Slashdot Mirror


User: nanohurtzGT

nanohurtzGT's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
9
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 9

  1. ..because that's a parents job not the computers on Why Doesn't 'Google Kids' Exist? · · Score: 1

    Is this a sincere question or troll baiting? There's no way I would subscribe to a "kids" version of Google. Why don't you have yahoo feed your children, and Sony Corporation take your children to the doctor. I don't have kids and even I know that this is just another example of why children are turning out the way they are. It's so called parents like you that want the television to play the part of babysitter and corporate America to educate them and integrate them into society like a machine.. We are headed to an autocratic society where one day machines will wipe our behinds because of lazy, and spastic people.

  2. Re:Hire a professional... on Ask Slashdot: Uses For a Small Office Server? · · Score: 1

    "Hire a professional?... Is that your best answer? I read a response like that and I envision a slanted eye smary car sales man in a moth eaten tweed coat "yess sirr this car is better, but don't take my word for it.." Anyway...MacOS servers have major advantages if you use Mac clients in your network. It allows for a rich set of features comprable to that of wins server. As an app server it's reluctant to break due to threading. A great search or index server. No, you don't need a pro to do this either. You can run client windows, vms, sftp, etc. A potential to be a PITA without cost to TCO like most wins environs. Scaling may be a challenge, and most move to Linux to do this. FOr now you have quiet a bit to work with

  3. Re:Most important point not in summary on Capturing Solar Power With Antennae · · Score: 1

    Nothing new, this was developed years ago, and took the approach of microvibrators. If only this were a resource based economy. This would hit the market tomorrow... * tosses the idea with the rest of the pile including the flying car, and the transatlantic super train *

  4. Re:Yeah, I want a Sony Pony too on Ask Slashdot: How Should Sony Compensate PSN Users? · · Score: 1

    Nothing Sony can offer can ever reverse the fact that my business is being sold through out the world. I am not impressed in the slightest. The same junk happened with FF Online and they supposedly hardened security so much that not even their normal virtual patrons could log on. Pathetic. What would I want Sony to give me in return? If it weren't for the fact that there are many people employed by them I'd recommend that they: - Close up shop - Get out of the online gaming business - Don't ever show face in the gaming community again... EVER

  5. Re:a good analogy? on Far-Fetched Time Travel Concept Receives Private Funds · · Score: 1

    The concept of "the infinite volume within a predefined 3 dimensional object" barely scratches the surface of how our universe works. Trying to picture it drives us towards discovery, but is irrelevant in it's application due to the constraints given. What were dealing with here goes beyond the sensory organs protruding from our faces. Our brain is not getting nearly the workout needed to begin perceiving this. keep staring at it, your not wasting time. Time is just an amputee label and has nothing to do with this.

  6. Re:Instantaneous communication? on Far-Fetched Time Travel Concept Receives Private Funds · · Score: 1

    If your rather large 600,000,000 meter pencil was a construct within a quantum bubble who's predefined point in space was -6e^2 x -6e^2 (-6e^4(2)|x1)) and you were to push one end of it, the reaction would be instanteneous. My point? That's one huge pencil and size is irrelevant for time travel.

  7. Re:Great Now I can finally prove my arguement on Far-Fetched Time Travel Concept Receives Private Funds · · Score: 1

    Theres one major problem to your theory in my opinion, it's based on time. Past, future, present, are non-sequitors to this. True time travel makes no use of those parameters. To plot it on a multidimension cartesian plane would be daunting with our limited understanding of it's mechanics.

  8. Re:The problem with Time Travel, etc. on Far-Fetched Time Travel Concept Receives Private Funds · · Score: 1

    by XxtraLarGe (551297) on Tuesday June 12, @12:10PM (#19478759) Isn't the basic premise that if sending messages back to the past is possible, we'd have received some by now? Seems like that's the same type of premise w/SETI as well. If there was intelligent life somewhere in the galaxy, we'd have already picked up the messages, unless of course, we're already the most advanced life forms. Comparing time travel to SETI is like comparing a dog to a number two pencil. The SETI program despite popular beliefs is still in it's infancy and does not begin to encompass the broad spectrum of sub harmonics traveling through space. It's nothing more than a mechanized version of the human ear capable only of picking up signals. As our understanding of bounded harmonics increase SETI will be revisted again and upgraded each time. If were not getting any call backs from the "little green men" it's because were too insignificant to do so. Were sending our own to fight for oil and piles of sand and were the most sophisticated beings in the universe that EXPECTS to hear from aliens? Right HAR-HAR!! :)
  9. He's onto something on Far-Fetched Time Travel Concept Receives Private Funds · · Score: 1

    Wow, the level of cynicism in this forum is shocking and laughable. Definitely, the result of the technological rhetoric through media, and ignorance that will not exist when (note the word) time travel becomes common place. Will this "technology" fall into the wrong hands? Will "bad" guys do bad things with this? I don't think so, as we would have evolved passed the baseless dependencies of governing defined morality (ergo laws) and the debilating need for money. Time travel will only exist within the subjects periphery. Go replay the winning lottery tickets, you'll win, but neither me or the silly audience here will know about it. Very simply, time travel (or the perception of) is but a label implied by our limited language and understanding of something we are already doing as you are reading this reply. Time travel is nothing more than the manipulation of energies. Consider E=MC2 if you can, without hurting your brain or ego. Albert Einstein was onto something, and so is this brave scientist. If I had a billion dollars to give to this man, I would in a heart beat. Nevertheless, I will be funding his endevour as best as I can. Laugh now, go fuel up on fossil, and vote for your next president, since no-one in this forum (myself included) will not live to see this ability (not discovery or invention) in the immediate future.