[quote]One small problem -- In order to register you must create an account... In order to create an account you must allow cookies (these pre-registration cookies serve as nonce values to help prevent spam).[/quote]
Why would you need those? You don't. Also, when you press register button then you have an intent to register.
There are way too many sites who just slap cookies as soon as you open them. Even if I don't even intended to be there longer than reading 1 page. Why would I need that cookie? There are even some which don't even work with those disabled. Now that's something.
Too good to be true. Browser will guess whether it needs "strict" rendering and that's about it. No one is going to have multiple ways to do things for all HTML or whatever versions. Other than legacy IE quirks mode.
You seem to make W3C a victim here. It's not. Unless you count it's own inability to go forward.
HTML 5 is perfectly fine.// This line has exactly the same number of facts as yours BTW. That is 0.
It's not clear to me what's so backwards and messy either. While I like XHTML myself XML serialization is till there with HTML 5. As for XHTML 2... it got nowhere. Blame W3C.
Well, "too much resources and slow" line is usually trolling <troll>unless it's about desktop application written in Java</troll> as browsers nowadays must do many things. Besides Opera resource usage is based on total available/free memory AFAIR.
Slashdot Mirror
I fear they day C++ guys will learn that Unicode has so many previously unused special symbols that can be reused to mean something in C++.
Use mozilla.debian.net.
[quote]One small problem -- In order to register you must create an account... In order to create an account you must allow cookies (these pre-registration cookies serve as nonce values to help prevent spam).[/quote] Why would you need those? You don't. Also, when you press register button then you have an intent to register. There are way too many sites who just slap cookies as soon as you open them. Even if I don't even intended to be there longer than reading 1 page. Why would I need that cookie? There are even some which don't even work with those disabled. Now that's something.
Do not set any cookies if person is not registered (here is your consent). Problem solved. Actually, that would be pretty nice.
I'm reading /. within maximized 1980px width screen. Seems perfectly fine. I get less scrolling as a bonus too.
Links that say nothing. Ok.
1st â" what's their source? An ass again? 2nd â" if you think no one install KDE in Ubuntu you are wrong.
You seem to like talking out of your ass. Would you please back up your claim?
I use Kate.
You may want it but GP certainly does not. And I agree with him here.
/. developers don't read. Telepathic interface, you see. They have never heard of medium font size either.
Too good to be true. Browser will guess whether it needs "strict" rendering and that's about it. No one is going to have multiple ways to do things for all HTML or whatever versions. Other than legacy IE quirks mode.
It is.
So you don't like auto because you prefer to type more... I see.
I thought Firefox + Opera is more than 1.
Good gaming is as much about user experience as gameplay itself.
Too bad f.d.o. tends to auto approve Gnome things as 'standard' without second though.
Toggle menu to a plain menu duh. Disabling graphical effects could help too I guess.
You seem to make W3C a victim here. It's not. Unless you count it's own inability to go forward.
HTML 5 is perfectly fine. // This line has exactly the same number of facts as yours BTW. That is 0.
It's not clear to me what's so backwards and messy either. While I like XHTML myself XML serialization is till there with HTML 5. As for XHTML 2... it got nowhere. Blame W3C.
Well, if
1. A > 0
2. B > 0
then (A + B) > A
If 2 is correct. I haven't RTFA yet though.
We don't need IE in this. It's just making sure we all have to wait more for something that others already do.
Well, "too much resources and slow" line is usually trolling <troll>unless it's about desktop application written in Java</troll> as browsers nowadays must do many things. Besides Opera resource usage is based on total available/free memory AFAIR.
This works for me as expected for some reason (Debian testing: KDE 4.4.5).
(nice offtopic trolling but) Opera works rather fine for me (i.e. instantaneous). I'm using Debian though.
Subjective. Besides Konqueror now uses Dolphin part for file browsing AFAIK.