A friend of mine floated the theory that there were no actual drones, but that the story of "4 drones" was made up as an excuse for letting the road full of cars burn.
I don't think I would have arrived at that same conclusion myself, but come to think of it, the whole story doesn't really make much sense. If drones were in the area, wouldn't they have just dumped water/flame retardant on them? Wouldn't there be some photographs or other evidence of drone presence?
This on the heels of the "drone with a gun" video making the rounds of the Internet. Seems like a convenient excuse to quickly pass drone legislation.
They build a bunny slope with a 100 foot cliff at the bottom and this guys comments on how kind they are to have stopped him from going over in his inner tube. I do not think I would have seen it that way. I'm pretty sure I would have called them a bunch of morons.
We have owned a Nest thermostat for a couple years and it has saved us a ton of money in utility bills, as well as making our home comfortable when we need it to be and conserving energy when we don't.
My family cooks a lot, and smoke detectors are a pain in the butt for the occasional burnt meal. We already have the "Home Hero" locally mesh-networked smoke alarms (http://reviews.homedepot.com/1999/100606954/homehero-2-in-1-smoke-and-carbon-monoxide-alarm-reviews/reviews.htm), but the Nest functionality is even better. I have no intention of upgrading, unless my current smoke alarms stop working, but if these were available a couple years ago, I would have bought them.
Back to the privacy concerns... I want to care, really, but as far as the lack of privacy is concerned, the genie is already out of the bottle, so I abashedly admit that I am willing to risk possible further loss of privacy in return for actual convenience.
It's a simple cost-benefit analysis and, for me at least, the benefit outweighs the unlikely potential cost in terms of loss of privacy.
What comprises maintenance? I'm curious if this includes hardware/software purchase costs and IT salaries. How is "slow boot up time" quantified? The devil is in the details.
It appears as is RumbleFish has disabled the contact link on their website. Use this email address instead to let them know what you think: YouTubeContentID@rumblefish.com
I majored in Mechanical Engineering while minoring in Philosophy. The classical Greek philosophers and political philosophers of the 1800's such as John Stuart Mill and Karl Marx actually had a lot of interesting and valuable things to say about the origins of civilization, law and religion.
I agree with the poster regarding his take on "common-day" philosophers. After enjoying several course sequences on classical philosophy, I had a professor who was supposedly a world-reknowned philosopher. The day we spent discussing whether we could take for granted that we exist here on Earth, instead of being mental projections from gelatinous blobs living on Alpha Centauri was the day I dropped the philosophy minor. Contemporary philosophy, from what little exposure I had, seemed to be nothing more than mental masturbation. A total waste of time that left me no more enlightened.
I got the ME degree, though, and am grateful for what I learned from classical philosophy. What has been most enlightening in my life, however, has been a solid understanding of physics and the scientific method. As far as I'm concerned, people who dismiss science offhand are complete idiots who lack the mental capacity, education - or both - to understand how it is that we have been able to create things like microchips and MRI machines.
These people dismiss scientific theories like evolution as they are just something someone dreamt, not realizing that gravity is also a theory (if I deny it, does that mean I can fly?). These are the same people who are afraid of putting Wi-Fi in their homes, but talk on their cell phones while driving their SUVs to attend the Texas State Board of Education meeting.
Agree. Could never pass the WAF (wife acceptance factor). WTF? And while I'm at it, could Apple please make a Mac Mini, AppleTV, whatever, that was the proper width for my stereo system? Or somebody make me a box I can put my Mac Mini into, and add a 3.5" SATA HD.... but I digress...
And the same fugliness applies to my friggin' silver, half-width cable box (black, please). This crap has got to go. Make it matte black and 17-1/8" (435mm) wide or it will look hideous on my AV rack. It's not rocket science.
IMHO, proprietary, business-specific products are a bad idea when there are suitable consumer-level products available that do the same thing. Stuff aimed at businesses is WAY too expensive and it is often not even as good as the consumer stuff because economies of scale allow the consumer stuff to be updated more often and better-supported.
I designed a very low-cost and effective solution that I teach in several times a week.
Put up a whiteboard at one end of the conference room. This will double as your screen for the LCD projector. There will be some glare, but I like being able to write on top of what's being projected. A pull-down screen mounted on the wall above the whiteboard is an option if the glare is a problem.
Make sure the projector is at least 1800 ANSI Lumens (the more, the better) and that it comes with a good wireless mouse. Any decent projector comes with a remote control that doubles as a wireless mouse by connecting the projector to a computer's USB port. I like Philips' projector models because they come with trackballs on the wireless remote/mouse pointer, which are far superior to joystick-type pointers that most remotes come with.
Get two or more free AIM accounts. One for your conference room and the rest for people at the other end (to save them the bother of having to sign up at meeting time). Install the AIM software at each remote location, or (even better) use Macs with iChat AV (AIM compatible).
Get a couple of webcams with omnidirectional microphones (Logitech makes decent stuff). If the webcam and/or computer mic sound is crap (it probably will be unsuitable for a conference room), then buy a separate, PA-quality mics and plug them into the sound cards.
The total cost is about $1200 for the projector and a couple hundred bucks for the other stuff... Very cheap and easy to add more remote sites as you go.
We already pretty much have this on Linux. It's called MOSIX. Once each linux workstation has the MOSIX kernel installed...
<flame retardant>
Duh! Of course you already have MOSIX clustering for Linux. Your argument is ignoring the key points:
It should be an out-of-the-box capability. In other words - no special kernel required!
Last time I checked, Photoshop wasn't available for Linux.
Understand the comment before you post a reply. This applies to the vast majority of the replies I see here, although the few of you/. readers who exist in the real world of desktop computing understood what I meant...
</flame retardant>
maya, photoshop, etc. on a cluster?
on
Macintosh Clustering
·
· Score: 5, Interesting
Wouldn't it be great if "plug and play" clustering became a reality. Say your office mates are out to lunch, or there's no one scheduled to use the school computer lab for the next hour and you want to render the effects for you three-hour iMovie, or you want to perform batch despeckle on a few hundred inages in Photoshop...
Nothing against Linux (I use it myself for a router), but a three-day setup for Beowulf clustering isn't a great deterrent if your calculations will be going for a month or two.
The type of clustering we're talking about here is something that could potentially appeal to the average SOHO or school, where they have five to 500 general-use Macs that have processor cycles to spare.
My question is this:
What would it involve to make Mac OS X and every program that runs natively on it to be able to take advantage of clustering right out of the box? If they can natively use multiprocessing, how much of a leap is it to patch the OS to natively support clustering?
Not only would this be great for techies, but it seems that this would be a great incentive to volume sales from Apple, where they now generally only get one or two Macs per site and the rest are Wintel workstations.
Slashdot Mirror
A friend of mine floated the theory that there were no actual drones, but that the story of "4 drones" was made up as an excuse for letting the road full of cars burn.
I don't think I would have arrived at that same conclusion myself, but come to think of it, the whole story doesn't really make much sense. If drones were in the area, wouldn't they have just dumped water/flame retardant on them? Wouldn't there be some photographs or other evidence of drone presence?
This on the heels of the "drone with a gun" video making the rounds of the Internet. Seems like a convenient excuse to quickly pass drone legislation.
They build a bunny slope with a 100 foot cliff at the bottom and this guys comments on how kind they are to have stopped him from going over in his inner tube. I do not think I would have seen it that way. I'm pretty sure I would have called them a bunch of morons.
^^
What SuperKendall said.
I own a Nest. It paid for itself a couple times over in just one Winter.
Privacy concerns aside...
We have owned a Nest thermostat for a couple years and it has saved us a ton of money in utility bills, as well as making our home comfortable when we need it to be and conserving energy when we don't.
My family cooks a lot, and smoke detectors are a pain in the butt for the occasional burnt meal. We already have the "Home Hero" locally mesh-networked smoke alarms (http://reviews.homedepot.com/1999/100606954/homehero-2-in-1-smoke-and-carbon-monoxide-alarm-reviews/reviews.htm), but the Nest functionality is even better. I have no intention of upgrading, unless my current smoke alarms stop working, but if these were available a couple years ago, I would have bought them.
Back to the privacy concerns... I want to care, really, but as far as the lack of privacy is concerned, the genie is already out of the bottle, so I abashedly admit that I am willing to risk possible further loss of privacy in return for actual convenience.
It's a simple cost-benefit analysis and, for me at least, the benefit outweighs the unlikely potential cost in terms of loss of privacy.
What comprises maintenance? I'm curious if this includes hardware/software purchase costs and IT salaries. How is "slow boot up time" quantified? The devil is in the details.
It appears as is RumbleFish has disabled the contact link on their website. Use this email address instead to let them know what you think:
YouTubeContentID@rumblefish.com
I am a gelatinous orb from Alpha Centauri. I visit Earth as a robot disguised as a human. I use dial-up to post to slashdot, though.
I majored in Mechanical Engineering while minoring in Philosophy. The classical Greek philosophers and political philosophers of the 1800's such as John Stuart Mill and Karl Marx actually had a lot of interesting and valuable things to say about the origins of civilization, law and religion.
I agree with the poster regarding his take on "common-day" philosophers. After enjoying several course sequences on classical philosophy, I had a professor who was supposedly a world-reknowned philosopher. The day we spent discussing whether we could take for granted that we exist here on Earth, instead of being mental projections from gelatinous blobs living on Alpha Centauri was the day I dropped the philosophy minor. Contemporary philosophy, from what little exposure I had, seemed to be nothing more than mental masturbation. A total waste of time that left me no more enlightened.
I got the ME degree, though, and am grateful for what I learned from classical philosophy. What has been most enlightening in my life, however, has been a solid understanding of physics and the scientific method. As far as I'm concerned, people who dismiss science offhand are complete idiots who lack the mental capacity, education - or both - to understand how it is that we have been able to create things like microchips and MRI machines.
These people dismiss scientific theories like evolution as they are just something someone dreamt, not realizing that gravity is also a theory (if I deny it, does that mean I can fly?). These are the same people who are afraid of putting Wi-Fi in their homes, but talk on their cell phones while driving their SUVs to attend the Texas State Board of Education meeting.
Mod parent. TFA is POS.
Agree. Could never pass the WAF (wife acceptance factor). WTF?
And while I'm at it, could Apple please make a Mac Mini, AppleTV, whatever, that was the proper width for my stereo system? Or somebody make me a box I can put my Mac Mini into, and add a 3.5" SATA HD.... but I digress...
And the same fugliness applies to my friggin' silver, half-width cable box (black, please). This crap has got to go. Make it matte black and 17-1/8" (435mm) wide or it will look hideous on my AV rack. It's not rocket science.
We did this in 1999. We even called it the "Locker."
No news here.
Move along.
Knock yourselves out!
I switch Windows users on a daily basis to Macs... The next switch will be to Linux. Let's see how long it takes until Linuz is ready for Joe Average.
I designed a very low-cost and effective solution that I teach in several times a week.
- Put up a whiteboard at one end of the conference room. This will double as your screen for the LCD projector. There will be some glare, but I like being able to write on top of what's being projected. A pull-down screen mounted on the wall above the whiteboard is an option if the glare is a problem.
- Make sure the projector is at least 1800 ANSI Lumens (the more, the better) and that it comes with a good wireless mouse. Any decent projector comes with a remote control that doubles as a wireless mouse by connecting the projector to a computer's USB port. I like Philips' projector models because they come with trackballs on the wireless remote/mouse pointer, which are far superior to joystick-type pointers that most remotes come with.
- Get two or more free AIM accounts. One for your conference room and the rest for people at the other end (to save them the bother of having to sign up at meeting time). Install the AIM software at each remote location, or (even better) use Macs with iChat AV (AIM compatible).
- Go here to register for the AIM accounts.
- Go here to download the AIM software or just use iChat AV if you have Mac OS X 10.4 or later (recommended).
- Get a couple of webcams with omnidirectional microphones (Logitech makes decent stuff). If the webcam and/or computer mic sound is crap (it probably will be unsuitable for a conference room), then buy a separate, PA-quality mics and plug them into the sound cards.
The total cost is about $1200 for the projector and a couple hundred bucks for the other stuff... Very cheap and easy to add more remote sites as you go.<flame retardant>
Duh! Of course you already have MOSIX clustering for Linux. Your argument is ignoring the key points:
Understand the comment before you post a reply. This applies to the vast majority of the replies I see here, although the few of you
</flame retardant>
Wouldn't it be great if "plug and play" clustering became a reality. Say your office mates are out to lunch, or there's no one scheduled to use the school computer lab for the next hour and you want to render the effects for you three-hour iMovie, or you want to perform batch despeckle on a few hundred inages in Photoshop...
Nothing against Linux (I use it myself for a router), but a three-day setup for Beowulf clustering isn't a great deterrent if your calculations will be going for a month or two.
The type of clustering we're talking about here is something that could potentially appeal to the average SOHO or school, where they have five to 500 general-use Macs that have processor cycles to spare.
My question is this:
What would it involve to make Mac OS X and every program that runs natively on it to be able to take advantage of clustering right out of the box? If they can natively use multiprocessing, how much of a leap is it to patch the OS to natively support clustering?
Not only would this be great for techies, but it seems that this would be a great incentive to volume sales from Apple, where they now generally only get one or two Macs per site and the rest are Wintel workstations.