Legless? What happened? Did the dwarf get pissed off and hack him? Wonder what else he's missing in the general area he seemed to like groin shots in the last movie.
But at the same time, he didn't answer the question. Read the whole question, read his reply. He didn't answer the question, but rather gave a short sermon on regret.
and what exactly is the marketshare going to do when Microsoft "looses" it? Are we going to see people screaming in horror as they frantically scramble away from the rampant marketshare running the streets like a rabid beast?
Hmm.... maybe you meant lose, but I'm more entertained by the visions of mayhem running through my head.
Scientific Games has turned over Harn's identity and other evidence to the New York State Police and New York State Racing and Wagering Board officials, who are continuing to investigate. The FBI also has become active in the probe, the New York Times reports.
"The board routinely involves other organizations in its investigations and will involve law enforcement if it feels appropriate,..."
Yeah, they have their own "organizations" to investigate when someone rips them off....Sucks to be him right now!
I would venture to guess that the liability factor would be too great when someone's pacemaker stopped as they passed through the field. Or whatever artificial medical device, etc....
Simply give NissanMotor.com the option of having a link to their site on his page....Perhaps you were looking for Nissan Motors.... Nissan should, of course, pay for this link. He registered his own family business long ago. The fact that it is, and has been his family name for generations SHOULD exhonerate him. Its ridiculous that one cannot own a domain of one's own name. (unless it's already taken, of course).
$99 is the one-time gateway fee for setting up a merchant account.
Still, not bad.
Re:You guys still use HTTP to get this? P2P!
on
Red Hat 8.0 Released
·
· Score: 1
The speed is dependant upon the users. More sharers more speed. It just needs to be pushed for and adopted as a standard method of distribution, if everyone that downloads it shares it out again, it should be screaming fast in no time flat.
Let's not forget that Wal-Mart is NOT the ONLY game in town either. There are plenty of other department stores everywhere that sell, among other things, music! If someone wants something they'll go where it's sold. If Wal-Mart per-se employed this tactic, they would have to maintain loss leader prices indefinitely, the other dept stores may not sell many CD's but they aren't going out of business because of it. And if Wal-Mart didn't carry a CD, then customers would still go somewhere else to get it.
Don't try painting the RIAA as the victim protecting itself, because it doesn't work.
Of course that estimated value is probably based on MAP + whatever-dollars, and it costs them next to nothing to produce them, so that really means nothing again. There should be a straight dollar amount fined with no substitution allowed. For all intents and purposes they are paying a fine with money they printed themselves.
Not only that, but he left out a point that we need to violate the DMCA, but NOT copyright infringement. Get a ripped movie on your computer that you already own. Violate the flawed DMCA while maintaining integrity. Copyright is valid, one has a right to protect their work, just not in the way legislated.
We've been seeing MUCH more stability since moving to Windows 2000. I have a little over 100 servers at this site, and the 2000 box's uptimes reflect zero crashes. They only go down for installations that (always) require a reboot.
But I still run linux at home, I keep my few services patched, and live happy.
Then of course, he should create a corporation, and patent it under the corp, [read, blanket of protection] in case something comes up down the road [read, infringement...legal action against him] so that his house, family, etc. is safe. IANAL, but It seems pretty clear to me that if legal action is a concern, then limiting liability is a must.
errr. take of every zig, sorry. (yes, I know it's offtopic. But my 2 year old goes absolutely crazy when I play this. He bounces and dances to it. I have to take down the child gate so he won't hurt himself in his frenzy to get to the screen. It's pretty funny.)
You need to find a better place to shop. I get great cases for less than 50-60 bucks total. Spend an EXTRA 50-60 bucks? No way! Rounded corners tool-less case nice paint job, mid tower with bays all the way down. Not that expensive. And yes, everything lines up beautifully.
The good thing for newbies is that for the most part, that isn't even an issue any more these days. So many boards are running practically jumperless. The last 5 PC's I bought / upgraded required NO jumper settings on the motherboard at all. It was pretty much nuts and bolts. Plug it in, turn it on, and go. Very smooth, very easy, you're up and running in no time flat. And the same goes with the last 50 servers I put together. The only RTFM was to connect the front panel switches and LED's correctly as the boards weren't silkscreened very helpfully. Clocks/multipliers/voltage is all pretty much automatic these days.
So tell me again, what did the company lose when the 13 year old "stole" the software? He had no way of purchasing it, and would not have done so if he had the money. I've been 13, and believe me, the last thing I'd spend $1000 on is software licensing. Your argument is fundamentally flawed. I have to agree with the parent post. Sounds like the company lost nothing. They may gain something down the road, then again, they may not. But they lost nothing.
Slashdot Mirror
Or gold-pressed-latinum either for that matter.
Legless? What happened? Did the dwarf get pissed off and hack him? Wonder what else he's missing in the general area he seemed to like groin shots in the last movie.
But at the same time, he didn't answer the question. Read the whole question, read his reply. He didn't answer the question, but rather gave a short sermon on regret.
and what exactly is the marketshare going to do when Microsoft "looses" it? Are we going to see people screaming in horror as they frantically scramble away from the rampant marketshare running the streets like a rabid beast?
Hmm.... maybe you meant lose, but I'm more entertained by the visions of mayhem running through my head.
No, they lose because they bet on the wrong horse, or horses. They lose becuase they chose to throw their money away.
Scientific Games has turned over Harn's identity and other evidence to the New York State Police and New York State Racing and Wagering Board officials, who are continuing to investigate. The FBI also has become active in the probe, the New York Times reports.
"The board routinely involves other organizations in its investigations and will involve law enforcement if it feels appropriate,..."
Yeah, they have their own "organizations" to investigate when someone rips them off....Sucks to be him right now!
I must have missed the URL, that picture is where again?... :)
I would venture to guess that the liability factor would be too great when someone's pacemaker stopped as they passed through the field. Or whatever artificial medical device, etc....
Simply give NissanMotor.com the option of having a link to their site on his page. ...Perhaps you were looking for Nissan Motors.... Nissan should, of course, pay for this link. He registered his own family business long ago. The fact that it is, and has been his family name for generations SHOULD exhonerate him. Its ridiculous that one cannot own a domain of one's own name. (unless it's already taken, of course).
Why does she need a driver's license if she's not allowed to drive, and has to sit in the back seat!
Actually, it's $118 annually.
$99 is the one-time gateway fee for setting up a merchant account.
Still, not bad.
The speed is dependant upon the users. More sharers more speed. It just needs to be pushed for and adopted as a standard method of distribution, if everyone that downloads it shares it out again, it should be screaming fast in no time flat.
Let's not forget that Wal-Mart is NOT the ONLY game in town either. There are plenty of other department stores everywhere that sell, among other things, music! If someone wants something they'll go where it's sold. If Wal-Mart per-se employed this tactic, they would have to maintain loss leader prices indefinitely, the other dept stores may not sell many CD's but they aren't going out of business because of it. And if Wal-Mart didn't carry a CD, then customers would still go somewhere else to get it.
Don't try painting the RIAA as the victim protecting itself, because it doesn't work.
Of course that estimated value is probably based on MAP + whatever-dollars, and it costs them next to nothing to produce them, so that really means nothing again. There should be a straight dollar amount fined with no substitution allowed. For all intents and purposes they are paying a fine with money they printed themselves.
Not only that, but he left out a point that we need to violate the DMCA, but NOT copyright infringement. Get a ripped movie on your computer that you already own. Violate the flawed DMCA while maintaining integrity. Copyright is valid, one has a right to protect their work, just not in the way legislated.
We've been seeing MUCH more stability since moving to Windows 2000. I have a little over 100 servers at this site, and the 2000 box's uptimes reflect zero crashes. They only go down for installations that (always) require a reboot.
But I still run linux at home, I keep my few services patched, and live happy.
Then of course, he should create a corporation, and patent it under the corp, [read, blanket of protection] in case something comes up down the road [read, infringement...legal action against him] so that his house, family, etc. is safe.
IANAL, but It seems pretty clear to me that if legal action is a concern, then limiting liability is a must.
Must have an anti-matter power source.
I hate it when my users are spilling gasoline on their desktops. So far they've alway forgotten the matches. Whew!
Not if you're from Texas. =D lol
errr. take of every zig, sorry.
(yes, I know it's offtopic. But my 2 year old goes absolutely crazy when I play this. He bounces and dances to it. I have to take down the child gate so he won't hurt himself in his frenzy to get to the screen. It's pretty funny.)
I thought that was remove every zig. No zig...no zig.....no zig.....
You need to find a better place to shop. I get great cases for less than 50-60 bucks total. Spend an EXTRA 50-60 bucks? No way! Rounded corners tool-less case nice paint job, mid tower with bays all the way down. Not that expensive.
And yes, everything lines up beautifully.
The good thing for newbies is that for the most part, that isn't even an issue any more these days. So many boards are running practically jumperless. The last 5 PC's I bought / upgraded required NO jumper settings on the motherboard at all. It was pretty much nuts and bolts. Plug it in, turn it on, and go. Very smooth, very easy, you're up and running in no time flat. And the same goes with the last 50 servers I put together. The only RTFM was to connect the front panel switches and LED's correctly as the boards weren't silkscreened very helpfully. Clocks/multipliers/voltage is all pretty much automatic these days.
So tell me again, what did the company lose when the 13 year old "stole" the software? He had no way of purchasing it, and would not have done so if he had the money. I've been 13, and believe me, the last thing I'd spend $1000 on is software licensing. Your argument is fundamentally flawed. I have to agree with the parent post. Sounds like the company lost nothing. They may gain something down the road, then again, they may not. But they lost nothing.