Your name better be "Dell" or "Apple" or "HP" if you want to buy one of these things. Samsung has been parading around their OEM-only SSDs for about 3 years, and rarely are consumers able to get their hands on them.
You don't need Java for IPMI. You may need Java for your OEM's specific shit that is NOT covered under IPMI, such as graphical console redirection, remote USB, etc.
Speaking of which, considering how many science articles you post to with something completely wrong at such a basic level, maybe you have some experience with what constitutes a failed science education...
The thing that really pisses me off is that they get praised by people, and indeed pat themselves on the back as well, for being champions of science and blah blah blah. They're doing HARM to science and fostering shitty, ignorant views about it. It's like when one of those shitstain hipsters thinks coating their genitals in paint and rubbing themselves on a canvas is art.
We have not seen things communicating with each at speeds greater than c. Entanglement is not communication.
The "holographic universe" "theory" is a joke. Real holograms occupy 3 dimensions and require 3 dimensions to be projected onto as well as observers in a space to experience them.
The "simulated universe" "theory" is a joke. Real computers occupy 3 dimensions and speed is determined by physical location (RAM closer to the CPU is accessed more quickly). They may not correlate to the position of objects in the virtual world, but the effects would either be observable for all objects (entangled or not) or not observable (because the simulated universe is blind to such effects since a reasonable simulator would wait until all of its fetching was done before processing the next universal tick). If your claim is that entanglement manipulates the physical position of data in memory (thus causing the effects to be observable for entangled objects but not other objects), then you've effectively broken out of the simulation. Then you're at the point where entanglement isn't a thing, it's just what you call the effects of moving memory in your simulator, which is part of the actual universe.
Neither of these "theories" are theories. They're baseless, untestable conjectures that a 14 year old thinks up while taking a shit.
The interior won't stay at a fixed temperature. Heat will build up in your insulated box. Humans and human activity tend to generate heat at a far higher temperature than is necessary to melt ice (we'll assume they're pressurizing the fucking thing and adding an Earth-like atmosphere, if they're not, then it's sublimation at a much lower temperature).
Insulation does not regulate temperature. A closed box needs to have active temperature regulation for long term use.
Why couldn't you just use the first stolen card's body?
As for the PIN, if it's wrong in an offline environment you'd never know. At best, you can reduce windows and thresholds for requiring allowing cards to be used offline. You can't stop this attack with the current hardware while still allowing offline transactions.
Researchers say that using this simple trick and information about iKettles, they drove around London, cracked home WiFi networks, and created a map of insecure WiFi networks across the city.
How much more click baity can you get? And how is this a surprise? EVERY device you allow to connect to your wifi network is allowed to do so. Did you know your phone has a file in it that STORES YOUR WIFI PASSWORDS?!
Stolen chip with malicious chip soldered on top. No idea why you need a second stolen card for the body as shown in the image.
Malicious chip MITMs the POS PIN challenge and says it's all good. Malicious chip in this case is a "FUNcard" chip. Basically a generic system you can buy for your laundromat, arcade, carnival, whatever.
This was done in France in 2011. EMVCo claims they've fixed this or made it harder. They won't say how. No one believes them.
Slashdot Mirror
Your name better be "Dell" or "Apple" or "HP" if you want to buy one of these things.
Samsung has been parading around their OEM-only SSDs for about 3 years, and rarely are consumers able to get their hands on them.
Because space nutters.
(This is one of the few times the "space nutters" AC troll should come out and rant about space nutters.)
Kronos is used at my workplace.
We got the email today - "don't upgrade Java because it won't fucking work with Kronos trololo".
It's absolute trash.
You don't need Java for IPMI.
You may need Java for your OEM's specific shit that is NOT covered under IPMI, such as graphical console redirection, remote USB, etc.
Speaking of which, considering how many science articles you post to with something completely wrong at such a basic level, maybe you have some experience with what constitutes a failed science education...
Try again!
It;s pop TV being celebrated for being something more when it shouldn't be.
It's like saying CNN is fostering journalism.
The better question is "Can I rip out Windows 10 and slap on Windows 7?".
No, just admit that you fucked up.
The thing that really pisses me off is that they get praised by people, and indeed pat themselves on the back as well, for being champions of science and blah blah blah. They're doing HARM to science and fostering shitty, ignorant views about it. It's like when one of those shitstain hipsters thinks coating their genitals in paint and rubbing themselves on a canvas is art.
Yup, the only one worth a damn.
It's because they're stupid, that's why. That's why everybody does everything.
-Homer Simpson
We have not seen things communicating with each at speeds greater than c. Entanglement is not communication.
The "holographic universe" "theory" is a joke. Real holograms occupy 3 dimensions and require 3 dimensions to be projected onto as well as observers in a space to experience them.
The "simulated universe" "theory" is a joke. Real computers occupy 3 dimensions and speed is determined by physical location (RAM closer to the CPU is accessed more quickly). They may not correlate to the position of objects in the virtual world, but the effects would either be observable for all objects (entangled or not) or not observable (because the simulated universe is blind to such effects since a reasonable simulator would wait until all of its fetching was done before processing the next universal tick).
If your claim is that entanglement manipulates the physical position of data in memory (thus causing the effects to be observable for entangled objects but not other objects), then you've effectively broken out of the simulation. Then you're at the point where entanglement isn't a thing, it's just what you call the effects of moving memory in your simulator, which is part of the actual universe.
Neither of these "theories" are theories. They're baseless, untestable conjectures that a 14 year old thinks up while taking a shit.
The interior won't stay at a fixed temperature. Heat will build up in your insulated box. Humans and human activity tend to generate heat at a far higher temperature than is necessary to melt ice (we'll assume they're pressurizing the fucking thing and adding an Earth-like atmosphere, if they're not, then it's sublimation at a much lower temperature).
Insulation does not regulate temperature. A closed box needs to have active temperature regulation for long term use.
All that does is delay the melting.
America = Nazi Germany now.
Do you really think that line of reasoning is valid? If so, the UK, Germany, Japan, and Korea owes the US more than their entire GDP.
Yes, yes they do.
Fuck You, DHS.
I know I shat on your carpet while running through your house uninvited, but why should I have to clean it up?
And the door handles often fail to “present” themselves as drivers approach their cars.
What kind of sexual failure do you have to be to desire a car that presents itself, ready and desperate for your touch, whenever you get near it?
Whatever you do, don't vote for Hillary Clinton.
I make sure my code fits in 80 columns max.
I do comment blocks like a well-formatted readme.
i = 0;
j = 1;
dice = "trash";
It pleasures the eyeballs. (There's no way slashdot would let me post it in full width.)
There's nothing wrong with GOTOs.
Why couldn't you just use the first stolen card's body?
As for the PIN, if it's wrong in an offline environment you'd never know. At best, you can reduce windows and thresholds for requiring allowing cards to be used offline. You can't stop this attack with the current hardware while still allowing offline transactions.
Researchers say that using this simple trick and information about iKettles, they drove around London, cracked home WiFi networks, and created a map of insecure WiFi networks across the city.
How much more click baity can you get?
And how is this a surprise? EVERY device you allow to connect to your wifi network is allowed to do so. Did you know your phone has a file in it that STORES YOUR WIFI PASSWORDS?!
Since Slashdot is useless, I'll post a summary.
http://www.net-security.org/im...
Stolen chip with malicious chip soldered on top. No idea why you need a second stolen card for the body as shown in the image.
Malicious chip MITMs the POS PIN challenge and says it's all good. Malicious chip in this case is a "FUNcard" chip. Basically a generic system you can buy for your laundromat, arcade, carnival, whatever.
This was done in France in 2011. EMVCo claims they've fixed this or made it harder. They won't say how. No one believes them.