Slashdot Mirror


Amazon Goes Wiki

StWaldo writes "Amazon.com has added a 'ProductWiki' to some of their item pages. Wikified items seem to be limited to certain categories, DVDs being one un-wikied realm. Adding Wikiness to the site is just the latest in new participatory activities Amazon has adopted, along with tags and customer discussions." From the article: "So Amazon's gradually allowing you, along with your Wish List, your purchases, your clickstream, and, if you sell anything on Amazon, how good your reputation is--to build up a pretty detailed database of what you like (or don't) and what's important to you. I don't know what Amazon will do with this--fortunately, it seems to have a pretty light touch with how it uses what it knows about you--or what it will allow us to do with all this data. But as it grows, it could become a pretty powerful profile."

120 comments

  1. Ah, but ... by Grumpy+Troll · · Score: 4, Funny

    The Amazon spokesman added that the wiki policy required contributions to be strictly NPOV, except for positive comments.

    1. Re:Ah, but ... by climbon321 · · Score: 1

      So does that mean I can use this new service as a new way to trash and insult anything on Amzaon connect to Jack Thompson or not?

  2. Patent? by strcmp · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I wonder if they will patent Wikis as well.

    --
    "Yields falsehood when preceded by its own quotation" yields falsehood when preceded by its own quotation.
    1. Re:Patent? by shokk · · Score: 1

      Only if it's a One-Click(TM) Wiki link. If you need to click the link twice to go to the next page, they have no claim.

      --
      "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart, he dreams himself your master."
  3. consumers: pathetic? by SlashSquatch · · Score: 1

    I like how they make it out that consumers seem to think that someone cares about what they do and don't appreciate. We all have more crap than we can ever use, but is there really adults out there making "wish lists"? I can't imagine it, but then again...

    --
    Autonomous Retard -- Is your camp safe? UnsafeCamp.com
    1. Re:consumers: pathetic? by aussie_a · · Score: 1

      I keep a wishlist in a personal database. That way instead of going "oh, well I can remember that big hit novel by X" I can take a look at the list of novels I -really- want, with the things that might not be as famous as that BIG NOVEL, but I might be more interested in.

      I'd keep it as a "wish list" at one particular site (and did for a while), but it didn't keep all the data I wanted. Besides which, no single website I buy from has all the books I want.

    2. Re:consumers: pathetic? by Tim+C · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I keep an Amazon wish list. Given that I have a family, mortgage, loan payments, etc I often don't have the money to buy the things I want when I see them. I also have a poor memory for that sort of thing, so I keep the list so as to not forget what it was that I wanted.

      Of course, I rarely get round to actually buying anything on my list, but that's another matter.

      I also know someone who runs a forum-based website with a fair number of users who keeps an amazon wishlist. From time to time people will buy him stuff on it, as a way to say thanks for providing the site (which he does free of charge and in his own time).

    3. Re:consumers: pathetic? by shokk · · Score: 1

      I'm glad you have more crap than you can use. Can I use some of it? I'm using my crap right now and often find that I don't have any that is not in use at any given moment. I bet your car works most of the time, too.

      --
      "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart, he dreams himself your master."
    4. Re:consumers: pathetic? by geekSession · · Score: 1

      There is.

      I have a wish-list for Christmas. My friends, girlfriend and family are always asking me what I want and I can't remember so I stuck it all in a wish-list so they could look at it.

      I think it's quite a good idea really.

      --
      Note to self: Don't comment on /. unless you are absolutely sure of what you are saying.
    5. Re:consumers: pathetic? by metallel · · Score: 1

      Amazon wish lists are a great way for me to make a note of something with one click, so I don't forget about it later. My parents also insist on it, so they can have something for me under the tree at Christmas. I use it pretty sparingly, because I already have more stuff than I can read/listen to. Also, I have a password protected "roll your own" online database where I log most stuff I don't want to forget.

    6. Re:consumers: pathetic? by wtmcgee · · Score: 1

      I use it quite often as a "future shopping cart" - items I'd like, but aren't terribly excited about buying just now. Additionally, when the holidays come around and someone asks what I'd like for xmas, it's nice to have a list of electronics/books/etc-related items I don't have yet, but would like.

      Sorry everyone isn't as cool as you.

      --
      *** For a better tommorow, change your life today ***
    7. Re:consumers: pathetic? by radish · · Score: 1

      Of course there are, in fact pretty much everyone in my family has one. They're great for two purposes - keeping track of things I'd like to buy for myself (I bunch orders for small things together to save on shipping) and giving others ideas if they want to buy me something. I'd much rather get a $10 CD I actually want for christmas than a $30 plastic piece of crap novelty.

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    8. Re:consumers: pathetic? by fossa · · Score: 1

      If you find yourself forgetting what you wanted... then maybe you didn't really want it. I find this a great way to reduce my spending. I've become so senile that only the pangs of starvation or the bite of the cold prod me to open my wallet.

    9. Re:consumers: pathetic? by SlashSquatch · · Score: 1

      Yep, I'm a slave to my crap.

      --
      Autonomous Retard -- Is your camp safe? UnsafeCamp.com
    10. Re:consumers: pathetic? by SlashSquatch · · Score: 1

      Yes you can. I have a car in the shop right now, a greasel blazer. I would very much like for someone to have it that has the time for it? Interested? Give me some good reasons to give it to you.

      --
      Autonomous Retard -- Is your camp safe? UnsafeCamp.com
    11. Re:consumers: pathetic? by slavemowgli · · Score: 1

      Of course there are. I have one, for example - it's a relatively handy way to keep things organised. If I actually want to buy a book or another item on my list, I'll get it from a local bookstore, but for organising purposes, it's quite nice.

      --
      quidquid latine dictum sit altum videtur.
    12. Re:consumers: pathetic? by abirdman · · Score: 1

      I keep a wishlist at Amazon, because a lot of times, I can't remember which album (or book, but that's more rare) I was interested in. I don't buy from them for many reasons --their patent policy, for one, and because I would rather buy locally or direct from the publisher-- but the service of having them remember the CD I heard online last weekend (lots of online music sources (like SomaFM) link directly to Amazon) is great. If I decide to buy some CD's next week, I'll just hop over to Amazon.com, click my wishlist, and write down the CD's I want. I know, that means they're keeping track of my buying habits, but I guess that's the cost I'm willing to pay for an automatic notetaker. If you want to keep them from knowing everything about you, pepper them with some false demographic data.

      --
      Everything I've ever learned the hard way was based on a statistically invalid sample.
    13. Re:consumers: pathetic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We all have more crap than we can ever use

      This is just luddite bullshit. Are you saying you've stopped buying things? That you'll never buy a book again in your life? Then you have more problems than any of the people you're heckling.

      but is there really adults out there making "wish lists"? I can't imagine it, but then again...

      A "wishlist" is just another name for things you might want to buy at some point in the future. It's easier to add things to a wishlist with one click than write them down in 20,000 different random txtfiles, which I'm sure is what you do, because you're so fucking 1337.

      If you're too retarded to see the value in this, fine, but don't drag everyone else down with you.

    14. Re:consumers: pathetic? by contrapunctus · · Score: 1

      I just switched to tags from wish lists. It seems simpler. They are set as "public" by default just like wish lists and if you care about privacy you would change them to "private".

    15. Re:consumers: pathetic? by goodzilla · · Score: 0

      Everytime u use OS software the developers present their wish lists. I have found wish list an awesomely useful way to

      • Get people the correct gift
      • Give back to developers who have done stuff i want to
      • passing around to people to make sure u get the gift you want.
      I do agree tho the day amazon decides to use these to customize ads to u from other advertisers :) i will regret it but for now i think its a nice way to avoid embarassment and pay respects to my peers :)
  4. Beware... by leonmergen · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Ignore parent, don't feed the trolls.

    --
    - Leon Mergen
    http://www.solatis.com
    1. Re:Beware... by mikkom · · Score: 1

      To be honest, I think that is quite a valid question. I even suspect that they have this covered by one of their patents or they have a patent pending for this. It just seems to be the way Amazon works.

    2. Re:Beware... by penguin-collective · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      The "troll" is you (well, actually, you're an astroturfer, but close enough).

    3. Re:Beware... by leonmergen · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah sorry, I forgot, this is slashdot, where any rediculous anti-patent rants is widely accepted...

      --
      - Leon Mergen
      http://www.solatis.com
    4. Re:Beware... by penguin-collective · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You aren't paying attention: we are actually quite selective in our anti-patent rants. Mostly, it's software patents, patents on life forms and DNA sequences, and business method patents we rant against, that is, the kinds of patents that aren't granted in most of the world, the kinds of patents that didn't use to be granted in the US, and the kind of patents that hamper progress and innovation.

      I'm sorry for you that you don't understand what a threat these kinds of patents represent to a democracy, to property rights, and to a free market economy. Just be happy that other people worry about that sort of thing.

    5. Re:Beware... by leonmergen · · Score: 1

      My point is that it's just rediculous to say that Amazon will patent Wiki's after SOOOO many publicity it has received. Sure, Amazon posesses evil patents like the one-click ordering, but suggesting Amazon will patent Wiki's is just a post to get yourself modded up, and I hate that...

      And well, I figured more people would see that it's just a standard reaction to ANY Slashdot post about patents, and merely posted to either get a reaction from other people or just to get himself modded up... anyway, I figured people would respond in the same way as I felt, but guess I was wrong... :-)

      --
      - Leon Mergen
      http://www.solatis.com
    6. Re:Beware... by Seumas · · Score: 1

      Yeah, you're right. The original poster is completely ridiculous. I mean - Amazon patent wikis? That's as silly a notion as suggestiont that they would patent reviewing items, suggesting items to a customer based on their purchases, one-click ordering and so on. Why . . . just unpossible!

    7. Re:Beware... by penguin-collective · · Score: 1

      My point is that it's just rediculous to say that Amazon will patent Wiki's after SOOOO many publicity

      It's not so ridiculous at all--it's in fact standard patent strategy and quite feasible. The strategy is known as "building a patent wall around" the core idea. That is, a company patents so many implementation details that are necessary for a real-world implementation but not contained in the original publication/patent that it becomes essentially impossible for anyone to implement it without violating a lot of them, and succeeding in striking down the patent in every single case is so expensive that people generally can't afford it.

      In any case, if you are going to participate in conversations, you should be familiar with the rudiments of written expression, which includes concepts such as "sarcasm" and "hyperbole". Although, sadly, in the case of Amazon, sarcasm and hyperbole are uncomfortably close to the truth. Amazon won't bother patenting Wikis not because they couldn't get away with it (they already have done similar things many times before), but simply because there is no money in it.

      On the plus side, Amazon's blatant abuse of the patent system will ultimately give us the ammunition to get big changes pushed through. Until then, any geek that wants to have a job in the future should not give them their business.

    8. Re:Beware... by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      Isn't hyperbole like the national championship for kids with ADD? (Shamelessly stolen from bash.org)

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
  5. And in other news... by DrYak · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Tomorrow headline :
    Amazon is granted patent for wikis and files suit against Wikipedia

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  6. Hope by TarrySingh · · Score: 1

    Here's hoping Amazon will give us the means to control access to that profile and, ideally, use it throughout the Web to get what we really want, and avoid what we don't.

    Let's hope :-)

    --
    Scott McNealy to Michael: "Suck my Sun!" Michael Dell to Scott : "Lick my Dell!"
  7. Clickstream? by flimnap · · Score: 1

    "Clickstream"? Who comes up with this stuff? Ick.

    1. Re:Clickstream? by shokk · · Score: 4, Funny

      You should have seen the rejected names list:
          CashStream
          Shut Up and Give Us Your Earnings
          Christmas... Pony Up
          Amazon Love Linky Winky
          Obligatory Purchase
          Comsume, You Gluttons!
          Clown Anus Portal
          Ha! We Have One-Click Patented! You Don't!
          Real-Time Stock Link! Watch Stock Rise After Each Purchase

      --
      "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart, he dreams himself your master."
    2. Re:Clickstream? by radish · · Score: 1

      Clickstream Analysis has been a common phrase for a few years now, it seems to be to quite fairly summarize the activity. Unless you think "log grokking" sounds better.

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    3. Re:Clickstream? by Seumas · · Score: 2, Funny

      You think that's bad?

      My company recently purchased another company for several billion dollars and one of the employees sent some sort of an email that was posted on our internal corporate page. It was referring to the culture of our company and how wonderful the language we used was.

      One of the comments they made was that "doubleclicking" an idea is brilliant! Where "doubleclicking" means that you want to look at an idea in more detail or discuss something further. As in "let's take a few minutes to doubleclick that interesting idea before we move on".

      What the HELL? Who the hell would use such an idiotic statement outside of . . . MAYBE marketing? If you talk like that, you might as well be one of those annoying tools that refers to not being able to find your screw driver as "I looked for a philips in my toolbox but it seems to be 404".

      GAAAAAAAH.

  8. So is Amazon spyware ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting


    if it was 180 solutions or gator who had an application that collected this level of information we would call it spyware, especially if the data was used in a commercial context to target the individual, but its all there to "help" us right ?

    notes the Amazon(TM) search box installed with Firefox by default

    1. Re:So is Amazon spyware ? by Graham1982 · · Score: 1

      The data is there just in case we forgot what it was that we wanted, it's not spyware. Why, what if you fell and hit your head on your new Xbox 360, and had sudden amnesia as to what games you were going to buy? Log on to good old Amazon, they know what you were planning to get!

    2. Re:So is Amazon spyware ? by imroy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      How the fuck can this be called spyware? I would have thought that spyware is, by definition, software that spys on your behaviour. This is a wiki, a web page. It doesn't run on your machine, and users have to wilfully input the information. There's nothing secretive about this at all. If Amazon want to search your contributions for keywords or something, then fine. But then it's called data mining. Not spyware.

    3. Re:So is Amazon spyware ? by m50d · · Score: 1

      OTOH, Google has more and doesn't get us calling it spyware. It's all collected legitimately, and not used for anything actively harmful to us.

      --
      I am trolling
    4. Re:So is Amazon spyware ? by EnsilZah · · Score: 1

      Right, Evil Evil Amazon for collecting information that will help me buy other products in the future.
      I go to the Amazon website willingly, i know that they are collecting this information, i even help them by marking how much i liked the items i've ordered.
      There is no conspiracy here.
      There is a context for this information gathering.
      Are you going to withold your medical history from the doctor that's treating you?

    5. Re:So is Amazon spyware ? by mizhi · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The difference is that Amazon gives you options. You can turn off most, if not all of the features of Amazon. Amazon is also upfront about the data it collects and even provides handy little links to help items explaining what the data collected is used for. Amazon, to my knowledge, has never installed software on my machine.

      Gator and Co use subterfuge and dishonest tactics to get programs installed on your computer. These programs are non-optional, disrupt other work that may be done on the computer, and are very difficult to completely remove.

      The comparison is non-sensical.

      --
      Humorless sig goes here.
    6. Re:So is Amazon spyware ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if it was 180 solutions or gator who had an application that collected this level of information we would call it spyware,

      That word, it does not mean what you think it means. Yet parent has been modded +3 Interesting. Good job moderators.

    7. Re:So is Amazon spyware ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This has to be the most retarded comment of the year. Spyware is software that spies on you without your consent, whereas this is visiting a freaking webpage, and doing it of your own free will. It is neither software nor unconsentual. Thus no matter how arbitrarily you'd like to stretch the definition, this isn't spyware.

      And this is modded "+4, insightful"? Fucking pathetic.

  9. not offtopic by jherber · · Score: 3, Interesting

    the article is about amazon building up information about you and your preferences. this leads to "silos" that do not interoperate. can this be shared with ebay, or other sites so that you don't have to teach all media commerce sites what types of things you like? no. perhaps a community based repository for preferences makes more sense. watch dick hardt's message from oscon - it just makes sense.

    http://www.identity20.com/media/OSCON2005/

    1. Re:not offtopic by mikkom · · Score: 1

      The customer information that is in these databases is worth a LOT of money. They certainly do not give it to their competitors, they might SELL it for very large sums but they will never, ever, ever share it voluntarily without very large compensation.

    2. Re:not offtopic by lousyd · · Score: 1

      I'd rather my buying information remains separated. It gives me the opportunity to tailor it to the seller. Not only that, but I may not even be interested in the same things at different sites. If Amazon showed me ads for women's lingerie I'd be turned off and maybe go away. Yet I could have been buying women's lingerie at angelbodywear.com just yesterday.

      --
      If aspiration is a virtue, achievement cannot be a vice.
  10. my amazon horror by Loconut1389 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I am -not- happy with amazon as of lately. I ordered a Canon EOS 20D and a Lexar memory card (~$1,500 total), cancelled the order a few minutes later (before billing or shipping or anything) because I wanted to change memory cards.. When I placed the new order, the credit card didn't have enough room left since they'd already charged it. No problem, I called and paid with a visa. The online system showed only the new order, but never showed it shipped. The next day, I received two cameras, apparently from the old order on the old card and the new order on the new card. The order status still didnt know the one camera had shipped, let alone two. The old order had disappeared completely because it was cancelled.

    In any case, I tried to call their support (via the click to call me thing) and their system would call me (Estara.com) and when it tried to transfer me to amazon I'd get a fast busy.. So I tried about 15 times, and it finally blocked me as an abuser. Very nice.

    I gave it a new number and got through, and the pakistani representative assured me i had not received one camera, let alone two.. After a while of arguing I hung up and emailed instead, which didn't get me a response.. So I called the next day and talked to another pakistani who while continually saying 'this was by our hand' never really got things fixed. She said she'd schedule a ups pickup and email me more information.. A day later, no email and no UPS pickup.. So I called back and they're going to send a ups shipping label which I should get in three days and itll go back ups ground.. So in 10 days, when they receive the extra camera, I can get my $1,500 back. Meanwhile, during the thanksgiving shopping rush yesterday and for the christmas shopping season, I'm $1,500 short, and am going to miss my rent payment.

    On top of that, amazon closed my account because they thought someone else accessed it. When I called about that, they said theyd probably closed it to keep my cards from being charged again.

    So f**k you amazon!

    1. Re:my amazon horror by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      I have one word for you friend: compensation. Being out that much money is not a laughing matter, especially if it's disrupted your plans (for shopping, celebrating the holiday, etc) and caused you to miss bill payments.

      If I were you, I'd be complaining to them very loud and very clear. Sure, it was a fuck up rather than anything malicious - but it was *their* fuck up, it's caused *you* pain, so they should splash a little cash to say sorry and help put things right. At the very least, they should reimburse any expenses you incur (eg interest charges, fees for late payment of bills, etc)

    2. Re:my amazon horror by Loconut1389 · · Score: 1

      I feel -exactly- like that, but a long email complaint resulted in a 1 line reply that said 'one of our representatives has already handled this issue'.

      In the box I'm returning the camera in, I have a 2 page letter (10pt font without much whitespace) and every email theyve sent me and the tracking information and all that..

      I'm definately not happy, despite the many successful orders they've had with me in the past. To a degree, I do feel responsible since I cancelled the first order, but I'm sure people do that all the time and I did it after about 2 minutes, literally.

      I'd love to talk to a manager or something, but most of the time you get outsourced reps. I've goten an american twice in about 10 calls.

      I kept hoping they'd say just to keep the extra memory card or something.

      Everything's so automated these days, its like in star wars where the planet is deleted from the database and nobody believes it was ever there. They kept saying to click the return this order button, but the order hadn't shipped according to the computer, so that option wasnt available.. It took a few calls to get that point across.. Outsourcing and automation were the two big annoyances of this process. Besides that, when my first card declined on the order due to the first order having been charged to it (I had overnight shipping on the order) the automated system said it would try again tomorrow. If someone wants overnight shipping, you darn well better call them when a card declines or something else is in the way.

      Anyway, I posted this mostly to vent, but also as a warning for others to be careful with large orders- eg make sure you order it right the first time.

      Thank you for your concern/support- its better than amazon's done.

    3. Re:my amazon horror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How was it Amazon's fuck up? He should have triple checked that he had everything he wanted before he clicked "Submit"; this isn't a supermarket, you can't put shit back after you pay for it. Its his own fault, no, he shouldn't get compensation.

    4. Re:my amazon horror by Loconut1389 · · Score: 1

      Except when I called to cancel, they said it would be just fine, and the old order disappeared off the radar. This was also about two minutes after I placed it. I think someone ordering $1,500 worth of stuff on a site that's used to orders around a couple hundred dollars on average would be a little flexible.

      Customer's always right, aren't they?

      I'm also not 100% sure the duplicate camera was from the cancelled order- it sort of looks like the order forked when my first card declined. The invoices I received had the same order number (not the one from the cancelled order as one would expect) but had the different credit cards and different order totals.

      If their computer system completely loses an order (they never knew one shipped, let alone two), its definately their fault- despite whatever the customer did. There's obviously a bug in their setup.

    5. Re:my amazon horror by mikeboone · · Score: 2, Informative

      Why not dispute the charges with your CC company? That'll get Amazon's attention in a hurry.

    6. Re:my amazon horror by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      Report a fraudulent transaction on the other card - you'll get your money back, since Amazon claim to have no record of the transaction... there's no papertrail, which is amazon's problem, not yours.

    7. Re:my amazon horror by lubricated · · Score: 1

      You're an idiot for not disputing the charge with your credit card company. You would have had the money back in a day. Unless you charged it to a debit card. Then you are just dumb.

      --
      It has been statistically shown that helmets increase the risk of head injury.
    8. Re:my amazon horror by willabr · · Score: 1

      What's the significance of the person being a "Pakistani"? What point are you trying to make, that a Pakistani screwed you? It's kind of revealing

      The point I think you are making is the electronic commerce is not always as flawless it we would like it to be, Confusion exists, and mistakes are made.

      Knowing how to deal with errors effectively is now becoming a economic skill (i.e. using the credit card company's services for resolution) much as not spending beyond your budget has been in the past, A kind of an "economic Darwinism" if you like.

      I'm not sure what your comment brings to the discussion.

    9. Re:my amazon horror by Loconut1389 · · Score: 1

      My only point was not necessarily that they are pakistani, but that they were having difficulty communicating with me and when I was already frustrated, having to explain everything several times wasn't helpful.

    10. Re:my amazon horror by kurzweilfreak · · Score: 1

      If they are so screwed up they can't keep track of their own paperwork, call your credit card company and get a chargeback on the card for the order you didn't want and sell the extra camera on Ebay. If they want that camera back, I'm sure that'll put a fire under their asses to get their stuff straight. Or, you end up with an extra camera to put up on Ebay. After all, if they say it never shipped, how can you send it back to them?

      --

      kurzweil_freak

      5th Kyu Genbukan Ninpo/KJJR student

      Be the darkness that allows the light to shine.

    11. Re:my amazon horror by Loconut1389 · · Score: 1

      re: being offtopic.

      I mentioned this because it was about amazon and the bugs in their system. The article is about how amazon is keeping track of customers information better, yet they lose track of a $1,500 order. Seems relevant, even if not directly on target- it's more on target than many posts marked informative in other threads.

    12. Re:my amazon horror by mmclean · · Score: 1

      When I placed the new order, the credit card didn't have enough room left since they'd already charged it.


      No, you silly bint -- they did not charge you credit card, they asked for and received a pre-authorization -- something that they must do accepting an order. Amazon.com is absolutely 0% (or less) at fault for this and if you, as a consumer, did not understand how credit cards work prior to this purchase, shame on you

  11. What will they do with all of that data? by Graham1982 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Somewhere, somehow, there is a hurricane of advertising just waiting to annoy the Hell out of you. They will be marketing things like Star Wars collectables and case mods among other geeky things that you bought or searched for on Amazon. You will not be able to run, you will not be able to hide, Jamster will want to give you the latest Chewbacca ringtone.

    1. Re:What will they do with all of that data? by NoneExpected · · Score: 2, Interesting

      When I was young, we made mistakes and thankfully most of them are buried in unwritten-history and with college buddies I don't see anymore.

      Nowadays everything you have written on-line or maybe every site you ever visited is recorded.

      Gods know how the Star Wars collectible will come back to haunt you, but I can imagine a scenario during a local election where your opponent shouts, "he collects dolls and plays with them in his bedroom!".

      Reminds of how Representative Claude Pepper of some southern state, lost an election when he opponent charged, "he practises nepotism with his niece in his office".

    2. Re:What will they do with all of that data? by Graham1982 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I have worse things than computer parts being bought over the Internet. I sometimes do worry what implications that data has over me. Life is too short to be so paranoid though. If I have a bad feeling about buying something directly, I transfer the funds to a friend, and give him a small profit for handling my shipments.

    3. Re:What will they do with all of that data? by NoneExpected · · Score: 1

      That is funny. Maybe there is a business here? Third party buyer?

    4. Re:What will they do with all of that data? by Cylix · · Score: 1

      If you haven't noticed, data retention really isn't a big deal of most providers.

      Try going back and finding some of the pages you used to visit. Granted, a good bit will still be around, but they do drop off at an odd speed.

      The internet is definately not written in stone.

      --
      "You should always go to other people's funerals; otherwise, they won't come to yours." -- Yogi Berra
  12. wtf? by matt4077 · · Score: 1

    So what does the wiki have to do with my profile? It seems like it's more specific to the product than to me. And since it's just free prose, it'll be rather difficult to do any funny shazingle to my profile by analyzing my wiki entries.

  13. jack thompson? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    yo. someone get me the link to jack thompson's book and the accompanying wiki, so everyone on slashdot can vandalize it ;)

    (disclaimer: i do not condone the use of vandalism when dealing with idiots. still, those pictures were damn funny.)

    1. Re:jack thompson? by WWWWolf · · Score: 1

      Here!, Thanks to link to (interestingly enough) Wikipedia.

      Actually, I think the feature was already up when Jack vs Amazon was discussed, and the comments in the wiki wasn't really flattering at the time. Specifically, link to Wikipedia article which describes in excruciating detail, yet pretty fairly, what a nutball Jack is =) I think it's the same comment it has now.

  14. Not the first time for Amazon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    This is not the first time Amazon has experimented with the wiki system. In 2003 they were working on a system called "Review Start". Users were allowed to submit their own review and make additions and edits to the product descriptions. The system was scrapped because Jeff Bezos thought it would hurt search indexing and ultimately Amazon sales. It will be interesting to see how the wiki model works for them.

  15. Saddly funny moderation by DrYak · · Score: 0, Redundant
    Amazon is granted patent for wikis and files suit against Wikipedia


    I think the best (the most ironic ?) part is that I got modded "Redundant".
    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
    1. Re:Saddly funny moderation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not ironic. Your "joke" was redundant as it had already been made in this discussion 5 minutes or so earlier. If you're going for the cliche, at the very least be the first person to use it. When you're not it's just fucking sad.

    2. Re:Saddly funny moderation by poopdeville · · Score: 1

      I, for one, welcome our new just fucking sad overlords.

      --
      After all, I am strangely colored.
  16. The Page I Made by neiljt · · Score: 1

    Recommendations and alerts based on past purchases (or browses) seems pretty neat to me. I haven't looked really hard to see if it's there already, but what would make this even better is if it could be actively tuned. This would be particularly useful if it allowed you to remove certain categories. As an example, I recently bought some lesbian literature as a gift ... and now Amazon thinks I love lesbian literature. Whilst faintly amusing, I am not actually a lesbian (though I feel sure I would be if I were a girl, heh), and the main problem with this is that it dilutes the usefulness of the system.

    1. Re:The Page I Made by MPolo · · Score: 1

      At least on the German version of the site, there is a link "Why was this recommended to me?", and if you follow that link, you can remove the item that triggered it from your recommendation triggers.

    2. Re:The Page I Made by greg1104 · · Score: 1

      Oh, I get it. That book on lesbians was a gift. Wink. I went through a similarly painful period where my recommendations were embarassing after ordering several country music CDs for my relatives during the holidays.

      There are two easy ways to fix this problem. If you hit the "Your Account" tab, scroll down to "Improve Your Recommendations", and there's the option to exclude purchases. You can fine-tine your entire list quickly there.

      The other way is to note that every time you're given a recommendation, there's a little note saying some variant on "recommended for your because...". Just click on that for the ones that stick out as obviously out of place, and you'll get a list of titles it used; turn off the "used to make recommendations" checkbox and the book is gone.

  17. Re:Wiki my asss !!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is gonna be really stupid I am sure, but can someone explain this troll?

    Thanks if you're willing :)

  18. Boo hoo by NineNine · · Score: 1

    Wow... you got screwed over by an anonymous international corporation? Wow! I'm so surprised! But really, you won't get any sympathy from me. You want to not support your local economy so you can pinch a few pennies? Fine by me. You get what you deserve.

    I really don't understand people who think that they can go to Amazon or Ebay in order to screw local retailers and save themselves a few bucks, yet get the same quality customer service. Customer service isn't free. Shop at a real store next time (even better... an independent retailer) and I can almost guarantee that you'd have much, much better service.

    1. Re:Boo hoo by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Firstly there *are* no 'local' stores any more - they're all part of big national chains.

      Secondly, they all charge 25%-50% more than online charges, have fewer items available, and don't get me started on customer support - those idiots wouldn't know support if it hit them on the head.

      I've had *far* better support from online retailers than I have ever had from 'local' stores.

    2. Re:Boo hoo by NineNine · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Firstly there *are* no 'local' stores any more - they're all part of big national chains.

      That's simply not true. I own quite a successful one, thank you.

      Secondly, they all charge 25%-50% more than online charges, have fewer items available, and don't get me started on customer support - those idiots wouldn't know support if it hit them on the head.

      25-50% more? I doubt that. They will be more expensive, sure, because they create good jobs, contribute to your economy, and give you a local place to get stuff. They're going to be more expensive. And, do you really NEED 100,000 different items to choose from? Are you buying 100,000 different items?

      But, keep repeating what you're saying and one day you'll be right... there will be no more local stores.

    3. Re:Boo hoo by Xugumad · · Score: 1

      I'm quite happy to pay for good customer service, but I live in a town with a population of under 20,000, local shops have an extremely limited range. I shop online because it's a hell of a lot easier than having to do all my shopping at lunchtime or at the weekend (everything except the supermarkets is closed by 5:30pm, and most of them by 5pm). If I want more of a selection, I have to spend over an hour travelling (including return journey) to get to the nearest city.

      Personally, I've had continually good experiences with Amazon, having been buying from them for over 7 years now. There's been a couple of times games haven't shipped in time to arrive on day of release, and I buy from a more reliable but also more expensive online shop if that's likely to bother me, but that's it...

    4. Re:Boo hoo by radish · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And, do you really NEED 100,000 different items to choose from? Are you buying 100,000 different items?
      No, I'm buying 1 item. But I need the correct one item. That's why a large selection is useful.

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    5. Re:Boo hoo by NineNine · · Score: 1

      Because the Canon Powershot 405x3ty will fill your needs, while the Canon Powershot 405x3tz won't? C'mon, I don't believe that for a second. Unless you're a professional that needs a speciailzed niche item, that's simply not true for most consumer products. And, I don't know of too many independent stores that can't order whatever you absolutely, positively need, anyway. We do that all of the time for the picky customers.

      All I'm saying is that maybe there are a few things out there that are just as, if not more, important than YOU getting the exact right plastic Chinese gizmo that you need at the absolute rock bottom price. Everything that you do has consequences, whethere it's buying that latest version of Windows, buying that new DRM'ed Sony CD, or shunning your own local economy.

      See the riots outside of Wal-Mart stores this time of year? That's the logical result of everybody "needing" all of their crap right NOW at the absolute rock-bottom price. As the American public becomes even more consumption-oriented, that kind of shit will become more and more common.

    6. Re:Boo hoo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      25-50% more? I doubt that. They will be more expensive, sure, because they create good jobs, contribute to your economy, and give you a local place to get stuff. They're going to be more expensive. And, do you really NEED 100,000 different items to choose from? Are you buying 100,000 different items?

      I'm sorry, but none of these arguments will convince me to shop at local stores. I shop at the places that best serve my needs. If I wanted to give charity, I'd give it to the Red Cross.

      That's not to say I think that local stores are always worse than national chains. If there is an advantage to shopping at a particular local store (i.e. less crowded, items I can't find anywhere else, better environment, etc.), then I will shop there. But telling me it "helps the local economy" will never get me to shop there. The economy exists to serve ME and every other CONSUMER. Period. If local stores can do that better in some instances than national chains, then they should exist. Otherwise, they should not exist. Shopping somewhere for charitable reasons sends entrepreneurs the wrong message. It tells them that consumers want more of something that they really don't.

    7. Re:Boo hoo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Secondly, they all charge 25%-50% more than online charges

      We charge, on average, 10% less for new goods than the chains do. Used is another matter . . . you're buying convenience, you're buying a better browsing experience.

    8. Re:Boo hoo by abirdman · · Score: 1
      they all charge 25%-50% more than online charges

      Be careful with that assumption. I have found that, with the exception of very large volume items (top 50 CD's, new bestseller fiction in hardcover, etc.), this simply is not true. In the last several months I found that checking the websites of music publishers (small, indie labels), buying a CD direct from the publisher can save a couple of bucks over the Amazon price (I assume this applies to Borders and B&N as well). I recently bought three Bright Eyes CD's for my daughter, and the publisher (Saddle Creek Records) had them for a couple dollars less than Amazon. And because I bought three, they shipped them free, and I got them overnight. Net savings-- about $10.00 on a $30.00 order. Once this summer, I found a CD (Shpongle, an obscure import a few years old), which Amazon wanted to sell me for $36.00 plus shipping. I called the local warehouse of a small local chain of record stores, and lo and behold, they had the CD (used) for under $10.00 and less than 10 minutes drive away.

      Amazon started out by selling everything cheaper than anyone else could. They didn't make a profit for years, and in that time put countless brick and mortar businesses out of business. They're not taking losses now-- hence the higher prices on non-volume items-- and it's often worthwhile to look for other sources.

      --
      Everything I've ever learned the hard way was based on a statistically invalid sample.
    9. Re:Boo hoo by NineNine · · Score: 1


      That's not to say I think that local stores are always worse than national chains. If there is an advantage to shopping at a particular local store (i.e. less crowded, items I can't find anywhere else, better environment, etc.), then I will shop there. But telling me it "helps the local economy" will never get me to shop there. The economy exists to serve ME and every other CONSUMER. Period. If local stores can do that better in some instances than national chains, then they should exist. Otherwise, they should not exist. Shopping somewhere for charitable reasons sends entrepreneurs the wrong message. It tells them that consumers want more of something that they really don't.


      So then, you should be able to buy any kind of gas guzzling car that spews black smoke out the back because it serves YOUR needs? Fuck anybody else, right? It's not your problem, after all. Environmental problems are another example of what happens when individual goods end up becoming a common bad. So sure, YOU may be able to save your precious $0.25 by buying online. Everybody can.
       
      But most of the country is already starting to be a place where it's simply not enjoyable to live. If you think that a lot of cookie cutter towns with the same big box stores and lots of UPS trucks is ideal, then go right ahead. I enjoy living in a town where I don't have to go into those big box stores, and I know the shopkeepers, and I know that my tax money is going back into the local economy to pay for things like sidewalks, bike lanes, libraries, recycling programs, our free bus service, our free wireless service, lots of park land, and lots of other things that make my town so much better than GenericSuburbia, USA where people don't even get out of their SUV's except to walk across a giant paved parking lot. Blech. You can have it.

      And it's certainly not charitable. I own a business that is beating the pants off of two big box stores because we have better service, better prices, and better products.

    10. Re:Boo hoo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So then, you should be able to buy any kind of gas guzzling car that spews black smoke out the back because it serves YOUR needs? Fuck anybody else, right? It's not your problem, after all.

      No, in my opinion, polluting your neighbor's air violates their rights if it harms or even annoys your neighbor. Of course, it gets more complicated than that, and how I think pollution should be handled is another topic.

      What I'm talking about is people losing their job. A job is not something that you're entitled to. Rather, it is something a company can offer to you if that company is serving customers. If that company can not serve customers (i.e. make a profit), then it should go bankrupt. To advocate that customers base their behavior on what creates the most local jobs is to advocate the reversal of the consumer-producer relationship. Producers serve customers, not the other way around.

      If you think that a lot of cookie cutter towns with the same big box stores and lots of UPS trucks is ideal, then go right ahead.

      Yes, we should all vote with our money. I usually move close to cities, because I enjoy the services that big box stores provide. What irritates me is when people threaten violence against (i.e. attempt to ban) Walmart when it tries to move to their town. If the people don't like the combination of services and prices that Walmart offers, then Walmart will not make money and will have to close its doors. Vote with your money and your feet. That's what I do.

      I know that my tax money is going back into the local economy to pay for things like sidewalks, bike lanes, libraries, recycling programs, our free bus service, our free wireless service, lots of park land, and lots of other things that make my town so much better than GenericSuburbia

      All of that can be done by people voluntarily banding together into groups and/or with the aid of contracts. There is no need for the threats of violence associated with taxes, in my humble opinion.

      And it's certainly not charitable. I own a business that is beating the pants off of two big box stores because we have better service, better prices, and better products.

      That's great! Those are the arguments that will get me into your store. Telling me to "support the local economy" or "You don't need all those choices" or "buy American" will not.

    11. Re:Boo hoo by radish · · Score: 1

      Oh please - get over yourself. I may be unusual, but yes, I research purchases. If I want a video card I spend days reading reviews, benchmarks and pricing guides, then I decide which one I want. Why should I compromise? You mentioned cameras - good example. Not much point selling me a Nikor lens for a Canon body is there? What happens when I buy a lens and I want the matching hood and, say, a polarizer? There is exactly one hood which will work with that lens - no other will do, and I don't want it in a week I want it now, with the lens. There are a number of filters I can choose from, but it would have to be the right size & type. Maybe I want a case from the excellent LowePro Street & Field series - they're popular because they're good. I don't want a cheap generic knock off in faux-leather, thanks all the same.

      And, I don't know of too many independent stores that can't order whatever you absolutely, positively need, anyway.
      Excellent - so I can pay someone else to go online and order it for me! What a fantastic idea. Tell you what, why don't I bring in my lunch so you can eat it for me - I'll even pay for the service. Am I supporting my local economy now? I used to work in a small computer shop with a limited (due to space) inventory. We could order stuff for people, and often did. But I felt horrible doing it. We'd go to the exact same mailorder company the customer could use themselves and stick 40% on the price. I don't like ripping people off, so I quit. They went bust shortly after - good riddance.

      See the riots outside of Wal-Mart stores this time of year?
      No, I never go to Walmart, they only sell cheap crap and that's not something I tend to buy. You seem to think that the reason I shop online is to buy cheap crap cheaply. Not so. It's so I can buy the exact product I want, that fits my needs exactly, and get it for the best price. I don't buy crap, but it's all most of the B&M stores I go to sell.

      There are some things for which local stores are unbeatable - food & drink, artworks, books, clothing, hifi etc. All these things benefit from personal service, the ability to see, touch and examine items before purchase, etc. For the large part, however, consumer electronics is not that way anymore. There's far more information online than any salesperson could memorise, even if they tried (which they rarely do) and the informed (or "picky" as you call them) customer typically already knows what they want. It's a dead market sector, and I'm sure as hell not going out of my way to support it. As we're always telling the **AA - you're not guaranteed a business model. If times change you have to keep up.

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

  19. Quick by rpillala · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Someone find a patent on wiki and sue. You know you want to.

    --
    When the axe came to the forest, the trees said, "Look out - the handle was once one of us."
  20. Errors with Safari by Athyra · · Score: 2, Informative

    I've been getting errors on Amazon pages as a result of the wiki (Javascript -- Null Value) on Safari with the last two MacOS systems. Amazon hasn't even responded to any of my messages about it, but I've got to say, even if an error is just harmless and can be bypassed by hitting "return," I'm not inclined to browse a site very often if I keep getting error pop-ups any more than if I'm getting ad pop-ups.

    Anyone know if other OS/browser combos are causing problems?

    1. Re:Errors with Safari by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ditto for me

    2. Re:Errors with Safari by Heembo · · Score: 2, Informative

      Safari is just behind the curve in browser support, mixed with a recent surge in use. As a AJAX web developer, that sucks. Take Sarissa - the lightning fast XML Javascript parsing engine. Works "everywhere" except for Safari. Many sights I develop just "looks different" in Safari. The positive side is, my employer bought me my first mac (iMac mini) and it's more responsive than my $2000 uber-dell. As for development, I now "code Javascript" to Safari - and test everywhere else, since Safari is the lowest common denominator.

      --
      Horns are really just a broken halo.
    3. Re:Errors with Safari by Athyra · · Score: 1

      Thanks -- it helps to know whether to yell at Apple or Amazon (although Amazon still gets a little blame in my book for not, at the very least, running a browser check to avoid the error).

    4. Re:Errors with Safari by Heembo · · Score: 1

      FYI: Safari 1.3 promises to close the gap - and include support for the Canvas object (whoa). :)

      --
      Horns are really just a broken halo.
  21. most folks have similar interests (.i.e p0rn) by ericcantona · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    gathering indivdual data will allow for target marketing for individual, etc
    however, summing across individuals , i.e., from a population perspective, most folks fall into groups who have similarities w.r.t. purchasing interests
    For example:
    I would hazard a geuss that most /.'ers would usually be interested in
    1. p0rn
    2. p0rn
    3. xscreensaver hacks
    4. the workings of the linux kernel
    5. crypto filesystems (keep p0rn safe)
    6. ruby
    7. how to get a job @ google
    8. how to get women to notice they are alive
    9. p0rn (again, 'cos they still didn't notice) & does it cause RSI/blindness ?
    10. direct neural interfaces 'cos p0rn caused blindness

    --
    When the seagulls follow the trawler, it's because they think sardines will be thrown in to the sea
  22. Same Here by toupsie · · Score: 1

    I was wondering about that. Every Mac OS X Tiger system I have used to access Amazon via Safari has been giving me the same error. At first, I thought it was a PithHelmet rule.

    --
    Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
  23. Tag CDs which are copy controlled by Tim+Macinta · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If you've bought a CD through Amazon.com which is copy controlled, this is a good opportunity to tag it as such by leaving a note in the wiki. For example, I did this here - nothing inflammatory, just a friendly note for others who are thinking about buying the CD. This is information that I personally would like to know before deciding to purchase a CD, and I expect some others here feel the same.

    1. Re:Tag CDs which are copy controlled by greg1104 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm sure you can add warnings all day to an title listed as the #55,186 best seller in music. I'm curious to see someone do that sort of thing with a popular title. My experience with Amazon's review features has been that I can rant about unpopular titles all day and those comments hang around, which reinforces the idea that they allow positive and negative reviews. Obviously biased comments, and ones that are negative about the topic of the book, seem to persist as well, also reinforcing that they're allowed. But try to put detailed warnings in about problems with a popular title, well those can silently go *poof*.

      Details: I've written many reviews about stock trading books. I've now tried to submit a review talking about exactly what's wrong with Michael Covel's "Trend Trading", ranked #1,415 in books, three times, each time changing the text around a bit. Every time it's dissapeared quickly afterward. Someone is editing out "+5 insightful" negative comments about this book, while leaving those unlikely to dissuade a buyer alone. It's all very curious.

    2. Re:Tag CDs which are copy controlled by Tim+Macinta · · Score: 1

      Well, I also added a wiki entry for Sean Paul - The Trinity awhile back too, which is a little more popular, and it's still around. Granted, it's not exceedingly negative (I just noted that the track listing is a little off) and the CD isn't the #1 best seller, so you could certainly be right.

    3. Re:Tag CDs which are copy controlled by broeman · · Score: 1

      Maybe I am a blind old man, but where is this comment/wiki (actually, I can't see anything that resembles wiki on any amazon sites)?

      --

      (yes this can be compared with sex)
    4. Re:Tag CDs which are copy controlled by Tim+Macinta · · Score: 1

      It's right below the Editorial Reviews section, at least for me and at least for now. My original wiki entry was made on November 11th, then it seemed that the wikis disappeared from Amazon.com for a few weeks, and now they're back, so they appear to be turning the feature on and off for whatever reason (maybe testing).

  24. Link? by Hershmire · · Score: 1

    Maybe I'm just being stupid, but can anyone give me a link to the damn site? I can't find one anywhere, not even on Amazon's main site, or in the startlingly pathetic "help" page /. links to.

    --
    if(!toilet_paper) roll.replace(new roll); //Stupid roommates.
    1. Re:Link? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.amazon.com/gp/wiki/what-is-this.html

      They have not enabled Wiki for all products though a casual glance/click finds http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/031615976X and you can see someone's entered a comment using the wiki much like a message board.

  25. yeah, gifts throw it all out the window by johnpaul191 · · Score: 1

    if there is a way to remove items that were gifts from contributing to your profile, then it is not super obvious or one click easy. that may be most of the reason the recommendations i get are worthless to me personally. i don't care enough about having Old Man Amazon suggest more things for me to buy, so i never dug too far to figure out how to remove items or flag them as having been gifts.
    does it not add them to your profile if you ship them to another address? i only used that a few times, but i never pondered if those had an influence on my Amazonian Profile (patent pending).

  26. tomorrow by penguin-collective · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Tomorrow, we'll learn that Amazon has patented the Wiki. After all, they invented it, and even if they didn't invent it, they have given us so many other inventions that we should just shut up and let them get away with this patent.

    Amazon sucks. Buy somewhere else. If you can't kick the amazon.com web site habit, use it for finding what you want and then buy somewhere else. BookBurro makes it simple and usually gets you a cheaper price as well.

    1. Re:tomorrow by SunPin · · Score: 2, Informative
      BookBurro makes it simple and usually gets you a cheaper price as well.

      BookBurro is spyware.

      --
      Laws are for people with no friends.
  27. Where are the device drivers? by tepples · · Score: 1

    Because the Canon Powershot 405x3ty will fill your needs, while the Canon Powershot 405x3tz won't?

    What happens when I go to a local store, and none of the flatbed scanners on display are on SANE's supported list?

    1. Re:Where are the device drivers? by NineNine · · Score: 1

      1. Ask the store to order you one. Considering that computer retail is getting destroyed by big box stores and online stuff, I'd be very surprised if they didn't get one for you immediately.

      2. They may have no clue as to what you're talking about, in which case you may have to order something online. Linux-specific computer hardware is a pretty tiny niche that I wouldn't expect any local computer store to deal with. I know that none of ours do, but they can always get anything special that I need.

  28. Limited to certain categories, not really by spazoid12 · · Score: 2, Informative

    "Wikified items seem to be limited to certain categories, DVDs being one un-wikied realm."

    Not really. It's scheduled for all categories, but the launch of this feature may temporarily conflict with the launch of others, thus it is dormant in some categories until various experiments settle.

  29. Need to improve their searches first by dcigary · · Score: 1

    I get very, very aggrivated at Amazon most of the time. I've found that unless you know EXACTLY what you are looking for when typing in your search text, the search is useless.

    There used to be a day when you could literally just browse online on Amazon, and find things pretty easily. Now, with all the combined seaches and stuff, a simple search for a CD brings up 1000's of different matches, most of which have NOTHING to do with your CD or don't even contain the text of your search.

    I usually Google for what I want, find the EXACT name of the item, then put it into Amazon's search.

    --
    ...my Karma ran over your Dogma...
  30. The Amazon way.... by zanderredux · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Now Amazon will try to patent the Wiki concept. And we complain about Microsoft?!

  31. So... you are saying... by rolandog · · Score: 1

    ... "the problem is choice"?

  32. the world is not fair by kwoff · · Score: 1

    A company who patents obvious web-application technology is now freely using wiki technology (and getting publicity for it on what is now basically a webvertisement site). I can only continue not buying anything from them, trying to keep my rage in check.

    Hah, no only kidding.

    :|