haha! soon this will be the first/. article to break 1000 comments...
Gnome is for sysadmins - not home users
on
GNOME 1.0 Released
·
· Score: 1
That's ridiculous. The GNOME agenda is to provide a quality, customizable, completely open-source desktop project. KDE is not only inherently less customizable, it is less flexible because of their choice of c++.
That's absurd. KDE uses as many libraries as GNOME, and it's not nearly as fully-featured -- it is just what happens when someone crosses OpenLook with Win98.:)
Why should the authors of GNOME re-invent the wheel? The authors of KDE were so bent on using C++ that they created software which violated the GPL, just because the libraries (Qt) were available.
I'm running a SB16 PnP which worked fine under 2.0.36, but which doesn't work under 2.2.1. I get the fabled "device or resource busy" when initializing the sb module (it's choking on the DMA address). Has anyone had any luck with a similar setup? Is this fixed in 2.2?
I'm running a SB16 PnP which worked fine under 2.0.36, but which doesn't work under 2.2. I get the fabled "device or resource busy" when initializing the sb module. Has anyone had any luck with a similar setup?
wow, I found about this BEFORE reading it on slashdot...heh.
The new version uses mpg123, and skips a little more. It seems a bit flakier, but it actually has a *lot* of new features. (feature set -- not just l&f -- reminds me of winamp on my girlfriend's computer)
Yeah, but your "solution" would break the distinction between IPs and domain names, which is only enforced by -- you guessed it -- the registrar. If I had an IP address 123.69.42.37, under your scheme, I could register "123.69.42.38" as a domain name for it, and no TCP/IP program would know better...
Slashdot Mirror
but KDE swallows.
haha! soon this will be the first /. article to break 1000 comments...
That's ridiculous. The GNOME agenda is to provide a quality, customizable, completely open-source desktop project. KDE is not only inherently less customizable, it is less flexible because of their choice of c++.
That's absurd. KDE uses as many libraries as GNOME, and it's not nearly as fully-featured -- it is just what happens when someone crosses OpenLook with Win98. :)
Why should the authors of GNOME re-invent the wheel? The authors of KDE were so bent on using C++ that they created software which violated the GPL, just because the libraries (Qt) were available.
sndconfig is broken in 2.2.x for SB cards because the module expects different arguments than it did in 2.0.x
I have already run isapnp and modprobe -- isapnp works, but modprobe fails with "device or resource busy".
wog
I'm running a SB16 PnP which worked fine under 2.0.36, but which doesn't work under 2.2.1. I get the fabled "device or resource busy" when initializing the sb module (it's choking on the DMA address). Has anyone had any luck with a similar setup? Is this fixed in 2.2?
wog
I'm running a SB16 PnP which worked fine under 2.0.36, but which doesn't work under 2.2. I get the fabled "device or resource busy" when initializing the sb module. Has anyone had any luck with a similar setup?
wog
If you install GNOME 0.99.3 over RH 5.2, you'll have the right versions.
cheers,
wb
wow, I found about this BEFORE reading it on slashdot...heh.
The new version uses mpg123, and skips a little more. It seems a bit flakier, but it actually has a *lot* of new features. (feature set -- not just l&f -- reminds me of winamp on my girlfriend's computer)
cheers,
wb
Yeah, but your "solution" would break the distinction between IPs and domain names, which is only enforced by -- you guessed it -- the registrar. If I had an IP address 123.69.42.37, under your scheme, I could register "123.69.42.38" as a domain name for it, and no TCP/IP program would know better...
How are they planning to coordinate these five companies?
Sounds like they'll still need one central server...
Hey, has anyone had any serious touuble with the new kernel in a stock RH 5.2 system?
(I'm trying to decide if I have enough free time to upgrade today...heh.)
Thanks,
wb