Here is an easy to understand comparison to show cheaper is better.
Say I had $10,000 to spend on cpus; a 1.3ghz athlon costs $133 and a 1.4ghz athlon costs $166.
With $10,000 i could buy 75 1.3ghz cpus, or 60 1.4ghz cpus. That's a total of 97.5ghz @ 1.3ghz, or 84ghz @ 1.4 ghz. This proves that it would be better value to build a cluster out of slightly slower cpus.
The breakeven point (where you get the same ghz for the same price) is at $670, where you could buy 5 1.3ghz cpus for a total of 6.5ghz, or 4 1.4ghz cpus for a total of 5.6 ghz.
I have noticed many people complaining about having an 8 byte smaller mtu... This has no effect on internet bandwidth at all. This is just to your isp; they are committed to giving you the bandwidth they have advertised. It just means that you send more packets/second to your isp than your isp does to the internet.
I believe you mean by using a trojan horse, to send the attacker an email, or logon to some private irc network to inform the hacker of your ip. This is not possible unless you are dumb enough to run programs of whos origin you dont know, or run IIS, or any other exploitable software.
HAHAHAHA guess what, i host chaz.ro0t.com, as well as web *and* mail for a few other domains, using my dialup modem, because i cant get cable or dsl where i live. and my isp disconnects me every 2 hours. stop spouting bs.
note, my friend might be getting cable soon, and she said she doesnt mind me dropping a freebsd box there:o)
UH, BT have always used PPPoE for their ADSL (Residential and Business 500 plans, im not sure about the Business 500PLUS and Business 1000 planes). I know, because I have friends using them and I've helped set up NAT for them.
BT have used PPPoE ever since they introduced ADSL, which i think has the largest user base of any isp in britain. I dont see what the problem is, its no harder to share over a network, which i think is what all the fuss is about. Plus it allows the use of MPPC compression, which speeds the downloading of compressible locations such as websites, text and postscript files even more. If you consider i can get 5-to-1 compression using a modem at 46.6kbs, at 576kbs (as is the standard BT OpenWorld plan, thats a total of 2,880 kbits/second, or 360 kilobytes/sec. I imagine the americans have it at even higher speed, so QUIT COMPLAINING DAMMIT.
live in australia, and work for uk. The money is worth more, and i have to pay less taxes, and the cost of living is less. Sweet. Dual citizenship rocks:D
Re:School isn't just to get a job
on
CS vs CIS
·
· Score: 1
Having moved from australia to england, ive found that my vast experience counts for very little, so unfortunately i have to waste my time getting certificates to prove what i already know://
Filters block more 'safe' sites then they restrict access to unsafe sites. Even when it blocks a site there are plenty of ways to get around... ie simple cgi script on your webserver to download the page then convert filtered words, ie cun7 etc.
Slashdot Mirror
first reply to first post!
Does that apply to the developer, the end-user, or both?
Anyone know of a mod to let it play spc's? :)
This is the sort of lame fucking question that should be asked on usenet and NOT HERE.
Here is an easy to understand comparison to show cheaper is better.
Say I had $10,000 to spend on cpus; a 1.3ghz athlon costs $133 and a 1.4ghz athlon costs $166.
With $10,000 i could buy 75 1.3ghz cpus, or 60 1.4ghz cpus. That's a total of 97.5ghz @ 1.3ghz, or 84ghz @ 1.4 ghz. This proves that it would be better value to build a cluster out of slightly slower cpus.
The breakeven point (where you get the same ghz for the same price) is at $670, where you could buy 5 1.3ghz cpus for a total of 6.5ghz, or 4 1.4ghz cpus for a total of 5.6 ghz.
I have noticed many people complaining about having an 8 byte smaller mtu... This has no effect on internet bandwidth at all. This is just to your isp; they are committed to giving you the bandwidth they have advertised. It just means that you send more packets/second to your isp than your isp does to the internet.
> tag your system
I believe you mean by using a trojan horse, to send the attacker an email, or logon to some private irc network to inform the hacker of your ip. This is not possible unless you are dumb enough to run programs of whos origin you dont know, or run IIS, or any other exploitable software.
HAHAHAHA guess what, i host chaz.ro0t.com, as well as web *and* mail for a few other domains, using my dialup modem, because i cant get cable or dsl where i live. and my isp disconnects me every 2 hours. stop spouting bs.
:o)
note, my friend might be getting cable soon, and she said she doesnt mind me dropping a freebsd box there
UH, BT have always used PPPoE for their ADSL (Residential and Business 500 plans, im not sure about the Business 500PLUS and Business 1000 planes). I know, because I have friends using them and I've helped set up NAT for them.
WinRoute (www.tinysoftware.com) handles PPPoE connections just as any other connection, and shares using NAT quite nicely :o)
using gnu software...
grep default\.ida access_log | tr -d '[' | tr -d ']' | gawk '{print $1 " " $4 " " $5}'
BT have used PPPoE ever since they introduced ADSL, which i think has the largest user base of any isp in britain. I dont see what the problem is, its no harder to share over a network, which i think is what all the fuss is about. Plus it allows the use of MPPC compression, which speeds the downloading of compressible locations such as websites, text and postscript files even more. If you consider i can get 5-to-1 compression using a modem at 46.6kbs, at 576kbs (as is the standard BT OpenWorld plan, thats a total of 2,880 kbits/second, or 360 kilobytes/sec. I imagine the americans have it at even higher speed, so QUIT COMPLAINING DAMMIT.
This has to be the worst headline ever. There is no mention of what Evolution is or does, and i am still clueless.
There is an ipv6 TCP/IP stack for windows nt available for download from http://research.microsoft.com/msripv6/.
Sorry I can't send you a letter now because you might be able to read it.
live in australia, and work for uk. The money is worth more, and i have to pay less taxes, and the cost of living is less. Sweet. Dual citizenship rocks :D
Having moved from australia to england, ive found that my vast experience counts for very little, so unfortunately i have to waste my time getting certificates to prove what i already know ://
Filters block more 'safe' sites then they restrict access to unsafe sites. Even when it blocks a site there are plenty of ways to get around... ie simple cgi script on your webserver to download the page then convert filtered words, ie cun7 etc.
I hate spam. Send the bastard to jail.
Did anyone notice that he never said if the mouse actually worked afterwards? http://you.know.you.want.to.have.sex.with.chaz.aft ernet.org/