn't even the fall that killed him, it was the beating he took from Jobs on the phone before he jumped that did the damage, after all his apartment was on the first floor.

  70. We require our suppliers to treat all workers... by agoliveira · · Score: 1

    ... with dignity and respect.
    Just like Steve Jobs does!

    --
    Scientia est Potentia
  71. seppuku?? by MMInterface · · Score: 1

    Actually most Japanese would also view this as a drastic response but with a little more contempt for the person who killed themselves than Americans are used to because it disrupts their lives. It's considered a desperate and inconsiderate act, especially for someone who isn't even a well known public figure, (the rare case where honor might even be considered and even then it's mostly only going to be a few right wing lunatics that cheer for you). The motivation is now more of a frowned upon social problem as opposed to some valiant effort to maintain honor that everyone accepts. If you want to consider modern Japanese culture then the extreme pressures of society and the workplace are the motivation.

  72. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I haven't read all of the posts yet, but one solution seems to have slipped the collective mind.

    Maybe he DID steal it, the bullying was warranted, and he killed himself to avoid going to jail.... ...I'm just sayin....

  73. Top 5, not Top 7 by Mal-2 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Your top five are not in Asia. You may not think of it as such, but Kazakhstan is most definitely an Asian country.

    Mal-2

    --
    How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
    1. Re:Top 5, not Top 7 by LunaticTippy · · Score: 1

      Thank you for the correction. I allowed Borat to cloud my geography.

      --
      Man, you really need that seminar!
  74. Steve can has... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Steve can has your liver!

  75. By Neruos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Goes to show you, material objects are more important than human life. The US supports this style of business and this style of government. Spin it anyway you want. Your tax dollars supported the people that support the foreign policy that supported the social enviroment that drove the force that killed this guy.

  76. FUCK APPLE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As long as it is is not illegal, Apple has no interesting in moral issues.

    Now before the apple fanbois start jumping up and down about capitalism and related bullshit - fuck off. Just because they are out there to make money does not mean they have to make it without considering moral or ethical side of it. I know some small and big business who do it right. But wait - most of them do it wrong, so Apple can do it too, right?

    It's not for no reason I have stopped buying Apple products - be it their close culture and locked products, they disdain to the concept of green (yeah, go ahead, label me a hippie), and last but not least, all the fanbois who would keep on overlooking all these and keep this motherfuckers in the game.

  77. Re:Who cares by nbauman · · Score: 1
    I can understand it, even in American terms.

    You're an up and coming engineer, you have a place of respect and admiration in society, you have a good life, lots of friends and co-workers.

    Then all of a sudden you make a mistake (or maybe you're just the victim of a crime), the people you thought were your friends turn on you, accuse you, denounce you, you lose your job. Your whole life falls apart.

    A couple of Madoff's victims killed themselves.

    People often commit suicide here when they get arrested. That's why they take away shoelaces and belts.

  78. Re:Who cares by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is the most racist thing on this page at the moment. Because he doesn't even know it is.

  79. Oh! there it is... by Bysshe · · Score: 1

    Must have fallen between the cushions.

    --
    Read what I mean, not what I wrote.
  80. Re:For a business, patronage is the highest praise by Knara · · Score: 1

    Just so you know, Foxconn has made non-Apple and non-Sony boards for a while. Dell has been using them for a couple years (though they might be upping their orders if the other two are cutting back and leaving open production capacity).

  81. "dignity and respect" by Gonoff · · Score: 1

    Perhaps this is another example of cultural imperialism but this is rare anywhere in the world and must be unheard of in China.

    The only thing that seems to make most employers treat their staff that way is a legal requirement. Even that doesn't always work.

    --
    I'll see your Constitution and raise you a Queen.
    1. Re:"dignity and respect" by ChaoticLimbs · · Score: 1

      Yeah, when Apple says they "require their suppliers to treat their employees with dignity and respect" is that written into the contract, or just something Apple says to the press when the factory boss goes and roughs up an employee? I would bet that it's not in the contract.

  82. Re:Who cares by Sinbios · · Score: 1

    I'm interested in the backstory - did a higher percentage of schools fall than other buildings, or what? If the buildings were indeed within the "entire towns and villages that disappeared", how does the reporter manage to justify her rather unsubtle implications that the government all but killed those children?

    --
    Anyone can "stand up for what they believe", but it takes a very brave individual to change what they believe. - Loundry
  83. Apple's PR? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "We require our suppliers to treat all workers with dignity and respect."

    That should be followed with:
    "But then we turn our heads to it because we know we can't enforce dignity and respect on another culture"

  84. Re:Who cares by Sinbios · · Score: 1

    Ritual suicide isn't a way out of a difficult situation, or giving up in the face of a challenge.

    I think your mistake is the impression that external observers despise failure and pressure someone into suicide. That is not the case. It's acknowledgement that there is nothing you could do to make up for your failure. It's a voluntary offering of your own life as the most sincere apology possible and the ultimate show of respect for those you've wronged.

    --
    Anyone can "stand up for what they believe", but it takes a very brave individual to change what they believe. - Loundry
  85. Re:On the upside.... On the DOWNSIDE... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is now another liver available for transplant.

    Tasteless and Insensitive....

  86. Re:Who cares?... I do. More people should. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your bosses were mean to you: sue them, find another job, learn to live with it.

    Yes, because that works so well in China, right?

    Get some fucking compassion, idiot.

    Well Said. Lack of compassion causes harm to everything and everyone.... and CAN cause suicides too... people should think about compassion, before they act or say anything.

  87. JUMPED? by gearloos · · Score: 1

    Ohh ya, he ahh... "jumped", said chinese official....who also convieniently witnessed the suicide from the balcony of the very apartment he jumped from! Now that witness could not be mistaken, being so close!

    --
    "Computers are a lot like Air Conditioners" "They both work great until you start opening Windows"
  88. Pay is relative by Shivetya · · Score: 1

    to the prices in the economy you live in.

    While I do not deny or accuse Foxconn of being a sweatshop people here need to quit judging incomes by amounts paid in their own countries. This is no different than declaring all poor the same, whereas in the US poor can mean you have shelter, more than one TV, a cell phone, and even a car.

    --
    * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
  89. Re:Who cares by jo_ham · · Score: 1

    Yes, more schools than anything else fell down because they were built cheaply, quickly and with corners cut, so they pretty much all collapsed very badly. Other buildings were severely damaged, but there was an appalling loss of life in schools across the area due to the school buildings in particular being deathtraps.

  90. Apple says: by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Apple says: "We require our suppliers to treat all workers with dignity and respect."

    Then why build your product in China?

    What's next, Apple, making MacBooks in rural Iran?

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
    1. Re:Apple says: by EtherMonkey · · Score: 1

      What makes you think that all companies in the US treat their workers with dignity and respect?

      --
      --- A man with a briefcase can steal more money, than any man with a gun. [Don Henley]
  91. Re:Who cares by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    Are you factoring in the culture in this case? Honor means a lot to Asians.

    Nice cultural bigotry. I suppose you think all Asian women live only to serve their men. and all Asian kids are great at math. I'd love to hear your take on which ethnic group runs the best pawnshops.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  92. If it were in the US... by zome · · Score: 1

    the poor guy would not jump from the building, he would buy a gun, take it to his office, kill bunch of random people who happen to be there, and then kill himself.. mod me down all you like, but in a few months it will be office shooting again somewhere, as it always have been.

  93. New iPhone by buss_error · · Score: 1

    -turn on humor mode please-

    OK, all you folks out there - rush out to buy a new $500 phone, give a DNA sample, sign a four year contract to get your new iBlood phone!

    -OK, now turn it off-

    This is sad. I have to have some dark humor here because the loss of a life over a phone prototype is just too tragic otherwise. What an utter waste.

    --
    Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.
  94. Re:It was inevitable by Abuzar · · Score: 0

    > Apple would have killed him had he not killed himself, but Apple probably would have tortured him first in attempt to find the iPhone he lost.

    Sad thing is, your comment isn't flamebait.

    Apple is responsible for his death, no matter what PR their machine puts out it isn't a secret what working conditions there are like. Intimidating someone into suicide is just as much of a murder as stabbing them yourself.

  95. Re:Who cares by Satanboy · · Score: 1

    in other news. . .

    We all know that the chinese and japanese have been historically very nice to eachother!

    (What's sad is I first learned of their mutual hatred for eachother through a bruce lee movie.)

  96. No love lost for suicide practioners by relaxinparadise · · Score: 1

    I just have a hard time having much sympathy for people that kill or try to kill themselves. Everyone alive realizes at some point that life is painful, the few that give up on life should not be looked upon with any admiration. I've been called mean and I suppose I am.

  97. not flaimbait by maxrate · · Score: 1

    I don't see what the big deal is of a missing apple prototype, I've got a good idea what it will be like having never witnessed the prototype: It will be aesthetically pleasing yet ergonomically a nightmare to operate.

  98. Re:Who cares by Uber+Banker · · Score: 1

    The sky is an eerie dark shade of brightness right here, near but not under the path of the current solar eclipse, high in the sky, but as if the brightness setting of a monitor has been turned right down, none of the hue of sunset. I believe this makes a good analogy to the GP's point.

  99. Cruelty-free leather? by SteveFoerster · · Score: 1

    ...someone will open a farm, raise the cows (cruelty free), get the leather....

    You can have cruelty-free or you can have leather. Pick one, you don't get them both.

    --
    Space game using normal deck of cards: http://BattleCards.org
    1. Re:Cruelty-free leather? by lennier · · Score: 1

      "You can have cruelty-free or you can have leather. Pick one, you don't get them both."

      I dunno... some way of killing the cows blissfully? Death by snoo-snoo?

      --
      You are not a brain: http://books.google.com/books?id=2oV61CeDx-YC
    2. Re:Cruelty-free leather? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, I had no idea that in nature, cows are immortal. You learn something new every day!

  100. With dignity and respect by samcan · · Score: 1

    Our customers on the other hand...

  101. Re:Who cares by gyrogeerloose · · Score: 2

    I'm afraid you're being pretty naive, my friend. Even here in the United States the chances of you being successful and winning a judgement in a wrongful termination suit are miniscule. In a totalitarian state like China, they'd be infinitesimal, and that's assuming that the government didn't go ahead and toss you in a jail cell for a few years just for having the temerity of bringing the suit in the first place.

    --
    This ain't rocket surgery.
  102. Re:Who cares by lynx_linux · · Score: 1

    Industrial espionage? How much is now in his bank account? Did he jump without anyone's assistance?

  103. It sends a message to Apple by Pinky's+Brain · · Score: 2, Informative

    That they will do anything that it takes to prevent this from happening again.

  104. Corporate Fascism by eee_eff · · Score: 1

    The poor guy was probably subjected to all kinds of threats and abuse; the inevitable result of a company like Apple that tries to maintain absolute secrecy of it products, while farming out the work to sweat shops, where they products are worth many times the wages of the workers...

  105. Lay off the jokes guys by dafing · · Score: 1
    I agree with you Starturtle, and to the commenters making jokes, why? If this were someone you had known I doubt you would have said such awful things. I dont think you can blame Apple for this, guy happened to work for the company that makes Apple hardware, Steve Jobs himself didnt shoot this guy you know, we dont have proof of any wrong doing etc etc etc.

    Suicide is always a terribly sad thing, even if its one of ~1.3 Billion people on the other side of the world.

    --
    --- ...or a new slashdot signature. Dear aunt, let's set so double the killer delete select all
  106. You can't handle the truth! by Lead+Butthead · · Score: 1

    Quoting a certain Hollywood flick --

    Son, we live in a world that has (iPhones) and those (iPhones) need to be guarded by (corporate thugs). Who's gonna do it? You? You, (Mr. I want my iPhone)? I have a greater responsibility than you can possibly fathom. You weep for (Sun Danyong) and curse (Foxconn); you have that luxury. You have the luxury of not knowing what I know: that (Sun Danyong's) death, while tragic, probably saved (Apple) and that my existence, while grotesque and incomprehensible to you, saves (western capitalism). You don't want the truth because deep down in places you don't talk about (on) parties (lines) you want me on that wall, you need me on that wall. We use words like (patents), (trade secrets), (copyrights). We use them as the backbone of a life trying to defend something. You use them as a punchline. I have neither the time nor the inclination to explain myself to a man who (surfs) and (phones) under the blanket of the very (iPhone) I provide and then questions the manner in which I provide it. I would rather you just said "thank you," and went on your way. Otherwise, I suggest that you pick up a (baseball bat) and stand a post. Either way, I don't give a damn what you think you are entitled to.

    --
    ELOI, ELOI, LAMA SABACHTHANI!?
  107. Prototypes aren't that interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have one (don't ask). It's exactly the same as a normal iPhone except the backplate has the "not approved by the FCC" text. Must be one of the later iterations of prototypes.

  108. Re:Who cares by MrResistor · · Score: 1

    A very large amount of Japanese culture actually comes from China.

    --
    Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
  109. Re:Who cares by kyliaar · · Score: 1

    Sure... you could say the same about any country though. Chinese history is the longest recorded record on Earth.

    However, China was split apart at one point by Western powers and they tend to take such things in stride.

    Japan became isolationist and only allowed Europeans on their land fairly recently.

    Thier culture may have similar roots but recent application and emphasis has been very different.

  110. capitalistic dictatorship / communist democracy by krischik · · Score: 1

    Well one does not imply the other - not all dictatorships are communist and a democracy does not need to capitalistic as well...

  111. Foxconn was "fired" by Apple and Sony by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

    It is not because of poor engineers suicide, Foxconn drove their partners mad by diminishing quality and their "me too" laptops based on the following The Inquirer article.

    http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/1433657/apple-sony-dump-foxconn-quanta

  112. Reasons are different by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

    " Western culture isn't immune to these effects either (cf. high-profile financial advisors committing suicide in 2008-2009), but I understand that it's significantly more of an issue in Asia"

    There is a huge difference between a very rich financial advisor losing all his money and clients, their trust and possibly going to jail committing suicide and a poor engineer committing suicide for sole reason of honor.

    For some cultures, losing honor means losing the entire reason of living. For example, at a free time, look for the reason why burglary rate at Japan is so low. Not mafioso style, the ordinary house burglary. You will be really surprised.

    While I don't agree that you should commit suicide for losing a protype of a paranoid American company, I try to understand.

  113. Don't mess with Jobs' personal rights by PensivePeter · · Score: 1

    "...We are saddened by the tragic loss of this young employee, and we are awaiting results of the investigations into his death. We require our suppliers to treat all workers with dignity and respect." Intimidating staff is a right reserved exclusively by and for Steve Jobs For all lawyers for Mr Jobs and Apple Computers reading this post, the entire contents are enclosed in invisible "irony" tags

  114. Danyong by alsdomain · · Score: 1

    Hello!

  115. did he died? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did he died?

  116. thinking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    none of this sits right..

    he told his boss.. so obviously suicide wasn't his first choice as he was already prepared to take responsibilty..

    also.. he couldn't back track every step? i.e it was easier to die than to do that?

    if you had a iphone prototype.. how would react to it missing? I know I would try and assist in every possible way to get it back..

    usually when untimely death is involved its always a matter of either love or money

  117. New product line... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    iSplat

  118. *What* dignity and respect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "We require our suppliers to treat all workers with dignity and respect."

    Oh really?

    http://koitsu.wordpress.com/2008/08/07/foxconn-and-slave-labour/
    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/13357555/

    Then pick another supplier/vendor. End of fucking story.

  119. Why do we believe the report? by ubermiester · · Score: 1
    Why would anyone, especially the /. crowd, take the report of this poor bastard's "suicide" at face value? He may have been distraught, but it would seem more likely that they made an example of him. "Look what happened to the last guy to lose a prototype."

    We buy just about everything we use in our daily lives from China, and in light of our dwindling manufacturing base, perhaps we should rethink our partnership until things like this are less common. Now this is not to say that intimidation is not a part of US history (or present for that matter), but a US corp could not order its thugs to intimidate and search the home of one of its workers. At least not publicly.

  120. You are wrong by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    China uses a basket, which they control and they keep the value fixed against the dollar even though they have accumulated 3 TRILLION dollars. In a proper economy, the dollar would plummet against the Yuan/Renminbi. In fact, most economists say that if China allowed it to properly float, that they Yuan would trade at about 1.5-2 yuan/dollar. Right now, it trades at ~7 yuan to a dollar. On September 30, 2008, the renminbi traded at 6.7899 yuan per U.S. dollar, which is a 17.3% increase and the highest rate since the removal of the peg. On the other hand, on October 27, 2008 it traded at 8.52812 yuan per euro, [23] which corresponds roughly to the rate at the time of the lifting of the peg against the US-Dollar. In fact, the renminbi has remained at a value of around 6.83 per U.S. dollar since July 2008, oscillating around a narrow band, which in practice amounts to a re-pegging of the renminbi against the dollar.

    Two trade is a good thing WHEN AND ONLY WHEN it is two way and money is allowed to adjust to properly encourage correct value. China's (and India's) actions are designed to drain jobs away from the west, mostly America. Had W done the right thing and either removed MFN or better yet, get China to live up to their agreements, then there would be NO RECESSION/DEPRESSION right now. This recession/depression has a LOT to do with this imbalance.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:You are wrong by abionnnn · · Score: 1

      You're still not completely understanding what a Peg means.

  121. Zen is Chinese, but haiku definitely isn't by zooblethorpe · · Score: 1

    Added to that, the Japanese have long been masters of integrating foreign concepts into their own culture. the result is that many of the concepts we think of as quintessentially Japanese actually originated in China. Examples include haiku and zen buddhism.

    I'll certainly give you zen, as that's the Chinese chan. But I think you're off base when it comes to haiku. :)

    The haiku is part of a distinctly Japanese poetic tradition stretching back to at least the Heian period, and likely evolving from something prior to that. The word itself means something like "excerpt", being the first three lines of a larger format called a tanka. The word tanka means "short song", and was contrasted against the chôka or "long song", both forms of the waka, or "Japanese song" -- "Japanese" to distinguish the form from the classical-Chinese-based kanshi style of poetry. More here.

    There is some speculation that Japanese poetic forms, particularly the renga style, might have arisen from or been heavily influenced by Chinese poetry, but the first paragraph here mirrors what I've read elsewhere, basically making the point that Japanese poetry doesn't owe much to Chinese. No doubt this is due at least in part to very different linguistic structures -- one might as well try to compose a limerick or iambic pentameter in Japanese. (For that matter, I happen to feel that a haiku in English makes about as much sense -- the haiku format only really works for a language with morae and relatively flat stress, which pretty much rules English out.)

    Cheers,

    --
    "What in the name of Fats Waller is that?"
    "A four-foot prune."
  122. Hypocritical bastards by spacefiddle · · Score: 1

    "We require our suppliers to treat all workers with dignity and respect"

    No you don't. You do business in China. You keep yourself willfully ignorant as much as possible about their internal workings, In fact you not only don't require any such thing from them; it would be more accurate to say that you cave in a hot second to China's "don't even think about telling us what to do, and we'll provide cheap labor you shouldn't think too hard about" attitude. So shut the fuck up.

  123. Re:Who cares by MrResistor · · Score: 1

    China being split apart by western powers was fairly recent and fairly brief, and I don't think the Western powers controlled enough of China to have a serious effect on the culture. The Communists did, however, and the Cultural Revolution did a pretty good job of forcing cultural change. Japan may have been more isolationist, but MacArthur didn't mess around when dictating Japan's new economic and political structure, and I think it's arguable which country has experienced the more drastic social changes post-WWII.

    That being said, the fact is that tons of Chinese school children commit suicide by jumping off tall buildings every year. The specifics may differ, but China most certainly has a tradition of suicide as a response to significant loss of face.

    --
    Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
  124. Re:Who cares by kyliaar · · Score: 1

    According to Wikipedia, Japan had a 34.8 male suicides per 100,000 people in 1999 with 13.2 for females. China had 13.0 with slightly more female suicides (14.8).

    To me, those numbers back up the statement regarding loss of face and seppuku as being much more of a predominant factor in Japanese culture.

    Having said that, certain countries double Japan's suicide rate in males. The top three are Lithuania (68.1), Belarus (63.3) and Russia (58.1). I suspect suicides there are not honor related.

  125. oh dear by Mortgage · · Score: 1

    Probably jumped just before he was about to be pushed.. Bet the mood in the bosses office wasn't too hot that day..

  126. Re:Who cares by MrResistor · · Score: 1

    If you believe any statistics that come out of China, you are a fool. The Chinese government lies constantly, about everything.

    A high suicide rate would make it look like things might be less than perfect in the People's Republic, which would cause the high party officials to lose face, and so many suicides are not recorded as suicides.

    --
    Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
  127. Re:Who cares by kyliaar · · Score: 1

    Well, then we can't really know much about anything about this. This guy may have actually have been murdered the security personnel and it was made to look like a suicide and that most reported suicides are actually covers for murders in China.

    This story may all be made up just to tarnish Apple's reputation. What sort of fact checking is it possible to do on stories that come out of China?

    One thing that I will point out is that it is interesting that the words we use for ritual suicide after a loss of shame, 'seppuku', is a Japanese word and goes back to a samurai tradition. To my knowledge, there never were Chinese samurai.

    This concept of committing suicide after a loss of face continues to remain a Japanese concept in my eyes, not a Chinese one.

  128. Re:Who cares by MrResistor · · Score: 1

    I don't know of any Chinese samurai either, but I do know of the Korean hwa rang, who were quite similar in many ways to samurai and predated them by a couple of centuries.

    As for using suicide as a cover for murder in China, that's unlikely. Wealth and political power go hand in hand in China, and the powerful can get away with just about anything. Why go to the trouble of making it look like suicide when you can just have him disappeared? That kind of effort is only worthwhile in countries that operate under the rule of law.

    --
    Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
  129. Re:Who cares by kyliaar · · Score: 1

    Hmm... China sounds very different from Japan after all, doesn't it.

    Did you have some point you were making or just demonstrating your knowledge?

  130. Re:Who cares by MrResistor · · Score: 1

    Both.

    My specific point is that suicide in the face of dishonor is a Chinese tradition. My more general point is that a significant amount of what you seem to consider to be distinctively Japanese is in fact derivative, and most of that was derived from China. The Japanese have long been masters of borrowing good ideas from other cultures, a fact that is largely responsible for their modern success.

    --
    Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
  131. Re:Who cares by kyliaar · · Score: 1

    I completely agree that the Japanese have demonstrated themselves as the great borrowers. The Chinese show a similar trend but to a much lesser degree.

    I still don't see any evidence presented that this is true in this particular case though. I am sure that suicide is probably a more acceptable answer to losses of honor in China or anywhere in the East than in the West. They have entirely different concepts in regards to how to value life or death than we do.

    I think the most succinct statement of this difference is that the Western approach to life is to conquer it by hitting it hard (hunter approach) and the Eastern approach is to endure (farmer approach).

    Having said all that, can you provide any data on what sort of factor honor-based suicide is in present-day China or are you extrapolating from other known data?

  132. chomskies of America by mi · · Score: 1

    fucking sick [...] self-righteous tool sheds, like yourself [...] whatever the fuck [...] fucking process [...] fucking framework [...] bag of douche [...] like a cunt [...] testicular

    Now, that's a fine way to make an argument, and teach others to do the same!

    To address your point — as much as I was able to discern it through foul language — he absolutely does have a full (fucking) right to live anywhere he wants to (and so does everyone else). And I (fucking) challenge you to show, where in my posting do I deny that right.

    My point was, people, who claim, that corporations and Capitalism are evil, are (fucking) inconsistent and hypocritical. They enjoy the awesome standard of living, that Capitalism offers even to its least-successful participants, while doing their damnest to undermine it.

    Having lived under and among such hypocrisy through my youth, I'm particularly angry at its practitioners here. Hypocrisy is not illegal, but had Chomsky and his followers been honest, they would've moved to a corporations-free country such as North Korea, or Cuba, or, at least, Venezuela. That they have no "testicular fortitude" to do so, does not lead me to advocate their deportation — contrary to your rant — but simply that I deem them to be hypocrites and would not honor their arguments with a direct rebuttal, since deep inside they don't hold the expressed opinions themselves.

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    1. Re:chomskies of America by Skye16 · · Score: 1

      Why, pray tell, would they need to move if they want things to change? Why not attempt to change it? It's terribly difficult to effect change in the US from Venezuela.

      Your argument basically ignores this entire concept, and instead you decide that they're hypocritical, and can't possibly conceive of why anybody who espouses their views would stay.

      I don't know if you've noticed, but it's terribly hard to try to change America when you've emmigrated to another country.

      And I'm so terribly sorry you can't make it past profanity; apparently telling Americans to leave if they don't like something (rather than try to change it) is far less bothersome to you than a fucking swear word. We must agree to disagree on this; I feel your attempts to disparage the individuals in question by claiming they should leave (as if they're not americans, have no right to say the things they're saying, and subsequently should not be listened to - whether that's your intent or not, that's the end result) are FAR more reprehensible than the word "fuck", but I suppose if that's what you want to fixate on, that's fine.