Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: How Should Sony Compensate PSN Users?

ogar572 writes "So Sony is going to give 20 million+ PlayStation Network users (numbers vary based on what article you read) two free games and free credit protection (US only) for what happened a few weeks ago. I for one do miss playing Black Ops online, but I have made it through this outage by doing other, more productive things. What I am most frustrated about is the lack of consistent details and information via email about what is going on. Now Sony says that they are going to compensate us with two free downloadable games (more than likely I have never heard of these games before). I would have been satisfied with the free credit protection. Now that they want to offer me 2 games, why can't I pick any 2 games that I want? I mean, my personal info is now probably being sold on the black market because of Sony. What do you think Sony should do, if anything, to compensate for what has happened?"

386 comments

  1. Yeah, I want a Sony Pony too by FineGuy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Well what do you want exactly? Shit happens. I will see slashdotters complaining about this whole thing again on this story. Some even complained that Sony isn't bringing PSN up while it was insecure. Yeah yeah, Sony is evil, they tried to boot off hackers from the games, why isn't sony giving us ponies after this and could we please have someone mention the 10 year old audio cd DRM thing just one more time?

    What I want from Sony:
    - Two free games
    - A free dinner at a fine restaurant with a female Sony representative (hey, can't get a date, so might just go for it!)
    - A nice big mansion
    - My own yatch
    - A Thai ladyboy for some fun

    I think it's only fair. I mean, my personal info is now probably being sold on the black market because of Sony.

    Now, we get you're disappointed at Sony. Then stop buying their products and get on with your life. The time you're spending on ranting about this (and then completely forgetting the thing until next /. story comes) you could actually be productive and do some work. Then maybe instead of trying to figure out what to demand from Sony you could just buy those things. And no, recession isn't an excuse. There is always some work available for a young fine fella who isn't afraid to work hard and enjoy the results.

    1. Re:Yeah, I want a Sony Pony too by Lord+Byron+II · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's not that anyone wants a pony, it's that Sony has seriously put a lot of people's information at risk. A stolen credit card can lead to your credit card being shut off at very inopportune times (I once had mine stolen and shutoff at the beginning of a month long trip in Europe. I had trouble even checking into my hotel because the credit card I gave them to hold the reservation no longer worked.). Even worse, if the thieves manage to damage your credit, that is exceptionally hard to repair and will stay with you for at least seven years. In the extreme, you could find yourself unable to buy a car or a house, or even turned down for a job (since some employers check credit history).

      The question is that given Sony has put some many people at so much risk, are two games of their choosing and some credit monitoring enough to compensate?

    2. Re:Yeah, I want a Sony Pony too by redemtionboy · · Score: 2

      So their F*(K up means they shouldn't try to remedy the situation at all? Personally I expect Sony to do nothing, but they should do something. I was very pleased when Microsoft gave everyone a free a game for their system outage a few years ago. We buy these systems and games with the expected notion that we're going to get to use the futures. Things happen and shit breaks, I understand that, but the company SHOULD do something.

    3. Re:Yeah, I want a Sony Pony too by x*yy*x · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It seems like you're mostly worrying about your credit. That was the first thing Sony fixed by offering free credit protection. I think it should be something related anyway.

      What is funny about the submitter is that he would had been just fine with only credit protection. Now that he got some extra compensation too he suddenly starts thinking what more he could demand. People...

    4. Re:Yeah, I want a Sony Pony too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait, so you think we will get ladyboys? I will go out and buy a PS3 right now if Sony is giving them out (I bet I could get one for cheaper than it costs for s PS3)

    5. Re:Yeah, I want a Sony Pony too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's a yatch?

    6. Re:Yeah, I want a Sony Pony too by Uhyve · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but if he works for money so he can buy those things, there's a fairly good chance of someone stealing his credit card information after this cluster****.

      /troll

      Seriously, what business of yours what he does with his spare time and what value he places on his identity? And who cares that a few people wanted the service to be back up already? I know that you're probably raging at the majority of Slashdot at the moment, so it's understandable that you're finding it hard to differentiate, but you can't just lump every single person you disagree with into one group... well, you could, but it would be stupid.

      Ah yes, what I want. Hmmm, I suppose a sum of money equal to the value of my identity (since they lost it, I don't care how, they could have sold it for all I care) and insurance against all identity theft crimes.

    7. Re:Yeah, I want a Sony Pony too by Mongoose+Disciple · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I think you're missing the point.

      It's not about what Sony "owes" anyone or what they deserve.

      It's what it will take for consumers to be willing to take another chance on PSN.

      Since so many popular games are crippled without online play, for the PS3 to be relevant, people have to want to use PSN. If they aren't, Sony essentially loses in the videogame arena forever and becomes a cautionary tale.

      Personally? I can't even imagine what Sony could do at this point to make me want, for example, to give them my credit card number, so I am going to stop buying their products and get on with my life -- but not everyone thinks as I do, and there's some segment of the market they can win back over through naked bribery. As much as they can even semi-reasonably do so, they have to to remain relevant.

      I've said it before and I'll say it again: Sony fucked up so bad with the security of their online play offering they've made Microsoft look good by comparison. Rehabilitating their image from that will not be easy -- it isn't the biggest mistake a gaming company's ever made by a longshot, but it's going to hurt their reputation badly for a long time, and there's a big market cost for that.

    8. Re:Yeah, I want a Sony Pony too by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 1

      Look, it's the Sony astroturf account with a single comment.

      Sony should be forced to pay everyone who had their information leaked the equivalent of $100 dollars, not in games, but in cash.

    9. Re:Yeah, I want a Sony Pony too by Reverand+Dave · · Score: 2

      This was more than just a run of the mill "Our servers accidentally imploded" downtime also, this was blatant negligence on the part of Sony. It's one thing when a WoW baby cries because the servers are down for extended maintenance, this was criminal negligence on Sony's part in failing to provide adequate protection for their users data thus violating their own EULA, so some recompense should be more than just a bit obligatory.

      --
      I got here through a series of tubes
    10. Re:Yeah, I want a Sony Pony too by uniquename72 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If "credit protection" worked like you seem to think it does, none of us would need it because we'd already be protected. In fact, "credit protection" is a big, time consuming pain in the ass that only works (if it works at all) for a limited time and in limited circumstances.

      But in this case the point is moot, since Sony isn't actually offering you anything at all.

    11. Re:Yeah, I want a Sony Pony too by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      ease up on the coffee.

    12. Re:Yeah, I want a Sony Pony too by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Look an Astroturfer. Only one comment and a fresh account.

      Look you stupid PR hack, if you are going to astroturf at least have the decency to create the account ahead of time and add a little to the dialog before you go posting your paid drivel.

    13. Re:Yeah, I want a Sony Pony too by morari · · Score: 1

      A Thai ladyboy for some fun

      I really wish that I owned a broken PS3 now... :(

      --
      "He who can destroy a thing, controls a thing." --Paul Atreides, Dune
    14. Re:Yeah, I want a Sony Pony too by TemperedAlchemist · · Score: 2

      I agree. Too few people are on Sony's side here. Most have jumped onto the Sony hate bandwagon infested with arrogance and ignorance. All I've heard is people bitching about how Sony is slow to inform people, but then when they keep people in the loop, people bitch about how Sony told them what they knew, and revised it when they learned more about the incident.

      Quit being hypocrites.

    15. Re:Yeah, I want a Sony Pony too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What would Brian Boitano do ?

    16. Re:Yeah, I want a Sony Pony too by galaad2 · · Score: 1

      i only want a single thing from sony (all of them): see them file for a chapter 7 bankruptcy

      i've had enough of them.
      they were a name for quality products up until about 15 years ago but since then it all went downhill: quality plummeted, rootkits, lies and deceptions, lawsuits against fans, and so on. I haven't bought a single product made by them during these last few years and i even refuse to support products made by them.
      If i get calls for service to a sony product i let the poor guy have an earful about why i refuse to support any sony product AT ALL.

      --
      root@127.0.0.1
    17. Re:Yeah, I want a Sony Pony too by Homr+Zodyssey · · Score: 2

      The message from Sony is. In recompense for recent events, a sum of $100 to you will be given. Please to provide name, birthday, social security number, telefone and bank account number for deposit.

      Quamey Boeteng,
      Sony Networks, Nigeria

    18. Re:Yeah, I want a Sony Pony too by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 1

      I bought a mini disk recorder when they were out, so I could record myself when playing guitar in a blues band in Saint Louis. One guy had one (that wasn't a Sony) and I liked the sound. What I found out was that yes, the sound was great on the live recording, but because of DRM, Sony had disabled any way of downloading the data/music from the disk to my PC in any realistic time frame. The only way to do it was to play the entire four hours, recording it from the diskplayer/recorder to the PC. Sure I should have done better research on it, but wtf, who would expect a 'digital' recorder to not be able to interface with your PC. Anyway it went back to the store. Not long after, the DRM rootkit CD thing happened. I never bought another Sony product, and never will unless they have the only unit to do the job.

      --
      -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
    19. Re:Yeah, I want a Sony Pony too by nschubach · · Score: 2

      You know your credit really isn't at risk unless you do it, right? If someone steals your card and charges up $15k in charges that are not yours, you call the credit card company, tell them you did not buy those (they are likely to call you first actually.... I've had it happen) and you get the charges reversed and a new card issued.

      It's dead simple and not a real concern, IMHO.

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    20. Re:Yeah, I want a Sony Pony too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This ain't gonna be popular with the self-entitled crowd, but I would say that you put yourself at risk.

      Part of being a smart, and intelligent, person is that you weigh the possible outcomes before you decide to execute actions that can harm you.

      That's not to say that I don't think Sony shouldn't have their feet firmly held to the fire, but, that everyone who put themselves in this position is at least an accomplice.

      Trusting anyone to do the right thing is asking for trouble. It sucks, but that's the reality of life.

    21. Re:Yeah, I want a Sony Pony too by synapse7 · · Score: 1

      Sony supplied all those things to your ID in the PSN, you didn't get yours?

    22. Re:Yeah, I want a Sony Pony too by sjames · · Score: 1

      If Sony wants to do a bit of fair compensation and some public service to get back in good graces, they should indemnify their users against any and all credit card fraud/identity theft (including consequential damages) and then sue the banks and credit agencies that make identity theft so easy and so damaging into the ground.

    23. Re:Yeah, I want a Sony Pony too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope you know how dumb you sound... You've decided to never buy/support their products yet you run around like an idiot frothing at the mouth every time the name is mentioned...

      Idiot.

    24. Re:Yeah, I want a Sony Pony too by Gresyth · · Score: 0

      Your 2 free games will be 8-bit releases from the late 1970's. WE think McDonalds is a FINE restaurant. We at Sony are pleased to announce we have just hired Jocelyn Wildenstein as our new Social Events representative. There is a fine mansion that has just become available in Abbottabad Pakistan. Take your pick of these fine yachts. http://madmariner.com/files/images/NEW_ORLEANS_KATRINA_MARINA_DAMAGE_011008_AP-P0.jpg (salvage costs are your responsibility). Your Thai play toy is eager to meet you. ( she has AIDS, herpes and Hepatitis )

      --
      Tech Support: "No, sir...clicking on 'Remember Password' will NOT help you remember your password."
    25. Re:Yeah, I want a Sony Pony too by AshtangiMan · · Score: 1

      If someone opens a card in your name, spends $500, and never uses the card again it will destroy your credit rating. I had it happen, and the company issuing the card stonewalled me when I tried to get it removed. I never opened the card, never saw a bill, and never got a letter telling me I was behind on a payment, yet the account info had my real address.

    26. Re:Yeah, I want a Sony Pony too by g0bshiTe · · Score: 1

      I agree, and if you are having trouble finding work, I hear the market is booming for Thai ladyboys.

      --
      I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
    27. Re:Yeah, I want a Sony Pony too by Lord+Byron+II · · Score: 4, Informative

      Worst case scenarios:

      -They use your existing credit card. You report it to the credit card company who disables your card and sends out a new one. For the week that you don't have the card, you can't use it. The law allows the credit card company to hold you responsible for the first $50 of fraudulent activity. Some credit card companies charge for a new card if your old one is stolen or misused (mine charges $10). In the end, you can't use your card for a week, and you could be out $60.

      -They use your existing debit card. You report it to the bank who disables your card. The bank, however, is not responsible for refunding the fraudulent charges. Your entire bank account could be wiped out and you could be left with numerous overdraft fees. In the end, you're broke.

      -They open a new line of credit in your name. You don't find out until you go to buy a car or a house or change jobs and only then you find out that you're considered an extreme credit risk. Some credit lines adjust your interest rate based on your credit score, so you could find that your existing credit card interest rate goes through the roof, even though that particular card isn't involved. It can take years to correct bad credit information, so in the end, you can't make any major purchases and you might not even be able to get a job.

      Yes, these are the extreme examples, but they aren't that far-fetched.

    28. Re:Yeah, I want a Sony Pony too by cinderellamanson · · Score: 0

      trusting people to do the right thing is the very foundation of business

      --
      Hey buddy, can i bum a karma? ~}CinderellaManson{~
    29. Re:Yeah, I want a Sony Pony too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's what it will take for consumers to be willing to take another chance on PSN.

      Given Sony's fanbase? Exactly one console-exclusive JRPG.

      Not a specific one, mind; any ol' generic JRPG will do.

    30. Re:Yeah, I want a Sony Pony too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That credit protection is essentially only an alarm telling you that you just got boned. You still have to do the hard work of proving that it wasn't you who decided to spend all your credit card money on money orders to Nigeria, coupled with 4-5 credit cards opened up to do the same.

      ID theft sucks, and it can bite you easily in many ways. I have an acquaintance that had an undocumented immigrant use her SSN (stolen from a previous employer who got haxxored) to get past the border and then do some crimes. Said acquaintance found out about this because she was arrested.

      Yes, it was a case of mistaken identity, but remember, if you are arrested for any reason whatsoever, a lot of places will never hire you, because they feel like people can get out of convictions, but if the person with the badge feels like its handcuff time, the person was guilty and is branded a criminal for life. During my job hunt after I graduated, almost every employer I applied to asked about arrest records, and didn't care one whit about convictions because if someone showed up in the NCIC database for any reason whatsoever, they were not working for that business, period.

      The arrest cost this acquaintance her job, and pretty much her career as a CPA, because no financial firm will ever hire someone who had an arrest, even if it was a mistaken identity and no charges were ever filed.

    31. Re:Yeah, I want a Sony Pony too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did everyone forget about the Rootkit Sony installed with BMG CD's.... IMHO IF you bough a Sony product you deserve what you got.

    32. Re:Yeah, I want a Sony Pony too by tgeek · · Score: 1

      I had a Sony pony, but mean people without names in black hats came and took him when I left the barn door wide open.

    33. Re:Yeah, I want a Sony Pony too by NoobixCube · · Score: 1

      And even so, all of this is only for US residents. OBVIOUSLY America is the most important place in the world, nobody else matters at all. Sony could probably afford to lose the Australian market, so they're not bothering to help us out at all. Mysteriously enough, just after the PSN went down, my Gmail account was compromised for the first time EVER, in the seceral years I've had it. I don't use the same password, but the canned security questions and personal info are all the same. I don't know what I had in my email, I've had to change every password for everything I use because most websites send your password back to you as PLAIN TEXT when you register or change it. I've had online stores send me my credit card number before, my WHOLE credit card number. I've had to cancel my credit and debit cards, so I'm living on the contents of my wallet until the new ones get mailed to me - exposing me to ANOTHER security risk, of the old fashioned sort. I don't think anyone truly realises the gravity of the situation, and Sony not actually offering me anything in the way of compensation or preventative measures is reprehensible. Hell, Americans should be insulted that Sony thinks a couple of free games will appease them. Sad thing is, Sony is right. Dangle something shiny and the small-minded masses are suddenly distracted.

      --
      Admit it. You post strawman arguments as AC so you get modded Insightful for refuting them, rather than Troll
    34. Re:Yeah, I want a Sony Pony too by RadiantPhoenix · · Score: 1

      Yacht

      It's a boat for noncommercial activities, such as cruising or racing. It's sort of like a fancy car for the water.

    35. Re:Yeah, I want a Sony Pony too by Colourspace · · Score: 1

      Not sure I entirely agree with your sentiment, in terms of ladyboys at least. But in full disclosure, a loyal PS3 owner here, and I have had 3 DS, 2 Wii and 2 XBOX360 in the same period.. And I only still have PS3. Mid you, I'm not an online player so a lot less bothered by the loss of PSN than some have the right to be. I do like your sweet style though. Nintendo = Apple = Google = HP = Facebook = Microsoft = Commodore = Atari = EA = Ubisoft = all wankers in their own way, many and often times over the past decade. Sony are the current whipping boys, and not without reason. But it is still the finest console out there in my mind. I'll park the flaming here if you like.

    36. Re:Yeah, I want a Sony Pony too by cgenman · · Score: 1

      I wish it weren't this way, but when you give any information to anyone online, there is a very good chance that information is owned by hackers. Nobody is as secure as they should be. And even if they were, it's very difficult to secure large, ripe targets from intrusion. With the physical card scams out there, even swiping your card is pretty iffy these days. I once worked for a mid-sized nationwide retailer that printed full credit card numbers and expiration dates on each recipt. And card swiping is easier than ever.

      Really, until we expand the available credit card number space to include single-retailer repeating use numbers, the security your private data has is in odd spending check algorithms, eyes on spending systems, and good old fashioned not being a big enough target.

      But when it comes right down to it, our primary payment system is just horribly outdated for the security environment it finds itself in. And while Sony should be darned ashamed for this breach, it's not like this is a weird one-off that never happens.

    37. Re:Yeah, I want a Sony Pony too by Colourspace · · Score: 1

      Yep, worst case, and I don't deny it doesn't. But really, what are the real stats for it happening?

    38. Re:Yeah, I want a Sony Pony too by s73v3r · · Score: 1

      So when a company fails to deliver something they promised, and even puts user information in jeopardy, they should not have to make restitution?

      I hope you enjoy the rule of corporate overlords. With an attitude like that, that's where you're going to end up.

    39. Re:Yeah, I want a Sony Pony too by History's+Coming+To · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's not how credit ratings work. OK, so somebody caught a fraud in progress on your account. All that means is that your account is a risky one - you had to employ specialists after all, and they actually caught somebody at it!

      Whether or not Sony offer protection, the fact remains that your account details have been compromised, which makes it a risky account. What would the credit ratings agencies suggest? Don't do business with companies who are likely to lose your data, I would imagine.

      --
      Please consider this account deleted, I just can't be bothered with the spam anymore.
    40. Re:Yeah, I want a Sony Pony too by Colourspace · · Score: 1

      Thank you Mr Insightful. Too much of a sense of entitlement in the world now, and few people are willing to take responsibility for their own actions. And all the fault of all the 'nanny states' that tell us how to group think and slowly take away the chance for individuals to be just that, and think for themselves. I'm looking st you AUS, GB and USA.

    41. Re:Yeah, I want a Sony Pony too by s73v3r · · Score: 1

      No. Your post is completely wrong and should be discarded. Users had absolutely no fucking hand in what happened. Blaming them is akin to blaming someone for being hit by a drunk driver because they happened to be out that night.

    42. Re:Yeah, I want a Sony Pony too by Kelbear · · Score: 1

      My CPA friend was arrested for murder.

      He was hired no problem by PWC, I imagine the other three big 4 accounting firms are using the same hiring process since they're all carbon copies of each other in virtually all other aspects.

    43. Re:Yeah, I want a Sony Pony too by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      What information did Sony have on file that allows them to get a new credit card in your name? If having an existing credit card number and name enough to get another credit card issued to a new address? Also, on point 2, why would Sony have your debit card info? I wouldn't give anybody especially a service like Sony PSN the ability to pull money directly from my account. And my debit card has been duped (twice) before, and the bank has refunded the money both times. And anybody I know who has had their card duped has got the money back without any hassle. Maybe you need a new bank.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    44. Re:Yeah, I want a Sony Pony too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What I want from Sony:
      - Two free games
      - A free dinner at a fine restaurant with a female Sony representative (hey, can't get a date, so might just go for it!)
      - A nice big mansion
      - My own yatch
      - A Thai ladyboy for some fun

      *ahem* One of these things is redundant.

    45. Re:Yeah, I want a Sony Pony too by Kelbear · · Score: 1

      Can someone explain to me what a "ladyboy" is and what the appeal of them is? From the very grief glimpses I've seen from movies, aren't they just feminine men in women's clothes? And unless I'm remembering incorrectly, there appeared to be crowds of men in the club, and composed of a mix of straight/gay guys.

      So my confusion is this:
      For straight guys, wouldn't they prefer a female hooker?
      For gay guys, wouldn't they prefer a male hooker?

      Or are ladyboys also fulfilling social cravings? Like a geisha or a hostess in one of those japanese cafes?

    46. Re:Yeah, I want a Sony Pony too by shadowfaxcrx · · Score: 3, Insightful

      To be intellectually honest, this question should be re-asked about 6 months from now after the Sony hackers have had time to steal more identities ;)

      --
      "I disagree with you" does not equal "flamebait."
    47. Re:Yeah, I want a Sony Pony too by Jim_Maryland · · Score: 2

      I've seen several examples of this, two affecting my me and my wife, one affecting a neighbor. - Me: My Visa debit card had a few mysterious charges that were caught by the bank before I even had my next statement. I was inconvenienced by it since I was out and my card was declined at a restaurant. The bank cleared up all the charges, but I was fortunate to have some cash on hand to cover the bill when the card was denied because of the bank deactivating it.

      - Wife: Similar situation, her card had a few small charges on it and one big charge from an auto repair shop over in Pakistan. We caught that one when the balance ended up way off. I recall it being about 4 smaller charges that could be accounted by both of us having access and the total for those being less than $25 total but the $1500 charge for the auto repair shop jumped out at us.

      - Neighbor has the last name Smith and someone apparently with the same name (living about 10 miles away from us) opened several accounts/cards in their common name with the rest of her information but another address. My neighbor spent about 2 years trying to resolve the problem.

      I don't think the parents examples are too extreme.

    48. Re:Yeah, I want a Sony Pony too by scot4875 · · Score: 1

      But really, what are the real stats for it happening?

      Why does that statistic even matter? If it happens even once, it's too often. If it happens due to Sony's negligence, it's too often.

      I suppose you're the kind of person who thinks, "well, only like 100 people were actually harmed by the data breach, so really it's not that bad. Sucks to be one of those 100 people." Or "Only 1% of executions are committed against innocent people, so really it's not that bad. Sucks to be one of those 1%."

      --Jeremy

      --
      Jesus was a liberal
    49. Re:Yeah, I want a Sony Pony too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shit, that's nothing a colleague of mine was convicted of posession with intent to supply a Class A drug, somehow avoided becoming a glove puppet in a womans prison and still works for a big 4 firm

    50. Re:Yeah, I want a Sony Pony too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its a trap. You have fallen in.

    51. Re:Yeah, I want a Sony Pony too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Could you have come up with a more hysterical bad analogy? Logical Fail. Not one victim of this is going to lose their life as a direct result of this security breach. At most, the users will be greatly inconvenienced. More likely, this will be a blip in the road for some, and a non-issue for the rest.

      Sony's users put themselves in this position without regard for the possible repercussions. Nobody forced them to purchase this device, and nobody forced them to give their information to Sony, yet they did because they wanted to be entertained.

      If the user's lives depended on giving Sony this information, then I'd be right there with you. However, their lives did not depend on this decision, so it is therefore voluntary, and turned out to be a bad decision.

      The user gets some of the blame for putting trust into an organization that has not shown itself to be trustworthy. (It's not as if there wasn't plenty of evidence out there showing that Sony may not be the best organization to trust.)

      Sony gets the lion's share of the blame for being the irresponsible fucktards that they are.

    52. Re:Yeah, I want a Sony Pony too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it isn't the biggest mistake a gaming company's ever made by a longshot

      Curious. What is the biggest mistake a gaming company has ever made?

    53. Re:Yeah, I want a Sony Pony too by AK+Marc · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Credit protection works only in the US because in most other places, people are immune to such problems. Rather than taking the point that credit protection is US only to mean that Sony is attacking the rest of the world, you should be noting that no one else needing credit protection indicates that the banks in the US have waged a war against their customers and won. In the US, you have to protect yourself against the banks libeling you and blaming you for letting them do it. But the rest of the world doesn't have that problem...

    54. Re:Yeah, I want a Sony Pony too by Digicaf · · Score: 1

      What you describe is a best case scenario for a stolen credit card. Things don't always go that way, and there are a million ways for the incident to be much less pleasant. There is a very real chance a lot of people will have to spend a significant amount of time and energy to get this cleaned up.

      Another thing to note here is that it's a closed system. Sure, in the end you won't have to pay the bill. But, I can guaran-damn-te the suits at Sony or Visa won't pay it either. So who pays the bill? Innocent bystanders when Sony raises their prices or Sony employees when they add the loss to their budget planning and have to eliminate another position to offset costs.

    55. Re:Yeah, I want a Sony Pony too by Idbar · · Score: 1

      They have dishonored many people. The least they can do is harakiri... at least the executives.

      Ah wait, we're talking about the consoles guys, not the music/RIAA execs...

      Ah.. meh... pure disappointment!

    56. Re:Yeah, I want a Sony Pony too by RoFLKOPTr · · Score: 1

      Even worse, if the thieves manage to damage your credit, that is exceptionally hard to repair and will stay with you for at least seven years.

      Identity theft does not stay on your credit report. If you follow the proper legal channels to ensure that the credit falsely in your name is removed from your name, a quick email to the credit bureaus will have your report fixed up in a jiffy.

    57. Re:Yeah, I want a Sony Pony too by AK+Marc · · Score: 3, Informative

      They use your existing debit card. You report it to the bank who disables your card. The bank, however, is not responsible for refunding the fraudulent charges. Your entire bank account could be wiped out and you could be left with numerous overdraft fees. In the end, you're broke.

      Unless they use it as a debit card (your PIN, which would not be in Sony's records), the rules are the same as credit cards with the difference being that they aren't required to refund your money while determining whether it was actually fraud. So yes, you could be broke for a bit, but you should get it all back. If they used your PIN (say, a robber that stole it and your PIN was written on the card) then the bank will assert that you broke the rules that protected you and you are responsible for 100% of the losses. If they use it as a credit card, signing your name fraudulently, the bank is responsible for the fraud, not you. They are even responsible for skimmers that give them the card and PIN, but it takes longer to get your money back when they think you did something wrong, like share your PIN.

      Perhaps that's not the requirement by law, but on the 5 debit cards I've had from different banks, all have followed that. I've never had a card in my life (and I collected then in college for fun, having $2000 per year income and 50+ cards with $100,000+ available credit) that would have charged me a cent had I been the victim of fraud. So perhaps there are some cards that target "subrprime" card holders with abusive terms, but everything mainstream does actually do a good job of protecting you.

    58. Re:Yeah, I want a Sony Pony too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why shouldn't he complain? I would image that Sony spends more on marketing than network security. But no, consumers should never complain and certainly not on story about a video game/electronics company with poor network security on a public forum for nerds. A story that effects tens of millions of people. They should just shut the fuck up and go somewhere else. What is it with this BS defense of corporations. They aren't divine you know. Becoming a large company=creating wealth=pros of capitalism=good for everybody, being a large company=accumulating wealth=cons of capitalism=bad for everybody.

      And if it's that your attention span simply can't stand talking about a story that is still in process consider why we (humans) always seem to fix our problems half ass and in hind sight.

      BTW I think the last Sony product I had was a Walkman that was given to me (20+ years ago). Not because I have anything against Sony but just because I don't buy many electronics and when I do it's usually a no name brand.

    59. Re:Yeah, I want a Sony Pony too by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Nobody forced them to purchase this device, and nobody forced them to give their information to Sony, yet they did because they wanted to be entertained.

      Entertainment is a requirement for life. If you received no pleasure at all from any source, your quality of life would be no better than death, and in almost all cases, you would never accomplish anything. But, aside from that, you are stating that if my local grocery store had done the same, it wouldn't have been my fault, as I use their services to eat and survive, but with Sony it would have been my fault because they just provide entertainment.

      That seems a silly arbitrary distinction concocted to support your personal opinion and in no way related to the facts of the matter.

    60. Re:Yeah, I want a Sony Pony too by nanohurtzGT · · Score: 1

      Nothing Sony can offer can ever reverse the fact that my business is being sold through out the world. I am not impressed in the slightest. The same junk happened with FF Online and they supposedly hardened security so much that not even their normal virtual patrons could log on. Pathetic. What would I want Sony to give me in return? If it weren't for the fact that there are many people employed by them I'd recommend that they: - Close up shop - Get out of the online gaming business - Don't ever show face in the gaming community again... EVER

    61. Re:Yeah, I want a Sony Pony too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "You don't find out until you go to buy a car or a house or change jobs and only then you find out that you're considered an extreme credit risk."

      Which is your own damn fault anyways for not taking advantage of a free yearly credit report or freezing your credit until you need to apply...

    62. Re:Yeah, I want a Sony Pony too by kelemvor4 · · Score: 1

      What would the credit ratings agencies suggest? Don't do business with companies who are likely to lose your data, I would imagine.

      These days, that's pretty much every company in existence unless maybe there's an Amish company out there somewhere that doesn't use computers.

    63. Re:Yeah, I want a Sony Pony too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      -They use your existing debit card. You report it to the bank who disables your card. The bank, however, is not responsible for refunding the fraudulent charges. Your entire bank account could be wiped out and you could be left with numerous overdraft fees. In the end, you're broke.

      This entirely depends on if the charges were PIN debit transactions, which you cannot do online.

      If we're talking credit card numbers here, the only difference with a debit card is your checking account is short until the bank resolves the fraud investigation which they can take up to ten days to do. Same resolution process as regular credit cards, you just don't typically need to withdraw cash from those.

    64. Re:Yeah, I want a Sony Pony too by node+3 · · Score: 1

      How is that going to happen from a stolen credit card number?

    65. Re:Yeah, I want a Sony Pony too by similar_name · · Score: 2

      I never thought of it before but I recently moved and went online to USPS to forward my mail. All that was required was the old address, the new address and a credit card charge of $1 to confirm identity. Once a crook gets a card in your name they can forward your mail.

    66. Re:Yeah, I want a Sony Pony too by node+3 · · Score: 1

      Life's full of risks. Only a idiot would somehow think they can remove all potential for bad things to happen. Sony fucked up, and they're fixing it. That's all you can expect from someone. It's absolutely absurd to demand they never make a mistake (I guess you're perfect?), the real measures are: how often do they make mistakes, and what do they do about the mistakes they make?

      Even the most diligent person or organization is going to make some huge, retrospectively obvious mistakes now and then.

      And yes, if millions of accounts are compromised, and only 100 actually end up with fraudulent activity, that would very much be a good thing. Just like if a tornado goes through a city, and a relatively small number of people are hurt or killed. It's a thing that happened, you know there is a potential for bad outcomes, so you hope for minimal fallout. When you get minimal fallout, things worked out better than expected and that's a good thing.

    67. Re:Yeah, I want a Sony Pony too by node+3 · · Score: 2

      The people that use terms like "nanny states" tend to be the ones that think personal responsibility is only something that the victims should have, not the perpetrators. What about Sony taking responsibility for *their* actions (which they do appear to be doing, which is good). The problem isn't that people trusted Sony in the first place (as the OP claims), it's that they somehow demand perfection. It's completely rational to place trust in others. But it's completely irrational to expect others to be perfect.

      If Sony had deliberately screwed their users, then all trust should be lost. But that's not what Sony did. They made a mistake, and are now having to deal with it. If they deal with it responsibly, trust can be maintained. If not, then trust can be lost.

      But to act like trust shouldn't even exist? Nonsense.

    68. Re:Yeah, I want a Sony Pony too by node+3 · · Score: 1

      "Criminal negligence"? Which criminal law, exactly, did Sony violate?

      The only criminals here were the ones that hacked into Sony's network vandalized the system and stole people's data.

    69. Re:Yeah, I want a Sony Pony too by wierd_w · · Score: 1

      For the most part, I agree. (Recently had this very thing happen, in fact. I DO have PSN account, which I used for some casual PSP game downloads about 8 months ago. At the beginning of the month it seems I took a surprise vacation to Poland, and bought a bunch of expensive clothing in georgia the next day. Fancy that. I never left my house that weekend... Called my card company, filed fraud dispute forms, had my number terminated and a new one issued. Right as rain now.)

      The problem that persists, however, is that SONY in their infinite wisdom, decided they needed to hold on to other pertinent information, such as security question answers, and other "Challenge" information that would greatly aid in additional attacks later, such as falsifying people's identities while contacting their credit card companies, and requesting new lines of credit at new addresses, etc.

      If it was JUST CC numbers, it would be OK. If it was JUST names, that would be OK too--- But, Sony gave them an identity theft motherload that could cause problems for a considerable amount of time to come, if the fraudsters want to be persistent about it.

    70. Re:Yeah, I want a Sony Pony too by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      That's easy, the Sega CD/32x/Saturn fiasco. Here you had a company that had constantly been raking in the money that thanks to the Sega Japan and Sega USA disconnect had a 123 punch that completely obliterated the company in less than 3 years. By the time Dreamcast rolled around they had burnt so damned many of their customers (as well as major retailers and developers with the Saturn sneak launch) they couldn't get anybody onboard and completely destroyed the company. While Sony's current fiacso certainly isn't gonna help their bottom line I doubt it will completely torpedo the company like the above did Sega.

      As for TFA frankly Sony is gonna have to do some damned serious groveling and frankly this couldn't have happened at a worse time. Nintendo is starting to build buzz on the rumors of their next gen while MSFT is rolling in the dough with the highest sell through rate and can afford to undercut the living hell out of Sony in the retail space and still make damned good money. To me the bigger question is will the drop in PSN users and bad buzz ultimately damage them enough they can't afford the giant R&D budget for PS4. lets be honest DLC and online are major cash cows for developers and if folks are afraid to whip out their CC on PSN their third party support could dry up and blow away.

      While I don't think this has the ability to kill Sony I think it will be seriously hard to get momentum back and bring new users into PSN. They were already getting killed by XBL and this couldn't have been a worse time to have this happen. Now the big question is will they be able to entice new users after everyone has seen "PS3 hacked CC numbers stolen!" all over the headlines. I bet new sales of PS3 is gonna suck for at least a quarter or two, unless they are willing to bleed money for a couple of quarters by selling the PS3 below cost to make the PS3 cheaper than the X360.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    71. Re:Yeah, I want a Sony Pony too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I weren't an Anonymous Coward (and feeling a little creepy about that "ladyboy for some fun" comment) I would upvote this post.

      Get a job losers! And get the hell off my lawn!

    72. Re:Yeah, I want a Sony Pony too by whereiswaldo · · Score: 1

      I don't expect any compensation from Sony. But I also don't plan on entering my _replacement_ credit card into their PSN, either, which equals lost revenue for them and a shallower experience for me.
      What I _do_ think they need to do is prove to users that their service is now as safe as any other well-secured system. They need to store less data on their servers. And they'll need to dangle a carrot to get many people using that system again.

    73. Re:Yeah, I want a Sony Pony too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Square, the one company that used to be able to do this with Sony products, no longer makes good games. See: Anything after FFX-2 (this is subjective but everyone will agree it's going downhill, fast).

    74. Re:Yeah, I want a Sony Pony too by smellotron · · Score: 1

      So who pays the bill? Innocent bystanders when Sony raises their prices ...

      I don't think so... Millions of PS3 customers are already mad at Sony. If gaming-related prices go up after this fiasco—especially the creation of a subscription fee for PSN—that will be enough to push many of their customers over to XBox.

    75. Re:Yeah, I want a Sony Pony too by similar_name · · Score: 1

      Why does that statistic even matter?

      Because statistics are fun!

      If it happens even once, it's too often.

      It's risk(cost)/benefit. People die in car accidents more than once and it sucks but we don't give up driving.

      If it happens due to Sony's negligence, it's too often.

      Fair enough for the consumer but from Sony's standpoint it's back to cost/benefit.

    76. Re:Yeah, I want a Sony Pony too by halowolf · · Score: 1

      Yes I'm in Aus too, and what I want is some basic customer service. I have not received a single direct communication from Sony explaining that my data has been compromised and that my credit card data may of been exposed. I noticed that PSN went down without any explanation, thats fine, but it was days later that I had to read on news websites that PSN had been hacked, and days later still that I could potentially be at risk, still with not a single official notification from Sony.

      Sure they put up notices on their website and their blog, but well I just don't bother reading them because I get weekly 'Whats new on PSN' emails from them that have the same stuff. Except that the weekly emails stopped, I guess their email servers were on the PSN as well... They don't seem to get what good customer service is. But as I cancelled my Credit Card, I made a point for my CC provider to record that it was Sony's PSN hack that was the cause for my cancellation and re-issuing of the card.

    77. Re:Yeah, I want a Sony Pony too by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      you can't use your card for a week, and you could be out $60

      Unpleasant, but not catastrophic for almost anyone who can get a credit card. Walk downtown to the homeless shelter if you're really starving over $60.

      They use your existing debit card... Your entire bank account could be wiped out and you could be left with numerous overdraft fees.

      That's why I don't have a debit-processed-as-credit card with a Mastercard/VISA logo. I have an ATM card, which works as a debit card with PIN - and nothing else. I strongly recommend you do the same. Banks may look at you funny the first time you ask, but they do still issue the old style cards.

    78. Re:Yeah, I want a Sony Pony too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well what do you want exactly?

      Personally, I want them excised from any market in a democracy, let them toil in the environment they appear to prefer.

    79. Re:Yeah, I want a Sony Pony too by zippthorne · · Score: 2

      Many banks are now offering contractual terms that match the credit card's legally limited liability for that very reason. I would not suggest even having a debit card that does not have such a contractual liability limit.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    80. Re:Yeah, I want a Sony Pony too by qubezz · · Score: 1
      Free games is uploading free 1's and 0's to your hard drive for Sony: no cost. Free 'credit protection? The only companies that are offering it are run by incompetent scam artists.

      The compensation should be a complete refund for the original purchase price of the PS3 system and all games possessed, for anyone who owns a PS3, no receipt, no questions asked. And a notarized letter that every bit of identifying information about you has been wiped from Sony's servers and backups.

    81. Re:Yeah, I want a Sony Pony too by happyhamster · · Score: 1

      >>recession isn't an excuse. There is always some work available for a young fine fella who isn't afraid to work hard and enjoy the results.

      Really? You are a smelly piece of excrement. You have no effin idea how hard it is out there in a recession worst in a generation. Stick your tongue up your behind, get out of your parents' basement, and feel the real world smashing your face. Burn in hell.

    82. Re:Yeah, I want a Sony Pony too by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      People are most definitely not immune to this problem in Canada. Shitty credit rating is a major pain in the ass there as well for all the same reasons.

    83. Re:Yeah, I want a Sony Pony too by Stupendoussteve · · Score: 1

      Credit protection does more than just alarm. In this case they provide assistance in fixing it, as well as insurance for associated costs.

    84. Re:Yeah, I want a Sony Pony too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They stopped being good long long before that. FF7 was the last good one.

    85. Re:Yeah, I want a Sony Pony too by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      Only the USA gives such importance to "credit rating"

      (I don't even know if I have such a thing...)

      --
      No sig today...
    86. Re:Yeah, I want a Sony Pony too by Stupendoussteve · · Score: 1

      There's a hole in this plan, the USPS Mail Forwarding FAQ makes it clear:

      You should receive a letter from the USPS at your old address to validate your move. This letter will not show your new mailing address to protect your privacy. You should also receive a confirmation letter or welcome kit from the USPS after your address has been changed.

      If you receive a letter saying your address has been changed, it's probably a good idea to go tell the USPS that this was fraudulent. It would almost be a good thing for this to happen, as the USPS has its own Law Enforcement arm (the Postal Inspection Service) which is, coincidentally, charged with investigating cases of mail fraud and (winner here) identity theft. USPS won't give you the new address, but they certainly know where the intended destination was. ID thief now finds themselves hit with Federal charges.

    87. Re:Yeah, I want a Sony Pony too by Stupendoussteve · · Score: 1

      Sony has debit cards because people are stupid sometimes, or they may not have a credit card. I blame the banks for making it so convenient that it "acts like a credit card!" It's great when you want to pay for something that doesn't take debit (restaurant? Not that smart to use debit there either), but horrible anywhere where credit card theft is likely, such as online.

    88. Re:Yeah, I want a Sony Pony too by Stupendoussteve · · Score: 1

      If you have fraudulent charges and get them canceled, the vendors that sold the merchandise to the thief get hit with the chargebacks. It may affect prices somewhere, but not on the Sony end.

    89. Re:Yeah, I want a Sony Pony too by Legal.Troll · · Score: 0

      The words "any and all" and "consequential damages" are crazy and not really supported by the law, in my opinion, but I would say some form of limited indemnification might be quite reasonable, although it would seem to invite abuse/fraud in the form of false claims, not least from some of the rabid nutjobs that sound off on these forums. 3

      --
      "Outdated business models" is code for "I don't like paying for things, but want them anyway"
    90. Re:Yeah, I want a Sony Pony too by Legal.Troll · · Score: 0

      Crap, forgot to also add, absolutely love the idea of suing the financial institutions. It's always struck me as absolutely absurd that people can actually get stuck with the consequences of identity theft when it's a systemic failure of those institutions that allowed it to occur. This comment will probably be blocked by my karma, but oh well.

      --
      "Outdated business models" is code for "I don't like paying for things, but want them anyway"
    91. Re:Yeah, I want a Sony Pony too by Legal.Troll · · Score: 0

      It wouldn't be a specific criminal law, per se, but rather a standard of negligence that might be nominally codified in specific state statutes. But ... Sony's conduct is laughably distant from that.

      Imagine someone who parks their delivery truck across both lanes of a narrow road, right around a bend so oncoming drivers can't see. That's criminal negligence (if and only if someone gets pretty seriously hurt as a result). You have to go through some serious analogizing to produce a comparison of Sony's behavior with that. The kind of analogizing that makes most rational people, including judges, say "yeah, ok, BS".

      --
      "Outdated business models" is code for "I don't like paying for things, but want them anyway"
    92. Re:Yeah, I want a Sony Pony too by spyder-implee · · Score: 1

      Yacht*

      --
      Take what ye can. Give nothing back!
    93. Re:Yeah, I want a Sony Pony too by sjames · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure why that is so crazy, particularly consequential damages. After all, it was negligence that caused the problem. I added any and all to avoid pitting individuals in the midst of a huge financial setback against corporate lawyers.

      I'm sure there would be false claims either way, but I firmly believe the the non-negligent individuals should get the benefit of the doubt (though if Sony can prove fraud after the fact, they're entitled to criminal and civil relief).

      Re-combining the posts, Sony is then entitled to sue the banks and credit agencies for their negligence that allows the damage to be as severe as it is. The banks for doing so little to verify who they are doing business with and then even moreso for hitting up a more or less defenseless 3rd party for the money they negligently gave away. The credit agencies for their wanton disregard for truth in their reporting. They do nothing significant to verify what creditors tell them or even to make sure they're not combining multiple people's reports into one. IMHO, it rises to the level of libel. Given that, it is surely the largest instance of mass libel in history and deserves a similarly large punitive award.

      That those very same credit agencies then have the unmitigated gall to suggest we should pay them extra money to "protect" us from some of the damage they themselves enable adds another order of magnitude (and possibly RICO) to it. That's a nice credit rating you have there, it'd be a real shame if something happened to it!

    94. Re:Yeah, I want a Sony Pony too by bgowing · · Score: 1

      Eh? Experian, for example, has operations in more than 65 countries. Experian PLC's corporate headquarters is in Ireland (tax dodge, anybody?). So your myopic viewpoint is completely wrong - many countries have significant credit rating operations in place.

    95. Re:Yeah, I want a Sony Pony too by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      I just checked the first country I could think of that wasn't in Europe or North America and Experian has operations there. And, get this, they don't do credit reporting there...

      So, 0 for 1, I stopped looking. And yeah, I'm not mentioning which country I checked. Go ahead and check a few if you don't believe me. They do some credit "risk management" stuff, but aren't a credit reporting agency of record and, as far as I could tell, nobody reports defaults and such to them. So maybe they search public records, but as far as I can tell, there is no credit agency anything resembling the US versions in most countries. Whether the US credit agencies are trying to push for such while performing similar operations in that country doesn't mean the same thing.

    96. Re:Yeah, I want a Sony Pony too by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      How about a £85 refund for removal of the Other OS feature while they are at it?

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    97. Re:Yeah, I want a Sony Pony too by Xest · · Score: 1

      Sorry but you're simply wrong. It's just the same here in the UK, and it's just the same pretty much anywhere in the world.

      I'm not really a fan of the US anymore if I'm honest, but in this case it's certainly not something that can be lumped as a problem merely with the US.

    98. Re:Yeah, I want a Sony Pony too by Builder · · Score: 1

      That's not true at all. Credit rating is important all over Europe too.

      Having said that, it's a lot easier to get stuff fixed here. I've had a card cloned once and I called my bank - they reversed all of the charges, gave me an overdraft to cover me for any other pending charges and everything was fixed within a week.

      Since then, I don't use my debit card anywhere anymore though :)

    99. Re:Yeah, I want a Sony Pony too by Krneki · · Score: 1

      The question is that given Sony has put some many people at so much risk, are two games of their choosing and some credit monitoring enough to compensate?

      More then enough.

      Sony drones will forget about the new fiasco in about 2 weeks. After all, why would you keep giving money to Sony if you don't have memory problems?

      --
      Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
    100. Re:Yeah, I want a Sony Pony too by JohnRoss1968 · · Score: 1

      LMFAO.....
      Seriously, You have no clue of what you are talking about. This isn't just about CC#'s. Its about ID theft. Have you ever had your Identity stolen?
      I did and trust me its a MAJOR pain in the ass.
      The guy who stole my identity not only ruined my credit, he also got arrested in South Carolina for drunk driving. You think all I had to do was to call them and say it wasn't me?? LOL, I wish. First off the police are NOT required to finger print someone for a DWI, so proving it was NOT me was difficult. Second off you cant just call them and say "it wasn't me Honest" I had to get a lawyer and go through all sorts of crap. It cost me a ton of time and money to get it sorted out. And during this time I couldn't get a drivers licence, and anyone doing a background check on me would see the DWI and the other charges he racked up.
      This person was also arrested in TN. on some drug charges (something to do with a large amount of either heroin or cocaine). Fortunately this happened in Knoxville TN and one of the arresting officers knew me so he realized it was a stolen identity issue.
      Trust me 2 free games (probably something from the bargain bin) and the other crap SONY is offering doesn't even begin to cover the costs of what could happen to you if your identity is stolen over this.

    101. Re:Yeah, I want a Sony Pony too by Spaseboy · · Score: 1

      Visa charges $33 a chargeback, whether it was authorised or not.

      --
      "I don't want more choice, I just want nicer things!"
      -Jennifer Saunders as Edina Monsoon
    102. Re:Yeah, I want a Sony Pony too by vuffi_raa · · Score: 1

      It's not that anyone wants a pony

      I want a pony.

    103. Re:Yeah, I want a Sony Pony too by S.O.B. · · Score: 1

      What I want from Sony:

      - Two free games
      - A free dinner at a fine restaurant with a female Sony representative (hey, can't get a date, so might just go for it!)
      - A nice big mansion
      - My own yacht
      - A Thai ladyboy for some fun

      You want a mansion AND a yacht? Who do think you are, Elmer J. Fudd?

      --
      Some of what I say is fact, some is conjecture, the rest I'm just blowing out my ass...you guess.
    104. Re:Yeah, I want a Sony Pony too by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      I just checked the first country I could think of that wasn't in Europe or North America [and they don't have credit reporting]

      Sorry but you're simply wrong. It's just the same here in the UK,

      Yes, because the UK isn't in Europe.

    105. Re:Yeah, I want a Sony Pony too by adamofgreyskull · · Score: 1

      What the fuck's a "yatch"? Suggest you ask for dictionary instead. ;)

    106. Re:Yeah, I want a Sony Pony too by Xest · · Score: 1

      Your original assertion was that it's not like this anywhere else in the world.

      It's like this pretty much everywhere in the world, don't try and twist the argument to suit your mistake, just accept that you were wrong, it's easier for everyone.

    107. Re:Yeah, I want a Sony Pony too by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Your original assertion was that it's not like this anywhere else in the world.

      No, it wasn't. And in the post you responded to with "but I'm in the UK and we don't do it that way" specifically excluded the area containing the UK. But for some reason, you think that my statements about "most" countries somehow means "all" and that the UK is not in Europe. So I have no doubt you will continue to assert my errors without actually contradicting anything I've said.

    108. Re:Yeah, I want a Sony Pony too by Xest · · Score: 1

      This is what you said:

      "Credit protection works only in the US because in most other places, people are immune to such problems. Rather than taking the point that credit protection is US only to mean that Sony is attacking the rest of the world, you should be noting that no one else needing credit protection indicates that the banks in the US have waged a war against their customers and won. In the US, you have to protect yourself against the banks libeling you and blaming you for letting them do it. But the rest of the world doesn't have that problem..."

      This is wrong, you clearly state things don't work this way in most other countries, that is completely and utterly wrong. You were wrong, end of, get over it.

    109. Re:Yeah, I want a Sony Pony too by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      This is wrong, you clearly state things don't work this way in most other countries,

      And that's a true statement. When you exclude North America and Europe, you find that nearly all countries work without central credit reporting companies. And you've never said a single thing that contradicts me. You've just been an ass about thinking I must be wrong because I mentioned that NA and EU work that way, and you still pointed to an EU country and I pointed out your proven inability to read or comprehend English. You took offense at me pointing out your idiocy and have had some irrational vendetta that leads you to not actually look up the credit reporting agency for Sudan or UAE, or Colombia, or Indonesia, or any of the hundreds of countries not in NA or Europe. Nope, instead when I indicate that credit reporting agencies are used almost exclusively in North America and Europe, you reply "You are wrong because they use credit reporting companies in the UK" or whatever. Yeah, I get that. I pointed out that I possessed that knowledge before you posted. You posted a redundant comment anyway that agreed with what I said. Then announced that because you agreed with me, I must be wrong.

      Having seen the rest of your posts, I can't disagree with that logic. I'm sure than in almost all cases anyone you agree with would be 100% wrong. However, in this case, after you agreed with me that they do use credit reporting agencies in the UK, you then somehow used agreeing with me on that point to indicate that I was wrong on all other points. But you never addressed them at all. You just agreed with me and declared me wrong.

    110. Re:Yeah, I want a Sony Pony too by Xest · · Score: 1

      Right, so what you're saying is if you remove around a quarter of the world's population from your original statement then you're right?

      You know, if I remove every country except Canada and the US from the list of countries in the world and say "Every country in the world is in North America" then that's true as well, but it's equally retarded a statement.

      It's quite amusing that you would spend so long typing a lengthy response when in reality all you needed to say was "Okay, well, maybe I overstated it originally in implying it was a problem fairly unique to the US".

      I'm not sure why you think I'm agreeing with you, I'm disagreeing quite clearly with your original statement, which you've desperately tried to weasel out of without actually having the balls to simply admit you were wrong. There are a lot of people like you on Slashdot who cannot merely accept that maybe, just maybe, you were a little over the top, or maybe you didn't check your facts first, you are boring, tiresome, and you make Slashdot shit. Congratulations on that.

    111. Re:Yeah, I want a Sony Pony too by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Right, so what you're saying is if you remove around a quarter of the world's population from your original statement then you're right?

      No, I'm saying I'm right. "Most" works just fine when 25% are on one side and the 75% majority is like I describe. What part of "most" don't you understand?

      I'm not sure why you think I'm agreeing with you,

      Because I acknowledge that most of NA and EU do it one way, and you agreed with that with your information about the UK. So you agreed with my assertion that NA and EU generally have them, but that still "most" of the world doesn't have credit reporting agencies.

    112. Re:Yeah, I want a Sony Pony too by Xest · · Score: 1

      But it's not 75%, that implies Europe and North America are the only countries who share the credit system we're used to and nowhere else in the world does, which is completely and utterly wrong.

      The fact India alone with 17% of the world's population also uses the same mechanism crushes such an assertion:

      http://www.cibil.com/

      The lengths people like you go to to avoid admitting you are wrong is quite impressive. You must truly believe you're infallible or some such ludicrous thing.

    113. Re:Yeah, I want a Sony Pony too by fremean · · Score: 1

      If you're in one of the few places Sony is making this offer - good for you, I'm yet to see any news of credit protection or monitoring for customers outside of the US.

  2. Easy.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Send 'em Xbox 360s.

    1. Re:Easy.. by HikingStick · · Score: 1

      I sense there are a lot of Sony fanboys out there with no sense of humor.

      --
      I use irony whenever I can, but my shirts are still wrinkled...
  3. sony eats dink by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    allow hackers to flash custom firmwares and still play on PSN for starters.

    1. Re:sony eats dink by x*yy*x · · Score: 2

      allow hackers to flash custom firmwares and still play on PSN for starters.

      Yeah, what about if we keep hackers out of PSN? Mess up with your own console all you want, but don't come ruin my online game with cheats.

    2. Re:sony eats dink by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      Im fine with the allowing custom firmware like on Iphone, but asking to also allow it on PSN is too far. Its my machine i can modify it as I like, but in no way does that mean i should expect/demand Sony to allow my rogue hardware on their network. Jailbreaking an iphone and using it on ATT is not the same thing at all. (common carrier vs custom content network)

      --
      Good-bye
    3. Re:sony eats dink by smelch · · Score: 1

      Have you ever played PC games online? Are you aware that PCs aren't locked down at all and a lot of people still play a lot of fun multiplayer games on them? Stop bitching about potential hackers. Its not that big of a deal. In reality, a good banhammer will go a long way.

      --
      If I can just reach out with my words and touch a butthole, just one, it will all be worth it.
    4. Re:sony eats dink by metalmaster · · Score: 1

      Sony isnt exactly catering to the hackers because their latest titles require the latest firmware.

    5. Re:sony eats dink by VGPowerlord · · Score: 1

      Have you ever played PC games online? Are you aware that PCs aren't locked down at all and a lot of people still play a lot of fun multiplayer games on them? Stop bitching about potential hackers. Its not that big of a deal. In reality, a good banhammer will go a long way.

      And people wonder why so many PC games have DRM?

      Oh well, at least the games I play use unobtrusive forms of DRM (Steam, WoW's Warden).

      --
      GLaDOS for President 2016! "Well here we are again. It's always such a pleasure." -- GLaDOS, 2011
    6. Re:sony eats dink by smelch · · Score: 1

      Well, can't they work just the same on a custom firmware playstation as they would on a PC?

      --
      If I can just reach out with my words and touch a butthole, just one, it will all be worth it.
    7. Re:sony eats dink by drkamil · · Score: 1

      but don't come ruin my online game with cheats.

      yeah right, let's just log in into PSN and start playing.
      Oops

    8. Re:sony eats dink by MeateaW · · Score: 1

      OP didnt say "remove DRM" OP said "Remove limitations on modded consoles" (IE consoles that can install linux).

    9. Re:sony eats dink by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While at it, what about we keep kids with blue bikes out of the parks?

    10. Re:sony eats dink by Grench · · Score: 1

      Or how about they engineer some kind of PS3-based VM which enables you to use/write homebrew software that:

      1) can take full advantage of the PS3's Cell architecture and graphics chipset
      2) doesn't let you fuck up commercial multiplayer games, or play copied commercial PS3 games
      3) doesn't need you to flash the BIOS
      4) can be shared via the PlayStation Network free of charge

      Kind of like the unofficial "homebrew channel" on Wii, but officially sanctioned. Of course, the fourth point would require that the software is vetted by Sony to ensure you're not producing anything that violates their PSN ToS (emulation, porn, racial/religious hatred, etc). And, they would need to produce a special EULA for that development environment that says if you do copy other people's work, you accept full responsibility (Sony can't be blamed, on your head be it, etc)

      Wouldn't that be good?

      --
      He's Jesus, for Christ's sake.
  4. Give OtherOS back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    And some sushi would be nice

    1. Re:Give OtherOS back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll take my OtherOS back along with some Sashimi, please.

  5. They already did them a favour. by mevets · · Score: 5, Insightful

    1. They helped them kick the habit.
    2. They introduced them to other game devices.
    3. They taught them the dangers of undeserved trust.

    These are pretty big lessons.

    1. Re:They already did them a favour. by compro01 · · Score: 1

      Still, they should end it with Chapter 11 and burning in hell.

      Are you sure you don't mean Chapter 7 (liquidation) as opposed to Chapter 11 (reorganization)

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    2. Re:They already did them a favour. by Pharmboy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I still say hari cari is the appropriate response. It is Japanese, it has a long tradition, and will reduce the chance that Sony does something similar in the future.

      This would include for all the executives involved in the root kit scandal, removing "other OS", and all their other instances of raping the public.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    3. Re:They already did them a favour. by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

      hari cari

      As an aside, how is it possible for you to take the time to link to an article on seppuku, which says it's also known as "harakiri", and still get the name wrong?

      And we wonder why Sony gets away with its shenanigans. "Just how dumb are Sony's customers?" we ask, very, very rhetorically.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    4. Re:They already did them a favour. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would actually be seppuku, but that's a technical detail.

    5. Re:They already did them a favour. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed, the Sony president committing seppuku is the obvious answer...

    6. Re:They already did them a favour. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but it's a bit untoward to ask all those consumers to kill themselves. Also it's Hara kiri, or Seppuku. Hari cari - i dunno what that is.

  6. Waht should Sony do? by Red+Flayer · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What do you think Sony should do, if anything, to compensate for what has happened?"

    IMO, Sony should do nothing. They should pack it all in and sell off their assets to competitors.

    How many times does Sony have to abuse our trust before we stop going back like some beaten spouse who thinks maybe, just maybe, this time he really means it when he says he's done drinking and is going to counseling and will really change?

    Sony is no longer, if it ever was, a company with which you should place any trust. They have deliberately infected machines with malware. They have a record of producing shitty stuff (like exploding batteries). They failed to take proper precautions to protect personal information.

    It's time for Sony to take the honorable way out and commit seppuku.

    --
    "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    1. Re:Waht should Sony do? by torgis · · Score: 0

      I second the seppuku idea. Mod parent up, and pass me that tanto!

    2. Re:Waht should Sony do? by joaommp · · Score: 1

      "Honorable way out"? They've already lost all honor they had, including the emergency reserves for an "honorable way out". Not even hara-kiri is good enough for them.

    3. Re:Waht should Sony do? by smelch · · Score: 1

      Your complaints about Sony are largely unappreciated, and unimportant. Its like when comic book nerds show up to blast the latest Marvel movie. Nobody gives a shit because we're watching an action flick, not some comics we didn't read. Completely irrelevant to the market at large, and yet here you are saying Sony should just pack it in, its the "honorable thing to do". No, it isn't. The fact that they provide people with the things they want, and they are still in business pretty much proves that they are doing more good than bad unless they have a secret plot we have yet to uncover where they are the cause of fat women or something.

      --
      If I can just reach out with my words and touch a butthole, just one, it will all be worth it.
    4. Re:Waht should Sony do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's time for Sony to take the honorable way out and commit seppuku.

      I even know where there's a reactor with a few leaks that could use plugging.

      With apologies to Vir Kotto, I'd like to see Sony's CEO jump straight into the pool of boiling water and molten corium at the bottom of the pressure vessel as a warning to the next ten generations that some features come at too high a price.

    5. Re:Waht should Sony do? by swordgeek · · Score: 1

      Everything you say is correct, except of course that no company is honourable enough to shut itself down - even in Japan.
      The government should bring down massive fines against them, and criminal charges against the decision makers, escalating every time they're busted again.

      But that's not how companies work. Sigh. In the meantime, I just don't buy anything from Sony - sadly, that means that there are a lot of musicians not getting my money.

      --

      "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
    6. Re:Waht should Sony do? by Wingfat · · Score: 1

      pics or it didn't happen on - "deliberately infected machines with malware" & "They have a record of producing shitty stuff (like exploding batteries)" "They failed to take proper precautions to protect personal information." they did have protection.. every co has protection in place.. even Bank of America got hacked and user info taken.. so did they not have precautions in place? yes they did, but hackers are hackers and know ins and outs of PCs.. why do you think GeoHotz is now working for Sony, so he can show them what he did and how to stop it. Two of my good friends from school, both got caught by the FBI, but now have high paying jobs with AT&T and the Federal Gov.

    7. Re:Waht should Sony do? by pegr · · Score: 1

      0/10: Troll FAIL.

    8. Re:Waht should Sony do? by Wingfat · · Score: 1

      oh that wasn't a troll comment.. and if it was, it worked as you replied. but you still have no Proof that Sony did anything bad ever. cool. more points to Sony.
      ___ His Power level is over 1million.

    9. Re:Waht should Sony do? by LandDolphin · · Score: 1

      they are the cause of fat women or something.

      Well, they do sell a lot of TVs.

      --
      Spelling and Grammar errors have been added to this post for your enjoyment
    10. Re:Waht should Sony do? by Red+Flayer · · Score: 2
      You write like Sony exists in a vacuum. They do not.

      They have competitors who could take up their slack.

      So I vented my frustration with Sony in a slightly creative way.

      The fact that they provide people with the things they want, and they are still in business pretty much proves that they are doing more good than bad...

      False. All it proves is that they are good at advertising, marketing, and PR. Nothing else.

      I used to think Sony made good products... either I was wrong or they have changed. My experience with them over the past five years or so has made me realize that they are a relatively shitty company.

      To top off the horseshit mentioned in my first post, let us not forget that Sony is an enemy of open standards. Blu-Ray. Sony Memory Sticks. It goes back at least as far as Betamax (I doubt you're old enough to remember those).

      I accuse Sony of being a shitty company, and here you are defending them just like an abused spouse will defend his or her abuser. Surely THIS time they will really quit drinking and beating you, right?

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    11. Re:Waht should Sony do? by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1, Informative

      Are you fucking kidding me? Where have you been, offline for the past five years?

      Sony greenlit a rootkit on their audio CDs. You don't remember that?

      Sony had unpatched Apache servers running. That's inadequate protection of consumer data. I didn't say NO protection, I wrote that they failed to have proper protection.

      But go ahead, defend your abuser.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    12. Re:Waht should Sony do? by Wingfat · · Score: 1

      I guess you only remember what you want to..
      "The included software interferes with the normal way in which the Microsoft Windows operating system plays CDs by installing a rootkit which creates vulnerabilities for other malware to exploit. "
      So if you can read that Sony didn't install and or infect ANYONE with malware.. you must be not an adult as your language is quiet improper for posting on Slashdot .
      I agree it was bad of Sony to put that on those music CDs, but they didn't made the worms and malware that actually effected people.. you might as well blame Microsoft for the same thing under your blanket statements.

    13. Re:Waht should Sony do? by SilentChasm · · Score: 1

      "deliberately infected machines with malware"
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sony_rootkit

      "They have a record of producing shitty stuff (like exploding batteries)"
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sony#Laptop_batteries_dysfunction

    14. Re:Waht should Sony do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they should just change the names of everything and watch the suckers line up

    15. Re:Waht should Sony do? by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1
      Wow, you're getting pretty riled up about this.

      It's very simple. Sony installed, without permission, a rootkit. You claim this rootkit was not malware. I disagree. That rootkit enabled other malware unauthorized access to people's PCs. It was malware. It did something to people's PCs that they would not wish to be done, without their knowledge.

      you must be not an adult as your language is quiet improper for posting on Slashdot .

      What the fuck? "improper language for posting on slashdot"? Are you serious? Besides which, an ad hominem is not a very effective way to counter someone's point.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    16. Re:Waht should Sony do? by Wingfat · · Score: 1

      You are still replying to this? FYI - ad hominem : adjective 1. appealing to one's prejudices, emotions, or special interests rather than to one's intellect or reason. 2. attacking an opponent's character rather than answering his argument. I said your language is improper - after I Answered your arguments. so you fail in your poor attempt to call me out. After all this it sounds like you only read what you want to and only retain what you what to think and not what the full story is. (also this is coming from the guy with "Trolls" in his tag line hmm) Either way.. just you thinking a that their rootkit was Malware doesn't make it so.. I believe that I am Spider-Man, does that make me a Super Hero? I believe that Slashdot is better than Edgadget.com.. does that make it so? maybe it does. Have an awesome day Red Flayer! it has been fun typing to you.

    17. Re:Waht should Sony do? by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1
      What are you going off about now?

      re: ad hominem: Your prior post clearly falls under the second definition you provided. You attacked my maturity rather than addressing any of my arguments.

      re: our disagreement: I've clearly explained why I feel the Sony rootkit was malware. Your response? "No, you're wrong". How is the Sony rootkit NOT malware? It meets the definition of malware as per US Cert. Here's the definition from that source:

      Malware, short for malicious software, consists of programming (code, scripts, active content, and other software) designed to disrupt or deny operation, gather information that leads to loss of privacy or exploitation, gain unauthorized access to system resources, and other abusive behavior.

      You can dismiss my arguments all you like, I'm fully confident that I'm correct in this instance and that you are either off your rocker, a Sony fanboy, or a Sony astroturfer.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    18. Re:Waht should Sony do? by Wingfat · · Score: 1

      "you're wrong" because you can't read, or comprehend what you do "read"... example, your Quoted text about Malware proved my point about Sony's DRM not being Malware as defined by the US. Thanks for helping prove my point that Sonys DRM did not disrupt operation, or gather info that lead to a loss of anything.
      and in my post about your maturity, the maturity part was after I pointed things out. So yet again, you fail, but keep the topic alive. I am happy to write back every morning about your faults. And yes I may be a bit insane, but my agruments ring true.
      Oh BTW, Your statements are could be construed as trolling since they have lacked any type of intelligent logic in them.
      FYI Sony does rule.. the only thing they ever did badly was Beta Max tapes ;-)

    19. Re:Waht should Sony do? by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      No, my quoted text does no such thing; it, in fact, demostrates that the Sony rootkit was indeed malware. Unauthorized access to system resources? Check. Gather information that leads to loss of privacy or exploitation? Check.

      I should know better to argue with idiots; you're far more experienced at inanity than I could hope to be able to counter.

      Lack of intelligent logic? Pot, meet kettle.

      Your arguments do not ring true. They ring loony.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    20. Re:Waht should Sony do? by Wingfat · · Score: 1

      hmm more name calling.. come on. you can do better than loony. I mean really now. How about an Anagram of your screen name: Dry Elf Ear or A Led Ferry have a good one Red.. type at you later

    21. Re:Waht should Sony do? by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      You started with the name calling. And I call 'em as I see 'em -- you're both a loony and a hypocrite.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    22. Re:Waht should Sony do? by Wingfat · · Score: 1

      "pics or it didn't happen" where is the proof.. as i read and recall you said first "off your rocker, a Sony fanboy, or a Sony astroturfer."

    23. Re:Waht should Sony do? by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      The proof is your continued denial about the fact that the Sony Rootkit was malware according to definition, along with your inane writing style and lack of logical facilities. You've offered no serious argument to support your beliefs. Add in your disorganized writings (and I therefore assume, your disorganized thoughts) and it paints the picture that you're one of the three things I mentioned. Based upon your further replies, I assume you're off your rocker.

      Or, you could just be trolling.

      Good day.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
  7. All I Want. by Seumas · · Score: 5, Informative

    All I want is for Sony to get things back online and learn some lessons from this. I don't want gifts or subscriptions or any other stuff. Just learn the importance of pro-active security measures. Always be validating the integrity of your systems. Have people on the payroll who can deal with these things instead of having to hire out for them after the fact. Especially when you're directly involved in litigation and supposedly under threats of "hacker" groups. And learn how to communicate with your customers. Take a lesson from the LastPass guys, for example.

    I don't want trinkets. Just get your shit together.

    1. Re:All I Want. by x*yy*x · · Score: 2

      Have people on the payroll who can deal with these things instead of having to hire out for them after the fact.

      I think it was extremely good Sony hired outside investigation. It could just as well been a dishonest employee and often in this type of things it is. Several million credit cards info on your hands and always some low paid guy will turn dishonest.

    2. Re:All I Want. by Seumas · · Score: 1

      I didn't so much mean "internal" versus "external" as much as I meant "don't wait until AFTER shit hits the fan to start hiring some forensic/security experts". These guys supposedly required many days to catch up on Sony's deployment and then analyze it and Sony's own blog posts seem to suggest this, too. That shouldn't have been the case. They should have had these guys on staff (in-house or contracted - whatever) who were maintaining things and, when it all went belly-up -- instantly prepared to do a post-mortem review and begin the recovery process.

    3. Re:All I Want. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *AHEM*

      BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

      Unless this whole incident costs Sony some serious money (far more than their "protection services" and "free games"), there's just no incentive to hire the people that would do a good job keeping things secure. It's not evil, it's just business.

    4. Re:All I Want. by geekmux · · Score: 1

      All I want is for Sony to get things back online and learn some lessons from this. I don't want gifts or subscriptions or any other stuff. Just learn the importance of pro-active security measures...

      Unfortunately, what you ask for here is never taken as a priority in business....until it affects the bottom line.

      Fortunately (or should I say hopefully) Sony has learned their lesson here and will re-prioritize security above the other shit they normally prioritize...like chasing after revenue streams regardless of any other factors. I have my doubts, even in the wake of a blatant negative impact to revenue.

    5. Re:All I Want. by stumblingblock · · Score: 1

      Do you really think you will get this? Anybody believer it will happen?

    6. Re:All I Want. by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 1

      Maybe companies will realize that horrible security breaches will, in fact, severely impact the bottom line. I don't think it's that hard to grasp.

      As consumers and the media make a big deal about this (my Mom head about the PSN network breach, so you know this is a pretty big deal), rest assured, Sony's competitors are taking a very hard look at their online security. You can bet the higher-ups at Microsoft and Nintendo are asking underlings "Could anything like this happen to our network?" and "What do we have to do to make sure this never, ever happens to us?"

      Capitalism is a highly Darwinian process (at least, it's supposed to be). You can get by for a while on past success and sheer size alone, but alienate too many customers and extinction awaits. American car companies have had to learn that the hard way several times. Now we see that Japanese mega-conglomerates can fall into the same sort of ruts as well, which seems a bit ironic to me.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    7. Re:All I Want. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you really trust them to do that? How are you going to know that they accomplished full security. They might get good security for today's standards but as time goes on will they maintain the necessary level of security.

      And how will you really know? Really.

      Toss that in with all the crap that Sony has done over the years (declining quality, root kit, psn security failure) why should anyone trust them? They'd have to do alot more than get PSN back online for my satisfaction. I'd have to lay back a bunch of years and Sony would have to show they aren't fuckups for all of those years before I'd start trusting them again.

  8. Free games by Skatox · · Score: 0

    I would be happy with selecting 2 games (anything i want from)

  9. Someone had to say it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sony should buy it's users a Microsoft XBOX-360 and a year of XBOX-Live subscriptions.

    Just getting the ironic comment out of the way...so we may have intelligent conversation from this point forward.

  10. Xbox Live by mehrotra.akash · · Score: 0

    Add Xbox live to PS3

    1. Re:Xbox Live by zombiechan · · Score: 1

      I know that would never happen, but it would be cool if it was then able to play with people using Xbox 360..

  11. Seppuku by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someone needs to REALLY accept responsibility.

    1. Re:Seppuku by bipbop · · Score: 1

      Don't worry. The Japanese are even better than Americans at picking out scapegoats when things go wrong. Sure, they won't be the people at fault, but that's not what people care about, is it? Just that heads will roll, not whose.

    2. Re:Seppuku by westlake · · Score: 1

      Someone needs to REALLY accept responsibility.

      Beginning with whoever broke into Sony's networks and systems? That part of the story doesn't seem to excite the geek so much.

    3. Re:Seppuku by Bobfrankly1 · · Score: 1

      Someone needs to REALLY accept responsibility.

      Beginning with whoever broke into Sony's networks and systems? That part of the story doesn't seem to excite the geek so much.

      In the geek mind, Sony's security was so lax that ANYONE could have broken in. Blaming Sony is easy in this case, they had been trusted with all this data that would obviously be a big target. Despite this, they failed to properly secure that data. If hacker group "a" hadn't stolen the data, hacker groups "b, c, d, etc" would have. Sony's history with security makes this viewpoint rather easy to adopt.

      It WAS Sony's house that was broken into, so dealing with the thief/hacker(s) is Sony's responsibility. Dealing with the lost data may not be Sony's responsibility, but failure to make some attempt at pacifying the masses would likely alienate their user base. So they will walk the line between cost and effect, just like any other business.

  12. I'm not from the US by joaommp · · Score: 2, Informative

    What about me? So, they fsck up for everybody, but only US users get some sort of compensation and protection from THEIR mistakes?

    1. Re:I'm not from the US by Anrego · · Score: 1

      Hopefully they are only extending credit protection to US customers because the risk to non-US users is minimal.

      Hopefully....

      - a somewhat worried Canadian

    2. Re:I'm not from the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Haha - but no, you got it backwards..

      They are only extending credit protection to US customers because the risk from non-US customers is minimal.

    3. Re:I'm not from the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry to burst your bubble. But its only offered in the u.s. because the concept of "identity theft" works only therein. Identity theft blames you the individual. BANK FRAUD is what it is and always has been. But now its the individuals problem. U get a headache for 7 years while the perpetrater is rewarded with the comfort that no one is coming after them.
      All stems from crappy laws. Everybody with mega bucks have they own banks. They simply won't let fraud occur if u stole their identity. So with no one to pay the politician to care, no one will.

    4. Re:I'm not from the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sony has really screwed up big time on this one...
      When your userbase trusts you with their credit information, and this is leaked to the "world" your basically done... out of business...

      And to make this all situation even worse, they are being totally cheap bastards... "We give you two (shity) games, and some "credit protection" only to US "

      What about me? So, they fsck up for everybody, but only US users get some sort of compensation and protection from THEIR mistakes?

      WTF ? the other users are playing for free??

      One month of a down PSN is just enough... incompetence, arrogance, and no information to their user, of WHAT IN THE HELL IS GOING ON it's not a winning combo... and Sony WILL learn this by the hard way...

      Confidence is hard to gain... but it is lost in a heartbeat... two games are not gonna cut it on this one...

  13. I say... by torgis · · Score: 2

    ...we nuke the whole thing from orbit. It's the only way to be sure.

  14. Nothing? by Anrego · · Score: 3

    my personal info is now probably being sold on the black market because of Sony

    This really is the key here. They can compensate people for the down time... but there is very little they can really do about the personal information thing, which to me is a much bigger deal. They can't compensate everyone adequately, they'd go bankrupt. What they _could_ do is offer the token compensation they are proposing, and have a much bigger compensation package for anyone who can prove they got screwed due to their info leaking out. Maybe free hardware and access for life or something. Not really much benifit to them though, and would probably be abused somehow.

    I've already ranted that our system in general is screwed up, and while there are (some) legal protections, the kind of data Sony had to be stolen should in a perfect world be of no concern. Relying on any piece of information that can't readily be changed as a credential (and in too many cases the only credential) is insane. And before I get flamed, no, I don't have a solution at hand... but surely we can come up with something better than "yup, the address matches, here's a credit card!".

    As a close second option, I'd love a system where Sony doesn't need any of that data. All they need is a _public_ credit card number and some kind of auth code that's generated via keyfob/SMS message/whatever and is tied to company/amount/date. If we didn't have to give all our personal info to every company we do business to, this would mitigate these kind of issues.

    1. Re:Nothing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your proposed system is called "PayPal".

      Sadly, not all online payment gateways accept this method.

    2. Re:Nothing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      on the right track..we need to have to digitally sign every time you use the card

    3. Re:Nothing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      my personal info is now probably being sold on the black market because of Sony

      This really is the key here. They can compensate people for the down time... but there is very little they can really do about the personal information thing, which to me is a much bigger deal. They can't compensate everyone adequately, they'd go bankrupt. What they _could_ do is offer the token compensation they are proposing, and have a much bigger compensation package for anyone who can prove they got screwed due to their info leaking out. Maybe free hardware and access for life or something. Not really much benifit to them though, and would probably be abused somehow.

      I've already ranted that our system in general is screwed up, and while there are (some) legal protections, the kind of data Sony had to be stolen should in a perfect world be of no concern. Relying on any piece of information that can't readily be changed as a credential (and in too many cases the only credential) is insane. And before I get flamed, no, I don't have a solution at hand... but surely we can come up with something better than "yup, the address matches, here's a credit card!".

      As a close second option, I'd love a system where Sony doesn't need any of that data. All they need is a _public_ credit card number and some kind of auth code that's generated via keyfob/SMS message/whatever and is tied to company/amount/date. If we didn't have to give all our personal info to every company we do business to, this would mitigate these kind of issues.

      I agree. they should make you buy, with cash, cards with value on them, and not use credit cards.

  15. Um... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I mean, my personal info is now probably being sold on the black market because of Sony.
     
    The only thing being sold is probably your billing info, which you should have cancelled if you're so worried about it.

  16. Without PSN by mehrotra.akash · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Make it compulsory for ALL new games to be functional without requiring PSN even once

    You should be able to buy a PS3 and use it till the end of its Hardware life without any internet access at all

    1. Re:Without PSN by happylight · · Score: 1

      I don't know any game that requires PSN for single player or split screen co-op mode.

      Multiplayer modes would need PSN obviously. There's no way that it can be done otherwise...

    2. Re:Without PSN by mehrotra.akash · · Score: 1

      Portal 2 I believe cannot be activated without use of PSN. I'm not sure though

      Multiplayer modes do not necessarily need PSN (look at multiplayer gaming on the PC, CS:S and CSv1.6 come to mind)

    3. Re:Without PSN by vrmlguy · · Score: 1

      I don't know any game that requires PSN for single player or split screen co-op mode.

      Multiplayer modes would need PSN obviously. There's no way that it can be done otherwise...

      • Portal 2? Yes, there's an online component, but there's also a single player mode, and right now you can't get *any* mode to work while PSN is down.
      • Xenogears on my PSP.
      • Just about everything from Capcom (which uses a PSN-dependent DRM scheme).
      --
      Nothing for 6-digit uids?
    4. Re:Without PSN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Portal 2? Yes, there's an online component, but there's also a single player mode, and right now you can't get *any* mode to work while PSN is down.

      It's clear that you don't have the game since you can play the single player portion with zero problems whatsoever. You can even play split-screen co-op. So before you start spouting shit you don't know about, take the time to learn it first.

    5. Re:Without PSN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not convinced on the Portal 2 argument unless you know from first hand experience and are not just making assumptions. The rest of the games you've mentioned are Digital PSN games, so could not have been acquired without PSN in the first place (and your comment about "Just about everything from Capcom" is actually just 2 PSN games, I think you underestimate how many games Capcom makes).

      As far as I know the only Disc-based Playstation games that require PSN acccess to play are things like DC universe online and other MMO's.

    6. Re:Without PSN by TrancePhreak · · Score: 1

      I think Heavy Rain did initially. I remember there was some PSN outage and people were unable to play the game. They patched it away, however.

      --

      -]Phreak Out[-
    7. Re:Without PSN by dumeinst · · Score: 1

      Not sure what you mean by 'activated'. Both Single and MultiPlayer modes work just fine. I bought the game 3 days ago and haven't had any issues.

    8. Re:Without PSN by Tiger_Storms · · Score: 1

      I agree with this statement. I understand the need for social networking and wanting to play games with for buddies, but I'm old school I'd rather invite people over and have a social gathering and play video games rather than us all be at our homes and link up and play. I hate the fact I've got to plug in my ps3 in to the internet when I've got to play this game or that game. and the fact I can't even play some of the games I've downloaded now because it requires me to sign in it just bull crap. I don't want free games, I want a system that'll work with out their system's dependance on it.

      --
      This is a Mac, what you have there is an embarrassment to your fellow computer users.
    9. Re:Without PSN by NekSnappa · · Score: 1

      I want them to make Polyphonic stop asking me 4 f'ing times if want want to login to PSN before letting me into GT5.

      --
      I want to shoot the messenger!
    10. Re:Without PSN by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Agreed.

      This INCLUDES multi-player games! Why should you be required to go through a third party service to get to the internet? Get rid of the stupid Windows-Games-Live or XBox-Live or PSN crap.

      If this is all due to some Blizzard-net like paranoia because someone might be cheating in diablo then grow up and only play with friends instead of strangers or stop worrying so much that strangers might be cheating.

      If someone wants to know about acheivements (yeah, I made level two and want my other kindergarteners to know about it) then connect to a service for that. But you should never be required to connect to Sony or anyone else to play with your friends. And that includes Steam!

    11. Re:Without PSN by geobaker · · Score: 1

      Amen. I used to read the fine print on packaging of games and hardware to look for confirmation of compatability. Now I want to see what login/access stipulations are required.
      I know I'm fighting a losing battle, but I'm just not interested in providing a company with my key personal data AND my hard-earned cash. Let me toil away in obscurity if *I* choose; I know I can expose myself (informationally speaking) at any time by clicking 2 buttons or 'answering a short survey' in exchange for a free 6-pack of coke.

    12. Re:Without PSN by Syberz · · Score: 1

      I still have my original Nintendo, my N64, a PS2 and they all work perfectly fine without any internet access. Why do all of the recent systems always require a connection? Maybe I'd like to play while my internet connection is down or maybe I just want to play in 10 years when your online system doesn't even exist anymore.

      I paid for the system and the games to be able to play whenever I want, I bought hardware, not a service god damnit!

      --
      ~Syberz
  17. Money to spend on games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would feel reasonably mollified if they gave $15-$20 to spend at the PSN store. This would have the added bonus of spurring sales for developers who are losing out right now because it's down.

  18. it's how you handle it by aahpandasrun · · Score: 0

    I could care less what Sony does with PSN. Hacking happens to everybody. It's how you handle the situation that really shows the quality of a company. Look at how open and honest LastPass was with their security incident, while Sony hid information for a week and still won't disclose what actually happened. I don't think bribing people with free games will restore faith in Sony as a company.

    1. Re:it's how you handle it by Builder · · Score: 1

      Why do you care so much ? How much less could you care?

  19. Nothing tangible by Beerdood · · Score: 1

    Well they won't be giving people any sort of physical or tangible deals, or anything with an associated production cost, that's for sure. (i.e. physical copies of games, discount on next console). It'll be some sort of credit, i.e. 3 months of free online play.

    --
    Global warming and other natural disasters are a direct effect of the shrinking number of pirates - Gospel of the FSM
  20. how about no by poetmatt · · Score: 1, Redundant

    What I want is for Sony to stop being a dinosaur of a fucking company that supports the BSA, and start being a company that sticks to best practices. what the fuck kind of company stores old archived sensitive data on a networked server in 2011, and then proceeds to grandstand against how it must be anonymous and basically mislead the public in it's entirety?

    People don't have the decision to retroactively fix the fact that they trusted a corporate identity with their information and that corporate entity just fucked them over bigtime.

    1. Re:how about no by x*yy*x · · Score: 1

      What's wrong with BSA? Unlike MPAA and RIAA, I've never seen them go after individuals. They're mostly going after companies illegally using pirated software and frankly if you're making money with someones software I think you should pay for it.

    2. Re:how about no by tbannist · · Score: 1

      proceeds to grandstand against how it must be anonymous and basically mislead the public in it's entirety?

      Except according to some members of Anonymous, it actually was some members of Anonymous who did it. Frankly, I don't think you can blame them at all for blaming Anonymous, it happened while Anonymous was attacking them, that alone would be enough to make them the prime suspect.

      Of course, that doesn't mean Sony wasn't running an incompetently administered network, I'm just pointing out that it's entirely reasonable for them to point the finger at Anonymous.

      --
      Fanatically anti-fanatical
    3. Re:how about no by tbannist · · Score: 3, Informative

      The BSA has a bad reputation of simply going after companies who have disgruntled employees and forcing them to prove that they own every a copy of Windows for every computer they have. I've heard that companies usually just pay the fine rather than go through the cost of auditing every computer they have. It's still a shakedown, but one that only targets companies.

      --
      Fanatically anti-fanatical
    4. Re:how about no by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 1

      What I want is for Sony to stop being a dinosaur of a fucking company that supports the BSA

      What I want is a Unicorn that poops rainbows. - fixed that for you

      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
    5. Re:how about no by poetmatt · · Score: 1

      The hilarity of this cracks me up. How can you not catch the obviousness here.

      Anonymous has senior members/veterans? Since when? Especially when ANYONE can claim to be a member of anonymous or post on their pages? Guess what, I'm a seasoned veteran of anonymous because I've been with them for greater than 3 seconds. There, I'm a vet, senior member, quote me. etc.

      what a joke.

    6. Re:how about no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the crooks decided they were part of anonymous, they were. It's completely inclusive, which also means you can't accuse anonymous of all being part of it. Since there's no standards of membership and no denying anybody, you can't attribute guilt to the whole from actions of a subset. There are no leaders, there is no coordinating structure other than that some individuals decide to, provisionally, act in unison. Unless they act in opposition. Or ignore the matter and continue posting lolcats.

    7. Re:how about no by ZorinLynx · · Score: 1

      I've always wondered what gives them the legal authority to do this.

      I've heard of them raiding companies with armed marshals.

    8. Re:how about no by mlts · · Score: 1

      The *only* way anonymous could ever have the ability for people to prove ranks is if they had a PGP web of trust in place, with people knowing and trusting at least some people. This way, if someone claims that Alice is the Grand Poobah of Anonymous and signs the key, this can be verified, especially if multiple people sign Alice's key.

      Pseudo-anonymity where people can't match the real person to the ID is very useful, provided someone doesn't link their anonymous ID with real life info [1].

      [1]: With PGP or gpg, with anonymous IDs, I'd recommend not just keeping those keys on a separate keyring, but perhaps on a completely different system (or VM), just to make sure the IDs never are linkable with each other.

    9. Re:how about no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This would have been a lot funnier if you would have posted this Anonymousy

    10. Re:how about no by Jibekn · · Score: 1

      It makes you a member, not a senior member.

      If you had said "Im in anonymous" back in 2008-ish, ide call you a senior member today.

      Senior just means old, whats the big deal? All they're saying is "Im an old member of anonymous" which is accurate isnt it?

    11. Re:how about no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, but even saying "I'm in anonymous" doesn't make sense. It's much more like "I just posted anonymously."
      Also 2008? Uh, no. I'm sure anyone new to their image board of choice would think that, but if you have actual history you'd bump it back by at least another two years.

    12. Re:how about no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... Guess what, I'm a seasoned veteran of anonymous because I've been with them for greater than 3 seconds. There, I'm a vet, senior member, quote me. etc.

      what a joke.

      LULZ, newfag is new. Probably doesn't even like Mudkips.

    13. Re:how about no by Legal.Troll · · Score: 0

      You get 1 US Marshal free with every federal search warrant not falling under the FBI's jurisdiction :) Hah. Maybe, just speculating. But I guarantee they don't just call up the marshal service and ask them out to lunch. We're talking court orders.

      --
      "Outdated business models" is code for "I don't like paying for things, but want them anyway"
    14. Re:how about no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I always thought that the best way to find out if somebody is a senior member of Anonymous is to test their ability to triforce.

    15. Re:how about no by tbannist · · Score: 1

      You understand yet fail to grasp the consequences.

      If anyone can claim to be a member of Anonymous and one or more people claiming to be members of Anonymous hacked the Sony servers, then was it Anonymous? What more do you need to do to be part of Anonymous than merely claim to be a part of it?

      The point I'm making is that it seems to me that Sony hasn't actually done much grandstanding. As far as I understand they haven't even accused Anonymous of being behind the hack, merely saying that they found evidence that it might have been Anonymous and then telling people that whoever it was left a calling card. A file called "Anonymous" containing the text "We are Legion". They haven't trumpeted this as proof that it was Anonymous, they specifically said that they don't know and may never know whether the people were part of Anonymous, or merely taking advantage of Anonymous.

      --
      Fanatically anti-fanatical
  21. more than you wanted still isn't enough? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    OK, I can hate on Sony as good as the next guy, but this statement just got to me:

    I would have been satisfied with the free credit protection. Now that they want to offer me 2 games, why can't I pick any 2 games that I want? I mean, my personal info is now probably being sold on the black market because of Sony

    So you were fine with a small compensation, but once they offered you more than what you originally wanted, now you want more than they offered?

    1. Re:more than you wanted still isn't enough? by tehniobium · · Score: 1

      Yea, that makes no sense what do ever...

      --
      No kitty, this is my pot pie!
  22. For my money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A blow job a week for a year would be adequate.

    1. Re:For my money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A blow job a week for a year would be adequate.

      From whom?

      Kristen Stewart, or Dwayne Johnson? :)

  23. I Want Sony to Scrub My Info by ThePolkapunk · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Instead of free games, I want a method by which Sony will completely delete all information they have about me. Regardless of how responsible they'll be in the future, they had their chance and they blew it.

    --
    Dear diary: Today I stuffed some dolls full of dead rats I put in the blender.
    1. Re:I Want Sony to Scrub My Info by Wingfat · · Score: 1

      hhahahehehehhahhhahahaha.. man you made me choke on my drink with that comedy. you should take that act on the road. Even if they could scrub your info,, it has already been taken and put out there. Sony didn't blow anything either.. sounds like you are the one on your knees.

    2. Re:I Want Sony to Scrub My Info by dudeman500 · · Score: 1

      The information was stolen. It's already gone.Have you learned nothing from the MAFIAA...

    3. Re:I Want Sony to Scrub My Info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you haven't changed your name, moved and cancelled your credit card yet, you're the problem, not Sony.

  24. Not at all by grumbel · · Score: 1

    Sony is giving you a free service that you didn't pay anything for. Why exactly is anybody expecting compensation? If there are actual damaged due to the need to get a new credit card or whatever, sure, they might be help liable, but for average Joe who only enjoys the free service and never entered the credit data in the first place? I don't see any need for compensation there at all.

    That said of course I wouldn't mind it getting two free games, but I don't see that as compensation, but simply as additional marketing to bump up the image of PSN, marketing that others do as well, even with out ever having lost your data (GOG.com gives you five free games on login, Valve gave Portal away for free for a few days, etc.).

    1. Re:Not at all by mevets · · Score: 1

      |Sony is giving you a free service that you didn't pay anything for.

      If it were free, why did Sony have credit card #s? Excuse my ignorance, I've never used their fine identity theft tool, but I don't consider iTunes or AppStore as being 'free' just because there is some free shit you can get there. Same with my smack dealer - she gives me the odd free hit, but I seem to give her a lot of money.

      Just to be pedantic, if they charged you for a free service, would it still be ok?

      My SO had a credit card compromised at a local grocery store. Afterwards, the many auto-billing services started popping up the "your credit card info needs updating". Bless her, she paid careful attention to the first few, but after that, it moved to autopilot. That is the real danger of the leak; the CC companies can figure it out pretty quick, but desensitizing people is a whole new problem.

      To get the desired effect, you don't actually have to steal any data, you just have to make people think you did.

    2. Re:Not at all by grumbel · · Score: 1

      If it were free, why did Sony have credit card #s?

      Because they have a shop where you can buy stuff. The online service and multiplayer is free, the games and DLC stuff isn't. In contrast on XboxLive you have to pay for multiplayer and pay for parts of the online service. You also don't need to give Sony your CC info if you don't plan to buy anything.

      The problem is simply that you can't fairly compensate for potential future damage produced by identity theft. Getting two free games now doesn't make the trouble go away that identity theft might produce down the road and getting five instead or $100 won't change that either. If they have broken a law they should get a fine, but compensating individual user really doesn't really serve much of a purpose.

    3. Re:Not at all by Gaelinda · · Score: 1

      If there are actual damaged due to the need to get a new credit card or whatever, sure, they might be help liable, but for average Joe who only enjoys the free service and never entered the credit data in the first place? I don't see any need for compensation there at all.

      Really, you don't think that other info besides a credit card number needs to be protected for free?! Honestly, I know that there is info in the sign-up for PSN that can be used to fuck a person's life up. I can replace the card I used with a phone call to the bank (which I already did), but I can't change my address and birthdate.

      That said of course I wouldn't mind it getting two free games, but I don't see that as compensation

      why not?!! It's compensation for the fact that a lot of the games didn't function fully because of the online features. i would have loved to play mortal Kombat online like Xbox-ers for more than a couple of days. I wholeheartedly would take a couple of free games. As far as actual money, I will agree that's a bit much. Sony lost loyal and potential new customers with this little faux pas that it's a huge dent in their gaming revenue.

      Dear Sony, please promise that you have taken this time to not only learn from your mistakes but also how to prevent future ones.

    4. Re:Not at all by Labcoat+Samurai · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Sony is giving you a free service that you didn't pay anything for.

      I paid $600 for it. It came as part of a bundle with some hardware.

    5. Re:Not at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not just the PSN that is down. All online services are so everquest is too and you must cough up your cc for that. So I wonder what they will get for compensation and YTF is it just limited to the US again? They're a Japanese company!

    6. Re:Not at all by grumbel · · Score: 1

      I can replace the card I used with a phone call to the bank (which I already did), but I can't change my address and birthdate.

      If you can fuck somebodies live up with that information, somebody has really really shitty security, and it ain't Sony in that case. Birthday and address should not be considered secret to begin with, as that information is stored all over the place and half the time even in public ones (phonebooks, year books, facebook, etc.).

      why not?!! It's compensation for the fact that a lot of the games didn't function fully because of the online features.

      It's a free service without any guaranteed uptime. I don't expect compensation when Slashdot or Google or whatever else is down either. Yeah, it sucks that some games broke in the process, but that's what you have to expect when buying into a lock-in service with no dedicated servers that you can run on your own. There have been quite a few multiplayer games that have been taken offline permanently because their servers simply got switched off, I don't see anybody getting compensated for that either.

      As said, I don't mind the free stuff and I think they should do it, but that's simply marketing, not really compensation.

    7. Re:Not at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As free as this service may be, there are other services which people pay money to use tied to this free service.

    8. Re:Not at all by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      If it's a free service, how did they get the credit card info?

    9. Re:Not at all by grumbel · · Score: 1

      They didn't from a lot of people, that's why they have 70 milllion accounts and only 10 million credit card numbers.

  25. Oh please by Tarlus · · Score: 2

    Now that they want to offer me 2 games, why can't I pick any 2 games that I want?

    Cry me a fucking river. You get your free credit protection, what more do you want for not being able to play your precious video games through a free online service?

    (I presume based on the OP's inane whining that they are not paying for PSN+.)

    --
    /* No Comment */
    1. Re:Oh please by Wingfat · · Score: 1

      agreed.

    2. Re:Oh please by Labcoat+Samurai · · Score: 1

      Cry me a fucking river. You get your free credit protection, what more do you want for not being able to play your precious video games through a free online service?

      (I presume based on the OP's inane whining that they are not paying for PSN+.)

      I know what I want. I want to play my video games through an online service. I'm sick of this stupid excuse. Online multiplayer is an advertised feature and an expectation of the system. If you bought a Kindle 3G and suddenly you couldn't download any books to it for a month, do you really think "Yeah, but you don't pay extra for the 3G service" is a valid excuse?

  26. Actual Compensation for Losses by Fulminata · · Score: 2

    Having never owned a PS3, I was not personally affected by this breach, but I have friends who were. The offer by Sony to provide free credit protection is admirable, but the offer came too late for those I know who were affected. They signed up for their own credit protection plans as soon as they became aware of the problem, while Sony did not offer protection until some time after. They might be able to switch over now to Sony's free plan, but they should be compensated for the money they were already forced to spend on their own credit protection. Given the difficulty in determining who paid how much for what, a blanket $20 payment for everyone affected would not be unreasonable.

  27. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  28. 2 Free DL games? What a joke. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    2 free downloadable games does not mean any loss of revenue for them. It is extremely easy for them to give 2 free downloadable games. And if Sony thinks that will satisfy it's customers then they are horribly wrong.

    I want Sony to either give OtherOS back or refund it's customers on the loss of OtherOS and the PSN outage, and also pay for 5 years of identity protection.

    I kind of hope that Sony were able to go broke over this. It's their own fault. They thought so great of themselves and then within 10 months Sony has been brought to their knees because of their security fails.

  29. Sure, here is your $0 refund by elrous0 · · Score: 0

    You get what you pay for. And since you pay, oh, NOTHING for PSN then that's what you deserve to get in compensation. Unless you're PSN Plus user or you have bought PSN games from them that you can't play offline, then STFU. This isn't Xbox Live, this is a free service that Sony generously provides. If you don't like it, buy an Xbox and pay them $5 a month for the privilege of what Sony gives you for free.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:Sure, here is your $0 refund by Uhyve · · Score: 1

      I've never gotten that argument, it's just illogical. Here's an analogy for ya:

      You give me your wallet and car keys to look after
      I lose your wallet and car keys
      You come back and I can't tell you what happened to them
      But **** you, because you didn't pay me anything

      In the adult world, there's a thing called responsibility and defending your toy manufacturer because of some odd sense of loyalty seems completely insane to normal people...

    2. Re:Sure, here is your $0 refund by PRMan · · Score: 1

      Actually, since it is REQUIRED for new games/Blu-Ray discs/Netflix (not anymore) that you PAY FOR, they have legal liability if it is down and they are keeping you from playing things that they required you to be on in order to play it.

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    3. Re:Sure, here is your $0 refund by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the cost of PSN is rolled into the cost of the console itself. PSN is not free. Just because the online functionality is not broken out and billed separately, like XBL, does not mean that it is free.

    4. Re:Sure, here is your $0 refund by Lifyre · · Score: 1

      So XBL users pay to have their information compromised?

      Your argument is that since the service cost nothing the liability should be nothing. The sad part if I think you might make a stellar politician. Expect a call from your local party office shortly.

      --
      I'll meet you at the intersection of "Should be" and "Reality"
    5. Re:Sure, here is your $0 refund by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I feel that comment is somewhat absurd.

        It is not about the loss-of-use of such free services, its about the loss-of-use of something I paid money for that requires said free service to use. i.e. games that won't boot without PSN.

        It is also about the personal data of said free service being exposed to ... god knows who...

        Who cares though, right? PSN users didn't PAY for that service - Sony just made a crap load of money from the use of the free service via advertising and probable purchases using the store set up on that free service that pays for the service itself, unlike Xbox who can't seem to figure out how to generate revenue via a store filled with low quality games and no company in its right mind willing to pay for advertising.

        When XBox Live's DB gets hacked, microsoft should surely bend over and hand you a fist full of dollars just because you paid the $5 a month and agreed to an EULA that says the service can go down at any time, right?

    6. Re:Sure, here is your $0 refund by yoda-dono · · Score: 1

      As mentioned in my own post, I pay for Netflix, and bought some of my PS3's primarily for Netflix streaming, but I cannot access what I am paying for since they needlessly require a PSN login before allowing Netflix functionality.

      But still, 'free' service or not, Sony is entrusted with a lot of responsibility for the information they actively sought from us. I don't play online games, but at some point they required I give them personal info, which I begrudgingly did. And don't kid yourself, they find that information valuable in various ways, just reference "The Social Network" (not really a fan of the movie, but it does show how coveted freely given information can be). Also, I swear I've seen a fair amount of ads scroll by on my PS3, they may not be charging us directly, but they're still making money off of us with the service. They broke their subscribers' trust and they shouldn't be allowed to move on as if nothing has happened without addressing the people they've harmed.

    7. Re:Sure, here is your $0 refund by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      So you got your PS3 for nothing?
      A rebate for the multiplayer portion of the game you don't use?
      Clearly sony is making more money by having PSN than not, or they would not have it.

      I think it is bad enough that in 10 years none of these games will work online, but I am sure DOOM2 still will. Yet, here we have another useful idiot defending the very folks who put it up his ass and broke it off.

    8. Re:Sure, here is your $0 refund by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      No, I paid for it, just like I paid for my fucking Xbox.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    9. Re:Sure, here is your $0 refund by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Cool, so you got ripped off since they promised PSN with that purchase. Go look at the box it came in if you doubt me.

    10. Re:Sure, here is your $0 refund by Labcoat+Samurai · · Score: 1

      You get what you pay for. And since you pay, oh, NOTHING for PSN then that's what you deserve to get in compensation. Unless you're PSN Plus user or you have bought PSN games from them that you can't play offline, then STFU. This isn't Xbox Live, this is a free service that Sony generously provides.

      And is a major selling point of their PS3 system, which they, last I checked, charge for. I think they charge for the games, too. Are you really trying to argue that PS3 owners have no reasonable expectation that Sony will maintain the service and continue to support their multiplayer experiences? Are you really trying to argue that Sony has no responsibility to its customers with regard to the state of PSN?

      The service is part of the package, and a customer has certain expectations of that service when the package is purchased. If you purchase a Kindle, you expect you'll be able to download books to it. That's a key selling point of the Kindle. It doesn't matter that they don't charge for the continued service; that's just how the damn thing is supposed to work. The PS3 is the same way.

      If you don't like it, buy an Xbox and pay them $5 a month for the privilege of what Sony gives you for free.

      Last I checked, XBL is still up. Look, which way do you want it? Do you want to argue that they are equivalent services and that Sony's is better because it's free or do you want to argue that Sony's service, due to being free, should not be subject to the same expectations as XBL? You seem to want to have it both ways.

    11. Re:Sure, here is your $0 refund by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      The cost of the PS3 and its games are right on par with the cost of a Xbox and its games. I maybe could accept this lame argument if PS3 games cost an extra $20 or something, but they don't. Sony is eating the cost of PSN in an attempt to better compete with the much Xbox Live (which is a much more stable, consistent service with a significant headstart over PSN--but which charges $5 a month). The only thing "subsidizing" PSN is Sony. And this security breach seems to indicate that they were trying to do it on the cheap.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    12. Re:Sure, here is your $0 refund by Labcoat+Samurai · · Score: 1

      The cost of the PS3 and its games are right on par with the cost of a Xbox and its games. I maybe could accept this lame argument if PS3 games cost an extra $20 or something, but they don't.

      According to amazon, the retail price of an equivalent PS3 unit (comparing 250 GB slim models) is 50 bucks more, or the price of about a year of XBL. So that's not technically true. But really, the relative prices are immaterial.

      Sony is eating the cost of PSN in an attempt to better compete with the much Xbox Live

      Yes, but that money comes from revenue they make from systems and games. You *are* paying for it. It just doesn't appear on your credit card statement every month. It's like buying a lifetime subscription to something.

      (which is a much more stable, consistent service with a significant headstart over PSN--but which charges $5 a month). The only thing "subsidizing" PSN is Sony. And this security breach seems to indicate that they were trying to do it on the cheap.

      Well yes, they probably were. But that doesn't mean we can't expect it to be a good service. It was advertised as a competitor to XBL with the benefit that you don't need to pay for an ongoing subscription. This was a promise they made to people who were holding that PS3 box in their hands contemplating putting down a chunk of change on gaming console. We paid for this service, we just don't pay for an ongoing subscription. In the long run, we definitely pay *more* for XBL. Maybe we should also expect more. But that's not how I look at it. If they can't provide the same service as Microsoft without charging a subscription, then charge a damn subscription. What was advertised was equivalent service, and that's what I want.

  30. Seppuku by Yaddoshi · · Score: 1

    But it would be over far too quickly.

  31. Satisfied but... by rockman_x_2002 · · Score: 2

    I'm satisfied with the consumer-end bargains that they're offering for PSN users like myself. The one year of identity theft protection is a big help, plus two game, even downloadable ones, are a nice touch as well. Retail vouchers would've been better, of course.

    But the only other thing I can ask is that, going forward, Sony should now be required to answer to a higher-up authority in regards to network security. What I mean is that, since Sony dropped the ball on such a massive scale, it could be argued that Sony should have to retain the services of a third-party security firm (not the government, mind you) to provide auditing and oversight at all times over the PSN, ensuring that this kind of breach can never happen again. Or at least, if such a breach occurs, consumer data is protected against the intrusion. This includes making sure that Sony keeps everything up to date, encrypted appropriately, and completely separate credit card information, personal data, and game-related profiles on their web servers into different locations so that hacking a user's gamer profile doesn't grant access to his/her personal data or credit card info.

  32. Agree not to sue? by stoicfaux · · Score: 2

    Question: in order to receive the free games, will you have to accept a click-through agreement and sign away your right to sue Sony over the breach?

  33. The service isn't really free... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...when you bought a $600 console to use it, as compared to $300 on a competing console that charges $50 yearly for online service.

    (in response to several posters on this thread)

    1. Re:The service isn't really free... by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      The PS3 retails for about the same as the XBOX 360. Other than that, a pretty good argument. Could have used a vampire though.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
  34. Insightful?? Really?? by webbiedave · · Score: 1

    Shit happens so sit back and do nothing about it. Really? That kind of attitude is exactly what lets corporations tread all over people.

  35. with... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    BLOOD.

  36. Monetary damages by cydroit · · Score: 1

    I want to get in on a class-action.

  37. Free credit protection + actual damages by davidwr · · Score: 2

    1) Free credit protection for at least a year
    2) Reimburse banks for reasonable and actual costs of changing credit card numbers for customers who want to do so.
    3) Change their back-end so this information isn't stored longer than it's needed, working with banks if necessary.
    4) Any customers who have under-$1000 actual damages beyond this should be reimbursable upon proof of loss and anyone with higher claims reimbursable upon proof of loss and at least a cursory fraud investigation (yes, people will try to scam Sony if they do this)

    By the way, the banking industry needs to come up with a way of "limited use" credit card numbers that are good for only a single payee for recurring purchases like online services, utilities, etc. where the account number will be stored for longer than one billing cycle. That way if it gets stolen it's useless.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    1. Re:Free credit protection + actual damages by bluewolf85 · · Score: 1

      By the way, the banking industry needs to come up with a way of "limited use" credit card numbers that are good for only a single payee for recurring purchases like online services, utilities, etc. where the account number will be stored for longer than one billing cycle. That way if it gets stolen it's useless.

      Eh, you mean 3V cards...?

  38. Capcom by HalAtWork · · Score: 1

    How will Capcom compensate the people who weren't able to play its games, which refuse to boot without connectivity?

  39. Nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They shouldn't have to pay anything. If anything they should be paid.

  40. Credit not games by d.the.duck · · Score: 1

    I think 50$ in PSN credit would do nicely. The credit protection and stuff would be good. Oh, and for humiliation they should have to change the "It only does everything" to "It used to do everything, but we're taking that away slowly"

    --
    Where does the signature go?
    1. Re:Credit not games by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      So $50 to spend on products that cost them nothing and will not work next time PSN goes down?

      I rather get a free game on a real disk, so I can have fun playing it while PSN is down. Actually I don't buy anything from PSN, I will not buy something that will disappear when they kill off the service in 5 years.

    2. Re:Credit not games by d.the.duck · · Score: 1

      How you spend it is up to you. Maybe you buy a game for online play, maybe you download dlc for Dragon Age, maps for Civilization Revolution, a movie, a theme...... I just don't want to hear that I can get some shitty game that I never would have wanted for free. That would piss me off. Many of the downloadable games don't require a connection to the PSN.

      --
      Where does the signature go?
  41. Unbind Netflix from PSN by yoda-dono · · Score: 1

    They could start with untangling the Netflix app from the PSN. There are so many occurrences of backward compatible PS3's dying after firmware updates that I feel I'm rightly cautious against upgrading willy-nilly and take time to research whether there are many problems being reported on each firmware release, but Sony has other ideas. In their effort to combat piracy (which they themselves actually spurred on by removing the "Install OtherOS" launch feature, and I'm still not happy about that) they made what otherwise would be a PSN independent Netflix app require a successful PSN log-on before functioning, in the hopes of forcing people to choose upgrading to keep Netflix functionality rather than staying on an older firmware and running unsigned code, but that's not the only people it hurts. I haven't done anything wrong from Sony's point of view with my PS3's, but am constantly faced with restricted access to Netflix service. I started buying extra PS3's back when Netflix required the streaming disc, and while a bit clunky, it worked brilliantly and functioned regardless of whether I was completely up to date on firmware. I just want to go back to that level of functionality, the less-restricted functionality the system had when I bought the rest of the way in, and as I recall, OtherOS still worked, and a whole heck of a lot more USB devices were recognized, what a great time to have owned a PS3, shame it was so short lived. (And no, I don't mean I want the disc method again, just less restrictions on the app would be fine.)

    Some people are having luck using Netflix while PSN is down (further showing just how 'important' PSN is to Netflix functionality), but sadly I didn't upgrade to the latest firmware till a few days into the PSN problems and for some reason I can't get Netflix to work at all. Way to go Sony, you suck.

  42. Two games is pretty generous by joeflies · · Score: 1

    Just how much did TJ Max, Gap, and Heartland give you for their breaches?

    1. Re:Two games is pretty generous by man_the_king · · Score: 1

      Also ChoicePoint (which never told me it had lost my information) and Citi Cards (who did not issue a press release but just gave me a call saying there was a chance my CC info may have been compromised and they were sending me a new card).

  43. Ritual Seppuku should suffice by aapold · · Score: 1

    oh, and re-enable linux on PS3. Hell, make an official distro.

    --
    "Waste not one watt!" - CZ
    1. Re:Ritual Seppuku should suffice by bubulubugoth · · Score: 1

      Back when OtherOS was official, YellowDog was the official PS3 distribution. YellowDog is a PowerPC distribution based upon Redhat. Actually they developed the yum tool...

      The distro was really nice, and originally was aimed for Apple computeres using the G or powerpc hardware...

      --
      Â_Â
  44. WHAT I WANT by sithkhan · · Score: 1

    If Sony wants my business back, then I am going to need a shiny new version of Final Fantasy VII, updated with today's and tomorrow's graphics. If Sony wanted to erase all bad feelings, AND increase market share, then FFVII. I could forgive many things if this happened.

    --

    is it that bad seein a hot chick again? if i see a hot chick walkin down the hall i dont say "repost"
    1. Re:WHAT I WANT by Wingfat · · Score: 1

      FFVII for real? serious? didnt you get the updated one already? but still.. FF is a good idea... maybe give us all FFXIV for free for a few months that would be fun. I beta tested it and wouldnt mind playing it again. (but i will NOT pay to play a MMO)

    2. Re:WHAT I WANT by zegota · · Score: 1

      Some things: 1) FF7 has not been updated or remade. 2) FF14 is not yet out on PS3, but it is free, as far as I know, on the PC because of how terrible it was and how slow they've been on fixing it.

    3. Re:WHAT I WANT by Wingfat · · Score: 1

      FYI - It was re-released in 1998 for Microsoft Windows-based personal computers and in 2009 on the PlayStation Network. and yes the 2009 version has updated graphics for wide screens.

    4. Re:WHAT I WANT by VortexCortex · · Score: 1

      If Sony wants my business back, then I am going to need a shiny new version of Final Fantasy VII, updated with today's and tomorrow's graphics.

      Well, you can get that already on the PC version of FF VII. There is (was?) a decent sized mod community sporting high-res packs and higher polygon models. It's not today's graphics, but then again -- not even tomorrow's computers do real-time raytracing, so you're left with the pre-rendered 2D play areas + depth map culling.

      As far as Sony paying me back -- well, since I've boycotted them for over a decade I don't think there is anything they can do...

    5. Re:WHAT I WANT by TrancePhreak · · Score: 1

      That relies on Square not Sony. Although Sony could dump a bunch of money into Square to ask for it to be done.

      --

      -]Phreak Out[-
    6. Re:WHAT I WANT by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      and yes the 2009 version has updated graphics for wide screens.

      No, it doesn't. It's the PS1 ISOs packaged up in a handy file with a PS1 emulator that runs on the PSP and the PS3.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  45. Restitution by Aaron_Pike · · Score: 1

    How about restoring the ability to freely install other operating systems on the PS3?

    1. Re:Restitution by Wingfat · · Score: 1

      there are ways around it.. quick Google searches show there is a way even with the new update to get something running.. but you didn't hear it from me.. ;-0

  46. Tort reform and coporparte arrogance. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The above attitude is why big business gets their asses sued off and why I can never support tort reform.

  47. This will never happen... by FSWKU · · Score: 1

    ...but howabout money? Not necessarily to the users (and CERTAINLY not to shark lawyers), but to a charitable organization? Say $500 per user affected donated, in the user's name, to the charitable organization of their choice. For users who choose not to specify an organization, the amounts are put into a seperate fund, and can be split between the EFF and providing information access in developing nations.

    This way Sony still feels the sting of their actions having real consequences, and it opens up the possibility of a lot of different worthy causes getting some much needed funding.

    --
    "So after all this, you make my case for me. To end this stalemate, you must die..."
    1. Re:This will never happen... by Gramie2 · · Score: 1

      Ummm. $500 x 77 million users = $38.5 billion. Somehow I don't think we're going to see that.

  48. Still Love Sony by Wingfat · · Score: 1

    I do play network games, but not those lame first person shooters. I have been happily playing my FF XIII and Move games while the network is down. But I do miss sending messages to friends and family (it is one of the only ways I talk with my Dad). Two free games is okay.. but what if i had already paid for said games.. other posts are correct, we should be able to choose what games we want.. or Sony should just fill everyone's Wallet with $40 so we can not only get a game or two, but also maybe an add-on or new levels to other games. Also that would help Sony because the developers were upset no one could buy their games for over a month. with the two free games we should all also get PS Plus for as many days as the outage so that people will also get discounts for buying games and get the fun demos and such. Sony I love you.. Hackers, i love you (because i guess i am one too), but get your act together and take down the X-box network. that would be awesome.

  49. How can they compensate us? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How can Sony compensate us?

    Leave Geohot the FUCK ALONE!!!

  50. I Want Sony to Scrub My Balls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...that'd be more like it!

  51. Take a page from Google by wjousts · · Score: 2

    Since PSN user's personal information has been stolen, Sony should take [Google CEO] Eric Schmidt's advice and help all their users change their names. Problem solved!

    1. Re:Take a page from Google by CPTreese · · Score: 1

      How about we insist that all of the executives and "big wigs" (especially whoever was in charge of the data on the servers) publish their personal information on the sony website in plaint text?

      --
      If there is no God then free will is an illusion.
  52. With a fixed network, and blackjack, and hookers.. by oracleofbargth · · Score: 1

    on second thought, forget the blackjack and the network.

  53. Compensation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am appaled that people apparently are going to settle for 2 free games in exchange for their private information... What's next? letting Sony executives sodomize them for a PS3?

    Also the protection thing, how long will it last and only US members? This is not going to go down well with EU laws either that explicitly specify that ANY information about ANY EU citizen has to be secure at all times no matter what country your company is based in.

    In EU Sony is breaking the law and offering a bribe (the games)
    so people shut up about it... I hope some EU officials wake up and give them whats coming to them.

    People just have no sense of value anymore; you realize you could just easily get said games for nothing ?

    Oh yes just a precision because someone is likely to make a comment about me being a butthurt PSN user. I don't even have a game console let alone a PSN account.

    Just fed up of seeing people shortchange their private data for some "cheap entertainment"...

  54. I want! I want! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Corporations don't give anything back to users when they screw things....they are shielded by legal sharks. If we are lucky, we may receive a 10% off on the PS4.

  55. Expectations by KerosX · · Score: 1

    While I haven't read every single comment to this thread, one thing that seems to be glossed over is the fact that when I put down $60 for a game like MK or Portal 2 (ok it's a little cheaper, but ignore that for now) I expect to be able to play using the PSN against other players. It has nothing to do with the fact that the PSN is free. It has everything to do with my expectations of the product when I purchase it. Maybe the value of the game is more like $50 or less if I can't play online or maybe I wouldn't buy the game if I couldn't play online.

    Couple the above with the much talked about identity theft potential and Sony needs to give it's customers something to say "We screwed up, we really do appreciate your business and we are trying to make it better." The problem is, the value of that something is different for every user. Some people may never have their identity stolen as a result of this problem and some people never play online. On the other hand you've got plenty of people that will have their identity stolen and expect to always be playing online. Their best option might be to give people a choice. 3-6 months of PS+, or 3-6 months of Netflix credit, or something else entirely.

  56. I want names. by MYakus · · Score: 1

    I want the names of the folks Sony is going to fire, starting with executives.

  57. Beer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That is all.

  58. You answered it yourself. by wcrowe · · Score: 1

    ...I have made it through this outage by doing other, more productive things...

    I think you just came up with an answer to the situation. Put away the Playstation and do something else with your life. Stop being a slave to Sony or any other similar company.

    --
    Proverbs 21:19
  59. Gifts... by MaWeiTao · · Score: 1

    I had an account at a bank which suffered data loss. It could have been theft or it could have been some idiot who misplaced sensitive information. They provided access to free credit reporting for a year. That should be mandatory. Unfortunately, even those guys are scumbags, because at the end of the year one of the credit reporting agencies actually began charging me for the service instead of closing the account.

    Really, what could Sony possibly do? I have no clue what measures Sony took previously to ensure security. I'm not confident that anyone is truly secure. In my mind this could have just as easily happened to Microsoft. If it's demonstrable that this breech came about because of negligence on Sony's part those involved should lose their jobs. And on a larger scale I'd like to see companies held directly responsible for this.

    The question should be turned on the users. If you're unhappy about what's happened make it obvious to Sony. Cancel your PSN account and stop using the PS3. Simple.

    If I were going to be totally self-serving about this I'd say the only thing I'd want is free games. A gift card good towards a retail or PSN game, or two. This has the added effect of providing some indirect compensation to publishers and developers. Nothing else they could conceivable offer, like free access to PSN+, amounts to any value at all.

    1. Re:Gifts... by Legion303 · · Score: 1

      "I have no clue what measures Sony took previously to ensure security."

      They had no CISO and the compromised systems were (according to scans floating around the net--check previous Slashdot PSN articles) last updated sometime in 2008. So the answer to your question is "fuck-all."

  60. They should give everyone an Xbox 360.

    And a Nintendo 3DS for PSP users.

    --
    sudo eat my shorts
  61. They can pay the balance by greymond · · Score: 1

    They can pay the balance of the trade in of my PS3 for my Xbox :P

  62. What I want from Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    A new XBOX 360 and 1 year of Xbox live

  63. Just Pay For People's Costs To Change The Info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sony should only be held liable for the costs incurred by people to change their stolen addresses and birth dates.

  64. "...Then stop buying their products..." by mmell · · Score: 1
    Wow - that's incredibly good advice. Thank you.

    Everybody out there listening? Sony's astroturfer actually managed to say something intelligent. Of course, the rest of the post was pure garbage, but this is certainly a diamond of wisdom in a pile of, er, dirt.

  65. New TOS? by magusxxx · · Score: 1

    What are the chances that you'll have to sign a new TOS agreement before getting back on the network. One say, you agree to their compensation and sign away all litigation rights in the future?

    --
    Care killed the cat, but satisfaction brought it back.
  66. /Thread by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A half hour with Maria Ozawa.

  67. What Sony *will* do. by anyGould · · Score: 1

    Don't own a PS3 (and not likely to ever own one - my PS2 works quite nicely thank you), so I can't say I care what they actually do, but...

    What Sony will do is whatever the cheapest way to create the perception that they have "made things right" and prevent lawsuits. The consumer protection is the heavy lifting, so I would suspect that your choice of games (assuming you get a choice) will be whatever they could negotiate the best price for. (Think "bargain bin").

  68. XBox points by damonlab · · Score: 1

    They should give away free XBox points. http://www.xbox.com/en-US/Live/MicrosoftPoints Heck, throw in an XBox too.

  69. List of Demands: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1: Bring back OtherOS
    2: Officially pardon Geohotz of any wrongdoing (go ahead and ban actual pirates though, please).
    3: Updated web browser (stock one is awful even at its best)
    4: Update Codec support so that it actually complies with the DivX certification it claims to have (currently does not support .mkv containers).
    5: In-game mouse/keyboard support.
    6: Free credit/identity protection service for everyone whose personal details have been compromised.

    A couple free games and movies would be nice too, and perhaps a skype-like app for chatting. Ultimately, it's not about free stuff. It's about having a piece of hardware that's really mine, connected to a network I can trust.

  70. I for one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I for one find it amusing to see all the gamers crying about how they've been harmed by not being able to play their infantile games, and how their trust in a huge multinational corporation to handle their personal data has been betrayed.

  71. Play Station Plus subscribers compensation by lostkeyes · · Score: 0

    Has anyone heard of a different compensation package for ps+ customers? I understand that there is no way to secure the data that has already been compromised and they need a plan or securing all data going forward but as a PS+ subscriber I just lost a month of a subscription I paid for. I would at least like my subscription extended.

  72. What about SOE games? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The SOE games, at least the website, is still offline so i can't cancel my subscription, but they are still charging me my monthly rate. Thats seems kinda IDK screwed up.

  73. sony should give Gaming PCs by Dan667 · · Score: 1

    all the good things people use to say about consoles are just not true.

  74. How should sony compensate their customers? by Klobbersaurus · · Score: 0

    a free xbox 360

  75. easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    blowjob

  76. No games for some of us by larry+bagina · · Score: 1

    Sorry, Sony. You see, I bought a PS3 to play games and play around with Cell programming on Linux. Thanks to your dick move, I'm permanently stuck on an older firmware revision. That normally wouldn't be a problem, but you cut off all online access for me unless I upgrade and disable linux support.

    --
    Do you even lift?

    These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    1. Re:No games for some of us by Legion303 · · Score: 1

      Well now you can update to CFW 3.55 (I recommend kmeaw) and use any of several new methods to get linux back on the machine you own, as well as being able to play pretty much every game released before Portal 2 (and some after).

  77. Witness relocation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They need to help everyone change their identities and move to small towns in the midwest so they can safely start over. Sure it'll be inconvenient but it'll help small towns in the midwest and it's the only way to be sure your identities and personal information are safe. The tough part will be finding legitimate birth certificates for that many users but with the level of infant mortality there should be enough bogus indentities to go around without having to restore to foreign countries.

  78. The traditional ways are best by Arrogant-Bastard · · Score: 2

    Given that Sony's executives have dishonored their ancestors and shamed themselves, I think apologizing in the traditional manner is completely appropriate. Users should be demanding this -- and moreover, demanding that it be webcast live, so that everyone can bear witness. On a more pragmatic level, executives are of course disposable and easily replaceable, so it really would have no meaningful impact on corporate operations.

    1. Re:The traditional ways are best by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was just about to suggest public sepuku! Excellent!

  79. Folding by Mia'cova · · Score: 1

    At least the Folding@home app still works without PSN. Rejoin and give that dusty old Slashdot team a bump? :)

  80. Needless Whining by pwagland · · Score: 1
    To quote from the summary:

    I would have been satisfied with the free credit protection. Now that they want to offer me 2 games, why can't I pick any 2 games that I want?

    Seriously! Stop whinging. If they are giving you more than you wanted, just accept the extra, or throw it in the bin. But don't come here whinging about it, that is just needless whinging.

  81. Guess the date at soepool.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    soepool.com

    The winners receive some free Everquest plat on a lower populated (much lower now I suppose) Everquest server but it was entertaining for 2 minutes.

  82. What about Anonymous's role by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The power-chugging corporations incite anger with their small-print agreements and monopolizing tactics, but the shareholders and executives are not considering how they can pre-emptively defend themselves by not being assholes. If Sony wasn't taking those hackers to court for using hardware they purchased, this wouldn't be on Slashdot, and their customers wouldn't be irreparably damaged. Anonymous should instead have just released CC info for the executives, releasing customer info was lame, and gives big corps more excuse for tighter internet standards against Net Neutrality.

  83. Duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now that they want to offer me 2 games, why can't I pick any 2 games that I want?

    Because you'll settle for less?

  84. PCI/PA-DSS by future+assassin · · Score: 1

    I wanna see some serious Sony ass kicking for breaking PCI/PA-CSS This is exactly why the CC companies introduced PCI/PA-DSS. If nothing happens to Sony then that whole standard goes out the window.

    --
    by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
    1. Re:PCI/PA-DSS by david_craig · · Score: 1

      I don't see anything from Sony's statements that show they were in breach of PCI-DSS. They stated that they were using encryption on the database where credit card information was stored (as required by PCI-DSS). PCI-DSS is hardly an onerous standard to comply to. You can be 100% compliant with PCI-DSS and still be vulnerable to trivial exploits.

  85. Other OS by crvtec · · Score: 1

    How about they bring back the Other OS option, or promise to never ever EVER again introduce their own proprietary media? :)

  86. I was compensated...sorta... by JustAnotherIdiot · · Score: 1

    I got a T-shirt in the mail for getting into sony's beta rewards program or something or another.
    I've lost a lot of weight since I gave them my shirt size though (which I don't remember doing), so it's too big.

    --
    What do I know, I'm just an idiot, right?
  87. Sweet Innocence by sarlos · · Score: 1

    Ahh, sweet innocence. Hackers have acquired the personal data of at least 20 million folks. This is a bad thing, for sure. The chances are pretty good, however, that your personal data is already in the possession of one or more malicious computer users. Hell, the Chinese government probably has your social security number and favorite brand of toothpaste on file somewhere. This is just one incident among the countless numbers that go unreported every day. Don't fool yourself into thinking this one breach is the only reason hackers may have your phone number and favorite playmate.

    --
    Government's view of the economy: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving,regulate it. If it stops moving, subsidize it.
  88. Better than Tivo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey, two free games is better than Tivo. They offered an email making customers aware that their data had been snagged.

  89. Is disclosure not enough? by david_craig · · Score: 1

    Very few companies disclose the fact that they have been hacked.

    I did some contracting work for a multinational charity a while back, and they knew that a rootkit had been installed on all of their web servers (which accepted credit card donations). They didn't bother to fix it until a second hacker broke the webserver (preventing apache from restarting due to a second rootkit that kept port 443 open). When the website went down the servers were rebuilt, and a press release went out blaming the outage on flooding in different part of the country from where the kit actually resides. The charity decided that they would not bother securing the webservers as they considered it cheaper to just rebuild them every three years (which is how long they had been running in an unpatched state for - I don't know how long they had been compromised, but it was at least four months).

    I'm sure that sort of think is common, and public disclosures are rare so I'm glad that Sony public announced their breach. They could have blamed the outage on earthquakes in Japan, they could have said the shut-down of PSN was to "Ensure the security of customers during the unlawful attacks being committed, thus far unsuccessfully, by an extremist fringe group".

    Public disclosure by Sony (which was reported on mainstream news where I live) allowed me to report by credit card stolen. The only other information that Sony held was my address (which can easily be obtained legally) and a fake date of birth that I supplied.

    I don't see any reason why I should be compensated for a free service not being available. I don't demand some free stuff whenever twitter is over capacity and I can't access it.

    If you are concerned about fraud report your credit card stolen, take advantage of the free fraud monitoring services if you wish, and move on.

    It highly likely that your details have already stolen from another company you've bought goods or services from and they haven't told you about it.

    1. Re:Is disclosure not enough? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I did some contracting work for a multinational charity a while back, and they knew that a rootkit had been installed on all of their web servers (which accepted credit card donations). They didn't bother to fix it until a second hacker broke the webserver (preventing apache from restarting due to a second rootkit that kept port 443 open). When the website went down the servers were rebuilt, and a press release went out blaming the outage on flooding in different part of the country from where the kit actually resides. The charity decided that they would not bother securing the webservers as they considered it cheaper to just rebuild them every three years (which is how long they had been running in an unpatched state for - I don't know how long they had been compromised, but it was at least four months).

      Wikileaks. Seriously. Exposing government corruption is all well and good, but it's nothing compared to the enormity of the cumulative effect of the many many examples of egregious shit like this that slips under the radar.

  90. OtherOS by medv4380 · · Score: 1

    ... along with PS2 backwards compatibility

    1. Re:OtherOS by Lose · · Score: 1

      That would be nice to see PS2 backwards compatibility. Unfortunately that would require them to throw all that PS2 hardware back into the console, make it bigger (again), and jack the price up.

      PS2 emulation just wouldn't cut it. My PC has some pretty beefy hardware to be sure, and it *barely* manages to make a handful of games run smoothly with PCSX2. I could only imagine how that would work out on the PS3. (The Xbox 360 can do Xbox hardware emulation okay, but Xbox hardware wasn't nearly as complex, was 32-bit, and used the typical x86 architecture, making it more reasonable to emulate).

      Personally, I'd like to just see them never let this happen again. I'd be happy enough if they could manage that much.

  91. Free Games? by hduff · · Score: 1

    I assume that they will pick the games, so that sucks.

    Better yet would be a US$120 credit in my account for me to spend as I wish. Or they could offer a choice of two of any downloadable game they offer. That would be a boon to older titles.

    But even better, just improve their security so it doesn't happen again.

    --
    "I believe in Karma. That means I can do bad things to people all day long and I assume they deserve it." : Dogbert
  92. Compensation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd settle with the Black ops escalation map pack next month since it's the only game I play. I don't really want the two free games plus I don't feel comfortable giving them my new credit card info so soon to get escalation. That would keep me happy and adequately compensated.

  93. I know this one by M0j0_j0j0 · · Score: 1

    Sueing the cosumers of course, what a dumb question.

  94. Here are my ideas... by keith_nt4 · · Score: 1

    Not that this would ever happen but... How about lifetime PSN Premium for all long time users of the platform. Reduced price to purchase lifetime PSN Premium for those who purchased more recently before the breach. So really great combo packages for incredibly cheap to lure in new people. Steam seems to have their act together. Maybe all purchases through PS3/Steam instead of through sony. Maybe that would help encourage some people to put their credit card in. Of course I'm saying this all as a non-PS3 owning person. If they sold the PS3 with at least two controllers for $100 I might actually be tempted to pick one up. Not sure I'd buy any PSN games or new $60 games so I wouldn't be a very good customer for them but at least they could give some numbers to their third parties and partners and say "see, it's not collapsing". As I said I doubt any of this would happen. Semi-related story: several years ago I purchases a used 360 during a post-Christmas sale at Fry's. I got it home and it still had some else's game tag and possibly their credit card number intact. How Fry's is still a thing I have no idea.

    --
    "UNIX is very simple, it just needs a genius to understand its simplicity." -Dennis Ritchie
  95. only the promises they broke before this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A return to firmware with the ability to install other OS's oh and That backwards compatibility thing they were going to do originally.

    Thanks for the gifts Sony.

  96. Buy them a Wii or XBox by ubergeek65536 · · Score: 1

    Maybe if they gave up their PS3 then they would realize that you can still play games and not let Sony bend you over whenever they are in the mood.

  97. How to Kill Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Only an idiot is going to put in another CC on their PSN account. If MS gave away a free year of XBox to former PSN users it would be the end of Sony's venture in this market.

  98. Legally, it is enough. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In a legal sense, your acceptance of credit monitoring means you can't push for more compensation (class-action lawsuit, etc). I've had similar situations with work, etc. regarding data theft where accepting their first offer (credit monitoring) means legally you've already been compensated.

    While you may want more, you've already accepted their first offer and they are not obligated to give you anything more.

    Should they? The cases you point out are rare indeed (damaged credit, etc.) and are usually the result of someone who isn't watching things very closely anyways. It's also highly unlikely your credit will be damaged as you got a note from Sony stating the fact that your information was leaked, you had an account with a monitoring service, etc. and all of this can be documented to credit agencies. Its a percentage game, most people won't be more inconvenienced more than having to get a new card number, put a freeze on their credit, etc. That's not worth a whole lot.

  99. How About a PS3That Does What it Claims to Do? by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

    They claim the PS3 does everything, while they keep taking things away form it. They should give out PS3 units that can still play PS2 games, and booth OtherOS. While we're at it, they should give them to people (like me) who don't yet own a PS3. After all, we might not be inclined to trust Sony in the future, but they can try buying some consumer trust...

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
  100. Learn from their mistakes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What they should do is easy: do not store any personal information of their users in the future. They don't need their real names for multiplayer. They don't need any personal data of them. They don't need to store any banking information undefinitely. Why was that data there in the first place?

  101. What sony could do, but won't by backdoc · · Score: 1

    Two things would satisfy me, neither of which would happen.

    1. Figure out who broke in and see if they can limit the fallout.
    2. Assume the attacks were vigilante in nature, admit they have made mistakes in customer service and offer the OtherOS back as well as make an effort to foster a better relationship with users going forward. In other words, don't punish users because some people choose to pirate.

  102. They could have just covered it up. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    2 free games, probably $10-15 each, and a month of PSN+ This is pretty close to a year's xbox-live subscription, for having their service offline for about a month. There is a small chance that your credit card number was taken, (but remember, they also stated that other information needed to make purchases, like the security code and expiration date, WERE NOT TAKEN), what does Sony do?, give you a Year of credit insurance for free. Best part about this, is that if you have a decent credit card, they will watch out for unusual spending and call you about it. I know with Visa that you don't have to worry about any purchases you didn't make, Visa and their fraud lawyers will take care of that for you. If other credit cards don't, then maybe you should reconsider which card you are trusting with your credit.

    Want to guess at how many other companies have been hacked over the past, let's say year?, probably at least a thousand, but 1) they didn't tell anyone about it, or if they did, they did as quietly as possible, and 2) certainly aren't offering compensation, (largely because that would require them to tell people about it). If Sony was being a dick they could have not told anyone about it, and pretended that all of the work they are doing is simply part of a planned network upgrade, (which they did talk about).

  103. $100 Billion by residieu · · Score: 1

    If the BSA can fudge numbers when determining their damages from piracy, I can fudge my damage numbers too. I estimate not being able to access PSN (when I haven't actually had time to touch my PSP in months anyway) as having cost me about $100 Billion

  104. Netflix much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For some users, Netflix was unavailable since it required PSN login. For some reason, Netflix deploys different versions to different users so not all users were affected. One workaround was to try logging in and it should still work even when login failed. This worked for some people. Didn't work for others. This didn't seem to have drawn much media attention. I have been ripped off of almost a month of Netflix. Where's my compensation?

    I think Hulu Plus was affected similarly. How will those users be compensated?

  105. not whiners - paying customers by rjejr · · Score: 1

    All you people complaining about the complainers seem to forget that there are people will real financial issues involved here. DC Online just recently came out - which required a PAID subscription, same with Free Realms (didn't require a paid subscription but some people do pay for one), Mushroom Wars just offer a $5 download to play online - if you paid that $5 you paid for nothing. Then there are the PS+ people. If you paid a 3 month subscription just before this happened you are down to paying for 3 months but getting 2. I know SONY said they'll resolve this, but the point is - people aren't just whining, they have spent thei rmoney and are not getting what SONY said they would for their money so they DESERVE compensation.

  106. Re:Jocelyn Wildenstein by webmistressrachel · · Score: 1

    Hooray! I'm not actually the ugliest woman on the planet, and if you feel the urge to troll that I am, others here have actually seen the (pretty disgraceful) pics, and will tell you otherwise! Hooray! Thank you, Gresyth...

    --
    This tagline was transcoded to result in at least one smirk. If you experience failure to smirk, please consult your Gen
  107. So EFFING What?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Personally I don't care. Yes it's annoying not to be able to go online. Yes, it shouldn't have happened. However unlike most people on the net today, I don't use social media services, so I should care. Bottom line is I don't as I chaned my credit card. That's all that matters. Everyone seems way to paranoid about your personal info that no one cares about. Just ignore the viagra adds you will be reciving in your inbox from now on..... Oh no wait, we alreay get those!!!

  108. GIve us our "other OS" option back by maliqua · · Score: 1

    would be a good start

  109. Moron. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Doing absolutely nothing is just as bad as being a part of the problem.

  110. It's all relative by mark_reh · · Score: 1

    Think about how many people have had info stolen, perhaps multiple times, and their computers turned into spambots over the years when they run MS Windows. Sony has had one network penetration and theft of customer data. Seems sort of small by comparison.

    That said, Sony will have a tough time living this incident down. MS still carries the stigma not only of Windows security problems but also Xbox 360 design problems (Red Ring of Death). For a long time it was easy to justify buying PS3 over Xbox because it didn't have such issues. It will be harder to make that justification in the future.

    Yes, I am one of those whose info was stolen from Sony's servers. I have not seen any email from Sony about credit protection or free games.

  111. Just restore OtherOS by cybersquid · · Score: 1

    That's all I ever wanted: for Sony to not attempt to steal something they've sold me. Then my family can log in to PSN, buy DLC, rent movies and buy new games. Until then... Sony loses.

  112. WipeoutHD.The Methadone For Speed And LSD Junkies! by kEnder242 · · Score: 1

    I recommend WipeoutHD. It's a worthy successor to the older WO racing games. Single and Multiplayer game play feels solid and polished. Don't take my word for it, download the demo.

    --
    my associative arrays can kick your hash - TCL
  113. Free Hugs by pinkushun · · Score: 1

    *Hugs his DRM free games* :D

  114. Netflix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I subscribed to Netflix just before all this happened. I have a Main computer in my Den and a notebook all of which run Linux. I am not going to install Windows just to use Netflix before someone suggest that I was going to use the PS3. I feel they owe me a free month because I can't sign in without also being signed into their network. If it was not Sony that allowed my digital ID to be stolen I am sure some of the other sites IE: Facebook,Myspace would have done it sooner or later.

  115. This should be fairly simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sony should only have to provide one year (yes only one year) Identity theft protection with a retroactive clause to at least one week prior to the earliest known point of intrusion, along with a minor compensation for the PSN downtime I'd say along the line of $5 per week of down time (roughly $1 per business day) per disabled or otherwise crippled game that the user owned, and any bank fees or losses that a user can prove are a result of this. Anyone who can not get their credit information fixed within a year deserves what they get. It's not like Sony stored your complete SSN along with birth certificate and tax records for the last seven years. If you gave Sony any of that information and your not a Sony employee then you deserve what you get. Granted I was not one of the people who owned a PS3 or used the PSN. But, I do believe that Sony is responsible for the hack as it was their responsibility to secure the network, blaming the hack on another agency is just a scapegoat tactic. However, it is outrageous to compensate a user for losses they did not incur.
    Sony is overlooking two facts. one is that it does not matter who did the hack, the vulnerability was there and could have been carried out by just about anyone. Two is that they delayed in notifying anyone about this. The only one they are owning up to at this point is PSN downtime. The delay of notifying users and the FBI of the hack, makes it more difficult for people to positivity identify exactly which items on a users credit are legitimate and which are not. This is inexcusable, for a company of Sony's size, and Sony should be held accountable for this, if for no other reason than to set an example. So that other corporations know how serious this act was.

  116. Difference on trade-in value of Portal 2 by Builder · · Score: 1

    I'll be taking Sony to small claims court in the UK because of this once PSN comes back and I can register my portal 2 steam copy.

    Basically, I would have traded portal 2 in over a week ago, but because I haven't been able to get the Steam copy registered yet (you have to associate your PSN account with your steam account first), I can't trade it in.

    The price difference between what I'll get on the trade in when I get to vs 2 weeks ago will probably be about 2 quid. But I'm just doing it for the giggles.

  117. A ruined image... ruined trust.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sony has really screwed up big time on this one...
    When your userbase trusts you with their credit information, and this is leaked to the "world" your basically done... out of business...

    And to make this all situation even worse, they are being totally cheap bastards... "We give you two (shity) games, and some "credit protection" so STFU!"

    One month of a down PSN is just enough... incompetence, arrogance, and no information to their user, of WHAT IN THE HELL IS GOING ON it's not a winning combo... and Sony WILL learn this by the hard way...

    Trust is hard to gain... but it is lost in a heartbeat... two games are not gonna cut it on this one...

  118. Names of the thieves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sony should track down all people who joined in with the attacks ("anonymous" my ass) publish their names and addresses an invite hacked off customers to go round and beat the living crap out of them with stout sticks then shit on their carpets and bugger their ponies.

  119. My new overpowered, offline, BD-Player. by Silicon+Mike · · Score: 1

    I'd like some Blu-Ray's. Because that's what my PS3 just became, an offline BD-Player. It's not the fact that my information was compromised, something that nobody can claim they can protect perfectly. It's at risk anywhere I use it. It's what they did that started this. I am by no means a Microsoft Fan Boy, but when their Windows 7 phone got compromised, they invited the team who jailbroke it to Redmond, all expense paid, and sat down and had a pow-wow with the group that did it. They all got the royalty treatment, and the shirts that said "I hacked the Windows 7 phone and all I got was this lousy t-shirt" was a riot. What Microsoft did was classy. I don't condone terrorism at all, but that's what whoever is attacking Sony is doing. They are being Digital Terrorists. In the end, I hope the corporate world looks at this and adds to their mission statement. "We will not fuck with our customers".

  120. I'd like an Xbox version of all my PS3 titles. by Silicon+Mike · · Score: 1

    That too....

  121. Be smart with credit cards and online services by syntap · · Score: 1

    There are banks (B of A is one) that allow you to create unique credit card numbers that link to yours, with expiration dates and credit limits you specify. Get one of those, and if someone steals it who cares? You can cancel it on the spot and it didn't touch your regular card. The inconvenience is limited to possibly a click to expire the number manually. I wouldn't dream of using my checking account debit/check card number online.

    But his whole problem stems from banks not performing due diligence in verifying identities of individuals they extend credit to. If they collect a fee from me for improperly spending even a penny into the negative on my checking account, where is MY fee for the hours of unscrewing I have to deal with when my info does get out or they extend credit to someone they didn't verify was me?

  122. pre-cu SWG released as freeware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I want Sony to release client and server copies of pre-cu SWG as freeware. It obvious they hated the game and never wanted it, at least they could have given it back to the people who did like it, you know...instead of choose to just keep ramming hot fire pokers into their eyes with repeatedly worse versions of it.

    Who gives a crap about the PSN anyways, it wasnt just the PSN that was affected, it was all online sony accounts, including those for PC games who don't even own a Playstation (nor will some of them). 2 free PS games don't mean S&@# to people with no PS.

    Besides, my demand predates all this recent baloney from Sony. Until my demand is meet, I will still point and laugh every time something bad happens to Sony, and will never (purposely) purchase another Sony product.

    Basically, I'm just saying Sony doesn't care about customers or subscribers, they will, as they have always done, just do whatever they want and just make up some lame story about how you love them...and you will....because...hey their Sony...and you will still buy their crap no matter what they do.

  123. Fix My Blu-Ray Drive! by kmhebert · · Score: 1

    That's what they should do. Stupid PS3. It's a brick in my entertainment center with that broken drive. And without PSN I am watching Netflix on my Wii. Stupid PS3!

    --
    Regular Meta Moderators are not more likely to get mod points.
  124. Just turn it back on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just turn PSN back on.
    Let me play my games and do what I did before.

    So what they have my name, birthday, email address and a credit card number.
    My name and birthday, parents names with maiden name were all published in the paper the week I was born.

    Email addresses aren't a big secret, and I hand out my credit card number and expiration date at least 10 times a week.

    Maybe they shouldn't have stored our CC numbers, but the credit card companies won't hold the consumer responsible for that.
    Holding us responsible is either explicitly banned by laws, or just bad business. Which credit card is going to want to be the "don't use online" card?

    They can all sit together and negotiate a settlement, and include the extra fraud costs that this will result in. We'll end up paying in the end, but hopefully someone can push to make it slightly painful for Sony. Maybe publicizing the knowledge that this type of breach can cost your company a significant amount of money will be enough for companies to take security seriously, but I doubt it.

  125. I'm going to go out on a limb here... by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    and say that Sony is going to argue that since their network is a free service, that the user never paid for, that its disruption will not have caused users any undue fiscal harm, and thus they don't feel obligated to reimburse users one red cent...

  126. They should pay everyone. by blair1q · · Score: 1

    This thing has annoyed people who never even had accounts there.

    Sony owes us all.

  127. Buy them... by NeuralAbyss · · Score: 1

    Simply buy the affected customers an XBox 360. Their online services are still working..

  128. Just give us online presence without PSN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would be happy if they would enable online functionality without the need to log in to the PSN network. In that case we can still be online in case there are issues with PSN.

  129. Good and Bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think this will be a valuable lesson for many folks (like myself) to become a bit more mindful of what they are giving companies and the data they are being entrusted with...on a positive, me and some buddies spent a few hours to make a small game based on the network crash, if you're bored, you can check it out at:
    http://www.kongregate.com/games/MightyRabbit/gamesnet-crisis

  130. Restore Linux support by iamacat · · Score: 1

    It doesn't make sense for hackers to have access to user data while users don't even have access to their own device.