Ok, I have to admit the use of the term "Zulu time" might seem pejorative at first glance...
On the contrary, I would vouch that some people, somewhere, have a clue. After all, did people using Zulu time realized the kind of major problems that could occur if they weren't?
It is me! The electrician ^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H locksmith!
I can assure you that I am fully legit and competent and that I possesse all certifications.
Fell free to call me anytime in full confidence, I guarantee your full satisfaction.
Also, do not believe all the fake news you read on the Internet. I am afraid that this article might impact me and make it harder for me to take care of my nine kids and my wife.
Also, the parent doesn't seem to know about JIT and runtime optimization. Things get optimized so it doesn't have to do a double dereference every time, in a loop for example.
I am surprised that java developers don't seem to know how to create output parameters. As stated in my first post above, I am not saying this is a good idea but here is how you do it if you need to:
int[] out1 = new int[1]; int[] out2 = new int[1]; int[] out3 = new int[1];
1. pass by reference (yah, probably not happening, but if I can choose only one, I'd take it.) 2. output variables. Sometimes you don't want to make yet another class/struct/etc.
an array will make a fine wrapper object and make the intention clear if you ever need to do this which is rare.
int firstNumber = 24; int secondNumber = 26; int[] result = new int[1];
I do have a String library that use use the passed StringBuilder as an input/output parameters to avoid creating new builders and strings on every string operation although.
It depends how well know your connection method is. Security by obscurity sometimes work. This is why I use tin can and piano string connectivity to get enhanced security and make my devices harder to connect to:
to make their firmware stacks available for audits on a continuing basis by security professionals and subject to binding actions based upon those audits to fix issues as they are found.
Well, if this works as well as OpenSSL, at least we could say it is a starting point I guess...
They say: "like nothing has happened". Note that skin heals without scars for benign scratches. Maybe this doesn't work at all for deep or straight through scratches and works like skin for small ones...
Yep indeed, you need layers and layers of IDS watching each other and some qualified humans to make sense of the reports (e.g. yet another layer of unknown working for the company teams). This has become ridiculously expensive to manage lately but remains the only way to go IMHO.
Slashdot Mirror
I had noticed your user name from the start ;-) hence the punch with somehow called zulu time...
Seriously this time, consider the following Unix timestamp:
120314165174Z
The "Z" means the Z timezone which is basically a short for UTC.
Now, airplane pilots and military often spell as follow:
tap: tango alfa papa
zoo: zulu oscar oscar
So, the Z timezone slowly became the "Zulu" timezone.
Denoting UTC as Z began around 1950 and it simply means "zero offset" to UTC.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
Ok, I have to admit the use of the term "Zulu time" might seem pejorative at first glance...
On the contrary, I would vouch that some people, somewhere, have a clue. After all, did people using Zulu time realized the kind of major problems that could occur if they weren't?
Then; Zulu==smart
I kinda have to admit that's what I thought too while reading the parent post a while ago...
Hello dear Sir,
It is me! The electrician ^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H locksmith!
I can assure you that I am fully legit and competent and that I possesse all certifications.
Fell free to call me anytime in full confidence, I guarantee your full satisfaction.
Also, do not believe all the fake news you read on the Internet. I am afraid that this article might impact me and make it harder for me to take care of my nine kids and my wife.
Thank you dear Sir,
Na, it's currently 12:38 in Zulu time. See here for current Zulu time:
https://www.timeanddate.com/wo...
I live on the ISS you insensitive clod, we simply use Zulu time.
It seems like somebody needs to step in and develop a root kit for those tractors.
A lack of memory protection actually did however encourage people to write better code...
What are you guys talking about? I had protected memory back then since I always installed a padlock on the computer case.
Also, the parent doesn't seem to know about JIT and runtime optimization. Things get optimized so it doesn't have to do a double dereference every time, in a loop for example.
Damn, I posted basically the same thing above. See here:
https://slashdot.org/comments....
I am surprised that java developers don't seem to know how to create output parameters. As stated in my first post above, I am not saying this is a good idea but here is how you do it if you need to:
int[] out1 = new int[1];
int[] out2 = new int[1];
int[] out3 = new int[1];
void setOutParameters(int[] v1,int[] v2, int[] v3) {
v1[0] = 1;
v2[0] = 2;
v3[0] = 3;
}
setOutParameters(out1,out2,out3);
System.out.println(out1[0] + "" + out2[0] + " " + out3[0]); // prints "1 2 3"
This is silly, for:
1. pass by reference (yah, probably not happening, but if I can choose only one, I'd take it.)
2. output variables. Sometimes you don't want to make yet another class/struct/etc.
an array will make a fine wrapper object and make the intention clear if you ever need to do this which is rare.
int firstNumber = 24;
int secondNumber = 26;
int[] result = new int[1];
add (firstNumber,secondNumber,result);
System.out.println(result[0]); // prints 50
void add(int firstNumber,int secondNumber,int[] result) {
result[0] = firstNumber + secondNumber;
}
I do have a String library that use use the passed StringBuilder as an input/output parameters to avoid creating new builders and strings on every string operation although.
It depends how well know your connection method is. Security by obscurity sometimes work. This is why I use tin can and piano string connectivity to get enhanced security and make my devices harder to connect to:
https://arstechnica.com/civis/...
to make their firmware stacks available for audits on a continuing basis by security professionals and subject to binding actions based upon those audits to fix issues as they are found.
Well, if this works as well as OpenSSL, at least we could say it is a starting point I guess...
I l ked dru printe s bet er
i m r t
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:TypefaceDrumPrinter1966.jpg
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Line_printer
They say: "like nothing has happened". Note that skin heals without scars for benign scratches. Maybe this doesn't work at all for deep or straight through scratches and works like skin for small ones...
In theory, use this on humanoid robots and they could become self-healing.
I see, maybe even alien sightings are reported as drones now,,,
Thanks for that! I never would have guessed...
I'd say it would need about 6-8 engines in total.
I am sure nobody will ever need more 640K engines anyway...
nope, for quite a while, we have been a testing ground for the US.
Yep indeed, you need layers and layers of IDS watching each other and some qualified humans to make sense of the reports (e.g. yet another layer of unknown working for the company teams). This has become ridiculously expensive to manage lately but remains the only way to go IMHO.
Of course it was.
-Hans
What are you talking about? Or, are you still using a CPU without virtualization flags?
In other words, the business model of Let's Encrypt is to sell digital certificates that aren't worth the electrons they are printed on.
Let's Encrypt certificates are free and issuance is fully automated.