So people that live in the cold are not obligated to live up to the terms of a contract they agreed to.
Legal contracts can be nullified because "hey, my customers aren't coming into my store any more..."
Icelanders have no sense of responsibility to live up to their end of a bargain?
"Hey times are hard - I ain't gonna pay you like I agreed"
WOW - these Icelanders are such responsible, honorable, noble people.
Remind me to never do business with someone who DECIDES it is no longer convenient for them to honor their agreements and legal obligations, goes public with childish wailing of how it is OK to back out of a deal when it doesn't go his way.
My four year old son has been raised to take more responsibility than most adults.
Ha Ha....
If the heavy handed liberal bias of/* is an indication of what's wrong...
Then I say - shut 'em down.
Any post that doesn't reflect the nutty left wing kook base of/* readers is VERBOTEN!
ROFLOL.....
Not to record history
Not to broadcast 'truth'
Not to present 'facts'
THEY SELL ADVERTIZING
Btw - that goes for 'News' papers, magazines, radio, billboards....
And I hope they look carefully.
Just think, if we had had this common sense approach to national security earlier, the 911 attacks could have been prevented.
The National Archives admits there may be an additional 3,022,030 textual records, 2,884 pages of electronic records, 1,021 photographs, 3 videotapes and 3 audiotapes related to the Task Force that are being withheld indefinitely from the public.
He is a second year student at USC (University of Southern California)
The attorney letter is from Holm Roberts & Owen LLP from their Denver office.
The school passed on the letter and when I called the school's Acting Litigation Manager - was told that the school would pass on student info if a lawsuit is filed and the school receives a subpoena.
To say I am disappointed at the school's passive position is an understatement. California has very strong laws requiring schools to protect the privacy of students - and if there should be legal action would be compelled to act in protecting student privacy.
Since the school has very strong ties with the recording / film industry, and the LA basin is full of attorneys and judges that are graduates, the lawyer I consulted suggested settling.
He's hoping to build the school a new building or two in the future...
As for the RIAA action, the school is doing the lawful thing, and so is the RIAA.
I don't like the law, the tactics, the methodology, the rational, not one bit.
But that IS the state of the law as it stands.
And as to minimize the impact - we'll take the path of least resistance.
I'm all for fighting the good fight, but in this case, until I hear other students might be willing to join together, going alone is just too much time energy effort and money.
Though transferring might be an option, I think all it would accomplish is hurt my son's studies - after all USC is a pretty good school, and the program he is in is a pretty special five year plan available in only a handful of schools.
Besides, the USC cheerleaders look great during the football games.
He is a second year student at USC (University of Southern California)
The attorney letter is from Holm Roberts & Owen LLP from their Denver office.
The school passed on the letter and when I called the school's Acting Litigation Manager - was told that the school would pass on student info if a lawsuit is filed and the school receives a subpoena.
To say I am disappointed at the school's passive position is an understatement. California has very strong laws requiring schools to protect the privacy of students - and if there should be legal action would be compelled to act in protecting student privacy.
Since the school has very strong ties with the recording / film industry, and the LA basin is full of attorneys and judges that are graduates, the lawyer I consulted suggested settling.
I believe the TOPIC is where the F "Judges" get all this new found power. . It sure ain't in the CONSTITUTION.
As for the CONSTITUTION, the Founding Fathers NEVER envisioned "Judges" running amok with all this Extra-Constitutional power
And President Peanut Farmer Carter enacting FISA makes it so?
FISA JUDGES say so?
Hummmm . ..And what makes FISA constitutional?
A President abrogating his responsibility?
Go ahead and READ what the Founding Fathers said about JUDGES getting out of hand.....
Waiting
Maybe read Mark Levin, "Men In Black"..."How the Supreme Court is Destroying America.."
I assume you CAN read.
The judiciary is SO far removed from what our Founding Fathers (yep - Dead White Guys ) envisioned - our troops ON THE GROUND in Iraq need JD approval to listen in on electronic intercepts when in hot pursuit - W T F
but but but
I heard that very smart man Mr. Gore say . . .
And what about Mt. Pinatubo, its eruption in 1991injected 20- million tons of sulfur dioxide into the atmosphere....
Is that more than all the sulfur dioxide man puts into the atmosphere? Hummmm
But but but
I heard that very smart man Mr. Gore say . . .
You mean the earth has undergone repeated cycles of extreme warming and cooling WITHOUT man?
But but but
I heard that very smart man Mr. Gore say . . .
Slashdot Mirror
But of course...you want someone ELSE to do your MORAL deeds
So people that live in the cold are not obligated to live up to the terms of a contract they agreed to. Legal contracts can be nullified because "hey, my customers aren't coming into my store any more..." Icelanders have no sense of responsibility to live up to their end of a bargain? "Hey times are hard - I ain't gonna pay you like I agreed" WOW - these Icelanders are such responsible, honorable, noble people. Remind me to never do business with someone who DECIDES it is no longer convenient for them to honor their agreements and legal obligations, goes public with childish wailing of how it is OK to back out of a deal when it doesn't go his way. My four year old son has been raised to take more responsibility than most adults.
That the world is warming.... And he showed a graph to PROVE it !
Ha Ha.... /* is an indication of what's wrong...
/* readers is VERBOTEN!
If the heavy handed liberal bias of
Then I say - shut 'em down.
Any post that doesn't reflect the nutty left wing kook base of
ROFLOL.....
Not to record history Not to broadcast 'truth' Not to present 'facts' THEY SELL ADVERTIZING Btw - that goes for 'News' papers, magazines, radio, billboards....
What violation? There ain't no violation The government read the contract - did you?
And I hope they look carefully. Just think, if we had had this common sense approach to national security earlier, the 911 attacks could have been prevented.
~ ~ ~ ~ I mean - you're a geek no?
Government rebates? What government rebates? That $11,000 is MY MONEY. NOT THE GOVERNMENTS MONEY. It's mine, and yours, they take it from you.
/ * is nearly worthless....
This story is worthless
http://www.judicialwatch.org/judicial-watch-releases-records-re-hillary-s-health-care-reform-plan-0
Now there is openness......
He is a second year student at USC (University of Southern California)
The attorney letter is from Holm Roberts & Owen LLP from their Denver office.
The school passed on the letter and when I called the school's Acting Litigation Manager - was told that the school would pass on student info if a lawsuit is filed and the school receives a subpoena.
To say I am disappointed at the school's passive position is an understatement. California has very strong laws requiring schools to protect the privacy of students - and if there should be legal action would be compelled to act in protecting student privacy.
Since the school has very strong ties with the recording / film industry, and the LA basin is full of attorneys and judges that are graduates, the lawyer I consulted suggested settling.
hummmm
As for the RIAA action, the school is doing the lawful thing, and so is the RIAA. I don't like the law, the tactics, the methodology, the rational, not one bit.
But that IS the state of the law as it stands. And as to minimize the impact - we'll take the path of least resistance.
I'm all for fighting the good fight, but in this case, until I hear other students might be willing to join together, going alone is just too much time energy effort and money.
Though transferring might be an option, I think all it would accomplish is hurt my son's studies - after all USC is a pretty good school, and the program he is in is a pretty special five year plan available in only a handful of schools.
Besides, the USC cheerleaders look great during the football games.
He is a second year student at USC (University of Southern California)
The attorney letter is from Holm Roberts & Owen LLP from their Denver office.
The school passed on the letter and when I called the school's Acting Litigation Manager - was told that the school would pass on student info if a lawsuit is filed and the school receives a subpoena.
To say I am disappointed at the school's passive position is an understatement. California has very strong laws requiring schools to protect the privacy of students - and if there should be legal action would be compelled to act in protecting student privacy.
Since the school has very strong ties with the recording / film industry, and the LA basin is full of attorneys and judges that are graduates, the lawyer I consulted suggested settling.
hummmm
A walking talking exemplar of "Liberalism is a mental disease".
Is this the astute statesman that was ripping the US on Syrian TV a few weeks before Israeli / American jets blew up their nuclear reactor site?
No! He's the Kucinich that was on Art Bell's show telling us about his alien abduction.
Look up in the sky - the Mother Ship !
Still avoiding facts . . . ah . . the liberal mind . .lol
Little wonder?
As for the riotously miss-leading heading - - -
I guess when folks are fed a diet of 'news' by the drive by media....
Well - no one ever accused techy nerds of rational thought and objective views.
And this story has WHAT TO DO with the Slashdot community?
Hummm
I believe the TOPIC is where the F "Judges" get all this new found power. . It sure ain't in the CONSTITUTION. As for the CONSTITUTION, the Founding Fathers NEVER envisioned "Judges" running amok with all this Extra-Constitutional power And President Peanut Farmer Carter enacting FISA makes it so? FISA JUDGES say so? Hummmm . . .And what makes FISA constitutional?
A President abrogating his responsibility?
Go ahead and READ what the Founding Fathers said about JUDGES getting out of hand.....
Waiting
Maybe read Mark Levin, "Men In Black"..."How the Supreme Court is Destroying America.."
I assume you CAN read.
Wiki??? LOL READ IDIOT Called the Federalist Papers They wrote it http://thomas.loc.gov/home/histdox/fedpapers.html
The judiciary is SO far removed from what our Founding Fathers (yep - Dead White Guys ) envisioned - our troops ON THE GROUND in Iraq need JD approval to listen in on electronic intercepts when in hot pursuit - W T F
We have the Raghead who planted it I say whatever it takes What the f is wrong with you people
That would be a Toyota Pious right?
And what about Mt. Pinatubo, its eruption in 1991injected 20- million tons of sulfur dioxide into the atmosphere ....
Is that more than all the sulfur dioxide man puts into the atmosphere? Hummmm
But but but I heard that very smart man Mr. Gore say . . .
You mean the earth has undergone repeated cycles of extreme warming and cooling WITHOUT man?
But but but I heard that very smart man Mr. Gore say . . .