Hey, fuckface, I agreed to your terms and upped the ante, so take your head out of your ass and smell some fresh air. That, and I already explained, that for physiological dependence one needs several weeks of high levels of heroin. This, and not just this is why I win the bet. Ask an anesthesiologist why that is if you can find one clever enough to know.
why don't you go and OD on heroin and improve the world, you worthless trolling fuck?
Doubleplusgood this. Did you know I don't think there's a single piece of meat in this stew? Looks like meat. Tastes like meat. Isn't meat at all. Doubleplusgood!
The total amount of economically extractable power available from the wind is considerably more than present human power use from all sources.[11] The most comprehensive study as of 2005[12] found the potential of wind power on land and near-shore to be 72 TW, equivalent to 54,000 MToE (million tons of oil equivalent) per year, or over five times the world's current energy use in all forms. The potential takes into account only locations with mean annual wind speeds 6.9 m/s at 80 m. The study assumes six 1.5 megawatt, 77 m diameter turbines per square kilometer on roughly 13% of the total global land area (though that land would also be available for other compatible uses such as farming). The authors acknowledge that many practical barriers would need to be overcome to reach this theoretical capacity.
On February 11, 2010, the National Renewable Energy Laboratory released the first comprehensive update of the wind energy potential by state since 1993, showing that the contiguous United States had potential to install 10,459 GW of onshore wind power. The capacity could generate 37 petawatt-hours (PWh) annually, an amount nine times larger than current total U.S. electricity consumption. The U.S. also has large wind resources in Alaska, and Hawaii.
And of course, most wind generator will only get back what it took to build for most of it's life time.
OK, let's see who's talking with the sphincter. First of all, to test the addictive potential, you have to find the boundary conditions. For physiological dependence from nicotine IIRC it's 5-10 cigarettes (that's how much it takes to deplete the adrenal medulla). For morphine/heroin they say it takes several weeks. That means you've exceeded the boundary conditions here - especially yours.
Second thing is dosage. The lethal dose of nicotine is 50-70mg for adult human. For heroin it's 80-400mg (before tolerance develops). That's why I'd win with 5g/day (quick death). So without adjusting our respective dosage to a "safe" maximum, the wager makes no sense.
Oh, well, I'm in IF it's a sexy nurse who injects me with pharmacological grade smack, and the stake is 10k euros.
Slashdot Mirror
You can't see The Sun, because this.
In some bank.
The Google-owned "Recaptcha" appearing on every board on 4chan doesn't hurt. It will identify everyone who isn't behind over NINE THOUSAND! proxies.
FTFY.
Kinda reminds me of "I accidentally 93MB of .rar files. what should I dois this dangerous ?"
Thanks man. BTW. What REALLY happened to the Androsynth?
=^.^=
padding for teh fcuking filter
As I said, meh.
Had something to say.
There you go.
Good luck managing version compatibility of the plugins.
Posting in a troll thread!
Hey, fuckface, I agreed to your terms and upped the ante, so take your head out of your ass and smell some fresh air. That, and I already explained, that for physiological dependence one needs several weeks of high levels of heroin. This, and not just this is why I win the bet. Ask an anesthesiologist why that is if you can find one clever enough to know.
why don't you go and OD on heroin and improve the world, you worthless trolling fuck?
Who's trolling, you brainless piece of shit?
Yes, it can.
A meltdown? No.
Besides, your point would only be valid if mining didn't increase the risk of a coal fire. It does, obviously, by exposing coal seams to air.
My point is still valid.
I overestimated them for sure, but I am getting more than the 200 milligram of heroin that is on the high end of the scale for junkies.
That's 1800mg/day.
And yet I don't end up screaming in cold turkey withdrawal when I don't smoke for a couple of days.
So yes, you are full of shit.
I wouldn't - in conditions mentioned above, and you would. But I'm tired explaining colors to the blind.
So yes, you are full of shit.
So, um, no, you are. The more so because of your name-calling. Good day, Mr Asshole.
Doubleplusgood this. Did you know I don't think there's a single piece of meat in this stew? Looks like meat. Tastes like meat. Isn't meat at all. Doubleplusgood!
— George Orwell, 1984.
Yes, it has.
This type of disaster could have happened without actual mining OR human stupidity involved. A nuclear meltdown couldn't.
" wind, " If you put a windmil in avery viable location in the US, you still wont' gt 1/10th are power needs."
You are an idiot or a shill. Or both.
The total amount of economically extractable power available from the wind is considerably more than present human power use from all sources. [11] The most comprehensive study as of 2005[12] found the potential of wind power on land and near-shore to be 72 TW, equivalent to 54,000 MToE (million tons of oil equivalent) per year, or over five times the world's current energy use in all forms. The potential takes into account only locations with mean annual wind speeds 6.9 m/s at 80 m. The study assumes six 1.5 megawatt, 77 m diameter turbines per square kilometer on roughly 13% of the total global land area (though that land would also be available for other compatible uses such as farming). The authors acknowledge that many practical barriers would need to be overcome to reach this theoretical capacity.
Also:
On February 11, 2010, the National Renewable Energy Laboratory released the first comprehensive update of the wind energy potential by state since 1993, showing that the contiguous United States had potential to install 10,459 GW of onshore wind power. The capacity could generate 37 petawatt-hours (PWh) annually, an amount nine times larger than current total U.S. electricity consumption. The U.S. also has large wind resources in Alaska, and Hawaii.
And of course, most wind generator will only get back what it took to build for most of it's life time.
Wow. You really are fucking dumb.
I stopped reading there.
The tongue is the only weapon that goes sharper with use.
(I know it was not Confucius).
In (not only) my opinion he should rather try some weed.
In fact who has ever used their real email to sign into a porn site.
I use this.
I think it'd be nice to relate this to the latest "scandal" in the US:
azmeal@cmc.gov.my | ilovedyna
flag@whitehouse.gov | karlmarx
kamarudinalias@mmea.gov.my | 814550
james.ben.hopkins@us.army.mil | j347576
wade.quigley@ang.af.mil | mywife01
aaron.c.sewell@us.army.mil | 3689817
OK, let's see who's talking with the sphincter. First of all, to test the addictive potential, you have to find the boundary conditions. For physiological dependence from nicotine IIRC it's 5-10 cigarettes (that's how much it takes to deplete the adrenal medulla). For morphine/heroin they say it takes several weeks. That means you've exceeded the boundary conditions here - especially yours.
Second thing is dosage. The lethal dose of nicotine is 50-70mg for adult human. For heroin it's 80-400mg (before tolerance develops). That's why I'd win with 5g/day (quick death). So without adjusting our respective dosage to a "safe" maximum, the wager makes no sense.
Oh, well, I'm in IF it's a sexy nurse who injects me with pharmacological grade smack, and the stake is 10k euros.
Yup, I've read the relevant article *after* I posted this crap... *facepalm*
Er... what about natural flora of ruminant alimentary tract? They digest cellulose.
and you start shooting, say, 5 grams of heroine every day for two weeks
With that dose I'd win instantly.