Right. Because nothing is more scientific than researchers refusing to share data. Proprietary information is bedrock of scientific progress; don't break it.
Have you considered moving to the other side of the flat earth? I have zero tolerance for people like you - The Data is right out there, a simple web search away, but you apparently either have a political reason of denial, or are new to the intertoobs.
As someone who saw it when it came out in theaters on post when I was in Germany, having a woman as the strong female lead wasn't even in consideration. It was just a fscking cool movie.
One of the strangest issues today is the so called "Strong Female Lead". Hollywood brays as if women were not even in films before, and this is some sort of great liberation over evil "white males". I wouldn't have even put that in there, but anyone thinking otherwise needs to research Brie Larson, the racist and sexist female lead in the new Captain Marvel movie.
If you actually have a strong female lead, you don't have to tell people she's a strong female lead. They can tell by watching the movie. Ripley kicked ass, and you cared about what happened to her. Sarah Conners in the first couple Terminators. Gal Gadot was good in WW, even if feminists were enraged that she shaved her armpits. https://www.maxim.com/entertai... Disclaimer - I do like Linda Carter WW better, but no problem if others differ.
It is high time that Hollywood stop acting like they are embracing racism and sexism. Just because the object of your hatred and vilification is white males, one does not eliminate racism and sexism by becoming a racist and a sexist. And a stronf female lead isn't whining, and inserting your political views into the movie.
Butt butt... wait are you saying the world is not flat?
I think it depends on the granularity. On the coast of Florida or Northwest Ohio, it surely looks pretty flat. Here in the Ridge and Valley region of PA - it's hard to tell what level even is.
So you think that all those scientists distributed on a global scale, along with all of their weather stations, and the different organizations like the Federation of American Scientists, NASA, etc. who are collecting satellite information and sharing data, being reviewed by their peers and science magazines, etc. You think it is likely all of that is one huge conspiracy?
Seriously, what the fuck is wrong with you people.
And only Fox News and Joe Bastardi stand in the way of the Conspiracy.
But a bright new day is coming - there are flat earthers all over the globe now.
(next month you can go back and check world map for Feb)
In the Eastern part of the US, there is an area called the "Snow Belt" It is warmer than areas north of it, yet gets more snow. How can this be???
As you note, it's moisture. While a fair bit warmer than it's northern neighbors, the temps hover around freezing, which makes for more moisture, and more likely snow storms. The resulting snow doesn't stay on the ground as long, but there is more of it.
If the denialists watched other than Fox News, they would hear more about the anomalously warm places. I did a search on the record breaking heat wave Australia has been having, lots of dead wildlife, fruit bats cooking in trees and dropping off dead, days of 120 degree plus weather.
Lots of coverage by apparently everyone. Four pages in - not one citation or article from Fox News.
But hey - it snowed in Spokane! Time to rewrote the laws of physics.
Fox News loyalists are being kept from the news. Or perhaps are teh lone stalwart of the truth, standing bravely against the entire world. If a place is getting unusual 120 degree plus temps, yet isn't reported, indeed the opposite is being pushed, there is a definite agenda.
Now I hesitate to do that sort of tit for tat comparison, as it is still weather. Brutal nasty scary weather.
But when the denialists point to a area suffering through cold as if it negates the physics of atmospheric energy retention, it isn't difficult to point out areas that at the same time are suffering intense heat.
The logic that it is okay to jail only a million people without trial because 'Murrica bad! is just ludicrous.
I never said any such thing.
The fact that innocent people in China are unjustly imprisoned is wrong.
The fact that innocent people in America are unjustly imprisoned is also wrong.
By pointing out that America is proportionally worse, I am not in any way justifying China's behavior.
Tell us why it is porportionally worse. What is the execution rate in China? Are their prisoners treated well? Are they given trials? Are they imprisoned for opinions?Tell me how you arrived at the conclusion that you would rather be jailed in China than in the USA. You made your claim twice, support it.
You're an apologist coward, Bill. You belong in a Chinese prison, bottom line.
Actually, he might be an employee just doing his job as directed. The logic that it is okay to jail only a million people without trial because 'Murrica bad! is just ludicrous.
Yeah, America jails too many people. This was the result of three major things. Thig one was the "get tough on crime" movement, the victim's right's movement, and the for profit prison system. All were intertwined.
The biggest problem of making the prison system a profit center is that like all corporate entities, you have to make more profit the next quarter. And there are limits to how cheaply you can maintain prisoners, so the answer is to make sure you have more prisoners in prison for a longer time.
For that, the magic elixir of the outrageous mandatory penalties for non-crime crimes like weed possession, the three strikes rules that could put a person in prison for life for silly things like shoplifting food, and the ability of the victims to keep a person in prison based on how they feel.
I can be sympathetic to the victims, but the rest of those assholes should be the ones behind bars.
But here's the thing - it isn't a crime for me to express that opinion. Bill should try some pointed criticism at the Chinese government - calling them assholes that belong in prison.
One side effect of Forcing those âoedudesâ out of leadership careers is that when these women decide that its time to get married and have a family, the pool of acceptable men has shrunk a lot. They want a well paid man in a leadership role as a husband. Very few women marry down. But there are now very few that fit the requirements, and if a well to do male reaches his mi 30â(TM)s - early 40â(TM)s without getting married, he is probably enjoying the bachelor life.
While one might realize a profit from their home selling, it is an odd investment. You have to have a place to live, and the monthly rent is always due. We paid off our house several years ago, and the lack of a couple thousand mortgage payment every month is like a very nice raise.
Now for the millennial and on young people, yes there are expenses. One guy I know spends around 500 a month on his phone bill. My point has always been live below your means when you are young. Then around the time you hit middle age, youâ(TM)ll be surprised how much money you have. Its almost pointless to point this out though. Most people donâ(TM)t have a good grasp of money and basic math.
Thatâ(TM)s how it was when I entered the workforce, and it is the same today.
In polite company, a person can discuss and disagree without calling the other person a moron or retarded. Try disagreeing with your boss and call him or her âoeidiot âoe.
In here, it isnâ(TM)t faux pas so much. But in either case, it shows an inability to form a good argumen when you resort to that sort of language.
But do as you are able.
Hah! Whiny little shit. I was retired 3 years before he passed away. Didnâ(TM)t even know that he had the money.
But you just continue being the archetypal victim. Spend all your money as quick as you can. Iâ(TM)ve seen your future, and the only thing that you have stockpiled is blaming others for your failures
Slashdot Mirror
Ooo, CNN and NPR links. Why don't you link globalwarmingisreal.com while you're busy wasting your time with fake news.
In other word, you got nothing. Congratulations on making a fool of yourself.
Right. Because nothing is more scientific than researchers refusing to share data. Proprietary information is bedrock of scientific progress; don't break it.
Have you considered moving to the other side of the flat earth? I have zero tolerance for people like you - The Data is right out there, a simple web search away, but you apparently either have a political reason of denial, or are new to the intertoobs.
No links, no mention of where temperature recordings were made.
If full links were provided to all the data, would you believe them ?
If no, why ask for links ?
If yes, then why are you doubting the conclusion ?
Links? We got links! https://edition.cnn.com/2019/0... https://www.npr.org/2019/01/25... https://phys.org/news/2019-01-... https://www.standard.co.uk/new...
Pages and pages of links.
I'll just note that I haven't found one Fox News link yet, as they are busy showing that Global warming is a hoax........
It snowed in Seattle, you know.
But a bright new day is coming - there are flat earthers all over the globe now.
I see what you did there--but I'd have gone with "there are flat Earthers all around the globe now".
I concur.
Me too. Then I thought about edible underwear. I'm sick.
You shouldn't eat them off "working women" if you don't want to get sick.
I'm speechless.
As someone who saw it when it came out in theaters on post when I was in Germany, having a woman as the strong female lead wasn't even in consideration. It was just a fscking cool movie.
One of the strangest issues today is the so called "Strong Female Lead". Hollywood brays as if women were not even in films before, and this is some sort of great liberation over evil "white males". I wouldn't have even put that in there, but anyone thinking otherwise needs to research Brie Larson, the racist and sexist female lead in the new Captain Marvel movie.
If you actually have a strong female lead, you don't have to tell people she's a strong female lead. They can tell by watching the movie. Ripley kicked ass, and you cared about what happened to her. Sarah Conners in the first couple Terminators. Gal Gadot was good in WW, even if feminists were enraged that she shaved her armpits. https://www.maxim.com/entertai... Disclaimer - I do like Linda Carter WW better, but no problem if others differ.
It is high time that Hollywood stop acting like they are embracing racism and sexism. Just because the object of your hatred and vilification is white males, one does not eliminate racism and sexism by becoming a racist and a sexist. And a stronf female lead isn't whining, and inserting your political views into the movie.
I totally read that as edible tables.
Me too. Then I thought about edible underwear. I'm sick.
Its probably better than our present habit of making stupid people famous.
I'm still unknown! :(
We'll probably become famous about the same time
Butt butt... wait are you saying the world is not flat?
I think it depends on the granularity. On the coast of Florida or Northwest Ohio, it surely looks pretty flat. Here in the Ridge and Valley region of PA - it's hard to tell what level even is.
So you think that all those scientists distributed on a global scale, along with all of their weather stations, and the different organizations like the Federation of American Scientists, NASA, etc. who are collecting satellite information and sharing data, being reviewed by their peers and science magazines, etc. You think it is likely all of that is one huge conspiracy?
Seriously, what the fuck is wrong with you people.
And only Fox News and Joe Bastardi stand in the way of the Conspiracy.
But a bright new day is coming - there are flat earthers all over the globe now.
Second snowiest Feb ever ( well, since 1893) and about third or fourth coldest in Spokane.
Snow is more an indicator of high moisture than extreme cold. Also, it's called 'global' warming, not 'Spokane' warming.
Here, check the worldwide map for January: https://data.giss.nasa.gov/gis...
(next month you can go back and check world map for Feb)
In the Eastern part of the US, there is an area called the "Snow Belt" It is warmer than areas north of it, yet gets more snow. How can this be???
As you note, it's moisture. While a fair bit warmer than it's northern neighbors, the temps hover around freezing, which makes for more moisture, and more likely snow storms. The resulting snow doesn't stay on the ground as long, but there is more of it.
If the denialists watched other than Fox News, they would hear more about the anomalously warm places. I did a search on the record breaking heat wave Australia has been having, lots of dead wildlife, fruit bats cooking in trees and dropping off dead, days of 120 degree plus weather.
Lots of coverage by apparently everyone. Four pages in - not one citation or article from Fox News.
But hey - it snowed in Spokane! Time to rewrote the laws of physics.
Fox News loyalists are being kept from the news. Or perhaps are teh lone stalwart of the truth, standing bravely against the entire world. If a place is getting unusual 120 degree plus temps, yet isn't reported, indeed the opposite is being pushed, there is a definite agenda.
Second hottest February on record (hottest was 1990) in Denmark.
This is why the plural of anecdote is not data.
Oz has been having a terrible time in the apparently chilly summer. Daytime highs of only 50 degrees....
Oh..... wait..... that's 50 degrees C. For the denialists, that's over 120 degrees F.
http://time.com/5506684/austra...
Now I hesitate to do that sort of tit for tat comparison, as it is still weather. Brutal nasty scary weather.
But when the denialists point to a area suffering through cold as if it negates the physics of atmospheric energy retention, it isn't difficult to point out areas that at the same time are suffering intense heat.
Gets warmer that's some powerful global warming. Got colder? Thats all that climate change moving in. Always a reason for a new project.
And it's soooo confusing some times!
I wasin Florida most of February. It was unusually hot. Upper 80's, humid, sunny. Ahhh - there's Global warming!
Came back to the Northeast, and snow! Freezing rain! Temps below or near freezing. So much for global warming!
Amazing that some folks debunk global warming by looking out the window and taking in maybe a square mile of the world.
Stop giving the animals super powers you fools!!!
Its probably better than our present habit of making stupid people famous.
The logic that it is okay to jail only a million people without trial because 'Murrica bad! is just ludicrous.
I never said any such thing.
The fact that innocent people in China are unjustly imprisoned is wrong.
The fact that innocent people in America are unjustly imprisoned is also wrong.
By pointing out that America is proportionally worse, I am not in any way justifying China's behavior.
Tell us why it is porportionally worse. What is the execution rate in China? Are their prisoners treated well? Are they given trials? Are they imprisoned for opinions?Tell me how you arrived at the conclusion that you would rather be jailed in China than in the USA. You made your claim twice, support it.
Right your boss would like it much better if you told him:
"Great plan, Einstein. You're a goddamn genius."
You didn't use the forbidden R word, so all is good.
You'll go far.
You're an apologist coward, Bill. You belong in a Chinese prison, bottom line.
Actually, he might be an employee just doing his job as directed. The logic that it is okay to jail only a million people without trial because 'Murrica bad! is just ludicrous.
Yeah, America jails too many people. This was the result of three major things. Thig one was the "get tough on crime" movement, the victim's right's movement, and the for profit prison system. All were intertwined.
The biggest problem of making the prison system a profit center is that like all corporate entities, you have to make more profit the next quarter. And there are limits to how cheaply you can maintain prisoners, so the answer is to make sure you have more prisoners in prison for a longer time.
For that, the magic elixir of the outrageous mandatory penalties for non-crime crimes like weed possession, the three strikes rules that could put a person in prison for life for silly things like shoplifting food, and the ability of the victims to keep a person in prison based on how they feel.
I can be sympathetic to the victims, but the rest of those assholes should be the ones behind bars.
But here's the thing - it isn't a crime for me to express that opinion. Bill should try some pointed criticism at the Chinese government - calling them assholes that belong in prison.
Most estimates are that there are less than a million detained in the Xinjiang camps.
Well then, all is well, and China wins the humanitarian award for this year! Only a million detained for no actual crime. That's just the noise floor.
You are an intelligent guy - But this is the dumbest thing you've ever written. What's your spin on the 1959 Cultural revolution famine?
Umm, try reading the article, lee
Enjoy being a victim. Because everything is so haaarrrd!
It just occurred to me, but go ahead and have fun with it!
One side effect of Forcing those âoedudesâ out of leadership careers is that when these women decide that its time to get married and have a family, the pool of acceptable men has shrunk a lot. They want a well paid man in a leadership role as a husband. Very few women marry down. But there are now very few that fit the requirements, and if a well to do male reaches his mi 30â(TM)s - early 40â(TM)s without getting married, he is probably enjoying the bachelor life.
While one might realize a profit from their home selling, it is an odd investment. You have to have a place to live, and the monthly rent is always due. We paid off our house several years ago, and the lack of a couple thousand mortgage payment every month is like a very nice raise. Now for the millennial and on young people, yes there are expenses. One guy I know spends around 500 a month on his phone bill. My point has always been live below your means when you are young. Then around the time you hit middle age, youâ(TM)ll be surprised how much money you have. Its almost pointless to point this out though. Most people donâ(TM)t have a good grasp of money and basic math. Thatâ(TM)s how it was when I entered the workforce, and it is the same today.
In polite company, a person can discuss and disagree without calling the other person a moron or retarded. Try disagreeing with your boss and call him or her âoeidiot âoe. In here, it isnâ(TM)t faux pas so much. But in either case, it shows an inability to form a good argumen when you resort to that sort of language. But do as you are able.
Hah! Whiny little shit. I was retired 3 years before he passed away. Didnâ(TM)t even know that he had the money. But you just continue being the archetypal victim. Spend all your money as quick as you can. Iâ(TM)ve seen your future, and the only thing that you have stockpiled is blaming others for your failures