Sorry if you already explained it elsewhere, but there is something I don't understand.
What I don't understand is this: how can you stop the voting machine from adding fake votes? Let's say I voted and asked for no coercion receipts. And then, automatically, the machine creates a fake coercion entry, but rather than adding 1 to each candidate, adds n votes to candidate-who-happens-to-be-a-friend-of-machine-creator and zero to the others (and also creates one coercion entry). In this case I will check with my only receipt and it will be ok (my vote will be validated). But I cannot check that no other vote has been done in my name...
However over the past half hour the work units available have been *increasing*. Currently 12,000 and increasing. Clearly they are adding more to be done faster than we're doing them.
Or, more probably, it's due to a bug and the program cannot handle negative numbers properly. So they are displayed as if they were positive but are still actually "decreasing", and they are (-24000) HITs left.
What do you have against plain text? What is the use of having an html page generated, and then having to parse the page to analyze the tags and get the relevant part when you can have it directly in plain text?
Unfortunately, archive.org does not list the page you are referring to before 2006. I am not implying that you are lying, just that it takes more than a page saying "today is such date" to actually prove that it was written on this date.
Slashdot Mirror
Hey! I had a similar idea for my account name, except I created it before you did :)
Clearly, you don't speak European.
(otherwise you would have called it a lift)
4 digits? you mean like cartoon characters?
you host the party !
Thousands of people happen to see the painting every day, and I've seen it several times myself.
Am I the only one finding it strange that the very first comment on this flickr page is from the girl herself?
What about electronic nail clippers with blinking LEDs ?
Sorry if you already explained it elsewhere, but there is something I don't understand.
What I don't understand is this: how can you stop the voting machine from adding fake votes?
Let's say I voted and asked for no coercion receipts. And then, automatically, the machine creates a fake coercion entry, but rather than adding 1 to each candidate, adds n votes to candidate-who-happens-to-be-a-friend-of-machine-creator and zero to the others (and also creates one coercion entry). In this case I will check with my only receipt and it will be ok (my vote will be validated). But I cannot check that no other vote has been done in my name...
More probably because of the people who chose to use this crap.
Or, more probably, it's due to a bug and the program cannot handle negative numbers properly. So they are displayed as if they were positive but are still actually "decreasing", and they are (-24000) HITs left.
Hey, the hero of this story comes here and he results being modded Offtopic!
If they say "This is a Maître Cue" instead of "This is a Maître Queux", the pronunciation is not the same.
However, we're back to the topic.
Ok.
;)
Queue. Queue. Queue. Queue queue queue. QUEUE!
Please post the videos
It will be exactly the same, but with a new 3D shiny logo.
We all know that a sequel is always worse than the first movie.
Anyway, we can expect that episode 3.0 will be almost as good as the original.
The ages were obviously in hexadecimal, so that matches your choices.
I am not sure, I heard his next autobiography will be named "I am not Kirk either".
or, more precisely :
In Korea, Email Is Only For Old People
Me too. Talk about diversification.
It's the perfect place to write SMS !
Ook?!
What do you have against plain text?
t s=on&unique=on&format=plain&rnd=new
What is the use of having an html page generated, and then having to parse the page to analyze the tags and get the relevant part when you can have it directly in plain text?
Your url, with s/html/plain :
http://www.random.org/strings/?num=10&len=10&digi
Well, in Hamlet, the butler did it too, and then everybody dies.
Unfortunately, archive.org does not list the page you are referring to before 2006. I am not implying that you are lying, just that it takes more than a page saying "today is such date" to actually prove that it was written on this date.
(and I began my blog in 2001)
Here !