No, this is not noise - this is explanation of the universe. Seriously though, if I had a dollar for each "grand theory of everything" recently proposed, I would buy myself some new ski set..
... I am posting from it right now (Linux), and it looks buggier than two day old nightly build (tagged M15) that I was using before that. I will put it back.
Well, let's just wait for good implementations of valarray and slice... Is not it what you want?
As for a mathematical libraries for C++ - here is one commercial one or other one. There are a lot of efforts in high-energy physics community to create some - take a look at CLHEP (well I know it is rudimentary..) or this one. But most of this efforts are pre-standard C++, not using the best features it has to offer (like STL). What do you want - gcc still has no implementation of even - say nothing , and that's the compiler academic comunity (around here at least) uses most. I would expect in the next few years good stable math libraries will appear.
Sorry, but you are a moron. Bye. P.S. Yes I work in a real world enviroment. Scintific data analysis and DAQ code. As well as, in particular, sattelite flight software.
It seems to me you are from the other planet. You have no idea whatsoever what you are talking about and is being done in the real world - that's the final diagnosis. And BTW, personally I develop on Linux with CORBA. NOt that it matters for you.
Nope. A talented team nowdays may well reuse a whole lot of somebodies else code. Is not it the very idea of OO code design. You pop that COM piece in - it crashes you wonderful tested $100/hour code. And BTW some junkies code I had on my hands to fix was by some super expensive consultants. Let's face it, having everything okey-dokey in a big piece of software nowdays is, what your handle says - Pure Fiction. Having it implemented in a languages that isolate potentially bad parts of the code and enforces proper memory access and management solves a TON of potential problems.
Yeah, if can hire one. In any large group of people (including our projects team) 80% are morons, and giving thema bazooka to shoot themself in a foot is not a good idea. Problem with runtime safety in C++ - you can not isolate that one moron who have dangling pointers all over him. In a safer language - you give guy an interface and specifications, then run automatic testing on his product, and if it works, it works, you do not worry it will crash...
And good programmers dont write bad code
Wrong. Shit happens. Errors happen. Unsafe code you inherited from somebody else happens.
And lo and behold - the superpartner of the photon, called the neutralino
If I remember correctly from my thesis, netralino is a mix of partners of photon, Z-bozon and up and down Higgz (being called Higgzino if Higgz portion dominates)
MOron. in many many cases placing a number of 'cout 's in is faster and easier to work with. Ever tried to debug libraries, called from God knows where or production code that has to run on some big remote server? Or tracing some effects that only appear rarely with some particular imput data variation? You are a moron and you know it.
...One post after another "What physicist can not explain, they invent something nobody can observe" Bullshit - physicists CAN observe it. This experiment is one way to do it. In a few years another sattelite based experiments would be done, that can detect signal from neutralino annihilation directly. It can and will be done.
Re:Do not read this book
on
Full Moon
·
· Score: 1
But I got the first post:) Even cartoon charachters wish to make a Slashdot first post:)) (Or, yeah, I am lame... BTW - how to turn off that karma thing?)
Doubt about a gazillion of security holes. Number of people who can actually find one is limited, and many of them could have looked into the code for long time under certain NDS and so on. They did pass quite some of outside scrutiny, including by government agencies.
So it would be fun to take look, but I doubt it will just fall apart...
In my experience - any time spend on "design", that you scoff so much, save 10 time the time in debugging and further maintenance. And it does not look like it is just my opinion.;)
You know, I am actively using Linux for software development for 3 years now, and I do not remember I ever had to look whats in/dev besides sda, floppy, cdrom. It just works. Ditto for dozen of Linux boxes I administer in my place On the other hand, upcoming conversion of a large portion of our network to Win2000 will be VERY noticible. For kernel developers devfs is important. For the rest of us - just make it working.
Slashdot Mirror
That would be neskolkO stakanov vodkI. Na zdorov'ye!
..Jobelins kutura mots? Ni pilkarovo, ni grukso. Dyrkolyavo bodnits kumaru. Blizu..
No, this is not noise - this is explanation of the universe. Seriously though, if I had a dollar for each "grand theory of everything" recently proposed, I would buy myself some new ski set..
... I am posting from it right now (Linux), and it looks buggier than two day old nightly build (tagged M15) that I was using before that. I will put it back.
I think your an offended VB Scripter that wishes he was coding linux candy... ;)
You can easily find my work if you want. Could you point me to yours?Slashdot ate my reference to "limits" and "valarray" (where I said gcc (or libstdc++) does even have an implementation of..)
Well, let's just wait for good implementations of valarray and slice... Is not it what you want?
As for a mathematical libraries for C++ - here is one commercial one or other one. There are a lot of efforts in high-energy physics community to create some - take a look at CLHEP (well I know it is rudimentary..) or this one. But most of this efforts are pre-standard C++, not using the best features it has to offer (like STL). What do you want - gcc still has no implementation of even - say nothing , and that's the compiler academic comunity (around here at least) uses most. I would expect in the next few years good stable math libraries will appear.Sorry, but you are a moron. Bye. P.S. Yes I work in a real world enviroment. Scintific data analysis and DAQ code. As well as, in particular, sattelite flight software.
It seems to me you are from the other planet. You have no idea whatsoever what you are talking about and is being done in the real world - that's the final diagnosis. And BTW, personally I develop on Linux with CORBA. NOt that it matters for you.
Nope. A talented team nowdays may well reuse a whole lot of somebodies else code. Is not it the very idea of OO code design. You pop that COM piece in - it crashes you wonderful tested $100/hour code. And BTW some junkies code I had on my hands to fix was by some super expensive consultants. Let's face it, having everything okey-dokey in a big piece of software nowdays is, what your handle says - Pure Fiction. Having it implemented in a languages that isolate potentially bad parts of the code and enforces proper memory access and management solves a TON of potential problems.
To that kiddie crap? Who is the loser here...
It is possible, and in good programming teams,
Yeah, if can hire one. In any large group of people (including our projects team) 80% are morons, and giving thema bazooka to shoot themself in a foot is not a good idea. Problem with runtime safety in C++ - you can not isolate that one moron who have dangling pointers all over him. In a safer language - you give guy an interface and specifications, then run automatic testing on his product, and if it works, it works, you do not worry it will crash...
And good programmers dont write bad code
Wrong. Shit happens. Errors happen. Unsafe code you inherited from somebody else happens.Yeah, that sucks. 1K was passed with a genuine discussion about Iraq bombing (well at least it were not robo posts). Or, well, I need some coffee.
2K comments!! I remember the days when 1K was first passed.. :) Oh, well, let's go home now..
And lo and behold - the superpartner of the photon, called the neutralino
If I remember correctly from my thesis, netralino is a mix of partners of photon, Z-bozon and up and down Higgz (being called Higgzino if Higgz portion dominates)MOron. in many many cases placing a number of 'cout 's in is faster and easier to work with. Ever tried to debug libraries, called from God knows where or production code that has to run on some big remote server? Or tracing some effects that only appear rarely with some particular imput data variation? You are a moron and you know it.
...One post after another "What physicist can not explain, they invent something nobody can observe" Bullshit - physicists CAN observe it. This experiment is one way to do it. In a few years another sattelite based experiments would be done, that can detect signal from neutralino annihilation directly. It can and will be done.
But I got the first post :) Even cartoon charachters wish to make a Slashdot first post :)) (Or, yeah, I am lame... BTW - how to turn off that karma thing?)
For routine parts?
Ever tried rolling your own distribution?
WHY ????Doubt about a gazillion of security holes. Number of people who can actually find one is limited, and many of them could have looked into the code for long time under certain NDS and so on. They did pass quite some of outside scrutiny, including by government agencies.
So it would be fun to take look, but I doubt it will just fall apart...Sold here . Who cares about the source code?
Donna... I better double it, than track rudiculously obscure C++ "features" (And, yes I do code my stuff in C++, and love it..
In my experience - any time spend on "design", that you scoff so much, save 10 time the time in debugging and further maintenance. And it does not look like it is just my opinion. ;)
You know, I am actively using Linux for software development for 3 years now, and I do not remember I ever had to look whats in /dev besides sda, floppy, cdrom. It just works. Ditto for dozen of Linux boxes I administer in my place On the other hand, upcoming conversion of a large portion of our network to Win2000 will be VERY noticible. For kernel developers devfs is important. For the rest of us - just make it working.