What resolution, bit depth, and JPEG encoding/compression methods did those images have? How compressible were those images with something generic like LZMA2?
The other thing is that you're taking about particles going back in time as an optional thing. In Feynman's formulation, they're not. "Everything not forbidden is compulsory." Since particles *can* go back in time, then they do, always and in every way they can. Why don't we see this happening normally? Self consistency. Particles traveling back in time can do so in a large number of different ways. When you run the numbers, you see that most of those different ways have quantum mechanical interference with each other. This means most, if not all, of the backward-in-time paths cancel each other out, leaving only the forward-in-time path we actually observe.
"Everything not forbidden is compulsory"
"Why don't we see this happening normally?" "most, if not all, of the backward-in-time paths cancel each other out"
If we don't see it happening then it's not compulsory and is forbidden.
Please stop clinging to celebrity scientists because you like the idea of what they say. Testable theories, experimentation, and results (positive or negative) or STFU.
"Case law" is not law. Individual interpretations of the law and the resulting decisions relating to specific cases are not law. Law is law.
Any lawyer trying to use "case law" as a basis for their argument should be disbarred as they clearly don't understand the difference between the legislative and judicial branches.
In this case, Samsung says its phone follows an engineering standard called IP68 that covers both dust- and water-resistance, and that the phone is designed to survive immersion in five feet of water for 30 minutes. That’s the spec we used in testing the Galaxy S7 Active.
In this case, Samsung says its phone follows an engineering standard called IP68 that covers both dust- and water-resistance, and that the phone is designed to survive immersion in five feet of water for 30 minutes. That’s the spec we used in testing the Galaxy S7 Active.
Doubt they only support Radeon cards and support every nVidia card and every one of Intel's embedded GPUs. I'm just asking for a little consistency here.
"Podcasts" are audio files of people talking about shit they don't know much about and that you only listen to because you're bored out of your mind.
"Vodcasts" are video files of people talking about shit they don't know much about and that you only listen to, and occasionally glance at (even though you should be focused on driving/working), because you're bored out of your mind.
Using a radio button means you want a max of 1 choice, yet 3 months down the line they'll change their mind and say they want to allow for multiple choices. You then have to decide on the default state for each checkbox like you decided on what the default radio button was. Then you have to change your database to store a flag for each checkbox instead of a value that has a relationship to a primary key table. And you have to decide on whether or not NULL is a valid, third state depending on what parts of what forms were completed. Then you have to decide on a default 1 or 0 or NULL.
Then it's a pain in the ass when they add and remove checkboxes because you have to generate forms based on which checkboxes were active on which dates, allow admins to override and see all the checkboxes regardless of date so they can go and retroactively fix old forms, etc. So you need a table for your checkboxes, their displayed names, and their valid dates, then a table for the order they should appear in for each date any change is made, a table to dynamically track the checkbox values for each form, etc.
And it has to be done yesterday because that's when the policy was signed. And you found out about it from a 3rd-party user because your actual customers you built the thing for don't communicate shit to you and don't understand their own business rules.
Everything has to be designed such that anything can happen at any time, because it will.
Media Center isn't just a player, it is a remote-friendly player, organizer, scheduler, DVR, guide, etc. It's also the only widely-available software I know of that properly handles guide info and recording certain "protected" content.
If you did the "reserve your copy" shit when this first was available, or if you start the "upgrade" now and cancel/rollback (not sure how far you have to let it go) then your machine is granted a permanent license. The activation servers get a hash of all ur shit and you don't even need a serial. Of course, if you change your hardware in some way that trips up MS's crazy, unknown rules, you'll have to call them up.
Windows Mobile 5 to Windows Mobile 6 was not generally free. I happened to get it for free because of the timeframe in which I purchased my WinMo5 phone. I was pleasantly surprised - I expected to have to shell out cash for the update.
You can't be "increasingly less useful" when comparing to yourself. You can be "increasingly less useful" when comparing to something else, but it doesn't mean what they intended.
If A is increasingly less useful than B, then: A is less useful than B. A's usefulness is increasing.
If A is increasingly less useful (than A), then: A is less useful than A (at some prior point in time). A's usefulness is increasing (compared to A at that same prior point in time).
That's a contradiction. It makes no sense.
If you don't want increasingly to modify useful, you really need to use that hyphen and write "increasingly-less". On the other hand, you would do well to write "increasingly and less useful" or "increasingly, less useful" to be more clear for the upward trend.
The best bet, however, is to write "decreasingly useful". The word "decreasing" contains the direction in it, so you don't need to try to negate "increasingly" with "less" and make a mess of things.
You can't train your test for Unknown Unknowns. At best you can heuristically catch Known Unknowns. And Knowns are already Known, you just need to make sure your tools catch them.
My local store, which I went to once because I happened to be in a hurry and it was nearby, lists the dates as being from January to June of this year.
It's not defeatist, it's correct. A secure line needs to be physically secured and controlled and carry traffic directly from A to B only. This is unfeasible to do on the scale of the internet. So we rely on encryption and hope that it keeps things private enough for long enough. It does not make the connection "secure".
The nature of the internet is such that communications are routed over lines you physically don't control. That is insecure on two fronts.
You neither have control over the pipe nor what the router at the end of it does.
A secure communications network requires physical control over the transmission medium and a direct connection for each path. No dynamic routing. Switching may be used if you control and verify each switch and guarantee a single, direct, unshared path each time you communicate.
Phones used to be switched this way - there was a physical switch board and you would get a direct connection to the person on the other end. Of course, you had to trust the physical line and the operator. Phones quickly started sharing lines, though because it was simply impossible to have 1 line for each call during times of heavy use. (You'd get the ol' "All lines are busy at the moment.")
But the concept of a hard line or a secure line still persists today.
Layering encryption on top of an unsecured line and that is dynamically routed/switched and co-mingles signals from others doesn't make the internet a secure communication medium.
Secure enough for most things, yes. Until that encryption is broken or the implementation has back doors built into it or flaws discovered.
You're confusing Nvidia's older generations with AMD's newer generations.
The AMD RX 460 and RX 470 haven't launched yet. The RX 480 launched recently. The Nvidia GTX 400 series launches ages ago.
The RX 480 has MSRPs of 200 (4 GB) and 240 (8 GB). Currently, all 4 GB cards are 8 GB cards and you can unlock them by flashing the BIOS.
The 1060 will have MSRPs of 250 and 300. Both have 6 GB of RAM. The 300 version is the "Founder's Edition". Both allegedly launch on the 19th and Nvidia claims they expect the bulk of sales to be the non FE version (with an MSRP of 250).
This is in contrast to the 1080 and 1070, where the bulk of sales was the FE version, the non FE versions were kept tightly under wraps until they launched, and no one had them in stock. For the 1080 and 1070, no one has reached the MSRP. Even when the cards were available (no retailer gouging), the manufacturers MSRPs have been above Nvidia's MSRP.
If you can find an RX 480 4 GB for $200 now and flash it to get all 8 GB, that's the best option.
Otherwise wait for reviews of the 1060 and reviews of the custom RX 480s.
If you can wait longer, we know a 490 is coming from AMD. We also know Vega (with HBM2) is slated for early 2017. It's also expected that Nvidia will release a 1080 Ti at some point. Even if you don't want those expensive cards, their releases will cause the prices of the other cards to adjust.
If you want to claim it comes from automatic, and not autonomous or anything else, then auto means self and matic means moving or thinking, from matos. Automatons are literally automatic things.
If you claim autopilot means automatic pilot then that means the pilot is an automaton.
Slashdot Mirror
Just a bout every step in JPEG quantization is lossy, even if you're using floating point DCT.
If you're subsampling your chroma, you need to be shot.
For starters, he's a liberal cuck.
What resolution, bit depth, and JPEG encoding/compression methods did those images have? How compressible were those images with something generic like LZMA2?
If a region of space contains mass it is not empty.
There I fixed it.
The other thing is that you're taking about particles going back in time as an optional thing. In Feynman's formulation, they're not. "Everything not forbidden is compulsory." Since particles *can* go back in time, then they do, always and in every way they can. Why don't we see this happening normally? Self consistency. Particles traveling back in time can do so in a large number of different ways. When you run the numbers, you see that most of those different ways have quantum mechanical interference with each other. This means most, if not all, of the backward-in-time paths cancel each other out, leaving only the forward-in-time path we actually observe.
"Everything not forbidden is compulsory"
"Why don't we see this happening normally?"
"most, if not all, of the backward-in-time paths cancel each other out"
If we don't see it happening then it's not compulsory and is forbidden.
Please stop clinging to celebrity scientists because you like the idea of what they say. Testable theories, experimentation, and results (positive or negative) or STFU.
The company cited case law
"Case law" is not law. Individual interpretations of the law and the resulting decisions relating to specific cases are not law. Law is law.
Any lawyer trying to use "case law" as a basis for their argument should be disbarred as they clearly don't understand the difference between the legislative and judicial branches.
In this case, Samsung says its phone follows an engineering standard called IP68 that covers both dust- and water-resistance, and that the phone is designed to survive immersion in five feet of water for 30 minutes. That’s the spec we used in testing the Galaxy S7 Active.
In this case, Samsung says its phone follows an engineering standard called IP68 that covers both dust- and water-resistance, and that the phone is designed to survive immersion in five feet of water for 30 minutes. That’s the spec we used in testing the Galaxy S7 Active.
fartnoise
Doubt they only support Radeon cards and support every nVidia card and every one of Intel's embedded GPUs.
I'm just asking for a little consistency here.
WTF is Intel Vulkan? Is it anything like Vulkan?
And Radeon is the brand, not the company. The company is AMD.
They've been doing it a lot more since the last buyout. I've had several deleted, none of which were even trolling.
Why can't we call these things what they are?
"Podcasts" are audio files of people talking about shit they don't know much about and that you only listen to because you're bored out of your mind.
"Vodcasts" are video files of people talking about shit they don't know much about and that you only listen to, and occasionally glance at (even though you should be focused on driving/working), because you're bored out of your mind.
The gunman was not an imminent threat. No attempt to kill him should have been made.
He was trapped. Wait him out.
It's not a lame example, It's a perfect example.
Using a radio button means you want a max of 1 choice, yet 3 months down the line they'll change their mind and say they want to allow for multiple choices. You then have to decide on the default state for each checkbox like you decided on what the default radio button was. Then you have to change your database to store a flag for each checkbox instead of a value that has a relationship to a primary key table. And you have to decide on whether or not NULL is a valid, third state depending on what parts of what forms were completed. Then you have to decide on a default 1 or 0 or NULL.
Then it's a pain in the ass when they add and remove checkboxes because you have to generate forms based on which checkboxes were active on which dates, allow admins to override and see all the checkboxes regardless of date so they can go and retroactively fix old forms, etc. So you need a table for your checkboxes, their displayed names, and their valid dates, then a table for the order they should appear in for each date any change is made, a table to dynamically track the checkbox values for each form, etc.
And it has to be done yesterday because that's when the policy was signed. And you found out about it from a 3rd-party user because your actual customers you built the thing for don't communicate shit to you and don't understand their own business rules.
Everything has to be designed such that anything can happen at any time, because it will.
Media Center isn't just a player, it is a remote-friendly player, organizer, scheduler, DVR, guide, etc. It's also the only widely-available software I know of that properly handles guide info and recording certain "protected" content.
If you did the "reserve your copy" shit when this first was available, or if you start the "upgrade" now and cancel/rollback (not sure how far you have to let it go) then your machine is granted a permanent license. The activation servers get a hash of all ur shit and you don't even need a serial. Of course, if you change your hardware in some way that trips up MS's crazy, unknown rules, you'll have to call them up.
Windows Mobile 5 to Windows Mobile 6 was not generally free. I happened to get it for free because of the timeframe in which I purchased my WinMo5 phone. I was pleasantly surprised - I expected to have to shell out cash for the update.
You can't be "increasingly less useful" when comparing to yourself.
You can be "increasingly less useful" when comparing to something else, but it doesn't mean what they intended.
If A is increasingly less useful than B, then:
A is less useful than B.
A's usefulness is increasing.
If A is increasingly less useful (than A), then:
A is less useful than A (at some prior point in time).
A's usefulness is increasing (compared to A at that same prior point in time).
That's a contradiction. It makes no sense.
If you don't want increasingly to modify useful, you really need to use that hyphen and write "increasingly-less".
On the other hand, you would do well to write "increasingly and less useful" or "increasingly, less useful" to be more clear for the upward trend.
The best bet, however, is to write "decreasingly useful". The word "decreasing" contains the direction in it, so you don't need to try to negate "increasingly" with "less" and make a mess of things.
Knowns
Known Unknowns
Unknown Unknowns
You can't train your test for Unknown Unknowns. At best you can heuristically catch Known Unknowns. And Knowns are already Known, you just need to make sure your tools catch them.
My local store, which I went to once because I happened to be in a hurry and it was nearby, lists the dates as being from January to June of this year.
They are the same. If you can't prove it's secure, it must be treated as if it were not secure.
It's not defeatist, it's correct. A secure line needs to be physically secured and controlled and carry traffic directly from A to B only. This is unfeasible to do on the scale of the internet. So we rely on encryption and hope that it keeps things private enough for long enough. It does not make the connection "secure".
The nature of the internet is such that communications are routed over lines you physically don't control.
That is insecure on two fronts.
You neither have control over the pipe nor what the router at the end of it does.
A secure communications network requires physical control over the transmission medium and a direct connection for each path. No dynamic routing. Switching may be used if you control and verify each switch and guarantee a single, direct, unshared path each time you communicate.
Phones used to be switched this way - there was a physical switch board and you would get a direct connection to the person on the other end. Of course, you had to trust the physical line and the operator. Phones quickly started sharing lines, though because it was simply impossible to have 1 line for each call during times of heavy use. (You'd get the ol' "All lines are busy at the moment.")
But the concept of a hard line or a secure line still persists today.
Layering encryption on top of an unsecured line and that is dynamically routed/switched and co-mingles signals from others doesn't make the internet a secure communication medium.
Secure enough for most things, yes. Until that encryption is broken or the implementation has back doors built into it or flaws discovered.
You're confusing Nvidia's older generations with AMD's newer generations.
The AMD RX 460 and RX 470 haven't launched yet. The RX 480 launched recently. The Nvidia GTX 400 series launches ages ago.
The RX 480 has MSRPs of 200 (4 GB) and 240 (8 GB). Currently, all 4 GB cards are 8 GB cards and you can unlock them by flashing the BIOS.
The 1060 will have MSRPs of 250 and 300. Both have 6 GB of RAM. The 300 version is the "Founder's Edition". Both allegedly launch on the 19th and Nvidia claims they expect the bulk of sales to be the non FE version (with an MSRP of 250).
This is in contrast to the 1080 and 1070, where the bulk of sales was the FE version, the non FE versions were kept tightly under wraps until they launched, and no one had them in stock. For the 1080 and 1070, no one has reached the MSRP. Even when the cards were available (no retailer gouging), the manufacturers MSRPs have been above Nvidia's MSRP.
If you can find an RX 480 4 GB for $200 now and flash it to get all 8 GB, that's the best option.
Otherwise wait for reviews of the 1060 and reviews of the custom RX 480s.
If you can wait longer, we know a 490 is coming from AMD. We also know Vega (with HBM2) is slated for early 2017. It's also expected that Nvidia will release a 1080 Ti at some point. Even if you don't want those expensive cards, their releases will cause the prices of the other cards to adjust.
Cloud storage is overrated, and way too openly trusted. I'd sooner set up a cloud solution using my home PC. Why don't we have that ability yet?
BTSync
If you want to claim it comes from automatic, and not autonomous or anything else, then auto means self and matic means moving or thinking, from matos. Automatons are literally automatic things.
If you claim autopilot means automatic pilot then that means the pilot is an automaton.