Shudder.... Well, figuring a rule 34 happening, I plunged in, did a DuckDuckGo, and.......
I think they actually do...Jeebuuz k. Rist! But I'm too afraid to click the links - imgine if the wife walks in when I'm looking at that! "It's not what it looks like honey! I'm doing important internet research - Seriously!!"
I mean Two Girls One Cup would be a walk in the park by comparison.
Whoops, bad advice. While it prevents the addition of new sites to the browser history, incognito mode doesn't erase the record of sites already visit. So it's better simply to create a new profile from scratch and then delete that profile. Now I think incognito mode is really a brain damaged idea, because it raises false expectations of privacy.
As well, your ISP is keeping records of you. There simply is no privacy on the intertoobz. It was never designed to be that way. And if you use TOR, there are others who will take great interest in you. About the only use of incognito mode is to keep your spouse from finding out about that shemale midget scat porn some folks like.
it has become pretty clear that women by and large simply do not like men, and a majority of them hate men. From this article...
Most of the women I meet love men. You know just as not all men are rapists, not all women are extreme feminists. Get away from the keyboard, and go out and meet some real people.
I would be a fool to say that all women hate men. But here is the problem. Change. Many women change over time. Most divorces are initiated be women, and one of the biggest reasons is irreconcilable differences. Which of course could mean she was angry at the color of your new rototiller.
If you are blessed to have almost all of the women you meet love men, then I am quite happy for you. Your's will be a fulfilling life and you will marry only once, if you choose to.
Because I'm talking about trends, not individuals. I will have been married 40 years this year to the same woman. She very much likes men. A lot of men work for her. Oddly enough, she doesn't like women all that much, having taken a lot of abuse from them over the years for her appearance. Tall, slender, and attractive. A lot of women can't stand those traits in another woman.
There is little evidence available to support that assertion. In fact there has been considerable empirical evidence suggesting exactly the opposite.
So when do you figure we'll be at infinity?
Regardless - I don't really care, because I'm tailoring my electrical use, and the more that grid power goes up, the sooner I'll be saving money off grid.
I wouldn't say turn in a climate scientist for Jesus, but I see more anti science rants from the SJWs than from anyone else.
All of the fringe groups hate science, bith left, right, and alt.
Fringe groups tend to believe in things like triumph of the will, where if you only believe hard enough, you can bend the rules of physics to whatever you want them to be.
But seriously, you actually see more anti-science from SJW's than deniers of the so called greenhouse effect? If it didn't exist, neither would we. Hey, I suspect that 3/4 of slashdot is anti-science, and this ain't no bastion of special snowflake liberals.
I think that idea is comforting to a certain kind of person, but I don't see that.
You can get in way more financial trouble with child support, and that doesn't require marriage.
That's why I have to chuckle when people say that I reference edge cases. This was a case of a female couple who wanted a child (which I support by the way) but one of them later sued the man for child support and won. Any man who donates sperm better be willing to support that child if the couple wants that to happen.
Peter Thiel sounds like the classic paternalistic moron who thinks that every problem needs him to solve it. People will get married or they won't. Who really cares?
Asshole fits as well. I suspect that the pushback is not based on being an asshole though. It takes special powers of denial to try to tap dance around what has happened.
As for caring about it, I don't, unless the aggrieved ladies don't become eligible to go after the In-Laws to take their money for child support. Note that it has been attempted. In 1988 in a case in Louisiana, a woman sued her child's paternal grandparents under Loiusiana's version of the Elizabethan Poor Law. She won, but lost on appeal. In general, the courts do not enforce child support from grandparents who are not in logo parentis.
So far.
The issue is there are a lot of women who would like children, and th esocial experiment has them hitting their mid thirties, and suddenly wondering where all the good men went. Some of us are out riding our motorcycles. It's less risky.
Of course not. It is an object lesson in making all problems the fault of the males though. A good example is what happened in primary and secondary schools. Finding a male teacher outside of say a football coach is getting very difficult. But even back in my high school days I heard that male teachers are very suspicious - why would a man who in't a pedophile be interested in teaching? And now, males are becoming extinct in teaching http://professionallyspeaking....
So the crime of teachers engaging in sex with underage students has gone completely away - we totally fixed the problem.
Then again, perhaps I am assuming the gender of these teachers who like to fuck children:
http://www.zimbio.com/The+50+Most+Infamous+Female+Teacher+Sex+Scandals . Fortunately, the female teacher's are once again, the victims. http://www.ign.com/boards/thre... Males - is there anything they do that isn't wrong? Child male rapists, wearing down the defenses of the selfless adult women that the child then proceeds to rape. A 34 year old woman who is defenseless against a child male, merely points out the insidious level of the patriarchy. Lest you think this is an isolated case there is more teacher rape by male rapist children: http://rare.us/rare-news/whats...
Adding the 110 gigawatts of "capacity" is a drop in the bucket. Capacity doesn't mean much actual power generated when it comes to solar.
We won't always use more and more power.
My place is very well insulated, I am running LED lights all over the house, and bought the most efficient of all our appliances.
The results? the Electrical company sends out notices regarding electrical use. Turns out my neighbors beside me use 10 percent less electricity than I do. Considering they are only home perhaps 5 days a month, that doesn't seem too bad.
I forgot to tell you, I have an efficient outside spa that is kept at 104 degress farenheit all winter long in the Northeast. In addition to a super efficient gas furnace that likewise has a really efficient blower fan. I could switch to a Solar city shingle system like the one Musk promotes and take tiny little sips from the grid with no effect on lifestyle and comfort.
Don't believe everything the opponents of alternative and high efficiency tell you. These things don't self destruct the second the warrantee is up. The payback times people cite are wildly pessimistic. A non electrical example is my furnace, which wasn't cheap, but considering that I'm paying about as much the entire winter what with switching from oil to gas, and the insane efficiency of the thing - there is no chimney as such, just a PVC pipe running outside - I'm spending about as much for an entire winter as people with my size place pay per month during the heating season. Payback happens pretty quickly when you save thousands every season.
At least they're working toward solving the problem, unlike Australia and USA, who would rather bury their head in the sand, deny there is a problem or spread FUD on renewables.
The world moves on, either with us in the lead, or us behind. The anti technology, anti physics, and anti science views that are becoming the law of the land will ensure that.
I predict that in the next few years, the dollar will be replaced by the yen in international currency.
With all that drivel all you've really done is managed to show that you simply don't have much interaction with women.
On that, you would be grossly incorrect. I am quite circumspect when meeting women, in order to gauge their demeanor, but you shouldn't draw onclusions about things you know nought about.
The fact you have to base your ideas about what women know and think on a couple of hard-line feminist websites, rather than, you know, actually talking to any of them is incredibly telling.
I go to a lot of websites. I offer tham as references. By the way, in New York, a man can be arrested for manspreading - is that something I just made up? Since you take offense if I offer a citation, look it up yourself. Once again, you are quite capable of making a lot of comentary on things that you presume, not actual facts.
I'll give you a hint - if we women dislike you it's not because of the way you're sitting, or any such thing, but because you've apparently never had an even remotely meaningful conversation with one in your life.
I'll give you a fact, instead of your silly "hint". I've been married for 40 years to a woman who was second in command at a construction based business. Well paid and no one's fool. One thing she did not do is take your approach of making self affirming self validating decisions about other people. Somehow or another, we get along just fine. Of the two of us, she is the most assertive. But she cannot stand what passes for feminism today, the practicioners of which she describes as whiny weaklings, outraged at almost everything, and unable to withstand criticism or anything not personally affirming. That's her thoughts on the matter. And more directly, of the hundreds of women I know, maybe one woman I actively dislikes me. Just a personality conflict, like anyone might have. Not too bad. You really shouldn't try to inject personal unfounded self affirming guess n people. I don't recall making any personal attacks on you.
I'd feel for you if it weren't for the fact that you're such an ass about it all, pretending you're intellectually superior when in reality you're profoundly ignorant in having apparently no clue whatsoever about how half the human race thinks which can only stem from no interaction with them.
Oh my, I neither need nor want your pity, and quite frankly do not care one whit about your turning me into some sort of strawman for whatever the heck it is you are trying to prove. Personal attacks on your part are quite illustrative of all of my generalized points, thank you very much. However I think that this conversation is over right about
Some placed have even enacted laws to prevent manspreading
Weird - a law against that? How fucking uptight are some people?
I doubt very much that the average man or woman or the street would give a shit either way, I suspect it's just an idiot like the magazine writer you quoted getting more attention than they deserve from legislators who are looking for an issue that will get them positive press. Of course that's just an opinion.
New York State. The presumptive reason was people taking too much room on public transit. The source was the third wave feminists, who are apparently so incredibly weak, that this manspreading completely destroys them. But some people have actually been arrested.
I'd better add that I wasn't being critical of your perspective merely that I have seen that toxic environment you speak of being spread in Universities by HR folk and similar who haven't been kept busy enough. They do this stupid shit of demonising people because it's easier than finding the very small number of real criminals. Management accept it because it's seen as spending some effort on campus safety etc and looks good as PR.
It's not so bad elsewhere IMHO.
The insane thing is that the women there knew who was harassing them. The men knew who the men were who were harassing the women, HR knew who the men were who were harassing women, because the women told them specifically who was doing it. And with one exception over the more than 30 years, it was legit. We'd even tell a couple of offenders to knock it off before we were hamstrung by the misandrists.
But the way it was handled was similar to how in high school, and someone gets caught smoking in the restrooms, everyone is punished. All that does is make most everyone angry at the administration, and the guilty do not give a damn. most inefficient and counterproductive.
Do not confuse an idea I present with my attitude, you know not of my attitude, all you know is the idea I presented, in a style that socially aligns with that idea. I am just a little lazy, perhaps bit of a worrier, nothing more. No MGTOW nonsense from me and I find the Mosuo culture interesting and a likely viable solution to the current chaos.
"you know not of my attitude" Holy smokes, someone who writes like I do!
Anyhow, the MGTOW movement is mostly made up of butthurt and broke guys who lost the marriage game, some shy folks who channeled their neurosis into disdain, and some folks who are reacting to the excesses of third wave feminism.
They are the ones making almost all the noise. But there are a lot of males out there who are just leading their lives as single without being that noisy about it.
Thanks for the link to Mosuo culture. An interesting setup, matriarchal and less restriction on sexual activity coexisting together.
I find hardly any logic what so ever in the current religious dogma controls of reproduction and mating which seem heavily tied to forced reproduction and seem quite disgusting.
It is warped, and no doubt. The coexisting concepts of forced birth, after which there is no concern for the offspring is probably due to the co-opting of fundamentalists by a political party for their own purposes, the leaders of which don't care at all except for votes. The last thing the politicians want is for abortion to be made illegal, because it is a hot button issue that allows some folks to vote against their self interests otherwise. That's as close as I can come to any rationale.
I recall that wealthy Republican women had a lot of medical "problems" when I was young and abortion was illegal that required them to undergo a procedure called a D and C. That all seemed to go away for some reason.
Regardless, increasing numbers of men are dropping out of the game as it is currently played. Marriage and reproduction rates are pretty fair indicators of that.
The ammosexuals don't even seem to understand that there can be any other positions except their own and some liberal in a safe room completely anti-gun.
And it doesn't help that the outspoken liberals agree with them on this point.
You'll have to make yourself a lot more clear on that.
Mothers have been telling daughters that forever (apparently). Around the 1980s the press decided they could get a lot more people paying attention and get more lovely ad revenue if they hyped things up as an "epidemic of crime".
I don't disagree with you, but it isn't that simple. In my workplace - a University setting, in the early 80's, we had our first sexual harassment meetings. There was no press or advertisement involved. But it gave a sneak preview of the future.
We were told first and foremost that "anything a woman considers to be sexual harassment by definition - is sexual harassment. We were told that if we even complimented a woman on her appearance, we were skating on very thin ice, and could be "charged". It did not take long to come to the conclusion that the harassment program was being run by people who hated males, and hated them with a passion.
The results? An incredibly toxic atmosphere, where men avoided the women unless there was no way of getting out of an interaction with them, and in most cases, a witness was present, and interaction was terse. The sad part was the creeps who were harassing women? Didn't change a thing on their part. They were known to be creeps before this started, and remained creeps. So the program was an abject failure. It was like a dress rehearsal for MGTOW.
This went on for several years, until women had about enough of that crap. Most women didn't have a problem with a guy telling her he liked her new earrings or haitstyle or that her dress was cute. But it is so difficult to force men to interact in a friendly manner with women if that friendly manner can destroy their career. So we started all over with more realistic guidlines. It helped, but a lot of the people who were there during the cold war were still way reserved around females.
So instead of going to already adult males, the misandry project moved into the schools and families, catching them at an early age. And they succeeded - sort of.
Humans, left or right wing, liberal or conservative, can be easily manipulated by pointing out to them what they should hate. With hate being a core competency of humans, they will assimilate and pick up the cause pretty quickly.
Gay's, Christians, Muslims, Gun owners, people who do not own guns, nerds, hipsters, women, and men. It's a big list though - so many things to hate. And so hard for most to break out of what they have been inculcated their whole lives.
The problem of course is that even though we males are all rapists and pedophiles, parthenogenesis has not been perfected. And avoiding women is hard to make into a crime.
Manspreading” is essentially part of rape culture."
Idiots writing shit to sell magazines will write shit. Don't tell me you also thought those horoscopes in those magazines were real?
You are taking what I gave as an example, and trying to make it look like I am saying all women think this way. Don't do that. Some placed have even enacted laws to prevent manspreading - http://www.huffingtonpost.com/... which even huffpo disagrees with. But how do you think the whole thing got started? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
I think it's a deeper problem and not a new one - most of America just seems to be scared of sex yet despite being the land of sleaze.
I think it is more like the consequenses.
Maybe go on a holiday somewhere to a place where bare boobs on a beach are common and women breastfeeding in public is just normal. Maybe if the silicon valley kids did that they wouldn't be so damned uptight when they get home.
As I noted in another posting, I suspect that the increase in males getting counseling is probably friendzone guys. That's
I own several, and let me tell you; the average guy I meet at the range or my private dealer are basically ammo-sexual. My dealer even went so far as to point out how I didn't seem that excited about my recent purchases.
Maybe it's because I take gun safety seriously...
A million times THIS. Go watch youtube where someone's busy shooting up a lawn mower and loses his leg, or giving a tiny woman a rifle and watching the fun ensue when she either falls over or rams the scope into her eye. Or the people who have a stack of guns in every room, including the children's plastic toy guns, and little sis gutshoots her brother and kills him and they claim it's a second amendment issue.
These are the people who stand between us and tyranny? Heaven help us when Jackass for rifle rounds are the heros.
The ammosexuals don't even seem to understand that there can be any other positions except their own and some liberal in a safe room completely anti-gun.
I have a number of firearms, and use them responsibly, and very carefully. They are devices used to kill, not blow up lawn mowers. I would be no fun at your dealer either.
. But why would a lack of sexual desire be a problem? It seems like it should make life easier. Let the rabbits get on with the procreating while you do whatever it is you are interested in.
A lot of people are concerned because the reproduction rate is falling. And it's falling especially among intelligent people.
I think that what has happened is that the male of the species has been marginalized to the point where many of the husband material guys - high earnings, non-violent, pleasant, civil disposition, and intelligent - have come to the conclusion that the much better than average chance that their wife will take them to the cleaners in a divorce, and make their lives miserable, that they just don't play that game any more.
I suspect that these guys mentioned in the story in sexual therapy are the friendzone guys, who have bought into the idea that if they become a sort of male/female BFF chimera, that their friendzoning female is going to engage in sex with them.
So with not wanting to sexually engage with the friendzone guys, and the guys who are considered husband material completely tuned out via simple risk/reward assessments, the only people left to provide the desired offspring are the jerks.
Slashdot Mirror
... shemale midget scat porn ...
So, no link?
No.
Because you only think about yourself.
Shudder.... Well, figuring a rule 34 happening, I plunged in, did a DuckDuckGo, and.......
I think they actually do...Jeebuuz k. Rist! But I'm too afraid to click the links - imgine if the wife walks in when I'm looking at that! "It's not what it looks like honey! I'm doing important internet research - Seriously!!"
I mean Two Girls One Cup would be a walk in the park by comparison.
Whoops, bad advice. While it prevents the addition of new sites to the browser history, incognito mode doesn't erase the record of sites already visit. So it's better simply to create a new profile from scratch and then delete that profile. Now I think incognito mode is really a brain damaged idea, because it raises false expectations of privacy.
As well, your ISP is keeping records of you. There simply is no privacy on the intertoobz. It was never designed to be that way. And if you use TOR, there are others who will take great interest in you. About the only use of incognito mode is to keep your spouse from finding out about that shemale midget scat porn some folks like.
Did you mean "by the yuan", perhaps?
Yuan all the rest of the folks are correct......
it has become pretty clear that women by and large simply do not like men, and a majority of them hate men. From this article ...
Most of the women I meet love men. You know just as not all men are rapists, not all women are extreme feminists. Get away from the keyboard, and go out and meet some real people.
I would be a fool to say that all women hate men. But here is the problem. Change. Many women change over time. Most divorces are initiated be women, and one of the biggest reasons is irreconcilable differences. Which of course could mean she was angry at the color of your new rototiller.
If you are blessed to have almost all of the women you meet love men, then I am quite happy for you. Your's will be a fulfilling life and you will marry only once, if you choose to.
Because I'm talking about trends, not individuals. I will have been married 40 years this year to the same woman. She very much likes men. A lot of men work for her. Oddly enough, she doesn't like women all that much, having taken a lot of abuse from them over the years for her appearance. Tall, slender, and attractive. A lot of women can't stand those traits in another woman.
We won't always use more and more power.
There is little evidence available to support that assertion. In fact there has been considerable empirical evidence suggesting exactly the opposite.
So when do you figure we'll be at infinity?
Regardless - I don't really care, because I'm tailoring my electrical use, and the more that grid power goes up, the sooner I'll be saving money off grid.
Future of United States
YIKES!
Yeah, and obama supporters voted for 'hope and change'. They got a basketball playing george bush, at least as far as civil liberties go.
Because Basketball playing George Bush somehow is worse than the Bowling Green Massacre.
You seriosly need to put out a newsletter citizen, because you obviously think correctly.
I wouldn't say turn in a climate scientist for Jesus, but I see more anti science rants from the SJWs than from anyone else.
All of the fringe groups hate science, bith left, right, and alt.
Fringe groups tend to believe in things like triumph of the will, where if you only believe hard enough, you can bend the rules of physics to whatever you want them to be.
But seriously, you actually see more anti-science from SJW's than deniers of the so called greenhouse effect? If it didn't exist, neither would we. Hey, I suspect that 3/4 of slashdot is anti-science, and this ain't no bastion of special snowflake liberals.
I think that idea is comforting to a certain kind of person, but I don't see that. You can get in way more financial trouble with child support, and that doesn't require marriage.
You can be hit for child support if you are only the sperm donor. http://www.cnn.com/2014/01/23/...
That's why I have to chuckle when people say that I reference edge cases. This was a case of a female couple who wanted a child (which I support by the way) but one of them later sued the man for child support and won. Any man who donates sperm better be willing to support that child if the couple wants that to happen.
Peter Thiel sounds like the classic paternalistic moron who thinks that every problem needs him to solve it. People will get married or they won't. Who really cares?
Asshole fits as well. I suspect that the pushback is not based on being an asshole though. It takes special powers of denial to try to tap dance around what has happened.
As for caring about it, I don't, unless the aggrieved ladies don't become eligible to go after the In-Laws to take their money for child support. Note that it has been attempted. In 1988 in a case in Louisiana, a woman sued her child's paternal grandparents under Loiusiana's version of the Elizabethan Poor Law. She won, but lost on appeal. In general, the courts do not enforce child support from grandparents who are not in logo parentis.
So far.
The issue is there are a lot of women who would like children, and th esocial experiment has them hitting their mid thirties, and suddenly wondering where all the good men went. Some of us are out riding our motorcycles. It's less risky.
Yup, it's all the women's fault.
Of course not. It is an object lesson in making all problems the fault of the males though. A good example is what happened in primary and secondary schools. Finding a male teacher outside of say a football coach is getting very difficult. But even back in my high school days I heard that male teachers are very suspicious - why would a man who in't a pedophile be interested in teaching? And now, males are becoming extinct in teaching http://professionallyspeaking....
So the crime of teachers engaging in sex with underage students has gone completely away - we totally fixed the problem.
Then again, perhaps I am assuming the gender of these teachers who like to fuck children:
http://www.zimbio.com/The+50+Most+Infamous+Female+Teacher+Sex+Scandals . Fortunately, the female teacher's are once again, the victims. http://www.ign.com/boards/thre... Males - is there anything they do that isn't wrong? Child male rapists, wearing down the defenses of the selfless adult women that the child then proceeds to rape. A 34 year old woman who is defenseless against a child male, merely points out the insidious level of the patriarchy. Lest you think this is an isolated case there is more teacher rape by male rapist children: http://rare.us/rare-news/whats...
http://www.seattletimes.com/li... It isn't abuse - it's a relationship.
Adding the 110 gigawatts of "capacity" is a drop in the bucket. Capacity doesn't mean much actual power generated when it comes to solar.
We won't always use more and more power.
My place is very well insulated, I am running LED lights all over the house, and bought the most efficient of all our appliances.
The results? the Electrical company sends out notices regarding electrical use. Turns out my neighbors beside me use 10 percent less electricity than I do. Considering they are only home perhaps 5 days a month, that doesn't seem too bad.
I forgot to tell you, I have an efficient outside spa that is kept at 104 degress farenheit all winter long in the Northeast. In addition to a super efficient gas furnace that likewise has a really efficient blower fan. I could switch to a Solar city shingle system like the one Musk promotes and take tiny little sips from the grid with no effect on lifestyle and comfort.
Don't believe everything the opponents of alternative and high efficiency tell you. These things don't self destruct the second the warrantee is up. The payback times people cite are wildly pessimistic. A non electrical example is my furnace, which wasn't cheap, but considering that I'm paying about as much the entire winter what with switching from oil to gas, and the insane efficiency of the thing - there is no chimney as such, just a PVC pipe running outside - I'm spending about as much for an entire winter as people with my size place pay per month during the heating season. Payback happens pretty quickly when you save thousands every season.
At least they're working toward solving the problem, unlike Australia and USA, who would rather bury their head in the sand, deny there is a problem or spread FUD on renewables.
The world moves on, either with us in the lead, or us behind. The anti technology, anti physics, and anti science views that are becoming the law of the land will ensure that.
I predict that in the next few years, the dollar will be replaced by the yen in international currency.
Turn in a climate scientist for Jesus.
With all that drivel all you've really done is managed to show that you simply don't have much interaction with women.
On that, you would be grossly incorrect. I am quite circumspect when meeting women, in order to gauge their demeanor, but you shouldn't draw onclusions about things you know nought about.
The fact you have to base your ideas about what women know and think on a couple of hard-line feminist websites, rather than, you know, actually talking to any of them is incredibly telling.
I go to a lot of websites. I offer tham as references. By the way, in New York, a man can be arrested for manspreading - is that something I just made up? Since you take offense if I offer a citation, look it up yourself. Once again, you are quite capable of making a lot of comentary on things that you presume, not actual facts.
I'll give you a hint - if we women dislike you it's not because of the way you're sitting, or any such thing, but because you've apparently never had an even remotely meaningful conversation with one in your life.
I'll give you a fact, instead of your silly "hint". I've been married for 40 years to a woman who was second in command at a construction based business. Well paid and no one's fool. One thing she did not do is take your approach of making self affirming self validating decisions about other people. Somehow or another, we get along just fine. Of the two of us, she is the most assertive. But she cannot stand what passes for feminism today, the practicioners of which she describes as whiny weaklings, outraged at almost everything, and unable to withstand criticism or anything not personally affirming. That's her thoughts on the matter. And more directly, of the hundreds of women I know, maybe one woman I actively dislikes me. Just a personality conflict, like anyone might have. Not too bad. You really shouldn't try to inject personal unfounded self affirming guess n people. I don't recall making any personal attacks on you.
I'd feel for you if it weren't for the fact that you're such an ass about it all, pretending you're intellectually superior when in reality you're profoundly ignorant in having apparently no clue whatsoever about how half the human race thinks which can only stem from no interaction with them.
Oh my, I neither need nor want your pity, and quite frankly do not care one whit about your turning me into some sort of strawman for whatever the heck it is you are trying to prove. Personal attacks on your part are quite illustrative of all of my generalized points, thank you very much. However I think that this conversation is over right about
Weird - a law against that? How fucking uptight are some people?
I doubt very much that the average man or woman or the street would give a shit either way, I suspect it's just an idiot like the magazine writer you quoted getting more attention than they deserve from legislators who are looking for an issue that will get them positive press. Of course that's just an opinion.
New York State. The presumptive reason was people taking too much room on public transit. The source was the third wave feminists, who are apparently so incredibly weak, that this manspreading completely destroys them. But some people have actually been arrested.
I'd better add that I wasn't being critical of your perspective merely that I have seen that toxic environment you speak of being spread in Universities by HR folk and similar who haven't been kept busy enough. They do this stupid shit of demonising people because it's easier than finding the very small number of real criminals. Management accept it because it's seen as spending some effort on campus safety etc and looks good as PR. It's not so bad elsewhere IMHO.
The insane thing is that the women there knew who was harassing them. The men knew who the men were who were harassing the women, HR knew who the men were who were harassing women, because the women told them specifically who was doing it. And with one exception over the more than 30 years, it was legit. We'd even tell a couple of offenders to knock it off before we were hamstrung by the misandrists.
But the way it was handled was similar to how in high school, and someone gets caught smoking in the restrooms, everyone is punished. All that does is make most everyone angry at the administration, and the guilty do not give a damn. most inefficient and counterproductive.
Do not confuse an idea I present with my attitude, you know not of my attitude, all you know is the idea I presented, in a style that socially aligns with that idea. I am just a little lazy, perhaps bit of a worrier, nothing more. No MGTOW nonsense from me and I find the Mosuo culture interesting and a likely viable solution to the current chaos.
"you know not of my attitude" Holy smokes, someone who writes like I do!
Anyhow, the MGTOW movement is mostly made up of butthurt and broke guys who lost the marriage game, some shy folks who channeled their neurosis into disdain, and some folks who are reacting to the excesses of third wave feminism.
They are the ones making almost all the noise. But there are a lot of males out there who are just leading their lives as single without being that noisy about it.
Thanks for the link to Mosuo culture. An interesting setup, matriarchal and less restriction on sexual activity coexisting together.
I find hardly any logic what so ever in the current religious dogma controls of reproduction and mating which seem heavily tied to forced reproduction and seem quite disgusting.
It is warped, and no doubt. The coexisting concepts of forced birth, after which there is no concern for the offspring is probably due to the co-opting of fundamentalists by a political party for their own purposes, the leaders of which don't care at all except for votes. The last thing the politicians want is for abortion to be made illegal, because it is a hot button issue that allows some folks to vote against their self interests otherwise. That's as close as I can come to any rationale.
I recall that wealthy Republican women had a lot of medical "problems" when I was young and abortion was illegal that required them to undergo a procedure called a D and C. That all seemed to go away for some reason.
Regardless, increasing numbers of men are dropping out of the game as it is currently played. Marriage and reproduction rates are pretty fair indicators of that.
Sorry, I couldn't hear you over the sound of how awesome my 'Beats by Dre' headphones are.
The absolute gold standard for listening to autotuned lyrics.
The ammosexuals don't even seem to understand that there can be any other positions except their own and some liberal in a safe room completely anti-gun.
And it doesn't help that the outspoken liberals agree with them on this point.
You'll have to make yourself a lot more clear on that.
If it was PBR or Coors, sure.
Sir! I said Beer, not PeeWaa!
Mothers have been telling daughters that forever (apparently). Around the 1980s the press decided they could get a lot more people paying attention and get more lovely ad revenue if they hyped things up as an "epidemic of crime".
I don't disagree with you, but it isn't that simple. In my workplace - a University setting, in the early 80's, we had our first sexual harassment meetings. There was no press or advertisement involved. But it gave a sneak preview of the future.
We were told first and foremost that "anything a woman considers to be sexual harassment by definition - is sexual harassment. We were told that if we even complimented a woman on her appearance, we were skating on very thin ice, and could be "charged". It did not take long to come to the conclusion that the harassment program was being run by people who hated males, and hated them with a passion.
The results? An incredibly toxic atmosphere, where men avoided the women unless there was no way of getting out of an interaction with them, and in most cases, a witness was present, and interaction was terse. The sad part was the creeps who were harassing women? Didn't change a thing on their part. They were known to be creeps before this started, and remained creeps. So the program was an abject failure. It was like a dress rehearsal for MGTOW.
This went on for several years, until women had about enough of that crap. Most women didn't have a problem with a guy telling her he liked her new earrings or haitstyle or that her dress was cute. But it is so difficult to force men to interact in a friendly manner with women if that friendly manner can destroy their career. So we started all over with more realistic guidlines. It helped, but a lot of the people who were there during the cold war were still way reserved around females.
So instead of going to already adult males, the misandry project moved into the schools and families, catching them at an early age. And they succeeded - sort of.
Humans, left or right wing, liberal or conservative, can be easily manipulated by pointing out to them what they should hate. With hate being a core competency of humans, they will assimilate and pick up the cause pretty quickly.
Gay's, Christians, Muslims, Gun owners, people who do not own guns, nerds, hipsters, women, and men. It's a big list though - so many things to hate. And so hard for most to break out of what they have been inculcated their whole lives.
The problem of course is that even though we males are all rapists and pedophiles, parthenogenesis has not been perfected. And avoiding women is hard to make into a crime.
Idiots writing shit to sell magazines will write shit. Don't tell me you also thought those horoscopes in those magazines were real?
You are taking what I gave as an example, and trying to make it look like I am saying all women think this way. Don't do that. Some placed have even enacted laws to prevent manspreading - http://www.huffingtonpost.com/... which even huffpo disagrees with. But how do you think the whole thing got started? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
I think it's a deeper problem and not a new one - most of America just seems to be scared of sex yet despite being the land of sleaze.
I think it is more like the consequenses.
Maybe go on a holiday somewhere to a place where bare boobs on a beach are common and women breastfeeding in public is just normal. Maybe if the silicon valley kids did that they wouldn't be so damned uptight when they get home.
As I noted in another posting, I suspect that the increase in males getting counseling is probably friendzone guys. That's
"The lack of women in SF ultimately does not matter."
My first really good relationship was a woman who wrote SF.
Hopefully she didn't have SF!
I own several, and let me tell you; the average guy I meet at the range or my private dealer are basically ammo-sexual. My dealer even went so far as to point out how I didn't seem that excited about my recent purchases.
Maybe it's because I take gun safety seriously ...
A million times THIS. Go watch youtube where someone's busy shooting up a lawn mower and loses his leg, or giving a tiny woman a rifle and watching the fun ensue when she either falls over or rams the scope into her eye. Or the people who have a stack of guns in every room, including the children's plastic toy guns, and little sis gutshoots her brother and kills him and they claim it's a second amendment issue.
These are the people who stand between us and tyranny? Heaven help us when Jackass for rifle rounds are the heros.
The ammosexuals don't even seem to understand that there can be any other positions except their own and some liberal in a safe room completely anti-gun.
I have a number of firearms, and use them responsibly, and very carefully. They are devices used to kill, not blow up lawn mowers. I would be no fun at your dealer either.
. But why would a lack of sexual desire be a problem? It seems like it should make life easier. Let the rabbits get on with the procreating while you do whatever it is you are interested in.
A lot of people are concerned because the reproduction rate is falling. And it's falling especially among intelligent people.
I think that what has happened is that the male of the species has been marginalized to the point where many of the husband material guys - high earnings, non-violent, pleasant, civil disposition, and intelligent - have come to the conclusion that the much better than average chance that their wife will take them to the cleaners in a divorce, and make their lives miserable, that they just don't play that game any more.
I suspect that these guys mentioned in the story in sexual therapy are the friendzone guys, who have bought into the idea that if they become a sort of male/female BFF chimera, that their friendzoning female is going to engage in sex with them.
So with not wanting to sexually engage with the friendzone guys, and the guys who are considered husband material completely tuned out via simple risk/reward assessments, the only people left to provide the desired offspring are the jerks.
No, that's Diurinal, durinal impulses are from the durian gland.
Which is durable as it turns out.
Overwork, constantly subverting the durinal impulse,"
You have two urinals?