If you have problems getting lost, you should try a full size map. They are usually available in printed on paper format and they are foldable. You unfold them when needed and they give you a bird's-eye view of the whole area.
Well I launch my vms with qemu from the command line. qemu is included by default in my distro. Example for a win2012 server:/bin/su qemu -c "qemu-system-x86_64 -m 3072 \ -M q35 \ -usb -usbdevice host:050d:2103 -usbdevice host:2001:3101 \ -smp 2 -net nic,model=e1000,macaddr=$MAC_WIN2012 \ -drive file=win2012.0.0.raw,index=0,media=disk,cache=none \ -net tap,ifname=${TAP_WIN2012},script=no,downscript=no \ -display vnc=127.0.0.1:${VNC_WIN2012} -daemonize \ -pidfile/var/run/qemu/win2012.pid -enable-kvm \ -boot menu=on,splash-time=15000 -usbdevice tablet -soundhw ac97"
The problem with what you suggest is that there doesn't seem to be any route (or road) in the description of the problem linked in TFA. Imagine you use an airplane. So, it seems like keeping a straight line between cities is optimal. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
Otherwise, like in real life where there are roads, you would have a point.
Also, I think this might change through the eras since I can't figure out a relation between the axis of the Earth and its orbit position so it seems random to me so far.
What seems worrying to me is that it looks like people are actually asking Google for advice in how to conduct their personal life like if they were talking to a psychologist or something.
Seriously although, I could bet that they aren't going to use multicasting even if the technology exists since the 1990. I bet that they will prefer to bill each customer for the bandwidth they use individually, multiplying the profits.
Oh! I forgot, your argument was in favor of iron roughnecks while I was bitching about them making the whole process much slower and that they were for dummies similarly to where technology sometimes seems to be going these days.
In truth, iron roughnecks prevent a lot of injuries but very few if any that would have been caused by spinning a chain. Hints: tongs, rotary table...
The danger of chain spinning is a myth that is used to make things look scary in documentaries.
As well, iron roughnecks might be faster than humans now compared to the models I have seen back then:)
Nope Rock Doctor! But I have posted about oil rigs about 2-3 times on/. since maybe 2005 and you have always replied to my posts. You are the only one that did so we must be the only persons on/. with oil rig experience:)
I believe the last time we were arguing about spinning chains and I was telling you it was pretty safe if you knew what you were doing and you had a hard time to believe that but you finally admitted that you never did spin a chain. Spinning chains is very low risk compared to other hazards that can sneak on you while working on the floor. The only risk of chain spinning a chain is if you let the chain go and you have to be pretty dumb to do that. If you let the chain go, it transforms itself into a metallic whip that clears the floor of human presence. You have to be even dumber to put your fingers between the chain and the pipe and it is pretty hard to have this happen.
For example, losing a foot when you put pipes stacked on the derrick back in the hole is order of magnitude more dangerous. It happens when the derrick man fails to close the hook properly and the pipe lifts up but then falls back on the floor. It happened to me at least 5 times and you are better keep your feet out of the way when it does. You have no time to realize it happened so you always keep your feet out of the way while holding on the pipe.
I have worked on oil rigs from 1979 to 1985 and I moved to IT afterward. I guess you could have been our geologist!
The deepest hole my buddies and I dug was 3.5 miles and we did it with a long pole made of a string of pipes. Also, a geologist was analyzing the layers as we were doing it.
Signing != encrypting! Granted, SSL might make it harder to alter content but it is weak compared to signing the content.
What you are saying is like saying that since you downloaded a piece of software through SSL, you are safe enough and you don't need to check the signature.
Note that signing doesn't require encryption at all.
Some corporate environments and maybe even some countries could force you to have their certs trusted. They can then alter content at will.
So in the end, you do not need encryption at all to make sure the content hasn't been altered. You only need signing. Furthermore, encryption is a weak way to guarantee that content hasn't been altered compared to signing.
I have always thought that submitting your information to those sites was kind of like submitting your information to sites like facebook and since I don't have a facebook account I won be using them either.
Any information you make available at large on the Internet may be used, not only to catch serial killer but for other reasons as well. It may also be used by serial killers to target you!
Easy! A three way is a switching device with 3 connectors instead of 2. You typically use 2 of those devices to be able to turn on the light downstairs and turn it off once you get upstairs. 4 way switches exist as well although they are rarer.
Mast cam has its own self-sufficient "DRAM" buffers so in the end flash vs DRAM is irrelevant. It isn't like the mast cam is going to use the main board memory as buffer if flash memory isn't fast enough. Same for sending pictures back to Earth. Data probably bypasses the main computer and goes directly from the camera to the transmitter.
So it goes for the rest of that rover.
Different architecture than your typical running linux kernel, it does a lot less, letting other hardware do the job by themselves. It is a distributed computer system and the RAD750 acts as a controller.
A RAD750 board costs 200,000$, same order of magnitude for the other rover components so you figure it out but I believe they already have done a good job at it.
256MB is like 640MB when it used to be 640KB for the job it has to do. Do you figure the guys who sent it there were on some kind of budget or that they were imbeciles?
I already posted with arguments and links and I don't want to repeat myself but the rover has many gigabytes of memory.
Then again, we could blame click-bating summaries but that's another story.
Slashdot Mirror
Brilliant!
use mod_security -> detect bad request -> is IP on blacklists and in a country you don't care about -> automatically tarpit IP
you can manually tarpit IP from other bad requests as well while reviewing mod_security logs, a little scripting makes this process quite fast.
Saves a lot of bandwidth and saves on log space.
If you have problems getting lost, you should try a full size map. They are usually available in printed on paper format and they are foldable. You unfold them when needed and they give you a bird's-eye view of the whole area.
You mean that "think of the children" prevails over "think of the planet"?
Well I launch my vms with qemu from the command line. qemu is included by default in my distro. /bin/su qemu -c "qemu-system-x86_64 -m 3072 \ /var/run/qemu/win2012.pid -enable-kvm \
Example for a win2012 server:
-M q35 \
-usb -usbdevice host:050d:2103 -usbdevice host:2001:3101 \
-smp 2 -net nic,model=e1000,macaddr=$MAC_WIN2012 \
-drive file=win2012.0.0.raw,index=0,media=disk,cache=none \
-net tap,ifname=${TAP_WIN2012},script=no,downscript=no \
-display vnc=127.0.0.1:${VNC_WIN2012} -daemonize \
-pidfile
-boot menu=on,splash-time=15000 -usbdevice tablet -soundhw ac97"
The problem with what you suggest is that there doesn't seem to be any route (or road) in the description of the problem linked in TFA. Imagine you use an airplane. So, it seems like keeping a straight line between cities is optimal.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
Otherwise, like in real life where there are roads, you would have a point.
"insensitive cloth" ???
Never hear that term...
Hehe, interesting but I think you have this backward. Earth seems closer in North hemisphere winter right now:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
Also, I think this might change through the eras since I can't figure out a relation between the axis of the Earth and its orbit position so it seems random to me so far.
What seems worrying to me is that it looks like people are actually asking Google for advice in how to conduct their personal life like if they were talking to a psychologist or something.
Or they could say "Danger Will Robinson! Danger!" when people approach wet floors, thus avoiding any liability.
Just use satellite internet with M-Bone IPs duh!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
Seriously although, I could bet that they aren't going to use multicasting even if the technology exists since the 1990. I bet that they will prefer to bill each customer for the bandwidth they use individually, multiplying the profits.
I will be in the vicinity next week-end.
What do I have to do already? Dust it off and put back on its feet? Roger.
Oh! I forgot, your argument was in favor of iron roughnecks while I was bitching about them making the whole process much slower and that they were for dummies similarly to where technology sometimes seems to be going these days.
In truth, iron roughnecks prevent a lot of injuries but very few if any that would have been caused by spinning a chain. Hints: tongs, rotary table...
The danger of chain spinning is a myth that is used to make things look scary in documentaries.
As well, iron roughnecks might be faster than humans now compared to the models I have seen back then :)
I guess those were the old days...
Cheers,
Nope Rock Doctor! But I have posted about oil rigs about 2-3 times on /. since maybe 2005 and you have always replied to my posts. You are the only one that did so we must be the only persons on /. with oil rig experience :)
I believe the last time we were arguing about spinning chains and I was telling you it was pretty safe if you knew what you were doing and you had a hard time to believe that but you finally admitted that you never did spin a chain. Spinning chains is very low risk compared to other hazards that can sneak on you while working on the floor. The only risk of chain spinning a chain is if you let the chain go and you have to be pretty dumb to do that. If you let the chain go, it transforms itself into a metallic whip that clears the floor of human presence. You have to be even dumber to put your fingers between the chain and the pipe and it is pretty hard to have this happen.
For example, losing a foot when you put pipes stacked on the derrick back in the hole is order of magnitude more dangerous. It happens when the derrick man fails to close the hook properly and the pipe lifts up but then falls back on the floor. It happened to me at least 5 times and you are better keep your feet out of the way when it does. You have no time to realize it happened so you always keep your feet out of the way while holding on the pipe.
I have worked on oil rigs from 1979 to 1985 and I moved to IT afterward. I guess you could have been our geologist!
Cheers,
pfff... half a mile? That's nothing!
The deepest hole my buddies and I dug was 3.5 miles and we did it with a long pole made of a string of pipes. Also, a geologist was analyzing the layers as we were doing it.
Some other dudes even went as deep as almost 8 miles...
https://www.oilandgasiq.com/dr...
Signing != encrypting! Granted, SSL might make it harder to alter content but it is weak compared to signing the content.
What you are saying is like saying that since you downloaded a piece of software through SSL, you are safe enough and you don't need to check the signature.
Note that signing doesn't require encryption at all.
Some corporate environments and maybe even some countries could force you to have their certs trusted. They can then alter content at will.
So in the end, you do not need encryption at all to make sure the content hasn't been altered. You only need signing. Furthermore, encryption is a weak way to guarantee that content hasn't been altered compared to signing.
See here if you weren't already aware of that fact:
https://users.ece.cmu.edu/~adr...
Sure buddy! I have heavy artillery available at will but I tend to usually adopt a more diplomatic tone when I post on /.
I suspect mostly everybody does that from Facebook to Volkswagen etc. so it isn't limited to technology.
Just don't get caught I guess...
I have always thought that submitting your information to those sites was kind of like submitting your information to sites like facebook and since I don't have a facebook account I won be using them either.
Any information you make available at large on the Internet may be used, not only to catch serial killer but for other reasons as well. It may also be used by serial killers to target you!
You only need to stay in the middle of the hurricane, there is plenty of room there. The eye of the hurricane is pretty comfy!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
I just tried to search "threesome" on Google and it gives me a 403 error, sorry about that.
It must be my father fooling around with his filters again. Some day, I will hack into his network!
Anyway, please, can you explain to me what a "threesome" is?
Thanks in advance!
Easy! A three way is a switching device with 3 connectors instead of 2. You typically use 2 of those devices to be able to turn on the light downstairs and turn it off once you get upstairs. 4 way switches exist as well although they are rarer.
Mast cam has its own self-sufficient "DRAM" buffers so in the end flash vs DRAM is irrelevant. It isn't like the mast cam is going to use the main board memory as buffer if flash memory isn't fast enough. Same for sending pictures back to Earth. Data probably bypasses the main computer and goes directly from the camera to the transmitter.
So it goes for the rest of that rover.
Different architecture than your typical running linux kernel, it does a lot less, letting other hardware do the job by themselves. It is a distributed computer system and the RAD750 acts as a controller.
A RAD750 board costs 200,000$, same order of magnitude for the other rover components so you figure it out but I believe they already have done a good job at it.
There is lot of bullshit going on with so called "military-grade" CPUs.
But if you care to read the link in my GP post, this seems to be the real deal, it is called "radiation-hardened":
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
Do you think the guys who sent the rover there were imbeciles or something?
Would you guys please stop this? :)
256MB is like 640MB when it used to be 640KB for the job it has to do. Do you figure the guys who sent it there were on some kind of budget or that they were imbeciles?
I already posted with arguments and links and I don't want to repeat myself but the rover has many gigabytes of memory.
Then again, we could blame click-bating summaries but that's another story.