If you have a formal education you have heard of his name for A*.
If you don't you will at the very least have heard the sentence Goto Considered Harmful... and I think we can all agree it's a snappy turn of phrase, hard to forget and by now iconic. Unless you lock someone up in a cave with The C Programming Language before they learned any programming I think they'll have heard of it by the time they are proficient with C.
In the last 2 decades on a general purpose processor? Why? AFAICS it has been proven without any room for reasonable doubt that programmers have to be protected against themselves in this... and the performance impact hasn't been relevant in a long time.
The silly thing is, this is the exact same guy now saying it was just the mistake of an individual. Multiple e-mails were sent which suggested mixing organics with the waste salts while the company asked for it to be looked at by someone who could determine it safe... nothing got sent to the right people. There isn't even a fucking decent inventory.
Just sue the people running wallet/mixing/whatever servers for international money laundering and the anonymity will go away, the money flows become more traceable. They can still transfer it to temporary bank accounts and get mules to get the money out of ATMs, but it all becomes a little harder.
That said, bitcoin is more trouble than it's worth at this point... just make trading in them illegal, problem solved.
Nope, circular argument... to trade it you have to own it. You can't use that line of reasoning to justify owning it in the first place.
Even considerably more detail won't save Rothbard&co's arguments either, they can try to bury Locke's Proviso beneath a mountain of detail... but it won't fool anyone but the naive and the stupid.
There's no such thing as a natural right to enclosure either... but the concept of rightful land ownership is convenient, as is the concept of a social contract.
It's no more or less voluntary than agreeing to the social contract of any other sovereign nation... and you will be held to your contract with violence too.
The only difference is that the contract is explicit instead of implicit.
They'll import everything, this isn't going galt... this is putting your throne outside the country your ruling. I doubt too many other 0.001%'ers will want to paint a target on themselves as much as he does though, so this will go nowhere.
It would be even safer to drive the speed limit (or even below it if you have a heavy load) and not trying to change lanes near the point of no return.
Never ran a red light where it wasn't my own fault.
That's silly. Progressives and classical liberals nearly don't exist as a political force and socialists only exist in name only, but they mostly just hand out bread and circuses.
That's fine and well, but if you give up the economic argument then Google's surrender becomes irrelevant.
The google guys never said PV/wind and grid storage couldn't economically make coal and gas superfluous in the near future, they didn't say Nuclear could... or even if Nuclear could do it cheaper than PV/wind/grid-storage.
"In short then, I think that most of those who support the argument from consciousness could be persuaded to abandon it rather than be forced into the solipsist position."
If someone creates a human level AI no one will give a rats fucking ass about Searle's semantic wanking... like all philosophy after Hume his was just a complete waste of time.
Slashdot Mirror
They finally disallowed that in v3 ... shame so many are sticking to the previous one.
Didn't Python 3 finally disallow mixing spaces and tabs for indentation by default? Should have done that from the start.
If you have a formal education you have heard of his name for A*.
If you don't you will at the very least have heard the sentence Goto Considered Harmful ... and I think we can all agree it's a snappy turn of phrase, hard to forget and by now iconic. Unless you lock someone up in a cave with The C Programming Language before they learned any programming I think they'll have heard of it by the time they are proficient with C.
He deposited the cash ... if the bank can't recognize it we have bigger issues.
In the last 2 decades on a general purpose processor? Why? AFAICS it has been proven without any room for reasonable doubt that programmers have to be protected against themselves in this ... and the performance impact hasn't been relevant in a long time.
Add one extra order of magnitude for amount of buffer overflow based exploits it has caused.
The only thing most IT projects gets done is throwing money down the drain (even when ostensibly successful, like most security sensitive C code).
Reprocessing is separate from MOX production.
Presently reprocessing doesn't really do a lot for waste volumes BTW. Used MOX doesn't get reprocessed.
The silly thing is, this is the exact same guy now saying it was just the mistake of an individual. Multiple e-mails were sent which suggested mixing organics with the waste salts while the company asked for it to be looked at by someone who could determine it safe ... nothing got sent to the right people. There isn't even a fucking decent inventory.
Mr. Conca is full of shit.
Just sue the people running wallet/mixing/whatever servers for international money laundering and the anonymity will go away, the money flows become more traceable. They can still transfer it to temporary bank accounts and get mules to get the money out of ATMs, but it all becomes a little harder.
That said, bitcoin is more trouble than it's worth at this point ... just make trading in them illegal, problem solved.
And yet ... we're still using C.
Directional antennas ...
Nope, circular argument ... to trade it you have to own it. You can't use that line of reasoning to justify owning it in the first place.
Even considerably more detail won't save Rothbard&co's arguments either, they can try to bury Locke's Proviso beneath a mountain of detail ... but it won't fool anyone but the naive and the stupid.
There's no such thing as a natural right to enclosure either ... but the concept of rightful land ownership is convenient, as is the concept of a social contract.
This isn't really trying the opposite, it's just a gated community.
It's no more or less voluntary than agreeing to the social contract of any other sovereign nation ... and you will be held to your contract with violence too.
The only difference is that the contract is explicit instead of implicit.
They'll import everything, this isn't going galt ... this is putting your throne outside the country your ruling. I doubt too many other 0.001%'ers will want to paint a target on themselves as much as he does though, so this will go nowhere.
It would be even safer to drive the speed limit (or even below it if you have a heavy load) and not trying to change lanes near the point of no return.
Never ran a red light where it wasn't my own fault.
That's silly. Progressives and classical liberals nearly don't exist as a political force and socialists only exist in name only, but they mostly just hand out bread and circuses.
Oops, I meant lawn trimmer.
If a smooth contact could clear the rails the breaking wheels would do it. Rotating bristles will wear an awful lot faster.
You'd need something akin to an assembly of hedge trimmers, so you can just keep spooling thread.
Oops, meant to say
"The google guys said PV/wind and grid storage couldn't economically make coal and gas superfluous in the near future"
That's fine and well, but if you give up the economic argument then Google's surrender becomes irrelevant.
The google guys never said PV/wind and grid storage couldn't economically make coal and gas superfluous in the near future, they didn't say Nuclear could ... or even if Nuclear could do it cheaper than PV/wind/grid-storage.
That's non sequitur.
"In short then, I think that most of those who support the argument from consciousness could be persuaded to abandon it rather than be forced into the solipsist position."
If someone creates a human level AI no one will give a rats fucking ass about Searle's semantic wanking ... like all philosophy after Hume his was just a complete waste of time.