You might want to think a bit more before calling someone an idiot. Or you just enjoy the Troll.
Sure cycle of water is a wonderfull thing, but if you used it more than it recycle, the shit hit the fan at the end. That what the author is talking about.
I'm not speaking about alex gabbard. You claim that coil radioactivity is peanuts and I would like to know where you found this information. It's not that I doubt what you say, but as far as I know, you're not a better ref yourself. (I didn't check your background mind you... You could be Stephen Hawking, I wouldn't know. And I don't even know if he know about the matter.)
I would invest to much in sea streams energy... With global weather change, they might change course to quickly to be exploited efficiently...
As for "very few impact on ecology", I don't buy it. I means how do to plan to install a big power plant underwater without disturbing life on the area?
And last, banksters don't prefer nuclear. They love new energy sources. It's a new vector of investment and they profit from it. Nuclear power is the most cost efficient way to produce power. But nuclear plants are heavy investment and you don't want to build one if you're not going to use it for the next fifty years. It's a bit long for banksters, really. In France, without the help of the gouvernment, their wouldn't be that much nuclear plant. Granted you think it was a shitty idea, but electricity in France is cheaper than anywhere else in europe. ( The controled market helped that quite a bit too... )
Electricity productors (EDF in this case) don't want to let go nuclear because they simply can't. Replacing all nuclear plant, if it's even possible, will take more time than just 10 years or so. And it's not cheap. The energy market is said to be liberated in France now... But don't worry : EDF have to buy electricity you product if you're not doing anything else with it. So if you build enough plant yourself, EDF won't need its nuclear plant anymore. You see? they Is a way out.
You might want to provide your own source, otherwise your claim won't be taken seriously. I know it's easy to find people spitting on nuclear power, even people who doesn't grasp the basic difference between fission and fusion. It's equally easy to find people religiously pro-nuclear with as much knowlege on the basic principles of the dangers. ( Hell, otherwise, nuclear plants wouldn't risk explosion from natural disasters... )
As I understand it, the true dangers with nuclear power isn't the source of the energy. It's the over-exageration of both the dangers and the safety of it, witch leads to confusion and some greedy bastards on the line profit from it cuting cost without being aware of the disasters that might result.
No no, You don't understand me : I actually missed bad car analogy on slashdot. Well actually, the "bad" here is more a mandatory adjective than anything.
First, writing bold doesn't make your point better. Stop it.
Second, your point is actually good, but I think it's a bit pessimistic. I don't think investement ruined the internet already. It has more content, more accessible than ten years from now and it's more userfriendly. (And for goddamn sake, the average webpage is now actually readable.)
Then it has its drowbacks... Investors like to get much for their money... So some design aren't what makes sense technically... streaming and online money operation comes to mind, and I'm sure there are other stuffs... But what would be Internet without investors? A collection of half empty pages barely readable for huma eye with pretty much no visibility? Well You can always find that web. It's still there somewhere...
ctrl-c ctrl-v still works in this case. And I really appreciate the highlight middle-clic thing. To copy paste things in the command line, for example, its just great.
Well for that matter, I don't know really good desktop environnement outside Linux either. I mean, I'll choose Gnome or KDE over any windows env any day. Not sur about OSx though, cause I don't know it enough, but It doesn't seems ultimate to me. Sweet all right, but still...
Now the desktop env shouldn't really matter when writing app. In the end it's more or less a matter of windows decorator...
Most message board have mechanisme to deel with that. either with plain text format or code balise or what ever. So the indentation can be save. It's not that difficult to do and anyway you should use it when capy/pasting code on whatever. Just for the sake of being readable, you know? For the case someone doesn't want to mindlessly copy code they know nothing about...
Mother nature doesn't exist, and if she does, she made us the way we are, so please stop conjuring her every time you want to feel bad about yourself being human. If we want to survive as a species we have our own challenge, but feeling wrong about what we are won't make anything happen, exept maybe mass extinction. (ironic isn't it?)
More to the point, Red Hats makes money with their business plan and it's good for every one. They very well know their are free alternatives OSes. They even have one themself! So nobody should feel bad for not supporting them. It's nice but it's a matter of conviction. If anything, the only thing you need to worry about is that the lake of support service will come back and shoot you in the foot later. But hey! You had the choice!
Copy/Paste is always Error prone, and you very well should reindent it anyway.
A good programmer won't pester all days about forced indentation or brace, yadda yadda yadda... A good programmer have seen enough unspeackable horror code to know this issue isn't really one. Not to say there isn't agruments for either way, but it's really a church battle.
The way I see it, a language that force every one to carefully indent the same way have a good point. If you can't adapt to that, you won't adapt to anything.
Plus C can get very ugly if you want it, sometimes even if you don't want... I wouldn't take C as an example of simple syntax. I like it and use it at work often (not by choice, thought), but I come to really hate the guy who wrote the code I'm working on.
Really, reading people pesting about forced indent or brace is quite amusing. It like the cats of the blue hat chirch and those of the red hat chruch in Red Dwarf...
Well of course they'll push there own product. That's what corporations do. Doesn't mean the product isn't of some interest. And by that I mean not necesary to you personally.
It might very well be true, but in this case, it seems javascript need a replacement. If the rockstar programmers behind dart are good enough, it will be easier to push dart into use than Google go.
Yes it's clear what you're trying to say, but it's just a contradiction to the previous statement. And that doesn't say anything apart from "I say you're wrong".
Seriously, if your not gonna explain more or link some related article, you might as well say nothing. Leave the "yes no yes no" argument to kids under 10.
And by not explaining that statement, you seem to say "I'm don't like what he is saying, but I don't understand a thing so I'll just say he is wrong. With little luck, I'll be right and look bright."
Problem is... Stallman isn't bad with speech if you listen to his whole speeches. But he says what he think, so it's easy to find pseudo controversial out of context quote. Plus it seems lots of people find it offensive just because he refuses to "round the angles".
I guess if your going to advertise freedom, it make sense if your spoke person feel free to speak without censuring himself.
Slashdot Mirror
You might want to think a bit more before calling someone an idiot. Or you just enjoy the Troll.
Sure cycle of water is a wonderfull thing, but if you used it more than it recycle, the shit hit the fan at the end. That what the author is talking about.
Brass Yourself. The Winter is coming...
I'm not speaking about alex gabbard. You claim that coil radioactivity is peanuts and I would like to know where you found this information. It's not that I doubt what you say, but as far as I know, you're not a better ref yourself. (I didn't check your background mind you... You could be Stephen Hawking, I wouldn't know. And I don't even know if he know about the matter.)
I would invest to much in sea streams energy... With global weather change, they might change course to quickly to be exploited efficiently...
As for "very few impact on ecology", I don't buy it. I means how do to plan to install a big power plant underwater without disturbing life on the area?
And last, banksters don't prefer nuclear. They love new energy sources. It's a new vector of investment and they profit from it. Nuclear power is the most cost efficient way to produce power. But nuclear plants are heavy investment and you don't want to build one if you're not going to use it for the next fifty years. It's a bit long for banksters, really. In France, without the help of the gouvernment, their wouldn't be that much nuclear plant. Granted you think it was a shitty idea, but electricity in France is cheaper than anywhere else in europe. ( The controled market helped that quite a bit too... )
Electricity productors (EDF in this case) don't want to let go nuclear because they simply can't. Replacing all nuclear plant, if it's even possible, will take more time than just 10 years or so. And it's not cheap. The energy market is said to be liberated in France now... But don't worry : EDF have to buy electricity you product if you're not doing anything else with it. So if you build enough plant yourself, EDF won't need its nuclear plant anymore. You see? they Is a way out.
You might want to provide your own source, otherwise your claim won't be taken seriously. I know it's easy to find people spitting on nuclear power, even people who doesn't grasp the basic difference between fission and fusion. It's equally easy to find people religiously pro-nuclear with as much knowlege on the basic principles of the dangers. ( Hell, otherwise, nuclear plants wouldn't risk explosion from natural disasters... )
As I understand it, the true dangers with nuclear power isn't the source of the energy. It's the over-exageration of both the dangers and the safety of it, witch leads to confusion and some greedy bastards on the line profit from it cuting cost without being aware of the disasters that might result.
No no, You don't understand me : I actually missed bad car analogy on slashdot. Well actually, the "bad" here is more a mandatory adjective than anything.
I think you've got a point here...
Hooray! I didn't read a good bad car analogy on slashdot in age! Thank you! \o/
First, writing bold doesn't make your point better. Stop it.
Second, your point is actually good, but I think it's a bit pessimistic. I don't think investement ruined the internet already. It has more content, more accessible than ten years from now and it's more userfriendly. (And for goddamn sake, the average webpage is now actually readable.)
Then it has its drowbacks... Investors like to get much for their money... So some design aren't what makes sense technically... streaming and online money operation comes to mind, and I'm sure there are other stuffs... But what would be Internet without investors? A collection of half empty pages barely readable for huma eye with pretty much no visibility? Well You can always find that web. It's still there somewhere...
ctrl-c ctrl-v still works in this case. And I really appreciate the highlight middle-clic thing. To copy paste things in the command line, for example, its just great.
Well for that matter, I don't know really good desktop environnement outside Linux either. I mean, I'll choose Gnome or KDE over any windows env any day. Not sur about OSx though, cause I don't know it enough, but It doesn't seems ultimate to me. Sweet all right, but still...
Now the desktop env shouldn't really matter when writing app. In the end it's more or less a matter of windows decorator...
Ah, but what about if it's wooshed by a FTL neutrino?
Most message board have mechanisme to deel with that.
either with plain text format or code balise or what ever.
So the indentation can be save. It's not that difficult to do and anyway you should use it when capy/pasting code on whatever.
Just for the sake of being readable, you know? For the case someone doesn't want to mindlessly copy code they know nothing about...
Well, the last Fortran I know would be 90, so I guess I'm not really up to date.
Mother nature doesn't exist, and if she does, she made us the way we are, so please stop conjuring her every time you want to feel bad about yourself being human. If we want to survive as a species we have our own challenge, but feeling wrong about what we are won't make anything happen, exept maybe mass extinction. (ironic isn't it?)
More to the point, Red Hats makes money with their business plan and it's good for every one. They very well know their are free alternatives OSes. They even have one themself! So nobody should feel bad for not supporting them. It's nice but it's a matter of conviction. If anything, the only thing you need to worry about is that the lake of support service will come back and shoot you in the foot later. But hey! You had the choice!
Copy/Paste is always Error prone, and you very well should reindent it anyway.
A good programmer won't pester all days about forced indentation or brace, yadda yadda yadda... A good programmer have seen enough unspeackable horror code to know this issue isn't really one. Not to say there isn't agruments for either way, but it's really a church battle.
The way I see it, a language that force every one to carefully indent the same way have a good point. If you can't adapt to that, you won't adapt to anything.
a(b + c) can't be a multiplication. At least in C. you'll need to write a*(b+c).
I agree the two can be easy to confuse. But there is no syntaxic ambiguity.
C? C??!!!! why not fortran?
Plus C can get very ugly if you want it, sometimes even if you don't want... I wouldn't take C as an example of simple syntax. I like it and use it at work often (not by choice, thought), but I come to really hate the guy who wrote the code I'm working on.
Really, reading people pesting about forced indent or brace is quite amusing. It like the cats of the blue hat chirch and those of the red hat chruch in Red Dwarf...
Well of course they'll push there own product. That's what corporations do. Doesn't mean the product isn't of some interest. And by that I mean not necesary to you personally.
It might very well be true, but in this case, it seems javascript need a replacement. If the rockstar programmers behind dart are good enough, it will be easier to push dart into use than Google go.
The guy who design the space craft isn't one to ride it usually... So it seems pretty safe for him.
Yes it's clear what you're trying to say, but it's just a contradiction to the previous statement. And that doesn't say anything apart from "I say you're wrong".
Seriously, if your not gonna explain more or link some related article, you might as well say nothing. Leave the "yes no yes no" argument to kids under 10.
And by not explaining that statement, you seem to say "I'm don't like what he is saying, but I don't understand a thing so I'll just say he is wrong. With little luck, I'll be right and look bright."
No, he is saying there are no meaning in the fall of an apple.
Problem is... Stallman isn't bad with speech if you listen to his whole speeches. But he says what he think, so it's easy to find pseudo controversial out of context quote. Plus it seems lots of people find it offensive just because he refuses to "round the angles".
I guess if your going to advertise freedom, it make sense if your spoke person feel free to speak without censuring himself.