Slashdot Mirror


User: hesiod

hesiod's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
6,151
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 6,151

  1. Re:Primary use = advertising on Video Screen in Thin Air · · Score: 1

    > That would certainly make you look anywhere fucking.

    Parse error: Sentence makes no fucking sense.

  2. Re:Groundbreaking suggestion on Xbox Auto-Update Blocks Linux Usage · · Score: 1

    > which is why I bought this.

    You can't beat it for 16 bucks. Definitely an A+ purchase.

  3. Re:Amit Yoran, WP 1993 on Head Of Homeland Cybersecurity Named · · Score: 1

    > Thank you for [...]

    'zalright

    > I can't blame a guy for being annoyed an officer wouldn't check his work. But then, I am no longer an officer.

    You might not be able to, since you're a part of it, but I can sure blame him. :) Unless you are saying something detrimental about W.P. or presenting yourself as a representative of such, he has no need to go off on you. Even if he's a S.O., it's not a big deal.
    Even if an officer does have spelling problems, I don't care. As long as you can get your point across well enough that everyone who needs to understand does so, and you can do your job, who am I to complain?

  4. Re:Any results? on Head Of Homeland Cybersecurity Named · · Score: 1

    > if the agents asked for the missiles, it becomes entrapment, which would get the case thrown out

    I don't think you understand the "rules" of entrapment (most people don't). If a cop goes up to a drug dealer or prostitute & asks for their "services," it is not entrapment. Hell, they don't even have to admit to being a cop if asked (contrary to popular belief). If this was entrapment, the cops would have to both ask for the weapons, on one side, while also acting as the one selling the missiles to the man trying to sell them.
    It's like kicking a drunk out of a bar, telling him he must leave the premises with his car, and then pulling him over for DUI immediately after.

  5. Re:his name sounds on Head Of Homeland Cybersecurity Named · · Score: 1

    > > I am no more a racist than you are a religious zealot.
    > Check out the link and see how much of a "zealot" I am. You'll be amused. :)


    Reread that statement. He said "I am just as much racist as you are just as much Christian." He went to the link, saw what it was (that you aren't christian) then said that he isn't a racist, using that info. Nice try.

  6. Re:Amit Yoran, WP 1993 on Head Of Homeland Cybersecurity Named · · Score: 1

    > I served in the Air Force

    1) I'm more likely to trust a guy who logged in, as opposed to an AC like you.
    2) There weren't that many mistakes, and certainly not a "gross number." There weren't even a "gross number" of words in the post.
    3) I've met plenty of stupid people in the Air Force, although, admittedly, none from West Point. That said, with enough money and "Just enough" skill, you can get through West Point. That "just enough" is probably more than I have, but whatever.
    4) Just because someone does not care about the perfection of a /. post does not mean they are dumb. It just meant they didn't feel the need to proofread a sentence that has better grammar than the majority of posts here.
    5) Troll? Hey, pot, meet the kettle!

  7. Re:Symantec getting very cosy on Head Of Homeland Cybersecurity Named · · Score: 1

    > Oh, and they have minions... You probably don't

    Aha, how little you know! I have about 7 minions. Unfortunately, they do little more than harass me while I'm drinking my tea, because they think it's "cool" to hang out at the coffee shop & annoy people slightly older than them. Evidently, I can't order them to get the hell away from me, but maybe I can get them to overthrow the government. They might be just dumb enough to try, and ignorant enough to succeed. or not.

  8. Re:Any results? on Head Of Homeland Cybersecurity Named · · Score: 1

    > Yes but the "buyers" asked for the missiles, [...] The US seems to like making criminals.

    That's a pretty stupid statement/troll.

    So, you should be legally allowed to sell anything you want? It's like saying I should be able to sell weapons-grade plutonium to anyone, but if someone buys it, they're breaking the law & I'm not? Geez, get a clue.

  9. Re:Any results? on Head Of Homeland Cybersecurity Named · · Score: 1

    > no matter the possibility that it is an enormous waste of time and money, is huge

    s/possibility/probability/

  10. Re: Any results on Head Of Homeland Cybersecurity Named · · Score: 1

    > unless of course you just get the facts and interpret them on your own

    The problem is that these "facts" aren't really available. Most of the "facts" you hear aren't entirely true and leave the idea out of context. Where do you find your so-caled facts? Obviously, some places are better than others. CNN, C-Span? Okay, they're not too bad. FOX News, NPR? Might want to try again.

  11. Re:They only stopped ANSWERING thier phones on Dave Barry Strikes Back Against Telemarketers · · Score: 1

    > Oh! I am so scared

    Okay, Mr. Sarcastic, you will be. Oh, you WILL be. Muwahahaha. Or not, it's a job, I don't care too much. I even have friends who are telemarketers. But at least they know that they are scum who lie to get people to buy lousy/worthlessv products. Some of them are even nice enough to tell the people on the phone that the product is crap, and the people buy it because the "marketers" are so honest & nice to them. It boggles the mind.

  12. Re:The real roots on Most Movies On P2P From Insiders? · · Score: 1

    > When a movie is cammed in the theatre small dots appear in certain frames which show the theatre it is being shown at

    Bull-friggin-shit. Those "dots" are indications of when to start timing the queuing-up of the next reel of film. Movies shown in theatres do not fit on one reel of film. This, of course, excludes fully-digital theatres.

  13. Re:I bet you'd be busted for accepting stolen... on Most Movies On P2P From Insiders? · · Score: 1

    > If I steal a car stereo and sell it at a pawn shop the pawn shop can be busted for accepting stolen property.

    Umm, actually they don't usually get busted, because they keep the name & I.D. info of the person who sold it to them. Then the police go track them down. If the pawn shop does not have that info, then they're in deep sh!t, but that falls under different laws (and probably varies from state to state).

  14. Re:Dont you watch South Park on Most Movies On P2P From Insiders? · · Score: 1

    > you know what the funniest part of the whole underpants gnomes thing was? They were making fun of OPEN SOURCE at the time...

    Umm, no? They were making fun of the fake "economic boom" of the 90's where venture capitalists threw money at everything with ".com" at the end of the name. They offered all kinds of content for free with the hope of making money.

    Since OSS doesn't really need the "3. Profit" step to succeed, it is not a statement of Open Source. If it was supposed to be, it's not a very accurate statement.

  15. Re:Seems funny only on planes on Electronics & Planes Don't Mix? · · Score: 1

    > the wiring should have been well shielded in the first place

    Please excuse my ignorance of interference & such things, but is the shielding still effective when not grounded?

  16. Re:Seems funny only on planes on Electronics & Planes Don't Mix? · · Score: 1

    > I don't get why electronic equipment can be shielded from interference anywhere except on planes.

    Admittedly, I'm just throwing out an idea without real understanding here:

    Maybe it is because when on the ground, there are plenty of things to pick up the interference, such as cars, buildings, trees, people -- all of which are grounded and can withstand the interference without problem.

    An airplane, however, is not exactly grounded, so the interference, once "picked up" by the hull of the craft, can go further and interfere with more electronics connected to it.

  17. Re:What about flight 93? on Electronics & Planes Don't Mix? · · Score: 1

    > Weren't folks on that plane using cellphones with no apparent problem?

    Well, maybe their attempt to "un-hijack" the plane failed, so they started making random phone calls to cause the crash!?

  18. Re:But that would be blasphemy on Electronics & Planes Don't Mix? · · Score: 1

    > you'd probably be better off inheriting Father, Son and Holy Spirit from an abstract GOD base class.
    > With all properties strictly read-only I suspect

    But with God not being accessible to just any function (Human[*]), and being of unknown origin, isn't it more like a mystical DLL?

  19. A bit more specific on Homemade Silly Putty · · Score: 1

    > Large flask of 55% Elmer's glue solution in water
    > Large flask of 16% sodium borate

    So, of course, 55% glue in water would mean 45% water, but when it says 16% sodium borate, does that mean the other 84% is water? They didn't really say that, but is it assumed it's in water? Otherwise, 16% of what?

  20. Re:copyrights on Homemade Silly Putty · · Score: 1

    > they can't shut down the site just for showing how to make it

    True. Especially because the end result of that "expiriment" isn't very close, chemically, to the real Silly Putty.

  21. Re:Refine your own oil on Homemade Silly Putty · · Score: 1

    > Just heat the oil to 600c and feed it into the distillation column in your backyard.

    Finally! Now I have a use for that old distillation column that's been sitting in my back yard all these years.

    WTF???

  22. Re:What if .. on Solar Flare Interference From 45k Lightyears Away · · Score: 1

    > we are unlucky enough to discover a magnetar close enough to us..
    > what would be the worst case senario?

    Umm... worst case? It magically appears on your front doorstep, instantly eradicating all life on the planet, not to mention the planet itself. Now, if you want to talk about realistic scenarios, you'll have to speak with an astrophysicist.

  23. Re:Have they got the numbers right ? on Solar Flare Interference From 45k Lightyears Away · · Score: 1

    > the energy will drop with the sqaure of the distance, not the cube

    Hehe, I find this even more informative because the O.P. seems to feel the need to brag about his B.S. Mensa membership.

  24. Re:Number is Toll Free! on Dave Barry Strikes Back Against Telemarketers · · Score: 1

    > Of course I don't mean to imply that [...] surgeons typically answer their phones during surgery in more developed countries.

    Obviously, I can't speak for every Hospital in the U.S., but in the hospital where I work you are not allowed to have a cell phone turned on while inside.

  25. Re:Number is Toll Free! on Dave Barry Strikes Back Against Telemarketers · · Score: 1

    > I wonder what the toll-free number for SCO is

    "For Sales & Product Inquiries," 1-800-726-8649

    "I'd like to inquire if you sell a product that does not include litigation?"