I'd say he dumped all of his shares. The remaining shares are tied to the CEO position, which he currently fills. Those shares aren't his until he leaves the position or the legal requirement to sit on them and do nothing with them is removed.
If you sell something that is fundamentally broken, you must issue a refund or a working, equivalent replacement. If you knowingly sell something that is fundamentally broken, that's fraud.
Really? Competition from who? I haven't heard of any competition coming anytime soon, and I follow these things very closely. I've heard of several vehicles that are expected to have a similar range to the model 3, however none of them are expected to have any form of charging network, which is somewhat important. Additionally I've only heard of one vehicle that might have a roughly similar driver assistance suite and that's a top of the line Cadillac, and even that's expected to be even more limited than Tesla's solution (which already can't match what Tesla themselves released in 2015)
It's a bit like taking a Rolls Royce and saying there's competition because Lexus put out a luxury sedan, or telling Lamborghini that the newest Toyota sports car is going to eat their lunch. Until you grasp what makes a specific vehicle successful you can't make a competing product, and trust me, the legacy car makes don't grasp anything about why Tesla has been successful.
Now don't take this as the rantings of a Tesla Fanboy, I am actually the complete opposite I absolutely abhor Tesla, and that's as someone who drives one every day. I think therapy scummiest company that has ever existed on this planet but as they don't have any competition, and there doesn't seem to be any coming anytime soon, I'm unlikely to sell my car just yet.
There have been 2 major Windows 10 updates since that thing was last updated. There's no way it still manages to block all of the shit, if it ever did.
The claim that this best practice is bullshit is itself bullshit.
The hole of determining if the name is in use by trying to sign up for an account using that name or trying to initiate the recovery process using that name is a solved problem.
The usual method is to require the login username to be an email address, and then to have a separate display name for use on the site, in the forum, in the game, etc. No one but the system should see the email address.
- If you try to log in using an invalid email address or invalid password, you get the "Invalid email or password" message.
- If you try to sign up using an existing email address, you get the normal success flow and "Please confirm your account by clicking the unique link sent to your email address." Legit users simply click that. Attackers simply get no email and no information. (Unless they have access to the target's email, at which point there's nothing the authenticating system can do.) The victim gets a "Someone tried to create an account using your email address." message.
- If you try to initiate the password reset process, you're again blocked by the email address. "If we have an account registered with that email address, we will send you an email with a link to reset your password."
You can also take it a step further by ambiguating display names used on the site, in the forums, in the game, etc. This typically involves appending a random number to the end of the user's name. Thus you can be "DipShit" in the game and "DipShit" to your friends. But to a stranger trying to get at your account, you're "DipShit51615" and there may be dozens of others with the same name.
Do you have any clue how many politicians they've bought at every level of the government?
From HOAs to townships to cities to countries to states to congress, they effectively own the fucking poles and the lines and were paid many of your tax dollars to own them and sit on them.
Netflix offers media hosting servers so that Netflix traffic doesn't have to travel over the ISP's upstream link - Netflix's library can be hosted and served locally within the ISP's network. Netflix offers this for free to larger ISPs. Verizon and Comcast refused Netflix's free offer just to manufacture a false argument for fast lanes
False. Netflix "offers" those boxes "for free", on condition that the ISP provide space, cooling, power and bandwidth to it, never look inside it, and ignore the fact that it hosts data other than the expected data related to Netflix's normal service offerings. And if you didn't accept the "offer" Netflix artificially limited features and told users that the ISP was to blame (despite the customer of the ISP having plenty of bandwidth). They even made websites with fake speed tests naming and shaming ISPs who dared to deny Netflix's offer. Netflix was artificially preventing users from getting the highest quality stream if their ISP hadn't bowed down to Netflix to get on the "nice list".
They were forced to stop this bullshit because a few ISPs didn't back down and threatened legal action over their bullshit. https://www.usatoday.com/story...
Netflix pulled the whole stunt in the first place because ISPs asked Netflix to pay for all the bandwidth it was using. So Netflix threw a tantrum. (Hint to Netflix: You're not a fucking peer for the purposes of any equal peering agreement, you don't carry as much bandwidth for others as they do for you. Not by a long shot. Pay for your bandwidth.)
Netflix tried to use those boxes as a wedge to become a full-fledged CDN without having to pay for the network. They had plans to sell space and service on those boxes to anyone and everyone, for any purpose.
In the meantime, much as I appreciate the sentiment that corporate lobbying SHOULD be, well, not "treason" but a pretty serious crime, the lobbying part per se is the tip of the iceberg. I could even live with it as long as the real problem is repaired.
Accepting money, property, or favors either directly or indirectly (e.g., "campaign contributions", "donations" to foundations, etc.) in exchange for influence betrays the office and is thus inherently in opposition to a representative government. Do it at a thus level (congress) and it's counter to the design and law of the nation, and I consider anyone engaging in this practice (on either end of the transaction) to be a traitorous enemy of the state. If you don't, you're part of the problem.
You're all mixed up. The name is Sol. It's not "the Sun", nor is it "The Sun". It would be "the sun", or "our sun" or "a sun". The word "sun" is a generic term for a star with planets orbiting it (actually, orbiting the barycenter of the system).
The phrase "the sun" is a planetary-centric expression referring to the star in the planet's system (or one of the multiple in the system). The sun effects various phenomena upon the planet, such as sunrise, sunset, sunshine, etc. When referring to exoplanets you would still refer to "sunrise" and "sunset" despite the star (or stars) involved not being Sol, our sun.
Futher, "Sol" is not the Latin name for the sun. The Latin word "sol" literally means sun. Both "sol" and "sun" come from the same word, which had two forms - saw[el] / suw[en]. The form "saw" was usually formed with the suffix "el", for "sawel", leading to "sol". The form "suw" was usually formed with the suffix "en", for "suwen", leading to "sun".
Thus, you can still call them "solar panels" (note the lower case s) even when the star involved isn't Sol.
If he called the FCC's repeal of its own regulations an "illegal rollback" he needs to kicked the fuck out of his job for incompetence. You don't have to like Ajit Pai and his bullshit, but the FCC absolutely has the authority to do what it did today, just as it had the authority to put those regulations in place back when Obama asked them to.
Slashdot Mirror
It's Hillary "Correct the Record" levels of horseshit.
I'd say he dumped all of his shares. The remaining shares are tied to the CEO position, which he currently fills. Those shares aren't his until he leaves the position or the legal requirement to sit on them and do nothing with them is removed.
You are a retard.
If you sell something that is fundamentally broken, you must issue a refund or a working, equivalent replacement.
If you knowingly sell something that is fundamentally broken, that's fraud.
Don't forget that Chrome being "standards-based" is tainted by the fact that Google so strongly influences the "standards".
Really? Competition from who? I haven't heard of any competition coming anytime soon, and I follow these things very closely. I've heard of several vehicles that are expected to have a similar range to the model 3, however none of them are expected to have any form of charging network, which is somewhat important. Additionally I've only heard of one vehicle that might have a roughly similar driver assistance suite and that's a top of the line Cadillac, and even that's expected to be even more limited than Tesla's solution (which already can't match what Tesla themselves released in 2015)
It's a bit like taking a Rolls Royce and saying there's competition because Lexus put out a luxury sedan, or telling Lamborghini that the newest Toyota sports car is going to eat their lunch. Until you grasp what makes a specific vehicle successful you can't make a competing product, and trust me, the legacy car makes don't grasp anything about why Tesla has been successful.
Now don't take this as the rantings of a Tesla Fanboy, I am actually the complete opposite I absolutely abhor Tesla, and that's as someone who drives one every day. I think therapy scummiest company that has ever existed on this planet but as they don't have any competition, and there doesn't seem to be any coming anytime soon, I'm unlikely to sell my car just yet.
The rantings of a Tesla Fanboy.
http://www.classactionrebates.... Browse, sign up, wait for your pittance.
I read at -1. I don't click your links.
Last update: Nov. 10, 2016
There have been 2 major Windows 10 updates since that thing was last updated. There's no way it still manages to block all of the shit, if it ever did.
Well, I'm guessing the approach was more along the lines of "an abundance of caution with the X86 ISA" as opposed to deliberate malice towards AMD.
Hi. Have you met Intel?
https://slashdot.org/story/18/...
Strawman.
Nope.
Scientists and engineers constantly correct for values as history and technology marches on.
No they don't. And when they do on occasion, there's a detailed explanation of why and the original data isn't hidden or destroyed.
Science is self-correcting
No it isn't. It takes constant hard work to undo the bullshit, propaganda, and state-sponsored conspiracies.
Too many people misunderstand science to support their own agendas.
No, too many misunderstand it yet think they're educated and understand it. These are called "useful idiots" or "liberals".
Nope, u dum.
The claim that this best practice is bullshit is itself bullshit.
The hole of determining if the name is in use by trying to sign up for an account using that name or trying to initiate the recovery process using that name is a solved problem.
The usual method is to require the login username to be an email address, and then to have a separate display name for use on the site, in the forum, in the game, etc. No one but the system should see the email address.
- If you try to log in using an invalid email address or invalid password, you get the "Invalid email or password" message.
- If you try to sign up using an existing email address, you get the normal success flow and "Please confirm your account by clicking the unique link sent to your email address." Legit users simply click that. Attackers simply get no email and no information. (Unless they have access to the target's email, at which point there's nothing the authenticating system can do.) The victim gets a "Someone tried to create an account using your email address." message.
- If you try to initiate the password reset process, you're again blocked by the email address. "If we have an account registered with that email address, we will send you an email with a link to reset your password."
You can also take it a step further by ambiguating display names used on the site, in the forums, in the game, etc. This typically involves appending a random number to the end of the user's name. Thus you can be "DipShit" in the game and "DipShit" to your friends. But to a stranger trying to get at your account, you're "DipShit51615" and there may be dozens of others with the same name.
Do you have any clue how many politicians they've bought at every level of the government?
From HOAs to townships to cities to countries to states to congress, they effectively own the fucking poles and the lines and were paid many of your tax dollars to own them and sit on them.
Netflix offers media hosting servers so that Netflix traffic doesn't have to travel over the ISP's upstream link - Netflix's library can be hosted and served locally within the ISP's network. Netflix offers this for free to larger ISPs. Verizon and Comcast refused Netflix's free offer just to manufacture a false argument for fast lanes
False. Netflix "offers" those boxes "for free", on condition that the ISP provide space, cooling, power and bandwidth to it, never look inside it, and ignore the fact that it hosts data other than the expected data related to Netflix's normal service offerings. And if you didn't accept the "offer" Netflix artificially limited features and told users that the ISP was to blame (despite the customer of the ISP having plenty of bandwidth). They even made websites with fake speed tests naming and shaming ISPs who dared to deny Netflix's offer. Netflix was artificially preventing users from getting the highest quality stream if their ISP hadn't bowed down to Netflix to get on the "nice list".
They were forced to stop this bullshit because a few ISPs didn't back down and threatened legal action over their bullshit. https://www.usatoday.com/story...
Netflix pulled the whole stunt in the first place because ISPs asked Netflix to pay for all the bandwidth it was using. So Netflix threw a tantrum. (Hint to Netflix: You're not a fucking peer for the purposes of any equal peering agreement, you don't carry as much bandwidth for others as they do for you. Not by a long shot. Pay for your bandwidth.)
Netflix tried to use those boxes as a wedge to become a full-fledged CDN without having to pay for the network. They had plans to sell space and service on those boxes to anyone and everyone, for any purpose.
If it crashes and he's found innocent, and they bother to return his property at all, they'd just buy him new, cheaper bitcoins.
I have no clue how "federal" turned into "thus".
In the meantime, much as I appreciate the sentiment that corporate lobbying SHOULD be, well, not "treason" but a pretty serious crime, the lobbying part per se is the tip of the iceberg. I could even live with it as long as the real problem is repaired.
Accepting money, property, or favors either directly or indirectly (e.g., "campaign contributions", "donations" to foundations, etc.) in exchange for influence betrays the office and is thus inherently in opposition to a representative government. Do it at a thus level (congress) and it's counter to the design and law of the nation, and I consider anyone engaging in this practice (on either end of the transaction) to be a traitorous enemy of the state. If you don't, you're part of the problem.
Correct. It died for me around 12 AM EST, you fucking goon.
You're all mixed up. The name is Sol. It's not "the Sun", nor is it "The Sun". It would be "the sun", or "our sun" or "a sun". The word "sun" is a generic term for a star with planets orbiting it (actually, orbiting the barycenter of the system).
The phrase "the sun" is a planetary-centric expression referring to the star in the planet's system (or one of the multiple in the system). The sun effects various phenomena upon the planet, such as sunrise, sunset, sunshine, etc. When referring to exoplanets you would still refer to "sunrise" and "sunset" despite the star (or stars) involved not being Sol, our sun.
Futher, "Sol" is not the Latin name for the sun. The Latin word "sol" literally means sun. Both "sol" and "sun" come from the same word, which had two forms - saw[el] / suw[en]. The form "saw" was usually formed with the suffix "el", for "sawel", leading to "sol". The form "suw" was usually formed with the suffix "en", for "suwen", leading to "sun".
Thus, you can still call them "solar panels" (note the lower case s) even when the star involved isn't Sol.
Attorney General Eric Schneiderman is a moron.
If he called the FCC's repeal of its own regulations an "illegal rollback" he needs to kicked the fuck out of his job for incompetence. You don't have to like Ajit Pai and his bullshit, but the FCC absolutely has the authority to do what it did today, just as it had the authority to put those regulations in place back when Obama asked them to.
The majority of the internet economy is driven by ads. I love watching it burn to the ground.
I don't know what Kik is, but you can't complain about "objectification" while bragging about selling yourself. And the fact is we're all objects.
Why migrate a whole bunch of users to another service, when most of them don't use it?
How many people actually use AIM?
I use it daily, via Trillian.
NBIRU!