I love to see legos doing advanced things, but for a chassis? I feel like people can be very smart, but sometimes afraid to learn how to build something with their hands. The lab example I posted above is at Cambridge University. Cambridge has a very competent engineering department, why not reach out to them?- It could have made for an excellent project for some engineering students.
Aside from your Lego-assembling robot, Lego is always assembled by hand. It's also cheaper and faster to build a Lego chassis than get the engineers to weld up one from mild steel.
"You don't have 5 years of experience coding in C#."
"But why does that even matter? I've been using Java for 10 years. The language doesn't matter, the principles and design patterns are what matter. The rest is just syntax."
"We require C#."
Recruiters typically know nothing about technology except how to use their iPhones.
This is why any decent employer will do a technical interview as well as/combined with an HR interview.
We at ACME Products Ltd apologise for the fault in your Sarcasm Detector, and have shipped a replacement for immediate installation. Please dispose of the old part responsibly.
It's important not to confuse equality with fairness though. The calculation of car insurance premiums based on risk is by definition fair, but is incompatible with gender equality.
It's important not to confuse equality with fairness though. The calculation of car insurance premiums based on risk is by definition fair, but is incompatible with gender equality.
It's important not to confuse equality with fairness though. The calculation of car insurance premiums based on risk is by definition fair, but is incompatible with gender equality.
It's important not to confuse equality with fairness though. The calculation of car insurance premiums based on risk is by definition fair, but is incompatible with gender equality.
Oh great, another who willingly twists my argument beyond breaking point, again by claiming racism where none exists. Race has nothing to do with my argument, as believe it or not, skin colour/ethnicity has no significant risk differences. However, it has been repeatedly shown that there is a significant difference between the genders.
Extending this logic, certain professions attract higher premiums, especially those that include high stress levels. Since high stress can impair judgement, workers in these jobs are statistically more likely to need to make a claim. Is it fair for a low-stress worker to pay the same premiums as a high-stress worker?
Am I the only one who thinks it's unfair for low-risks groups to effectively subsidise high-risk groups?
What do I have to do to stop this racism bullshit? I've explained my argument in full as a piece of pure logic, and yet you seem hell bent on twisting my argument as racist.
Let's go over this one more time: The more likely someone is to make a claim, the higher the premium they pay. Please note the complete lack of skin colour/gender/sexuality/favourite food in that statement.
Slashdot Mirror
2010 'Won't somebody think about the children!'
2012 'Won't somebody think about the overpaid sportspeople!'
FTFY
So, they'll have Slashdotters with mod points enforcing the law?
*sings* It's the end of the world as we know it
I love to see legos doing advanced things, but for a chassis? I feel like people can be very smart, but sometimes afraid to learn how to build something with their hands. The lab example I posted above is at Cambridge University. Cambridge has a very competent engineering department, why not reach out to them?- It could have made for an excellent project for some engineering students.
Aside from your Lego-assembling robot, Lego is always assembled by hand. It's also cheaper and faster to build a Lego chassis than get the engineers to weld up one from mild steel.
A supercomputer is any overall system that's IO limited not CPU limited like most machines.
Do all your computers have a 286? Last time I checked, modern PCs are always IO limited.
I see what you did there.
Are you immune to chromostereopsis? I know I'm not.
Admonished by an AC! However will I live?
*returns to SSRS 2005 (yes I know it's crap, no it's not my choice)*
*head explodes trying to understand AC*
apt-get a-life
Only on Slashdot.
Web design, geeks suck at it
OMG you sound like my web design teacher. Is that you? Shed fail you if the colors clashed.
Good - I don't want to be blinded when I view a website.
He's right. I had a similar experience.
"You don't have 5 years of experience coding in C#."
"But why does that even matter? I've been using Java for 10 years. The language doesn't matter, the principles and design patterns are what matter. The rest is just syntax."
"We require C#."
Recruiters typically know nothing about technology except how to use their iPhones.
This is why any decent employer will do a technical interview as well as/combined with an HR interview.
Amazon Payments working on Amazon Marketplace? Who would have thought?
In other news: Google Checkout works on Google Play.
You've set off the douche alarm!
Possibly more stupid:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nissan_Cedric
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nissan_Homy
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trumpchi
We at ACME Products Ltd apologise for the fault in your Sarcasm Detector, and have shipped a replacement for immediate installation. Please dispose of the old part responsibly.
Is this particle "consistent" with what we believe to be a Higgs Boson, or is it actually a Higgs Boson?
It's within the expected mass range, but its properties have yet to be determined, making it a Higgs candidate.
We live in a world where a woman sued and won against spilling hot coffee on herself
Don't forget the girls who sued and won because fatty foods made them fat.
It's important not to confuse equality with fairness though. The calculation of car insurance premiums based on risk is by definition fair, but is incompatible with gender equality.
It's important not to confuse equality with fairness though. The calculation of car insurance premiums based on risk is by definition fair, but is incompatible with gender equality.
It's important not to confuse equality with fairness though. The calculation of car insurance premiums based on risk is by definition fair, but is incompatible with gender equality.
It's important not to confuse equality with fairness though. The calculation of car insurance premiums based on risk is by definition fair, but is incompatible with gender equality.
Oh great, another who willingly twists my argument beyond breaking point, again by claiming racism where none exists. Race has nothing to do with my argument, as believe it or not, skin colour/ethnicity has no significant risk differences. However, it has been repeatedly shown that there is a significant difference between the genders.
Extending this logic, certain professions attract higher premiums, especially those that include high stress levels. Since high stress can impair judgement, workers in these jobs are statistically more likely to need to make a claim. Is it fair for a low-stress worker to pay the same premiums as a high-stress worker?
Am I the only one who thinks it's unfair for low-risks groups to effectively subsidise high-risk groups?
Glad you're happy to penalise people in the name of some misguided ideal of equality. Me, I prefer to live in the real world.
What do I have to do to stop this racism bullshit? I've explained my argument in full as a piece of pure logic, and yet you seem hell bent on twisting my argument as racist.
Let's go over this one more time: The more likely someone is to make a claim, the higher the premium they pay. Please note the complete lack of skin colour/gender/sexuality/favourite food in that statement.
Because the SLS (Senate Launch System) will never fly.
I hope it does launch. I'd like to see the Senate fly into space :)
You could always use more than two rails.