Read data off a BlueRay, Decrypt it, re-encrypt it internally, send to video drivers, decrypt it, send to display port, re-encrypt it, send to another receiver, use video card to decrypt it, compress it, view it, encrypt it, send to your monitor, decrypt it, display on monitor...
You ISP doesn't actually hand out an IP like ABCD:ABCD:ABCD:0001. It hands it out like ABCD:ABCD. It doesn't care what IPs you using in that range because *all* packets that start with ABCD:ABCD will get routed to your Cable/DSL modem. All modern OSs would get confused if your ISP tried to assign an IP. Unless your ISP decides to give you a custom IPv6 network stack.
You will get a/64 with 2^64 IPs to play with, each IP with 2^16 ports.
My understanding is that the hole has gravity. The gravity is doing work on matter surrounding the hole and/or else where in the universe as gravity extends out to infinity. Work requires energy. Mass and energy are the same.
When the hole does work outside of itself via gravity, it loses mass/energy and will eventually disapear.
I have a question regarding micro blackholes that someone may help me with. Lets say you have your two protons in the LHC smash into eachother. A bunch of energy/mass is given off as other particles. Then you get lucky enough to create a blackhole. Now this blackhole is really just an event horizon based on the mass of the original particles minus lass mass/energy given off from the collision.
We're talking about a freaking small event horizon. From what I've read, particles act as waves on the very small scale. Would this micro black hole even be able to consume a particle if it's forced to interact with the particle as a wave because of its size?
From stories of people I know that travel and help in missionary trips, they've seen many name brand drugs that go for $100-$200 a pop go for $5-$10 in other countries and we're talking about buying from the same company, so not stolen.
Go to a poorer country and buy up drugs at an almost free rate and re-sell back to the USA.
If the OP read the news from a site that links to the source, I would think it ethical to link to that site instead of directly to the source since the OP should be giving credit to the site that notified him of the story.
I get very good targeted adds from NewEgg, Amazon, Stables, and other well known places via Google. And usually the the adds are targeted to what I'm searching and does a pretty good job at it.
Spam and scams? I didn't know Newegg was in the business of scamming.
Their text format is bad? The ads I see are extremely easy to read, stands out just enough to notice but not enough to annoy and a quick glance is all I need to see what the ads is for.
You rarely click on ads but the ones you do are non-flash banners? I haven't seen a Google flash banner in forever.
I can't understand how Google ads are sending you crap unless they're unable to correctly track you. I let Google track me and I don't get crap ads. Most ads are actually stuff that I want and limited deals that I didn't not now about something that I did want.
Even worse with SSDs since TRIM now zeros sectors when not in use. Delete a file, sector gets Zero'd. If you have ANY data in there that isn't marked by the File System, it's probably encrypted stuff.
I fail to see how dual booting has anything to do with laziness. If I can do everything I want in Windows, why should I have to reboot into Linux just to browse the web and watch videos?
Rebooting is a huge hassle and VERY annoying. Linux would have to offer more functionality than Windows if I were to dual boot. If Linux did replace Windows on whichever box, then I wouldn't have to dual boot in the first place.
When I can run the newest games with the newest hardware on Linux without having to setup anything, then I'll switch for my main box. Otherwise I haven't had malware/virii on mine or my wife's computers in over 10 years and I have yet to have Win7 crash or anything. My only issue is my computer is a bit sluggish at times, but that's because I have VS2010 installed with a ton of debug stuff running in the background along with MS-SQL. My wife's box is still VERY snappy. Drop a SSD in and I would have no issues at all.
Actually, now that I think of it, I did have one VERY annoying issue with Win7 when I first got it. Some scaling window issue for TCP in their new network stack was causing my computer to ready VERY slowly from my wife's computer. Only ~150mbit/sec. Once I disabled their new feature, it jumped up to 946mbit/sec. MMmmm 114MB/sec over SMB with only 1-2% cpu.
I use to work in a group of 7 people who did the installation, back-up, general maintenance, and trouble shooting of ~8000 computers.
AD's network policies were a HUGE help with management of all those computers. My job was actually quite easy, except during the summer when each of us 7 people would have to upgrade 50-100 computers each over the period of 2-3 months on top of our regular duties.
We actually had very few issues with malware. Most of the issues were day-to-day hardware failure or hardware upgrades/installations.
What options does Linux have for the above case where we need to fine tune network and computer policies on thousands of PCs? Not a sarcastic question as I am not very Linux savvy.
Where the hell are you getting throttling from? Sounds like a strawman(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strawman) to me.
They're talking about *increasing* the priority of other services, not artificially limiting others. There's a BIG difference.
On my home router, I set my games to have priority over downloading. My downloading is 99% unaffected by me playing games, but my games are 100% affected by too much downloading.
Now, if AT&T wants to use this for an excuse to not build out and increase internal bandwidth, then that's a problem. But there will ALWAYS be choke points on a large network no matter how much you build out. The question is, do you want someone's P2P making your internet suck or should your games/voip/youtube run higher priority any make Little Jimmies Hurt Locker download drop from 50mb/sec to 40mb/sec?
I do agree there is a slippery slope, but that why we need laws to counter that and allow the good aspects while reducing the bad.
I know lots of "programmers" that copy/paste what they read for exercises in books and that's what they use.
The problem is they never learn "why". They write just because that's how they saw it done in examples.
I don't look at a problem and think, how can I program this. I look at a problem and think, if I was a computer, how would I do this. Once I figure that out, I try to figure out how to make the computer do that with my programming language.
I love to know how things work. How does the.Net GC work How does.Net handle objects How does SQL decide to use indexes Why is a 64bit op non-atomic in a 32bit machine How does the CPU calculate floats/doubles/etc and how can I reduce math errors How can I take advantage of the 80bit double precision of x86 registers
Which SQL object should I use for reading in data vs manipulating datasets. When should I use Byte Arrays to manipulate string instead of String methods. How can I re-use objects to not use so much memory. How can I reduce lock contention for multi-threaded programming. How can I use bit flags to reduce the amount of data stored in a struct. How can I reduce cache thrashing. How can I pack more important data into a cache line to reduce fetches. Can I use a hash table or binary search. How are managed objects stored in.Net and how can this affect threaded programming
I may work in a high level language, but I don't think in the high level language. I program using logic, I communicate with the computer using a programming language.
My cousin was doing server benchmarks before doing a large purchase for his datacenter and he found the i7 with HT disabled was still beating the AMD and with HT it about doubled in speed. He runs a mix of DB/Video Compression and everything is ran on Solaris/Linux and stores several petabytes of data.
I guess consumer grade apps/hardware tend not to enjoy the extra kernel threads so much.
the real question is how does Intel vs AMD compete a price ranges. Who cares that Intel's top end CPU is $1k+. I can get an i7 and OC it to 4ghz and beat the crap out of AMD.. at least for now. and still keep a close cost
CPUs tend to be better at different things. From the sound of it, AMD is claiming about a 50% increase in performance because of per-core reduced die space while offering a relative per-core performance.
How will that compare to Intel's 32nm 6core with HT?.. who knows. I hope AMD does well because we need the competition.
Can't wait for 2011. The year of SSDs and many core CPUs
I don't know about your company, but my cousin works in a data center with 13,000+ harddrives. They're not allowed to use a file system unless it's been tested and used in enterprise settings for at least 5 years.
I would assume that most enterprise situations require tested and reliable file systems and not some buggy alpha grade FS.
I googled BTRFS within the last month to see how it was doing and I got lots of people talking about stability issues and lost data. Sounds like a great platform to store several petabytes of data you can never recreate.
In the future it may/will be good, but for now ZFS is the only *great* FS
I can't have SSRIs. Doctor says I'm sensitive to serotonin.
The first time I took an SSRI, I took 1/4 of th recommended starting dose and it gave me an adrenaline rush with a 140 pulse that lasted ~4 hours.
It was exactly like an adrenaline rush. I felt so light. I could pick up stuff some normally heavy stuff and it seemed light to me. I had a VERY reduced sense of pain. It was kind of scary as I got a few cuts during this short period of time and could barely feel them until after. If I sat still too long, my muscles would start to tense up.
It's possible for the personality to be the same, but the person to know different information which changes their actions.
eg. Most people who only saw me from time to time use to think I was quiet, but my friends thought I was very talkative. I didn't get out much, so I didn't know how to act around people which caused me to be quiet.
After college and meeting lots of new people in class/etc, I've learned more about what I can/can't talk about with people I don't know. I am now fairly chatty around new people. but my personality is the same in that sense.
Slashdot Mirror
why care about the routers? Just buy a switch for $30 or use your router as a switch by plugging into a LAN port instead of the WAN port.
If I unplug from my router and plug strait into my cable modem, I can access every IPv6 site out there. I don't have to config ANYTHING.
Luckily my router runs on Linux and eventually DD-WRT will correctly support it and then I'll just use it as a IPV4-NAT and an IPv6 Firewall.
fyi, if your DSL modem is 10 years old, go to your ISP and trade in for a new one. I did that with my modem and got an IPv6 compatible one.
Read data off a BlueRay, Decrypt it, re-encrypt it internally, send to video drivers, decrypt it, send to display port, re-encrypt it, send to another receiver, use video card to decrypt it, compress it, view it, encrypt it, send to your monitor, decrypt it, display on monitor...
I love DRM.
The IPv6 routing standard assumes a /64.
You ISP doesn't actually hand out an IP like ABCD:ABCD:ABCD:0001. It hands it out like ABCD:ABCD. It doesn't care what IPs you using in that range because *all* packets that start with ABCD:ABCD will get routed to your Cable/DSL modem. All modern OSs would get confused if your ISP tried to assign an IP. Unless your ISP decides to give you a custom IPv6 network stack.
You will get a /64 with 2^64 IPs to play with, each IP with 2^16 ports.
screw NAT.
My understanding is that the hole has gravity. The gravity is doing work on matter surrounding the hole and/or else where in the universe as gravity extends out to infinity. Work requires energy. Mass and energy are the same.
When the hole does work outside of itself via gravity, it loses mass/energy and will eventually disapear.
I have a question regarding micro blackholes that someone may help me with. Lets say you have your two protons in the LHC smash into eachother. A bunch of energy/mass is given off as other particles. Then you get lucky enough to create a blackhole. Now this blackhole is really just an event horizon based on the mass of the original particles minus lass mass/energy given off from the collision.
We're talking about a freaking small event horizon. From what I've read, particles act as waves on the very small scale. Would this micro black hole even be able to consume a particle if it's forced to interact with the particle as a wave because of its size?
From stories of people I know that travel and help in missionary trips, they've seen many name brand drugs that go for $100-$200 a pop go for $5-$10 in other countries and we're talking about buying from the same company, so not stolen.
Go to a poorer country and buy up drugs at an almost free rate and re-sell back to the USA.
If the OP read the news from a site that links to the source, I would think it ethical to link to that site instead of directly to the source since the OP should be giving credit to the site that notified him of the story.
Do you have Google's tracking disabled some how?
I get very good targeted adds from NewEgg, Amazon, Stables, and other well known places via Google. And usually the the adds are targeted to what I'm searching and does a pretty good job at it.
Spam and scams? I didn't know Newegg was in the business of scamming.
Their text format is bad? The ads I see are extremely easy to read, stands out just enough to notice but not enough to annoy and a quick glance is all I need to see what the ads is for.
You rarely click on ads but the ones you do are non-flash banners? I haven't seen a Google flash banner in forever.
I can't understand how Google ads are sending you crap unless they're unable to correctly track you. I let Google track me and I don't get crap ads. Most ads are actually stuff that I want and limited deals that I didn't not now about something that I did want.
Even worse with SSDs since TRIM now zeros sectors when not in use. Delete a file, sector gets Zero'd. If you have ANY data in there that isn't marked by the File System, it's probably encrypted stuff.
I fail to see how dual booting has anything to do with laziness. If I can do everything I want in Windows, why should I have to reboot into Linux just to browse the web and watch videos?
Rebooting is a huge hassle and VERY annoying. Linux would have to offer more functionality than Windows if I were to dual boot. If Linux did replace Windows on whichever box, then I wouldn't have to dual boot in the first place.
When I can run the newest games with the newest hardware on Linux without having to setup anything, then I'll switch for my main box. Otherwise I haven't had malware/virii on mine or my wife's computers in over 10 years and I have yet to have Win7 crash or anything. My only issue is my computer is a bit sluggish at times, but that's because I have VS2010 installed with a ton of debug stuff running in the background along with MS-SQL. My wife's box is still VERY snappy. Drop a SSD in and I would have no issues at all.
Actually, now that I think of it, I did have one VERY annoying issue with Win7 when I first got it. Some scaling window issue for TCP in their new network stack was causing my computer to ready VERY slowly from my wife's computer. Only ~150mbit/sec. Once I disabled their new feature, it jumped up to 946mbit/sec. MMmmm 114MB/sec over SMB with only 1-2% cpu.
Linux getting ZFS is going to be sweet.
I use to work in a group of 7 people who did the installation, back-up, general maintenance, and trouble shooting of ~8000 computers.
AD's network policies were a HUGE help with management of all those computers. My job was actually quite easy, except during the summer when each of us 7 people would have to upgrade 50-100 computers each over the period of 2-3 months on top of our regular duties.
We actually had very few issues with malware. Most of the issues were day-to-day hardware failure or hardware upgrades/installations.
What options does Linux have for the above case where we need to fine tune network and computer policies on thousands of PCs? Not a sarcastic question as I am not very Linux savvy.
My parents use to pay $40 for 386kbit back in '98
I now pay $50 for 16mbit.
account for 4% inflation over 12 years and that $40 was worth ~$60 in todays money.
yep, has gone down
If OpenID takes off like a rocket, I'll pay for User/Pass/FOB to secure my account. Would be awesome
Google+OpenID+FOB=Awesome
Where the hell are you getting throttling from? Sounds like a strawman(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strawman) to me.
They're talking about *increasing* the priority of other services, not artificially limiting others. There's a BIG difference.
On my home router, I set my games to have priority over downloading. My downloading is 99% unaffected by me playing games, but my games are 100% affected by too much downloading.
Now, if AT&T wants to use this for an excuse to not build out and increase internal bandwidth, then that's a problem. But there will ALWAYS be choke points on a large network no matter how much you build out. The question is, do you want someone's P2P making your internet suck or should your games/voip/youtube run higher priority any make Little Jimmies Hurt Locker download drop from 50mb/sec to 40mb/sec?
I do agree there is a slippery slope, but that why we need laws to counter that and allow the good aspects while reducing the bad.
ISPs should have to state 3 speeds
#1. Avg Sustained during peak
#2. Max Sustained
#3. Burst (aka turbo/etc)
eg. 16mb line may say
2mb sustained, 16mb Max, 38mbit burst
Now here comes the problem. How do I maintain low pings/jitter during peak hours?
I WANT QoS so when their over-subscribed networks hit peak, I can still get low pings and low jitter.
Now I do with my current ISP for whatever reason, but I'm just lucky right now.
All ISPs are oversubscribed. If they weren't we'd be paying $300/mbit and that sounds expensive to me.
Going along with hsmith:
I know lots of "programmers" that copy/paste what they read for exercises in books and that's what they use.
The problem is they never learn "why". They write just because that's how they saw it done in examples.
I don't look at a problem and think, how can I program this. I look at a problem and think, if I was a computer, how would I do this. Once I figure that out, I try to figure out how to make the computer do that with my programming language.
I love to know how things work. .Net GC work .Net handle objects
How does the
How does
How does SQL decide to use indexes
Why is a 64bit op non-atomic in a 32bit machine
How does the CPU calculate floats/doubles/etc and how can I reduce math errors
How can I take advantage of the 80bit double precision of x86 registers
Which SQL object should I use for reading in data vs manipulating datasets. When should I use Byte Arrays to manipulate string instead of String methods. How can I re-use objects to not use so much memory. How can I reduce lock contention for multi-threaded programming. How can I use bit flags to reduce the amount of data stored in a struct. How can I reduce cache thrashing. How can I pack more important data into a cache line to reduce fetches. Can I use a hash table or binary search. How are managed objects stored in .Net and how can this affect threaded programming
I may work in a high level language, but I don't think in the high level language. I program using logic, I communicate with the computer using a programming language.
yeah.. SIMD sux.. My video compression is only 3xs faster with SSE... booo!!!
My cousin was doing server benchmarks before doing a large purchase for his datacenter and he found the i7 with HT disabled was still beating the AMD and with HT it about doubled in speed. He runs a mix of DB/Video Compression and everything is ran on Solaris/Linux and stores several petabytes of data.
I guess consumer grade apps/hardware tend not to enjoy the extra kernel threads so much.
the real question is how does Intel vs AMD compete a price ranges. Who cares that Intel's top end CPU is $1k+. I can get an i7 and OC it to 4ghz and beat the crap out of AMD.. at least for now. and still keep a close cost
CPUs tend to be better at different things. From the sound of it, AMD is claiming about a 50% increase in performance because of per-core reduced die space while offering a relative per-core performance.
How will that compare to Intel's 32nm 6core with HT?.. who knows. I hope AMD does well because we need the competition.
Can't wait for 2011. The year of SSDs and many core CPUs
I don't know about your company, but my cousin works in a data center with 13,000+ harddrives. They're not allowed to use a file system unless it's been tested and used in enterprise settings for at least 5 years.
I would assume that most enterprise situations require tested and reliable file systems and not some buggy alpha grade FS.
I googled BTRFS within the last month to see how it was doing and I got lots of people talking about stability issues and lost data. Sounds like a great platform to store several petabytes of data you can never recreate.
In the future it may/will be good, but for now ZFS is the only *great* FS
I can't have SSRIs. Doctor says I'm sensitive to serotonin.
The first time I took an SSRI, I took 1/4 of th recommended starting dose and it gave me an adrenaline rush with a 140 pulse that lasted ~4 hours.
It was exactly like an adrenaline rush. I felt so light. I could pick up stuff some normally heavy stuff and it seemed light to me. I had a VERY reduced sense of pain. It was kind of scary as I got a few cuts during this short period of time and could barely feel them until after. If I sat still too long, my muscles would start to tense up.
Never again.
I see lots of high-end server grade UPSs claiming 97% efficiency at 80%+ load and 95% efficiency at 35%+ load. Is 80% really that great?
wait.. people still use tape?
or that the servers are not on their own vLAN with an ACL that doesn't block other vLAN's DHCP
256bit AES is not only stronger but faster than a 4096bit public key.
typically you encrypt the AES key with a large public key which is probably what you're thinking about. Just use RSA8192+AES256
It's possible for the personality to be the same, but the person to know different information which changes their actions.
eg. Most people who only saw me from time to time use to think I was quiet, but my friends thought I was very talkative. I didn't get out much, so I didn't know how to act around people which caused me to be quiet.
After college and meeting lots of new people in class/etc, I've learned more about what I can/can't talk about with people I don't know. I am now fairly chatty around new people. but my personality is the same in that sense.
nutshell: same algorithm, different data.