Slashdot Mirror


User: Axe

Axe's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
1,031
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 1,031

  1. At the day Win2000 launches... on Linux 2.3.46 Released Unto the World · · Score: 2

    ...2.3.978a-ac-dc is far more important news indeed. Gee. Dozen of changes to ancient network drivers and to devfs. I am thrilled.. Come on. THis is business as usual. Win2K launch is not (as much as I dislike the system). Have a sense of perspective.

  2. Re:Nethack!! on Java 2 for Linux Released & Blackdown Gets Creds · · Score: 1

    I would better wait until they implement generics/templates and get a good native compilation working.

  3. Re:Nethack!! on Java 2 for Linux Released & Blackdown Gets Creds · · Score: 1

    they probably got tangled in the no-multiple inheritance Huh? Have you heard of "implements" ? What else do you need? If you miss ":virtual public" mess, you have serious self-punishment problems ;)

  4. Why a bottleneck? on Java 2 for Linux Released & Blackdown Gets Creds · · Score: 1

    Do not you do memory management when coding in C++? Only by hand and error-prone. Your code spends 80% of its time withing like 10% of the program. If you do not create and dispose of too many objects in there - GC overhead is negligible and well worth it. REal bottleneck in Java for me was its floating point performance. I can not use GCC now, for lack of features, but I would expect it will alleviate this..

  5. Nethack!! on Java 2 for Linux Released & Blackdown Gets Creds · · Score: 1

    Port it to Java!!

  6. Use autoconf. on The State of Linux Package Managers · · Score: 0

    ...it is good ;)

  7. Re:On breaking bubbles.. on Linux Grabs #2 Server OS Sales Spot, NT Still #1 · · Score: 1

    like it or not I do not have an opinion on this whatever works is fine - but I found that although the code would work just fine on $500 Intel/AMD box under Linux decision is made for Sun due to MUCH higher reliability of their hardware. So my (very humble) conclusion from what I saw is that proliferation of Linux on cheaper development hardware only facilitates the decision to go for a Sun on the production box (as opposed to when using NT to develop). Good compatibility with LInux is good news for Sun high end hardware. - Some of the boxes always will be big..

  8. Somebody got a copy in your cashe? on Linux Blamed for DDoS Attacks · · Score: 1

    Just post it here... Curious what have "slipped" there...

  9. Re:too bad no real tracking on Linux Grabs #2 Server OS Sales Spot, NT Still #1 · · Score: 1

    No reason indeed. I just type configure/make when running my Linux developed code on our 10000...

  10. On breaking bubbles.. on Linux Grabs #2 Server OS Sales Spot, NT Still #1 · · Score: 1

    ...what I observed, is when the "One big box" approach fails, and the software, you are talking about, is rewritten to be destributed - that other box one buys often is still a Sun. Given that porting lots of code from Linux development boxes, that pop up, replacing NT, to Solaris is often as easy as typing configure/make, that makes a lot of sense...

  11. Re:but they're not talking about desktops on Linux Grabs #2 Server OS Sales Spot, NT Still #1 · · Score: 1

    ..while remaining more robust, modular and customizable OS, and without sacrificing support for less powerful hardware.

  12. Most likely NT share includes.. on Linux Grabs #2 Server OS Sales Spot, NT Still #1 · · Score: 1

    ..that ~500 licenses we have for nodes on our site running Linux now..

  13. Would not remote detection be.. on FBI Releases Updated DDoS Detection Tools · · Score: 1

    ...easily defeated with hacked standard services that are activated only if receiving some obscure encrypted message. Say hacked finger who will start up Some other daemon when you "finger A$RWEPE" ? Or smth to this effect? How you remotely detect those? Careful check of the system files maybe the answer but I for one have about 20 LIux boxes in the lab - all of them reconfigured by their users a bit. - I am not going over each one for sure. They were reasonably secured (Everything possible down adtelnet replaced with ssh), but who knowswhat could have happened...

  14. Re:is it reasonable? on Red Hat 6.2 Beta on FTP Servers · · Score: 1

    Yes it is. I am running 6.1 with updates from rawhide (== 6.2). Unless you have specific problems with 6.1 (some particular versions of packages) - 6.2 is not better. And you can always point your kpackage to ftp://rawhide.redhat.com/pub/rawhide/i386/RedHat/R PMS and just upgrade some packages that you want. Kde 2.0 and Xfree 4.0 will/b> be worth getting them thought.

  15. Re:Yeah, right.. on NASA Gets Smart · · Score: 1
    Sure, when I said "no" I meant nothing significant


    My point was not about who can design a better engine. I am sure US has enough H1-B's and green cards to develop whatever they want. My point is that for the money paid, they got more than enough in return, and knowing NASA's own track record of delays (personally I have spent extra 2 years in grad school because of one of them - say about missed opportunities) all the current PR company is bullshit.

  16. Re:ISS == pointless on NASA Gets Smart · · Score: 1

    Huh? What do you read Anonymous? Star? National Inquirer? No, what you right is not true. Go back into your corner.

  17. Offtopic.. on BSD Quickies · · Score: 0

    I felt complelled to declare to the world that whatever I was writing over night produced garbage, and I am going home.. 5 fucking am.

  18. Re:Who is getting this money? on BSD Quickies · · Score: 1

    The rest is donated to the FreeBSD Project

    Like individual coders getting that money? Hm.. And what is the publishing company name, public or not...
  19. Re:ISS == pointless on NASA Gets Smart · · Score: 1

    As long as your out of the atmosphere it'll take a fraction of the fuel to get from here to there

    It is MUCH cheaper to lift that extra fuel to low orbit. Consider - either two 20 ton launches to 300km, or two 3 ton launches to 36000km - for the same price. Say nothing, as I mentioned below, that you would not want to work for months inside radiation belts.. Believe me, you would not.
  20. Re:ISS == pointless on NASA Gets Smart · · Score: 1

    so they didn't end up going crazy like the people on Mir.

    Just where you got this bullshit from?

    At Goddard SFC, I actually met one guy who have been there. He was the only normal person around.
  21. Re:ISS == pointless on NASA Gets Smart · · Score: 1
    A geosynchronous orbit IIRC is in the realm of 12000

    ..will put them nicely into the raditation belts and kill all the crew in the next magnetic storm.

    If you actually paid attention about Mars exploration projects you would notice that a great deal of attention is paid for radiation shielding from potential solar explotions.
  22. Re:Why the Russians are involved anyway on NASA Gets Smart · · Score: 1

    Me thinks, Russia should just screw that ISS affair and go try make some real money off its technology - not some crumbs from Goldin's table.

    With all this Goldin's bullshit - did you ever pay attention what are the money involved? It is rudiculous - for all that hard earned knowledge Russian firms get few bucks. And that Goldin (NASA's boss) jerk is covering his ass blaming them.

    delays.. Chandra was 2 years late.. Sattelite I got my thesis data from was 5(!) years late, sitting 3 months on the top of the booster in the end. Of course there are delays - especially if you want to screw people over using their current situation. If NASA paid honest money for what it got, it would have been done: projects like Sea Launch, or new engine for Lockheed's booster went just fine..
  23. Who is getting this money? on BSD Quickies · · Score: 1

    Have not heard about any FreeBSD IPO's. Is any company making $$ off it?

  24. Re:Still the enemy on NASA Gets Smart · · Score: 0

    I would bet russian nuke boosters on being more reliable? Envious? Moron.

  25. Re:Yeah, right.. on NASA Gets Smart · · Score: 2

    They just never got anywhere

    That's exactly my point. NASA/DOE and Co just had 4 crashes in a year, resorting to buying engines/boosters from competitors, while spitting PR bullshit on how Russia is setting back ISS. AFAIK, it was US people who were positevely insisting on skipping November window for launch after Proton crash. (Though Proton still has a better record than Delta's say nothing latest Titan)

    NASA bought shitload of know-how for peanuts - the money Russia got will not buy a toilet seat for shuttle -- and still spinning it as if Russians are only ones to blame for delays.

    beause the Rusians haven't figured something out.

    Why is then they were thinking on adopting Russian spacewalking suit design?

    Knowing a lot of guys from NASA, and some Russian engineers now working there this PR spinmastering makes me sick..