Slashdot Mirror


Consumer Reports Withdraws Its Tesla Model S Recommendation (consumerreports.org)

An anonymous reader sends news that Consumer Reports, after earlier giving the Tesla Model S a perfect road test score, has now withdrawn its recommendation for the electric car after investigating its reliability. As part of our Annual Auto Reliability Survey, we received about 1,400 survey responses from Model S owners who chronicled an array of detailed and complicated maladies. From that data we forecast that owning that Tesla is likely to involve a worse-than-average overall problem rate. ... The main problem areas involved the drivetrain, power equipment, charging equipment, giant iPad-like center console, and body and sunroof squeaks, rattles, and leaks. ... Overall, squeaks and rattles appear to be the most prevalent complaint. But as one respondent commented, "The car is so very silent when driving that minor squeaks and rattles that you wouldn't be able to hear in a gasoline engine car become very annoying." The list of issues also includes more significant problems, which could be pricey to fix once out of warranty. Based on survey responses, Tesla has made a habit of replacing the car’s electric motors. The brake rotors tend to warp. And the door handles often fail to “present” themselves as drivers approach their cars.

222 comments

  1. My 93 Escort squeaks and rattles a lot by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hearing those noises is reassuring - it tells me the part making the noise hasn't fallen off yet.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:My 93 Escort squeaks and rattles a lot by goose-incarnated · · Score: 1

      Hearing those noises is reassuring - it tells me the part making the noise hasn't fallen off yet.

      Ah, but the part stopping the noise might have fallen off :-) FTFA:

      "The car is so very silent when driving that minor squeaks and rattles that you wouldn't be able to hear in a gasoline engine car become very annoying."

      This bit is pure BS - once my car gets to 60km/h and above the engine is undetectable above the sound of road, wind and tyre noise. Most ICE cars don't have engine noise in the cabin at a level sufficient to drown out squeaks and rattles.

      --
      I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
    2. Re:My 93 Escort squeaks and rattles a lot by KGIII · · Score: 1

      I love the car threads... Anyhow, I bought a BMW, it's my third in my life, and was so impressed with the noise level inside the cabin. It's silent. I don't know what they did for installation but it's damned quiet unless I want it to be loud and then it's a low throaty growl and the front end hunkers down (it's the 640Li) but, assuming I'm not playing with a ricer at a stop light, the thing's really quiet. It's almost alarmingly quiet at speed.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    3. Re: My 93 Escort squeaks and rattles a lot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know. I once assembled a computer so quiet that suddenly the buzz of my LCD monitor bothered me. Not that it was at all loud, or any louder than it was before, but when it's the only sound in the room, you notice.

      As for the Model S's motor needing replacement, or the door handles not functioning, I'd be genuinely disappointed about that.

  2. The car is great to drive, but... by Strudelkugel · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I always wondered how the door handles would work after an ice storm or freezing rain. I've dealt with my share of frozen car door locks, but at least I could get the handle to move. I think the touch screen console was a big mistake. You need to be able to manage things like climate settings, radio stations, etc. by touch. Forcing the drive to look at a screen for mundane things was a bad idea. I don't own a Tesla, partly because they are so new and I don't like the design elements I mentioned. But I have driven one. There are very few other cars that are as much fun to drive.

    --
    Imagine how much harder physics would be if electrons had feelings! -Feynman, maybe
    1. Re:The car is great to drive, but... by Moridineas · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think the touch screen console was a big mistake. You need to be able to manage things like climate settings, radio stations, etc. by touch.

      Knobs and buttons in a car seem to be going the way of the dodo. It's a major pet-peeve for me--I can't stand the idiocy of car user interface design--they seem to be getting so much worse. Wife's Honda Odyssey has two screens (one touch, one not), and it's never clear which information will display where, the climate control is dreadful, tuning the radio is time consuming and attention-grabbing. It's just awful.

      Nice car though.

    2. Re:The car is great to drive, but... by MightyYar · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't own one because it's $100,000 for a damn car. Any $100,000 car is going to be unreliable - the whole reason it is $100,000 is because it is all gussied up with extra crap that can break.

      But when electrics become economically prudent I will probably get one. They should be mechanically simpler and I only commute 20 miles a day - my wife only goes 10 miles.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    3. Re:The car is great to drive, but... by Falc0n · · Score: 2, Interesting

      But in the Chevy Volt, for the 2nd gen (2016), the knobs and buttons have made a comeback. The space-age tactile feedback flat buttons were pretty well shunned by the community. And for good reason, they were clunky, and not usable in cold months with gloves on. I've owned the car for 3 years and for even simple buttons like seek takes an extra few seconds compared to other vehicles.

    4. Re:The car is great to drive, but... by rmdingler · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Yes, and the inevitable learning curve every new technology encounters.

      It takes a while to work out all the bugs during the incipient stage.

      I just always figured the wealthy are covering the R & D expenses in exchange for the Look what I got! conversation starter;

      so that, in the future, these become within the realm of affordable for us mere mortals.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    5. Re:The car is great to drive, but... by AK+Marc · · Score: 1, Interesting

      . I think the touch screen console was a big mistake. You need to be able to manage things like climate settings, radio stations, etc. by touch. Forcing the drive to look at a screen for mundane things was a bad idea.

      Yes, everyone here drives without taking their eyes off the road. Yet I've never ridden with anyone where that was the case. Everyone I've ever watched touch a control in the center console turned and looked at it. Ride with someone. Watch their eyes. They will turn and look at the console, every time. Unless you are explicitly trying to adjust something without looking, you'll glance at it.

      That is, of course, everyone on the planet but those here, who are the only ones in the universe who fiddle with the console without looking.

    6. Re:The car is great to drive, but... by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      depends on the console. muscle memory is very good concerning buttons.

      ever use your remote in the dark to change the channel? Do you look or know where the button is???

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    7. Re:The car is great to drive, but... by Rei · · Score: 4, Informative

      That's pretty much what the article says - the summary only cited the bad:

      The Tesla wasn’t the only high-performance vehicle that fell below average in reliability. Others include the BMW X5 and 5 Series, and the Chevrolet Corvette.

      When automakers roll out new technology, be it infotainment, transmissions, or engine variations, it often has a deleterious effect on vehicle reliability. Tesla is not only the poster child for a new type of high-performance, high-mileage EV, but it also has been adding complex new variations as assembly-line updates, such as all-wheel drive this year. So it’s not surprising to see problems continue to crop up.

      Despite the problems, our data show that Tesla owner satisfaction is still very high: Ninety-seven percent of owners said they would definitely buy their car again. It appears that Tesla has been responsive to replacing faulty motors, differentials, brakes, and infotainment systems, all with a minimum of fuss to owners.

      And Tesla’s attention to customer service has been effective. Almost every survey respondent made note of Tesla’s rapid response and repair time, despite the lack of a traditional dealer service network. For its early adopters, Tesla has made a practice of overdelivering on service problems under the factory warranty, as noted by these owners:

      “A minor amount of play developed in the differential gears. Tesla replaced the entire drive system. Remarkable service!”

      And:

      “Had a creaking ball joint in the driver[-side] front lower control arm. Tesla replaced it the following day after they were notified.”

      --
      The War of 1812... the good 'ol days when the federal government actually tried to save New Orleans.
    8. Re:The car is great to drive, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The difference is that with hard controls the glance to the console is to orient your hand; operation can be done without looking. My ex has a Prius; I drive a 2002 Honda Accord. I can adjust my radio by resting my hand on the stick shift. The third preset button has a bump on it (factory bump), so I know my orientation. My climate controls require a quick glance. The Prius, on the other hand, uses a touch screen interface. Look. Touch to change screen. Look for setting. Touch. Eyes shifting back and forth between screen and road, or just looking at screen.

      Touch interface are cool, but they won't last. They are as distracting to driving as sending a text. I expect to see cars move back to dedicated controls until true hands-free operation is available.

    9. Re:The car is great to drive, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      True, they will often look. The difference is the time needed to actually actuate the control. A quick glance is enough to get your finger on the right real button, because you can rely on touch to "zero in" on the control.

      With a touch screen, you have to keep your eyes off the road a lot longer, because there is no point at which you can rely on touch alone.

    10. Re:The car is great to drive, but... by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      I can adjust my radio by resting my hand on the stick shift.

      On my '99 Regal GS I could adjust the radio or cruise control with my thumbs without having to look, and without taking my hands off the wheel.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    11. Re:The car is great to drive, but... by tnk1 · · Score: 1

      I thought the popping out handles was only an option. And a $10K option at that. Or part of a $10K package anyway.

    12. Re:The car is great to drive, but... by tnk1 · · Score: 2

      Strictly speaking, you're probably right.

      However, you could build a very well designed car that is $100,000 which is only that expensive because it was built with the best possible parts and careful engineering. There's a lot of plastic shit in cars today where it might be better off with some good metal. Or even better, with a durable, lightweight, but absurdly expensive alloy.

      Not that I am saying that this describes a Tesla, of course.

    13. Re:The car is great to drive, but... by AK+Marc · · Score: 0

      Read again. Slower this time. I know *you* can do it. Any jackass reading this will assert they "can". Now, watch everyone else on the planet. Do they?

      It's not a question of "possible" but a question of reality. When reality and your opinion collide, I'll believe in reality.

    14. Re:The car is great to drive, but... by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      Now, watch everyone else on the planet. Do they?

      Umm, yes, for the remote control example given, everyone else probably does. Except you, it seems.

    15. Re:The car is great to drive, but... by Solandri · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Knobs and buttons will always be best in cars for physically manipulated interface controls. The reason is pretty simple - cars move. When they move, they hit bumps that makes everything inside jiggle. Unless through a remarkable coincidence the mass, springiness, and dampening of your body, arm, and fingertip exactly matches that of the LCD display, this means your finger will move relative to the screen every time you hit a bump. This makes trying to precisely manipulate touchscreen controls in a moving car an exercise in frustration.

      Knobs and buttons are not just decorative. They support your fingers as you wrap them around the controls, effectively "docking" your fingers to the control. When the Shuttle or Soyuz capsule reaches the International Space Station, do they just kinda press up against the ISS and open the hatch? No. They dock the two with clamps which hold them together, then open the hatch. That's an extreme example because lives are at stake, but the principle is the same. By docking your fingers to the knob or button, you prevent your fingers from slipping around the control with every little bump you hit - your wrist and arm absorbs the relative motion of your body with the car, while your fingers remain stationary relative to the controls. Thus allowing you to precisely manipulate the interface in a moving, jiggling, bouncing car.

      Don't get me wrong, touchscreens have their place. They're especially good for arbitrary 2-dimensional inputs, like typing on a virtual keyboard or flinging a GPS map back and forth. But the designers who decided to make basic controls like the radio and climate control touchscreen-only were idiots too caught up in the hype over the latest trend to bother thinking about why traditional interface controls are built they way they are. They can be somewhat forgiven because they probably used their phone or tablet inside and car and thought it was great. But what they didn't realize was that when you use a touchscreen phone or tablet in a moving car, you're holding the device so it doesn't move relative to you. And so accurate touchscreen inputs are possible.

    16. Re:The car is great to drive, but... by phantomfive · · Score: 0

      I always wondered how the door handles would work after an ice storm or freezing rain. I've dealt with my share of frozen car door locks, but at least I could get the handle to move.

      Wow, you remind me why I'm glad to live in Silicon Valley

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    17. Re:The car is great to drive, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. Old school car controls you learnt once, it stuck in muscle memory and you could do things while driving without thinking or looking - so for eg you could turn AC on/off, change channels etc just by blindly reaching to where you know the button/knob is. On a touch-screen system that is basically a computer interface you can't do that: you need to look down to see if your swipe has called up the correct menu, and because all the controls are now in the one physical spot you can forget using a quick blind reach-across, swipe and hope.

      P. I. T. A.

    18. Re:The car is great to drive, but... by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      I thought the popping out handles was only an option. And a $10K option at that. Or part of a $10K package anyway.

      I don't think so. My wife has the base model (only $70k), and the handles pop out.

    19. Re:The car is great to drive, but... by lgw · · Score: 2

      It only take me a few milliseconds of glance to operate the center dash controls on my car by touch - volume, source select, temp, etc. Once my hand is in the right general area, the dash has a lot of tactile clues build in to guide my hand w/o looking and is safe to gently touch anywhere. I can fumble my way to the desired outcome quite reliably.

      I used to have an Audi where all the dash controls were smooth and uniform - not a touch screen, just a stupid style decision. It was very distracting. To do anything required taking my eyes of the road for a few seconds. It never felt safe. An actual touch screen seems even worse - heck, if there are actual menus to navigate it would be a menace. I don't want to have to win the video game in order to change the climate controls!

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    20. Re:The car is great to drive, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even in the cases where they look to deal with knobs and buttons -- do they divert their attention for the same amount of time as they do with a touch screen? less? more?

    21. Re:The car is great to drive, but... by imboboage0 · · Score: 1

      I have an older Mustang where the shifter rests just perfectly for radio adjustments - keep in mind this is not the norm. I'm an auto tech and have seen it all. The 05 Chevy truck I'm in has steering wheel controls and they work great. It's even better than knowing, you literally don't go anywhere for them. You don't miss features like that until you've had them.

      --
      Honesty may be the best policy, but by process of elimination, dishonesty is the second best policy.
    22. Re:The car is great to drive, but... by ksheff · · Score: 2

      “A minor amount of play developed in the differential gears. Tesla replaced the entire drive system. Remarkable service!”

      meaning that Tesla's field service techs don't know how to fix that, so it's easier to just remove the entire thing, send it back, and let the factory rebuild the offending part for a new customer.

      I found these parts interesting:

      Based on survey responses, Tesla has made a habit of replacing the car’s electric motors. The brake rotors tend to warp.

      I thought low maintenance was a part of the EV-crowd's mantra. With regenerative braking, one wouldn't have to replace brake pads very often and especially not rotors. This sounds like a car that one would not like to have once it was out of the warranty period.

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
    23. Re:The car is great to drive, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The handles will push through a 1/4 inch of ice. I've heard it happen. Well, I didn't measure the ice but I'm guesstimating --- in any case, an nontrivial amount of frozen rain. I was walking up to the car and heard a gun go off and, like the New Yorker I am, I hit the deck. But then I put 2 and 2 together and realized what had happened.

    24. Re:The car is great to drive, but... by turbidostato · · Score: 2

      "Everyone I've ever watched touch a control in the center console turned and looked at it. Ride with someone. Watch their eyes"

      Probably yes.

      But the difference is, as a parent poster said, with physical knobs/buttons, people look at the controls just an instant, enough to reach it and then operate it without look at it. With touchscreens you need to look at them for the whole process. Ride with someone. Watch their eyes.

    25. Re:The car is great to drive, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      just like everyone looks at the keyboard to type. Nope, you're just a jackass. I tune the radio all the time without looking. The only reason to look at the screen is for the GPS navigation cues.

    26. Re:The car is great to drive, but... by rmdingler · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Like the light switch in the dark in the bathroom of a domicile of long habitation,

      a radio knob can be located in the dark of night on an unfamiliar interstate, on virtual autopilot, drinking truck stop coffee while needing to pee.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    27. Re:The car is great to drive, but... by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Umm, yes, for the remote control example given, everyone else probably does. Except you, it seems.

      I never mentioned a remote control, so using an unrelated example to prove me wrong is quite silly.

      Next time you are in the front passenger seat of a car, ask the driver to turn the radio down, or turn the A/C up or something, and watch their eyes. 100% of the time, they'll glance at the controls.

      Yes, I know, theeoretically they don't have to, but realistically, they do. Try it and let us know. Go on, stop arguing the (wrong) theory, and try it. The only time they won't is if you start off with "bet you can't change the radio station without looking" or otherwise draw attention to their attention.

    28. Re:The car is great to drive, but... by mykro76 · · Score: 1

      Not to wholly defend the touchscreen design approach - you make a lot of very good points. But you do also make the assumption that touch is the primary input. In many of the new systems voice control is designed to be the primary input, PARTICULARLY when the car is in motion. Now whether they've been successful with that yet is another story, but I would argue we are going to see a little more evolution in this relatively new type of control mechanism.

    29. Re:The car is great to drive, but... by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 1

      meaning that Tesla's field service techs don't know how to fix that, so it's easier to just remove the entire thing, send it back, and let the factory rebuild the offending part for a new customer.

      Or it's just easier to swap out the whole in order to get the car back to the customer quicker.

    30. Re:The car is great to drive, but... by jrumney · · Score: 1

      Radio stations can generally be changed from buttons on the steering wheel. With a modern climate control system, why would you need to adjust anything (except maybe toggling the defog setting) while you are driving. This isn't some 70's style slider controlling radiator water flow into the heating system and a manual fan speed control. You set a target temperature, and the climate control automatically adjusts the heating/cooling and fan speed to get the car interior to that temperature.

    31. Re:The car is great to drive, but... by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      I dont..... as i said, when i get a new car it takes a few days to feel it out, but once you do its second nature.

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    32. Re:The car is great to drive, but... by cliffjumper222 · · Score: 1

      Hmm, the obvious solution is to filter out finger movements due to bumps by shifting the screen in the opposite direction. Accelerometer sensors would provide the inputs, along with "anticpational imaging", i.e., a camera that tracks generalized finger movement and plots out the likely tradgectory. It'd be like a steady-cam, but for the touchscreen. Alternatively, you could be boring and have a knob or button.

    33. Re:The car is great to drive, but... by beltsbear · · Score: 1

      The touch screen console is one of the things that works well. The two main problems are the door handles and the main drive motor.

    34. Re:The car is great to drive, but... by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Throw more software at the problem. Oh! Now we need a faster CPU!

    35. Re:The car is great to drive, but... by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      We always make fun of the Windows people for just reinstalling the whole thing when something happens that is wrong.

      After the warranty period is over, do we want replacing the whole drive train to be what the service people are experienced with doing to fix problems?

    36. Re:The car is great to drive, but... by TomGreenhaw · · Score: 1

      Actually the controls are very easy to use and the steering wheel has mechanical controls that adjust fan speed.

      --
      Greed is the root of all evil.
    37. Re:The car is great to drive, but... by TomGreenhaw · · Score: 1

      We've had ours for almost two years in Chicago and we did have a couple of bad ice storms. The handles popped out ok. I guess the motors are strong enough to break the ice...

      --
      Greed is the root of all evil.
    38. Re:The car is great to drive, but... by AK+Marc · · Score: 0

      I never asked what you do. I flatly stated that anyone reading this would assert that they do it without looking. You are only proving me right, but in a very disagreeable manner. But I know, nobody likes you well enough to let you in a car with them, so you have no way of testing this, and that makes you feel bad. I get it. I'm sorry. Maybe one day, when you learn how to not alienate everyone, someone will allow you to ride in the front seat with them, and you can test this.

    39. Re:The car is great to drive, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No the handles always pop out. That's standard.
      Presenting themselves to you when you approach, that's part of a package that requires $$ (at least it did when I bought mine, and I think it still is).

    40. Re: The car is great to drive, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      only big time idiots could imagine a touch ui being progress in any type of cockpit.

      ergonomics and psychology research figured a very long time ago that tactile feedback and knob identity encoding are extremely useful in critical situations. when seconds of lost attention can kill you, for example.

      but the western world has become dominated by the irrationality of marketing and communist agitprop. which often is the same. hail money !

    41. Re:The car is great to drive, but... by KGIII · · Score: 1

      You are wise in the Way of the Interstate Traveler. I've grown fond of steering wheel controls. I didn't think I would. I think that turned into a good design idea but it requires familiarity. You can't just hop into a different make and model and know what you're doing. For a vehicle that you're intimately familiar with, however, it's a great idea. BMW really has this figured out. With HUD it's not bad at all. You can really give a good amount of attention to the idiots on the road with you.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    42. Re:The car is great to drive, but... by KGIII · · Score: 1

      It's also not a great idea to constantly keep your eyes out of the car - sometimes it's good to let them focus on something different, even if only for a second and - of course, while safe to do so. If you can't take your eyes off the road for a second then you needn't be driving. Err - some heavily trafficked areas make that untrue but it's true for the vast majority of miles traveled.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    43. Re:The car is great to drive, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I always wondered how the door handles would work after an ice storm or freezing rain. I've dealt with my share of frozen car door locks, but at least I could get the handle to move. I think the touch screen console was a big mistake. You need to be able to manage things like climate settings, radio stations, etc. by touch. Forcing the drive to look at a screen for mundane things was a bad idea. I don't own a Tesla, partly because they are so new and I don't like the design elements I mentioned. But I have driven one. There are very few other cars that are as much fun to drive.

      Clearly you do not own or have not seen any videos showing the level of personalization you can achieve through Tesla's system. You can even control the climate settings (temperature, mode, switch on/off, etc.) from the steering wheel.
      Can you do that in your car?

    44. Re: The car is great to drive, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As we all know: Newer is Always better. No exceptions, No matter what.

    45. Re:The car is great to drive, but... by jcdr · · Score: 1

      The Prius, on the other hand, uses a touch screen interface. Look. Touch to change screen. Look for setting. Touch. Eyes shifting back and forth between screen and road, or just looking at screen.

      My Prius II have all the important settings directly on the steering wheel:
      http://www.motorauthority.com/...
      After a few practice, I don't even have to look at them.

    46. Re:The car is great to drive, but... by MightyYar · · Score: 2

      It's entirely possible that in Tesla's service model it is cheaper to swap a part and recondition it in mass production than it is to train and pay a local technician.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    47. Re:The car is great to drive, but... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      The Tesla has physical controls too - on the steering wheel. They are fully configurable. The idea is that you set up the functions you want to use while driving, like radio tuning or climate control, on those buttons. There are little mini displays for the left and right side buttons to either side of the speedometer.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    48. Re:The car is great to drive, but... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Nissan Leaf owners are finding them to be reliable, and getting very low wear on the brakes. It seems to be a Tesla specific problem.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    49. Re:The car is great to drive, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your argument is one big fallacy, sorry. Go home and learn some proper logic. You can't say "everyone here is an idiot and by saying they aren't, they provide proof". No, logic doesn't work like that.

    50. Re:The car is great to drive, but... by frenchgates · · Score: 1

      I guess the assumption is that the driver is probably texting anyway, so, wht, what's one more touchscreen?

      --
      Syntax error: loose != lose, affect != effect, then!=than
    51. Re:The car is great to drive, but... by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      You are right that some of the plastic parts could probably be replaced with some metal parts, and then those parts would last longer. But it wouldn't really matter once the drivetrain and suspension points are all worn out - you'd just toss the whole thing anyway. They even get the upholstery about right - just when the seats are falling apart is when the car isn't worth repairing anymore mechanically. Higher quality material in the seats would delay them getting ratty, but you'd still have to toss out the (now more expensive) car.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    52. Re:The car is great to drive, but... by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Break wear is proportional to how ludicrously fast the owners drive the car. Actually, it's probably an exponential curve. The Tesla S is a very fast car, and very heavy to boot. I don't imagine Leaf owners are getting into a whole lot of trouble with their 92 MPH speed governor and 8.8 second 0-60 times.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    53. Re:The car is great to drive, but... by ndavis · · Score: 1

      I always wondered how the door handles would work after an ice storm or freezing rain. I've dealt with my share of frozen car door locks, but at least I could get the handle to move. I think the touch screen console was a big mistake. You need to be able to manage things like climate settings, radio stations, etc. by touch. Forcing the drive to look at a screen for mundane things was a bad idea. I don't own a Tesla, partly because they are so new and I don't like the design elements I mentioned. But I have driven one. There are very few other cars that are as much fun to drive.

      This is what I like about Ford vehicles they have the options in the touch screen but also have regular buttons and knobs that can do the same thing. I never use the touch screen to adjust the temp or fans as I feel the buttons are faster and require less thought. Oh and I agree about the Tesla really nice car to drive and a lot of nice elements but I found the interior to be minimalist which doesn't work when you have kids I felt.

    54. Re:The car is great to drive, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Holy shit, that choad is thicker than his legs are. Seriously, what the fuck?

    55. Re:The car is great to drive, but... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      The Leaf is actually pretty quick off the mark... The 0-60 time doesn't do it justice. It does pretty well in the Traffic Light GP, and it's kinda funny hearing other cars giving themselves a hernia trying to keep up.

      I'd love to know how much braking force the re-gen can supply. There is a 'B' mode that cranks it up when you take your foot off the accelerator, and it's high enough that the brake lights should really come on. Based on that I'd say that I rarely ever use the actual brakes, except below about 3 MPH where the re-gen doesn't seem to be active.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    56. Re:The car is great to drive, but... by gnupun · · Score: 1

      Even if the driver had to look at the knob/button, it still takes less visual time than with a similar control on a touchscreen.

      Manual knob: driver quickly locates the knob with his eyes and once his hand is on the knob or near it, he no longer needs to look at the knob.

      Touch screen slider: driver has to be sure he is on the right screen. Then he locates the slider. While still looking at the slider, he slides it until it's the desired value. All this time he has to take his eyes off the road while operating the touchscreen.

      No matter how much you argue, touchscreen devices take more visual time to operate than manual buttons/knobs. If a manual button/knob is frequently used, the driver would not need to take his eyes of the road to find it due to remembering it from muscle memory (eg: radio station switch buttons). By contrast, all touchscreen operations require the driver to take his eyes off the road (besides the huge, bright screen will distract you from what is happening on the road).

    57. Re:The car is great to drive, but... by sribe · · Score: 1

      Knobs and buttons in a car seem to be going the way of the dodo.

      Just bought a new car. Happy to say that trend seems to have peaked, and for some makes knobs and buttons are back, and I expect more makes will follow.

    58. Re:The car is great to drive, but... by j2.718ff · · Score: 1

      But in the Chevy Volt, for the 2nd gen (2016), the knobs and buttons have made a comeback. The space-age tactile feedback flat buttons were pretty well shunned by the community. And for good reason, they were clunky, and not usable in cold months with gloves on. I've owned the car for 3 years and for even simple buttons like seek takes an extra few seconds compared to other vehicles.

      I'm so glad to hear this. I loved everything about the Volt until I test drove one last year. That horrible dashboard turned me off to the car completely. Perhaps I'll give it another look now.

    59. Re:The car is great to drive, but... by es330td · · Score: 1

      I got to experience this problem personally. I owned a 1986 SAAB 9000 Turbo with a flat panel radio. Instead of the knob for volume it had a - and + button one either held or pressed repeatedly. It looked great, but in practice doing volume changes while driving was a pain, especially since the car was a 5 speed. (Yes, I had to do frequent adjustments. I am a big fan of orchestral movie scores like Williams, Horner, et al and the dynamic changes of that kind of music required frequent adjustment to compensate for road noise.) While I know that now those kind of controls are on the steering wheel, they didn't used to be and I longed for a twist knob for volume control. I eventually replaced the head unit with a new one that included a CD player and SAAB had the presence of mind to go back to a volume knob.

    60. Re:The car is great to drive, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      . . . there is no point at which you can rely on touch alone

      I've never had a problem with it. Neither did your mom.

    61. Re:The car is great to drive, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the 2015 mazda 3 has a really nice infotainment knob thing right under the shifter. you can go right from shifting into 4th to adjusting the volume or changing pod casts without ever looking at the screen. its rad.

    62. Re:The car is great to drive, but... by RonTheHurler · · Score: 1

      Yeah, my refrigerator even has a freaking touch sensitive "button" to turn the light on. Damned if I can find it in the middle of the night though. I specifically looked for a fridge with tactile buttons when I replaced it. Couldn't find one. So now I've got one of those battery operated LED pods mounted to the door, but that doesn't help the cube/crush ice button sense my hard, calloused fingers any better. I have the same problem on those touch-screen POS systems at the stores now too. I like to joke that I'm just a damn good looking zombie when the checker notices my fingers have no effect on the touch screen "These things don't work for dead people." I calmly tell them as I reach for the stylus or ask them to touch it for me.

      Any sufficiently advanced technology shouldn't have to be hacked it just to make it usable. Enough with the bells and whistles that only get in the way of what I need to do instead of helping me do it.

      And while we're on the topic of self-driving cars... A thought occurred to me in the parking lot of Best Buy. How the hell are self-driving cars going to navigate a parking lot and find a spot near the store I want to go to?
      What if I notice a different store and change the plan at the last minute?
      What search strategy will it use to seek that one open spot in a full lot?
      I'll keep the steering wheel, thanks.

    63. Re:The car is great to drive, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's probably been injecting it with synthrol or silicone.

    64. Re:The car is great to drive, but... by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      no you said watch people, everyone looks away

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    65. Re:The car is great to drive, but... by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Yes, everyone here drives without taking their eyes off the road.

      no you said watch people, everyone looks away

      I said that *you* don't look away. And everyone reading this doesn't look away. But that if you ride in the passenger seat and watch the driver, you'll see they do look away.

      What kind of insanity is it where the listener swears he knows what the speaker meant, after repeating it wrongly repeatedly and being corrected? Whatever mental illness that is, it seems to be spread through Slashdot. I've never seen a place where so many people correct others, asserting what they meant, even in opposition to the original speaker's clarifications.

    66. Re:The car is great to drive, but... by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Yes, the flat torque curve is very nice at low speeds. But the Tesla also has that, and is doing 60 by the time the Leaf gets to 30.

      I imagine the limit to regenerative braking is how quickly the battery can take the charge. If you really wanted to you could pass the motors through a resistor to save wear on the pads. But brake pads are cheap. The real problem is the rotor damage - but you need thin rotors to bleed off the heat. It's not a trivial problem to solve in fast cars, and the Tesla adds a lot of weight to the equation.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    67. Re:The car is great to drive, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Touchscreens are great for the manufacture, cheap, easy to install, scalable, and upgradable.

      Buttons are none of those. Big win for the vendor, Big loss for the consumer. Phone industry proved the same deal.

    68. Re:The car is great to drive, but... by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      Right. So five years from now there likely won't be any economical means at all to service these Teslas.

    69. Re:The car is great to drive, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most of the controls that you use while driving are on the steering wheel or at your foot, i.e. like a regular car. I have never found the screen to be a negative issue. The controls are intuitive, flexible and largely automated. For instance, the car automatically brings up my calendar so when I get in the car I simply press on the calendar entry and I am going to my destination. The suspension knows the locations it needs to be up and down and the rules depending on speed. I never adjust it. The climate control is remarkably simple and usually automatic. Frankly I love the interfaces and I get so much information from the displays whether listening to various entertainment choices or information on my trip progress and energy consumption, the map is huge and a massive luxury. I suppose tthere have been instances where I hit a button somewhat wrongly because of car motion. Compared to the facility it seems a small price to pay. I could never ggo back to the clunky controls of regular cars. They seem so inflexible and stupid. Frankly, my main beef with all the controls on the tesla is the location of the turn signal. It is behind the wheel in an odd place for me and I always and hitting the cruise control knob instead of the turn signal even more than a year later.

    70. Re:The car is great to drive, but... by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      When the Shuttle or Soyuz capsule reaches the International Space Station, do they just kinda press up against the ISS and open the hatch? No.

      You may have just stumbled upon the reason that the Tesla uses a touchscreen. The SpaceX Dragon 2 pilot and command centers are touchscreen-based. Not only does this save (almost literally) a ton of weight, but it also permits better egress to the relevant seats and fold up when not needed. It is a genius design - iff using a touchscreen is as good an experience as using a 'real' control panel.

      Perhaps the Tesla uses the touchscreen to beta-test touchsceen UI decisions that are to be incorporated in the Dragon 2.

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    71. Re:The car is great to drive, but... by lucien86 · · Score: 1

      When I saw it I thought can that be real. A quick Google search gives the answer "Docking into a huge silicone cock". But what the hell is going on I don't know....

      --
      Below the speed of light Special Relativity is one of the most accurate theories in physics - above the speed of light..
    72. Re:The car is great to drive, but... by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Why? At the end of the day you always have "take it apart and fix it locally". Teslas should be at least as easy to fix as an equivalent ICE car. And hold on while I shed some tears for people who spend $100,000 on a car and then whine about repair costs.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    73. Re:The car is great to drive, but... by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      I don't feel sorry for the people who spend $100,000 for a car and then can't sell it for $16,000 five years later because repair costs are astronomical. But it's something that should be considered before buying.

    74. Re:The car is great to drive, but... by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Ah! They have thought of you. They have a "resale value guarantee" which promises that your car will be worth at least 50% of what you paid for it after 3 years. $50k over 3 years? Why, what else were you going to do with that money :)

      Tesla seems to hold value compared to other electrics. I've seen it speculated that it is because Tesla's battery holds up very well. It loses only 6% of it's initial capacity over the first 50,000 miles, and then only 1% per 30,000 miles thereafter. That means you could legitimately never expect to replace the battery pack.

      If I wanted to (and I have to admit it is kind of tempting), I could pick up a used Leaf with less than 30,000 miles for around $12k. That's a car that starts for around $30k. I suspect this would not be the case if the battery packs held up better (and gas wasn't practically free).

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    75. Re:The car is great to drive, but... by toddestan · · Score: 1

      And while we're on the topic of self-driving cars... A thought occurred to me in the parking lot of Best Buy. How the hell are self-driving cars going to navigate a parking lot and find a spot near the store I want to go to?
      What if I notice a different store and change the plan at the last minute?
      What search strategy will it use to seek that one open spot in a full lot?
      I'll keep the steering wheel, thanks.

      Presumably the car would drop me at the door and go find a spot to park by itself, which wouldn't even have to be close to the store. When I'm done shopping I'd use an app or something to summon the car back to where I am.

    76. Re:The car is great to drive, but... by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      I was talking about five years later, though. Or six, or eight.

      I drive a 2006 light truck that I bought new and I expect it to last at least five or six more years with affordable service costs.

    77. Re:The car is great to drive, but... by RonTheHurler · · Score: 1

      That's actually a great idea. I'm looking forward to self driving cars. Truly. But there was a podcast recently -- planet money, where they talked about all the reasons self-driving cars will probably ship without steering wheels or foot pedals. I think that's a bad idea. Just thinking of all the times I've had to wait in line at a valet station, or changed my mind when I saw how busy a restaurant was then drove off aimlessly while pondering where to go next, saw a store in passing and suddenly remembered I needed something there and decided to duck-in real quick... Unless the human-machine interface is really, really, good, I'm not ready to give up the steering wheel.

    78. Re:The car is great to drive, but... by Moridineas · · Score: 1

      Actually the controls are very easy to use and the steering wheel has mechanical controls that adjust fan speed.

      Definitely not on the Odyssey (2014) middle trim--there are no fan control buttons on the steering wheel.

      Here's another example of the utter idiocy of the UI. Climate controls:

      1) Turn knob for temperature
      2) A multiple push button (toggles between states) for where the air blows, with only a TINY hard-to-read icon on the greyscale LCD to show you what mode your own
      3) Two buttons (Up/Down) that control fan speed.

      Did they not have room to put on a slider switch too?

  3. Reminds me of a stand up joke: by UnknowingFool · · Score: 4, Funny

    Comedian: "So I just spent $200 to fix my muffler."
    [Crowd cheers]
    Comedian: "No, no. It's a bad thing. It was so loud that I couldn't hear all the other things that were wrong with my car."
    "Now I'm going to have to spend $500 . . .
    . . .
    . . .
    "for a better stereo system."

    --
    Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    1. Re:Reminds me of a stand up joke: by somenickname · · Score: 1

      I understand this is a joke but, it's a surprisingly accurate one. As you lower the noise floor in the vehicle, it becomes increasingly difficult to make it tolerable in the cabin. You can take any car, pull out the interior, cover it in dynamat/dynapad type materials, put everything back in and you will nearly eliminate road noise. The problem is that you have then lowered the noise floor to such an extent that you can now hear a seatbelt gently tapping against the door. You can hear a crumb under your seat shifting as you accelerate. You can hear every single tiny noise that was previously masked by having a noise floor a few dB higher. Quiet cars are maddeningly difficult to make silent.

    2. Re:Reminds me of a stand up joke: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      White noise generator? Same as when I have fan running at night.

    3. Re:Reminds me of a stand up joke: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Comedian: "So I just spent $200 to fix my muffler."

      [Crowd cheers]

      Comedian: "No, no. It's a bad thing. It was so loud that I couldn't hear all the other things that were wrong with my car."

      "Now I'm going to have to spend $500 . . .

      . . .

      . . .

      "for a better stereo system."

      a veteran auto mechanic once told me that any problem you couldn't hear over the radio didn't constitute a problem.

  4. Says more about Consumer Reports than the car by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That a car can fall this far this fast with little or no structural or locomotional changes says more about the raters than the ratee.

    1. Re:Says more about Consumer Reports than the car by 0123456 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That a car can fall this far this fast with little or no structural or locomotional changes says more about the raters than the ratee.

      Why? When a new car is released, they typically rate it based on initial experience of the new model, and past experience with similar models from the same manufacturer. If reality proves it's not, they adjust the rating.

      What else do you expect them to do? Travel into the future and ask owners how reliable it's been over the last ten years?

    2. Re:Says more about Consumer Reports than the car by Tx · · Score: 2

      Seems a bit harsh. You can only go with the information available at the time. You're not going to be able to pick up on longer term wear-and-tear issues until the products have actually been around for a while. Now that that information is available, they've updated their opinion to factor it in. That seems eminently reasonable and honest to me. I guess they could refuse to give an opinion on anything until it has been around for a year or two...

      --
      Oh no... it's the future.
    3. Re:Says more about Consumer Reports than the car by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Consumer reports has been a joke as car raters for decades.

      They rated the 84 'vette as unacceptable because it wasn't an economy car. Seriously, it's been bad that long yet people still pay attention to them. I don't know why.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    4. Re:Says more about Consumer Reports than the car by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      Or it merely means they are updating their rating as more data comes in? How horrible of them!

    5. Re:Says more about Consumer Reports than the car by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because they're a far more reliable source of information than the people who fall over themselves to fellate Musk?

    6. Re:Says more about Consumer Reports than the car by Nothing2Chere · · Score: 1

      So you're saying "Payola" is the reason for the adjustment?

      I can believe that.

    7. Re:Says more about Consumer Reports than the car by AK+Marc · · Score: 2, Informative

      They deliberately rigged the Suzuki Sidekick to tip, by strapping weights on the side, then used an altered photo to make it look like it would tip without the weights, which never happened.

      Consumer reports is not ethical, and I don't listen to anything they have to say.

      If you want proof that their methods don't work, go look at their reports on dual-badged cars. Ford/Mazda co-ventures, Mitsubishi/Chrysler co-ventures. The cars will score very differently based on who sold them, unrelated to who made them. It proves an inconsistent subjectivity to the whole process, and the worthlessness of their polling methods and results.

    8. Re:Says more about Consumer Reports than the car by ChrisMaple · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I expect them not to rate it until it has a track record.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    9. Re:Says more about Consumer Reports than the car by CaptainLard · · Score: 1

      On that note, hopefully they* won't release anymore software till its done and free of bugs!

      *the "they" they, not necessarily CR

    10. Re:Says more about Consumer Reports than the car by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And just how many people died when the Sidekick rolled?

    11. Re:Says more about Consumer Reports than the car by ChrisMaple · · Score: 2

      Downgrading the 1984 Corvette because it wasn't an economy car was silly. I had one, and given the sort of car it was, fuel economy wasn't bad. What was bad was reliability. It was a new version, and many things were terrible. Air conditioner failed twice in 2 years, power steering failed, clutch master cylinder failed, horns failed, pressurized struts for hood and hatchback failed, instrument console failed, temperature sender connector failed, car barely passed emissions testing, radiator fan control failed, upper radiator hose failed, paint cracked, and much more that I can't remember at the moment. I owned it from about 1989 to 1993 (odometer range 70,000 to 100,000) and spent $6000 on repairs, taking my life savings down to almost zero. A terrible car.

      CR's car ratings have limitations that must be understood, and one big limitation is that they aren't enthusiasts. However, ratings from car enthusiast magazines are even more problematic; there's little attention to reliability and none to customer feedback. CR fills a niche, understand it and use it.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    12. Re:Says more about Consumer Reports than the car by tnk1 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      That works for the used cars, but not for the new ones.

      I think CR did the right thing. They made a recommendation based on the best information they could get at the time, and then when faced with conflicting experience which only time would have exposed, they changed their recommendation to fit new data.

      The fact is that despite the potential for mistakes, following someone's advice who has done the investigation is always a better strategy than the alternative.

      Now if their investigations are slanted or have crappy methodology, then by all means trash them, but don't do that for simply trying to provide good advice for an important purchase (ie. a new car) where they can't have the benefit of time, because once you have tried out a new car over time, it's no longer a new car.

    13. Re:Says more about Consumer Reports than the car by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      I don't listen to anything they have to say.

      If you want proof that their methods don't work, go look at their reports on ...

      I thought you said you don't listen to anything they say. Or do you cut and paste your comments from some Consumer Reports hate site that you frequent?

    14. Re: Says more about Consumer Reports than the car by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nobody cares what you expect to happen. What will happen will happen.

    15. Re:Says more about Consumer Reports than the car by labnet · · Score: 0

      Because they're a far more reliable source of information than the people who fall over themselves to fellate Musk?

      More like Musk hasn't dropped a big enough bag of Benjamins on their desk yet.

      --
      46137
    16. Re:Says more about Consumer Reports than the car by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      Cool story. So people should just buy completely blind on new car models? Yeah, that sounds real consumer friendly.

    17. Re:Says more about Consumer Reports than the car by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It is irresponsible to give brand new anything a reliability recommendation. Which is exactly what they did and this is why they shouldn't.

      Remember people are actually paying for this shitty advice.

    18. Re:Says more about Consumer Reports than the car by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yeah sorry. No. History doesn't actually bear out your story.

      [quote]It sued Consumer Reports the following year, and although they would settle out of court eight years later, Suzuki probably came out looking worse. The problem was that a Suzuki internal memo from 1985 surfaced, saying "It is imperative that we develop a crisis plan that will primarily deal with the "roll" factor. Because of the narrow wheelbase, similar to the Jeep, the car is bound to turn over." The Pinto-like paper trail would have surely been even more damaging if Suzuki hadn't already pulled the vehicle out of North America. Suzuki would eventually admit to having knowledge of 213 deaths and 8,200 injuries as the result of rollover, and would settle some 200 lawsuits.[/quote]

      http://www.carbuzz.com/news/20...

    19. Re: Says more about Consumer Reports than the car by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're right. They shouldn't have down rated the Corvette because of fuel efficiency, but because it's a douchemobile.

    20. Re:Says more about Consumer Reports than the car by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As opposed to the ones that are taking it up the rump from Big Oil, and are rather obvious in their defense of the status quo?

      I'm rather disappointed to see someone that styles themselves "Linux Nutcase" fail a bias check.

    21. Re:Says more about Consumer Reports than the car by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      As opposed to the ones that are taking it up the rump from Big Oil, and are rather obvious in their defense of the status quo?

      That's an amazingly poor leap of logic. I own an EV so I'm hardly against them. I am against the Musk Defense Force that can't stand that anyone might dare to criticize their messiah.

      I'm rather disappointed

      Shall I call the waaahmbulance?

      to see someone that styles themselves "Linux Nutcase" fail a bias check.

      That isn't my handle.

    22. Re:Says more about Consumer Reports than the car by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 2

      213 deaths and 8200 injuries due to rollovers.

      http://www.carbuzz.com/news/20...

    23. Re:Says more about Consumer Reports than the car by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know someone who had one of those. We used to joke he was going to flip it. Then he flipped it (swerving from someone passing). No major injuries though. wow, this brings back memories...

    24. Re:Says more about Consumer Reports than the car by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dual-badged cars are not the same cars. Yes they are made on the same line, but they don't use the same parts/suppliers, and that makes a big difference in the overall quality of the car.

    25. Re:Says more about Consumer Reports than the car by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Yes, it is prone to rolling over. That doesn't excuse Consumer Reports' fraud.

    26. Re:Says more about Consumer Reports than the car by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      I don't drink breastmilk. That doesn't mean I've never done it. I just grew up. Try it sometime, you might like it.

    27. Re:Says more about Consumer Reports than the car by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      None from the Consumer Reports tests, where they couldn't make one roll. Ever. The photo was a fraudulent dramatization, not a test result and never happened in testing.

      But yes, the statistics show it to be unsafe. It's a cheap car. Cheap cars are more likely to be driven by younger drivers. Real-world crash survival is correlated well to cost of car. Not because of the safety of the car, but the type of driver. But people assume it's the car, and confirmation bias, and we all assume it's "common sense" that a more expensive car is inherently safer.

      That's why the rollover tests were added and such, because the results from Consumer Reports were faked for publicity, and the driver makes more of a difference in real world performance than the car.

    28. Re:Says more about Consumer Reports than the car by dywolf · · Score: 1

      The funniest part of this, is that you don't even realize just how stupid you look right now.

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
    29. Re:Says more about Consumer Reports than the car by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tesla of course already know what reliability they have, since they get all the issues logged in their database, not just the small sample CR used. Elon said that the rate of change is on average 20 modifications to manufactured cars per week, which makes the rate of issues very relevant to a specific build date. This is different to how other car manufacturers operate, and possibly warrants a different methodology when tabulating the answers from those surveyed. If CR didn't account for the continuous iterations on the car, their reliability score will be misleadingly low (assuming here that Tesla addresses more issues than they introduce). One interesting question, which CR could have answered, is how is the rate of issues changing depending on build date.

    30. Re:Says more about Consumer Reports than the car by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhh, no. Let's put this in terms you can understand.

      You're at the gay bar and you meet a cute guy named Raul. So you go in the bathroom and he fucks you in the ass with his 8" cock and give you his phone number and suggests going out for drinks in a couple days.

      So you rate him a 100%.

      Then a couple weeks later you have ass warts and he gave you a fake phone number and it turns out he videotaped the encounter and posted it on ass-sluts.com.

      So you probably drop his rating to a 90%. Because he still filled your asshole with that big dick, but it turns out it wasn't all you hoped it would be.

    31. Re:Says more about Consumer Reports than the car by Luthair · · Score: 1

      Then they'd never rate any new cars since manufacturers iterate the design every year.

    32. Re:Says more about Consumer Reports than the car by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are also poor at reviewing in a general sense:

      http://www.consumerreports.org/media/content/Categories/CarsTrucks/Autos/ford/crownvictoria/overview/sedanlse/profile.html

      I owned one of these. If you are reasonable, the car will get 25 mpg actual fuel mileage (many report more if they drive like grandma, but 25 will let you cruise on the freeway in the left hand lane). Now, compare that against other cars of similar size. Yet it receives a "poor" mpg rating? Compared to what? A Toyota Yaris? Sure. Compared against completely different classes of vehicles, it gets shitty fuel mileage. But if we're doing that, compare it to a school bus and the crown vic looks like a fuel sipper.

      It gets "very good" acceleration. Again, as an owner of one, these are not quick accelerating vehicles by any stretch of the imagination. They do, however, sound nice. :D

      As for the rear seat, they say it's not roomy. I've had four people sit across it before, and not in each others' lap.

      The crash test results are not impressive, but consumer reports thinks they are. Go ahead and check on youtube for what happens during a side impact. The car becomes a slaughterhouse. And this car has the pinto issue. Due to the gas tank placement, the car can burst into flames upon rear impact (again, youtube).

      They didn't even bother to mention that due to being RWD, car owners need to be familiar with RWD handling, especially in snowy areas. While I appreciated it, I know of many others in the snow belt who won't touch a RWD car with a 10 foot pole because if you aren't good at driving, it can spin out with ease.

      Basically, consumer reports is bad at reviewing cars. Probably bad at other stuff, too.

    33. Re:Says more about Consumer Reports than the car by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Troll

    34. Re:Says more about Consumer Reports than the car by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Support: Just install new great version. It will fix all your problems, the last week's version is hopelessly outdated.
      If you will still have problems, just call us, and we tell you to install next week's version that will fix all bugs and do not introduce any new ones ;)

    35. Re:Says more about Consumer Reports than the car by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Let's be honest: given how little horsepower it had (205), the 1984 Corvette should have been an economy car!

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    36. Re:Says more about Consumer Reports than the car by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      So you thought it was fine when Dateline attached explosives to the sidesaddle gas tanks to show they are unsafe as well? Just an innocent test.

      If they have to fake the results, they are fraudster. It doesn't matter whether they are right, it's still unethical fraud.

    37. Re: Says more about Consumer Reports than the car by billdale · · Score: 0

      Uggggh... I have no patience for morons such as yourself that take every opportunity to flame anyone such as Musk for his daring, his commitment to ideals, and to producing a good product. Once he started pushing Model Ses out the door he could have just leaned back and done virtually nothing more but rake in the megabucks people were lined up to spend for The Next Big Thing... and, then, when people started to have problems, ignore them, the way many companies do these days, until things got so bad that the company collapsed under its own bad PR. No... he did ' do that... he started spending BILLIONS installing high - speed stations all over the country to enhance the usability, and forging ahead with new and better upgradable software to make the cars safer, better and more user-friendly. He shoveled billions more into the Gigafactory... and when problems did arise on this ultra-high-tech ride, he got right on top of it, replacing anything necessary to make it as exhilarating an experience as he knew how to make it. Where can you fault him? For having a car that was not PERFECT right out of the gate? Let me see YOU produce anything more complex than a yo yo that does not have problems after a hundred thousand copies leave your factory! Ohhhh... let me guess... you live in your uncle's attic cuz you're too insecure to get a job, for fear you'll do something imperfectly, and suffer the same kinds of, abuse you are dishing out right now. Musk shelled out $150 billion to get Tesla up and running... that was all the cash he had... what is the most YOU ever risked on a venture? A buck on a Hi - Flier kite, maybe? You are pathetic.

    38. Re:Says more about Consumer Reports than the car by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      It's a mouse. You want more HP you bolt them on for cheap.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    39. Re:Says more about Consumer Reports than the car by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure what you are recommending trying, breast milk or growing up. But you may indeed like breast milk if you try it, especially from the teat of a beautiful woman. Growing up on the other hand is overrated. ;P

  5. Our new model will address those issues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Besides, the dashboard entertainment will be vastly improved, and you deserve a new car.

    Get with the program!

  6. I'm not surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm not surprised. NADA wrote about their experience driving one for a year, and they experienced a lot of problems over that time. Their problems, like what CR indicates, were with drivetrain and touch screens mostly. Frankly, I don't even find anything about this concerning except the drivetrain problems. The only electric I'd be interested in would be a low-mid end model, which likely wouldn't have as much extra stuff to break (touch screens, pop out handles, etc.). However, if they can't even keep the drivetrain from breaking, that doesn't bode well for the lower models.

    I like Tesla, but I have a nagging feeling that what's going to happen is that one of these days Toyota or Honda or someone will start taking electric very seriously, and Tesla will be done. Toyota and others have experience and economies of scale that Tesla can't match.

    1. Re:I'm not surprised by rsborg · · Score: 1

      I like Tesla, but I have a nagging feeling that what's going to happen is that one of these days Toyota or Honda or someone will start taking electric very seriously, and Tesla will be done. Toyota and others have experience and economies of scale that Tesla can't match.

      Tesla will be happy when that happens, because they've been living electrics for years, and any competition that Toyota or Honda can put up will force that company to compete with its other offerings, causing internal disruption.

      This is classic innovators dilemma territory and Musk/Tesla and everyone else knows it. Which is why there will be no competition, simply hit-pieces and trumped up issues that are funded by industry groups.

      and btw, Toyota has bet the farm not on battery-electric hybrids (Prius) as it's future, but instead fuel-cells. Seriously. Yeah, Toyota isn't going near electrics anytime soon.

      --
      Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
    2. Re:I'm not surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Electric (hybrid /fuel cell included) offerings do not and will not compete with ICE because of the price disparity. otherwise prius would have already caused that internal "diarrhea".
      electric only is a specific use case scenario and does not fit well with majority of drivers, heck you probably don't even want every one driving the battery powered cars. this is probably why they are focusing on fuelcell.

      Chances are musk will in 5 years time announce he is ready to innovate on fuel cell.

    3. Re:I'm not surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tesla's end-game is to be a tier-1 supplier of batteries and charging infrastructure for the major auto-makers. Building their own car is simply a way around the chicken-and-egg dilemma.

    4. Re:I'm not surprised by tnk1 · · Score: 1

      They have economies of scale, but battery tech and battery production are things they don't have. They would need to seriously ramp up their production of batteries or source them from someplace that has production in order to compete in the EV market.

      You know who is working on a lot of battery production capacity? Tesla.

      I assume that a back-up plan for Tesla is precisely what you consider to be their doomsday scenario. Yes, Tesla may not ever make a splash as a car manufacturer in that scenario, but they could be the world's largest battery producer and let the car companies worry about designing cars while they worry about battery tech and battery production. Instead of competing with Toyota, they could simply set up a lucrative supplier deal with them and any other automaker who wants EVs.

    5. Re:I'm not surprised by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Last year, Toyota sold over twice as much kWhr by battery as Tesla. They have battery tech - and they have production. Tesla is playing catch-up, not the other way around (Toyota: Prius has a 1.3 kW battery pack, Tesla S has an 85 kW battery pack. Prius sales of 419,000 in 2014 and Tesla 32,000 in 2014).

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    6. Re:I'm not surprised by fnj · · Score: 1

      Last year, Toyota sold over twice as much kWhr by battery as Tesla. They have battery tech - and they have production. Tesla is playing catch-up, not the other way around (Toyota: Prius has a 1.3 kW battery pack, Tesla S has an 85 kW battery pack. Prius sales of 419,000 in 2014 and Tesla 32,000 in 2014).

      So according to your own figures, Tesla sold 2.72 GWh of installed batteries and Prius sold 0.54 GWh of installed batteries. I realize Toyota sells other hybrid cars, but so far you sure haven't supported your claim.

      Also, how much of those Prius GWh are nickel metal hydride, that would be practically useless for EVs?

    7. Re:I'm not surprised by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Look at Ferrari. They sell cars to fund their racing. Tesla will probably continue to sell some cars, just high end cars. They'll keep developing tech in that sector and sell/license it to others. What's funny is all the people assuming all sorts of strange conspiracies in this thread - not you but I've noticed it as I am going through. Really, it's just good business sense. Also, and again not you, why are people made that a company changes its stance when new information comes in? That's as stupid as being mad a a politician who changes their views when they learn more things. We're supposed to be ever changing and able to admit our mistakes!

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    8. Re:I'm not surprised by jcdr · · Score: 1

      Toyota seem to like relatively small NiMH battery for now as there use it on hybrid and fuel cell cars. There is maybe ecological and economical reasons to limit the quantity of the battery that will need to be recycled. Toyota officially plan to recycle nearly all the NiMH battery there sold, and at least the European program seem to be on track to archive this goal. Don't know about Tesla on this question as searching returns mixed results.

    9. Re:I'm not surprised by silentcoder · · Score: 1

      > That's as stupid as being mad a a politician who changes their views when they learn more things. We're supposed to be ever changing and able to admit our mistakes!

      Sadly. most voters around the world do not agree. They want politicians to be "principled" (a euphemism that means: stick to your guns and defend what I want to believe regardless of facts and evidence). A politician who changes his mind based on new information gets branded a "flip-flopper" and deemed unreliable. Voters believe that such a politician is less likely to keep their election promises as they may change their minds after being elected.

      Rationality has almost no place in the democratic process - if it did attack-ads (blatant ad hominem fallacies) would be neither common nor effective .

      None of which, I may add, is an argument against democracy - for despite it's irrational and illogical nature, ever alternative we've come up so far is even worse and relies on depriving people of any say in their governance at all.
      The argument that people should have a say in the laws they live under is purely philosophical and based on the (not particularly logical) concept of natural human rights, but then so is a lot of things that we probably don't want to live without (like say - not letting people murder those who inconvenience them).
      But it is important to recognize the shortcomings too - most important among those that rationality and the laws of logic are essentially absent (and, in fact, punished) by the system. This is one reason why we need checks and balances and means of ensuring accountability in between elections - exactly because elections do not (ever) select the rationally most suitable candidate, or even the one with the most rational policies, it merely selects the most popular one (and to suggest that those correlate is, itself, a fallacy).

      --
      Unicode killed the ASCII-art *
    10. Re:I'm not surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know what's funny?

      Toyota has a deal and buys batteries from Tesla.

    11. Re:I'm not surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, and GM's end-game is to provide health insurance to retired union employees. Building their own car is simply a way around the chicken-and-egg dilemma.

    12. Re:I'm not surprised by sshir · · Score: 1

      Don't know about Tesla as a company, but Tesla's _investors_ surely wont be so happy about serious competition. Maybe Tesla will be able to retreat to its gigafactory and make profit from selling batteries, but maybe not...

    13. Re:I'm not surprised by rworne · · Score: 1

      Toyota's now discontinued Rav 4 EV was also produced in a partnership with Tesla (battery and powertrain) as well.

      --
      I tried every decent and legal way I could think of to resolve the issue w/the business before I rented the chicken suit
  7. Can they fix it? by gnu-sucks · · Score: 1

    So the question is, can they fix it? This is a relatively new car company, certainly the most successful of any new car company in the last decade. A problem with a door handle or a brake rotor is hardly unique in this industry.

    To think this will cause permanent harm to all future Tesla owners is ridiculous. The car is pretty darn good for a new model. In a few years people will start to notice all the failed parts on their Fords and Toyotas and buy a Tesla next.

    1. Re:Can they fix it? by Trepidity · · Score: 1

      That's the key question, and I think too early to say. A one-time repair under warranty is fine from an owner's perspective (even if not ideal) as long as it's really a one-time fix, and the replacement will last a long time rather than need to be replaced/repaired a second time, but this time out of warranty at the owner's expense. It's hard to really guess whether that will be the case. Tesla presumably claims that they fixed early mechanical problems, but you have to wait a few years to figure out if those fixes were really solid.

    2. Re:Can they fix it? by es330td · · Score: 1

      In a few years people will start to notice all the failed parts on their Fords and Toyotas and buy a Tesla next.

      What are these people going to buy when they start noticing failed parts on their Tesla? Every car is going to have parts wear/rattle/fail. This is the nature of subjecting a two ton object made of metal and plastic to the forces of nature.

    3. Re:Can they fix it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you don't fix an iPhone you throw it away and buy a new one that costs more. thats called innovation

    4. Re:Can they fix it? by rch7 · · Score: 1

      You can only fix something stable. You can't fix something that gets new features each week. New features, new bugs. It is your choice - constant updating with new "great" features that you can boost about, or something stable that can be more reliable (or not). Both are impossible.

    5. Re:Can they fix it? by rch7 · · Score: 1

      No, it is not innovation. It is called "consumptionism" and it is exactly what makes this planet a junk yard.

  8. Growing pains for a young company by haruchai · · Score: 2

    Squeaks, rattles, door handles? oh, that can't possibly ever be fixed
    Yes, all those things are annoyances for owners but they'll be addressed. Did someone not get the 4 year bumper to bumper warranty? It's included in the sale.

    Motor and brake problems are more serious but again, nothing unfixable.
    However, the company has to work on improving its reliability quickly, before the launch of the Model 3.
    That's the car that's going to determine if Tesla has a future - and is far more likely to be the ONLY car someone owns.

    --
    Pain is merely failure leaving the body
    1. Re:Growing pains for a young company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The problem is when the 4 years are up and its $10,000 to fix a "minor problem"

      The resale value of a car with expensive repairs can go to near zero, fast, which will affect the price Tesla can demand for its new cars.

    2. Re:Growing pains for a young company by willworkforbeer · · Score: 0

      Ever been on a date, it gets super quiet, and all the two of you hear is your Chipotle-induced stomach noises?

      Point being, if there was some motor noise you might not hear a squeak.
      Or your Chipotle being turned to "liquid uh-oh, date's over."

      "Date" I know, sorry for the obscure reference on slashdot.

      --
      Pretending this is my office full of bitter coworkers..
    3. Re:Growing pains for a young company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just because your rapier-like wit has never got you a date doesn't mean the rest of us are so hampered.

    4. Re:Growing pains for a young company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes quality problems can be fixed.

      However it will take a lot of time and effort to fix everything to the point of where they will be competitive in quality with the luxury brands.

      All the knowledge required to documenting the problems, identifying the root causes, and have a system for taking effective countermeasures takes many years to put into practice. The majors have the tribal quality knowledge already.

    5. Re:Growing pains for a young company by willworkforbeer · · Score: 1

      Just because your rapier-like wit has never got you a date doesn't mean the rest of us are so hampered.

      Pssh. Hamperless pretty boys.

      --
      Pretending this is my office full of bitter coworkers..
    6. Re:Growing pains for a young company by zlives · · Score: 2

      yeah if only they had a audio system in that 100K car

    7. Re:Growing pains for a young company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aside from the obvious electric car angle, this thing competes with the S-class Mercedes, 7-series Beemer and 8-class Audi's. All vehicles for which a $10K out-of-warranty repair bill is considered normal.

    8. Re:Growing pains for a young company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aside from the obvious electric car angle, this thing competes with the S-class Mercedes, 7-series Beemer and 8-class Audi's. All vehicles for which a $10K out-of-warranty repair bill is considered normal.

      Nonsense. You don't get rich enough to buy an S-class by throwing away money on items where a $10k repair is "normal".

    9. Re:Growing pains for a young company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see you're unfamiliar with the 7 series. You should check out what a used one costs to buy once it's out of warranty. They're quite affordable to purchase. Repairing...not so much. And it's always been considered the massive drop in resale value is all because the reliability problems and cost of repairs.

    10. Re:Growing pains for a young company by willworkforbeer · · Score: 1

      yeah if only they had a audio system in that 100K car

      What? And miss the $100k squeak?

      --
      Pretending this is my office full of bitter coworkers..
    11. Re:Growing pains for a young company by dasgoober · · Score: 1

      I always wondered how muc audio equipment I could put into a tesla before I seriously started affecting battery life.

    12. Re:Growing pains for a young company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Enough to destroy your hearing in quick order without ever taxing the battery. Moving a bit of cloth driving a multi ton hunk of metal.

    13. Re:Growing pains for a young company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is when the 4 years are up and its $10,000 to fix a "minor problem"

      The resale value of a car with expensive repairs can go to near zero, fast, which will affect the price Tesla can demand for its new cars.

      Hence why used Mercedes and BMWs are so cheap to buy, it's the post-warranty maintenance and repairs that kills you and why they get dumped by people who didn't lease them instead.

    14. Re:Growing pains for a young company by KGIII · · Score: 1

      I've the 640Li - I won't keep it past the warranty probably. It was also more expensive than the 7s. Yes, yes I have that *one* and it is awesome.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    15. Re:Growing pains for a young company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cowboy Neal also suggests driving over a dead skunk to mask the smell.

    16. Re:Growing pains for a young company by willworkforbeer · · Score: 1

      Cowboy Neal also suggests driving over a dead skunk to mask the smell.

      +1 AND 10 points for Gryffindork for Cowboy Neal reference. Also, I will submit the "buy one burrito, get one skunk free" idea to Chipotle.

      --
      Pretending this is my office full of bitter coworkers..
    17. Re:Growing pains for a young company by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      The problem is when the 4 years are up and its $10,000 to fix a "minor problem"

      Time will tell if this is the case. Don't apply common car industry assumptions on a player doing their best to shake up the industry. Quite frankly most of those $10000 problems do not at all cost $10000 to fix and it just pure price gauging by the vendor.

    18. Re:Growing pains for a young company by toddestan · · Score: 1

      It doesn't matter to the people who buy those kind of cars new, because they'll get rid of them before things start going seriously wrong, or when the warranty ends. That is, if they don't lease the car (most cars like that are not bought, they are leased). It's the second and third owners who buy those kind of cars used, enticed by the chance to get into a high end luxury car for regular car money, then get soaked keeping them on the road.

  9. Driving habits? by caladine · · Score: 1

    Tesla deserves some scrutiny, but I'd be very interested in the driving habits of those surveyed. With the rotors reportedly "tending to warp" I'd be interested in knowing whether the rotors are insufficiently thick (it's a pretty heavy vehicle at 4800 lbs/2100 kg) or if the drivers tend to have a lead foot.

    1. Re:Driving habits? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At that price you can get Porsche, race on track, and your rotors will be fine. I don't think think Model S owners go street racing all the time and they have regenerative braking after all. Looks like inadequate rotors or something else related.

    2. Re:Driving habits? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now, I'm no fan of Tesla. I think it's mostly Musk and all the fanbois are so insufferably smug, but lets be fair. A Porsche also doesn't weigh as much as a massive pickup truck.

      The model S is impressively heavy. I think the ones with the large battery pack weigh over 5000 lbs. That is not sedan weight class there.

    3. Re:Driving habits? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Model S is 4,647 to 4,830 lbs. Carrera Turbo is 3,538 lbs. It is less, but no way you can compare track driving with street driving. It would need to go up to around 200 mph (4 times more energy than 100 mph) at Nürburgring lap, brake as fast as possible, go up again and so on. Model S wasn't able even to finish it because of overheating (maybe Tesla fixed it by now, I don't now). So I don't see how Model S drivers would be able to put so much stress on rotors just by driving on street.

  10. It's all relative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    At the price range of the Tesla, owners are used to Daimlers and BMWs. There are not rattles and squeaks. And no, it's not hidden by loud combustion engines either. Not at 55 mph, that's close to idle. The Tesla is an american car, what do you expect?

    1. Re:It's all relative by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      no rattles and squeaks?

      have you ever driven one right after the warranty is up???

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    2. Re:It's all relative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no rattles and squeaks?

        have you ever driven one right after the warranty is up???

      You can't ride a BMW after the warranty period is up because they just stop from a half dozen fatal ailments.

    3. Re:It's all relative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After 25 years it burned down due to a 3rd party after market exhaust replacement. No rattles, no squeaks up to that point.

    4. Re:It's all relative by ErikTheRed · · Score: 1

      You can't ride a BMW after the warranty period is up because they just stop from a half dozen fatal ailments.

      Funny. My 15-year-old BMW runs pretty much like new. Amazing what regularly scheduled maintenance will do.

      --

      Help save the critically endangered Blue Iguana
  11. Have some patience by Trachman · · Score: 1

    VW publicly stated that they will going to electric car business.

    Wait for Apple competition, Apple Car, in several years.

    Hope that Toyota will deliver their water-electric (hydrodgen fuel) cell products.

    One needs to assume that Chinese owned Volvo will roll out some models for the western market.

    Then American manufacturers will follow. There is room for many manufacturers. I hope that prices will drop and there will no longer be dealers to deal with.

    1. Re:Have some patience by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Saab's supposed to have some EVs for the Chinese market according to some news that I've read. As for Greeley owning Volvo, yeah - I expect them to do the EV thing too. They've not done too bad with the brand from what I've seen. I love my brick. I need to drive it more often. It goes from 0 to 60 in about three days but it's awesome/fun in the snow. (I'm also a Saab fan - I've a 900S Turbo and it sees some use - I love it on the twisties out through the mountains. Five speed, of course.)

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  12. More like "Politically Correct Reports." by ErikTheRed · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Consumer Reports does some good work tracking reliability ratings and some of their reviews are decent, but over the past several years they have weighted things so heavily towards environmentally "friendly" products (scare quotes because items that don't work well aren't really that friendly when they wind up in a landfill when you replace them with something that actually fucking works right) that their overall recommendations are pretty close to worthless.

    --

    Help save the critically endangered Blue Iguana
    1. Re:More like "Politically Correct Reports." by Major+Blud · · Score: 1

      Not to mention they are the same guys to recommend the iPhone 4, and then not recommend it after conducting a test that they saw someone else do that they didn't feel important enough to do the first time.

      --
      If you post as Anonymous Coward, don't expect a reply.
    2. Re:More like "Politically Correct Reports." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They lost me at this point: A Lexus part can be rated worse than a Toyota part, even when they're the same part. So this was all anti-capitalist crap to begin with. But let me be a sucker and follow through...

      Darn, that Tesla is no longer a buy according to Consumer Reports! I had that $140,000 all ready to go, stuffed in my wallet, ready to go to the Tesla dealership, but (*sigh*) I guess I'll have to settle on the Prius instead (sigh)...

  13. I see through Tesla's scheme by GoodNewsJimDotCom · · Score: 5, Funny

    They aren't powered by electrity, but hampsters. Now hampsters normally are not enough to power a car, but put some snakes in with them, and they make orders of magnitude more energy trying to run away. This is the only possible reason you hear squeeks and rattles.

  14. There Is A Single Answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    When rotors warp there is a single answer as to why. They were not designed/manufactured thick enough. Don't blame driving styles or any bullshit like that. Brake rotors should be able to glow red and still not warp.

    But weight. But cost. But didn't think. But, driving style. These are all lame excuses for bad design. And when I pay $100,000 for a car, I expect proven technologies like disc brakes to be flawless!

    What this Consumer Reports article is telling me is that, most unfortunately, my plan to buy a used Tesla at a "reasonable" price is a very bad idea. Perhaps worse than buying a used British sports car. As in both cases, the problems will be frequent and the repair cost will be extremely high.

    1. Re:There Is A Single Answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When rotors warp there is a single answer as to why. They were not designed/manufactured thick enough. Don't blame driving styles or any bullshit like that. Brake rotors should be able to glow red and still not warp.

      Worse still, with the regenerative braking system there the rotors shouldn't even need to be as high-spec as those in comparable sports cars.

    2. Re:There Is A Single Answer by 0123456 · · Score: 1

      Buying any $100,000 car used is generally an expensive proposition.

    3. Re:There Is A Single Answer by CaptainLard · · Score: 1

      Actually, It most likely is driving style! In this case, the nature of driving an electric car. First of all, rotors don't "warp" in the sense that you're implying. Vibrations from a "warped" rotor aren't from deformed metal, its from uneven brake pad material deposits that can come from improper bedding procedures or operation outside of ideal operating temperatures. A brake's stopping power isn't simple friction, its also a complex interaction of brake pad material transferring between the pad and rotor.

      In a Tesla you have the added complication of regenerative braking. If you drive gently enough, you may never need to use the actual brakes. The problem is when you do, there will be excess oxidation on them and they will be very cold which is not ideal if you need to make a sudden stop. Repeat this and you'll get uneven deposits resulting in vibration that gets lumped under "warped rotors".

      A quick search of "tesla brake rotor" shows that they are aware of this and have changed the rotor spec. So yeah, sucks that there are a bunch of little issues in a completely new from the ground up car design (who saw that coming?) but its encouraging that they are getting fixed as they come up. Which is how things should be.

    4. Re:There Is A Single Answer by maeka · · Score: 1

      First of all, rotors don't "warp" in the sense that you're implying. Vibrations from a "warped" rotor aren't from deformed metal, its from uneven brake pad material deposits that can come from improper bedding procedures or operation outside of ideal operating temperatures.

      Says someone who clearly has spent more time reading about rotors than working on rotors.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WkBrrOLRd00

      Or are you suggesting 8/1000ths of invisible pad material?

    5. Re:There Is A Single Answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I've found that on /., most of the time somebody starts their post with "Actually", it tends to mean what's about to follow is a bunch of BS spewed forth by someone who doesn't have the slightest clue what they're talking about.

      But again, this is just my personal finding, for all those people who want to "Actually" me.

    6. Re:There Is A Single Answer by paulej72 · · Score: 1

      When rotors warp there is a single answer as to why. They were not designed/manufactured thick enough. Don't blame driving styles or any bullshit like that. Brake rotors should be able to glow red and still not warp.

      Worse still, with the regenerative braking system there the rotors shouldn't even need to be as high-spec as those in comparable sports cars.

      And that is why there is an issue. Regenerative breaking does not help much when you do a panic stop on the highway from 65 MPH. A smaller sized rotor would be easier to warp in that scenario.

    7. Re:There Is A Single Answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When rotors warp there is a single answer as to why. They were not designed/manufactured thick enough. Don't blame driving styles or any bullshit like that. Brake rotors should be able to glow red and still not warp.

      Worse still, with the regenerative braking system there the rotors shouldn't even need to be as high-spec as those in comparable sports cars.

      And that is why there is an issue. Regenerative breaking does not help much when you do a panic stop on the highway from 65 MPH. A smaller sized rotor would be easier to warp in that scenario.

      And brakes are something that absolutely need to be able to stop the car in the event that the regenerative braking failed, they should still be full size for that reason.

    8. Re:There Is A Single Answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This might be the issue. They might have assumed with the regenerative breaking, they wouldn't need heavy duty rotors. But since these are more sports car than a typical electric/hybrid, the brakes are probably getting used harder and more often than is typical in a regenerative system.

    9. Re:There Is A Single Answer by KGIII · · Score: 2

      Actually, you're probably correct.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    10. Re:There Is A Single Answer by BenFenner · · Score: 1

      CaptainLard is correct. Brake rotors do not warp. When they get hot, they "cone" and when the cool off they return to their normal shape.

      Any and all run-out is due to uneven pad material transfer. Uneven pad material transfer is due to overheating the rotor which crystallizes the cast iron and promotes continued and early overheating after the fact. Even if you resurface the rotor to remove all pad buildup, you're going to get uneven pad transfer soon again at lower temps because the rotor has localized hot spots built in now.

      The pad material is very often metallic (not ceramic) on performance setups as shown in that YouTube video. The material is molecularly bonded to the iron rotor. This makes it indistinguishable on the surface of the metallic rotor.

  15. arg by dlenmn · · Score: 1, Funny

    undoing mod

  16. Re:Failure to Present by CaptainLard · · Score: 2

    Someone with a username like yours should probably already know the answer to such a question but I completely understand why that's the first thing that would come to your mind.

  17. How the Musk Stole Car-Making by r-diddly · · Score: 1

    What if car-making, he thought, doesn't come from a store. What if car-making...perhaps...means a little bit more?

    It's weird, it's almost like making a car is hard, especially one with a new kind of power source. Like maybe the existing auto industry weren't just sitting on their hands being old and uncool? Maybe they actually have a couple advantages compared to the noobs. Like a few decades of cumulative trial-and-error / design iteration / test data / customer feedback perhaps. Or an existing, intricately interconnected global industrial infrastructure & supply chain.

    Now OK granted, they lack Musk's massive government subsidy for "renewable" energy (i.e. burning coal to power the electric grid), because they still mostly depend on petroleum. But I'll bet they get subsidies of their own, since they're a huge and mature industry and are well-connected politically. So that one's a tie.

    What else? Well Musk sure has "gumption" by golly, totally gonna "change" and "disrupt" a bunch of stuff, fuckyeah! Big Auto, not so much, mainly because they are frankly standing there holding a firehose of money and don't want to risk doing anything that might slow the flow. So advantage to Musk in the gumption department. Somebody give him a peanut butter & jelly sandwich, pat him on the head and give him some fucking Legos to play with so he doesn't break anything.

    1. Re:How the Musk Stole Car-Making by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What if car-making, he thought, doesn't come from a store. What if car-making...perhaps...means a little bit more?

      It's weird, it's almost like making a car is hard, especially one with a new kind of power source. Like maybe the existing auto industry weren't just sitting on their hands being old and uncool? Maybe they actually have a couple advantages compared to the noobs. Like a few decades of cumulative trial-and-error / design iteration / test data / customer feedback perhaps. Or an existing, intricately interconnected global industrial infrastructure & supply chain.

      Now OK granted, they lack Musk's massive government subsidy for "renewable" energy (i.e. burning coal to power the electric grid), because they still mostly depend on petroleum. But I'll bet they get subsidies of their own, since they're a huge and mature industry and are well-connected politically. So that one's a tie.

      What else? Well Musk sure has "gumption" by golly, totally gonna "change" and "disrupt" a bunch of stuff, fuckyeah! Big Auto, not so much, mainly because they are frankly standing there holding a firehose of money and don't want to risk doing anything that might slow the flow. So advantage to Musk in the gumption department. Somebody give him a peanut butter & jelly sandwich, pat him on the head and give him some fucking Legos to play with so he doesn't break anything.

      Oh Elon, your cock is so big and thick! Omm, nom, nom...

  18. Getting real: my real world Tesla experience by matthollingsworth · · Score: 2

    As a Tela owner: 1) Assembly quality lags BMW but is plenty good especially considering they have not been building cars for decades 2) Some people have had motor units replaced due to a whine. This isn't actually a motor issue or a reliability issue and doesn't affect the reliability at all. It's shim wear that is fixed by replacing the shim in the single gear transmission. Since the motor with gear is easily swapped in a few hours (free), I chalk this up as a minor issue that they will likely fix with a better shim 3) body hardware problems are going to be the same as other cars since they use the same designs as other cars for things like the sunroof. A lot of people are hoping that Tesla will stumble. This doesn't qualify as a stumble. I've had zero problems with my car. One of my friends had an immediate issue with his new Tesla that was fixed and since then nothing. Another friend (who accelerates flat out all the time) experienced the gear whine at 50,000 miles and Tesla swapped it for free quickly. Things that will last a lot longer than other cars: the brakes. Some people think they will last for the life of the car because most of the braking occurs by lifting your foot to decelerate (it recharges the battery by sending energy back from the motors into the battery). Usually you touch the brake at speeds less than 5 mph. The motor - there is only one moving part and no oil changes or lubrication required. The transmission - only one gear as opposed to the crazy complexity in gas cars. The cooling system - it operates at much lower temperatures to cool the battery than it would when trying to cool a hot engine. Spark plugs, air cleaners, ignition systems, etc - non-existant on the Tesla. There is no engine to "service" under the "hood". Switches? Almost everything is controlled by the huge touchscreen which means zero wear. Any software problems can be fixed over the cell connection that is free for life and virtually always connected. If that computer fails? Just swap the thin center touchscreen/computer assembly out in a few hours. Incidentally the sophisticated computer controlled all wheel drive with 500 treadwear base tires mean that there is quicker acceleration while maintaining minimal wheel spin on any surface which is safer and all this makes tires last longer and also avoids the need to rotate tires (based on my observations so far). My problems in the first 10,000 miles: zero. Did I mention that I’ve been driving for free on the free-for-life Tesla charging? Also I have been letting the car do 90% of my heavy traffic commuting here in LA since the recent release of Autopilot. It’s a revelation on the 405 in rush hour

    1. Re:Getting real: my real world Tesla experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did I mention that I’ve been driving for free on the free-for-life Tesla charging?

      I like my P85D as much as the next Tesla guy, but remember that the supercharger access wasn't free. It's a $2,500 option, after which it's "free" (sometimes the cost comes bundled in the variant you buy).
      So far no issues with mine, aside from a bit of back and forth "install dance" when it came to swap my rear seats for the "next gen seats" that they didn't have back when the P85Ds just started to get out of the assembly line (but I knew I was going to have to do that when I decided to keep the car with the "wrong" seats for 6 months), and some rubbing noise in the front left wheel well (the tire seems to rub against the body at a certain angle - can only be reproduced in my driveway).
      To speak about service: when we couldn't reproduce the rubbing problem at their service center, they sent 2 guys to come to my house so I could reproduce and show them in my driveway. Every time I brought the car in they proactively changed a bunch of parts because they knew they were going to fail prematurely (from stats from other cars/customers), without me asking and at no cost. I guess they figured it's actually cheaper to replace the parts while they have the customer's car in their service center, than having to dispatch a flatbed and do the whole towing/fixing process not to mention customer goodwill.
      Good service so far. No complaints.

    2. Re:Getting real: my real world Tesla experience by Pentium100 · · Score: 1

      Since the motor with gear is easily swapped in a few hours (free)

      Is this offer valid forever or just while the warranty is valid and after that it's $10k?

      Switches? Almost everything is controlled by the huge touchscreen which means zero wear.

      On the other hand, the touchscreen forces you to look at it to operate it and if if fails, then it fails completely (unlike, say, the rear window heat switch failing, but others working fine).

      Any software problems can be fixed over the cell connection that is free for life and virtually always connected

      Unless the company decides to EOL your car and updates the software to no longer work. Or someone hacks their server and uploads a malicious update.

      I'm not saying the car is bad, it may be very good. Not for me though. I prefer a car with simple mechanical controls and no computers.

    3. Re:Getting real: my real world Tesla experience by matthollingsworth · · Score: 1

      just during warranty period, but you can extend the warranty after 8 years for $4k. The mechanical switches/keys are the parts that fail most often in modern devices - much more often than the computers themselves. Of course batteries wear out eventually but can be replaced easily in minutes. 97% of Telsa owners would buy it again - the highest measurement ever for a car I believe. That speaks for itself. People who don't have one can have an opinion, but I contend it's better not to speculate and instead ask the people who forked over $100k for their car and drive it every day :-)

    4. Re:Getting real: my real world Tesla experience by Pentium100 · · Score: 1

      My car is 33 years old and only two switches have failed in it - the ignition lock contacts (I had to move the key a bit to get the fan to turn on) and hazard blinker switch. The most problems in my car recently came from deteriorating rubber seals (looks like the rubber used is only good for 28 or so years) and rust (they use salt on roads in my country).

      Tesla is quite a new car company and its cars are all quite new. I wonder what problems Tesla cars start to have when they are 15-30 years old. 15 years is the average age of a car in my country.

  19. Same headlines last summer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yet no effect on Tesla sales: http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/news/2014/08/consumer-reports-tesla-model-s-has-more-than-its-share-of-problems/index.htm

  20. Ours has been nearly trouble free. by TomGreenhaw · · Score: 1

    We've had our Model S for almost two years. The only issue we've had was with the tire pressure sensor. It would say we had low pressure when we didn't. Tesla came out to where our car was parked and replaced a wifi antenna. Who knew tire pressure sensors use wifi? In any case once they replaced the wifi antenna with a newer design that problem went away (except for when we got a nail in the tire). The limited experience with Tesla service has been amazing.

    Other than that - 0 problems. No noises, rattles or squeeks. No charging problems. No drivetrain problems. It just works. We paid a couple thousand extra to extend the warranty from 4 to 8 years, so if my knocking on wood right now doesn't work, at least I won't have to pay for a long time. The warranty covers everything except tires. Even windshield wipers, and brakes are covered.

    There may be 100,000 reasons not to buy a Tesla, but from our experience, reliability and maintenance is not one of them.

    --
    Greed is the root of all evil.
  21. Re:Haters Gonna Hate by KGIII · · Score: 1

    I own a Porsche. It's a factory restored '78 911 in Targa trim. I own a whole, absurd even, lot of cars actually. I'm what you might call a car geek. Are you *really* comparing a Leaf to a Porsche? Really? Either your Porsche is a piece of shit (and you should sell it to someone who will properly care for it) or you have no idea why one would want to own one to begin with.

    Well, I guess, from a practical standpoint you're correct. However, if you own a Porsche for practicality reasons - you're doing it wrong. Err... I don't suppose you want to buy a Porsche? 46,000 miles, mint condition, and I'll take 80 for it. 70 if you throw in the Leaf.

    Seriously, it's not like I use it to go buy groceries. I don't even drive it to impress my neighbors. I don't even really drive it except a few times a year and then mostly only to a couple of shows down in West Gardiner. I almost always take it down to the last show of the season (Thursday night, nice place off of 201 in W. Gardiner - good people, too) and there's an unofficial smoke show at the end of the last show for the year. It usually means needing to buy new tires. ;-)

    Lemme see you do that in your Leaf... I need a better hobby. At least I own absolutely zero trailer queens - they all get used at varied rates. On a more on-topic idea, I will be buying the next model Tesla with the extended range features they're claiming they will have. As a car aficionado, how can I not want a Tesla? It won't be all that practical in my neighborhood but it will get its fair share of use. Also, I want to play with Ludicrous mode. Just think of me as an overgrown five-year-old.

    --
    "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  22. Not really true by evilviper · · Score: 1

    "The car is so very silent when driving that minor squeaks and rattles that you wouldn't be able to hear in a gasoline engine car become very annoying."

    That's only true at low speeds. At highway speeds, 3/4s of vehicle noise comes from tires on the road (trapping pockets of air as they roll), not the engine. That's why those sirens on EVs like the Leaf can shut-off above 35MPH, and why you still don't want to live near a busy road in an all-EV future...

    Some design changes to roads have been tested, but the improvements are small.

    If you want a notably quieter future car, you need to hope airless tires advance quickly and eventually surpass current pneumatic tires everywhere.

    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  23. Minor squeaks and rattles by grahamtriggs · · Score: 1

    So, the most prevalent complaint is that the car is too good, such that you can notice minor defects that would be undetectable in a petrol car.

    1. Re:Minor squeaks and rattles by slashdice · · Score: 1

      I think I'd notice a "minor defect" like the drive train filing in a petrol car. If not the first or second time, the third time.

      --
      Copyright (c) 1990 - 2014 Dice. All rights reserved. Use of this comment is subject to certain Terms and Conditions.
  24. Where's the crying MILF? by paiute · · Score: 1

    Man, if these are not first world problems, I don't know what is.

    "I can hear the electric motor in my expensive electric car."

    "The handle of the door doesn't come out to meet my hand when I walk up to my expensive electric car."

    --
    If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
  25. Instantaneous torque is hard on drivetrain by avandesande · · Score: 1

    I have to wonder how many of the people are showing off their 'ludicrous mode' to their friends. My guess is that people that drive normally will have few problems with their Tesla.

    --
    love is just extroverted narcissism
    1. Re:Instantaneous torque is hard on drivetrain by TomGreenhaw · · Score: 1

      That's an interesting question. We have a Model S P85 which is the high performance version from a couple of years ago. It does not have dual motors or ludicrous mode. When we first got the car, we did do a bunch of maximum acceleration because its such a novelty, but since then it rare that we floor it. Flooring a high performance Tesla is like being in an amusement park. Its a lot of fun - but if you really do it all the time you are a dangerous reckless driver. The model we have accelerates faster than the '02 Z06 Corvette I sold last year and my motorcycle. The new ones are *way* faster than the Tesla we have.

      That said my wife was able to (barely) avoid a t-bone accident by stepping on it. That one incident alone convinced me of the value of high acceleration to avoid an accident.

      It would be interesting if Consumer Reports would provide a lot more detail about reliability by model instead of a blanket statement that I suspect may not be accurate and is so contrary to our experience.

      --
      Greed is the root of all evil.
  26. So, what's your point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now, I'm no fan of Tesla. I think it's mostly Musk and all the fanbois are so insufferably smug, but lets be fair. A Porsche also doesn't weigh as much as a massive pickup truck.

    The model S is impressively heavy. I think the ones with the large battery pack weigh over 5000 lbs. That is not sedan weight class there.

    So, what's your point? My 6,000lbs. truck, that can tow another 11,000lbs. comes with massive discs and pads. The breaks are designed to effectively stop greater than the design load under all circumstances. As someone you drives their truck like an F1 car, braking late, braking hard, braking often, I've never had a warped rotor or unusual brake wear. I have however had Honda's and Acuras that would warp rotors if you looked at them sideways.The fix, fat rotors.

    Like OP stated, if the rotors warp, it is a design failure. The car needs bigger brakes!

  27. Tesla's quandary by billdale · · Score: 0

    Just as Tesla appears to be ready to start offering non-leather interior to those with PETA-fied concerns about animal products, perhaps Tesla should also consider taking one step backward by offering knobs and physical switches and maybe mechanical door handles, too... and maybe offer a menu of which high-tech bling they want in their car, for drivers that yearn for retro... or, maybe just greater reliability. As a matter of fact, I am an EV driver already, and want to get a Tesla myself, but with fewer things to go wrong.

  28. Re:fanbois rejoice! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have YOU tried stuffing a GREASED UP YODA DOLL up your ASSHOLE?

    PS -> it feels GOOD, doesn't IT?!

  29. Coincidence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That this article gets press the same day Ferrari goes public and talks about competing/mimicking Tesla & the silicon valley "auto makers".