Right, but that system would only save NASA for five uses of mother nature. I hope for $19m they're going to get more then 6 uses before they need to replace it.
I hope they don't get too many people up there or else the internet will get REALLY clogged up. Although it would explain why there's so much shit on it.
I don't download songs so I'm not overly worried about these attack dogs. I'm more then happy for a court appointed third party to inspect my hardware for music. The only media of Sony's I buy is the games and I've never needed to use a backup copy of my game, so I'm also fine with the DRM.
Were I to be facetious, the $299 X360 is still way more expensive (more than double the cost) of the PS2 which has a far better library of games. Why you felt the need to make such a ridiculous point is beyond me. The Xbox360 isn't trying to compete with the PS2, no-one is. There's no need to try to compete with it, because its dead. Any gamer that's looking for a console now, is going to be looking at one of the new-gen consoles.
Now if they've never played an Xbox or playstation then they'll definitely look at backwards compatibility. However if we assume they've played ONE of the consoles, given how much of a failure the Xbox was, chances are they owned a PS2. In which case they'll be looking at non-PSX games and non-PS2 games, as they already have access to both. This means that the Xbox360 has all of the Xbox games along with all of the Xbox360 games to compete against the PS3-only games.
Or we could simply stop being silly and compare the next-gen consoles with each other. The Wii (which I've yet to hear of a game that would be halfway enjoyable), PS3 (which has a couple of games I'd enjoy along with a couple coming in the future) and the Xbox360 (which has a couple I'd enjoy with a few coming in the future).
For me its looking like I'll eventually get an Xbox360, but I might simply skip this generation altogether and go with the next gen as I'll have the next gen's games along with this gen's games (assuming they're backwards compatible).
They can run their network on private property anyway they like. The second this network is placed on public property it should become subject to certain rules, net neutrality being one of them.
One could say the same thing about a balloon. To be honest I doubt we have anywhere near enough knowledge to accurately predict what will happen in the end.
These companies can sell printers at a loss and in bulk, thus making it impossible for their smaller competitors to compete, and make up the difference in printer cartridges. Your average Joe won't look beyond the initial printer sale.
By claiming anytime piracy is used its clearly against the law it will help either change the law or get people to stop using it. After all if you ask Joe Schmoe if downloading videos off the internet is illegal he'd go "I don't fucking care." If you asked him if using a cheaper printer catridge was illegal he'd probably have a stronger opinion.
And how would that happen if the machines are secure to the UN inspection committee's satisfaction? I'd trust the UN pretty well, oh wait, we don't allow them sort in our country. I forgot.
What!? I can easily spend more then 30 minutes in one building taking photos as a tourist without blocking anyone else. I am most definitely the definition of the casual photographer and my rights would be trampled.
Next we'll require permits to for free speech in public areas for anyone whose speaking to more then one person for over 30 minutes or five people at the same time for more then 10 minutes. Beggars will be exempt as no-one pays attention to them.
How well regulated is it if anyone whose simply that age is a part of it? Do we kill boys before they reach 17 if they aren't good enough to own a good?
Wait, its not the same twitter? Oh that's good to know. I'd lost quite a bit of respect for John Edwards (what little I have for him considering I constantly get him confused with John Edward) when I thought he was using such blatant trolls for marketing.
someoneWeTradeWith = mostEvilNationWeTradeWith someoneWeShouldEmbargo = mostEvilNationWeTradeWith someoneWeEmbargo = leastEvilNationWeEmbargo IF someoneWeTradeWith.atrocities > someoneWeEmbargo.atrocities THEN WHILE someoneWeTradeWith == someoneWeShouldEmbargo Criticize USA and say we should trade with someoneWeEmbargo ENDWHILE
Have the above code in a loop until we no longer trade with evil countries. That is why it isn't hypocritical.
Yes, it would make perfect sense that our relationship would be better with the people who owned the nukes then the people who simply housed them. That makes perfect sense.
If Cuba wants the embargo lifted they need to provide cheap labor like China does. After all, China commits terrible atrocities and yet we continue to trade with them for our cheap electronics. Cuba on the other hand, not so bad in recent times, but they only give us cigars so we keep the embargo.
Slashdot Mirror
In a court of law this is true. However slashdot isn't a court of law and as such the level of burden is significantly lower.
Resembles an airplane one (which is used in Earth's atmosphere so it IS on Earth). It isn't exactly alike, but it certainly resembles it.
Right, but that system would only save NASA for five uses of mother nature. I hope for $19m they're going to get more then 6 uses before they need to replace it.
I hope they don't get too many people up there or else the internet will get REALLY clogged up. Although it would explain why there's so much shit on it.
Yeah, but we don't want to take the piss.
I don't download songs so I'm not overly worried about these attack dogs. I'm more then happy for a court appointed third party to inspect my hardware for music. The only media of Sony's I buy is the games and I've never needed to use a backup copy of my game, so I'm also fine with the DRM.
Now if they've never played an Xbox or playstation then they'll definitely look at backwards compatibility. However if we assume they've played ONE of the consoles, given how much of a failure the Xbox was, chances are they owned a PS2. In which case they'll be looking at non-PSX games and non-PS2 games, as they already have access to both. This means that the Xbox360 has all of the Xbox games along with all of the Xbox360 games to compete against the PS3-only games.
Or we could simply stop being silly and compare the next-gen consoles with each other. The Wii (which I've yet to hear of a game that would be halfway enjoyable), PS3 (which has a couple of games I'd enjoy along with a couple coming in the future) and the Xbox360 (which has a couple I'd enjoy with a few coming in the future).
For me its looking like I'll eventually get an Xbox360, but I might simply skip this generation altogether and go with the next gen as I'll have the next gen's games along with this gen's games (assuming they're backwards compatible).
Sweet. That means personal information can't be stolen!
I do agree copyright infringement isn't theft. But you're reasoning is a dangerous one.
You mean nerds don't care about flagrant abuses of power? No wonder Bush got reelected. If nerds don't care about it, who the fuck does?
Picture is either removed or Live in Dayton is lying through his teeth in an attempt to get karma. I'll let the moderators call this one.
They can run their network on private property anyway they like. The second this network is placed on public property it should become subject to certain rules, net neutrality being one of them.
Perhaps they were criminals flying in a stolen science spaceship and accidentally hit the autopilot to one of the pre-entered planets.
One could say the same thing about a balloon. To be honest I doubt we have anywhere near enough knowledge to accurately predict what will happen in the end.
I thought by downgrade he did mean switch to OSX.
These companies can sell printers at a loss and in bulk, thus making it impossible for their smaller competitors to compete, and make up the difference in printer cartridges. Your average Joe won't look beyond the initial printer sale.
By claiming anytime piracy is used its clearly against the law it will help either change the law or get people to stop using it. After all if you ask Joe Schmoe if downloading videos off the internet is illegal he'd go "I don't fucking care." If you asked him if using a cheaper printer catridge was illegal he'd probably have a stronger opinion.
And how would that happen if the machines are secure to the UN inspection committee's satisfaction? I'd trust the UN pretty well, oh wait, we don't allow them sort in our country. I forgot.
What!? I can easily spend more then 30 minutes in one building taking photos as a tourist without blocking anyone else. I am most definitely the definition of the casual photographer and my rights would be trampled.
Next we'll require permits to for free speech in public areas for anyone whose speaking to more then one person for over 30 minutes or five people at the same time for more then 10 minutes. Beggars will be exempt as no-one pays attention to them.
How well regulated is it if anyone whose simply that age is a part of it? Do we kill boys before they reach 17 if they aren't good enough to own a good?
Wait, its not the same twitter? Oh that's good to know. I'd lost quite a bit of respect for John Edwards (what little I have for him considering I constantly get him confused with John Edward) when I thought he was using such blatant trolls for marketing.
Why does it have to be at the time you cast your vote?
someoneWeTradeWith = mostEvilNationWeTradeWith
someoneWeShouldEmbargo = mostEvilNationWeTradeWith
someoneWeEmbargo = leastEvilNationWeEmbargo
IF someoneWeTradeWith.atrocities > someoneWeEmbargo.atrocities
THEN
WHILE someoneWeTradeWith == someoneWeShouldEmbargo
Criticize USA and say we should trade with someoneWeEmbargo
ENDWHILE
Have the above code in a loop until we no longer trade with evil countries. That is why it isn't hypocritical.
Yes, it would make perfect sense that our relationship would be better with the people who owned the nukes then the people who simply housed them. That makes perfect sense.
If Cuba wants the embargo lifted they need to provide cheap labor like China does. After all, China commits terrible atrocities and yet we continue to trade with them for our cheap electronics. Cuba on the other hand, not so bad in recent times, but they only give us cigars so we keep the embargo.