The Supreme Court would only get involved if someone with standing sued and it got appealed up to that level. The SC isn't going to swoop in and say "sorry, we think this is wrong so we're putting a stop to it" because that's not how our system works.
Likewise Congress isn't about to do anything because they don't care and if they tried the conservative media would whip up the mob with fears about terrorism and Islam and brown people.
Lastly even if Obama could unilaterally declare hostilities over as you assert, he's not going to while we've got active fighting in Afghanistan. That'd be stupid.
We've got a number of programs and a few outside websites that require IE9 or older. Good thing that we're cool with letting our users have Firefox and Chrome, though some of them really like IE and would rather use that instead.
you can make up to 88 dollars an hour working from your house. Click here for one weird tip on how to lose your bellyfat. U R homo. Ron Paul 2012! bit.do\bNB9
15-30 meters down, isn't it? I toured the (decommissioned) Minuteman command silo at Whiteman AFB in the mid '90s and I seem to remember it being pretty far down.
I'm sure you're right about it being boring as fuck, yet stressful.
...aside from the soldiers that we send over when an oil supplying country looks wobbly, the externalized pollution that petroleum-burning engines make, etc. You're clueless.
There is plenty in his other comments to indicate that he knows little about science.
Because I don't toe the denier line, amirite?
People need to understand that libertarians are here, we are a sizable force, and you better deal with us by making smart comments, instead of the bullshit that people like Nimey and you post.
Lollers. You're only perpetuating negative stereotypes about libertarians and their lack of social understanding & empathy with other people, especially with that simian chest-thumping about how mighty you lot are.
Your mom's got loose credibility.
Filehippo's pretty good.
Pah. Slashdot's been in the shitter for years, it's just that we can still use the periscope and snorkel.
More importantly, it still doesn't use a dependency-resolving package manager. If that works for you, great, but it doesn't for me.
"Fed worship"? Strawman off the starboard bow, Captain!
The Supreme Court would only get involved if someone with standing sued and it got appealed up to that level. The SC isn't going to swoop in and say "sorry, we think this is wrong so we're putting a stop to it" because that's not how our system works.
Likewise Congress isn't about to do anything because they don't care and if they tried the conservative media would whip up the mob with fears about terrorism and Islam and brown people.
Lastly even if Obama could unilaterally declare hostilities over as you assert, he's not going to while we've got active fighting in Afghanistan. That'd be stupid.
You really should educate yourself better.
Wrong. Congress specifically denied funding for this, so you still can't blame him for this one.
Point of order: Obama /did/ try to close Guantanamo more than once, but Congress repeatedly blocked him. You can't pin this one on him.
The correct plural is "penes", philistine. It's a Greek word and not Latin; in any case to be "penii" the singular form would have to be penius.
Or you could be /not/ pretentious and just say "penises".
We've got a number of programs and a few outside websites that require IE9 or older. Good thing that we're cool with letting our users have Firefox and Chrome, though some of them really like IE and would rather use that instead.
No, there was an actual RAM Doubler from Connectix for both Mac and Windows. You're thinking of Syncronys SoftRAM.
If only I could foe the mods who were stupid enough to vote you up.
Praise Cthulhu, an intelligent and reasonable American conservative.
you can make up to 88 dollars an hour working from your house. Click here for one weird tip on how to lose your bellyfat. U R homo. Ron Paul 2012! bit.do\bNB9
15-30 meters down, isn't it? I toured the (decommissioned) Minuteman command silo at Whiteman AFB in the mid '90s and I seem to remember it being pretty far down.
I'm sure you're right about it being boring as fuck, yet stressful.
Your mother is a whore.
Oh gods. Now I'm imagining what'd happen if Rupert Murdoch decided he had a financial stake in having his viewers listen to Archimedes Plutonium.
Well, he'll probably grow out of it eventually.
So, basically, because I don't toe the denier line and because I think libertarianism is something for immature man-children.
See? Much more laconic and quicker to read than your self-congratulatory word salad.
...aside from the soldiers that we send over when an oil supplying country looks wobbly, the externalized pollution that petroleum-burning engines make, etc. You're clueless.
There is plenty in his other comments to indicate that he knows little about science.
Because I don't toe the denier line, amirite?
People need to understand that libertarians are here, we are a sizable force, and you better deal with us by making smart comments, instead of the bullshit that people like Nimey and you post.
Lollers. You're only perpetuating negative stereotypes about libertarians and their lack of social understanding & empathy with other people, especially with that simian chest-thumping about how mighty you lot are.
Derp. The point is that AGW reduces the amount of water going in, so the aquifers get drawn down more quickly.
[3 people like this]
This is the Internet. We don't need /reasons/ to insult one another.
In the morning I may be in a more pleasant mood, but you shall still be stupid.