Slashdot Mirror


Alex the African Grey Parrot Dies

grrlscientist writes "Yesterday, I received the devastating news that Alex the African Grey parrot, who was both a study subject and colleague to Irene Pepperberg, died unexpectedly at 31 years of age. 'Even though Alex was a research animal, he was much more than that. This species of parrot generally lives to be 50-60 years old, so Alex was only middle-aged when he died. According to some reports I have read, it is possible that Alex might have succumbed to Aspergillosis, a fungal infection of the lungs that he has battled in the past. However, the cause of death will not be known until after a necropsy has been completed... Alex's veterinarian is returning from vacation to personally conduct this necrospy.'"

242 comments

  1. Cue the... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Anyone who makes a comment about pining for the fjords gets a slap.

    1. Re:Cue the... by zeromorph · · Score: 4, Funny

      Ok no jokes, but did we get any last words to quote then?

      --
      "Hannibal's plans never work right. They just work." Amy/A-Team
    2. Re:Cue the... by ScrappyLaptop · · Score: 4, Informative
      Alex, what shape?

      "Four...corner"

      Alex, what color?

      (slowly) "Browwwn"

      Climb in, Alex (closes lid).

      He was going mad years ago and it made me sad to see him. When I first learned of Alex, he had just begun to be displayed for the media and he looked great. A few years down the road, after he (and his handler) had become media darlings, he had plucked every feather he could. Among parrots, isn't that a sign that things just aren't right?

    3. Re:Cue the... by FUD+spreader · · Score: 0

      This isn't a joke. He was killed as a government conspiracy, because the government though he was learning too much, and wanted to make sure he kept his mouth shut! Michael Moore just announced he's going to make a documentary of it.

      --
      If you feel like the government is watching you, they're not. They're watching everyone! Stop BIG BROTHER!
    4. Re:Cue the... by Rei · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Well... it has more significance with some species than others. Greys are notorious for feather plucking. It's not a good sign, but greys can develop it even out of habit. Now, if you see an amazon that's all plucked, that means that something is seriously not right.

      Reading about this broke my heart. As a parrot owner myself, you hope that your bird outlives you. And yet, in some ways, they're just so delicate. You can't take a nap next to your parrot because you might roll onto it. You have to keep their wings clipped, or they might fly into a ceiling fan, or a burner, or escape (which in most places is a death sentence due to hawks, inclement weather, etc). You have to be very careful when using teflon, because the fumes from overheating teflon are very poisonous to parrots. You have to be careful about smoke of all kinds, because they tend to perch high and are sensitive to smoke (all birds are sensitive to bad air due to their highly efficient lungs -- hence a "canary in a coal mine"). You can't give them caffine, chocolate, avocado, and all sorts of other things. And on and on. I once read about a person who had raised an African Grey for a decade, and got it a mate. After a long time, they finally bred, and at long last, the chicks hatched. He was so happy for them, and wanted them to keep their strength up, so he picked them an avocado off his tree. Didn't know they were poisonous to parrots. Came back an hour later, and the whole family was dying.

      It's so easy to grow attached to a parrot as you would a child. You know, when you have a dog or a cat, they have their own world. You love them, but they're a different species, and they never really attempt to blur the line. A dog happily sticks its head in a bowl of dog food, runs around with a wagging tail, sniffs other dogs, and in general has its own little world. Parrots tend to live in your world. Mal, my amazon (named after Mal from Firefly), takes part in our life. He goes with us when we go outside, and even on the plane when we travel cross country (he's small enough to take as carry-on). He eats off our plates, the same food we eat, every meal (we're vegetarians; our diet is very similar to his natural diet). You don't "pet" him -- if he wants to be scratched, he'll let you, but he's just as likely to want to "scratch" (preen) you back. . It's a mutual social relationship, not a relationship where you only give. He goes to the bathroom on command (although he still has the occasional accident). He asks for up when he wants it ("I want up"). He invented a tradition of kissing before meals when he's really happy (rather than walk straight to the food, he walks over to us and says "Kiss!" and then kisses us). When he does something wrong that we've taught him is wrong, he often tries to hide it, just like a little kid. He solves puzzles better than children his age -- seriously. At just six months old, he figured how to get at an inaccessible treat ball by grabbing it by its support rope, hauling the rope to a safe spot, and wrapping it in place so it would stay while he ate. He can take apart wooden clothespins in less than 15 seconds, unbutton the clasps on my shirts, and once even removed the hinge pin to take apart a kitchen magnet (took us a half hour to get it back together -- we only gave it to him because we didn't see a way *we* could have taken it apart). He even addresses us by name -- I kid you not. I'm "Kareh" (Karen), and my partner is "Elay" (Elaine). If I'm fixing dinner, and he's getting impatient, I'll invariably hear, "Kareh! I want up!" If the wrong person tries to pick him up, he gets angry.

      Yet, he's just a year and a half old. Like a Grey, he should live to be 50-60.

      When something knows your name, it's hard not to see them as a family member... I really feel for Dr. Pepperberg and her staff right now.

      --
      By a scallop's forelocks!
    5. Re:Cue the... by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      I raise three major breeds of parrots*. I also have a pair of grays that are "special needs". Beckett (Congo Gray) plucks himself incessently and is perfectly healthy. I won't sell him, because of this. He is a charity case (and still very lovable, if funny looking). Sammy (Timna Gray) is "needy". If I found someone who was really good with birds and would give him the vast amounts of attention that he needs I would likely sell him, after he decided he liked them.
      -nB

      * Macaws, Cockatoos, Lovebirds.

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    6. Re:Cue the... by everphilski · · Score: 1

      You make me miss my parakeets.

      I got my first on my sixteenth birthday. He died shortly after we got him. Don't know how or why, he was adequately cared for. I got a second one after that, we had fun he would squak while I was gone, and while I was there, he liked listening to my music, he would calm down and bob his head; he lived for 5 or 6 years and died under the care of one of my siblings while I was in college 1,000 miles away (no birds in the dorms).

      I got a pair (male/female) as I was finishing up college. The female was a noisy chick, she would not shut up! squack, squack, squack! The male was very tempered. They appeared to have fun, very different temperments (the female was rowdy and would incite the male, the male generally pretty stoic but could get worked up by the female). We'd let them fly around the apartment from time to time when it was safe. The female passed on after about 2 years, I came home from class and found her there, don't know how it happened. The male lived on. I wound up donating it to the humane society when we moved, my wife wasn't thrilled with them since we started having kids.

      I always wanted to get a bigger bird, a parrot or macaw, but I keep getting afraid of it passing on too early in life. I realise parakeets are little birds and things happen, especially when you live up in WI in a drafty old house (may be what did either of my first 2 birds in), but birds are just so personable...

      thanks again for the story Rei

    7. Re:Cue the... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone who makes a comment about pining for the fjords gets a slap.

      with a fish!

  2. Uhm... by BlueParrot · · Score: 4, Funny

    Ok... *still trying to figure out how this is newsworthy* I know, I know.. I'm new here...

    1. Re:Uhm... by QMalcolm · · Score: 4, Funny

      Newsworthy? Colored parrots are going down. Dude, you're next!

    2. Re:Uhm... by Rebelgecko · · Score: 5, Funny

      by BlueParrot (965239) on Sunday September 09, @12:18PM (#20530525)
      Ok... *still trying to figure out how this is newsworthy* I know, I know.. I'm new here... As one of his fellow parrots, you should be very familiar with Alex. You should not let minor differences such as the color of your feathers get in the way of appreciating the scientific contributions of another parrot. Be tolerant of different-colored parrots, it's what Alex would have wanted.
      --
      CATS/Diebold '08- All your vote are belong to us!
    3. Re:Uhm... by smittyoneeach · · Score: 1

      Surveying the responses while in the ~10 range, the news value of this story seems related to the "Dead Parrot Sketch".

      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    4. Re:Uhm... by MBCook · · Score: 5, Informative

      You must not know much about this. Alex was an incredible bird. I've seen him on TV a couple of times. Many birds can repeat things. Some might even be able to associate (say specifically ask for food).

      Alex, though hard training and probably natural ability was far beyond that. He knew tons of words. He could answer simple questions and interpret human language. I remember seeing videos of them giving him a little toy car and asking him what it was, to which he responded "truck" (close enough). He did this with a couple of objects. They could ask him what color an object was and he could tell you.

      Check out the Wikipedia article on him.

      This is news, like Washoe dying would be news (is Washoe still alive?)

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    5. Re:Uhm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I figured that out when I clicked through to the article (yes, really!) and saw the picture (saw him on TV too), but that's the type of information that you think the little Slashdot summary could have contained.

      Personally, my bet is that kdawson saw the submitter was "grrl"-something and thought he had to post it to try and get laid. Geeks will do anything that a girl - or at least, someone they think is a girl - asks them.

    6. Re:Uhm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      is Washoe still alive?

      It would appear so: http://www.friendsofwashoe.org/washoe_bio.shtml

    7. Re:Uhm... by Gorath99 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Also, Alex has been covered by Slashdot before. Here's a previous Slashdot article about the fact that he may have grasped the concept of zero.

      I'm also pretty sure that one of the releases of Parrot (the perl6 VM) was named after him. If that doesn't make his death "News for Nerds", then I don't know what does.

    8. Re:Uhm... by HTTP+Error+403+403.9 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Hopefully there was any fowl play involved.

      --
      I'm not a Troll, it's reverse psychology.
    9. Re:Uhm... by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 4, Informative

      Alex is an important case for understanding cognitive development and non-human linguistic competence, and findings related to the study of Alex's linguistic development have implications for natural language processing.

      In this case, the shark jumps you.

    10. Re:Uhm... by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

      Ok... *still trying to figure out how this is newsworthy* I know, I know.. I'm new here... They're just providing the setup so everyone can make ex-parrot jokes. This is to nerds as laser pointers are to cats.
      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    11. Re:Uhm... by 808140 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Or maybe, just maybe, he (like many Slashdotters, including myself) actually knew who Alex was, because a) he's famous and b) we have more varied interests than just whether Apple is going to release a new iPod or not.

      Non-human intelligence is interesting for some of us, even if said non-humans don't come from another planet.

    12. Re:Uhm... by tsjaikdus · · Score: 2, Informative

      I remember him from this article (had to buy it on paper, no internet that I was aware of then) http://www.sciamdigital.com/index.cfm?fa=Products. ViewIssuePreview&ARTICLEID_CHAR=5FB5779F-4127-45C5 -9197-183F52218F0

    13. Re:Uhm... by User+956 · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Newsworthy? Colored parrots are going down.

      Indeed, but are we talking about African, or European parrots?

      --
      The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
    14. Re:Uhm... by marcello_dl · · Score: 1

      > Be tolerant of different-colored parrots, it's what Alex would have wanted.

      Sad. I didn't know colors mattered, too.
      I thought all the fuss was about african vs. european ones.

      --
      ---- MISSING MISCELLANEOUS DATA SEGMENT --- [sigdash] trolololol
    15. Re:Uhm... by jafiwam · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You missed "spontaneously offering up other little details in conversation" like he was interested in, and wanted to talk about the subject. I am sure it's on Youtube somewhere, the one when he's eating corn and they have a conversation about it.

      And, making generalizations that far surpassed what some of the top dolphins have done, and what we are barely doing with chimps now.

      Heck, I have met people in bars with less cognitive awareness than this bird.

    16. Re:Uhm... by sco08y · · Score: 1

      He could answer simple questions and interpret human language.

      From what I've heard, he made prelearned sounds in response to certain shapes or sounds. That's nothing like answering any kind of question or interpreting any language, let alone human language.

      Human language is a unique feat of evolution and it's not arrogant to say so, it's simple fact. Our trying to find it in other species would be the same as a bunch of giraffe scientists looking at a human and saying "wow, he stretched his neck a whole quarter inch! He's just like us!"

    17. Re:Uhm... by Mouthless+Wolf · · Score: 1

      Good night, sweet prince. Born - 1976 Died - September 7, 2007 :(

    18. Re:Uhm... by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 1

      Read the book, or at least some reviews of it, before you make such wrong-headed assumptions based on "what you've heard."

    19. Re:Uhm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Soviet Russia...

    20. Re:Uhm... by SKPhoton · · Score: 1

      His head fell off. He was pretty old...

    21. Re:Uhm... by Megatog615 · · Score: 1

      Raaagh! Dude, you're next! Dude, you're next!

    22. Re:Uhm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are only three words to describe why a story like this makes it onto Slashdot, and those three words are "Dead Parrot Sketch."

    23. Re:Uhm... by master_p · · Score: 3, Funny

      "Here's a previous Slashdot article about the fact that he may have grasped the concept of zero"

      Too bad he's dead. If he could grasp the concept of null as well, he would be a fine programmer.

    24. Re:Uhm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, from the Parrot FAQ page

      "Why did you call it "Parrot"?

      The name "Parrot" started with Simon Cozens's April Fool's Joke (http://www.perl.com/pub/a/2001/04/01/parrot.htm) where Larry Wall and Guido van Rossum announced the merger of the Perl and Python languages."

      But it was a good guess...

    25. Re:Uhm... by markov_chain · · Score: 1

      I dunno... the fact that Luciano Pavarrotti used to be a ventriloquist is a strange coincidence, don't you think?

      --
      Tsunami -- You can't bring a good wave down!
    26. Re:Uhm... by Ex-MislTech · · Score: 1

      Too bad he's dead. If he could grasp the concept of null as well, he would be a fine programmer.

      Nah...his typing would just be hunt and peck..... ... I am here all week, *tap* *tap* is this mic on ? ....

      --
      google "32 trillion offshore needs IRS attention"
    27. Re:Uhm... by maxume · · Score: 1

      Crows and Ravens aren't impressed. They can solve novel(to them) logic problems:

      http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/main.jhtml?view=D ETAILS&grid=&xml=/earth/2007/08/17/scicrow117.xml

      Ravens can also remember and recognize other individuals, and do stuff like creating fake food caches. There was a good article in Scientific American a few months back.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    28. Re:Uhm... by SenorCitizen · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Indeed, but are we talking about African, or European parrots?

      Laden or unladen?

    29. Re:Uhm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bin Laden

    30. Re:Uhm... by Spokehedz · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I don't knooooooAAAAAAUUUUGHHH!!!

      *lameness filter getarounder*

      I'm a lumberjack, and I'm okay. I sleep all night and I work all day.
      I cut down trees, I skip and jump, I like to press wildflowers.
      I wish I'd been a girlie, just like my dear paapaw.

    31. Re:Uhm... by SeaFox · · Score: 1

      Newsworthy? Colored parrots are going down. Dude, you're next!


      Everyone calm down. This poster is incorrect, it was a grey parrot that died. Check TFA, that bird is not colorful at all. So I think we're safe for now.
    32. Re:Uhm... by TapeCutter · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "From what I have heard" some slashdotter's think they know more about things they have never heard of than the actual scientists who have spent decades studying the subject. That's nothing like science, it's just the parroting of ancient man/beast concepts.

      As the owner of many large parrots and dogs over the last 40yrs, I can attest to the fact that both species understand certain words, phrases and gestures to the point that they can comunicate what they desire. Of course the owner also needs a modicum of intelligence before the animal goes to the trouble of communicating with them.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    33. Re:Uhm... by Rei · · Score: 1

      All of these dumb, joking comments make me really sad to read. Don't any of you feel sorry for Dr. Pepperberg and her staff?

      --
      By a scallop's forelocks!
    34. Re:Uhm... by Rei · · Score: 1

      So, would you say that learning to address people by their names is "prelearning sounds in response to certain shapes or sounds"? Because that's why my parrot has done. He asks for specific people by name. And isn't happy if the wrong person responds.

      How often do you think he heard the phrase, "Karen -- I want up!" in my house? Do you think that's a phrase that my partner and I use with each other? No -- he first learned the command "up" (which we'd give to him), then learned that saying "I want apple" got him an apple, then put them together ("I want up") and learned that that got him up, then he learned that we'd come and pay attention to him if he used our names and that he could get specific people, and then combined it with "I want up" to get a specific person to pick him up.

      Would you call this simple operant conditioning? And if so, how much more than operant conditioning are we?

      --
      By a scallop's forelocks!
    35. Re:Uhm... by Schemat1c · · Score: 1

      All of these dumb, joking comments make me really sad to read. Don't any of you feel sorry for Dr. Pepperberg and her staff? Yeah, it's so sad. And in other news some brown people died today.
      --

      "Nobody knows the age of the human race, but everybody agrees that it is old enough to know better." - Unknown
    36. Re:Uhm... by Rei · · Score: 1

      And that changes the fact that this is sad news how?

      --
      By a scallop's forelocks!
    37. Re:Uhm... by shaitand · · Score: 1

      You are confusing parrots with swallows.

    38. Re:Uhm... by Schemat1c · · Score: 1

      And that changes the fact that this is sad news how? Doesn't change the fact at all but maybe puts it in a more realistic perspective.
      --

      "Nobody knows the age of the human race, but everybody agrees that it is old enough to know better." - Unknown
    39. Re:Uhm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a fucking bird that died. How about we bow our heads in silence about the squashed squirrel down the street?

    40. Re:Uhm... by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So, if you or your relative's pet dies, I can tell either you or them to get over it, because a couple hundred people were killed in drunk driving accidents?

      I think you're full of it.

    41. Re:Uhm... by Schemat1c · · Score: 1

      So, if you or your relative's pet dies, I can tell either you or them to get over it Well, if it's me you can say what you want but don't expect an answer.
      --

      "Nobody knows the age of the human race, but everybody agrees that it is old enough to know better." - Unknown
    42. Re:Uhm... by mgabrys_sf · · Score: 1

      re:"Or maybe, just maybe, he (like many Slashdotters, including myself) actually knew who Alex was, because a) he's famous and b) we have more varied interests than just whether Apple is going to release a new iPod"

      Apple releasing another new iPod?! AGAIN? Cooool! What is it! What is it! What is it! What is it!

    43. Re:Uhm... by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Heh probably a coincidence resulting from him being put back into his cage but I found this bit funny:

      ALAN ALDA: (Narration) Through that language he shows a grasp of abstract concepts like sameness, or the idea of combining qualities. But the big question for researchers is, do animals think conceptually without the help of human-taught languages?

      ALEX: I'm sorry. You're a good boy.

      ALAN ALDA: (Narration) That's what we'll explore next.

      ALEX: I love you.

      From the bit just above: http://www.pbs.org/saf/transcripts/transcript903.h tm#4

      --
    44. Re:Uhm... by mblase · · Score: 1

      *still trying to figure out how this is newsworthy*

      The submitter was clearly hoping to get a wealth of Monty Python posts out of this headline.

    45. Re:Uhm... by mblase · · Score: 4, Funny

      You missed "spontaneously offering up other little details in conversation" like he was interested in, and wanted to talk about the subject. I am sure it's on Youtube somewhere, the one when he's eating corn and they have a conversation about it.


      "Alex, would you like some corn?"
      *squawk* "Why do you want to talk about some corn?"
      "Well, we could talk about something else."
      *squawk* "Does it please you to believe we could talk about something else?"

    46. Re:Uhm... by jav1231 · · Score: 1

      We don't call 'em "colored" in MY house!

    47. Re:Uhm... by Gorath99 · · Score: 1

      Ah, interesting. I didn't know where the name "Parrot" came from. But I was referring specifically to release 0.3.0 (see the /. article I linked to) which was codenamed "Alex".

    48. Re:Uhm... by sco08y · · Score: 1

      "From what I have heard" some slashdotter's think they know more about things they have never heard of than the actual scientists who have spent decades studying the subject.

      In my case, "what I've heard" comes from reading linguists who have spent decades studying the subject and also think it's bunk.

      Of course the owner also needs a modicum of intelligence before the animal goes to the trouble of communicating with them.

      Right, I'm an idiot because I don't talk to my dog. Mmmkay.

    49. Re:Uhm... by sco08y · · Score: 1

      He asks for specific people by name. And isn't happy if the wrong person responds.

      No, he squawks out something that your very adaptable human hearing associates with the name, and he does whatever song and dance you've trained him to do when the wrong person responds. And then once the handful of tricks you've taught him are exhausted, he will repeat them to get more praise or food.

      Compare him to a dog. A dog has much more humanlike behaviors because it's a social animal. Dogs will play, hunt together, bond, etc. The parrot never does anything close to this. And a dog can be taught far more sophisticated imperatives, showing that it has superior linguistic abilities. But a dog doesn't have as well evolved an ability to reproduce sounds, so you actually think the parrot is smarter!

      Would you call this simple operant conditioning?

      Yes.

      And if so, how much more than operant conditioning are we?

      Lots.

    50. Re:Uhm... by Rei · · Score: 1

      No, he squawks out something that your very adaptable human hearing associates with the name, and he does whatever song and dance you've trained him to do when the wrong person responds. And then once the handful of tricks you've taught him are exhausted, he will repeat them to get more praise or food.

      You really need to read the research with Alex; they countered this bias with blind evaluation -- i.e., the people who determine what his responses were did not hear the questions or see what stimuli were given. The research with Alex was peer-reviewed. They got the same results that I experience in my everyday life with Mal. And I'm sure that nothing that I say will convince you of this, but I can assure you that it's repeatable. If you want video, let me know -- I can set up cameras to film any part of it you want (timing is always tricky, but I can just leave them running).

      The parrot never does anything close to this.

      Ok, now you're being just plain ignorant. You're apparently not even aware that parrots are incredibly social animals (with, IMHO, a much more complex social arrangement than the "alpha dog leads" arrangement that dogs use). Why do you think they have the sort of complex language abilities that they do -- coincidence? Wild flocks have their own "languages" and even "dialects" which they use to recognize outsiders, bond, and communicate threats and feeding)**. Parents pass the learned "language" on to their young. Depending on the species, parrots use varying degrees of cooperative foraging (even inter-species cooperation, at least in the case of many Amazons and Macaws, but not in the case of Greys), and spend most of their time in complex social "play" activities. In some places, the play activities have been part of the species undoing -- for example, the New Zealand Kea***, which, as a neophile, has a penchant for destroying manmade objects (one object commonly reported damaged is the seals on car windows).

      Anyways, until you start reading *any* basic parrot research or even a factsheet about how they live (in captivity or the wild), there's not much point in even talking to you, now is there? I've had dogs (4). I've had cats (2). And I have a parrot now. While there are some aspects of learning I'd give to dogs over parrots (they learn faster, in my experience -- at least operant conditioning-type learning). However, in terms of reasoning ability, parrots easily win out. I've seen a dog open a cabinet and pull a box of treats down with his nose, but I've watched my parrot take apart a spring-locked hinge and "think outside the box" by going at a treat ball by reeling in its support line. There's no question which one I'm more impressed with.

      ** Not all language with parrots is learned; they do have some instinctive sounds (sort of like how humans have crying, laughing, etc). Baby amazons, for example, have a clucking "feeding call" that goes away as they get older. They also have a "trill" for when they're happy, and sound like they're hyperventilating when they get excited. The rest, however, is learned.

      *** Speaking of the Kea, it is the only parrot that actively hunts large mammals, most notably (to ranchers, at least) sheep and rabbits (another factor leading to its decline). Also known as the "feathered wolf", groups of Kea attack sick or wounded sheep and drive them into obstacles or off cliffs, not unlike how humans hunted mammoth. While the reports go back as far as 1867, the behavior wasn't caught on video until 1993.

      --
      By a scallop's forelocks!
    51. Re:Uhm... by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      ""what I've heard" comes from reading linguists"

      Perhaps you could point to a couple of these "linguists", I would like to see their reasoning but I am assuming they are the same as the "scientists" who to this day continue to poo-poo Jane Goodall's work.

      In other words, I assume their objections boil down to the philisophical viewpoint that "humans are not animals" and like yourself wouldn't be seen dead "talking to a dog" even if it got up and started reciting Shakespear.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    52. Re:Uhm... by NateTech · · Score: 1

      Better than most, that's for sure.

      --
      +++OK ATH
    53. Re:Uhm... by NateTech · · Score: 1

      Damn, I should have known. Alex was just Eliza in disguise!

      --
      +++OK ATH
  3. Obligatory by TheBearBear · · Score: 1

    Wonder if anyone has checked for a nail?

    1. Re:Obligatory by cpq · · Score: 1

      Or a lock box key...

    2. Re:Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mmm only if there was a sparrow in the room.

  4. Gov't had something to do with it? by cpq · · Score: 1

    He was just middle aged, I smell something wrong here. I suggest a full investigation into the causes of his untimely demise... Slow news day, huh?

    1. Re:Gov't had something to do with it? by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      Clearly he knew too much.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    2. Re:Gov't had something to do with it? by ccbailey · · Score: 5, Informative

      Unfortunately, it seems that Alex died on the 7th and his necropsy won't be conducted until the tomorrow, the 10th. The thing about avian tissues is that they tend to autolyze rather quickly. If he really died of aspergillosis and has fungal plaques all over the lungs, air sacs, and liver then the diagnosis is a no-brainer. On the other hand, if the diagnosis requires high quality histologic sections to make- well that might be harder with three-day-dead bird tissues.

      Why would anyone wait three days for his personal veterinarian to return when there are boarded veterinary pathologists at Angell and Tufts in the state who could be called in over the weekend? Seems like with a bird this famous, it would have been worth the effort to do things right.

    3. Re:Gov't had something to do with it? by toganet · · Score: 1

      Pardon my ignorance, but would keeping the bird cold (not frozen) reduce the tissue degradation you mention? I wondered the same thing, but assumed that the bright people Alex worked with would have thought of this. Although grief often makes clear thought difficult.

    4. Re:Gov't had something to do with it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, well that's because they needed to be able to take out the monkey brain before anyone else noticed.

    5. Re:Gov't had something to do with it? by ccbailey · · Score: 1

      Yes, it certainly beats leaving the body at room temperature or baking in the hot, hot sun but still, if you open a bird after two days in the refrigerator there's plenty already plenty of autolysis going on. Brain and gastro-intestinal tract are particularly bad in this regard and both important places to look for lesions.

    6. Re:Gov't had something to do with it? by Rei · · Score: 1

      I've heard that recommended, and I'm not a parrot researcher (just a parrot owner). So, yes, I'd imagine that Dr. Pepperberg's lab knows to do that.

      --
      By a scallop's forelocks!
    7. Re:Gov't had something to do with it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Although _____ often makes clear thought difficult.

      And here, we see the problem with all animal language "experiments"...

  5. Elsewhere, by smiltee · · Score: 1, Insightful

    in other news, 300 Chinese people died from a coal mine explosion.

    --
    Blame Canada!
    1. Re:Elsewhere, by meringuoid · · Score: 4, Funny
      in other news, 300 Chinese people died from a coal mine explosion.

      Yeah, but that doesn't give us a cue to commence the recital of Monty Python routines.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    2. Re:Elsewhere, by Attila · · Score: 1

      in other news, 300 Chinese people died from a coal mine explosion. Yeah, but there's no obligatory Monty Python reference in that, is there?
      --
      Dear Will, the plums were poisoned. -- Cheese Club
    3. Re:Elsewhere, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Oh please, are you trolling? Firstly slashdot isn't a general news site, secondly there's always more "worthy" news to report, if we followed those criteria all news outlets would be 24/7 death and misery ... we're near enough to that already.

      Sadly a bunch of Chinese miners dying isn't particularly unusual or newsworthy, either. That's what happens when you have hardly any safety measures at all.

    4. Re:Elsewhere, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sadly a bunch of Chinese miners dying isn't particularly unusual or newsworthy, either.
      Wise choice to post as AC. Now who's trolling.
    5. Re:Elsewhere, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gee, my condolence. Have a good life, kid.

    6. Re:Elsewhere, by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

      in other news, 300 Chinese people died from a coal mine explosion. Oh, good, now we can work in the "I like chinese" song, too.
      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    7. Re:Elsewhere, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whatever. They'll make more

    8. Re:Elsewhere, by turgid · · Score: 1

      If only they had been lumberjacks.

    9. Re:Elsewhere, by Synonymous+Dastard · · Score: 1

      My dad lost his job because of cheap fukin chinese crap.


      More probably because of the people who chose to use this crap.
    10. Re:Elsewhere, by JeanPaulBob · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Sadly a bunch of Chinese miners dying isn't particularly unusual or newsworthy, either. That's what happens when you have hardly any safety measures at all.
      I agree with your point, the GP was trollish.

      However, in one sense, the idea that it's not unusual for large groups of miners to die due to insufficient safety measures...is itself newsworthy.
    11. Re:Elsewhere, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >My dad lost his job because of cheap fukin chinese crap.
      Pity they haven't repo'ed the computer yet.

    12. Re:Elsewhere, by dkf · · Score: 1

      However, in one sense, the idea that it's not unusual for large groups of miners to die due to insufficient safety measures...is itself newsworthy. Sure it is, but on slashdot? The technical solution is trivial. Similarly, the political/managerial parts of the solution are also no-brainers. All we're really left with is the observation that some people (certain mine owners and local officials in this case, if they're distinct categories) are scum. But that's not news anywhere; it's just depressing (and its consequences, statistics).

      I so wish I could be less cynical about this all.
      --
      "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
    13. Re:Elsewhere, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Ha ha ha, your dad does menial labor if he's competing with Chinese factory slaves. Not something to boast about. ;)


      You're probably going to end up like him- overweight, unable to provide for your family, always listening to AM radio hatefests about the libruls and islamofascists.


      ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha

    14. Re:Elsewhere, by neurovish · · Score: 1

      Well, if the politeness level of Chinese waiters is any indication, it would be safe to say that none of these miners were ever rude.
      You DO like Chinese food right?

    15. Re:Elsewhere, by Vulva+R.+Thompson,+P · · Score: 1

      Kind of:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I_Like_Chinese

      Google for the lyrics/song but be forewarned...it's catchy. You'll be humming it all week long.

    16. Re:Elsewhere, by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but that doesn't give us a cue to commence the recital of Monty Python routines.

      Oh yes it does, but nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition.

      --
      Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
    17. Re:Elsewhere, by zombie_striptease · · Score: 1

      A lack of safety measures in China? Say it ain't so!

    18. Re:Elsewhere, by mowijo · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but that doesn't give us a cue to commence the recital of Monty Python routines.
      I like Chineese...
    19. Re:Elsewhere, by INowRegretThesePosts · · Score: 1

      All we're really left with is the observation that some people (certain mine owners and local officials in this case, if they're distinct categories) are scum. And the observation that people from around the world will readily buy products "made in China" just because they're cheap.
    20. Re:Elsewhere, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes it does, "I like Chinese"

    21. Re:Elsewhere, by dwye · · Score: 1

      > However, in one sense, the idea that it's not unusual for
      > large groups of miners to die due to insufficient safety
      > measures...is itself newsworthy.

      Only on a short time scale. For millenia before (counting Welsh flint mines, that preceded the tin mines, that preceded the coal mines) the idea that *it would be **newsworthy** that large groups of miners died* would be newsworthy. Subsurface mining is inherently very dangerous; that its safety record has improved to the point that mine disasters are "news" rather than just back page filler like the weekly police blotter is quite an improvement.

      Of course, if a million chinese died in a disaster, that would just be a statistic (at least according to Stalin).

  6. What about the Norweigan Blue? by the_womble · · Score: 3, Funny

    And have they tried putting 50,000 volts through it?

    1. Re:What about the Norweigan Blue? by BlueParrot · · Score: 4, Funny

      Jeg lever fortsatt. Er litt sliten da... tror jeg skal sove lidt...

    2. Re:What about the Norweigan Blue? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For those interested in a really cool Norwegian bird, go visit Jaco at Oslo Zoo Senter. True story:
      When I worked there we used to have a lady coming every Friday to buy dog food and she was our least favorite customer, always complaining.
      One day she came in and Jaco kept on asking: "Lady, what's your name?" ("Damen, hva heter du?"), which she ignored completely. When she had paid for the food she went down the stairs to look at the fishtanks. As she did Jaco suddenly burst out "BITCH!" ("Drittkjerring!").

      I never laughed so hard in my life!

      The woman actually took it in stride and replied "I guess I deserved that", which surprised us even more...

  7. Profit? by SavedLinuXgeeK · · Score: 3, Funny

    I wonder if anyone has tried to sell him to a blind kid...

    --
    je suis parce que j'aime
    1. Re:Profit? by meringuoid · · Score: 2, Funny
      1: Obtain dead parrot
      2: ???
      3: Profit!

      2 probably involves some sort of comedy routine, rather than any attempt to sell the thing, though.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
  8. "My parrot died, give me money"... by tjstork · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    That sums up the article for ya, right there. Famous bird, written up in New York Times. A tragedy, dead. Give me some money...

    --
    This is my sig.
    1. Re:"My parrot died, give me money"... by meringuoid · · Score: 1
      Famous bird, written up in New York Times. A tragedy, dead. Give me some money...

      It is quite newsworthy, though. This parrot had particularly beautiful plumage.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    2. Re:"My parrot died, give me money"... by turgid · · Score: 1

      That sums up the article for ya, right there. Famous bird, written up in New York Times. A tragedy, dead. Give me some money...

      Paris Hilton? That's not a tragedy. I'll keep my money.

  9. What the Hell? by Romancer · · Score: 0, Troll

    Will someone tell me what kdawson is smoking? Why do I find myself looking at that name every time I see an article that has no business on Slashdot?

    --


    ) Human Kind Vs Human Creation
    ) It'd be interesting to see how many humans would survive to serve us.
    1. Re:What the Hell? by Jim+Hall · · Score: 0, Troll

      No kidding. I've lost patience for this "editor". Fortunately, I can take him out of my profile so I don't see stories posted by him.

      But I hope CmdrTaco or someone else in charge of the site gets the hint and takes this guy off editor duty.

    2. Re:What the Hell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um... "kdawson" is a girl?

    3. Re:What the Hell? by MBCook · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Can you explain to me why this story isn't newsworthy? It's not like this was just someone's personal parrot. This was a very important and rather famous research animal. I've seen him on more than one TV show. I think I've seen him on the evening news once. I know he was a segment on an episode of Scientific American Frontiers with Alan Alda.

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    4. Re:What the Hell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because Slashdot hired a political blogger who didn't read Slashdot before working here because he could further their agenda for politics.slashdot.org? I'll never forget him putting a story about whether or not people have an inherent right to broadband under the "Enlightenment" topic (it was changed to a different topic a while afterward). I assume they were trying to roll Jon Katz and Michael Sims into one editor.

    5. Re:What the Hell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Moron.

      This is newsworthy to any science geek worth his/her salt. The fact that you think it isn't says more about your own sad lack of understanding than anything else.

      Slashdot isn't all about P2P, wifi and linux you know. Perhaps you shouldn't be just about those things either. It may make you a better person in the long run.

    6. Re:What the Hell? by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 5, Insightful

      For me, the sign of the decline of Slashdot isn't that they are posting articles on the death of Alex. It's that the readership thinks only articles about iPhones, CPUs and videogames are "news for nerds."

    7. Re:What the Hell? by arivanov · · Score: 1

      The owner instead of training the parrot to be a dumb pet treated the bird using common approaches for children (especially ones with learning disabilities) with an amazing result. The parrot could talk and reason up to a level of roughly 3-3.5 year old.
      I have seen the bird on a BBC documentary (PBS originally) and if this is the same bird I remember that was totally nuts. I could not believe what I see and what I hear. It was surreal.
      This is news. Sad unfortunately.

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    8. Re:What the Hell? by lpontiac · · Score: 1

      For me, the sign of the decline of Slashdot isn't that they are posting articles on the death of Alex. It's that the readership thinks only articles about iPhones, CPUs and videogames are "news for nerds."
      You can see a similar effect over in this thread. The "hurrr CFLAGS hurrr" 'nerd' crowd is here in force.
    9. Re:What the Hell? by tsjaikdus · · Score: 1

      However in this thread they are easily recognizable. Mostly it's a lot harder to tell who is talking shit en pick out the few comments that have any value.

    10. Re:What the Hell? by Bryan+Ischo · · Score: 1

      I agree. I'd say 1/3 of headlines I see on Slashdot are flamebait or fluff, and 1/2 of those come from kdawson. Just now I went into my preferences pages and removed kdawson but then after a few minutes I undid it. Why?

      Because I don't want to miss the 1/3 of stories that he posts that are worth reading. I am worried about missing something, because even though kdawson is the worst editor slashdot has ever had (although it's a close race with zonk), every once in a while even he/she/it posts something worthwhile.

      Is there some way to filter just the ridiculously lame stories that kdawson posts? Is there a slashdot tag that is something like "kdawson-at-it-again" or something, so I can filter just the 50% of crap out?

    11. Re:What the Hell? by Bryan+Ischo · · Score: 1

      I think what you are proposing is called a "false dilemma". The assertion is that this news story is garbage that shouldn't have made it to slashdot headlines (which I agree with; I mean if you really cared about this story you'd already be subscribed to alt.fan.parrots or maybe alt.pet.obituaries and wouldn't need slashdot to tell you about this). You are suggesting that the only way for one to see this story as worthless is if you have too narrow a focus and only care about iPhones, CPUs, and videogames. And yet there is a third option, that is in fact the correct one:

      The majority of slashdot readers think iPhones, CPUs, and videogames are very geek-newsworthy, but also have lots of other interests and appreciate a wide variety of stories about science & technology subjects. Most of them, I am guessing, don't give a shit about one particular researcher's one particular pet subject having died. Doesn't make their interests narrow.

      Obviously, what is and isn't interesting news is highly subjective. But I'll bet if you took a poll, most people would put this in the "roll your eyes and move on" category. Hell I only read the comments of this article to see how many people flamed kdawson (deservedly so) for posting it. I was surprised to find people defending him but I guess I shouldn't have been. There is always a contrary position out there somewhere.

      I think it's telling that this story was posted by kdawson. Do you think that one of the more respected editors would have pushed this crap out?

    12. Re:What the Hell? by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      A dead parrot?

      If GWB died, and TV brought a special feature about it, you'd probably complain about that too, because just that someone dies doesn't justify a special feature. After all, how many people die every day?

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    13. Re:What the Hell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would you filter any editor out? Editors are irrelevant. We all come here to read out-there comments, don' we.

    14. Re:What the Hell? by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 4, Informative

      If you did any reading of the article or the other posts on this thread, you'd know that this was significant to people interested in cognitive development, non-human cognition, and linguistics - very nerdly topics, if you get past the lack of iPhones and such. But no, you decided to go ad hominem.

      There was a book about Alex, called "The Alex Papers," describing the research, and the relationship between the researcher and Alex. It may have some flaws, but it is still important work.

      You may be right about that poll, though. That's what I describe as a "decline." The term "idiocracy" comes to mind.

    15. Re:What the Hell? by Workaphobia · · Score: 1

      The reason it's on Slashdot is that when I looked at the headline I said out loud, "Oh damn", because I actually heard of the bird (admittedly from a previous Slashdot posting, but one of unquestionable interest) and was moved by its death. It's about as relevant as a space probe dying, if not more.

      --
      Evidently, the key to understanding recursion is to begin by understanding recursion. The rest is easy.
    16. Re:What the Hell? by Peter+Bortas · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's not a duplicate. It's something other than the usual "someone got agitated over a misunderstanding on a *BSD/Linux mailing list and we misinterpreted it even further for you". It is news from one of the "soft" sciences that are nice to read for a change now and then.

      I'd actually like to nominate this a one of kdawsons best use of editorial control for a long while.

    17. Re:What the Hell? by squared99 · · Score: 1

      Agree,

      This is science people! I personally studied this stuff in the few psych courses I took at University. Very important in regards to animal learning and cognition.

      God, Slashdot is getting boring. Hey, let's talk about WOW again!

    18. Re:What the Hell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well there's a nice big ad hominem for everyone who doesn't share your interest. Well done.

      Anyway, you seem to be confusing "interesting research on bird's intelligence" with "contentless story about a bird dying". Definitely 'roll your eyes and move on' material.

    19. Re:What the Hell? by soliptic · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't have modpoints and you're at +5 already, so let me instead say: BRAVO. Well said.

      This sort of quirky, hard-to-categorise but somehow "of geeky interest" story is what brought me here. Sadly, in recent years, such stories have come along every few months, buried under a flood of flamebait RIAA/MS are evil / fanbait Google/Apple are glorious tripe, which are clearly just trolling for maximum ad impressions. And when they DO come along, someone pops up and complains they're not related to Halo 3 or whatever idiotic computer game is flavour of the month at the moment, and therefore not news for nerds.

    20. Re:What the Hell? by Bryan+Ischo · · Score: 1

      Can you please point out the ad hominem attack in my post? As far as I know I didn't attack you personally at any time.

      The other guy said it best - this story is not interesting because it's not about the research or about cognitive science or anything useful at all. It's about a parrot dying. It's very tangentially related to an interesting subject, and you'd have to be pretty damn interested in the particular research of one particular researcher to even care about this. I'm not saying that there isn't *somebody* out there who cares that this parrot died. I'm just saying that it doesn't even come close to the threshold of being interesting to enough people to be worth posting on Slashdot.

      Perhaps Slashdot should post a news article every time a cognitive science department at a university gets a new grant? It's probably more practically useful knowledge for the people who would be interested in this dead parrot, although no more interesting for the rest of us.

    21. Re:What the Hell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would've been more obvious that this was worthy of a front-page post if the summary actually described WHY it was 'news for nerds'.

      I had no idea who Alex was by name, nor what he was 'famous' for. My first reaction after reading the summary was also to question why is this newsworthy. After reading up, I now see why this particular parrot was worth a front-page post, but it could have, and should have, been made much clearer by the summary.

    22. Re:What the Hell? by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Do you remember Koko, the signing chimpanzee? Or Sitka, the first dog that was shot into space? These animals were symbolically important in scientific history. The case of Alex is particularly important, because it suggests that it is interaction (that is, the close relationship between learner and teacher) that is as important as innate capability in structuring cognitive function. Research like this is hard to repeat, since it involves actually creating a long-term relationship, including an emotional one, with your research subject. (Imagine trying to raise a child you didn't care about - it's the same problem.)

      The ad hominem isn't against me. It's what I see as your campaign against kdawson, which is what motivated your remark to begin with. I don't really notice who-edits-what - I'm not really a Slashdot trainspotter - but you assumed that since he posted it, it must not have been of value or interest. You were wrong.

      And the "practically useful knowledge" remark reinforces my observation about iPhones, CPUs and videogames.

    23. Re:What the Hell? by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 1

      Correction, by the way: Laika was the dog shot into space.

      Do you think it wouldn't be "news for nerds" to report the death of Laika?

    24. Re:What the Hell? by Bryan+Ischo · · Score: 1

      I don't think the death of those other animals you spoke about would be particularly slashdot-worthy either. But I guess we'll have to agree to disagree on these points.

      Yes you are right, I did attack kdawson, the guy/gal annoys me terribly. I went so far as to write an email to CmdrTaco complaining about kdawson's editorial quality, I find it that bad.

    25. Re:What the Hell? by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 1

      Not really an ad hominem. More like a question of semantics, really: people who are only interested in consumer commodities rather than anything theoretical, scientific or philosophical, I'd call idiots a priori. But it's just not about my interests, either: I don't have much interest in theoretical physics, but I would still consider articles about physics news-for-nerds and stuff-that-matters, and I would read them to stay abreast.

      The interesting research part was in TFA.

    26. Re:What the Hell? by Torvaun · · Score: 1

      Not really, unless there were special circumstances like long-term effects from the space travel. Laika was just a random dog that happened to be put on a rocket. Likewise, I don't care about the death of Dolly the sheep, but I might care about the death of her clone, again, for genetics related reasons. Alex, on the other hand, was an active participant. He matters, by my reckoning.

      --
      I see your informative link, and raise you a pithy comment.
    27. Re:What the Hell? by Romancer · · Score: 1

      The fact that this article is in no way furthering the scientific area of which the parrot is famous for contributing to, nor is it broadening the general knowledge of the community by offering information to those previously unnaware, are the issues I take with this posting on Slashdot. Nothing else. Not a narrow appreciation of the field, not a closed view of the definition of the word Nerd or the misunderstanding of the nature of the slashdot community.

      Just the simple fact that there is no news other than a death. An obituary. On slashdot. Nothing deeper in the link than a breif description of the parrots media appearances and a short list of abilities:

      "As early as 1999, he was able to "identify 50 different objects and understand quantities up to 6; he could distinguish 7 colors and 5 shapes, and understand the concepts of 'bigger', 'smaller', 'same', and 'different', and he was learning 'over' and 'under'," according to the New York Times. By 2002, Alex had a vocabulary of more than 100 words."

      Notwithstanding that this was an accomplishment in and of itself for a parrot, it is not news that a parrot died. They die. And if there was an effect on the people in this field, they would have known about it through the more specialized sites and news outlets that they subscribe to since the actual death is a highly significant event to these people.

      It is not however the acceptable news article for a site that claims as it's tagline: "News for Nerds, Stuff that matters"
      Since this is a forum that basically discusses the news articles as they are posted, there is not too much news to discuss here since it is an obit. Nothing more. A single event of the passing of life from a being. The requirements that it fails to meet in my opinion would have been: :Reference link to important effects brought about by the study of this particular parrot. :Information of how the study or interaction of this parrot was significantly different than others of its kind. :The inclusion of the effects that the loss of this specimin will have on the future of that study.

      Any one of which would have lead to a significantly greater number of people currently posting being more accepting of this article appearing on slashdot. Since this would make it "Matter" to them much more. It is not the greatest qualification for a story on slashdot that you have "...seen him on the evening news once". These obits in the past have been reserved for either much better documented stories about the deceased or much greater general awareness by the readers of slashdot than this. I think you'll see that the tags and general posts support the idea that the death is simply not enough to qualify by itself in this case.

      This was, for me at least, the assumption of story submittals being rejected in favor of better documented, linked or referenced submissions. This is now also the expectation that I will waive for kdawson and just skip the stories that this editor posts if this trend continues.

      --


      ) Human Kind Vs Human Creation
      ) It'd be interesting to see how many humans would survive to serve us.
    28. Re:What the Hell? by zsau · · Score: 1

      Well done.

      I have almost given up my Slashdot addiction, precisely because of this problem. The one article I bother reading every couple of times I visit this site once every week or so, always seems to be filled with responses to people asking why this is news. Would that there were a decent replacement. (Technocrat's okay, but doesn't have enough discussion and tends to have articles that are too political or too repetitive — one global warming article a year is enough.)

      --
      Look out!
    29. Re:What the Hell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The ppl next door where I live have an African Grey, it's very smart- I'll train it to compile a kernel- then we can post that as a news. There are several articles here that don't really talk about IT- this story I did find interesting enough without criticising it, I ever do though- I rather spend my time training the next door parrot. //~maceto

  10. The news today... by doit3d · · Score: 1

    ...has gone to the birds.

    --
    "This is America... where the will of the few outweigh the outrage of the many..." - Unknown
  11. Obligatory Monty Python by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mr. Praline: 'Ello, I wish to register a complaint.

    (The owner does not respond.)

    Mr. Praline: 'Ello, Miss?

    Owner: What do you mean "miss"?

    Mr. Praline: I'm sorry, I have a cold. I wish to make a complaint!

    Owner: We're closin' for lunch.

    Mr. Praline: Never mind that, my lad. I wish to complain about this parrot what I purchased not half an hour ago from this very boutique.

    Owner: Oh yes, the, uh, the Norwegian Blue...What's,uh...What's wrong with it?

    Mr. Praline: I'll tell you what's wrong with it, my lad. 'E's dead, that's what's wrong with it!

    Owner: No, no, 'e's uh,...he's resting.

    Mr. Praline: Look, matey, I know a dead parrot when I see one, and I'm looking at one right now.

    Owner: No no he's not dead, he's, he's restin'! Remarkable bird, the Norwegian Blue, idn'it, ay? Beautiful plumage!

    Mr. Praline: The plumage don't enter into it. It's stone dead.

    Owner: Nononono, no, no! 'E's resting!

    Mr. Praline: All right then, if he's restin', I'll wake him up! (shouting at the cage) 'Ello, Mister Polly Parrot! I've got a lovely fresh cuttle fish for you if you
              show...

    (owner hits the cage)

    Owner: There, he moved!
    Mr. Praline: No, he didn't, that was you hitting the cage!

    Owner: I never!!
    Mr. Praline: Yes, you did!

    Owner: I never, never did anything...

    Mr. Praline: (yelling and hitting the cage repeatedly) 'ELLO POLLY!!!!! Testing! Testing! Testing! Testing! This is your nine o'clock alarm call!

    (Takes parrot out of the cage and thumps its head on the counter. Throws it up in the air and watches it plummet to the floor.)

    Mr. Praline: Now that's what I call a dead parrot.

    Thanks! I'll be here all week!

  12. Dead parrot by sepluv · · Score: 0, Redundant

    'E's not pinin'! 'E's passed on! This parrot is no more! He has ceased to be! 'E's expired and gone to meet 'is maker! 'E's a stiff! Bereft of life, 'e rests in peace! If you hadn't nailed 'im to the perch 'e'd be pushing up the daisies! 'Is metabolic processes are now 'istory! 'E's off the twig! 'E's kicked the bucket, 'e's shuffled off 'is mortal coil, run down the curtain and joined the bleedin' choir invisibile!! THIS IS AN EX-PARROT!!

    --
    Joe Llywelyn Griffith Blakesley
    [This post is in the public domain (copyright-free) unless otherwise stated]
    1. Re:Dead parrot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I got a slug.

    2. Re:Dead parrot by sepluv · · Score: 0, Redundant

      At risk of stating the obvious, the parent is not public domain. It is a fair use excerpt from the Dead Parrot Sketch which was written by Graham Chapman, et. al. for Monty Python's Flying Circus and is copyright (1989) Pantheon Books/Random House, Inc.

      --
      Joe Llywelyn Griffith Blakesley
      [This post is in the public domain (copyright-free) unless otherwise stated]
  13. I don't know... by thegnu · · Score: 4, Funny

    in other news, 300 Chinese people died from a coal mine explosion.

    Yeah, but that doesn't give us a cue to commence the recital of Monty Python routines.

    I don't know, the Chinese government says they're sleeping.
    --
    Please stop stalking me, bro.
    1. Re:I don't know... by hey! · · Score: 1

      But the palindrome of "Tianjin" would be "Nijnait"!! It don't work!!

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  14. Researcher's Famous Dog Seen in Bronco by tjstork · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Animal control officials are shadowing Fido, rumoured to be in a White Ford Bronco driving down I-95. Fido, the famous physics dog, is said to be a suspect in the surprising parrot case. Yesterday, a necropsy revealed teethmarks in the flank of Alex, the dancing parrot who is said to have helped invent the personal computer.

    A trainer for Fido was heard to say, via cell phone, "if the tooth don't fit, you must acquit!"

    --
    This is my sig.
    1. Re:Researcher's Famous Dog Seen in Bronco by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      Actually I've heared the parrot was killed by Schrödinger's cat.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    2. Re:Researcher's Famous Dog Seen in Bronco by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 3, Funny

      No, the parrot may or may not have been killed by Schrödinger's cat, who may or may not be dead.

    3. Re:Researcher's Famous Dog Seen in Bronco by FooAtWFU · · Score: 1

      Animal control officials are shadowing Fido, rumoured to be in a White Ford Bronco driving down I-95. Fido, the famous physics dog, is said to be a suspect in the surprising parrot case.
      What breed of dog is Fido? He wouldn't happen to be a lab, would he?
      --
      The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
  15. from the teaching-us-how-to-communicate dept? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This story is clearly from the "he's resting" or "beautiful plumage" dept.

    kdawson please check in your geek card at the door on the way out!

  16. Great attention grabbing first sentence by antifoidulus · · Score: 3, Funny

    albeit probably unintentionally: As you know, I have spent my life researching, breeding and living with birds,

    This coming from someone who calls themselves grrrlscientist. You could probably make some videos to pay for your research.....

    1. Re:Great attention grabbing first sentence by fireforadrymouth · · Score: 1

      Damn it! You beat me to it - I couldn't help but pause after reading that, either.

  17. Alex was cool. by FlatCatInASlatVat · · Score: 5, Informative

    I met him once. He really was a remarkable bird and could use language for communication, not just mimicry. He would answer all sorts of question about objects that you showed him. Some errors, of course, but correct responses way above chance. Together with all the reports over the last few years about tool-making and using in crows, it makes you have a lot more respect for birds. Makes me think of watching crows play and tumble on a strong, turbulent wind or pelican "surf" the air just in front of a nice clean wave. Awesome.

    1. Re:Alex was cool. by blakestah · · Score: 1

      Alex used words, but not language.

      Language use requires word polymorphisms, grammar, and verbs.

      Noted linguists such as Noam Chomsky did not feel that Alex's use of the 100 english words Alex knew constituted a true language.

      An average college graduate in the USA has a vocabulary of 100,000 words.

      Still, Alex displayed remarkable intelligence for a bird.

    2. Re:Alex was cool. by king-manic · · Score: 1

      Alex used words, but not language.

      Language use requires word polymorphisms, grammar, and verbs.

      Noted linguists such as Noam Chomsky did not feel that Alex's use of the 100 english words Alex knew constituted a true language.

      An average college graduate in the USA has a vocabulary of 100,000 words.

      Still, Alex displayed remarkable intelligence for a bird.


      The average American high school graduate knows only 4 words. Yes. No. Beer. fuck. The other 99,996 are all just synonyms for those 4 they pick up in college.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    3. Re:Alex was cool. by smaddox · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Take a look at http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/pepperberg03/peppe rberg_index.html.

      The last 4 paragraphs read thusly:

      There are some things that the birds do that, colloquially speaking, "just blow us away." We were training Alex to sound out phonemes, not because we want him to read as humans do, but we want to see if he understands that his labels are made up of sounds that can be combined in different ways to make up new words; that is, to demonstrate evidence for segmentation. He babbles at dusk, producing strings like "green, cheen, bean, keen", so we have some evidence for this behavior, but we need more solid data.

      Thus we are trying to get him to sound out refrigerator letters, the same way one would train children on phonics. We were doing demos at the Media Lab for our corporate sponsors; we had a very small amount of time scheduled and the visitors wanted to see Alex work. So we put a number of differently colored letters on the tray that we use, put the tray in front of Alex, and asked, "Alex, what sound is blue?" He answers, "Ssss." It was an "s", so we say "Good birdie" and he replies, "Want a nut."

      Well, I don't want him sitting there using our limited amount of time to eat a nut, so I tell him to wait, and I ask, "What sound is green?" Alex answers, "Ssshh." He's right, it's "sh," and we go through the routine again: "Good parrot." "Want a nut." "Alex, wait. What sound is orange?" "ch." "Good bird!" "Want a nut." We're going on and on and Alex is clearly getting more and more frustrated. He finally gets very slitty-eyed and he looks at me and states, "Want a nut. Nnn, uh, tuh."

      Not only could you imagine him thinking, "Hey, stupid, do I have to spell it for you?" but the point was that he had leaped over where we were and had begun sounding out the letters of the words for us. This was in a sense his way of saying to us, "I know where you're headed! Let's get on with it," which gave us the feeling that we were on the right track with what we were doing. These kinds of things don't happen in the lab on a daily basis, but when they do, they make you realize there's a lot more going on inside these little walnut-sized brains than you might at first imagine.

    4. Re:Alex was cool. by dreddnott · · Score: 1

      Alex combined existing words to describe new objects: "corknut" for an unshelled almond and "banerry" for an apple (outside like a cherry, inside like a banana).

      I read about Alex many years ago in one of my science periodicals and it's pretty disappointing to see him go so young. I hope it wasn't the stress of all the experiments.

      --
      I may make you feel, but I can't make you think.
    5. Re:Alex was cool. by sydneyfong · · Score: 1

      > An average college graduate in the USA has a vocabulary of 100,000 words.

      $ wc /usr/share/dict/words
      57025 57024 529097 /usr/share/dict/words

      Granted it's not a comprehensive dictionary (i use "wamerican-small"), but no way an average person knows twice as many words than a dictionary list...

      Perhaps you meant 10,000?

      --
      Don't quote me on this.
    6. Re:Alex was cool. by blakestah · · Score: 1

      Whether or not something is language is an academic topic with relatively standardized criteria. Whether non-humans have EVER used language is a hot topic in academic debate.

      Alex clearly grasped abstract concepts and used those in symbolic communication. But that is not nearly enough for language, and is arguably trainable via simple conditioning. For example, understanding what a color is means you understand the concept of color, but does not mean you can use language.

      Its a complex topic, and not easily explained to someone who is unfamiliar with linguistics.

    7. Re:Alex was cool. by blakestah · · Score: 1

      No, I meant what I wrote. Neuroscience, ed. Dale Purves, 2nd Edition, page 591

      Or nearly any american book on linguistics.

      A remarkable learning feat is that Americans learn, on average, 14 words each day from age 3 until college graduation. In other languages the rates are similar (but there is some language-to-language change).

  18. A new beginning... by machinelou · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Although this animal could do some fairly impressive things, I often felt she (Dr. Pepperberg) and her colleagues made too much of it. The constellation of things referred to by English speakers as "Language" is far too broad to be especially meaningful when applied to the behavior of a parrot. The behaviors of "speaking" and "listening" are better described as falling along a continuum as opposed to a skill that one either has or not.
    And this is fairly important news because, from what I understand, most Alex's success has not been replicated with other birds. Hopefully this will prompt her and/or others to better describe the conditions under which animals (and humans) come to do things we refer to as language as opposed to simply cataloging differences between species which are all too easy to find.

    1. Re:A new beginning... by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What I hope is that findings like those related to Alex, as well as those involving learned and socially communicated non-human primate behavior, gets us farther and farther away from crude nature-vs-nurture models and toward theories based on brains as adaptive, re-organizing dynamical systems. It is shocking how much naive innatism and folk-modularity is getting promulgated in the popular media nowadays.

    2. Re:A new beginning... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, she devotes an entire chapter of "The Alex Studies" to precisely that, describing experiments done with other subjects investigating the effects of such methods as watching a video alone, being given a reward for saying the correct word(also while alone)and interaction and joint attention without explicit modeling to demonstrate correct word meaning(The model/rival approach used with Alex was found to be the most effective.). And she most certainly IS replicating her work with Alex with her other subjects(albeit-presumably-not yet up to the same level as Alex). So are many, many Parrot owners in admittedly non-professional settings who will be happy to relate her technique's effectiveness! :-)

              She NEVER claims fully abstract(eg. KEY in the data; the KEYs to the car)referential 'language' on the part of her subjects, merely 'peri-referentiality'(her term), that is the ability to meaningfully label categories such as 'matter' and 'color' and concepts such as 'bigger/smaller' and perhaps 'want'(as in 'I want x'), a conservative interpretation that I find fully supported by the facts and data she presents.

              Of COURSE no other(professional)researchers have replicated or(even better)improved upon her techniques/results;none have made the attempt(a surefire way to not replicate results!)! like I stated in a previous post, an absurd travesty, which frankly leaves me stunned. What a Joke(but nobody's laughing....)! :-(

              Joel L. Lewis

  19. For the sake of completeness... by E++99 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Dead Parrot Sketch

    The cast:

    MR. PRALINE
    John Cleese
    SHOP OWNER
    Michael Palin

    The sketch:

    A customer enters a pet shop.

    Mr. Praline: 'Ello, I wish to register a complaint.

    (The owner does not respond.)

    Mr. Praline: 'Ello, Miss?

    Owner: What do you mean "miss"?

    Mr. Praline: I'm sorry, I have a cold. I wish to make a complaint!

    Owner: We're closin' for lunch.

    Mr. Praline: Never mind that, my lad. I wish to complain about this parrot what I purchased not half an hour ago from this very boutique.

    Owner: Oh yes, the, uh, the Norwegian Blue...What's,uh...What's wrong with it?

    Mr. Praline: I'll tell you what's wrong with it, my lad. 'E's dead, that's what's wrong with it!

    Owner: No, no, 'e's uh,...he's resting.

    Mr. Praline: Look, matey, I know a dead parrot when I see one, and I'm looking at one right now.

    Owner: No no he's not dead, he's, he's restin'! Remarkable bird, the Norwegian Blue, idn'it, ay? Beautiful plumage!

    Mr. Praline: The plumage don't enter into it. It's stone dead.

    Owner: Nononono, no, no! 'E's resting!

    Mr. Praline: All right then, if he's restin', I'll wake him up! (shouting at the cage) 'Ello, Mister Polly Parrot! I've got a lovely fresh cuttle fish for you if you
    show...

    (owner hits the cage)

    Owner: There, he moved!

    Mr. Praline: No, he didn't, that was you hitting the cage!

    Owner: I never!!

    Mr. Praline: Yes, you did!

    Owner: I never, never did anything...

    Mr. Praline: (yelling and hitting the cage repeatedly) 'ELLO POLLY!!!!! Testing! Testing! Testing! Testing! This is your nine o'clock alarm call!

    (Takes parrot out of the cage and thumps its head on the counter. Throws it up in the air and watches it plummet to the floor.)

    Mr. Praline: Now that's what I call a dead parrot.

    Owner: No, no.....No, 'e's stunned!

    Mr. Praline: STUNNED?!?

    Owner: Yeah! You stunned him, just as he was wakin' up! Norwegian Blues stun easily, major.

    Mr. Praline: Um...now look...now look, mate, I've definitely 'ad enough of this. That parrot is definitely deceased, and when I purchased it not 'alf an hour
    ago, you assured me that its total lack of movement was due to it bein' tired and shagged out following a prolonged squawk.

    Owner: Well, he's...he's, ah...probably pining for the fjords.

    Mr. Praline: PININ' for the FJORDS?!?!?!? What kind of talk is that?, look, why did he fall flat on his back the moment I got 'im home?

    Owner: The Norwegian Blue prefers keepin' on it's b

  20. No no he's not dead, he's, he's resting! by Per+Abrahamsen · · Score: 2, Funny

    nt

  21. Obligatory Python video.. by Snotboble_ · · Score: 1
    --
    Q: How does a Unix guru have sex? A: unzip;strip;touch;finger;mount;fsck;more;yes;umount;sleep
  22. Pining for the fjords? by GBC · · Score: 5, Funny
    Finally, I can quote the "Dead Parrot Sketch" and not be off-topic!

    Luckily for me, Alex died young - I don't know if I could have held out for another 19-29 years...

    1. Re:Pining for the fjords? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fortunately, it will be modded redundant very very quickly.

  23. Clearly it was Hospital Food that done him in. by infonography · · Score: 1
    Anonymous Coward

    Anyone who makes a comment about pining for the fjords gets a slap. Pining for Fjords just makes them grumpy. Besides He was an African Grey, not a Norwegian Blue. Still if this is the Second Earth Commissioned by the Mice then Slartibartfast got to have glaciers roll over Africa as he mentioned in the Hitchhikers Guide (the good version).
    --
    Sorry about the writing. Robot fingers, you know? Cliff Steele in DOOM PATROL #23
  24. Whats newsworthy about this is : by unity100 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    this parrot was smarter and more intelligent than a certain percentage of /.ers. this is that kind of news.

    no really, he was really, really overly smart. major geek stuff.

  25. Arrrggghhhh!!!!!!! by fishthegeek · · Score: 4, Funny

    Me an Me shipmates extend to ye oer sympathies. Tis tuf to looz a parrot, I wuldnt be da same witout mine. Arrrrrggghhhh.
    May he rest in Davy Jones Locker in peace. Arrrgghhhh!!!!!

    --
    load "$",8,1
    1. Re:Arrrggghhhh!!!!!!! by chris.evans · · Score: 1

      To bad they could not get Alex to say, "No quarter taken or given, Har."

  26. no way! by SadMarvin · · Score: 0, Redundant

    He is just pining for the fjords... I cant believe I nobody said it already!!! C'mon wath is happening with Slashdot!

  27. Final count down?? by kanweg · · Score: 1


    Three, two, one.....

    Bert

  28. What They Didn't Tell... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    He was delicious!

  29. how sad by Rutulian · · Score: 3, Funny

    I met Alex four years ago at Brandeis. He tried to mate with my arm... :(

    1. Re:how sad by marcello_dl · · Score: 1

      >He tried to mate with my arm...

      This is slashdot. Everybody here uses own arm to try to "mate".

      Nevermind, read TFA and TFcomments, some interesting story about nuts, really.

      --
      ---- MISSING MISCELLANEOUS DATA SEGMENT --- [sigdash] trolololol
    2. Re:how sad by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 1

      You probably have one fine looking arm.

  30. This hit me hard... by jflo · · Score: 1

    The death of Alex the African Grey Parrot hit me harder than when Data died in the last Star Trek movie. This is truely a horrible day for Bird lovers everywhere. I guess I'll just go buy myself a gerbal to help fill the void. These are not smiles times.

    --
    WWPD - What Would Picard Do?
    1. Re:This hit me hard... by JDHannan · · Score: 1

      keep that gerbil OUT of your void!

  31. LOL. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    LOL Bitches.

  32. Of Course It's Tech News! by Easy2RememberNick · · Score: 1

    A Parrot is a bird, a Penguin is a bird, the mascot of Linux is Tux the Penguin. See? Totally relevant.

    1. Re:Of Course It's Tech News! by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      For a short while, though, the Linux mascot was a Platypus.

      But then the penguin-biting-Linus incident happened down in Australia... alas.

      Didn't they make the Darwin mascot the platypus, now that I think of it? (long after Linux)

  33. I was about to rejoyce ... by porky_pig_jr · · Score: 1

    after reading the news that the Mac community prevented the coup, and now you are bringing me down with a news that whatever parrot died. reading the slashdot is becoming a roller-coaster ride.

  34. Birds live long by fishbowl · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My local pet store has a parrot that was born in 1914. He seems healthy and spry (and he bites).

    obHomer: Mmmmmm.... peppered bird...

    --
    -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  35. The last nail... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    in Perl's coffin :*(

    at least it was a natural death (no python involved).

  36. News for Nerds? by phorm · · Score: 3, Funny

    If that doesn't make his death "News for Nerds", then I don't know what does.

    Initially I read Nerds as Birds... which would make for an interesting headline:

    News for Birds, stuff with crackers

    1. Re:News for Nerds? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn, I thought you wrote

      News for Birds, Stuff for Crackers

  37. It's not electronic by phorm · · Score: 1

    If it were a robotic parrot, maybe people would care more. Unfortunately, most people on here only acknowledge the "Computer Nerd" variety of nerdome, overlooking veterinary, medical, science, and many other forms of nerddome.

    I must admit, at first I was wondering why an article about a parrot was on the front-page of slashdot. I'm a regular, but apparently I haven't caught Alex on the news on slashdot before. However, the article was enough to pique my interest and look up a bit more of Alex... although I do have a personal interest in African Grey's (always wanted one as a pet, but they're a lot of money, and require more attention than I could give right now). They're supposed to be incredibly intelligent birds, with live spans that often mean that need to be included in the owner's will (because they've been known to outlive humans).

    I do wonder that, if Alex had been a famous Chimpanzee or primate, then perhaps more people would find interest in this article. Just because he's a bird and not a mammal such as a monkey or dolphin, doesn't mean that his intelligence isn't noteworthy or perhaps of scientific value. Heck, if you pay close attention to even some more common birds such as crows (or better, ravens) you'll find that they show rather keen level of intelligence and shrewdness. This is generally centered around getting food, but just because their needs/desires are much simpler than ours doesn't mean that their intellect is.

    1. Re:It's not electronic by mvdwege · · Score: 1

      It's not the 'Computer Nerds' that are the problem. If anything, the generation of 'Computer Nerds' that was responsible for Slashdot in the first place was a generation that had a lot of interest in things outside computers. The reason I stuck around when I first found Slashdot was because Rob Malda's scattershot of "things I and my friends are interested in" so closely mirrored my own view of the world.

      These days however, the average poster seems to be a WoW-playing script kiddie, whose knowledge of computers does not reach further than knowing how to key in registry edits from magazines and websites to 'tune up' his PC. It is this crowd that responds with jeers whenever something even outside that mainstream is posted.

      In Computer Nerd terms, they are the high school dropouts who took an ExamCram braindump to pass their MCSE and now fashion themselves System Administrators, all the while showing in their every utterance that they know exactly nothing about computers.

      If these are the folks complaining about kdawson, I say to Rob Malda: please hire more kdawsons!

      Mart
      --
      "I know I will be modded down for this": where's the option '-1, Asking for it'?
  38. operant conditioning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Noam Chomsky criticised the parrot's ability to speak saying it was just operant conditioning, but I'd say that's about as much as most slashbots have.
     
    I can see it now: "In Soviet Russa... In Soviet Russia *SQUAWK* I FOR ONE WELCOME *SQUAWK*"

  39. Primer by giminy · · Score: 1

    Isn't Apergillis how the folks in the movie Primer discovered what their device did?

    --
    The Right Reverend K. Reid Wightman,
    1. Re:Primer by Esion+Modnar · · Score: 1

      I saw that movie on IFC a while back. If anybody made a time machine, it would probably be by some nerdy guys in a garage somewhere. No typical Hollywood special effects: flashing lights and machines that go bing! It felt more like a documentary than a movie. Very interesting.

      --

      They say the first thing to go is your penis. Well, it's either that or your brain. I forget which...
  40. As a parrot owner, sad news by MarkWatson · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I have a Meyers Parrot named Brady (picture: http://flickr.com/photos/mark_watson/392128570/) who is about 6 years old. When Brady was a baby, I used to show him videos on my computer, not of Alex, but of the Parrot at MIT who used a symbolic language. Brady was fairly much fascinated by the videos, and I showed them to him many times.

    Although parrots have small neocortexes, they are clever little creatures. Brady has good analytic (puzzle solving) abilities, but his long term memory seems to be limited to things that he has been exposed to many times - this is just my own opinion, not backed up by any scientific research.

    I work at home and can frequently give our parrot attention during the day - please don't even consider getting a parrot unless either your family can give it frequent attention and play time every day, or get a mated pair that can keep each other company. We find that we can't really leave rady in a room by himself, so we move him to where ever we are in the house, or better yet, just let him run/fly around (also known as running amuck :-)

    A problem with parrots is that they do bite - I get a good bite every month or two, but I try to not let it hurt my feelings. I could probably avoid most bites by not handling Brady when I know that he is pissed off, but why bother.

    1. Re:As a parrot owner, sad news by MarkWatson · · Score: 1

      Another cool thing about parrots: being birds, they fly :-)

      Brady probably reaches speeds well over 30 miles an hour flying around our house, but he avoids crashes, knows about windows, etc. I am careful to let him know if I am going to walk through a doorway while he is flying to avoid any unfortunte ramifications of the conservation of momentum and the pauli exclusion principle :-)

      Baby birds mess up on the flying thing a lot, but it must be like learning to ride a bicycle - once you have it down, you have it down.

    2. Re:As a parrot owner, sad news by epine · · Score: 1


      If humans were birds, we would die in the shell. With our giant noggins we'd be completely unable to weild the egg tooth to crack out of our shell. Birds have a lot more pressure to develop cognitive capacity without also developing cognitive bulk. It's hardly surprising that birds accomplish more with less.

      I personally regard Alex as a lot more interesting and significant than any Apple product. However, the topic is hardly worthy of discussion. It could work as a honeypot. -1 for everyone who chimes in with an obligatory parrot joke.

    3. Re:As a parrot owner, sad news by timjdot · · Score: 1

      I was surprised to find our white capped pionus is quite intelligent too. I grew up with dogs so am well aware of their non-human interests and thought processes but was surprised to compare the pionus (about 8 inches) to the cockatiels (about 5 inches). The pionus clearly can do path planning and when placed in a complex environment simply walks the right ways to exit (given three turns/tricky moves for instance). The cockatiel exhibits far less cognitive modeling. They make 5 or 6 tries on each needed turn/trick until they get it and then go to the next one. Sometimes they undo their progress but then it takes fewer tries to get back where they were. The older cockatiel will try to show the younger one what to do. Birds certainly have different behaviors than humans. The striking thing about animals is how quickly they turn to violence. They love unconditionally but will maime and kill without hesitation. They have strict pecking order. But in reality maybe humans are not much different. I guess the "man" has me down low on the pecking order but like everyone like to pretend my social position is for some contrived, human, and civilized reason.

      Oh yeah, the cockatiels are extremely adept at flight and enjoy banking and dipping over all obstacles. The only time they hit a window is in panic when a silly hawk comes in for a grab (blocked by another window of course).

      --
      Expect Freedom.
  41. Tastes like chicken! by HangingChad · · Score: 1

    I ate what? Well, how would I know it was a talking parrot?

    --
    That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
  42. But white ones can dance! by antdude · · Score: 1

    Check out Frostee who can dance to Creedance Clearwater song. Now, that's neat to see him go down and boogey. :D

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  43. Obligatory post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This story is for the birds.

    Hey, someone had to say it.

  44. Well, duh. by porcupine8 · · Score: 1
    Obviously neuroscientists, cognitive scientists, neurolinguists, etc are not Real Nerds (tm). Because figuring out how people and animals work rather than how to make a computer work isn't Real Science.

    It's not like the histories of artificial intelligence and cognitive science as fields of study are inextricably linked. We haven't been going back and forth between models of thinking based on computer programming and models based on human or animal behavior, building from one to the other, for over fifty years now. If it's not about particle physics, space travel, or the new iPod, a true nerd would know nothing about it.

    No, Alex the parrot and Irene Pepperberg have NO PLACE on a nerdly site like slashdot.

    --
    Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
    1. Re:Well, duh. by Romancer · · Score: 1

      Any one of the topics you mention could be a completely valid article but since they were not the topic of the article in question they are moot examples. This is an obit. No other information is present, linked or assembled in the submission.
      This argument is the equivalent of trying to say that the death of any scientist should be on Slashdot. No mention of how they have furthered the field themselves, no mention of how rare or unique the abilities were among their kind, and no mention of how the loss of an admittedly valuable and cared for friend will actually impact the area of study you seem to care so much for. Those are the things that would invalidate the submission in my opinion for a front page Slashdot article.

      Please try not to "Black and White" the argument as a tactic to persuade others. It doesn't come off as intellectually mature. The whole "real science/nerds" rant is a fabrication of your need to convince, not a valid argument addressing the points in this issue.

      --


      ) Human Kind Vs Human Creation
      ) It'd be interesting to see how many humans would survive to serve us.
  45. Banerry by belg4mit · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I still remember the bit on 3-2-1 Contact where they featured Alex.
    The coolest bit was that he invented a word for an apple (banerry)
    based on its similarities in color and taste to fruits he knew.

    --
    Were that I say, pancakes?
  46. Happened to my African Grey too.. by gracenote · · Score: 1

    My African Grey recently died too at an early age, 15, she was an amazing intelligent bird. We had a necropsy done and it turned out to be a heart attack / hear disease. Big bummer, I really dug Alex, very extraordinary bird.

  47. He's not dead... by cdomigan · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...he's pining for the fjords!

    1. Re:He's not dead... by Bushido+Hacks · · Score: 1

      Pining for the FJORDS?! What kind of talk is that? Look, why did he fall flat on his back the moment I got him home?

      --
      The Rapture is NOT an exit strategy.
  48. If you want to help... by weeboo0104 · · Score: 5, Informative

    I got the news from another member of my bird club who knew that Dr. Irene Pepperberg did a demonstration with myself and my Grey for our club a few years ago.

    Irene's research was instrumental in helping understand the cognitive ability of animals (ironicly, her research started out as trying to help brain damaged humans rebuild cognitive ability through Model/Rival training).

    Irene has a big heart and I know she must be crushed from this loss.
    If you want to support her research with her 3 other birds (lab space and research assistants aren't free), please donate a check made payable to:

    The Alex Foundation MS/062
    Department of Psychology
    Brandeis University
    415 South Street
    Waltham, MA 02454
    Attn: Alex Memorial

    The Alex Foundation is a 503c not-for-profit organization.

    --
    It is easier to build strong children than to repair broken men. -Frederick Douglass
  49. Clone him, if possible by ceallaigh · · Score: 1

    Did they even selectively breed him with other parrots?

    1. Re:Clone him, if possible by Bushido+Hacks · · Score: 1

      Clone a dead parrot?! That sounds like mad science to me! How dare you suggest that we clone a dead parrot! Just kidding. This site is full of mad scientists just waiting to clone a dead parrot. Just let me put this dead parrot in this cage.

      Cue the Six Million Dollar Man intro!
      **Setting the Parrot int the Catapult.**
      **Engages the cataput with the dead parrot flying away**
      DUN-NANANANANANANA
      Done! See I told you we could make him better! Look at him fly!

      --
      The Rapture is NOT an exit strategy.
  50. Next, they'll be telling us there's no Cheddar! by aqk · · Score: 1

    OK-
    So it's a dead parrot.

    But does Mr.Wensleydale still have no cheese?


    1. Re:Next, they'll be telling us there's no Cheddar! by Bushido+Hacks · · Score: 1

      Sorry, we got no cheddar today.

      --
      The Rapture is NOT an exit strategy.
  51. he's resting! by Willuknight · · Score: 0

    No no, e's not dead, uh,...he's resting. Look there, he moved!

    --
    Do not anger the Karma Whores, for they don't bathe often, and might decide to come visit you in person. -Ryan Amos
  52. minor correction by Twisted64 · · Score: 1

    Owner: The Norwegian Blue prefers keepin' on it's back! Remarkable bird, id'nit, squire? Lovely plumage!
    Just because there's a real word there... that should be kippin', as in sleeping.
    --
    Consciousness is a myth. Trust me.
  53. Favourite Joke by Pogdranaut · · Score: 1

    Q. What's this ? "Pieces of Seven! Pieces of Seven!"

    A. A parity error.

  54. No offense but by arcite · · Score: 1, Interesting
    I think that keeping a bird as a pet is quite possibly one of the most cruel things in this world.

    These creatures were meant to fly free in their native rain forests, not to languish in cages, regardless of your anthropomorphizing. I've been working in East Africa for the past several years and have seen first hand the results of the horrible practices of raiding the last few intact habitats for the pet trade. Everything is for sale, from exotic fresh water fish, to birds, rare butterflies, pretty much anything and everything. This trade contributes and hastens the destruction of these habitats forever.

    In Kenya I used to marvel at the diversity of exotic birds that congregated in my garden, from the majestic eagles and kites, to the brightly coloured sunbirds, the odd Ibis or Kingfisher.

    Then I had an idiot neighbor that had some kind of parrot locked up in a cage that would squauk all day, poor bastard. Parrots in Kenya are becoming rarer and rarer...all because some people on the other side of the world think its cool to "own" one.

    1. Re:No offense but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      to be honest though, a lot of the parrots that are in the pet trade were bred for that specific purpose and if they were released to the wild they'd just die
      but you do get a lot of illegal captured birds though but it depends who your dealer is.

    2. Re:No offense but by Yosho · · Score: 4, Insightful

      These creatures were meant to fly free in their native rain forests

      Creatures are not "meant" to do anything, unless you believe in an invisible friend in the sky who is pulling all of our strings like puppets.

      As long as it's happy -- as long as any pet is happy, for that matter -- why does it matter if they're not living in their natural habitat? Just because there's one more parrot in the US doesn't mean there's one less in Africa. You should be attacking people who abuse them, not somebody who has given one a caring home.

      --
      Karma: Terrifying (mostly affected by atrocities you've committed)
    3. Re:No offense but by kalirion · · Score: 1

      Keep that in mind when our future alien overlords put you in a zoo and feed you happy pills.

    4. Re:No offense but by Rei · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Keeping a parrot != Keeping a parrot in a cage.

      Mal's cage door only shuts at night. He has half of my entire living room to himself, a veritable jungle. He treats us like he'd treat his flock in the wild. And regardless of what you call "anthopomorphizing", his intelligence really is impressive, and we've tested it. A common demonstration that I'll do is to put a finger front of him and then say some random word. He does nothing. Then I'll say up, and he goes up. I can hold him over a trash can, and say "Go potty", and if he can go, he does right then. He really does solve the sort of puzzles that I described (I have video -- want to see it?), and he really, honestly does address us by name, and he really isn't happy if the wrong person comes. If I'm cooking dinner, 98% of the time, he calls for me ("Kareh!). If Elaine is, 98% of the time, it's for her. This isn't anecdotal; we've been paying extra attention to this. If this is some sort of "trick", as opposed to name recognition, I'd really like to know how he's pulling it off. I can take video if you need it.

      Re, flying: he can still "fly", just not gain altitude. All that matters is that he not be able to make it to a kitchen burner or a ceiling fan. He can still cover the distance halfway across the house. Furthermore, Amazons are a lot more oriented to climbing than to flying (if you've ever looked at one, they're rather stocky birds). They love to climb (hence the standard advice to make sure that their cages have plenty of horizontal bars).

      Anyways, who are you to tell me that even though my (captive raised) bird is demonstrably happy, that he'd somehow be better off starving and trying to dodge predators out in western Mexico (his native habitat)? Hey, you're a human -- your native habitat is the plains of east-central Africa. Want me to ship you back over there? Even if Mal was wild raised and knew how to survive out there (which he isn't; he'd die quickly), he'd undoubtedly be shunned by the other local parrots since he doesn't know their habits and they're very social, "community-oriented" animals.

      Anyways, Mal just called Elaine (who is fixing breakfast) and said he wanted up. She just picked him up, and he just said, "Good Elaine!". Breakfast will be ready in just a minute, so I better get going.

      --
      By a scallop's forelocks!
    5. Re:No offense but by Gulthek · · Score: 1

      These creatures were meant to fly free in their native rain forests

      Interesting concept. Were we humans 'meant' to develop modern civilization or do you think something interfered?

    6. Re:No offense but by orclevegam · · Score: 2, Funny

      Keep that in mind when our future alien overlords put you in a zoo and feed you happy pills.

      A roof over your head, three square meals, and all the drugs you can want. Now, give me a computer with internet access, and I'm not seeing a down side here.

      --
      Curiosity was framed, Ignorance killed the cat.
    7. Re:No offense but by Fifty+Points · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Something tells me most Americans are already doing this.

      --
      I'm in between insightful sigs right now...
    8. Re:No offense but by AgentSmith · · Score: 1

      I'm not seeing a down side here

      Hi folks at home, this is Bob Barker.

      Remember to spay or neuter your humans.
      Let's keep the human population down.

    9. Re:No offense but by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Creatures are not "meant" to do anything,
      No, I think birds are meant to be able to fly, the wings are a bit of a clue.
      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    10. Re:No offense but by UbuntuDupe · · Score: 1

      Timeout.

      Assuming "Karen" is a female, she just claimed that:

      a) she's a lesbian
      b) who reads slashdot
      c) and watches Firefly
      d) and a parrot that understands verbal semantics
      e) and which can poop on command
      f) and knows someone who carefully raised a bird family and then accidentally killed it by feeding it avacados

      and the part you found hardest to believe was that she isn't exterminating biodiversity in East Africa?

    11. Re:No offense but by rumpsummoner · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Okay, enough with the drama. First of all, my bird would never be in a rain forest because he is Australian. Second of all, I am pretty sure that my bird would argue with you about how cruel his existence is if he could talk.

      He is fully flighted. I take him outside with me all the time. He pretty much has free reign of the house when I am home. When I am not home he has to play all day in his gym and listen to the radio. He is only in a cage to sleep which I think he would prefer to being hunted 24/7. He was not wild caught so all of the things you're complaining about are non-applicable. Rather than saying no one should have birds as pets, perhaps you should say that people should do their homework before they buy animals to make sure things are on the up and up. The birth of my bird didn't affect Africa or Australia any more than my birth is affected Switzerland or England.

      It is tragic that bad things happen. It is more tragic when people over-react to those bad things and tromp all over things that make people happy.

    12. Re:No offense but by Rei · · Score: 1

      You're close. A few corrections.

      a) Bi, but with a (female) partner of 8 years.
      d) Limited to a few cases, but yes.
      f) Not "knows". Read an article from a vet talking about a client of his to whom that happened.

      Also, a few notes:

      c) I not only watch Firefly, but I'm the maintainer of the package fortune-firefly. :)
      e) That's not even particularly rare. Potty training parrots is becoming the standard. They're smart animals. :)

      --
      By a scallop's forelocks!
    13. Re:No offense but by elrous0 · · Score: 1
      Well, actually most countries (incl. the U.S.) actually forbid importation of wild parrots to protect against this. Almost all of the parrots sold in the U.S. are natively bred by parrot breeders, not stolen from some rain forest. And, I should also point out that many parrot enthusiasts and zookeepers have been responsible for keeping many breeds alive too, long after they have or would have gone extinct in the wild (like the Thick Billed Parrot, one of the last parrot species still alive that's native to the U.S.).

      Many parrot enthusiasts also give generously to wild parrot conservation efforts. Years ago, when I had a African Grey myself, I used to donate to efforts to preserve the Greys in the wild (African farmers tend to regard them as a nuisance, and so they are often poisoned en masse, leading to a population decline).

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    14. Re:No offense but by elrous0 · · Score: 0, Troll

      Hah! How many of us are, for all intents and purposes, ALREADY in a cage? Most humans would be damn happy to VOLUNTARILY trade complete freedom for a safe, stable envinroment where all their needs were met.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    15. Re:No offense but by elrous0 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I had a Grey that was brilliant. That little bird not only had a huge vocabulary (and even larger collection of sound FX), but he understood most of the words to (or, at least, their effect). He would say "Good morning" in the morning and "Good night" at night when he got tired. He knew everyone in the house, and would call out to each person by name. He would say "outside" when he wanted to go outside and "inside" when he wanted to go back in. That bird had *ME* better trained than I had him.

      The funniest was when he first began to learn sounds (before he learned to speak). He would pick up on sounds that got attention. He learned that the sound of the phone ringing would cause people to run into the room. So, when he got lonely (he HATED being alone unless he was asleep), he would do a pitch-perfect imitation of the phone. It was cute, if a little annoying (he got so good at it, it was impossible to tell the difference between him and the real phone).

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    16. Re:No offense but by LionMage · · Score: 1

      No, I think birds are meant to be able to fly, the wings are a bit of a clue.

      No, you missed the point. The word "meant" implies intention, as in "I meant to hit that guy with my car," as opposed to "I accidentally hit that guy with my car." To say that birds are "meant" to fly implies that someone (e.g., God, Zeus, whatever) intended for them to fly. Or to put it in the words of the person to whom you were replying, "Creatures are not 'meant' to do anything, unless you believe in an invisible friend in the sky who is pulling all of our strings like puppets." Just because you might assume that's a true statement doesn't mean everyone else believes that. It's an article of faith, not a fact.

      More on-topic, I agree with Yosho. These animals are not in their native habitats, but they are well cared for, respected, and even considered colleagues instead of mere research animals. They don't have to fear predation, and they have a mentally stimulating existence. That's a pretty good deal in my book.
    17. Re:No offense but by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 1

      They can fly because they have wings, they are not "meant" to fly. Penguins have wings: are they meant to fly?

      Avoid inappropriate teleological arguments.

    18. Re:No offense but by tehcyder · · Score: 1
      No, I didn't miss the point at all, I was making a joke.

      But I do think that it is inappropriate to keep a large flying bird in a small cage, or a bear tied to a stake, for example.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  55. wtf. the parrot was a spy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Alex's veterinarian is returning from vacation to personally conduct this necrospy."

    Obviously, a dead spy is necrospy.

  56. The real question is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    did he drop any epic loot?

  57. Sorry to hear about that by Tarlus · · Score: 1

    I got the opportunity to hold and play with this bird a few years ago. He had an equivalent IQ to a 3-year-old child and was able to identify (and speak the name of) a number of different objects presented to him.
    He also did this strange dance for me whenever I had a piece of fruit in my hand.
    But he was a remarkable creature, so it's definitely a sad bit of news for the University of Arizona dept of biology.

    --
    /* No Comment */
  58. And that doesn't BEGIN to describe his abillities! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's what most people know of Dr. Pepperberg's work with Alex and the other African Grey's she works with(Griffin and Wart are their names I believe, so no, the adventure doesn't end here by any means :-) ), but while Dr. Pepperberg's tight controls and careful interpretation of her data give her results a rock-solid foundation and those question-answer sessions ARE at the core of those results, it's what Alex did PRODUCTIVELY and SPONTANEOUSLY that really puts her research over the top for me.(note, the following statements, unless otherwise noted, are based on claims made directly, and clearly supported by cited evidence, by Dr. Pepperberg in 'The Alex Studies', available from Amazon.com-HIGHLY recommended for those interested in the subject in general and especially for those interested in her work in particular)

    Alex didn't just use words;he played creatively with similar variants of words he just learned(i.e. 'cane', 'shane', etc.), not unlike the manner in which young children probe for new words. Also similar to very young children, when alone he would hold private monologues and dialogs with himself similar but NOT identical to interactions with researchers during the previous day. He not only acquired the use of, at minimum, a slot-based grammatical rule(i.e. 'I want x', 'Wanna go y'), and could answer non-'grammatical' but highly conjunctive-recursive questions such as 'how many three-cornered blue paper?(And YES, whatever issues you may be about to raise regarding possible cuing-expectation or otherwise-she accounted for and took appropriate and sufficient precautions against!)but SPONTANEOUSLY began to use, ON HIS OWN, simple rules of word order in some of his answers(e.g. 'three-cornered wood') Recent research had since shown-Google it or check newsletters at her site-that he indeed had deep and robust understanding of the words he used;for example, having some difficulty producing the sound for 'P', he pronounced 'spool' as 's-pause-wool', a very 'phonetic' solution to the problem(Chompskians reading this should be wailing and gnashing their teeth about now! :P )
    And oh yeah, that remind me;Alex COMMENTED-a LOT-in the name-it-then-claim-it variety(Any parent with toddlers should know exactly what I'm talking about! :D ) And I'll leave it to the reader to run a search on 'banerry' and the relevant names(Hint: a newsletter account of Alex uttering 'yummy bread' while eating cake bears some relevance!) And and...and....

    For anyone who doubts the full intentionality on Alex's part in such statements as 'I'm gonna go now'(followed by him, uhhhh, leaving by climbing down from the his perch and walking away) and 'I wanna X', some accounts quoted DIRECTLY from 'The Alex Studies':

    "...If he was on the gym and stretching toward another location (e.g. his cage), he would alter the phrase somewhat to "Wanna go gym-no" or "Wanna go... Wanna go... " If trainers asked, "Wanna go back?" his reply was often a squeaky "Yeah." We...uttered sentence frames such as "I'm putting you on the chair."Here, sit on my shoulder." and avoided using the phrase "Wanna go Y".... We wanted to see what he would do. within 3 months he began using "Wanna go Y" with various Ys." (pgs. 245-246)

    Alex further demonstrated the intentionality of such utterances by the simple act of refusing to leave the researcher's hand if taken somewhere other than where he requested.

    And with regard to what I choose to call 'commenting':

    "Alex's behavior during training differed from that during probe trials. His accuracy declined considerably. This decrease appeared, however, to have little to do with understanding the task. Alex began to (1)label and grab favored items before we asked questions, or (2) respond to many queries with either the label "green" (while pulling at the gre

  59. Alex the African grey dies at 31 years by alba+desol · · Score: 1

    I feel very sorry for the owner of Alex. He was a very special parrot. I have a parrot named Poncho and he is about 32 years old and hearing the news made take a little more peticular care of him. I once wrote a paper on my talking parrot and included the research of Alex that he could form syntex. I did this for my linguistic class the the professor was quite surprised. It got me a better grade and I passed the difficult class. I owe it to the information on Alex, the intelligent parrot. although I think my parrot understands what he is telling me. I am very sorry to hear this news.

  60. death of alex by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yes, it is. while it's true greys are notorious feather pluckers, you have to understand that they don't do it in the wild. only in captivity, so yes it is a BIG sign alot is wrong. ONly a grey owner can tell you that Alex's intelligence is no surprise. I have two of them. They are all very intelligent; but, we appreciate the gift they are to us and hopefully, don't exploit that like Pepperberg does. I suspect the bird was stressed out from too much work. I saw videos of Pepperberg and her assistants training Alex and they hit him in the beak to get him to elicit a remark. I would never treat my bird that way, greys are very sensitive and so intelligent, I am sure he knew he was being manipulated every day. They bond so much to people, with lab assistants constantly changing will stress out an African Grey, they need stability with their human flock, else they will attach to a person and then the person leaves them. They can get a broken heart very easily. Also, I am sure an environment where he has to perform constantly or get hit on the beak was humiliating and frustrating. He was quoted as always saying "I'm sorry." The poor bird, how confusing. All the articles I read indicate that he knew how to communicate frustration, and is quoted as saying "wanna go back" when he'd had enough. They should have listened, I am sure he had enough. I think the lab training borders on abuse, I've heard it's 8-10 hours a day. In the wild, those birds forage most of the day with their flock, not stand on a perch and get hit in the face if they don't memorize colors and numbers and words. While I realize the research is valuable, where do we draw the line? Isn't ten years of service in a lab enough.. but 30??? I've seen pictures of Griffin her other parrot, his feathers are all plucked it's shameful. Get those birds out of there. PUtting a bird so intelligent into a lab situation for 30 years is like locking a race horse up in a small barn and making it roll over for treats. That's just wrong. I think enough is enough, she has proven her point, but as I said, anybody who owns an African Grey parrot can tell you how much they can learn. Irene Pepperberg's research should be monitored closely. Grey's need to bond with and live with their mate person; they fall in love with their owner and other people, they are wired to mate for life. They shouldn't be living in a lab, they're too intelligent. That's like keeping a dolphin in a swimming pool. There's my two cents; I suspect other people feel this way but are afraid to knock the famous Dr. Pepperberg. Thank you Dr. for doing this research. You can stop now, please leave those wonderful birds alone &^#!! please. Seriously.