Slashdot Mirror


School Kids Get Virtual Web Lockers

Lucas123 writes "Seventh and eighth graders in Tulsa, Oklahoma not only get tablet PCs at the beginning of the school year, but they are now issued 100MB of storage through a hosted school 'Web Locker' system. The Web lockers also include chat, calendaring, and collaboration capabilities, but school administrators can also monitor and track all files uploaded to the system, and lock out individuals for misuse."

178 comments

  1. Useless... by MMC+Monster · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Any eight-grader who's worth his salt will have an accessory gmail account to keep the important stuff.

    --
    Help! I'm a slashdot refugee.
    1. Re:Useless... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cute. So the other 99.99% (don't question the number) of 8th graders who don't have an 'accessory gmail account' are worthless/sub par? We're in for a grim future then :)

    2. Re:Useless... by thewiz · · Score: 3, Insightful

      100MB?
      Most kids have thumb drives; why would they want to use 100MB of disk space that can be spied on?

      --
      If "disco" means "I learn" in Latin, does "discothèque" mean "I learn technology"?
    3. Re:Useless... by tomhudson · · Score: 0, Troll

      Because the whole purpose of it is to spy on the kids ... duh! They even admit its one of the big "features."

      Get kids used to it now, and they'll vote for it later. Same as the idea behind setting up the Hitler Youth (hey, its not a Godwin if its an appropriate reference :-).

      Whoever proposed this is a dickhead. If the kids are smart, they'll bring bootable thumb drives with a bootable copy of peanut linux or some other mini-distro on it.

    4. Re:Useless... by heinousjay · · Score: 1

      But pretty much every computer on a private network is monitored, This isn't really a new "feature" so much as a continuation of existing procedure.

      Besides, you kinda killed your point with that picture.

      --
      Slashdot - where whining about luck is the new way to make the world you want.
    5. Re:Useless... by Orkie · · Score: 1

      "If the kids are smart, they'll bring bootable thumb drives with a bootable copy of peanut linux or some other mini-distro on it." No, only if the kids are extremely stupid will they bring anything bootable into school to use on the computers. The people who run the network won't understand it, and even if they do it is likely in breach of a policy at the school (which isn't a bad policy if it helps them secure their network) and they run the risk of getting kicked out, or at least causing a lot of unnecessary trouble for themselves.

    6. Re:Useless... by tomhudson · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "But pretty much every computer on a private network is monitored, This isn't really a new "feature" so much as a continuation of existing procedure."

      It depends on where you work. We don't monitor anything where I work - anyone stupid enough to try that would be caught out quickly enough. Its expected that people (both men and women) will hit a few porn sites every now and then. Big deal ... just don't download tons of porn all at once and swallow up all the bandwidth while everyone else is trying to work.

      Not only that - its part of the job description for some of them. They're expected to keep on top of the latest trends and technologies, and the porn industry has always been THE first mover.

      Exactly what does the school hope to accomplish by monitoring? Talk to a teacher. They'll tell you about kids in grades 2, 3 coming up to them and telling them about the pictures of penises on mommy's computer, or boobies on daddy's computer, and the parents will complain about how they can't keep their kids away from the porn sites.

      The battle to keep the kids eyes safe from the sight of T and A, while letting them watch 17,000 murders and violent crimes on TV before they're 18, was always pointless, except to those who'd rather make war, not love, and the religious right, who need an enemy so they can fleece the flock for more $$$ to "promote family values." Funny how those "family values" don't go after violence on TV.

    7. Re:Useless... by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      riiight ... teach the kids to be good little sheeples now.

      Heck, the kids cell phones probably have more data storage than they're given on this "service". All they need to trade files is a transfer cable (which mine came with).

    8. Re:Useless... by WastedMeat · · Score: 1
      It is quite novel to see my home town mentioned on slashdot (particularly so since that home town is in Oklahoma), but how in the hell is this news?

      I also did not see it mentioned anywhere that this is a private catholic school, and expensive as hell even for that. Yet in spite of this, providing a basic service to the students is not only news, but slashdot-worthy news.

    9. Re:Useless... by Jonner · · Score: 1

      So what about all the violent images on the web? I suppose there's no point in trying to protect kids from that either?

    10. Re:Useless... by myowntrueself · · Score: 4, Funny

      Funny how those "family values" don't go after violence on TV.

      Hey!

      Violence is Gods work! Didn't you ever read the old testament??!?!?!?

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    11. Re:Useless... by jabuzz · · Score: 1

      Because storing stuff on a pen drive is the quickest way to ensuring it gets lost. They are great for moving stuff from A to B in a high capacity sneaker net. However the *moment* you start using them to store stuff you let yourself in to a *world* of hurt. It is about as sensible as playing in the fast lane of the motorway.

    12. Re:Useless... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some of the "family values" types do go after violence, but in our society going after sex is a guaranteed win. It's so so so easy to tag someone as a deviant or pervert and then spread that taint to anyone who might consider defending them. (Senator who?)

    13. Re:Useless... by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      "So what about all the violent images on the web? I suppose there's no point in trying to protect kids from that either?"

      1. They see a lot more violence, a lot more realistically portrayed, on TV. TV has been around a LOT longer. The motivation of people arguing for net censorship is self-serving and hypocritical, because they don't want to deprive themselves of their TV violence.

      2. Your argument is a fallacy - it posits an either-or situation, which is not the case here.

      3. Kids are more likely to find porn on the net than violence. Porn isn't as harmful. Lets face it - would you rather kids imitate 2 people having sex like they see on the net, or 2 people killing each other, like they see on TV?

    14. Re:Useless... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      killing each other of course, it's far cheaper, you pay for a funeral, but then no allowancee, no food, no tuition fees or anything to pay, and you can turn their room into a nerd room. Kids fuck, you either save nothing, or they get preggo and you have to pay for their kid too, and they probably steal your existing nerd room as a nursery. Unless you can get you daughter to fuck your son, then you at least get your nerd room, cos they can share a bedroom.

    15. Re:Useless... by gallwapa · · Score: 1

      I beg to differ. You need to see "Taliron". Additionally, Teal'c properly identified Zat's and Tac's.

    16. Re:Useless... by Jonner · · Score: 1

      I don't think I made a strong argument. I'm trying to understand what your argument is. Are you saying that it would be better to make no attempt to control what the kids access on the Internet in any way?

    17. Re:Useless... by iamhassi · · Score: 1

      "...an accessory gmail account to keep the important stuff."

      Unless they can't access gmail from school.

      100 mB virtual lockers? What are they, zip drives from 1995? 2 gig flash drives are $20. Why the measly 100 megs?

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    18. Re:Useless... by Tyler+Eaves · · Score: 1

      Dude, what are you doing to your drives? I've never had one fail on me, and that includes one that got dropped into a cup of soda.

      --
      TODO: Something witty here...
    19. Re:Useless... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Porn isn't as harmful"

      Not as harmful to them at least. Just the people they rape. Its seems unbelieveable that people still refuse to see the harm in porn.

    20. Re:Useless... by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

      If watching porn caused rape I'd be a serial rapist. I'm not proud of it, but I'm single and fap once a day.

      And if you look at the statistics, Japan, a country that is more open about sex to the point that they have computer games where you stalk and rape women, has a far lower amount of sex crime than the US.

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    21. Re:Useless... by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

      Because all they should be storing is some word documents and maybe some images they're going to use for reports. It's for school. They're not downloading movies and music.

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    22. Re:Useless... by Darundal · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Not sure about most schools, but all the schools I went to, after thumbdrives came out, started prohibiting people from using thumbdrives.

    23. Re:Useless... by badspyro · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Yes, it would
      In the past, parents let their children read all kinds of books. Horror stories, romances, hell, even the bible includes sex, rape and murder. This stuff is NORMAL for a child to see and experience. Hell, I was reading Steven king at the age of 10. A pannel member at a games development company stated that he read the exorcist at about the same age.

      As far as I can see, there is little to no difference between what children see now and what they saw in the past. The only difference is that parents can actualy tell that their children have been looking at those websites rather than them not noticeing what books the children were reading.

      (gets off high horse)

    24. Re:Useless... by badspyro · · Score: 1
      I'm afraid, certanly where I come from, systems administrators don't give a flying f**k, as long as it doesn't mean more work for them.

      In the UK, systems admins are overworked, have more users than in any other sector and have pressure from parents, teachers and zellots to "save the children". The systems administrators that I know who do know what linux is didn't care when we booted into it, either from a USB hard drive or a CD, and the ones that didn't know... well, what can I say? They were too dumb to notice :p

    25. Re:Useless... by Architect_sasyr · · Score: 1

      The second a kid comes to school with a blue tooth enabled, viral infected phone is the second they crack down on this too.

      It's not about teaching the kids to be sheeples, it is about making the sysadmin's life easier. I remember when I was in school and wreaking havoc on the network, a policy was put into place and I was suddenly in trouble. Most of the other kids stopped doing what they were doing because of this policy. I did not, and ended up being an un-official assistant to the sysadmin in my senior years... those who stopped have since moved on into other jobs (like beancounting!) yet here I am working as a SysAdmin.

      The policy's purpose was to weed out the part time computer users and have a backup if the full time users (myself) got to 'dangerous'. Kids will always find ways around things, they were doing it years before computers were in schools and they will be doing it years after we all get in-skin's.

      --
      Me failed English...
      FreeBSD over Linux. If my comments seem odd, this may explain...
    26. Re:Useless... by Foobar+of+Borg · · Score: 1

      100 mB virtual lockers? What are they, zip drives from 1995
      No kidding! Now, I get 128 mb thumbdrives free whenever I buy a spool of DVD-R's (for, um, data backups of course).
    27. Re:Useless... by sh3l1 · · Score: 1

      As a high school student i have been using DSL on school computers for years. I also have an accessory gmail account (bobsagetpwnsyou@gmail.com) that i use with gspace.

      --
      Help Me! I'm trapped in the tubes! Oh noes! Here comes a internet!
    28. Re:Useless... by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      Yes. Instead of keeping it from them, sit down with them and find out what they're looking at. Most of it isn't that bad.

      Its like one of my sisters - she was always complaining that her son and his friend were always surfing asian porn sites.

      Years later, shes saying "Thank god they're just surfing asian porn sites."

      As far as she's concerned, as long as there's no sign they're "getting into" gay porn, she doesn't care.

      (note to self - must plant gay porn on nephew's computer :-)

    29. Re:Useless... by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      Since when does porn cause rape? TV shows that depict rape sound a more likely cause. Cultural values that promote inequality between men and women sound more likely. Speaking of which, when is the US going to finally declare that men and women are equal?

    30. Re:Useless... by morari · · Score: 1

      No, most kids have cell phones and MP3 players. A thumb drive would just be too useful.

      --
      "He who can destroy a thing, controls a thing." --Paul Atreides, Dune
    31. Re:Useless... by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      So explain how all this requires them to monitor chat conversations.

      It doesn't.

      Its a "we will be nosy because we can" thing.

      What are they going to do when kids routinely set up their own encrypted AlterNets in a few years?

      Right - nothing. Because they won't be able to do squat.

    32. Re:Useless... by gallwapa · · Score: 1

      Please. Trek is lame. Stargate has things like guns, sarcasm, and scantly clad deities.

    33. Re:Useless... by Jarjarthejedi · · Score: 1

      Heh...1920. The declaration that Women and Men are equal came a long time ago, the problem you seem to be pointing out is that no one has really listened to that declaration. I've found that the inequality so spoken of is pretty minimal in the Southwest at least. Of course there are still inequal situations, but just as many of them seem to go towards Women over Men (so as not to appear sexist, which is horribly hypocritical but whatever) as the other way around so it kinda balances out.

      Groups of people, as a whole, will always consider themselves superior to another group, that's human nature. The question is how much that affects the world and the answer, at least where I live, is that it doesn't that much, and when it does it's almost always inequal in the woman's favor.

      --
      There are two kinds of fool One says 'This is old therefore good' Another says 'This is new therefore better'- Dean Ing
    34. Re:Useless... by freedomlinux · · Score: 1

      Apologies- Slip of the mouse. Didn't quite mean to mod this redundant.

    35. Re:Useless... by jZnat · · Score: 1

      There was plenty of sex (including incest) in there as well, so I don't get it...

      --
      'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you? No. Can Firefox show you naked women? Yes.'
    36. Re:Useless... by tomhudson · · Score: 1
      1920? Which constitutional amendment was that? I see the 19th amendment, which gave women the right to vote, but that's far from a declaration that men and women are equal.

      The ERA http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equal_Rights_Amendmen t would fix that. For 35 years, its been before congress, and they continually refuse to ratify it. Can't expect too much from an old boys club.

    37. Re:Useless... by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      There was plenty of sex (including incest) in there as well, so I don't get it...

      Yeah but the sex was almost always in the context of bad and sinful whereas the violence was almost always viewed in a favorable light by God.

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    38. Re:Useless... by Jonner · · Score: 1

      So, you're convinced that most children have long had access to printed books with the same type of content easily available on the web today? Unless I'm mistaken, porn magazines have not been and are not as easily accessible to children even today. Was there a time when photos of nude people and dismemberment was common to see in books, magazines, movies, or television with no age restrictions?

      There certainly have been books whose text contain those things for a long time, but that's not quite the same as a photo. I think it's very difficult to support the position that children have always had the same access to images they do today. The access to various things people have considered objectional, whether images, words, or ideas, is not constant. Sometimes there's a trend toward more restriction, and sometimes the opposite.

      To me, it doesn't make any more sense to allow children at school unrestricted web access than to allow them to come and go from class any time they please. The primary reason for them to be at school is to learn, so restricting activities that don't help learning and may impede it is definitely a responsibility of the administration and teachers. I'm not sure what the best approach is, since we all know well filtering software and services work.

      Maybe the best approach is just active teacher monitoring and clearly stated guidelines about what types of activities and content isn't allowed. Of course, different classes and projects would probably need different standards. In many contexts, students would probably only need access to a few specific sites related to the class activity, while others might require unrestricted access. The school should also seek input from parents. Maybe you would let your kids see and read anything they came across, but I would have some boundaries, as I know many parents do. My parents did often take an interest in what I read when I was growing up.

    39. Re:Useless... by Jarik_Tentsu · · Score: 1

      Nothing new. My school (in Melbourne) has backup servers with probably around 1TB for 1000 students.

      ~1GB per student, but there's no real limit. Each student gets a directory and they can upload their work there. Since not everyone uses it, and barely anyone uses more than 100MB, in reality, you get a lot more. But they do monitor it - if there's a guy who fills up 10GB, they'll definitely make sure its 'work' and not a bunch of other stuff.

      ~Jarik

    40. Re:Useless... by badspyro · · Score: 1
      The imagination is often far more vivid than anything an image can portray.

      In respects to the pornography, no it wasn't as readily avalable, but large numbers of children found their parents stash or got the material from somewhere, or even seen their parents having sex. Realisticaly, the attitude that we as a civilization have towards sex, especialy in the USA is counterproductive to the point of it being life threatening. Take for example Nebrasca banning the words "sex" and "sexual" in state program public media, including AIDS media (http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2007/07/n ebraska_considered_harmful.html - NSFW), or the Mormon Church banning masterbation (causing more than one teenager to commit suicide) (Disclaimer - I used to be a member of the aforementioned organisation).

      However, in citys such as Amsterdam, thease things are taken as the norm, and not treated as anything special, giving sexual advice about protection and sexual prositions even in the citys sciance museum. This allows for people to grow up understanding what to do on their wedding night, understanding that a crisp packet or a menthos mint is NOT a form of contraceptive.

      As far as I can see, it is America that has got it all worng about sex, and is trying to push its stunted and misguided views onto the rest of the world, and if we were more open about this kind of thing, then there would be fiewer unwanted pregnancys, aids cases and maybe even rapes.

      I'm so moving to Amsterdam.

    41. Re:Useless... by Zencyde · · Score: 1

      They also have a police box on every block. It's very difficult to try to do something like that when one knows that there is a cop near them. It's a little more difficult to set up something like that in America. For instance, in Houston, where I live, the average distance between major streets is roughly one to two miles. A police box on every block would do little good here. It's about culture and the way that cities develop more than it is society. I'm not saying that PC America doesn't leave a salty taste in my mouth; but, your argument is invalid.

      --
      What day is it? Could you please tell me?
    42. Re:Useless... by Slack3r78 · · Score: 1

      They don't necessarily have to get damaged. They can simply be lost, too.

      That said, I've had customers break everything from the USB connector to internal ICs off the the PCB. I can actually usually repair broken USB connectors to recover their stuff, but you'd be amazed how many people store their only copy of a file on a USB drive rather than keeping an extra copy on their HDD as well.

    43. Re:Useless... by prezkennedy.org · · Score: 1

      Hey if the kiddies want to set up their own encrypted AlterNets, they can do that. On their parents' computer systems. These computers were bought by the school using public money. So basically, their computers, their rules. You have a problem with that, well... sucks to be you. That's really all there is to it.

      Just as I expect anyone logging onto my computer to follow my rules. If you logged into my laptop and installed a bunch of crap on it just because you think you're entitled to as the person using it, my foot will be kicking your ass.

      --
      It started back in Team Fortress Classic
    44. Re:Useless... by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Most kids have thumb drives
      God, I feel old.
      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    45. Re:Useless... by curlynoodle · · Score: 1

      RTFA. The intent of the system is to curb the use of flash drives to "help keep bad things out of our system".

      My question is, does this really help middle school students learn? I went through middle and high school during the personal computer boom. I am a software developer/eet, so I use PCs everyday. But really, a tablet for each student. What is wrong with computer labs for computer work, and pencil and paper for true essentials learning? IMHO, modern computing technology is still too distracting for full-time educational use.

    46. Re:Useless... by Sandbags · · Score: 1

      100MB if far more than any person realistically needs for a bookmark cache, word, excel, and PPT docs, and an entire semester's worth of document trading between student and teacher. If you exclude music, video, and hi hes picture files (nothing over 1MP), then you really need very little storage. I have about 300 docs in a folder (mix of pdf, doc, xls, and other) and it's less than 40MB. Most of these docs include images...

      Remember, this "useless" structure is not really a personal file store for the students, but a place to store assignments where only the individual student can get to them, and on a secure 3rd party managed system where the school does not have to front the massive cost of maintaining their own systems. It's also a direct connection between the student's home computer, classroom and lab workstations, and other points in between. The excuse "I lost my thumb drive" won't be an excuse if they are required to store, transfer, and submit works via this locker system. Also, this system prevents other students from swiping your thumb drive, copying your doc, changing the name, and then hacking the doc to make it look like it was made earlier than yours. This kind of plagiarism (and cheating) is becoming common in schools.

      Because all docs in or out of the system are scanned for viruses, it also greatly reduces the risk of allowing kids to use floppies, bus drives, or CDs to move data in and out of the school network. Aside from e-mail and downloads, removable media is the next biggest security risk.

      Also, in response to another poster who said, "If the kids are smart, they'll bring bootable thumb drives with a bootable copy of peanut Linux [linuxquestions.org] or some other mini-distro on it," what's the point? This locker is not a security system. Students VOLUNTARILY place docs here. There's nothing preventing them from saving these to a thumb drive (unless USB is disabled). I see this system being quickly tied into webmail and an assignment tracking system (like my wife uses for some college classes she takes online) to allow teachers to monitor progress on large projects, accept completed assignments, and to return graded docs to students electronically. The paper savings in one month alone likely pay for the electronic service for the whole year in this case. This particular article notes that an online markup system to allow teachers to do just that is coming soon.

      The service is not to spy on kids, but to give them a place to store data where it is secure. Many schools spend thousands a year maintaining servers, backups, and redundancy to protect data. At $1 per student per year, there's no way any school can compete with this service and host the data themselves on their own school network, let alone provide enough bandwidth to it and make it reliable. Even a "cheap" storage server implementation, with backup, and accounting for bandwidth, licensing, and labor to implement and maintain is typically about $10K per 100GB.

      On the note of booting from a linux distro, every school I've been in that offers any kind of secure system (I'm not counting the 80% of schools that don't, just the ones that actually embraced modern technology and have competent IT staffs) disables USB and CD boot in every PC installed in public areas. This is simple IT administration 101. A BIOS password prevents access to the settings, a case lock prevents resetting the firmware, and monitoring tools (optionally) let admins know if a machine is shut down or rebooted (and whether this was a normal shutdown or a hard power off). Even if they work around and reboot to other media, proxy and firewall systems should disallow network access if not authenticated normally, or if the MAC address appears active, but the OS type is not recognized or a security app is not seen to be running. The USB trick usually works at your local library, or in schools that think a custom OS and login screen equals security, but in most schools, especially those subject to security audits by local or state agencies, this is pointless.

      --
      There is no contest in life for which the unprepared have the advantage.
    47. Re:Useless... by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      They will be setting up their AlterNets on their own palmtops, using lilypad meshes, bluetooth, and wifi. The school systems will be as useful as a room full of Apple ][s.

      Within 10 years you'll be able to roll up your screen, type on a virtual keyboard, and have your screen communicate with both your system unit (attached to your belt, in your pocket or purse, or doubling as your phone) and everyone else in the local mesh, and via the mesh, the outside world.

    48. Re:Useless... by Orkie · · Score: 1

      You think it is a good idea for children to risk missing out on some of their education when they are kicked out of school just because you disagree with a policy (which does have valid reasons)? Clearly you are quite dense if you believe this.

    49. Re:Useless... by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      "You think it is a good idea for children to risk missing out on some of their education when they are kicked out of school just because you disagree with a policy (which does have valid reasons)? Clearly you are quite dense if you believe this."

      Nobody can "require" that you use only their system. Just like your boss at work can't require that you use only their internet access.

      You'd probably also agree to school-issue music players that don't allow "subversive" song content (Feel like banning that old Woodstock album? Weird Al? Everything popular since 1930? Make everyone listen to Pat Boone or the Moron Tabernacle Choir?)

    50. Re:Useless... by Orkie · · Score: 1

      Of course they can't force you to use the computers, but if you do, they can force you not to use anything other than what they have installed - seems reasonable enough to me. It's their system, their rules.

  2. Incentive? by arth1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And what's the incentive for the kids to use this solution, as opposed to the numerous free one provided, which won't have the big brother sees you problem?

    1. Re:Incentive? by KlaymenDK · · Score: 3, Funny

      Um, feeling like Ender? That's the only one I can come up with...

    2. Re:Incentive? by Constantine+XVI · · Score: 4, Funny

      So it comes with an RPG whose sole purpose is to drive you insane?

      --
      "I think an etch-a-sketch with an ethernet port would beat IE7 in web standards compliance."
    3. Re:Incentive? by blowdart · · Score: 1

      Isn't that called "dating" in most school systems? (for us geeks anyway)

    4. Re:Incentive? by stonecypher · · Score: 1

      Well for one, if they're storing their homework there, it's timestamped, and if the system fails, the dog really did eat it, and the teacher isn't going to crap down their neck. For two, it's likely to be at least partially integrated with the grading system, meaning that it's likely to be far less hassle for the teacher, meaning that the teacher is likely to require it. There wasn't an advantage to the kind of paper pad my highschool teacher required, but I used them anyway, because it was required.

      Unlike software, tools at school don't have to be better to gain momentum.

      --
      StoneCypher is Full of BS
    5. Re:Incentive? by fm6 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The web locker isn't just a file storage space. It's where students download assignments, upload homework, collaborate with other students, etc.

      Of course any technically clueful student will have a thumb drive, unofficial email and IM accounts, and lots of other places to stash/do stuff they don't want teachers and parents to know about. (Though not all students are technically clueful, and the school will try to prevent such unmonitored activity.) But all the stuff they're supposed to be doing will live on the official server.

      This school portal idea (which is kind of obvious/inevitable) is less interesting than the laptop program itself. There's still a lot of argument over whether laptops for this age group are a boon or a distraction.

    6. Re:Incentive? by German_Dupree · · Score: 0

      So the schoolchildren are getting free World of Warcraft subscriptions? Damn, they should do something like that in my district.

    7. Re:Incentive? by irc.goatse.cx+troll · · Score: 1

      This school portal idea (which is kind of obvious/inevitable) is less interesting than the laptop program itself. There's still a lot of argument over whether laptops for this age group are a boon or a distraction.
      I think the problem is it can be both for different people, or even the same person in different circumstances.

      I'm horrible at handwriting, I hate doing it, and would have done a lot better in school had I typed everything, been able to copy/paste and arbitrarily reformat documents post-writing, and all the other upsides of computers.

      I'd also get horribly bored as the stupid kids slow down the class and start gaming, chatting, or whatever I could get away with and likely continue to do so even when I should be paying attention, thus bringing myself down as well.
      --
      Pain lasts, kid. Its how you know you're alive. Sometimes I think this growing up thing is just pain management-TheMaxx
    8. Re:Incentive? by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      Gee, I guess you didn't RTFA. There is no integration for grading, etc., yet. As for submitting assignments, the teacher has a 1-gig allotment.

      The way to take this system out quickly is for a bunch of kids to all start spreading stories about one or two teachers using the chat function. You know its going to happen. A few kids will post that "Mr. Brown" keeps asking them to spend extra time with him after school doing research and

      • they all ended up getting drunk and high
      • he kept trying to "touch" them
      • gee, his penis looks funny!!!
      Rinse, lather, repeat.

      Teachers suspended, careers ruined, lawsuits against the schools for providing the means.

    9. Re:Incentive? by arth1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There wasn't an advantage to the kind of paper pad my highschool teacher required, but I used them anyway, because it was required.

      The big difference being that the school didn't have and didn't exercise a right to read through everything written on school paper. Your love poems to the girl two rows over, and which you kept at home, were kept safe, not only from her and other schoolmates, but from the teachers too. The papers they got to see, they got to see because you handed them over, not because they had automatic access.

      I think it's really bad when everything kids do is being supervised 24/7. Kids need hidey-holes and journals with a lock on. They won't ever be able to build their own identity nor handle secrets as an adult if they haven't been allowed to and trusted to keep secrets while growing up.

    10. Re:Incentive? by hedwards · · Score: 1

      Women aren't that bad. Just visualize a quantum black box containing 1,000 tons of TNT and an equal amount of doilies.

      It's not that bad as long as you ask questions that only pertain to the doilies and don't bother to open the box or measure the contents. If you do that, you might, just might manage to get to second base or destroy the entirety of whatever continent your on.

    11. Re:Incentive? by SamP2 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Umm, maybe the same one as when in the workplace you are given a corporate email?

      This big brother paranoia is going through the roof on /. Nobody is forcing students to use the mail/file system for their own private stuff. But just like in the workplace, where for official business you use corporate resources, in school you are given *for free* school resources to store your notes, homework, projects, or anything else school related.

      Some advantages:

      - Local storage means much faster access times than external provider
      - School bears responsibility for system upkeep - if it fails, you have a legitimate reason to not produce your homework or project that was stored or submitted there.
      - System can be integrated with class notes and announcements, and the calendar can be used as school agenda - student logs in, sees the courses he's taking, and sees the homework assigned to him in each course.
      - With login information tied to student IDs, it is much easier to track assignments and work going through the system for administration and teachers, you don't need to wonder who submitted the work coming from email s3xyb4b3@gmail.com.

      And YES, you will get in trouble if you download pr0n or pirate music using the system... Just like you would at your workplace for doing the same thing using the corporate system. If you want to send something without being monitored, don't use the school system for that particular message, just as you wouldn't use your work email unless you expect it to be monitored by your employer.

      It's very nice more schools are accepting the high-tech way of doing work. Not only it makes managing assignments much easier (meaning teachers can spend more time TEACHING and less time going through homework), but it trains children to real life, where high-tech work has already became a standard.

    12. Re:Incentive? by Crash+Culligan · · Score: 1

      KlaymenDK: Um, feeling like Ender? That's the only one I can come up with...

      Sadly, there's a way such a "feature" could possibly be implemented: the school administrators could load up the locker system with "cool content" that makes most of the kids want to use their locker solution. Peer pressure and ostracism would follow as a matter of course if their system achieved a critical mass of users. (Dare I say it? "Schoolyard brownshirts")

      And where it backfires--mercifully, beautifully--is that we're talking about school administrators loading a computer system with "cool content" for the students. Think about that one for a moment or two. The kids that can work outside the system will get all sorts of friends looking to find out how they get to the good stuff rather than the school admin shovelware.

      --
      You cannot truly appreciate Dilbert until you read it in the original Klingon.
    13. Re:Incentive? by arth1 · · Score: 1

      This big brother paranoia is going through the roof on /. Nobody is forcing students to use the mail/file system for their own private stuff.

      That's exactly why the subject of your post is "Re: Incentive?". They want it to be for everything, but that would require a carrot.

      But just like in the workplace, where for official business you use corporate resources, in school you are given *for free* school resources to store your notes, homework, projects, or anything else school related.

      What do you mean "for free"? It's not free, but costs a lot of money that either could be saved (i.e. not exctracted from the parents or general public), or be used for other things. But the big lack of insight in your above statement are the four last words -- "anything else school related". The big problems here are that (a) it's sold to the students as "anything else" without a qualifier, and (b) the privacy implied by the word locker is false, when school administrators and teachers are given free access without even having to justify why they looked.

      Even if what you need stored is school related, there may be valid reasons why you don't want your teacher or administrators to see it. Which often coincide with the teacher's and administrators' desire to see it. Student union plans, for example.

      This isn't about making it easier or safer for students -- that's an excuse. It's plain and simply an way for teachers and admins to easier go through what the students write and think, without them even knowing. If it wasn't, it could be launched without the big brother features. It wasn't, so it isn't. This clearly shows the intent.
    14. Re:Incentive? by miskatonic+alumnus · · Score: 1

      It's very nice more schools are accepting the high-tech way of doing work. Not only it makes managing assignments much easier (meaning teachers can spend more time TEACHING and less time going through homework)

      Please do explain. How is it going to be easier managing assignments? Whether an essay is submitted on paper or as a .doc, it takes just as long to read and grade it. Furthermore, you imply that managing/grading/going through homework is not a part of teaching --- so, what is teaching?

      but it trains children to real life, where high-tech work has already became a standard.

      Using a word processor to replace a typewriter doesn't mean you have graduated to "high-tech". Most jobs in the U.S. are service jobs, not "high-tech" jobs. I know how to program microprocessors and microcontrollers, using various assembly languages, C, FORTRAN, and BASIC. I have mastered markup languages like LaTeX and HTML. I have honed my script-fu using bash, sed, and awk. I am comfortable using Excel, Word, and Photoshop. I've built my own computer, built my own LAN, used IPTables for firewalling, and have (repeatedly) installed various incarnations of Windows and Linux. Care to take a guess at how much formal training I've had? ZERO. NONE. I taught myself all these things, as an adult. And yet, bozos like you claim "It's a technological world and kids need technical training at an early age to prepare them for the REAL WORLD." It's a load of bullshit. What most kids need to learn can be taught in a matter of a few weeks.

    15. Re:Incentive? by sethstorm · · Score: 1

      You have to start training them to do goldfarming sometime.

      --
      Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
    16. Re:Incentive? by German_Dupree · · Score: 0

      Sounds like a great way to amortize school costs.

    17. Re:Incentive? by pla · · Score: 1

      Umm, maybe the same one as when in the workplace you are given a corporate email?

      I use my corporate email for work-related communication only. For everything else, I use one of several external accounts based on importance and probability of getting spam.


      This big brother paranoia is going through the roof on /.

      As soon as Big Brother shows some good faith, I'll take off my beanie. Until then...


      Local storage means much faster access times than external provider

      You haven't used a school computer in quite a few years, have you? Think of how efficient and knowledgeable you consider your local broadband provider. Now lower that by a factor of ten.

      The best school networks have the kids running them as a hobby. Anything "official" in that area means "massively overpriced and slow-if-not-outright-broken".


      if it fails, you have a legitimate reason to not produce your homework or project that was stored or submitted there.

      My school used to give out late slips when the busses showed up late. You expect them to care about, much less understand, system downtime? I can just hear my 11th grade English teacher now - "How ever do you suppose Dickens managed to produce such a notable body of work without the computers working properly? Yet you cannot manage to produce a three page essay using a pencil and paper, or god forbid, a library computer?"


      If you want to send something without being monitored, don't use the school system for that particular message, just as you wouldn't use your work email unless you expect it to be monitored by your employer.

      Again, you apparently forget the experience, but schools have a long history of massively overstepping their bounds. To "encourage" students to focus more on their work, how long do you suppose it will take this district to make "use of any account not provided by the administration" a punishable offense"? Of course, they'll impose that at school as the first step, since they actually have that authority; But the first time one student harasses another, or cheats on a test, or posts unflattering commentary about a teacher to MySpace - Bam, they'll try to make it stick 24/7.

    18. Re:Incentive? by Baricom · · Score: 1

      It doesn't have to be cool content. It merely needs to be required content.

    19. Re:Incentive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That sounds like school to me!

      As an hillarious sidenote, the captcha for this post was "puberty"

    20. Re:Incentive? by psychicsword · · Score: 1

      Takes out "Desk"
      "Cover you butt Bernard is watching - God" ???
      "I love you butt let me kiss it - Bernard" LOL

    21. Re:Incentive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, they've probably got the network locked down so it's harder to get to another service. *or* they could violate the school's terms of service (like in my district) and would loose computer privileges all together.

      Of course my district also uses a network drive that the My Documents folder is re-directed to thru AD, so both staff and students that are a bit less savvy, don't even know they're putting things on the network.

    22. Re:Incentive? by RealGrouchy · · Score: 1

      This big brother paranoia is going through the roof on /. How else would I be able to fit in my joke about vendors "bully"ing school districts by "locking them in" to their Virtual "Locker" software?

      - RG>
      --
      Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
    23. Re:Incentive? by guruevi · · Score: 1

      In this world, it seems like that is the whole purpose of 'save the children' and 'columbine prevention'. Getting the kids accustomed to 24/7 monitoring will get them easier switched once we are dead or too old to do anything about it.

      The surveillanced world is coming, just not under our watch because we know how the internet came about and what happened with uncontrolled surveillance by government agencies, just because we value our privacy. If you raise the kids nowadays that surveillance is normal and checking what you're doing or being punished for what you say is a day-to-day thing, they will much easier accept it from government agencies in the future.

      As soon as we are dead and the rest of the world as we know it isn't, that change is going to happen.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    24. Re:Incentive? by cookieinc · · Score: 0

      s3xyb4b3@gmail.com Way to post my email address you insensitive clod!
    25. Re:Incentive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well at least your not his crazy ass brother peter or Bonzo Madrid :)

    26. Re:Incentive? by arth1 · · Score: 1

      I don't know about you, but I plan on living forever.
      And teach my kids that it's perfectly fine to have secrets and that no thoughts are illegal, despite what certain people claim. And if there's something they think I should know but they don't want to tell me, they're better off telling me anyhow, or things will just be much worse when I find out. But they have a right to privacy -- from me, from teachers, from governments, from lovers and from god herself. If they want to lock their doors, write secret novels or manifestos, or hide e-mails to and from their school mates from the eyes of teachers, it's their right, and I'm glad to see them exercising it.

      To kids today: Give the teacher what the teacher is due -- attendance when required, the final result of homework assignments, and take the tests as scheduled, and do better than most of the others (which isn't hard). But your privacy isn't your teachers' or parents' business. Claim it, guard it, and use it! And when getting a job, give your employer what he's due, to the full. You're paid for that. But when the pay ends, and your private life starts, it's none of your employers business whether you have gratuitous sex with oranges or correspond by e-mail with Fidel Castro. So keep your private matters private, and don't let anyone tell you that you have no rights. Look down on and pity the sods who give up their privacy, cause they will always be sheep, not leaders.

    27. Re:Incentive? by Lesrahpem · · Score: 1

      I don't know about your area, but most of the schools around here have done something like this. Soon after they banned students from bringing flash drives to school unless a teacher "virus scans" them before each usage. They used the web filter to block access to any sort of free web hosting and most file-storage sites as well. The "virus scanner" not only scans the disks for malware, it copies everything on them to a shared drive on the network which system administrators and teachers are able to look through later.

    28. Re:Incentive? by Dhalka226 · · Score: 1

      the privacy implied by the word locker is false, when school administrators and teachers are given free access without even having to justify why they looked.

      Given that it is a private, Catholic school, they don't have to justify opening your real locker either.

      It's plain and simply an way for teachers and admins to easier go through what the students write and think, without them even knowing.

      Wow. You know, it's possible you're right -- but even if you are, you're still a fool for thinking that clearly shows anything. You're exactly the tinfoil-hat paranoid that the OP was talking about. People like you do far more harm to legitimate privacy concerns than you do good.

  3. Product Placement by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The Web lockers also include chat, calendaring, and collaboration capabilities

    And, of course, a steady supply of advertising and "product placement".

    That's quite the story write-up, almost as if done by a PR writer...

    --
    If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    1. Re:Product Placement by vishbar · · Score: 1

      Ummm...where in TFA (or anywhere else, for that matter) do you see advertising mentioned?

      I know the tin-foil-hat mentality is rampant here on slashdot, but please, at least try to have a bit of concrete (no, anecdotal doesn't count) evidence before you go around slinging accusations.

      --
      Ride the skies
    2. Re:Product Placement by westlake · · Score: 1
      And, of course, a steady supply of advertising and "product placement".

      I don't see any hint of of this on Networld's School Web Lockers home page. What I do is a link to to an add-free online demo, using the simplest of text and calendar displays.

  4. Congratulations by DJCacophony · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    You've discovered file sharing. Now you're pretty much on par with anybody who has used computers in the last couple decades.

    --
    Slow Down, Cowboy! It's been 60 minutes since you last successfully posted a comment.
    1. Re:Congratulations by stonecypher · · Score: 1

      You've discovered snide remarks. Now you're pretty much on par with any troll who has tried to be rude to look smart on slashdot in the last couple of decades.

      (This is, of course, a lie: you're not at all on par with them, since they're usually funny. But, the joke only works if I parrot you.)

      --
      StoneCypher is Full of BS
    2. Re:Congratulations by DJCacophony · · Score: 1

      There's no need to get so worked up just because I dissed your school. Maybe I broke the illusion, I'm sure when you get back in class tomorrow it will seem advanced again.

      --
      Slow Down, Cowboy! It's been 60 minutes since you last successfully posted a comment.
  5. This isn't news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I was in middle school, some seven or eight years ago, we had "home" drives and email accounts in the school system. I'm sure this is a slicker interface, but the principle is the same: there's no new technology involved at all!

  6. Innovative use of AJAX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They are also using AJAX so students can serialize themselves for compression and centralized storage of themselves by school bullies.

  7. They will WANT the control by drDugan · · Score: 1

    and the people will want the controls placed on them.

    because it seemed easier

    because it seemed faster

    because it seemed safer

    because I was afraid

    because I thought I had to

    because it was more expensive if I didn't let them do it

    becuase it wasn't worth fighting any more for freedom

    because if I refused, the terrorists would win

    because everyone else was doing it

    a system like this- services for kids in school seems simple, seems good - but it is a wolf in sheeps clothing. These students are being taught to use a system that is ultimately not in their own interests.

    But in the end it won't matter how they get you to give up your humanity and your freedom, you will not be able to get it back once you are chipped, tracked, and recorded. Other people will "manage" your finances, your access rights, and your permissions -- all electronically and under one central system. It will make 1984 look appealing: at least they could hide from the telescreen in some corners of their world. The idea of dissent will fade from the collective understanding.

    If you have not seen it yet, the Zeitgeist movie http://www.zeitgeistmovie.com/ covers this pretty well. Like sheep herded in the yard, dumb people who just can't seem to stop the TV long enough to figure out that centralized control of their life makes them no longer free.

    1. Re:They will WANT the control by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      However, what happens when people grow up and go to work. They will be expected to be on the corporate network and use their file servers,email servers, collaboration, calendering, and other tools. Of course all the files they upload to those systems will be subject to scrutiny by the company they work for. I don't see how this is any different. This is space to work on your school assignments. And as such, they don't want you putting stuff up there that isn't related to your school work. If you have storage needs that aren't for school projects, then find somewhere else to store it. Just like if you have files that aren't related to work, don't store them on the file server at your office.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    2. Re:They will WANT the control by stonecypher · · Score: 5, Insightful

      These students are being taught to use a system that is ultimately not in their own interests.
      Oh for fuck's sake, it's a convenient integrated storage system for student homework to clean the process up for the teachers. This isn't an Orwellian mystery plot. It's not like having this system shuts the students out of other services. The school can't require digital homework delivery if it doesn't provide a baseline so that they know students can fall back on their system if they don't already have something.

      Grow up. Not everything is Big Brother.
      --
      StoneCypher is Full of BS
    3. Re:They will WANT the control by arth1 · · Score: 1

      Oh for fuck's sake, it's a convenient integrated storage system for student homework to clean the process up for the teachers.

      Ok, ask some teachers if they would want a system like this if it didn't come with the ability to snoop on students. I dare you to ask.

      I have teachers in my family, and can assure you that very few, if any, teachers want more technical hoops to jump through, more training classes, and more possible points of failure, even if it adds abilities they didn't have before. They're under enough stress as is, and do not welcome changes that come with a learning threshold and don't really cut down on the time they spend, after all of it is summed up.
    4. Re:They will WANT the control by the+phantom · · Score: 1

      I'm a teacher. I would love to have a system where students could easily submit their work for grading. Timestamps are good, too. I don't need to snoop, so long as I can get their homework. Does that answer your question?

    5. Re:They will WANT the control by westlake · · Score: 1
      These students are being taught to use a system that is ultimately not in their own interests.

      "Kid Nation" is a fantasy.

      Scripted and monitored by adults behind the scenes.

      The classroom is a supervised environment precisely because kids don't have the experience or the maturity needed to make the right decisions in an unsupervised environment.

    6. Re:They will WANT the control by stonecypher · · Score: 1

      Ok, ask some teachers if they would want a system like this if it didn't come with the ability to snoop on students. I dare you to ask.
      I don't need to. I wrote one for the LA county school system several years ago, and it didn't come with the ability to snoop on students. It was compiled, so please don't waste my time informing me about the black-suit Russian commandos that came in behind me and rewrote my code to turn it into SkyNet. I mean, seriously, do you ask whether the new Xerox machine has secret genetic scanners too? Can't a tool just exist for its superficial purpose? "My god, the coke machine connects to the phones, IT MUST BE A SPYING DEVICE, AND YOU'RE AN IDIOT IF YOU BELIEVE THERE'S A MODEM IN THERE DIALLING HOME TO ORDER MORE MELLO YELLO."

      I've seen episodes of American Dad with more believable claptrap than this.

      I have teachers in my family
      They should have spent more time with you.

      and can assure you that very few, if any, teachers want more technical hoops to jump through
      Going by the Hyundai commercial, I believe the appropriate phrase here is "big duh." Are you prepared to explain why centralizing digital homework submission is more complicated than leaving it to whichever arbitrary dozens of systems the current students and their parents may or may not have chosen, or do you just prefer to imply that everything that you haven't bothered to think through is a problem?

      They're under enough stress as is, and do not welcome changes that come with a learning threshold and don't really cut down on the time they spend, after all of it is summed up.
      When you assume, you don't actually make an ass out of me. Just you. Keep that in mind.
      --
      StoneCypher is Full of BS
    7. Re:They will WANT the control by arth1 · · Score: 1

      I don't need to. I wrote one for the LA county school system several years ago, and it didn't come with the ability to snoop on students. It was compiled, so please don't waste my time informing me about the black-suit Russian commandos that came in behind me and rewrote my code to turn it into SkyNet. I mean, seriously, do you ask whether the new Xerox machine has secret genetic scanners too? Can't a tool just exist for its superficial purpose? "My god, the coke machine connects to the phones, IT MUST BE A SPYING DEVICE, AND YOU'RE AN IDIOT IF YOU BELIEVE THERE'S A MODEM IN THERE DIALLING HOME TO ORDER MORE MELLO YELLO."

      I've seen episodes of American Dad with more believable claptrap than this.

      Except that in this particular instance, the ability to snoop is touted as a feature. It's not something you have to wear a tinfoil hat to believe in, when it's one of the documented and stated purposes.

      --
      *Art
    8. Re:They will WANT the control by arth1 · · Score: 1

      The key word here being "easily".
      Would you still want it if it requires not only you and fellow teachers learn how to use the system, but also teach the students how to use it and help them when they can't, whether it is for technical or wetware reasons? And potentially (which is an euphemism for "certainly") be out of the water when the system goes down, and you lose access to not only a single paper, but all of them, including your own work? When you then have to make up the lost time on your own copious spare time? When you spend more time signing in and out, checking in and out, and jumping through procedural hoops than actual reading and grading? When you get a new student, who is prevented from delivering his homework because he's not added to the system yet? Or one student claims another broke into his account? Or a student really does break into other students' accounts? There's so many new things that can go wrong, and so many extra things to learn how to use correctly that it's not a given that it's always easier.

      If it was guaranteed to make things easier, it would be a boon. However, systems like these invariably create more extra red tape, hoops and paperwork than the reduction of paperwork act ever did.

    9. Re:They will WANT the control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=285765&cid=204 31537

      Same exact comment, other thread. Just ban this spammer already

    10. Re:They will WANT the control by the+phantom · · Score: 1

      The question was if teachers would still want a system like this if they couldn't snoop. I answered "yes," because I see no reason to snoop. Your comment is irrelevant to my comment.

      If you asked me if I would use such a system, I might, but I probably wouldn't. I have a system that works (i.e. I can email students, post assignments online, &c.), and, unless the system worked very well, I probably wouldn't have much used for it. A system like the one proposed is not a panacea -- it is a tool, and, like any other tool, it would be nice to have access to it, but I shouldn't be required to use it if I don't want to.

    11. Re:They will WANT the control by drDugan · · Score: 1

      Yes, it is a very similar comment. The very same point applied... and many people keep missing the point:

      1- There are two group entities involved in both cases: a minority who controls a situation (group A), and a larger group of not-in-control people (group B).

      2- The belief of an artificial need for both groups was created/sold

      3- A technology "solution" was applied, again for both groups to use

      4- In both cases, group B has almost no say in the matter, yet it affects them much more than group A. Group A typically creates and implements the solution, and "encourages/forces" group B to use it.

      In both cases, the solution creates as many or more problems for group B as they had in the past. The solution is primarily oriented toward solving the fake "problem" for group B but in fact, what it does is increase the control Group A has over Group B. It makes the administration task for A easier and cheaper, while unequivocally diminishing the freedom for individuals in group B.

      Given all that -- how do you conclude my comment was "spam"? I'm not selling anything here. This problem happens ALL THE TIME, and people don't see it.

      In these two cases, the technology really only helps the diminishing minority - the minority who controls the situation have an easier time doing their job. It is sold do the majority crowd to solve a fake problem - one created mostly because the minority group is not really doing their job very well.

      You, mr passive AC are part of the problem here. You might consider carefully this quote by novelist George Bernanos...it goes like this:

      "I have thought for a long time now that if, some day, the increasing efficiency for the technique of destruction finally causes our species to disappear from the earth, it will not be cruelty that will be responsible for our extinction and still less, of course, the indignation that cruelty awakens and the reprisals and vengeance that it brings upon itself...but the docility, the lack of responsibility of the modern man, his base subservient acceptance of every common decree. The horrors that we have seen, the still greater horrors we shall presently see, are not signs that the rebels, the insubordinate, untamable men are increasing in number throughout the world, but rather that there is a constant increase in the number of obedient, docile men."

  8. ComputerWorld Shill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    In case anyone was wondering, Lucas123 (the submitter) is a ComputerWorld shill. Interesting how many "stories" at Slashdot come from such obvious shills.

    1. Re:ComputerWorld Shill by JosefAssad · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure why you got modded down. You're pretty obviously correct.

    2. Re:ComputerWorld Shill by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure why you got modded down. You're pretty obviously correct.

      Actually, this very activity - shilling stories to blogs as a part of a calculated advertising / PR campaign - would make an excellent Slashdot story itself!

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    3. Re:ComputerWorld Shill by chiok · · Score: 1

      I'll give you 123 guesses who modded him down.

    4. Re:ComputerWorld Shill by stonecypher · · Score: 1

      It's a user-submitted system. If you want fewer commercially submitted news items on this news service, stop whining in anonymous comments and start writing stories. Sloth doesn't fix anything; if you want something better, write it yourself. (By the way, you might want to look up what the word "shill" means; if you were correct, which you aren't, he would be selling computerworld subscriptions. Driving news traffic to a news site isn't shilling, as nobody but advertisers are handing over money. Don't use words you don't understand.)

      --
      StoneCypher is Full of BS
    5. Re:ComputerWorld Shill by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 1

      By the way, you might want to look up what the word "shill" means; if you were correct, which you aren't, he would be selling computerworld subscriptions. Driving news traffic to a news site isn't shilling, as nobody but advertisers are handing over money. Don't use words you don't understand.

      Websters: "to act as a spokesperson or promoter"

      Wikipedia: "A shill is an associate of a person selling a good or service, who pretends no association and assumes the air of an enthusiastic customer." There are many more definitions that don't involve selling subscriptions.

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    6. Re:ComputerWorld Shill by mazarin5 · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure why you got modded down. You're pretty obviously correct.


      Actually, this very activity - shilling stories to blogs as a part of a calculated advertising / PR campaign - would make an excellent Slashdot story itself!


      You're right! I'm going to write something up in my blog and then submit it!
      --
      Fnord.
    7. Re:ComputerWorld Shill by stonecypher · · Score: 1

      Uh huh. For once, Webster's isn't wrong, although its definition is partial in a misleading fashion, and although it's still an absolute trash reference (you might as well be referring to infomercials.) This man is acting neither as a spokesperson nor as a promoter. He is at no point so much as mentioning his employer. All he's doing is passing on a news link to a news aggregator. It turns out that writing out a URL doesn't make you a shill. Similarly, even though I have an advertisement for a company in my sig, I'm not a shill, as I'm not making any actual claims about them.

      Now, shills aren't actually by definition hiding their association; I'd say I wasn't sure where Wikipedia got that idea, except that in fact, I do know exactly where it got that idea: from some dude like you who has confused their ability to find poor reference which they know by name, put bold on it and pretend that it supports them, who decides that the definition of some word isn't in line with what they remember, and adds things to the entry which are essentially full of crap. Yes, some shillabers were on the down low, but others were up front about their associations, and just tried to spin a compelling case for the service (whether or not the case was honest is not at issue.) For example, there is the snake oil salesman, and his buddy who comes along to tell what joys that J. P. McFee's Miracle Diamondback Elixir did for his shingles, shackles, shiggelosis and sheehan syndrome. At no point does this person pretend not to know who the snake oil salesman is; indeed it would be contrary to his scam. That is a "public shill," as opposed to a "private shill."

      Now, if you were finding out what the word actually meant, instead of taking half a sentence out of context and reading into it as deeply as you could in the desperation to invent yourself into correctness, you might find out that shill explicitly means someone working for a corrupt gambler or peddler; indeed, to shill implies that what is being sold is fake. Maybe you believe ComputerWorld invents its news, like The Onion, but if you don't, then you're just exposing your lack of understanding either of the word or how to track down what it really means.

      Merriam Webster is a reasonable mistake; most people don't realize how low quality a reference it is (try AmHet or the Collins dictionary; word cemetaries like Webster and the OED just serve to make men stupider, by accepting any half-assed misunderstanding as a definition in the hoary desperation to inflate word count for sales purposes.) Believing in Wikipedia, though? You should know better.

      If you want to criticise the ComputerWorld columnist, go right ahead. I'm not attacking your criticism. Just use appropriate terminology. Whether or not what that man's doing is right isn't what I'm talking about. All I'm saying is that if you say "that man works for the company he links to, he's a total sausage mcmuffin," someone's going to step up and explain that a tasty breakfast sandwich isn't actually a way to describe comercially exploitative manipulation of network news services.

      He may be doing something creepy. He is not shilling a damned thing. Stop learning words from dictionaries; without context your understanding of their normative definition is partial in even the most generous of situations.

      --
      StoneCypher is Full of BS
    8. Re:ComputerWorld Shill by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      What difference does it make who submitted the story?

      You have the "what" in your comment, but you certainly don't have the "why should I give a crap" covered.

    9. Re:ComputerWorld Shill by Lucas123 · · Score: 1

      Then you'd be wrong.

  9. Whats the point of having a "locker" by antifoidulus · · Score: 0, Troll

    if you cannot be shoved in it? I mean come on, those traumatic memories are the basis for our geekdom, or am I alone on this?

    1. Re:Whats the point of having a "locker" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just what is the shoved-in-the-locker analogy here? If it were 1MB, I'd say the analogy would be, "Argh! Those bullies made it so I have to boot off this floppy. [*cry*] Someone help me reinstall to hard disk! Help! Help!" But 100MB is too accommodating for that.

  10. 100 Megs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What do they get on gmail?

    The school should try to give the students something better than they have at home anyway.

  11. Abuse? by ksd1337 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    How do we know students won't just abuse this system?
    What kind of monitoring is there for inappropriate content?
    Does it run Linux?!?!

    1. Re:Abuse? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And when it goes down will they send the FBI after the CentOS people?

  12. great. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    another way to distract kids from learning in school because some technology zealots want to fill their wallets

  13. So basically... by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1

    it's a space to put their homework in? I see no other practical use for that. Reading e-books? COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT! Music? Ditto. Games? Not appropriate for school.

    Now, if the lockers were encrypted with TRUECRYPT (and YOU had the key in USB or something), now THAT'd be something.

    1. Re:So basically... by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      Of course, if the kids DID encrypt their files before uploading, they'd have all those snoopy people wanting to know what sort of terr'rist crap they were into.

      If the security is as poor as one system I got into a few years ago (3 attempts to get the default new user password, 1 to get the current school admin password - it was too easy to call it "hacking") ...

      1. p0wn teacher's account
      2. Upload shit like this or this
      3. PROFIT!
      No system is safe from a large group of intelligent, motivated monkeys.
    2. Re:So basically... by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      Reading e-books? COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT! It's not copyright infringement if you have a license, and an e-book license may be significantly cheaper than textbooks.
      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
  14. Yawn by goto11 · · Score: 1

    We did this in 1999. We even called it the "Locker."
    No news here.
    Move along.

    --
    Why don't you just make 10 louder and make 10 be the top number...and make that a little louder?
  15. Re:And yet, by oyenstikker · · Score: 0

    Isn't evolution just some theory? What makes it more than just some theory? It is a reasonably scientific theory given the evidence. It hasn't been proven. It hasn't been disproved. Sounds like every other theory they teach in school.

    --
    The masses are the crack whores of religion.
  16. ...This is new how? by Ironspork · · Score: 1

    My school had this when I was a freshman, and it got ditched after the first year because it sucked so much. It's really not a new system, nor is it very worthwhile.

  17. Re:They will WANT the control - "OMG SHEEPLE!111" by @madeus · · Score: 1

    Someone thought it would be a good idea to give the kids a file share on the network to store their digital stuff (like classwork, etc.) now they are all using computers these days, and this way they wouldn't have to carry USB memory sticks around (which 8th graders are bound to lose/break/set fire to/swallow - and forget to backup).

    THE SCUMBAGS.

  18. How many megabytes? by Pollux · · Score: 4, Informative

    In the past, she said, students were only allotted 10MB of server space on the school's network. "We knew this year [students] would be creating movies and doing other things, [so] they needed a lot more space," she said.

    School admin here. This quote is just laughable. Granted, up until last year, I had my students set at 100 MB apiece. Looking at the quota log, most students could get along just fine with 25 MB, although those who have more usually just have too many pictures saved up.

    But, as soon as we started up doing a multimedia class last year using PhotoShop and Movie Maker, 100 MB was laughable. Some PS projects alone were 60-70 MB, and editing raw video requires ~200 MB per minute of video data. I upped these kids to 300 MB, and when they worked on videos, it was in a separate lab that let students save their data to the hard drives.

    I can understand the desire to have portability for students and staff, but that's what thumb drives are for. Besides, there are a number of families who still do not have online access yet.

  19. When I were a lad by Linker3000 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Oh how we struggled with the few books we had to carry home while we left unneeded ones in our lockers.

    The frustration of never a moments peace because we could read the books on the bus or train and be briefed ready to start our homework sooner, leaving more spare time that had to be filled with 'leisure activities - or - worse yet - the hassle of arranging to meet your friends and actually see them in person - heck sometimes we even shared a meal or some sodas in a local park - OUTDOORS - whole we worked together on projects!

    At the moment it's a real pain when I have to visit my 7-year-old son's school to have him show me through his project books and explain what he has been working on. Soon I may be able to login to his folder, have a quick browse and tick a box.

    Yay progress!

    --
    AT&ROFLMAO
    1. Re:When I were a lad by renoX · · Score: 1

      > heck sometimes we even shared a meal or some sodas in a local park - OUTDOORS

      Well, ironically if you live in a third world country, it would be easier to use the laptop outdoors as the OLPC black&white screen is much easier to read outdoors than traditionnal LCD screens (and it has a higher resolution), too bad normal laptop builders have more or less stopped inovating (the flash disk being the only exception).

  20. New? Really? by vidarlo · · Score: 1

    I've used Class Fronter since around 2004. Thats...uhm...*counts on fingers*..for three years.

    Class Fronter (or fronter in shorthand) has file uploading space. It got hand-in folders which blocks uploads after a specific date. It got chat. It got games. It got integrated multiple-choice tests. In short; it's a locker with some damn nice features. So why the heck is this on slashdot? I mean, Learning Management Systems, or a "Locker" is nothing new at all. It is at least 10 years old I guess.

    1. Re:New? Really? by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      Why? Because its, ummm, because ... ummm I personally believe that U.S. Americans are unable to do so because, uhmmm, some people out there in our nation don't have maps and uh, I believe that our, I, education like such as uh, South Africa, and uh, the Iraq, everywhere like such as, and I believe that they should, uhhh, our education over here in the US should help the US, uh, should help South Africa, it should help the Iraq and the Asian countries so we will be able to build up our future, for the children.

      And because it works with the TUBES over the internet.

  21. The Tablet PCs seem to be much more notable to me by QunaLop · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Tablet PCs start around a grand, 100MB of storage is pennies

    Tablet PCs allow students to use computers productively (and more easily) in all classes, 100 MB of storage provides ???

    Tablet PCs have (most likely) at least 40,000 MB of storage, 100 MB of storage has 100 MB of storage...

    I for one think that if teachers are taught to use the tablets effectively, they can be a boon for education, as opposed to laptops, which I find to be virtually useless in most classroom environments in current usage scenarios. I don't that online storage has any discernible benefit to any population's education either.

  22. A digital locker you can't own but must have. by Erris · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This brings us one step further to losing your right to read. All they need to do is fill it with non free textbooks and tell you not to share them. If there's something everyone needs, you don't need to put it in a locker. A private space for students and computer access would be nice, but not if it's just another tool of control. Requiring the use of non free software is just the first part of that control and it's funny that one of the reasons given was the lack of reliability of the old non free software. The web already offers ways to share calendars, movies and the rest outside the control of the school.

    --
    DMCA, Hollings, Palladium. What might have sounded like paranoia is now common sense.
  23. Social pegs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The Web lockers also include chat, calendaring, and collaboration capabilities, but school administrators can also monitor and track all files uploaded to the system, and lock out individuals for misuse.""

    So they finally learn what it means to be a responsible adult.

  24. Mod -1, references Zeitgeist Movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Buy stock in tinfoil now!

  25. Hah! by atomicthumbs · · Score: 1

    Funny, at my high school we get two gigabytes of space, inside which we can keep any program we need to (mIRC, sunbird, Pidgin, etc.). In addition, we get a VPN connection. Although I sure wish we got Tablet PCs, as my laptop just stopped working. :(

    --
    http://pinopsida.com
  26. Slashdot is not news for nerds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This fucking "feature" is a standard in any network environment. Its called a network drive you losers. Every school and college give spaces for files. Slashdot has been trolled. Its storys like this why nerds get beaten up and why linux is not ready for the desktop. Goatse and friends is the only real reason why people visit slashdot

  27. I don't understand by PCM2 · · Score: 1

    So if the same story got submitted by somebody other than Lucas123, then it would be OK? But because Lucas123 works for the publication that published it, it's bad and evil.

    So if Taco Bell is giving away free tacos, and your mom drives down there and gets you some, that's OK. But if the guy from Taco Bell drives right up to your house and hands them to you, that's an evil marketing ploy because he's just a shill.

    --
    Breakfast served all day!
    1. Re:I don't understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess you think Roland is just fine, too.

    2. Re:I don't understand by PCM2 · · Score: 1

      Surely you see the difference between someone who submits XYZ story because he wants you to visit some Web site, and someone who submits XYZ story because he wants you to visit XYZ story?

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
  28. something better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have something almost like thyat at my high school, only not idiot accessable and more mature; ftp. And you have to know what it is and how it works to get a folder on the server.

  29. Nice - my school already does this by kid-noodle · · Score: 1

    Over here in the UK, I'm a professional geek for a secondary school. We've had this stuff available for a few months now (We run an internal myspace/facebook clone, for example).

    Not that we can get the little wretches to make good use of it, but we have it :)

    --
    fortune -o
  30. It's gonna be used for... by eagl · · Score: 1

    Porn, music/movie sharing, copies of the anarchist cookbook, test cheat sheets, and other people's essays. It'll all be cleverly stored in compressed, encrypted, password protected zip files (or current equivalent) so snooping admins can't get at it. And if that's not enough, they'll hack the server or other student's accounts and store their stuff in places that will get someone else busted if they're caught.

    At least, that's pretty much what I did with my 200k of high school provided server storage back in 1987.

    1. Re:It's gonna be used for... by mjmeyer · · Score: 1

      Porn, music/movie sharing ... At least, that's pretty much what I did with my 200k of high school provided server storage back in 1987. So you're saying you had ASCII porn and MIDI files. Although you have me stumped on "movies"
    2. Re:It's gonna be used for... by eagl · · Score: 1

      You never did ascii animation? Complete with dumb terminal beep codes?

      We'd make the printer terminal sing too. Fun times.

  31. ehh by thatskinnyguy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The Tablet PC is just plain awesome. If they can get the money to do such a thing, so be it.

    But the "Locker" thing... I've seen plenty of solutions like this. All have either received negative or lukewarm reviews by students (including me). WebCT and Blackboard are the only two I can think of off-hand.

    Really, what it comes down to is that whatever content is posted on these portals (calling a spade a spade) is owned by the school district. If teachers and students post their work on the portal, the school owns it. I don't suppose people plan on putting any personal work on there.

    --
    The game.
  32. Hrm... by severoon · · Score: 1

    Problem: once they provide virtual lockers, they will likely remove access to USB ports to plug in thumb drives. Can't do that now because the kids actually need access to them. And even with access to a USB port, rebooting to peanut linux probably isn't a good solution either—talk about attracting attention. In my grade/jr high/high school, when we had access to a computer, rebooting was not allowed (nor was opening applications other than the one we were supposed to be using).

    I think the proper approach would be to teach kids about security and protecting themselves online. This would be a great way to teach kids to implement their own little security program to encrypt their data (Caesar cipher to start) and then move them up to real encryption.

    --
    but have you considered the following argument: shut up.
    1. Re:Hrm... by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      In a few years all the kids will have laptops. Heck, they don't need the school system for chat, im, videos, email, sms, web surfing and posting, music, etc - they just need a recent cell phone.

      And you can be sure that cell phone has a lot more than a measly 100 megs.

    2. Re:Hrm... by severoon · · Score: 1

      What you say is too true and so like government. Hey kid, I see you have an 8GB iPhone there with full web and email capabilities. We're introducing this great new service at school you should get familiar with. It's a whole 100 megabytes of teacher-monitored space hosted on our own servers, admin'd by our resident IT and security expert—your very own computer teacher! Hey, where are you going?

      You gotta love it when the state gets involved in stuff like this. It's so adorable!

      --
      but have you considered the following argument: shut up.
  33. They invented /home? by Dakkus · · Score: 1

    So, basically user's account now include a home directory onto which the user may save his files. Isn't it actually rare /not/ giving the users a home directory? So, in the end they have only built some new interface for something that was earlier done with the normal file browser interface. The only difference to the old is that the it's yet another interface that the users will have to get used to.

    To other news... The scientist in Oxford University have just invented a device they call "wheel". "It's a point-symmetrical polygon with 100 sides, so it has an almost smooth surface on which the device can roll on a platform. No more need to move big objects by letting slaves pull them on ropes. Future designs will include a bigger amount of sides, resulting with even less friction."

    1. Re:They invented /home? by arth1 · · Score: 1

      To other news... The scientist in Oxford University have just invented a device they call "wheel". "It's a point-symmetrical polygon with 100 sides, so it has an almost smooth surface on which the device can roll on a platform. No more need to move big objects by letting slaves pull them on ropes. Future designs will include a bigger amount of sides, resulting with even less friction."

      Since it's apparent that a larger amount of sides is always beneficial (the ability of a square to roll is obviously much worse than that of a 100-sided wheel), regulations will be introduced to immediately mandate a minimum number of angled sides. In particular, the "round" devices with a single non-angular surface will henceforth be banned, because all logic dictates that they can't roll at all.
  34. It's always been that way. by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

    Cute. So the other 99.99% (don't question the number) of 8th graders who don't have an 'accessory gmail account' are worthless/sub par? We're in for a grim future then :) That's nothing new, really. I think 99.99 percent is probably a stretch, but out of any 100 randomly selected children, I strongly suspect that 90 will live their entire lives completely at the whims of various higher authorities, never bothering to seriously challenge or question them. That's not really a commentary on our society in particular as much as it is human nature in general; I suspect you could go back 2000 years and see basically the same things.
    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    1. Re:It's always been that way. by ThePengwin · · Score: 1

      I wish my school was like that school.

      Apart from a measly small storage space, and stupid restrictions on USB devices because they didnt fork out money for a proper antivirus solution, The system administrator thought it was a good idea to take away the right click functionality of windows explorer.

      Luckily we were given VB.

      Within a week i made a program that let me edit the registry and a nifty app to restart explorer. In seconds i got all the proper functionality of windows back.

      I always tried to use the computers to their full potential. even if that did mean i was responsible for showing the school how to share games, message eachother through the command prompt and remove all the rights restrictions they placed on our desktops.

      I was never banned once :D

    2. Re:It's always been that way. by Suriken · · Score: 1

      I had much the same experiences.
      ah, the multiplayer games of quake in computing class while the teacher wasn't looking... Except I did get caught. Almost lost all my credits for computing one year, banned from using computers at all. (And this was about the same time that I had a Computing assignment due, as well as my Design portfolio and Graphics final project due) and when everyone started 'net send'ing each other it all somehow was placed on me, even though I wasn't allowed on the computers (officially.)
      Also got told off for changing the resolution of the computers. Stupid teachers had them all set to 800x600. On 19" LCDs even. Add they expected me to be able to even work in photoshop properly with that, I couldn't even fit all the palletes on the screen! My computing teacher (he was absolutely clueless, don't know how he even got the job, to be honest...) decided that it was a bug in flash that the welcome page didn't fit properly on the screen at that resolution. What an idiot.

      --
      My Mommy says smoking kills. Oh, is your Mommy a doctor? No. A scientific researcher of some kind? No. Well then sh
  35. When will it all end? by mblakeley · · Score: 1

    Can we please stop-stop-stop talking about computers are educational devices? I think this is a ploy initiated by Compaq/HP/etc in order to sell more and more computers. I have come to the opinion that while a computer is only necessary for word processing and spreadsheeting. All these schools are really doing is shifting the blame for poor performance back a few years - any parents continuously believe that well equipped computer labs actually indicate a better education.

  36. School deploys nfs with quota by Cajun+Hell · · Score: 3, Insightful

    More in-depth reporting on this amazing and lightning-paced story, as it develops!

    Wow, somebody got paid for this, as an innovative product. People's tax money was spent on a "technology" for storing files on a remote server. Does anyone else feel a feint impulse to just give up, turn evil, and start fleecing suckers like this? They're out there, and they're waving their money around, jumping up and down, yelling, "Do me! Do meeeeee!!"

    --
    "Believe me!" -- Donald Trump
    1. Re:School deploys nfs with quota by loraksus · · Score: 1

      Wow, somebody got paid for this...

      Just paid? Try "paid a shitload". Educational contracts are highly lucrative because a.) the librarian who managed the computers before doesn't know her ass from her elbow and is easily wowed by salesmen b.) it's just taxpayer money anyways.
      Which is why you have a retarded limit like 100mb.

      --
      1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
    2. Re:School deploys nfs with quota by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tax payers did not pay for it, parents paying tuition to a private school did. If you had googled for the school in TFA you would have seen it is a private school, that can do whatever it wants with tuition received from parents. Blasting it as a fleecing of tax payers is immature and without merit.

    3. Re:School deploys nfs with quota by Cajun+Hell · · Score: 1

      Alright, good tip, and I'll try to remember that when I Go Evil. I'll have the PR department explain, "We're only ripping off private funds."

      --
      "Believe me!" -- Donald Trump
  37. wow! by paltemalte · · Score: 1

    Its just like this one time, when I went to school, we also got our own storage space on an old NT server. I think we had about 5 megabytes each. We were not allowed to put porn (or hacking tools, I learned the hard way) on this share.
    So wtf is new about giving students access to such share, except for that they will make accessible over the internet, not just the LAN?

    If its the fact that it will be surveyed that put it on the /. frontpage - surveillance is nothing new either. I was not allowed to store neither 'una_bomber.exe' (mailbomber) or 'aggressor.exe' (malicious packet generator) on my share, and the sysadmin let me know about this, so I renamed the programs to 'school_project_may.doc' and such which defeated the surveillance scheme. But regardless, how can this be /. frontpage material?

    --
    Sam has one liberty, which he sacrifices for one security. Can you tell me what Sam has now?
  38. Not important news by razorart · · Score: 1

    "Teacher I swear. I had my homework stored in the locker and a virus ate it!"

  39. How is this even slightly news? by Kris_J · · Score: 1

    I wrote a web storage module for the (international) college group I used to work at years ago. IIRC it automatically assigned 5MB of storage per subject (configurable). It was built to replace the "H: Drive" that was only available within our computing labs and reduce the need for (unreliable) removable storage, ie; Floppy and Zip disks.

    We also had a messaging module, installations of phpBB and MediaWiki, electronic assignment submission, on-line marks entry for the lecturers and a raft of other features all built just to keep our heads above the workload. We can't have been the only ones in the world doing this stuff.

  40. Finally! by Dachannien · · Score: 2, Funny

    Finally, a virtual place that kids can keep their virtual weed when they're at school.

    1. Re:Finally! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure... it'll seem great right up to the point where we see the first news story about a cyberbully stuffing someone into their virtual locker.

  41. Mod Parent Funny....please? by Prysorra · · Score: 1

    Just saying :D

  42. Calling it a "virtual locker" proves you're dumb. by DragonTHC · · Score: 2, Funny

    Calling it a "virtual" anything is just a buzzword for the subcents.

    It's a collaboration suite.

    --
    They're using their grammar skills there.
  43. Wow by trickster721 · · Score: 0

    So somebody came up with a cute metaphor for something that's been going on for a decade or so?

  44. well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yes, lets have everyone make their own version of this and see what kind of trouble script kiddies can make

  45. Sounds useless. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who keeps dreaming this crap up?

    Nobody wants a LAN network drive or idiot friendly online FTP. The closest "network personal space" has come is use specific non-general registration required sites, or custom search engine home pages.

    Why would anyone bother locking their files up on a network drive or FTP that you need propritetary software to access? If you can't get to it with a web browser, it's not going to get embraced. Period.

    If it's a general use, solution looking for a problem: It's not going to be embraced! Period!

  46. But... by tom66 · · Score: 1

    My school gives me about 100 MB storage and a 'Virtual Learning Enviroment' (which is basically a calendar and chat based on Moodle) What's the big deal?

  47. Uh, isn't this just called a 'home directory'?? by JetScootr · · Score: 1

    ? Such as Unix's ~./* ? This feature has been a part of EVERY shared computer system I've ever worked on, and I started programming in 1976. It was considered old hat, even then.
    I saw nothing in TFA that distinguishes this from normal home dir usage. Did I miss something?

    --
    Pavlov wouldn't be so famous if he'd used a can opener instead of a bell.
  48. Re:I'll file for a patent on polygon by JetScootr · · Score: 1

    I'm going to file for a patent on polygonal wheels. By making the polygon's sides nonlinearly bulge outward, following the formula (pi)*r**2, a smoother rolling experience may be enjoyed.
    This enhancement may be done to polygonal wheels that have any number of sides.

    --
    Pavlov wouldn't be so famous if he'd used a can opener instead of a bell.
  49. what do you think, for heaven's sake by RMH101 · · Score: 1

    A lot of UK schools offer a similar service as part of a virtual learning environment. It gives the school a reliable method of communicating with students outside of school, without insisting that they buy a laptop. Important calendar info (lesson times, exam times, school trips?) can be communicated and looked up at home on the family PC, or in school on a classroom PC. It allows access to coursework, online marking, and school educational material from home.
    I'm sure they're not just providing it for the kids to play with in a way entirely unrelated to education.

  50. Who's paying for this? by Shadoglare · · Score: 1

    Is this a public school or private? I can tell you if this was coming out of my tax dollars I'd be pretty PO'd. But then again, I can also tell you that I lived in Tulsa for a while, and they LOVE taxes there. Pretty much any tax that goes to the polls will get passed.

  51. News by unix_core · · Score: 1

    When I started elementary school here in Sweden around the year 2000, we had a system like that (first class/open text) which was shared by all elementary schools in the municipality. Perhaps we didn't have as much as 100 megabytes at the time, but still...

  52. I feel sorry for your kids by sbate · · Score: 1

    They will be doing what my kids say....

    --
    Added Pressly: "Oh, and by the way, milk is nothing but liquid meat."
  53. simple is as simple does by Gary+W.+Longsine · · Score: 1

    I think the concern is that Slashdot has become a fraud. Four out of the last five stories that I've submitted were rejected. Some of those showed up as approved when submitted by others many hours later. In some cases the approved versions had over hyped and inaccurate article summaries pointing to secondary sources. I try to take care to get a link to a source as close to an original article as reasonable (say, an article in a magazine which was presumably fact checked, rather than an original research paper which may be too tedious or a breathless adver-blog. Watching my own low rate of success, and hearing the complaints of many others, I've basically stopped my little experiment and no longer waste my time submitting articles. Lots of other people are doing that, too. That makes Slashdot less interesting. Collapse is inevitable. It will become just another digg clone.

    --
    If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine.