How is that a problem? Everyone knows eating ass is 6.5 out of 10. (Originally rated at 6, but upgraded to 6.5 after some further thought on the matter.) Just Bing for the official eating ass review. (Yes, it's SFW.)
I think it's probably a good thing too, but will it stand the test of judicial review?
If I am a business and I want to put a non-disparagement clause or review gag order into my contracts, I don't see why I can't. Nobody is forced to do business with me, and they entered knowingly (presumably) into the agreement.
First amendment guarantees the right to free speech. At best you can sue a person for the direct damage they caused if their statements were false. Most likely you'd only be able to nullify the contract.
You do not have the right to stop another person from speaking. Neither does the government, even though they often do.
Since they're built on the HTML5 mobile web standard, the games load in seconds and don't need to be downloaded.
Man, I must be out of touch! I didn't realize HTML5 was a "mobile web standard".
I thought it was a version of a marketing^W markup language that is unstable^W agile, poorly^W diversely supported, and terribly^W uniquely implemented. And you don't even need to DOWNLOAD DATA with HTML5! That puts the WWW in WOWWW!!!
Nothing viable in the modern market or in the near future, as far as I can see. It really fucking sucks. I went from being an enthusiastic early adopter of smartphones (well before the iPhone) to being a jaded, hateful pile of salt.
You're a troll and Android is also shit, is not open source, and it basically malware itself, but iPhones are also shit and the morons who use them don't matter anymore than the rest of the morons who use Android, black turtleneck or not.
States appoint the electors. They have no other power over them. It is the electors who vote. You can't buy, sell, or coerce votes, even through the force of law.
Not reading the rest of your little rant. You don't like the electoral college because your side lost. The problem is that you picked a "side" to begin with. I don't see you campaigning and petitioning for an amendment or constitutional convention to get rid of the electoral college. i see you whining and bitching on the internet.
Requiring Electors to vote a certain way is blatantly unconstitutional. It goes against the very purpose of the Electoral College. That hasn't been tested in the Supreme Court. All that has been tested is requiring a pledge from each of the Electors. No one has tested holding them to that pledge because it's fucking insane and obviously illegal.
However, I wouldn't put anything past the current Supreme Court, unfortunately.
some electors are legally bound to vote with their state, etc.
False. Some states require electors to sign a pledge agreeing to vote however the state says. They can require them to sign the pledge but they can't require them to honor the pledge.
The Electors are free to elect any eligible person to the office of the President.
American has never ever been better than it is today
The housing market, the job market, the middle class, our civil liberties, and just about everything else would like to have a word for you. But they're can't, because they're dead.
1. Regulations are not created by some evil Liberul cabal in Berkeley that sits around smoking weed and drinking espressos saying, "How can we make business more difficult. Regulations arise because there is at least a few assholes who think, "If it's not illegal, then it's OK!" - even if it causes the deaths of people. So these regulations didn't come out of thin air - somewhere, they are (or were) protecting someone.
2. Corporate taxes are comparatively excessive in the US - even compared to evil Socialist European tax systems. BUT, any tax cuts means revenues will have to be made up somewhere else and let's give up on the fantasy that lowering taxes boosts the economy enough to wash out the tax cuts.
3. The stock markets are hoping that the Republican controlled government does what Republicans do best: cut taxes, spend like a motherfucker, and borrow the short falls. "Bringing manufacturing jobs back" looks like a cover for doing just that.
4. And when deficits go further through the roof, the Republicans will just blame Obama.
5. I bet Trump's imagined wealth that this will in fact happen.
1: Plenty of regulations are awful and need to be scrapped. See most things related to the ADA, for example.
2: Corporations aren't fucking paying ANY taxes because they use loopholes to claim they're headquartered in Ireland or some shit. Lowering the corporate tax rate and tightening those loopholes would be a massive net gain.
3: Don't pretend you know what the stock market wants. Don't pretend that it's based on reality in any way.
4: You're assuming deficits will go further through the roof. Even if they do, what's the acceptable cutoff period for blaming Obama? Is it 8 years after the acceptable cutoff period for Obama and the Dems blaming Bush Jr. for everything from the economy to that big yellow thing in the sky? If not, go fuck yourself.
5: Oh, envy and salt. Good to know.
Trump's a moron in many ways and an asshole in general, but he's not wrong here.
Here's the "how": National Security Letter handed directly to Tim Cook. Build your shit here and pay some portion of taxes or take a permanent vacation to Super Gitmo while we force your staff to put backdoors into every iThing made form here on out.
Welcome to Slashdot! Please check your logic and sanity at the door. msmash will show you to the latest clickbait, or you can follow BeuaHD to the Slashvertisements, though you'll have to sit through a few of his unintelligible summaries that he somehow copy pastad incorrectly.
What you have is protection from the state digging around for evidence that you had an abortion because the state's interest in protecting a fetus doesn't let it violate the constitution.
The media and fools like you like to frame it as "abortion rights" because abortion is a divisive issue. By letting them chip away at "abortion right", about half of the country will support you (and more than half if you do it gradually enough). The real effect is that it chips away at the constitution, and your protections against the government in general. That's FAR more serious than "abortion rights".
Slashdot Mirror
That doesn't get you past bitlocker, though.
He's just slutting out his aliexpress referral link.
the meat tasted like ASS.
How is that a problem? Everyone knows eating ass is 6.5 out of 10. (Originally rated at 6, but upgraded to 6.5 after some further thought on the matter.)
Just Bing for the official eating ass review. (Yes, it's SFW.)
I think it's probably a good thing too, but will it stand the test of judicial review?
If I am a business and I want to put a non-disparagement clause or review gag order into my contracts, I don't see why I can't. Nobody is forced to do business with me, and they entered knowingly (presumably) into the agreement.
First amendment guarantees the right to free speech.
At best you can sue a person for the direct damage they caused if their statements were false. Most likely you'd only be able to nullify the contract.
You do not have the right to stop another person from speaking. Neither does the government, even though they often do.
Since they're built on the HTML5 mobile web standard, the games load in seconds and don't need to be downloaded.
Man, I must be out of touch! I didn't realize HTML5 was a "mobile web standard".
I thought it was a version of a marketing^W markup language that is unstable^W agile, poorly^W diversely supported, and terribly^W uniquely implemented.
And you don't even need to DOWNLOAD DATA with HTML5! That puts the WWW in WOWWW!!!
Today the Finnish company which develops and maintains the core code
Try reading next time.
"Alexa Play Pandora Fallout Boy", "Alexa how many tablespoons are in a cup"
I'm struggling to figure out which of these two is the more retarded request.
The AC you replied to stated a fact.
You're the homophobic bigot who assumed Casey's gender and interpreted it as an insult.
I saw it as a compliment.
It's a perfectly cromulent word.
Nothing viable in the modern market or in the near future, as far as I can see. It really fucking sucks. I went from being an enthusiastic early adopter of smartphones (well before the iPhone) to being a jaded, hateful pile of salt.
You're a troll and Android is also shit, is not open source, and it basically malware itself, but iPhones are also shit and the morons who use them don't matter anymore than the rest of the morons who use Android, black turtleneck or not.
I don't say "evasion". I say "avoision".
H1-B skilled worker visas
Depends on your definition of "skilled".
Not anymore. It's a white X on a green folder with a sheet of paper peeking out.
States appoint the electors. They have no other power over them. It is the electors who vote. You can't buy, sell, or coerce votes, even through the force of law.
Not reading the rest of your little rant. You don't like the electoral college because your side lost. The problem is that you picked a "side" to begin with.
I don't see you campaigning and petitioning for an amendment or constitutional convention to get rid of the electoral college. i see you whining and bitching on the internet.
Or just eat the garlic. Whole bulbs of it. Wario style.
Requiring Electors to vote a certain way is blatantly unconstitutional. It goes against the very purpose of the Electoral College.
That hasn't been tested in the Supreme Court. All that has been tested is requiring a pledge from each of the Electors. No one has tested holding them to that pledge because it's fucking insane and obviously illegal.
However, I wouldn't put anything past the current Supreme Court, unfortunately.
some electors are legally bound to vote with their state, etc.
False. Some states require electors to sign a pledge agreeing to vote however the state says. They can require them to sign the pledge but they can't require them to honor the pledge.
The Electors are free to elect any eligible person to the office of the President.
63% percent of the US population is white. I urge you to get a lawyer and sue every math teacher you ever had.
I urge you to look up stats less than an eon old.
American has never ever been better than it is today
The housing market, the job market, the middle class, our civil liberties, and just about everything else would like to have a word for you. But they're can't, because they're dead.
1. Regulations are not created by some evil Liberul cabal in Berkeley that sits around smoking weed and drinking espressos saying, "How can we make business more difficult. Regulations arise because there is at least a few assholes who think, "If it's not illegal, then it's OK!" - even if it causes the deaths of people. So these regulations didn't come out of thin air - somewhere, they are (or were) protecting someone.
2. Corporate taxes are comparatively excessive in the US - even compared to evil Socialist European tax systems. BUT, any tax cuts means revenues will have to be made up somewhere else and let's give up on the fantasy that lowering taxes boosts the economy enough to wash out the tax cuts.
3. The stock markets are hoping that the Republican controlled government does what Republicans do best: cut taxes, spend like a motherfucker, and borrow the short falls. "Bringing manufacturing jobs back" looks like a cover for doing just that.
4. And when deficits go further through the roof, the Republicans will just blame Obama.
5. I bet Trump's imagined wealth that this will in fact happen.
1: Plenty of regulations are awful and need to be scrapped. See most things related to the ADA, for example.
2: Corporations aren't fucking paying ANY taxes because they use loopholes to claim they're headquartered in Ireland or some shit. Lowering the corporate tax rate and tightening those loopholes would be a massive net gain.
3: Don't pretend you know what the stock market wants. Don't pretend that it's based on reality in any way.
4: You're assuming deficits will go further through the roof. Even if they do, what's the acceptable cutoff period for blaming Obama? Is it 8 years after the acceptable cutoff period for Obama and the Dems blaming Bush Jr. for everything from the economy to that big yellow thing in the sky? If not, go fuck yourself.
5: Oh, envy and salt. Good to know.
Trump's a moron in many ways and an asshole in general, but he's not wrong here.
Here's the "how": National Security Letter handed directly to Tim Cook. Build your shit here and pay some portion of taxes or take a permanent vacation to Super Gitmo while we force your staff to put backdoors into every iThing made form here on out.
Welcome to Slashdot! Please check your logic and sanity at the door. msmash will show you to the latest clickbait, or you can follow BeuaHD to the Slashvertisements, though you'll have to sit through a few of his unintelligible summaries that he somehow copy pastad incorrectly.
Slashdot has its own "editors".
Abortion rights
Where are those enumerated? They aren't.
What you have is protection from the state digging around for evidence that you had an abortion because the state's interest in protecting a fetus doesn't let it violate the constitution.
The media and fools like you like to frame it as "abortion rights" because abortion is a divisive issue. By letting them chip away at "abortion right", about half of the country will support you (and more than half if you do it gradually enough). The real effect is that it chips away at the constitution, and your protections against the government in general. That's FAR more serious than "abortion rights".