Slashdot Mirror


User: Tony+Hoyle

Tony+Hoyle's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
5,728
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 5,728

  1. Re:Nothing for you to see here. Please move along. on Dutch Court Orders Lycos to Reveal Client · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Dude, if you think racism is 'calling people names' then you need to *seriously* get an education.

  2. Re:Good! on Dutch Court Orders Lycos to Reveal Client · · Score: 1

    Bullshit. Proving a negative is just as easy as proving a positive.

    I can prove that I did not have hot sex with 32 virgins 10 minutes ago.

    I can prove that 1+1!=2,4392

  3. Re:Nooo...... on Breakthrough in Biodiesel Production · · Score: 1

    Oh the old sugar in a tank myth... that was debunked over 10 years ago that I heard of.. it's probably been known to be bullshit longer than that.

  4. Re:Why not a Peer to Peer DNS? on Dotless Top Level Domains? · · Score: 1

    I've often thought of something like that... no idea how to do it though (even most p2p systems have a failure point eg. trackers, catalogue servers, etc.). You'd ideally want something that would be able to be completely decentralised.

    It wouldn't be any use as a commercial system - if a peer decided to start advertising microsoft.com as his there's nothing to stop him.. so the standard roots would still be needed for authoritative stuff.

  5. Re:com? on Dotless Top Level Domains? · · Score: 1

    Wierd... yahoo are .com.org?

    Either that or FF did the google lookup *first* which is severely broken behaviour IMO.

  6. Re:Keywords on Dotless Top Level Domains? · · Score: 1

    I get the x.org homepage.... all FF has done is append '.org' onto the domain name.. big whoop.

  7. Re:That would be a trademark violation on Dotless Top Level Domains? · · Score: 1

    Trademarks in which country? For what use? - remember even within countries trademarks are limited to specific fields of endevour.

    If some chinese company wanted to register the microsoft TLD you really think the chinese gov. give a shit about the US trademark registries?

    If a scottish shoemaker wants to call themselves McDonalds they can. They can also register mcdonalds as their domain name without breaking trademark... OK ICANN will steal the domain off them and give to the other one as they can pay more bribe money to the ICANN committee, but legally there's no problem.

  8. Re:yeah but no but yeah on Dotless Top Level Domains? · · Score: 1

    They tried that with .ltd.uk.. I remember trying to register a company I was at. It was a 3 year old company, registered at companies house, etc.

    The .ltd.uk registrars refused registration, because we had used a hyphen in the name and the registration at companies house had a space (you couldn't make it up really!).

    To compound the issue they then offered to register us under several *unrelated company names* that they'd pulled out of their ass for a fee. I smelled scam, and backed out.

    I presume they pulled that one with everyone, because I've never seen a .ltd.uk domain in actual use (not even spammers bother with it).

  9. Re:Seems simple enough... on Nessus 3.0 discussed · · Score: 1

    If there are *any* then they have to contact the authors and get permission or remove the code.

    Even if it's a single line if it's contributed under GPL it remains GPL unless the original author decides to relicense it (although it'd be difficult to prove a single line GPL violation in court, and most wouldn't bother).

    Changing OSS project licenses is a difficult job, and for some projects may not even be possible short of a complete rewrite.

  10. Re:GPL resistance? on Nessus 3.0 discussed · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Not really, what he said *is* true.

    If your application links with *any* gpl code it cannot be distributed without making the whole application GPL. That's the reason for corporate policies against using GPL software - the risk is too great.

    'complying with the license afterwards' == 'release your software as GPL'. Not acceptable - and most companies would *prefer* to pay $150,000 per incident than do that.

  11. Re:Boo hoo on Amazon Goes Wiki · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Firstly there *are* no 'local' stores any more - they're all part of big national chains.

    Secondly, they all charge 25%-50% more than online charges, have fewer items available, and don't get me started on customer support - those idiots wouldn't know support if it hit them on the head.

    I've had *far* better support from online retailers than I have ever had from 'local' stores.

  12. Re:my amazon horror on Amazon Goes Wiki · · Score: 1

    Report a fraudulent transaction on the other card - you'll get your money back, since Amazon claim to have no record of the transaction... there's no papertrail, which is amazon's problem, not yours.

  13. Re:Pointless in a home environment on Is There Too Much Enthusiasm Over Wireless? · · Score: 1

    Me too. The wireless router is switched off at the moment... no need for it.

    It's just too damned unreliable. 2.4ghz isn't just wireless (not much of that conflicting around here) but microwaves, taxis, the local trains, and half a dozen other things probably.

    I've upped the power to quite frankly illegal levels, put a high gain aerial on top of that, and still can't cut through the interference. Eveventually I gave up and went back to wired.

  14. Re:solution vs. problem? on Is There Too Much Enthusiasm Over Wireless? · · Score: 1

    I would have thought archie fits the bill there.

  15. Re:preying on the dumb - what else is new? on Company Develops Microwave-powered Water Heater · · Score: 1

    That's an old myth.

    Microwaves heat water.. it can *appear* they are doing this if the food has a dry outside, as there's nothing to heat, however in the normal case they'll heat in the same way as a conventional oven (albeit faster).

    If you've ever used a microwave you'll have had times when food was frozen in the middle after cooking (lots of times in my case... my MW is old and not as efficient as it used to be).

  16. Re:Yeah but you can't bully all the time on Chinese Bloggers vs. The BBC · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There's a huge difference between bullying and demanding a straight answer.

    In the famous paxman interview, the politician *repeatedly* refuest to give a straight answer to a simple question. He was lying, and it was becoming more apparent as the questioning went on that (a) he wasn't going to admit publicly what he had done, and (b) it was painfully obvious that he had done it.

    A good interviewer will try any means possible to get a straight answer out of the interviewee. Someone who is fudging will have a *really* bad time (unless they resort to barefaced lies, which tends to get them thrown out of office), and someone telling the truth will have a relatively easy time.

    Politicians are easy meat, because they *never* give a straight answer to anything. If you asked one what time it was they'd talk crap for 10 minutes and still not tell you the time...

  17. Re:NOT blocked! on Google Blocks Porn In Base, Patches Appliance · · Score: 1

    It's more than that.

    Got onto base.google.porn

    Type 'porn'.

    Oggle.

    I an *not* logged into google, so safe search is presumably on.

  18. Re:Probably not enough DVDs/sec on Bandwidth Challenge Results · · Score: 1

    Note that that's transmitting the *whole* dvd for download.

    VOD doesn't do that - it streams it in realtime, so you're talking about being able to server many tens of thousands of customers simultaneously.

    Take into account multicast and align each 'broadcast' to a minute granularity (so you only need 90 simultaneous streams of the most popular movies to serve everyone) and there's more than enough bandwidth to scale to even the largest city.

    Even if you were wanting to download the whole DVD to a hard disk (assuming for the moment you could build a hard disk that could store a DVD in half a second), you wouldn't transmit the same movie multiple times... same economies of scale - the popular stuff actually ends up taking less bandwidth proportionately to the obscure stuff (which might only be transmitted per-customer).

  19. Re:Slashdot headlines != reality on Einstein's Biggest Blunder That Wasn't · · Score: 1

    Please read the Slashdot comments for critical analysis

    You must be new here...

  20. Re:BOINC blows on SETI@home Becomes Part of BOINC · · Score: 1

    Download BIONC. Install. Sign up with whatever @Home project you're interested in using. Go back to BOINC, attach to project using account key that was e-mailed to you (or e-mail address.). .. deal with the totally unnecessary configuration screens. Walk away. Come back 24 hours later to find that the software has done *nothing* and now refuses to even attempt to connect to the server, because it failed too many packets (for no reason at all other than it felt like it). Uninstall crap software. Get on with life.

  21. Re:BOINC blows on SETI@home Becomes Part of BOINC · · Score: 1

    I've tried (and given up on) BOINC before. I got it to connect but every single packet came back as failed. No explanation was given, and the stats steadfastly remained at zero.

    Same behaviour on multiple machines, all with plenty of disk space/memory. I uninstalled the thing as it was clearly broken.

  22. Re:Yet another dup... on The 11 Year Soap Bubble · · Score: 2, Insightful

    #1 has to be the cardboard box the toys came in.

  23. Re:Shroedinger's cat? on Breakthrough for Quantum Measurement · · Score: 1

    Lots of ways... it stops moving about, for example. Also the cat itself knows whether it's dead or not.

    I always had a problem with that experiment - it implies that human intellegence has some link with the state of the universe. I don't buy that for one minute. What happens if an ant crawls into the box for example? Because it's not 'really' an observer the cat is still half alive?? Plus since it's by definition unobservable it's also unprovable - so the whole experiment relies on philosophy rather than science.

  24. Re:I'd like to see... on Ask The Mythbusters · · Score: 1

    Birds get sucked in all the time... it's a known hazard. It's not much of a stretch to imagine a person getting sucked in (provided they were in the air at the right point... parahcuting???).

  25. Re:Real Science on Ask The Mythbusters · · Score: 1

    Yes the show would be *so* much better if they did this.

    I can't believe there aren't engineers working behind the scenes on some of the myths anyway.. eg. the large catapult where you were trying to throw buster as far as possible (forget why..) - that's 100% solvable mathematically, and presumably was off-camera, but you never showed even a laymans summary of this.