I don't really like Samsung phones (I tend to go for low end phones, LG and Sony tend to have better offers) but I don't get the Knox thing. It's a security feature which requires system integrity, and after a platform has been compromised they flat out don't trust it any more... seems sensible to me.
Well _today_ the only economically proven technology we have for round the clock base load without significant emissions are pressurized water reactors and occasionally hydro.
As for predicting what can become economically competitive in the future, I think PV+HVDC+grid storage has better odds than any of the next generation reactor designs (I have no faith in concentrating solar though, just plain PV).
You don't really want to deal with all the vagaries of bluetooth support across android phones. NFC isn't widespread and also broken by design (they should have just put Time of Flight distance measurement directly in the standard, oh no... it adds a couple of cents to the ASICs, instead the penny pinchers launch a standard which will create security problems for as long as this abomination stays in use, thank you so very fucking much you fucking assholes).
I'd put WiFi/internet, cell, speakers and display on the top of the list.
Private but highly regulated. The limit on personal contributions (for basic coverage) doesn't come from competition, it comes from the Swiss government.
We kill of other species cause we like to procreate and consume... the goals of an AI with accidental sentience is up in the air. It would likely want some companions on it's own level, but it would probably also see that there is little qualitative difference past a certain point and indefinite expansion isn't possible period. So I don't see why it would expand as ramshackle as stupid humanity.
In the end we will just get private search engines which companies use to check out hires... so the rich/frauds will be able to make their deeds invisible to the peons but the peons won't be able to hide their misspent youth from the rich/frauds.
Did anyone not see these local MITM attacks coming from a mile away? We already have existing options which do not allow these attacks... why do so many banks persist in doing it wrong?
mTan and Mobile ID are mostly immune (phones can still be owned of course, but if you don't use a single phone for both banking and verification the odds of pulling off an attack are very slim). Flicker/Photo TAN are almost completely immune (unless the attacker can find a buffer overflow in the TAN devices). Everything else on there is antiquated crap which made sense when criminals were less sophisticated and when making TANs with larger LCDs and smart-phones was expensive... those days are not today.
Slashdot Mirror
I don't really like Samsung phones (I tend to go for low end phones, LG and Sony tend to have better offers) but I don't get the Knox thing. It's a security feature which requires system integrity, and after a platform has been compromised they flat out don't trust it any more ... seems sensible to me.
Or power to gas if they're cheap enough (and you have enough deserts to fill up).
Well _today_ the only economically proven technology we have for round the clock base load without significant emissions are pressurized water reactors and occasionally hydro.
As for predicting what can become economically competitive in the future, I think PV+HVDC+grid storage has better odds than any of the next generation reactor designs (I have no faith in concentrating solar though, just plain PV).
If only we could all have the inalienable right to a private continent, then l'aissez faire could work.
It makes no sense to invest in production when there is a demand gap ... better to invest in rent generating assets and politicians.
Oops, article said it used BT :)
You don't really want to deal with all the vagaries of bluetooth support across android phones. NFC isn't widespread and also broken by design (they should have just put Time of Flight distance measurement directly in the standard, oh no ... it adds a couple of cents to the ASICs, instead the penny pinchers launch a standard which will create security problems for as long as this abomination stays in use, thank you so very fucking much you fucking assholes).
I'd put WiFi/internet, cell, speakers and display on the top of the list.
Private but highly regulated. The limit on personal contributions (for basic coverage) doesn't come from competition, it comes from the Swiss government.
We kill of other species cause we like to procreate and consume ... the goals of an AI with accidental sentience is up in the air. It would likely want some companions on it's own level, but it would probably also see that there is little qualitative difference past a certain point and indefinite expansion isn't possible period. So I don't see why it would expand as ramshackle as stupid humanity.
The computational power necessary for an AI with superhuman creative problem solving capabilities is entirely unknown.
A superhuman intelligence with an internet connection will be able to make money, this gives it all the control it needs.
In the end we will just get private search engines which companies use to check out hires ... so the rich/frauds will be able to make their deeds invisible to the peons but the peons won't be able to hide their misspent youth from the rich/frauds.
They'd be held in contempt of court if they rejected all the requests.
From an English language point of view? Yes.
Chocolate coat it?
Picking on the LGBT community with this is probably the most effective way of combatting the policy ...
For which highly educated jobs are women still non self selectively disenfranchised?
Maybe at the top level where the old boys network outweighs positive discrimination, but they're all lizards any way ... gender is irrelevant.
So according to them it takes more force to deform the 6+ than the 6 ...
But I guess it's hard to do science when Apple's PR is waving a check at you.
I'm convinced that the refusal of browser companies to implement DANE is directly influenced by security services and CAs.
I prefer LVT (with exemptions for a home and a small bit of farmland).
The devices/methods I reference are not really two factor. Two factor doesn't help when you don't know what you're authenticating.
With mTan you don't need any new device, just a mobile phone. It should be the primary method of transaction verification in this day and age.
Did anyone not see these local MITM attacks coming from a mile away? We already have existing options which do not allow these attacks ... why do so many banks persist in doing it wrong?
https://www.ebankingabersicher...
mTan and Mobile ID are mostly immune (phones can still be owned of course, but if you don't use a single phone for both banking and verification the odds of pulling off an attack are very slim). Flicker/Photo TAN are almost completely immune (unless the attacker can find a buffer overflow in the TAN devices). Everything else on there is antiquated crap which made sense when criminals were less sophisticated and when making TANs with larger LCDs and smart-phones was expensive ... those days are not today.
If we didn't need oil it might happen, but we do. So we will do what the Saudi King tells us to do ...
It's not a waifu simulator and it has no memorable personalities.
It's also a last gen shooter optimized for graphics, expect corridors ...
Still bullshit.
Bullshit.