So you believe the bit about pulling people to a offsite location and telling them the IRS is going to go back on THEIR tax records 5 years to garnish some imagined top wages that may or may not have already been reported, and somehow quitting would solve it?
I wouldn't put it past a shitty manager to say that kind of shit, even off the record, but no one with a brain would believe it.
Create your own cert and sign it, then the user can set the powershell policy to prompt for untrusted certs. The prompt lets them choose whether or not to run shit each time. They also have the option to accept a particular cert permanently via that same prompt.
When you write your script, you can name your shit properly and describe it properly. Then anyone using it will get a friendly error message saying their usage was wrong and showing what the correct usage is. You also get tab completion for commandlets and arguments and even options for arguments.
I rarely use powershell but when I do I always appreciate the fact that it's actually pretty great. This is coming from a STRONK hater of nearly everything MS has done in the last 4 years.
1: The word you want is "fewer", not "less". 2: "Fewer" is a relative term (as is "less"). You need to compare it to something, such as getting fewer votes than Boothead. 3: If you're referring to the national popular vote, you're correct. That's not a reason she lost because that's not how the US elects its President.
Really, will they shutdown Facebook in Europe? Will they be forced to pay fines that are more than they get from selling the data? (Not just have fines declared - actually pay out.) Will they be unable to blame this on a bug, a user traveling, a user's "friend"on Facebook providing that info, or Facebook otherwise obtaining that info legally (but in a way that they can't reveal so as to protect their business interests)? Will they extradite Zuckerberg and his cronies and put them in jail in Europe?
I don't believe for half a fart that they've stopped. They're either still doing it and lying about it, or still collecting it but waiting for some "oopsie" "bug" to send it all up to the mothership at some point, at which point they'll say they've deleted it and expect us to believe it.
If it made economic sense to manufacturer in the U.S. then it's not a loss for China overall as other sectors would benefit from the increased productivity.
If it made economic sense to manufacture in China, then it's not a loss for the US overall as other sectors would benefit from the increased productivity.
I sure love me that increased productivity in the abandoned warehouse and derelict manufacturing plant sectors! It's okay, bro. Lots of tarded people have normal lives now.
Fuck your melting pot. No one melts anymore. They float like fatty turds to the top and demand special status and recognition. Integration into society is lost on them.
Asians are the last remaining group of immigrants who generally work hard and try to integrate into American society while still maintaining their roots. THAT is why they get ignored and shat on by the media and politicians - they're basically Uncle Toms because they don't serve to drive the narrative they want to push.
They want to push a divisive narrative on race (and sex, and everything else) because it keeps retards like you busy fighting a made up us-vs-them political war while they lie, cheat, and steal the economy and the government out from under you.
Climate change zealots are retards, but "warmer than any year prior to the last two decades" doesn't mean "warmer than any year in the past two decades" like you said it does.
Chroma subsampling (4:2:2 or 4:2:0) and the realtime compression (DisplayPort 1.3 and up I believe) are ways they drive high res displays over a single cable @ 60 Hz. I'd sooner find out how many toothpicks I could fit in my urethra than drive a 5K display with subsampled chroma, however.
Polaris parts support HDMI 2.0 and DisplayPort 1.4 with HDR.
I don't know what the MacBook Pro is passing things over, via how many ports, or what the monitor expects, but you can get a subset of a DisplayPort signal over the latest Thunderbolt / USB shit.
I didn't say he didn't nominate anyone. I said he didn't try to get anyone appointed.
He made no effort, and his own party didn't push the issue like they did for prior appointments. Where was the media coverage we had when Sotomayor was up? The media has already admitted to being a tool for the DNC and working their asses off for Hillary. (They keep talking about how they were wrong, how they were biased for Hillary, how they underestimated Trump, etc. in order to announce to the GOP that they'll dance to the Republican tune as well.)
Yes, the GOP blocked it. That's how it goes. You never put your first choice first. You offer one you expect to be rejected immediately, then another you would love but will probably be rejected, then the one you actually want and expect to have a chance. This is true for everything from supreme court nominees to buying a car.
You made a big point of saying "three quarters of a year ago". What has he done in those "three quarters of a year" to get the seat filled? Sit on his ass? Where's the effort? If the defeatist attitude of "Oh, the Republicans will just block it." is guiding his decisions, why did he make the first nomination at all? HINT: It was lip service. It's a no effort, lazy, nomination with no push behind it. He fully expected it to be blocked and didn't care, he simply wanted to kick the can down the road to Hillary and a bluer congress.
It's all politics with them (DNC and GOP), and if you take anything at face value you're a fool.
Obama's fault for not trying to appoint anyone to the Supreme Court. It's his duty, but he decided to wait for the election to let Hillary do it so she could, eventually, get a hard liberal past Congress.
Oops.
Had he just selected a moderate or even a sane liberal, the DNC could have used any blocking and delaying as general ammunition against the GOP in the run up to the election.
Slashdot Mirror
So you believe the bit about pulling people to a offsite location and telling them the IRS is going to go back on THEIR tax records 5 years to garnish some imagined top wages that may or may not have already been reported, and somehow quitting would solve it?
I wouldn't put it past a shitty manager to say that kind of shit, even off the record, but no one with a brain would believe it.
Bitcoin is as anonymous as you want it to be.
Exchanging it for fiat currency isn't.
Create your own cert and sign it, then the user can set the powershell policy to prompt for untrusted certs.
The prompt lets them choose whether or not to run shit each time. They also have the option to accept a particular cert permanently via that same prompt.
When you write your script, you can name your shit properly and describe it properly.
Then anyone using it will get a friendly error message saying their usage was wrong and showing what the correct usage is.
You also get tab completion for commandlets and arguments and even options for arguments.
I rarely use powershell but when I do I always appreciate the fact that it's actually pretty great. This is coming from a STRONK hater of nearly everything MS has done in the last 4 years.
Getting less votes is not one of them either.
1: The word you want is "fewer", not "less".
2: "Fewer" is a relative term (as is "less"). You need to compare it to something, such as getting fewer votes than Boothead.
3: If you're referring to the national popular vote, you're correct. That's not a reason she lost because that's not how the US elects its President.
Really, will they shutdown Facebook in Europe?
Will they be forced to pay fines that are more than they get from selling the data? (Not just have fines declared - actually pay out.)
Will they be unable to blame this on a bug, a user traveling, a user's "friend"on Facebook providing that info, or Facebook otherwise obtaining that info legally (but in a way that they can't reveal so as to protect their business interests)?
Will they extradite Zuckerberg and his cronies and put them in jail in Europe?
They'd be in tepid water at best.
I don't believe for half a fart that they've stopped. They're either still doing it and lying about it, or still collecting it but waiting for some "oopsie" "bug" to send it all up to the mothership at some point, at which point they'll say they've deleted it and expect us to believe it.
If it made economic sense to manufacturer in the U.S. then it's not a loss for China overall as other sectors would benefit from the increased productivity.
If it made economic sense to manufacture in China, then it's not a loss for the US overall as other sectors would benefit from the increased productivity.
I sure love me that increased productivity in the abandoned warehouse and derelict manufacturing plant sectors!
It's okay, bro. Lots of tarded people have normal lives now.
I'm not sure how he thinks he can legally do that.
Tariffs. Import restrictions. Like every other country not in an economic death spiral has.
LOL!
Learn to read, kids!
Fuck your melting pot. No one melts anymore. They float like fatty turds to the top and demand special status and recognition. Integration into society is lost on them.
Asians are the last remaining group of immigrants who generally work hard and try to integrate into American society while still maintaining their roots. THAT is why they get ignored and shat on by the media and politicians - they're basically Uncle Toms because they don't serve to drive the narrative they want to push.
They want to push a divisive narrative on race (and sex, and everything else) because it keeps retards like you busy fighting a made up us-vs-them political war while they lie, cheat, and steal the economy and the government out from under you.
As is Russia and many former USSR members.
Yet "Asian" includes neither Russians nor Indians when you're talking to your typical racist liberal.
They don't even consider Hispanics white.
Do you not remember the lamp-style iMacs?
The removal of optical drives?
The countless port changes?
The one button mouse?
Because they value form over function, and the form is tired and boring.
A schizophrenic takes a shot at a politician and you're blaming politics? You don't know much about mental illness.
A citizen takes a shot at a politician and you're blaming mental illness? You don't know much about politics.
"If you can touch it, you can own it"
That's known as Trump's Postulate.
No one denies that when it comes to industrial design, Apple earns the praise it gets.
Apple does not deserve praise for its designs.
Climate change zealots are retards, but "warmer than any year prior to the last two decades" doesn't mean "warmer than any year in the past two decades" like you said it does.
Once sniff of your ass and your dog knows more about what you've been up to than your spouse, your boss, and the NSA combined.
Chroma subsampling (4:2:2 or 4:2:0) and the realtime compression (DisplayPort 1.3 and up I believe) are ways they drive high res displays over a single cable @ 60 Hz. I'd sooner find out how many toothpicks I could fit in my urethra than drive a 5K display with subsampled chroma, however.
Polaris parts support HDMI 2.0 and DisplayPort 1.4 with HDR.
I don't know what the MacBook Pro is passing things over, via how many ports, or what the monitor expects, but you can get a subset of a DisplayPort signal over the latest Thunderbolt / USB shit.
The last time Apple used performance Nvidia parts they got screwed because they were all defective. See bumpgate.
I didn't say he didn't nominate anyone. I said he didn't try to get anyone appointed.
He made no effort, and his own party didn't push the issue like they did for prior appointments. Where was the media coverage we had when Sotomayor was up? The media has already admitted to being a tool for the DNC and working their asses off for Hillary. (They keep talking about how they were wrong, how they were biased for Hillary, how they underestimated Trump, etc. in order to announce to the GOP that they'll dance to the Republican tune as well.)
Yes, the GOP blocked it. That's how it goes. You never put your first choice first. You offer one you expect to be rejected immediately, then another you would love but will probably be rejected, then the one you actually want and expect to have a chance. This is true for everything from supreme court nominees to buying a car.
You made a big point of saying "three quarters of a year ago". What has he done in those "three quarters of a year" to get the seat filled? Sit on his ass? Where's the effort? If the defeatist attitude of "Oh, the Republicans will just block it." is guiding his decisions, why did he make the first nomination at all? HINT: It was lip service. It's a no effort, lazy, nomination with no push behind it. He fully expected it to be blocked and didn't care, he simply wanted to kick the can down the road to Hillary and a bluer congress.
It's all politics with them (DNC and GOP), and if you take anything at face value you're a fool.
Obama's fault for not trying to appoint anyone to the Supreme Court. It's his duty, but he decided to wait for the election to let Hillary do it so she could, eventually, get a hard liberal past Congress.
Oops.
Had he just selected a moderate or even a sane liberal, the DNC could have used any blocking and delaying as general ammunition against the GOP in the run up to the election.
If they hadn't been rigging the news feeds and injecting their own bias, they wouldn't have gotten into this mess.
private corporations are allowed to have bias and opinions
And are allowed to experience backlash because of it.